Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/05/22
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Geordie-Williamson-2018-by-Jayne-Ion.jpg
copyvio : https://fr.sputniknews.com/sports/201805061036248236-cm-hockey-russie-autriche/ Supertoff (talk) 05:07, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 06:58, 22 Mai 2018 UTC: copyvio : https://fr.sputniknews.com/sports/201805061036248236-cm-hockey-russie-autriche/ --Krdbot 12:40, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
unlicensed copy from http://hdwallpapers5k.com/the-elephant-man-1980-john-merrick-wallpaper_128476.html MBq (talk) 16:26, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, license review failed. Taivo (talk) 17:47, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
unlicensed still of John Hurt (1980) "The Elephant Man", see http://deadline.com/2017/01/john-hurt-dead-reactions-hollywood-mel-brooks-elijah-wood-1201896259/ MBq (talk) 16:31, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, license review failed. Taivo (talk) 17:44, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
This picture is also online at osk1977.nl. There is no indication that the work is in the public domain. There is no author, no permission. Rode raaf (talk) 10:26, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 12:44, 22 Mai 2018 UTC: privacy violation not notable young persons --Krdbot 18:40, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Gallery without images. E4024 (talk) 14:16, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Self-promotion, out of scope. --Achim (talk) 20:41, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Image Source: cdninstagram Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:02, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:NETCOPYVIO - these may use {{Copyvio}}. --Эlcobbola talk 21:35, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Previously published at http://uniquetimes.org/exclusive-gallery-aileena-catherin-amon/ Ytoyoda (talk) 16:49, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted latest upload, kept old one, blocked the uploader. --Materialscientist (talk) 22:54, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Ana Maria Sousa isn't mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in pt.wiki. Out of project scope, copyright violation is possible too. Taivo (talk) 11:12, 21 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:18, 28 November 2017 (UTC)
personal file, out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:28, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:40, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
because I want that Elmjd (talk) 04:29, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:45, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
porque lo he creado sin querer Miguelangelduromba (talk) 08:38, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- O sea "fue sin querer queriendo", como diría El Chavo del Ocho. Delete --E4024 (talk) 08:42, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: vandalism. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:11, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
Invalid licence claimed Andy Dingley (talk) 18:09, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- The picture was taken from this paper, which is licensed CC BY 4.0. There is an attribution note on the paper saying Regarding the illustrations used in this article, Figs. 1 [the portrait of Asperger], 3, 4, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 are scans of archival materials held at the Municipal and Provincial Archives of Vienna, reproduced with permission from the copyright holder. Going to the image's source, I don't see any general release of copyright. My question, then, is whether the paper's license also applies to the figures contained within it. clpo13(talk) 18:25, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- I missed the attribution note, since the paper is CC-BY and this is the my first time with this type of issue. Now I have the same question that Clpo13. From note, I understand that copyright holder released the image because the author of paper have informed the holder that it will be published on a free license. --Ixocactus (talk) 02:07, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- I emailed this discussion to the author of the paper and received a response of a Wiener Stadt- und Landesarchiv person. He informs: We welcome the use of our documents and the spread of scientific knowledge, so we’d prefer not to see the picture deleted – just update the information please: Licence: CC-By-NC-ND Source: Wiener Stadt- und Landesarchiv, M.Abt. 202, A5 – Personalakten: Hans Asperger. In reply, I send our COM:L and the OTRS link requesting authorization to use. As I think that they are a potential GLAM partner, also send GLAM case studies links from Meta. Ixocactus (talk) 18:15, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- CC-by-nc-nd isn't a free licence for Commons anyway, so that wouldn't be enough.
- I don't think this is acceptable under any licence. If though it's demonstrably PD owing to age etc, (PD is a state, not a licence) then we can keep it on that basis (and the paper's authors don't have any control over it). But any recent granting of licences isn't acceptable to us: the image is either PD (and so doesn't need one) or it's not (and so the paper's authors, or an uploader here, aren't in any position to grant one). The only people who can grant useful licences are those who hold the copyright. Andy Dingley (talk) 08:58, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- I emailed this discussion to the author of the paper and received a response of a Wiener Stadt- und Landesarchiv person. He informs: We welcome the use of our documents and the spread of scientific knowledge, so we’d prefer not to see the picture deleted – just update the information please: Licence: CC-By-NC-ND Source: Wiener Stadt- und Landesarchiv, M.Abt. 202, A5 – Personalakten: Hans Asperger. In reply, I send our COM:L and the OTRS link requesting authorization to use. As I think that they are a potential GLAM partner, also send GLAM case studies links from Meta. Ixocactus (talk) 18:15, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- speedy. The person informs that is not possible circumvent their license. Ixocactus (talk) 14:02, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - NC-ND are not acceptable terms. Note also that this, as presented, was COM:license laundering; anyone can include an image in a paper just as anyone can upload an image to Flickr. Unless the actual copyright holder authorized the license claimed with such an inclusion or upload, the license is not valid. --Эlcobbola talk 14:33, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Anezka.Pohlova as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: it's me on the picture and I don't like it, Jan Louzek can offer you better pics, this one is moreover old one JuTa 17:28, 20 February 2018 (UTC)
Kept: If you have a request, whatever it may be, for a photo where you are the subject, and in order for us to be sure that you are legitimate to make the request, please make your request by mail to permissions-commons
wikimedia.org with an email address that we can identify as yours. If the request is legitimate one of our volunteers will restart a new discussion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:44, 1 March 2018 (UTC)
Reopening. There is OTRS request from subject to delete the photo per courtesy. The photo is unused and we have more free photos of subject, so I Delete here. The request is delayed as an unrelated DR for this photo was pending. Ankry (talk) 15:41, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete this and other pics, per Commons:Categories for discussion/2018/05/Category:Michaela Krausová. Has she hold any important office? Why not the pictures are used anywhere? This is promotion of a junior politician. IMHO, of course. --E4024 (talk) 15:55, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: To be honest I'm not sure what's the correct thing to do according to our policy but the person on the photo is a young Czech politician who doesn't like photos of her. Her identity has been confirmed via OTRS ticket 2018031910009453. Via her message on my talk page she offered the links to new photos of her from Flickr like [1] or [2] if we need any. --Podzemnik (talk) 23:04, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
