Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2019/01/27
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Violation of rights - publication not authorized!!! 79.218.99.73 12:12, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
Keep Photo shows a public event and does not hurt any privacy. --Erika H. List (talk) 14:21, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
DELETE!!! On this event no photographers with professional equipment were allowed to take pictures neither permitted to publish unauthorized pictures! Furthermore the uploader loaded up a plenty of unauthorized pictures of this event which does not provide any additional information. Even in case of authorized pictures 1 or 2 pix would have been enough. The only reason seems to be that the uploader wants to put himself into the spotlight as a photographer! P.S.: If you are unsure concerning the non-authorization, don't hesitate to get in touch with the shown person via info @bolivar-music.de P.P.S.: By the way this photo doesn't show a public event. In this particular case just a woman smiling!
- Keep. The adherence to, or violation of, any agreement to not take photographs (or not take a certain class of photographs) has no bearing on the free license status of this work. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:44, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
DELETE!!! The uploader's assertion "All identifiable persons shown specifically consented to publication of this photograph or video." is false!!! Shown person NEVER consented to publication! Violation of rights! Contact: info @bolivar-music.de . Furthermore it was not a public event in the sense of requested conditions, as it was just a small concert where tickets were sold to a small amount of people and where photographers taking photos for unauthorized publication were explicitly forbidden.
DELETE!!! No consent was given by the shown person to upload the pictures and provide it for worldwide use, which - under these circumstances - is a violation of rights as consent was never given. This effects the person's interests.Sunrider53 (talk) 09:52, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Sorry, but I had obtained permission to photograph during the concert. It was given to me by Mr. Martin Engelien, head of the Go Music concert series, including an agreement with the other musicians. There must be a misunderstanding. --J.-H. Janßen (talk) 21:34, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept, permission exists. Taivo (talk) 06:30, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
Violation of rights - publication not authorized!!! - Dear Mister Janßen, Mr. Martin Engelien maybe gave you the permission to take photos of him, but he never gave you the permission to take photos of me, because I, Sylvia Gonzalez Bolivar, never gave Martin Engelien the permission! I never gave it to you neither. So, it is wrong what you say! You never received my permission to take photos of me! Not by me and not by Mr. Martin Engelien. By the way: he has no rights to give you the permission to take photos of me!!! Otherwise: show me any document that says so!! So, I expect, that these photos are deleted asap!!!! I repeat: PERMISSION DOES NOT EXIST!!! Regards, Sylvia Gonzalez Bolivar 62.143.230.8 17:40, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:26, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Identifiable person shown in this photograph, in this case myself, didn't consented to publication. The uploader assertion is wrong! Sunrider53 (talk) 21:32, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Guanaco (talk) 21:48, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Fair use media file - non-free logo recognizable (there is a copyright on the recognizable "R" that stands for the brand "Replay"). Recognizable especially on this high resolution picture. Xylometa1980 (talk) 06:56, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. The "R" is maybe trademarked but not copyrighted. --Raymond 09:11, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Violation of rights - publication not authorized!!! Sunrider53 (talk) 12:25, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Photo shows a public event and does not hurt any privacy. --Erika H. List (talk) 14:30, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
DELETE!!! On this event no photographs with professional equipment were allowed to take pictures neither permitted to publish unauthorized pictures! Furthermore the uploader loaded up a plenty of unauthorized pictures of this event which does not provide any additional information. Even in case of authorized pictures 1 or 2 pix would have been enough. The only reason seems to be that the uploader wants to put himself into the spotlight as a photograph! P.S.: If you are unsure concerning the non-authorization, don't hesitate to get in touch with the shown person via info @bolivar-music.de
- Keep. The adherence to, or violation of, any agreement to not take photographs (or not take a certain class of photographs) has no bearing on the free license status of this work. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:41, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
DELETE!!! The uploader's assertion "All identifiable persons shown specifically consented to publication of this photograph or video." is false!!! Shown person NEVER consented to publication! Violation of rights! Contact: info @bolivar-music.de . Furthermore it was not a public event in the sense of requested conditions, as it was just a small concert where tickets were sold to a small amount of people and where photographers taking photos for unauthorized publication were explicitly forbidden. Sunrider53 (talk) 09:51, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept, permission exists. Taivo (talk) 06:49, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
Violation of rights - publication not authorized!!! - Dear Mister Janßen, Mr. Martin Engelien maybe gave you the permission to take photos of him, but he never gave you the permission to take photos of me, because I, Sylvia Gonzalez Bolivar, never gave Martin Engelien the permission! I never gave it to you neither. So, it is wrong what you say! You never received my permission to take photos of me! Not by me and not by Mr. Martin Engelien. By the way: he has no rights to give you the permission to take photos of me!!! Otherwise: show me any document that says so!! So, I expect, that these photos are deleted asap!!!! I repeat: PERMISSION DOES NOT EXIST!!! Regards, Sylvia Gonzalez Bolivar 62.143.230.8 17:42, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Guanaco (talk) 02:22, 1 September 2017 (UTC)
Identifiable person shown in this photograph, in this case myself, didn't consented to publication. The uploader assertion is wrong! Sunrider53 (talk) 21:39, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Guanaco (talk) 21:48, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Fair use media file - non-free logo recognizable (there is a copyright on the recognizable "R" that stands for the brand "Replay"). Recognizable especially on this high resolution picture. Xylometa1980 (talk) 06:57, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. The "R" is maybe trademarked but not copyrighted. --Raymond 09:11, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Fair use media file - non-free logo recognizable (there is a copyright on the recognizable "R" that stands for the brand "Replay"). Recognizable especially on this high resolution picture Xylometa1980 (talk) 06:57, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. The "R" is maybe trademarked but not copyrighted. --Raymond 09:11, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Fair use media file - non-free logo recognizable (there is a copyright on the recognizable "R" that stands for the brand "Replay"). Recognizable especially on this high resolution picture Xylometa1980 (talk) 07:00, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. The "R" is maybe trademarked but not copyrighted. --Raymond 09:12, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Violation of rights - publication not authorized!!! Sunrider53 (talk) 12:22, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Photo shows a public event and does not hurt any privacy. --Erika H. List (talk) 14:29, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
DELETE!!! On this event no photographs with professional equipment were allowed to take pictures neither permitted to publish unauthorized pictures! Furthermore the uploader loaded up a plenty of unauthorized pictures of this event which does not provide any additional information. Even in case of authorized pictures 1 or 2 pix would have been enough. The only reason seems to be that the uploader wants to put himself into the spotlight as a photograph! P.S.: If you are unsure concerning the non-authorization, don't hesitate to get in touch with the shown person via info@bolivar-music.de
- Keep. The adherence to, or violation of, any agreement to not take photographs (or not take a certain class of photographs) has no bearing on the free license status of this work. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:41, 25 August 2017 (UTC)
DELETE!!! The uploader's assertion "All identifiable persons shown specifically consented to publication of this photograph or video." is false!!! Shown person NEVER consented to publication! Violation of rights! Contact: info @bolivar-music.de . Furthermore it was not a public event in the sense of requested conditions, as it was just a small concert where tickets were sold to a small amount of people and where photographers taking photos for unauthorized publication were explicitly forbidden. Sunrider53 (talk) 09:38, 27 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept, permission exists. Taivo (talk) 06:47, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
Violation of rights - publication not authorized!!! - Dear Mister Janßen, Mr. Martin Engelien maybe gave you the permission to take photos of him, but he never gave you the permission to take photos of me, because I, Sylvia Gonzalez Bolivar, never gave Martin Engelien the permission! I never gave it to you neither. So, it is wrong what you say! You never received my permission to take photos of me! Not by me and not by Mr. Martin Engelien. By the way: he has no rights to give you the permission to take photos of me!!! Otherwise: show me any document that says so!! So, I expect, that these photos are deleted asap!!!! I repeat: PERMISSION DOES NOT EXIST!!! Regards, Sylvia Gonzalez Bolivar 62.143.230.8 17:41, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
Speedy keep on procedual close grounds, no new reasons for deletion expressed. The community consensus on previous deletion request was keep. Again, you may contact legal@wikimedia.org or express your personal concerns directly with the uploader. Please be civil. Streisand effect, anyone? 2001:2003:54FA:2232:0:0:0:1 21:27, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
Info: User:Taivo also blocked the nominating IP-address for vandalism. 2001:2003:54FA:2232:0:0:0:1 22:07, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:27, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Identifiable person shown in this photograph, in this case myself, didn't consented to publication. The uploader assertion is wrong! Sunrider53 (talk) 21:37, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Guanaco (talk) 21:48, 30 September 2017 (UTC)
Fair use media file - non-free logo recognizable (there is a copyright on the recognizable "R" that stands for the brand "Replay"). Recognizable especially on this high resolution picture Xylometa1980 (talk) 07:00, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. The "R" is maybe trademarked but not copyrighted. --Raymond 09:12, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Fred MacMurray CejeroC (talk) 11:37, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. --Эlcobbola talk 13:00, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
This graphic can be deleted! Replaced by this new version: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Synthese_von_tert.-Butylamin.svg Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 13:15, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Delete Graphic can be deleted, I replaced it with this new version. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 13:20, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader's request. Unused. Ed (Edgar181) 13:31, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Accidently uploaded. Not encyclopedic Mattinbgn (talk) 01:46, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 10:12, 27 Januar 2019 UTC: G7 --Krdbot 14:16, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
vulgar image Bohbye (talk) 06:35, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 10:11, 27 Januar 2019 UTC: Vandalism, only used for vandalism on Enwiki --Krdbot 14:17, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deshehrabagh Mayankvivek (talk) 09:29, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: by Herbythyme. --Achim (talk) 19:13, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
wrong created category Володимир Ф (talk) 17:28, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, bad name. --Achim (talk) 19:10, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
This graphic can be deleted! It´s a old and unused version! Replaced by this one: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Synthese_von_Essigs%C3%A4ure-n-pentylester.svg Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 15:17, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Old and unused file, already replaced by this graphic. Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 15:19, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader request. Unused. Ed (Edgar181) 20:47, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
not a "own work" by the uploader, but a copyviol from winx-club.wikia.com.--Luca•M 13:15, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 21:40, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
not a "own work" by the uploader, but a copyviol from it.kisspng.com.--Luca•M 13:11, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 21:41, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
not a "own work" by the uploader, but a copyviol from winx.fandom.com.--Luca•M 13:17, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 21:41, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
URV - Wasserzeichen und damit Namensnennung wie von Autor erwünscht wurde entfernt Haster2 (talk) 21:43, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Derivative work. Source, licence and author is mentioned as required by cc-by-sa 4.0: "Creator if supplied and attribution parties if designated in reasonable manner". Namensnennung wie vom Autor erwünscht ("Gregor Rom") ist in der Dateiseite enthalten. Speedy Keep / Schnellbehalten. --Sargoth (talk) 21:51, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: No copyvio, original File:Nord-Kivu und Ituri.png is licensed under cc-by-sa 4.0 and so everybody can copy, redistribute, remix and transform this picture, when he names the author and the license. --Ra'ike T C 21:53, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal image, non-notable person. Uploader is only spamming other projects, out of commons scope. -★- PlyrStar93 →Message me. ← 15:46, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted by Ronhjones at 23:22, 27 Januar 2019 UTC: Previously deleted file File:Farnaaz.png --Krdbot 02:14, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Missing a charge (corrected as File:SlimeBorate.png) DMacks (talk) 19:59, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Agree. As the author of this art, it w should be discarded. --Smokefoot (talk) 21:13, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (non-controversial, uploader concurs). --DMacks (talk) 03:16, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ungal selva (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 10:14, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ungal selva (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 15:01, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:33, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ungal selva (talk · contribs)
[edit]The files are private and self-promoting, which is a violation of COM:PS.廣九直通車 (talk) 10:18, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:27, 11 February 2019 (UTC)
Above COM:TOO, uploaded by user with history of copyvios funplussmart (talk) 21:46, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, by Túrelio with reason "Non-free content. Image is of a cover of an audio recording, and the copyright for it is most likely owned by either the publisher of the work or the artist(s) which produced the recording or cover artwork in question. See en:File:XXXTENTACION-Sad-Changes-Single-Cover.jpg for closely related cover". Taivo (talk) 08:24, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Likely derivative work per COM:TOY — Racconish 💬 14:59, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: See UDR. --Yann (talk) 07:54, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Per COM:TOYS A1Cafel (talk) 06:25, 23 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:20, 30 October 2020 (UTC)
Personal photo. Not used. Nv8200p (talk) 01:12, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:22, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Personal photo. Not used. Nv8200p (talk) 01:13, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:22, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Personal photo. Not used. Nv8200p (talk) 01:21, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:22, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- photo quality and significance of the photo is low--Ayratayrat (talk) 17:58, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:22, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- photo quality and significance of the photo is low — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ayratayrat (talk • contribs) 17:58, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:22, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
photo quality and significance of the photo is low --Ayratayrat (talk) 17:57, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:22, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- photo quality and significance of the photo is low--Ayratayrat (talk) 18:00, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:23, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- photo quality and significance of the photo is low--Ayratayrat (talk) 18:01, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:23, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- photo quality and significance of the photo is low--Ayratayrat (talk) 18:01, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:23, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- photo quality and significance of the photo is low--Ayratayrat (talk) 18:01, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:23, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- photo quality and significance of the photo is low--Ayratayrat (talk) 18:01, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:23, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- low quality фтв questionable relevance--Ayratayrat (talk) 17:22, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:23, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- photo quality and significance of the photo is low--Ayratayrat (talk) 18:04, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:23, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- photo quality and significance of the photo is low--Ayratayrat (talk) 18:04, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:23, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- photo quality and significance of the photo is low--Ayratayrat (talk) 18:04, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:23, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- photo quality and significance of the photo is low--Ayratayrat (talk) 18:04, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:23, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- photo quality and significance of the photo is low --Ayratayrat (talk) 09:41, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:23, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
- photo quality and significance of the photo is low --Ayratayrat (talk) 12:01, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:26, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by R-Star Roushan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 10:26, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:23, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:27, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
FBMD at MD. E4024 (talk) 02:50, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:00, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
FBMD at MD. E4024 (talk) 02:51, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:00, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
FBMD at MD. E4024 (talk) 02:55, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:00, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art - Sining Lakbay, GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall (Araneta Center)
[edit]These artworks are not in the public domain and there is no FOP in the Philippines. Mostly unknown artists but based on the gallery's description, the paintings were made by artists from the University of the Philippines. The sculpture, entitled Liwanag, is a piece by Jenny Cortes.
- File:505SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 01.jpg
- File:505SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 02.jpg
- File:505SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 03.jpg
- File:505SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 04.jpg
- File:505SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 05.jpg
- File:505SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 06.jpg
- File:505SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 07.jpg
- File:505SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 08.jpg
- File:505SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 09.jpg
- File:505SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 10.jpg
- File:505SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 11.jpg
- File:505SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 12.jpg
- File:505SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 13.jpg
- File:505SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 14.jpg
- File:505SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 15.jpg
- File:505SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 16.jpg
- File:505SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 17.jpg
- File:505SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 18.jpg
- File:505SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 19.jpg
- File:505SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 20.jpg
- File:505SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 21.jpg
- File:505SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 24.jpg
- File:505SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 25.jpg
- File:505SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 26.jpg
- File:505SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 27.jpg
- File:505SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 28.jpg
- File:505SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 29.jpg
- File:505SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 30.jpg
- File:505SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 31.jpg
- File:505SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 32.jpg
- File:505SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 33.jpg
- File:505SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 34.jpg
- File:505SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 35.jpg
- File:505SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 36.jpg
- File:505SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 37.jpg
- File:505SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 38.jpg
- File:505SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 39.jpg
- File:505SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 40.jpg
- File:505SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 41.jpg
- File:505SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 42.jpg
- File:505SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 43.jpg
- File:505SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 44.jpg
- File:505SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 45.jpg
- File:505SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 48.jpg
- File:505SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 49.jpg
- File:554SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 01.jpg
- File:554SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 02.jpg
- File:554SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 03.jpg
- File:554SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 04.jpg
- File:554SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 05.jpg
- File:554SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 14.jpg
- File:554SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 15.jpg
- File:554SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 16.jpg
- File:554SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 17.jpg
- File:554SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 18.jpg
- File:554SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 19.jpg
- File:554SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 20.jpg
- File:554SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 21.jpg
- File:554SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 22.jpg
- File:554SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 23.jpg
- File:554SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 24.jpg
- File:554SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 25.jpg
- File:554SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 26.jpg
- File:554SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 27.jpg
- File:554SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 28.jpg
- File:554SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 29.jpg
- File:554SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 30.jpg
- File:554SiningSaysay Philippine History in Art Sining Lakbay GateWay Gallery, Gateway Mall Araneta Center 31.jpg
Howhontanozaz (talk) 03:21, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for all the messages; when I took these pictures I asked permission from the officers, and I was told that taking photos of these are allowed, especially they appear to be advertisements of the mall for public learning; at any rate, I respectfully submit to the sound discretion of more learned editors on the matter; very sincerely yours Judgefloro 06:35, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- May I suggest a Written-Formal Query on No Freedom of Panoramana in the Philippines to Director General Josephine Rima-Santiago
- Considering that a New Director has been appointed replacing Director Blancaflor (who, I presume did not categorically respond on my or your editors' query on No Freedom of Panoramana in the Philippines) it is but just and fitting that Senior editors or sysops of Wikimedia Commons formally submit a written Query on the matter, to settle once and for all whether photos should be deleted or not based on the present rules of Commons on the matter. Director General Josephine Rima-Santiago of Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines Very sincerely Judgefloro 09:41, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- Considering that a New Director has been appointed replacing Director Blancaflor (who, I presume did not categorically respond on my or your editors' query on No Freedom of Panoramana in the Philippines) it is but just and fitting that Rulings on these Deletion of images entries be held in abeyance for the sake of Wisdom of future Users and global learners of Wikimedia Commons; today, I formally submitted a written Query on the matter, to settle once and for all whether photos should be deleted or not based on the present rules of Commons on the matter. Director General Josephine Rima-Santiago of Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines
- Letter to Intellectual Property Office (Philippines) IPO Director General Josephine Rima-Santiago (Philippines) 6 pages Letter from Judge Florentino V. Floro, Jr. or User:Judgefloro regardings Commons:Freedom of panorama specifically Freedom of panorama Philippines Re: Request for a Definitive Opinion on Freedom of panorama concerning Wikimedia Commons Photography - Uploading - Publishing vis-a-vis the IP Code of the Philippines (Act No. 8293) (2015 Edition), Chapter VIII ("Limitations on copyright) which does not appear to make any exception for photographs of copyrighted works. This letter is mailed today via LBC mail as evidenced by Category:LBC Express receipts Very sincerely yours, Judgefloro 08:26, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
- Considering that a New Director has been appointed replacing Director Blancaflor (who, I presume did not categorically respond on my or your editors' query on No Freedom of Panoramana in the Philippines) it is but just and fitting that Rulings on these Deletion of images entries be held in abeyance for the sake of Wisdom of future Users and global learners of Wikimedia Commons; today, I formally submitted a written Query on the matter, to settle once and for all whether photos should be deleted or not based on the present rules of Commons on the matter. Director General Josephine Rima-Santiago of Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:00, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Guillermo Tolentino
[edit]No freedom of panorama in the Philippines. The Philippines have a copyright term of life+50 years, so the statues enter the public domain in the Philippines in 2027. In the United States, they enter the public domain 95 years after they were erected. Can be undeleted in 2027 or 95 years after the statues were erected, whichever is later.
Stefan4 (talk) 20:34, 11 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:33, 18 December 2012 (UTC)
- Recent
Comment: if ever FOP is introduced here, for File:Andres Bonifacio Monument.jpg, please restore only the version 21:07, 27 September 2012 by 14macgirl, as the two different versions are blatant copyvios. Thanks. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:56, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
Files in Category:Guillermo Tolentino
[edit]Guillermo Tolentino died in 1976. His works would be public domain in the Philippines in 2027 (1976+51).
