Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/07/16
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Commons:Deletion requests/Commons:Deletion requests/File:Zdzisław Otello Horodecki 2008.jpg
Inappropriate Unni Vaibhav (talk) 07:12, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Storkk at 13:42, 16 Juli 2018 UTC: Likely copyright violation, see COM:Licensing. If you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on OTRS. - --Krdbot 18:52, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Seems mass COM:LL from https://www.flickr.com/photos/142978182@N03/ though I don't have reviewed them all.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:02, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- I took a look at their userpage, and translated it, with this as the result. I'd say we don't need 500+ pictures of "sexy" feet, but that's just me...TJH2018talk 17:09, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Large-scale license laundering, I have added the flickr account to the blacklist. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:38, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Low quality images, providing no tangible benefit to the project by their retention.
Chrissymad (talk) 16:39, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- all images comply with the copyright terms. Why delete them? בר-כח (talk) 17:32, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- In any case, I require a vote on each picture separately, because it seems to me that some of the pictures are more important than others. בר-כח (talk) 17:50, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- They're low quality, no educational value and out of scope of the project. Chrissymad (talk) 17:57, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- They match categories already in Wikimedia Commons.There are many images like these. בר-כח (talk) 18:07, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- They're low quality, no educational value and out of scope of the project. Chrissymad (talk) 17:57, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - No tangible benefit for them being on the project. As for "There are many images like these" other stuff exists, so what? That is a poor reason to keep something. - Cameron11598(talk) 18:14, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- In any case, there are pictures that I think are more important than others. Why do we have to point out all of them together? בר-כח (talk) 18:16, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- Commons is not your personal webhost. Chrissymad (talk) 18:16, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- Many pictures have no faces at all. Did you look at the images before you decided to delete them? בר-כח (talk) 18:19, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- This has literally nothing to do with this nomination. Chrissymad (talk) 18:20, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- Commons isn't a webhost for images you like or think are important for some reason. "In any case, there are pictures that I think are more important than others" Okay but they aren't used anywhere outside of your user space so that clearly doesn't seem to be the case... - Cameron11598(talk) 18:24, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- Is this the criterion of importance? First of all, it's best to focus on pictures that show faces. בר-כח (talk) 18:27, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- Generally if something is used vs not used yeah I'd say its more important. Faces have absolutely nothing to do with anything so I'm not sure what you are getting at? - Cameron11598(talk) 18:31, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- The photos are relatively new. The fact that they have not yet entered Wikipedia does not necessarily indicate their insignificance. בר-כח (talk) 18:33, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- And in fact, similar images have entered Wikipedia. בר-כח (talk) 18:34, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- There is literally no use for 300+ random pictures of feet. Chrissymad (talk) 18:35, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- Exactly. Especially with some of the slightly inappropriate titles that appear to have been chosen. - Cameron11598(talk) 18:36, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- There is literally no use for 300+ random pictures of feet. Chrissymad (talk) 18:35, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- Generally if something is used vs not used yeah I'd say its more important. Faces have absolutely nothing to do with anything so I'm not sure what you are getting at? - Cameron11598(talk) 18:31, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- Is this the criterion of importance? First of all, it's best to focus on pictures that show faces. בר-כח (talk) 18:27, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- Many pictures have no faces at all. Did you look at the images before you decided to delete them? בר-כח (talk) 18:19, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- Commons is not your personal webhost. Chrissymad (talk) 18:16, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- In any case, there are pictures that I think are more important than others. Why do we have to point out all of them together? בר-כח (talk) 18:16, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
They are obviously random. But they are in the designated categories. And it does not matter what their title is. בר-כח (talk) 18:38, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- Have you ever edited on another project? People are far less likely to use images with some of these titles anywhere, for example on EN-Wikipedia I seriously doubt you'd find any content creator using images with those names on an article they'd hope to get to GA or FA status one day. You don't seem to have a compelling reason to keep the images on commons. So provide a reason that appears to be well thought out and compelling to keep the unused, and unlikely to be used images other than "I feel they are important" or "I like them" or "they might be used one day" IMHO those don't seem to be compelling reasons to keep the images. - Cameron11598(talk) 18:43, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- If the problem is in the titles, then let's change the titles. The solution is not to delete. In any case, readers do not see the title when they see the picture. בר-כח (talk) 18:54, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- The issue is there are no use for the images. Honestly you seem to have some odd incessant desire these don't be deleted. Why? What worth do they provide? They are of a non-educational nature and don't appear to serve any other purpose than to decorate your user page... - Cameron11598(talk) 18:59, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- Do whatever you want. You probably will not change your position on this discussion. בר-כח (talk) 19:01, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- The issue is there are no use for the images. Honestly you seem to have some odd incessant desire these don't be deleted. Why? What worth do they provide? They are of a non-educational nature and don't appear to serve any other purpose than to decorate your user page... - Cameron11598(talk) 18:59, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- From Special:CentralAuth/בר-כח, it appears he's an established editor on the Hebrew Wikipedia. ekips39 (talk) 20:31, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- If the problem is in the titles, then let's change the titles. The solution is not to delete. In any case, readers do not see the title when they see the picture. בר-כח (talk) 18:54, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
Comment Some images may be individually in scope due to the location or depiction. Such as people using an ashiyu. Care should be taken when deleting en masse --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:40, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
- There are plenty of other pictures in Category:People in ashiyu that were not uploaded by this person. I notice File:Ashiyu2.jpg, File:Ashiyu3.jpg, File:Ashiyu4.jpg and File:Ashiyu8.jpg were not tagged or listed here. ekips39 (talk) 21:06, 8 August 2018 (UTC)
Keep They are not all of low quality and many of them are perfectly in scope. For instance, I don't see any logical reason to delete files like File:Beach volleyball.jpg, File:Dance barefoot 1.jpg, File:Barefoot muslim.jpg, File:Barefoot on the table.jpg (in use) or File:Girls walking barefoot.jpg. That massive DR is abusive. Some pictures may deserve separate DR (like File:Ashiyu1.jpg or File:Barefeet shopping.jpg, which are really low quality, or File:Barefeet girl6.jpg and many other pictures of the same women, which are watermarked and useless because of that), or at least mass DR that are more homogeneous and pertinent. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:02, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- How about you detail which files should be kept ? What you describe as an abusive DR is going to be someone elses 'homogenous and pertinent' mass DR and vice versa. I've no issue about keeping individual files that editors in good standing can sensibly demonstrate have uses beyond filling a pervert's gallery. Nick (talk) 17:46, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- "a pervert's gallery" > Try not to judge people like that, it won't lead anywhere good. Such inappropriate statement doesn't help as far as Commons is concerned. This IS an abusive mass DR since the files are clearly not in the same case. So no, it's not the way it works with DR : when a mass DR has not been thought cleverly enough, it has to be closed and other appropriate DR have to be launched with a better reflexion and a more homogeneous list of problems. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 19:02, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- I don't know if you're aware, but the files were uploaded by a foot fetishist and added exclusively to their userpage gallery. They've since been blocked because of their behaviour. I've no objection to anybody who can demonstrate that any of these files may actually be in scope as you've done above. If you list the files you want to keep (I note you've listed a small number above) then we can pull them from the DR, rename them if necessary and write more useful descriptions. The remainder can then be deleted. I don't see how breaking up the DR into smaller batches will help here, the rationale for these files to be uploaded was purely for the uploader's gratification, they weren't uploaded with any thought of their compliance with our core mission which is to provide free and open content which has sensible re-use potential, on that basis, smaller DRs are just as likely to include photos which you or I would consider to be in scope and photos which you or I would consider to be out of scope. If you're opposed to this, perhaps group photos together and I'll separate them out into separate DRs. Nick (talk) 11:19, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
- That's not how it works. Mass DR have to be launched with homogeneous/coherent reasons. Many mass DR have been closed with no deletion when it was too messy and heteroclite. And it's clearly the case here, since the qualities and the subjects are diverse. Sorting is the responsability of the user who lanched the mass DR, not mine. If a mass DR has been badly thought, it has to be closed and relaunched differently with a better choice and possibly in different separate DRs. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:35, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
- @TwoWings: I don't know if you're deliberately being difficult or you're just failing to understand the issue here, but whatever. Do you want me to close the DR and ask the nominator to file individual DRs for each file, or do you intend to co-operate and actually suggest groupings for the mass DRs ? Nick (talk) 12:03, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
- It's not about not willing to co-operate ! It's just not up to me to sort that enormous list ! The nominator needs to do some effort to launch well-thought mass DRs. Is that so hard to understand ? I'm actually not the only one here to say that there are various cases in that long list. So yes, please, try to make the nominator understand that it would be better to make some homogeneous and coherent DRs. In his nomination, he's writing "Low quality images" and "no tangible benefit to the project", as if those pictures were all of the same quality and as if their inappropriate names and descriptions meant that there is no other use for them. It's clearly not the case. When a DR is launched with inappropriate reasons, it is closed and asked to re-think properly. I'm not the origin of the problems here. I hope you can understand that - although I have doubts since I tried to explain that several times ! --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 13:24, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
- @TwoWings: I'm sorry, but your complaint that "It's just not up to me to sort that enormous list !" is nonsense - this is supposed to be a collaborative project, if you think some of the files should be kept, and that the DR should be split into several smaller mass DRs, then you need to explain which files should be kept and/or suggest groupings for the mass DRs. The concern I have and why your co-operation is needed, is that smaller mass DRs could still have a mix of files that should be kept and files that should be deleted depending on how the nominator or I split the DR further. You need to collaborate with the nominator here and suggest ways in which they can better use the DR process, instead of repeatedly saying 'not up to me'. How about you start by suggesting headings under which the DR can be split - such as watermarked files, low resolution/poor quality files, inappropriate and out-of-scope content etc and perhaps list files you definitely want to keep, so they can be removed from the DR process entirely. Nick (talk) 16:12, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
- I'm sick of losing my time with that discussion. The nomination is not valid and the cases are very different, so this DR has to be closed and it has to be re-thought and re-done differently with better reflexions and more coherent groups. That's how mass DR have worked for years. I don't know how to make you understand that. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 16:50, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
- Let us try yet again. I am asking for your help to determine what pictures should be kept. You have clearly looked at some of the images and listed some which should be kept, I'm asking for your help in deciding what files to keep and remove from this and future DRs, and for some ideas on ways to split the DR. I'm not asking you to file the mass DRs or to look through every file or anything like that, I'm just asking for suggestions from you. If I don't know how you think this one huge DR should be split into several other mass DRs, I am worried that further mass DRs may have the same problem, with more files which should be retained being mixed in with files which should be deleted. Please, tell us here what subjects and rationales you think would make sensible mass DRs and if you've some idea of what files should be kept, list them. I'm not being awkward to try and find a way to delete files or anything like that, if any of these files have a potential use and can be saved, then I genuinely want to see them kept, I just need to know what files you think should be kept. Nick (talk) 21:38, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
- Comment - I think that a load of these images are decent, but they mostly have inappropriate names and descriptions. There are many photos which are however just plainly out of scope - personal images which were only uploaded because the subjects happened to be barefoot. Also of note is that the uploader has now been blocked from editing on Commons. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:38, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
- I will take the initiative and sort through these. See User:Mattbuck/footstool (to be deleted once I'm finished). -mattbuck (Talk) 19:35, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
- I have reviewed all the photos and my survey is as below. If no one objects, I will action this tomorrow. -mattbuck (Talk) 21:59, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
- I will take the initiative and sort through these. See User:Mattbuck/footstool (to be deleted once I'm finished). -mattbuck (Talk) 19:35, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
To be kept[edit]Decent quality potentially useful photo[edit]In use[edit]In scope as Shilin Stone Forest[edit]Procedural - to be re-DRed with others under CHILDPROTECT[edit]
To be deleted[edit]Glamour shot with no educational value[edit]Low quality[edit]Watermarked[edit]Personal images with no likely use[edit] |
_1.jpg)
_2.jpg)
_3.jpg)
Kept: The ones which seemed vaguely useful. Deleted: the ones which didn't. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:29, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Mattbuck: Even if I disagreed to sort the files (since I consider the nominator had to do that job), I mentioned at least some few examples of files to keep (see above), and some have been deleted. Could you please undelete them ? Especially File:Barefoot_on_the_table.jpg since it was in use. Thanks. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 21:50, 15 August 2018 (UTC)
- @TwoWings: undeleted that one file. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:56, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Mattbuck: Thanks. But what about the other files I mentioned ? (File:Dance barefoot 1.jpg, File:Barefoot muslim.jpg and File:Girls walking barefoot.jpg) --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:13, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- @TwoWings: the dancing one seemed quite low quality, Girls walking Barefoot I thought of as extremely replaceable / random photo of people with no educational value, and the barefoot muslim I thought seemed like a personal photo. If you want those back please take it to COM:UDEL. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:15, 18 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Mattbuck: Thanks. But what about the other files I mentioned ? (File:Dance barefoot 1.jpg, File:Barefoot muslim.jpg and File:Girls walking barefoot.jpg) --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:13, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
- @TwoWings: undeleted that one file. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:56, 16 August 2018 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 21:39, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry, I didn't notice the source and authorship weren't transfered while automatically transfering the file, I Added them now. --MohamedTalk 22:08, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks! Jcb (talk) 22:12, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 22:12, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Licensed by magazine Leeyang9981 (talk) 15:24, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 06:37, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Vandalismo Geom (talk) 21:01, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 04:35, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
I want to use this photo later, so that it can be seen on the site dedicated to the deceased actor. Agrezt (talk) 13:22, 16 July 2018 (UTC) Błąd podczas zamieszczania pliku
Deleted: speedied as uploader request within 7 days. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 07:42, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Possible copyviol Dipralb (talk) 14:59, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 07:29, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
A formal PR picture and the photographer is mentioned in the file's details. It cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 09:24, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS. -- Geagea (talk) 08:52, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dr devagan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused selfies and self-promotional images.
- File:Hema R chandran.jpg
- File:Hema chandran.jpg
- File:Dr.Hema chandran.jpg
- File:Dr Hema chandran.jpg
- File:Dr Hema chandran .jpg
- File:Dr.Hema chandran(Best scientist of India award winner) .jpg
- File:Dr.Hema chandran.(Best scientist of India).jpg
Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:29, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: files of previous indef'ed user. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:34, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dr devagan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Diagrams of varying quality and style. Likely copyright violations.
- File:HEMA CHANDRANS LAW OF RING FORMATION IN PLANETS.png
- File:HEMA CHANDRANS LAW OF STABILITY OF PLANETS.png
- File:CHANDRANS LAW OF ORBITAL ROTATION.png
- File:Law of self revolution hemachandran.png
- File:LAW OF REPULSION AND RETRACTION.png
- File:Chandrans law of orbital rotation.png
- File:CHANDRANS THEORY OF UNIVERSAL ACTIVITIES.png
- File:Chandrans anti denv decoction.png
- File:Signature Dr hema chandran.jpg
- File:MCCH.png
- File:Chandran's solar Modulator .jpg
- File:Hema chanran.jpg
- File:Chandran's Theory of Activities of Space 2.jpg
- File:Chandran's Theory of Activities of Space.jpg
Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:33, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: files of previous indef'ed user. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 14:34, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Failed licence review. The original source link is dead so the licence of this previously published work cannot be verified. De728631 (talk) 23:44, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- @De728631: https://web.archive.org/web/20180701040714/https://500px.com/photo/71992589/abandoned-ii-by-bs-od
<a about='https://web.archive.org/web/20180701040714/https://drscdn.500px.org/photo/71992589/q%3D80_m%3D2000/v2?webp=true&sig=97cb62f6637e556642146a70338af89c9915aafb1707b6205ee5cb947059f554' href='https://web.archive.org/web/20180701040714/https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/' id='server_photo_cc_license' rel='license'></a>
- - Alexis Jazz ping plz 02:01, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination Excellent. I found this archived page too, but since the image itself was missing there I didn't care to check the source code. So with href='https://web.archive.org/web/20180701040714/https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/3.0/'there is evidence of the original licence. De728631 (talk) 03:18, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Nomination withdrawn. --De728631 (talk) 03:19, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TRANSviada (talk · contribs)
[edit]Proper license tags should be used. See Commons:Screenshots.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- @EugeneZelenko: Check the pages again and see if removing the deletion requests aplly.
[TRANSviada@talk ~]$18:52, 16 July 2018 (UTC) - @EugeneZelenko: I'm going to contact the noticeboard if you do not reply me.
[TRANSviada@talk ~]$20:57, 17 July 2018 (UTC)- @TRANSviada: Sorry for delay, I overlook your messages. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- @EugeneZelenko: Check the pages again and see if removing the deletion requests aplly.
