Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/01/31
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
The logo appears to be invisible due to the color being altered during the conversion process. Bryantriplex (talk) 05:30, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted as F7 - The svg text shows just a blank box. Also there was a facebook link, but no cc-zero statement in Facebook. --Ronhjones (Talk) 17:32, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:31, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Not PD : Grandjouan (né le 22 décembre 1875 à Nantes - mort le 12 novembre 1968) Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 18:00, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - speedy as previously deleted. — Racconish 💬 18:24, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
The file format conversion resulted in the text being unclear. Bryantriplex (talk) 05:54, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:50, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
This file can be deleted! I replaced it because of some small errors with: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Synthese_von_Maleins%C3%A4ure.svg Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 16:46, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 21:34, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Displays with a blurred company slogan JE Triton (talk) 10:07, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:32, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:04, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. Used in promotional Wikidata item. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:32, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
(c) Palshkov Nikita Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:21, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Ronhjones at 20:29, 31 Januar 2019 UTC: Previously deleted file --Krdbot 02:11, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: страница принадлежит журналу или авторам журнала Dogad75 (talk) 20:32, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 06:59, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Spam and advertisement --Alaa :)..! 16:39, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:55, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ataba opeyemi (talk · contribs)
[edit]private images, out of project scope
- File:Benin city.JPG
- File:CONVO 7.jpg
- File:Ope award night.jpg
- File:CONVOcation.jpg
- File:Award two.jpg
Krd 15:14, 12 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 17:09, 19 September 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ataba opeyemi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
- File:ATABA OPEYEMI WEDDING.jpg
- File:ATABA OPEYEMI MY WONDERFUL PARENTS.jpg
- File:Ataba Opeyemi.jpg
- File:CEO mowit kulture.jpg
- File:Ataba Opeyemi pdf.pdf
- File:Ataba Opeyemi Award Night.jpg
Ies (talk) 12:29, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ataba opeyemi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possible copyvios. Copyright holders are Peter Adams and David Sacks
T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 13:18, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:07, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish 💬 12:08, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
Wrong Title Benashraf111 (talk) 11:49, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Keep –- May be deleted over an implausible authorship claim. Sorry, didn’t notice {{Own}} timely. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 14:51, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: PD-Lebanon. Ruthven (msg) 16:59, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by FRONT AGUA PURIFICADA (talk · contribs)
[edit]Spam and/or out of scope. All files loaded by (apparent) representative of company. App seems to be purely means to order filtered water from this company.[1]
- File:F R O N T LOGO.jpg
- File:F R O N T SERVICIO EXCLUSIVO.jpg
- File:Ordene F R O N T.jpg
- File:Servicio F R O N T.jpg
- File:F R O N T.jpg
- File:F R O N T Agua Purificada.jpg
Ubcule (talk) 21:42, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:32, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by TheDragonFire as Copyvio (SD) and the most recent rationale was: F1 (Apparent copyright violation)
- TheDragonFire rightfully points that the file is not explicitely licensed as CC BY 3.0 on the ticket. The copyright holder gave us the right "to use the picture anyway(sic) that we may need" and post for others to use for free. He does ask to be credited.
Problematic points:
- It doesn't convey the right to modify the work
- The right for reusers to have the same rights that we are given seems to be intended, but isn't explicit.
Although this is a 2009 ticket, it seems worth to attempt clarifying these points.
Platonides (talk) 23:25, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Comment I have emailed the author asking for a clarification. Platonides (talk) 00:03, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- See 2019012910004173. --Krenair (talk • contribs) 00:49, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (at request of OTRS agent handling ticket). --Nick (talk) 09:19, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
bad upload, try again Mjrmtg (talk) 18:29, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:47, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:30, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:47, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
bad upload, try again Mjrmtg (talk) 18:36, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; F7. --Gbawden (talk) 06:46, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
It does not look like a free image. E4024 (talk) 18:42, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:46, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
copyvio, promo MiguelAlanCS (talk) 19:10, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:44, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
copyvio, promo MiguelAlanCS (talk) 19:11, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:44, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
copyvio, promo MiguelAlanCS (talk) 19:13, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:44, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Personal photo. Out of scope. // sikander { talk } 19:26, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:42, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Not own work. Copied from http://ellosyellas.com.pe/reportajes/reportajes-internacionales/bajo-la-lupa-99f3 // sikander { talk } 19:29, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio, not own work. --Gbawden (talk) 06:43, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Personal image. Out of scope. // sikander { talk } 19:30, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:42, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Personal image. Out of scope. // sikander { talk } 19:30, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:33, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Personal image. Out of scope. // sikander { talk } 19:31, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:32, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Personal image. Out of scope. // sikander { talk } 19:31, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:32, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
poor image quality, no purpose Tukka (talk) 19:42, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:32, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
poor quality, other pictures available of Pijperring, Delft Tukka (talk) 19:50, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:32, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
poor image quality, no purpose, many other pictures available of Kerkpolder, Delft Tukka (talk) 19:53, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:32, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alvarez uliana (talk · contribs)
[edit]Quality too low to be useful.
BevinKacon (talk) 19:55, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:31, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
poor image quality Tukka (talk) 20:08, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:28, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
COM:NOTHOST - unused, low quality, non-notable person Эlcobbola talk 20:31, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:27, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Low quality selfie. Not used. Nv8200p (talk) 20:39, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:28, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
poor quality Tukka (talk) 20:56, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:27, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. Not used. blurred. Nv8200p (talk) 20:58, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:26, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
poor quality Tukka (talk) 20:58, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:26, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. Not used personal photo. Nv8200p (talk) 21:00, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:24, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
poor quality Tukka (talk) 21:00, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:24, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Not used anywhere Mbch331 (talk) 21:02, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:20, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Unused promotional photo Nv8200p (talk) 21:03, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:20, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:18, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:18, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 07:18, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:01, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:18, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:01, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:16, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:13, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by NavinPrabhakar1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Top 5 Comedian - Navin Prabhakar.jpg
- File:No.1 Comedian in india.jpg
- File:Top 5 Comedians in india.jpg
- File:No.1 Comedian.jpg
- File:2016 Top Comedian.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 07:13, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jacoballey5 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:11, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:11, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:11, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:10, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:02, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:02, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Spam, out of scope. Ubcule (talk) 16:19, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:00, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Inzamam quraishi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, not used for personal purposes.
- File:Inzamam hacking.jpg
- File:Inzamam.jpg
- File:Inzamam with his wepon 2.jpg
- File:Inzamam 2.jpg
- File:Inzamam with his wepon.jpg
User already blocked at English Wikipedia. ("Bbb23 (talk | contribs) blocked Inzamam quraishi (talk | contribs) with an expiration time of indefinite (account creation blocked) (Clearly not here to contribute to the encyclopedia)") Ubcule (talk) 16:22, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:00, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
spam and advertisement --Alaa :)..! 16:40, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:58, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
out of scope MehdiTalk 16:47, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:57, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
bad upload, try again Mjrmtg (talk) 16:58, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:57, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
bad upload, try again Mjrmtg (talk) 16:58, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:57, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 17:44, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:56, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 17:52, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:57, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Any metadata except FBMD=any evidence it's an U.S. Government work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:53, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, Appears on official senate page. [2] [3]. Connormah (talk | contribs) 00:09, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- Speedy keep per Connormah. Gage (talk) 03:17, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, it appears on her official .gov senate page and is therefore a U.S. government work. Pharexia (talk)
Kept: As per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 06:54, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE personal images.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:02, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Currently INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 06:53, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:03, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:52, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
bad upload, try again Mjrmtg (talk) 18:03, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:52, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Apparently not been shot at a Bollywood party or event in India. Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:08, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep - AFAIG, Actor Elijah Wood visited India to perform across Mumbai, Delhi and Hyderabad. Kind regards, — TBhagat (contribs | talk) 05:02, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Has OTRS permission. --Gbawden (talk) 06:51, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Apparently not been shot at a Bollywood party or event in India. Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:09, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep - AFAIG, Snoop Dogg - Adidas bash was held in Mumbai on the 10th of January at Aurus in Juhu. Kind regards, — TBhagat (contribs | talk) 04:48, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Has OTRS permission. --Gbawden (talk) 06:51, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:18, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:50, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
bad upload, try again Mjrmtg (talk) 18:19, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:49, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
