Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/08/11

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive August 11th, 2018
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

yucky, i like [[File:Pnm logo.png]] as a substitute 2001:8003:A885:4B00:3CCE:DF2F:111C:AEDC 09:37, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Non-admin closure, speedy kept, test nomination. --B dash (talk) 10:04, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Resolution 2605:6001:E7C4:1E00:A99C:FCE8:5FE4:7174 04:28, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept, bad faith DR; image in very wide use in multiple projects. -- 02:31, 21 November 2018 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused (EN-WP draft rejected), and/or personality right issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 00:12, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Moheen Reeyad at 08:46, 11 August 2018 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 13:07, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file, and/or personality right issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 00:12, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 08:37, 11 August 2018 UTC: This image is a screenshot of a non-free program or other copyrighted material. Although the image may be usable in certain circumstances under the doctrine of fair use, fair use claims are never allowed on Commons: see COM:FU. This file may be deleted without further notice.
Note: If the screenshot shows a program or other material that is itself under a free license like GPL, please indicate this with the {{
--Krdbot 13:07, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incomplete conversion to djvu by the iaimport bot. The latter half of the book is blank. I'm trying again. Akme (talk) 04:16, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 08:34, 11 August 2018 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion) --Krdbot 13:07, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image, missing permission. Found with © xezerxeber.az at http://www.xezerxeber.az/G%C3%BCnd%C9%99m/214962.html Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:52, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

So a fella can’t upload a photo he has taken because he sent to a collegue to share it on his personal Facebook profile? Is this something new since I have not been active on here for many years?Gulmammad (talk) 13:23, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Mardetanha talk 18:35, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is taken from Facebook. It is a clear violation of the Copyright. Recommend for Speedy deleteion. Ranjith -- (Ranjithsiji) (talk to me) 06:36, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Too likely to be a copyvio. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 08:39, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:49, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Michelet-密是力 (talk) 06:55, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 18:02, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaders request: wrong photo added Liiva. (talk) 13:40, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 14:55, 12 August 2018 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion) --Krdbot 19:16, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I sent it by mistake. it's my father's grave ElsaBornFree (talk) 14:18, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 14:56, 12 August 2018 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion) --Krdbot 19:16, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

トリミング未処理で投稿しましたので削除お願いします。 江戸村のとくぞう (talk) 14:30, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 14:58, 12 August 2018 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion) --Krdbot 19:16, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

トリミング未処理で投稿しましたので削除お願いします。 江戸村のとくぞう (talk) 14:31, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 14:58, 12 August 2018 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion) --Krdbot 19:16, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/438098095025692673/xXAqQ-4L_400x400.jpeg and https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCQXp_Hv-uZNfH8BvBnvsfgA Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:30, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ronhjones at 19:12, 12 August 2018 UTC: Previously deleted file File:Frenchy diaz.jpg --Krdbot 01:08, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Scaliwood (talk · contribs)

[edit]

self-promo, out of project scope

Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:38, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Promotional images. Out of project scope. – Kwj2772 (talk) 06:03, 19 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pop'n music is better 2001:8003:A885:4B00:ADF8:1609:6015:F583 23:13, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: speedy-kept, as no valid reason for deletion. --Túrelio (talk) 12:50, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Refila boy Template:Info/Música/artista Refila Boy mschel (chokwe, agosto de 1985) mais conhecido comoRefila. Boy ou mesmo nwa hosié umcantor, produtor moçambicano.{{Citar Bay isaias king (talk) 17:32, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Author or uploader requested deletion of recently created, unused content (G7). --Achim (talk) 11:25, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bay isaias king (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused COM:OOS image.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:58, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 11:35, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bay isaias king (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:15, 26 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:44, 29 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Emansisongarcia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

EugeneZelenko Hi! The aforementioned pictures were taken from a cellphone and cropped using a desktop based application. I tried to keep the files as small as possible. This could probably be the reason for your comment. But this is DEFINITELY my own work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emansisongarcia (talk • contribs) 01:10, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per uploader's claim, and images not found elsewhere on the internet using Google Images. P 1 9 9   14:28, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Emansisongarcia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Files may be the uploader's self-photographed images, but the subject, Eloisa Jayloni, was deemed unnotable at English Wikipedia (w:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eloisa Jayloni). Images of a non-notable individual.

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 03:21, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:35, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GREAT PAINTER (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is not a private photo album nor private web space.

Achim (talk) 19:05, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by GREAT PAINTER (talk · contribs)

Personal images, out of scope

Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:49, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: The sock puppet obstructed the speedy deletion process for A_Dog.jpg. As was stated, it is a degraded version of the image uploaded earlier as File:The Dog.jpg. Moreover, deletion of the latter was invalid. @Magog the Ogre: undelete the file that had better quality, please. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 05:48, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Incnis Mrsi: They were the same image of the same resolution. If there was any difference at all, it was too small to notice. As such, it qualifies for speedy deletion. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:11, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Wrong. The quality of a JPEG is not determined by the resolution alone, but also by its compression ratio. The two files were far for being identical byte-for-byte. The_Dog.jpg has better quality (and data size), whereas A_Dog.jpg is noticeably degraded, possibly derived off the former. A_Dog.jpg could be speedily deleted as worse one if Ronhjones got to revert the sock’s disruption promptly. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 20:30, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I looked at both images. They are of the same quality; one is not noticeably degraded. I have listened to your concern and rejected it. Please take the issue to COM:UNDEL. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:43, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: All but the dog and sheep are out of scope personal files. --Guanaco (talk) 20:04, 22 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. No camera metadata, the image uploaded from https://zdorovs.livejournal.com/26765.html with no evidence of free license. Permission is needed. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:34, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:56, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty page about individual with no significant content Sadads (talk) 20:37, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, empty gallery page. --Achim (talk) 21:13, 24 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(sorry french) l'exif indique auteur : Jesús López Antoñanzas. Pas travail personnel. Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 10:05, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:20, 25 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted Image (© 2018 ASRock Inc. All rights reserved), not licensed under CC. Uploader claims source is "Own work", however the image is a copyrighted stock image by Asrock from a page on their official website. CyberXRef 16:18, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 02:33, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The article about him in he.wiki deleted גיא בן עמי as COM:OOS. -- Geagea (talk) 09:44, 26 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file, and/or personality right issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 00:19, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:31, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file, and/or personality right issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 00:20, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:31, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file, and/or personality right issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 00:20, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:31, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file, and/or personality right issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 00:20, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:31, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Micah225 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:31, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rafael Zink (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploader removes No Source templates despite explanation hence this regular DR.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:05, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Those DR are unjustified. I do have stated the sources and the author. All licenses are fine. Seems like Patrick Rogel is bugging me! Rafael Zink (talk) 17:28, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
A license permission has been send by Carambol to OTRS-Team last night. Check first before delete any files! Regards Rafael Zink (talk) 07:36, 5 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:11, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rafael Zink (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Permission of different photographers needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:11, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:53, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rafael Zink (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not sure the permission is sufficient for Commons: "re-publication" doesn't mean re-license.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:11, 8 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: license at source site is non-free. For example, it does not allow for modification. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:55, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rafael Zink (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Photographer's permission needed via COM:OTRS.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:31, 24 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