Kept: Proper screenshot licenses are used now. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
| File:Trump Baby Balloon.jpg | Commons:Deletion requests/File:Trump Baby Balloon.jpg Trump baby balloon being flown over Parliament Square, photo is own work by User:Hammersfan. |
| File:Trump baby balloon.jpg | Commons:Deletion requests/File:Trump baby balloon.jpg - You are here! Trump baby balloon in a hangar from commondreams.org, not entirely clear who is the photographer. |
| File:Trump baby balloon.png | Commons:Deletion requests/File:Trump baby balloon.png Balloon extracted from the above. |
Image also found in Crowdfunder, which is "All rights reserved". It is likely that Commondreams copied the images from Crowdfunder, and display them under the CC-BY-SA license. B dash (talk) 14:51, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as "all rights reserved" = copyvio. -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 14:58, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - The message on the Crowdfunder webpage has now changed from "Back on Monday" (or WTTE) to "You'll need to contact the project owner directly about this. You can do this by clicking the contact project button at the top right hand side of their project page." When I clicked on the button I was asked to sign in using Facebook credentials, but I am not on Facebook. Can someone else who is on Facebook please just ask them? Until then I'm going to vote keep. nagualdesign 17:30, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Delete per COM:PCP unless permission is confirmed from both the photographer and the creators of the artwork itself. The balloon's design may be a public protest, but "The copyright owner will not mind/should be pleased that we have disseminated his/her work" is explicitly not a valid excuse. FOP doesn't apply because it's not permanently located in a public place. Guanaco (talk) 19:06, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- To be clear, I'm suggesting that we contact the copyright owner and ask them to confirm that they had agreed to license this image as CC BY-SA 3.0, as the Common Dreams article suggests. I'm not sure why this is being made so complicated. nagualdesign 19:12, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- I agree, but if such confirmation isn't given, this has to be closed as delete. Guanaco (talk) 19:32, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, closed as delete. As the Tesla rocket image should be, {{U|Guanaco)). We don't delay deletion when an image has no confirmation it's not a copyvio then wait and wait and wait for that confirmation. When in doubt, delete. As policy states, "The precautionary principle is that where there is significant doubt about the freedom of a particular file, it should be deleted." If we get positive confirmation of free image copyright status at a later time, then it can be restored. -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 19:53, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- I agree, but if such confirmation isn't given, this has to be closed as delete. Guanaco (talk) 19:32, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- To be clear, I'm suggesting that we contact the copyright owner and ask them to confirm that they had agreed to license this image as CC BY-SA 3.0, as the Common Dreams article suggests. I'm not sure why this is being made so complicated. nagualdesign 19:12, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comment, highest resolution available is [1] (2700×1620, ie. directly supplied and without resizing) is via w:People (magazine); where the Exif metadata (Caption and Image description) states "Trump Baby balloon London
https://www.crowdfunder.co.uk/trump-baby
Credit: Trump Baby/Crowdfunder". newlines included. Sladen (talk) 22:58, 16 July 2018 (UTC)‒
- Sladen, are you saying that you believe the image was stolen originally from People Magazine by Crowdfunder? -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 16:19, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- Negative, cannot see any reason to "believe the image was stolen originally from People Magazine by Crowdfunder." People magazine published what they were given, EXIF metadata and all. —Sladen (talk) 22:32, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- Then what are you saying? -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 23:32, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- The most original version, (the version most likely to have come directly from the authors/copyright-holders), was modified (in the EXIF metadata) to explicitly to mark that version as non-free. —Sladen (talk) 07:30, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- Then what are you saying? -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 23:32, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- Negative, cannot see any reason to "believe the image was stolen originally from People Magazine by Crowdfunder." People magazine published what they were given, EXIF metadata and all. —Sladen (talk) 22:32, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- Sladen, are you saying that you believe the image was stolen originally from People Magazine by Crowdfunder? -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 16:19, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- Update - It seems to me that Crowdfunder are probably not the copyright owners either. The photo appears to be taken at Imagine Inflatables, Leicester, where the balloon was constructed, so was likely taken by them or by Leo Murray who commissioned its construction. I've contacted Crowdfunder several times via the 'instant' messaging system on their website (which is like pulling teeth), and I've had several unhelpful replies. I'll repeat them here, and perhaps someone with a Facebook account can sort this out:
- July 14
- Regarding https://www.crowdfunder.co.uk/trump-baby I'd like to know whether the images are freely licensed for re-use with modification (CC BY-SA 3.0) as some publications suggest
- Crowdfunder will be back on Monday.
- Give them a way to reach you:
- July 16
- Hi there, You'll need to contact the project owner directly about this. You can do this by clicking the contact project button at the top right hand side of their project page. All the best, Katie
- Hello, is anybody there?
- I'd like to inquire about the copyright status of one of your images
- Please contact me at [my email address]
- July 17
- Hi there, This is Katie again from Customer Support. You need to click the 'Contact Project' button at the top right of the project page itself to contact the project owner please. Many thanks, Katie
- Are you there, Katie?
- Unfortunately I cannot do not have a Facebook account, so I cannot contact the project owner. Could I please just have a simple answer to a simple question; I'd like to know if Crowdfunder own the copyright to the photographs used on the 'Trump Baby' page?
- I'm tired of reading "If we can't contact them the images will have to be deleted" by people who are making no effort whatsoever to contact them and every effort to throw a spanner in the works. You may as well just delete the images. At this point I couldn't care less. nagualdesign 12:06, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you for making contact. Throwing a contact via www.spannerfilms.net/people/leo_murray could indeed be the one that works next, —Sladen (talk) 22:55, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- Strong keep Andre (talk) 03:20, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- Andrevan, on what basis would Commons be legally allowed to host this file? —Sladen (talk) 07:23, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: We've got to the stage now where no new arguments are being advanced, and I think it unlikely that new points are going to emerge. This is not an issue where consensus matters since it's an issue of English copyright law as applied by Commons policies, so it's perhaps fitting that a qualified lawyer closes this. The balloon is, as it stands, a copyrighted creative work, copyright applying by default. Any images of it hosted here are derived works of the balloon and whatever the copyright or licensing status of the images, it is the status of the balloon that is critical. On that, if its creator wishes to release the object itself with a suitable licence, fine, but that has not happened yet and per policy it is for the uploader or defender of an image to provide proof of its lack or copyright or acceptable licensing for hosting on Commons. As for freedom of panorama, the balloon lacks that degree of permanent location to benefit from the exemption- two things here: (a) could I go to a public place and view it right this minute? I doubt it, since it's probably in storage somewhere, and (b) Permanence cannot be determined ex post facto because that would require time travel, which is, per Stephen Hawking, impossible given the current state of physics. So it can only be determined at the time of situating an object. I'd argue that tethering an object such as a balloon does not constitute situating it in any permanent sense, and we do know that this balloon has been tethered in both London and Edinburgh, which would seem to militate against any degree of permanence. Therefore, on the grounds of (a) lack of appropriate licence from its designer, (b) lack of permanence so as to benefit from [[COM:FOP|freedom of panorama and (c) on the basis of the precautionary principle, all of these images will be deleted unless and until appropriately released with an appropriate licence to Commons. Rodhullandemu (talk) 00:05, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
| File:Trump Baby Balloon.jpg | Commons:Deletion requests/File:Trump Baby Balloon.jpg Trump baby balloon being flown over Parliament Square, photo is own work by User:Hammersfan. |
| File:Trump baby balloon.jpg | Commons:Deletion requests/File:Trump baby balloon.jpg Trump baby balloon in a hangar from commondreams.org, not entirely clear who is the photographer. |
| File:Trump baby balloon.png | Commons:Deletion requests/File:Trump baby balloon.png - You are here! Balloon extracted from the above. |
Image also found in Crowdfunder, which is "All rights reserved". It is likely that Commondreams copied the images from Crowdfunder, and display them under the CC-BY-SA license. B dash (talk) 14:51, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep / Strong Keep - The background of the original photo has been deleted, and only the blimp itself is now in the photo. As is now, the current photo is a rudimentary reproduction of the motive, for which no copyright can be asserted to any further extend other than what falls under the motive. Since the blimp's creators have stated the blimp to be a medium of public protest, then the blimp's appearance in photos can not alone give rise to copyright claims. Whether or not the blimp itself (incl. blueprints) is copyrighted, is fortunately not a question, which needs to be answered here (WMF is much short on the technologies used on USS Enterprise, as depicted in the Star Trek series). -- DexterPointy (talk) 17:14, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy delete as "all rights reserved" = copyvio. If there is definitive proof of copyright/permission for licensing, then the images can be uploaded again. Until then, delete is the only option. -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 17:18, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - The message on the Crowdfunder webpage has now changed from "Back on Monday" (or WTTE) to "You'll need to contact the project owner directly about this. You can do this by clicking the contact project button at the top right hand side of their project page." When I clicked on the button I was asked to sign in using Facebook credentials, but I am not on Facebook. Can someone else who is on Facebook please just ask them? Until then I'm going to vote keep. nagualdesign 17:30, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:PCP unless permission is confirmed from both the photographer and the creators of the artwork itself. The balloon's design may be a public protest, but "The copyright owner will not mind/should be pleased that we have disseminated his/her work" is explicitly not a valid excuse. FOP doesn't apply because it's not permanently located in a public place. Also, removing the background does not void the copyright of the original photo, as it is a 3D artwork as opposed to 2D copying. Guanaco (talk) 19:06, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- To be clear, I'm suggesting that we contact the copyright owner and ask them to confirm that they had agreed to license this image as CC BY-SA 3.0, as the Common Dreams article suggests. I'm not sure why this is being made so complicated. nagualdesign 19:13, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- It's not complicated, but unless someone does contact them, we have bupkes in the way of copyright provability. Which is why the image needs to be speedy deleted ASAP. -- ψλ ● ✉ ✓ 03:21, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- To be clear, I'm suggesting that we contact the copyright owner and ask them to confirm that they had agreed to license this image as CC BY-SA 3.0, as the Common Dreams article suggests. I'm not sure why this is being made so complicated. nagualdesign 19:13, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: We've got to the stage now where no new arguments are being advanced, and I think it unlikely that new points are going to emerge. This is not an issue where consensus matters since it's an issue of English copyright law as applied by Commons policies, so it's perhaps fitting that a qualified lawyer closes this. The balloon is, as it stands, a copyrighted creative work, copyright applying by default. Any images of it hosted here are derived works of the balloon and whatever the copyright or licensing status of the images, it is the status of the balloon that is critical. On that, if its creator wishes to release the object itself with a suitable licence, fine, but that has not happened yet and per policy it is for the uploader or defender of an image to provide proof of its lack or copyright or acceptable licensing for hosting on Commons. As for freedom of panorama, the balloon lacks that degree of permanent location to benefit from the exemption- two things here: (a) could I go to a public place and view it right this minute? I doubt it, since it's probably in storage somewhere, and (b) Permanence cannot be determined ex post facto because that would require time travel, which is, per Stephen Hawking, impossible given the current state of physics. So it can only be determined at the time of situating an object. I'd argue that tethering an object such as a balloon does not constitute situating it in any permanent sense, and we do know that this balloon has been tethered in both London and Edinburgh, which would seem to militate against any degree of permanence. Therefore, on the grounds of (a) lack of appropriate licence from its designer, (b) lack of permanence so as to benefit from freedom of panorama and (c) on the basis of the precautionary principle, all of these images will be deleted unless and until appropriately released with an appropriate licence to Commons. Rodhullandemu (talk) 00:06, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
When I first uploaded this file I thought it was under a compatible license. However, I recently noticed it's now licensed under CC-BY-ND 2.0. Either I was mistaken at first, or the uploader changed the license between now and when I uploaded it. If anyone knows how I could find out if the license was changed, I'd like to know. FallingGravity (talk) 20:09, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Wdwd at 13:53, 19 Juli 2018 UTC: Non-free Flickr license disallowing commercial use and/or derivative works --Krdbot 18:48, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded by mistake, wrong file size/resolution/etc Vingarzan (talk) 12:55, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:37, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Flaming Spaghetti Monster (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: unused fictitious diagram.
- File:AlterniaSenate2018.svg
- File:AlterniaCoD2018.svg
- File:AlternianSeante2012.svg
- File:My CONParliament3.svg
- File:My CONParliament2.svg
- File:My CONParliament.svg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:05, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Flaming Spaghetti Monster (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope - unused election diagram with no means of finding which election it may relate to
Cabayi (talk) 15:43, 23 February 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:59, 3 March 2019 (UTC)
Licensed by magazine, copy right issue. Leeyang9981 (talk) 16:13, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: user talk page. --JuTa 05:30, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Jetstar A320 VH-VFU.jpg HutheMeow (talk) 10:26, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: speedied as uploader request. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:38, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Jetstar Airbus A320 in night flight.jpg HutheMeow (talk) 10:27, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:44, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Jetstar Airbus A320 in flight (photostrip 2.).jpg HutheMeow (talk) 10:34, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: speedied, uploader request. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:39, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Jetstar Airbus A320 in flight.jpg HutheMeow (talk) 10:39, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: speedied as uploader request. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:45, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Per COM:PRP. Considering the uploader's background (see logs) and other deletion requests, such as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jorge Minaya.jpg, I tend to think none of his/her uploads is valid
Discasto talk 08:03, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 02:05, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#United_Arab_Emirates Ronhjones (Talk) 01:32, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:52, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Russia for 2D works. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:00, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:53, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in France and the building is modern. The photo violates architect's copyright. Taivo (talk) 15:03, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:54, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Ukraine. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:54, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
no FoP in Japan. This statue is established in 1994.[2] そらみみ (talk) 17:33, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete
- Google machine translation
- "Freedom of panorama" is non free image, they will not be accepted in the Wikimedia Commons.
- Original text(japanese)
- 屋外美術はフリーな画像ではないので、コモンズでは受け入れられません。--Kh2K 08:11, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:55, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: copyrighted to Edo Mihevc (1911-1985) and Boris Kalin (1905-1975). Eleassar (t/p) 17:36, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Also the following:
--Eleassar (t/p) 17:47, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- The file description of File:Grobnica narodnih herojev - Tomb of National Heroes (Ljubljana) 05.jpg uses {{ChristianMichelides}} as license template which refers to ticket:2015051110021786 which covers neither this photograph nor the depicted artwork. The ticket is restricted to photos of stolpersteins („alle meine Stolper- und Gedenksteinfotos uneingeschränkt“), but not to this sculpture. --AFBorchert (talk) 19:14, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Donna Gedenk as Speedy (SLA) and the most recent rationale was: No freedom of panorama in slovenia Donna Gedenk (talk). Convert to DR, since this file has an OTRS ticket, and FoP cases are often complicated. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 07:40, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:45, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Later also deleted:
--TadejM (t/p) 13:51, 28 October 2022 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: unfree sculptures. Eleassar (t/p) 17:44, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:46, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: the sculpture is copyrighted to Drago Tršar (still living). Eleassar (t/p) 17:45, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:46, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: the sculpture is copyrighted to Drago Tršar (still living). Eleassar (t/p) 17:46, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:46, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: the sculpture is copyrighted to Drago Tršar (still living). Eleassar (t/p) 17:48, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:46, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: no evidence that this relief is in the public domain. Eleassar (t/p) 17:55, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:47, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: unclear copyright status of the relief. Eleassar (t/p) 17:59, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:47, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: the sculpture is work by Jože Plečnik (d. 1957). Eleassar (t/p) 18:01, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:47, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: the sculpture is work by Jože Plečnik (d. 1957). Eleassar (t/p) 18:01, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:47, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: the relief is work by Ivan Zajec (d. 1952). Eleassar (t/p) 18:04, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:47, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: unclear copyright status of the relief; seems modern. Eleassar (t/p) 18:05, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:43, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:47, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Prešeren Monument (Ljubljana)
[edit]Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: the sculpture and architecuture are copyrighted.
- File:Ljubljana, Slovenija 2013 - panoramio (13).jpg
- File:Ljubljana, Slovenija 2013 - panoramio (3).jpg
- File:Prešernov trg - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Ljubljana - panoramio (8).jpg
Eleassar (t/p) 18:07, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:48, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Prešeren Monument (Ljubljana)
[edit]Outside the scope of Commons, which includes only free materials. The sculptures will enter public domain in 2023. See COM:FOP Slovenia.
- File:Liubliana 40.jpg
- File:Ljubljana, Slovenija 2013 - panoramio (14).jpg
- File:Ljubljana, Prešernov spomenik.jpg
Eleassar (t/p) 13:05, 9 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted. Taivo (talk) 19:40, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
- One restored in 2023 Remaining images show the pedestal, which is the work of Max Fabiani (1865–1962). These can be undeleted in 2033. —RP88 (talk) 04:36, 3 January 2023 (UTC)
Work of Jože Plečnik (1872-1957); nominated due to COM:FOP#Slovenia.
- File:Ljubljana 093.JPG
- File:Nat library slovenia.JPG
- File:National Library Ljubljana 2010.jpg
- File:National Library of Slovenia. Main Reading Room.jpg
- File:National Library of Slovenia. Main Staircase.jpg
- File:NUK door knowb.jpg
- File:NUK Plečnik.JPG
- File:NUK stairs.jpg
- File:NUK statue (2).jpg - the bust of Ivan Prijatelj; work of France Gorše (1897-1986); undelete in 2057.
- File:NUK statue.jpg
- File:NUK window (s).jpg
- File:NUK window.jpg
- File:NUK-maketa.JPG
- File:NUK1.jpg
- File:NUKMojzes.JPG - work of Lojze Dolinar (1893-1970); undelete in 2041.