copyright violation appears to come from this website FOX 52 (talk) 05:10, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: Copyright violation, speedily deleted. — regards, Revi 19:28, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Phil Baglini (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:55, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:47, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
unused personal image, out of Scope Migebert (talk) 18:10, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb at 12:44, 27 Mai 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 18:35, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
http://www.news.com.au/national/tasmania/former-premier-paul-lennons-pokies-play-for-federal-hotels/news-story/6de91f903e8bd6699e1f03198f47782f Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:28, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: uploaded by sock serial violator. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:25, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Mark Trainor (talk) 05:24, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 06:27, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Mark Trainor (talk) 05:25, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 06:26, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Mark Trainor (talk) 05:26, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 06:26, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Mark Trainor (talk) 05:27, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 06:26, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Mark Trainor (talk) 05:28, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 06:26, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Mark Trainor (talk) 05:29, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 06:27, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Mark Trainor (talk) 05:30, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 06:27, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Mark Trainor (talk) 05:31, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 06:27, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Mark Trainor (talk) 05:32, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 06:27, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Mark Trainor (talk) 05:33, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 06:27, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Mark Trainor (talk) 05:34, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 06:27, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
File:My reflection in windows at Walla Walla College in College Place, Washington, 2002. (10899835246).jpg
[edit]personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Mark Trainor (talk) 05:36, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 06:27, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
corrupt file Afifa Afrin (talk) 05:44, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 06:28, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Mark Trainor (talk) 05:45, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 06:28, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, Personal photo Afifa Afrin (talk) 05:48, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 06:28, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Mark Trainor (talk) 05:49, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 06:29, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Mark Trainor (talk) 05:51, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 06:29, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Mark Trainor (talk) 05:52, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 06:29, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Mark Trainor (talk) 05:54, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 06:29, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ingle.shashikant116 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope. Commons is not a photo album
- File:शशिकांत चिंधाजी इंगळे .jpg
- File:Buddharatna Shashkant Ingle 2587.jpg
- File:Buddharatna Shashkant Ingle 275.jpg
- File:Buddharatna Shashkant Ingle 278653365656.jpg
- File:Buddharatna Shashkant Ingle 278.jpg
- File:Buddharatna Shashkant Ingle 28.jpg
- File:Buddharatna Shashkant Ingle ६६६.jpg
- File:Buddharatna Shashkant Ingle 6786.jpg
- File:Buddharatna Shashkant Ingle f278.jpg
- File:Buddharatna Shashkant Ingle २५५५५.jpg
- File:Buddharatna Shashkant Ingle 0102012222.jpg
- File:Buddharatna Shashkant Ingle १३४५४६५४.jpg
- File:Buddharatna Shashikant ingle.jpg
- File:Shashikant Ingle Sir00010101 15.jpg
- File:Shashikant Ingle Sir00010101 14.jpg
- File:Shashikant Ingle Sir00010101 08.jpg
- File:Shashikant Ingle Sir00010101 06.jpg
- File:Shashikant Ingle Sir00010101 13.jpg
- File:Shashikant Ingle Sir00010101 01.jpg
- File:Shashikant Ingle Sir00010101 05.jpg
- File:Shashikant Ingle Sir00010101 03.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 10:14, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 06:31, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JAGESHWAR SAHU (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope. Commons is not a photo album
- File:Jageshwar sahu -.jpg
- File:Jageshwar sahu1.jpg
- File:Jageshwar sahu (9).jpg
- File:Jageshwar sahu (10).jpg
- File:Jageshwar sahu (8).jpg
- File:Jageshwar sahu (6).jpg
- File:Jageshwar sahu (7).jpg
- File:Jageshwar sahu (5).jpg
- File:Jageshwar sahu (2).jpg
- File:Jageshwar sahu,.jpg
- File:Jageshwar sahu.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 10:15, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 06:47, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MASOOD DOOL (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope, commons is not a photo album
- File:MASOOD DOOL-4.jpg
- File:MASOOD DOOL-5.jpg
- File:MASOOD DOOL-1.jpg
- File:MASOOD DOOL-2.jpg
- File:MASOOD DOOL-3.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 10:17, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 06:47, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rameshdiyali1983 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 12:40, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen (keep talking) 06:47, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
I don't fully understand the magazine photography side of things but wouldn't the images in the magazine be copyright ? .... –Davey2010Talk 21:11, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Uploader's account is globally locked for long-term abuse and this recent batch of problem uploads do nothing to discourage that view. Andy Dingley (talk) 22:20, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Derivative work of non-free photographs. --De728631 (talk) 17:15, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
bad quality, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 00:00, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, out of scope. --SKas 08:43, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:42, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
out of scope: poor quality, low educational value. Abiyoyo (talk) 00:00, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:42, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
COM:Toys Elisfkc (talk) 00:14, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:43, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted character Elisfkc (talk) 00:18, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:43, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
COM:DW --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 00:59, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:46, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Imho the file cannot even be "saved" by cropping. In this condition it is not suitable to illustrate the depicted object or the topic. It thus falls out of common's scope. Jotzet (talk) 01:00, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - broken or corrupt. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:47, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 01:10, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:48, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Only used on the Spanish Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted in August 2017 as spam. Out of project scope.
