Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/02/07
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![131 File:"This is the Enemy" MCANW poster, 1980s Wellcome L0075379.jpg](#File:"This_is_the_Enemy"_MCANW_poster,_1980s_Wellcome_L0075379.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
I Want to delete as i not want to make it public now Abhay Shukla Journalist (talk) 16:30, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
Keep Derivative of this image is used in Wikipedia. Ronhjones (Talk) 16:35, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --DMacks (talk) 05:01, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
For reasons of European policies. This image is nominated for imminent Elimination of this platform as soon as possible. For more information I contacted info@frasiganmusic.com Michelle San (talk) 05:15, 24 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:33, 25 December 2018 (UTC)
The person represented in this image, has contacted me to remove his face from the wikimedia repository Michelle San (talk) 13:01, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:06, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
It is a low-quality picture of Georg Cantor, not of Ioan Budai-Deleanu. Chaoborus (talk) 18:19, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, obviously. --VIGNERON (talk) 20:47, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
This file can be deleted! Replaced by new version: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Synthese_von_Isobutanal.svg Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 19:48, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader request. Unused. Ed (Edgar181) 21:15, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:28, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Porque no soy el propietario Kokekovacs (talk) 15:53, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:23, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
I accidentally used a non-descriptive file name when uploading. File:Sir Watkin Williams, 3rd Bt of Llanforda.jpg is the correct file P. S. Burton (talk) 00:41, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:50, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
This flickr account is blacklisted. Leoboudv (talk) 23:58, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Leoboudv: Keep per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Flickr images from bad authors. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 00:24, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Comment: OK. Keep. But only an Admin can pass this image. I am not allowed to. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:26, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: @Leoboudv: account was removed from the blacklist, FlickreviewR reviewed it. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 15:55, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Fantasy. This flag does not exists. --Kwasura (talk) 11:31, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
- User:Kwasura: Please notify the uploader when nominating files for deletion! I have now notified all uploaders of this file. No comment on the desired outcome of the deletion request. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:14, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: ton of sock uploads. probably funny to bring false info to people. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:09, 5 November 2015 (UTC)
Restored per undeletion request. Alan (talk) 09:23, 8 November 2015 (UTC)
Non existing incorrect flag. All correct and existing flags are already uploaded. Kwasura (talk) 13:53, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
- SPEEDY Keep -- This deletion request is semi-stupid (since the image is exactly described by its name), and adds nothing whatsoever to the previous rejected deletion requests above, and under the file's former name at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Finland Air force.svg. AnonMoos (talk) 15:14, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- I am having a discussion here with the people who do not give a damn, but are politically active, and vote as true republicans. Difficult task... very difficult... --Kwasura (talk) 21:58, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
- I have no idea what you're talking about, but it doesn't matter, because your claimed reasons for deletion don't make too much sense. This is the base flag, or flag template, or whatever you want to call it, for the different squadrons, or brigades, or whatever you want to call them, of the Finnish Air Force. No one has ever claimed it was anything else. I renamed the flag in the case the previous name might have been unintentionally misleading. Therefore there is no reason to delete this image. AnonMoos (talk)`
- Just compare your upload with any existing flag. Just do it. I don't even know why we still having this conversation. File should be deleted a long time ago. Perhaps, it is AnonMoos personal project to keep it here. The reasons remain unknown though. You want a template? So download any of the existing correct files and use it. --Kwasura (talk) 12:50, 28 September 2018 (UTC)
- If you do this, then you'll see it's the flag of Finland Air force squadrons without a squadron emblem in the corner (what a coincidence). AnonMoos (talk) 04:27, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
- Now it is just gibberish... --Kwasura (talk) 00:31, 6 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 13:13, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
| Not shown in the transclusion mode. Please, open the request. |
Incorrect image of non existing flag. Kwasura (talk) 02:46, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Delete - not here to confuse people. --E4024 (talk) 02:50, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep – non existing? LoL. Search images in Internet for “lennoston lippu”. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 20:22, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- I request a SPEEDY AND DEFINITIVE FINAL KEEP -- User:Kwasura has some kind of unhealthy obsession with this flag image, and has banging away at it for years, but none of his deletion requests (when made in the proper form with the proper notifications) has been upheld. User:Kwasura should only get so many "bites of the apple" (as they say in the U.S. legal system) -- if he can't come up with any new reasonable arguments, then his bringing up of this file for repeated deletion nominations serves no useful purpose... AnonMoos (talk) 19:35, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
@Perhelion: the request is technically still pending. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 21:31, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: speedy close, 4. renominating without new reason, User:Kwasura is warned not to do this again or this is vandalism. -- User: Perhelion 21:33, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate, sorry Judithcomm (talk) 15:21, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 07:58, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
change of file Prof.Steel (talk) 17:23, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:39, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Copyright Jonixpr (talk) 02:52, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Ronhjones at 23:38, 10 Februar 2019 UTC: Previously deleted file --Krdbot 01:58, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
(c)Torsten Helmke www.torstenhelmke.de Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:24, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing. --1989 (talk) 01:13, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Altes Foto. Wir haben ein neueres. Thelmke (talk) 12:09, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy deleted as a copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 14:02, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Photo by, or sourced by, Archivio Perini@ This is not "own work" by the flickr account uploader but a flickrwash. Leoboudv (talk) 09:29, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:23, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Did not get the rights Quotenbanane (talk) 23:52, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:10, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
change of file Prof.Steel (talk) 17:35, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb at 13:11, 13 Februar 2019 UTC: No permission since 5 February 2019 --Krdbot 19:53, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 00:02, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- I don't know what this is supposed to be, or why it is showing as in use on so many en.wp admin talk pages when it clearly isn't there, but it' a useless image. Beeblebrox (talk) 22:50, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:56, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Probably copyright violation, unlikely that uploader took the photo. 1960s picture of baseball player, see http://beisbolredes.blogspot.com/2014/06/blas-arredondo-hector-espino.html and https://www.pitlane.mx/mlbylmb/lmb/al-bat-1624/ Verbcatcher (talk) 00:04, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:57, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Not own work, first appeared on gundeminfo.az Kges1901 (talk) 00:22, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:00, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Medinapapi (talk · contribs)
[edit]More TICS homework.
- File:SUCESIÓN-testamentaria-monografia-Vi (1).pdf
- File:MEDIOS-PROBATORIOS-CORROMPIDOS-E-INEFICACES.pdf
- File:MEDIOS-PROBATORIOS-CORROMPIDOS.pdf
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:32, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:02, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Medinapapi (talk · contribs)
[edit]More TICS homework.
- File:Delitos EN LAS REDES SOCIALES.pdf
- File:ORIENTACION VOCACIONAL 2.pdf
- File:ORIENTACIO-VOCACIONAL.pdf
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:32, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:02, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Medinapapi (talk · contribs)
[edit]More TICS homework.
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:33, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:02, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Medinapapi (talk · contribs)
[edit]More TICS homework.
- File:La libertad de expresión en el peru.pdf
- File:EL-ABORTO-TERAPEUTICO-Y-EUGENESICO.pdf
- File:EL ABORTO TERAPEUTICO Y EUGENESICO.pdf
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:33, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:02, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Medinapapi (talk · contribs)
[edit]More TICS homework.
- File:DECLARACIÓN DE LOS DERECHOS HUMANOS (1).pdf
- File:Aborto en el Perú.pdf
- File:Declaración de los derechos humanos.pdf
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:34, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:02, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Medinapapi (talk · contribs)
[edit]More TICS homework.