- File:09801jfHiyas ng Bulacan Museum Blas Ople Malolos Cityfvf 01.jpg
- File:09801jfHiyas ng Bulacan Museum Blas Ople Malolos Cityfvf 02.jpg
- File:EDS masterguitarist.JPG
- File:FvfMuseum6730 01.JPG
- File:FvfMuseum6730 14.JPG
- File:FvfMuseum6730 17.JPG
- File:FvfMuseum6730 18.JPG
- File:FvfMuseum6730 19.JPG
- File:FvfMuseum6730 20.JPG
- File:FvfMuseum6730 21.JPG
- File:FvfMuseum6730 22.JPG
- File:FvfMuseum6730 23.JPG
- File:FvfMuseum6730 24.JPG
- File:FvfMuseum6730 25.JPG
- File:FvfMuseum6730 26.JPG
- File:FvfMuseum6730 27.JPG
- File:FvfMuseum6730 28.JPG
- File:FvfMuseum6730 29.JPG
- File:FvfMuseum6730 35.JPG
- File:FvfMuseum6730 36.JPG
- File:FvfMuseum6730 37.JPG
- File:FvfMuseum6730 38.JPG
- File:FvfMuseum6730 39.JPG
Howhontanozaz (talk) 07:47, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:01, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
COM:PENIS, Too low quality to be useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 10:12, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Worthless, poor quality,redundant and out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 00:40, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- I'm not commenting on the content of this DR, but AshFriday seems to reply with the exact same statement over, and over, and over, and over again. What value does that add to the conversation? This person doesn't seem to comment on the content being discussed but leaves a repetitive message in order to let any admin think that there is another "vote" for deletion which is playing with any actual forms of consensus based on content. So any admin reviewing this please take the above in context. Please use actual arguments. Also note that some uploaders have found these comment less than collegial. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:38, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:33, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
This guy's contributions have been DR'd and deleted twice before. I fail to see how they add anything to Commons however if they are deleted again I feel the account should be blocked to save wasting time in the future.
- File:Male masturbation 05.jpg
- File:Male masturbation 06.jpg
- File:Male masturbation 04.jpg
- File:Male masturbation 03.jpg
- File:Male masturbation 02.jpg
Herby talk thyme 08:49, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
- Delete all: Commons is not your personal free web host. In addition poor quality. --Achim55 (talk) 12:26, 19 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 04:26, 28 December 2021 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kiraniyeractor (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
- File:IMG-20181008-WA0006.jpg
- File:20180224 205155nnm.jpg
- File:20181008 231103jj.jpg
- File:IMG-20190101-WA0006.jpg
- File:IMG-20180220-WA0003.jpg
- File:20181008 230911pp.jpg
- File:IMG-20181108-WA0022.jpg
- File:20181209 101800007hjj.jpg
- File:IMG-20190110-WA0004.jpg
- File:IMG-20181207-WA0108.jpg
- File:IMG-20181021-WA0019 wife.jpg
- File:IMG-20181014-WA0013.jpg
- File:IMG-20181021-WA0016.jpg
- File:IMG-20180810-WA0032.jpg
- File:IMG-20181214-WA0021.jpg
- File:IMG-20180919-WA0017.jpg
- File:IMG-20180913-WA0009.jpg
- File:IMG-20180914-WA0036.jpg
- File:IMG-20180531-WA0032.jpg
- File:IMG-20180601-WA0003.jpg
- File:IMG-20180610-WA0007.jpg
- File:IMG-20180601-WA0004.jpg
- File:IMG-20180205-WA0047.jpg
- File:20180720 012719bnw.jpg
- File:20181008 093353 kiran with bala.jpg
- File:IMG-20181214-WA0010.jpg
- File:IMG-20181021-WA0007.jpg
- File:IMG-20181122-WA0006.jpg
- File:20181209 101920kovalam.jpg
- File:IMG-20180916-WA0011.jpg
- File:20180809 20nansnjs.jpg
- File:IMG-20190108-WA0013.jpg
- File:Night effect.jpg
- File:20180601 205113bbb.jpg
- File:IMG-20190123-WA0031.jpg
- File:IMG-20181214-WA0005.jpg
Ies (talk) 10:22, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:32, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
- Out of COM:scope. Commons is not a depository for private files Kathisma (talk) 13:10, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:28, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Looks like a derivative work (still from something). Is it free? E4024 (talk) 02:01, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:38, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Screen grab is not own work of uploader Bohbye (talk) 02:24, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:38, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
photo is clearly not public domain Howhontanozaz (talk) 02:31, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:37, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted poster B dash (talk) 02:44, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:38, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
- photo quality and significance of the photo is low---Ayratayrat (talk) 18:26, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: quality is OK. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:38, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
- photo quality and significance of the photo is low --Ayratayrat (talk) 17:58, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:38, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
- photo quality and significance of the photo is low--Ayratayrat (talk) 18:01, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:38, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
- photo quality and significance of the photo is low---Ayratayrat (talk) 18:26, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:38, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
- photo quality and significance of the photo is low--Ayratayrat (talk) 18:01, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:36, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
- photo quality and significance of the photo is low---Ayratayrat (talk) 18:26, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:36, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
- photo quality and significance of the photo is low---Ayratayrat (talk) 18:26, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: quality is OK. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:36, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
- photo quality and significance of the photo is low---Ayratayrat (talk) 18:26, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: quality is OK. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:36, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
- photo quality and significance of the photo is low---Ayratayrat (talk) 18:26, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:36, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
No added values to Commons ThatBPengineer (talk) 03:41, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:37, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
- photo quality and significance of the photo is low---Ayratayrat (talk) 18:26, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:37, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Low quality pics for COmmons. TOo blur for any uses in any documents ThatBPengineer (talk) 03:48, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:37, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Similar to https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1823650194377386&set=a.101592603249829&type=3&theater Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:12, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Only used in speedily deleted vanity article ([1]) in no.wikipedia. Let's speedy delete the photo as well. Regards, Kjetil_r 21:58, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:39, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
user:Summerboy1977
[edit]Nominating these contribs by Summerboy1977 (talk · contribs):
- File:Maria Emma Mejia addressing Generals at Permanent Mission of Colombia in New York.jpg
- File:Maria Emma Mejia addressing Generals at Permanent Mission of Colombia in New York.jpg
- File:Ambassador Maria Emma Mejia and Deputy Permanent Representative (left) Ambassador Francisco Gonzalez.jpg
- File:Ambassador Maria Emma Mejia addressing Colombian General prior to enter into force agreement for Colombia's participation in United Nations Peacekeeping Operations.jpg
- File:Maria Emma Mejia como embajadora y representante permanente de Colombia ante las Naciones Unidas 31.png
- File:Maria Emma Mejia como embajadora y representante permanente de Colombia ante las Naciones Unidas 30.jpg
- File:Maria Emma Mejia como embajadora y representante permanente de Colombia ante las Naciones Unidas 20.jpg
- File:Maria Emma Mejia como embajadora y representante permanente de Colombia ante las Naciones Unidas 21.jpg
- File:Maria Emma Mejia como embajadora y representante permanente de Colombia ante las Naciones Unidas 19.jpg
- File:Maria Emma Mejia como embajadora y representante permanente de Colombia ante las Naciones Unidas 18.jpg
- File:Maria Emma Mejia como embajadora y representante permanente de Colombia ante las Naciones Unidas 17.jpg
- File:Maria Emma Mejia como embajadora y representante permanente de Colombia ante las Naciones Unidas 16.jpg
- File:Maria Emma Mejia como embajadora y representante permanente de Colombia ante las Naciones Unidas 15.jpg
- File:Maria Emma Mejia como embajadora y representante permanente de Colombia ante las Naciones Unidas 14.jpg
- File:Maria Emma Mejia como embajadora y representante permanente de Colombia ante las Naciones Unidas 13.jpg
- File:Maria Emma Mejia como embajadora y representante permanente de Colombia ante las Naciones Unidas 12.jpg
- File:Maria Emma Mejia como embajadora y representante permanente de Colombia ante las Naciones Unidas 11.jpg
- File:Maria Emma Mejia como embajadora y representante permanente de Colombia ante las Naciones Unidas 10.jpg
- File:Maria Emma Mejia como embajadora y representante permanente de Colombia ante las Naciones Unidas 09.jpg
- File:Maria Emma Mejia como embajadora y representante permanente de Colombia ante las Naciones Unidas 04.jpg
- File:Maria Emma Mejia como embajadora y representante permanente de Colombia ante las Naciones Unidas 03.jpg
- File:Maria Emma Mejia como embajadora y representante permanente de Colombia ante las Naciones Unidas 01.jpg
- File:Maria Emma Mejia como embajadora y representante permanente de Colombia ante las Naciones Unidas 02.jpg
Several files from the uploaded has been deleted because they belong to UN photographers, as indicates in metadata. These files haven't metadata at all. Authorship should be verificated through OTRS, IMHO. Regards. --Ganímedes (talk) 23:13, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:40, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
(c) The Storyalist www.facebook.com/thestoryalist Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:19, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:41, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 23:29, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:41, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Damaged photo Snowdawg (talk) 23:37, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:41, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Satpal Singh Sandhu (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 10:54, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:42, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 15:12, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:43, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Daniwagnitz (talk · contribs)
[edit]These files can easily be found on internet in different places, which makes me believe that they were dowloaded and uploaded on Commons with improper claim of authorship. Also, there is no reference to the author on original sources.
- File:Spaki.jpg
- File:Domgeremiaslondrina.png
- File:Dombanejamin.jpg
- File:DomGeremiasSteinmetz.jpg
- File:DomGeremias.jpg
- File:Brasão de Dom Geraldo Fernandes.jpg
- File:Madre Leonia.jpg
- File:Coast of arms de Dom Geraldo Sigaud.png
- File:Sigaud.jpg
- File:Orlandinho.png
- File:Brasaoalbano.jpg
- File:Taddei.jpg
- File:DomParedes.jpg
- File:Domvirgilio.jpg
- File:Mazaroto.jpg
—Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 15:18, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:43, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mark Parken (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:45, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Not an own work and probably out of scope also. E4024 (talk) 15:58, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:45, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:45, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from poster. Should be blanked to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:07, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:44, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by KareemKhan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Official symbols. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.
- File:Flag of Seminole County, Florida.jpg
- File:Flag of Altamonte Springs, Florida.png
- File:Flag of Plant City, Florida.jpg
- File:Flag of Temple Terrace, Florida.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:09, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:43, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Unused personal file, out of Commons scope. E4024 (talk) 11:33, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Jameslwoodward at 12:40, 31 Januar 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Masalli qasimli --Krdbot 19:33, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Is this file empty or do I have a browser problem? I DR it due to lack of MD and user behaviour. E4024 (talk) 16:09, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - file is indeed empty. --Jcb (talk) 13:44, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by KorcaPlusTV (talk · contribs)
[edit]used for spam only, unlikely to be own work and out of scope.
- File:Korca plus LOGO..png
- File:Eduart bardhushi - korca plus tv.jpg
- File:Eduart Bardhushi- Korca Plus.png
- File:Korca Plus TV - INFO.png
Praxidicae (talk) 20:19, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:46, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by EChannelKorca (talk · contribs)
[edit]Used for userpage spam, no project usage and likely copyvios.
- File:Eduart Bardhushi - Korca Plus.png
- File:Eduart Bardhushi.png
- File:Presidenti i Korça Plus,Eduart Bardhushi,me rastin e 2 vjetorit te televizionit..jpg
- File:Korca Plus TV info ne tabele.png
- File:Korca Plus TV info wikipedia.png
- File:Korca Plus TV- Eduart Bardhushi.jpg
- File:Korca Plus TV logo-2vjetori.png
- File:Korca Plus logo transparent.png
- File:Korca Plus LOGO.png
- File:Korca Plus info wikipedia.png
- File:Korca Plus logo.png
- File:TV Plus Korca logo.png
- File:EHD Korca.png
- File:Kanali E Korca logo.png
- File:Kanali E.gif
- File:E Channel Korca LOGO.gif
Praxidicae (talk) 20:20, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:46, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Allitaround (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal images
- File:7 Съемки клипа "Кукла" - Возвращение.jpg
- File:8 Съемки клипа "Кукла" - Возвращение.jpg
- File:6 Съемки клипа "Кукла" - Возвращение.jpg
- File:4 Съемки клипа "Кукла" - Возвращение.jpg
- File:5 Съемки клипа "Кукла" - Возвращение.jpg
- File:3 Съемки клипа "Кукла" - Возвращение.jpg
- File:1 Съемки клипа "Кукла" - Возвращение.jpg
- File:2 Съемки клипа "Кукла" - Возвращение.jpg
1989 (talk) 21:18, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:47, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Personal images
- File:114 AP IN THE STU.jpg
- File:114 AP IN FORT LAUDERDALE.jpg
- File:114 AP AT SPEEDWAY.jpg
- File:114 AP RECORDING ARTIST.jpg
- File:114 AP IN THE STUDIO.jpg
- File:114 AP BEHIND THE SCENES.jpg
- File:114 AP "SELAZI" VIDEO SHOOT.jpg
- File:114 AP "FORT PIERCE JIT" VIDEO SHOOT.jpg
1989 (talk) 21:20, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:47, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
uploaded by accident. wrong platform Snoop2018 (talk) 21:14, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 06:21, 16 April 2018 UTC: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file: wrong platform --Krdbot 12:37, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
versehentlicher upload, schlechte qualität Thatsit2000 (talk) 21:22, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 13:47, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
copyright violation MisterXS (talk) 20:16, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete this failed upload. --E4024 (talk) 20:20, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 17:15, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Unused image with no meaningful description or categories, uploaded by a user whose only other contribution is one deleted self-promotional edit on Spanish Wikipedia. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. —LX (talk, contribs) 22:44, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 17:14, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
I mistakenly published it in a hurry, hoping to edit later. After I wasted too much time struggling to edit, I realize it's better to delete it and re-upload it with the correct title and date. The File Title and Date of Production are currently wrong and need to be edited. I can only edit Caption and Summary Sirsteve17 (talk) 12:29, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
I mistakenly published it in a hurry, hoping to edit later. After I wasted too much time struggling to edit, I realize it's better to delete it and re-upload it with the correct title and date. The File Title and Date of Production are currently wrong and need to be edited. I can only edit Caption and Summary Sirsteve17 (talk) 11:20, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:39, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Low quality images and unfit for the COmmons usage ThatBPengineer (talk) 04:22, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:39, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Padmalochan Patel (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
- File:बबलू .jpg
- File:PAdmalochan Patel.jpg
- File:Padmalochan .jpg
- File:Padmalochan.jpg
- File:Padmalochan Patel.jpg
Ies (talk) 13:16, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:40, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
not a "own work" by the uploader, but a copyviol from mediagol.it.--Luca•M 10:07, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 21:40, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
El soledadense
[edit]- File:Ruben barroso tocando el contrabajo en el museo jesus soto.jpg
- File:Ruben ernesto.jpg
- File:Protesta en conmemoracion al congreso de angostura 15 de febrero 2014.jpg
- File:Ruben barroso en tabaro comunidad indigena.jpg
- File:Centro para latino america.jpg
- File:Centro de liberalismo clásico.jpg
- File:C Liberalismo Clásico.jpg
- File:Movimiento Estudiantil.gif
Missing EXIF data, including logos and recreations. Some are violations of COM:EDUSE. Uploader has a history of copyright violations. --Jamez42 (talk) 11:52, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:41, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Crows in the rain (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal images
- File:Ppster 2019-01-16 Croped Band.jpg
- File:02 Azadi .jpg
- File:Crows in the Rain Azadi Concert 1 .jpg
- File:Live in shiraz 2017.jpg
- File:Early Years 03.png
- File:Early Years 02.png
- File:Early years 01.jpg
- File:Poster 2019-01-16 Croped.jpg
- File:Poster 2019-01-16 .jpg
- File:Live At Azadi Tower December 2018 .jpg
- File:Ekbatan, 2018.jpg
1989 (talk) 21:07, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:41, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yusufhassanin (talk · contribs)
[edit]Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata, the nature of the images, and the uploader's history. For several of the images, it's also unclear why they would be within our project scope.
- File:Gallery-photogallery pics-pic 114.jpg
- File:Gallery-photogallery pics-pic 112.jpg
- File:Gallery-photogallery pics-pic 101.jpg
- File:Gallery-photogallery pics-pic 104.jpg
- File:Arabiata logo.png
—LX (talk, contribs) 22:05, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:42, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Photo: Jesse Yakubu Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:37, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:16, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Photo: Sherene Hustler Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:54, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:16, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Copyright: Ambrosio Sanchez Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:51, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:15, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unknown person –out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 12:51, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:15, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
- photo quality and significance of the photo is low--Ayratayrat (talk) 11:59, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, quality is fine, and this photo has educational value. --B dash (talk) 14:07, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, already a historical photo. The restaurant is closed. Insider (talk) 08:56, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- This is not a historical photo, but a photo-trash of an ordinary cafe. cafe in Ufa there are more than 1000. for each cafe we will create a category? In our community in a strange way more than 15 photos of this restaurant. I think it falls under advertising.--Ayratayrat (talk) 23:20, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:15, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
- photo quality and significance of the photo is low--Ayratayrat (talk) 12:00, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, quality is fine, and this photo has educational value. --B dash (talk) 14:07, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, already a historical photo. The restaurant is closed. Insider (talk) 08:56, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:14, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
quality and significance of the photo is low --Ayratayrat (talk) 11:53, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, quality is fine, and this photo has educational value. --B dash (talk) 14:08, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- strongly disagree. What educational value do you see in this photo? This photo looks more like Facebook, even Facebook would have been removed from your personal profile!there is no explanatory inscription on the photo that would explain the value of this photo at all. either it's a street or it's some kind of house or it's some kind of unique car or something else ... it doesn't give an idea of anything!--Ayratayrat (talk) 18:23, 16 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:14, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
{{PD-Japan-exempt}} doesn't apply; The JOGMEC holds copyrights of images published on its website [2].
- Sorry,I did not confirm it. I agree with your deletion requests. Thank you for pointing out. NUFoF (talk) 18:50, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:13, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 15:39, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:13, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:21, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:11, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Someone is having fun here, this is a useless collage of unrelated pictures... Frederic Y Bois (talk) 18:55, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:11, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:36, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:10, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
missing subscript 3, nominated by author Smokefoot (talk) 21:22, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
missing subscript 3, nominated by author Smokefoot (talk) 21:23, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Author requested deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:07, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Author requested deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:07, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
missing subscript 3, nominated by author Smokefoot (talk) 21:23, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
missing subscript 3, nominated by author Smokefoot (talk) 21:23, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
missing subscript 3, nominated by author Smokefoot (talk) 21:24, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Author requested deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:07, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Author requested deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:07, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Author requested deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:07, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Unused low-quality personal photo of subject with no apparent notability. Apparently uploaded for spamming in es:PERZIVAL GAMEPLAYS. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of project scope. —LX (talk, contribs) 22:07, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:06, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Private photo of unnotable persons. Picture not used. Out of scope. Pugilist (talk) 22:09, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, likely copyvio too. --Gbawden (talk) 07:06, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
I did not fully understand the upload policy of Wikimedia Commons or licensing when originally submitting the file. Sjgdzn (talk) 22:21, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:06, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
I did not fully understand the upload policy of Wikimedia Commons or licensing when originally submitting the file. Sjgdzn (talk) 22:22, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Author requested deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:05, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
I do not wish it to be on Wikimedia any longer. Redwolfphoto (talk) 22:12, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
- Keep nominator has failed to give a good enough reason for why this file should be deleted. ThatGirlTayler (talk) 22:39, 7 April 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:32, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
I did not fully understand the upload policy of Wikimedia Commons or licensing when originally submitting the file. Sjgdzn (talk) 22:24, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Author requested deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:05, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Unused, completely black image with spammy file description. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. —LX (talk, contribs) 22:24, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:05, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
I did not fully understand the upload policy of Wikimedia Commons or licensing when originally submitting the file. Sjgdzn (talk) 22:25, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Author requested deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:05, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
I did not fully understand the upload policy of Wikimedia Commons or licensing when originally submitting the file. Sjgdzn (talk) 22:26, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Author requested deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 07:04, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Singhhimanshu3344 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 10:00, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Delete as out of scope. --Rrburke (talk) 13:26, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:44, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Singhhimanshu3344 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyvio and unused personal photo.