OTRS [Ticket#2018110410004211] Carambol Regards Rafael Zink (talk) 09:15, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: OTRS I have just accepted permission under ticket:2018110410004211. --Emha (talk) 15:42, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rafael Zink (talk · contribs)

[edit]

OTRS template added by a non-OTRS Team member. To be verified.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 07:18, 28 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Again, Roger, you are wrong. I have the permission to do so via e-mail from 18 decembar 2019 by @Reinhard Kraasch: . This permission includes also his other templates for me as uploader, including: {{Carambol cc-by-sa}}, {{Martin Horn cc-by-sa}}, {{Karsten Witte cc-by-sa}}, {{Roger Schaewe cc-by-sa}},

 Info This seems to be an approach that looks a bit unusual, as the license template {{Carambol cc-by-sa}} used by Rafael Zink includes the OTRS template and was created by OTRS team member Reinhard Kraasch for that purpose, so Rafael Zink didn't directly add an OTRS template as a non-OTRS team member. I think we only need a short confirmation by Reinhard Kraasch that it applies to the current uploads too, then everything can be kept. Gestumblindi (talk) 12:45, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The ticket says "all images by Dieter Ernst/Carambol uploaded by Rafeal Zink", so it also covers these uploads. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 15:12, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 15:14, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of display. Per COM:FOP, FoP in Norway is for buildings only. (Also hard to believe this would be in scope.) Эlcobbola talk 01:27, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:36, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Ukraine. Created 2010. No Permission from the sculptors Володимир Стасюк and Андрій, Володимир Сухорські, arhitect Ізабелля Ткачук and Данилом Чепілем, Анатолієм Водоп'яном.

And also

Микола Василечко (talk) 05:59, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File:Stamps of Ukraine, 2015-33.jpg kept. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:02, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for posters in Hong Kong B dash (talk) 10:37, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:04, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://www.stgau.ru/company/personal/user/8287/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:51, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:05, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 廣九直通車 as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G10. In use. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:18, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 DeleteBut even the page where the file is used is also written in a style of advertisement, see this. I believe this is an act of cross-wiki spamming.廣九直通車 (talk) 13:24, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:04, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I believe this file has been taken from the internet. I am unable to provide the exact URL, but when I search "https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b_DJ3pBe6OI" on Google, I see the exact same image in the thumbnail of a youtube video (dating from 2016). Given that the dimensions of this image are similar, I doubt this is an "own work". In case the uploader is the owner of the image, I would request them to please provide some proof of ownership. DreamLinker (talk) 15:13, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@DreamLinker: This is a image of church and this image is used in so many places and magazines including youtube etc. I'm residing near this church. This is photo taken by our believers in our church and we used this photo in different places. Thank you--Path slopu(Talk) 16:26, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
But the image information box specifies the source as an own work.  Delete – cannot be attributed, even if is free. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 17:14, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:05, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D artwork in USA B dash (talk) 17:24, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:06, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work НоуФрост (talk) 18:58, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:07, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work НоуФрост (talk) 18:58, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:07, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work НоуФрост (talk) 18:59, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:07, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии: малый размер файла, отсутствуют метаданные, фото ищется в Интернете до загрузки до Викисклада <http://ieshua.org/novodvorskaya-evrejskie-korni-est-vsego-lish-odna-vosmushka.htm>, <http://ivona.bigmir.net/showbiz/stars/396111-Umerla-Valerija-Novodvorskaja--V-Set--popali-detskie-foto>. Необходимо подтверждение в OTRS от автора фотографии. Dogad75 (talk) 20:25, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:08, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Leodxb (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self-promotion, out of project scope. No contribs to any wm project.

Achim (talk) 08:11, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:58, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Accidentally uploaded PDF version Kjerish (talk) 08:52, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:58, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Agustin Robles Bravo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:50, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Esq4rt (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Esq4rt (talk · contribs)

[edit]

College logo. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:57, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Teungku Ampon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploaded among group of COM:NETCOPYVIOs - may or may not be COM:TOO discussion needed.

Эlcobbola talk 00:19, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:23, 8 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Verletzung meiner Persönlichkeits- und Datenschutzrechte als Eigentümer 84.185.250.15 15:23, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep not a valid reason for deletion. This seems to be part of a bunch of nominations for the same reason. Multichill (talk) 15:33, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep but the buildings owner is seeking for work and doesn't want to show someone his financial situation.
I think, I could hide the coordinates and adress (rename the pictures so) for three years and then revert this, and help him so.
I will do so as soon as someone say, that we shall do so. --Wilhelm Zimmerling PAR (talk) 07:51, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Verletzung meiner Persönlichkeits- und Datenschutzrechte als Eigentümer 84.185.246.177 20:04, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 16:18, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Verletzung meiner Persönlichkeits- und Datenschutzrechte als Eigentümer 84.185.250.15 15:44, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep not a valid reason for deletion. This seems to be part of a bunch of nominations for the same reason. Multichill (talk) 15:48, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep but the buildings owner is seeking for work and doesn't want to show someone his financial situation.
I think, I could hide the coordinates and adress (rename the pictures so) for three years and then revert this, and help him so.
I will do so as soon as someone say, that we shall do so. --Wilhelm Zimmerling PAR (talk) 07:42, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Verletzung meiner Persönlichkeits- und Datenschutzrechte als Eigentümer 84.185.246.177 20:05, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 16:19, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Verletzung meiner Persönlichkeits- und Datenschutzrechte als Eigentümer 84.185.250.15 15:50, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep not a valid reason for deletion. This seems to be part of a bunch of nominations for the same reason. Multichill (talk) 16:56, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep but the buildings owner is seeking for work and doesn't want to show someone his financial situation.
I think, I could hide the coordinates and adress (rename the pictures so) for thre years and then revert this, and help him so.
I will do so as soon as someone say, that we shall do so. --Wilhelm Zimmerling PAR (talk) 07:42, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Verletzung meiner Persönlichkeits- und Datenschutzrechte als Eigentümer 84.185.246.177 20:05, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 16:18, 11 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hen is not a simple shape. Invalid license. Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:56, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 15:47, 22 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by HapHaxion as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright is held by the entity in question, as stated on their webpage. Michelet-密是力 (talk) 07:23, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:35, 25 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not much explanation. Should see the source. Jeromi Mikhael (talk) 11:16, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 DeleteShould have been tagged with Template:npd as the file's source page do not have a proper permission.廣九直通車 (talk) 12:25, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:48, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused file, potentially advertisements, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 00:25, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:00, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused file, potentially advertisements, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 00:25, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:00, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Merely a grey/washed out version of this. There seems to be sufficient text/prose so as to be well above the TOO. Эlcobbola talk 00:26, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:00, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparent Flickr washing. Author per metadata is Elias Wessel, not Flickr account name, Wendy Suzuki. Suzuki, further, is the mere subject; copyright is held by the author (photographer), not subject, unless formally transferred. COM:OTRS needed. Эlcobbola talk 00:35, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:00, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