ℯxplicit 01:10, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:49, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Low-quality image of simple text. DMacks (talk) 02:18, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- No objections as the person transferring from Wikibooks. I agree with DMacks. – Adrignola talk 02:21, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:50, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Own mistaken upload, high-res version already available (File:Vincent van Gogh - Head of a skeleton with a burning cigarette - Google Art Project.jpg} HLHJ (talk) 02:26, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:53, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Logo being used purely for spamming on the English Wikipedia. Whpq (talk) 02:36, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:54, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Mark Trainor (talk) 05:02, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:56, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Mark Trainor (talk) 05:03, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:56, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Mark Trainor (talk) 05:09, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:56, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Mark Trainor (talk) 05:10, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:56, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Mark Trainor (talk) 05:11, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:56, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Mark Trainor (talk) 05:14, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - anyway grabbed from Facebook "FBMD". --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:57, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Mark Trainor (talk) 05:16, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:57, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Mark Trainor (talk) 05:18, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:57, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Mark Trainor (talk) 05:19, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:57, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
very old personal photo Aboulhassan2 (talk) 01:26, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
very old personal photo Aboulhassan2 (talk) 01:30, 21 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:18, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Mark Trainor (talk) 05:20, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:58, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Mark Trainor (talk) 05:21, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:58, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Mark Trainor (talk) 05:21, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:58, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Mark Trainor (talk) 05:23, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:58, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Mark Trainor (talk) 05:37, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination+derivative works issues. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:59, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Not own work. Scanned from a book. Permission is needed. Out of scope, should be Wiki-table if needed. Castillo blanco (talk) 05:38, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- It is just a table and a some numbers. This is below the threshold of originality. Keep Chaddy (talk) 12:26, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination+unused graph of questionable notability. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:00, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Mark Trainor (talk) 05:38, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:01, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Not own work. Scanned from a book. Permission is needed. Out of scope, should be Wiki-table if needed. Castillo blanco (talk) 05:39, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- It is just a table and a bit text. It is below the threshold of originality. Keep Chaddy (talk) 12:25, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination+unused graph of questionable notability. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:01, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
File:My Silence is My Attitude - Young Man with Child - Srimangal - Sylhet Division - Bangladesh (12907727493).jpg
[edit]personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Mark Trainor (talk) 05:40, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: derivative work issues anyway. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:03, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Mark Trainor (talk) 05:41, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:03, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Larger & older on his Facebook profile picture, https://www.facebook.com/ydgfilms/ Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:53, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 18:49, 28 Mai 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: Book my show is not a CC0 Website. Purely copyright violation --Krdbot 00:34, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
web-resolution, no camera metadata, likely taken from a website, thank you Linda Lessi (talk) 06:20, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Taken from here. --E4024 (talk) 06:21, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per E4024. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:59, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:00, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:34, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:59, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 06:35, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 09:59, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Allvaronnovaes (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 06:37, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:00, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Faiz frk khan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Self promotional files.
Godric ki Kothritalk to me 08:02, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:06, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by JoséGarcete (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal low-quality photos of subjects with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. Also: questionable authorship claims based on the low resolutions and missing metadata.
