Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/06/28

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive June 28th, 2018
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

LTA user + OOS --Alaa :)..! 02:40, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:41, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free image taken from news site Citing (talk) 02:42, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyvio from getty images: no indication of listed free use license at source. czar 03:20, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"DHKCP" does not exist. Not used personal item. E4024 (talk) 08:20, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Speedily kept. Alternate of File:Flag_of_DHKC.svg, obviously not a "personal item" and could be useful. Possibly should be {{Rename}}d to DHKPC, depending on whether the order of Partisi and Cephesi are interchangeable or not. --Storkk (talk) 09:16, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This page only contains swear words, I will re-create it for a sock tag, but this should be purged from the (non-admin-visible) history. Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 10:01, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann: Could you please revision delete all edits to this page prior to your tag? And then close this request as invalid. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 10:02, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:05, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.elsiglo.mx/galeria/12667-27247758.silvia-pinal-de-mesera-a-diva-del-cine-teatro-y-tv Yann (talk) 11:37, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Yann: not PD-Italy since the film was entirely shot in Mexico. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:41, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:42, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful Saadbl (talk) 13:25, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Abuse of DR. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 21:21, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep per the four previous discussions at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Debbie Does Dallas.ogg. Nothing fundamental has changed since then. Betty Logan (talk) 04:26, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete Well, but it's under copyright -- or anyway, it might be under copyright. It's apparently quite complicated -- here is an article that describes the situation (it's from 2011, so maybe things have changed since then, but not that I know of). There was a legal agreement where a company called Arrow has agreed to be permanently enjoined from manufacturing, copying, or reproducing Debbie Does Dallas in favor of a company called V.C.X. -- which in doing so they are acknowledging the validity of V.C.X.s copyright in a legal document, if I understand it. Now, it's complicated -- there was apparently a 1987 case that held that it was in the public domain. Whether this later agreement supersedes that and re-establishes a copyright I don't know, and even a lawyer skilled in this area possibly could not say with 100% confidence.
So what I get from all this is "some people believe it is in the public domain and some don't", and it hinges on interpretation of technical minutae I think. Since it is unclear we should err on the side of caution -- I don't think "Well, it might be in the public domain, depending on who you talk to" is up to our standards for hosting material -- everything we host is supposed to be backed by our full faith and credit that it is free to use.
And besides that, this is a full-length feature film which obviously V.C.X. is trying to make a living off this and has successfully engaged lawyers to prevent Arrow from distributing the film. I don't know about here, but at the English Wikipedia we have a rule "respect for commercial opportunity" where we are extra careful not to impinge if its going to cost somebody actual financial distress. This is different from 99+% of cases where it's purely a technical question of some no-value photo from 1923. So if we continue to host this (probable, or anyway possible) copyvio we are putting the actual copyright holder in a bad spot, as well as putting anybody who in good faith distributes the film (figuring its on Commons so its free) in the position of getting sued, and actually losing. Let's not do this. Herostratus (talk) 06:54, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It is not under copyright in the United States and if you take the time to read the two documents linked at File:Debbie_Does_Dallas.ogv#Summary then you would know why: namely a court judgment ruled that Debbie Does Dallas has been “irretrievably injected into the [U.S.] public domain” because a copyright notice was not attached upon its original release. Law Law land Blog summarise DDD's copyright status here:

In 1987, the Eastern District of Michigan specifically ruled, at VCX’s urging, that Debbie Does Dallas had been “irretrievably injected into the public domain” because it was — you guessed it — distributed without proper copyright notices. (Try not to snicker at the court’s choice of words.) In other words, while VCX may have been peeved about Arrow competing with it in distributing Debbie Does Dallas, there was virtually nothing VCX could do to stop Arrow. Which means that Arrow gave up the right to do something it was definitely legally entitled to do (because Debbie is in the public domain), and gave up its lawsuit against VCX for doing something VCX was likely not entitled to do (because Deep Throat probably is not in the public domain), in exchange for VCX’s acknowledgement that VCX wasn’t allowed to do it and its promise to stop. Wow. Now that’s what I call a deal.