your opinions are asked : panoramio transfer of poor quality, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ?? Roland zh (talk) 01:30, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:00, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably should be deleted, as it is clearly a derivative work of the original smug pepeSpanishSnake (talk | contribs) 01:57, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Asav: It is true that a likeness is not automatically a copyright infringement. However, if you look at this image side by side with smug pepe, it becomes clear that the eyes and mouth are identical, and therefore this is in fact a derivative work. —SpanishSnake (talk | contribs) 17:01, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I completely disagree. I find it undeniable that the differences between the two depictions (one being a Jack O' Lantern!) are quite obvious and sufficient to make this an autonmous work. Asav | Talk 18:45, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Asav: The Jack O' Lantern is an autonomous work, meaning that it has differences, but being in a different medium still makes it a derivative work. You can see here that the eyes and the mouth closely resemble the original, and most likely the author of the pumpkin derived the features he put on the pumpkin from it. —SpanishSnake (talk | contribs) 16:52, 18 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:01, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Estonia Flying Saucer (talk) 04:24, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:02, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted content not de minimus SecretName101 (talk) 06:27, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:02, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 4nn1l2 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Persian description says "taken from the Iranian portal of statistics" which does not publish its content under a free license. Michelet-密是力 (talk) 06:55, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:02, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 4nn1l2 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://tineye.com/search/1825199b6c1cb634a7a5f0aff92eaf3121f71fa4/?sort=size&order=desc Probably posted by the com department of FRIB, needs OTRS. Michelet-密是力 (talk) 07:05, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:02, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for single pieces of artwork in Austria B dash (talk) 07:18, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Which one do you consider to be an artwork and why do you think that the Threshold of originality is given? --Herzi Pinki (talk) 07:24, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:02, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Swapnil Kaustubh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Non-notable person.

Hindust@niक्या करें? बातें! 12:11, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:02, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Swapnil Kaustubh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Unused personal images.

Érico (talk) 02:32, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 03:48, 13 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

company logo, probably not under CC-by Luk (talk) 12:24, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Dear Luk hi, how are you? I'm the Marketing Director of Precious Metals International and I can assure you we have full CC with this file. Feel free to contact me if you need more information.

Thank you!

Alejoserranocol (talk) 13:21, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:02, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Everyday Bank (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely derivative works of stock photos and therefore copyright violations.

Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 13:21, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 DeleteEven the page where the file is used is also written in a style of advertisement, see this. I believe this is an act of cross-wiki spamming.廣九直通車 (talk) 13:24, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: previously deleted. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:03, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 01:03, 29 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:49, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted Per nom. Only image uploaded by user. Published before in Facebook. Unlikely own work. PRP applies. Strakhov (talk) 17:27, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

عکس فاقد اهمیت است و در هیچکجا استفاده نشده است. Ariaamiri (talk) 13:50, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, Google translates this as "The picture is irrelevant and has not been used anywhere." But in my opinion the file has some educational value, place is identifiable. Taivo (talk) 17:46, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

عکس فاقد اهمیت است و در هیچکجا استفاده نشده است. Ariaamiri (talk) 13:50, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, Google translates this as "The picture is irrelevant and has not been used anywhere." But in my opinion the photo has some educational value, place is identifiable. Taivo (talk) 17:51, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

عکس فاقد اهمیت است و در هیچکجا استفاده نشده است. Ariaamiri (talk) 13:51, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, Google translates this as "The picture is irrelevant and has not been used anywhere." But in my opinion the photo has educational value. Taivo (talk) 17:54, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file, and/or personality right issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 00:07, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:22, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused upload, and seriously personality right issues > children < hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 00:09, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:23, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused upload, and/or personality right issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 00:13, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Uploaded in appropriate page available. Will add an article on him as the person is a popular writer and literary critic. Please remove deletion tag. --రహ్మానుద్దీన్ (talk) 17:05, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use. P 1 9 9   16:23, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file, and/or personality right issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 00:16, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused personal photo. P 1 9 9   16:26, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personality right issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 00:17, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: DW, dubious source and author. P 1 9 9   16:26, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 00:24, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:28, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file, and/or personality right issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 00:30, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:28, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused file, potentially advertising, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 00:59, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: appropriate for Category:Ramanaidu Film Studio. P 1 9 9   16:32, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file, and personality right issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 01:11, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:28, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 01:20, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:28, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of superior vector file File:Auburn Tigers logo.svg IagoQnsi (talk) 02:34, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:34, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image, no EXIF B dash (talk) 04:39, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have self taken this photo on Solar eclipse 2015 by converting the Exif are lose.--Richard Reinhardt (talk) 12:40, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Other picture have regulary no EXIF --Richard Reinhardt (talk) 12:41, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9   16:35, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file has a low resolution and no EXIF. The user uploaded other copyvio files for promotional purpose. Given that, the actual copyright of this file is doubtful. Ruthven (msg) 08:06, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:37, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image, no EXIF B dash (talk) 10:34, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9   16:39, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cropped, reduced version of this image is published elsewhere: https://m.indiamart.com/proddetail.php?i=15090686055, owner should submit OTRS ticket request Ytoyoda (talk) 10:40, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:40, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader and the photographer were two different persons. There is no evidence that the photographer allowed the publication of the photograph under a free licence. Eleassar (t/p) 11:17, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I was made by my sister who let to use it. Hugo.arg (talk) 12:43, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It is a very nice photograph. I'd be most happy if your sister provides her authorisation as described in COM:OTRS. --Eleassar (t/p) 12:52, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Undelete if an OTRS ticket is ever received. P 1 9 9   16:40, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright © 2018 l o u • s t e j s k a l. All Rights Reserved., https://loustejskal.com/2016/05/21/geranium-oad-masters-dinner/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:58, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:22, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