- File:OBLIGACIONES EN EL DERECHO ROMANO.pdf
- File:OBLIGACIONES-.pdf
- File:Obligaciones ppt.pdf
- File:OBLIGACIONES.pdf
- File:Obligaciones.pdf
- File:OBLIGACIONES-DE-HACER-.pdf
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:34, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:02, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Medinapapi (talk · contribs)
[edit]More TICS homework.
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:37, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:02, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope person. E4024 (talk) 00:57, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:03, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
This images is random drawings/sketches which possess low values for encyclopedic contents Mister NightMoon (talk) 03:06, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:04, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Wikidata spam Mahir256 (talk) 03:11, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - this is part of a cross-wiki spam campaign by several socks. Hiàn (talk) 03:30, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:05, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
YouTube video does not have CC BY license. – Rhain ☔ 03:42, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- It used to when I uploaded it. Unfortunately the uploader changed the license, so I can't do anything about it. If it needs to be deleted I'm fine with that. -NowIsntItTime (talk) 03:54, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Found the archived version of the webpage and verified the license stated. --1989 (talk) 02:10, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jarkani.786 (talk · contribs)
[edit]No permission, taken from facebook
- File:Jama Masjid Dumrama Compare.jpg
- File:Jama Masjid Dumrama Old Look.jpg
- File:Jama Masjid Dumrama.jpg
Afifa Afrin (talk) 04:35, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:12, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Self Promotion, out of scope Prongs31 06:08, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:13, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by C raju kumar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 06:26, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:14, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by C raju kumar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope, commons is not a photo album
- File:C raju kumar 9.jpg
- File:C raju kumar 8.jpg
- File:C raju kumar7.jpg
- File:C raju kumar 6.jpg
- File:C raju kumar5.jpg
- File:C raju kumar4.jpg
- File:C raju kumar3.jpg
- File:C raju kumar2.jpg
- File:C ra.jpg
- File:C raj.jpg
- File:C raju k.jpg
- File:C raju ku.jpg
- File:C raju kum.jpg
- File:C raju kuma.jpg
- File:Princess.jpg
- File:Bahuballi.jpg
- File:Devil raju.jpg
- File:C raju.jpg
- File:C raju kumar.jpg
- File:C Raju kumar.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 13:30, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by C raju kumar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal images, out of project scope. Commons is not your free web host.
- File:Raju kumar8.jpg
- File:Raju kumar7.jpg
- File:Raju kimar6.jpg
- File:Raju kumar5.jpg
- File:Raju kumar4.jpg
- File:Raju kumar2.jpg
- File:Raju kumar1.jpg
- File:Raju kumar.jpg
— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:44, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by C raju kumar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal files, not in use. Please read this,
- File:Raju kumar11.jpg
- File:Raju kumar13.jpg
- File:Raju kumar10.jpg
- File:LSQ 20190106 154427188.jpg
- File:Raju kumar6.jpg
- File:Raju kumar3.jpg
- File:Raju kumar15.jpg
- File:Raju kumar 11.jpg
- File:Raju kumar9.jpg
— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:02, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 17:03, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by C raju kumar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope
- File:C raju kumar2.jpg
- File:C raju kumar3.jpg
- File:Craju kumar.jpg
- File:C raju kumar1.jpg
- File:C raju kumar.jpg
- File:Raju kumar11.jpg
- File:Raju kumar13.jpg
- File:Raju kumar10.jpg
- File:LSQ 20190106 154427188.jpg
- File:Raju kumar6.jpg
- File:Raju kumar3.jpg
- File:Raju kumar15.jpg
- File:Raju kumar 11.jpg
- File:Raju kumar9.jpg
- File:Raju kumar8.jpg
- File:Raju kumar7.jpg
- File:Raju kimar6.jpg
- File:Raju kumar5.jpg
- File:Raju kumar4.jpg
- File:Raju kumar2.jpg
- File:Raju kumar1.jpg
- File:Raju kumar.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 12:56, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:49, 13 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by C raju kumar (talk · contribs)
[edit]personal photos - have been deleted several times in the past.
- File:C raju kumar9.jpg
- File:Sudha.png
- File:C raju kumar3.jpg
- File:LSQ 20190208 094841678.webp
- File:Raju k.jpg
- File:C raju kumar.jpg
- File:C raju kumar.png
- File:C raju Kumar 1.jpg
- File:C Raju kumar.jpg
- File:Raju kumar2.jpg
- File:Raju kumar1.jpg
- File:Raju kumar.jpg
Frood (talk) 05:53, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:43, 7 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by C raju kumar (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:CSD#F10 (personal photos by non-contributors)
- File:Raju k.jpg
- File:Ch raju.jpg
- File:K raju.jpg
- File:Devil boy.jpg
- File:Devilraju.jpg
- File:Raju boy.jpg
- File:C raju kumar.jpg
- File:My attitude.png
Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:08, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (see also Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#C raju kumar). --DMacks (talk) 10:42, 8 September 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kevinret XP (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 06:29, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:15, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Nonsense upload of apparently copyrighted images. Note the nonsense descriptions, authors and sources. Not realitically useful for an educational: Out of project scope.
- File:Kuymhaaaa.jpg
- File:ยอดรัก-สลักใจ.jpg
- File:ครูบาบุญชุ่ม11-680x445.jpg
- File:1430912349-images-o.jpg
Ies (talk) 06:57, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete all per nom. --Paul_012 (talk) 13:16, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
Nonsense upload, not realitically useful for an educational purpose and as the nonsense description, source and author show not intended to be useful: Out of project scope.
- File:ดี๋ ดอกมะดัน.jpg
- File:14474190 314953688876595 3822621262530740224 n 1477475231.jpg
- File:สีหนุ่ม3.jpg
- File:Sarayuth chuenyim.jpg
- File:Ss2346.jpg
- File:News201512010828863.jpg
- File:Act239-1.jpg
- File:4DQpjUtzLUwmJZZPEbhoU8Y7ZKSrLAPexLdE6NK002Lj.jpg
- File:Kuymhaaaa.jpg
- File:ยอดรัก-สลักใจ.jpg
- File:ครูบาบุญชุ่ม11-680x445.jpg
- File:1430912349-images-o.jpg
Ies (talk) 12:37, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:18, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted GoogleMap satellite imagery (Google watermarks in the image), source site is not imagery owner and just uses Google imagery Bogomolov.PL (talk) 08:26, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:22, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted GoogleMap satellite imagery (Google watermarks in the image), source site is not imagery owner and just uses Google imagery Bogomolov.PL (talk) 08:27, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:22, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted GoogleMap satellite imagery (Google watermarks in the image), source site is not imagery owner and just uses Google imagery Bogomolov.PL (talk) 08:27, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:22, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted GoogleMap satellite imagery (Google watermarks in the image), source site is not imagery owner and just uses Google imagery Bogomolov.PL (talk) 08:28, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:22, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted GoogleMap satellite imagery (Google watermarks in the image), source site is not imagery owner and just uses Google imagery Bogomolov.PL (talk) 08:28, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:22, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted GoogleMap satellite imagery (Google watermarks in the image), source site is not imagery owner and just uses Google imagery Bogomolov.PL (talk) 08:29, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:22, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted GoogleMap satellite imagery (Google watermarks in the image), source site is not imagery owner and just uses Google imagery Bogomolov.PL (talk) 08:29, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:22, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted GoogleMap satellite imagery (Google watermarks in the image), source site is not imagery owner and just uses Google imagery Bogomolov.PL (talk) 08:30, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:22, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted GoogleMap satellite imagery (Google watermarks in the image), source site is not imagery owner and just uses Google imagery Bogomolov.PL (talk) 08:30, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:22, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted GoogleMap satellite imagery (Google watermarks in the image), source site is not imagery owner and just uses Google imagery Bogomolov.PL (talk) 08:30, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:22, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted GoogleMap satellite imagery (Google watermarks in the image), source site is not imagery owner and just uses Google imagery Bogomolov.PL (talk) 08:31, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:22, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted GoogleMap satellite imagery (Google watermarks in the image), source site is not imagery owner and just uses Google imagery Bogomolov.PL (talk) 08:31, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:22, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted GoogleMap satellite imagery (Google watermarks in the image), source site is not imagery owner and just uses Google imagery Bogomolov.PL (talk) 08:32, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:22, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted GoogleMap satellite imagery (Google watermarks in the image), source site is not imagery owner and just uses Google imagery Bogomolov.PL (talk) 08:32, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:22, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted GoogleMap satellite imagery (Google watermarks in the image), source site is not imagery owner and just uses Google imagery Bogomolov.PL (talk) 08:33, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:22, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused personal photo. Solomon203 (talk) 08:50, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:22, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Low quality/out of scope Gbawden (talk) 10:41, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:24, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
yet another unused fantasy election result created by this author - out of scope Cabayi (talk) 10:51, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:25, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
unused doodle which is of no practical use - out of scope Cabayi (talk) 11:17, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:25, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Professionally taken image uploaded via whtsapp with claim to be own work. No evidence to support that claim Noq (talk) 11:17, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:27, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
potential copyright violation - professionally taken image with claim of own work uploaded via whatsapp Noq (talk) 11:22, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:27, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Latvia and the photo violates sculptor's (Romualds Gibovskis) copyright. Taivo (talk) 11:57, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- I noticed: uploader's name is Gibovski. The uploader may be sculptor's relative. OTRS-permission from sculptor (if dead, then from heir) is still needed. Taivo (talk) 12:00, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:28, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
unused personal file, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:26, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:30, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:28, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:31, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:33, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:34, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:35, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG without captions if useful.