As for the subpoenas sent to the ISPs, this was part of a copyright trolling shakedown, where a copyright troll—Evan Stone in this instance—would target porn sharers/downloaders and threaten to humiliate the defendent with a court case if they didn't pay a "settlement fee". Stone was behind the DDD subpoenas (https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20100902/11385710880.shtml) but they were ruled illegal and Stone was fined. A brief overview is given at https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20110911/01030715892/copyright-troll-evan-stone-sanctioned-more-than-10k-sending-subpoenas-when-court-said-to-wait.shtml. If you google the case it suddenly dies in early 2012 i.e. no court cases, no judgments, no fines etc. Betty Logan (talk) 08:21, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I get it. But all this comes down to "In my personal opinion it is not under copyright". "My interpretation of the situation is that it is not under copyright". "My take is that the people claiming copyright are trolls and are wrong". You might be right, but the operative clause here is "might be". Who knows? I don't, and you don't. My understanding -- I'm not a regular here -- is that we have a pretty strict interpretation of copyright. Maybe I'm wrong, and maybe the operative rule de facto is "we have a strict interpretation of copyright, except when we don't feel like it", and if that is the rule, then of course that's different. Herostratus (talk) 21:14, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think you do get it. This doesn't come down to my personal opinion at all. It comes down to a court ruling that explicitly ruled that that the film was in public domain. A lawyer illegally sent subpeonas to thousands of people filesharing adult moves and was find by a judge for contempt of court. That's not my opinion, again that is a court judgment. Exactly under what interpretation of a law does a court ruling not stand, unless it is overturned by another court ruling? Betty Logan (talk) 09:17, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, right. That's a different angle -- not that the film is under copyright, but that the film itself violated someone else's copyright. According to that article, the Dallas Cowboys were given injunctive relief against the film being shown. What the status is of that injuction I don't know... if it is still in force, that would be a second reason that we can't host this media. Here is the legal mumbo-jumbo. So hmmm. Herostratus (talk) 21:23, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sigh...according to that document the injunction was against trademark infringement, not violation of copyright. To quote the relevant text: "The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York held therefore that the Appellant violated the Dallas Cowboy Cheerleaders' trademark and that the injunction was proper ... Whle the "Debbie" case was mainly linked with trademarks, in the Star/Varsity dispute we are dealing with copyrights.". The case you cite was a trademark issue, not a copyright issue and the Commons hosts hundreds of trademarks. It is allowed to because the Commons dos not intrude on the commerical use of the trademark per Commons:Non-copyright_restrictions#Trademark_law. Betty Logan (talk) 09:21, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment The various arguments so far:
    1. This file has been nominated four times for deletion under its previous title (see Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Debbie_Does_Dallas.ogg) and survived on all four occasions. The same arguments keep coming up but nothing substantive has changed in the interim.
    2. The argument that the file is not educational is inconsistent with the presence of other files. The fact remains the film is a classic of its genre (possibly the most famous adult movie ever made) and it isn't inherently less "educational" than File:Night of the Living Dead (1968).webm for example, which has never been nominated for deletion.
    3. As explained at Debbie_Does_Dallas#Copyright, DDD was exhibited without a copyright notice. After the producers failed to fix the problem a court ruling in 1987 found that the ommission of the copyright notice 'resulted in the film being irretrievably injected into the public domain "several months" later'. No court ruling since then has overturned this judgment. There is a legal interpretation of the ruling at Law Law land Blog.
    4. In 2011 Arrow (the distributor of Deep Throat) sued VCX (the distributor of DDD) for distributing Deep Throat. Arrow and VCX settled and acknowledge each others' "copyright claim" to stop the case going to court. This does not revoke the earlier court ruling. As Law Law Land Blog explains, the copyright over Deep Throat is unclear. The blog explains that Arrow have a very good argument that Deep Throat is still under copyright, and thus the settlement was not a good one for them because Arrow had the legal right to distribute DDD; the reason they settled was because they did not want to risk the judgment over Deep Throat going against them, so they acknowledged VCX's bogus copyright claim to DDD.
    5. Wikimedia does not have a moral duty to protect VCX's revenue stream from the film. They acquired exclusive rights to the film but VCX was the plaintiff in the 1987 case and instrumental in having the film ruled in the public domain so they would not have to pay royalties. They can't have it both ways i.e. have their revenue stream protected by copyright law while at the same time claiming it is in the public domain to get out of paying royalties.
    6. In 2010, a lawyer (Evan Stone) subpoenad the identities of 113 John Does who had been filesharing DDD ([1]). This was a classic copyright trolling case. It works like this: the lawyer identifies the filesharers (usually for porn) and offers them a settlement (usually a couple of thousand bucks). The ruse is highly effective (about 50% of the targets pay up) because the filesharers fear being publicly humiliated in a court case. In this case the court did not give permission for the subpeonas and the judge fined Stone $10,000 (see [2]). Unsurprisingly the filesharing case did not progress and it died in 2012 along with Stone's legal career.
    7. The latest ploy by those determined to get the file deleted is that the film is protected by derivative copyright due to the cheerleader outfits which is wrong and misrepresents the facts. In 1979 the Dallas Cowboys Cheerleaders successfully obtained an injunction against the Pussycat Theater to prevent them from promoting the film, on the basis that the cheerleader costumes constituted trademark infringment. Trademark infringement is not the same as copyright infringement. Trademarks protect commercial opportunities, and since Wikipedia does not interfere in those commericial opportunities it is permitted to host them per Commons:Non-copyright_restrictions#Trademark_law.
The simple fact is that there are very few files on here that are explicitly backed up by a court ruling that the work is in the public domain. Even if that ruling were to be legally challenged and overturned at some point (doubtful considering the law is clear cut about copyright notices) then Wikimedia has a legitimate defence against claim for damages in that a court had ruled the film was in the public comain. Even though the film does not show up under the file usage section it is infact COM:INUSE because a direct link is provided in the external links setion at the Debbie Does Dallas article. The file is linked in this manner in accordance with the consensus over the placement of the video, since it was deemed necessary that viewing the video should require a proactive decision by the user, since embedded videos can be started automatically or accidentally. There is a clear agenda at play here to get this file deleted, using spurious copyright arguments that do not hold up. The repeated attempts to delete the file are nothing more than an attempt to COM:CENSOR Commons by the backdoor, and is anyone really fooled by the ploy? I am getting tired of having to make repeated vists here to regurgitate the same arguments over and over. The film is in the public domain by virtue of a court judgment and its use and educational value is consistent with that of other full-length films hosted here. If you really want to get rid of the file I suggest you either change the rules to i) prohibit hosting feature-length films or ii) ban pornographic material and be honest to your convictions. Betty Logan (talk) 10:26, 26 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Debbie Does Dallas.ogg // do not nominate for deletion again
please contact wikimedia legal. There is nothing we can do for you. --Steinsplitter (talk) 19:24, 24 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Restoring closure. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:58, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this page cotains a video of sexuality content Very good wiki (talk) 09:37, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep SPA, blocked for WP0 abuse. Keep per all the previous DR. I find always funny to see someone opening a page marked as having a pornographic movie and them demand its deletion for it being a "video of sexuality content". Tm (talk) 11:07, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Speedy keept – no need to loose time for a DR created by a WP0 abuser. --jdx Re: 12:07, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Full movie and non encyclopedic Elie Hague (talk) 15:36, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nothing has changed since previous nominations. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 17:32, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is pure porn, Luce333eeee (talk) 22:40, 21 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep And????? Per previous times Tm (talk) 03:46, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Nothing has changed since previous nominations. --Achim55 (talk) 08:44, 22 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a porn 194.233.96.65 06:30, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept. The fact that it is porn is not a reason to delete it. Taivo (talk) 10:45, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrights Andrzei111 (talk) 07:36, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Masur (talk) 13:04, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like spam; Contains uncredited https://www.alamyimages.fr/photo-image-la-cathedrale-de-coventry-coventry-west-midlands-england-uk-europe-de-louest-59210834.html?pv=1&stamp=2&imageid=0458103B-09A5-4236-AE0B-05D47D001001&p=156757&n=0&orientation=0&pn=1&searchtype=0&IsFromSearch=1&srch=foo%3dbar%26st%3d0%26pn%3d1%26ps%3d100%26sortby%3d2%26resultview%3dsortbyPopular%26npgs%3d0%26qt%3duk%2520night%2520city%2520coventry%26qt_raw%3duk%2520night%2520city%2520coventry%26lic%3d3%26mr%3d0%26pr%3d0%26ot%3d0%26creative%3d%26ag%3d0%26hc%3d0%26pc%3d%26blackwhite%3d%26cutout%3d%26tbar%3d1%26et%3d0x000000000000000000000%26vp%3d0%26loc%3d0%26imgt%3d0%26dtfr%3d%26dtto%3d%26size%3d0xFF%26archive%3d1%26groupid%3d%26pseudoid%3d%26a%3d%26cdid%3d%26cdsrt%3d%26name%3d%26qn%3d%26apalib%3d%26apalic%3d%26lightbox%3d%26gname%3d%26gtype%3d%26xstx%3d0%26simid%3d%26saveQry%3d%26editorial%3d1%26nu%3d%26t%3d%26edoptin%3d%26customgeoip%3d%26cap%3d1%26cbstore%3d1%26vd%3d0%26lb%3d%26fi%3d2%26edrf%3d0%26ispremium%3d1%26flip%3d0 Lacrymocéphale (talk) 15:23, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:02, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An offensive and immoral image Monkey D Louffy (talk) 23:31, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Guanaco (talk) 23:39, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A violent and immoral image Monkey D Louffy (talk) 23:33, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Guanaco (talk) 23:39, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A violent and immoral image Monkey D Louffy (talk) 23:33, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Guanaco (talk) 23:39, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doggie style 50.159.96.70 21:26, 30 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Didym (talk) 00:04, 6 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An offensive and immoral image Monkey D Louffy (talk) 23:35, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Wikimedia Commons is not censored. --Guanaco (talk) 23:36, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Mhhossein talk 08:16, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedied as copyvio. --Ankry (talk) 09:54, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded for testing purposes. This file already exists in Commons Kaartic (talk) 11:04, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: dupe of File:Косарі в дельті ДУнаю.jpg. --JuTa 01:56, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's not own work by the uploader. The images is copyrighted by annampominova@gmail.com. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:07, 25 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:56, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Created by a blocked user (Joey) in violation of a block. Furthermore, not even his own work. 203.173.245.76 06:22, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete : Not relevant Arianewiki1 (talk) 08:17, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: it's a retouched derivative work, and other such exist per the description on File:Star-sizes.jpg. Is this inappropriate? Perhaps the licensing is dubious? Praemonitus 16:46, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Delete: Per nomination. Created by a blocked user. It is also a good idea to blacklist astronomy and Martha Speaks related files. 210.246.18.155 19:16, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 19:35, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Muhammad Usman Mandor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 06:34, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:24, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, low technical quality and possibly violation of personality rights. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:40, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:25, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE due to quality issues (very blurry). Leoclerc (talk) 12:14, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:28, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

