Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/11/20

Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Year	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2004	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2005	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2006	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2007	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2008	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2009	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2010	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2011	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2012	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2013	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12

Year	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2014	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2015	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2016	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2017	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2018	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2019	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2020	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2021	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2022	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2023	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2024	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12

Archive November 20^th, 2018

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wn.png

Out of scope: serves no purpose Sjö (talk) 20:19, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as the nominator said, out of scope and currently being used in a disruptive nature on en-wiki. --TheSandDoctor (talk) 21:21, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Speedy deleted. Vandalism and actually a copyrighted image anyways. --Majora (talk) 21:32, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Annual Eisa Championship Tournament of Universities in Fujian

wrong page. the correct one is category:Annual Eisa Championship Tournament of Universities in Fujian. please delete it. - I am Davidzdh. 14:15, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Jcb. --Achim (talk) 22:06, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The 4th Annual Eisa Championship Tournament of Universities in Fujian

wrong page. the correct one is category:The 4th Annual Eisa Championship Tournament of Universities in Fujian. please delete it. - I am Davidzdh. 14:19, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Jcb. --Achim (talk) 22:08, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category:1st-century BC inscriptions in Frances

The correct mane of the category is Category:1st-century BC inscriptions in France. Dorieo (talk) 21:50, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Typo, author's request. --Achim (talk) 21:58, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jr.png

speedy delete as a repeatedly uploaded shock image BrxBrx (talk) 22:26, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:28, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:El Koala-Rock Rustico De Lomo Ancho-Frontal.jpg

Imagen con copyright Geom (talk) 18:23, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by Túrelio at 19:42, 20 November 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: non free cover --Krdbot 02:03, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jana Miartusova & Eufrat - back.jpg

Unrecognizable. Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:18, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep and I want to know what Patrick Rogel has against these porn stars. This case is also discussed on Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Misuse of Copyvio templates by autopatroller. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 18:41, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Patrick Rogel can you please explain your nomination rationale ? Thanks, — Racconish ^💬 19:00, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The photo was taken their back faced to the photographer. Since they are on their back, how can we see faces? We don't! That's pretty much all the files in the categories of photos of people seen from behind. Should we delete them because we don't see faces? I wonder...--Jim Bangs (talk) 22:06, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I think that this is a very clear case. Is this useable for an educational purpose? Of course, nothing prevents that. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 04:52, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Unrecognizable rationale to delete image in scope of two porn actresses with articles in several language wikis. Tm (talk) 05:23, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. Patrick Rogel seems to have admitted a mistake here. — Racconish ^💬 12:23, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per above. --Sealle (talk) 13:43, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tibbi.jpg

unlikely to be own work Sakhalinio (talk) 06:22, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish ^💬 07:42, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ginandjar Kartasasmita and Boediono.jpg

Photo of photo, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:30, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - PD heirs. — Racconish ^💬 07:26, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ginandjar Kartasasmita - 1998.jpg

Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ginandjar Kartasasmita and Boediono.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:32, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - PD heirs. — Racconish ^💬 07:26, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:1998 in Jakarta

Derivative work with no indication the original image is free.

— Racconish ^💬 20:10, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I wonder why such an assertion without evidence is made by an admin. MagentaGreen (talk) 20:21, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

MagentaGreen : because of the aspect of the photographed document and the similarity with Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ginandjar Kartasasmita and Boediono.jpg. Nevertheless, I deemed it better to have a community discussion on the matter — Racconish ^💬 20:32, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand that and I'm sorry, but the lack of any justification is, in my opinion, unworthy for any admin in both cases. MagentaGreen (talk) 21:05, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what you don't understand. Please take a look at COM:DW. — Racconish ^💬 21:18, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure what you want to understand. Please take a look at COM:DW. Please be more specific. MagentaGreen (talk) 21:51, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Racconish and MagentaGreen: Hello. I'm sorry to respond just now, but the the thing is that the photograph is taken by my grandfather and these photographs was scanned by me. My father was working in a book publishing and press. I should publish this by PD-heir but unfortunately no CC BY 4.0-heir.--Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 07:00, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jeromi Mikhael , yes, please change the license to {{PD-heirs}} and specify your grand father's name as the author in File:Muchtar Pakpahan and Sri Bintang Pamungkas (retouched).jpg, File:Muchtar Pakpahan and Sri Bintang Pamungkas.jpg, File:Ginandjar Kartasasmita and Boediono.jpg, File:Ginandjar Kartasasmita - 1998.jpg, File:Muchdi Purwoprandjono and Syahrir MS.jpg and File:Muchdi Purwoprandjono and Syahrir MS (retouched).jpg. I will then withdraw this nomination. — Racconish ^💬 08:11, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Racconish: Done.--Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 06:41, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I withdraw my nomination — Racconish ^💬 07:24, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. — Racconish ^💬 07:24, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:AquiPoesia15.pdf

Tagged no license. Clara Silva died in 1976, document not free in Uruguay until 2027. Abzeronow (talk) 02:18, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:50, 22 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kokyawzayya (talk · contribs)

low resolution and low file size from other sources, claiming as own works.

Ninja✮Strikers ^«☎» 13:55, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Kokyawzayya (talk · contribs)

small and low resolution files taken from various sources.

Ninja✮Strikers ^«☎» 14:26, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Kokyawzayya (talk · contribs)

low resolution and low file size from other sources, claiming as own works.

File:Ka Ni.jpg - https://plus.google.com/photos/photo/100457323227939641238/6534624928928619602
File:Daze.jpg - from Facebook
File:Kaw Lin.jpg - enlarged photo from here
File:Inn Taw.jpg - from Facebook

Ninja✮Strikers ^«☎» 04:36, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:08, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kokyawzayya (talk · contribs)

Photos taken from Google Map and claimed as own works

Ninja✮Strikers ^«☎» 07:44, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:40, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Foto Daniel Cestau Liz.jpg

Privacidad digital Verónica Vilte (talk) 18:53, 15 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

{{speedydelete|Privacidad digital, Página de prueba}} Verónica Vilte (talk) 21:31, 20 November 2018 (UTC) De acuerdo[reply]

Deleted: the person does not seem to be notable, thus out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:24, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mohshin Habib.jpg

Not sure of own work. Metadata suggests a different author. — T. 08:27, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 03:55, 24 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Черный джип службой отогрева www.otogrev.ru.jpg

Incomplete upload JopkeB (talk) 21:01, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 05:31, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Абдулла Кодирий.jpg

before starting the transfer I thought the Russian license tags were fine, but now I see that PD-old-70 is claimed but the author is stated as unknown. This is contradictory. The photographer in that GULAG could have lived another 15 years or more with something similar to ease. → «« Man77 »» ^[de] 21:25, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 05:32, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ron Williams.jpg

Copyright not certain. Should be removed. RW2Enterprises (talk) 23:17, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 05:34, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mario Bilate.jpg

Watermarked RKC and not AdPfotografie. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:49, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 05:35, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:RKC-Telstar-Mario Bilate.jpg

http://www.adpfotografie.nl/ : Alle Rechten op de foto's liggen bij AdPfotografie Foto's mogen zonder toestemming niet gebruikt worden voor publicatie Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:53, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 05:35, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sade live.jpg

This is a photo of a monitor displayed at a concert. It is an inappropriate derivative work. ℯ xplicit 00:00, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 05:34, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Anil Machado Yoga Pose.jpg

Unused {{Userpage image}}. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:31, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:29, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bineshshahmoradii (talk · contribs)

Out of COM:PS, promotional, not used anywhere.