~Moheen (keep talking) 04:47, 2 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Singhhimanshu3344 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
- File:Himanshu Singh7786.jpg
- File:Akshara Singh.jpg
- File:Singh himanshu.jpg
- File:Singh Himanshu Arvind.jpg
Ies (talk) 07:00, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 13:34, 9 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Singhhimanshu3344 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 16:28, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 18:47, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Singhhimanshu3344 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Note that this user reuploads the same private and previously deleted images again and again and again!
- File:हिमांशु कुमार.jpg
- File:Himanshu Kumar at street.jpg
- File:िहमांशु सिंह.jpg
- File:Himanshu Singh 1.jpg
- File:Himanshu Singh(boy).jpg
Ies (talk) 10:31, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Comment File:Himanshu Singh(boy).jpg it's in use in en:WP. It's obviously a young user, with (I guess) no many idea of the risk of the net and the real purpose of Wikimedia Commons (not social network). Perhaps a little chat about instead some automathic templates could help? --Ganímedes (talk) 11:38, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep the files which are in use. Kind regards, — TBhagat (contribs | talk) 05:08, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Singhhimanshu3344 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 18:55, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: INUSE. --Gbawden (talk) 07:17, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Small and pixelated. Have File:Sodium metaborate structure.svg in the same level of detail DMacks (talk) 20:00, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete As DMacks mentioned above, this file is pixelated and has been already replaced by File:Sodium metaborate structure.svg! I support the deletion! Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 12:44, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 10:09, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
K3AlCl6 contains octahedral [AlCl6]3– not a neutral "AlCl3" surrounded by other K+/Cl– ions. Just like your nice File:Potassium hexafluoroaluminate3D.png case DMacks (talk) 20:13, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Likewise:
DMacks (talk) 20:13, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Sorry, this file follows the following url:NISTClaudio Pistilli (talk) 22:28, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Yes, and they are well-known to be full of complete nonsense. DMacks (talk) 03:13, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Leyo 10:11, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Small with distracting border. Have File:Пентадеканолид.png as higher quality DMacks (talk) 20:23, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 10:11, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Doubtful CC-BY, image from public FB profile (declared authorship: Desana Dudášová), https://www.facebook.com/ChmelarEduard/photos/a.277853988913167/2190178111014069/ Teslaton (talk) 21:34, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:04, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Small resolution, bad quality, most likely derivative work 1989 (talk) 21:21, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:22, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Undescribed photo of an unidentified place, very low resolution - out of scope. ŠJů (talk) 01:09, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:05, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Romeodas74 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 10:28, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:06, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Fictionnal, not in use => out of COM:scope Kathisma (talk) 13:19, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:07, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
fictionnal, not in use => out of COM:scope Kathisma (talk) 14:11, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:08, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
fictionnal, not in use => out of COM:scope Kathisma (talk) 14:11, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:08, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
fictionnal, not in use => out of COM:scope Kathisma (talk) 14:12, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:08, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
not identifiable, probably fictionnal, not in use => out of COM:scope Kathisma (talk) 14:14, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:09, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
fictionnal, not in use => out of COM:scope Kathisma (talk) 14:15, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:09, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
fictionnal, not in use => out of COM:scope Kathisma (talk) 14:20, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:10, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
fictionnal, not in use => out of COM:scope Kathisma (talk) 14:20, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:10, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
fictionnal, not in use => out of COM:scope Kathisma (talk) 14:22, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:10, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
fictionnal, not in use => out of COM:scope Kathisma (talk) 14:22, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:10, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
- Personal selfie photos, out of scope Kolforn (talk) 10:14, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:11, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
fictionnal, not in use => out of COM:scope Kathisma (talk) 14:24, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:13, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
fictionnal, not in use => out of COM:scope Kathisma (talk) 14:26, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:13, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
fictionnal, not in use => out of COM:scope Kathisma (talk) 14:26, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:13, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
fictionnal, not in use => out of COM:scope Kathisma (talk) 14:26, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:13, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
fictionnal, not in use => out of COM:scope Kathisma (talk) 14:27, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:13, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
fictionnal, not in use => out of COM:scope Kathisma (talk) 14:28, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:14, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
fictionnal, not in use => out of COM:scope Kathisma (talk) 14:28, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:14, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
fictionnal, not in use => out of COM:scope Kathisma (talk) 14:31, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:15, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
fictionnal, complotist, not in use => out of COM:scope Kathisma (talk) 14:33, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:16, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
fictionnal, not in use => out of COM:scope Kathisma (talk) 14:34, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:15, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
File:Royal Coat of Arms of the Lauwiner Empire and of Jonas I King Emperor of the Lauwiner Empire.svg
[edit]fictionnal, not in use => out of COM:scope Kathisma (talk) 14:53, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:18, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
File:Royal Coat of Arms of the Lauwiner Empire and of Jonas I of Lauwiner Lesser Version Escutcheon with Crest.svg
[edit]fictionnal, not in use => out of COM:scope Kathisma (talk) 14:53, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:18, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
fictionnal, not in use => out of COM:scope Kathisma (talk) 14:53, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:18, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
spam image uploaded almost 12 years ago by account that has no undeleted edits on any other project and that has no identifiable purpose. Not in project scope. DS (talk) 14:54, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:18, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:16, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:19, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:18, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:18, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Low graphical quality (arrow shafts are jagged/crooked). Have File:Pentacene synthesis.svg as higher quality replacement, that also better illustrates the geometry of the central ring DMacks (talk) 20:45, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Comment Left a note for original uploader (en:User:V8rik). Ronhjones (Talk) 20:54, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Pixelated chemical graphic which is not in use anymore! File:Pentacene synthesis.svg as replacement is well suited! I support the deletion request! Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 18:07, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. Ed (Edgar181) 14:27, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Uploads by Z3greb
[edit]It seems that all the uploads by Z3greb (talk · contribs) come from Youtube videos, without any proof of permission or acceptable licence. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 15:51, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- I agree – insuffisant proofs of permission from Youtube's uploaders –, furthermore this contributor seems not encline to discuss his actions or answer to legitimate questions asked by others. At this point, complete deletion of uploaded files is the only solution.--LPLT (talk) 19:05, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep File:Peter.Doherty.jpg – This is clearly labelled as CC-by at the YouTube source: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yEdZzqn67r0 Andy Dingley (talk) 19:25, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep File:Xenia Fedorova.jpg Channel Thinkerview created this video and released it under a Creative Commons license --Butko (talk) 13:35, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, this one is licensed CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, which is incompatible with COM:L. clpo13(talk) 18:01, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- Speedy keep all and re-nominate individual screenshots that are problematic. Screenshots of freely licensed YouTube videos are okay per COM:SCREENSHOT and COM:WHERE#YouTube. If it's in doubt that a YouTube uploader had the rights to freely license a video (a case of COM:LL), then that should be specified. This DR is much too broad, given that there are many images here with no reason to doubt the legitimacy of the original YouTube uploader, such as File:Bill.Gates.jpg. clpo13(talk) 18:00, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Clpo13: In such cases, the effort should be made by the uploader, not by people who try to sort that out, i.e. deleting everything and asking Z3greb (talk · contribs) to be more careful and checking which files might respect license rules (and therefore those that we could restore). Because that kind of contribution is time-consuming for the others. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 18:56, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- Delete it all and sort it out later is a disruptive way of doing things, especially when images are in use at other projects. Additionally, many images uploaded by this user passed license review even before this DR was created, so your deletion rationale doesn't even apply to them. clpo13(talk) 19:22, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- @Clpo13: In such cases, the effort should be made by the uploader, not by people who try to sort that out, i.e. deleting everything and asking Z3greb (talk · contribs) to be more careful and checking which files might respect license rules (and therefore those that we could restore). Because that kind of contribution is time-consuming for the others. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 18:56, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- I've found two such files tagged with licencereview and I am ready to approve them. This DR is useless. You could just append the template to all and wait for licence reviewers to approve or DR them one by one.--Roy17 (talk) 16:16, 5 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: as per above discussion. --Yann (talk) 06:00, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Similar data existing Brijeshmh (talk) 08:53, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Similar data existing Brijeshmh (talk) 08:56, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Similar data existing Brijeshmh (talk) 08:57, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Similar info existing Brijeshmh (talk) 08:58, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Personal photo, out of scope. --Gbawden (talk) 11:54, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small image, missing EXIF, user upload history. 4nn1l2 (talk) 00:35, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mhhossein talk 06:09, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:People Power Monument
[edit]No freedom of panorama in the Philippines.
- File:EDSAMonumentjf1977 01.JPG
- File:EDSAMonumentjf1977 13.JPG
- File:EDSAMonumentjf1977 14.JPG
- File:EDSAMonumentjf1977 16.JPG
- File:EDSAMonumentjf1977 18.JPG
- File:EDSAMonumentjf1977 22.JPG
- File:EDSAMonumentjf1977 26.JPG
- File:EDSAMonumentjf1977 27.JPG
- File:EDSAMonumentjf1977 28.JPG
- File:EDSAMonumentjf2030 05.JPG
- File:EDSAMonumentjf2030 06.JPG
- File:EDSAMonumentjf2030 07.JPG
- File:EDSAMonumentjf2030 09.JPG
- File:EDSAMonumentjf2030 12.JPG
- File:EDSAMonumentjf2030 13.JPG
- File:EDSAMonumentjf2030 15.JPG
- File:EDSAMonumentjf2030 16.JPG
- File:EDSAMonumentjf2030 17.JPG
- File:EDSAMonumentjf2030 18.JPG
- File:EDSAMonumentjf2030 19.JPG
- File:EDSAMonumentjf2030 20.JPG
- File:EDSAMonumentjf2030 21.JPG
- File:EDSAMonumentjf2030 22.JPG
- File:EDSAMonumentjf2030 23.JPG
- File:EDSAMonumentjf2030 24.JPG
- File:EDSAMonumentjf2030 25.JPG
- File:EDSAMonumentjf2030 26.JPG
- File:EDSAMonumentjf2030 27.JPG
- File:EDSAMonumentjf2030 28.JPG
- File:EDSAMonumentjf2030 29.JPG
- File:EDSAMonumentjf2030 30.JPG
- File:EDSAMonumentjf2030 31.JPG
- File:PPMQuezonCityjf2007 01.JPG
- File:PPMQuezonCityjf2007 03.JPG
- File:PPMQuezonCityjf2007 07.JPG
- File:PPMQuezonCityjf2007 11.JPG
- File:PPMQuezonCityjf2007 12.JPG
Kelly (talk) 16:11, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 07:34, 5 October 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:People Power Monument
[edit]No freedom of panorama in the Philippines. The author, Eduardo Castrillo, died in 2016.
- File:EDSA People Power Monument Creative Shot.jpg
- File:EDSA People Power Monument side view..jpg
- File:EDSA People Power Monument.jpg
- File:People Power Monument Aug 2018.jpg
- File:People Power Monument Back.jpg
- File:People Power Monument Detail.jpg
Howhontanozaz (talk) 03:52, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete I have no objection to the deletion of my contributions. Also no current PD-Philippines tag is applicable that will protect Freedom of Panorama Markoolio97 (talk) 00:23, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mhhossein talk 05:09, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Low quality images ThatBPengineer (talk) 04:15, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Mhhossein talk 06:06, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1949. Jcb (talk) 17:41, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mhhossein talk 06:07, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1949. Jcb (talk) 17:44, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mhhossein talk 06:07, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
vandalism (hear what it sounds like!) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Infovarius (talk • contribs) 2019-01-24T22:18:26 (UTC)
Deleted: @Infovarius: I deleted it, but I don't think it was vandalism. The speaker simply says "Zucker" which is the German word for sugar, so I assume it was a file naming mistake. There are many other pronunciation uploads by this user which are fine. But the file is not needed, as we have already a file for the pronunciation of "Zucker", File:De-Zucker.ogg. Gestumblindi (talk) 22:28, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
- Ah, may be. Because I thought it was "suka" ("bitch" in Russian)... --Infovarius (talk) 20:29, 15 February 2019 (UTC)
- photo significate and quality is poor --Ayratayrat (talk) 13:27, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, quality is fine, and this photo has educational value. --B dash (talk) 14:16, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: We don't have too many images in Category:October avenue, Ufa; quality is not particularly good, but good enough. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:36, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no license. Well there is a CC license, but from 1875 that very unlikely own work of the uploader. A proper source would be needed to apply i.e. {{PD-old}} ow similar. JuTa 20:52, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Photographer is Józef Kordysz aka Joseph Kordysch http://worldcat.org/identities/viaf-301587876/. He died in 1896. Kiev is the location of publication so it's also {{PD-Russian Empire}}. Abzeronow (talk) 22:26, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: @Abzeronow: Maybe you could add some categories; apparently, we have quite a few photos by Kordysch resp. Kordysz, so maybe create a category and a creator template for him to prevent future deletion requests?. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:44, 12 February 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Quezon Memorial Shrine 1
[edit]No freedom of panorama in the Philippines. The artist died in 1989, so this work will not be in the public domain until 2039.
- File:04785jfQuezon City Memorial Circle Gardenfvf 09.jpg
- File:04785jfQuezon City Memorial Circle Gardenfvf 10.jpg
- File:04785jfQuezon City Memorial Circle Gardenfvf 11.jpg
- File:04785jfQuezon City Memorial Circle Gardenfvf 12.jpg
- File:04785jfQuezon City Memorial Circle Gardenfvf 13.jpg
- File:04785jfQuezon City Memorial Circle Gardenfvf 15.jpg
- File:04785jfQuezon City Memorial Circle Gardenfvf 16.jpg
- File:04785jfQuezon City Memorial Circle Gardenfvf 21.jpg
- File:04785jfQuezon City Memorial Circle Gardenfvf 22.jpg
- File:04785jfQuezon City Memorial Circle Gardenfvf 23.jpg
- File:04785jfQuezon City Memorial Circle Gardenfvf 24.jpg
- File:05800jfQuezon Memorial Cityfvf 01.JPG
- File:05800jfQuezon Memorial Cityfvf 02.JPG
- File:05800jfQuezon Memorial Cityfvf 03.JPG
- File:05800jfQuezon Memorial Cityfvf 04.JPG
- File:05800jfQuezon Memorial Cityfvf 05.JPG
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 01.JPG
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 02.JPG
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 03.JPG
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 04.JPG
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 05.JPG
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 06.JPG
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 07.JPG
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 08.JPG
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 09.JPG
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 10.JPG
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 11.JPG
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 12.JPG
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 13.JPG
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 14.JPG
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 15.JPG
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 16.JPG
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 18.JPG
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 19.JPG
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 20.JPG
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 21.JPG
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 23.JPG
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 28.JPG
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 29.JPG
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 31.JPG
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 32.JPG
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 33.JPG
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 34.JPG
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 35.JPG
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 37.JPG
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 40.JPG
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 41.JPG
- File:8051jfQuezon Memorial Circle Monumentfvf 14.JPG
- File:8051jfQuezon Memorial Circle Monumentfvf 22.JPG
- File:8051jfQuezon Memorial Circle Monumentfvf 25.JPG
- File:Quezon City Memorial Circle.jpg
- File:Quezon Memorial Circle 02.jpg
- File:Quezon Memorial Circle 03.jpg
- File:Quezon Memorial Circle 04.jpg
- File:Quezon Memorial Circle 05.jpg
- File:Quezon Memorial Circle 06.jpg
- File:Quezon Memorial Circle 07.jpg
- File:Quezon Memorial Circle 08.jpg
- File:Quezon Memorial Circle 09.jpg
- File:Quezon Memorial Circle 10.jpg
- File:Quezon Memorial Circle 11.jpg
- File:Quezon Memorial Circle 12.jpg
- File:Quezon Memorial Circle.jpg
- File:Quezon Memorial Shrine by Shanax1997.jpg
Howhontanozaz (talk) 04:11, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Oppose The architect was an employee of the government and the shrine is owned and maintained by the government. As such the shrine is considered a work of the government and according to the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines, no copyright subsists in works of the government. This also applies to when the Philippine government was part of the United States during the time the shrine was designed. —seav (talk) 17:24, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Seav: Oh, if that's the case, could someone please undelete these Deletion requests/Files in Category: Quezon Memorial. -Howhontanozaz (talk) 23:47, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for all the messages; when I took these pictures I asked permission from the officers, and I was told that taking photos of these are allowed, especially they appear to be for public learning; I respectfully remain very sincerely yours Judgefloro 06:38, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- May I suggest a Written-Formal Query on No Freedom of Panoramana in the Philippines to Director General Josephine Rima-Santiago
- Considering that a New Director has been appointed replacing Director Blancaflor (who, I presume did not categorically respond on my or your editors' query on No Freedom of Panoramana in the Philippines) it is but just and fitting that Senior editors or sysops of Wikimedia Commons formally submit a written Query on the matter, to settle once and for all whether photos should be deleted or not based on the present rules of Commons on the matter. Director General Josephine Rima-Santiago of Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines Very sincerely Judgefloro 09:41, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- Considering that a New Director has been appointed replacing Director Blancaflor (who, I presume did not categorically respond on my or your editors' query on No Freedom of Panoramana in the Philippines) it is but just and fitting that Rulings on these Deletion of images entries be held in abeyance for the sake of Wisdom of future Users and global learners of Wikimedia Commons; today, I formally submitted a written Query on the matter, to settle once and for all whether photos should be deleted or not based on the present rules of Commons on the matter. Director General Josephine Rima-Santiago of Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines
- Letter to Intellectual Property Office (Philippines) IPO Director General Josephine Rima-Santiago (Philippines) 6 pages Letter from Judge Florentino V. Floro, Jr. or User:Judgefloro regardings Commons:Freedom of panorama specifically Freedom of panorama Philippines Re: Request for a Definitive Opinion on Freedom of panorama concerning Wikimedia Commons Photography - Uploading - Publishing vis-a-vis the IP Code of the Philippines (Act No. 8293) (2015 Edition), Chapter VIII ("Limitations on copyright) which does not appear to make any exception for photographs of copyrighted works. This letter is mailed today via LBC mail as evidenced by Category:LBC Express receipts Very sincerely yours, Judgefloro 08:25, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
- Considering that a New Director has been appointed replacing Director Blancaflor (who, I presume did not categorically respond on my or your editors' query on No Freedom of Panoramana in the Philippines) it is but just and fitting that Rulings on these Deletion of images entries be held in abeyance for the sake of Wisdom of future Users and global learners of Wikimedia Commons; today, I formally submitted a written Query on the matter, to settle once and for all whether photos should be deleted or not based on the present rules of Commons on the matter. Director General Josephine Rima-Santiago of Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines
- Oppose The FOP issue is a gray area of Philippine copyright law that affects images of many modern architectural works in the Philippines posted here on Commons (but not elsewhere on the Web), and I agree with the two this should not be deleted as Seav states is clearly a government-commissioned work. It's just time not to step too far regarding lack of FOP in the Philippines, but I agree US copyright law prevails (the work needs to be both free in the US and the Philippines) and the nominator just did it right. As far as I know, Filipino architects don't mind any pictures of their works, even where posted on the Net; it's just the existing law (from the 1990s) that doesn't reflect reality. --TagaSanPedroAkoTalk -> 02:06, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Quoting user Seav:
- The architect was an employee of the government and the shrine is owned and maintained by the government. As such the shrine is considered a work of the government and according to the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines, no copyright subsists in works of the government. This also applies to when the Philippine government was part of the United States during the time the shrine was designed. —seav (talk) 17:24, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- and PD-PhilippinesGov tag.