One-time upload. Looks out of scope. Is it? (If I'm wrong please tell me directly.) E4024 (talk) 13:14, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:30, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image, spam Migebert (talk) 13:45, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:31, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:31, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Raju.meshram (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:33, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:31, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:33, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:36, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:35, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amarjeet kumar Bhaskar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:18, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Amarjeet kumar Bhaskar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of COM:SCOPE unused images.

Lacrymocéphale (talk) 15:27, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:37, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

شارلي شابلن 154.149.121.194 15:34, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:39, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded with malicious intent by previous partner Michealwestover (talk) 17:01, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

uploaded with malicious intent by previous partner Michealwestover (talk) 21:47, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:43, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:ADVERT. Any reason to keep these? I blocked the account for a week.

Yann (talk) 18:20, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete likely copyvios. For example, File:Massage chair for home.jpg is a Photoshop of a massage chair onto [3]. howcheng {chat} 18:32, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:45, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope – not educationally useful (unused userpage image with no foreseeable educational use). Hiàn (talk) 23:34, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:48, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope selfie... an Anuj Naik on the web is seen only on agrandizing sites such as Instagram and Facebook. Looks like another of this users 'Out of Scope' was also deleted (probably the same image)... see user's talk page. Acabashi (talk) 23:34, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:49, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nrjbusiness (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's userpage was speedily deleted in October 2017 as spam. The contributor was blocked the week prior for promotion. Out of project scope.

xplicit 23:48, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:49, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, source clearly claims copyright Acroterion (talk) 00:58, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:29, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

clear copy/paste of non-free file from the internet Acroterion (talk) 01:14, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:29, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Williamsblack990 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:23, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:30, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is owned by PT INKA: https://www.inka.co.id/product/view/27 Alqhaderi AliffianikoTalk 01:35, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:31, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Owned by PT INKA http://web.archive.org/web/20170603211942/http://www.inka.co.id/ Alqhaderi AliffianikoTalk 01:55, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:35, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Owned by PT INKA http://web.archive.org/web/20170603211942/http://www.inka.co.id/ Alqhaderi AliffianikoTalk 02:04, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:35, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Owned by PT INKA http://web.archive.org/web/20170603211942/http://www.inka.co.id/ Alqhaderi AliffianikoTalk 02:05, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:35, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Owned by PT INKA http://web.archive.org/web/20170606073149/http://www.inka.co.id/?page_id=44 Alqhaderi AliffianikoTalk 02:08, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:35, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Owned by PT INKA http://web.archive.org/web/20170606073149/http://www.inka.co.id/?page_id=44 Alqhaderi AliffianikoTalk 02:09, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:35, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://web.archive.org/web/20120204135435/http://www.inka.co.id/ Alqhaderi AliffianikoTalk 02:19, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:35, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small size withpit EXIFs, unlikely to be own work Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:08, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:45, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claims to be photo of 13-year-old boy, possible child pornography? Auntof6 (talk) 06:06, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:45, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Randykitty (talk) 06:13, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:46, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The "getty images" watermark on it makes me think it's probably copyrighted. Et0048 (talk) 06:23, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:46, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2018 picture with low resolution, no permission, no metadata, certainly external source. Cjp24 (talk) 11:37, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:04, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Chemical mistake. The lower ring in this diagram is pyrazine (aromatic) but the compound has a piperazine (saturated) there. Category:Eszopiclone has several 3D diagrams that are correct DMacks (talk) 14:19, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 09:18, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Also:

Files with another deletion request:

As discussed at Commons:Village_pump#Category:Files_with_no_description_pages_(uploaded_June_27,_2018) due to server errors couple hundred files were uploaded yesterday without any metadata. They will need to be reuploaded or metadata pages with file descriptions and licenses will need to be created.

I am nominating those files for deletion as a way to keep track of them. So if you reupload or add metadata page please remove your file from this DR or ask me and I will. Jarekt (talk) 19:17, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jarekt: , you can delete my files without any problem:
Skimel (talk) 19:47, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Jarekt: , you can delete this file:

--Catfaster (talk) 18:13, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: a few files that have been fixed in the meantime, deleted the rest. --Jcb (talk) 10:20, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False information 46.217.244.109 08:31, 8 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Use {{Rename}} or {{Fact disputed}} instead. P 1 9 9   16:44, 26 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False information Gero1119 (talk) 17:12, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