4nn1l2 (talk) 03:54, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:30, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Anlakivac2.jpg

unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 06:19, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

include

File:Anlakivac.jpg

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:31, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Melihcan.jpg

unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 21:41, 14 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:43, 26 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Melihcan.jpg

unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 06:21, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:31, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:AstridFoto.jpg

Out of scope. Poor quality image of no possible educational value Headlock0225 (talk) 10:00, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:32, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Canadian Navy Captain Karel Heemskerk.pdf

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:33, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Diversity in Workplace Ireland.pdf

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:33, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Vocaroo User page reading.ogg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused audio version of text of questionable notability. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:34, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Horaciomendez.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:34, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Secuencia didáctica.pdf

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:34, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Notice de montage Chariot de transport écologique pour bouteille de gaz (désherbage thermique).pdf

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:35, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Active Ageing Academy.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:35, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Andrei Duduc Iumor.jpg

Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:35, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Doctor Armando Moreno Gáfaro.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:01, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:35, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dr. Muhammad Hani Mughal.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:36, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dr. Mohamed Saad Seoud.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:36, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dr. Michelle Laws.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:36, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dr. Mahesh Bhatt.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:36, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dr. Abdur Rasheed Khichi (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:37, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Subrata Ghanty (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:07, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:38, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ashraf Elassal (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:09, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:42, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Ashraf Elassal (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:09, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:39, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Carolina Gonzales (8488375591).jpg

Who is she? Is she in scope? E4024 (talk) 16:15, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:41, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:JAVIER FERREA - Profile Photograph.jpg

Who is he? Is he in scope? Someone just uploaded this image and disappeared. E4024 (talk) 17:15, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:41, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alexandru Birsanu.jpg

Out of scope of Wikipedia education policy and self promotional content - IndrajitDas 17:54, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:40, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Calle Norlén, textförfattare.jpg

Only half a picture JopkeB (talk) 20:02, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copprupted file. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:48, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chemancheri 20181104 171557.jpg

broken file Poecilotheria36 (talk) 20:02, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copprupted file. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:48, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gpu-cpu-test.jpg

Incomplete upload JopkeB (talk) 20:05, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copprupted file. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:48, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mamad75001xxx.png

Out of scope Poecilotheria36 (talk) 20:10, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:47, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nagytárkny Látkép.jpg

Incomplete upload JopkeB (talk) 20:30, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copprupted file. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:49, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:L.difficilis Juvenile Female.jpg

broken file Poecilotheria36 (talk) 20:41, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copprupted file. --George Chernilevsky ^talk 09:49, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cbsatpathy (talk · contribs)

Book covers and promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:55, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Todiste2.png

there is mistake Allahh01 (talk) 19:31, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: in any case, out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:41, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hydro Quebec Dash 8 landing 24L in Montreal (3116162382).jpg

No clear subject on the photo. Blurry. Unlikely to be of use. -- Asclepias (talk) 01:29, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:47, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Javadkarachi123.jpg

1) Not own work; 2) promotional for a certain person called Javad Karachi (out of COM:PS); 3) Copyright concerns regarding logo (above COM:TOO, and not COM:DM) 4nn1l2 (talk) 03:49, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:47, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:25-zpq.png

Recht am eigenen Bild Carlossanchez4520 (talk) 09:37, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:51, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:EugDepotSign.JPG

Derivative work of a sign which includes copyrighted text and images Pi.1415926535 (talk) 10:32, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:52, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Russia political location map.svg

Крым не Россия! 91.142.162.6 10:35, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy keep, IDONTLIKEIT nomination. The map reflects de-facto situation and so, it can (and should) be renamed, but not removed. See Commons:Disputed territories: "Both versions of any map can be uploaded as separate files, clearly labelled with their POV, and linking one another as Other Versions". --Seryo93 (talk) 10:48, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The map is neutral, with the color fil showing the fe facto situation and all partially recognized borders shown dasheed. Hellerick (talk) 12:52, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:53, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Amtrak logos

Per the legislation that created it, Amtrak is explicitly not a federal government agency; instead, it is a quasi-public corporation. Thus, PD-USGov is not valid for these files.

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 10:45, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:53, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Maurice de vlaminck, villaggio in vallata, 1913 ca.jpg

This work of art is copyrighted in its source country until after 1 January 2029. The artist died in 1958 Coldcreation (talk) 11:42, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:55, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:LE REMORQUEUR AU PONT DE CHATOU.PNG

This work of art is copyrighted in its source country until after 1 January 2029. The artist died in 1959 Coldcreation (talk) 11:39, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:59, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:La Seine à Chatou .jpg

This work of art is copyrighted in its source country until after 1 January 2029. The artist died in 1958. Coldcreation (talk) 11:40, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:01, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Manor house reflected in the water.jpg

This work of art is copyrighted in its source country until after 1 January 2029. Vlaminck died in 1958 Coldcreation (talk) 11:41, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:02, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Кулиева В.В.jpg

Found at higher resolution at https://baikal.ldpr.ru/region/events/vasilina-kulieva-9-sentiabria-vazhnaia-data-v-politicheskoi-zhizni-regiona-2/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:10, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Это фото взято с сайта Государственной Думы. http://duma.gov.ru/duma/persons/99111873/ На сайте чётко написано: Все материалы сайта доступны по лицензии: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Насколько я поняла этот файл использовать можно по этой лицензии. --Ledy Win (talk) 12:40, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

{{duma.gov.ru}} — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ledy Win (talk • contribs) 14:22, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:03, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mesulgergine.svg

Chemical mistake (and typo in filename). Corrected structure is at File:Mesulergine.svg DMacks (talk) 13:17, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:04, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mesulergine.png

Chemical mistake. Corrected structure is at File:Mesulergine.svg DMacks (talk) 13:20, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:05, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:BUSCANDO A NEMO.pdf