{{PD-PhilippinesGov}} Markoolio97 (talk) 00:31, 7 February 2019 (UTC)
Category:Letter (Receipt-Appropriate Action-Feedback) of the Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines (Marou Eduarte - of Josephine Rima-Santiago to Florentino Floro
[edit]- Considering that a New Director has been appointed replacing Director Blancaflor (who, I presume did not categorically respond on my or your editors' query on No Freedom of Panoramana in the Philippines) it is but just and fitting that Rulings on these Deletion of images entries be held in abeyance for the sake of Wisdom of future Users and global learners of Wikimedia Commons; on January 30, 2019, Judge Floro formally submitted a written Query on the matter, to settle once and for all whether photos should be deleted or not based on the present rules of Commons on the matter in the light of IPO-Laws on Copyright of the Philippines Director General Josephine Rima-Santiago of Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines
- Letter to Intellectual Property Office (Philippines) IPO Director General Josephine Rima-Santiago (Philippines) 6 pages Letter from Judge Florentino V. Floro, Jr. or User:Judgefloro regardings Commons:Freedom of panorama specifically Freedom of panorama Philippines Re: Request for a Definitive Opinion on Freedom of panorama concerning Wikimedia Commons Photography - Uploading - Publishing vis-a-vis the IP Code of the Philippines (Act No. 8293) (2015 Edition), Chapter VIII ("Limitations on copyright) which does not appear to make any exception for photographs of copyrighted works. This letter is mailed today via LBC mail as evidenced by Category:LBC Express receipts
- Letter (Receipt-Appropriate Action-Feedback) of the Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines (Marou Eduarte - of Josephine Rima-Santiago to Florentino Floro - dated January 30, 2019 - stating that her IPO Office received Judge Floro's letter dated January 30, 2019 and regarding the latter's "Request for a Definitive Opinion on Freedom of panorama concerning Wikimedia Commons Photography - Uploading - Publishing vis-a-vis the IP Code of the Philippines (Act No. 8293) (2015 Edition), Chapter VIII ("Limitations on copyright”) which does not appear to make any exception for photographs of copyrighted works." The IPO Office stated that Appropriate Action-Feedback will be issued in due course by the IPO as it referred this matter to its subordinate Bureau of the Intellectual Property Office (Philippines) Judgefloro 10:49, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
- Letter to Intellectual Property Office (Philippines) IPO Director General Josephine Rima-Santiago (Philippines) 6 pages Letter from Judge Florentino V. Floro, Jr. or User:Judgefloro regardings Commons:Freedom of panorama specifically Freedom of panorama Philippines Re: Request for a Definitive Opinion on Freedom of panorama concerning Wikimedia Commons Photography - Uploading - Publishing vis-a-vis the IP Code of the Philippines (Act No. 8293) (2015 Edition), Chapter VIII ("Limitations on copyright) which does not appear to make any exception for photographs of copyrighted works. This letter is mailed today via LBC mail as evidenced by Category:LBC Express receipts
- Considering that a New Director has been appointed replacing Director Blancaflor (who, I presume did not categorically respond on my or your editors' query on No Freedom of Panoramana in the Philippines) it is but just and fitting that Rulings on these Deletion of images entries be held in abeyance for the sake of Wisdom of future Users and global learners of Wikimedia Commons; on January 30, 2019, Judge Floro formally submitted a written Query on the matter, to settle once and for all whether photos should be deleted or not based on the present rules of Commons on the matter in the light of IPO-Laws on Copyright of the Philippines Director General Josephine Rima-Santiago of Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines
Kept: {{PD-PhilippinesGov}} applies here. --Ankry (talk) 19:47, 13 February 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Quezon Memorial Shrine 2
[edit]No freedom of pano in the Phils. Ilustre (d. 1989) designed this "beautiful" monument ONLY on his capacity as a private citizen whne he won a competiton. Some "notes" here claiming that it is work by govt are lblatant lies.
- File:04785jfQuezon City Memorial Circle Gardenfvf 09.jpg Delete focus on monument JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:12, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
- File:04785jfQuezon City Memorial Circle Gardenfvf 10.jpg Delete focus on monument
- File:04785jfQuezon City Memorial Circle Gardenfvf 11.jpg Delete focus on monument
- File:04785jfQuezon City Memorial Circle Gardenfvf 12.jpg Delete focus on monument
- File:04785jfQuezon City Memorial Circle Gardenfvf 13.jpg Keep monument out of focus
- File:04785jfQuezon City Memorial Circle Gardenfvf 14.jpg Keep monument out of focus
- File:04785jfQuezon City Memorial Circle Gardenfvf 15.jpg Delete focus on monument
- File:04785jfQuezon City Memorial Circle Gardenfvf 16.jpg Keep out of focus
- File:04785jfQuezon City Memorial Circle Gardenfvf 17.jpg Keep out of focus
- File:04785jfQuezon City Memorial Circle Gardenfvf 21.jpg Delete in focus
- File:04785jfQuezon City Memorial Circle Gardenfvf 22.jpg Delete in focus
- File:04785jfQuezon City Memorial Circle Gardenfvf 23.jpg Delete in focus
- File:04785jfQuezon City Memorial Circle Gardenfvf 24.jpg Keep out of focus
- File:05427jfQuezon Memorial Sky Circlefvf 01.JPG from here Delete with the monumental tower in focus
- File:05427jfQuezon Memorial Sky Circlefvf 02.JPG
- File:05427jfQuezon Memorial Sky Circlefvf 03.JPG
- File:05427jfQuezon Memorial Sky Circlefvf 04.JPG
- File:05427jfQuezon Memorial Sky Circlefvf 05.JPG
- File:05427jfQuezon Memorial Sky Circlefvf 06.JPG
- File:05427jfQuezon Memorial Sky Circlefvf 07.JPG
- File:05427jfQuezon Memorial Sky Circlefvf 08.JPG
- File:05427jfQuezon Memorial Sky Circlefvf 09.JPG
- File:05427jfQuezon Memorial Sky Circlefvf 10.JPG
- File:05427jfQuezon Memorial Sky Circlefvf 11.JPG
- File:05427jfQuezon Memorial Sky Circlefvf 12.JPG
- File:05427jfQuezon Memorial Sky Circlefvf 13.JPG
- File:05427jfQuezon Memorial Sky Circlefvf 14.JPG
- File:05756jfQuezon City Memorial Circlefvf 05.JPG
- File:05756jfQuezon City Memorial Circlefvf 06.JPG
- File:05756jfQuezon City Memorial Circlefvf 08.JPG
- File:05756jfQuezon City Memorial Circlefvf 10.JPG
- File:05756jfQuezon City Memorial Circlefvf 12.JPG
- File:05756jfQuezon City Memorial Circlefvf 13.JPG
- File:05756jfQuezon City Memorial Circlefvf 16.JPG ... up to here Delete as the monument is in focus
- File:05756jfQuezon City Memorial Circlefvf 18.JPG borderline case, but Weak delete as the intented object is the monument itself, and no other subjects here like a crowd or a group of people
- File:05756jfQuezon City Memorial Circlefvf 19.JPG Delete in focus to the monument
- File:05756jfQuezon City Memorial Circlefvf 20.JPG Weak keep smaller sculpture is shown here, but borderline case
- File:05756jfQuezon City Memorial Circlefvf 21.JPG Delete in focus to the monument
- File:05756jfQuezon City Memorial Circlefvf 22.JPG Delete monument in focus
- File:05756jfQuezon City Memorial Circlefvf 23.JPG Delete smaller sculpture
- File:05756jfQuezon City Memorial Circlefvf 24.JPG Delete monument in focus
- File:05756jfQuezon City Memorial Circlefvf 25.JPG Delete monument
- File:05756jfQuezon City Memorial Circlefvf 27.JPG Delete smaller sculpture
- File:05756jfQuezon City Memorial Circlefvf 28.JPG Delete smaller sculpture
- File:05756jfQuezon City Memorial Circlefvf 29.JPG Delete monument
- File:05756jfQuezon City Memorial Circlefvf 30.JPG Delete smaller sculpture
- File:05756jfQuezon City Memorial Circlefvf 31.JPG Delete base of the monument
- File:05756jfQuezon City Memorial Circlefvf 32.JPG Delete smaller sculpture
- File:05756jfQuezon City Memorial Circlefvf 33.JPG Delete base of the monument
- File:05756jfQuezon City Memorial Circlefvf 34.JPG Delete base of the monument
- File:05756jfQuezon City Memorial Circlefvf 35.JPG Delete base of the monument
- File:05756jfQuezon City Memorial Circlefvf 36.JPG Delete monument
- File:05756jfQuezon City Memorial Circlefvf 37.JPG Delete base of the monument
- File:05756jfQuezon City Memorial Circlefvf 38.JPG Delete base of the monument
- File:05756jfQuezon City Memorial Circlefvf 39.JPG Delete base of the monument
- File:05756jfQuezon City Memorial Circlefvf 40.JPG Delete base of the monument
- File:05756jfQuezon City Memorial Circlefvf 41.JPG Keep base is out of focus, smaller sculpture is distant, and the table (text) is out of focus
- File:05756jfQuezon City Memorial Circlefvf 42.JPG Delete base of the monument
- File:05800jfQuezon Memorial Cityfvf 01.JPG Delete base of the monument
- File:05800jfQuezon Memorial Cityfvf 02.JPG Delete monument
- File:05800jfQuezon Memorial Cityfvf 03.JPG Delete base of the monument
- File:05800jfQuezon Memorial Cityfvf 04.JPG Delete base of the monument
- File:05800jfQuezon Memorial Cityfvf 05.JPG Delete base of the monument
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 01.JPG Delete base of the monument
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 02.JPG Delete monument
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 03.JPG Delete base of the monument
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 04.JPG Delete base of the monument
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 05.JPG Delete base of the monument
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 06.JPG Delete base of the monument
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 07.JPG Delete monument
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 08.JPG Delete base of the monument
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 09.JPG Delete base of the monument
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 10.JPG Delete base of the monument
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 11.JPG Delete monument
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 12.JPG Delete base of the monument
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 13.JPG Delete base of the monument
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 14.JPG Delete base of the monument
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 15.JPG Delete monument
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 16.JPG Keep out of focus to the sculptural objects
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 18.JPG Delete base of the monument
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 19.JPG Delete base of the monument
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 20.JPG Delete monument
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 21.JPG Weak keep borderline case but, sculptural objects out of central focus
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 23.JPG Delete monument
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 28.JPG Delete monument
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 29.JPG Weak keep as the base "seems distant" IMO
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 31.JPG from here Delete as the images' motif is the monument...
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 32.JPG
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 33.JPG
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 34.JPG
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 35.JPG
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 37.JPG
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 40.JPG
- File:05805jfQuezon Memorial City Circlefvf 41.JPG
- File:05847jfQuezon Memorial Circle Landmark Elliptical Road Quezon Cityfvf 01.JPG
- File:7958-jfQuezon Memorial Circle Marker Mausoleumfvf 01.JPG
- File:7958-jfQuezon Memorial Circle Marker Mausoleumfvf 02.JPG ... up to here Delete as the main motif of the images is the monument
- File:7958-jfQuezon Memorial Circle Marker Mausoleumfvf 03.JPG Keep text and sign is too simple
- File:7958-jfQuezon Memorial Circle Marker Mausoleumfvf 04.JPG Keep text and sign is too simple
- File:7958-jfQuezon Memorial Circle Marker Mausoleumfvf 07.JPG Delete monument
- File:7958-jfQuezon Memorial Circle Marker Mausoleumfvf 08.JPG Keep text and sign is too simple
- File:7958-jfQuezon Memorial Circle Marker Mausoleumfvf 11.JPG Delete small sculpture
- File:7958-jfQuezon Memorial Circle Marker Mausoleumfvf 14.JPG from here Delete monument in focus...
- File:7958-jfQuezon Memorial Circle Marker Mausoleumfvf 15.JPG
- File:7958-jfQuezon Memorial Circle Marker Mausoleumfvf 16.JPG
- File:7958-jfQuezon Memorial Circle Marker Mausoleumfvf 17.JPG
- File:7958-jfQuezon Memorial Circle Marker Mausoleumfvf 18.JPG
- File:7958-jfQuezon Memorial Circle Marker Mausoleumfvf 19.JPG
- File:7958-jfQuezon Memorial Circle Marker Mausoleumfvf 20.JPG
- File:7958-jfQuezon Memorial Circle Marker Mausoleumfvf 21.JPG
- File:7958-jfQuezon Memorial Circle Marker Mausoleumfvf 22.JPG
- File:7958-jfQuezon Memorial Circle Marker Mausoleumfvf 23.JPG
- File:7958-jfQuezon Memorial Circle Marker Mausoleumfvf 24.JPG
- File:7958-jfQuezon Memorial Circle Marker Mausoleumfvf 27.JPG.... to here Delete monument in focus
- File:7958-jfQuezon Memorial Circle Marker Mausoleumfvf 28.JPG Keep scene is toward the clouds/sky
- File:7958-jfQuezon Memorial Circle Marker Mausoleumfvf 33.JPG Keep no focus on monument
- File:7958-jfQuezon Memorial Circle Marker Mausoleumfvf 37.JPG from here Delete focus on monument...
- File:7958-jfQuezon Memorial Circle Marker Mausoleumfvf 39.JPG
- File:8005jfQuezon Memorial Circlefvf 01.JPG
- File:8005jfQuezon Memorial Circlefvf 02.JPG
- File:8005jfQuezon Memorial Circlefvf 03.JPG
- File:8005jfQuezon Memorial Circlefvf 04.JPG
- File:8005jfQuezon Memorial Circlefvf 05.JPG ... to here Delete focus on monument
- File:8005jfQuezon Memorial Circlefvf 22.JPG Keep no focus on monument
- File:8005jfQuezon Memorial Circlefvf 26.JPG from here Delete focus on monument...
- File:8005jfQuezon Memorial Circlefvf 27.JPG
- File:8005jfQuezon Memorial Circlefvf 28.JPG
- File:8005jfQuezon Memorial Circlefvf 30.JPG
- File:8005jfQuezon Memorial Circlefvf 32.JPG
- File:8005jfQuezon Memorial Circlefvf 33.JPG ...to here Delete focus on monument
- File:8005jfQuezon Memorial Circlefvf 34.JPG Keep general view and monument out of focus
- File:8005jfQuezon Memorial Circlefvf 35.JPG from here Delete focus on monument...
- File:8005jfQuezon Memorial Circlefvf 36.JPG
- File:8005jfQuezon Memorial Circlefvf 37.JPG
- File:8005jfQuezon Memorial Circlefvf 38.JPG
- File:8005jfQuezon Memorial Circlefvf 39.JPG
- File:8005jfQuezon Memorial Circlefvf 40.JPG
- File:8005jfQuezon Memorial Circlefvf 41.JPG
- File:8005jfQuezon Memorial Circlefvf 42.JPG
- File:8051jfQuezon Memorial Circle Monumentfvf 01.JPG
- File:8051jfQuezon Memorial Circle Monumentfvf 02.JPG
- File:8051jfQuezon Memorial Circle Monumentfvf 03.JPG
- File:8051jfQuezon Memorial Circle Monumentfvf 04.JPG
- File:8051jfQuezon Memorial Circle Monumentfvf 05.JPG
- File:8051jfQuezon Memorial Circle Monumentfvf 07.JPG ... to here Delete focus on monument
- File:8051jfQuezon Memorial Circle Monumentfvf 14.JPG Keep generic entrance
- File:8051jfQuezon Memorial Circle Monumentfvf 22.JPG Keep unimportant part of the base
- File:8051jfQuezon Memorial Circle Monumentfvf 25.JPG Delete base of the monument
- File:8051jfQuezon Memorial Circle Monumentfvf 30.JPG Delete focus on monument
- File:8051jfQuezon Memorial Circle Monumentfvf 31.JPG Delete focus on monument
- File:8051jfQuezon Memorial Circle Monumentfvf 32.JPG Delete focus on monument
- File:8051jfQuezon Memorial Circle Monumentfvf 33.JPG Delete focus on monument
- File:8051jfQuezon Memorial Circle Monumentfvf 34.JPG Delete focus on the monument
- File:8095jfQuezon Memorial Circle City Monumentfvf 28.JPG Keep no focus on monument
- File:Allan Jay Quesada - Quezon Memorial Circle fountain DSC 2689.jpg Weak keep monument is distant, and the "decorative lights" of the fountain are "ordinary" (thereby the monument no longer becomes sole subject)
- File:Allan Jay Quesada - Quezon Memorial Circle on a sunset DSC 2588.jpg Delete monument is the sole subject
- File:Circle at QC.jpg Delete focus on monument
- File:Manuel Quezon Memorial Shrine.JPG Delete focus on monument
- File:Pure Rosero - Quezon Monument 01.jpg Delete focus on monument
- File:Pure Rosero - Quezon Monument 02.jpg Delete monument is an essential element here. Blurring or cropping would render it unusable
- File:Pure Rosero - Quezon Monument 03.jpg Delete same as above
- File:QC Circle Monument.jpg Delete monument is substantial here
- File:QC Circle Obelisk.jpg Delete focus on monument
- File:QC MONUMENT009.JPG Delete focus on monument
- File:Quezon City Circle Monument.jpg Delete focus on monument
- File:Quezon City Circle Obelisk.JPG Delete focus on monument
- File:Quezon City Memorial Circle (2).jpg Delete focus on monument
- File:Quezon City Memorial Circle Monument.jpg Delete focus on monument
- File:QUEZON CITY MEMORIAL CIRCLE.jpg Delete focus on monument
- File:Quezon city memorial circle.JPG Delete focus on monument
- File:Quezon City Memorial Circle.jpg Delete focus on monument
- File:Quezon City Memorial Monument.jpg Delete focus on monument
- File:Quezon City Memorial Park.jpg Delete focus on monument
- File:Quezon City Monument.JPG Delete monument is important here. Cropping of the top to change perspective may work, but it may become unusable image
- File:Quezon Memorial Circle - monument (Diliman, Quezon City; 01-01-2020).jpg Delete focus on monument
- File:Quezon Memorial Circle - monument tower (Elliptical Road, Diliman, Quezon City; 2010-08-13) 02.jpg Delete focus on monument
- File:Quezon Memorial Circle - monument tower (Elliptical Road, Diliman, Quezon City; 2014-12-31).jpg Delete focus on monument
- File:Quezon Memorial Circle - Monument Tower closeup.jpg Delete focus on monument
- File:Quezon memorial circle 02.jpg Delete focus on monument
- File:Quezon Memorial Circle 02.jpg Delete focus on monument
- File:Quezon Memorial Circle 03.jpg Delete focus on monument
- File:Quezon Memorial Circle 04.jpg Delete focus on monument
- File:Quezon Memorial Circle 05.jpg Delete focus on monument
- File:Quezon Memorial Circle 06.jpg Delete base of the monument
- File:Quezon Memorial Circle 07.jpg Delete focus on monument
- File:Quezon Memorial Circle 08.jpg Delete focus on monument
- File:Quezon Memorial Circle 09.jpg Delete focus on monument
- File:Quezon Memorial Circle 10.jpg Delete focus on monument
- File:Quezon Memorial Circle 11.jpg Delete focus on monument
- File:Quezon Memorial Circle 12.jpg Delete focus on monument
- File:Quezon Memorial Circle monument tower (Diliman, Quezon City)(2018-02-07).jpg Delete focus on monument
- File:Quezon Memorial Circle Monument.jpg Delete focus on monument
- File:Quezon Memorial Circle.jpg Keep general view, monument is distant in relation to the dimensions of the image
- File:Quezon Memorial Monument.jpg Delete focus on monument
- File:Quezon Memorial Rays of Light.JPG Delete focus on monument
- File:Quezon Memorial Shrine 19.jpg Delete focus on monument
- File:Quezon Memorial Shrine at Night.JPG Delete focus on monument
- File:Quezon Memorial Shrine by Shanax1997.jpg Delete focus on monument
- File:Quezon Memorial Shrine.JPG Delete focus on monument
- File:Quezon Memorial Structure.JPG Delete focus on monument
- File:Quezon monument 1.jpg Delete focus on monument
- File:Quezon Monument 1.jpg Delete focus on monument
- File:Quezon monument 2.jpg Delete focus on monument
- File:Quezon Monument 2.jpg Delete focus on monument
- File:Quezon monument 3.jpg Keep monument is distant
- File:Quezon Monument 3.jpg Delete focus on monument
- File:Quezon monument 4.jpg Keep monument is distant
- File:Quezon Monument 4.jpg Delete focus on monument
- File:Quezon Monument at Night.JPG Keep monument is distant
- File:Quezon Monument at Night.jpg Delete focus on monument
- File:Quezon Monument Facade.jpg Delete focus on monument
- File:Quezon Monument in Infra Red.jpg Delete focus on monument
- File:Quezon Monument in Metro Manila.jpg Delete focus on monument
- File:Quezon Monument Night Artistic Shot.jpg Keep monument is distant
- File:Quezon Monument Quezon City.JPG Keep monument is distant
- File:Quezon Monument with the Fountain facade.jpg Keep monument is distant and out of focus
- File:Quezon Monument.jpg Delete focus on monument
- File:Quezon monument.jpg Delete monument is essential. See also a Belgian FOP case at: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Abuela Coca Atomium.JPG.