- File:Slovenia National and University Library doors closeup.jpg
- File:VidGajsek - Inside NUK III.tif
- File:VidGajsek - Inside NUK Slovenia.tiff
- File:VidGajsek - Inside Slovene National Uvicersity Library II.tiff
Eleassar (t/p) 17:46, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
- When I uploaded my photo, Slovenia was not described as having FOP issues, and still some of the info is contradictory. Anyway, did you check at all who the heirs are and whether they lay any copyright claim on photographic reproductions of his buildings? This source states that his "legacy" was sold to the City of Ljubljana. Also, if the decision is to follow the usual precautionary anti-educational deletion process, if you care, images now appearing in the German Wiki article could be transferred there prior to deletion here, as that Wiki does not observe foreign FOP. Otherwise, I gave up any hope to find common sense on Commons, and mostly gave up participation here, so you are welcome to delete my photos under whatever reason. Thanks. --ELEKHHT 23:53, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
- First, "in all cases the uploader must provide appropriate evidence to demonstrate either that the file is in the public domain or that the copyright owner has released it under a suitable licence... the burden of proof lies on the uploader or other person arguing for the file to be retained..." (see COM:SCOPE). For now, there is no reason to presume that Plečnik's works are out of copyright.
- Second, I'm sorry about deleting other people's work. Anway, my opinion is that Commons has a well-defined scope, which is to not offer all educational files, but only those that are free, and this is what gives it its sense and place in relation to other similar projects (like Flickr etc.). We're creating free knowledge. Its vast collection can still be used for a number of purposes. If we indulge here, other cases will follow and its mission will become moot.
- Third, I'm actively replacing files in the Slovene Wikipedia. To diminish the number of mass deletions in the future I'm also tagging categories with {{NoUploads}}. I've also updated File:Freedom of Panorama in Europe.svg. However, I don't know the situation at wp:de and don't speak German well enough to be prepared to contribute files to the German version. In the case you need a certain file, you may always fill a request at COM:UNDEL, and you may upload your files locally where this is according to the policy. --Eleassar (t/p) 11:31, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
- That's precisely the pseudo-lawyeristic 'don't care' response which became standard practice at Commons. The inconsistency of nominating some files but not others within the same category is also typical. You might also consider subjecting your own uploads to the same "burden of proof" test. --ELEKHHT 23:24, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
- One of the images listed above is mine. Please, rest assured that other copyvio images from the category that you mention will also be proposed for deletion; they just can't be proposed all at once. I think you should learn to assume good faith. --Eleassar (t/p) 08:05, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
- I am always assuming good faith, but I know how much harm can be done with good intentions. --ELEKHHT 02:36, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
- If other editors agree with your assessment that the preemptive deletion of FOP cases is harmful and should be avoided, this should be written in some guideline per consensus at COM:VP. For now, I don't see such a consensus. On the contrary, COM:FOP states: "If the country the image is taken in does not have these provisions, or only allows them for non-commercial purposes, they cannot be licensed under a license compatible with our Licensing policy and must be deleted." --Eleassar (t/p) 08:45, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi Eleassar, I do not understand your deletion request, could you please be so kind and explain in to me!? --Peter Lauppert (talk) 07:47, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
- Article 55 of the Slovenian copyright and related rights act allows only for non-commercial exploitation of copyright-protected objects found in public places (buildings, sculptures etc.). Commons demands that all images are also allowable for commercial use. The image you have provided, File:NUKMojzes.JPG, depicts a sculpture by Lojze Dolinar, who died in 1970, and a building by Jože Plečnik, who died in 1957. These works are still copyrighted, because 70 years have not passed yet since the death of their authors, as requested by the Slovenian law for works to come into public domain. This means that File:NUKMojzes.JPG can't be included in the project until 2041. See also COM:FOP. --Eleassar (t/p) 11:09, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
- Article 55 states: "(1) Works permanently placed in parks, streets, squares, or other generally accessible premises may be used freely." So what do you mean? Are you sure you know what you are doing? --Peter Lauppert (talk) 16:24, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
- The following sentence of the same article states: "(2) Works mentioned in the foregoing paragraph may not be reproduced in a threedimensional form, used for the same purpose as the original work, or used for economic gain." For example, one can't use images of copyrighted architectural works (like the ones listed above) to print postcards.([3] pg. 67) Images of works that may be exploited only for non-commercial purpose are not accepted by Commons; see COM:FOP. Therefore Delete. --Eleassar (t/p) 16:36, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
- We are not reproducing anything in a threedimensional form. --Peter Lauppert (talk) 10:16, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
- Images of these objects may also not be used for economic gain. We are providing only images that may be used for economic gain. --Eleassar (t/p) 10:41, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
- The following sentence of the same article states: "(2) Works mentioned in the foregoing paragraph may not be reproduced in a threedimensional form, used for the same purpose as the original work, or used for economic gain." For example, one can't use images of copyrighted architectural works (like the ones listed above) to print postcards.([3] pg. 67) Images of works that may be exploited only for non-commercial purpose are not accepted by Commons; see COM:FOP. Therefore
- Article 55 states: "(1) Works permanently placed in parks, streets, squares, or other generally accessible premises may be used freely." So what do you mean? Are you sure you know what you are doing? --Peter Lauppert (talk) 16:24, 23 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi Eleassar, I do not understand your deletion request, could you please be so kind and explain in to me!? My picture is: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Nat_library_slovenia.JPG --Hadi (talk) 14:20, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
- See above. Architecture in Slovenia can't be freely photographed for any (including commercial) use, as demanded by the Commons criteria. This is work of Jože Plečnik who died in 1957, therefore his work will be out of copyright only in 2028, i.e. 70 years after his death. Your image will be undeleted then. --Eleassar (t/p) 15:52, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
- NUK-maketa.JPG
This model derives from Minimundus Klagenfurt. It is not made by a Slovene sculpturer. Commons:Freedom of panorama#Austria has no problems with that? Since the uploader and promoter for deletion is the same person, he will surely take care of it. But it is very nice to see him writing to himself LOL. Žiga (talk) 06:15, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
- This is an automated tool to notify users LOL. What is important is the source country of the original work, not a derived one. The holders of copyright are the heirs of Plečnik, not the Austrian sculptor. "Exact replicas of public domain works, like tourist souvenirs of the Venus de Milo, cannot attract any new copyright as exact replicas do not have the required originality."; see Commons:Derivative works#Casebook. --Eleassar (t/p) 07:35, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Fop for Slovenia states: Not OK for works of authors who died in 1945 or later INeverCry 06:59, 25 September 2012 (UTC)
Later deleted for the same reason:
Work by Jože Plečnik (d. 1957); per COM:FOP#Slovenia, not free for Commons until 2028.
- File:La bibliothèque nationale et universitaire (Ljubljana) (9400586082).jpg
- File:La bibliothèque nationale et universitaire (Ljubljana) (9400587936).jpg
Eleassar (t/p) 09:01, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
Deleted. INeverCry 00:34, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: copyrighted to Jože Plečnik (d. 1957) until 2028.
- File:Jože Plečnik Slowenische National- und Universitätsbibliothek.jpg
- File:Starcase National Library, Ljubljana.jpg
Eleassar (t/p) 18:10, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:48, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: copyrighted to Jože Plečnik (d. 1957) until 2028.
沈澄心✉ 02:51, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep. Per De minimis. The building of the library is not the main subject of those photos. See case 3. Donarius (talk) 04:31, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
- Keep - a cityscape is clearly de minimis. --Sporti (talk) 08:33, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Butchers' Bridge
[edit]Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: the sculptures are copyrighted to Jakov Brdar (living).
- File:Ljubljana - panoramio (13).jpg
- File:Ljubljana - panoramio (15).jpg
- File:Mobile impressions in Ljubljana - panoramio (4).jpg
- File:The Satyr by Jakov Brdar (11992175535).jpg
Eleassar (t/p) 18:14, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:49, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: the architecture is copyrighted to Ivan Vurnik (d. 1971). Eleassar (t/p) 18:15, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:49, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: the sculptures are work by L. Dolinar (d. 1970). Eleassar (t/p) 18:22, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:49, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: copyrighted to the sculptor Hugo Franz Kirsch (d. 1961). Eleassar (t/p) 18:28, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:49, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
ununsed personal upload or/and personality right issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 18:28, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:41, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: copyrighted to the sculptor Hugo Franz Kirsch (d. 1961). Eleassar (t/p) 18:28, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:49, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: the sculptures are copyrighted to L. Dolinar (d. 1970). Eleassar (t/p) 18:30, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:49, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: the architecture is work by Max Fabiani (d. 1962). Eleassar (t/p) 18:32, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:50, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: unclear copyright status of the sculpture. Eleassar (t/p) 18:37, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:50, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: work by Božidar Pengov (d. 1985). Eleassar (t/p) 18:46, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:50, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: copyrighted to S. Batič (d. 2015). Eleassar (t/p) 18:48, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:50, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: copyrighted to Z. Kalin (d. 1990). Eleassar (t/p) 18:49, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 11:50, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, includes copyrighted images Themightyquill (talk) 08:50, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; copyvio. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 13:41, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SecretName101 (talk · contribs)
[edit]impossible to review. impossible to determine if this video was shot for voa or in his personal capacity.
- File:Field being set-up for Super Bowl LII halftime show (00) (cropped).png
- File:Field being set-up for Super Bowl LII halftime show (00).png
- File:Arash Arabasadi - .@VOANews HalftimeShow is about to start at SuperBowlLII.webm
RZuo (talk) 15:25, 25 May 2023 (UTC)
Keep Easy review. He was attending as a press personal credentialed with/by VOA to cover the Super Bowl, therefore media of of the game they captured was as part of that assignment. — Preceding unsigned comment added by SecretName101 (talk • contribs) 16:26, 25 May 2023 (UTC) (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. —holly {chat} 16:45, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
Screenshot of copyrighted website reserveamerica.com. Bottom of the website states "(c) 2018 Aspira all rights reserved". Hiàn (talk) 01:27, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:42, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hasmikhayrapetyan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Corrupted files, uploader should try again
Ytoyoda (talk) 01:32, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:41, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Obvious copyright violation. Uploader did not create this image.
And also: File:Гладун Захід сонця.jpg, File:Orest Hladun.jpg, File:Поезії.jpg, File:Dmytro Hladun.jpg.
Микола Василечко (talk) 06:11, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:08, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private notebook. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:57, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:41, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Andanmoderato (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful.
- File:Tatsuo Sasaki, Timpanist, Percussionist, Xylophonist, Marimbist.pdf
- File:Tatsuo Sasaki Musician.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:40, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo-album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:40, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Toshichauhanofficial (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope; not a personal photo repository.
TJH2018talk 15:10, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of Commons project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:39, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Small and unused image B dash (talk) 15:32, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of Commons project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:38, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope; not a personal photo repository. TJH2018talk 16:25, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:38, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope; COM is not a personal photo repository. TJH2018talk 16:31, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:38, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope; COM is not a personal photo repository. TJH2018talk 16:34, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of Commons project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:37, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope; COM is not a personal photo repository. TJH2018talk 16:35, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of Commons project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:37, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope; COM is not a promotional photo repository. TJH2018talk 16:37, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:37, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope; COM is not a personal photo repository; unused personal image. TJH2018talk 16:37, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of Commons project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:36, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:49, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:35, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:49, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:35, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jack Folly (talk · contribs)
[edit]OTRS permission needed and likely out of COM:SCOPE
Steinsplitter (talk) 18:18, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of Commons project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:34, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Maybe too blurred to be educationally usable. Superseded by sharper photo of the same object File:馬德里蓮花寺等10.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:41, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:33, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status / out of scope. FDMS 4 18:45, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of Commons project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:33, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:51, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of Commons project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:33, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. (We have photos of the building in Category:Exterior of the Taj Mahal.) Kulmalukko (talk) 18:56, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of Commons project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:32, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:06, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:31, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:07, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of Commons project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:31, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
unused personal image : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:13, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:30, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Maybe too blurred to be educationally usable. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:24, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of Commons project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:29, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Too blurred. Superseded by a sharper image of the same object File:印度馬德里印度門154.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:25, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:29, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Too blurred. Superseded by a sharper image of the same things: File:印度阿格拉紅堡67 India Agra Red Fort.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:26, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:30, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:41, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:29, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
out of scope Joschi71 (talk) 20:54, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:27, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
out of scope Joschi71 (talk) 20:54, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:27, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 09:21, 17 May 2014 (UTC)
Deleted: Natuur12 (talk) 19:34, 24 May 2014 (UTC)
out of scope Joschi71 (talk) 20:54, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:26, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Is the user = Jeff Gerew - C7Photo.com (see metadata)? See also Deletion_requests/File:Lalala.jpg. Wouter (talk) 14:29, 10 April 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:04, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
out of scope, poor quality Joschi71 (talk) 20:55, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:26, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
File:88a Sol, gloria superior entre os astros celestes; que engrandece o dia como que um sorriso galanteador.jpg
[edit]out of scope, poor quality Joschi71 (talk) 20:56, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:25, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
out of scope Joschi71 (talk) 21:02, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:25, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mikail Yasir (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused selfies and unlikely to be used in a project.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 22:30, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:25, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Selfie, social media profile seb26 (talk) 22:42, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of Commons project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:24, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Advertising, book cover (albeit a 3D one) with unknown copyright status seb26 (talk) 22:43, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of Commons project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:24, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Advertising, logo for a design company, using Commons as a web host seb26 (talk) 22:46, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of Commons project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:23, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal picture with incorrect description Lymantria (talk) 08:32, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:46, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Photo of an insignificant subject. "Commons is not your personal free web host." nor a social network. The file is out of project scope. Msaynevirta (talk) 09:10, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of Commons project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:45, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Photo of an insignificant subject. "Commons is not your personal free web host." nor a social network. The file is out of project scope. Msaynevirta (talk) 09:11, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:45, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Photo of an insignificant subject. "Commons is not your personal free web host." nor a social network. The file is out of project scope. Msaynevirta (talk) 09:26, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:45, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope due to poor quality (Nintendo DS photo).-- Nāvika (talk) 10:13, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of Commons project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:44, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope due to poor quality (Nintendo DS photo).-- Nāvika (talk) 10:14, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of Commons project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:43, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Pixelface: out of scope.-- Nāvika (talk) 10:18, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:43, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bizeyebarnabe (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
- File:Barnabe Bizeye.jpg
- File:Barnabe Bizeye2.jpg
- File:Barnabe MTN 20170720 172640.jpg
- File:Barnabe BIZEYE.jpg
- File:Bizeye Barnabas behind Obama' grandmother.jpg
- File:Barnabe.jpg
- File:Bizeye Barnabas and colleagues behind Obama' grandmother.jpg
Ies (talk) 10:20, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:42, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и правообладателе, необходимо разрешения в OTRS Dogad75 (talk) 22:37, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:30, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DAVID FRANCISCO CAMARGO HERNÁNDEZ (talk · contribs)
[edit]Covers of books, unknown copyright sources, advertising-esque descriptions
- File:OCULATERAPIA.jpg
- File:CAMARGUITO.jpg
- File:FÁBULAS MODERNAS.jpg
- File:CARACTERIZACIÓN DEL FUNCIONARIO PÚBLICO.jpg
- File:CORRUPCIÓN PÚBLICA Y PRIVADA.jpg
- File:SISTEMA CEDULAR.jpg
- File:COMPRA Y VENTA DE INMUEBLES.jpg
seb26 (talk) 22:44, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 11:08, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
Delete: unless there is a good reason to have a low quality jpg of the wiki logo instead of a png format which renders the image much better, this should be deleted. There are already plenty of png format images in this category: Category:English Wikipedia logo. Besides which the uploader claims to be the author which is incorrect but maybe that's just a new editor misunderstanding. Ww2censor (talk) 22:59, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 11:07, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Belarus. The file includes the image of previously deleted photo due to lack in freedom of panorama. Jarash (talk) 20:48, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Yeah, it's problematic for Belarus, but, in this case, we must delete almost all the Belarusian photos. --Belarus2578 (talk) 15:11, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 14:06, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Bogus license. Jcb (talk) 21:34, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 14:05, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
Newspaper cut out, no source, date or authorship information seb26 (talk) 22:37, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 14:04, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
The uploader's only contributions to Wikimedia projects were to add these 220x220px images along with a spammy link. (diff) It's likely the images are from the linked website which is now offline.
- File:Fck euro away kit 12-13.png
- File:Fck euro home kit 12-13.png
- File:Fck away kit 12-13.png
- File:Fck home kit 12-13.png
- File:Fck euro third kit 12-13.png
Guanaco (talk) 04:20, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:41, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
Unused and replaced by a number of other files. Useless to keep Forthrunner (talk) 04:51, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:41, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
No FOP for architectural workin France. B dash (talk) 07:35, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. These lamp posts on the Pont Neuf are from the 1800s, so too old for copyright, and the locks themselves are not a single artwork, but a collective act of vandalism [4]. IronGargoyle (talk) 02:03, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per IronGargoyle. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:43, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
No FOP for architectural work in France B dash (talk) 07:36, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no copyrighted objects are depicted: the statue has been erected in 1818. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:54, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
No FOP for architectural work in France B dash (talk) 07:36, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Hello, Thanks for your insight on this picture. I was traveling from France to Berlin and I spend a day in Paris, I decided to take some memorable high-quality images for Wiki Commons. I didn't know this image will violate Commons Policy. Apologies. I am still learning every single day. Please go ahead and delete it. I have no reservations. --Kabusa16 (talk) 17:18, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no copyrighted objects are depicted: the statue has been erected in 1818. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:55, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Romania Dogad75 (talk) 09:53, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
• удалил со страницы, как удалить со склада - не понял Maiorov victor (talk) 21:11, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 09:01, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lucas Pianta (talk · contribs)
[edit]Seems to be movie/game screenshots.
