Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/06/08
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
![71 File:"Old Blue Jeans" Hannah Montana.jpg](#File:"Old_Blue_Jeans"_Hannah_Montana.jpg){kind=link}
![102 File:אוהל הרה"ק האמרי שפר מדאראג בבית החיים בדאראג.jpg](#File:אוהל_הרה"ק_האמרי_שפר_מדאראג_בבית_החיים_בדאראג.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_Massimo_Campigli_museo_del_900.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
;_Bevölkerungsentwicklung_a.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
mistake Azdak264 (talk) 04:04, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Tagged for speedy deletion as copyvio and at uploader request. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 22:58, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:17, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
No more use あ四タ (talk) 09:37, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 09:51, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope + promotion to Instagram account --Alaa :)..! 13:55, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 19:59, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope + promotion to Instagram account ; recreation of a photo already deleted in may 2018 Civa (talk) 12:03, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- Also this one File:Asrararef.jpg --Alaa :)..! 00:16, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, source – Facebook. Image is the same, but previous was derivative work and this is original. Taivo (talk) 07:53, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Taivo: sorry, but the two pictures above uploaded again :/ --Alaa :)..! 17:56, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- The user blocked in arwiki for 1 week --Alaa :)..! 17:59, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- I blocked him/her in Commons for month (second block) and deleted all uploads. Taivo (talk) 18:07, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- The user blocked in arwiki for 1 week --Alaa :)..! 17:59, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Clara Vogedes
[edit]No Fop in France. According to French law, it is not allowed to publish picture whose the main subject is an original creation until 70 years after the death of its author. Unless prior authorization by the author or his heirs. The painter Clara Vogedes was dead in 1983. I put DR only on paintings in France (not on paintings in Germany for example).
- File:Clara Vogedes - Bretagne, 1977.jpg
- File:Clara Vogedes à Paris 1.jpg
- File:Clara Vogedes à Paris 2.jpg
- File:Clara Vogedes - Paris, Gewitter, 1976.jpg
- File:Clara Vogedes - Paris, Luxemburggarten, 1976.jpg
- File:Clara Vogedes - Paris, Notre-Dame nach der Ostermesse, 1976.jpg
- File:Clara Vogedes - Paris, Pont Neuf, 1976.jpg
- File:Clara Vogedes - Paris, Rue Galande, 1976.jpg
- File:Clara Vogedes - Paris, Rue de la Huchette, Pariser Dächer, 1976.jpg
Civa (talk) 14:01, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Civa: Whats the problem with the license? It's given by the administrator of the heirs! Rafael Zink (talk) 14:16, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- OK. If the autorization is given by the heirs of the painter, no problem. But it should be nice if you add on each photo that this authorization has been given to avoid new DR for no-FoP.
Keep I withdraw my DR. --Civa (talk) 14:24, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- There is a OTRS-Ticket (Ticket-No: 2018021510002325). Does it not show up to You? Check this discussion with OTRS-Member Ruthven: User talk:Ruthven#Files with missing permission in Category:Clara Vogedes Rafael Zink (talk) 14:34, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per above, OTRS ticket exists. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:56, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Данный файл загружен не в самом лучшем качестве Николай Симагин (talk) 14:08, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:42, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
fh Shoaibhak (talk) 18:57, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: self-nomination, out of scope. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:57, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
Unknown location ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use. Civa (talk) 11:56, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:04, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Unknown location ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use Civa (talk) 12:06, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb at 15:05, 13 Juni 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 18:37, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
It is not for Wiki Loves Earth Beqabai (talk) 03:03, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:37, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
as per COM:SELFIE. No use. mr.choppers (talk)-en- 03:55, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work but grabbed from facebook "FBMD". --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:40, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
as per COM:SELFIE mr.choppers (talk)-en- 03:55, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- Used on a "recent" userpage. Give them some time to prove they will be a Wikipedian/Commoner. --E4024 (talk) 08:21, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- Well, now I will "kind of" oppose myself: I have opened a red cat, Category:Anamika (given name), where I collect some people. I do think part of their images could be deleted for OoS or for not being in the PD. Anyways, I will complete the cat in the meantime. --E4024 (talk) 12:16, 13 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:39, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
as per COM:SELFIE mr.choppers (talk)-en- 03:55, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:40, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SSãläh éddīñé (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal image.
- File:المنظر مخضر بالربيع يا إلاهي.jpg
- File:ما أجمل الطبيعة وراء هاذا الوجه البريئ.jpg
- File:أنظر إلى ورائي أليس المنظر خلابا.jpg
- File:أنظر إلى ورائي هناك توجد الطبيعة.jpg
Mitte27 (talk) 03:57, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - as per nom. mr.choppers (talk)-en- 04:34, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:47, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
No evidence that the uploader is the poster’s copyright owner Ytoyoda (talk) 04:23, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:48, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:29, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:41, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:29, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:41, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:35, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:43, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:36, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:43, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:36, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:43, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Personal document; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:36, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:43, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Personal document; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:36, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:43, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Personal document; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:38, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:43, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:39, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:44, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Payalranu.210121 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats
- File:जल.pdf
- File:प्राथमिक स्तर के उर्दू माध्यम के विधार्थियों की उर्दू भाषा में प्रवीणता का अध्ययन.pdf
- File:शैक्षिक अनुसन्धान की कार्य प्रणाली.pdf
- File:प्रयुक्त अनुसन्धान Applied Research.pdf
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:39, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:44, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:39, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:44, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Only used on the Spanish Wikipedia, where the subject's article was deleted in August 2011 via deletion discussion. Out of project scope.
ℯxplicit 04:45, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:45, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
EXIF credits YingChingHeng, does not appear to be the uploader Ytoyoda (talk) 04:47, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - unlikely to be own work. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:57, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
unused image replaced by svg file:B166-AT.svg Puclik1 (talk) 04:58, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:58, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
unused derivate of existing file:Bundesstrasse 9 Oesterreich.png Puclik1 (talk) 05:00, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:58, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jonolester (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images are all published on Flickr as "all rights reserved":
- https://www.flickr.com/photos/jonolester/33654209495/
- https://www.flickr.com/photos/jonolester/27589355806/
- https://www.flickr.com/photos/jonolester/32079489021/
- https://www.flickr.com/photos/jonolester/34328397371/
- https://www.flickr.com/photos/jonolester/33580310060/
- https://www.flickr.com/photos/jonolester/35700420871/
Which may be fine if the uploader can show that they are also the Flickr account owner, but they appear to be photographed by different 3rd parties. This one credits Adam Thomson @ ThomoTakesPics, though it's the only one with a distinct photographer credit.
- File:Jonolester-portrait.jpg
- File:Jonolester-gulfracing.jpg
- File:Jono-lester-supergt-okayama.png
- File:Jono-lester-super-gt.jpg
- File:Jonolester-asianlms.jpg
- File:Jono Lester 2016.png
- File:JonoLester-Portrait.jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 05:06, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - all right reserved - and anyway the flickr account is likely not the copyright holder of those files. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:03, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
From here: https://www.flickr.com/photos/jonolester/6977158571/in/album-72157629206969872/ Credit goes to the racing team. Ytoyoda (talk) 05:14, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:04, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Image was previously published at https://www.instagram.com/p/CGsrc1Gh77N/?igshid=gpifv1aero1. Files that were published elsewhere prior to upload at Commons require COM:OTRS verification to determine the copyright status. Ytoyoda (talk) 03:57, 26 October 2020 (UTC)
Deleted. Does not look like selfie. OTRS-permission from photographer (not from depicted person) is needed. Taivo (talk) 10:16, 7 November 2020 (UTC)
Crop of photo from https://twitter.com/JonoLester/status/635615129166479360 Ytoyoda (talk) 05:19, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:04, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
From https://twitter.com/JonoLester/status/734241657051222016 Ytoyoda (talk) 05:21, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:04, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Unused photo about unknown man, seems like out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:15, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:49, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:54, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:58, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SUKILONDON (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:56, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:58, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Shivamautozone l456.png
- File:Shivam Autozone Logo n.jpg
- File:Logos for.png
- File:Shivamautozone 321.png
- File:Shivam Autozone logo 12.png
- File:Shivam Autozone logo (2).png
- File:SZpic.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found with Google Images.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:43, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:43, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Road boyz24 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Seems that source page marked with Non-Commercial variant of Creative Commons license.
