Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/03/12

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive March 12th, 2019
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ronhjones as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Book Cover

  •  Keep The book cover looks upside-down. Standing on my head, it appears that the book is from 1903, so I think it's PD. Should still be rotated in order to be useful. DMacks (talk) 05:00, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@DMacks: - Maybe a bigger monitor - I see 1993. Ronhjones  (Talk) 05:04, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed. Yes, it's the original problem as tagged. Thanks for bearing with my blurriness:( DMacks (talk)!

Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 05:12, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File created by mistake AR.Dmg (talk) 08:34, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 08:43, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fair use license Yohannvt (talk) 07:40, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted already. --E4024 (talk) 15:52, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

порнография 79.126.53.52 16:00, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 16:32, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c)Michèle Pauty, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:39, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Gbawden at 14:08, 12 März 2019 UTC: Insufficient or doubtful author or license; OTRS validation required (F1): Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alexis Von Hoensbroech.jpg: (c)Michèle Pauty, missing permission. --Krdbot 20:00, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nomination withdrawn.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:56, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

There appears to have been a technical fault during upload resulting in an incomplete image. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:01, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn - Per Fæ, has a phabrictor ticket been opened? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:54, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CopyVio ( https://www.instagram.com/p/BuqvsxknCZM/ ) 42.98.137.82 08:23, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 06:14, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CopyVio ( https://www.instagram.com/p/BuqvsxknCZM/ ) 1.64.16.114 16:09, 15 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: previously deleted = speedy. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:36, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Insufficient license SecretName101 (talk) 16:10, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:39, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE personal image. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:23, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:15, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:57, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Olusegundare (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos. Out of scope

T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 12:46, 8 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Olusegundare (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos. Out of scope

T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 12:15, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:10, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yali0607 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:56, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:53, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Handcuffed (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Problematic copyright issues, as described by Toyntanen, April 21, 2012 in http://chross.blogt.ch/forum/read.php?11,9900

24.134.38.87 08:40, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 07:12, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Handcuffed (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Referral to DR, for determination as to applicability of these to "educational" scope given COM:NOPENIS, and the exhibitionist nature of some of the other uploads of this user. It would be nice if Commons had a distinct policy of ONLY accepting images of certain subjects from accredited sources. There isn't an easy mechanism to request wholesale review of a contributors updates, but for this uploader, The expertise of others on Commons in reviewing the "sensitive" areas this uploader's media deals with would be greatly appreciated.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:06, 10 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn per subsequent comments in related DR's and demonstrated lack of competence on the part of the nominator. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:34, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn: Please do not renominate or re-open, without extensive consultation or specfic evidence backed concerns. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:19, 16 March 2019 (UTC) (Non Admin Closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Handcuffed (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Delete on privacy grounds (in many images a face is visible), unless uploader (or another experienced contributor) is able to provide further clarification as to documented participant consent for use of this media on Wikimedia Commons.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 00:08, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I've struck out some images , per the disscussions in a related DR on review, an expert view on those remaining would be appreciated ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:13, 14 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep all.
It is disruptive to raise large mass deletion requests on speculation, then somehow expect other users to sort them out, and if we don't then expect them to be deleted because, maybe, there might be some sort of doubt vaguely related to policy.
With regard to Handcuffed, they have been uploading kinky or sexuality related photographs to Commons for 8 years, they have never been blocked. They are not a troublesome account, even though their chosen speciality of uploads will always feel problematic for some of our contributors; not for others. Because of the apparent controversial nature of their uploads, they have been targeted for deletion many times, looking back on at least one of the deletions, I find the reasoning faulty, and the "evidence" of copyright violations now missing, it is hard not to suspect that DRs on these sexuality related images tend to end up in deletion simply because their subject is sexuality rather than complying with the policies in the way that any other type of photograph would. I am not going to spend time digging deeper, but any allegation of copyright issues, or "privacy" issues needs to be analysed correctly before creating DRs and the evidence clearly included or logically and unambiguously expressed. Variations of "oh my, COM:PENIS" is not adequate, especially when some of these file have been happily hosted here for over 7 years.
With regard to these specific files, including the prior DR which is still open, files like File:This is me - Flickr - stnu.jpg which have been hosted for several years are good quality, useful for illustration or other educational reuse and are stable, they should be kept. Files like File:Red clothespins BDSM.jpg do not fail the PENIS test, as they are well beyond amateur dick pics, have high educational value by showing fringe or unusual sexuality, and in this case is not even sexually graphic or unnecessarily "naked"; I am not even sure Commons has much better illustrations of pegging without distracting backgrounds or focusing on genitals far more than this shot does.
I could do more research, pointing out which files are in use, and similar DRs for Handcuffed's uploads, and make the same explanation that "private" is not the same as "intrusive", but let's save on that volunteer time, please. Thanks -- (talk) 15:23, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Withdrawn without prejudice to other contributors who may have different views. If you have a closing script Fæ I think we can apply a SNOWBALL clause here. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:22, 16 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn: Please do not renominate or re-open, without extensive consultation or specfic evidence backed concerns. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:19, 16 March 2019 (UTC) (Non Admin Closure)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ogute (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope personal photos