این عکس مجددا توسط خود هنرمند با تغییراتی جزیی آپلود شده است. duplicate Ariaamiri (talk) 13:48, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: duplicate of File:SABZEVAR City.jpg. P 1 9 9   17:25, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 13:52, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:27, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hishamawadshams (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:55, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:27, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:55, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: dubious source and author. P 1 9 9   17:28, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:56, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:29, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:00, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:29, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Error in naming. It is redirected to "Kreuz Ecke Roereken - Overoth.jpg" LeFagnard (talk) 14:17, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:29, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:29, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:30, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: self-promotion. Historical book illustrations are available. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:31, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:31, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Not found elsewhere using Google Images. P 1 9 9   17:32, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:32, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In the meta information of this and related images, the original photographer has stated these are copyrighted works. These have been uploaded from here, which contains a statement that rights are reserved. I'm concerned this may mean Commons is hosting copyrighted works without permission. FYI this is one of five images. WCMemail 15:03, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Wee Curry Monster: The metadata states that author is "Augusto Starita / Ministerio de Cultura de la Nación.", as usual, when an government institution hires a photographer the copyright holder is the institution, not the photographer, but they usually credit the photographer for identification and promotional purposes. This pictures (and the remaining ones) comes from the official Flickr of the Ministry of Culture, which releases the picture with a Creative Commons license, this is also verified by the bot FlickreviewR.--BugWarp (talk) 15:55, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Inauguración muestra “Malvinas, mi casa” - Día de la Mujer en el Museo Malvinas e Islas del Atlántico Sur (16758527992).jpg. WCMemail 16:01, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Inauguración muestra “Malvinas, mi casa” - Día de la Mujer en el Museo Malvinas e Islas del Atlántico Sur (16758527992).jpg. P 1 9 9   17:36, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In the meta information of this and related images, the original photographer has stated these are copyrighted works. These have been uploaded from here, which contains a statement that rights are reserved. I'm concerned this may mean Commons is hosting copyrighted works without permission. FYI this is one of five images. WCMemail 15:04, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Wee Curry Monster: The metadata states that author is "Augusto Starita / Ministerio de Cultura de la Nación.", as usual, when an government institution hires a photographer the copyright holder is the institution, not the photographer, but they usually credit the photographer for identification and promotional purposes. This pictures (and the remaining ones) comes from the official Flickr of the Ministry of Culture, which releases the picture with a Creative Commons license, this is also verified by the bot FlickreviewR.--BugWarp (talk) 15:56, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Inauguración muestra “Malvinas, mi casa” - Día de la Mujer en el Museo Malvinas e Islas del Atlántico Sur (16758527992).jpg. WCMemail 16:00, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Inauguración muestra “Malvinas, mi casa” - Día de la Mujer en el Museo Malvinas e Islas del Atlántico Sur (16758527992).jpg. P 1 9 9   17:37, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In the meta information of this and related images, the original photographer has stated these are copyrighted works. These have been uploaded from here, which contains a statement that rights are reserved. I'm concerned this may mean Commons is hosting copyrighted works without permission. FYI this is one of five images. WCMemail 15:04, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Wee Curry Monster: The metadata states that author is "Augusto Starita / Ministerio de Cultura de la Nación.", as usual, when an government institution hires a photographer the copyright holder is the institution, not the photographer, but they usually credit the photographer for identification and promotional purposes. This pictures (and the remaining ones) comes from the official Flickr of the Ministry of Culture, which releases the picture with a Creative Commons license, this is also verified by the bot FlickreviewR.--BugWarp (talk) 15:57, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Inauguración muestra “Malvinas, mi casa” - Día de la Mujer en el Museo Malvinas e Islas del Atlántico Sur (16758527992).jpg. WCMemail 16:00, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Inauguración muestra “Malvinas, mi casa” - Día de la Mujer en el Museo Malvinas e Islas del Atlántico Sur (16758527992).jpg. P 1 9 9   17:37, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In the meta information of this and related images, the original photographer has stated these are copyrighted works. These have been uploaded from here, which contains a statement that rights are reserved. I'm concerned this may mean Commons is hosting copyrighted works without permission. FYI this is one of five images. WCMemail 15:05, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Wee Curry Monster: The metadata states that author is "Augusto Starita / Ministerio de Cultura de la Nación.", as usual, when an government institution hires a photographer the copyright holder is the institution, not the photographer, but they usually credit the photographer for identification and promotional purposes. This pictures (and the remaining ones) comes from the official Flickr of the Ministry of Culture, which releases the picture with a Creative Commons license, this is also verified by the bot FlickreviewR.--BugWarp (talk) 15:57, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I'm happy to withdraw the nomination if I'm wrong but the meta information seems to indicate the photographer retained the copyright. WCMemail 15:59, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
What makes you think that?.--BugWarp (talk) 14:51, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Wee Curry Monster: Yes, "some rights are reserved" the cc-by-sa licence is not a copyleft, is a copyright licence...all this photos are in the Ministry of Culture of Argentina offical Flickr account, under a proper licence to re-use them in Commons (as almost all the Argentinian media content). Cheers.--Mauricio V. Genta (talk) 04:28, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Mauricio V. Genta: Does that allow free use? My understanding was the license requirement on wikipedia had to be free use. WCMemail 06:53, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Wee Curry Monster: "Free use" is a way to say it, but they have certain restriction, depending which CC licence we choose. Please read article carefully before requesting deletions, so we do not waste time. Cheers, --Mauricio V. Genta (talk) 15:35, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
OK I withdraw the 5 nominations. WCMemail 16:03, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. P 1 9 9   17:36, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