- File:Produce 101 Im Na Young Young Daegu Dong Sung Guerilla Concert.jpg
- File:Nayoung DurinG Produce 101 showcase.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- why need to delete it...i think i take from the relevant website and the source also from the true website Road boyz24 (talk) 14:13, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete I see no evidence of a free license.Ronhjones (Talk) 16:10, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:06, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Road boyz24 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal Photos - Out of scope
- File:President Syahiran.jpg
- File:Dinner BWP.jpg
- File:Color run 01.jpg
- File:Color run 02.jpg
- File:Color run 03.jpg
- File:Badan Wakil Pelajar.jpg
Ronhjones (Talk) 16:12, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:45, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, look like Advertising logos.
- File:Awadh Travelling Services List with Image 11.jpg
- File:Awadh Travelling Services List with Image 10.jpg
- File:Awadh Travelling Services List with Image 9.jpg
- File:Awadh Travelling Services List with Image 7.jpg
- File:Awadh Travelling Services List with Image 8.jpg
- File:Awadh Travelling Services List with Image 6.jpg
- File:Awadh Travelling Services List with Image 5.jpg
- File:Awadh Travelling Services List with Image 4.jpg
- File:Awadh Travelling Services List with Image 3.jpg
- File:Awadh Travelling Services List with Image 2.jpg
- File:Awadh Travelling Services List with Image 1.jpg
Ronhjones (Talk) 17:24, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:47, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Personal photo? not used, the only one upload of the user Avron (talk) 17:44, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:50, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:11, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:53, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Was testing an upload of a photo I took last month. Thought I could test the process and then remove it. I don't want this particular photo online. Thanks! Robtkruger (talk) 03:29, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:17, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Onan peyon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Per COM:NOTHOST: personal photos
Takeaway (talk) 19:06, 30 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:56, 6 September 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Onan peyon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images not in use, out of project scope, advertising content.
- File:Onan Peyon Agustina.jpeg
- File:Onan Peyon Apahapsili.png
- File:Onan Peyon.jpeg
- File:Onan Peyon HUT Apahapsili.png
- File:Onan Peyon.png
— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:13, 14 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:18, 21 September 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Onan peyon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal images. Out of project scope.
- File:Album Onan Peyon - 15.jpg
- File:Onan Peyon.jpg
- File:Peyon-Yowel Onan Peyon.jpg
- File:Onan Peyon Yalimo.jpg
— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 18:01, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 07:17, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Onan peyon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Onan Peyon 2.jpg (dupe of File:Onan Peyon dari keluarga kurang mampu.jpg --JuTa 22:43, 12 April 2018 (UTC))
- File:Onan Peyon.jpg
- File:SEBLON LOHO.jpg
- File:DOLFIUS HISAGE.jpg
- File:PENDIDIKAN, Melan Mansumber.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:05, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Onan peyon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 06:40, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:17, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
No permission Gyrostat (talk) 07:43, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 15:16, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Photo credit : Landmark / PR Photos (cf) Gyrostat (talk) 07:44, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 15:14, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be 'own work': [1] Gyrostat (talk) 07:44, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 15:15, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Unknown location ; no description ; no use ; out of scope Civa (talk) 12:15, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 15:21, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Exact duplicate of: File:Ministra Nadia Calviño.jpg Asqueladd (talk) 13:07, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Delete Per above. --IngenieroLoco (talk) 18:16, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 15:22, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
COM:TOYS. ℯxplicit 03:01, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 22:54, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:01, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
The poster is nonfree content. Tohma (talk) 04:30, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:01, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
unused derivate of existing file:Bundesstrasse 17 Oesterreich.png Puclik1 (talk) 05:01, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:02, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
The photograph is a derivative work of Särkynyt Lyhty, a 2013 sculpture by Pekka and Teija Isorättyä (both born in 1980),[2] located in Tornio, Finland. The authors of the original work (the sculpture) are still living, so the sculpture is still under copyright and thus not in public domain. FOP in Finland is for buildings only. Apalsola t • c 07:28, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. Antilope (talk) 11:42, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:05, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in France. Filename suggests, that Grande Arche is not de minimis, but main object, and architect von Spreckelsen died in 1987. In addition, the pavement probably surpasses threshold of originality, author and restore date are unknown. Taivo (talk) 08:11, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:06, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
screenshot from website Migebert (talk) 08:35, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:07, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Promotional material Smooth O (talk) 09:27, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete I'm not sure the promotional nature is a problem, but it's certainly a copyright violation. --bjh21 (talk) 23:24, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:08, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
False license. The image is cropped from this Youtube video which released it in standard Youtube license, not CC-BY 3.0; therefore fails the requirements to stay on Commons. Bagas Chrisara (talk) 09:37, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:08, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Logo from off. site. Can't be free Bilderling (talk) 16:05, 9 October 2014 (UTC)
Kept: {{PD-textlogo}}. Yann (talk) 14:11, 10 October 2014 (UTC)
Кажется, я нарушил авторские права. Хочу удалить. DeletedUser (talk) 18:51, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request. Amada44 talk to me 19:10, 18 November 2015 (UTC)
http://ru.elderscrolls.wikia.com/wiki/%D0%9B%D0%B5%D0%B3%D0%B0%D1%82_%D0%A1%D0%BA%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%80 ложные сведения о файле, нарушение АП Иван Дулин (talk) 05:49, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 03:13, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
http://ru.elderscrolls.wikia.com/wiki/%D0%9B%D0%B5%D0%B3%D0%B0%D1%82_%D0%A1%D0%BA%D1%83%D0%BB%D0%BD%D0%B0%D1%80 ложные сведения о файле, нарушение АП Иван Дулин (talk) 05:50, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 03:13, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Spam, out of COM:Project scope
Lacrymocéphale (talk) 21:20, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:05, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Not useable version of Cobalt Blue SPD en.svg! Ras67 (talk) 21:45, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:04, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Stills from http://viyoutube.com/video/vfiSwphGFvg/hannah%20montana%20forever%20season%204%20-%20wherever%20i%20go%20(acapella)%20-%20episode%209 Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:33, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
![22:33, 8 June 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/06/08#c-Patrick_Rogel-2018-06-08T22:33:00.000Z-File:"Old_Blue_Jeans"_Hannah_Montana.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:04, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
![19:04, 19 June 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/06/08#c-Ellin_Beltz-2018-06-19T19:04:00.000Z-File:"Old_Blue_Jeans"_Hannah_Montana.jpg){kind=link}
Fair use content ZebaX2010 (talk) 22:35, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:04, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Copy at trwiki needs deletion as well. –LaundryPizza03 (dc̄) 23:01, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:03, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
This image from Globo. Searching by Google and http://www.miseria.com.br/index.php?page=noticia&cod_not=192820 179.216.253.226 23:42, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:03, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Previously deleted as non-free logo File:MuchMusicLogo.png Ronhjones (Talk) 23:56, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:03, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Locatoni23 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Snapshots of software ; advertisement ; no use
Civa (talk) 12:30, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:17, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Corrupted file. Harold (talk) 12:31, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:17, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution ; missing EXIF. Civa (talk) 12:33, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:16, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Unknown location ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; this photo is the only upload of the user. Civa (talk) 12:36, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:16, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Filmçi Tahir (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unknown location ; NO DESCRIPTION ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; the user has uploaded only these 2 photos whose the subject is himself and family.