- File:Gearhead graphic - clutch lever.png
- File:Gearhead graphic - maintain control in a side collision.png
- File:Gearhead graphic - maximum turning speed.png
- File:Gearhead graphic - proper placement of the chain retaining clip.png
- File:Gearhead graphic - practice turning in a parking lot for low speed turns.png
- File:Gearhead graphic - lean your bike for sharp turns.png
- File:Gearhead graphic - owning the lane.png
- File:Gearhead graphic - dropping a bigger bike.png
- File:Gearhead graphic - negative trail on bumps.png
- File:Gearhead graphic - lean the bike.png
- File:Gearhead graphic - pushing up your bike.png
- File:Gearhead graphic - trail definition.png
- File:Gearhead center of gravity.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:35, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:36, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:36, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:36, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/insource:Thinkerview
[edit]CC BY-NC-SA 4.0
- File:Vincent Mignerot.jpg
- File:Philippe Pascot.jpg
- File:Xenia Fedorova.jpg
- File:RUFFIN.png
- File:David Koubbi.jpg
- File:Olivier Berruyer.jpg
- File:Eric Sadin.jpg
- File:Xenia Fedorova, 2018 (cropped).jpg
- File:Fabrice Arfi, 2018 (cropped).jpg
- File:Laurent Obertone, 2018 (cropped).jpg
- File:Vincent Mignerot, 2018 (cropped).jpg
- File:Éric Sadin, 2018 (cropped).jpg
- File:Jacques Sapir.jpg
- File:Aude Lancelin.jpg
- File:Michel Collon.jpg
- File:Aude Lancelin, 2018 (cropped).jpg
- File:Aminata Dramane Traoré,.jpg
- File:Laurent Obertone.jpg
- File:Cédric Villani.jpg
- File:Pablo Servigne, 2018 (cropped).jpg
- File:Pablo Servigne.jpg
- File:Fabrice Arfi.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Roy17 (talk) 15:23, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete despite having a CC BY 3.0 license on YouTube, the descriptions specify CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, which is incompatible with COM:L. Per the precautionary principle, we should assume the more restrictive license is what they intended. clpo13(talk) 16:30, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:38, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshot of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:39, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:39, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
The National Portrait Gallery is not part of Crown Copyright. Photograph by Walter Bird who died in 1969. Undelete in 2040. Abzeronow (talk) 15:26, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:41, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:39, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Setyawanaris (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos and book cover. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Pias; Kumpulan Tulisan Seni dan Budaya oleh Aris Setyawan.jpg
- File:Aris Setyawan.jpg
- File:Auretté and The Polska Seeking Carnival.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:41, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:44, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:45, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from Windows wallpaper. Should be blanked to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: “Processed By eBay with ImageMagick, z1.1.0. ||B2” (from metadata). --1989 (talk) 02:46, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AlqueriaXat (talk · contribs)
[edit]Most likely derivative work. Found some from this website here.
1989 (talk) 04:21, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:30, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lukapaunovic (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 06:39, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:30, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial flag, duplicate of File:Bandera De la provincia de Los Santos.jpg. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 02:48, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Miscellaneous material related to Malekshahi Kurds extremely unlikely to be own work. See for instance the following deletion request (another upload from the same person). Consider the use of {{PD-Iran}} instead
- File:Habib .jpg
- File:Abass Azizian.jpg
- File:Abas khan.jpg
- File:Mohmmad Karim 12.jpg
- File:Shamega 1.JPG
- File:Hasan Malekshahi 100.jpg
- File:Bozorgan Malekshahi.jpg
Discasto talk 17:31, 3 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:33, 9 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:32, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:32, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:32, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:32, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:32, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:32, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pablopierrot1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:32, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:33, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:33, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:33, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pankajpuniainc (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:33, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:35, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used or irrelevant to article.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:35, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
vOut of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:35, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:01, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:35, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:01, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:35, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Rabbia Furiosa - er canaro - Riccardo De Filippis.jpg
- File:Paolo Glisenti.jpg
- File:Paolo Glisenti e il direttore di Expo 2020 Dubai.jpg
- File:Paolo-glisenti-commissario-italiano-expo-2020.jpg
- File:Firma-paolo-glisenti-expo-2020-dubai.jpg
- File:Consulcesi sede balerna.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:07, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:37, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:07, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:36, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Uploaded by 1-upload user Televisa Presenta Images (talk · contributions · Statistics) on 02.02.2016. Most likely (considering also the user name) a TV/video screenshot. Note that the file was cropped. Gunnex (talk) 17:59, 16 March 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:33, 29 March 2016 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, does not look like own work. Probably copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 18:04, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:38, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
If I am not wrong, it is the same deleted file, right? E4024 (talk) 15:14, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
Speedy delete per COM:CSD#F1 as a copyvio of https://www.minutoe.com/espectaculos/2020/2/25/enfurecido-el-novio-de-angelique-boyer-responde-los-rumores-sobre-un-supuesto-embarazo-5274.html and per COM:CSD#F4, COM:CSD#G4, and the above sections. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:12, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Túrelio (talk) 11:49, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by V.A.M. Vigilanza Aeronautica Militare (talk · contribs)
[edit]Most likely derivative work
- File:Bannervam.gif
- File:GIRAMENTO 81°.jpg
- File:GIURAMENTO 81°.jpg
- File:VESTIARIO V.A.M.png
- File:Cambio V.A.M.jpg
- File:Rientro della SAT e BAF.jpg
- File:DISEGNO Col warcopy.jpg
- File:Coccarda.jpg
- File:DISEGNO Banner mirino.jpg
- File:DISEGNO COCCARDA V.A.M.jpg
- File:100 cento vam.jpg
- File:Disegno.jpg
- File:Patch V.A.M.jpg
- File:Patch BTG V.A.M.jpg
1989 (talk) 19:06, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:38, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
The watermark shows it has been taken from a website. No permission is shown. 37.168.93.48 19:15, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:39, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Low resolution, bad quality, no EXIF, most likely derivative work
- File:Redouane Asloum et Karina Azzoug.PNG
- File:Redouane Asloum.png
- File:Redouane Asloum, 2013 (2).png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
1989 (talk) 19:16, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:39, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Whitespaces (Useless for basically anything) Mister NightMoon (talk) 19:19, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:40, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal image of questionable notability, no metadata. Cjp24 (talk) 19:48, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:41, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Poor knock-off of the actual Bungie logo. Check the SVG version of the company's website for comparison. Lordtobi (✉) 20:51, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
OK delete it . EEIM
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:41, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination I see a small cc license logo on source, not a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License one. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:50, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- You can see in the end of this page a big paragraph in french, titled « Licence ». Excuse me, my english is so bad, because i speak arabic or french. Thanks.--Mohatatou (talk) 00:18, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Mohatatou: Oui, c'est vrai, merci. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 00:31, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:43, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
flyer. spam, no significance GAndy (talk) 22:50, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:43, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Corkythehornetfan as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not his official US House photo. This image was from his personal twitter account (https://twitter.com/SeanCasten) and can also be seen from an article on him during his campaign (https://www.thewellnews.com/il-06-sean-casten/) 1989 (talk) 04:09, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Delete Delete as this is confirmed to not be his official portrait: in case the unusual background and pose didn't make it obvious, his official portrait was released and can be found here. Not to mention this was a campaign photo and certainly looks like a copyright violation. Westroopnerd (talk) 05:53, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:49, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
poor quality Tukka (talk) 12:42, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:48, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Duplicate of File:OOjs UI icon link-ltr.svg — Newslinger talk 14:27, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:47, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Non-notable person, out of project scope. Лушников Владимир Александрович (talk) 19:27, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep for internal consumption by Commons volunteers. Commons isn’t Wikipedia, Commons hasn’t notability criteria. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 19:41, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 06:44, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Videke-événunyé (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused image of questionable notability.