- File:Kells animation Scriptorium.jpg
- File:Athelstan Scriptirium.jpg
- File:Scriptorium O Nome da Rosa.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: speedied per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 07:30, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lucas Pianta (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical drawings. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Dear, we don't have much experience with Commons, could you help us figure out if this image can be uploaded and used at Wikipedia.pt? May I comment here? Thanks, --Felipe da Fonseca (talk) 23:14, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
I found the right from File:Scriptorium Of Tábara.jpg here ([5] and [6]), it can be used for educational purposes: "The content of this website is copyrighted by the Morgan Library & Museum or by third parties who have granted their permission for their materials to be included on this site. The content of this site is for personal, educational, noncommercial use only. " (my bold). --Felipe da Fonseca (talk) 23:22, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- Obs: we just realised, that we can not crop the image, we will upload the full image soon.--Felipe da Fonseca (talk) 23:27, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete with the deletion.--Felipe da Fonseca (talk) 23:29, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep PD-Art. Yann (talk) 09:42, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: PD-Art, license fixed. --Yann (talk) 09:45, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 22:31, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
Pirated Pic - Korean translated - Haejin Kang's Profile, copyright sin-jung Kim. 책읽는달팽 (User talk) 03:45, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Ronhjones at 13:58, 28 Juli 2018 UTC: In category Media_missing_permission_as_of_16_July_2018; no permission --Krdbot 18:39, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Jetstar A320 in flight 1.jpg HutheMeow (talk) 10:33, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, uploader request Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:37, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:52, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Jetstar A320 VH-XJE parked in BNE from window view.jpg HutheMeow (talk) 10:40, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Uploader request. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:38, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:52, 31 July 2018 (UTC)
Has existed for four years, but doesn't appear to be used. Is rather unclear even in its intent: what exactly is a "funeral chapel"? Is it a sepulchral chapel, the chapel of a funeral home, a cemetery chapel, or what? Since it's not used, it seems to me to be simplest just to get rid of it. Jmabel ! talk 03:15, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Jmabel: I don't remember why there is this template
I'm ok that it should be delete. Pyb (talk) 06:29, 23 July 2018 (UTC) - NOTE: when deleting, also delete Template:Funeral chapel of/doc. - Jmabel ! talk 19:49, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
![9 File:גונן אוסישקין מנכ"ל אל על.jpg](#File:גונן_אוסישקין_מנכ"ל_אל_על.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_05.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![225 File:Franco Moschino "In Love we Trust" Jacket Mint Museum of Art Charlotte, NC.jpg](#File:Franco_Moschino_"In_Love_we_Trust"_Jacket_Mint_Museum_of_Art_Charlotte,_NC.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(2).jpg){kind=link}
_(6).jpg){kind=link}
_(3).jpg){kind=link}
![09:24, 16 July 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/07/16#c-Ldorfman-2018-07-16T09:24:00.000Z-File:גונן_אוסישקין_מנכ"ל_אל_על.jpg){kind=link}
![08:52, 17 July 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/07/16#c-Geagea-2018-07-17T08:52:00.000Z-File:גונן_אוסישקין_מנכ"ל_אל_על.jpg){kind=link}
_.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![[1]](https://peopledotcom.files.wordpress.com/2018/07/trump-baby-2.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_05.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_05.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_05.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_05.jpg){kind=link}
_05.jpg){kind=link}
_05.jpg){kind=link}
_05.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(3896752305).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(9400586082).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(9400587936).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(15561102806).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(40492717963).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_.jpg){kind=link}
_.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: unused template. --JuTa 06:45, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Non-recognizable. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:34, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:38, 14 August 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Notes from @Patrick Rogel:
- Found with ©2008 at http://www.williamconger.com/imgs/trolley.jpg, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:28, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
- Found with ©2017 at http://www.williamconger.com/imgs/william-conger-say-when.jpg, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:32, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
I have asked Congers to add the 500px account to http://www.williamconger.com/links.html if it belongs to him. If that happens this should all be fine.
- File:Chicago Art Write.V.1.N.1.jpg
- File:William Conger Trolley 2007.jpg
- File:William Conger South Beach 1985 60x72.jpg
- File:William Conger Say When 2017 30x28.jpg
- File:William Conger City on the Make 2001.jpg
- File:William Conger Flossie's Night 1972.jpg
- File:William Conger 2016.jpg
- Alexis Jazz 18:44, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: As suggested, the artist, William Conger, has directed his web person to add the 500px link to his "Links" page on his official website, verifying that the site is his and that the images all have valid permissions for use through dedication in the public domain. This should happen in the next day or so, so I hope this will delay the deletion of the images. If needed, I can provide notification that is has occurred. --Mianvar1 (talk) 18:26, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Mianvar1: DR is open for at least a week (only obvious cases are closed sooner) and sometimes even longer so there is time. - Alexis Jazz 22:42, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: Please note that the artist, William Conger, has now added the 500px link to his "Links" page on his official website, verifying that the 500px site is his and that the images all have valid permissions for use through dedication in the public domain: http://www.williamconger.com/links.html Please withdraw the deletion requests. --Mianvar1 (talk) 14:49, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Mianvar1: DR is open for at least a week (only obvious cases are closed sooner) and sometimes even longer so there is time. - Alexis Jazz 22:42, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: As suggested, the artist, William Conger, has directed his web person to add the 500px link to his "Links" page on his official website, verifying that the site is his and that the images all have valid permissions for use through dedication in the public domain. This should happen in the next day or so, so I hope this will delay the deletion of the images. If needed, I can provide notification that is has occurred. --Mianvar1 (talk) 18:26, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination - Alexis Jazz 17:10, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
https://www.neoimages.com/artistportfolio.aspx?pid=3717
Can't confirm the Flick account belongs to Robin Tewes. @Mianvar1: perhaps you can contact Tewes and ask her to contact OTRS?
- File:Robin Tewes.jpg
- File:Robin Tewes Underwater Series 2016.jpg
- File:Robin Tewes Moose Club Gambling 1978.jpg
- File:Robin Tewes Inanimate Conversation 1996.jpg
- File:Robin Tewes I'm Not Home Please Leave A Message 1999.jpg
- File:Robin Tewes I Do Not Have a Penis Nor Do I Want One 2005.jpg
- Alexis Jazz 19:25, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- People have no reason to list their Flickr accounts or link to them, so it isn't surprising to not find links to them. I will contact the artist and see if she can email OTRS following the guidelines at Commons:Email templates giving permission. --Mianvar1 (talk) 20:01, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: As requested, the artist Robin Tewes has verified that the Flickr account is hers and has indicated her permission for each of the images in an email to OTRS using the template at Commons:Email templates, Please remove the deletion requests. --Mianvar1 (talk) 09:10, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Mianvar1: I changed the delete template to {{OTRS pending}}. - Alexis Jazz 22:42, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: As requested, the artist Robin Tewes has verified that the Flickr account is hers and has indicated her permission for each of the images in an email to OTRS using the template at Commons:Email templates, Please remove the deletion requests. --Mianvar1 (talk) 09:10, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination
Can't confirm the Flickr account belongs to her, it's not listed on http://www.merletemkin.com/contact/. I asked her to add the link if the Flickr account belongs to her.
Other images on w:Merle Temkin should be listed as well, but they are on Wikipedia.
- Alexis Jazz 19:35, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Artists don't customarily list their Flickr accounts or link to them on their websites. So it isn't surprising to not find links to them. I will contact the artist and see if she can email OTRS following the guidelines at Commons:Email templates giving permission. --Mianvar1 (talk) 20:02, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
- Merle Temkin linked Wikipedia and Instagram. So it's kind of surprising when Flickr isn't linked. OTRS is fine too, but may be more complicated (and take months) than just adding a link to Flickr next to the Instagram link. - Alexis Jazz 07:10, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: As suggested, the artist, Merle Temkin, has directed her web person to add the Flickr link to her "Links" page on her official website, verifying that the site is hers and that the images all have valid permissions for use through dedication in the public domain. This should happen in the next day or so, so I hope this will delay the deletion of the images. If needed, I can provide notification that is has occurred. --Mianvar1 (talk) 18:27, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Mianvar1: DR is open for at least a week (only obvious cases are closed sooner) and sometimes even longer so there is time. Please move the images from Wikipedia to Commons. - Alexis Jazz 22:42, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: Hi. Please note that the artist, Merle Temkin, has now added the Flickr link to her "Contact" page on her official website, verifying that the Flickr site is hers and that the images all have valid permissions for use through dedication in the public domain: http://www.merletemkin.com/contact/ Please withdraw the deletion requests. --Mianvar1 (talk) 04:19, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Mianvar1: sorry, she hasn't.. http://flickr.com/search/?text=merle%20temkin does not link to her account, it just searches Flickr. - Alexis Jazz 06:00, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: She may not be very technically proficient and may have provided the address incorrectly to her web person. But that shouldn't matter—Flickr is searchable and one can look for and see her site at will. If the intention of this was to prove that the site is hers, this should prove that—why else would she put it on her site if she didn't have the Flickr site? Does it not seem a bit excessive and burdensome to continue to push for the deletion at this point? --Mianvar1 (talk) 06:13, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Mianvar1: William Conger even has a link on his site to google him. And the first result on that Flickr search page isn't even from her account. (although I think the rest is, but that could change) I don't think she has replied to my message (I accidentally copypasted the wrong link) so maybe you can contact her again. The correct link is https://www.flickr.com/photos/156108856@N03/. I just asked her as well, but I don't know if my mails reach her. - Alexis Jazz 19:46, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: Hi. Just letting you know that I contacted Merle Temkin and she has sent the permissions letter to OTRS . She will also address fixing the Flickr link on her website, but that will take some more time as said couldn't schedule time with her web person until June. --Mianvar1 (talk) 17:17, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Mianvar1: okay, will you move the other 4 files by Merle Temkin from Wikipedia to Commons? - Alexis Jazz 18:14, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: Okay, I believe I have moved the 4 files to Commons correctly. --Mianvar1 (talk) 20:34, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Mianvar1: alright. I also see the OTRS was done as I got a cc. One thing, you forgot w:File:Merle Temkin TulipTree 2014.jpg. - Alexis Jazz 21:08, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: Okay, I believe I have moved the 4 files to Commons correctly. --Mianvar1 (talk) 20:34, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Mianvar1: okay, will you move the other 4 files by Merle Temkin from Wikipedia to Commons? - Alexis Jazz 18:14, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: Hi. Just letting you know that I contacted Merle Temkin and she has sent the permissions letter to OTRS . She will also address fixing the Flickr link on her website, but that will take some more time as said couldn't schedule time with her web person until June. --Mianvar1 (talk) 17:17, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Mianvar1: William Conger even has a link on his site to google him. And the first result on that Flickr search page isn't even from her account. (although I think the rest is, but that could change) I don't think she has replied to my message (I accidentally copypasted the wrong link) so maybe you can contact her again. The correct link is https://www.flickr.com/photos/156108856@N03/. I just asked her as well, but I don't know if my mails reach her. - Alexis Jazz 19:46, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: She may not be very technically proficient and may have provided the address incorrectly to her web person. But that shouldn't matter—Flickr is searchable and one can look for and see her site at will. If the intention of this was to prove that the site is hers, this should prove that—why else would she put it on her site if she didn't have the Flickr site? Does it not seem a bit excessive and burdensome to continue to push for the deletion at this point? --Mianvar1 (talk) 06:13, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Mianvar1: sorry, she hasn't.. http://flickr.com/search/?text=merle%20temkin does not link to her account, it just searches Flickr. - Alexis Jazz 06:00, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: Hi. Please note that the artist, Merle Temkin, has now added the Flickr link to her "Contact" page on her official website, verifying that the Flickr site is hers and that the images all have valid permissions for use through dedication in the public domain: http://www.merletemkin.com/contact/ Please withdraw the deletion requests. --Mianvar1 (talk) 04:19, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Mianvar1: DR is open for at least a week (only obvious cases are closed sooner) and sometimes even longer so there is time. Please move the images from Wikipedia to Commons. - Alexis Jazz 22:42, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: As suggested, the artist, Merle Temkin, has directed her web person to add the Flickr link to her "Links" page on her official website, verifying that the site is hers and that the images all have valid permissions for use through dedication in the public domain. This should happen in the next day or so, so I hope this will delay the deletion of the images. If needed, I can provide notification that is has occurred. --Mianvar1 (talk) 18:27, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
- - Alexis Jazz 21:11, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: I did upload the last one ("Tulip Tree"), but it seems to have been deleted. I just uploaded it again. --Mianvar1 (talk) 22:04, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 08:24, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
Delete according to Commons:Where is the license on various sites? there should be a Creative Common section or Creative Commons link on each image page. These images have no such link or evidence they are freely licenced.
- File:Chicago Art Write.V.1.N.1.jpg
- File:William Conger Trolley 2007.jpg
- File:William Conger South Beach 1985 60x72.jpg
- File:William Conger Say When 2017 30x28.jpg
- File:William Conger City on the Make 2001.jpg
- File:William Conger Flossie's Night 1972.jpg
- File:William Conger 2016.jpg
@Alexis Jazz: I saw the discussion above and I agree there is a link on the artist's own website but no evidence he has released them freely. There is no statement to that effect either on his own site or on the 500px site pages. His own website has a clear ARR statement at the bottom of all pages, so I see absolutely no reason to assume we can keep them. Ww2censor (talk) 09:43, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
@Ww2censor: Do I understand correctly this DR has been created because 500px is busy strangling Creative Commons? Okay, here goes. Open the 500px page. Click "view page source" or whatever your browser calls it.
- https://500px.com/photo/256344699/caw-by-william-conger
<a about='https://drscdn.500px.org/photo/256344699/q%3D80_m%3D2000/v2?webp=true&sig=d2aee7105ff5c162bec18a1ad6434018a1972bf547d93ebd84cce8cd1929f7b7' href='http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/' id='server_photo_cc_license' rel='license'></a>
- https://500px.com/photo/256344663/william-conger-trolley-by-william-conger
<a about='https://drscdn.500px.org/photo/256344663/q%3D80_m%3D2000/v2?webp=true&sig=a0c380b30258480cd0839376b90e7ec61af15f7f7cb50c08e739c96c2fab5f1a' href='http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/' id='server_photo_cc_license' rel='license'></a>
- https://500px.com/photo/256344669/a-southbeach-63-rgb-by-william-conger
<a about='https://drscdn.500px.org/photo/256344669/q%3D80_m%3D2000/v2?webp=true&sig=a63db73517cbe06fee2bc977105428d1aa2e6bf2a4d140307070343be18111e9' href='http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/' id='server_photo_cc_license' rel='license'></a>
- https://500px.com/photo/256344675/william-conger-say-when-x-by-william-conger
<a about='https://drscdn.500px.org/photo/256344675/q%3D80_m%3D2000/v2?webp=true&sig=51b84050c416513c07a4c4a1370ff9e217d9730bf40927240c6554b5b2e9ec5e' href='http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/' id='server_photo_cc_license' rel='license'></a>
- https://500px.com/photo/256344659/william-conger-city-on-the-make-by-william-conger
<a about='https://drscdn.500px.org/photo/256344659/q%3D80_m%3D2000/v2?webp=true&sig=80cd1a0424e27af05ca51ca66fd1377cc9848b2d14837dc78b5cb197a20e9842' href='http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/' id='server_photo_cc_license' rel='license'></a>
- https://500px.com/photo/256344667/cnger-flsnght-by-william-conger
<a about='https://drscdn.500px.org/photo/256344667/q%3D80_m%3D2000/v2?webp=true&sig=05250f6a9e0a5eab85485135dd30c26e710860c56a88de5bf87f6a76e705abaf' href='http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/' id='server_photo_cc_license' rel='license'></a>
- https://500px.com/photo/256344657/william-conger-by-william-conger
<a about='https://drscdn.500px.org/photo/256344657/q%3D80_m%3D2000/v2?webp=true&sig=04da5c7efe345708cd21a62cb34a1c2eac24fbf9854310d7f79507f9870261c6' href='http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/' id='server_photo_cc_license' rel='license'></a>
Verify with other files if you want. This is accurate. COM:WHERE LICENSE seems to be outdated. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 11:46, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Alexis Jazz: No this not because 500px are strangling CC licences. All I get with your links are a "Error 403 No go" error and when I view a page source, which means I have to change browser, I see that every image page has a script that contains a list of all the creative commons licences both free and unfree. I can't find any that specifically seem to apply to the image in question. So, unfortunately, I can't verify what you state. If you can provide a better url, I'll be happy to review again. Thanks anyway. Ww2censor (talk) 13:39, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Ww2censor: sorry those links were not supposed to be clickable (or be clicked). Photos with a different license contain a different link to creativecommons.org, files without a CC license don't have any <a about link at all. You just have to look at the photo using the regular link, view the page source and find the <a about link. I'm working on an overview for more files. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:46, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- In other words, click the source link, right-click the page and select "View page source" (or equivalent), Ctrl-F "server_photo_cc_license", and verify the license URL. clpo13(talk) 19:30, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Ww2censor: sorry those links were not supposed to be clickable (or be clicked). Photos with a different license contain a different link to creativecommons.org, files without a CC license don't have any <a about link at all. You just have to look at the photo using the regular link, view the page source and find the <a about link. I'm working on an overview for more files. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:46, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Wow Alexis Jazz, to be forced to verify a copyright status in such a convoluted way is a real pain. I eventually found the source code you referred to, so if you are really sure this verifies the licence, I'll accept. However, it's not really our job to have to go to such lengths; showing the licence should be much easier and is the responsibility of the uploader to provide an easily found link. We really should have an OTRS ticket instead. Ww2censor (talk) 21:11, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Clpo13 and Ww2censor: Hmm, I didn't link Commons:Village pump#Start your 500px importing please, Commons:500px licensing data and COM:WHERE LICENSE here, did I? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 21:21, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- (Edit conflict) 500px used to have such a notice. See Commons:Village pump/Archive/2018/07#The 500px website will delete all its photos under Creative Commons license and this old revision of COM:WHERE. clpo13(talk) 21:24, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep These are old uploads from the time when 500px did have notes on free licenses at their file pages. These were removed from 500px but the original licensing can be traced back through the source code as has been demonstrated by Alexis Jazz. Since CC licenses are irrevocable, there is no need for OTRS. De728631 (talk) 22:53, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Ok, clpo13 has now given them a good review, so this can be closed as a keep. Ww2censor (talk) 09:14, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: apparently resolved. --Jcb (talk) 23:54, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Hiàn
[edit]Files sent in as part of a photo contest, not taken by staff of Virginia State Parks. Permission needed.