Gbawden (talk) 07:46, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:01, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 10:52, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:02, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ChristianahAdeyemi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos. Out of scope

T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 11:40, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:02, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photos. Out of scope T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 12:12, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:03, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused person photos. Out of scope T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 12:13, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:03, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not notable. Out of project scope. Hanooz 12:41, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:03, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by VakitaZsom (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused and out of COM:SCOPE.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:51, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:04, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:06, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:06, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:06, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Yann (talk) 16:41, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:07, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promo/ad, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 16:42, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:07, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 16:43, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:08, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uncertain copyright, and out of scope. Yann (talk) 16:43, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:08, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very poor quality, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 16:45, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:08, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very poor quality, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 16:45, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:08, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mediafreak22 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused out of COM:SCOPE personal images (:en:Geetanjali Singh).

Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:21, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:09, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused private file. Cjp24 (talk) 17:39, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 00:09, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used image of an unknown woman. Medium-low size, uploaded by a dubious uploader (by their other contributions, see TP). E4024 (talk) 00:42, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:39, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 01:58, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:39, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The user name of the uploader is identical to the rights owner (company). What I cannot understand is, why did they upload only this file and leave the place. I have my doubts that the user name is just that, a "user name" or a "nickname" and does not necessarily represent the rights holder. Too skeptical? E4024 (talk) 02:41, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Serial sockpuppeteer, almost certainly not who he claims to be. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:44, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stolen from subjects Twitter account: https://twitter.com/RahulGandhi Coffeeandcrumbs (talk) 06:30, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:47, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly unfree – The file is tagged with a freeness claim, but may actually be eligible for copyright in the United States. AmericanAgent (talk) 08:44, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nonsense nomination by now-blocked user. I've added the correct PD license. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:50, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing OTRS Permission AmericanAgent (talk) 10:46, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nonsense nomination by now-blocked user. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:48, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ibrahim Babarinde (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvios. Source is Facebook (FBM)

T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 11:38, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:51, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 12 March 2019 (UTC) Author, Data and country have been supplied in addition to updated copyright status. Unclear why this is requested for deletion. This is a historical photo taken by Marjorie Eaton as identified. She is deceased. The photo is from her estate. I am new at this and have no idea if I am doing this correctly. keithkirkfelton[reply]


Deleted: No indication that the image has been released under the claimed license. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:38, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does Commons:Freedom of panorama in source country allow this? EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Response: This work was destroyed, painted over, the Cafe no longer exists and and therefore the mural depicted is no longer in public view hence Commons:Freedom of panorama does not apply. keithkirkfelton


Deleted: FOP still applies for destroyed works. No indication that the image is available under the claimed license either. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:38, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file from Facebook NinjaStrikers «» 16:13, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:51, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NOT RELAVENT Thesculpere (talk) 18:26, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:53, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file, showing an autograph session of a WW II era German fighter pilot in Wehrmacht / Luftwaffe uniform, was uploaded to Flickr with the CC "public domain" mark by the National Museum of the U.S. Navy.