False information 46.217.244.109 13:38, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not open repetitive DRs. --E4024 (talk) 13:40, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:21, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False information 46.217.244.109 06:30, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:36, 18 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non free image and not correspond with real society and famousness Gero1119 (talk) 07:13, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Gero1119: Why do you think it is a violation of copyright? While it is small and has no EXIF data, there is no copy on the Internet except [4], which is not the source. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:35, 26 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 06:25, 27 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no evidence that the subject (who is supposedly the author of the photo, even though it doesn't look like a selfie) agreed to transfer the copyright to the uploader. The uploader claims to be the copyright holder ("I, the copyright holder"), but makes no claim of being the author. OTRS permission confirming the authorship and copyright transfer is needed. Looking at Special:Log/Gero1119, the uploader appears to have been making dubious claims of being the copyright holder of the works of a lot of different people. It's worth noting that the uploader is the one who initiated at least two (probably all four) of the previous deletion discussions, so they probably realized that this upload was a copyright violation and tried to rectify it. Disappointing to see so many administrators failing to connect the dots. LX (talk, contribs) 11:01, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Support I agree, I don't know why I missed this previously. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:57, 30 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:28, 7 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Due to a problem you had yesterday with your servers regarding metadata this file has been nominated for deletion. I uploaded it again with the necessary metadata the other file lacks. So, this file has no reason to exist. I hope I have not done anything wrong by uploading it again. I am not very familiar with how Wikimedia works. However, if you thing I have done something wrong please inform me about it and I will be happy to correct it. I am grateful to you for the chance to give me to promote the cultural inheritance of my country. George E. Koronaios (talk) 20:18, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb at 10:14, 6 Juli 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:1st earl Malise Graham Seal.png - --Krdbot 12:40, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Brisbanehotcool (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-res images. Most of them can be easily found via Google reverse image search from various blogs, forums and other websites. "Own work" claim is not credible. Several of the religion-related images have been previously uploaded by various sockpuppets and SPAs, and have been copyvio-deleted in the past.

GermanJoe (talk) 05:28, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 23:39, 6 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Could be old enough. Yann (talk) 11:18, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: still no license at all. --JuTa 13:30, 8 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF says Carlos Insaurriaga Ytoyoda (talk) 17:36, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination as copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 07:32, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Monkey D Louffy (talk) 23:39, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Monkey D Louffy: Explain why you believe this is a copyright violation. Guanaco (talk) 23:43, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

An image taken at a wedding venue is considered copyrighted by its owner Monkey D Louffy (talk) 23:50, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I have not heard of this. In almost all cases, the copyright holder is the photographer. Can you provide a source for this law? Guanaco (talk) 23:57, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Speedy keepNot a valid reason for deleting the file.廣九直通車 (talk) 07:22, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: abusive DR by sockpuppet. No valid reason for deletion. --Guanaco (talk) 10:09, 9 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Annoying as per words of Youssefali2019 and IP ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 14:05, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Comment: The IP who wrote the objection on the description page invokes privacy rights. It is not obvious if this can be considered as a public or a private event. It may be reasonable to delete. The pictured people are not identified, presumably not celebrities, and the file is currently only in general articles about marriage (inserted there by the uploader) and easily replaceable. Also, the fact that the uploader included a lot of unrelated categories to this file, and that his uploads are from many cameras, can evoke some questions. -- Asclepias (talk) 19:52, 30 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete it violates the private life of the couple and it may cause problems for them. الرشيد (talk) 17:52, 28 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • The image must be deleted because my wife is showing it, and it has been uploaded to Wikipedia and Wikimedia without my knowledge without permission or consent. It should be deleted because it violates and violates my rights and my wife's rights. Thank you 105.66.7.10 23:34, 8 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

مرحبا ارجوا منكم حذف هذه الصورة لأنها تنتهك حقوقي وحقوق زوجتي .. لا أعلم من قام بارسال على الموسوعة .. لذا اتمنى ان يتم إزالتها عاجل*ا 105.66.130.237 18:09, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Hi this photo violates my rights and my wife's rights so I would like to remove them because they have been lifted without consulting us, so please all officials to remove the picture as soon as possible please .. Thank you for understanding 105.66.0.38 17:49, 25 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

أؤكد على أنني ارشح هذه الصورة للحذف ، أنا من قام بتصوير هذه الصورة لكن رفعتها على ويكيميديا بالخطأ ، وأرجوا منكم حذفها بارك الله فيكم حفاظا على حرية وحقوق الزوجين اللذان يظهران بالصورة ، وشكرا* Saideljamali (talk) 10:34, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Courtesy deletion. --JuTa 03:18, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copivio from maps.yandex.ru Dima st bk (talk) 08:13, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:11, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BenDavies20 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These are all promotional photos from the Ziferblat cafe chain (the four styles/venues being covered by http://www.mediacityuk.co.uk/newsroom/ziferblat-opens-its-largest-branch-so-far-in-mediacityuk/, http://www.ziferblat.co.uk/images/gallery2.jpg, http://www.ziferblat.co.uk/images/gallery17.jpg, http://www.ziferblat.co.uk/images/06-edge-landing.jpg). The company website credits the photography to Paul Chambers and includes no CC licence, but the uploader Ben Davies claims it as "own work" and CC-licenced.

Lord Belbury (talk) 10:23, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:15, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Villaganzerla90 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own works, no evidence of a free license.

Yann (talk) 10:43, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:19, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Villaganzerla90 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low-re images, unlikely to be own works.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:45, 12 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 19:23, 6 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Created 1983. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 19:11, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:21, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Created 1992. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 19:19, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:25, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Created 1991. No Permission from the sculptor. Микола Василечко (talk) 19:20, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:37, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thelmaelvir (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Works of a living artist uploaded from http://blasaguilar.blogspot.com/ No evidence of CC license in the source. Permission is needed via OTRS

Anna (Cookie) (talk) 02:41, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Artist must confirm a free license by following the instructions on OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 09:38, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While there is no phonographic copyright on this video, the underlying song "Baba Yetu" presumably is copyrighted, being composed in 2005 by Christopher Tin. Chess (talk) 03:59, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 09:40, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing artist / copyright details. --ghouston (talk) 04:01, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 09:38, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shashankadas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal, Out of COM:SCOPE, Used for spam.

Steinsplitter (talk) 09:44, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 09:45, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marcelobaraoster (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small images without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 11:12, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Photographers must confirm license by following the instructions on OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 09:50, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Albertomos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Pictures of 3D objects. Difficult to assert whether it's in the public domain

Discasto talk 12:52, 20 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:37, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

--Albertomos (talk) 07:16, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Albertomos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted work by Antonio Mosca (d. 1951), missing permission.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:05, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

see
Italiano: Autore:Albertomos

Email con foto allegate inviate dall'autore ("Dichiaro di essere detentore dei diritti d'autore delle foto allegate:

  • File:AM-1909-In-giardino-acquerello.jpg
  • File:AM-1940-dal-Parco-Nuovo-di-Milano-acquerello.jpg
  • File:AM-1909-dalla-finestra-acquerello.jpg
  • File:AM-Madonna-con-bambino-02.jpg
  • File:AM-Madonna-con-bambino-01.jpg
  • File:Am-Sacra-famiglia-copia-da-Pompeo-Batoni.jpg
  • File:AM-esterno-con-pergola-e--cane.jpg
  • File:AM-natura-morta-rose-in-vaso.jpg
  • File:AM-natura-morta-crisantemi.jpg
  • File:Antonio-Mosca-ritratto-del-nipotino-Paolo-in-culla.jpg
  • File:Antonio-Mosca-ritratto-del-nipotino-Paolo-bambino.jpg
  • File:AM-casa-con-pergola.jpg
Dichiaro di essere d'accordo alla pubblicazione di tali opere sotto la licenza libera
I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following license:
w:en:Creative Commons
attribution share alike
This file is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license.
You are free:
  • to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work
  • to remix – to adapt the work
Under the following conditions:
  • attribution – You must give appropriate credit, provide a link to the license, and indicate if changes were made. You may do so in any reasonable manner, but not in any way that suggests the licensor endorses you or your use.
  • share alike – If you remix, transform, or build upon the material, you must distribute your contributions under the same or compatible license as the original.
, di cui ho letto il testo e di cui accetto le condizioni") e da me in copia a permissions-it@wikimedia.org in data sabato, 30 giugno 2018 8:49 AM per autorizzare pubblicazione.
.