COM:NUDITY Ronhjones (Talk) 00:09, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:41, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal file, out of scope. E4024 (talk) 01:25, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:41, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal file; out of scope. E4024 (talk) 01:27, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:40, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal file; out of scope. E4024 (talk) 01:28, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:40, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal file; out of scope. E4024 (talk) 01:29, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:40, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Of of scope: COM:SELFIE — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:09, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- This is a photo of me I want removed Michael14375 (talk) 09:47, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:40, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope: personal photo — JJMC89 (T·C) 02:11, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- I don't need this photo anymore and I want it removed — Michael14375 (talk) 09:44, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:39, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Promotional image, not used on any page on any project. Risker (talk) 04:07, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:39, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:Ramon FVelasquez
[edit]- File:NCCAIntramurosjf9983 13.JPG
- File:NCCAIntramurosjf9983 14.JPG
- File:NCCAIntramurosjf9983 16.JPG
- File:NCCAIntramurosjf9983 17.JPG
- File:NCCAIntramurosjf9983 18.JPG
- File:NCCAIntramurosjf9983 19.JPG
- File:NCCAIntramurosjf9983 27.JPG
- File:NCCAIntramurosjf9983 28.JPG
Per Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2019/01#Are these photos acceptable in Commons?, these files are images of modern art works in the National Commission for Culture and the Arts building, the Philippines, where there are no COM:FOP Philippines. Therefore, the files may be copyrighted by the original authors of the artists and unfree.--廣九直通車 (talk) 05:09, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Delete per nom, prp. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:15, 31 January 2019 (UTC)- Delete. No FOP Philippines, and no credible claim to de minimis for architecture of the walls or whatever for these exact images. --Animalparty (talk) 05:19, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: As per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:39, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Promotional image not used on any project or page. Apparent copyvio based on watermark. Risker (talk) 05:17, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. No source or exif info. --Gbawden (talk) 07:38, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Charan Karnakanti (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 05:56, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: One kept as INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 07:37, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CopperCrane01 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Nonsense image uploaded to vandalize in en:Alan Thompson (broadcaster). Not realitically useful for an educational: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 06:03, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:36, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CopperCrane01 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 31 July 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — Tulsi Bhagat [ contribs | talk ] 03:19, 7 August 2021 (UTC)
Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 06:10, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:31, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Nonsense upload, not realitically useful for an educational purpose and as the nonsense description and nonsense category show not intended to be useful: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 06:38, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Support deletion. Agree with nominator. --Cayambe (talk) 07:29, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:31, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kareem Fikrey (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 06:41, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:30, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by سلمى وغيداء (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 07:13, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:30, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Personal image, out of project scope. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 09:55, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:29, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 10:45, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:29, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Photo: Aleksandr Kulikov Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:41, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:27, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
(c) Jens Sauerbrey www.facebook.com/ansichtssachen Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:44, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:27, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Photo: WITOLD KRYMSRYS, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:23, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:26, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Photo: JULIUS_KONTTINEN, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:49, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not own work. --Gbawden (talk) 07:26, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Historical map. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Looks 18th Century as indicated by description. Abzeronow (talk) 17:27, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Matthaus Seutter (1678-1757) was one of the most important and prolific German map publishers of the 18th century. This map represents the Paraguay Provinces controlled by the Jesuits around 1740. There is a copy in the Bibliotheque National de France (https://gallica.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/btv1b8596664n) as well as a very similar one. Other copìes can be found in various antique maps dealers sites. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Coquemp (talk • contribs) 22:50, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Kept as per discussion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:23, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:22, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Samshersinghbeniyaaz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Neeraj and Shaan.jpg
- File:Neeraj and Roop Kumar.jpg
- File:Neeraj Shrivastava.jpg
- File:GDG Music Director.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:22, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alishereen (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:21, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nelsonopoku (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:21, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:20, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by NICOLAS ALVAREZ (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- I Agree with EugeneZelenko and marked the files for speedy deletion.--AutomobilePassion (talk) 19:59, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by another admin. --Gbawden (talk) 07:20, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; likely copyvio. --Gbawden (talk) 07:20, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:19, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Not used anywhere Mbch331 (talk) 21:00, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Gbawden at 06:23, 7 Februar 2019 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Pngos.png --Krdbot 13:55, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
There is too much space in the image that is not being filled up by the logo. Bryantriplex (talk) 06:05, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Delete: The file qualifies for speedy deletion for two reasons:
- Criterion G7 "Author or uploader request deletion"
- Criterion F8 "Exact or scaled-down duplicate" of Arista Records monochrome logo.svg
TilmannR (talk) 13:29, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:31, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Immomakler (talk · contribs)
[edit]The images were uploaded within two weeks around New Year 2018, all without a description and without a file name indicating the content. The uploader was not active since then. All the images have filenames not relating to the content, but advertising for a company. Further all have a licence which is not compatible with Commons because the uploader requires requires a link to his company's website. (See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files of User:Immomakler which was meant as a mass deletion request. I was told later that for such a mass-deletion the tagging and notification of all affected images is a necessity.)
Bjs (talk) 13:31, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:27, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
British photograph from 1945-1950. PDM on Flickr. Could be PD-UK-unknown if before 1949 but more information on the photograph would be needed. Probably can't be hosted here until at least 2021. Abzeronow (talk) 16:56, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:12, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Borujerdma (talk · contribs)
[edit]Governmental documents are copyright protected in Iran. These works are not old enough to be in the public domain. They are from 20 years ago, at most.
- File:TAPSCANNER ۲۰۱۹۰۱۱۶ ۱۰۳۷۳۵ 69.jpg
- File:TAPSCANNER ۲۰۱۹۰۱۱۶ ۱۰۳۵۳۳ 78.jpg
- File:TAPSCANNER ۲۰۱۹۰۱۱۶ ۱۰۳۲۲۵ 95.jpg
- File:TAPSCANNER ۲۰۱۹۰۱۱۶ ۱۰۲۲۰۴ 84.jpg
- File:TAPSCANNER ۲۰۱۹۰۱۱۶ ۱۰۱۹۳۴ 138.jpg
- File:TAPSCANNER ۲۰۱۹۰۱۱۶ ۱۰۱۷۲۹ 80.jpg
- File:TAPSCANNER ۲۰۱۹۰۱۱۶ ۱۰۱۴۰۵ 99.jpg
- File:TAPSCANNER ۲۰۱۹۰۱۱۶ ۱۰۱۱۰۱ 99.jpg
- File:TAPSCANNER ۲۰۱۹۰۱۱۶ ۱۰۰۳۱۸ 112.jpg
- File:TAPSCANNER ۲۰۱۹۰۱۱۶ ۱۰۰۰۵۳ 104.jpg
- File:TAPSCANNER ۲۰۱۹۰۱۱۶ ۰۹۵۱۴۴ 144.jpg
- File:TAPSCANNER ۲۰۱۹۰۱۱۶ ۰۹۴۶۴۸ 92.jpg
- File:TAPSCANNER ۲۰۱۹۰۱۱۶ ۰۹۱۰۵۶ 87.jpg
4nn1l2 (talk) 05:27, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:51, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Iamtigersid (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope, currently used on a promotional userpage tagged for deletion
- File:Tiger Sid in Fun Republic.jpg
- File:Tiger Sid is in Fun Republic Mall,Gomti Nagar,Lucknow.jpg
- File:Tiger Sid At Photoshoot.jpg
- File:Tiger Sid 2017.jpg
- File:Tiger Sid on Dilkusha.jpg
- File:Tiger Sid.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 13:50, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:51, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ام محمد زينب (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low resolution, from FB/Instagram (see Metadata). Unlikely Own work, not in use.
— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 09:33, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:42, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted poster B dash (talk) 09:42, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
•Nǐ hǎo B dash Thanks. I will ask IKEA to release the poster to creative commons soon. Geraldshields11 (talk) 17:21, 31 January 2019 (UTC) o
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:42, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
not own work as claimed, but from Christoph Riebli from Newspaper "Neue Obwaldner Zeitung", see EXIF data, copied from here: https://www.luzernerzeitung.ch/zentralschweiz/obwalden/sarnen-naturliebhaber-und-forschender-reporter-ld.111416 Alpöhi (talk) 10:27, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 10:43, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Low quality/out of scope Gbawden (talk) 10:42, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:34, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Statue by sculptor Knud Nellemose from 1981. Mr Nellemose died in 1997. No freedom of panorama in Denmark. Pugilist (talk) 11:48, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:39, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
duplicate exists File:Pred Valentinovih hlevom pred 1920.jpg Hladnikm (talk) 11:54, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, add redirection. --Wdwd (talk) 12:38, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
See COM:PACKAGING. Yann (talk) 12:11, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, PCP. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 20:06, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:35, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission from copyright holder. Taivo (talk) 12:27, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 12:42, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Marcus Cyron as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: It's a poster, of course not free See [4]. Yann (talk) 12:39, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Deutsch: Der Vereinsvorsitzende hat mich gestern Abend noch versucht zu kontaktieren - bitte noch nicht löschen.!----Metilsteiner (talk) 09:09, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
- Deutsch: Der Verein BRC 05 Friedrichroda e.V. ist Rechteinhaber und gestattet die Verwendung dieses Bildmotives unter CC0 1.0 Universal (CC0 1.0) Public Domain Dedication - für weitere Rückfragen steht der Vereinsvorsitzende Herr Möller unter s-moeller-froda<at>freenet.de gerne zur Verfügung.--Metilsteiner (talk) 18:23, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing permission. --Wdwd (talk) 12:43, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
There is a complete oneː File:Ceramic work presented at the The Gallery of Mariam and Eranuhi Aslamazyan Sisters.jpg JopkeB (talk) 13:02, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: corrupt/broken file. --Wdwd (talk) 12:45, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Collage without proper licencing. E4024 (talk) 01:42, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:17, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal file; out of scope. E4024 (talk) 01:48, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:17, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Promotional image, not used on any page on any project. Risker (talk) 04:07, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:18, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Promotional image not used on any project, licensing is probably not correct. Risker (talk) 04:58, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:19, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Promotional image not used on any page on any project. Licensing is probably not correct. Risker (talk) 05:09, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:19, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Promotional image not used on any page on any project. Licensing is probably not correct. Risker (talk) 05:09, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:20, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
File:Statue of Liberty holding Syrian girl art at NoBanNoWallSF Rally - Feb 4, 2017 (32731734035).jpg
[edit]Derivative work of a copyrighted poster B dash (talk) 06:07, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:20, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Nonsense upload, not realitically useful for an educational: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 06:10, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:20, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Topbossplasticlagunaplant (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commercial advertisement, SPAM: out of project scope.