Civa (talk) 12:41, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:16, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
False date, found elsewhere : http://www.eliebassil.com/690 Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:04, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:16, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
No visible object on the photo ; very small image (572 bytes) ; no encyclopedic value Civa (talk) 13:05, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:16, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:26, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- We have the permission from Louise Seloy herself, and it is her private photo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sascha Faxe (talk • contribs) 09:38, 14 June 2018 (UTC) [Sascha Faxe]
- @Sascha Faxe: It's not a private photo since it has been published earlier on Facebook. Please note too that Facebook images are not free of use so they can't put it under a free license here. The copyright holder of the picture, which is almost always the photographer, must send a permission via COM:OTRS. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:23, 14 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:15, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:26, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:15, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution ; missing EXIF. Civa (talk) 13:37, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:15, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Advertisment for Arabic Language Courses with an URL Civa (talk) 13:48, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:15, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Advertisment for Arabic Language Courses with an url Civa (talk) 13:49, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:15, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:52, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:15, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Standré.jpg
- File:FL 44.jpg
- File:1er Août.jpg
- File:Vinissima.jpg
- File:PAYSAGES73.jpg
- File:PAYSAGES83.jpg
- File:Maison du Livre.jpg
- File:CHAMOSON02.jpg
- File:ST PIERRE05.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- also different names in Exif data: Christian HOFMANN, Valerie Pinauda --Herzi Pinki (talk) 19:30, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:15, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by พรพรรณ สุขอาภา (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:เอ็ม-อดุลย์รัศมิ์.jpg
- File:เติม-ch7.jpg
- File:อาทิตย์ch7.jpg
- File:ณัฐรินทร์-ลิเบีย.jpg
- File:เมฆจุติ.jpg
- File:ธนิศช่อง7.jpg
- File:Faihima.jpg
- File:ละครสมิงจ้าวท่า.jpg
- File:ลูกไม้ลายสนธยา.jpg
- File:Meenpimchanok.jpg
- File:หนุ่ม-ชมวิชัย.jpg
- File:เติร์ก-ณัฐชนน.jpg
- File:เพชรหอมสงสัย.jpg
- File:Dokyanaipayu.jpg
- File:ระบำมาร.jpg
- File:Prakotkaendee company.jpg
- File:Winsarantorn.jpg
- File:แม่สื่อปากร้ายผู้ชายรสจัด.jpg
- File:ฟ้า-อิงฟ้า-เกตุคำ.jpg
- File:เกรซบุศรินทร์.jpg
- File:Tistnarongrit.jpg
- File:Mangmumpongsatat.jpg
- File:Ben-santiraj.jpg
- File:เติ้ล สุทธิ์คุณ.jpg
- File:คลื่นผีป่วน.jpg
- File:สมิงจ้าวท่า.jpg
- File:สัมปทานหัวใจ.png
- File:พงศกร.โตสุวรรณ.jpg
- File:เกรท-สพล.jpg
- File:Bankartit.jpg
- File:Lybia.jpg
- File:พันธกานต์รัก.jpg
- File:Foon.takphet.jpg
- File:แมงมุม.jpg
- File:Tong-patcharapol.jpg
- File:พชรพล ศุขอร่าม.jpg.png
- File:วิน ศรันทร์ธร.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:14, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Personal photos out of scope. Some are used on a vanity WP page but he isn't a valid WP user
- File:Actor monu 004.jpg
- File:Actor Monu school times photo.jpg
- File:ACTOR MONU001.jpg
- File:ACTOR MONU002.jpg
- File:ACTOR MONU.jpg
- File:Actor monu.jpg
- File:ACTOR MONU 00.jpg
- File:Actor Monu 01.jpg
- File:Actor Monu & Manoj Kumar.jpg
- File:Actor monu &Amitab.png
- File:Actor Monu.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 06:37, 2 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:25, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Actor monu on K.k.R 3.jpg
- File:Actor monu on K.k.R 2.jpg
- File:Actor monu on K.k.R.jpg
- File:Actor Monu ,Balram Redhu .jpg
- File:ACTOR MONU503.jpg
- File:Actor Monu and Friends.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
New promotional pictures uploaded by the same user, Actormonu. There are children in some pictures. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Actor Monu- 2.jpg
- File:Actormonu.jpg
- File:Actor Monu with Naina 2.jpg
- File:Actor Monu With Naina.jpg
- File:Actor Monu or Manoj Kumar.jpg
- File:Keep Support Rich Jaat.jpg
--Harlock81 (talk) 13:53, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:13, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Personal photos, out of scope, commons is not a photo album
- File:APSRA MONU KE.png
- File:APSRA KA MONU.png
- File:AM = APSRA MONU.jpg
- File:Procedure-for-application-of-marraiage-certificate copy.jpg
- File:APSRA PARCHA WEDS MONU REDHU.jpg
- File:ON WORK IMAGE.jpg
- File:ON WORK.jpg
- File:ON WORK DURANA CSC.jpg
- File:ACTOR MONU ON WORK.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 11:21, 24 January 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 08:21, 31 January 2019 (UTC)
not a web host
QueerEcofeminist "cite! even if you fight"!!! [they/them/their] 12:42, 8 May 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; again!. --Gbawden (talk) 06:20, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
Historical documents and photo. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected.
- File:Robert Royou Beard.jpg
- File:R R Beard 197.pdf
- File:R R Beard 176.pdf
- File:Sheet3 RRBeard - Patent 330, 549.jpg
- File:Sheet1 RRBeard - Patent 330, 549.jpg
- File:Sheet2 RRBeard - Patent 330, 549.jpg
- File:Page2 RRBeard - Patent 330, 549.jpg
- File:Page1 RRBeard - Patent 330, 549.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:11, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
lower-quality copy of File:Chasaren.jpg Constantine ✍ 14:51, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:10, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: text document of questionable notability. Should be moved to relevant project as wiki-text if useful. Used on user page. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:10, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Copyvio from https://www.mangobaaz.com/iqra-aziz-on-vacation-so-much-hate/ The Mighty Glen (talk) 15:33, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:09, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Uploader request on time. See the TP of the file please. E4024 (talk) 15:59, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- I upload it by mistake.
NickNYCN (talk) 9:23, 9 June 2018 (UTC+8)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:09, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Bogus license. Jcb (talk) 16:04, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Comment Thomas Thomsen, the author, died in 1941 [3]. On the other hand, the picture is a derivative of a work by Morten Pedersen Porsild who died in 1956. — Racconish 💬 16:45, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- Ok, so from 2027 we are safe for this file. I have added this DR to Category:Undelete in 2027. Jcb (talk) 19:55, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- I'm ok for this option --Ruyblas13 (talk) 08:07, 9 June 2018 (UTC).
- Ok, so from 2027 we are safe for this file. I have added this DR to Category:Undelete in 2027. Jcb (talk) 19:55, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. — Racconish 💬 08:20, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete --Ruyblas13 (talk) 08:28, 9 June 2018 (UTC).