- File:QuezonMemorialPhilippines.jpg Delete focus on monument
- File:QuezonMonument.jpg Delete focus on monument
- File:Quezonmonument.jpg Delete monument is essential here
- File:Sunset Quezon Memorial Circle.jpg Delete monument is essential here
- File:The Emblem of Quezon City.jpg Keep silhouetted subject
- File:The Heart of Quezon City.jpg Keep monument not the central focus and distant
- File:The Quezon City memorial Circle.JPG Delete focus on monument
- File:The Quezon Memorial Shrine.jpg Delete focus on monument
- File:WikiLovesEarth 2K19 IDK 2.jpg Delete focus on monument JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:12, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Mrcl lxmna (talk) 14:25, 3 September 2020 (UTC)
- Info much of these files were discussed in two DR's before: at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Quezon Memorial (Sept.–Oct. 2015 discussion) and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Quezon Memorial Circle (Jan.–March 2019 discussion). JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:18, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
- Thanks for your messages and good afternoon from hereat Bulacan, Philippines; by way of Reply please allow me to state that a) I was granted permission by the Tourism Offices and b) I talked to the lawyers and legal officers of the Category:Intellectual Property Center IP PHL both under Category:Ricardo R. Blancaflor and Category:Intellectual Property Center IP PHL and his successor Josephine Rima-Santiago (Philippines) as evidenced by i) Category:Letter (Receipt-Appropriate Action-Feedback) of the Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines (Marou Eduarte - of Josephine Rima-Santiago to Florentino Floro and ii) Category:Letter to Josephine Rima-Santiago (Philippines) and iii) Letter to Director Blancaflor Receipt; sad to say there is no Ruling, Directive or any Reply on my FOP request for Definitive Ruling due to the fact that the matter is very Grey under Philippine Jurisprudence and no Appellate or Lower Court ruling has been issued on any justiciable controvert ever; what I hold are verbal but authoritative opinions of both the Lawyers of the Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines and the Tourism Authority offices; IN FINE: I respectfully submit that until now, since the passage of Copyright Law in the Philippines, Wikipedia article on it teaches that there are only 2 Supreme Court cases on the Law and nothing has been ruled on any justiciable controversy by any party hence Directress Josephine Rima-Santiago could not and has not issued any Reply to my or Our Letters for Legal Ruling; as a Regional Trial Court Judge and Ateneo Lawyer Alumni, please allow me to state that in the Philippines which also follows the USA Jurisprudence from Federal Rules, photography regarding FOP alleged prohibitions cannot and would not be curtailed until the Supreme Court or the Intellectual Property Center would issue a Ruling or Circular on the matter of prohibition; I hesitate to say that is a real grey area, for if there is no penal law, on the specific matter of FOP, then no punishment could be born; with all these, I respectfully submit to the sound discretion of Commons as I remain very truly yours Judgefloro (talk) 06:37, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Judgefloro: to note, the no FoP in the Philippines matter was recently raised (anew) at the Commons talk:Copyright rules by territory/Philippines#New discussion on PHL FoP, in light with the recent DR's made by this new user targeting various Philippine buildings and sculptures. I hereby request admins to put this and other DR's on hold until this matter has settled. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:04, 4 September 2020 (UTC)
If I were to decide, I'd sayweak keepbecause it was argued by many Pinoy Wikipedians that this is a commissioned work of the government, with Ilustre said to be working at the Bureau of Public Works at that time. However, a new issue was raised at my undeletion attempt for the 2000's-era photo entitled File:Quezon memorial.jpg, in which Nat pointed out that Ilustre designed the monument "for a national design competition held in 1951 for the then-planned monument for late President Manuel L. Quezon, where he won the grand prize," which might also mean that he might had worked on the monument "in his capacity as a private citizen," with the date of his part on the bureau becoming irrelevant.
- Pardon me po if I might repeat page of various other users for this issue: @Jsnueva1022, Seav, Ianlopez1115, P199, King of Hearts, and TagaSanPedroAko: JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:14, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
- Paging also @Howhontanozaz: . 17:16, 5 September 2020 (UTC)
Update changed my poll now to strongto quote Jsnueva1022's statement: "The Quezon Memorial Shrine is a historical location located in Quezon City, Philippines. It was built by the Philippine government, local government unit of Quezon City in specific, in honor to the late President Manuel Quezon." JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:31, 9 September 2020 (UTC) Keep:
- Speedy keep That said, the "{{PD-PhilippinesGov}} applies here" didn't contested by the new nominator. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 06:26, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
- @Liuxinyu970226: The position that "{{PD-PhilippinesGov}} applies here" completely ignores the long discussion on the matter here: Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#File:Quezon_memorial.jpg --Ìch heiss Nat. Redd mìt mìr.🥨 02:34, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
- Nat, I would say that this question should better be answered by @Ankry: , the closing-admin of the previous discussions above. --Liuxinyu970226 (talk) 07:04, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
I would say either put this DR on hold or Keep since a relevant discussion exists at Commons talk:Copyright rules by territory/Philippines#New discussion on PHL FoP. IMO, as long as that forum is open, deletions should not be made. This DR should also be closed since it was started by a foolish troll. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 08:49, 12 September 2020 (UTC)
Slashed my inputs. I will leave this matter on its natural cause without forcing the resolution (whether keep or delete) through my inputs. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 18:22, 19 October 2020 (UTC)
Extract of my undeletion attempt for the Quezon Memorial Shrine photo from the undeletion requests
|
|---|
|
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Quezon memorial.jpg, file was deleted because of "no FoP in the Philippines," deletion was made in 2012. However, per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Quezon Memorial Circle (dated 2019), QMC (esp. the monument) was designer by Federico Ilustre who "was working for the Bureau of Public Works when he did this design." (per User:Jameslwoodward) Added basis is from @Seav: , quoted by @Markoolio97: :
As such, QMC is PD (a work of and owned by the government) and photos of it are permissible at Commons. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 04:28, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
@Nat: A quote from the Philippine Star article concerning the construction of the now-demolished terminal building of the Manila International Airport (precursor of NAIA):
It seems to contradict various claims by several sites that he designed the monument as a Bureau of Public Works employee. His public works position wasn't also mentioned in the following:
If this is true then does that mean all other pictures of this monument are also affected (in particular all pictures undeleted at Commons:Undeletion_requests/Archive/2019-02#Photographs of Quezon Memorial)? JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 07:31, 12 August 2020 (UTC)
@Nat: according to Jsnueva1022 at User talk:Mrcl lxmna#Nomination to delete the Quezon Memorial Shrine photo, this monument "was built by the Philippine government, local government unit of Quezon City in specific, in honor to the late President Manuel Quezon." So I think this should now rest the case. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 02:58, 9 September 2020 (UTC)
|
Fyi for info to you all this is a part of https://www.vigattintourism.com/tourism/articles/Quezon-Memorial-Circle-A-Famous-Historical-Park-in-Quezon-City
- "The site was originally intended as the grounds of the National Capitol to be built in Quezon City to house the Congress of the Philippines. The location was also part of a larger National Government Center located around Elliptical Road and the Quezon City Quadrangle (made up of the North, South, East, and West Triangles). The NGC was meant to house the three branches of the Philippine government (legislative, executive, and judicial). While the cornerstone for the structure was laid on November 15, 1940, only the foundations were in place when construction was interrupted by the beginning of the Second World War in the Philippines. After World War II, President Sergio Osmeña issued an executive order stipulating the creation of a Quezon Memorial Committee to raise funds by public subscription to erect a memorial to his predecessor, President Manuel L. Quezon. After a national contest was held for the purpose of designing the Quezon Memorial Project, a winning entry by Filipino architect Federico S. Ilustre was selected. Aside from the monument itself, a complex of three buildings, including a presidential library, a museum, and a theater, were also planned to be erected."
Im gping to strees this line "After a national contest was held for the purpose of designing the Quezon Memorial Project, a winning entry by Filipino architect Federico S. Ilustre was selected." MRCL LXMNA ----
Another source from https://www.theurbanroamer.com/the-soul-of-quezon-city-the-quezon-memorial-circle-and-its-shrine-part-1/
"Until the government decided to dedicate this field instead as a memorial to the man whose vision made Quezon City possible, with a shrine instead of the planned capitol to be its landmark..........A contest was soon held for the design of the planned Quezon Memorial Shrine that was to rise in the elliptical field. The prize was eventually given to the design of Filipino architect Federico Ilustre, which incorporated contemporary design with some classical and symbolic inspirations."
Take note of the RA 8293 statement. Part iv chapter 2:"""""172.2. Works are protected by the sole fact of their creation, irrespective of their mode or form of expression, as well as of their content, quality and purpose. """""
After accessing and digesting the content of the debate between Nat and jwilz for some time, I am still conviced that tgese photos, until the philippines has freedom of pano, should be deleted. Accessing a philstar link to https://www.philstar.com/lifestyle/modern-living/2016/01/08/1540557/portal-jet-age just only reinforces my point that this is not a government work.
"""In 1954 Magsaysay gave the Bureau of Public Works the orders to implement designs prepared by noted government architect Federico Ilustre. Ilustre had apprenticed with Juan Nakpil before the war. After Liberation, he won the competition for the Quezon Memorial. He became the chief architect of the Bureau of Public Works, the precursor of today’s DPWH."""
Ilustre designed thw monument before he came to government position so he was a private citizen at that time. This monument is not a government work, and even if it was a work by the government, could still fail its eligibility for wikimedia commons as the government is not obliged to force the creators to withdraw their moral rights. My position is delete these photos, with these massive evidences against claims made by various filipino wikipedians. Mrcl lxmna (talk) 13:00, 29 September 2020 (UTC)
- Keep Because the photos are unimportant DE MINIS so to speak and the photos are part of Tourist attractions or Heritage of the Local or National Government and theTourism Office of the Philippines, including the Museum of Political Arts etc. granted me express permissions to take Tourist and interesting points photos for it is for their political advantages in the comming election, hosting for free in a great encyclopedia; hence DE MINIS in Commons and Phil Law; No copyright exists in them, and
- In support of my stance, opposition to the deltion and inputs, I am respectfully submitting to the editors and Commons adminstrators my legal treatise on the matter as I copy paste and discuss Strong Evidence against the Nominators Mass Deletion Requests, to wit:
FOP matter update: Rejoinder
|
|---|
Rejoinder II : the case of Yuraily Lic is 100x different in the Philippine Mass Deletions: Reason: our 2012 Cybercrime and Stalking Law is absolutely different from theirs, if any: I have no objection to Deletions by any editor or administrator regarding FOP cases in Philippines, but, but and but - the Mass Deletions Requests placed on my talk page since September by a single new editor falls squarely with the 4 corners of Cybercrime * (My midnight thoughts out of no FOP in the Philippines frustration) It seems you are a "disciple" or follower of Yuraily Lic! I can notice your DR's nearly similar to their's, and Yuraily had an issue similar to yours at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems/Archive 79#Yuraily Lic, mass tagging and nominating copyrighted buildings and artworks for no FOP reasons with little or no evidences (other than links to Commons pages). Just my thoughts only. BTW, you seem to have some luck today, as the latest (as of today) copyright-related webinars in our country — the October 30, 2020 FB Live webinar of the Office for Alternative Dispute Resolution (OADR) (in which important people from IPOPHL were among its principal guests) — has no mention of FoP, de minimis or whatsoever. But nevertheless, our call and advocacy for full FOP in the Philippines continues, albeit intermittently now. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 17:20, 9 November 2020 (UTC)"
Rectifying my mistakes and instead report here phil bldg and sculpture photos Hello everyone. Its my biggest mistake to have made mass deletions. I sincerely appologise most esp to the moderator @Mutichill:. I will not do those deletions by myself again. Instaed i will forward here some violations on phil photos of bldgs and sculotures.
|
I fervently hope that Commons editors would wait for the Reply or replies to my 2 letters or your would be filed draft to final letters to IPO or DOJ secretary; in the meantime; : "Respectfully submitted ..." as I register my Strong Objection to the Mass Deletions of a single Nominator very sincerely Judgefloro (talk) 08:13, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
- Comment (mirrored from my comment on another pending Philippine FOP case) the discussion at Commons talk:Copyright rules by territory/Philippines#Comment with Query (the latest thread in that discussion forum that has started from September this year) reached a conclusion that none of the "near-FOP" limitations enumerated at Section 184 could be applied. While elcobbola mentioned the clause (j): "Public display of the original or a copy of the work not made by means of a film, slide, television image or otherwise on screen or by means of any other device or process: Provided, That either the work has been published, or, that the original or the copy displayed has been sold, given away or otherwise transferred to another person by the author or his successor in title." According to Clindberg it sounds like "you own a physical copy of an already-published work, you're allowed to publicly display it, but not make further copies." Clause (d) in the same section is only applicable to "reporting of current events," and clause (e) is limited to "teaching purposes," both are of fair use-type and not free enough for Commons (take note, Commons:Fair use insists Commons does not accept fair use licensing). So sadly @Judgefloro: , there is no Commons-applicable freedom of panorama in the Philippines (the current position of Commons:FOP Philippines). A potential meeting or dialogue between the Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines (IPOPHL) and the Wikimedia Foundation (with freedom of panorama as the principal agenda, as based on IPOPHL's reply to the latest email sent by Higad Rail Fan) might help in introducing freedom of panorama in the Philippines, through an amendment to Republic Act No. 8293 (hopefully). When will both this meeting/dialogue and amendment happen, I cannot say yet however. I will also leave the final decision to admins in closing this and all other pending nominations at Category:Philippine FOP cases/pending. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 14:24, 25 November 2020 (UTC)
- Final poll is Delete as this is a government-commissioned work still copyrighted by Ilustre's heirs. See also COM:Philippines#Commissioned works and COM:Philippines#Government works. Unless there is "a written stipulation on the contrary". While this may come PD in the Philippines in 2040 (50+1 years after Federico Ilustre's death), this work is not an architecture per U.S. law (not habitable). Hence, falls on COM:URAA duration 95+1 years after publication. 1972 (completion)+95+1=2068. Or if FOP is introduced here. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:12, 8 January 2021 (UTC)
Kept: per en:WP:TRAINWRECK, different cases, please renominate as separate DRs. --Anatoliy (talk) 11:07, 13 March 2021 (UTC)
Snapshot of a person that is in no way relevant to the encyclopedia, most likely offends the portrait rights of the subject. Take Mirrenberg (talk) 09:31, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Personal photo, out of scope. --Gbawden (talk) 09:27, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Please delete this image I uploaded because I have replaced it with a better one at File:Jaggln - the top trumps-IMG 5969.jpg. Bermicourt (talk) 09:54, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:26, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- photo quality and significance of the photo is low --Ayratayrat (talk) 09:41, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, already a historical photo. The restaurant is closed. Insider (talk) 08:56, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- This is not a historical photo, but a photo-trash of an ordinary cafe. cafe in Ufa there are more than 1000. for each cafe we will create a category? In our community in a strange way more than 15 photos of this restaurant. I think it falls under advertising.--Ayratayrat (talk) 23:19, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:26, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
I am doing this for my request. RainbowSilver2ndBackup (talk) 21:18, 23 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Looks like requestor withdrew nom. --Gbawden (talk) 09:24, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Too low quality to be useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 13:40, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Dear Ras67, thank you for adjustment and advice, but I have taken this photo only in JPG format. However I have taken photo of same scene with better exposition --Butko (talk) 06:25, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete, indeed, a better photo of that scene exists. --Ras67 (talk) 11:01, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 09:23, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- quality and significance of the photo is low. No. automobile code -is not correct!--Ayratayrat (talk) 11:56, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, quality is fine, and this photo has educational value. --B dash (talk) 14:05, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:22, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- photo quality and significance of the photo is low--Ayratayrat (talk) 11:58, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, quality is fine, and this photo has educational value. --B dash (talk) 14:06, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:22, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- photo significate and quality is poor --Ayratayrat (talk) 13:31, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, quality is fine, and this photo has educational value. --B dash (talk) 14:17, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:21, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- delete? significata and quality of photo is poor, incategoysed phoro (ufa is very big)--Ayratayrat (talk) 13:49, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, quality is fine, and this photo has educational value. --B dash (talk) 14:19, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Category:October avenue, Ufa + coords. Keep Insider (talk) 08:40, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
- delete significata and quality of photo is poor, incategoysed phoro (ufa is very big)--Ayratayrat (talk) 13:52, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Too blurry to be realistically useful. --Gbawden (talk) 09:20, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Apparently a copyvio. "headshot by Jessica Raphael" and "own work" can't be true at the same time. Ies (talk) 15:08, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Not own work. --Gbawden (talk) 09:19, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
E4024, you have been the ONLY user to DR these uploads, several other users have spoken up against it. I recommend if you do not like the pics or the categories they are in that you look at different places.