RUDEAU G. Droit D'Auteur Photo of photo, missing permission, false date. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:54, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: 13:05, 28 August 2018, by Well-Informed Optimist. P 1 9 9   17:51, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In the meta information of this and related images, the original photographer has stated these are copyrighted works. These have been uploaded from here, which contains a statement that rights are reserved. I'm concerned this may mean Commons is hosting copyrighted works without permission. FYI this is one of five images. WCMemail 15:05, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Wee Curry Monster: The metadata states that author is "Augusto Starita / Ministerio de Cultura de la Nación.", as usual, when an government institution hires a photographer the copyright holder is the institution, not the photographer, but they usually credit the photographer for identification and promotional purposes. This pictures (and the remaining ones) comes from the official Flickr of the Ministry of Culture, which releases the picture with a Creative Commons license, this is also verified by the bot FlickreviewR.--BugWarp (talk) 15:57, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Inauguración muestra “Malvinas, mi casa” - Día de la Mujer en el Museo Malvinas e Islas del Atlántico Sur (16758527992).jpg. WCMemail 16:00, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Inauguración muestra “Malvinas, mi casa” - Día de la Mujer en el Museo Malvinas e Islas del Atlántico Sur (16758527992).jpg. P 1 9 9   17:37, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Verletzung meiner Persönlichkeits- und Datenschutzrechte als Eigentümer 84.185.250.15 15:29, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep not a valid reason for deletion. This seems to be part of a bunch of nominations for the same reason. Multichill (talk) 15:33, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep but the buildings owner is seeking for work and doesn't want so show someone his financial situation.
I think, I could hide the coordinates and adress (rename the pictures so) for thre years and then revert this, and help him so.
I will do so as soon as someone say, that we shall do so. --Wilhelm Zimmerling PAR (talk) 07:51, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: 17:41, 7 September 2018, by Túrelio. P 1 9 9   17:41, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Verletzung meiner Persönlichkeits- und Datenschutzrechte als Eigentümer 84.185.246.177 20:06, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: 17:41, 7 September 2018, by Túrelio. P 1 9 9   17:41, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Verletzung meiner Persönlichkeits- und Datenschutzrechte als Eigentümer 84.185.246.177 20:07, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: 17:41, 7 September 2018, by Túrelio. P 1 9 9   17:41, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Datei unvollständig - file corrupted Sport-racing (talk) 15:29, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:41, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Verletzung meiner Persönlichkeits- und Datenschutzrechte als Eigentümer 84.185.250.15 15:30, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Verletzung meiner Persönlichkeits- und Datenschutzrechte als Eigentümer 79.238.238.140 09:47, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Verletzung meiner Persönlichkeits- und Datenschutzrechte als Eigentümer 84.185.246.177 20:03, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above. P 1 9 9   17:55, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Verletzung meiner Persönlichkeits- und Datenschutzrechte als Eigentümer 84.185.250.15 15:30, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Verletzung meiner Persönlichkeits- und Datenschutzrechte als Eigentümer 84.185.246.177 20:03, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per User:Multichill. P 1 9 9   17:56, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Verletzung meiner Persönlichkeits- und Datenschutzrechte als Eigentümer 84.185.250.15 15:46, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9   17:56, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Verletzung meiner Persönlichkeits- und Datenschutzrechte als Eigentümer 84.185.250.15 15:47, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Verletzung meiner Persönlichkeits- und Datenschutzrechte als Eigentümer 84.185.246.177 20:04, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9   17:56, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Verletzung meiner Persönlichkeits- und Datenschutzrechte als Eigentümer 84.185.250.15 15:51, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep not a valid reason for deletion. This seems to be part of a bunch of nominations for the same reason. Multichill (talk) 16:56, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep but the buildings owner is seeking for work and doesn't want to show someone his financial situation.
I think, I could hide the coordinates and adress (rename the pictures so) for three years and then revert this, and help him so.
I will do so as soon as someone say, that we shall do so. --Wilhelm Zimmerling PAR (talk) 07:40, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: 17:41, 7 September 2018, by Túrelio. P 1 9 9   17:41, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Verletzung meiner Persönlichkeits- und Datenschutzrechte als Eigentümer 84.185.250.15 15:53, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Verletzung meiner Persönlichkeits- und Datenschutzrechte als Eigentümer 84.185.246.177 20:08, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Verletzung meiner Persönlichkeits- und Datenschutzrechte als Eigentümer 84.185.246.99 21:18, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: 17:39, 7 September 2018, by Túrelio. P 1 9 9   17:58, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False date (person pictured died 1989), missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:55, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:01, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

J'ai demandé cette suppression car je suis en cours d'une page wiki. sur cette personne.Actuellement je suis sur brouillon
merci --RUDEAU.G (talk) 10:36, 29 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion, out of project scope. By now no contribs to any wm project. Achim (talk) 16:22, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:04, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless description, non-copyright-free images included Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 17:04, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:05, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pas de licence autorisée Léodras (talk) 17:04, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:05, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyviol: "Tous droits réservés"! Arbalete (talk) 17:33, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: author clearly released it with compatible license on Flickr. P 1 9 9   18:08, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 17:47, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:08, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. Mitte27 (talk) 18:24, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:10, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. Mitte27 (talk) 18:28, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:10, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It was a test image and it was just for testing an upload Science music knowledge (talk) 19:23, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion. P 1 9 9   18:14, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and unusable text only image with grammatical errors. -- Tuválkin 22:46, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Also affected:

-- Tuválkin 22:47, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:15, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SUNIL SAMOTA RLS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images, out of scope

Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:49, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:15, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Freigabe durch den Rechteinhaber ist bis auf weiteres noch nicht erfolgt. Urspilk (talk) 09:05, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:03, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Freigabe durch den Rechteinhaber ist bis auf weiteres noch nicht erfolgt. Urspilk (talk) 09:10, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:03, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a music score, does not enjoy the same copyright expiration as a photo. Mys_721tx (talk) 15:52, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:06, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a music score, does not enjoy the same copyright expiration as a photo. Mys_721tx (talk) 15:52, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:06, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a music score, does not enjoy the same copyright expiration as a photo. Mys_721tx (talk) 15:53, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:06, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of the cover of the previously mentioned music score, does not enjoy the same copyright expiration as a photo. Mys_721tx (talk) 15:53, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Disagree, the cover of a book, which was not mentioned toward the music score, was not relevant with a copyright of music. Walter Grassroot (talk) 16:56, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
So you are agreeing that the photo is a derivative work of the book and therefore is not in public domain then. -Mys_721tx (talk) 17:12, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:06, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

logo non libre de droit Léodras (talk) 17:05, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:07, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad quality, much better File:Sondershausen St. Trinitatis 05.jpg Martin Sg. (talk) 17:32, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Das zur Löschung beantragte Bild stammt aus 2006, es ist mit einer Analogkamera (Farbfilm, anschließende Digitalisierung) aufgenommen. Aus meiner Sicht ist es trotzdem nicht schlecht gelungen. Immerhin wurde es von einem Dritten mit einer seiner Dateien verlinkt. Natürlich ist das Bild aus dem Jahre 2016 technisch brillanter, daran ändert sich auch nach der erneuten Bildbearbeitung nichts. Übrigens fotografiere ich mit neuer Digitalspiegelreflexkamera nun oft Bilder in Gemäldegalerien uns stelle sie ins Netz, ohne Löschung wirklich schlechter Bilder vom gleichen Objekt zu beantragen. Oft ist es auch Geschmackssache, was gut ist oder nicht. Sollte das Bild gelöscht werden, beachte man die Verlinkung ! --Dguendel 14:34, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

Kept: per User:Dguendel. P 1 9 9   17:11, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(possiblynon-notable) artist's album cover. Possibly not own work. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 18:14, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:11, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata Afifa Afrin (talk) 18:29, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9   17:12, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has a permission statement but has no source. Leoboudv (talk) 19:16, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above. P 1 9 9   17:14, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lack of permission to upload on the cc-by (look at the source page http://dzwola.eu/gmina-dzwola/solectwa/kocudza-gorna/) Sławek Borewicz (talk) 19:50, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:16, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lower resolution duplicate of File:T. R. Zeliang and Narendra Modi.jpg Gazoth (talk) 20:28, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:19, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clear evidence that the image was taken more than 25 years ago must be given, missing source and permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:55, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Source (http://leslu.com.ar/galeriasll/g80/g802.htm) says 1980/89 --Yilku1 (talk) 19:56, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: appears to be indeed older than 25 years. P 1 9 9   17:22, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clear evidence that the image was taken more than 25 years ago must be given, missing source and permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:55, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Source (http://leslu.com.ar/galeriasll/g80/g802.htm) says 1980/89 --Yilku1 (talk) 19:57, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: appears to be indeed older than 25 years. P 1 9 9   17:22, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader is not the author (see Information template) Gikü (talk) 21:24, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:23, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Depiction of an industrial product with its label and logo. Not an own work, maybe taken from that page [3] Texniths (talk) 21:33, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:23, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.deviantart.com/thebullfrog/art/The-many-faces-of-Che-Guevara-55295073 from 2007 (this was uploaded in 2008) but also plenty of COM:DW. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:10, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:24, 11 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images are an entrants to a photography contest organized by a department of Government of India. The terms of the contest might allow the government to display and reuse the photograph, but probably would not have required the photographer to hand over the copyrights to Government of India. This would make the image ineligible for GODL-India license. —Gazoth (talk) 22:53, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Adding a few more
Gazoth (talk) 22:53, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Adding a few more
Sorry for the large list, I've already modified the upload script on the bot to ignore any files that contains the phrase "National Photo Contest". I'll manually review those files before uploading them. —Gazoth (talk) 22:02, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:13, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional. Out of the project scope. Edslov (talk) 23:38, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:13, 12 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Estonia Flying Saucer (talk) 04:22, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The file name "Pushkin street in Narva with Pushkin monument" suggests that the Pushkin monument was one of the reasons, or the main reason, to take that specific photo, it's prominently featured therein, so I do not think that COM:DM applies. --Gestumblindi (talk) 18:55, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Murales in Milan, Italy. Unfortunately there is no FOP in Italy for artworks, and we need the author's permission. Ruthven (msg) 11:27, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 18:56, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D artwork in USA