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:09, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
To corrupt to be useful. -- Geagea (talk) 16:42, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:08, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
unused image replaced by svg file:ACB-RO.svg Puclik1 (talk) 18:36, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:08, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
unused image replaced by svg file:RO Roadsign 7C.svg Puclik1 (talk) 18:39, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:08, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
unused image replaced by svg file:RO Roadsign 7C.svg Puclik1 (talk) 18:39, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:07, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
unused image replaced by svg file:DJ100-RO.svg Puclik1 (talk) 18:46, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:07, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
False attribution; copyright violation. Oknazevad (talk) 18:50, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:07, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
False attribution. Copyright violation Oknazevad (talk) 18:50, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:07, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
False attribution. Copyright violation Oknazevad (talk) 18:52, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:07, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
False attribution. Copyright violation Oknazevad (talk) 18:52, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:07, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Doublon illisible de File:Carte du Secteur Fortififié de Thionville.jpg Borvan53 (talk) 19:44, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:07, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Doublon illisible de File:Carte-SF-Thionville.jpg Borvan53 (talk) 19:45, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:07, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Doublon illisible de File:Carte du SF de la Crusnes.jpg Borvan53 (talk) 19:46, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:07, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Doublon illisible de File:Carte du SF de la Crusnes.jpg Borvan53 (talk) 19:48, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:06, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
제목을 변경하여 다시 등록할 예정입니다. 유선정 (talk) 07:31, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, deletion requested as self-deletion request on the date of upload. — regards, Revi 14:40, 23 June 2018 (UTC)
I uploaded a duplicate image of this version King Rishab Dugar (talk) 13:06, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. The duplicate exists at File:Suswani Mata.jpeg. However, while the photograph may be the uploader's own work, I am skeptical that the sculpture is. I am not sure what copyright issues are relevant here. Anachronist (talk) 00:18, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 16:36, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
inappropriate Joseph usef (talk) 18:21, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 13:06, 24 Juni 2018 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion) --Krdbot 18:29, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
inappropriate Joseph usef (talk) 18:22, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 13:06, 24 Juni 2018 UTC: CSD G7 (author or uploader request deletion) --Krdbot 18:29, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
unused image replaced by svg file:BE-N74.svg Puclik1 (talk) 05:35, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:42, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
unused image replaced by svg file:BE-N403.svg Puclik1 (talk) 05:36, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:42, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
unused image replaced by svg file:BE-N423.svg Puclik1 (talk) 06:11, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:43, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
unused image replaced by svg file:M2-BIH.svg Puclik1 (talk) 06:16, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:43, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 07:52, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:43, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
We have more than hundred photos in category:Sunsets of Isla Margarita, so this small bad quality photo is really not needed. Taivo (talk) 08:27, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:43, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
False information 46.217.244.109 08:31, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Use {{Rename}} or {{Fact disputed}} instead. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:44, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
False information Gero1119 (talk) 17:12, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
False information 46.217.244.109 13:38, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
- Please do not open repetitive DRs. --E4024 (talk) 13:40, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:21, 6 July 2018 (UTC)
False information 46.217.244.109 06:30, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:36, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Non free image and not correspond with real society and famousness Gero1119 (talk) 07:13, 21 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Gero1119: Why do you think it is a violation of copyright? While it is small and has no EXIF data, there is no copy on the Internet except [4], which is not the source. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:35, 26 September 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 06:25, 27 September 2018 (UTC)
There is no evidence that the subject (who is supposedly the author of the photo, even though it doesn't look like a selfie) agreed to transfer the copyright to the uploader. The uploader claims to be the copyright holder ("I, the copyright holder"), but makes no claim of being the author. OTRS permission confirming the authorship and copyright transfer is needed. Looking at Special:Log/Gero1119, the uploader appears to have been making dubious claims of being the copyright holder of the works of a lot of different people. It's worth noting that the uploader is the one who initiated at least two (probably all four) of the previous deletion discussions, so they probably realized that this upload was a copyright violation and tried to rectify it. Disappointing to see so many administrators failing to connect the dots. —LX (talk, contribs) 11:01, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Support I agree, I don't know why I missed this previously. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:57, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:28, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
Copied from a magazine, no indication of permission from publisher or photographer. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 08:59, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:53, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Despite being taken from the LaMoncloa website, this pic (as stated in the web) is a Pool EFE Pic (Pool EFE/ Javier Lizón, see http://www.lamoncloa.gob.es/multimedia/galeriasfotograficas/presidente/Paginas/2018/070618-promesa.aspx) (from the Agencia EFE), not a "Pool Moncloa", therefore it doesn't comply with {{attribution-La Moncloa}} see legal notice [5] Asqueladd (talk) 10:28, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Delete In this case, it should have been {{Speedydelete}} --Discasto talk 17:22, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Delete --IngenieroLoco (talk) 17:57, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Delete Comment from the uploader: can be deleted now, was just a wildcard (not necessary anymore...)
With that being said, it's really shocking me how bureaucratic picture hunts are a thing in this wiki Greyt (talk) 09:16, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:54, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
cant fix the black background Gzhegozh (talk) 11:06, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:55, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
doesn't look like own work, tiny, and we can better: File:Building saint pierre de clages valais.jpg Herzi Pinki (talk) 11:43, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: 23:56, 15 June 2018, by Yann. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:55, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Unknown location ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; this photo is the only upload of the user. Civa (talk) 11:52, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:55, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ertyuiopooo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unknown location ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; the user has uploaded only these 4 photos whose the subject is himself.
- File:Minuto do milagre.jpg
- File:Minuto do milagres.jpg
- File:Hora dos milagres.jpg
- File:Hora do milagres.jpg
Civa (talk) 12:25, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, advertising. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:56, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Unknown location ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; this photo is the only upload of the user. Civa (talk) 12:25, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:57, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unknown location ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use Civa (talk) 12:32, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:57, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
blurry, no useful information JiriMatejicek (talk) 12:33, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:57, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Unknown location ; unidentified plant ; no use ; no encyclopedic value Civa (talk) 12:56, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:57, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Unknown location ; unclear description (=the morning) ; No notability ; No use ; no encyclopedi value Civa (talk) 13:00, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:58, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Not relevant King Rishab Dugar (talk) 13:07, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:58, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Newer version uploaded King Rishab Dugar (talk) 13:08, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: clearly copyvio. Don't upload a newer version!. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:01, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution ; missing EXIF. Civa (talk) 14:03, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:02, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
duplicate of File:Glentleiten Nr 13.jpg with lower resolution HerrAdams (talk) 14:27, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:03, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Historical book. Proper author/source and country of origin should be provided and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
I'm fairly new to Commons, so not sure where to update the license tags appropriately. Country of origin is England. The author is George Cavendish, and the work was written between 1550-1561, with first publication in 1641. This edition is from 1905, scan from the Internet Archive with copyright under CC 3.0. Grillo7 (talk) 15:07, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Grillo7. Seems to be properly licensed. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:06, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Exists elsewhere on the web, unused, out of scope. ~Cybularny Speak? 18:15, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:08, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
out of scope, inscriptions Joschi71 (talk) 18:45, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:09, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
mauvais chargement Anne-Marie Dufour (talk) 21:18, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:09, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Данный файл находится без надобности на проекте Wikipedia Николай Симагин (talk) 14:06, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:13, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Данный файл находится без надобности на проекте Wikipedia Николай Симагин (talk) 14:06, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:13, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Данный файл находится без надобности на проекте Wikipedia Николай Симагин (talk) 14:07, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:13, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Subject is now correctly identified, and files recategorised to Category:Nikolay Sobolev. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 00:35, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Whereas the photo is used in an article and in a Wikidata item about a diplomat born in 1924 it is clearly not a diplomat depicted (the guy on the photo is around 30, and there is no way a Soviet diplomat in the 1950s would be dressed like this). Therefore, this is an unused personal image and must be deleted. Ymblanter (talk) 14:28, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- If it gets deleted, the category becomes empty and up to speedy deletion.--Ymblanter (talk) 14:29, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- Pinging @Aka: as the person that added it to the dewp article, and @Sobolevv: as the original uploader. I have no comments myself on this, except to say that I'm happy for the category to be speedy deleted if it does become empty. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 13:45, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
- This deletion rationale seems strange. I think the guy looks closer to 20 than to 30, but sure: Let's say that he's 30 years old in this picture. That means that it's 1954. For most of the 1950s, Sobolev ran a youth organization. (He didn't become a diplomat until 1964, when he was 40 years old.) Why would you expect the head of a youth organization to dress like a Soviet diplomat? And even if you thought that the head of a youth org didn't find it appropriate to be dressed like a fashionable young man, then who says that he has to dress for work round the clock and that he couldn't ever get a photo made for personal use? I think it far more plausible to guess that the photo was uploaded by one of his family members than to say that it can't be him because an editor thinks that he's not dressed for a job that he didn't have at that time. WhatamIdoing (talk) 21:43, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
- I do not expect. I KNOW how the head of the Komsomol would be dressed in the 1950s. It was just not possible to find a pink jacket, and, if by any chance he succeeded to find one, he would be expelled from the Komsomol the next day. The natural explanation is that someone who has the same name but is completely unrelated to the diplomat uploaded his own personal photo, and someone else erroneously added it to the German Wikipedia article.--Ymblanter (talk) 19:08, 22 June 2018 (UTC)
- You're ignoring the fact that this image was uploaded as "own work" by User:Sobolevv with the only description being "sobolev face". Furthermore, that user's only other upload was File:Youtube Sobolev Bloger Russian Lifeyoutube.jpg. That immediately tells me that this very likely a self-portrait of the uploader, a Russian Youtuber, not the notable Sobolev. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 19:24, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Picture of Russian vlogger Nikolay Sobolev, not Vladimir Mikhailovich Sobolev. --Ahecht (TALK
PAGE) 19:34, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Copyright infringement https://vk.com/photo2183360_456259907 Skepsiz (talk) 21:20, 22 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 20:23, 10 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pastore.MF (talk · contribs)
[edit]Highly unlikely that these are actually the uploader's own creations, and the claimed license is not valid. Information about the actual author and copyright status is needed.
Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:26, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Not own work. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:42, 4 July 2018 (UTC)
Found with higher resolution at https://t.co/LeB5asxlkt, some EXIF missing at Flickr. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:43, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- The photo should be free for use here though in whatever resolution as it does meet our licensing requirements. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MMMcMaster (talk • contribs) 06:57, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep The Flickr account is presumably controlled by Doug Ford's team. Unless proven otherwise, photo meets licensing requirements. // sikander { talk } 14:30, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Sikander: And ? It's not Commons which has to prove that this photo has been shot by Doug Ford's team but them. And the lack of important EXIF informations seems not good too... --Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:52, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
- Send an OTRS email to Ford regarding the matter then Patrick Rogel? — Preceding unsigned comment added by MMMcMaster (talk • contribs) 22:51, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Sikander: And ? It's not Commons which has to prove that this photo has been shot by Doug Ford's team but them. And the lack of important EXIF informations seems not good too... --Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:52, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, there is nothing proving that this Flickr account is official, and especially after finding the image at higher resolution we should err on the side of caution until we can verify that the file is freely licensed by the true copyright holder.. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:42, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Found with higher resolution at action.news/news-headlines.php?article=https://t.co/LeB5asxlkt, some EXIF missing at Flickr.|subpage=File:Ford and Family.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:44, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Support because the original I uploaded was not the highest resolution version on Flickr. I uploaded a new version of the original but this one needs to be replaced. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DrJenkins365 (talk • contribs) 22:02, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ford and Family.jpg. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:44, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Probably copyvio, because photo from a newspaper or a photo studio (Parisienne de photographie) Civa (talk) 14:06, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:33, 18 July 2018 (UTC)
Le fichier existe déjà - Ryse93 (talk) 09:39, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: dupe of Autoroute française 13a.svg @Ryse93: La prochaine fois utilisez {{Duplicate}}, merci. Ruthven (msg) 10:21, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
This file, which is used on the Chile article, is basically a cropped screenshot of a map from traveler.sharemap.org. Although the file says that it follows the copyright guidelines, the general Wikimedia Commons rule is not to upload images of screenshots of applications. Anyway, we use static maps or dynamic maps on Wikvioyage, but not maps like this. SelfieCity (talk) 01:10, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - COM:INUSE and seems to be freely licensed. —Granger (talk · contribs) 02:03, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 10:21, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
I uploaded this lower res version of file:O. W. Nixon.png recently (unused beyond uses I am replacing). - Pete Forsyth (talk) 01:56, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: not exact duplicate. Sepia version can be kept. Ruthven (msg) 10:22, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
Appears to be from a Flickrwashing account. The Flickr profile was just created. The image was originally published on Twitter (though the tweet went missing since I originally posted the link), which means we need a permission statement from the photographer, who is obviously not True Tamplin. Ytoyoda (talk) 04:01, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- Hi there, I requested a photo from the author and told him that one of the ways he could allow access to the photo was by uploading a photo that he owned to a Flicker account. This could be why the account was created 1 day ago. I'll happily post a screenshot of our email conversation.
- In regards to the photo being from Twitter, you put a link to a 404 error (or maybe that's just me?).
- Thank you for your concern, I think that True Tamplin is the owner of that Flickr account and that he had the authority to upload that photo. Either way, I will help make sure everything is correct. Thederekjohnson (talk) 04:19, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Thederekjohnson: That's weird, the tweet was there when I posted, but now it's gone. Anyway, you missed two very important things I mentioned above.
- True Tamplin is likely not the copyright owner of this image (or the other one you uploaded earlier). Copyright belongs to to the photographer.
- Whether Mr. Tamplin or the photographer owns the image, we need a permissions statement submitted to OTRS, since Flickr wasn't where the photo was originally published.
- Please don't post a screenshot—OTRS needs an email from the photographer or Mr. Tamplin's office (preferably not the Gmail address you communicated with for the other photo). You can tell them to follow the steps outlined here. Thanks. Ytoyoda (talk) 04:40, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Thederekjohnson: That's weird, the tweet was there when I posted, but now it's gone. Anyway, you missed two very important things I mentioned above.
- @Ytoyoda: Thank you for the great insight. I have sent a message to Mr. Tamplin explaining to him what he needs to do. I feel bad for making him jump through so many hoops to release his image, but hopefully he successfully emails permissions-commons@wikimedia.org the necessary information to release the rights to his photo. Thank you again for the helpful links. Thederekjohnson (talk) 05:50, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- OTRS is in receipt of an email with a permission statement from True Tamplin. There is one small detail that still needs to be sorted out, but I think it will be sorted out shortly.--Sphilbrick (talk) 18:08, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
- It has now been sorted out.--Sphilbrick (talk) 14:33, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
- OTRS is in receipt of an email with a permission statement from True Tamplin. There is one small detail that still needs to be sorted out, but I think it will be sorted out shortly.--Sphilbrick (talk) 18:08, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Ytoyoda: Thank you for the great insight. I have sent a message to Mr. Tamplin explaining to him what he needs to do. I feel bad for making him jump through so many hoops to release his image, but hopefully he successfully emails permissions-commons@wikimedia.org the necessary information to release the rights to his photo. Thank you again for the helpful links. Thederekjohnson (talk) 05:50, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per Sphilbrick. Ruthven (msg) 10:22, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
Copyright. 58.20.126.133 05:45, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: copyviol from [6]. Ruthven (msg) 10:23, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
w:Massimo Campigli (1895-1971), copyright violation Mutter Erde (talk) 06:25, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Keep No copyright violation, as Paolo Monti (one of the most important professional photographers in Italy in the 20th century) always had permissions to shoot from artists, gallerists, owners, and museums, for books, catalogues and magazines. Documentation is available in his Archive preserved in the Civici Archivi Fotografici in Milan (unfortunately, not yet digitalised). Fondazione BEIC (owner of the photo collection and of the archive) granted it has full copyrights and authorised publication under CC BY-SA. --Marco Chemello (BEIC) (talk) 13:48, 11 June 2018 (UTC) - integrated --08:31, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
-2018-06-11T13:48:00.000Z-File:Paolo_Monti_-_Servizio_fotografico_-_BEIC_6361509.jpg){kind=link}
- The problem is not the photographer, but the painter w:Massimo Campigli (1895-1971). Mutter Erde (talk) 14:24, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
- The photographer always had the permission from artists/owners. Paolo Monti was a well-known friend of many artists like Campigli. --Marco Chemello (BEIC) (talk) 08:31, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Please send permission obtained by Paolo Monti to OTRS. Ruthven (msg) 10:24, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
,_Massimo_Campigli_museo_del_900.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_Massimo_Campigli_museo_del_900.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
it:Achille Funi (1890-1972), copyright violation Mutter Erde (talk) 06:29, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
,_Massimo_Campigli_museo_del_900.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:25, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
,_Massimo_Campigli_museo_del_900.jpg){kind=link}
possible copyright infringement, the death date of the creator of the sculpture is unknown, and the work was made in the 1940s. It was accidentally uploaded to Europeana with a CC-O license, but this was only applicable to the metadata. Please remove. SIryn (talk) 09:18, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Pieter Ruitinga lived from 1867-1949. He was rector of the University of Amsterdam in the year 1925-1926. The sculptor is unknown; the inscription on the bust reads 'cire / C.Valsuam / perdu' . There is no C. Valsuam in the RKD database, so the sculptor is likely to remain unknown. The estimation of the date of origin of the sculpture (1940s) was made by me -it could equally have been the 1920s (at the end of his rectorate) or the 1930s. It is unlikely that the identity of the sculptor will ever be resolved. The license given by Europeana was indeed incorrect: I have now changed the license to {{Anonymous-EU}}. Vysotsky (talk) 09:52, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- But you could reason that the photographer made a creative work of the sculpture, and owns some copyright of this image. If the photographer is unknown, the age of the photograph is important. Anonymous-EU might apply.Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 13:06, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: The work is signed and the sculptor appears to be C. Valsuam. The artwork is too recent to be PD. Ruthven (msg) 10:30, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