—LX (talk, contribs) 08:08, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:06, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Non-free logo Ayack (talk) 08:18, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Non-free too complex. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:18, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:06, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Official logo of the French military. Not CC. Cryptic-waveform (talk) 00:16, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: CSD F1. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 17:13, 29 September 2024 (UTC)
Personal photo. Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 08:22, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:06, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Personal photo. Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 08:22, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:06, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Personal photo. Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 08:22, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:06, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Copyvio- Fair user photo (File poster) --Alaa :)..! 09:24, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:07, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Copyvio- Fair user photo (File poster) --Alaa :)..! 09:24, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:07, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alexmadecosta (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not own work. At least one pic is from facebook https://www.facebook.com/AlexMadeCosta/photos/a.185101218301035.60676.161716953972795/1295168310627648/?type=3&theater
- File:Alex Costa in Los Angeles in February 2018.jpg
- File:Alex Costa in Los Angeles in January 2018.jpg
- File:Alex Costa in Florida in December 2017.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 10:11, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:07, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Found everywhere such as http://www.otravoz.co/el-polo-y-las-izquierdas-hacia-el-2018-en-tres-etapas/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:48, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:07, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:51, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:07, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Image appears to be from http://www.novosti.rs/vesti/sport.297.html:691454-Obradovic-predsednik-Strucnog-saveta-ASS Ytoyoda (talk) 11:12, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:04, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:20, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:04, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
personal vacation photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:26, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:03, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:32, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:03, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Personal photos, out of scope. Commons is not a photo album
- File:KASHMIRARANKAIL09.jpg
- File:KASHMIRARANKAIL0108.jpg
- File:KASHMIRARANKAIL07.jpg
- File:KASHMIRARANKAIL0105.jpg
- File:KASHMIRARANKAIL06.jpg
- File:KASHMIRARANKAIL03.jpg
- File:KASHMIRARANKAIL01.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 12:37, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Done by Christian Ferrer. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:03, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope personal file. E4024 (talk) 13:30, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:03, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Not an own work but taken from here: https://www.mehrnews.com/photo/2220733/%D8%A8%D8%B2%D8%B1%DA%AF%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B4%D8%AA-%D9%85%D9%84%D8%A7-%D9%81%D8%A7%D8%B6%D9%84-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B3%DA%A9%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C E4024 (talk) 14:03, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:03, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Not an own work but taken from here: https://www.mehrnews.com/photo/2220733/%D8%A8%D8%B2%D8%B1%DA%AF%D8%AF%D8%A7%D8%B4%D8%AA-%D9%85%D9%84%D8%A7-%D9%81%D8%A7%D8%B6%D9%84-%D8%A7%D9%84%D8%B3%DA%A9%D8%B1%D8%A7%D9%86%DB%8C E4024 (talk) 14:04, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:03, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:51, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:02, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:51, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:02, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Image is from YouTube user's image, https://www.youtube.com/user/TheKavadsefilms Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:54, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:01, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Facebook size, added frame, movie lighting suggest this is a promo shot or professional shot and not work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:55, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:01, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Copied from https://www.montrest.com/ video without apparent permission. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:00, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:02, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:40, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:01, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
https://agenciamegars.wordpress.com/tag/renata-kuerten/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:48, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:01, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Copyvio, see https://www.stokecityfc.com/news/unveiling-gary-rowett. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:52, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:01, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:06, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:01, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:07, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:00, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:07, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:00, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Nishi Mangaraja is a student of BCA Graduation live in Raipur Chhattisgarh India
Unused user image, and otherwise out of scope. Themightyquill (talk) 23:18, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:01, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Horribly low visual quality (almost too low to be understandable) and "CL" is the wrong chemical symbol. Category:Fischer projection has a few educational examples of this visual relationship DMacks (talk) 13:58, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 13:23, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
No permission. 'alle Bestandteile so verändert, dass sie nicht dem Original entsprechen' is a derivative work. Permission needed for original image. Castillo blanco (talk) 05:23, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- There is a "ToO" on the shield. :) --E4024 (talk) 08:23, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- It is just a simple badge and some words. This is below the threshold of originality. Keep Chaddy (talk) 12:27, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- This is definitely not below the threshold of originality in any jurisdiction. Castillo blanco (talk) 12:35, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Of course it is. Why do you presume not? Chaddy (talk) 12:37, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:43, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Baku Higher Oil School
[edit]Unlikely to be own work. Small size, no metadata.
- File:BHOS building.jpg
- File:BHOS library.jpg
- File:BHOS students on practice.jpg
- File:New BHOS building.png
- File:Student research union.jpg
Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:17, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:44, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
out of focus JiriMatejicek (talk) 15:08, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 15:08, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 05:59, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:44, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 08:27, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:45, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
The uploader says: "This file is my own screenshot." DW then. E4024 (talk) 08:30, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:45, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Who is this? Certainly not "El Chavo". Is it a personal file? E4024 (talk) 08:44, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Please note that it is not in use. --E4024 (talk) 08:50, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:45, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Looks to close to the actual Amnesty logo not to under the same copyright as a COM:DW. Just that the Sis mirrored the other way. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 08:56, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:47, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
The file is an introduction of actor Ali Rehman Khan, which is likely a violation of COM:WP. 廣九直通車 (talk) 08:57, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:47, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
This flickr account is blacklisted. I got this message when I was about to review it. Leoboudv (talk) 09:34, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:46, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Not in the public domain, see osk1977.nl, no permission, nog athor. Rode raaf (talk) 10:16, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:46, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Highly unlikely that this is own work. Gbawden (talk) 10:18, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:46, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
https://amanifestival.com/fr/artiste/thomas-lusango Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:55, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:46, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
https://amanifestival.com/fr/artiste/thomas-lusango Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:56, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:45, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Found everywhere such as https://www.raconteur.net/business/how-it-outsourcing-can-add-value Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:59, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:45, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Found everywhere such as https://www.raconteur.net/business/how-it-outsourcing-can-add-value Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:00, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:45, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Found everywhere such as https://www.raconteur.net/business/how-it-outsourcing-can-add-value Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:00, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:45, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
https://itarena.ua/it-arena-2016-where-people-and-technology-met/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:04, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:45, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope: unused personal image. Cjp24 (talk) 22:20, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Keep Not personal. --Allforrous (talk) 13:44, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Not per nomination or discussion, but because it's a copyvio. http://www.sprintmoto.pt/marca/. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:14, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Cjp24 (talk) 22:22, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:14, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
unlikely uploaders own work, everywhere else on the web this is found credits Amanda Marsalis, who is not mentioned anywhere, no exif data either BevinKacon (talk) 22:27, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:14, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Per this webpage the uploader is not the original creator. Please have the original creator send a free license to COM:OTRS. Wcam (talk) 22:33, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:14, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolution. The metadata suggests the file was grabbed from social media. —LX (talk, contribs) 23:19, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:15, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
This is a photo of a photo, with no indication why the underlying photo would be in the public domain (or, even less likely, free-licensed). Jmabel ! talk 23:53, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, PRP. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 05:24, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:12, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
out of scope, commons isn't a social networking site Chrissymad (talk) 14:28, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:50, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal photos. Out of scope. Kalbbes (talk) 15:09, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:51, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal photos. Kalbbes (talk) 15:10, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:52, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
out of scope (unknown children depicted) Xgeorg (talk) 15:20, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:52, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
out of scope Triplecaña (talk) 15:30, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:53, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Personal photo. Out of scope Kalbbes (talk) 15:35, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:53, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Personal photo. Not useful to illustrate anything in my opinion Kalbbes (talk) 16:55, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:54, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Samcorporation (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused personal images/selfies. Out of Project Scope.