- File:Jumbo Plastic linoleum Floormatting Congratulations Catriona Gray.jpg
- File:Jumbo Plastic Retractable Gazebo Tent Heavy Duty Philippines.jpg
- File:Topboss Plastic schedule of delays 234235w.jpg
- File:Topboss Plastic schedule of delays 234235.jpg
Ies (talk) 07:19, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:21, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Photo derived from Getty images 219.79.96.105 08:56, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:48, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
not original author Syced (talk) 13:11, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:49, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Still from https://www.youtube.com/watch?time_continue=53&v=r-TFZVGmOiU Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:43, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Speedy keep. This is a full-size photo without modifications with metadata. And the compressed video of the same concert is obviously filmed from another point and from a different angle. As I wrote earlier, this author has been engaged in this work for many years (see contribution). --sasha (krassotkin) 14:26, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Krassotkin: "You wrote earlier" but not at the place you are intended to do so: you are not allowed to undo a speedy deletion request unless you open a regular one, hence this DR. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:09, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- This is our most common practice to undo obviously erroneous edits. --sasha (krassotkin) 17:34, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Krassotkin: "You wrote earlier" but not at the place you are intended to do so: you are not allowed to undo a speedy deletion request unless you open a regular one, hence this DR. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:09, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- the photo camera was located about 1.5 meters from the video camera. It shows. The type and parameters of the photo device are given in the photo description. The reason for the removal is not clear.HominiLupus (talk)
Kept: per discussion. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:51, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:55, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:55, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
Textbook. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Even if the book is uploaded by the author, there are still photos which are linely unfree. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:57, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
File:Libro 2da. Edición, Método practico para la investigación de la Tesis de graduación académica.pdf
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:05, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:58, 8 February 2019 (UTC)
A formal PR picture and the photographer is mentioned in the file's details. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 16:38, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
I have just accepted permission for “File:גיל_ביילין.jpg” under ticket:2019011510005902. -- Geagea (talk) 04:22, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Per OTRS. -- Geagea (talk) 04:23, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Picture of a picture. FunkMonk (talk) 19:38, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:53, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
No evidence of a free license, no permission.
- File:Banner iphan 2.jpg
- File:Brasao Tomeaçu Pa.jpg
- File:Brasao Curuá Pará.jpg
- File:Bandeira-curua-pa.jpg
- File:Bandeira Jacareacanga.jpg
- File:Brasão jacareacanga.jpg
Yann (talk) 17:04, 8 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:09, 14 January 2017 (UTC)
Apparent bulk COM:NETCOPYVIO upload. All low res, no camera EXIF, and elsewhere prior to Commons upload (e.g., File:Igreja de Santana da Campina.jpg is here; File:Carimbó pau e corda1.png is here; File:Engenho Murutucu 03.jpg is here, etc) Quack!
- File:Carimbó pau e corda1.png
- File:Carimbó pau e corda2.png
- File:Engenho Murutucu 03.jpg
- File:Engenho Murutucu 04.jpg
- File:Engenho Murutucu 02.jpg
- File:Coleção etnografica museu goeldi.jpg
- File:Igreja de Santana da Campina.jpg
Эlcobbola talk 20:26, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:51, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Unused promotional photo. Nv8200p (talk) 21:01, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:51, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
copyvio MiguelAlanCS (talk) 21:02, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:50, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. Not used. Low quality personal image Nv8200p (talk) 21:10, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:50, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Minor company in Bangladesh; this is spam and/or out of scope Ubcule (talk) 21:39, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:49, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Spam and/or out of scope? (Company apparently provides insurance for smartphones.) Ubcule (talk) 21:47, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:49, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Crucible31 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Duck copyvios - very low res, no EXIF, clearly bogus author claims (e.g. File:MUNOZ-wiki.jpg is here, etc.) Quack.
Эlcobbola talk 22:50, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:48, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_04.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![[3]](https://www.senate.gov/artandhistory/history/resources/graphic/medium/McSallyMartha.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![[4]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&oldid=337157979#File:Friedrichroda_Bergziegenrennen.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_04.jpg){kind=link}
_04.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_04.jpg){kind=link}
_04.jpg&diff=prev&oldid=337164808){kind=link}
_04.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(15561102806).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(40492717963).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by SecretName101 (talk · contribs)
[edit]impossible to review. impossible to determine if this video was shot for voa or in his personal capacity.
- File:Field being set-up for Super Bowl LII halftime show (00) (cropped).png
- File:Field being set-up for Super Bowl LII halftime show (00).png
- File:Arash Arabasadi - .@VOANews HalftimeShow is about to start at SuperBowlLII.webm
_(cropped).png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
RZuo (talk) 15:25, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
Keep Easy review. He was attending as a press personal credentialed with/by VOA to cover the Super Bowl, therefore media of of the game they captured was as part of that assignment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SecretName101 (talk • contribs) 16:26, 25 May 2023 (UTC) (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —holly {chat} 16:45, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Church is build in 1959. The centered glass-window is protected. No FOP in Germany within buildings an no de minimis for this window. So permission is needed from glass-artwork-copyright-holder. Quedel (talk) 09:10, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (as the church was built in 1959, the reason for deletion also applies to the architecture of the church itself, not just the window). --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:57, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Historical drawing. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Obvious PD-Art is obvious. Fixed license(which only would have taken a minute) Abzeronow (talk) 17:14, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep I don't know how to fix this. I make very little changes on Wikipedia yet even for this simple change/fix I have no idea how to make the correction and comply with the request from planksip®.planksip --Planksip (talk) 21:25, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: by Albrecht Dürer, license tags were corrected. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:01, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:03, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Internet image, low resolution, no EXIF Wcam (talk) 15:21, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 12:25, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Photo of copyrighted magazine page. If uploader is copyright owner, needs OTRS verification of ownership; otherwise delete. MPF (talk) 18:38, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted per nom. Strakhov (talk) 01:58, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
500px photos by Ioan Sendroiu
[edit]- File:Altaussee (211571735).jpeg
- File:Grundlsee (222507137).jpeg
- File:Night (205566461).jpeg
- File:Chill (205080241).jpeg
- File:Winter (204937865).jpeg
- File:Grundlsee (204777593).jpeg
- File:Blue Hallstatt (204466021).jpeg
- File:Sunset (203652329).jpeg (not explicitly copyrighted)
- File:Altaussee (203791553).jpeg (not explicitly copyrighted)
- File:Moonrise (203502639).jpeg (not explicitly copyrighted)
- File:Frozen Grundlsee (203341807).jpeg (not explicitly copyrighted)
- File:Hallstatter See (203187435).jpeg (not explicitly copyrighted)
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
Possible copyright violation Withdrawn: Files were originally uploaded to 500px by Ioan Sendroiu from Romania and marked as CC-0, but EXIF contains copyright by Bo Albertus of Denmark. The last 5 aren't explicitly copyrighted by Bo Albertus, but are by the same suspicious uploader and are also winter photographs of Austria.— hike395 (talk) 08:02, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- No, the copyright is not Bo Albertus of Denmark... The copyright at the metadata starts with BoaPix Bo Albertus... You simply ignored the first information. Trying to find BoaPix you will face something like:https://consumerqueen.com/cq-contests/boapix-canvas-giveaway?m
- So they was probably a team of photo editors.
- Romania and Austria are not far from it other... And Denmark is away further. And people travel, I do not see your point. -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 11:45, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Rodrigo.Argenton: Copyright violations are generally detectable via some sort of inconsistency. Here, the author or copyright field has "BoAPix Bo Albertus", while the uploader to 500px is "Ioan Sendroiu". Now, sometimes you see aliases in these fields, where there are two different names for the same person. However, "BoAPix Bo Albertus" has a .dk email address, while "Ioan Sendroiu" is from Romania, so it's unlikely for these to refer to the same person. That's why I think it's a possible copyright violation.
- There's an easy way to prove this is not a copyright violation. Send email to boa@tromme.dk, provide links to the Commons photographs and the archive links at 500px. If you hear back that it's ok, then you can follow the steps at Commons:OTRS to register their permission. If you get an angry email back, or don't hear back, then we have to assume that Ioan Sendroiu stole the photographs and posted them to 500px. (Note that this isn't your fault -- you were following the license posted to 500px).
- Generally, if there is uncertainty about copyright, Commons deletes the files. I'll defer to an administrator to decide whether this case warrants deletion. — hike395 (talk) 15:42, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
-
- Cheesus!!
- "then we have to assume that Ioan Sendroiu stole the photographs"
- Do not you think they are very harsh words? Remember that your words will be here by a long time and when people search for "Ioan Sendroiu" this will appear, right?
- The pattern shows a different thing:
- https://www.instagram.com/ioansen/
- vs
- https://www.facebook.com/bo.albertus
- People also buy used cameras. It's weird, but this a very strong accusation, you should have very strong evidences to say this openly.
- I'll try to reach both of then, and you mind your words until then. Jesus...
- -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 02:36, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Rodrigo.Argenton: Any news? — hike395 (talk) 02:38, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
-
- Hike395,
- Bo Alberus answered as:
- "This pictures are not my photographs. Best regards. ~Bo Alberus"
- Even me asking " do you recognise this images, or can imagine why this happen?"
- Ioan didn't answered me, but I sent a message to him just today.
- -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 22:32, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. I have marked the photographs as pending OTRS examination, which should temporarily supend any deletion. This is an unusual case, so I will ask a question at the OTRS noticeboard, to make sure we're doing the right steps here. Thanks for emailing Bo and OTRS! — hike395 (talk) 04:28, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- Hike395,
- I email him, in a lack of response, I reach him by the Facebook, there he confirmed that he own the email, that his not the author of the photos.