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (41669247344).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (37484351896).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry (37428456736).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry (36767062074).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry (23624093838).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry (23624094648).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry (36767055884).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (38706744711).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry (36806589703).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (37501128142).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (37484347966).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (37273906410).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (37484343926).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (37484355576).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (37484353206).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry (36767050844).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry (36806839983).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry (37445797302).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry (23624089458).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry (36806594913).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry (37218480160).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry (37428686926).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (37623559216).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry (23624078368).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (37273906650).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (24834090858).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry (23624083678).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry (37476287601).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (37484350006).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (37501131402).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (24829910648).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry (36806844153).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry (23624316838).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (37273901670).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (24833931238).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry (37476278771).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (37639585912).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (37672696281).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (23819376658).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry (23624408808).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (37639928132).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (37639922722).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (37639783702).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (37672669131).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (37623588476).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (37623566576).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entre (37482026231).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (41867624671).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (37623560676).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (23819366098).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (23819364288).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (36962260694).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (37414521730).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry (37476283221).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (37414372110).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry (37428653746).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (37414333090).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (37623563396).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (37672619591).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (37484346346).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (36962258484).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (36962240044).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (37414334760).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (37639926442).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (23819695588).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (37414373570).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (37001984673).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (37414519370).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (37001993323).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (37672667511).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (37414381830).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (37414491140).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (37623376566).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (37623591806).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry (37476274431).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (37414520660).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry (37445789502).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (26930921949).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (37001995553).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry (37445795822).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (37414493340).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry (37476277601).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (37001986013).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (23819373818).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry (37445805302).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry (37476273221).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (37818937215).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (37001988523).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (37414376200).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest entry (37623562336).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (26926477139).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (37749077215).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (37837973075).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (37749294185).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (26949613989).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (26860887289).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (24764746018).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (38646514616).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (38646705996).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (24764531178).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (38670117936).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (37748488465).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (24852700278).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (38669608642).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (38669862756).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (38580202266).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (38669857586).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (38669606122).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (37748660315).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (37748480985).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (24852597638).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (38670115626).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (38693492792).png
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (38725700261).png
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (38702218591).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (37748494085).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (24765367118).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (38702380671).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (38580206026).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (38670119976).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (38580197446).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (37837969545).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (38669852416).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (37749838985).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (38646558446).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (37837976575).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (37748477035).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (24764704088).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (26860858609).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (26949868319).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (38008205994).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (37919424014).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (38669844116).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (38669844416).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (26926413979).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (37748496085).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (38725911871).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (24765221838).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (26949587989).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (37837981565).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (38637071931).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (38669961906).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (38669841906).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (24764486148).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (37984442644).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (38670139166).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (24765332318).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (38669859996).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (38725702941).png
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (38693673962).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (24852602748).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (38580928406).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (38008509454).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (37918690994).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (38670008426).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (38669849226).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (38670011146).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (38670018986).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (38669612272).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (38669856556).jpg
- File:Think Outside photo contest Douthat State Park (26949611179).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Belle Isle Lake State Park. (36749143464).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Caledon State Park. (36788871023).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Caledon State Park. (37411288166).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Bear Creek Lake State Park. (37457674371).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Caledon State Park. (37818852955).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Belle Isle Lake State Park. (37410887966).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Caledon State Park. (36788866073).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Bear Creek Lake State Park. (37200418710).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Bear Creek Lake State Park. (37410606276).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Bear Creek Lake State Park. (23606161878).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Belle Isle Lake State Park. (37427530832).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Bear Creek Lake State Park. (23606159238).jpg
- File:Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Bear Creek Lake State Park 2017 (36787678563).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Caledon State Park. (36788847543).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Belle Isle Lake State Park. (37410896526).jpg
- File:Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Bear Creek Lake State Park 2017 (37200196080).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Caledon State Park. (36749579304).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Caledon State Park. (36789138113).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Caledon State Park. (37201482330).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Chippokes Plantation State Park. (36789324163).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Bear Creek Lake State Park. (37200473740).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Bear Creek Lake State Park. (37410572026).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Belle Isle Lake State Park. (37411041566).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Bear Creek Lake State Park. (37200630900).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Bear Creek Lake State Park. (37457676731).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Bear Creek Lake State Park. (37410597986).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Bear Creek Lake State Park. (38702542171).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Caledon State Park. (36789129823).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Chippokes Plantation State Park. (36789326873).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Bear Creek Lake State Park. (37457661951).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Bear Creek Lake State Park. (37457849621).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Bear Creek Lake State Park. (37457857191).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Belle Isle Lake State Park. (37458370521).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Bear Creek Lake State Park. (37457681241).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Bear Creek Lake State Park. (37200421570).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Bear Creek Lake State Park. (36748592474).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Bear Creek Lake State Park. (37410593516).jpg
- File:Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Bear Creek Lake State Park 2017 (37200178100).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Caledon State Park. (37201329210).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Caledon State Park. (37984941884).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Belle Isle Lake State Park. (37410893416).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Belle Isle Lake State Park. (37410891156).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Caledon State Park. (37411486646).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Chippokes Plantation State Park. (36789310843).jpg
- File:Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Bear Creek Lake State Park 2017 (37200245450).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Caledon State Park. (37411327876).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Caledon State Park. (37458789361).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Caledon State Park. (36789152223).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Caledon State Park. (42000980022).jpg
- File:Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Bear Creek Lake State Park 2017 (36748316924).png
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Bear Creek Lake State Park. (37984785204).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Caledon State Park. (37427725422).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Caledon State Park. (37201480640).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Caledon State Park. (36789128733).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Caledon State Park. (36789134363).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Caledon State Park. (36788861073).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Caledon State Park. (38674273062).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Caledon State Park. (37984864774).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Caledon State Park. (38706549801).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Bear Creek Lake State Park. (23606324848).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Belle Isle Lake State Park. (37411081186).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Belle Isle Lake State Park. (38848157490).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Chippokes Plantation State Park. (36789316283).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Caledon State Park. (37411323736).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Caledon State Park. (37427767472).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Belle Isle Lake State Park. (37201125680).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Chippokes Plantation State Park. (36789328063).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Belle Isle Lake State Park. (37458392751).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Bear Creek Lake State Park. (38650757486).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Belle Isle Lake State Park. (37201117460).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Caledon State Park. (24833794688).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Caledon State Park. (24829751278).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Chippokes Plantation State Park. (37201704670).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Caledon State Park. (37411471136).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Belle Isle Lake State Park. (37411046226).jpg
- File:Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Bear Creek Lake State Park 2017 (36787681023).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Caledon State Park. (37201563240).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Caledon State Park. (36789142093).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Belle Isle Lake State Park. (37411044676).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Belle Isle Lake State Park. (37458212951).jpg
- File:Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Bear Creek Lake State Park 2017 (37426460952).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Belle Isle Lake State Park. (37458382311).jpg
- File:Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Bear Creek Lake State Park 2017 (37200098460).jpg
- File:Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Bear Creek Lake State Park 2017 (26926526359).jpg
- File:Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Bear Creek Lake State Park 2017 (37984664134).jpg
- File:Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Bear Creek Lake State Park 2017 (36748323934).png
- File:Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Bear Creek Lake State Park 2017 (38452564214).jpg
- File:Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Bear Creek Lake State Park 2017 (36748303684).jpg
- File:Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Bear Creek Lake State Park 2017 (38669955752).jpg
- File:Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Bear Creek Lake State Park 2017 (37410152466).jpg
- File:Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Bear Creek Lake State Park 2017 (37426444302).jpg
- File:Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Bear Creek Lake State Park 2017 (36748299744).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Chippokes Plantation State Park. (37201698110).jpg
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Belle Isle Lake State Park. (38646939986).jpg
- File:Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Bear Creek Lake State Park 2017 (37200242440).png
- File:2017 Think Outside Photo Contest Entry from Belle Isle Lake State Park. (37458373551).jpg
- File:Lady fishing along lake shore at Douthat State Park Photo contest think outside (37748806005).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Hiàn (talk) 22:59, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- from the ontest rules: http://www.dcr.virginia.gov/state-parks/blog/virginia-state-parks-think-outside-photo-contest
- The individual submitting the photograph warrants that it is their original work. Upon entering a photo in the contest, the photographer agrees to give Virginia State Parks, the Department of Conservation and Recreation and Virginia Tourism full rights to use the photograph for marketing and publicity purposes without attribution and the rights to crop or otherwise adapt the photo. The photographer also warrants that he or she has a photographic release from any individual depicted. Winners may be asked to provide a written release of copyright.
- --Kersti (talk) 12:30, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- And more specifically, "agrees to give Virginia State Parks, the Department of Conservation and Recreation and Virginia Tourism". Noting that nothing is stated about licensing and use by others. Hiàn (talk) 23:53, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per above, no evidence that the actual authors agreed to a free license or to allow Virginia State Parks to sublicense the photos. --Guanaco (talk) 10:38, 29 August 2018 (UTC)
Official symbols. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Official symbols. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain.
- File:AC Badges NEW.png
- File:Badges Fine.jpg
- File:Badge PNG.jpg
- File:Round Badges Centre.png
- File:AC designer.jpg
- File:Pakistan Armored Corps Badges.pdf
- File:AC Badge New By usman.png
- File:AC Badges Trasparent.png
- File:Badges New Design.png
- File:Armoured Corps Centre Badges.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
- Support All have missing sources and licenses and are potential CR violations. Adamgerber80 (talk) 05:35, 22 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:44, 4 September 2018 (UTC)
low-quality, unofficial "remake" of flag. Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:04, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Sealle (talk) 13:24, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Romaniuk Ihor (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unclear copyright status / out of scope.
- File:Морті Сміт (Morty Smith).png
- File:Бірманські будні.jpg
- File:Бориславська залізнична станція.jpg
- File:Рік та Морті (з сайту hurtom.com).png
- File:Село Попелі.jpg
- File:Арт на тему Ріка.jpg
- File:Church mrazhnycia 1935.jpg
- File:Liahowicz Drogobicz 1633.png
- File:Liahowicz Drogobicz.png
- File:Ікона Страшного Суду, с.Ванівка, XV ст.jpg
- File:Нафтові шиби .jpg
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
FDMS 4 17:37, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 13:25, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
This image and the accompanying information is wrong. The photo on the page is a work in the collection of Fred Keeler. I work in the American Art department at the Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco - this painting is not the version in our collection. Please change the institution information. Lpalmor (talk) 18:44, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Keep - The image information note stated that it is in the collection of Fred Keeler. The listing with the Fine Arts Museums of San Francisco is a Wikidata issue, not sure how to fix. There should be no reason to delete. --Zeete (talk) 19:03, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Keep - Created new Wikidata item to address concerns. The file now refers to the collection of Fred Keeler. --Zeete (talk) 15:07, 30 August 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 13:28, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
web-quality, no EXIF. unlikely to be own work Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:33, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 13:29, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:31, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 06:01, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
Non-free image. Promo. 1 MiguelAlanCS (talk) 11:38, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, {{copyvio}}. —LX (talk, contribs) 19:01, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 22:14, 19 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
File entered in photo contest, likely not taken by staff of Virginia State Parks. Permission needed (alternatively, personal file and out of scope). Hiàn (talk) 01:12, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:19, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files found with Special:Search/BC-2015 Photo Contest Hiàn
[edit]Files submitted in a photo contest, likely not taken by staff of Virginia State Parks. Permission needed.
- File:BC-2015 Photo Contest (22612762145).jpg
- File:BC-2015 Photo Contest (22612951025).jpg
- File:BC-2015 Photo Contest (22586896036).jpg
- File:BC-2015 Photo Contest (22624329281).jpg
- File:BC-2015 Photo Contest (22586753846).jpg
- File:BC-2015 Photo Contest (22612624635).jpg
- File:BC-2015 Photo Contest (22586647976).jpg
- File:BC-2015 Photo Contest (21991750363).jpg
- File:BC-2015 Photo Contest (22623925651).jpg
- File:BC-2015 Photo Contest (22424702490).jpg
- File:BC-2015 Photo Contest (22612628865).jpg
- File:BC-2015 Photo Contest (22424844750).jpg
- File:BC-2015 Photo Contest (22425010860).jpg
- File:BC-2015 Photo Contest (21991960413).jpg
- File:BC-2015 Photo Contest (22586713236).jpg
- File:BC-2015 Photo Contest (22599361382).jpg
- File:BC-2015 Photo Contest (22624072831).jpg
- File:BC-2015 Photo Contest (22623878831).jpg
- File:BC-2015 Photo Contest (22599322622).jpg
- File:BC-2015 Photo Contest (22624075761).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Hiàn (talk) 01:17, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- from the ontest rules: http://www.dcr.virginia.gov/state-parks/blog/virginia-state-parks-think-outside-photo-contest
- The individual submitting the photograph warrants that it is their original work. Upon entering a photo in the contest, the photographer agrees to give Virginia State Parks, the Department of Conservation and Recreation and Virginia Tourism full rights to use the photograph for marketing and publicity purposes without attribution and the rights to crop or otherwise adapt the photo. The photographer also warrants that he or she has a photographic release from any individual depicted. Winners may be asked to provide a written release of copyright.
- --Kersti (talk) 12:30, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- And more specifically, "agrees to give Virginia State Parks, the Department of Conservation and Recreation and Virginia Tourism". Noting that nothing is stated about licensing and use by others. Hiàn (talk) 23:53, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:03, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Files found with Special:Search/First Day Hikes 2014 Photo Contest Entry Hiàn
[edit]Files uploaded part of a photo contest, likely not taken by Virginia State Parks staff. Permission needed.