- File:Partnership and General Assambely fellowship with Mahfuzur Rahman.png
- File:Mahfuzur Rahman at GENERAL ASSEMBLY and FELLOWSHIP.png
Migebert (talk) 18:16, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:54, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope as an unused image of a person. Formerly in w:User:Willymonka/sandbox. —Cryptic (talk) 19:54, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:55, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
out of scope, possibly spam BevinKacon (talk) 20:17, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:56, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
out of scope, possibly spam BevinKacon (talk) 20:17, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:56, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
personal file, out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:23, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:57, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Out of scope Kalbbes (talk) 20:35, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:57, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Blurry, out of project scope, no educational value — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:51, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:57, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
out of scope edit of File:Ice Cube 2012.jpg no use BevinKacon (talk) 22:00, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:58, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Single upload. Not sure if this is free just like that. No OTRS needed? (Cats point to both China and Japan BTW:) E4024 (talk) 11:18, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:38, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Personal photos, out of scope
- File:SIVY Bruno Siviero Cantautore.jpg
- File:Cantautore SIVY Bruno Siviero.jpg
- File:SIVY Bruno Siviero .jpg
- File:SIVY Bruno Siviero.jpg
- File:Siviero2.jpg
- File:Siviero.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 12:41, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:28, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Self-promotion, out of project scope. By now no contribs to any project.
- File:M.SAEED UL HASSAN RAZA.jpg
- File:Iammshr Portrait Click - For Official Use Only.jpg
- File:Iammshr Portrait.jpg
Achim (talk) 13:57, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:28, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
- File:Shari Dollinger headshot 1 5-14-18.jpg
- File:Shari Dollinger US Embassy Jerusalem 1 5-14-18.jpg
- File:Shari Dollinger with Hagee family Kotel 5-14-18.jpg
Out of scope as unused promotional images of a person. Formerly in w:Shari Dollinger. —Cryptic (talk) 14:31, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:28, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SanitystealerKT (talk · contribs)
[edit]Uploader request per these edits.
- File:Katie Boren.jpg
- File:Katie Boren (2).jpg
- File:Katie Boren's hard nipples.jpg
- File:Bottomless Katie Boren.jpg
- File:Woman flashing naked body.jpg
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:38, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, these unexceptional quasi-sexual photos of a non-notable person are certainly not particularly valued; model consent for upload is unclear; even if rules don't make this certain, I'd support deletion as a courtesy. - Jmabel ! talk 16:11, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete I agree with Jmadel Elmschrat (talk) 19:28, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete as a courtesy, if there was any doubt. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:46, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:39, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Art works by Wang Hsiu-Ch
[edit]No freedom of panorama for artwork in Taiwan. The artist is still living, so these works won't be public domain until 50 years after he dies.
- File:100 00039王秀杞淡水社區老人群.JPG
- File:100 00098王秀杞大地勇士.TIF
- File:100 00110王秀杞觀音菩薩女神像.TIF
- File:100 04507王秀杞淡江大學五虎碑雕塑.JPG
- File:100 04509王秀杞淡江大學海豚吉祥物里程碑.JPG
- File:100 04651王秀杞正統五路財神廟招財進寶聚寶盆.JPG
- File:100 05964王秀杞中興醫院天地之心.JPG
- File:100 05980王秀杞佛光山彌勒佛神像.JPG
- File:Goddess of Justice for SCU School of Law 100th anniversary 20150519.jpg
- File:Goddess of Justice for SCU School of Law 100th anniversary 20151221.jpg
- File:Taipei Taiwan City-police-headquarters-04.jpg
- File:Taipei Taiwan Taipei-City-Fire-Department-03.jpg
- File:Weed out the Wicked and Give People Peace 20100207.jpg
- File:Weed out the Wicked and Give People Peace 20111225.jpg
- File:中興醫院 Zhongxing Hospital - panoramio.jpg
clpo13(talk) 16:10, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:28, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
- Restored: as per [3] and {{FoP-Taiwan}}. Yann (talk) 11:43, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Art works by Wang Hsiu-Ch
[edit]See this Village Pump/Copyright discussion. Latest correspondences from Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO) reaffirmed that the non-commercial restriction for Taiwanese non-architecture extends to photographic reproductions like these. Since these photos show the artwork intentionally, then these cannot benefit from Taiwanese de minimis (in which the artwork must be incidental or at background). Correspondences in Chinese: [4] and [5].