- I request to him send a email via boa
tromme.dk to permission, he answered that he would do yesterday, so may be it's already there. I'm not a OTRS volunteer any more, I can't check it. - -- Rodrigo Tetsuo Argenton m 15:25, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
- This is an interesting case for sure. ticket:2019021610002429 confirms that the copyright holder metadata is no longer valid. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:47, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
- That OTRS ticket means that the authorship is no longer ambiguous (right, AntiCompositeNumber?), so I will withdraw my deletion request. — hike395 (talk) 00:00, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
- This is an interesting case for sure. ticket:2019021610002429 confirms that the copyright holder metadata is no longer valid. --AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:47, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: nomination withdrawn and OTRS ticket shows metadata is invalid. --Majora (talk) 00:08, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Invalid license, not "own work" Ronhjones (Talk) 00:25, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
I was given this telegram by a relative of Fr. O'Flanagan's and have permission to use it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cliffoney (talk • contribs) 00:39, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Keep It's a telegram reply by en:David Lloyd George who died in 1945, so it's in the public domain, I think (author died more than 70 years ago). But then the licensing (CC-BY-SA 4.0) seems to be wrong, it should be PD-old-70, I assume? Or maybe use {{Licensed-PD}} if the telegram was not previously published, to cover possible publication right or jurisdictions where the scan itself might be deemed copyrightable. Gestumblindi (talk) 21:54, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: It must be uploaded again with true source/author. --Ezarateesteban 00:43, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
I accidentally uploaded it 136.159.213.13 00:37, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 00:42, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Not own work, invalid license (no attribution to original author). Image is CC-BY-Sa at en:File:Sue_Jelley.JPG Ronhjones (Talk) 01:16, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- (original image now on commons File:Sue Jelley.JPG) Ronhjones (Talk) 01:22, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 00:41, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ezarateesteban 00:44, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:PCP and single page .pdf is mostly white space and shouldn't be used where a .png or .jpg would do. Abzeronow (talk) 17:24, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 00:45, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
I just realized I made a rough mistake while making the image, so I want to take it down. RestInPapercut (talk) 15:13, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 00:45, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Historical poster. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete DW of a 1935 film whose last principal author died in 1960 (the director René Guissart). Undelete in 2031(coincidentally when poster would also be free of URAA nonsense) Abzeronow (talk) 17:21, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 00:46, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 00:46, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Derivative work of sign in exhibition. Tokfo (talk) 15:25, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 00:47, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kblackmore1 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 00:47, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
This image is just a piece of text presented in a way which ignores the accessibility requirements and defies any editing. It should be presented in a wiki table, not an image. Cabayi (talk) 14:26, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete as unused table of text per nom. @Cabayi: if you find these, please tag them {{Convert to wikitable}} if they are in use so that others can help replace them for the reasons you note. DMacks (talk) 04:30, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:38, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jamil yaiche (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:40, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Karl Friedrich (Germany) died in 1989, so he is not dead for 70 years and therefor this painting cannot be in the public space without permission of the heirs. JopkeB (talk) 15:47, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:41, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Karl Friedrich (Germany) died in 1989, so he is not dead for 70 years and therefor this painting cannot be in the public space without permission of his heirs. JopkeB (talk) 15:51, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:41, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Not used either. --E4024 (talk) 13:31, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:43, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Blatant copyviol Khruner (talk) 18:18, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, including File:Gold Nefertiti Bust Love On The Brain.jpg. --Rosenzweig τ 12:46, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Blatant copyviol Khruner (talk) 18:18, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:46, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
étenteur du droit d'auteur © François Van Malleghem / Macif, autorisation nécessaire, voir Commons:OTRS/fr Shev123 (talk) 21:10, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 12:55, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Author died in 1949, so undelete in 2020, unless another reason it's PD can be found. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 21:44, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: US illustrator, image published in the US before 1924, so PD-US-expired. --Rosenzweig τ 12:59, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Ricardo Pérez © Grupo Expansión Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:29, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 13:03, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
(c) Jacqueline Jablecki Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:33, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 13:02, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Photo: Marco Borggreve Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:34, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 13:03, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo: MOHAMMAD RAKIBUL HASAN Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:53, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 13:04, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Lady-Pro.M (talk · contribs)
[edit]- Please see related discussion: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Venom-rose. --sasha (krassotkin) 10:27, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Files only being used for xwiki spam of a non-notable individual, wildly out of scope.
- File:FakTyrA on recording studio (005).jpg
- File:FakTyrA on recording studio (001).jpg
- File:FakTyrA on recording studio (003).jpg
- File:FakTyrA on recording studio (004).jpg
- File:FakTyrA on recording studio (002).jpg
- File:FakTyrA on recording studio.jpg
- File:FakTyrA among graffiti.jpg
- File:FakTyrA (studio photos).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Praxidicae (talk) 14:46, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:32, 8 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Mediocre quality. Not used. Nv8200p (talk) 21:08, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Close-up of horse head. Could be useful. Better (for Commons I mean :) than many personal files waiting to be deleted. --E4024 (talk) 13:34, 2 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, per nomination. No horse head here and I do not believe, that somebody will ever need that. Taivo (talk) 22:07, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
I have uploaded a better-quality png version of this image Levana Taylor (talk) 00:01, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Comment I can't find the png version of the image, could you link it so I can evaluate both? --Ezarateesteban 00:41, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Comment File:Divorce a Vinculo - The Cotton-Tops.png'Levana Taylor (talk) 11:04, 25 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted and redirected. --Rosenzweig τ 22:22, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Billelaggab (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Logo Pro.png
- File:شعار مدينة المبرمجين.png
- File:Cityprogrammers.png
- File:شعار موقع مدينة المبرمجين.png
- File:City Programmers.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:09, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Billelaggab (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely copyright violations, considering the user's upload history.
Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:29, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:NETCOPYVIO - File:Keith Bergelt.jpg, for example, is here. --Эlcobbola talk 08:20, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Billelaggab (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:44, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 12:46, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:20, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
Possible Copyvio. Source is facebook (FBM) T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 12:56, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:20, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
Author is Festus Teye. There is no evidence that uploader is Festus Teye T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 13:45, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:20, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
Copyright holder is GhCampus.com. OTRS permission is needed. T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 13:46, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:19, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
标题为“安定门”（西安），但该照片实际为“长乐门”。照片为西安城墙长乐门箭楼。楼牌匾一“旭日东升”，牌匾二“长乐阁”，二者均为长乐门箭楼特征。 碧海风 (talk) 00:55, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: file has been renamed to correct the misidentification. --Wcam (talk) 14:59, 14 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:03, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Now there's a PNG version (File:Logo of Tsun Jin High School.png) with transparent background available for use. Comparing with that file, this one doesn't have enought quality. Whisper of the heart (talk) 08:26, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Now there's a PNG version (File:Logo of Tsun Jin High School.png) with transparent background available for use. Comparing with that file, this one doesn't have enought quality. Whisper of the heart 14:34, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Whisper of the heart: Why two requests? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:21, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Because nobody processes the first one for too long time.--Whisper of the heart 04:23, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
- This is not a valid reason to open multiple DRs. Regards. T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 07:44, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Because nobody processes the first one for too long time.--Whisper of the heart 04:23, 31 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; better quality PNG file available. --Gbawden (talk) 12:43, 1 April 2019 (UTC)
Spam, out of scope. Ubcule (talk) 16:13, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:24, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
Personal image out of scope + bad file name // sikander { talk } 19:20, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:23, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
The original painting File:Stieler, Joseph Karl - Alexander von Humboldt - 1843.jpg is in color, having a black and white one is useless, so this should be deleted and redirected there. BevinKacon (talk) 19:57, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: INUSE so I will tag as a duplicate. not sure why the want a B&W when the colour is so much better. --Gbawden (talk) 12:20, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
COM:TOYS Ronhjones (Talk) 20:10, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:19, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
COM:TOYS Ronhjones (Talk) 20:10, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:19, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
copyvio MiguelAlanCS (talk) 20:58, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:18, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yankho Kawalewale (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused perspnal photo. Out of scope
- File:Golf club in Lilongwe.jpg
- File:Lilongwe Golf club.jpg
- File:Concert Lilongwe Golf club.jpg
- File:Concert at Lilongwe Golf club.jpg
- File:Rugby Malawi.jpg
- File:Mpemba, Blantyre, Malawi.jpg
T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 12:05, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:17, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nii Dartey Shadrack Akrofi-Quarcoo (talk · contribs)
[edit]The source is facebook (FBM). The copyright holder of the image taken with Canon EOS 6D is Festus Teye and the one taken with Canon 3200D is Cn Campus.com. Evidence of permission should be sent to our support team. Aside the fact that the images taken with LG-K500 are unused personal photos, I doubt the uploader is the copyright holder considering the issues with other images uploaded by this user.