I don't quite see why it should be in the PD. The license tag currently used, {{PD-USGov-Military-Navy}}, appears to be patent nonsense. Why and how would a US Navy photographer take a photo of a German fighter pilot ace giving autographs on the hood of a German model (Adlerwerke) car and apparently nowhere near the sea?

The horizontal crease in the middle of the image suggests that this is really a scan from some magazine or clipping which was acquired by the US military at some point for whatever reason.

So we have to assume this is not a Navy or other US military photograph, but a scan from some magazine. The file should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 18:57, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Rosenzweig, thanks for your work here. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:54, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author Request 61.6.238.169 11:47, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Author Request — Preceding unsigned comment added by Medzeth (talk • contribs) 12:13, 26 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: the author is Medzeth. Ruthven (msg) 16:13, 6 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture is inadequate to share as it is not nice to pose without permission. Medzeth (talk) 07:14, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 06:46, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SPAM Lacrymocéphale (talk) 08:17, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:45, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FBMD in EXIF data. ~Cybularny Speak? 09:45, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Could You explain something more? ~WikiMiKra 12:05, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Own work tag can only be used for pictures taken personally by the uploader and never published before. FBMD string indicates that the file existed previously on Facebook. According to COM:OTRS, previously published material needs permission to be hosted on Commons. ~Cybularny Speak? 14:20, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Picture was sent by messenger communicator only between computers, and wasn't published on facebook. That pictures was shot by my and I don't agree with Your proposal to delete the picture. ~WikiMiKra 12:55, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:45, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c)Patrice Kunte, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:44, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:43, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Yann as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copied from http://blogdelviejotopo.blogspot.com/2015/10/maria-limanskaya-una-imagen-iconica.html Yann (talk) 14:12, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; not own work as claimed. --Gbawden (talk) 06:44, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Vue.js_Logo_2.svg, which is a better produced SVG, has the correct colours (the colours in this version are wrong), and has the correct licensing information, and is the version that is used in wikipedia pages (this file is not currently used anywhere) Mooncow (talk) 14:14, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:43, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tzypanchak (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE personal images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:19, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvios based on the watermark. --Gbawden (talk) 06:42, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c)Karen Minasyan, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:22, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:41, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original image was deleted B dash (talk) 15:05, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 06:41, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope NMW03 (talk) 15:24, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 06:40, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marko Vavpotič is the copyright owner. The user who uploaded this image as "own work" has forgotten to clear the MD. E4024 (talk) 15:31, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:40, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marko Vavpotič is the copyright owner. The user who uploaded this image as "own work" has forgotten to clear the MD. E4024 (talk) 15:32, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:40, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not an "own work" as stated. E4024 (talk) 15:41, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:39, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FBMD at MD. E4024 (talk) 15:42, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:39, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FBMD at MD. E4024 (talk) 17:14, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Image mise en ligne par la marque J&M. Jérémy-Günther-Heinz Jähnick (talk) 08:41, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; sorry copyvio trumps INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 06:38, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c)Amy Dubey, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:15, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:37, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c)Amy Dubey, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:16, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:37, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c)Anton Mislawsky, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:46, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:36, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flagrant copyvio. Google Images brings up multiple commerical sources. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 22:11, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:35, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c)Thibault Carron, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:39, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:34, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio from https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/montreal/rugby-world-cup-beno%C3%AEt-piffero-only-quebecer-on-team-canada-1.3205948 / https://i.cbc.ca/1.3205975.1440695572!/fileImage/httpImage/image.jpg_gen/derivatives/original_780/benoit-piffero.jpg; no free licence - Daxipedia - 達克斯百科 (d) 22:45, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:35, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(C)2009 Bella Faccie Sports Media \ Thomas Di Nardo, all rights reserved Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:15, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:34, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Itzjohnnyp (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused out of COM:SCOPE personal images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:17, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:34, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DMbqQMRXUAAtvok.jpg, no permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:20, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:34, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo by C.Nieszawer, missing permission (https://www.imdb.com/name/nm6549024/mediaviewer/rm2584478208) Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:33, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Photo changed to the one displayed on a website under CC BY-NC 4.0 — Preceding unsigned comment added by WikiLeb19 (talk • contribs) 04:18, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; deleted as a copyvio. The new image must be uploaded separately. --Gbawden (talk) 06:34, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused selfie, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:29, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 08:21, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All sorts of un-even sizing/spacing. Category:Neryl acetate has a bunch of alts. DMacks (talk) 05:52, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 14:21, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unknown persons Adelfrank (talk) 14:33, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 21:57, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Flyalg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and coat of arms. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:12, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aurachan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photos from Facebook and claimed as own work.