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:21, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:KUTCHI LANG TREE.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:19, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Saka-fire.png

It's a screenshot of Marathi Newspaper Daily Sakal, which is copyvio in itself, additionally this image has been used to dissruptive edits. QueerEcofeminist (talk) 18:15, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:16, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mtaa.png

Copyvio, this is a screenshot of the marathi daily Maharashtra Times and additionally this image has been used to create fights between editors. QueerEcofeminist (talk) 18:18, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:12, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Emmaintegra.jpg

Supposed logo for the Emma Integra, but it is not. It's just an abstract image with no educational value.  Senator2029 ➔ “Talk”  18:48, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:10, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ouvrage de Bréhain.jpg

Poor quality version of File:Plan A6 Ouvrage de Bréhain.jpg Borvan53 (talk) 19:40, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:08, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Little Spider (26512293).jpeg

absolutely useless picture; nobody will ever be able to identify this species; the specimen only covers a small part of the picture Poecilotheria36 (talk) 20:53, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I tend to agree, kind of useless indeed.-- Darwin ^Ahoy! 21:08, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:07, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Manoel Neto 2016.jpg

foi carregado acidentalmente, não servirá para nada Amazonense 33 (talk) 21:08, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:07, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Robert Blackadder.png

Per COM:FANART this is not educational, and almost certainly a copy vio from the original Blackadder TV series. Also only used for vandalism on Enwiki. Voice of Clam (formerly Optimist on the run) (talk) 22:43, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I haven't seen the TV series so I don't know if it appears in the show itself, but the image may be a copy vio of this: https://www.redbubble.com/people/matti-walker/works/26456236-rowan-atkinson-blackadder-drawing. Jiten D (talk) 00:06, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:06, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Arena Riga - 2017-06-17.jpg

I uploaded this file without any knowledge of FOP. After reading a bit into FOP I think this image doesn't qualify to be on Commons. I wanted to nominate on the off chance I miss-read the rules. Also if I could clarify what license this could be uploaded to Wikipedia instead if it can be of use? Salavat (talk) 23:46, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Follow up query, if this image is able to be transferred to Wikipedia is it correct that I can upload it with the FoP-USonly license? Salavat (talk) 13:59, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleting this one. Concerning Wikipedia, this might depend on the project. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:05, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mes3.png

Smaller version of File:Mesulergine 2.png. Maybe not exact dup in the COM speedy sense due to margins and other graphical details. DMacks (talk) 13:30, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 17:10, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mes4.png

Smaller version of File:Mesulergine 2.png. Maybe not exact dup in the COM speedy sense due to margins and other graphical details. DMacks (talk) 13:30, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 17:10, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Structure of mesulergine.png

Low graphical quality. Have File:Mesulergine 2.png and File:Mesulergine.svg as alts. DMacks (talk) 13:34, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 17:11, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ljubljana2 102.JPG

Blurred. Unblurred version of same author is File:Ljubljana2 103.JPG. Simon04 (talk) 06:02, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 ^{talk to me} 20:35, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fotíme česko (rastr, černá).png

png on Commons is redundant, the file exists in svg Klscho (talk) 11:01, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fotíme česko (rastr, černá).png

redundant png - svg exists Klscho (talk) 11:06, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: duplicate of: Fotíme česko (vektor, černá).svg. --Amada44 ^{talk to me} 21:02, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fotíme česko (rastr).png

Dělám to přes to Nominate for deletion, to by taky mělo být ok? :) K Klscho (talk) 11:05, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: duplicate of File:Fotíme česko (vektor).svg. --Amada44 ^{talk to me} 21:01, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fotíme česko (rastr, bílá).png

Dělám to přes to Nominate for deletion, to by taky mělo být ok? :) K Klscho (talk) 11:05, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: duplicate of: Fotíme česko (vektor, bílá).svg. --Amada44 ^{talk to me} 21:06, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Senioři píší Wikipedii (horizontální, rastr).png

redundant png - svg exists Klscho (talk) 11:06, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:Senioři píší Wikipedii (horizontální, rastr).png

redundant png - svg exists Klscho (talk) 11:07, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: could not find svg version. --Amada44 ^{talk to me} 21:18, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Studenti píší Wikipedii (rastr).png

redundant png - svg exists Klscho (talk) 11:06, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: duplicate of: Studenti píší Wikipedii (křivky).svg. --Amada44 ^{talk to me} 21:07, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Studenti píší Wikipedii (rastr, bílá).png

redundant png - svg exists Klscho (talk) 11:06, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: duplicate of: Studenti píší Wikipedii (křivky, bílá).svg. --Amada44 ^{talk to me} 21:10, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Studenti píší Wikipedii (rastr, černá).png

redundant png - svg exists Klscho (talk) 11:06, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: duplicate of: Studenti píší Wikipedii (křivky, černá).svg. --Amada44 ^{talk to me} 21:11, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wikimedia CZ - horizontal logo - Czech version - white.png

redundant png - svg exists Klscho (talk) 11:06, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 ^{talk to me} 21:17, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wikimedia CZ - horizontal logo - Czech version.png

redundant png - svg exists Klscho (talk) 11:06, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: duplicate of: Wikimedia CZ - horizontal logo - Czech version.svg. --Amada44 ^{talk to me} 21:13, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wikimedia CZ - horizontal logo - English version - white.png

redundant png - svg exists Klscho (talk) 11:06, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 ^{talk to me} 21:17, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wikimedia CZ - horizontal logo - English version.png

redundant png - svg exists Klscho (talk) 11:07, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: duplicate of: Wikimedia CZ - horizontal logo - English version.svg. --Amada44 ^{talk to me} 21:15, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wikimedia CZ - vertical logo - Czech version - white.png

redundant png - svg exists Klscho (talk) 11:07, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: duplicate of: WMCZ logo CZ white horizontal 02.svg. --Amada44 ^{talk to me} 21:16, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wikimedia CZ - vertical logo - Czech version.png

redundant png - svg exists Klscho (talk) 11:07, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: duplicate of Wikimedia CZ - vertical logo - Czech version.svg. --Amada44 ^{talk to me} 21:08, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wikimedia CZ - vertical logo - English version - white.png

redundant png - svg exists Klscho (talk) 11:07, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 ^{talk to me} 21:17, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wikimedia CZ - vertical logo - English version.png

redundant png - svg exists Klscho (talk) 11:07, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: duplicate of: Wikimedia CZ - vertical logo - English version.svg. --Amada44 ^{talk to me} 21:14, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flucht- und Rettungsplan DIN ISO 23601 Muster.png