- File:ALOUMON Viwanou Agbénigan Claude signant un autographe devant la cathédrale Notre Dame de Paris.jpg
- File:ALOUMON Viwanou Agbénigan Claude signant un autographe devant la tour Eiffel à Paris.jpg
- File:ALOUMON Viwanou Agbénigan Claude devant la cathédrale Notre Dame de Paris.jpg
- File:ALOUMON Viwanou Agbénigan Claude signant un autographe au mont parnasse.jpg
- File:Thierry Le Mordicus vu de face.jpg
- File:Thierry Le Mordicus en 2013.jpg
- File:Thierry Le Mordicus en 2012.jpg
- File:Tournage de l'équipe d'empreinte lors du tournage du clip de djivi déka de nam Manny laissles - Real One 4life & Sethlo le 10 janvier 2013.JPG
- File:Thierry Le Mordicus chez lui.JPG
- File:Thierry Le Mordicus face.JPG
- File:Thierry Le Mordicus-LOGO.jpg
- File:Thierry Le Mordicus..JPG
- File:Thierry Le Mordicus Etiquettes pour Perspective-Mordicus.JPG
- File:Thierry Le Mordicus-photo-passeport.JPG
- File:Tournage de l'équipe d'empreinte lors du tournage du clip de djivi déka de nam Manny laissles - Real One 4life & Sethlo le 10 janvier 2013 à la maison de Production Face2Face (5).JPG
- File:Tournage de l'équipe d'empreinte lors du tournage du clip de djivi déka de nam Manny laissles - Real One 4life & Sethlo le 10 janvier 2013 à la maison de Production Face2Face (4).JPG
- File:Tournage de l'équipe d'empreinte lors du tournage du clip de djivi déka de nam Manny laissles - Real One 4life & Sethlo le 10 janvier 2013 à la maison de Production Face2Face (3).JPG
- File:Thierry Le Mordicus avec Amon eric Smith dans la maison de production Face2Face.JPG
- File:Thierry Le Mordicus avec l'équipe d'empreinte.JPG
- File:Thierry Le Mordicus.jpg
- File:Thierry Le Mordicus et Amon Eric Smith.JPG
- File:El Kampeuzo -(1.jpg
- File:El Kampeuzo - 3.jpg
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Cjp24 (talk) 19:31, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope personal images. --Gbawden (talk) 06:44, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
bad quality, questionable value for encyclopedia Wanted (talk) 19:56, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:49, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
A watermark says 'www.photointer.com.brazil' Leoboudv (talk) 20:11, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep @Leoboudv: The Flickr account's publicly visibly name is "Israel Cidade" and it uses an avatar similar to the logo in the watermark. The author in the EXIF is "ISRAEL CIDADE". The website http://www.photointer.com.br which no longer works was first archived by archive.org in 2016. The Flickr account was registered all the way back in 2008. The first football-related photos the account uploaded were uploaded in October 2016 - matching the month archive.org first indexed photointer.com.br. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 02:27, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep OK keep per Alexis Jazz's comments. --Leoboudv (talk) 04:49, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: As per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 06:43, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 21:26, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:43, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
(c) Dieter Schnöpf Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:15, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn by nom. --Gbawden (talk) 06:39, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Photo: MARIO FRANCIS, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:19, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:38, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
(c) ROBERTO DELLA VITE, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:42, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:32, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as no permission (No permission since) Fæ (talk) 23:08, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
![23:08, 7 February 2019 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2019/02/07#c-Fæ-2019-02-07T23:08:00.000Z-File:"This_is_the_Enemy"_MCANW_poster,_1980s_Wellcome_L0075379.jpg){kind=link}
- Wrong use of no permission as there is a release. If there is evidence of an invalid release, please present the case. --Fæ (talk) 23:11, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Fæ: There's no permission for this file because it doesn't exist at the link https://wellcomecollection.org/works?query=L0075379&wellcomeImagesUrl=/indexplus/image/L0075379.html so may you explain why it has been put under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license and what is its status regarding copyright (when created and where). --Patrick Rogel (talk) 01:18, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
- Linkrot is not a deletion rationale. See EXIF. --Fæ (talk) 01:25, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
- My bad. You're right, I haven't seen the EXIF. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:08, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
- Linkrot is not a deletion rationale. See EXIF. --Fæ (talk) 01:25, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Fæ: There's no permission for this file because it doesn't exist at the link https://wellcomecollection.org/works?query=L0075379&wellcomeImagesUrl=/indexplus/image/L0075379.html so may you explain why it has been put under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license and what is its status regarding copyright (when created and where). --Patrick Rogel (talk) 01:18, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 06:31, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
![06:31, 14 February 2019 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2019/02/07#c-Gbawden-2019-02-14T06:31:00.000Z-File:"This_is_the_Enemy"_MCANW_poster,_1980s_Wellcome_L0075379.jpg){kind=link}
Image is not usable as it is to blurry calle_sa (talk) 23:20, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:29, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Not sure if this is a photograph or a painting. (Please see the cat change I made to the file.) If it is the photograph of a painting (DW in other words) then we need OTRS from the painter. Am I right? E4024 (talk) 02:16, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: clearly a painting. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:37, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Seems like out of project scope (unused logo of non-notable company?). Taivo (talk) 12:13, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:37, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Artsorks are protected 70 years after author's death in Norway. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Norway This sculpture is made by Dyre Vaa, who died in 1980, so pictures of his work can be uploaded in 2051. Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 12:25, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:39, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Artworks are protected 70 years after author's death in Norway. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory/Norway This sculpture is made by Dyre Vaa, who died in 1980, so pictures of his work can be uploaded in 2051. Anne-Sophie Ofrim (talk) 12:26, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:39, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Eugene Savage mosaic files in Category:Épinal Memorial
[edit]This mosaic is the work of Eugene Savage (d. 1978). This work is subject to FOP in France and is thus not in PD.