copyright violation Mutter Erde (talk) 09:59, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:33, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
This is a copyvio : the uploader says : The claim (of copyright) is invalid since taking the photograph was not a creative act. Wrong ! A photograph is not free of rights. We must have the agreement of the author of a photo before publishing it. And the source in insecula doesnt more exist. Civa (talk) 10:29, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep According to {{PD-Art}}, The official position taken by the Wikimedia Foundation is that "faithful reproductions of two-dimensional public domain works of art are public domain". The depicted work is undoubtedly in the public domain. Admittedly, the depicted work is not perfectly two-dimensional, but as close to two-dimensional as a hammered metal plate can get. The minor deviation from two-dimensionality does not justify a major deviation from policy. The presumed reason for the requirement of two-dimensionality is the fact that faithfully photographing two-dimensional objects is a mere technical act that does not involve creativity; this reason applies to our near-two-dimensional object just as well. AxelBoldt (talk) 12:34, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: a relief is not a two-dimensional artwork. Ruthven (msg) 10:44, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
File:Fotografía del vicepresidente del gobierno el almirante Luis Carrero Blanco hablando con una autoridad militar.jpg
[edit]
Derivative works:
- File:Fotografía del vicepresidente del gobierno el almirante Luis Carrero Blanco hablando con una autoridad militar (cropped).jpg
- File:Luis Carrero Blanco, vicepresidente cropped.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
According to the website, pics are currently (and from my own experience it's been that way for a while) released under a cc-by-nc-4.0 license https://kutxateka.eus/Detail/page/3 Asqueladd (talk) 10:33, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:55, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
EXIF information names "Martin Dietrich" as photographer, and rights reserved. We will need OTRS permission to keep this photo. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 11:36, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. OTRS authorisation needed from the author Martin Dietrich. Ruthven (msg) 10:56, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
If shot in UK, any reason for this picture to be public domain yet. Like File:Antigone Costanda Miss World 1954.jpg. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:17, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:57, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
If shot in UK, any reason for this picture to be public domain yet. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:17, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:57, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Doubon de qualité médiocre de File:Carte SF ligne Maginot.jpg Borvan53 (talk) 19:50, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:59, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
EXIF Author is allegedly "Vake Up". — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 20:42, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 10:58, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Lower quality and different shaded version of File:Flag of the Republic of China.svg, otherwise no difference. Champion (Talk) 23:34, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Update, I have commented at en:Template talk:Country data China Champion (Talk) 01:22, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep If it's a different shade, more reason to keep it. If it were the same shade then it should be deleted as a duplicate file. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk • contribs), 06:47, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: in use. Ruthven (msg) 10:58, 20 July 2018 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 14:40, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: file uploaded in 2006 when current template was not in use. Moreover, this map has no proprietary info. As per COM:DW: The factual information, such as boundary lines and locations of landmarks, is supposedly unprotected. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:00, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 14:40, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: A clear case of {{grandfathered old file}}. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 13:00, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
- Besides, most maps of in this style are tagged as {{Pd-user|RTCNCA}}. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 13:24, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
- {{Grandfathered}} cannot be used here, because there is no permission statement at the file description page. Jcb (talk) 14:52, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
- <personal attack removed> But for anyone honestly interested in curating a useful repository of media files, the lineage of this file is obvious. If you cannot be arsed to do something useful about this file, at least stop harassing me with bogus DRs and give me time to document its borked file history. Thank you. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 14:55, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
- Comment I just made this edit; usually I’dd add these assumed-templates along with the addition of {{Information}}, but I forgot. Then I hesitated about editing the file page at all, as there is a pending DR, but some boldness might be help more than hinder. (Also, @RTCNCA: and @Rfc1394: ) -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 16:13, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
- Editting a file description page during a DR is not a problem per se, many problems with files are resolved during DRs. But I disagree with the assumption that this would be own work, it's in fact highly unlikely that this would be own work. DW at best. Jcb (talk) 16:26, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
- Why would it be unlikely to be the uploader's own work? Rfc1394/RTCNCA has a long history of working with area code maps. In another file (File:Area code 808.png), the source of the underlying map is given as the US Census. clpo13(talk) 17:46, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
- Actually you are answering your own question. Of course these maps are not own work. The other file is properly sourced to a PD source map, this file isn't. Jcb (talk) 20:23, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
- Why would it be unlikely to be the uploader's own work? Rfc1394/RTCNCA has a long history of working with area code maps. In another file (File:Area code 808.png), the source of the underlying map is given as the US Census. clpo13(talk) 17:46, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
- Editting a file description page during a DR is not a problem per se, many problems with files are resolved during DRs. But I disagree with the assumption that this would be own work, it's in fact highly unlikely that this would be own work. DW at best. Jcb (talk) 16:26, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: file uploaded in 2006 when current template was not in use. Moreover, this map has no proprietary info. As per COM:DW: "The factual information, such as boundary lines and locations of landmarks, is supposedly unprotected.". P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:02, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 14:41, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: file uploaded in 2006 when current template was not in use. Moreover, this map has no proprietary info. As per COM:DW: "The factual information, such as boundary lines and locations of landmarks, is supposedly unprotected.". P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:03, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 14:41, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:11, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Although I think these are Civil Registry photos (making them PD), there is no evidence this is uploader's own work nor for my thoughts küñall (nütramyen) 15:10, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Kept: if you think these PD, then any derivative work is also PD. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:13, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Bedivere as no permission (No permission since). Survived DR in the past, not eligible for expedited deletion. King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 04:15, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
Question What's the deletion rationale and has anything changed since 2018? -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:16, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- @Ikan Kekek: Can the correct license tag be identified? -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 08:08, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- Other than the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported license mentioned on the file page? I have no idea; I just observe the keep rationale given for the previous deletion nomination. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 19:34, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- What I mean is that this is a COM:DW, and an actual reason (with evidence) that the original work is PD must be provided. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:52, 12 July 2022 (UTC)
- Well, the original deletion nominator thought it was PD. I haven't tried to find the original photo. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 00:45, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- Correct, if you're talking about the first DR, but Bedivere does not, making this a valid nomination. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 00:50, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
- OK, I understand now and have no dog in this fight. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 06:03, 13 July 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellywa (talk) 01:57, 3 December 2022 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Danidamiobi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unclear copyright status (no evidence of permission for what appears to be mostly stock photos).