- File:Gef 1018.jpg
- File:Gef 1015.jpg
- File:Gef 1012.jpg
- File:Gef fun poses.jpg
- File:Gef 1009.jpg
- File:Gef 1007.jpg
- File:Gef 1005.jpg
- File:Gef 1001.jpg
- File:Gef 1003.jpg
- File:Gef crazy pose.jpg
- File:GEF2.jpg
- File:GEF18.jpg
- File:GEF29.jpg
- File:GEF56.jpg
- File:GEF108.jpg
- File:GEF74.jpg
- File:Visiting with young friends.jpg
- File:Playing the "trust me" game.jpg
- File:Planning kid missions with team.jpg
- File:With missionary friends.jpg
- File:Drama plays big role in socialising our kids.jpg
- File:Africans valie family and friends.jpg
- File:Teaching an African dance.jpg
- File:Christmas In Africa.jpg
- File:Setting up for Christmas in Africa.jpg
- File:Africa PLAYS MOST at Christmas.jpg
T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 12:37, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nii Dartey Shadrack Akrofi-Quarcoo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Evidence of permission should be sent to our support team. Copyright holder is Cn Campus.com
- File:African fathers are great fun.jpg
- File:GEF5.jpg
- File:GEF105.jpg
- File:African child learns to lead through competing.jpg
T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 12:43, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:16, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:17, 3 April 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jae zambia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyright holder is "Wills Robert". There is no evidence that Jae zambia is the same person as Wills Robert. Evidence of permission should be sent to COM:OTRS
T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 12:49, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep He is the owner of the pictures in question am the project leader for Wiki Loves Africa in Zambia and I confrim can he is the copyright holder the problem is that he is using a cracked Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 6.0 (Windows) software thus the images being listed under Will Robert. But i did show he how to request using the COM:OTRS. --Icem4k (talk) 11:20, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
- Ticket:2019030110002581 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 11:01, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
- Ticket:2019030110002633 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 11:01, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
- Ticket:2019030110002651 has been received regarding to file(s) mentioned here. --Krdbot 11:01, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:09, 7 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Designer is Parviz Moayyed-Ahd (d. 2016). The permission of his heirs is required. 4nn1l2 (talk) 05:32, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination; not own work, OTRS permission required. --Gbawden (talk) 13:20, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Small size, no exif, unlikely to be own work
- File:54Mubinul Azim in 1952.jpg.jpg
- File:Mubinul Azim in 1957.jpg .jpg
- File:Mubinul Azim.jpg .jpg
- File:Mrs Momota Azim.jpg.jpg
- File:Image = Mubinul Azim.jpg .jpg
- File:Mubinul Azim.jpg.jpg
— Racconish 💬 18:18, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --ℯxplicit 03:59, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
COM:PENIS Ronhjones (Talk) 00:06, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Worthless, poor quality, redundant and out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 01:39, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- I'm not commenting on the content of this DR, but AshFriday seems to reply with the exact same statement over, and over, and over, and over again. What value does that add to the conversation? This person doesn't seem to comment on the content being discussed but leaves a repetitive message in order to let any admin think that there is another "vote" for deletion which is playing with any actual forms of consensus based on content. So any admin reviewing this please take the above in context. Please use actual arguments. Also note that some uploaders have found these comment less than collegial. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 22:40, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- Isn't there another .gif file of this? If not then it could be useful. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 22:40, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- Specifically at COM:NUDITY "An image or video of decent quality which does provide additional useful information, e.g. about the background and age of the individual or relevant vital statistics, might indeed be useful. Likewise, a file that is sufficiently different from existing files should generally be kept. A new file of decent quality may mean that a similar poor image or video can be deleted." and I can't find any similar .gif files of 23 year old males of European descent ejaculating through masturbation on Wikimedia Commons. Of course if anyone does find a better quality version y'all can disregard this comment. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 23:09, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- Useful for what? Delete --E4024 (talk) 02:31, 27 February 2019 (UTC)
- Image should NOT be deleted. It is useful to illustrate for educational purposes for reasons cited by user above Donald Trung - to include, but not limited to the fact that the image is above "decent qualiy" and includes useful information about "background and age...or relevant vital statistics." The uploader listed the subject depicted in the image as a male, adult, 23 years of age, and no other similar image exists and the image is of good quality, therefore it is a useful image, and therefore this image should not be deleted. Jake23921 02:00, 1 March 2019
- Jake, you are the uploader, right? What else are you planning to contribute to Commons? --E4024 (talk) 12:37, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
- Sequence should NOT be deleted. Despite its medium resulution, individual frames in the sequence are not as blurred as some videos that have been up for some time. Also, there is a "call" on the page description for more videos showing masturbation and ejaculation with a SIDE VIEW, and this one shows a side view. The sequence is also labeled with helpful info as to the age of the subject as a "23 year old". The image sequence is slightly out of the ordinary regarding the size and shape of the subject's organ, as well as the arc and distance/length of the ejaculation, the latter of which is easier to see than in other videos, again, as it is less blurred and seen from the side with a neutral background. (The sequence quality/resolution is at least as good as the best VHS image.)--108.69.217.88 01:10, 2 May 2019 (UTC) Mike P.
Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 17:12, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:12, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:12, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from painting. Should be blanked to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:11, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Spam, out of scope. Ubcule (talk) 16:06, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:11, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Spam, out of scope. Ubcule (talk) 16:06, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:10, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Spam and/or out of scope. Not- apparently- a major company. Ubcule (talk) 16:12, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:10, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Some certificate owned by a non-notable company in rejected article at en:Draft:Compsense. Ubcule (talk) 16:14, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:10, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
spam, out of scope Ubcule (talk) 16:14, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:09, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Spam, out of scope. Ubcule (talk) 16:16, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:09, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Spam, out of scope. Ubcule (talk) 16:19, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:09, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Nibbrig ist laut Artikel erst 1993 verstorben. Xocolatl (talk) 17:03, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:07, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Nibbrig ist laut Artikel erst 1993 gestorben. Xocolatl (talk) 17:04, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:07, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
NIbbrig ist laut Artikel erst 1993 gestorben. Xocolatl (talk) 17:04, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:07, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Nibbrig ist laut Artikel erst 1993 gestorben. Xocolatl (talk) 17:05, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:07, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Laut Artikel ist Nibbrig erst 1993 gestorben. Xocolatl (talk) 17:07, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:07, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Laut Artikel ist Nibbrig erst 1993 gestorben. Xocolatl (talk) 17:07, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:07, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Not used anywhere and it's a promotional video for a YouTube Channel Mbch331 (talk) 21:02, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 13:02, 1 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Worldbeats
[edit]
User:Worldbeats is a en-wiki blocked user that apparently promoting an artist Allan Banford. portrait that similar to File:Allan Banford 2019.jpg, had upload again and again and then deleted due to incomplete tag, by the uploader. en-wiki Afd of the article Allan Banford determined the subject is non-notable. Some off-topic, it seem the uploader had sock accounts (or meat sock) user:Newmedia113, user:Artworldtoday, user:Artero113 in common-wiki and may be more that solely work in en-wiki
For Challenger by Allan Banford.jpg, it was at first uploaded by Artero113, and then again by Worldbeats. Since all upload by Artero113 had deleted, it seem all upload by those accounts need OTRS verification, to clear out copyvio and sock issues.
--Matthew hk (talk) 01:25, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:00, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
image not in source URL; zero details on where it might be from or how we know it depicts what its title says czar 04:15, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- http://www.saintefoylagrandehistoire.com/dossiers/dossier.php?val=41_paul+reclus, http://www.estelnegre.org/documents/paulreclus/paulreclus.html and http://balearweb1.rssing.com/chan-13961322/all_p142.html all seem to confirm the title. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:20, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - not at source given/. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:59, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Now there's a PNG version (File:Motto of Tsun Jin High School.png) with transparent background available for use. Comparing with that file, this one doesn't have enought quality. Whisper of the heart (talk) 07:25, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:59, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Heritage Park, Library, Museum, BMA Monument, Sports & Community Centers and Municipal Offices (Bustos Municipal Hall)
[edit]Artist Conrado Mercado died in 2010. Since sculptures are "literary and artistic works" according to Sec. 172 of the IP Code of the Philippines, the term of protection is 50 years after the author's death. So, until 2061, photos of these sculptures would be derivatives and thus infinging on it's copyright. There is also no FoP in the Philippines.