User Mark, sorry to have DR'ed several of your uploads. However, you should know that Commons is not your personal free web host nor is an amateur porn site. To learn our policy, guidelines or whatever they are called you can read COM:PORN, COM:Nudity and COM:NOTHOST. Your "model" does not bring in better alternatives to so many female nude images we have here. Alright, some of the lingerie images found a place in our cats and that should satisfy you. Look, if you do not take it as a personal issue, I would like to recommend you, with the best of my good intentions, to look out from the window of that bedroom. You will see many other things to picture and upload here. (If you do not like the preceding sentence we can strike it, no problem for me.) E4024 (talk) 20:13, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete Redundant and out of scope. AshFriday (talk) 00:36, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, I can't find a single overweight woman in "Category:Nude women with brown hair" (other than this one) making her the only one, why does Wikimedia Commons only want photographs of thin, large breasted non-Spanish speaking White women with symmetric faces older than 18 (eighteen) but younger than 40 (forty)? Because those seem to be the only nudes around here that are "acceptable" which could probably be seen as "the taste of the Wikimedia Commons community" rather than a reflection of any real world demographics. If a user would want to use a nude brown haired woman who doesn't conforms to society's beauty standards this image is currently the only one in that category. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 07:52, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
- Mr Trung, the blue links I provided with are "official guidelines" of Commons, as you already know very well. Therefore please do not "disregard" them. (So you're looking for an overweight nude woman with brown hair? I imagine internet is big enough to find images of that kind. Maybe the uploader can help you to find some. This part in parentheses is just to melt the ice with Mark, who seems to be angry with me, judging by their edits following this DR. :) --E4024 (talk) 13:29, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
E4024 you have consistently and repeatedly DR'd uploads of mine. so far you have been the ONLY one doing this. Some have been removed others your requests have been rejected followed by you requesting the same again. It seems you have developed an obsession. I know that in some countries this is accepted behavior and the will of the sultan is law, but it's no excuse to justify nominating pictures that are in the right category and as others have pointed out add value. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markfree123 (talk • contribs) 00:22, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- Dear Mark, you only make me smile, but please be more careful with personal attacks, as suddenly you may find yourself blocked. Did you read the pages I showed you? Take care. --E4024 (talk) 00:53, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
Dear E4024, not sure how I do that. Does the truth make you smile often? You are the one that is attacking people here and making threats, now for the third time. Please remember this a free world and not a dictatorship. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markfree123 (talk • contribs) 00:57, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
- "keep" I see nothing wrong with the picture as it represents what it is posted for. The bottom line it is a perfect representation of the description as it should be. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Showme3 (talk • contribs) 14:09, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- Dear Showme3, why are you only interested in the DRs concerning User:Markfree123? :) --E4024 (talk) 14:12, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Dear E4024 perhaps he likes the pics and doesn't see the point in you DRing without a real reason? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markfree123 (talk • contribs) 14:31, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
- How do you know that the user is "he"; could also be "she"... :) --E4024 (talk) 15:00, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
E4024that's the first time I agree with you, Showme3 could be female — Preceding unsigned comment added by Markfree123 (talk • contribs) 15:21, 1 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: I agree that its significantly different enough to be useful. --Gbawden (talk) 09:18, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
This is NOT a picture of the Charles E. Firestone house. Jacob.W13 (talk) 23:22, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Rather us the rename tag. The file is in use so it possibly is correct. --Gbawden (talk) 09:15, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
תמונה לא טובה 89.139.205.216 00:13, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:33, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
From memory, this is the same (or similar) to File:Man wearing a blue thong at the Beach 06.jpg and File:Mann auf Mallorca im Stringtanga.jpg, and perhaps others, which were previously deleted over copyright and sock puppetry concerns. Grayfell (talk) 03:38, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted. --Gbawden (talk) 09:31, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
mario ruddyart Ruddyart (talk) 04:36, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Gbawden (talk) 09:30, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Small and unused image, out of scope B dash (talk) 08:09, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- keep image is in scope as it is educational. Small is irrelevant, and so is unused. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:42, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete. Inferior JPEG version of File:Music-doublewholenote.png, which already existed on Commons when this was uploaded to Ukrainian Wikipedia. Since then we also have an SVG version. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:07, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Better versions already on Commons. --Gbawden (talk) 09:29, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
unused personal photo\ out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 08:13, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- include
Deleted: Unlikely to be own work. --Gbawden (talk) 09:28, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Uploader's request: Commons:Photographs of identifiable people, and File:Gwanchon Station concourse 1.jpg is same without person. ysjbserver (talk) 07:15, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: I wouldn't say that the person in the image is identifiable (very blurry, no discernible face), but your other image is better, so I think we don't need that low-quality one. --Gestumblindi (talk) 13:43, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
No Com:FOP in China for works situated indoors. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:06, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Calendars are not protected by Chinese copyright law.MNXANL (talk) 13:44, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- @MNXANL: I don't see that: may you link to the correct text of law? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:07, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete derivative work under PRC law. (FOP can never even apply to this. No one can put a piece of creative work outdoor, take a photo and then claim FOP.)--Roy17 (talk) 12:32, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per Roy17. --Gestumblindi (talk) 13:45, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
The low quality photo can be replaced with File:Lotteria Xinyi Store 20190127.jpg. Solomon203 (talk) 14:01, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep The camera angle is different from your work, and significance of image is fine. -- Kly (talk) 13:39, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Not only is the camera angle different, the store's appearance has also changed (different logo), so despite the poor quality, this 2012 image is already somewhat "historical" in nature. --Gestumblindi (talk) 13:49, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Jean-Michel Basquiat died 1988, painting in copyright until 2059, unlikely Flickr user has the copyright. Ronhjones (Talk) 17:38, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 13:51, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- photo significate and quality is poor --Ayratayrat (talk) 13:29, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Weak keep, quality is marginally fine, and this photo has educational value. --B dash (talk) 14:06, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, too blurry, nothing extraordinary is depicted. Taivo (talk) 19:41, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- quality and significance of the photo is low--Ayratayrat (talk) 11:53, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, quality is fine, and this photo has educational value. --B dash (talk) 14:08, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Delete - blurry and the preceding photos show the same scene better Gbawden (talk) 09:22, 14 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, per Gbawden. Taivo (talk) 19:43, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- photo significate and quality is poor --Ayratayrat (talk) 13:30, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, quality is fine, and this photo has educational value. --B dash (talk) 14:17, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, bad composition, I don't like the photo. Taivo (talk) 19:45, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- photo significate and quality is poor no. autonobile code show is not correct--Ayratayrat (talk) 13:30, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, quality is fine, and this photo has educational value. --B dash (talk) 14:17, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, bad composition, weak educational value. Taivo (talk) 19:47, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- photo significate and quality is poor --Ayratayrat (talk) 13:28, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, quality is fine, and this photo has educational value. --B dash (talk) 14:19, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, too blurry. Taivo (talk) 19:49, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- photo quality and significance of the photo is low--Ayratayrat (talk) 12:01, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, quality is fine, and this photo has educational value. --B dash (talk) 14:19, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept, somehow I like it. Surprising. Taivo (talk) 19:52, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- delete significata and quality of photo is poor, incategoysed phoro (ufa is very big) --Ayratayrat (talk) 13:50, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, bad quality. Taivo (talk) 19:56, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Blurred, low resolution, useless, redundant with images of much more better quality in Category:Rose window of St. Vitus Cathedral (interior view) — Preceding unsigned comment added by ErwinMeier (talk • contribs) 2019-01-24T19:00:53 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 20:00, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
- photo significate is poor --Ayratayrat (talk) 13:22, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep, no reason for deletion.Insider (talk) 08:49, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted, I must agree: weak educational value. Taivo (talk) 20:05, 16 February 2019 (UTC)
Taungoke Stadium Taungoke Stadium (talk) 19:09, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:08, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
None of the alleged arguments to claim public domain apply to this document (even if not faked). This documents is not a text of laws, decrees, official regulations, public treaties, judicial decisions or other official acts (leyes, decretos, reglamentos oficiales, tratados públicos, decisiones judiciales y demás actos oficiales). If not faked, this does not seem to be but an internal project that hasn't reached the status mentioned by the copyright law (article #4) Discasto talk 00:12, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Discasto: To be honest, I would say it looks like an elaborated hoax ("fake news" or "alternative facts" people call it these days) instilled in different wikipedias. The uploader did even create an article in en.wikipedia based in several primary sources and a passing mention in a Bloomberg webpage. This supposedly "official" pdf was distributed by the so called "Instituto Prensa y Sociedad de Venezuela" (by no means an official agency ) under the claim "Este manual de uso interno del Estado llegó a IPYS Venezuela a través de fuentes confiables durante el mes de mayo de 2017". And I have to believe that because...? Because a posteriori Bloomberg and La Patilla commented on that? Sort of WikiLeaks meets Breitbart News. Anyway, wrt Commons ...main issue is... it doesn't even pass the copyright test. It's kinda funny, though. Strakhov (talk) 15:05, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Comment @Strakhov: We can not expect that an official agency recognizes this in a country where even Wikipedia was blocked less than a month ago.--ArwinJ (talk) 21:15, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
- So what? Then we have to believe in every loony leaked pdf we find in the internet? Great! I have no doubt the Government of Venezuela has a strategy regarding social networks (they would be stupid if they don't), but this "Ejército Bolivariano de Trolls" seems an hoax. Anyway the falsehood status doesn't matter, this is not in the public domain (whether made secretly by Maduro's minions or most probably by a bored oppositor) and has to be deleted. Do whatever you feel entitled to do in Wikipedia with the related "content", but be also aware of the possibility of having spread an hoax. Anything goes in the Post-truth era, doesn't it? Strakhov (talk) 21:29, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Comment Any decision applies to File:Bolivarian Army of Trolls.png as well. --Discasto talk 13:49, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Fake, fake, fake. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:11, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
No proof about actual authorship has been provided Discasto talk 00:16, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Fake, fake, fake. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:12, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
As the video actually describes, the videos are not from The New York Times, but from other sources ("posted on social media") or by Osca Pérez himself Discasto talk 00:20, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Discasto: Agree. Should be deleted.--ZiaLater (talk) 14:58, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:12, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
As the slide clearly states, it's been provided by COFAVIC and therefore, CIDH cannot wash other organizations' copyright Discasto talk 00:21, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:12, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
As the slide clearly states, it's been provided by COFAVIC and therefore, CIDH cannot wash other organizations' copyright Discasto talk 00:21, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:12, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Alleged "free license" claims haven't been sustained Discasto talk 00:22, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Comment: The law states, "The texts of laws, decrees, official regulations, public treaties, judicial decisions and other official acts shall not be protected by this Law." This would be the cover of those documents (the Venezuelan constitution). Do you have an opinion Jamez42? --ZiaLater (talk) 14:56, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
- Comment I'm the owner of this copy of the book. Its copies are handed out for free, but the publishers state that "selling a copy is a counter-revolutionary act". I am not familiarized with which the closest license in Commons would be. --Jamez42 (talk) 15:27, 4 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: That looks like an NC license to me. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:13, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small, no EXIF, user is blocked because of uploading copyvio, TinEye search shows one result. 4nn1l2 (talk) 00:55, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:14, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Subject is a 3D installation by Dawani de Leon, who is still alive, entitled "Omnipresent Inner Light". There is also no FOP in the Philippines. Howhontanozaz (talk) 01:15, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:14, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. The picture was taken in 1933, but when was it published? Even if contemporaneously published, it would not have been PD on the URAA date and is still copyrighted in the US. Buidhe (talk) 01:37, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:14, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Author Costantino Zicarelli is still alive, no FOP in the Philippines. Howhontanozaz (talk) 01:46, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for all the messages; I respectfully submit to the sound discretion of more learned editors on the matter; very sincerely yours Judgefloro 06:30, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:14, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Artist Gino Bueza is still alive, no FOP in the Philippines Howhontanozaz (talk) 01:48, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for all the messages; I respectfully submit to the sound discretion of more learned editors on the matter; very sincerely yours Judgefloro 06:31, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:14, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Ateneo Art Awards 2017 (Ateneo Art Gallery, Areté, Ateneo de Manila University)
[edit]No FOP in the Philippines, artworks are not in the public domain.
- File:811Ateneo Art Gallery University 21.jpg
- File:811Ateneo Art Gallery University 22.jpg
- File:811Ateneo Art Gallery University 23.jpg
- File:811Ateneo Art Gallery University 24.jpg
- File:811Ateneo Art Gallery University 25.jpg
- File:811Ateneo Art Gallery University 26.jpg
- File:811Ateneo Art Gallery University 27.jpg
Howhontanozaz (talk) 01:57, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for all the messages; I am an alumni of the Ateneo de Manila University and Ateneo College of Law; when I took these pictures I asked permission from the officers; at any rate, I respectfully submit to the sound discretion of more learned editors on the matter; very sincerely yours Judgefloro 06:33, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- For clarification, is (a) the event a non-profit event, and (b) the reproduction of the artworks through photography approved by the Management? Markoolio97 (talk) 02:49, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for all the messages; I am an alumni of the Ateneo de Manila University and Ateneo College of Law; when I took these pictures I asked permission from the officers; at any rate, I respectfully submit to the sound discretion of more learned editors on the matter; very sincerely yours Judgefloro 06:33, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Ateneo Art Awards 2017 (Ateneo Art Gallery, Areté, Ateneo de Manila University)
[edit]No FOP in the Philippines, artworks are not in the public domain.
- File:811Ateneo Art Gallery University 28.jpg
- File:811Ateneo Art Gallery University 29.jpg
- File:811Ateneo Art Gallery University 30.jpg
- File:811Ateneo Art Gallery University 31.jpg
- File:811Ateneo Art Gallery University 32.jpg
- File:811Ateneo Art Gallery University 33.jpg
- File:811Ateneo Art Gallery University 34.jpg
- File:811Ateneo Art Gallery University 35.jpg
- File:811Ateneo Art Gallery University 37.jpg
- File:811Ateneo Art Gallery University 38.jpg
- File:811Ateneo Art Gallery University 40.jpg
- File:811Ateneo Art Gallery University 41.jpg
- File:811Ateneo Art Gallery University 42.jpg
- File:811Ateneo Art Gallery University 43.jpg
- File:811Ateneo Art Gallery University 44.jpg
- File:811Ateneo Art Gallery University 45.jpg
- File:811Ateneo Art Gallery University 46.jpg
- File:811Ateneo Art Gallery University 49.jpg
- File:860Ateneo Art Gallery University 02.jpg
- File:860Ateneo Art Gallery University 03.jpg
- File:860Ateneo Art Gallery University 04.jpg
- File:860Ateneo Art Gallery University 05.jpg
- File:860Ateneo Art Gallery University 06.jpg
- File:860Ateneo Art Gallery University 07.jpg
- File:860Ateneo Art Gallery University 08.jpg
- File:860Ateneo Art Gallery University 09.jpg
- File:860Ateneo Art Gallery University 10.jpg
- File:860Ateneo Art Gallery University 11.jpg
- File:860Ateneo Art Gallery University 12.jpg
- File:860Ateneo Art Gallery University 14.jpg
- File:860Ateneo Art Gallery University 15.jpg
- File:860Ateneo Art Gallery University 16.jpg
- File:860Ateneo Art Gallery University 17.jpg
- File:860Ateneo Art Gallery University 18.jpg
- File:860Ateneo Art Gallery University 19.jpg
- File:860Ateneo Art Gallery University 20.jpg
- File:860Ateneo Art Gallery University 21.jpg
- File:860Ateneo Art Gallery University 22.jpg
- File:860Ateneo Art Gallery University 24.jpg
- File:860Ateneo Art Gallery University 25.jpg
- File:860Ateneo Art Gallery University 26.jpg
- File:860Ateneo Art Gallery University 43.jpg
- File:860Ateneo Art Gallery University 44.jpg
- File:860Ateneo Art Gallery University 45.jpg
- File:860Ateneo Art Gallery University 46.jpg
- File:860Ateneo Art Gallery University 47.jpg
- File:860Ateneo Art Gallery University 48.jpg
- File:860Ateneo Art Gallery University 49.jpg
- File:909Ateneo Art Gallery University 02.jpg
- File:909Ateneo Art Gallery University 03.jpg
- File:909Ateneo Art Gallery University 04.jpg
- File:909Ateneo Art Gallery University 06.jpg
- File:909Ateneo Art Gallery University 08.jpg
- File:909Ateneo Art Gallery University 12.jpg
- File:909Ateneo Art Gallery University 13.jpg
- File:909Ateneo Art Gallery University 14.jpg
- File:909Ateneo Art Gallery University 15.jpg
- File:909Ateneo Art Gallery University 16.jpg
- File:909Ateneo Art Gallery University 17.jpg
- File:909Ateneo Art Gallery University 18.jpg
- File:909Ateneo Art Gallery University 19.jpg
- File:909Ateneo Art Gallery University 20.jpg
- File:909Ateneo Art Gallery University 21.jpg
- File:909Ateneo Art Gallery University 22.jpg
- File:909Ateneo Art Gallery University 23.jpg
- File:909Ateneo Art Gallery University 24.jpg
- File:909Ateneo Art Gallery University 25.jpg
- File:909Ateneo Art Gallery University 26.jpg
- File:909Ateneo Art Gallery University 27.jpg
- File:909Ateneo Art Gallery University 30.jpg
- File:909Ateneo Art Gallery University 32.jpg
- File:909Ateneo Art Gallery University 33.jpg
- File:909Ateneo Art Gallery University 34.jpg
- File:909Ateneo Art Gallery University 35.jpg
Howhontanozaz (talk) 02:55, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for all the messages; I am an alumni of the Ateneo de Manila University and Ateneo College of Law; when I took these pictures I asked permission from the officers; at any rate, I respectfully submit to the sound discretion of more learned editors on the matter; very sincerely yours Judgefloro 06:33, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- May I suggest a Written-Formal Query on No Freedom of Panoramana in the Philippines to Director General Josephine Rima-Santiago
- Considering that a New Director has been appointed replacing Director Blancaflor (who, I presume did not categorically respond on my or your editors' query on No Freedom of Panoramana in the Philippines) it is but just and fitting that Senior editors or sysops of Wikimedia Commons formally submit a written Query on the matter, to settle once and for all whether photos should be deleted or not based on the present rules of Commons on the matter. Director General Josephine Rima-Santiago of Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines Very sincerely Judgefloro 09:40, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- Considering that a New Director has been appointed replacing Director Blancaflor (who, I presume did not categorically respond on my or your editors' query on No Freedom of Panoramana in the Philippines) it is but just and fitting that Rulings on these Deletion of images entries be held in abeyance for the sake of Wisdom of future Users and global learners of Wikimedia Commons; today, I formally submitted a written Query on the matter, to settle once and for all whether photos should be deleted or not based on the present rules of Commons on the matter. Director General Josephine Rima-Santiago of Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines
- Letter to Intellectual Property Office (Philippines) IPO Director General Josephine Rima-Santiago (Philippines) 6 pages Letter from Judge Florentino V. Floro, Jr. or User:Judgefloro regardings Commons:Freedom of panorama specifically Freedom of panorama Philippines Re: Request for a Definitive Opinion on Freedom of panorama concerning Wikimedia Commons Photography - Uploading - Publishing vis-a-vis the IP Code of the Philippines (Act No. 8293) (2015 Edition), Chapter VIII ("Limitations on copyright) which does not appear to make any exception for photographs of copyrighted works. This letter is mailed today via LBC mail as evidenced by Category:LBC Express receipts Very sincerely yours, Judgefloro 08:26, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
- Considering that a New Director has been appointed replacing Director Blancaflor (who, I presume did not categorically respond on my or your editors' query on No Freedom of Panoramana in the Philippines) it is but just and fitting that Rulings on these Deletion of images entries be held in abeyance for the sake of Wisdom of future Users and global learners of Wikimedia Commons; today, I formally submitted a written Query on the matter, to settle once and for all whether photos should be deleted or not based on the present rules of Commons on the matter. Director General Josephine Rima-Santiago of Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines
Re: February 5, 2019 Reply-Acknowledgement Letter-Receipt of-by the IPO Directress General's Office Josephine Rima-Santiago to Judge Floro, promising to Act on the Letter to Josephine Rima-Santiago (Philippines) and Freedom of Panorama in the Philippines
[edit]- Today, the I received the IPO Directress General's Office Reply-Acknowledgement Receipt stating that the IPO Office of the Director General will Act and issue Reply-Legal Opinion on Judge Florentino Floro's Letter on Freedom of Panorama in the Philippines; it is now in Meycauayan, Bulacan and I will upload the letter and its contents here in Commons once I go to Meycauayan, I therefore ask the Administrators and editors to await the Ruling of the IPO Office on Freedom of Panoramafor the benefit of Commons very Sincerely Judgefloro 05:12, 6 February 2019 (UTC)
Category:Letter (Receipt-Appropriate Action-Feedback) of the Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines (Marou Eduarte - of Josephine Rima-Santiago to Florentino Floro
[edit]- Considering that a New Director has been appointed replacing Director Blancaflor (who, I presume did not categorically respond on my or your editors' query on No Freedom of Panoramana in the Philippines) it is but just and fitting that Rulings on these Deletion of images entries be held in abeyance for the sake of Wisdom of future Users and global learners of Wikimedia Commons; on January 30, 2019, Judge Floro formally submitted a written Query on the matter, to settle once and for all whether photos should be deleted or not based on the present rules of Commons on the matter in the light of IPO-Laws on Copyright of the Philippines Director General Josephine Rima-Santiago of Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines
- Letter to Intellectual Property Office (Philippines) IPO Director General Josephine Rima-Santiago (Philippines) 6 pages Letter from Judge Florentino V. Floro, Jr. or User:Judgefloro regardings Commons:Freedom of panorama specifically Freedom of panorama Philippines Re: Request for a Definitive Opinion on Freedom of panorama concerning Wikimedia Commons Photography - Uploading - Publishing vis-a-vis the IP Code of the Philippines (Act No. 8293) (2015 Edition), Chapter VIII ("Limitations on copyright) which does not appear to make any exception for photographs of copyrighted works. This letter is mailed today via LBC mail as evidenced by Category:LBC Express receipts
- Letter (Receipt-Appropriate Action-Feedback) of the Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines (Marou Eduarte - of Josephine Rima-Santiago to Florentino Floro - dated January 30, 2019 - stating that her IPO Office received Judge Floro's letter dated January 30, 2019 and regarding the latter's "Request for a Definitive Opinion on Freedom of panorama concerning Wikimedia Commons Photography - Uploading - Publishing vis-a-vis the IP Code of the Philippines (Act No. 8293) (2015 Edition), Chapter VIII ("Limitations on copyright”) which does not appear to make any exception for photographs of copyrighted works." The IPO Office stated that Appropriate Action-Feedback will be issued in due course by the IPO as it referred this matter to its subordinate Bureau of the Intellectual Property Office (Philippines) Judgefloro 10:47, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
- Letter to Intellectual Property Office (Philippines) IPO Director General Josephine Rima-Santiago (Philippines) 6 pages Letter from Judge Florentino V. Floro, Jr. or User:Judgefloro regardings Commons:Freedom of panorama specifically Freedom of panorama Philippines Re: Request for a Definitive Opinion on Freedom of panorama concerning Wikimedia Commons Photography - Uploading - Publishing vis-a-vis the IP Code of the Philippines (Act No. 8293) (2015 Edition), Chapter VIII ("Limitations on copyright) which does not appear to make any exception for photographs of copyrighted works. This letter is mailed today via LBC mail as evidenced by Category:LBC Express receipts
- Considering that a New Director has been appointed replacing Director Blancaflor (who, I presume did not categorically respond on my or your editors' query on No Freedom of Panoramana in the Philippines) it is but just and fitting that Rulings on these Deletion of images entries be held in abeyance for the sake of Wisdom of future Users and global learners of Wikimedia Commons; on January 30, 2019, Judge Floro formally submitted a written Query on the matter, to settle once and for all whether photos should be deleted or not based on the present rules of Commons on the matter in the light of IPO-Laws on Copyright of the Philippines Director General Josephine Rima-Santiago of Intellectual Property Office of the Philippines
Deleted: per nomination - The copyrights are almost certainly held by the artists, not the University or the Art Gallery, so permission would be required from each of the artists. I see no reason why a new Director would change the law. It is clear that there is no FOP exception to the Philippine copyright law. Note, also, that even if an FOP exception turns up, only 22 out of the 122 countries we follow allow FOP for indoor 2D works and only Thailand and Kenya allow it for non-permanent works such as these. If and when the "due course" specified above runs out and we actually discover that the Philippines allows FOP for indoor non-permanent 2D works, they can be restored. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:16, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Low quality images / blurry ThatBPengineer (talk) 05:11, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: That's very true, but they are actually in use, so we cannot delete them except for copyvio. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:43, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
No FOP in the Philippines. Artist Guillermo Tolentino died in 1976, so this sculpture would be public domain in the Philippines in 2027 (1976 + 51) and 2047 for the EU (1976 + 71).Howhontanozaz (talk) 06:57, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:43, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Old image available online, not taken by uploader Bohbye (talk) 07:00, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:45, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF dat , unlikely to be own work B dash (talk) 08:15, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Túrelio: @KeyKing666:
- Speedy keep - @B dash: ; This is your second attempt to have this image removed. You originally claimed that it was a copyvio of a specific image. It was even deleted on that basis, until the uploader pointed out that the two were different(!!) As a result, it was restored and the "copyvio" claim was removed by an admin.