Kept: OTRS permission received. Ruthven (msg) 07:56, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Albertomos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Very probably it's copyrighted material. PD-Italy applies to simple photographs only, not to drawings or books.

Ruthven (msg) 07:12, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep "PD-EU-no author disclosure" Italy awards 70 years from disclosure, per EU rules. "Probably" should be asked at Village Pump, rather than jump to deletion. The maps are younger than 70 and should be deleted. --RAN (talk) 12:17, 6 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Most since they're still under US copyright because of URAA. The ones without a date in the title are from 1958, which aren't public domain in Italy or the US. Kept the 1920s ones since there isn't a credited human author and they would have been public domain in 1996. --Abzeronow (talk) 16:46, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a widely available image on the internet: https://www.pinterest.com/pin/643381496736436362/ Ytoyoda (talk) 21:40, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Proper licence and source are needed. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:53, 11 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a duplicate file. Jpetracek (talk) 18:45, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:59, 17 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a screen-grab from the television, note the PSL logo in the top corner. Highly unlikely it was taken by the author, with such poor quality Lugnuts (talk) 08:07, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 21:54, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by RaviC as Copyvio (copyvio) ~Moheen (keep talking) 03:42, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is the official logo for Britain for Europe, so fair use applies. NB: There is an ongoing AfD for the article itself by the same editor WP:Articles for deletion/Britain for Europe. --The Vintage Feminist (talk) 09:33, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
There's no such thing as fair use on Commons. It's copyrighted (and the uploader claimed it was CC-1.0). --RaviC (talk) 16:00, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Moheen I have created a new file - File:Britain_for_Europe_logo.png - which is article specific and not on Commons, which has the fair use rationale. This file can be deleted and the new one used on the article, I'm assuming Aaronruddock will have no objection. --The Vintage Feminist (talk) 02:12, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted as copyvio. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:27, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no useful content Stepro (talk) 04:19, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:29, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:DERIV, because the art relies heavily on the Ralph Wiggum character from The Simpsons, this would be considered a derivative work and rights belong to the show's creators and/or 20th Century Fox. Could be used on Wikipedia where fair use content is permitted, but cannot be stored on Commons. Ytoyoda (talk) 04:37, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your answer COM:DERIV and Ytoyoda. But I don't understand what I have to do because I have the authorization of the artiste and it's write that to post the picture it has to be stored on Commons. So I'm very lost. — Preceding unsigned comment added by ‎V. F Inès (talk • contribs) 07:54, June 28, 2018 (UTC)
The issue is prett complicated. Normally, you take a picture, you own the rights and you can do whatever you want. But because it’s a picture of someone else’s artwork, you need permission from the artist. But then, because the art incorporates a copyrighted image, you need permission from the Simpsons creator if you want the image to be copyright-free, and I don’t think that’s happening. Ytoyoda (talk) 23:32, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Deleted by Ronhjones. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:30, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Varabala (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own works, grabbed fom facebook "FBMD"

Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:57, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:30, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Alamy stock photo, available in higher resolution (https://c8.alamy.com/comppt/b81w4x/lexi-alexander-lexi-alexander-lexi-alexander-realisatrice-du-film-hooligans-ano-2005-usa-uk-b81w4x.jpg), most likely not own work, no EXIF Magnus (talk) 06:58, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:31, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is a svg and it does not display correctly: we can't see anything but black! Sobarbie (talk) 09:21, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:32, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Binodbhagat (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small images without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 10:23, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:31, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No valid license (unspecified CC-BY license in permission).

Previously indicated {{cc-zero}} by uploader and later license reviewed by User:INeverCry (banned) as such, but I don't trust this to ever have been under cc-zero on Twitter without an OTRS ticket as tweets cannot be edited to my awareness. 84.250.17.211 10:56, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


for now  Keep: INeverCry done maybe someting wrong but here he witnessed a fact and that's enough. The only reason for me right now to delete would be if the uploader and the reviewer are socks.--Sanandros (talk) 20:06, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is this sufficient? 84.250.17.211 17:41, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:33, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dr. Khurshed Alam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photo, unlikely to use any project

Afifa Afrin (talk) 11:15, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:35, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:17, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:35, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Keyse Costa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:45, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:36, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Xiaohong.wiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

> Can be deleted, didn't know how to do it  Thank you. Xiaohong.wiki (talk) 22:10, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:37, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused GIF version of File:Hospital for Special Surgery Logo.png. LX (talk, contribs) 16:33, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:37, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm not sure what this text means, but such a gif is generally outside the project scope. Guanaco (talk) 21:16, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Guanaco: It's the name of a website --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 11:18, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:53, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:47, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:54, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently taken from Flickr (per Tineye result). No EXIF, precautionary nomination. küñall (nütramyen) 03:37, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep It was my flickr account. I already removed it from flickr (Didn't know that cannot be on both sites). {{Alejandrocif (talk) 12:58, 28 June 2018 (UTC)|12:47, 28 June 2018|Alejandrocif}}[reply]

Alejandro, no, there is no problem in the picture being elsewhere. Problem it is does not have an EXIF, making it suspicious of being taken from somewhere else (commons:license laundering) --küñall (nütramyen) 16:12, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Künall: Do I have to upload it again with EXIF? How can I replace the photo with the same, but with EXIF data? (BTW: I know how to export with EXIF, my question is about wikimedia)