NinjaStrikers «» 16:25, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:12, 19 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 19:15, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

include

File:Yiğit DUMAN, Katalog Çekimi 2018.jpg

Best Model of Turkey 2018 semi-finalist. Am I wrong? He belongs to Category:Male models from Turkey.  Keep You can delete the second pic for "failed upload". The guy is within scope of Commons. --E4024 (talk) 19:37, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per user:E4024: no valid reason for deletion, could be within scope. (second file deleted, broken content). --Wdwd (talk) 15:48, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio content on TV. -Slenderman7676 (talk) 19:28, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 15:45, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Misleading author claim - this is a commerical photograph published in Elle, page 78, August 31 1967, and the source page was a commercial site selling vintage advertisements and magazines that has now closed down. Copyright belongs to the photographer and/or to Elle magazine. Mabalu (talk) 21:36, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no permission. --Wdwd (talk) 15:44, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete: a 2013 stamp like this is most likely copyright for 70 years pma per Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Sri Lanka#Stamps Ww2censor (talk) 22:14, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:42, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Aus nicht-freien Inhalten abgeleitetes Werk als Screenshot vermutlich von Google Maps AxelHH (talk) 22:17, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Der User reagiert nicht auf Ansprache. --AxelHH (talk) 22:18, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 15:41, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own work claim by new user; their only other photo uploaded has no permission and will be deleted. No Exif data. There are larger, uncropped versions of this image elsewhere on the net [4] Koyyo (talk) 22:18, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 15:39, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously not self-work - low resolution, no EXIF, first upload by a newbie. TechyanTalk22:29, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, personal photo and/or advertising, unused. --Wdwd (talk) 15:38, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it to broadcast anymore. Azitad (talk) 23:18, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion; And file is in use, no recent upload. --Wdwd (talk) 15:35, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is a private image. It is a violation against privacy policy. Also, it has copy right issue. Azitad (talk) 19:05, 3 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: PCP. --Gbawden (talk) 06:42, 10 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Who is the painter and why is the work public domain? Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:54, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader also agrees to delete (he nominated the file for speedy deletion). Taivo (talk) 08:55, 26 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not BH image, available all over internet link Biplab Anand (Talk) 06:57, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:46, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Parisou (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative works. I doubt the Flickr account owns the copyright of these. Also probably out of scope.

Yann (talk) 16:48, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 13:21, 31 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small and unused image, replaced by File:Maria 2017-09-19 0000Z.jpg B dash (talk) 01:36, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:38, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

book cover design is zh:黃永玉, still living. Not PD shizhao (talk) 01:57, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The cover of book is juridical person's project, belong People's literature publishing house. In China Copyright Law chapter 2 section 3, protect period of juridical person's project is 50 years after publish. The book was published in 1962, after 50 years is 2012. And it should be notice that, this is an image of the front cover of book, not an image of paiting which work by Huang Yongyu.--瑞丽江的河水 (talk) 07:42, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Even if it was PD in 2012, the copyright have been restored in USA (URAA). --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:45, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Crop of YouTube cover image: https://i.ytimg.com/vi/w1SlC-8j2oA/hqdefault.jpg Ytoyoda (talk) 04:15, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:46, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dev 9696 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Both images were previously deleted, unreliable user