This file was initially tagged by Ronhjones as Dw no source since. The uploader (his only congribution) claimed to be to this profecional and the plan is his own work - see my talk page. Do we need a confirmation through Commons:OTRS in this case? Ju Ta 15:00, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I created the file as well as the underlying drawing especially for wikipedia to replace other files with advertising information on the picture. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jantar18 (talk • contribs) 15:22, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@JuTa: The image does say "Muster GmbH" in the bottom left. I would therefore think that an e-mail from them will be required. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 15:31, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ronhjones, Muster GmbH is german and means example, template or pattern company. There is no real company with that name. I.e. The english John Doe ist called in german Max Mustermann. --Ju Ta 15:38, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@JuTa: You learn something every day! I suspect not many non-German speaking person know that! Ronhjones ^(Talk) 15:44, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

They might want to say that on the image page to stop anyone else tagging it. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 15:58, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: own work by uploader. --Amada44 ^{talk to me} 21:23, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chemancheri 3027.jpg

redundant duplicate; there is a better picture of the exact same specimen, see File:Chemancheri 2893.jpg Poecilotheria36 (talk) 19:54, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: not a duplicate. --Amada44 ^{talk to me} 20:56, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fouad Mofleh.jpg

Facebook image. Is it free to use? E4024 (talk) 16:08, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: would need OTRS Permission. --Amada44 ^{talk to me} 21:34, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Moustafa Nour.jpg

Unlikely to be own work.--Mona Maher (talk) 18:21, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 ^{talk to me} 21:37, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cupra Marittima 2013 by-RaBoe 312.jpg

bad quality Adelfrank (talk) 21:26, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep good enough. --Ralf Roleček 05:09, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: keept as the best of the 4 images. --Amada44 ^{talk to me} 22:13, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Meanwhile deleted as a duplicate. Amada44 ^{talk to me} 13:07, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cupra Marittima 2013 by-RaBoe 313.jpg

bad quality Adelfrank (talk) 21:26, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep good enough. --Ralf Roleček 05:09, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no educational value. --Amada44 ^{talk to me} 22:12, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cupra Marittima 2013 by-RaBoe 314.jpg

bad quality Adelfrank (talk) 21:27, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep good enough. --Ralf Roleček 05:09, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no educational value. --Amada44 ^{talk to me} 22:11, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cupra Marittima 2013 by-RaBoe 315.jpg

bad quality Adelfrank (talk) 21:27, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep good enough. --Ralf Roleček 05:07, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no educational value. --Amada44 ^{talk to me} 22:11, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gay anal sex.jpg

Bad quality picture, selfie. Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:25, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

NSFW (obviously)

Keep clearly shows.. well.. what the filename said, while not perfectly sharp it's properly framed. Now, I don't really want to go and see if Commons already has similarly properly framed images of this that are sharper. Because.. do I have to explain that? If it turns out we have plenty of similar and properly licensed but sharper images, I may reconsider. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 20:00, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

~~Delete~~ I had doubts when I uploaded this image that I found on Flickr. I do agree with Patrick Rogel that the image is blurry, thus why my doubts. The intention was adding a different angle. But on a second thought, not much can be added with this image. I believe that Alexis Jazz (sorry) was talking about a photo like this other image.--Jim Bangs (talk) 21:33, 20 November 2018 (UTC)

Keep Since everyone sees this image useful.--Jim Bangs (talk) 00:04, 1 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jim Bangs: that's a better photo, but not properly licensed beyond doubt. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 22:20, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've taken a closer look and this one is. High resolution (not found on the web. yes, not fully sharp, but not downscaled), EXIF, date in EXIF checks out with the upload date on Flickr (uploaded the next day), Flickr pro account, about page of the Flickr user doesn't raise any suspicion either (openly gay). I prefer a somewhat blurry image with virtually no doubt it was published and licensed with consent over a super-sharp but questionable image any day. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 22:31, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep While it is true that the quality can be better, the question that should be asked is: Is it useful for an educational purpose. The answer is yes, because the quality does not prevent one from using it. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 04:48, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This image was also included in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Jim Bangs (nomination for all files uploaded by Jim Bangs). - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 04:43, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It has educational value, and as Alexis Jazz says, no doubt about it being properly licensed. Abzeronow (talk) 20:33, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept per discussion. Strakhov (talk) 19:09, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gay anal sex.jpg

Obscenity Walther16 (talk) 12:46, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per previous discussion. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 15:58, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Keep It used to be that when somebody nominated a file for deletion, when it was already kept before they were advised to read the prevous discussion. Has this feature been disabled? ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 19:22, 16 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @Gone Postal: Certainly this feature was active within the last month or so, and not only refers to previous nominations of the file, but any deletion discussion that links to the file being nominated. Of course, some users can’t (or won’t) read these warnings. Brianjd (talk) 04:47, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy keep There was a previous DR for this file specifically, which links to a mass DR that also includes this file. Both DRs were closed as keep. Brianjd (talk) 04:49, 18 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Reading the previous DR I understand two things: 1. The quality is law and we have better pics for the same. 2. It has "educational value". As long as a conclusive expert opinion is not given on what this picture has as per educational value that the other files cannot satisfy, my vote (opinion) is delete. I think the anti-porn DR reflection is almost as strong as the deletion crusaders. We must stop "giving reactions" and look at the images before rejecting or defending them. (An admin told me so, m/l. :) --E4024 (talk) 19:37, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment Saying "we have better pics" is meaningless unless we clarify what we mean by better. I would consider "better" to mean "more fitting for a specific educatinally purpose". So we need to think of educational purposes and find better images. But in all honesty I do not want to go through all the images and consider different educational useage and which one is better. The point is that we do not demand this for anything other than "Gay Anal Sex". Please see how many images of houses we have, why do we have so many houses? We can just have one house and then assume that all the other houses are the same. Why do we have so many birds? They are also all the same, and we can just find a good image and delete all the rest, right? In other words this is dishonest to start this deletion, and it is also dishonest to say "We have a better image" unless you specify the criteria. In both cases as soon as you are proven wrong, you simply repeat and shift the goal post. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 19:51, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  - As I have not started the DR and only used words from the previous discussion I do not blame you for trying to insinuate "dishonesty" towards a very honest person. However I have noted your name in my list of users to avoid interaction, and I have to inform this to you before that list is activated in your case. Before going away, I kindly request you to try not to insult people who are working voluntarily here. Thanks for not directing any words to me again, ever, anywhere. E4024 (talk) 20:01, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    - There was no insult. I do not care about the drama. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 20:06, 23 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I closed this DR with the comment “No valid reason for deletion.” But @E4024 reverted it with the edit summary “No CONSENSUS. LET AN ADMIN CLOSE IT.” Let me respond to this briefly:
1. Consensus. Of course there is consensus. There were no votes other than some “keep” votes and @E4024’s “delete” vote; there were no good arguments for deletion, remembering that this file has survived two previous DRs.
2. Closure by non-admins. Commons:Deletion requests#Closing discussions:
  Non-admins may close a deletion request as keep if they have a good understanding of the process, and provided the closure is not controversial.
I believe I have a good understanding of the process and this closure is not controversial. (By the way, @E4024 did suggest in another DR that I become an admin to help clear the backlog of admin tasks. Perhaps they were just being sarcastic.)