If you really do have it, you can upload the original file (as taken from the camera, with no modifications preferably) --küñall (nütramyen) 02:47, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, I re-upload the picture with EXIF data (And more resolution also). I hope it's ok now. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alejandrocif (talk • contribs) 00:35, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, the EXIF show Photoshop Lightroom because I always show in RAW, so I made some basic adjustments in Lightroom --Alejandrocif (talk) 16:28, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Alejandrocif has shown enough proof that he's the author (and has control of the flickr account as well). --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:01, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by FabianHorst as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Rechtslage nachträglich unklar geworden.
Converted by me to regular DR, as it formally does not qualify for SD. However, I support a courtesy-deletion, as the image is neither in use on a WM project nor are there any external uses (checked with Google and TinEye). -- Túrelio (talk) 07:34, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I could not find any use outside the commons category. Due to the unclear legal situation, I am in favor of a quick deletion. --FabianHorst (talk) 08:10, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: @FabianHorst: Note that this is really and purely a courtesy deletion, and it's stretching our usual approach to courtesy deletions a bit (image has been on Commons for more than two years). It was not explained why the legal situation is supposed to be "unclear", but as the image apparently isn't used anywhere, I think it's more resource-efficient and in the spirit of recognizing your continuing contributions to the project to honor this request (as an exception) instead of opening a detailed discussion on possible legal issues. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:30, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad upload Uhmoke (talk) 21:03, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (broken image). --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:39, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 07:26, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 11:19, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Philsville (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small images without EXIF data, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 10:46, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 11:19, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred image showing the interior of the Cybo Chapel in the basilica. We have lots of high quality images about this chapel. Zello (talk) 11:07, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 11:20, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred image showing the nave of the basilica. We have lot of high quality images about the same interior space. Zello (talk) 11:09, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 11:20, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred image showing the Altar of the Holy Family in the basilica. We have a better picture about the same altar. Zello (talk) 11:11, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 11:20, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred image showing the dome of the basilica. We have high quality picture showing exactly the same area. Zello (talk) 11:13, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 11:20, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file is a low resolution (980×983) image of a female vagina, which is likely a violation of COM:PORN and COM:NUDE. It's educational value is also doubted. 廣九直通車 (talk) 11:13, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 11:19, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality picture with tourists and blurred details. It could be acceptable but we have tons of very good pictures about the facade. Zello (talk) 11:15, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 11:19, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurred picture showing the main altar. We have many pictures of good quality showing the same object. Zello (talk) 11:16, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 11:19, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The claim of this being in the public domain notwithstanding, it's clearly a copy of the company's logo at https://www.zeuspackaging.com/ so the claim of "own work" is bogus and should be deleted on the grounds of a false authorship statement. RoySmith (talk) 17:49, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 11:21, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image found on various other webpages like https://elclubdelrock.com/concierto/boom-boom-kid-en-lima-2017/ (https://elclubdelrock.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/boom_boom_kid.jpg) Blogpost seems to be from 2017, upload from 2014. Also there is a "GO" watermark in the bottom-left corner. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 18:55, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 11:22, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nina07011960 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Bogus licenses. Insufficient authorship information, unknown copyright situation.

Jcb (talk) 20:28, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: File:Matthew Washington Kennedy.jpg speedied (COM:GCSD#4) as second time (!) reuploaded out-of-process. Эlcobbola talk 20:41, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 11:22, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nina07011960 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

It has been determined that the submitter of ticket:2018042110007476 is not the copyright holder.

~ Rob13Talk 13:45, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 17:16, 16 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.fundeu.es/recomendacion/a-tope-con-todo-a-full/ "Foto: © Archivo Efe/Eliseo Trigo" - Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:47, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 11:22, 31 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 18:26, 1 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate from File:Hotel Astor am Holstenplatz 1-2 (Kiel 34.259).jpg Snoopy1964 (talk) 12:25, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:29, 13 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. Hanooz 15:59, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 07:23, 16 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Majo statt Senf (talk) 16:06, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All photos on http://vitalykuzmin.net, unless otherwise noted, were licenced under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International licence until 30 August 2017. — Nickel nitride (talk) 17:58, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 17:39, 20 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a left over copy of a film that received an OTRS confirmation. Dgw (talk) 12:59, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jcb, please  Delete. Thank you. Dgw (talk) 16:14, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --matanya talk 10:18, 7 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bodvar Antonio Gregersen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and newspaper. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 21 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Historical books and document. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:El TelegrafoDelHomenajeGenMorales.pdf, File:LBNCCE-Alfaro-2313-PUBCOM (1).pdf, File:Gatazo.pdf.pdf, and File:GeneralMoralesLlerenaProclamationTo General.jpg per Alexis.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 08:59, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
N.B. User:Bodvar Antonio Gregersen and COM:HD#My images are nominated for deletion also appear to concern these files.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:58, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Probably keep File:El TelegrafoDelHomenajeGenMorales.pdf as it is a newspaper from 1901. I added some information, it only needs a license for Ecuador now. (PD-1923 also applies) - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:21, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
"Art. 81. – Where the holder of rights in a work from the time of creation of the work is a legal person, the period of protection shall be 70 years from the making, disclosure or publication of the work, whichever is the later."
I can't remember the template for that. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 19:36, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: can we take a closer look at this? This is all so old it's more likely to be than not be PD. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 00:40, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment File:Gatazo.pdf.pdf pages from appendix III from 1976 book by Elías Muñoz Vicuña Hathitrust Google books, "Parte oficial de la batalla de gatazo". Seemingly written/signed by Juan Francisco Morales who died in 1901. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:01, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment More info can perhaps be found at w:es:Usuario:Bodvar Antonio Gregersen/Taller. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 01:48, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment For the photo and painting, is there any hope we could ever figure out who made those? Could we consider them to be anonymous? (anonymous works from Ecuador also expire 70 years after creation) If not, considering they are roughly 120 years old (at least), I think we need to put some "Undelete in.." category on this before deleting it. I don't know how we determine that. Is this what {{PD-old-assumed}} is for? - Alexis Jazz ping plz 10:35, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Alexis Jazz: Yes, we could consider them to be anonymous and this is what {{PD-old-assumed}} is for.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:45, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: looks like license issues have been resolved, images are old enough. See also Commons:Help desk/Archive/2018/06#My images are nominated for deletion. P 1 9 9   15:42, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bodvar Antonio Gregersen (talk · contribs) 2

[edit]

Historical book pages. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 3 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per Alexis at 17:34 above.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:56, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Alexis_Jazz&diff=853565892&oldid=853181069 :
"The above three files were taken from the book entitled "Recopilation De Mensajes Dirijidos Por Los Presidentes Y Vicepresidentes De La Republica: Jefes Supremos Y Gobiernos Provisorios A Las Convenciones Y Congresos Nacionales Desde El Ano De 1819 Hasta Nuestro Dias, Volumes 4-5... This book was published in 1901. Hence by U.S. and Ecuadorean copyright law, the book is out of copyright protection.
As to the images of Juan Francisco Morales Llerena, those photos were made no later than 1901 because he died in 1901. That means that the files of General Juan Francisco Morales Llerena are not protected by U.S. and Ecuadorean copyright Ecuadorean copyright protection ends 70 years after the copyright's holder's death."
- Alexis Jazz ping plz 17:42, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: text-only document, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:37, 3 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Restored: per Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2018-10#File:Mensaje del Presidente about GenMoralesPagina276.pdf. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:55, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bodvar Antonio Gregersen (talk · contribs) 2

[edit]

Who is author of cover?

EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:38, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I don't know, but this completely unrelated book uses the same cover image. Need to remove the first page. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:23, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done - Alexis Jazz ping plz 14:32, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]
@Jeff G.: They did. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 20:55, 9 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Strakhov (talk) 19:24, 18 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Egon Eagle as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: fanart Yann (talk) 11:28, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jon Kolbert at 19:29, 5 Oktober 2018 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 00:23, 6 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect licensing. Not sure if it could just be transferred to PD-logo, however. HapHaxion (talk) 00:53, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

No information on TOO in Turkey on COM:TOO Jon Kolbert (talk) 13:26, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: changed license to PD. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:33, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from Facebook per MD. Is this a free image? E4024 (talk) 14:24, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Unlikely to be own work. --Majora (talk) 22:12, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because I created it and im enable to use it, so i'm trying to reupload it whit a diferent name. Daniel AR Pires (talk) 18:48, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused. Nominated day of upload by uploader. G7. --Majora (talk) 22:28, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Italian senate website has a CC-BY license, but it doesn't allow the material to be used for commercial uses (see this page (in italian)).--ƒringio · 15:33, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Image is part of the dati.senato.it site and therefore is under the CC-BY-3.0 license. I have updated the source, license, and removed the differing image from the file history. No valid reason for deletion. --Majora (talk) 22:34, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not submitter's own work as claimed. A tineye.com reverse image search shows it is widepsread on the web. 71.48.137.163 19:04, 14 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. Copyvio. Yann (talk) 15:25, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:14, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 23:16, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fontd'er (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images taken from wallpaper sites

Ytoyoda (talk) 17:31, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 17:48, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author(s) must send permission(s) to OTRS

Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:59, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copied from the talk page:

"

"

Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:57, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: OTRS permission received. --Majora (talk) 17:53, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

</noinclude>

Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:43, 27 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright infringemen from: https://www.facebook.com/avi.gil.92 דגש חזק (talk) 13:34, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 18:55, 4 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems not to be educationally useful and I would not know in which case it would be useful.--Kai3952 (talk) 04:06, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Weak keep Well, it's a market stall selling cacti in New Taipei, clearly defined and categorized - I wouldn't say that it can't be educationally useful, could imagine uses in Taiwan-related contexts despite some blurriness. If it were only for COM:SCOPE, I would keep the image, but I do have some personality rights concerns. Gestumblindi (talk) 22:11, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Definitely has educational value for illustrating everyday life in Taiwan. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:59, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 07:00, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I was experimenting with CropTool, intended to overwrite original file, and didn't notice that it selected the "new file". Please delete, I will redo with the correct option set. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 08:13, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: G7. --Majora (talk) 20:00, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contemporary painting. Needs permission from fr:Vanecha_Roudbaraki

Hanooz 17:05, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 20:03, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Authors: Farnoud and Gilles Dacquin, Uploader: User:Vanecha.Roudbaraki. Needs permission from the authors.

Hanooz 17:08, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 20:04, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False date, https://www.xuehua.us/2018/05/29/%E6%B3%B0%E6%8B%B3%E6%96%B0%E7%9A%87%E5%B8%9D%E8%80%80%E5%A8%81%E7%8C%9C%E6%AF%94%E8%A5%BF%E6%8F%90%E7%8C%9C%E6%9B%B4%E9%9C%B8%E6%B0%94%EF%BC%8C%E4%BB%96%E6%83%B3%E8%B5%A2%E9%81%8D%E4%B8%80%E9%BE%99/zh-tw/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:51, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 20:53, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False date, https://twitter.com/CalTradArts/status/989312566701637632 Patrick Rogel (talk) 19:55, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 20:51, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Finoskov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Files from the V&A website seems problematic : https://www.vam.ac.uk/articles/terms-of-use#3. False license tag (not 2-D art) and no permission from the photographers for the others. To be discussed.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:27, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Clearly problematic files. PD-Art does not apply as these are not 2D objects and the licensing statement on the website is not Commons compatible. Unfortunately I don't see any recourse here but to delete them. --Majora (talk) 20:12, 6 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ein eigener Import von Flickr mit seltsamer "Musik" im Hintergrund. Die Tonspur ist offenbar fehlerhaft. lewenstein (talk) 01:42, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Music would need to be identified and confirmed to be under an acceptable license. Otherwise this is simply a derivative we can't keep. --Majora (talk) 00:58, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly a screenshot of a likely copyrighted broadcast Ytoyoda (talk) 04:13, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • No, it wasn't copyrighted broadcast. It was video-bridge in World Cup 2018 press center. I have the journalist accreditation at World Cup 2018 press centers, so I have the right to share any information that was voiced or demonstrated on the monitor and imprinted on my camera during this press conference. This is my journalistic right.--Soul Train (talk) 16:05, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Update. And what's next?--Soul Train (talk) 16:25, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep I confirm that Oleg (Soul Train) is an officially accredited journalist to the World Cup 2018. It was a video conference with Julio Cesar Maglione, specially organized for accredited journalists in Moscow press center. Live video on the monitor of the press conference is not a creative work, but is a mechanical means for communication only. Like an interview on the phone, videophone, skype etc. In this case, the journalist is the owner of copyright for all recorded, processed and selected materials (audio, photos, videos and interpretation of the interview). --sasha (krassotkin) 17:34, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Krassotkin: I'm not necessarily disagreeing with you, but do you have any actual evidence that courts have treated video of press conferences as uncopyrightable? Storkk (talk) 09:44, 10 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: This might merit a VPC discussion regarding the point raised by Storkk but I would have to agree with the above discussion as of right now. Also, withdrawn by nominator. --Majora (talk) 01:02, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This object is artworks installed in public places of Japan. Then, Wikimedia license for this picture is not consistent with U.S. and Japan copyright law. Designer: 尼子靖(Yasushi Amako). Exhibition:2018/03/22 - . c.f. Hiratsuka City, Town news.--Loasa (talk) 08:03, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No FoP for artistic works in Japan. --Majora (talk) 01:05, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The permission of this file is unclear Shxahxh (talk) 10:27, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Probably out of scope anyways. --Majora (talk) 01:06, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Whatever the uploader's modifications are, the principal drawing apparently is not his own work and therefore a copyvio. The file should be deleted per the precautionary principle, unless the uploader can explain in a satisfactory way that he indeed created the entire drawing. Rosenzweig τ 11:30, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The drawing is not my own work, instead the picture I've taken with my camera is my own work... I expected reactions like this, if you think that this picture must be deleted, please delete it, there are no problems... thank you for having examinate my picture... bye ...Luc106