- (Google Images provides just one supposed "match"... and it's the image you listed above. Perhaps this is where you found it? It *looks* the same at thumbnail size, but it isn't, and shows why comparisons should be made at full scale. Did you do this, and are you aware that Google Images is far from perfect and often matches non-identical images?)
- Regardless, resolution and EXIF issues do not provide a case for deletion in themselves. If there are *already* other obvious signs or suspicions that images are commercial copyvios, they strengthen that case. However, this does not look like a commercial-quality image, there is no sign of it elsewhere online, and it was uploaded literally two days after the railway station was reopened.
- In short, it wasn't a copyvio the first time you claimed it was, and you haven't provided enough evidence to justify this second attempt to have it deleted. Laerol (talk) 00:16, 9 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: As noted, it is small and has no EXIF. The user has a history of claiming "Own Work" on images that have been proven to be the work of others. I see no reason to believe that this is different. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:51, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
illustration signée Würth, artiste qui n'est pas dans le domaine public (date de mort inconnue,dernières œuvres signées connues datant des années 1960) - contributeur déposant spécialisé dans la contrefaçon Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 09:26, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Il s'agit d'une partition éditée par Beusher, il est interdit de la reproduire, ce serait puni comme une contrefaçon.
- Il est bien normal que les éditeurs interdisent qu'on reproduise leurs éditions de livres, y compris que d'autres éditeurs reprennent la couverture pour faire une autre édition du texte.
- On n'est pas du tout dans ce cas, ce n'est pas un scan haute définition, ni un tirage offset de toutes les pages qui pourrait être assimilé à une édition et à une publication, c'est une simple photo basse définition (640x400) d'une face de l'objet qui relèver de la citation.
- Il y a une différence entre reproduire une montre Rolex en fabriquant une réplique en métal et en verre, et la reproduire en prenant une photo de l'apparence de l'objet: dans un cas il y a contrefaçon de l'oeuvre et violation de la propriété intellectuelle et artistique, dans l'autre il y a une simple citation, même si le dessin ou le design de la montre est reproduit dans la photo.
- C'est la même chose pour les lives, une reproduction de toutes les pages du livre est une contrefaçon, une simple photo de l'objet montrant sa couverture n'est absolument pas assimilable à une édition pirate, la partition ne peut pas être lue, ni reproduite, elle ne fait pas de concurrence à l'éditeur, ni à l'artiste.
- Vous avez une interprétation complètement abusive de la loi sur la propriété intellectuelle et artistique, prendre une photographie d'une cafetière (et donc de son design qui est protégé), ce n'est pas violer les droits intellectuels et artistique du designer, ce n'est pas reproduire la cafetière, c'est une citation. Tous les magasines, tous les catalogues de vente le font: ils montrent une photo des objets ou des livres dont ils parlent, ça n'a rien à voir avec une reproduction réelle des objets. Heurtelions (talk) (talk) 01:15, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- Je souhaiterai connaître l'avis de @Racconish: sur les aspects juridiques. De mon point de vue, les arguments de Heurtelions sont fallacieux, et servent d'excuses à cet utilisateur pour enfreindre les droits des auteurs depuis des années. voir l'historique Merci. --Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 14:25, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- La photo Harcourt incorporée, en tant qu’œuvre collective [4], est à présent dans le domaine public. Concernant l'illustration, je ne vois pas la signature de Würth. Si le graphisme n'est pas signé, il est aujourd'hui dans le domaine public. S'il est signé, c'est 70 ans pma. Cordialement, — Racconish 💬 14:58, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- L'image de la partition déposée sur commonns est tronquée. Sur la version intégrale, la signature de Würth est bien visible (en bas à gauche), cf sur le site de la vendeuse Agnès Bidard. J'ai constaté à plusieurs reprises que supprimer la partie de l'image comprenant la signature était une astuce utilisée par quelques contributeurs commons peu soucieux de réelle diffusion de connaissances (car l'auteur fait partie des connaissances) et peu respectueux des droits d'auteur. Faut-il demander confirmation à l'éditeur ? Cordialement --Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 16:16, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- Une deuxième image sur laquelle la signature de l'illustrateur est bien visible --Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 16:32, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- Donc sous droit d'auteur jusqu'en 2030 au plus tôt. En revanche, il est licite de recadrer sur la photo Harcourt [5] et de supprimer la version antérieure. Me faire signe si besoin. Cordialement, — Racconish 💬 16:56, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- Je dois dire que je ne comprends pas l'intérêt de la solution proposée par @Racconish: … Quel serait l'apport d'une photo de très mauvaise qualité en basse définition – à moins que @Heurtelions: ne dispose de la partition et puisse faire un scan de meilleure qualité (ce qui j'en fais l'hypothèse relève du fantasme car plusieurs indices laissent penser que cette image provient d'un site de vente en ligne…).
- Il serait de mon point de vue préférable de télécharger une version de la photo de presse Harcourt.
- Si j'ai bien compris, cette image ne va donc pas être supprimée, dans l'attente d'un improbable recadrage ? Bien cordialement --Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 23:54, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- L'intérête de cette image est qu'elle illustre cinq articles de wikipedia.
- Je ne me serai jamais permis de faire un scan haute définition d'une couverture de livres, surtout illustrée, n'ayant pour but que de faire une citation. Et maintenant que l'auteur est conue, ce serait de la contrefaçon puisque Racconish dit que l'oeuvre est protégée jusqu'en 2030. Si ce n'était pas le cas, et qu'on voulait spécifiquement publier une oeuvre de Würth, ce qui n'était pas mon but initial, il vaudrait mieux publier un des premiers tirages qui ont l'air d'être en bichromie, le mien est monochrome.
- J'ai publié sur common de nombreuses photos de livres, donc forcément du côté de la couverture, pour illustrer des pages de wikipedia. Ce sont des photos prises à la volée avec un petit appareil photo Sony que je possédais et qui était réglé en basse définition 640x400. Ensuite pour donner à la photo un format rectangulaire je massicotais la photo pour enlever les déformations de perpective et les marges de champ. C'est comme ça que le nom du photographe que je n'avais pas vu et qui était en bordure s'est retrouvé hors du cadre. Il s'agit de photos de livres comme il y a dans tous les catalogues ou annonces de ventes, et pas du tout d'un fichier scanné en haute définition de la couverture, reproduction qui serait assimilable à sa reproduction.
- Cela fait deux fois que vous m'accusez d'être un affreux contrefacteur, et vous renvoyez à l'historique des suppressions. J'avais pris la peine de photographier une bonne centaine de livres pour pouvoir illustrer wikipedia, il y en a au moins la moitié qui ont fait l'objet de procédures de suppression pour violation du droit d'auteur, alors que toutes de ces couvertures (à l'exception de cette édition en 1939 de la partition que je croyais tombée dans le Domaine Public au bout de 50 ans, l'oeuvre musicale elle-même étant toujours protégée) correspondaient à la couverture standard d'une collection d'éditeur, sans graphisme en dehors de la maquette avec les inscriptions d'usage sur un frontispice de livre (nom d'auteur, oeuvre, éditeur), donc sans création intellectuelle ou artistique. La couverture de la collection blanche de Gallimard est protégée, ça veut dire qu'un autre éditeur n'a pas le droit d'utiliser cette maquette, ces polices de carctères, pour éditer ses propres publications, et faire ainsi croire que c'est une oeuvre publiée dans cette collection prestigieuses, ce serait effectivement une contrefaçon. Cette protection ne vise pas à interdire de publier une photo des livres de la collection blanche pour en rendre compte dans une encyclopédie ou un catalogue de vente, ce qui est le cas ici.
- J'ai essayé d'expliquer que d'une part ces couvertures n'avaient aucune valeur intellectuelle ou artistique particulière, que d'autre part il ne s'agissait pas d'une reproduction de l'oeuvre mais d'une simple citation graphique comme une petite photo dans une catalogue, ce qui est une exception admise. Aucun éditeur ne se plaindra jamais qu'on montre en photo un de ses livres pour en parler, ce qui est bien l'objet de ces photos, cette accusatiuon de violer les droits de l'éditeur n'a aucun sens.
- Voyant qu'on ne tenait pas compte de mes explications, je n'ai plus répondu pour les autres et j'ai laissé supprimer, sauf pour une édition pirate d'un texte de Guy Debord qui avait mis par avance toutes ses oeuvres et celles de l'Internationale Situationiste dans le domaine public, en incitant à les reproduire par tous moyens.
- J'ai eu aussi des demande de suppression pour des photographies de tags sur des murs de Paris, et des photos de choses et d'autres dont j'avais mal renseigné la licence. Bref j'ai été dégoûté de publier sur common des photos d'illustrations pour wikipedia. -- Heurtelions (talk) 23:30, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
- Donc sous droit d'auteur jusqu'en 2030 au plus tôt. En revanche, il est licite de recadrer sur la photo Harcourt [5] et de supprimer la version antérieure. Me faire signe si besoin. Cordialement, — Racconish 💬 16:56, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- La photo Harcourt incorporée, en tant qu’œuvre collective [4], est à présent dans le domaine public. Concernant l'illustration, je ne vois pas la signature de Würth. Si le graphisme n'est pas signé, il est aujourd'hui dans le domaine public. S'il est signé, c'est 70 ans pma. Cordialement, — Racconish 💬 14:58, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- Je souhaiterai connaître l'avis de @Racconish: sur les aspects juridiques. De mon point de vue, les arguments de Heurtelions sont fallacieux, et servent d'excuses à cet utilisateur pour enfreindre les droits des auteurs depuis des années. voir l'historique Merci. --Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 14:25, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- Weak delete This image is not in the public domain since Würth's artwork is not. The incorporated Harcourt photo is now PD but in my opinion not worth keeping since resolution is too low. I have uploaded 7 better Harcourt photos of Piaf. — Racconish 💬 13:36, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: The cover is under copyright. I see that you would like the law to be different, but we can only follow what the law is, not what you would like it to be. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:55, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Photos by Calcifer Yeol on Tistory
[edit]The photographer has deleted the photos that I uploaded and left the license changed by a restrictive as indicated on their website. It is no longer recommended that these images remain hosted on Commons.
- File:Park Chan-yeol at Nature Festival on February 3, 2018.jpg
- File:Park Chan-yeol at MLB Korea Open Event in Hong Kong on March 23, 2018.jpg
- File:Park Chan-yeol at a fansigning event on August 13, 2017 (1).jpg
- File:Park Chan-yeol at a fansigning event on August 13, 2017 (2).jpg
- File:Park Chan-yeol at The EXO'rDIUM dot on May 27, 2017 (1).jpg
- File:Park Chan-yeol at The EXO'rDIUM dot on May 27, 2017 (2).jpg
--Suzy Oh tell me 23:34, 21 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - If, as I understand it, this is a case where the license on the source site has changed, that is the reason we have License Review -- so that we can capture the free license before it is changed. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:58, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
I question whether this is own work. A higher resolution can be found here. There are no meta data and it is the only contribution of the user. Wouter (talk) 13:10, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:59, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Fictionnal, not in use => Out of COM:scope : Commons is not a depository for private files Kathisma (talk) 13:13, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- If we could put it on Wikipedia (not sure if it is), I would welcome the deletion, as I'd prefer not to break any rules :)
- Kingdom of Baustralia (talk) 21:23, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:59, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
All files by this user do not seem to be own work (low res, available via Google...). This file is credited here “Facebook M. Kňažko”. Gumruch (talk) 13:15, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:59, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
screenshots — Preceding unsigned comment added by Acar54 (talk • contribs) 2019-01-20T08:08:02 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:59, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
The source has a NC restriction. No evidence that this would be a work from the federal US government. Jcb (talk) 14:00, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Info At the Flickr uploader's (John Collier Jr.) info page you can find the information that "From 1941 to 1943 he worked as a photographer under Roy E. Stryker for the Farm Security Administration and the Office of War Information." This 1943 image would probably fit the bill. There's an article en:John Collier Jr. with further information. --Rosenzweig τ 14:47, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - It is clear from the cited biography that he was working for the FSA when this image was taken, so it is PD-USGov. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:09, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Derivative work of a copyrighted poster B dash (talk) 14:00, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:09, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 14:09, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:10, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 14:12, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:10, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:15, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:10, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from music. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:15, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:11, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Historical document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:17, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:11, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:20, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:11, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:20, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:11, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Roger Cans.jpg
- File:Sir-Everard-Ferdinand-im-Thurn.jpg
- File:Sir-Robert-Brownrigg-1st-Bt.jpg
- File:James-Stuart-Soldier.jpg
- File:Sir-Bernard-Henry-Bourdillon.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:27, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep File:Sir-Robert-Brownrigg-1st-Bt.jpg & File:James-Stuart-Soldier.jpg. Clearly PD-Art and PD-old-100.
- Keep File:Sir-Bernard-Henry-Bourdillon.jpg. PD-UK-unknown because it's Bassano Limited and it's from 1946.
- Delete File:Sir-Everard-Ferdinand-im-Thurn.jpg since National Portrait Gallery does not license CC-BY, it licenses CC-BY-NC-ND, which is not compatible with Commons & this is not in the public domain in the UK yet since Walter Stoneman died in 1958. Undelete in 2029. Abzeronow (talk) 19:58, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination as above except that for File:Sir-Bernard-Henry-Bourdillon.jpg, in order to use PD-UK-Unknown, you must prove that either it has never been available to the public or it was made available to the public more than 70 years ago. There is nothing here to show that it was made available more than 70 years ago and also nothing to show (this is difficult, of course) that it was not public less than 70 years ago. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:19, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
FBMD at MD. Other uploads of the user also are dubious own work. E4024 (talk) 16:28, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:19, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
No FoP in Ukraine. Building after 1988. No Permission from the architect. Микола Василечко (talk) 17:19, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:19, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
No Fop in Japan for sculptures. COM:FOP Japan Ronhjones (Talk) 17:40, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
日本の著作権法は、（道路上、もしくは公園内、もしくは一般の人々が容易に出入りでき容易に見ることが可能な場所、もしくは建築物の外壁などの）野外に恒久的に設置されていていて、公衆が容易に見ることができる芸術作品を撮影したものに限っては非商業的目的（※商業目的とは複製物の販売を目的として複製し、又はその複製物を販売すること...第4項）での使用を認めている。
したがって下記の注1の著作権法の制約下にある作品でも、この条件を満たしたものは使用できることになる。 Ntsctalk (talk) 02:07, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
一般の人々が容易に出入りでき容易に見ることが可能な場所、愛知県体育館前の屋外で、使用が認められております。Ntsctalk (talk) 02:39, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- @Ntsctalk: クリエイティブ・コモンズ 表示-継承 2.0 一般ライセンスでは営利目的での利用を認めているため、著作権の侵害を促す恐れがあります。複製・販売・改変が自由でないコンテンツはコモンズでは受け入れていません。日本語版ウィキペディアへのアップロードを検討して下さい。（→w:ja:Wikipedia:屋外美術を被写体とする写真の利用方針, w:ja:Wikipedia:ファイルのアップロード） Darklanlan (talk) 13:14, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
ありがとうございました。了解しました。Ntsctalk (talk) 14:01, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Delete The sculpture was established in 1966, and created by Nonomura, Kazuo (w:ja:野々村一男) who died in 2008. [6] [7] Its copyright will expire in 2059. Darklanlan (talk) 13:34, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:22, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 17:49, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- This photo was illustration from book by Matthew Josephson "Empire of the Air: Juan Trippe and the struggle for World Airways" (New York, Harcourt, Brace and Company, 1944). See [8], [9]. This photo in book was signed as "JUAN T. TRIPPE The president of Pan American Airways in his "legendary" globe-gazing role." and attributed to "Pix"(?). --Kaganer (talk) 22:57, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- See original photo by Alfred Eisenstaedt (1898-1995) in the LIFE collection.
- See also similar photo by Alfred Eisenstaedt from the LIFE Picture Collection/Getty Images (1941). Source in the LIFE collection--Kaganer (talk) 23:13, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Third photo from these same session. --Kaganer (talk) 23:21, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- So this may be or may not be {PD-US}, but the current {PD-USgov} license is wrong at least. Jcb (talk) 16:29, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Aside from the LIFE copyright, the Harcourt Brace book almost certainly had a copyright notice. That copyright will expire in 2039. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:25, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Codc as no permission (No permission since) but it’s unclear what needs permission and from whom. The video is appropriately licensed by its author. clpo13(talk) 19:09, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- It seems clear that Steven Crowder has licenced the image from one of his own videos. Not sure what the issue is supposed to be. (ping me if responding). Insertcleverphrasehere (talk) 21:45, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- As far as I am aware, there are no licensing issues with this file. Please keep this image. Also note that the original user who tagged this file for speedy deletion has not responded to concerns about this on his talk page for over a week now, despite being active elsewhere. 72 (talk) 17:29, 3 February 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:26, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
There is no reason to believe that Paul Joseph Watson agreed to a Creative Commons licensing of his webcam stream by appearing on Louder with Crowder. Mark Schierbecker (talk) 00:06, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Abzeronow (talk) 01:51, 12 April 2019 (UTC)
- Delete I fully agree to Mark Schierbecker´s reasoning, also out of scope! I support the deletion! Chem Sim 2001 (talk) 19:08, 19 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:33, 24 April 2019 (UTC)
Taking photographs of newspapers does not make them "own work". I know, because I also made this mistake. Please see: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kostas kasapoğlu.jpg. E4024 (talk) 19:10, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Please write, why can't I use this photo in Wikipedia? Mark the rule that prohibits it.--Gardmanahay (talk) 19:16, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Better ask the IP that opened the above DR. They seem to be an expert on these issues as they got deleted several of my uploads. If I knew who that is, I would recommend them for admin here, because we have piles of DRs waiting. Let's hope the admin who will close the discussion teach us both which photographs from newspapers are acceptable (I guess for example those photographs of 19th Century) and which not. If I got confused and disturbed you with a wrong DR, sorry. Any admin reading this, please help ASAP. --E4024 (talk) 19:40, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: This is, I think, a 1996 periodical from Armenia. According to Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Armenia, it will be under copyright for 70 years from publication, that is, until January 1, 2067. Any copy of it is a Derivative Work and infringes on the copyright. Therefore this cannot be kept on Commons without a free license from the publisher. If this is not enough explanation -- after you have read the linked pages -- please feel free to drop a request on my talk page.. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:36, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Probable Flickrwashed copyvio that original Flickr user likely does not have rights to. Taken from concert programme. Any alternate reason for its retention should be given by uploader or those who wish to retain it. Ubcule (talk) 19:15, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep. I don't see a copyright notice on the concert program. {{PD-US-no notice}} Abzeronow (talk) 20:04, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Good catch, User:Abzeronow. I think we have the whole program here and the notice would have to be on the inside cover. Without notice, a 1956 document is PD. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:43, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
A piece of contemporary art, claimed as own work Удивленный1 (talk) 20:34, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:44, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
A piece of contemporary art, no evidence of PD or a free license. Удивленный1 (talk) 20:35, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:44, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Painting is copyright Herbert James Gunn, who died 55 years ago. Firebrace (talk) 23:15, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- The painting meets the criteria to no longer have copy right though. Nford24 (talk) 03:16, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- Copyright in UK is life of the author plus 70 years. The painting may or may not have been Crown copyright (we don't know what the agreement was between the painter and his subject), but even if it was, Herbert James Gunn also retained his copyright, i.e. the painting had two different copyright statuses. Now that the Crown copyright has expired (assuming it was), the author's own copyright expires in 2034.