- File:09674jfHeritage Park Bustos Municipal Hall Bulacanfvf 08.jpg
- File:09674jfHeritage Park Bustos Municipal Hall Bulacanfvf 10.jpg
- File:09689jfHeritage Park Bustos Municipal Hall Bulacanfvf 05.jpg
- File:09689jfHeritage Park Bustos Municipal Hall Bulacanfvf 06.jpg
- File:09764jfHeritage Park Bustos Municipal Hall Bulacanfvf 01.jpg
- File:09764jfHeritage Park Bustos Municipal Hall Bulacanfvf 02.jpg
- File:09764jfHeritage Park Bustos Municipal Hall Bulacanfvf 03.jpg
- File:09781jfHeritage Park Bustos Municipal Hall Bulacanfvf 01.jpg
Howhontanozaz (talk) 10:37, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for your message; these photos were taken during the Minasa Festival of Bustos; I proceeded to the Tourism office which is in the Mayor's Office; I was granted express permission by the Mayor's Office to take photos not only this Municipal Compound but all the landmarks of Bustos for Commons; note that the subjects of these photos were transferred absolutely to the ownership of the Municipal Government hence, as owned by Bustos Government, it is in the Public Domain Judgefloro 11:11, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Consolidated Reply and Argument
- I was expressly permitted and even assisted by the Officers of Bustos Mayor's Office to take photos
- Thanks for your message; these photos were taken during the Minasa Festival of Bustos; I proceeded to the Tourism office which is in the Mayor's Office; I was granted express permission by the Mayor's Office to take photos not only this Municipal Compound but all the landmarks of Bustos for Commons; I was then asking them for photos of Alexis Santos and Mayor Thelma Santos; I was even assisted by them in some of the photo-taking; note that the subjects of these photos were transferred absolutely to the ownership of the Municipal Government hence, as owned by Bustos Government, it is in the Public Domain and expressly exempted from Copyright law prohibitions; note also that I did not take photos of properties still owned by the artists: under Philippine Civil Laws, specifically Ownership and its accessory rigths, as such, under the Rules of Statutory Construction, the special provisions of General Law, the Civil Code prevails over the general provisions of Specific Law, the Copyrights law; for this reason, Director Blancaflor stated that the Copyright law is silent on the Matter; however, I differ with him since he did not respond to my Written Petition to Issue Legal Opinion; hence I forthwith wrote and did Petiion the New Director General, thusly:
Category:Letter to Josephine Rima-Santiago (Philippines)
- Considering that a New Director has been appointed replacing Director Blancaflor (who, I presume did not categorically respond on my or your editors' query on No Freedom of Panoramana in the Philippines) it is but just and fitting that Rulings on these Deletion of images entries be held in abeyance for the sake of Wisdom of future Users and global learners of Wikimedia Commons; today, I formally submitted a written Query on the matter, to settle once and for all whether photos should be deleted or not based on the present rules of Commons on the matter. Director General Josephine Rima-Santiago of Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines
- Letter to Intellectual Property Office (Philippines) IPO Director General Josephine Rima-Santiago (Philippines) 6 pages Letter from Judge Florentino V. Floro, Jr. or User:Judgefloro regardings Commons:Freedom of panorama specifically Freedom of panorama Philippines Re: Request for a Definitive Opinion on Freedom of panorama concerning Wikimedia Commons Photography - Uploading - Publishing vis-a-vis the IP Code of the Philippines (Act No. 8293) (2015 Edition), Chapter VIII ("Limitations on copyright) which does not appear to make any exception for photographs of copyrighted works. This letter is mailed today via LBC mail as evidenced by Category:LBC Express receipts Very sincerely yours, Judgefloro 08:21, 29 January 2019 (UTC) Judgefloro 11:25, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Considering that a New Director has been appointed replacing Director Blancaflor (who, I presume did not categorically respond on my or your editors' query on No Freedom of Panoramana in the Philippines) it is but just and fitting that Rulings on these Deletion of images entries be held in abeyance for the sake of Wisdom of future Users and global learners of Wikimedia Commons; today, I formally submitted a written Query on the matter, to settle once and for all whether photos should be deleted or not based on the present rules of Commons on the matter. Director General Josephine Rima-Santiago of Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines
Category:Letter-Permit to-from Arnel F. Mendoza (Philippines)
- Consolidated Reply and Argument: I was expressly permitted and even assisted by the Officers of Bustos Mayor's Office to take photos
- On 21 July 2017, I took photos of the exterior and all inside the interiors of the Heritage Park, Library, Museum, BMA Monument, Sports & Community Centers and Municipal Offices (Bustos Municipal Hall) including the memorabilia in the Library and works of Conrado Garcia Mercado, Sigrid Mercado and Portia Mercado, like the Last Stand, Cocoon, Eggmans Dome, Takipsilim and the likes in the Heritage Park which is part of the BMA Shrine. Bustos, Bulacan
- Before I took these pictures, as courtesy, during the Minasa Festivals, I went to your Tourism office and asked permission for photography of Bustos and their landmarks including all in the Municipal Compound, specifically the Heritage Park, Library, Museum, BMA Monument, Sports & Community Centers and Municipal Offices (Bustos Municipal Hall) including the works of the Conrados. The Conrados are architects-artists and were native; they donated or transferred to the Bustos Municipal Government and the BMA Shrine absolutely and all these are now owned and maintained by your administration and government. As such the Shrine is considered a work of your government and according to the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines, no copyright subsists in works of the government. This also applies to when the Philippine government was part of the United States during the time the shrine was designed. As far as I know, Filipino architects don't mind any pictures of their works, even where posted on the Net, and they are even thankful to those who remember them and take photos of their legacy, works for the education of future Filipinos.
- On 21 July 2017, I took photos of the exterior and all inside the interiors of the Heritage Park, Library, Museum, BMA Monument, Sports & Community Centers and Municipal Offices (Bustos Municipal Hall) including the memorabilia in the Library and works of Conrado Garcia Mercado, Sigrid Mercado and Portia Mercado, like the Last Stand, Cocoon, Eggmans Dome, Takipsilim and the likes in the Heritage Park which is part of the BMA Shrine. Bustos, Bulacan
- Consolidated Reply and Argument: I was expressly permitted and even assisted by the Officers of Bustos Mayor's Office to take photos
On February 1, 2019, as express permission and ratification of grant of permission to previous photography, Mayor-his Office Arnel F. Mendoza issued herein Editor an Official written Permit granting the Filed Letter-Request dated February 1, 2019 of herein editor; therefore, in accordance with Philippine Copyright Law vis-a-vis Civil Code of the Philippines, the subject of the photos are within the jurisdiction, administration and ownership of Bustos Municipal Government, hence, not within the prohibition of the Laws, due to the Permit Granted, Sincerely, I hereby Oppose the Deletion, with all due respect Judgefloro 08:33, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, artworks - no FOP in the Philippines. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:58, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Files only being used for xwiki spam of a non-notable individual, wildly out of scope and improperly licensed
Praxidicae (talk) 14:45, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:57, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Smooth O as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://tineye.com/search/58562984e0fb3548792ad9cbe9cfd7a4fb068e29/?sort=size&order=desc. Tineye cited as grounds that this is a "blatant" copyright violation, however it was uploaded here 3 weeks before the first tineye hit, unless I have made an error. On the other hand, the source is given as Merida, and it does look like a product shot, so it is likely a DW. Storkk (talk) 16:06, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Note: upload date is actually after the first tineye hit - I erred by looking at the wrong date field... rusty, sorry! Storkk (talk) 16:08, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:57, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Gbawden as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: (C) (Roland Osbeck) as per exif. User:Rolandhino1 claims to be Roland Osbeck. Uploader: please simply confirm your identity by following the instructions on OTRS. Storkk (talk) 16:11, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Roland is since a year back one of the regular Wikimedia Sverige volunteers, and I've helped him with both accreditation and tech equipment. Even if it's not through OTRS I can confirm that he uploads images as User:Rolandhino1. /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 07:55, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- This should be documented via the established procedures at OTRS, in order both to archive and to centralize the documentation. Storkk (talk) 10:29, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- Withdrawn Gbawden (talk) 13:19, 9 April 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:57, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Although the image is used on a NASA's website, it is not work of NASA. jdx Re: 20:07, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:56, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
(Not educationally useful: self created artwork) According to ESRB.org, the K-A rating was retired in 1998. This recreation uses a design that wasn't introduced until 2000.
When referring to K-A, pages should use the official designs from 1994 or 1998. Stevoisiake (talk) 20:18, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:56, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope. Low resolution. Promotional. Nv8200p (talk) 20:54, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep No reason for deletion. Insider (talk) 11:52, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- Except for the three reasons I listed above. Nv8200p (talk) 12:03, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:55, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
(Not educationally useful: self created artwork) According to ESRB.org, the K-A rating was retired in 1998. This recreation uses a design that wasn't introduced until 2000. When referring to K-A, pages should reference the official designs from 1994 or 1998. Stevoisiake (talk) 20:55, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:56, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by User:JoshuaIsTheFalco
[edit]- File:Donisthorpe railway station and tunnels..jpg
- File:MeashamSt2.jpg
- File:Snarestone station.jpg
- File:Hugglescote station site.jpg
- File:Ibstock and Heather station.jpg
- File:Stoke Golding station site and goods yard.jpg
- File:HighamOnTheHillStation.jpg
All of these images are sourced to various websites but the uploader is claiming own work on them and licencing them under CC-BY-SA-4.0 without establishing if they are so licenced or even in the public domain at all. --Nthep (talk) 22:45, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:55, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chulu sakaz (talk · contribs)
[edit]The source is facebook (FBM). Evidence of permission should be sent to our support team. Regards.