There you have it. Another bunch of crap that our overworked admins have to deal with. Brianjd (talk) 14:21, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps I understand the process better than @E4024, who undid my closure here but failed to undo the corresponding edits on the file and its talk page. I have now undone those edits as well. Brianjd (talk) 14:51, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- @E4024: This DR has been archived. It no longer appears on the daily DR list. Can you suggest a way of bringing more attention to this DR? Brianjd (talk) 14:54, 24 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Mdaniels5757: I see that you have closed similar DRs and have not contributed to this one (so you could be an independent voice here); could you take a look at this one? Brianjd (talk) 01:48, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Low quality, unused image of questionable education value. Simply saying it could be used doesn't place it automatically within scope:

An image does not magically become useful by virtue of the argument that it could be used to illustrate a Wikipedia article on X, merely because X happens to be the subject of the photograph...For example, the fact that an unused blurred photograph could theoretically be used to illustrate an article on "Common mistakes in photography" does not mean that we should keep all blurred photographs. The fact that an unused snapshot of your friend could theoretically be used to illustrate an article on "Photographic portraiture" does not mean that we should keep all photographs of unknown people. The fact that an unused pornographic image could theoretically be used to illustrate an article on pornography does not mean that we should keep low quality pornographic images...

Direct quote from Project Scope. AshFriday (talk) 23:47, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

- Comment If we had another better image, or were likely to have a better image, I would probably agree with you. I think you have significaantly misunderstood every keep vote here. I do not think that people argue that this photograph is impossible to replace, but rather that we have nothing to replace it with. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 05:31, 28 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Survived previous DRs. No new substantial reasons for deletion given. @E4024, who reopened this DR last time I closed it, has not explained why this was necessary. Brianjd (talk) 15:30, 4 September 2020 (UTC) (non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Paris Parc de la Villette La Géode 17.jpg

No FOP for architectural works in France. The sphere fills the entire frame.

There are 16 more images in the series ranging from borderline DM (images 01 & 10) to primary subject (images 09 & 16). 68.193.211.254 01:07, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:37, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Videocon d2h logo-01.jpg

Rebranding of the Brand - New Logo Vshyamal (talk) 05:23, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; uploader request, unused. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:38, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jacob Kistemaker 2008.jpg

This should really be a DR that we can discuss rather than missing-permission template. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 14:37, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The original uploader on their talk page stated the following: "The author gave me permission orally in 2008, when we were colleagues. Back then, there was no requirement of written evidence; why did the rules change after the fact? Both I and the author changed jobs in the meantime, so you're giving me quite a headache. But I'm trying to get in touch with her." I think that at the very least we should allow for time to contact the person after 10 years of file being here. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 14:39, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Though COM:GOF does not strictly apply, it is close. The context can be accepted in good faith.

Keep --Fæ (talk) 14:46, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

(Original uploader here.) Fortunately, I could reach the author, who has now submitted a declaration of consent. Apparently, there was an auto-reply stating that due to a backlog, the processing of the declaration could take longer than the 7-day term for deletion - an un-deletion would be necessary. Hankwang (talk) 15:15, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Hankwang: Thank you very much. Perhaps you can add {{subst:OP}} to the page, which is the appropriate way to use {{OTRS-pending}}. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 15:22, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

DeleteAs it is now in its reverted state it is best to delete it, because it reveals a telephone number on the board, which might be privacy issue. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 22:19, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

There is an OTRS email received for “File:Jacob_Kistemaker_2008.jpg” but not processed yet, ticket:2018110510003166. --Ww2censor (talk) 23:39, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have just accepted permission for “File:Jacob_Kistemaker_2008.jpg” under ticket:2018110510003166. --Ww2censor (talk) 22:02, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Evidence of permission was provided. --4nn1l2 (talk) 22:09, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jacob Kistemaker 2008.jpg

Personality rights Lotje (talk) 06:13, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep A person in their office, the photo does not appear to have been taken candidly. I doubt that somebody has expectation of privacy at that time. The individual is also dead and is notable enough to have articles on 3 different Wikipedias. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 06:23, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Personality rights has never been a deletion rationale. Also please check for prior DRs, there have to be far better reasons than this to raise a DR two weeks after the last one. --Fæ (talk) 07:19, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep @Lotje: If this is about the phone number, there is another version available. Or yet another could be made. (I can't overwrite anything from Arkesteijn without admin permission though) - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 13:08, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, what personality rights are being infringed upon here? This seems like a person in a professional environment raising no objection towards the photographer. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 14:55, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Donald Trung: it's not the person that I am worried about, it is the mobile phone number written on the blackboard. Suppose it's mine, wouldn't like someone to call me...

Lotje (talk) 15:09, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Lotje: , a mobile telephone number is not personal and gets reused for new costumers after a certain period of inactivity, and who seriously would call a random telephone number included in a photograph they saw? I'm not saying that those people don't exist but unless there is a 4Chan'esque campaign to troll this person by contacting them they would have as much chance of being called by a random person who happened to have seen their mobile telephone number on Wikimedia Commons than by having someone accidentally dial them. This is pure speculation, but I'd almost ask you to dial the number and ask them how many random strangers from Wikimedia Commons or otherwise unidentified prank callers would call them (this is a joke, don't actually call them). --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 16:20, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Donald Trung: most likely none, because the phone number was only visible in the current version of the photo from 6 August 2008 - 8 August 2008 and 4 November 2018 - present. But if you WhatsApp the number on this version, I won't stop you.

- Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 16:46, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexis Jazz: , is this some sort of sick joke? I got contact with Mind Korrelatie and they said that I sounded like a crazy person contacting a number from a random photograph I found on Imgur.

--Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 17:09, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Donald Trung: when you put it like that, I admit it does sound kind of crazy. But isn't it helpful to direct people who contact phone numbers from photos to the proper authorities? Or am I confusing helpful and

again.. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 17:42, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The mobile phone number can be blurred by the closing admin if necessary. Abzeronow (talk) 17:49, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Abzeronow: blurring may actually draw unwanted attention to it. w:WP:BEANS. I think modifying or (partially) blanking the number is better. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 15:38, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no consensus for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:41, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Day 52-100 - A Message To My Fellow Veterans....webm

Unfortunately we did not get to this fast enough. The video is not unavailable on Youtube. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 06:27, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

However, I guarantee you it was uploaded and licensed as indicated when I uploaded it here. And the fact that many other videos were uploaded by him with similar likely serves to bolster the credibility of my assertion.SecretName101 (talk) 07:38, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, but while it is a reasonable assumption I have never seen an admin close something like that as keep. Archive.org does not do Youtube and there is no way to confirm. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 07:47, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: while source removed from Youtube, the remainder of videos are licensed as CC, no reason to doubt this one was not the same. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:45, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Day 52-100 - A Message To My Fellow Veterans....webm

No CC tag found on source page Eatcha (talk) 10:57, 7 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: the video is not available. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:29, 19 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Yosoyakoe7.jpg

「(C) 池田満」 within the image. No evidence for permission is provided. 2001:240:2409:C825:B1C6:61F2:9E78:59EB 07:58, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:49, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Karl Eugen Heinrich.JPG

Dublette, bessere Version verfügbar [1] Mehlauge (talk) 09:30, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; use File:Karl Heinrich (1835-1908).JPG. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:53, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mogla sam.jpg

This video clip has no youtube license under COM:WHERE LICENSE which means it is copyrighted. Leoboudv (talk) 09:36, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:56, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Amtrakchargertalgo.jpg

Blurry and small; fully replaced by other images in Category:Siemens SC-44 locomotives of WSDOT Pi.1415926535 (talk) 10:35, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:56, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Boockvar-John-new-pix.jpg

Picture available on hospital website https://www.northwell.edu/find-care/locations/division-neurosurgery-lenox-hill-hospital/brain-tumor-center -- Deadstar (msg) 13:23, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; image is not selfie, so is copyright of someone else. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:12, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kamila Salwerowicz.jpg

This my friend, she is an actress from Poland, and she asked me to try to remove this picture from the internet. It was uploaded without her aproval. And she is not happy about the fact that it pops up while searching her name in the google or wiki. She has many pictures in the web and happy with all of them, apart from this one. Please let me know if you require any more info. My email address is michal.kretkowski@gmail.com 212.204.110.133 15:16, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletionl file isnot in copyright, and is within scope. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:11, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Visa Restrictions Index world map.png

User:Norvikk seems not have any OTRS permission from Henley & Partners to publish this.-- Jazzek (talk) 16:38, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:07, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:行政院 (160 - 222) (13695028614).jpg

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No COM:FOP in Japan. Wcam (talk) 16:47, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Photo seemingly taken in Taiwan, not Japan. --Wcam (talk) 16:48, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

My bad. No COM:FOP in Taiwan for outdoor 2D artistic works. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:52, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete As it stands now it is a derivative of another copyrighted work. I do not believe that this is anonymous work, we can only Undelete in 2115. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 04:40, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:46, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:NG-10 S.S. John Young Cygnus.jpg

Not NG-10 : taken on 14-11-2017, and duplicate of File:ISS-53 Cygnus OA-8 approaching the ISS (2).jpg Gyrostat (talk) 18:18, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:47, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mustafa Halim Özyazıc.jpg

Tagged as {{Copyvio}}. Might be {{PD-Ottoman Empire}} since 1331 Hijiri is 1913. Abzeronow (talk) 18:22, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ˑKeep The photograph is a faithful, two-dimensional representation of the artist. The date the photograph was taken is unknown, but judging by the appearance of the subject, it predates 1930. The subject, who was born in 1898 appears to be aged 20- 25 years in the photograph, meaning that the portrait was made between 1919 and 1924. The inference is that the portrait was made around 89 years ago. My understanding is that in Turkey, a period of only 70 years applies for copyright. For these reasons, the portrait should be allowed and retained. ̴̴̴̴ — Preceding unsigned comment added by BronHiggs (talk • contribs) 00:50, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Text in the image says "8 Nisan" and looks like "1331". 1331 AH would be 1912-1913, so if the subject is the same as the person in the description, they'd be about 15 years old. Nisan was used by the Rumi Calender as well so it would give us a date of "April 21, 1915" using Rumi to Gregorian conversion. Subject would have been 17 years old at that date. Abzeronow (talk) 16:25, 21 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Date on the stamp is also 1331. Typical secondary or high school pic belonging to 1910s. --E4024 (talk) 15:01, 27 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:50, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Krishna pandey.jpg2.jpg

because it belongs to the user whose file is already there. Krishnapandeyrtist (talk) 18:38, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:50, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Krishna Pandey.jpg1.jpg

because this is another file uploaded by the same author whose. Krishnapandeyrtist (talk) 18:43, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:51, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Arimathi.jpg

i dont like my photo Ilavengai (talk) 18:54, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It's not bad, but your own pic cannot be your "own work". Delete. --E4024 (talk) 18:58, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:51, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Shamsul-wares-collected by-nur-uddin-riyad.jpg

The uploader's other two uploads are likely copyright violations. Under the precautionary principle, it is difficult to accept that this one is valid. B (talk) 19:16, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:52, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chemancheri 3126.jpg

redundant picture; nearly identical to File:Chemancheri 3115.jpg Poecilotheria36 (talk) 19:33, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:07, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chemancheri 3091.jpg

redundant picture; nearly identical to File:Chemancheri 3077.jpg Poecilotheria36 (talk) 19:35, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: within scope, users can decide which they prefer,. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:53, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chemancheri 1938.jpg

redundant duplicate; there is a better picture of the exact same specimen, see File:Chemancheri 1987.jpg Poecilotheria36 (talk) 19:38, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:54, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chemancheri 1959.jpg

redundant duplicate; there is a better picture of the exact same specimen, see File:Chemancheri 1987.jpg Poecilotheria36 (talk) 19:38, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:54, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chemancheri 1961.jpg

redundant duplicate; there is a better picture of the exact same specimen, see File:Chemancheri 1987.jpg Poecilotheria36 (talk) 19:38, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:54, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chemancheri 1994.jpg

redundant duplicate; there is a better picture of the exact same specimen, see File:Chemancheri 2006.jpg Poecilotheria36 (talk) 19:40, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:54, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chemancheri 2043.jpg

File:Chemancheri 2006.jpg Poecilotheria36 (talk) 19:40, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:54, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chemancheri 2049.jpg