- File:Epinal Cemetery Savage Mosaic.JPG
- File:Épinal Amerikanischer Friedhof Kapelle 1.jpg
- File:Épinal Amerikanischer Friedhof Kapelle 2.jpg
- File:Épinal Amerikanischer Friedhof Kapelle 3.jpg
Labattblueboy (talk) 13:48, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:42, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Image taken and published without approval by subject. 72.79.212.36 04:29, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
Keep - Not a valid reason. Apparently she was at a book reading which is a public event. AgnosticPreachersKid (talk) 18:36, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Famous people in public events needs no authorization. --Sailko (talk) 11:56, 14 December 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Rosenzweig τ 03:15, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Request from subject at OTRS 2019020610000959 - Deletion as per COM:IDENT. No permission given Ronhjones (Talk) 01:05, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete i ordinarily support deletion upon request. however subject might want to consider the other image File:Edie meidav 142824.jpg which would replace it. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 02:07, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep in use and arguably more flattering than the alternative linked above. This photo was taken at an event in the United States, so assuming it was a public event where the participants had no reasonable expectation of privacy, consent to take and publish a photo is unnecessary. If the subject wishes to provide a better photo with a suitably free license, then that could replace this one. clpo13(talk) 16:42, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- except the photo subject has now nominated, and emailed twice, which suggests an unfamiliarity of the process here. acquiesce is not affirmative consent, regardless of the law. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 02:54, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: The image was taken at a book fair in the United States. Therefore, as noted above, the subject has no right to require us to remove the image. If she appears in public places, in the United States (and many other countries), she must expect that her photograph will be taken and published. As suggested above, she can certainly supply a freely licensed image that she likes better, in which case we would probably remove this one. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:48, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Japan has no Freedom of Panorama for modern artistic statues. Leoboudv (talk) 09:53, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:48, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Photos by August Vannas
[edit]Following photos originate from archive fund of photographer August Vannas (1886–1964) which means that August Vannas is probably the author. So copyright probably hasn't expired and there is no evidence of permission.
--2001:7D0:81F7:B580:C0DF:6D0E:91F4:7EED 11:40, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:56, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
This photo is by August Vannas (1886–1964) per http://www.ra.ee/fotis/index.php?type=2&id=224884, so copyright hasn't expired. 90.191.76.154 09:14, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 15:10, 20 October 2017 (UTC)
This photo is by Parikas brothers as per this archive database entry. So copyright not expired and no evidence of permission. 2001:7D0:81F7:B580:DD91:E883:C93:BC8E 10:53, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:56, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
This is not the flag of Svalbard. It is not acknowledged in any Norwegian laws and has never been acknowledged by the Norwegian government. It has no use as Svalbard uses Norway's flag, and it as such cannot be used on anything related to Svalbard, but judging by the amount of Wikipedia articles this fictional flag is used on, both on the English Wikipedia and otherwise, that hasn't stopped many users from being misled into using it. For this reason, it's for the best to have it deleted, to prevent any future misunderstandings. TyholtApenes (talk) 17:12, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: As acknowledged above, the file is in use all over the place. As described in COM:NPOV, Commons should not delete a used file just because it is inaccurate. @TyholtApenes: I would suggest that you update the description of the file to correctly describe it, and maybe ask for it to be renamed. You might also want to look at the original, File:Flagg av Svalbard.png. @OnWikiNo: You may be interested in this, as the creator of the original. --bjh21 (talk) 18:37, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
- There are virtually no article currently using this. A handful, mainly seemingly translated during a brief period when this was on noWP. Guy 23:15, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
- Keep:Português: Paz e bem! Basta alterar a descrição deixando claro que é bandeira nãooficialEugenio Hansen, OFS (talk) 09:23, 17 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 17:43, 22 February 2018 (UTC)
Svalbard does not have a flag and this fictitious flag is appearing as a real flag in other Wikis. It is not a useful fictional flag and has been deleted before and reuploaded. It does not belong in Wikimedia. GPinkerton (talk) 12:40, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete: This file is now unused, partly by GPinkerton's own efforts. If it stays that way, I think it can finally be deleted. Note, though, that the formerly-deleted "flags of Svalbard" (Flag of Svalbard (local).JPG, Svalbard Flag.svg) seem to have been a completely different flag, shown on https://www.fotw.info/flags/sj-arms.html, so I don't think this is a case for CSD G4. --bjh21 (talk) 16:58, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Inventing flags for Svalbard seems to be popular: the one described in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of Svalbard.png is different again. For anyone visiting this page in the future, this fictional flag of Svalbard is like the flag of Norway but with the red replaced with pale blue. --bjh21 (talk) 17:17, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:02, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
This flag is made up and is in no way official. Provide an official source Cutlerys (talk) 04:31, 2 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete flag is fictitious and is no longer COM:INUSE (it was used on w:pnb:یورپ, but I removed it). --SHB2000 (talk)
- Keep has been in use for a long time (see previous DRs), and therefore is in scope. --PaterMcFly (talk) 10:41, 3 July 2023 (UTC)
- It is not in use now because I removed it from all pages that used it. Fictitious flags are not in scope. SHB2000 (talk) 12:57, 5 July 2023 (UTC)
- Delete Fake flags are out of scope and have no value on any project. All previous flags using this name were deleted for the same reason: there is no Svalbard flag and any file with that name is fictitious, misleading, and out of scope. GPinkerton (talk) 11:11, 19 July 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Jon Kolbert. --Rosenzweig τ 11:30, 20 July 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ohiggins16 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Most likely derivative work. Some low resolution. No EXIF.