- File:CA52c47f70-0f6c-49ef-9dd0-6c4a0aa61734 (11720857154).png
- File:CA52c4d662-8574-4779-915f-0b640aa61734 (11720485985).png
- File:CA52c4aad6-39b4-4269-a57b-2a1f0aa61734 (11720862314).png
- File:CA52c4cd13-b87c-4c47-8803-57480aa61734 (11720487865).png
- File:CA52c49b7d-85ec-4887-96e6-365b0aa61734 (11720483735).png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Hiàn (talk) 01:35, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:04, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Image is approximately at 1:32 in the video and is a still photograph. Per the caption: Still photographs used courtesy of Harvey Finkle, Hanbit Kwon, and BG Productions. The publisher of the video does not own the still photographs and does not have the right to release them under a CC license. Majora (talk) 01:42, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Majora: Thanks for filling my license review request. The first line in the video's description states: Photographed and edited by Michael Candelori [video creator]. I will concede the creator's description is self-contradictory, however the second line does not say all still photos, which is why I uploaded it under the provided license. How does the Commons handle this kind of licensing ambiguity? I Appreciate the help. → GS → ☎ → 08:05, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- @GrapefruitSculpin: It was my assuming that they meant videoed by Michael Candelori. The part about still photographs makes this a problem. In order to keep this we would need confirmation from the copyright holder sent into our volunteer response team through the form here: COM:ET. Since there is significant doubt due to the video's description I'm afraid that is the only way. Sorry. --Majora (talk) 21:06, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Majora: No worries, thanks for the guidance and apologies for generating extra work for you. I'll see if I can find an appropriate video still and upload that instead. → GS → ☎ → 08:16, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- @GrapefruitSculpin: It was my assuming that they meant videoed by Michael Candelori. The part about still photographs makes this a problem. In order to keep this we would need confirmation from the copyright holder sent into our volunteer response team through the form here: COM:ET. Since there is significant doubt due to the video's description I'm afraid that is the only way. Sorry. --Majora (talk) 21:06, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:14, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Templates can be used to display these two images side-by-side. Creating a third image that combines the two is not necessary. SharkD Talk 01:44, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Images is in use on pl:Barwa, pl:System barw Ostwalda, and uk:Філіпп Отто Рунге. Pictures that are in use on Wikimedia projects are automatically considered useful (COM:INUSE). --bjh21 (talk) 23:24, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:15, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Templates can be used to display these two images side-by-side. Creating a third image that combines the two is not necessary. SharkD Talk 01:45, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep The file is in use on ar:الفضاء اللوني (ص ش ض) و (ص ش ق). Files that are in use on Wikimedia projects are automatically considered useful (COM:INUSE). --bjh21 (talk) 23:26, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:15, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
This photograph is from https://www.flickr.com/photos/traveller2020/930455036/ via Wikipedia. The Flickr page shows it has All Rights Reserved not Creative Commons. The Wikipedia uploader, User:Traveller2020, has a documented history of uploading copyright violations. Senator2029 ➔ “Talk” 02:16, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:16, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Also, the image is completely out of COM:SCOPE, and it's not used on any article or link. Sfs90 (talk) 02:46, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:28, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Also, the image is completely out of COM:SCOPE, and it's not used on any article or link. Sfs90 (talk) 02:47, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:28, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Also, the image is completely out of COM:SCOPE, and it's not used on any article or link. Sfs90 (talk) 02:47, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:28, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Also, the image is completely out of COM:SCOPE, and it's not used on any article or link. Sfs90 (talk) 02:47, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:28, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Also, the image is completely out of COM:SCOPE, and it's not used on any article or link. Sfs90 (talk) 02:47, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:28, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Also, the image is completely out of COM:SCOPE, and it's not used on any article or link. Sfs90 (talk) 02:47, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:28, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Also, the image is completely out of COM:SCOPE, and it's not used on any article or link. Sfs90 (talk) 02:47, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:28, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Also, the image is completely out of COM:SCOPE, and it's not used on any article or link. Sfs90 (talk) 02:47, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:28, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Also, the image is completely out of COM:SCOPE, and it's not used on any article or link. Sfs90 (talk) 02:47, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:27, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Also, the image is completely out of COM:SCOPE, and it's not used on any article or link. Sfs90 (talk) 02:48, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:27, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Also, the image is completely out of COM:SCOPE, and it's not used on any article or link. Sfs90 (talk) 02:48, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:27, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Also, the image is completely out of COM:SCOPE, and it's not used on any article or link. Sfs90 (talk) 02:48, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:27, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Also, the image is completely out of COM:SCOPE, and it's not used on any article or link. Sfs90 (talk) 02:48, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:27, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Also, the image is completely out of COM:SCOPE, and it's not used on any article or link. Sfs90 (talk) 02:49, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:27, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Also, the image is completely out of COM:SCOPE, and it's not used on any article or link. Sfs90 (talk) 02:49, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:27, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Also, the image is completely out of COM:SCOPE, and it's not used on any article or link. Sfs90 (talk) 02:49, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:27, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Also, the image is completely out of COM:SCOPE, and it's not used on any article or link. Sfs90 (talk) 02:49, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:27, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
As per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Also, the image is completely out of COM:SCOPE, and it's not used on any article or link. Sfs90 (talk) 02:49, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:27, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The image is completely out of COM:SCOPE, and it's not used on any article or link. Also, as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Sfs90 (talk) 02:49, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:27, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The image is completely out of COM:SCOPE, and it's not used on any article or link. Also, as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Sfs90 (talk) 02:50, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:27, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The image is completely out of COM:SCOPE, and it's not used on any article or link. Also, as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Sfs90 (talk) 02:50, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:27, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The image is completely out of COM:SCOPE, and it's not used on any article or link. Also, as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Sfs90 (talk) 02:50, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:27, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The image is completely out of COM:SCOPE, and it's not used on any article or link. Also, as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Sfs90 (talk) 02:50, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:27, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The image is completely out of COM:SCOPE, and it's not used on any article or link. Also, as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Sfs90 (talk) 02:50, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:27, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The image is completely out of COM:SCOPE, and it's not used on any article or link. Also, as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Sfs90 (talk) 02:51, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:27, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The image is completely out of COM:SCOPE, and it's not used on any article or link. Also, as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Sfs90 (talk) 02:51, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:27, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The image is completely out of COM:SCOPE, and it's not used on any article or link. Also, as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Sfs90 (talk) 02:51, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:27, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The image is completely out of COM:SCOPE, and it's not used on any article or link. Also, as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Sfs90 (talk) 02:51, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:27, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The image is completely out of COM:SCOPE, and it's not used on any article or link. Also, as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Sfs90 (talk) 02:51, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:26, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The image is completely out of COM:SCOPE, and it's not used on any article or link. Also, as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Sfs90 (talk) 02:51, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:26, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The image is completely out of COM:SCOPE, and it's not used on any article or link. Also, as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Sfs90 (talk) 02:51, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:26, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The image is completely out of COM:SCOPE, and it's not used on any article or link. Also, as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Sfs90 (talk) 02:51, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:26, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The image is completely out of COM:SCOPE, and it's not used on any article or link. Also, as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Sfs90 (talk) 02:51, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:26, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The image is completely out of COM:SCOPE, and it's not used on any article or link. Also, as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Sfs90 (talk) 02:51, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:26, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The image is completely out of COM:SCOPE, and it's not used on any article or link. Also, as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Sfs90 (talk) 02:52, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:26, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The image is completely out of COM:SCOPE, and it's not used on any article or link. Also, as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Sfs90 (talk) 02:52, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:26, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The image is completely out of COM:SCOPE, and it's not used on any article or link. Also, as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Sfs90 (talk) 02:53, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:26, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The image is completely out of COM:SCOPE, and it's not used on any article or link. Also, as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Sfs90 (talk) 02:53, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:26, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The image is completely out of COM:SCOPE, and it's not used on any article or link. Also, as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Sfs90 (talk) 02:53, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:26, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The image is completely out of COM:SCOPE, and it's not used on any article or link. Also, as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:142151-esc2008logo-RESIZE-s925-s450-fit.jpg which established that the heart and text logos of the Eurovision Song Contest met the threshold of originality in Switzerland (the country of origin) and should therefore not exist on Commons as per Commons:Licensing. If the situation remains uncertain, then the answer should be to default to delete per the precautionary principle. This country is not a member of the European Broadcasting Union, so is highly unlikely to participate in the Eurovision Song Contest. Sfs90 (talk) 02:53, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:26, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ariyansabz (talk · contribs)
[edit]This user has uploaded various copyrighted images taken from the web, claiming them as own work. The ones which can be found on Google Image Search have been deleted. Most of the remaining images are of low resolution and have incomplete or no EXIF data, so I doubt they're the user's own work.
- File:کمبود کلسیم.png
- File:عکس سراسر نما روستا.png
- File:نمای روستالبا ی.jpg
- File:نمای روستا.jpg
- File:بازی های فوتبال.jpg
- File:غروب زیبای روستا.jpg
- File:روز برفی در آریان.jpg
- File:غروب روستا.jpg
- File:تصویر زمستانی روستای آریان.jpg
- File:گیاه کما.jpg
Guanaco (talk) 05:32, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:34, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Promotional photo, unlikely to be own work. Same as: File:퓨전국악밴드 비단 1.png and File:퓨전국악밴드 비단 2.png. Smooth O (talk) 07:16, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:35, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Claimed own work 2017, but the image is widely published in the web starting from at least 2011 [7], and credited to DSR-precision GmbH here. MKFI (talk) 09:23, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:38, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Claimed own work 2017, but the image has been published at least in 2011: https://www.rumaniamilitary.ro/inteligenta-romaneasca-mli-84m1-si-coechipierii-sai MKFI (talk) 09:30, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:39, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
m Amit199309 (talk) 09:32, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:39, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of COM:EDUSE due to an artistic filter applied, also wrongly classified.-- Nāvika (talk) 09:36, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Please explain how the use of an HDR filter, makes a file out of scope? This tecnique even has an one page in En Wikipedia, in en:High-dynamic-range imaging. Tm (talk) 18:31, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:41, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
nutzlos, nichts zu erkennen Mehlauge (talk) 09:37, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Imagem útil, com boa qualidade e em que é reconhecível uma vista de Ahvaz. Nomeação, para eliminação, sem qualquer utilidade. Or in english: Image useful, with good quality and with an recognizable a view of Ahvaz. Monination, for elimination, is useless. Tm (talk) 18:34, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:41, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope. "Países Tabarneses" is a parody created by the author. Foguera (talk) 09:46, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete It's definitely in scope, but this specific map is totally original and lacks educative value. A "proper" Tabarnia map, such as this would be enough. --Discasto talk 12:54, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:44, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Protected logo - COM:TOO?.-- Nāvika (talk) 09:49, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:45, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
because i want to delete this page so that Rajchhetris (talk) 10:20, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:45, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
copyvio - Ludmiła Pilecka (talk) 10:40, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:46, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Copyright violation. [8] p58 DaizY (talk) 11:02, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:46, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Copyright violation. [9] p61 DaizY (talk) 11:07, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: don't find the image but anyway an unused graph of questionable notability. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:51, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Copyright violation. [10] p67 DaizY (talk) 11:09, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: don't find the image but anyway an unused graph of questionable notability. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:51, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Small image, no EXIF B dash (talk) 11:16, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - unlikel y to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:51, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Copyright violation. [11] p11 DaizY (talk) 11:19, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: don't find the image but anyway an unused graph of questionable notability. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:52, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Copyright violation. [12] DaizY (talk) 11:23, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: don't find the image but anyway an unused graph of questionable notability. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:52, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Commercial advertisement, SPAM: out of project scope.
- File:Places you miss in your andaman and nicobar trip.jpg
- File:Things to do in yours Andaman and NIcobar tours.jpg
- File:Facts you must know before traveling to andaman and nicobar.jpg
- File:Biggest issues and Concervs with Relocations.jpg
- File:Tips for Preparing to move out of a Rental Property.jpg
- File:Place to Visit in One day Trip To Kerala.jpg
- File:How to Prepare Best For Shifting.jpg
Ies (talk) 12:12, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: dleted by Herbythyme. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:54, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
This file has already been deleted three times, once under this name, twice under File:Logo Robert-Enke-Stiftung.jpg. It's a sophisticated logo that incorporates a photograph whose source is not provided. Ytoyoda (talk) 12:34, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Edit looks like the photo in the logo is a work of Getty Images: https://www.gettyimages.com/license/57604388. 12:36, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:54, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Website says: © 2018 Ricky Koole. Webdesign: Charlotte Blokhuis. Fotografie: Rob Becker. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 13:11, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- It is doubtful that this is own work. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 13:54, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - Press photo, I agree with the nominator. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 10:08, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:55, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
The picture is damaged Agrezt (talk) 13:20, 16 July 2018 (UTC) Template:SpeedydeleteIaccidental creation
Deleted: already deleted. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:54, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Official document. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:56, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images.
- File:Mateu.jpg
- File:Ganza.jpg
- File:Reco Reco ou bage.jpg
- File:Rabeca.jpg
- File:Pandeiro pandeirista.jpg
- File:Cavalo Marinho Estrela Brilhante1.jpg
- File:Cavalo Marinho Estrela Brilhante.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:57, 22 October 2018 (UTC)
duplicate of File:Yellow-red card.svg MBH (talk) 11:12, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:11, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
False date, similar to https://mulpix.com/post/1784768882314086638.html Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:35, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:11, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I'm nominating this photo as the uploader for being out of scope. Not educationally useful in its current form! Meisam (talk) 13:56, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:10, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Fujiwara.masaharu (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:10, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:09, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
There is no Creative Commons license in the source, not even in the legal notice (http://www.tarrega.cat/avis-legal), I assume the image is in copyright. Docosong (talk) 15:28, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:09, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
There is no Creative Commons license in the source, not even in the legal notice (http://www.tarrega.cat/avis-legal), I assume the image is in copyright. Docosong (talk) 15:29, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:09, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
There is no Creative Commons license in the source, not even in the legal notice (http://www.tarrega.cat/avis-legal), I assume the image is in copyright. Docosong (talk) 15:30, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:09, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
There is no Creative Commons license in the source, not even in the legal notice (http://www.tarrega.cat/avis-legal), I assume the image is in copyright. Docosong (talk) 15:30, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:09, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope; COM is not a personal photo repository, TJH2018talk 16:32, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:09, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope; COM is not a promotional photo repository.
- File:Leandro Cóccaro (12).jpg
- File:Leandro Cóccaro (10).jpg
- File:Leandro Cóccaro (11).jpg
- File:Leandro Cóccaro (09).jpg
- File:Leandro Cóccaro (08).jpg
- File:Leandro Cóccaro (07).jpg
- File:Leandro Cóccaro (04).jpg
- File:Leandro Cóccaro (06).jpg
- File:Leandro Cóccaro (05).jpg
- File:Leandro Cóccaro (02).jpg
- File:Leandro Cóccaro (03).jpg
- File:Leandro Cóccaro (01).jpg
- File:Leandro Cóccaro 10.jpg
- File:Leandro Cóccaro 09.jpg
- File:Leandro Cóccaro 05.jpg
- File:Leandro Cóccaro 06.jpg
- File:Leandro Cóccaro 04.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
TJH2018talk 16:36, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:NETCOPYRIGHT: grabbed from the web. --Sealle (talk) 10:59, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
EXIF credits SHARAN ESTONE Ytoyoda (talk) 16:49, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:00, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:52, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:00, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
https://www.pinterest.fr/pin/813955332629862206/?lp=true Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:13, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:00, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Derivative work of copyrighted content. FDMS 4 17:14, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:00, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Արիս-արսենի (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unclear copyright status / out of scope.
- File:2. Aris Arseni - ANDRANIK, AYSINQN - ARAJAMARTIK.jpg
- File:14. Aris Arseni - ARI SIRENQ MENQ MEKMEKU.jpg
- File:15.Aris Arseni - VASTAKAVOR RACIONALIZATOR@.jpg
- File:13. Aris Arseni - CHAPHATSO EV ARDZAK YERGITSANQ.jpg
- File:11-12. Aris Arseni - ZERVON VARDANYANI KYANQN U ANMAHUTYUN@.jpg
- File:10. Aris Arseni - APH.jpg
- File:9. Aris Arseni - HAMANVAG.jpg
- File:8. Aris Arseni - ANTARI DZAYNITS INCU EM HUZVUM.jpg
- File:6.Aris Arseni - LRUTYAN ROPE.jpg
- File:5. Aris Arseni - GHOGHANJ HISHATAKI.jpg
- File:4. Aris Arseni - YEV AYSPISI CHAKATAGIR.jpg
- File:3. Aris Arseni - USHACACH YERKXOSUTYUN ARARAT GHAZARYANI HET.jpg
FDMS 4 17:34, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:59, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
The author 坂上政克 died in 1982, No FOP in Japan[13]. そらみみ (talk) 17:36, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: by Storkk. --Sealle (talk) 11:01, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unclear copyright status. The cited author is 'Archdiocese of Ljubljana'. Eleassar (t/p) 17:41, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:07, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by FundacionCerezales (talk · contribs)
[edit]Derivative works of modern artworks
Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:48, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:02, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hacı Quliyev (talk · contribs)
[edit]The author is the subject, the photo don't look as selfies, unlikely to be own works
Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:53, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:07, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by NitzanHappy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern artworks, no permission from the artist (see OTRS)
- File:Ilana Raviv for the Prime Minster conference Jerusalem 2008.jpg
- File:The Taming of the Shrew Acrylic on Canvas 120cm X 100cm 2003.jpg
- File:Spanish Woman Acrylic on FiberGlass Paper69cm X 56cm 2003.jpg
- File:Napping on a Chair Acrylic on canvas 91cmX60cm 2007.jpg
- File:Merry-Go-Round Acrylic on Canvas 40inX30in 1986.jpg
- File:Helen of Troy Acrylic on Canvas 62in X 50in 1998.jpg
- File:Girl with Dog Acrylic on Canvas 47.2in X 39.3in 2003.jpg
- File:Hagar Acrylic on Canvas 60in X 36in 1996.jpg
- File:Don Quixote and Sancho Panza Acrylic on Canvas 120cmX100cm 2001.jpg
- File:Doll With Toys Giclee Print 29X37.jpg
Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:14, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Support There is no OTRS permission. Hanay (talk) 07:26, 3 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:03, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
unused low-resolution personal image, out of commons scope -★- PlyrStar93 →Message me. ← 20:13, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Support related to this long term abuse --Alaa :)..! 08:44, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: by Guanaco. --Sealle (talk) 11:04, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
I passed this image but now I think its difficult to assert whether Azulmatte owns the rights of the marketing campaigns it creates for cklass Leoboudv (talk) 20:38, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:04, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
https://www.pinterest.fr/pin/426293920960514324/?lp=true Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:39, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, the artwork is almost certainly copyrighted. Salavat (talk) 01:39, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:04, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
https://www.pinterest.fr/pin/536561743084630718/?lp=true Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:41, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, the artwork is almost certainly copyrighted. Salavat (talk) 01:40, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:05, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:42, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:07, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
A priori, l'image a déjà été supprimée sous le nom de File:Kyunghee Kim-Sutre 2010.png Shev123 (talk) 21:02, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:07, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wilson mina marquez (talk · contribs)
[edit]All these images show the person Wilson Mina Marquez but were definitely not taken by him, meaning he isn't the owner of copyright.The majority of images also have Facebook metadata tags.