- I am surprised it has taken more than two years for anyone to nomiate this for deletion, as similar photographs and paintings have been speedy deleted in the past. The uploader must be very popular... Firebrace (talk) 13:01, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- Oppose deletion. In the UK, prior to 1989, copyright in a commissioned portrait was held by the commissioner, not the creator.[10] As a commissioned state portrait,[11] this work would fall under the rules for Crown copyright in force at that time, and now be in the public domain.--Trystan (talk) 19:32, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
- See https://www.dacs.org.uk/knowledge-base/factsheets/commissioned-works#1912
On or after 1 July 1912 until 31 May 1957: The 1911 Copyright Act contained similar provisions to those in the 1956 Copyright Act (described above). In the case of an engraving, photograph or portrait where the work was ordered by a third party and paid for with money or its equivalent, copyright remains with the person placing the order, unless there is agreement to the contrary.
- Two problems here. We don't know if there was an agreement to the contrary or not. We also don't know if Herbert James Gunn was paid money or its equivalent. It has been said, in previous nominations where the image was deleted, that artists would often paint or photograph the Queen for free to enhance their profile as an artist. Firebrace (talk) 22:51, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination It is clear that HJG was not a Crown employee, so the question falls on whether he was paid for the work or not. As pointed out above, often portraitists would work for the monarch for free just for the publicity value of having been chosen. Our standard of proof is "significant doubt". I think a significant doubt exists here. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:52, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ThatBPengineer as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Commons are not social media to post personal photographs Scope issues should generally be directed to Requests for Deletion, not Speedy Deletions. Strakhov (talk) 23:17, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- @4nn1l2: Pinging Persian speakers. Could this image be considered, somehow, in scope? Strakhov (talk) 23:22, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- This picture shows Parvaz mountaineering group which is based in Isfahan, Iran. They have an official website: http://www.gparvaz.ir/ and a gallery page: http://www.gparvaz.ir/?page_id=280 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:40, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep OK enough for me. Not high quality but we don't have any picture of that organization. Category:Mountaineering in Iran is indeed pretty empty. Strakhov (talk) 19:47, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:53, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation property of FC Barcelona Brgesto (talk) 12:15, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Rastrojo (D•ES) 14:55, 6 March 2019 (UTC)
Duplication of File:Official map of Pima County, Arizona. LOC 77692954.jpg MB (talk) 20:43, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Rosenzweig τ 21:02, 15 March 2019 (UTC)
SVG version is available. Fandi89 (talk) 03:28, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: UK logo --25 year typesetting copyright applies. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:57, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Quezon Memorial Circle
[edit]No freedom of panorama in the Philippines. The artist died in 1989, so this work will not be in the public domain until 2039.
- File:05847jfQuezon Memorial Circle Landmark Elliptical Road Quezon Cityfvf 01.JPG
- File:Quezon Memorial Circle 03.jpg
- File:Quezon Memorial Circle 04.jpg
- File:Quezon Memorial Circle.jpg
- File:Sunset Quezon Memorial Circle.jpg
Howhontanozaz (talk) 04:04, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for all the messages; when I took these pictures I asked permission from the officers, and I was told that taking photos of these are allowed, especially they appear to be for public learning; at any rate, I respectfully submit to the sound discretion of more learned editors on the matter; very sincerely yours Judgefloro 06:37, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Quoting user Seav:
- The architect was an employee of the government and the shrine is owned and maintained by the government. As such the shrine is considered a work of the government and according to the Intellectual Property Code of the Philippines, no copyright subsists in works of the government. This also applies to when the Philippine government was part of the United States during the time the shrine was designed. —seav (talk) 17:24, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- and PD-PhilippinesGov tag.
- Thanks for all the messages; when I took these pictures I asked permission from the officers, and I was told that taking photos of these are allowed, especially they appear to be for public learning; at any rate, I respectfully submit to the sound discretion of more learned editors on the matter; very sincerely yours Judgefloro 06:37, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: The designer, Federico Ilustre was working for the Bureau of Public Works when he did this design. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:03, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
не затверджений герб — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2019-01-25T15:17:39 (talk • contribs) Her213 (UTC)
KeepЦе історичний герб села, причому тут не затверджений.
Deleted: Named source has an explicit copyright notice. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:10, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
не затверджений герб — Preceding unsigned comment added by Her213 (talk • contribs) 2019-01-25T15:16:54 (UTC)
Keep:Проти видалення. Цей герб використовується місцевою владою як офіційна символіка. http://photo.i.ua/user/1153581/376676/11049292
Вважаю за доцільне видалення або заміну лише після офіційного затвердження іншої символіки. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vity OKM (talk • contribs) 2019-01-27T22:16:54 (UTC)
Deleted: Named source has an explicit copyright notice. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:10, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
не затверджений герб — Preceding unsigned comment added by Her213 (talk • contribs) 2019-01-25T15:16:09 (UTC)
Deleted: Named source has an explicit copyright notice. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:11, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Photographs of identifiable people (Commons:Photographs of identifiable people) ysjbserver (talk) 12:10, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Can be blurred, but public place. --Yann (talk) 09:12, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Uploader's request: person's face is directly exposed, and File:Imsil Bongcheon Station F4.jpg is same without person. ysjbserver (talk) 07:08, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:14, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Contains personal information (Car number) ysjbserver (talk) 12:15, 7 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Can be blurred, but public place. --Yann (talk) 09:12, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Uploader's request: It wasn't used and File:Imsil Bongcheon Station F4.jpg is same file without the car number. ysjbserver (talk) 07:12, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:14, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
non-free, taken from https://www.gettyimages.in/photos/kuldeep-yadav?sort=mostpopular&mediatype=photography&phrase=kuldeep%20yadav Lugnuts (talk) 07:26, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:14, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Small and unused image, out of scope B dash (talk) 08:12, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- keep This is the earliest photo of this solar eclipse. It has been used in the English Wikipedia in the past. The scope is educational, which is what commons is for. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 09:39, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: How many essentially identical images of solar eclipses do we need? Certainly not small, poor quality ones. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:16, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
не затверджений герб — Preceding unsigned comment added by Her213 (talk • contribs) 2019-01-25T15:15:16 (UTC)
Deleted: Source does not have a free license. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:17, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
не затверджений герб — Preceding unsigned comment added by Her213 (talk • contribs) 2019-01-25T15:14:02 (UTC)
Deleted: Source does not have a free license. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:18, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
не затверджений герб Template:Unigned
Deleted: Source does not have a free license. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:18, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
obvious copyvio Howhontanozaz (talk) 10:26, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:18, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Copyright infringement https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Boomerang_logo_v2.svg — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2403:6200:8863:f63b:c836:a11f:267b:a2e4 (talk • contribs) 2019-01-26T10:45:03 (UTC)
Deleted: Infringes the UK typography copyright. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:32, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Australian football guernseys
[edit]Designs or logos above the threshold of originality (which is, in fact, very low in Australia). All of them copyrighted by their respective clubs/teams.
Files affected:
- File:Gol Gol Hawks.jpg
- File:Heywood Lions Jumper.png
- File:Trikot Frankfurt Redbacks.svg
- File:Trikot Munich Kangaroos.svg
* File:Burnie Dockers Jumper.png
Fma12 (talk) 12:31, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:33, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ThatBPengineer as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://media-cdn.tripadvisor.com/media/photo-s/14/ba/fa/5d/gran-estanconfor-veranda.jpg Image upload date (15 September 2014) pre-dates link provided for speedy. Discussion needed. Эlcobbola talk 13:04, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:38, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
This is my own upload. I am not sure about the date of first publication. Sorry. 4nn1l2 (talk) 13:07, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:38, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 13:10, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:38, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Factually incorrect (no supporters have been granted, non canonical composition) + not in use = out of COM:scope Kathisma (talk) 13:34, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Disagree of elimination
[edit]I disagree, because wikimedia has always motivated the creativity of each user, if there is indeed an error, instead of deleting the file, any user can make a contribution by improving the referred file File:Coat of arms of the Middleton Family.svg! Edward Mendes ✉ 22:41, 2 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:39, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
copyright violation, propaganda Gholaghabijan (talk) 12:21, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: from oguztv.com. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:40, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
This picture appears to show the Hansa 400 / 500 and copyrights do not seem to be expired. --Hans Haase (talk,express talk) 11:53, 25 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:41, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Проект символіки. Не затверджена. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Her213 (talk • contribs) 2019-01-25T13:22:36 (UTC)
Keep:Проти видалення. Цей герб зазначається на сайті села як наш герб. https://sites.google.com/site/zubrecselo/
Вважаю за доцільне видалення або заміну лише після офіційного затвердження іншої символіки. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vity OKM (talk • contribs) 2019-01-27T22:16:54 (UTC)
Deleted: No free license at named source. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:43, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Проект символіки. Не затверджена. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Her213 (talk • contribs) 2019-01-25T12:37:16 (UTC)
Keep Draft coat of arms. What is the violation? --Микола Василечко (talk) 15:22, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: The coat of arms may or may not have a copyright, but this particular representation of it certainly does have a copyright, unless it is old enough that the copyright has expired. Since no source is goven, we can check that. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:45, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
fictionnal, not in use => out of COM:scope Kathisma (talk) 14:33, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:05, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope: seems to be a made-up logo. 4nn1l2 (talk) 14:39, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Also:
4nn1l2 (talk) 14:41, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - either fictional or, if they are, real, then they are copyvios. Either way, we cannot keep them. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:06, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
PD-UEA is incompatible with the copyright policy of Wikimedia Commons that requires freely licensed images only. Osmo Buller is not the copyright owner those files licensed under this license and is not in the position to authorize the use of those works. The source for this statement of Osmo Buller is nowhere to be found. Nobody could provide it in an earlier discussion. Robin van der Vliet (talk) 22:41, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- I just sent an email to UEA explaining the whole situation and I asked them to take a look at this discussion and for help. Let's wait for some time first to see how they reply. Robin van der Vliet (talk) 23:32, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - A template such as this must have either an OTRS ticket or a link to a Web Site that proves its validity. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:58, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Files in Category:Restaurant Andrew Fairlie
[edit]License looks dubious. OTRS from David Gillanders may be necessary.
Abzeronow (talk) 22:45, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Uploader is not the same as the author. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:55, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Do not looks like „own work“. DaB. (talk) 14:41, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:35, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ThatBPengineer as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Images from par Tou photographe — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 15:40, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep Tou=Toufik --— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 15:41, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn by nom. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:35, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Es besteht der Verdacht, dass der Hochlader nicht mit dem tatsächlichen Urheber identisch ist, siehe diese Google-Abfrage, die auf ältere Versionen des Bildes verweist. 77.47.12.143 16:43, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Hey, wir sind der Urheber des Fotos. Das Foto entstand im Sommer 2018, bitte entschuldige die falsche Jahresangabe. Wie kann man es korrigieren? — Preceding unsigned comment added by TSKRVLTN (talk • contribs) 16:48, 27. Jan. 2019 (UTC)
- Der Urheber des Fotos ist Jannis Rolfs > https://www.fkpscorpio.com/de/presse/nugat und nicht "Ihr". Wie auch immer, nun wird eine OTRS-Freigabe benötigt, damit das Foto behalten werden kann. Sonst wird es wohl gelöscht. --Migebert (talk) 09:41, 28 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: Needs a license from the actual photographer via OTRS. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:34, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Gros doute sur la licence libre
L'origine, Wikimanche, n'est pas en CC 0, le contributeur qui l'a importé sur Wikimanche a importé d'autres images copyvio et sans donner l'origine (de celle là ni des autres). HaguardDuNord (talk) 17:32, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:32, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Origine indéfinie
Sur Wikimanche, plusieurs photos importées par le même contributeur ont été supprimées car l'origine et la licence ne sont pas précisées. Copyvio très probable. HaguardDuNord (talk) 17:37, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:32, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Poor image quality (esp. stiching errors), better replacement is Swetizchoweli-Kathedrale 22.jpg Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 17:36, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:31, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Poor image quality (esp. stiching errors), better replacement is Swetizchoweli-Kathedrale 22.jpg Giftzwerg 88 (talk) 17:37, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:31, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ThatBPengineer as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COmmons are not social media I think the nominator meant the work is not in Commons scope. Mhhossein talk 19:26, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:31, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Kfz-Kennzeichen identifizierbar Rollroboter (talk) 20:14, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:31, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no license. Well, there is a CC license, but as an image from 1880 that veeeery unlikely own work of the oploader as claimed. JuTa 20:50, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - this work is 149 years old -- PD everywhere. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:29, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
complex logo, appearing to be taken directly from TKP-ML website (from a screen capture, see file name), http://ikk-online.org/tkpml-dersim-parti-komitesi-gdpk-alanimizdaki-hizip-kalkismasidir.html not likely released by the TKP-ML under this licence Thespoondragon (talk) 21:07, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:18, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
I authored this art. It is slightly inferior to a subsequent drawing Smokefoot (talk) 21:17, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:18, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
copyvio, promo MiguelAlanCS (talk) 21:45, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:18, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Watermarked, unlikely to be own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:45, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:18, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Unused image with no meaningful description or categories, uploaded by a user whose only other contributions are two deleted edits on Spanish Wikipedia. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. —LX (talk, contribs) 22:16, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:17, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
If this is their own work, why has it been on the internet since December 2017[12], and meta date says they edited it photoshop in November 2017, but uploaded it 11 months later? Copyvio. BevinKacon (talk) 22:18, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:17, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
If this is their own work, why is a professionally lit photo, so low res and been on internet since Nov 2015[13]? Users only upload. Copyvio. BevinKacon (talk) 22:18, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:17, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Duplicate BSicons
[edit]Duplicates of File:BSicon KDSTaq red.svg and File:BSicon KDSTaq yellow.svg respectively. They cannot be speedily deleted since they are in use on log and template-generated gallery pages in userspace on Commons, which do not need to have the file removed.
Jc86035 (talk) 13:39, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete, per nom. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 15:45, 9 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:20, 16 September 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Duplicate
[edit]Initially tagged as duplicates. They are not true duplicates - the png version is a crop of the original. Might be deletable as "redundant images"
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Government_Cover.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Ambassador_Francisco_Gonzalez.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_02.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
(2018-02-07).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Government_Cover.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Government_Cover.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
![[5]](https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/7/71/20190128170140%21Elle_fr%C3%A9quentait_la_rue_pigalle%2C_Raymond_Asso%2C_Louis_Maitrier%2C_Edith_Piaf_1943.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
![[9]](https://assets.catawiki.nl/assets/2016/3/13/7/d/d/7ddc23fa-e94d-11e5-9d7d-e20cafa108de.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
- File:NGC3645 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3646 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3647 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3648 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3649 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3650 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3652 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3655 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3656 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3657 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3658 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3659 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3660 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3662 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3664 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3665 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3666 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3668 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3669 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3670 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3671 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3672 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3674 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3675 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3676 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3677 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3678 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3681 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3682 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3683 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3684 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3685 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3686 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3687 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3688 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3689 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3690 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3691 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3692 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3694 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3695 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3697 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3700 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3701 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3702 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3703 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3705 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3710 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3712 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3713 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3714 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3716 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3718 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3725 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3726 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3728 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3729 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3731 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3733 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3735 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3736 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3737 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3738 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3739 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3740 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3741 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3743 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3744 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3751 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3752 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3755 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3756 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3757 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3758 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3759 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3761 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3762 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3764 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3765 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3767 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3768 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3769 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3770 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3772 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3773 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3776 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3780 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3781 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3782 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3787 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3790 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3795 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3796 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3798 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3805 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3806 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3808 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3809 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3810 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3811 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3812 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3813 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3814 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3815 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3816 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3817 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3819 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3820 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3821 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3822 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3824 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3825 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3826 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3827 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3828 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3829 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3830 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3833 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3834 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3835 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3837 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3838 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3839 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3840 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3843 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3844 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3846 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3849 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3850 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3851 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3853 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3856 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3857 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3859 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3860 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3861 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3863 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3864 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3867 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3868 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3869 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3870 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3871 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3872 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3876 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3877 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3878 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3879 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3880 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3881 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3883 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3884 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3886 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3888 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3890 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3891 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3893 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3896 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3897 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3898 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3900 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3902 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3906 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3908 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3910 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3911 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3912 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3913 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3914 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3916 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3917 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3920 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3921 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3922 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3924 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3925 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3926 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3928 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3929 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3930 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3931 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3932 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3933 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3934 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3935 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3937 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3938 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3940 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3941 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3943 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3944 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3945 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3946 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3947 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3949 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3951 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3953 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3954 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3958 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3961 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3963 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3964 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3968 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3971 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3972 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3973 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3976 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3977 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3979 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3982 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3983 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3984 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3985 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3986 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3988 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3990 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3991 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:Messier109 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3993 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3996 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3998 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC3999 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4000 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4001 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4002 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4004 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4005 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4006 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4008 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4009 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4010 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4011 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4012 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4013 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4015 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4016 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4017 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4018 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4019 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4020 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4021 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4022 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4023 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4025 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4026 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4029 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4030 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4031 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4032 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4034 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4036 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4037 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4040 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4041 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4042 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4043 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4044 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4045 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4047 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4048 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4049 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4051 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4053 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4054 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4056 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4058 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4060 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4062 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4063 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4064 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4065 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4066 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4067 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4068 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4069 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4070 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4072 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4073 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4074 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4075 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4076 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4077 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4078 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4079 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4080 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4081 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4082 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4083 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4084 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4085 - SDSS DR14.jpg
- File:NGC4095 - SDSS DR14.jpg
Ronhjones (Talk) 22:27, 27 January 2019 (UTC)
- Keep - Why didn't we delete the png-files then?
- It is for shure not a matter of which file is older, but which file is better.
- And there are some reason to do it the other way around:
- why should we delete the uncropped version at all? The uncropped angel of view is choosen to give sharp and full detailed view in thumbs - the cropped version due to png and higher pixel scale less so.
- the increased angle of view is helpful for larger objects (examples below), without loosing on smaller objects (as explained above)
- there is no point in storing a jpeg compressed file in a png format, as it is done in the png-files
- Now we have NGC 1 - NGC 3644 in jpg with one scale, NGC 3645 - NGC 4095 as png in a different scale and NGC 4096 - NGC 7800 as well as IC 1 - IC 5300 again in the first appearence
- the png-files have artefacts in the lower right corners
- The angle of view can be expressed in a short form, ie 4' x 4'
- BR, --21:01, 29 January 2019 (UTC) Fabian RRRR (talk) 21:03, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Kept: Two reasons to keep these -- they are roughly 10% the size of the PNGs, and nine of the ten I randomly checked are in use on WP. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:09, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
بالغلط Soekah (talk) 21:32, 26 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:42, 27 January 2019 (UTC)