File:Chemancheri 2006.jpg Poecilotheria36 (talk) 19:40, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:54, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chemancheri 2366.jpg

redundant duplicate; there is a better picture of the same specimen, see File:Chemancheri 2367.jpg Poecilotheria36 (talk) 19:42, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:54, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chemancheri 2540.jpg

redundant duplicate; there is a better picture of the exact same specimen, see File:Chemancheri 2546.jpg Poecilotheria36 (talk) 19:44, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:54, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chemancheri 2706.jpg

redundant duplicate; there is a better picture of the exact same specimen, see File:Chemancheri 2707.jpg Poecilotheria36 (talk) 19:48, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:54, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chemancheri 2701.jpg

redundant duplicate; there is a better picture of the exact same specimen, see File:Chemancheri 2707.jpg Poecilotheria36 (talk) 19:48, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:55, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chemancheri 2703.jpg

redundant duplicate; there is a better picture of the exact same specimen, see File:Chemancheri 2707.jpg Poecilotheria36 (talk) 19:48, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:55, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chemancheri 2704.jpg

redundant duplicate; there is a better picture of the exact same specimen, see File:Chemancheri 2707.jpg Poecilotheria36 (talk) 19:48, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:55, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chemancheri 2705.jpg

redundant duplicate; there is a better picture of the exact same specimen, see File:Chemancheri 2707.jpg Poecilotheria36 (talk) 19:48, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:55, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chemancheri 2714.jpg

redundant duplicate; there is a better picture of the exact same specimen, see File:Chemancheri 2707.jpg Poecilotheria36 (talk) 19:48, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:55, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chemancheri 2690.jpg

redundant duplicate; there is a better picture of the exact same specimen, see File:Chemancheri 2657.jpg Poecilotheria36 (talk) 19:50, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:55, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chemancheri 2691.jpg

redundant duplicate; there is a better picture of the exact same specimen, see File:Chemancheri 2657.jpg Poecilotheria36 (talk) 19:51, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:55, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chemancheri 2879.jpg

redundant duplicate; there is a better picture of the exact same specimen, see File:Chemancheri 2893.jpg Poecilotheria36 (talk) 19:54, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:54, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chemancheri 2882.jpg

redundant duplicate; there is a better picture of the exact same specimen, see File:Chemancheri 2893.jpg Poecilotheria36 (talk) 19:54, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:54, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chemancheri 2935.jpg

redundant duplicate; there is a better picture of the exact same specimen, see File:Chemancheri 2893.jpg Poecilotheria36 (talk) 19:54, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:54, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chemancheri 2966.jpg

redundant duplicate; there is a better picture of the exact same specimen, see File:Chemancheri 2893.jpg Poecilotheria36 (talk) 19:54, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:55, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chemancheri 3005.jpg

redundant duplicate; there is a better picture of the exact same specimen, see File:Chemancheri 2893.jpg Poecilotheria36 (talk) 19:54, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:55, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chemancheri 3031.jpg

redundant duplicate; there is a better picture of the exact same specimen, see File:Chemancheri 2893.jpg Poecilotheria36 (talk) 19:54, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:55, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chemancheri 3035.jpg

redundant duplicate; there is a better picture of the exact same specimen, see File:Chemancheri 2893.jpg Poecilotheria36 (talk) 19:54, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:55, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chemancheri 3038.jpg

redundant duplicate; there is a better picture of the exact same specimen, see File:Chemancheri 2893.jpg Poecilotheria36 (talk) 19:55, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:55, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chemancheri 3041.jpg

redundant duplicate; there is a better picture of the exact same specimen, see File:Chemancheri 2893.jpg Poecilotheria36 (talk) 19:55, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:55, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chemancheri 30430.jpg

redundant duplicate; there is a better picture of the exact same specimen, see File:Chemancheri 2893.jpg Poecilotheria36 (talk) 19:55, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:55, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chemancheri 3049.jpg

redundant duplicate; there is a better picture of the exact same specimen, see File:Chemancheri 2893.jpg Poecilotheria36 (talk) 19:55, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:55, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ആഫ്രിക്കൻ പായൽ1.JPG

blurry picture; there are way better pictures of Salvinia Poecilotheria36 (talk) 20:32, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep OK enough for me. Strakhov (talk) 19:11, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:56, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:EWINZELER photo.png

no indication of permission from the photographer named in the EXIF data, Thomas Farnetti, nor form the claimed copyright holder, the Centre for Genomics and Global Health, The Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Oxford University. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:00, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; Author Photographer, Thomas Farnetti Copyright holder © Centre for Genomics and Global Health, The Wellcome Trust Centre for Human Genetics, Oxford University. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:08, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The boulevard of Sabana Grande, the heart of the Metropolitan Area of Caracas. The main shopping thoroughfare of Caracas.webm

also file:The boulevard of Sabana Grande, the main shopping street of Caracas.webm
Sorry, in my opinion the videos are out of project scope. Educational value is weak, here are simply people walking on street. Such videos are needed as well, but only if quality is good; here quality is bad. Taivo (talk) 12:27, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:17, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Saurav Goswami iim.jpg

Do we think the draft about this gentleman will come to a good end, any notability? (I mean Commonswise. ) E4024 (talk) 13:01, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use at this time, so within scope; if article deleted, then we can review. — billinghurst sDrewth 11:14, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Saurav Goswami iim.jpg

not in use anymore, see previous deletion request. Also no permission Estopedist1 (talk) 14:53, 16 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:31, 27 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ภาพวาด วิถีชาวเมือง.pdf

Historical painting. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 21:23, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Raitha.jpg

FBMD. Is this an "own work" as stated? Is it free? E4024 (talk) 16:30, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - grabbed from facebook, unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 21:23, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Masdggg (talk · contribs)

Missing information at Flickr, unlikely to be public domain. COM:LL.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:15, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No,no,no. The information is enough.--Masdggg (talk) 17:59, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Some information are written in Chinese.Please don’t misunderstand.If you can't read Chinese, please use translation tools.--Masdggg (talk) 18:03, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: License reviewed. --Yann (talk) 10:48, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Masdggg (talk · contribs)

Signatures from China are not OK on Commons, per Commons:When to use the PD-signature tag#China, People's Republic of

Wcam (talk) 13:43, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep 何代钦、王宗华都是教育官员，签名常常用于学校文件，不具备著作权。 He Daiqin and Wang Zonghua are educrats, their signatures often be used in document.--Masdggg (talk) 17:52, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The persons are officers in public universities, {{PD-PRC-exempt}} might be applicable, as per Commons:When to use the PD-signature tag#China, People's Republic of "If a signature is originally from documents of legislative, administrative, or judicial nature, it is in the public domain..." Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 21:31, 24 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per above. --Yann (talk) 14:08, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Masdggg (talk · contribs)

The rationale for keeping these two files in the previous DR is flawed. First of all, there is no actual proof that these signatures are originally from documents of legislative, administrative, or judicial nature (the uploader does not provide such documents). Furthermore, it is a stretch to claim that public universities are government agencies, and documents issued by an university are hardly of legislative, administrative, or judicial nature.