B dash (talk) 10:02, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep File:House of Hades Toynbee tile at 27th and 6th Ave in New York City September 2012.jpg. When I uploaded this (and several others) I did not know about freedom of panorama. Some time later I inquired about COM:GRAFFITI at Commons talk:Copyright rules by subject matter, and was told they were okay -- though admittedly I did not link to these files directly. For the record, these Toynbee tiles have been showing up on US city streets since the 80s, and the artist(s) is still unknown. See also Category:Toynbee tiles which most (if not all) are in the United States. MusikAnimal talk 18:09, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per {{Non-free graffiti}}. Ruthven (msg) 14:36, 7 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

logo non libre de droit Léodras (talk) 17:05, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — Racconish💬 16:40, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is an image of the mascots of the Indonesian Asian games in Indonesia, and are considered as artworks. As only allows FOP for educational and non-commercial usage according to Commons:Freedom of panorama#Indonesia, so the file is probably copyrighted and unfree. 廣九直通車 (talk) 13:07, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:57, 13 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D artwork in USA B dash (talk) 09:54, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disagree

I hold the copyright to this original work. There is no FOP issue with this photograph. JonathanCross (talk) 22:08, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 10:34, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Lithuania, need permission from the painter

B dash (talk) 10:21, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 10:34, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Lithuania, need permission from the painter B dash (talk) 10:22, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 10:34, 23 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RUDEAU.G (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:03, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 09:45, 8 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RUDEAU.G (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by RUDEAU.G

Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:55, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

     Je certifie  Rudeau Georges fils de Rudeau Raoul 1923-1989 et Oncle de Rudeau Georges 1922-1944
     être l'auteur de la mise en ligne des Fichiers jpg ci-dessus et autorise wikimedia commons à les publier en ligne.
    Les documents mis en ligne proviennent d'archives personnelles et de coupures de presse de l'époque. — Preceding unsigned comment added by RUDEAU.G (talk • contribs) 08:43, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
     
                                                                                Georges RUDEAU — Preceding unsigned comment added by RUDEAU.G (talk • contribs) 10:50, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

[[Category:Comme vous me l'avez demandé j'ai supprimé des documents et desphotos.Les notes restantes sont essentiellement des articles de presse ou des articles sur des sites comme celui de la résistance Gallia.Sinon mon oncle Rudeau Georges estdécédé il y a plus de 70 ans.]]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:17, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D artwork in USA

B dash (talk) 10:08, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:12a.PennQuarter.WDC.19January2017 (32420434432).jpg, File:13a.PennQuarter.WDC.19January2017 (32532684596).jpg, File:13b.PennQuarter.WDC.19January2017 (31729695434).jpg: do they really exceed TOO?
File:2008 The Church of SubGenius card.jpg: I suspect {{PD-US no notice}}, but let the uploader prove it
File:TheCurseMorley.jpg seems like this is really about the (PD-text) quote. The figure that was drawn in the corner is part of the poster, but not essential to it.
File:Washington Rally 2003 01.JPG the few graphics on here may be DM. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:56, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - some kept per above. --Эlcobbola talk 20:18, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright © 2018 l o u • s t e j s k a l. All Rights Reserved., https://loustejskal.com/2016/05/20/atelier-september/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:01, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Oops sorry about that. Any idea why I found it by y using this page= And I uploaded it by using the upload wizard, how come it didn't object as it usually does if you try to upload an image with a wrong license by mistake?Ramblersen (talk) 14:21, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@User:Patrick Rogel: And looking at the Flicker page, it says "Some rights reserved " and not "all rights reserved" as stated above. What is it that I am missing?Ramblersen (talk) 14:59, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
There are contradictory statements : copyrighted (website, Facebook...) / non copyrighted (Flickr), that's why an Administrator decision is needed. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:46, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The loustejskal.com website links to the Flickr stream, implying the latter is official and thus that the CC-by license therein is genuine. We are not bound to the more restrictive assertion when a legitimate free alternative is available. (Also, Flickr is not "non copyrighted" unless labeled PD. Free licenses, like CC-by, are still under copyright; they have merely waived some, but not all, of their rights.). --Эlcobbola talk 20:29, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Japan for 2D works. Should be blanked to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, it was mistaken. I set wrong category "Advertising", it must be building. --Mkuriki (talk) 08:09, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 20:30, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sock upload, and I don't trust it.

I already wasted too much time on checking uploads from this sock, reporting them and ignoring their insults so the above rationale is more than sufficient. I refuse to argue over it. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:12, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Valid YouTube CC-BY license. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 01:27, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

On discussion on Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Cookie Anna (Cookie) (talk) 15:54, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

After running into another clear cases of laundering, I created a mass DR for all files from this channel (including this one, to keep discussion central): Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with insource:"UCmCnA Xl0Rz4rWoFRxeHO8Q". - Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:19, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: This does not appear to be an official channel. 1) The comment "of fans for Disney fans" is damning; 2) Disney News Latino has no social media verification checks (for example, Twitter and Facebook). Legitimate Disney does have verification checks for each of its "sub-groups" (Facebook - [4], [5], [6], [7], [8], etc.; Twitter: [9], [10], [11], [12], etc.), including regional/linguistic sub-groups (e.g., Disney Channel Latinoamérica - Facebook and Twitter); and 3) relatedly, I can find no official Disney site linking to this YouTube channel. Deleted per COM:PRP. --Эlcobbola talk 20:55, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

@Leoboudv, Discasto, and Cookie: File:Karol Sevilla presentación Coco.jpg (¡Karol Sevilla en la Premiere de COCO y Mucho Más! | Disney Planet News #1) was laundered from ¡Karol Sevilla en el Estreno de Coco y Mucho Más! | Disney Planet News #1 by DisneyChannelLA.