File:Kids playing with ballons.jpgkept per OTRS permission --Krd 16:25, 22 February 2019 (UTC)- File:Video game players in Zambia.jpg
- File:Basketball play in Zambia 07.jpg
- File:Basketball play in Zambia 06.jpg
- File:Basketball play in Zambia 05.jpg
- File:Basketball play in Zambia 04.jpg
- File:Basketball play in Zambia 03.jpg
- File:Basketball play in Zambia 02.jpg
- File:Basketball play in Zambia 01.jpg
T Cells (talk · contribs · email) 12:02, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Permission has been submitted to the our support team. --Icem4k (talk) 11:25, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Mixed close, one kept, the others removed. No additional infomration since February. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:55, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Screenshot of non-free content B dash (talk) 00:09, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep but blank the screen. It would still a useful image regarding the design of an in-flight entertainment system. clpo13(talk) 00:12, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- As it is on a North Korean flight, it might be covered by Freedom of Panorama.--Jack Upland (talk) 09:43, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 14:58, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The window in the center is from de:Eugen Keller (Maler), who died in 1995. So the window is protected. As there is no FOP in Germany within buildings and such a huge window can't be de minimis, a permission from copyright-holder from Mr. Kellers work is needed. Quedel (talk) 09:07, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 14:59, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Artist Portia Mercado is still alive. Sculptures are copyrighted for 50 years after the death of it's author. There is also no FoP in the Philippines. Howhontanozaz (talk) 10:53, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for your message; these photos were taken during the Minasa Festival of Bustos; I proceeded to the Tourism office which is in the Mayor's Office; I was granted express permission by the Mayor's Office to take photos not only this Municipal Compound but all the landmarks of Bustos for Commons; note that the subjects of these photos were transferred absolutely to the ownership of the Municipal Government hence, as owned by Bustos Government, it is in the Public Domain and expressly exempted from Copyright law prohibitions Judgefloro 11:14, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Consolidated Reply and Argument: I was expressly permitted and even assisted by the Officers of Bustos Mayor's Office to take photos
- On 21 July 2017, I took photos of the exterior and all inside the interiors of the Heritage Park, Library, Museum, BMA Monument, Sports & Community Centers and Municipal Offices (Bustos Municipal Hall) including the memorabilia in the Library and works of Conrado Garcia Mercado, Sigrid Mercado and Portia Mercado, like the Last Stand, Cocoon, Eggmans Dome, Takipsilim and the likes in the Heritage Park which is part of the BMA Shrine. Bustos, Bulacan
- Before I took these pictures, as courtesy, during the Minasa Festivals, I went to your Tourism office and asked permission for photography of Bustos and their landmarks including all in the Municipal Compound, specifically the Heritage Park, Library, Museum, BMA Monument, Sports & Community Centers and Municipal Offices (Bustos Municipal Hall) including the works of the Conrados. The Conrados are architects-artists and were native; they donated or transferred to the Bustos Municipal Government and the BMA Shrine absolutely and all these are now owned and maintained by your administration and government. As such the Shrine is considered a work of your government and according to the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines, no copyright subsists in works of the government. This also applies to when the Philippine government was part of the United States during the time the shrine was designed. As far as I know, Filipino architects don't mind any pictures of their works, even where posted on the Net, and they are even thankful to those who remember them and take photos of their legacy, works for the education of future Filipinos. On February 1, 2019, as express permission and ratification of grant of permission to previous photography, Mayor-his Office Arnel F. Mendoza issued herein Editor an Official written Permit granting the Filed Letter-Request dated February 1, 2019 of herein editor; therefore, in accordance with Philippine Copyright Law vis-a-vis Civil Code of the Philippines, the subject of the photos are within the jurisdiction, administration and ownership of Bustos Municipal Government, hence, not within the prohibition of the Laws, due to the Permit Granted, Sincerely, I hereby Oppose the Deletion, with all due respect Judgefloro 08:37, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- On 21 July 2017, I took photos of the exterior and all inside the interiors of the Heritage Park, Library, Museum, BMA Monument, Sports & Community Centers and Municipal Offices (Bustos Municipal Hall) including the memorabilia in the Library and works of Conrado Garcia Mercado, Sigrid Mercado and Portia Mercado, like the Last Stand, Cocoon, Eggmans Dome, Takipsilim and the likes in the Heritage Park which is part of the BMA Shrine. Bustos, Bulacan
- Consolidated Reply and Argument: I was expressly permitted and even assisted by the Officers of Bustos Mayor's Office to take photos
Deleted: COM:OTRS required. --JuTa 14:50, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Artist Portia Mercado is still alive. Sculptures are copyrighted for 50 years after the death of it's author. There is also no FoP in the Philippines. Howhontanozaz (talk) 10:56, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for your message; these photos were taken during the Minasa Festival of Bustos; I proceeded to the Tourism office which is in the Mayor's Office; I was granted express permission by the Mayor's Office to take photos not only this Municipal Compound but all the landmarks of Bustos for Commons; note that the subjects of these photos were transferred absolutely to the ownership of the Municipal Government hence, as owned by Bustos Government, it is in the Public Domain and expressly exempted from Copyright law prohibitions Judgefloro 11:15, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Consolidated Reply and Argument: I was expressly permitted and even assisted by the Officers of Bustos Mayor's Office to take photos
- On 21 July 2017, I took photos of the exterior and all inside the interiors of the Heritage Park, Library, Museum, BMA Monument, Sports & Community Centers and Municipal Offices (Bustos Municipal Hall) including the memorabilia in the Library and works of Conrado Garcia Mercado, Sigrid Mercado and Portia Mercado, like the Last Stand, Cocoon, Eggmans Dome, Takipsilim and the likes in the Heritage Park which is part of the BMA Shrine. Bustos, Bulacan
- Before I took these pictures, as courtesy, during the Minasa Festivals, I went to your Tourism office and asked permission for photography of Bustos and their landmarks including all in the Municipal Compound, specifically the Heritage Park, Library, Museum, BMA Monument, Sports & Community Centers and Municipal Offices (Bustos Municipal Hall) including the works of the Conrados. The Conrados are architects-artists and were native; they donated or transferred to the Bustos Municipal Government and the BMA Shrine absolutely and all these are now owned and maintained by your administration and government. As such the Shrine is considered a work of your government and according to the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines, no copyright subsists in works of the government. This also applies to when the Philippine government was part of the United States during the time the shrine was designed. As far as I know, Filipino architects don't mind any pictures of their works, even where posted on the Net, and they are even thankful to those who remember them and take photos of their legacy, works for the education of future Filipinos. On February 1, 2019, as express permission and ratification of grant of permission to previous photography, Mayor-his Office Arnel F. Mendoza issued herein Editor an Official written Permit granting the Filed Letter-Request dated February 1, 2019 of herein editor; therefore, in accordance with Philippine Copyright Law vis-a-vis Civil Code of the Philippines, the subject of the photos are within the jurisdiction, administration and ownership of Bustos Municipal Government, hence, not within the prohibition of the Laws, due to the Permit Granted, Sincerely, I hereby Oppose the Deletion, with all due respect Judgefloro 08:38, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- On 21 July 2017, I took photos of the exterior and all inside the interiors of the Heritage Park, Library, Museum, BMA Monument, Sports & Community Centers and Municipal Offices (Bustos Municipal Hall) including the memorabilia in the Library and works of Conrado Garcia Mercado, Sigrid Mercado and Portia Mercado, like the Last Stand, Cocoon, Eggmans Dome, Takipsilim and the likes in the Heritage Park which is part of the BMA Shrine. Bustos, Bulacan
- Consolidated Reply and Argument: I was expressly permitted and even assisted by the Officers of Bustos Mayor's Office to take photos
Deleted: COM:OTRS by the artist required. --JuTa 14:55, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Artist Portia Mercado is still alive. There is also no FoP in the Philippines. Howhontanozaz (talk) 11:04, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for your message; these photos were taken during the Minasa Festival of Bustos; I proceeded to the Tourism office which is in the Mayor's Office; I was granted express permission by the Mayor's Office to take photos not only this Municipal Compound but all the landmarks of Bustos for Commons; note that the subjects of these photos were transferred absolutely to the ownership of the Municipal Government hence, as owned by Bustos Government, it is in the Public Domain and expressly exempted from Copyright law prohibitions Judgefloro 11:16, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Category:Letter-Permit to-from Arnel F. Mendoza (Philippines)
- Consolidated Reply and Argument: I was expressly permitted and even assisted by the Officers of Bustos Mayor's Office to take photos
- On 21 July 2017, I took photos of the exterior and all inside the interiors of the Heritage Park, Library, Museum, BMA Monument, Sports & Community Centers and Municipal Offices (Bustos Municipal Hall) including the memorabilia in the Library and works of Conrado Garcia Mercado, Sigrid Mercado and Portia Mercado, like the Last Stand, Cocoon, Eggmans Dome, Takipsilim and the likes in the Heritage Park which is part of the BMA Shrine. Bustos, Bulacan
- Before I took these pictures, as courtesy, during the Minasa Festivals, I went to your Tourism office and asked permission for photography of Bustos and their landmarks including all in the Municipal Compound, specifically the Heritage Park, Library, Museum, BMA Monument, Sports & Community Centers and Municipal Offices (Bustos Municipal Hall) including the works of the Conrados. The Conrados are architects-artists and were native; they donated or transferred to the Bustos Municipal Government and the BMA Shrine absolutely and all these are now owned and maintained by your administration and government. As such the Shrine is considered a work of your government and according to the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines, no copyright subsists in works of the government. This also applies to when the Philippine government was part of the United States during the time the shrine was designed. As far as I know, Filipino architects don't mind any pictures of their works, even where posted on the Net, and they are even thankful to those who remember them and take photos of their legacy, works for the education of future Filipinos. On February 1, 2019, as express permission and ratification of grant of permission to previous photography, Mayor-his Office Arnel F. Mendoza issued herein Editor an Official written Permit granting the Filed Letter-Request dated February 1, 2019 of herein editor; therefore, in accordance with Philippine Copyright Law vis-a-vis Civil Code of the Philippines, the subject of the photos are within the jurisdiction, administration and ownership of Bustos Municipal Government, hence, not within the prohibition of the Laws, due to the Permit Granted, Sincerely, I hereby Oppose the Deletion, with all due respect Judgefloro 08:38, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- On 21 July 2017, I took photos of the exterior and all inside the interiors of the Heritage Park, Library, Museum, BMA Monument, Sports & Community Centers and Municipal Offices (Bustos Municipal Hall) including the memorabilia in the Library and works of Conrado Garcia Mercado, Sigrid Mercado and Portia Mercado, like the Last Stand, Cocoon, Eggmans Dome, Takipsilim and the likes in the Heritage Park which is part of the BMA Shrine. Bustos, Bulacan
- Consolidated Reply and Argument: I was expressly permitted and even assisted by the Officers of Bustos Mayor's Office to take photos