- File:100 00039王秀杞淡水社區老人群.JPG
- File:100 00098王秀杞大地勇士.jpg
- File:100 00098王秀杞大地勇士.TIF
- File:100 00110王秀杞觀音菩薩女神像.jpg
- File:100 00110王秀杞觀音菩薩女神像.TIF
- File:100 04507王秀杞淡江大學五虎碑雕塑.JPG
- File:100 04509王秀杞淡江大學海豚吉祥物里程碑.JPG
- File:100 04651王秀杞正統五路財神廟招財進寶聚寶盆.JPG
- File:100 05964王秀杞中興醫院天地之心.JPG
- File:100 05980王秀杞佛光山彌勒佛神像.JPG
- File:Goddess of Justice for SCU School of Law 100th anniversary 20150519.jpg
- File:Goddess of Justice for SCU School of Law 100th anniversary 20151221.jpg
- File:Taipei Taiwan City-police-headquarters-04.jpg
- File:Taipei Taiwan Taipei-City-Fire-Department-03.jpg
- File:Weed out the Wicked and Give People Peace 20100207.jpg
- File:Weed out the Wicked and Give People Peace 20111225.jpg
- File:中興醫院 Zhongxing Hospital - panoramio.jpg
JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 16:11, 11 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 02:26, 18 January 2023 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gilles Cohendy (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promotional gallery of art by Giles Cohendy, see https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gilles_Cohendy for rejection of article. No proof that Mr. Cohendy is notable, no indication of user's own work on these images which include portraits of the artist as well as rephotographs of work. Requires two things (a) notability, and (b) COM:OTRS permission if notable.
- File:Gilles cohendy New York.png
- File:Peinture tableau 9.png
- File:Fè§ûèyç!hàoiàçuàç.png
- File:Photo ophis.png
- File:Ma photo 2222.png
- File:T6YT87T89.jpg
- File:TABLEAU GILLES COHENDY.jpg
- File:Tableau GH.jpg
- File:T776YGBIUB.jpg
- File:9089T2CGFYTF7.jpg
- File:T57890000.jpg
- File:T5688.jpg
- File:T5900.jpg
- File:T4560.jpg
- File:T7000.jpg
- File:T300.jpg
- File:T2000.jpg
- File:T100.jpg
- File:T9.jpg
- File:T00.jpg
- File:T5HG87.jpg
- File:T4E576.jpg
- File:T3655.jpg
- File:Gilles Cohendy.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:50, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:29, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
First we don't both similar images. Secondly this is a photomontage and a free source must be provided for each images.
Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:10, 29 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 00:24, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
No indication of own work on drawings claimed from 1860, and 1867 as well as photo from 1932, city logo, city seal and a sign.
- File:Mont Rest in Bellevue.jpg
- File:Bellevue logo.jpg
- File:Bellevue iowa seal.png
- File:1867 drawing jcc.png
- File:1860drawing.jpg
- File:Rvcbanner.jpg
- File:Sav-Sab-Bridge-Constr.1932.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:02, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:29, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Plainjane344 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyvios, all taken from https://skoobadesign.com/ , and out of scope as advertising.
- File:890312 SMALLWRAP MAIN 1.jpg
- File:200002 S-4 Laptop Brief.jpg
- File:100001 V3STANDARD MAIN 1.jpg
- File:Luggage bag.jpg
- File:Laptop carrying bag.jpg
- File:101010 CHECKTHROUGHMIINI MAIN 1.jpg
P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:06, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 22:32, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
Any metadata, low-re image, found at http://www.carrefourdesarts.artogue.fr/pages/invite-29-carrefourdesarts.php?action=141 Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:03, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb at 20:29, 29 Mai 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Gilles Cohendy --Krdbot 00:32, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
La Pyramide Inversée
[edit]Main subject = recent architecture. No FoP in France, not de minimis. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 18:13, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- File:Inverted Pyramid in the Carrousel du Louvre (2358723585).jpg
- File:Inverted Pyramid in the Louvre, Paris - panoramio.jpg
- File:Louvre glass pyramid - panoramio.jpg
- File:Louvre Inverted Pyramid (5987328824).jpg
- File:Musée du Louvre Darafsh (1).jpg
- File:Musée du Louvre Darafsh (2).jpg
- File:Musée du Louvre Darafsh (3).jpg
- File:Paris - Pyramide du Louvre.jpg
- File:Saint-Germain-l'Auxerrois, Paris, France - panoramio (95).jpg
- File:Saint-Germain-l'Auxerrois, Paris, France - panoramio (96).jpg
- File:ルーブル美術館 - panoramio - mayatomo (2).jpg
- File:卢浮宫.倒金字塔 - panoramio.jpg
- File:法國羅浮宮7.jpg
- File:法國羅浮宮70.jpg
- File:法國羅浮宮8.jpg
- File:La Pyramide Inversée,Louvre Paris, France - panoramio (123).jpg
- File:Louvre - panoramio (16).jpg
Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 06:21, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Шихов Петро (talk · contribs)
[edit]No indication that user created any of these images, which include 3 copies of same logo, and six other logos at a size too small to use, and two copies of a group shot with no indication of own work.