For File:Gurpo Bronco.jpg (BRONCO presenta "El Corrido de Miguel Rivera" | COCO, de Disney•Pixar) there is a similar video at Interpretan canción para “Coco”. I'm guessing the band recorded various promos for YouTubers. (striking through: It's the same video with different audio. Nevertheless, there is no indication the YT channel is anything other than a fan channel) Magic News Latino might create their own content sometimes, but if they do I see no way to tell which content.

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:17, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The source of File:Karol Sevilla presentación Coco.jpg is Magic News Latino published on 6 nov. 2017. The supposed laundered site is DisneyChannelLA, the video was published on 5 nov. 2017 without CC license, true, but since both channels belong to the same group I don't think this is a real case of license laundering.
The case of File:Gurpo Bronco.jpg has nothing to do. This video may have been copied from the original channel, also from Magic News Latino and both published on 9 oct. 2017. Can you prove the license laundering?
Can you also prove license laundering on the rest of the files? Anna (Cookie) (talk) 04:38, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Cookie: I've now noticed that while the audio is different, the video for Bronco is the same. But still, I can't find a link from http://disneylatino.com/ to https://www.youtube.com/user/DisneyNewsLatino/ . Where do you see this link? Here are the connections I see:
Separate:
How do you connect DisneyNewsLatino/DisneyNewsLA to DisneyChannelLA/disneylatino.com? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 06:20, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The link is in the page of the video: Sitio oficial de Disney Channel: http://www.disneylatino.com/disneycha... Anna (Cookie) (talk) 01:10, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Cookie: that is a link from https://www.youtube.com/user/DisneyChannelLA/ to http://www.disneylatino.com/. This says nothing about DisneyNewsLatino/DisneyNewsLA. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:46, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Per Cookie's. Although they may be lying, I don't think Disney allows a YouTube channel telling us (bold is mine): La magia de Disney en Latinoamérica. Encuentra las últimas novedades de Disney Channel, Disney Studios, Pixar, Disney Parks, Marvel Studios, Lucasfilm; de fans para fanáticos Disney. Somos Disney News Latino.

I mean, if they claim to be part of the Disney group and Disney does not send a cease and desist order to them, it's pretty clear they're a legitimate Disney channel. Having proved that, and having proved that a legitimate CC license is used, what's the point? When it comes to Interpretan canción para “Coco”, it is obviously a copy from the Disney channel, as the quality is lower. --Discasto talk 10:43, 13 August 2018 (UTC) PS: @Leoboudv, Strakhov, Alexis Jazz, and Cookie: [reply]

 Comment (bold is mine):

La magia de Disney en Latinoamérica. Encuentra las últimas novedades de Disney Channel, Disney Studios, Pixar, Disney Parks, Marvel Studios, Lucasfilm; de fans para fanáticos Disney. Somos Disney News Latino.

meaning from fans to Disney fanatics. They claim they are Disney fans so PRP (IMHO) should be applied... strakhov (talk) 10:51, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Good catch, strakhov. "by fans, for fans. We are Disney News Latino." They are Disney News, not Disney. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:46, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Strakhov: I must agree. --Discasto talk 16:26, 14 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This does not appear to be an official channel. 1) The comment "of fans for Disney fans" is damning; 2) Disney News Latino has no social media verification checks (for example, Twitter and Facebook). Legitimate Disney does have verification checks for each of its "sub-groups" (Facebook - [13], [14], [15], [16], [17], etc.; Twitter: [18], [19], [20], [21], etc.), including regional/linguistic sub-groups (e.g., Disney Channel Latinoamérica - Facebook and Twitter); and 3) relatedly, I can find no official Disney site linking to this YouTube channel (Cookie's linking comment, for example, is asinine and backwards; that this channel links to Disney is not helpful. Anyone can link to Disney (see?); Disney itself linking to someone, a YouTube Channel, is an entirely different animal--and one we don't have.) Deleted per COM:PRP. --Эlcobbola talk 20:58, 8 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ONyCS1ri4ZM Tarawa (jo ta ke irabazi arte) 21:11, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Tarawa1943: No tiene derecho,porque la imagen es creative commons — Preceding unsigned comment added by W2288 (talk • contribs) 21:31, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Tarawa1943: that video has a Creative Commons license. I don't really trust the channel though. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 23:31, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Valid YouTube CC-BY llicense. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 01:29, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

On discussion on Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/User problems#Cookie Anna (Cookie) (talk) 15:56, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

After running into another clear cases of laundering, I created a mass DR for all files from this channel (including this one, to keep discussion central): Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with insource:"UCmCnA Xl0Rz4rWoFRxeHO8Q". - Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:19, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: See Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with insource:"UCmCnA Xl0Rz4rWoFRxeHO8Q". --Эlcobbola talk 15:44, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not up to date, not useable in this form. HERCVLES (talk) 16:15, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:NOTUSED - not in use and no source for underlying data so cannot be updated or checked for accuracy by re-users, the latter a significant impairment to utility. --Эlcobbola talk 15:49, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Malpass93 (talk) 17:23, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Эlcobbola talk 15:46, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hana-photo.jpg, of which this is a colourised derivative (see source) was deleted as a copyvio. If the current image is legitimate, the other should be undeleted. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 18:06, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, this photography should be kept. Because Hana died more than 70 years ago and the author of the picture is anonymous. I modified the license by adding "anonymous-eu". The original one should also be undeleled for the same reasons. --Madelgarius (talk) 09:04, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Madelgarius: what is the evidence that the photographer is anonymous and the first publication was sufficiently long ago? Do the USHMM, Yad Vashem, or other databases consider the image public domain? Catrìona (talk) 06:10, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Catrìona: Hello, if the photographer was known we can be sure Yad Vashem should have mention it. This is not the case and my personnal research on this could'nt find anything either. Regards, --Madelgarius (talk) 06:24, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep as per Madelgarius. Yann (talk) 07:18, 18 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Anonymous claims require evidence that the author is genuinely unknown (to anyone), not merely unknown to us. Not only does the source not provide this evidence (COM:EVID), that license was merely slapped on in response to the bogus pma +70 claim (author death, not subject death, is the relevant consideration for pma license) being challenged. --Эlcobbola talk 15:55, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lα cσpiα dε εstε vidεσ, sεяα dεnunciαdα. Tσdσs lσs Dεяεcнσs Rεsεяvαdσs. cσρчяιgнτ ©2013 LO+MUSICAL© https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eQLFDhKvh1o Tarawa (jo ta ke irabazi arte) 20:14, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per COM:PRP - contradiction and uploaded by Sol-lol sock. The latter alone is sufficient for significant doubt given extensive uploads of laundered content (see, for example, Commons:Deletion requests/Files found with insource:"UCmCnA Xl0Rz4rWoFRxeHO8Q"). --Эlcobbola talk 16:02, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP for 2D artwork in USA