Ytoyoda (talk) 04:51, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:48, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incomplete upload, previously published at https://www.instagram.com/petermoller12/p/Bqe0kfCnGqZ/?utm_source=ig_share_sheet&igshid=f34iwvc7gdu6 Ytoyoda (talk) 05:08, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:48, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission, it's selfie + licence laundering QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 05:58, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no permission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:50, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cnlvie (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logos are not necessarily PD, see also the decision for a related logo at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Canal Vie 1997 logo.png

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:57, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:51, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Kbar100 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Does not hold copyright anymore
Converted by me to DR to allow for discussion. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:42, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: logo above ToO. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:52, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Already deleted as File:Alisa Pomerantz-Boro.jpg
Converted by me to DR to allow for discussion, as uploader may be identical to Facebook account-holder[5]. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:10, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:59, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, but the depicted "mural" seems to be above COM:TOO and thereby copyrightable. Regrettably, in France there is no FoP exception from copyright. So, we need a permission by the artist or the image needs to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:12, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:59, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No valid author or licence info. FunkMonk (talk) 09:20, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:00, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:01, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Juliokoenig (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Very small, no EXIF, so I doubt the uploader is actually the photographer. Also, no categories, so these are useless -- lost in our 50 million images.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:33, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:02, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fjr1994 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional photos, and unlikely to be the 2nd and 3rd upload of a brand new user. No exif, delete as per PCP

Gbawden (talk) 10:41, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:04, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:13, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Timboro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyvios. See COM:Screenshot

T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 12:04, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unlikely to be own works. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:15, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small file without EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 14:13, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:20, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ronhjones as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Book Yann (talk) 14:17, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: the texts are also subject to copyright. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:22, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File without svg extension. Kaštel Stari (talk) 14:55, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: bogus license IMO. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:23, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MOUMINI (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:24, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:25, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I forgot to censure registration plates of private cars, so that this image would be compliant with General Data Protection Regulation. Szczecinolog (talk) 23:51, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 12:18, 13 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope NMW03 (talk) 15:23, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:01, 24 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama in Belarus. Ymblanter (talk) 08:34, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:53, 26 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These photos look like scans of a printed publication. Stefan4 (talk) 21:59, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I own the right to this printed zed card so what is the problem? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sharky60 (talk • contribs) 2013-03-15T22:51:00 (UTC)

Since the card appeared outside Commons before it appeared here, you need to contact OTRS and prove that you took all three photos. See COM:OTRS for instructions. --Stefan4 (talk) 00:21, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This appears to be part of the OTRS ticket being discussed at Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Sharky60 uploads — just so we're all in the same place. --Closeapple (talk) 09:20, 16 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Stefan4, as you can see in the summary page of this upload, I am not the author of these pix, but these friends:casale, jeffery, woodward. However I am the legal owner of all the rights to these pix and have granted use in wikipedia. This pic also appears on my official page biscarini.com.--Sharky60 (talk) 14:02, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Sharky, please contact COM:OTRS FASTILY 07:53, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Restored - per OTRS ticket 2013031610006952 - Jcb (talk) 00:34, 15 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have the same card in jpg and jpeg formats. I understand one would be enough, am I right? E4024 (talk) 02:34, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: use {{Duplicate}}; without a link to the other file, we cannot verify. Ruthven (msg) 11:40, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Peppo-s zed card.jpeg E4024 (talk) 15:20, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: this is the earlier original upload, redirected the JPEG version as duplicate. P 1 9 9   13:59, 14 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF, unlikely to be own work B dash (talk) 08:53, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no other versions found on the web. Ruthven (msg) 11:40, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If the previous version is (was) not PD it must be deleted and not kept here; this is why I marked the file for "split". I meant "split it so let's see if both are OK"; if not, then we cannot and should not keep a not acceptable version here. E4024 (talk) 12:58, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Lovely! Keep them both and close this DR. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 15:23, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept per good news from OTRS agent. I withdraw the nom. --E4024 (talk) 15:26, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is the old version, please delete it per this edit by the uploader.   — Jeff G. please ping or talk to me 16:24, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Firstly, -I think for browser reasons- I see two of the same image. Having said that, I opened a DR for the older file, thinking it might have a CR problem. Now that it has been confirmed there is no such issue, we have no reason to delete the file. We need both old and new images of notable subjects. BTW, Jeff G., I know it's a good Samaritan work from your part to open this DR, but I'm sure the interested party could also have been able to do that by themselves, as they have been able to upload several files to Commons and even manage the OTRS procedure.  Keep --E4024 (talk) 17:24, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Based on timestamps, the originally accepted OTRS ticket was for the older file, with the newer one (that I histsplit and sent to File:Abbashow Swede Sensation.jpg of previously-uncertain (but now confirmed okay) CR status. DMacks (talk) 17:28, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Dear Jeff, being in use or not has no importance at all in this case, as the images both belong to a notable band. Therefore even if someone goes and removes the image from any WP, that has nothing to do with our discussion. --E4024 (talk) 17:34, 20 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 11:42, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Veraltete und damit irreführende Informationen Nsphho (talk) 13:43, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 11:57, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Burleon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical book. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: 1783 book. Ruthven (msg) 12:01, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An IP reported that is is not the right person; I, original uploader, prefer deleting the file altogether.