- File:Емблема ПФ.png
- File:Емблема ПТФ.png
- File:Емблема ФФ.png
- File:Емблема ФФВ.png
- File:Емблема ФГФ.png
- File:Колектив Наукового товариства університету.jpg
- File:Емблема НТУ.png
- File:Емблема істфаку.png
- File:Емблема НТ університету.png
- File:Колектив Наукового товариства.jpg
- File:Емблема НТ.png
Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:05, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --PierreSelim (talk) 06:28, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Linda Lessi (talk) 06:12, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Speedy keep, nonsense DR. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:01, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: @Jeff G.: Unused personal pictures are regularly deleted per COM:SCOPE: "The uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of Commons or another project is allowed as long as that user is or was an active participant on that project." As this image is apparently a personal picture of the uploader "Mr. Banafea", it is unused, and the only contributions of the user seem to be to promote himself on his English Wikipedia user talk page (different account "Abdullah Banafea"), it seems to fall into the category of personal pictures that are usually deleted. Notwithstanding that the DR came from an account that has been blocked as a INeverCry sockpuppet, it seems therefore correct. --Gestumblindi (talk) 09:55, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Mark Trainor (talk) 05:43, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:07, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Linda Lessi (talk) 06:08, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, nonsense DR. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:01, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- Single upload of an unused image. I guess this could be a personal file. --E4024 (talk) 08:28, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:08, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Linda Lessi (talk) 06:14, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, nonsense DR. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:01, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:09, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Linda Lessi (talk) 06:15, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, nonsense DR. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:01, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- ' Keep' - Realistically he or anyone could advertise his tours with this image so in that respect it's in scope and could be used by either him or different websites. –Davey2010Talk 03:23, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry, who is Mr Herod? --E4024 (talk) 06:01, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- A tour guide. –Davey2010Talk 13:23, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- Then I'm adding Category:Tour guides to the pic but am not convinced that anybody that enters there is in scope. This one doesn't even have a microphone or umbrella-like thingy that most tour guides use. I see little -if any- educational value. --E4024 (talk) 13:36, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- Well according to the image it was taken in St Lucia which is the Carribean, As I said the image can be used for him personally or maybe tour guides over all so there is some scope here, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 14:53, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- Then I'm adding Category:Tour guides to the pic but am not convinced that anybody that enters there is in scope. This one doesn't even have a microphone or umbrella-like thingy that most tour guides use. I see little -if any- educational value. --E4024 (talk) 13:36, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- A tour guide. –Davey2010Talk 13:23, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:10, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Linda Lessi (talk) 06:18, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, nonsense DR. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:01, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- He has even one other (almost identical) pic at a user page, therefore independently from who nominated it, I guess this should be deleted as a UPF. --E4024 (talk) 13:49, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:11, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Linda Lessi (talk) 06:22, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, nonsense DR. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:01, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:11, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Linda Lessi (talk) 06:23, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, nonsense DR. Not notable enough for enwiki yet per en:User:Paidpiper/sandbox. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:01, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:12, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Linda Lessi (talk) 06:30, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, nonsense DR. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:00, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:12, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Linda Lessi (talk) 06:32, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, nonsense DR. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:01, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:13, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Linda Lessi (talk) 06:36, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, nonsense DR. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:02, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:14, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Linda Lessi (talk) 06:40, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, nonsense DR. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:02, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:15, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Linda Lessi (talk) 06:42, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, nonsense DR. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:02, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:15, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Linda Lessi (talk) 06:43, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, nonsense DR. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:02, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by Jon Kolbert. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:15, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Linda Lessi (talk) 06:44, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, nonsense DR. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:02, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:16, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Linda Lessi (talk) 06:47, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, nonsense DR. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:02, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:16, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Linda Lessi (talk) 06:50, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, nonsense DR. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:02, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:16, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Linda Lessi (talk) 06:51, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, nonsense DR. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:02, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:21, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Linda Lessi (talk) 06:53, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, nonsense DR. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:02, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:21, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Linda Lessi (talk) 06:54, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, nonsense DR. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:02, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: In use on user page. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:24, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Linda Lessi (talk) 06:55, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, nonsense DR. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:02, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:26, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Linda Lessi (talk) 06:56, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, nonsense DR. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:03, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:26, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
personal photo not used, no education value for Commons, thank you Linda Lessi (talk) 06:57, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy keep, nonsense DR. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 03:03, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- Who is Muhammad Saqib? No cats, no use. Looks like a personal image. --E4024 (talk) 14:02, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:27, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