B dash (talk) 10:30, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep took you up on your offer. @Jeff G.: all photos have been cropped. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 00:26, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Changed File:NoMuslimBanEver 4250010.jpg to a version with blurring as I found this photo to be best to show a bit more of the surroundings. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 02:52, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
thanks, if you go through Category:Demonstrations and protests in Washington, D.C., you can find many like this. the dividing line between sign as artwork and de minimis, is not obvious. low risk, don't believe there has been a DMCA. i used to crop before uploading, but with the course of events, prefer to spend more time on the street. like today. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 12:20, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It looks like some people have been identified since my last edit, so my delete does not apply to those, or anymore identified.--BevinKacon (talk) 18:46, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@BevinKacon: same story as on Commons:Deletion requests/File:Crank Sturgeon - OEMF 2012 - 01.jpg. Commons scope is not the same as Wikipedia scope. Commons is not Wikipedia. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:28, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
In addition to that, you're just plain wrong. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:37, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
A photo of an unidentified person is not "realistically useful for an educational purpose."--BevinKacon (talk) 19:45, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
"not realistically useful for an educational purpose" means "don't upload blurry dick pics, 200 photos of you drinking with your friends, crappy amateur artwork, spam for your business, the photo you accidentally took of your feet, made-up logos and photos that are too blurry to ever be able to identify the subject". Category:No Muslim Ban Ever (April 2018 protest) is more than notable enough for Commons. File:NoMuslimBanEver 4250093.jpg shows Karen Korematsu, the daughter of Fred Korematsu. File:NoMuslimBanEver 4250097.jpg shows Mazie Hirono. Those speakers are not nobodies. How did you conduct your research that concluded that "the few identified ones don't have an English Wikipedia article"? Did you daydream it? I can't explain it otherwise. Commons is not Wikipedia. If you want to contribute to Commons in a meaningful way, you have to understand that. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:35, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
i object to the insertion of category "unidentified person" where it is not appropriate. these are identifiable people in a public place, and quite prominent. adversive tactics will not motivate people to identify speakers at public demonstrations. if you want to circumscribe commons scope as suggested here, then let me know and i will take my work to flickr. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 18:57, 29 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: Category:MuslimBan 2.0 Protest‎ was created after I had created Category:No Muslim Ban Ever (April 2018 protest)‎ and Category:No Muslim Ban Ever in 2017‎. I could create Category:No Muslim Ban Ever in 2018‎ with Category:No Muslim Ban Ever (April 2018 protest)‎ as it's only subcategory. The speakers at this protest were not just anybody. Quite some are currently not identified, but the names of those who are tell me enough. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:35, 27 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Cropped by User:Alexis Jazz, and revdeled by me except for 4250103 and 4250074. The event and protests are notable enough for Wikimedia Commons as demonstrated by the attendance of several notable speakers. Categories were fixed by me as well. --4nn1l2 (talk) 11:50, 11 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Costumes and cosplay

"If the costume is purely utilitarian and has no distinct or original graphical features - for example, if it's the kind of clothing that an ordinary person might wear on the street or on the job - then it is permitted under #Clothing above."

Yeah.. that's not really the case here is it?

"In short, both costumes and masks are copyrightable. Additionally, posting pictures of costumes or masks that are themselves under copyright, or which depict characters that are under copyright could qualify as copyright infringement (subject to a fair use analysis)."

Well, that settles it.

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 02:13, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep on all. From the same section: "However, the community has not accepted this strict view". From the reference at the end of that line: "And there is no case law I'm aware of which would indicate that a photograph of a person wearing a costume (or mask even) in public would be deemed a derivative work -- in fact, as I've said, the case law on photographs strongly indicates otherwise." - AdamBMorgan (talk) 20:57, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and Jeff. --JuTa 17:54, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by ВоенТех as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: 1-1 CD draws European Activity Set 140502-A-BS310-097.jpg These are the same photo, but the two versions differ in color balance. Guanaco (talk) 18:27, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: differnent colouring - keepable. --JuTa 17:34, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by ВоенТех as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: 1-1 CD draws European Activity Set 140502-A-BS310-057.jpg These are the same photo, but the two versions differ in color balance. Guanaco (talk) 18:27, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: different couloring - keepable. --JuTa 17:36, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Costumes and cosplay

"In short, both costumes and masks are copyrightable. Additionally, posting pictures of costumes or masks that are themselves under copyright, or which depict characters that are under copyright could qualify as copyright infringement"

"The 1991 policy decision on costumes and masks by the Copyright Office appears to still be in effect, and although it is only advisory, it is a good indication of where courts tend to fall on this issue. It says that masks are definitely copyrightable,"

- Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:23, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep on image File:MickeyTrumpetMG03.jpg (note I am the photographer and uploader); shows a group of costumers one of whom is wearing a headpiece likely inspired by Mickey Mouse though the resemblance is quite imprecise. It was kept per earlier deletion discussion listing at Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Mickey_Mouse_-_The_Mad_Doctor.png. (Alternative suggestion: If the image is judged too derivative, I suggest cropping the image rather than deletion, as it is in use to illustrate the musical instrument being played by someone else in the photo. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:04, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Infrogmation: I did hesitate to include that photo. There is much more going on in the photo and the mask is either poorly made or appears to be inaccurate. But even if the mask isn't Mickey, it would likely still be a copyrightable mask. I don't see much of a reason not to consider it {{De minimis}} if the filename is changed (only you, being the uploader, can realistically request this), Mickey removed from the categories and the description changed to say "trumpet player in mouse costume with some likeness to Mickey Mouse" or something like that. (already did that part as part of cleaning up the description as a whole) The image that is actually in use is File:Guiro.jpg. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 04:28, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Possibly this deletion request includes images which would fall under different cases. I note that for example File:Mrs_Maaya.jpg show what are clearly professionally made costumes adhering to the Disney character template, File:Mickey_Mouse_costume.jpg to the contrary seems to be a home made costume which while described as "Mikey" might as well be considered a generic anthropomorphized mouse costume. -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 03:10, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Infrogmation: I think that's an old (terrifying) version of Mickey. w:File:Mickey Mouse concept art.jpg looks a bit like it. Or it's something different altogether. I've seen it before, but I don't know where. Maybe it's a Mickey parody from some other cartoon. Either way, the mask is probably copyrightable. Without knowing which version or parody of Mickey this refers to I'm not sure it's even in scope though. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 05:37, 12 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep on all (with the possible exceptions of File:Badut (1).JPG and File:Mickey (10949162755).jpg). From the same section: "However, the community has not accepted this strict view" and "Present consensus has adopted the view that in order to be a copyright violation, '[t]he photo would have to be primarily of the mask...'" (this latter part being the reason for the two possible exceptions). From the reference at the end of that line: "And there is no case law I'm aware of which would indicate that a photograph of a person wearing a costume (or mask even) in public would be deemed a derivative work -- in fact, as I've said, the case law on photographs strongly indicates otherwise." - AdamBMorgan (talk) 21:02, 15 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:PRP. --JuTa 18:01, 17 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]