Wcam (talk) 13:02, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Unaccountable reason.--Masdggg (talk) 13:06, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment By the way, they are Chinese educrat. These signatures have administrative nature.--Masdggg (talk) 13:10, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Merely being a university president does not automatically make all signatures during their lifetime public domain. Signatures have to be from documents of legislative, administrative, or judicial nature to be in the public domain (Commons:When to use the PD-signature tag#China, People's Republic of). Please show proof. --Wcam (talk) 13:17, 17 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment 再强调一遍，他们是中国公立学校领导，都是政府部门任命、管理的，与政府机构紧密关联。他们的签名，必然会具备行政性质。--Masdggg (talk) 15:27, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Again, please read Commons:When to use the PD-signature tag#China, People's Republic of. Your statement is plain wrong. --Wcam (talk) 16:42, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Commons:When to use the PD-signature tag#China, People's Republic of. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 12:48, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:AvonWalkforBreastCancer2013.jpg

Metadata listed that author is Matt Mendelsohn, possible copyright violation. B dash (talk) 08:32, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

While it states an author, it also states a copyright holder, which aligns with the uploader. This requires Commons:OTRS @Avonffw: , though is doubtful. — billinghurst sDrewth 06:51, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:36, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Copenhagen 2018-03-03 (27542872658).jpg

The Little Mermaid is copyright protected. Bot upload. Pugilist (talk) 07:33, 28 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The deletion request was listed among a long list of other requests of 28 Sep. I guess the administrator mistakenly thought that this image was part of a group that should be kept, see https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/2018/09/28#File:Copenhagen_2018-03-03_(27542872658).jpg No rationale for keeping the file. The other requests of 28 Sep for deletion of similar images of The Little Mermaid resulted in deletion. So please, review again. Pugilist (talk) 18:17, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

User:Pugilist, the fact that the file still appears at Commons:Deletion requests/2018/09/28 means that the admins haven't decided whether it should be kept or deleted yet. The backlog with unclosed deletion requests goes back all the way to June. --Stefan2 (talk) 13:26, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The original request was archived, so a decision was actually made. Not much doubt btw as similar requests made the same date regarding two almost identical motives were deleted without any fuss. Pugilist (talk) 14:41, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Pugilist: Please provide some basic supporting detail for your claim. Year of conception, lifetime of sculptor, etc. A bald claim is insufficient to progress. FWIW the request is still listed at the earlier page, so is still undetermined. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:45, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The pictures of The Little Mermaid are routinely uploaded to Commons and routinely deleted by experienced administrators. I am not going to spend much time on this issue, but if you are in doubt I suggest you take a glance at Category:Statue of the Little Mermaid (Copenhagen) or leave the conclusion to another. —Pugilist (talk) 20:01, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

One of Denmark's most famous sculptures. Category:Undelete in 2030 is full of deletion requests for photos of this sculpture because the sculptor hasn't been dead for 70 years. --Stefan2 (talk) 19:46, 31 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, as Pugilist correctly points out this will be out of copyright in 2030. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:41, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tip válido para detectives privados.jpg

The original is mine M3rlinux (talk) 20:52, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@M3rlinux: Please explain how this image is not within scope, and why it should be deleted. — billinghurst sDrewth 10:58, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: This is a tricky one, but I COM:PRP deleted because the "source" link led to essentially a porn site, and the image I just deleted wasn't there. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:42, 1 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Street Fighter IV TE stick.jpg

Querying the free use of this image because of the art work on the joystick. I'm not sure if it's enough to make it non-free. Salavat (talk) 23:54, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

just in case I made a version without the artwork.

Amada44 ^{talk to me} 22:03, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. All uses of the original have been replaced with the modified version. --Majora (talk) 00:28, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MERS-Co-V1.jpg

Unlikely to be own work. Previously published here: https://www.clinicalcorrelations.org/2014/05/20/primecuts-this-week-in-the-journals-249/. Same goes for File:MERS-CoV1.jpg. Smooth O (talk) 13:30, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Something is peculiar as the journal article cited says "Image courtesy of Wikimedia Commons". So did we have a version here previously? — billinghurst sDrewth 10:23, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Rotated/flipped versions of File:MERS-CoV electron micrograph1.jpg from the CDC. --Majora (talk) 01:25, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Template:20minutos.es

Apparently, there are at least two problems here:
1. They don’t mention which particular license they mean, just “Creative Commons”, so we can't be sure whether it is compatible with WM Commons licensing policy.
2. 20minutos concede al Usuario una licencia de Creative Commons sobre sus contenidos propios, es decir, sobre las noticias publicadas bajo la autoría de 20minutos. News, but not photos.
Лушников Владимир Александрович (talk) 22:14, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This would make about 20 images up to (speedy) deletion - see Special:WhatLinksHere/Template:20minutos.es. --Ju Ta 10:42, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Just needs clarification, and there is a page where it is more clear: https://www.20minutos.es/especial/corporativo/creative-commons/ - Para nuestra obra, which links to http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/. So their work (obra) is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0, work woud include stories and photos. My Spanish isn't good enough to be completely sure what viñetistas means, but viñetas seems to be cartoons, so I'm guessing it means cartoonists; so no cartoons. --GRuban (talk) 21:09, 21 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per GRuban. The template can just be corrected. If this is in error please open a discussion at COM:VPC to get more input. --Majora (talk) 01:22, 1 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Watt Story's Blacksmith Shop (26147890222).jpg

I believe that the text in the bottom part of the image is still copyrighted. Although the card itself is made in 1908 the person recalls that the farther died in May 1933, therefore this was written at least in that year, and probably later. If we assume that the father was 40 when the son (who wrote this) was born, and if we assume the similar lifespan we need to delete the first upload and undelete it in 2044. If I am incorrect in my judgement, please revert my crop. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 11:23, 20 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted the crop, as the image is the photograph and the commentary and to what has been uploaded is a record. I would think that you are wanting to do is to make a derivative, then we can deal with the record. — billinghurst sDrewth 07:04, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Quick research shows that E. M. Story was the brother.

Walter Young Story's children born 1896 through 1910s, died between 1925, and 1994 possibly one even later, and it is unknown which of his 10 children was the author.

The work couldn't be considered published until 2015, unless can be shown to be published earlier, so didn't make the 120 year cutoff of anonymous or unidentified; and would be 70 years PMA. The photographer is also unidentified, though would see to have similar restrictions of 70 years PMA. Both look to be delete, unless the determination that it has been released from copyright by the archives. — billinghurst sDrewth 07:20, 23 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment As of now the old version has been restored. If an admin decides to delete, please only delete the offending versions, leaving the cropped one intact, since it is definitely in scope and is public domain. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 12:49, 27 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Kept photo, deleted text per discussion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:29, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]