I created the file based on the description of Eerste training FC Utrecht 2.jpg, as well as its legend in :cs:Anouar Kali, but a Google search brings different people. Laddo (talk) 15:16, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: use {{Rename}} instead. Ruthven (msg) 12:02, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Max-e-d-90 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: found a copy at http://ayanoticias.com/w/politica/paola-dominguez-seria-candidata-a-intendente-del-pj/. Ruthven (msg) 12:03, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The pic is taken from a copyrighted page. Maybe "I could not" find the reason of being PD, but my doubts are enough to open this DR. Our good admins always correct my mistakes. (We also have several other images of the person.) E4024 (talk) 15:22, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. On the website I read: "(image copyright 1001 Inventions Ltd, released under free licence)", which is obviously not enough. Then, the terms say: " Images, copyright, trademarks, brands and all other intellectual property rights displayed on this website or existing in this website belong to us, or a third party and used by permission, and are protected by copyright, trade mark and other intellectual property laws. All copyright therefore may not be reproduced or take for ones own use in any manner without written permission of us or their respective owner(s). Further to, any material found on this website may not be copied, reproduced, republished, broadcasted or posted without obtaining permission from us, the owners of the website and credited to us appropriately. ". Ruthven (msg) 12:05, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Neue größere Grafik vorhanden, diese ist redundant geworden. Sciencia58 (talk) 15:23, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 12:06, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Neue größere Grafik vorhanden, diese ist redundant geworden. Sciencia58 (talk) 15:23, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 12:06, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wegen Texteinmischung HaSt (talk) 15:40, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 12:07, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

soubor nebo stránka jsou zbytečné vzhledem k existenci jiné(ho) Valentina Shuklina Šindelářová (talk) 17:03, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 12:08, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

soubor nebo stránka jsou zbytečné vzhledem k existenci jiné(ho) Valentina Shuklina Šindelářová (talk) 17:08, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: we can keep multiple images of one person. Ruthven (msg) 12:09, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:38, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Clearly in scope (in use). However the collage is a copyvio. Ruthven (msg) 12:13, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is claimed as own work, but the EXIF solely consists of a a mention of Google. Was this given the date an image located by the uploader on Picsa or Goggle Image search, and which thus may have a seperate copyright? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 19:06, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:14, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright:Matt Hoyle Photography, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:22, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(transfered) This photo was commissioned by Rainn and Matt Hoyle should not have any copyright attached to it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wilhorn (talk • contribs) 22:37, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Wilhorn: Since file has been published everywhere under an unfree license prior of being uploaded here Commons policy requires that the copyright holder (whoever he/she is) should send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:53, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:15, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All photography © ChrisWRCox, 2018 (https://cwrcphotography.com/portraits-1/tgsrnhnzhux2mirsr3u239ir581vbs), permission needed via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:25, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