1989 (talk) 12:48, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:58, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Skjoldbro as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: according to Getty Images, the author is Walter Stoneman (1876–1958), and was taken in 1942 1989 (talk) 13:17, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- I am new to this, but hasn't the author been dead for over 60 years? I corrected the date and author on the image page in Commons. Is there some other reason for deletion?--Quisqualis (talk) 20:28, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- UK copyright lasts until 70 years after the death of the author, so this will be in copyright until 2028. --bjh21 (talk) 14:04, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:03, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Skjoldbro as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: according to Getty Images, the author is Walter Stoneman (1876–1958), and was taken in 1942 1989 (talk) 13:17, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:04, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
An invented flag attached to unrelated items at hu.wiktionary, like Hong Kong, to prevent deletion. E4024 (talk) 13:24, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:04, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Chiyako92 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Posted to source as "don't edit + don't crop". Not free, not allowed on Commons. 1989 (talk) 17:16, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination -- no free license at the source -- the CC-BY license shown is a fiction. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:07, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Commons:Currency#Poland Ronhjones (Talk) 19:36, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- This is not a coin [Currency#poland], but MEDAL only, so there are not any restrictions to present it on the photo. Iszkowski (talk) 21:37, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- In that case surely it become a 3D artwork, and Freedom of Panorama in Poland only extends to permanently exhibited works of art. Someone designed this medal - there must be some copyright. Ronhjones (Talk) 17:33, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
- Ronjones, hi! Sure, you're right, the designer's personal copyrights are fairly clear. I will send an appropriate application in this matter to OTRS shortly. Ency (talk) 18:08, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
- In that case surely it become a 3D artwork, and Freedom of Panorama in Poland only extends to permanently exhibited works of art. Someone designed this medal - there must be some copyright. Ronhjones (Talk) 17:33, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:08, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Book scan, derivative work 1989 (talk) 19:37, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:08, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- File:Princess Marie Louise of Schleswig-Holstein1.png
- File:Princess Marie Louise of Schleswig-Holstein 1953.jpg
Copyrighted until 2024 in the UK (commercial work created and published by a company in 1953). Not a UK government work. DrKay (talk) 19:40, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:08, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Copyrighted until 2051 in the UK (70 years after death of creator). DrKay (talk) 19:43, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:09, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Creator, who was not a government employee, died in 1958. DrKay (talk) 19:52, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:09, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by DrKay as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: both sources say it's copyrighted and it isn't from before 1949 1989 (talk) 19:55, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:10, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Creator died in 1980. Copyrighted until 2051 in the UK. Copyright retained by Beaton's estate, which was donated to V&A after his death. DrKay (talk) 19:55, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:12, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Extracted from a deleted file: File:Obchody Narodowego Święta Niepodległości (11.11.2018).jpg. Maybe {{PD-Polishsymbol}}? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:39, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- This is {{PD-author|Ministerstwo Spraw Wewnętrznych i Administracji}}
Petralczino (talk) 11:23, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Petralczino: how/why? Flickr Public Domain Mark does not translate to PD-author. PDM is only for content that already is in the public domain, otherwise the Flickr account should have used CC0. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:51, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: PDM is not CC-0 and is not allowed on Commons. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:18, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Life magazine image, not first published in Iraq. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:01, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry, I have changed the name of the country and find it a suitable picture and represent the Iraqi president.Usamasaad 13:33, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Usamasaad: Why do you think that this image is public domain? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:53, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
- Because it was published in newspapers and magazines after the revolution of February 8, 1963, where the Iraqi president went to Egypt to complete the Arab Unity Treaty on 22 February 1963. I think it is a matter of Iraq's general policy. Usamasaad 15:37, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Usamasaad and Patrick Rogel: It is considered a public domain in Egypt. --Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 16:15, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete since country of origin would appear to be the US and 1963 Life Magazines would very likely be copyrighted. Undelete in 2059 Abzeronow (talk) 17:16, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
- I am sorry , Thank you.Usamasaad 09:59, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:28, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A file with the same name was deleted recently. I am not sure, is it the same one? E4024 (talk) 18:02, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Please also see: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Starflareent. --E4024 (talk) 13:46, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:24, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Not an original work by {{Fars}}. The Iranian news agency has most probably no original works about Afghanistan. w:Fars News Agency has been established in 2003, but Bamiyan Buddha statues were regrettably destroyed by Taliban in 2001. 4nn1l2 (talk) 15:14, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, original source is [1] which they licensed it from. Author is still alive, so no foreseeable copyright expiry date..--BevinKacon (talk) 20:36, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:36, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Mister NightMoon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not own work, images taken from physical books 1989 (talk) 19:28, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:34, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Mister NightMoon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Images unlikely own work, scanned from textbook and posted in Wikimedia Commons 1989 (talk) 19:36, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:34, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Mister NightMoon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Images are not own work. Highly possible is scanned from textbook and post to Commons 1989 (talk) 19:36, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:33, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
This "portrait" has been messed with, just look at it. Not usable. Bishonen (talk) 22:09, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:19, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:26, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:03, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Photo: Bernd Brundert 2018, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:38, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: Do you have a source to show the author? Tineye didn't find it nor google Gbawden (talk) 06:33, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Gbawden: Yes, same series as here. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:12, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as per nom Gbawden (talk) 12:16, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Gbawden: Yes, same series as here. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:12, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:02, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:OOjs UI icon image-ltr.svg — Newslinger talk 14:23, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:05, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:OOjs UI icon reference.svg — Newslinger talk 14:26, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:05, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Source:Dolatjan. Author:Dolatjan. Uploader someone else. Is this PD? E4024 (talk) 15:23, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:06, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Low resolution, bad quality, no EXIF, most likely derivative work 1989 (talk) 15:34, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:06, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
The photograph is a news cutting from the British Newspaper Archive using an article from the Aberdeen Journal. No photographer name is available and would not be possible to source due to its age. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Highlandfootballedits (talk • contribs) 00:04, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:06, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Highlandfootballedits (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:North Caledonian League Championship trophy.jpg
- File:The new North Caledonian Cup trophy.jpg
- File:A victorious Thurso F.C. with the PCT North Cup in 2004..jpg
- File:Thurso F.C. - victorious holders of the PCT North Caledonian Cup.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination+derivative worlks issues for the two first. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:08, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Das Bild ist hochkant. Neue Version wurde korrigiert eingestellt. Christine Primke (talk) 12:14, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Datei:Werner_von_Schmieden_1956_Stra%C3%9Fburg.jpg Christine Primke (talk) 12:14, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: file was already deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 22:33, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: file was already deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 22:33, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Nominated by Gbawden as selfie. Kges1901 (talk) 12:29, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Used on enwiki to illustrate subject's article. Kges1901 (talk) 12:30, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: file was already deleted. --Rosenzweig τ 22:33, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
parce que c est chiant 164.177.115.42 14:19, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --1989 (talk) 09:15, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Infineon 4MB DDR-SGRAM.png, which was taken from my old Flickr portfolio along with the biased (i.e. unsuitable for Wikipedia) description. Trio3D (talk) 19:07, 30 July 2016 (UTC)
Actually, it is not a duplicate.
Yes, same photo cropped and rotated.
Kept: Not exact or scaled down duplicate. --Sanandros (talk) 22:23, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
This old photo was sourced from my discontinued flickr account back in the day. I've since uploaded a higher-res PNG on white background (File:ASUS V6800 Deluxe (Infineon DDR-SGRAM).png, and I kindly request this version to be considered obsolete and superseded. Trio3D (talk) 08:51, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Keep Not exact or scaled down duplicate. — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 188.110.55.143 (talk) 04:50, 25 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:08, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
w:de:Recht am eigenen Bild (Deutschland) and no permission from the people on the picture dokumented Codc (talk) 14:30, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Gesteigertes Informationsinteresse der Öffentlichkeit besteht — Preceding unsigned comment added by Schnawwel432 (talk • contribs) 14:53, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Definitely public interest --GPSLeo (talk) 22:58, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 10:09, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
w:de:Recht am eigenen Bild (Deutschland) and no permission from the people on the picture dokumented Codc (talk) 14:32, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Definitely public interest and punished by the persons on the picture. --GPSLeo (talk) 22:59, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; no permission. --Gbawden (talk) 10:10, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Visuel ancien, portant préjudice au sujet (droit à l'image) 109.190.190.71 11:18, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- Cette photo date de 9 ans, et fut prise sans aucune volonté de nuire, d'ailleurs elle n'est même pas en ligne sur la page wiki dédiée... Vous y allez fort, en parlant de "porter préjudice". Une action qui porterait bien plus "préjudice" serait de proposer la page de Wikipédia en français en procédure de suppression... --Tsaag Valren (talk) 11:27, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Taken in a public place. No valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 12:23, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 19:46, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Msaynevirta as Copyvio (Copyvio) 1989 (talk) 13:06, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 19:56, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
This file is a low-quality attempt to convert File:Aliasing-folding.png to type .svg. This file is not linked to by any articles. Bob K (talk) 19:19, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose, as creator – it's not beautiful, but compared to the alternative file, it has several advantages:
- SVG, not PNG
- Simpler – not cluttered with many annotations or curved lines
- Linear & interpretable – directly shows the map from original frequency to aliased frequency, rather than showing a spectrum.