- File:Wilson mina marquez colombia.jpg
- File:Wilson mina marquez 7.jpg
- File:Wilson mina marquez 5.jpg
- File:Wilson mina marquez 4.jpg
- File:Wilson mina marquez campeon.jpg
- File:Titulo tecnico ciclismo .jpg
- File:Tecnico ciclismo.jpg
- File:Wilson mina marquez 2.jpg
- File:Wilson mina marquez.jpg
- File:Campeon wilson mina marquez.jpg
- File:Campeonato mollet del valles.jpg
- File:Cafe de cdolombia.jpg
seb26 (talk) 22:40, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:05, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
small size without EXIFs : unlikely to be own work. + maybe out of scope too Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:16, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: can be seen her (צילום: דור מלכה). -- Geagea (talk) 08:52, 26 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Similar to https://attitude.co.uk/article/interview-boy-with-beer-playwright-paul-boakye-on-the-importance-of-black-gay-love/12778/, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:40, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep @Patrick Rogel: Copyright Holder has confirmed the license via OTRS --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 14:57, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Permission provided. --Mhhossein talk 05:32, 16 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
It is a personal picture of mine while I was underage, I want it to be deleted. Toykandogan (talk) 14:32, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:14, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:14, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope; not a personal photo repository. TJH2018talk 15:09, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete within scope because it is used on FAWP. However, delete it as NETCOPYVIO [14] 4nn1l2 (talk) 09:30, 17 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:13, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:51, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:11, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
montage of at least two images which are not linked to media on Wikimedia Commons, hence, potentially copyright issues ?? Roland zh (talk) 18:33, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:11, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
no permission the author is died in 1989 https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leopold_Haefliger Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:55, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:10, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
Derivative work Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:57, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Definitely not simple enough to be public domain. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 09:48, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:09, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
facebook file "FBMD" Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:58, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:09, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
text written by a Pakistani poet, writer. The text is very likely under copyright Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:00, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Poet is still alive, born in 1962. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ • ✍ ⏿) 09:51, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:09, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
out of scope personal image, obviously wrongly used Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:03, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:08, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work, unclear copyright status Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:12, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:07, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
unused single-file upload, and, as per description, advertisements, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 19:43, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:07, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
Professional photograph with no OTRS license and no camera metadata 100cellsman (talk) 20:15, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:06, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
Possibly not own work, see [15]. Permission needed per COM:PRP. ~Cybularny Speak? 11:28, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:16, 22 December 2018 (UTC)
Ineed it is my own work,I am a photographer and I own the copyrightand I wish to share it. The picture is not downloaded from the internet
Center pivot irrigation north of Deverre
[edit]- file:Aerial view of center pivot irrigation north of Deverre, Nebraska 1.jpg
- file:Aerial view of center pivot irrigation north of Deverre, Nebraska 2.jpg
- file:Aerial view of center pivot irrigation north of Deverre, Nebraska 3.jpg
- file:Aerial view of center pivot irrigation north of Deverre, Nebraska 5.jpg
- file:Aerial view of center pivot irrigation north of Deverre, Nebraska 6.jpg
- file:Aerial view of center pivot irrigation north of Deverre, Nebraska 8.jpg
- file:Aerial view of center pivot irrigation north of Deverre, Nebraska 9.jpg
These are the worst quality files from this set. IMHO there is no COM:EDUSE possible. There are enough good alternatives in Category:Center pivot irrigation systems from above present.
One file is better and wasn't included to this request.--Nāvika (talk) 09:41, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Support They really look bad.--Pyrophyt (talk) 19:12, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:57, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Uploader claims photo was released under CC0 licence, but linked source did not mention it is avaible under that licence. Robotje (talk) 05:23, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Photograph made in 1926 by unknown photographer. License changed to correct license. Vysotsky (talk) 13:23, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep for the motivation Vysotsky gives. It has been tagged correctly now. Ymnes (talk) 17:13, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete No US copyright tag. {{PD-1996}} doesn't apply because under {{Anonymous-EU}} the picture only entered the public domain in the Netherlands in 1997. --bjh21 (talk) 23:35, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- Dutch law applies here, not American. Ymnes (talk) 05:29, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- Commons:Licensing#Interaction of US and non-US copyright law says that works must be in the public domain both in the source country and in the US. The image was uploaded after 1st March 2012, so {{Not-PD-US-URAA}} can't be applied. Assuming publication in 1926, the picture will enter the public domain in the US in 2022. --bjh21 (talk) 10:00, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- It's a Dutch picture, Dutch law applies here. Ymnes (talk) 15:36, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- Of course Dutch law applies: that's not in dispute. But American law also applies because Commons is hosted in the US, and because Commons:Licensing (which is part of Commons policy) says that non-US images must be free both in the country of origin and in the US. --bjh21 (talk) 17:05, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- Specifically, look at the section COM:L#Interaction of US and non-US copyright law. clpo13(talk) 18:02, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- Of course Dutch law applies: that's not in dispute. But American law also applies because Commons is hosted in the US, and because Commons:Licensing (which is part of Commons policy) says that non-US images must be free both in the country of origin and in the US. --bjh21 (talk) 17:05, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- It's a Dutch picture, Dutch law applies here. Ymnes (talk) 15:36, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- Commons:Licensing#Interaction of US and non-US copyright law says that works must be in the public domain both in the source country and in the US. The image was uploaded after 1st March 2012, so {{Not-PD-US-URAA}} can't be applied. Assuming publication in 1926, the picture will enter the public domain in the US in 2022. --bjh21 (talk) 10:00, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
- Dutch law applies here, not American. Ymnes (talk) 05:29, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
I re-read the page Commons:Licensing. This photograph was made by an anonymous photographer in the Netherlands and published in 1926 by the photographic press agency N.V. Vereenigde Fotobureaux. Commons:Licensing mentions: "For works first published before 1964, copyright lasts 28 years after publication (and is therefore currently expired) unless the owner filed for renewal (during the window between 27 and 28 years after publication) in which case rights were extended to 95 years after first publication—the large majority of works published before 1964 have passed into the public domain, but it is imperative to determine that copyright was not renewed (which can be done through an online search at the Copyright Office for works published since 1951)". Which (to my best knowledge) means that this photograph is both Public Domain in the Netherlands and in the United States of America. Vysotsky (talk) 15:49, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- The registration and renewal requirements don't apply to works whose US copyright was restored by URAA. Commons:URAA-restored copyrights gives an example: "A French short story that was first published without copyright notice in 1935 will be treated as if it had both been published with a proper notice and properly renewed, meaning that its restored copyright will expire on December 31, 2030". --bjh21 (talk) 16:22, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- I like the example of the French short story published in 1935, without copyright notice (an official example by the US Copyright Office!). The example is so laughable that it boomerangs straight back into the URAA face. (And yes, I know the URAA is an official act of the US Congress -and I always respect copyright laws.) I will ask the contact person of the National Archives of the Netherlands about the copyright status of the photographs of the NV Vereenigde Fotobureaux. I couldn't find an archival description of this collection on their website (where they host this collection of 1890 photos), but it might be that the Dutch National Archives own the copyright of this collection and are willing to release these photographs into the public domain. Vysotsky (talk) 17:05, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Vysotsky notified me of the discussion about this deletion reques. When I took a closer look in the collection magagement system of this specific image I found out that in one field, related to the copyright a metadatafield was filled incorrect. Due to this fault the Public Domain Waiver isn't being showed next to the image. However quite some information, related to its rights can be found by using the Open Search API in comnination with the photonumber http://www.gahetna.nl/beeldbank-api/opensearch/?q=022-1282. The metadata has been corrected by me, probably tomorrow the PD Waiver will be visible. --Timmietovenaar (talk) 11:34, 11 September 2018 (UTC)
- I like the example of the French short story published in 1935, without copyright notice (an official example by the US Copyright Office!). The example is so laughable that it boomerangs straight back into the URAA face. (And yes, I know the URAA is an official act of the US Congress -and I always respect copyright laws.) I will ask the contact person of the National Archives of the Netherlands about the copyright status of the photographs of the NV Vereenigde Fotobureaux. I couldn't find an archival description of this collection on their website (where they host this collection of 1890 photos), but it might be that the Dutch National Archives own the copyright of this collection and are willing to release these photographs into the public domain. Vysotsky (talk) 17:05, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Jcb (talk) 15:08, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Es la misma fotografía que aparece en el sitio de la SCD, probablemente no sea propiedad de quien la subió. Se necesitaría permiso OTRS. küñall (nütramyen) 22:46, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:10, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Definitivamente no es obra de Rdrs62. Fotografía utilizada profusamente en la prensa. küñall (nütramyen) 22:50, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:09, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Definitivamente no es obra de Rdrs62. Fotografía utilizada profusamente en la prensa. küñall (nütramyen) 22:50, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:10, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Definitivamente no es obra de Rdrs62. Fotografía utilizada profusamente en la prensa. küñall (nütramyen) 22:50, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:10, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Na prośbę Zdzisława Otella Horodeckiego, którego wizerunek znajduje sie na zdjęciu. Marwo21 (talk) 11:59, 4 June 2018 (UTC)
- Dostałem e-mail'a na prywatną pocztę z prośbą o usunięcię zdjęcia na prośbę autora. Proszę w imieniu autora o usunięcie zdjęcia. Fafik Napisz coś® 22:25, 25 June 2018 (UTC)
- Jest to mój wizerunek z błędami obiektywu i mam prawo zgodnie z prawem o ochronie wizerunku do ingerencji w jego byt .Zdzisław Otello Horodecki — Preceding unsigned comment added by Flawiuszott1 (talk • contribs) 04:45, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Licences are not revocable. --BrightRaven (talk) 08:13, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Proszę ponownie o usuniecie mego wizerunku takie mam prawo
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Zdzis%C5%82aw_Otello_Horodecki_2008.jpg Dotyczy odmowy usunięcia foto w Commons na ktorym jest moja twarz. Foto zostało zrobione w pracowni 2004 roku z bardzo bliska obiektywem szerokokątnym co spowodowało deformacje.Zostało użyte jako pierwsze w wiki gdyż w chwili.zakladania strony nie miałem innego. Bylo to w 2008 r.Od początku bylo złe.Postanowiłem z userem Marwo21, w związku z ponagleniem Wiki zostawić je. W Commons są inne moje fotosy bez błędów technicznych. To spełniało swoją rolę prawie przez 8 lat.Dopiero gdy powstały inne portrety to naturalnie zeszło. To foto grało w info radia ale na moją prośbę radio przeszło.na firmowe z Commons.Proszę Państwa o pomoc.Po oczekiwaniu i dzisiejszym moim monicie odrzucono moją i nie tylko moją prośbę.Ponowilem dzisiaj prośbę o usunięcie.Twarz jest własnością szczególnie chronioną i jeśli istota tego żąda zgodnie z prawem na całym świecie ujęcie jest usuwane.Bardzo proszę Panie,Panów o decyzyjną pomoc Zdzisław otello Horodecki.Flawiuszott1
Flawiuszott1 (talk) 17:33, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Comment. There are many other pictures of the subject in Category:Zdzisław Otello Horodecki, so maybe it is actually not necessary to keep this one. Maybe it would be easier to give a positive answer to this request if you explained why this picture is so problematic for you. BrightRaven (talk) 09:06, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Po raz enty proszę Wielmożnych Panow o podjecie decyzji o usunieciu.Powód jest podany Zgodnie z prawem mam prawo do decydowaniu o wizerunku.Proszę albo w lewo albo w prawo.Z zewnatrz wyglada to na nieporadnosc. Wisi to i wisi.Pytania zewnętrzne nie są komplementami. Flawiuszott1 (talk) 05:15, 10 October 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. File uploaded in 2010. Ruthven (msg) 16:12, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
This is a Getty Images photo, not a Soccer.ru original. See https://www.fifa.com/worldcup/photos/galleries/fifa-world-cup-1998-1974208 (slide 17/26). Ytoyoda (talk) 14:38, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:13, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Consent from persons depicted in the photo seems doubtful. 91.34.38.43 16:37, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Neutral - "doubtful": the linked discussion concerned in particular the mention of the musician as a local peculiarity on wikivoyage-de. The musician is aware of the existence of these images and had no objection at that time, on the contrary - he resisted the removal of the mention in wikivoyage. No reason for deletion in my opinion, but even no reason to keep. --Tine (talk) 02:06, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept: I added {{Consent}}. There is a reason to keep: the photo is in use. If there are further developments, we can reconsider. Ruthven (msg) 16:18, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Consent from persons depicted in the photo seems doubtful. 91.34.38.43 16:38, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep This appears to be a public place where there is no expectation of privacy. In my experience, street performers would generally rather have attention than not, but it is open to the accordionist to come here and protest, although I think he's on very very weak ground. His personality rights are a different issue, but that does not arise on this site, it arises elsewhere if anyone uses the image, and that too, is no reason to delete it. Rodhullandemu (talk) 16:44, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Just to make this clear: I have absolutely no personal interest in keeping or deleting this picture.
- I would like to understand what you are saying though: "His personality rights are a different issue, but that does not arise on this site". Why would Commons not have to care about personality rights? --91.34.38.43 16:50, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- And let me point out that there are also children depicted in the photo, in a quite recognizable way. As far as I am aware, publishing pictures of children without an appropriate consent is generally considered to be quite problematic these days. --91.34.38.43 16:58, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Re personality rights, I have added a {{Personality rights}} warning to one of these images, but it's not that Commons does not care about them, it is more that we are alive to the issue and warn reusers that it may be problematic for them. As for the children, we would consider a request by a parent or guardian to blur their faces, if they are that paranoid. We have, oh, several images of children in public places, and as far as I can remember, have received no complaints. Rodhullandemu (talk) 17:04, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- O.k., that personality rights warning might be a feasible solution.
- "No complaints"... well, you may just have been lucky so far. :-) Ask schools and kindergartens about their experiences with publishing pictures of children on their website, and they'll tell you that many parents nowadays are quite "paranoid" in that respect and don't want to see their children's picture anywhere on the internet.
- And, to the best of my knowledge, the legal situation is quite clear as far as German laws go: Unless someone is a person of general public interest (which this accordeonist certainly is not, much less the children), you need their consent if they are depicted in a somewhat central way -- which they certainly are in this case, the accordeonist's name even being explicitly mentioned in the description. --91.34.38.43 17:16, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- P.S. Just so I get this right, would you consider Wikipedia, Wikivoyage etc. to be "reusers"? I mean, they are all using and publishing these pictures on the world wide web... and so is Commons... --91.34.38.43 17:42, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Re personality rights, I have added a {{Personality rights}} warning to one of these images, but it's not that Commons does not care about them, it is more that we are alive to the issue and warn reusers that it may be problematic for them. As for the children, we would consider a request by a parent or guardian to blur their faces, if they are that paranoid. We have, oh, several images of children in public places, and as far as I can remember, have received no complaints. Rodhullandemu (talk) 17:04, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Consent might not be required in this case on grounds of the exceptions made in § 23 KunstUrhG, (1)2. «Images wherein the persons appear only as an accessory next to a landscape or other locality» (de minimis), and (1)3. «Images of assemblies, pageants or similar events, in which the depicted persons have been taking part». --Abderitestatos (talk) 14:24, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Neutral - "doubtful": the linked discussion concerned in particular the mention of the musician as a local peculiarity on wikivoyage-de. The musician is aware of the existence of these images and had no objection at that time, on the contrary - he resisted the removal of the mention in wikivoyage. No reason for deletion in my opinion, but even no reason to keep. --Tine (talk) 02:04, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept: see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rolandsbrunnen Hildesheim 620-h.jpg. Ruthven (msg) 16:19, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Consent from persons depicted in the photo seems doubtful. 91.34.38.43 16:39, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Consent might not be required in this case on grounds of the exceptions made in § 23 KunstUrhG, (1)2. «Images wherein the persons appear only as an accessory next to a landscape or other locality» (de minimis), and (1)3. «Images of assemblies, pageants or similar events, in which the depicted persons have been taking part». --Abderitestatos (talk) 14:24, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Neutral - "doubtful": the linked discussion concerned in particular the mention of the musician as a local peculiarity on wikivoyage-de. The musician is aware of the existence of these images and had no objection at that time, on the contrary - he resisted the removal of the mention in wikivoyage. No reason for deletion in my opinion, but even no reason to keep. --Tine (talk) 02:07, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept: see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rolandsbrunnen Hildesheim 620-h.jpg. Ruthven (msg) 16:19, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Consent from persons depicted in the photo seems doubtful. 91.34.38.43 16:41, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Neutral - "doubtful": the linked discussion concerned in particular the mention of the musician as a local peculiarity on wikivoyage-de. The musician is aware of the existence of these images and had no objection at that time, on the contrary - he resisted the removal of the mention in wikivoyage. No reason for deletion in my opinion, but even no reason to keep. --Tine (talk) 02:07, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept: see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rolandsbrunnen Hildesheim 620-h.jpg. Ruthven (msg) 16:19, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Consent from persons depicted in the photo and explicitly mentioned by name in the description seems doubtful. 91.34.38.43 16:45, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Neutral - "doubtful": the linked discussion concerned in particular the mention of the musician as a local peculiarity on wikivoyage-de. The musician is aware of the existence of these images and had no objection at that time, on the contrary - he resisted the removal of the mention in wikivoyage. No reason for deletion in my opinion, but even no reason to keep. --Tine (talk) 02:07, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept: nobody is identifiable in this photo. moreover, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rolandsbrunnen Hildesheim 620-h.jpg. Ruthven (msg) 16:19, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP Slovenia: new bridge, the architecture is protected by copyright. Eleassar (t/p) 18:12, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: stairs are below ToO. Ruthven (msg) 16:22, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
no FoP in Iran Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:57, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:22, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
File:Bath Mill, Bath Lane, Mansfield (Also Goldie, Wade and Goldie, former mill, now demolished) (2).jpg
[edit]_(2).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate to File:Bath Mill, Bath Lane, Mansfield (3).jpg, which is the one with higher resolution Tine (talk) 20:16, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. @Tine: Next time use the template {{Duplicate}} in the File page. Thanks. Ruthven (msg) 16:24, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
File:Bath Mill, Bath Lane, Mansfield (Also Goldie, Wade and Goldie, former mill, now demolished) (6).jpg
[edit]_(6).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(6).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate to File:Bath Mill, Bath Lane, Mansfield (8).jpg, which is the one with higher resolution Tine (talk) 20:18, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. @Tine: Next time use the template {{Duplicate}} in the File page. Thanks. Ruthven (msg) 16:24, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
File:Bath Mill, Bath Lane, Mansfield (Also Goldie, Wade and Goldie, former mill, now demolished) (3).jpg
[edit]_(3).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(3).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Duplicate to File:Bath Mill, Bath Lane, Mansfield (4).jpg, which is the one with higher resolution. Tine (talk) 20:20, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. @Tine: Next time use the template {{Duplicate}} in the File page. Thanks. Ruthven (msg) 16:24, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:33, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- File:Proti-Bruselská akce.jpg is in scope as an illustration of anti-Dublin protests and Moravian nationalism. --ŠJů (talk) 03:29, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: all but one; per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 16:25, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
This picture seems to be a present from the president of Guatemala. As such, no mention to copyright release is included and therefore must be considered to be subject to the copyright rules of Guatemala Discasto talk 22:37, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:29, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Definitivamente no es obra de Rdrs62. Fotografía utilizada profusamente en la prensa. küñall (nütramyen) 22:49, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 16:30, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
No source for either file version, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 21:43, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 19:54, 4 January 2019 (UTC)
Does Andrew Scheer actually hold the copyright to this image? The image is credited to the House of Commons Photo Services/Bernard Thibodeau - Canada has no similar law to the US where a work by a federal employee is PD. The same issue probably faces a number of other files in this flickrstream as well. Jon Kolbert (talk) 07:23, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 21:52, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
No permission Rode raaf (talk) 10:02, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- De rechten zijn vrijgegeven en er is toestemming om de vlag vrij te gebruiken. http://achterhoeksevlag.nl/downloads/ --Viking-nl (talk) 10:20, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- That page contains "Stichting PakAn stelt alle rechten van de ontwerper Paul Heutinck beschikbaar". So at least the CC-BY-SA license does not apply. Although the intention might be to put it in public domain this way, it is legally not sufficient. First of all, "Stichting PakAn" can only do that if the copyright has been transfered to them by Paul Heutinck. But more important, it is not really possible in the Netherlands to declare something public domain; "In Nederland is het strikt gezien niet mogelijk om werken rechtstreeks in het publieke domein te plaatsen voordat het auteursrecht verlopen is." (source: creativecommons.nl). You can get very close to reaching PD, but that line is insufficient. A CC0 license would be fine, but this flag is also not CC0 licensed.