Deleted: COM:OTRS by the artist required. --JuTa 14:52, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Artist Portia Mercado is still alive. There is also no FoP in the Philippines. Howhontanozaz (talk) 11:06, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for your message; these photos were taken during the Minasa Festival of Bustos; I proceeded to the Tourism office which is in the Mayor's Office; I was granted express permission by the Mayor's Office to take photos not only this Municipal Compound but all the landmarks of Bustos for Commons; note that the subjects of these photos were transferred absolutely to the ownership of the Municipal Government hence, as owned by Bustos Government, it is in the Public Domain and expressly exempted from Copyright law prohibitions Judgefloro 11:17, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Consolidated Reply and Argument: I was expressly permitted and even assisted by the Officers of Bustos Mayor's Office to take photos
- On 21 July 2017, I took photos of the exterior and all inside the interiors of the Heritage Park, Library, Museum, BMA Monument, Sports & Community Centers and Municipal Offices (Bustos Municipal Hall) including the memorabilia in the Library and works of Conrado Garcia Mercado, Sigrid Mercado and Portia Mercado, like the Last Stand, Cocoon, Eggmans Dome, Takipsilim and the likes in the Heritage Park which is part of the BMA Shrine. Bustos, Bulacan
- Before I took these pictures, as courtesy, during the Minasa Festivals, I went to your Tourism office and asked permission for photography of Bustos and their landmarks including all in the Municipal Compound, specifically the Heritage Park, Library, Museum, BMA Monument, Sports & Community Centers and Municipal Offices (Bustos Municipal Hall) including the works of the Conrados. The Conrados are architects-artists and were native; they donated or transferred to the Bustos Municipal Government and the BMA Shrine absolutely and all these are now owned and maintained by your administration and government. As such the Shrine is considered a work of your government and according to the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines, no copyright subsists in works of the government. This also applies to when the Philippine government was part of the United States during the time the shrine was designed. As far as I know, Filipino architects don't mind any pictures of their works, even where posted on the Net, and they are even thankful to those who remember them and take photos of their legacy, works for the education of future Filipinos. On February 1, 2019, as express permission and ratification of grant of permission to previous photography, Mayor-his Office Arnel F. Mendoza issued herein Editor an Official written Permit granting the Filed Letter-Request dated February 1, 2019 of herein editor; therefore, in accordance with Philippine Copyright Law vis-a-vis Civil Code of the Philippines, the subject of the photos are within the jurisdiction, administration and ownership of Bustos Municipal Government, hence, not within the prohibition of the Laws, due to the Permit Granted, Sincerely, I hereby Oppose the Deletion, with all due respect Judgefloro 08:39, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- On 21 July 2017, I took photos of the exterior and all inside the interiors of the Heritage Park, Library, Museum, BMA Monument, Sports & Community Centers and Municipal Offices (Bustos Municipal Hall) including the memorabilia in the Library and works of Conrado Garcia Mercado, Sigrid Mercado and Portia Mercado, like the Last Stand, Cocoon, Eggmans Dome, Takipsilim and the likes in the Heritage Park which is part of the BMA Shrine. Bustos, Bulacan
- Consolidated Reply and Argument: I was expressly permitted and even assisted by the Officers of Bustos Mayor's Office to take photos
Deleted: COM:OTRS by the artist required. --JuTa 14:53, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Protože je neaktuální a je žádoucí snímek vyměnit za fotku, která zachycuje současnou podobu tvůrce. Eva.Albrechtova (talk) 12:14, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Skutečnost, že snímek zachycuje osoby před několika lety, není důvodem pro jeho smazání. Ten snímek zde může i nadále volně existovat. Třeba se může někomu hodit. --Jan Polák (talk) 13:09, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Translation for administrators: It's outdated and it's necessary to replace it with a foto which captures artist's current look. Matěj Suchánek (talk) 20:56, 19 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --JuTa 15:00, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
- This was a speedy deletion request by User:Horst Gräbner. Reason: copyrighted, see ttps://www.gettyimages.fr/license/537140795
- I doubt, that Getty Images has any rights on this photograph by Becker & Maass. Mutter Erde (talk) 15:04, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 14:57, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Missing permission for the glass-windows in the center. As the church is build in 1953, the windows are protected. As there is no FOP in Germany within buildings, permission is needed. Quedel (talk) 09:04, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 15:03, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. With no source or author indicated (supposedly anonymous) the photo must be prior to Jan 1, 1955 to be PD in Australia. - Fma12 (talk) 11:11, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 15:02, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Venom-rose (talk · contribs)
[edit]- Please see related discussion: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Lady-Pro.M. --sasha (krassotkin) 10:26, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Files only being used for xwiki spam of a non-notable individual, wildly out of scope.
.jpg){kind=link}
Praxidicae (talk) 14:46, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep: These files are used in Wikinews articles published by independent editors (Wikinews is a premoderated project with an independent review mechanism), that is enough. --sasha (krassotkin) 15:22, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- krassotkin I don't see any evidence that the wikinews articles are even legitimate as they're not sourced to any sort of RS and are made by several SPAs that are spamming this person xwiki and as such, I've also requested a glock. Looking at the "sources" that are included on ruwikinews, they're all directly to the website of the subject and I don't see how the person nor their works qualify as in any projects scope. Praxidicae (talk) 16:46, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Common means common: "It should be stressed that Commons does not exist to editorialise on other projects – that an image is in use on a non talk/user page is enough for it to be within scope", - from the same place. You can discuss all questions in the target project. --sasha (krassotkin) 17:22, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Well now they are all glocked and the content is slowly being deleted (ruwikinews is blocked on my network, so I can't even tag there.) Praxidicae (talk) 20:55, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- IMHO, it is a bad idea. Some of these accounts have only positive contribution to some our projects and there have never been any complaints about them. For example User:R-sellimor created two news story about British band w:Mumford & Sons (n:ru:Группа «Mumford & Sons» выпустила четвертый студийный альбом «Delta») and w:Jennifer Lopez single w:Limitless (Jennifer Lopez song) (n:ru:Дженнифер Лопес выпустила новый сингл Limitless).
Here on Commons, I myself have offered this file for a slow deletion in due time. But as I see, User:Venom-rose found a common language with our OTRS-system Ticket:2018060710009685, Ticket:2019012110004857 etc. And now they are carefully following copyright laws and our rules.
I also intersected with them. And I saw from their side a desire to observe our rules. Even when I spoke harshly, they tried to listen carefully and fulfill our demands. Therefore I am surprised by the global locking of all users at once. I do not know where they broke the rules, but the global locking all of them is incommensurable and not fair in any case, IMHO. Ruslik0, what do you think about? Sorry I didn't see that request in a timely. In my opinion, we can not change anything, but if they will be asked to review their case, we must bear in mind this information.
As I see, FakTyrA is a young independent musician. But he really exists on the Russian underground scene. Here you can see his albums. Probably he does not pass by the rules of the most Wikipedia editions. But, as we see, the communities of some our projects do not object to his references in some capacity. We have to illustrate this. Therefore, we must keep the files on Wikimedia Commons.
--sasha (krassotkin) 10:22, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- IMHO, it is a bad idea. Some of these accounts have only positive contribution to some our projects and there have never been any complaints about them. For example User:R-sellimor created two news story about British band w:Mumford & Sons (n:ru:Группа «Mumford & Sons» выпустила четвертый студийный альбом «Delta») and w:Jennifer Lopez single w:Limitless (Jennifer Lopez song) (n:ru:Дженнифер Лопес выпустила новый сингл Limitless).
- Well now they are all glocked and the content is slowly being deleted (ruwikinews is blocked on my network, so I can't even tag there.) Praxidicae (talk) 20:55, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Common means common: "It should be stressed that Commons does not exist to editorialise on other projects – that an image is in use on a non talk/user page is enough for it to be within scope", - from the same place. You can discuss all questions in the target project. --sasha (krassotkin) 17:22, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- krassotkin I don't see any evidence that the wikinews articles are even legitimate as they're not sourced to any sort of RS and are made by several SPAs that are spamming this person xwiki and as such, I've also requested a glock. Looking at the "sources" that are included on ruwikinews, they're all directly to the website of the subject and I don't see how the person nor their works qualify as in any projects scope. Praxidicae (talk) 16:46, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- krassotkin The problem is that, whether they were nice about it or not, they had several accounts mass spamming multiple projects - that is a problem for the integrity of every project, not just one. Praxidicae (talk) 14:52, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- I'm also not sure how this is any more harsh than any of the other vanity-spammers that get glocked either. If the intent is to push information into any project about themselves/their friends and they aren't adequately within scope (as is the case here), that is a net negative to Wikimedia. Praxidicae (talk) 14:59, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- Meta is the best place to discuss these issues. But I don’t think that several dozen edits in a year look like massive spam. Moreover, as I showed before, there is a constructive unrelated contribution. Nobody anywhere has blocked them locally this year. I talked a little with some of them too and did not see aggressive attitude or desire to break our rules. They are quite obedient guys. You have could just tell them not to do something. In my opinion, you are a little overdone. But what's done is done. I propose to focus in this discussion on images of Commons. Regardless of the behavior of their authors, these images are used and we should not delete them. --sasha (krassotkin) 18:30, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- No need to delete! photo must be used. --sus (Wikimopsus) 03:45, 1 March 2019 (UTC)
Kept: confirmed OTRS release and in use. --JuTa 15:11, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Historical photo, book cover, postcard. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
EugeneZelenko Could you please advise what data I should add? Please do not delete these photos. Shomroni (talk) 14:54, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 15:05, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Streamline8988 (talk · contribs)
[edit]A twitter URL is not suitable to validate permission. Needs to be the Tasnum News site url
Ronhjones (Talk) 17:41, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- The photos were taken by someone who is a Tasnim journalist and were intentionally watermarked with a Tasnim watermark, so they're Tasnim photos. Per the footer "All Content by Tasnim News Agency is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License," there's no requirement for the photos to be hosted by the Tasnim website. Streamline8988 (talk) 20:52, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- Update: the first two photos can be found at this link.
- Keep the first 2 photos which I reviewed. The other 2 images I have no opinion. --Leoboudv (talk) 23:25, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep They're marked Tasnim News, by a Tasnim journalist. I think they're clearly Tasnim photos, so subject to the Tasnim license. The license doesn't say "All Content by Tasnim News Agency and on our web site". --GRuban (talk) 19:45, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
Kept: the first 2 as confirmed license rewiev, deleted the other 2. --JuTa 15:08, 14 June 2019 (UTC)