- Symmetry is obvious – this file is used to demonstrate a certain symmetry group, and it's easy to see from the simple diagram, without the distraction of details from frequency analysis.
- —Nils von Barth (nbarth) (talk) 00:02, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
- Also Oppose. I believe I was hasty in my nomination, and I apologize. Also, before reading this, I just uploaded an SVG version of File:Aliasing-folding.png, which can be reverted if necessary, and I will understand. But I would like to point out that it is not depicting a spectrum (as erroneously stated above). For that we have File:Example of spectral "folding" caused by sampling a real-valued waveform.png. It is an example of one sinusoid and some its aliases. The solid red line is an example of how those aliases would change if the signal's frequency and amplitude are changed. The purpose of the curvature is to emphasize the arbitrariness of those changes. I believe the linearity of the previous figure is actually misleading or at least not clear what it means.
- Let me assure you that I'm just trying to help, but revert if you're not convinced. Thank you for listening, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.
- --Bob K (talk) 13:41, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
- OK, upon further thought, I finally understand the vertical scale of the linear version, which explains the linearity, and I have reverted my upload. What actually got me started down this dead-end path is that I converted File:Aliasing-folding.png to an SVG version and tried to upload to File:Aliasing-folding.svg, which resulted in a name conflict. So now I will upload to a different name.
- --Bob K (talk) 14:00, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: still in use. --JuTa 19:41, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
This file is a low-quality derivative of File:Aliasing-folding.png, but in .svg filetype. This file is not linked to by any articles. Bob K (talk) 19:22, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- Support, as creator – I thought it would be useful, but it hasn't been, and it's easy to recreate if necessary.
- —Nils von Barth (nbarth) (talk) 00:05, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 19:39, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
L'édifice et les œuvres artistiques ont moins de 150 ans et auteurs sont décédés depuis moins de 70 ans Didier Hgn (talk) 22:01, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 19:59, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by BevinKacon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: unfree stock image © Henri Bureau.Sygma/CORBIS 1989 (talk) 22:21, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: by nomination. --JuTa 19:52, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by BevinKacon as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: unfree stock image © David Rubinger/CORBIS 1989 (talk) 22:21, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 19:54, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
Shot in Egypt, not Iraq. When has it first published and in which country? Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:58, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry, I have changed the name of the country and find it a suitable picture and represent the Iraqi president.Usamasaad 13:30, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Usamasaad: where's the evidence that this picture has been published one day, first in Egypt and at which date? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:55, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
- I think it's a general picture. Because it was published in newspapers and magazines after the revolution of February 8, 1963, in Iraq. where the Iraqi president went to Egypt to complete the Arab Unity Treaty on 22 February 1963. I think it is a matter of Iraq's general policy.Usamasaad 15:41, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Usamasaad: what we call "eiidence" is e.g. a scan of a newspaper published in 1963, not a 2019 website. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:34, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
- I think it's a general picture. Because it was published in newspapers and magazines after the revolution of February 8, 1963, in Iraq. where the Iraqi president went to Egypt to complete the Arab Unity Treaty on 22 February 1963. I think it is a matter of Iraq's general policy.Usamasaad 15:41, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
- I am sorry, Thank you.Usamasaad 10:01, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Usamasaad: where's the evidence that this picture has been published one day, first in Egypt and at which date? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:55, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: looks OK now. --JuTa 19:37, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not found at URL, please modify. 1989 (talk) 23:17, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- This is a derivated work, not a copivio. I added this template to the description: This file was derived from: Lou Anna Simon crop.jpg by Bike Ann Arbor
Please, if the template is incorrect, I appreciate help to fix it. Señoritaleona (talk) 05:35, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: but the "frame" makes it unuseable. --JuTa 19:58, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not found at URL, please modify. 1989 (talk) 23:17, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- This is a derivated work, not a copivio. I added this template to the description: This file was derived from: Ayesha Riyaz (cropped).jpg by IAEA Imagebank
.jpg){kind=link}
Please, if the template is incorrect, I appreciate help to fix it.Señoritaleona (talk) 05:40, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: but the "frame" makes it unuseable. --JuTa 19:43, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not found at URL, please modify. 1989 (talk) 23:18, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- This is a derivated work, not a copivio. I added this template to the description: This file was derived from: Ileana Yahaira Molo Alvarado Panamá Defensores ambiente (33113712120) (cropped).jpg by Daniel Cima/CIDH
Please, if the template is incorrect, I appreciate help to fix it.Señoritaleona (talk) 05:51, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
_(cropped).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: but the "frame" makes it unuseable. --JuTa 19:48, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
This photo originates from archive fund of photographer Artur Kalm which means that Artur Kalm is probably the author. As per newspaper snippet photographer Artur Kalm died in 1987. So copyright probably hasn't expired and there is no evidence of permission. 2001:7D0:81F7:B580:C0DF:6D0E:91F4:7EED 12:00, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 20:05, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Achmadmaulanaibr (talk · contribs)
[edit]False license: copyrights are hold by their respective owners, not the government of Indonesia.
- Comment Some are OK, some not (hold by the various policical parties). --Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:36, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Why some are OK, some are not? kindly please elaborate. Also, i think government of Indonesia are copyrights holder of indonesian government agency logo (some of them are mentioned below, such as OJK, ombudsman, bawaslu, BPOM, and etc). --Ckfasdf (talk) 02:33, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Ckfasdf: it's written above: some works are hold by various policical parties, not the government: e.g. File:Partai Reformasi (Indonesia).png by Partai Reformasi, File:Logo Partai Swara Rakyat Indonesia.png by Partai Swara Rakyat Indonesia and so on... --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:43, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: Sorry, I missed your point on logo of gov't agencies... so gov't agencies logo are all OK. However for political party logo, according to Indonesian Copyright Act No 28 Year 2014 Chapter VI Article 43 Point d, distribution of copyrighted material is allowed for non commercial purpose (note that 'PD-IDGov' still refer to outdated copyright act.) and based on same Act Point b, Any Publication, Distribution, Communication, and/or Reproduction executed by or on behalf of the government are not copyright infringement, Since political party logo is also distributed by gov't agency (KPU/General Election Commision). Therefore, I believe that they are also OK.--Ckfasdf (talk) 12:54, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- No, Government of Indonesia can't release under such a license a work he's not the author of. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:00, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- You can say anything, but that is the rule in Indonesia as written on article 43 of latest copyright act. --Ckfasdf (talk) 09:28, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Ckfasdf: Once again you're wrong. Copyright (which lasts generally 70 years after the date of creation) doesn't magicaly disappear simply because a work is copyied elsewhere. Only the copyright holders (which are the various policical parties) may put it under a Creative Commons license. Nevertheless I don't know why you're intervening here since you're not the uploader so please wait for an Administrator's decision. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:42, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: Who decide copyright lasts around 70 years after date of creation? I believe it's the law who decide that and the law that we refer in this case is Indonesian copyright act, CMIIW. That law dictate an act which is not considered as copyright infringements, including "the production and distribution of the Copyrighted content through information technology and communication media that are not commercial and/or lucrative for the Author or related parties". Since I believe wikimedia commons is not intended for commercial purpose, therefore it should be OK to put the logo of various indonesian political party here. But OK.. let's wait for an Administrator decision. --Ckfasdf (talk) 15:22, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- First and though I'm not a specialist of International law it seems to me that treaties (Indonesia has signed 2002 the WIPO Copyright Treaty) are superior to local laws. Second Indonesia itself has decided the 70 years. Finaly commercial use must be allowed on Commons and it has nothing to do with copyright: IMO there's a confusion with fair use which is tolerated on some Wikipedias but not on Commons. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:27, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- As far as I know, WIPO copyright treaty acknowledges copyright limitation and commercial use of any files on Commons are still subject to copyright restriction. IMO --Ckfasdf (talk) 1:28, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