Deleted: per above. Derivative work of likely copyright content. --Majora (talk) 01:07, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://www.moyareklama.by/single_ad_new.php?id=209011799 01.05.2018 НоуФрост (talk) 11:31, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 01:08, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Blogspot source, from where this flag was supposedly taken, does not exist any more. The flag is not used and it has nothing to do with the flags in Category:Aramean flag. (BTW this cat should be renamed to plural per our naming convention.) E4024 (talk) 11:57, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Unclear copyright status. --Majora (talk) 01:10, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused derivate of existing file:O-52 otoyolu.png Puclik1 (talk) 12:30, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Majora (talk) 01:09, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused derivate of existing file:O-51 otoyolu.png Puclik1 (talk) 12:30, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Majora (talk) 01:09, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused derivate of existing file:O-20 otoyolu.png Puclik1 (talk) 12:30, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Majora (talk) 01:09, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused derivate of existing file:D 100.png Puclik1 (talk) 12:33, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Majora (talk) 01:09, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused derivate of existing file:D 130.png Puclik1 (talk) 12:33, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Majora (talk) 01:09, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused derivate of existing file:D 110.png Puclik1 (talk) 12:40, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Majora (talk) 01:09, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission from the unnamed photographer Verbcatcher (talk) 14:06, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 00:53, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Digital conversion of Internet images. No sources is given and suspicious licensing. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by 暴跳魚雷 B dash (talk) 14:43, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 00:54, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • I wanted to place the category "Public Domain", but somewhere I missed it (Help!). You can add the author of the photograph. I don't have this newspaper, only scan of the photograph77.253.68.164 08:36, 1 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Polish-American actress, photo apparently from the 60s, but with no further information. Not enough info to keep this. --Majora (talk) 00:56, 10 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a work by the Government of Republic of Indonesia. Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:34, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Oppose This work is published by the government of the Republic of Indonesia through the National Gallery of Indonesia in cooperation with the Ministry of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia. You can see the information at the bottom left of the website that I add. Thanks :) Raudalkhudri (talk) 03:53, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Being in a national gallery does not give that gallery the copyrights to that painting. The copyright belongs to Amang Rahman Jubair. --Majora (talk) 17:37, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr photos by Roz Galloway seems All rights reserved, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:12, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. That wasn't hard to find. --Majora (talk) 21:48, 11 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No licence specified - in addition while the photo on the meseum plaque appears to be Crown Copyright, the text is not and will be copyrighted. Nigel Ish (talk) 11:35, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Cropped and original version removed from history. --Majora (talk) 04:59, 12 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://theredlist.com/wiki-2-20-881-1399-1161-1146-view-classical-ballet-profile-don-quixote.html Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:15, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Photograph on site included metadata so inclusion of that here does not prove anything unfortunately. --Majora (talk) 03:13, 14 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low res file, no evidence that uploader is the photographer. ... Thanks,   CJ [a Kiwi] in  Oz  13:34, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 04:49, 16 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:15, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The Facebook uploader is clearly identical with the Commons uploader, permission {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} is given, no valid reason to question it. --ŠJů (talk) 19:57, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@ŠJů: Yes there is a reason : photo is © 2018 | Cimbálová muzika Milana Broučka | Vytvořila: Vlaďka Křenková so a permission is needed. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:03, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: The photo is maybe identical as at Facebook but this does not mean that if was borrowed from Facebook to Commons. It was placed to cimbalovamuzikamb.cz under © (the © belongs to the website generally, it not specifies authorship of the photos), while paralelly under {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} to Commons. Vlaďka Křenková is a member of the musical group, and the Commons uploads are also signed as a selfpromo of the musical group (as implies the nickname), i.e. there is no reason to suspect that it was released here against or without the will of the author. Probably, Vlaďka Křenková manages a promotion of the group everywhere: at their website, Facebook, Instagram, Youtube as well as at Wikimedia projects. The fact that the website of the musical group is generally under copyright doesn't mean that the group cannot release their photos (indepentently on the website) under free license at Commons. --ŠJů (talk) 21:15, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Unfortunately a nickname can be anything so we can't go by that. Seeing as it was available on another website with a copyright notice, in full resolution, and with metadata, I have even more doubts. The copyright holder can email our COM:OTRS team confirming permissions. --Majora (talk) 05:19, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:16, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The Facebook uploader is clearly identical with the Commons uploader, permission {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} is given, no valid reason to question it. --ŠJů (talk) 19:57, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@ŠJů: Once again there is a reason : photo is © 2018 | Cimbálová muzika Milana Broučka | Vytvořila: Vlaďka Křenková so a permission is needed. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:06, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Patrick Rogel: Once again: The photo is maybe identical as at Facebook but this does not mean that if was borrowed from Facebook to Commons. It was placed to cimbalovamuzikamb.cz under © (the © belongs to the website generally, it not specifies authorship of the photos), while paralelly under {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} to Commons. Vlaďka Křenková is a member of the musical group, and the Commons uploads are also signed as a selfpromo of the musical group (as implies the nickname), i.e. there is no reason to suspect that it was released here against or without the will of the author. Probably, Vlaďka Křenková manages a promotion of the group everywhere: at their website, Facebook, Instagram, Youtube as well as at Wikimedia projects. The fact that the website of the musical group is generally under copyright doesn't mean that the group cannot release their photos (indepentently on the website) under free license at Commons. The permission is given here. --ŠJů (talk) 21:17, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You are wrong : a copyright can't transform by magic into a CC license unless a permission is provided. Besides we don't know who is Vlaďka Křenková; we only know an user nicknamed @Cimmilbr: --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:23, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Unfortunately a nickname can be anything so we can't go by that. Seeing as it was available on another website with a copyright notice, in full resolution, and with metadata, I have even more doubts. The copyright holder can email our COM:OTRS team confirming permissions. --Majora (talk) 05:19, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative work from advertisement. Should be blanked to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is NOT an advertisement. It is the route information to the passengers only. Ckh3111 (talk) 04:19, 29 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: If we are talking about the water babies ad with the sticker over it then that would qualify for de minimis in my opinion. Same as for case #1 on the information page. If we are talking about the bus route ad I'm not seeing how that is a problem. It is plain text in a country that has FoP allowances. --Majora (talk) 22:32, 18 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 20:56, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment: the original upload had a caption, presumably in Ottoman Turkish, but might be any other language using the Nastaliq variant of the Arabic script. It might shed more light on the context of the photograph. --HyperGaruda (talk) 15:56, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: we dont have any source information. --JuTa 18:41, 9 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@JuTa: What do you think about a restoration since it is now PD-old-100?--Tadarrius Bean (talk) 12:54, 17 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]