- Furthermore, I think the flag meets the threshold of originality, so it is not public domain. --Wimmel (talk) 14:55, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Insufficient release on source page. --Majora (talk) 21:54, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Falsche Infos Higgenhorscht (talk) 12:56, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: G7. --Majora (talk) 21:55, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 廣九直通車 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: The file is found on flickr with an unfree flickr license.|source=https://www.flickr.com/photos/cop2061/324768220/ Has been on Commons for over 10 years, and the Flickr source is possibly suspect for other reasons. I think that this is not blatant enough to speedy, and needs a full DR. Storkk (talk) 13:23, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- I think what you mean is that you suspected that the file was stolen from Commons and pretended to be the Flickr users own image? If so, can the date of upload for the Flickr source be viewed?廣九直通車 (talk) 05:22, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- I think that is quite possible, yes. If you look at the Flickr user's uploads, they appear at least somewhat likely to have crawled the web and collected as many police-related images as they could. Of course, it's not impossible that they took all those photos... but like you, I don't know how to ask Flickr to tell you the date of upload. In any case, {{Copyvio}} should be used only in "obvious" cases. Storkk (talk) 10:13, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
I have an idea:what if I ask the original uploader on English Wikipedia regarding the Flickr account? If the Flickr account does not belong to the original uploader, then the theory of stealing the file from Wikimedia Commons and pretends to be photographed by the Flick user can then be established. If not, then the original uploader may need to add extra copyright information to the Flickr image page.廣九直通車 (talk) 10:39, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Questionable if this was ever under an acceptable license I'm afraid. --Majora (talk) 21:58, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
This appears to be the own work of the uploading user, and not an official patch of the OTE. It is suspiciously similar to the official FBI seal. Jamacfarlane (talk) 18:02, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Even if it was created by the uploader, New York State does not put their material in the public domain automatically so there are copyright concerns. --Majora (talk) 22:01, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
This photo was originally uploaded to the German Wikipedia by a user named Pixelmirror, apparently with the licenses CC BY-SA 3.0 Germany, CC BY-SA 3.0 Unported, and GFDL 1.2+. A source was given and the user who uploaded there is also named Pixelmirror (Marcel Strobel). However, the source website gives a license of CC BY-NC 3.0 (check the source code for the string server_photo_cc_license per COM:WHERE#500px), though perhaps it originally had a more permissive license.
Since the license at 500px is non-commercial and it was uploaded there before being uploaded to dewiki, the creator would need to email COM:OTRS to prove they intended to license it freely. clpo13(talk) 19:15, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. License has NC restrictions. --Majora (talk) 22:10, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1948 and no indication that this would be an anonymous work. Jcb (talk) 21:29, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Just added the source. --Guise (talk) 07:24, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- Well, "Ebay.fr" has no value as a source of course. Even if you would have taken it from Ebay (which we cannot verify if you just link to the Ebay main page), this still doesn't tell un anything about the copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 07:39, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, Ebay is not a reliable source. A library or a museum would be one (GLAM). Regards, Yann (talk) 06:21, 29 September 2018 (UTC)
- Well, "Ebay.fr" has no value as a source of course. Even if you would have taken it from Ebay (which we cannot verify if you just link to the Ebay main page), this still doesn't tell un anything about the copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 07:39, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Other source given by uploader, zvab.com (a book information site), is also not acceptable. --Majora (talk) 22:16, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
This is not a photo of Frank Stilwell. No photos of him are known to exist. Source: True West Magazine, published since 1953 68.201.32.129 23:14, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Can the nominator for deletion provide the reference found in True West magazine stating that there is no known photo of Frank Stilwell? Otherwise we have only a "I said / You said" situation without proof on either side. -- btphelps (talk) (contribs) 17:38, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Doesn't appear to violate any copyrights and it is in use. Fights over its authenticity can be taken to the individual projects. --Majora (talk) 22:03, 5 January 2019 (UTC)
Recently published historical photographs under Basel Mission copyright
[edit]- File:Nair Women (1914).jpg
- File:Nair woman.jpg
- File:Nair Women during Thalappoli (1914).jpg
- File:"Nayermädchen Malabar." "Nayer girl in Malabar." "മലബാറിലെ നായർ പെൺകുട്ടി".jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Reasons for deletion request -- I apologize in advance for the large amount of text here, but I can assure that none of it is fluff. The criteria from the following link is enough for deletion, but because there has apparently been some confusion during the a deletion discussion for one of the pictures, I have discussed this in detail below just in case. See here (under the unpublished works section) where the policy deals with U.S copyright on works created before 1978. Note the bottom of that section. The bottom line is that the images are not public domain because they were published recently under the USC archive even though they were created after 1978, and are held under copyright by the Basel mission. I had meant for this to be a speedy deletion request, but had made the mistake of nominating it here as I thought this was where to go for multiple images.
Basel Mission claims copyright on its pictures from various archives: (All the images (photographic and non-photographic) made available in this collection are the property of the Basel Mission and are managed by mission 21. mission 21 / Basel Mission claim copyright on the images in their possession and require those publishing any of the images -- both individuals and organisations -- to pay a user's/copyright fee). A search in the history of some previous deletion discussions of one of the photographs came to the conclusion that the picture is valid because it is in public domain as it was created before 1914. This is wrong, and I have explained why below. It is not public domain per either Indian copyright law, or U.S copyright law, which I have also explained below. Keeping a picture in commons requires the picture to adhere to the copyright laws of the other country ‘’and’’ U.S copyright law, and more specifically, the more strict criteria on commons. The key thing to keep in mind here is that even though the work was likely created around 1914, it was not ’published' until posted in the USC archive (The USC archive says that it is the publisher on the information section of the pictures).
- First I would need to clarify that for this photo there is no direct specification that someone known as Inspector Frohnmeyer was the one who had taken the photos, as apparently a previous deletion discussion for one of the pictures had confused this. The information tables just say that it is part of the collection called “photographs from Inspector Frohnmeyer” which is part of the larger collection under photographs from the Basel Mission. Photographs from the collection of Frohnmeyer do not mean that they were taken by Frohnmeyer; it would just as likely mean that the photographs were brought to custody through him, and it is even likely true that this was a person working under the Mission. Even if Inspector Frohnmeyer was the creator, the photos were evidently not published by him as we have no evidence of any publishing prior to the USC archive’s publication. The picture would only be in public domain if this individual had ‘’published’’ the picture prior to when copyright effects would take place. Creation is not what constitutes public domain, unless it is for sure more than hundreds of years old. Evidently, the photographs part of this collection were only published in the recent USC archives. Which leads to why they fail copyright.
- The pictures failing U.S copyright is enough for it to be deleted (at the area where it says interaction of U.S and non-U.S law) per commons criteria, but I will explain this part of it too just to be sure.
The picture fails Indian copyright law, (ie., is not in public domain in India) as it has not been 60 years since the work has been published. The pictures would have been public domain if the works were published earlier during the author’s lifetime, which in this case is not only highly unlikely, but more importantly there is no evidence of that being so. Not only this, its true that the pictures was said to be created before 1914, but there is no evidence of the pictures being made before 1908 (the tag for Indian copyright has one such criteria that the picture would be in public domain if it was made before 1908). There is also no given evidence of the author of the photograph dying before 1958 either, as likely as it may be.Nevertheless, even in the highly unlikely chance that we did find that the author of the picture had died before 1958, the picture would still be deleted because it fails United States copyright rules.See here for more information on Indian copyright (under copyright rules:India).
- Per U.S copyright rules, the standard terms do not apply with works created before 1978 but only published 1978 or later. Hence, the criterion explained here (under the section unpublished works) would apply. These terms apply in the U.S. also for foreign works. Note that the world wide web was created around 1989, and the “publishing” of the pictures in the University of California internet archive could only have happened after that minimum date as the picture was obviously published online. The real date of publishing is likely much later than 1989, but the work will still not enter public domain anyway as explained below. Anyway, it puts us in the time frame of these two copyright times.
- If the work was published 1978 to 2002 (inclusive), it is copyrighted according to the longer of the standard U.S. rules, or until the end of 2047. (17 USC 303) It is currently not 2047.
- If never published, or published after 2002, the work is copyrighted according to the standard U.S. rules.
No matter what the date is, the date of publication to the UC archive must fall between the dates of 1978-2002 or 2002-date of uploading to WMC. Either way, the work will not meet the minimum required date in order to enter public domain or be free from copyright. On a side note, there is also likely more of these type of photos from the mission. BreadBuddy (talk) 17:10, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, PRP. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:45, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
Delete per above,unless some evidence of non-recent publication is given. Guanaco (talk) 18:01, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- Commons:Copyright rules by territory#India is unclear and misleading, especially for pre-1957 images. Guanaco (talk) 19:44, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, I will update that. But Commons:Copyright rules by territory#India summary is OK, and {{PD-India}} is OK too. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:53, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- I was going off of what the Indian copyright information on commons had said. With the new criteria given, I am willing to agree that the work may be okay under Indian copyright providing that what he said was true. But Indian copyright is irrelevant to commons if it fails United States copyright, which it quite explicitly does according to here https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Hirtle_chart and the main page regarding the U.S copyright, which i've linked above and also in the below discussion. BreadBuddy (talk) 20:03, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- Keep There is no reason to delete these files. These are images from India from 1914, and in that case, the copyright duration is counted from the date of creation. So these went into the public domain in India in 1965, and are also free of URAA. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:21, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Yann: (I copied my response from the admins noticeboard to here) Even if that were the case, commons requires files to be public domain in both India and the United States if they are to be kept. The files fail copyright in the U.S because they were created before 1978, but published in the online USC archives (which has to be sometime for sure after 1989 because the www had not existed before that). Basel Mission claims copyright on them per this criteria. BreadBuddy (talk) 19:31, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- I believe that the given criteria is because the wikimedia servers are in the U.S and have to comply with U.S copyright law. I have explained this and given a link to the policy in what I've wrote in the reason for deletion. BreadBuddy (talk) 19:31, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Yann: (I copied my response from the admins noticeboard to here) Even if that were the case, commons requires files to be public domain in both India and the United States if they are to be kept. The files fail copyright in the U.S because they were created before 1978, but published in the online USC archives (which has to be sometime for sure after 1989 because the www had not existed before that). Basel Mission claims copyright on them per this criteria. BreadBuddy (talk) 19:31, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- You are wrong about Indian copyright. It is very clearly explained in {{PD-India}} (last line). There are several reasons you could be wrong about the US copyright. If the author is known, there are in the public domain 70 years after the death of author, even if unpublished. And one author is mentioned. Then what constituted publication at that time is quite different than what it is today. We have had several discussions about that. I don't remember the details, which could be found in the archives of COM:VPC. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:43, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- What is explained in the commons policy literally says here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Public_domain#Unpublished_works would apply. The bottom of the first page on this official document and the hirtle chart ensure that this is true. Essentially all works created before 1978, if the work was published after 1978, would be under United States copyright. Now, we have no evidence of the works being published (which is very different from creation) before 1978 under any magazine or newspaper. But we do have evidence of the works being published after 1989 in the USC archive. Hence, the works are under United States copyright. This isn't my interpretation, this is just what the rules say.
- I would like to state what it says here in the link for unpublished works that I have given. It says, " Actually, that can happen easily with photographs in archives. Remember that "publication" requires the consent of the rights holder (initially the photographer). Many historic photos may thus actually be unpublished works, unless it can be shown that they were published in olden times. Especially items like private letters or family photographs, or photos found in some album, may well be unpublished. There are special exemptions in copyright law for libraries and archives that allow them to reproduce (even for the general public) such works for non-commercial uses, but that does not constitute "publication" unless done with the authorization of the rights holder. " Keep this in mind in addition to the failing of U.S copyright law.BreadBuddy (talk) 12:08, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- Regarding the author, "Photographs from inspector frohnmeyer" is just the name of the collection and it does not state nor imply the person who had taken the images. Because we have no conclusive evidence or idea on whom the real photographer is, we would have to apply the precautionary principle (which you would have to do anyway because the works literally have a copyright attached to it under the file descriptions on the source).
- I would like to remind that the files must pass United States copyright in order to be eligible for uploading in commons. Even if it does pass Indian copyright, the files would still fail U.S copyright. BreadBuddy (talk) 20:38, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- One very important piece of information is also said here here. I quote from this where it says " Even though many countries have accepted the rule of the shorter term based on Article 7 of the Convention, please note that the United States Copyright Act has not honored such a rule. For example, 17 U.S.C. 104A(a)(1)(B) may restore copyright on a work published outside the USA for the remaining American copyright term even if its copyright may expire sooner in its source country. This may affect works that were still copyrighted on 1 January 1996 in their source countries. This means that a work now in the public domain in a Commons user's home country might still be legally copyrighted in the USA. "Besides the fact that the works fail United States copyright, the work being public domain in India does not apply or correlate to any relation in the United States. BreadBuddy (talk) 21:51, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- You are wrong about Indian copyright. It is very clearly explained in {{PD-India}} (last line). There are several reasons you could be wrong about the US copyright. If the author is known, there are in the public domain 70 years after the death of author, even if unpublished. And one author is mentioned. Then what constituted publication at that time is quite different than what it is today. We have had several discussions about that. I don't remember the details, which could be found in the archives of COM:VPC. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:43, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Since the photos were created in (or around) 1914 in India, they became public domain there after 1964, per {{PD-India}}. As they were public domain in India prior to the URAA date (January 1, 1996), their copyright wouldn't have been restored in the United States by URAA. However, the available evidence appears to show that they were first published when USC put them online, so they fail the first requirement (and probably the second) of {{PD-1996}}, though they pass the third. Therefore, we have to treat these photos according to US copyright law unless it can be proven that they were first published outside the US. We don't know anything about the author of the photos, so the public domain date depends on when they were first published, per COM:HIRTLE. It seems likely that it would have been after 2002, in which case the photos will become public domain 120 years after creation (that's 2035, assuming a 1914 creation date). Since there's significant doubt over their copyright status in the US and Basel Mission claims to own the copyright to them, they should be deleted per COM:PRP. clpo13(talk) 22:54, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
- For each of these images, an author is mentioned, so they are not anonymous, so this rule doesn't apply.
- Also, we consider all old images to be published at the time of creation, or shortly thereafter, unless extraordinary claims. So you have to prove that they were not published. Regards, Yann (talk) 07:40, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- The creator of the individual pictures is not mentioned. You are speculating the author from the name of the miscellaneous collection, which you shouldn't be doing. There is no definitive author given for the individual pictures.Besides this, the original Basel mission website and archives literally state that the creator is unknown for each of the photos.
- For the second point, that is not what United States law defines as publication. BreadBuddy (talk) 12:05, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: PD-India. --Jcb (talk) 15:11, 6 January 2019 (UTC)