- First and though I'm not a specialist of International law it seems to me that treaties (Indonesia has signed 2002 the WIPO Copyright Treaty) are superior to local laws. Second Indonesia itself has decided the 70 years. Finaly commercial use must be allowed on Commons and it has nothing to do with copyright: IMO there's a confusion with fair use which is tolerated on some Wikipedias but not on Commons. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:27, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: Who decide copyright lasts around 70 years after date of creation? I believe it's the law who decide that and the law that we refer in this case is Indonesian copyright act, CMIIW. That law dictate an act which is not considered as copyright infringements, including "the production and distribution of the Copyrighted content through information technology and communication media that are not commercial and/or lucrative for the Author or related parties". Since I believe wikimedia commons is not intended for commercial purpose, therefore it should be OK to put the logo of various indonesian political party here. But OK.. let's wait for an Administrator decision. --Ckfasdf (talk) 15:22, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Ckfasdf: Once again you're wrong. Copyright (which lasts generally 70 years after the date of creation) doesn't magicaly disappear simply because a work is copyied elsewhere. Only the copyright holders (which are the various policical parties) may put it under a Creative Commons license. Nevertheless I don't know why you're intervening here since you're not the uploader so please wait for an Administrator's decision. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:42, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- You can say anything, but that is the rule in Indonesia as written on article 43 of latest copyright act. --Ckfasdf (talk) 09:28, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- No, Government of Indonesia can't release under such a license a work he's not the author of. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:00, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: Sorry, I missed your point on logo of gov't agencies... so gov't agencies logo are all OK. However for political party logo, according to Indonesian Copyright Act No 28 Year 2014 Chapter VI Article 43 Point d, distribution of copyrighted material is allowed for non commercial purpose (note that 'PD-IDGov' still refer to outdated copyright act.) and based on same Act Point b, Any Publication, Distribution, Communication, and/or Reproduction executed by or on behalf of the government are not copyright infringement, Since political party logo is also distributed by gov't agency (KPU/General Election Commision). Therefore, I believe that they are also OK.--Ckfasdf (talk) 12:54, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Ckfasdf: it's written above: some works are hold by various policical parties, not the government: e.g. File:Partai Reformasi (Indonesia).png by Partai Reformasi, File:Logo Partai Swara Rakyat Indonesia.png by Partai Swara Rakyat Indonesia and so on... --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:43, 10 February 2019 (UTC)
File:OJK Logo.pngOKFile:Logo-full-2-600-reduced.x25718.pngOKFile:Lsf logo utama.pngOKFile:Logo Ombudsman.pngOKFile:Logo Bawaslu.pngOK- File:Partai Reformasi (Indonesia).png
- File:Logo Partai Swara Rakyat Indonesia.png
- File:Lambang Partai Rakyat.jpg
- File:Lambang Partai Bhinneka Indonesia (PBI).png
- File:Lambang Partai Indonesia Kerja.png
- File:Peureute Gabthat.png
- File:Partai Islam Aceh.jpg
- File:Logo Partai Gabungan Rakyat Aceh Mandiri.jpg
- File:Logo Partai Pemersatu Bangsa.png
- File:Logo Partai Idaman.png
- File:Lambang Partai Aceh.jpg
- File:Logo Partai SIRA (2017).png
- File:Lambang Partai Nanggroe Aceh.png
- File:Lambang Partai Daerah Aceh.png
File:Logo PDKB.pngOK <-- this is also political party (not gov't agency), so why this is OK?- File:Logo Partai Nasional Indonesia - Front Marhaenis.jpg
- File:PDIPLogo.png
- File:Logo PDI-Perjuangan Transparent.png
File:Logo ANRI (2016).jpgOKFile:Logo Badan POM.pngOKFile:BPKP Logo.pngOKFile:Kemenpora Logo.pngOKFile:BEKRAF.pngOKFile:Logo BPN-KemenATR (2017).pngOKFile:Kemendes Logo.pngOK- File:Partai Bulan Bintang Logo.jpg
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:33, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep File:Logo Badan POM.png is a logo of an Indonesian Government agency and therefore the copyright would indeed belong to the Indonesian Government. Several others are too simple such as File:Logo Partai SIRA (2017).png and File:Lambang Partai Aceh.jpg and File:Lambang Partai Nanggroe Aceh.png and File:Partai Bulan Bintang Logo.jpg. Fry1989 eh? 01:31, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: most, kept some based on discussion. --JuTa 20:21, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Achmadmaulanaibr (talk · contribs)
[edit]False license: copyrights are hold by their respective owners, not the government of Indonesia.
- File:Logo Partai Kebangkitan Bangsa.png
File:Logo Partai Amanat Nasional.pngFile:Logo Partai Nanggroe Aceh.pngFile:Logo Partai Bulan Bintang.pngFile:Partai Masyumi Baru.png- File:Logo Partai RepublikaN.png
- File:Partai Bintang Reformasi (Indonesia).jpg
- File:PDI Perjuangan.png
- File:GolkarLogo.png
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Patrick Rogel (talk) 09:25, 19 September 2019 (UTC)
- Look, I recreated this logo my own using CorelDraw in high quality based on website of each website, I do not use licence of Government of Indonesia Patrick Rogel. User:Achmadmaulanaibr 21:39, 20 September 2019 (UTC+8)
- @Achmadmaulanaibr: Yes you are right but this not mean logos are free. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:56, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The logos are still copyrighted by their original owners even if they are recreated. A few of them are simple enough to not be covered by copyright, however. Please feel free to reupload to the Indonesian Wikipedia locally (as they do accept fair use). --Kaldari (talk) 00:28, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
L'édifice et les œuvres artistiques ont moins de 150 ans et auteurs sont décédés depuis moins de 70 ans Didier Hgn (talk) 22:03, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 20:00, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
L'édifice et les œuvres artistiques ont moins de 150 ans et auteurs sont décédés depuis moins de 70 ans Didier Hgn (talk) 22:04, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 20:01, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
L'édifice et les œuvres artistiques ont moins de 150 ans et auteurs sont décédés depuis moins de 70 ans Didier Hgn (talk) 22:05, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 20:02, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rejebfaouz (talk · contribs)
[edit]non-notable person
1989 (talk) 22:28, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- @1989: He appears to be a published author so probably notable. They aren't personal images so probably in scope Gbawden (talk) 06:35, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --JuTa 20:23, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
Shot in Lebanon, not Iraq. Where first published and in which country? Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:05, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- Thank you, I have changed the name of the country and find it a pretty good picture. Usamasaad 13:27, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
- If copyrighted (c) eltaher.org I suppose it's not a free picture and the author is not unknown. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 01:24, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
- Ok, I am sorry, But it seems to me that it is a free Picture taken in 1961. you can delete it. thank you. Usamasaad 07:57, 30 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --JuTa 20:07, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not found at URL, please modify. 1989 (talk) 23:19, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
- This is a derivated work, not a copivio. I added this template to the description: This file was derived from: Mariana Gheorghe (2015).jpg by Willem Popelier
Please, if the template is incorrect, I appreciate help to fix it.Señoritaleona (talk) 05:58, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: but the "frame" makes it unuseable. --JuTa 20:03, 15 June 2019 (UTC)