(transfered) I am the photographer www.cwrcphotography.com and I own the rights to this image. Chriswrcox (talk) 14:52, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Chriswrcox: Make your identity verified via COM:OTRS or change the license on your website from © ChrisWRCox to a valid one, please. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:59, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
I have changed the license on my website to © ChrisWRCox, 2019. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Chriswrcox (talk • contribs) 12:41, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Chriswrcox: No you haven't: it's still All photography © ChrisWRCox, 2019. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:44, 18 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please explain to me, exactly what I have to do to get my photo confirmed? I thought changing it to @ChrisWRCox 2019 would be enough to confirm it's my work as it shows I have access to the site also.


Deleted: per nomination; please send permission to OTRS. --Gbawden (talk) 13:36, 30 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dzolland (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Have the name of the photographer as a watermark, which none of their other uploads have. No exif. Likely copyvio

Gbawden (talk) 10:56, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:10, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dzolland (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unclear copyright status, the same images were nominated for deletion there Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Dzolland, and reuploaded before the deltion without watermark but with "FBMD" in the EXIFs. The autorship should be confirmed via com:OTRS

Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:10, 11 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; G4. --Gbawden (talk) 06:00, 12 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work if it was sent to him via whatsapp Gbawden (talk) 09:37, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Gbawden: Where do you see that it was sent via whatsapp? --Ruthven (msg) 11:41, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Ruthven: Hi. Based on the file name, specifically The WA part at the end. If someone sends you an image via whatsapp your device saves it with date received followed by -WA and the digits are a sequence number Gbawden (talk) 11:43, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Gbawden: Thank you. Everyday I learn something new. I don't know if it's evidence enough for deletion, but I would have used {{No permission since}} in those cases. As a side note, the user has several similar uploads. --Ruthven (msg) 11:56, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:50, 15 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Juanrac! (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small files without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 13:42, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Juanrac! Se trata de fotos sacadas por mi en conciertos y de un dibujo en un tipex de un caracter chino también hecho por mí. El que tengan poca resolución no significa nada. Tengo los originales con más definición, podría subirlo si así quedáis más contentos. Gracias y un saludo!

@Juanrac!: Por favor, sube los ficheros originales en cima de estas versiones: aquí no guardamos versiones con poca resolución. Cuando lo tengas hecho, escribeme haciendo {{ping|ruthven}} aquì. Gracias --Ruthven (msg) 11:44, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination (no news since). Ruthven (msg) 12:53, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Juanrac! (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical paintings, drawings and book pages. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Juanrac!Todos los planos de El Escorial son originales míos de mi tesis doctoral. Por supuesto son planos originales míos, de una hipótesis no real, y no existían antes de que los dibujara yo mismo, imitando los originales de Juan de Herrera. El resto son libros del s.XVI escaneados por mí mismo de los propios originales y recortados o mejorados en el contraste, excepto uno o dos que están sacados de Google Books, que fue quien hizo el trabajo de escaneado de los originales. Por supuesto no hay nadie que no muriera antes de 1599 que pueda tener ningún derecho sobre las ilustraciones.