- File:Wiki UI banner.png
- File:Wikidemocracy banner 04.png
- File:Wikidemocracy banner 01.png
- File:Wikidemocracy banner 03.png
- File:Wikidemocracy banner 02.png
- File:Wikimedia Community for African Developers Nigeria.png
- File:Ilorin Wikimedia Hub Meetup March.png
- File:Poster for Wikimedia User Group Nigeria, Press for Progress.png
- File:Poster for WikiUrban a Wikimedia User Group Nigeria Edithaton.jpg
- File:Banner for WikiRefugees by Wikimedia UserGroup Nigeria.jpg
- File:Wikimedia Vision.png
- File:Wikimedia Fan Club, UNILORIN campaign.png
- File:Proceed and be bold campaign poster for Wikimedia Fan Club UNILORIN.png
FDMS 4 17:08, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Danidamiobi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unclear copyright status / out of scope.
- File:Temporary screen shot showing success of IP block removal.png
- File:Temporal screenshots of blocked ip for registration at Wikimedia Fan Club UNILORIN 04.jpg
- File:Temporal screenshots of blocked ip for registration at Wikimedia Fan Club UNILORIN 02.jpg
- File:Temporal screenshots of blocked ip for registration at Wikimedia Fan Club UNILORIN 03.jpg
- File:Temporal screenshots of blocked ip for registration at Wikimedia Fan Club UNILORIN 01.jpg
- File:Temporary WikiFanClub issue with accounts 03.png
- File:Temporary WikiFanClub issue with accounts 02.png
- File:Temporary WikiFanClub issue with accounts 01.png
FDMS 4 17:11, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:15, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:16, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Probably not own work by uploader. Jcb (talk) 20:50, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- I'm sorry but this photo is of my, my father (son of Vitaliano Arbitrio),my uncle(son of Vitaliano Arbitrio),my aunt(daughter of Vitaliano Arbitrio) my grandmother (wife of Vitaliano Arbitrio) prduction. I invite you to remove the report. Thank you so much Best regards Fabio Arbitrio — Preceding unsigned comment added by Fabioarb1 (talk • contribs) 11:03, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- Who is the photographer? Jcb (talk) 13:11, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
i'm the photographer. Alessandro Arbitrio born in Napoli in 1961. Son of Vitaliano Arbitrio. Do u want my passport ? Do u want other information about this photo ? Thank u--Fabio-VA (talk) 19:48, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
- The copyright may be in order then. Let's wait what happens to the article: it:Vitaliano Arbitrio. It's currently nominated for speedy deletion. Jcb (talk) 21:00, 12 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:17, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Mural is the subject and while the city of Greeley may release copyright of the photo into the public domain, there is no FoP in the United States for works of art. Sixflashphoto (talk) 14:01, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Materialscientist at 12:08, 23 Juli 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Greeley, Colorado --Krdbot 00:19, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work: could be found with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:55, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
–— This was taken at our old office and sent to a publication for an article, which is why it is appearing on Google Images. Sportskido8 (talk) 18:46, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and purely promotional, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:25, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
From a likely Flickrwashing account. Image was published before it was posted to Flickr: https://www.whowhatwear.com/up-and-coming-actresses-2018--5aefd58b69dec Ytoyoda (talk) 04:13, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- It's not Flickrwashing because Casi Moss is a real photographer - check out her website: http://casimoss.com/ Iamasavage (talk) 09:17, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- I guess the question is whether the Flickr stream actually belongs to Cassi Moss. A brand new account with zero followers and a single relatively low res photo previously published elsewhere isn’t the best way to verify license info. Ytoyoda (talk) 00:19, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- Understood. What else can Casi do to verify the license info? Iamasavage (talk) 00:28, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- I think a permissions message to OTRS from her professional addrsss (I’m thinking she had one on casimoss.com would be more than enough. Let me know if you have questions about the process. Ytoyoda (talk) 00:41, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you! How can she send a message to OTRS? Is there an email address she can use? I am not familiar with the process. Iamasavage (talk) 00:52, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Iamasavage: you can find instructions here. Ytoyoda (talk) 05:09, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- Thank you! How can she send a message to OTRS? Is there an email address she can use? I am not familiar with the process. Iamasavage (talk) 00:52, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- I think a permissions message to OTRS from her professional addrsss (I’m thinking she had one on casimoss.com would be more than enough. Let me know if you have questions about the process. Ytoyoda (talk) 00:41, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- Understood. What else can Casi do to verify the license info? Iamasavage (talk) 00:28, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- I guess the question is whether the Flickr stream actually belongs to Cassi Moss. A brand new account with zero followers and a single relatively low res photo previously published elsewhere isn’t the best way to verify license info. Ytoyoda (talk) 00:19, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion OTRS itcket. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:13, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
Wrong attribution. Indian Navy used File:INS Delhi-1.JPG without proper attribution to Brian Burnell. This a much lower quality copy of the same image, there is no point in keeping both. Gazoth (talk) 11:11, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:15, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
Wrong attribution. Indian Navy used File:INS Delhi-1.JPG without proper attribution to Brian Burnell. This a much lower quality copy of the same image, there is no point in keeping both. Gazoth (talk) 11:30, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:15, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution ; missing EXIF. Civa (talk) 12:32, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:19, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1951, depicted person died in 1968. Jcb (talk) 14:49, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:21, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 15:26, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:21, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
Image contains en:File:Wesleyan University Shield.svg which is a non-free logo. Wcam (talk) 19:30, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:23, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
No FOP in France Elisfkc (talk) 19:59, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:23, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
No FOP in France Elisfkc (talk) 20:07, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:23, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
Author Aleksey Pogrebnoj-Alexandroff is indefinitely blocked as User:Pogrebnoj-Alexandroff, his contributions are not welcome here. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 20:47, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:24, 25 July 2018 (UTC)
;_Bev%C3%B6lkerungsentwicklung_a.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
;_Bev%C3%B6lkerungsentwicklung_a.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Datei beinhaltet einen Fehler / file contains errors Colling-architektur (talk) 15:23, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
;_Bevölkerungsentwicklung_a.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: courtesy deletion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:26, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
;_Bevölkerungsentwicklung_a.jpg){kind=link}
Fake {{PD-RU-exempt}} license. Non-governmental awards are copyrighted in Russia. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:34, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:34, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama in Latvia and the building seems modern. I suspect architect's copyright violation. Who is the architect and when (s)he died? Taivo (talk) 11:32, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- By Russian wiki, work of architect V. Ozoliņš from 1947. Taivo (talk) 11:40, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:11, 4 October 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
DW rather than own work. No source for the components. Unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 15:29, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Source renseignée : Balzac lui même dans "le lys dans la vallée" donne le blasonnement : Écartelé de gueules à un pal de vair, flanqué de deux mains appaumées de carnation et d'or à deux lances de sable mises en chevron. Dessin réalisé en fonction de ce blasonnement. --Ssire (talk) 17:27, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- That's a source for the description, not for the depiction. Where did you take the components from? Jcb (talk) 20:00, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per Ssire. Depiction isn't important in french heraldry. Furthermore, "Le Lys dans la Vallée" is a novel. There are no drawing... - Bzh-99 (talk) 21:20, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- You are wrong, individual depictions of CoA's do have their own copyright. And as you say, there is no drawing in the indicated source. So where did Ssire take the components from, needed for their "montage"? Jcb (talk) 21:36, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- Avant d'affirmer "you are wrong", vous feriez bien de vous renseigner sur ce qu'est un blason. Sa description (= blasonnement) est la traduction en texte de son dessin possible. Donc restituer par montage un dessin selon le blasonnement est une chose des plus naturelles: chaque élément est héraldiquement parfaitement défini. (Il est d'ailleurs notable que tous les dessins de blason sur Wikipedia sont dus à des montages fait par des "users", la reproduction stricte d'un dessin de blason entraînerait un "copyvio" !!) --Ssire (talk) 23:27, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- Please answer the question: Where did you take the components from? What's e.g. the source of the drawing of the hand? Jcb (talk) 13:05, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- Il s'agit d'images élementaires simples quasi en libre service pour ce genre de travail. J'en ai fait pour ma part un grand nombre. Si tu taxes de non sourcé tout ces "emprunts" tu va pouvoir faire supprimer 90% des blasons réalisés. Mais je peux aussi dire : dessiné par moi même. Tu peux prouver le contraire ? --Ssire (talk) 18:21, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- It's indeed true that many other 'blason' files have problems as well. Jcb (talk) 21:57, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- Il s'agit d'images élementaires simples quasi en libre service pour ce genre de travail. J'en ai fait pour ma part un grand nombre. Si tu taxes de non sourcé tout ces "emprunts" tu va pouvoir faire supprimer 90% des blasons réalisés. Mais je peux aussi dire : dessiné par moi même. Tu peux prouver le contraire ? --Ssire (talk) 18:21, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- Please answer the question: Where did you take the components from? What's e.g. the source of the drawing of the hand? Jcb (talk) 13:05, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- Avant d'affirmer "you are wrong", vous feriez bien de vous renseigner sur ce qu'est un blason. Sa description (= blasonnement) est la traduction en texte de son dessin possible. Donc restituer par montage un dessin selon le blasonnement est une chose des plus naturelles: chaque élément est héraldiquement parfaitement défini. (Il est d'ailleurs notable que tous les dessins de blason sur Wikipedia sont dus à des montages fait par des "users", la reproduction stricte d'un dessin de blason entraînerait un "copyvio" !!) --Ssire (talk) 23:27, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- You are wrong, individual depictions of CoA's do have their own copyright. And as you say, there is no drawing in the indicated source. So where did Ssire take the components from, needed for their "montage"? Jcb (talk) 21:36, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: these are all elements widely used in project heraldry. I added some possible source in any case. Ruthven (msg) 12:39, 5 October 2018 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 14:41, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- Comment: This is one of a few hundered NANP area code maps by Rfc1394 (talk · contribs). The cartography is horrible, the iconography sucks, there is almost no additional data, most maps got unsynched (or rather only a few got updated), the SVG redraws are almost as bad as the original PNGs (some are even worse), many (most?) filepages are missing {{information}}, and whichever source and copyright information is scattered thinly and needs to chased down. (F.w.i.w., File:Area_codes_ny.png is the image this one was modified from.)