@Juanrac!: El problema es que has añadido información incorrecta. Si los planes son de siglo 16, tienes que poner la fecha correcta en cada pàgina y no "2012" u otra fecha. Dime cuando lo has hecho, para evitar de borrar los ficheros. Gracias. --Ruthven (msg) 11:45, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I fixed the license for some of the files. Regards, Yann (talk) 15:20, 8 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: uploader made corrections to dates and authors, all are old enough for PD. P 1 9 9   15:59, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is probably a hoax, see the remark on my NL Wikipedia userpage https://nl.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Overleg_gebruiker:Ellywa&diff=53378675&oldid=53348485 Elly (talk) 20:15, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:02, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The license at source is OK, but EXIF says that the copyright holder is David Lord Photography. We need either a confirmation from Phil Hanson Racing or from David Lord Photography via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 23:53, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann: Apologies first if my mark-up is incorrect. We all have to start somewhere. In response, I have email communication from David Lord confirming that he has transferred copyright to Phil Hanson Racing for all the images he's taken of Phil, both portrait images and on-track. I was requested by Phil Hanson to add a profile image to his Wiki page, and he suggested this file. How would you like to receive confirmation of this agreement? ThumperGT (talk) 00:15, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@ThumperGT: Good. Could you please transfer this email to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Then you will receive an answer with the ticket number, and you can add {{OTRS pending|id=<ticket number>}} in the description, so that the file is not deleted. Regards, Yann (talk) 00:18, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: Thanks for the quick response. I'll do that straight away. ThumperGT (talk) 00:24, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Undelete if ever OTRS ticket is received. P 1 9 9   16:05, 17 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In ticket:2019031110006656, the subject asked the deletion of the file because '[it was uploaded] 1. without my consent, 2. image is negative'. Bencemac (talk) 17:08, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Only free picture available for subject. If subject can make a better picture available, we can consider replacing; since subject is already in contact with OTRS, this should be easier than usual. --GRuban (talk) 02:24, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:16, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logos of political parties of Argentina

[edit]

Not simple logos; all above the TOO, in some cases clear copyright violations. In the specific case of File:Logo Partido Socialista Argentina.png, {{PD-AR-BALegislature}} template indicates that only photos and original material from the Legislature are in the PD; in this case, the logo was generated by the political party as its own emblem (see logo on PS current website).

Files affected:

Fma12 (talk) 00:56, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The source of File:Logo del Partido Obrero.png and File:Logo PO.jpg is under CC-BY license. Mr. Moonlight (talk) 01:06, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment @Mr. Moonlight: Can you specify a direct link to the images nominated? I could not find them on the Official Partido Obrero website (source indicated by you) - Fma12 (talk) 01:10, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
It seems that is no longer available in that website but it is in Prensa Obrera's (see page 3) which is also distributed under CC-BY. Mr. Moonlight (talk) 02:42, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Aditionally I have found an older version of te official website (I think that I tooked from here in first place) with the file and the same license.Mr. Moonlight (talk) 02:56, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Mr. Moonlight: In this case, I retry my nomination of those two files. - Thanks for your feedback - Fma12 (talk) 11:27, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
File:FPCyS 2012.png and File:FPCyS 2015.png as it says, use File:Happyman.svg with the correct license. --Yilku1 (talk) 00:32, 15 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Also there is this image: File:Binner2011.jpg with the same logo with an ORTS.--Yilku1 (talk) 19:14, 30 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Logo Partido Socialista Argentina.jpg kept per {{PD-AR-BALegislature}}. Ruthven (msg) 16:01, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mitte27 as no permission (No permission since) — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 15:47, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:01, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was first published in 1995, not 1859. It is a 1995 redrawing of a diagram from 1859. My understanding is that it is therefore in copyright in the United States from 1995, not in the public domain. Chreliot (talk) 17:17, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: there is no enough originality in the redrawing to be considered a separate work. Ruthven (msg) 16:02, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Where's the ezvidence that image has been created more thjan 70 years ago? Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:54, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Eqrem Vlora was born in 1885. In this image he is 56 years old, which dates the image to 1941. This image was taken right around the time before he was appointed minister which was in 1942. Kj1595 (talk) 06:20, 13 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Kj1595. Ruthven (msg) 16:03, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately this is not a CC-by licensed file. It is part of a well-known series of photos published by Werlé, from French lab ONERA, in the 1980s, displaying boundary layer and flow separation around a sphere using air bubbles in water. The photo is easily identifiable, see for example https://www.researchgate.net/figure/Flow-passing-a-sphere-ReuD-n20000-Modified-figure-from-172-Photograph-by-H_fig7_309386335 . Ariadacapo (talk) 18:15, 12 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:03, 7 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]