- This DR is haphazard and deleting this one image will solve nothing, rather only crippling what is a complete set one which needs to be treated as a whole: No only concerning categorization (which I am currently doing) but also permission/copyright.
- -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 18:30, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- This DR is not haphazard, it's caused by this edit, in which an information template was added without filling it in, so that the file entered the Images without source problem category. Making up that this would be own work by the uploader, which is obviously false, only makes things worse. Jcb (talk) 20:18, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- Guy, don’t give me that righteous rap — I’ve been around long enough to know this tune and how it goes. This is about some 400 images that have been here for more than 5 years, transfered from en.wp, of all places. You and your crowd never took interest in then, again for well known reasons. Now, my improvement edit (added {{information}}) triggered your action, like a human bot maximizing cheap admin action count, and bam! — a DR. My subsequent edit (learn how to link diffs locally already?) merely copied the authorship and source indicated in other images of this series — it was not «worse».
- Saying it’s worse only shows your bad faith. Don’t get me wrong: I do dispise half of the admins here, you’re right about that; but I dont go around fixing filepages and adding categories to spite you; on the contrary, I do it because I think it’s important for Free Knowledge and because it feels fun and relaxing.
- I plan to determine the origin of the cartographic data in this set and correctly tag each filepage with the appropriate authorship, source, and permission data. I plan also to clean up this set of maps, eventually even replace them, and while at it also improve the categorization of NANP area code related media — both the category tree and its population. That has only any sense if there is a big enough number of media files to warrant such categorization (yeah, because deleting temporarily empty categories is another way of maximizing cheap admin action count).
- I will not do that under a Damocles’ sword. So, if your goal is to delete this file, state it right away and I’ll immediately abbandon my work on NANP area codes and will find something else to do.
- -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 22:06, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- Your so called "improvement edit" was not an improvement. Throwing a file from one maintenance category to another is in fact pointless. Now if you want to save this file, find out where the base map comes from, so that we can see if this base map is free. Regarding your rant about 'cheap admin action count', if I would want that, I would not have been working for two years already on the 'images without source' backlog, which is actually a very time consuming job with hardly admin actions. Jcb (talk) 22:47, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Comment: although I am leaning towards keep (the crude map may indicate that it is hand-drawn with a simple graphics editor), this map is somewhat more complex. But the uploader is still active on Commons from time to time. Let's wait for his/her input.
@Rfc1394: Please explain where the map came from. Thanks. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:11, 23 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Rfc1394's contemporaneous uploads (e.g., File:DC & Arlington VA.png and File:Woodrow Wilson Bridge Location 450x500.PNG) credit the U.S. Census Tiger Map server (now datamapper.geo.census.gov) which, upon inspection, indeed reasonably seems also to be the source of this image. Given this, and that there is no indication the image appeared elsewhere before upload to Commons and the notions of COM:GOF, Rfc1394's "own work" claim is not significantly in doubt. --Эlcobbola talk 16:39, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Photo taken in France lisensed by a French agency : https://www.gamma-rapho.com/fr/asset/fullTextSearch/search/Bernard%20Menez/page/1 Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:35, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Elvis Presley in Germany.jpg - Groupir ! (talk) 21:45, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Groupir !: Could you explain your argumentation ? Commons:Deletion requests/File:Elvis Presley in Germany.jpg says Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Antoine Pinay 1955.jpg and Antoine Pinay 1955.jpg has been deleted, not kept... --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:47, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: Copyright merely managed by a French agency. According to the law, "this Law shall apply to all works of Italian authors, wherever first published". - Groupir ! (talk) 17:03, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Groupir !: Such an argumentation hasn't been followed by Administrator @AFBorchert in the page you mention above : Commons:Deletion requests/File:Antoine Pinay 1955.jpg so why are you repeating it again ? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:14, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: Such an argumentation has been followed by @Ruthven in this page. - Groupir ! (talk) 17:23, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Groupir !: Such an argumentation hasn't been followed by Administrator @AFBorchert in the page you mention above : Commons:Deletion requests/File:Antoine Pinay 1955.jpg so why are you repeating it again ? --Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:14, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: Copyright merely managed by a French agency. According to the law, "this Law shall apply to all works of Italian authors, wherever first published". - Groupir ! (talk) 17:03, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Groupir !: Could you explain your argumentation ? Commons:Deletion requests/File:Elvis Presley in Germany.jpg says Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Antoine Pinay 1955.jpg and Antoine Pinay 1955.jpg has been deleted, not kept... --Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:47, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: The closure of Commons:Deletion requests/File:Elvis Presley in Germany.jpg is bizarre and contradicted by the cited Commons:Deletion requests/File:Antoine Pinay 1955.jpg, in which AFBorchert put it very well: "Commons:Licensing#Interaction of US and non-US copyright law is clear: The 'country of origin' of a work is generally the country where the work was first published. As we have no information about when and where this photo was published first, we cannot simply apply {{PD-Italy}} without having proof of a publication in Italy. Even if the photographer was Italian, employed by an Italian magazine etc. we are not sure if this was published at all contemporarily. Many photographs go unpublished into the archives. We must be careful here and also consider possible reusers who hope that we provide reliable information." In Elvis, the sole keep comment was devoid of any substance and contrary to the cited Pinay DR, as was the vacuous "Kept: per Materialscientist" closing rationale. In looking for precedent, Elvis actually contained substantive discussion and was closed (as delete) in line with policy. --Эlcobbola talk 16:56, 18 October 2018 (UTC)
Spam, out of COM:Project scope
Lacrymocéphale (talk) 21:20, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:05, 19 June 2018 (UTC)