Error (wanted to create a category, not a page) AK Kennedy (talk) 14:53, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Túrelio. --Captain-tucker (talk) 20:28, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
There is no evidence that the photos have a free license. Site materials are protected by copyright GAndy (talk) 16:22, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:47, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
There is no evidence that the photos have a free license. Site materials are protected by copyright GAndy (talk) 16:24, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:47, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
There is no evidence that the photos have a free license. Site materials are protected by copyright GAndy (talk) 16:24, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:48, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
appears to be out of scope Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:03, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: com:INUSE. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:50, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
Nominating my own picture for deletion. It was taken as part of a user testing for the mobile application. Flycatchr (talk) 20:38, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ankry (talk) 11:18, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
In the source ( https://www.wien.gv.at/wiki/index.php?title=Johann_Kremenezky#tab=Bild ) this photo is licensed: Bildrechte CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 and not under the license CC BY-SA 4.0 as mentioned in the description Walter Anton (talk) 02:20, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Walter Anton and I have discussed and agreed to delete this image. I uploaded the image and I did not properly understand the difference between CC BY-NC-ND 4.0 and CC BY-SA 4.0 at the time. The image is not in use anywhere and will not cause any disruptions if and when it is deleted. Shushugah (talk) 21:51, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:21, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Errror a la hora de subir. Lockuss (talk) 01:02, 21 May 2018 (UTC)
Foto pertenece a Facebook extraida desde https://scontent.felp1-1.fna.fbcdn.net/v/t1.0-9/11813533_1676879099208486_6802301889038526730_n.png?_nc_cat=0&_nc_eui2=AeEQ6EGptUjkYWBqJ8K1MaIjMZO4OMsfPylhRlSajq57cGsIjRB9x6WcFDzBaEAhyJgNL4hI6maJLf_RRRov8-aOvPZvUJ1ofS6e7Q5FvHDABQ&oh=252ca770d2c8b8e2bfdba1b7f210955b&oe=5BC25560 Campylobacter (talk) 04:25, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:22, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
It is not used 129.127.113.27 05:34, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
It is not used Rocky231293 (talk) 05:36, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:25, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
- also file:Berezka 2.jpg
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 05:57, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:26, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
No indication of a model that could be in scope. E4024 (talk) 07:37, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep interesting image. Good image quality, unusual angle, lighting, interesting tattoo. Could be used as an example for various things and have some things extracted into seperate images as well. For all the crap Commons is overflowing with (and which is really not that hard to find) I don't understand what brought you to nominate this file. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 07:57, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per Alexis. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:16, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:EDUSE. This image is not realistically useful for educational purposes. Interesting tattoo is not a valid reason to keeping images here. There are enough tattoo on Common. Unless you can provide additional useful information, e.g. about the background and age of the individual or relevant vital statistics, this image is out of scope. T Cells (talk) 16:15, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep looks professional and I can't find another file of better quality taken of a woman in this exact position, not sure how this file isn't within scope as it could be used to describe what some people mind find seductive. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 17:06, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: consensus to keep. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:30, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Modu%C5%82_osuszacza_membranowego_FunctionKMM_tcm16-17319.gif Konrad.gorecki (talk) 08:05, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:31, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
I'm with KnowledgeTrain Marketing team. I did the submission but I was advised not to se the old logo. Knowledgetrainuk (talk) 09:48, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused promotional logo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:33, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Photo by Christian Johnson. No evidence that Christian Johnson is the owner of the flickr account Rodrigolopes (talk) 10:26, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:34, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Looks like a screenshot or scan. E4024 (talk) 11:08, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- I think it was taken from YouTube. --E4024 (talk) 11:10, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:35, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
The author's name is written in the bottom right corner and nothing seems to indicate that the uploader is the same person.
 |
File:Bill kaulitz1.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:36, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, blurry. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:29, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:36, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Copyright infringement. File is from: here דגש חזק (talk) 14:06, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope too. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:36, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal file. Is there something called Federated States of Antarctica? E4024 (talk) 14:35, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:46, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Want to start a fresh job Zanyzain (talk) 14:46, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per user request. Please do not use your user page as if it were a WP article next time. --E4024 (talk) 14:54, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:47, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Want to start a fresh article Zanyzain (talk) 14:49, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload, now unused. Moreover, likely not own work anyway. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:48, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Imho the file cannot even be "saved" by cropping. In this condition it is not suitable to illustrate the depicted object or the topic. It thus falls out of common's scope. Jotzet (talk) 18:09, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:51, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
kjh dfklsiuhdka 204.126.157.10 19:37, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- The image belongs to the PSM project on Wikisource. Keep in mind that this image is 146 years old. Please leave these, and all other images from the PSM project alone.— Ineuw talk 21:06, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:04, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope image - Having done a search the results say the vehicle is a "MERCEDES-BENZ PLATAFORMA PARALL" - Searching "Mercedes-Benz Plataforma" brings up the T2, Vario and Axor models (and searching "Mercedes-Benz Plataforma Parall" brings up nothing) so identifying the exact vehicle is an issue,
The other issue is that we as far as I'm aware don't have "Chassis number" categories but even if we did I fail to see how any sort of website could use this image when there's no info on the exact vehicle, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 19:45, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Just to note one can pay for records of the Production Year as well as other (irrlevent) things however the website says there are no records for of the Production Year for this specific vehicle so as such I'm not paying £1.50 for nothing ...... Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 20:02, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:54, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
low quality, no need for the category Afifa Afrin (talk) 19:45, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:54, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Please note the fuzzy line at bottom of photo where image merges into a white border, like the edge of a print. Then notice that the meta data reads PICASA and that this uploader has no demonstrably Own Work in entire upload gallery. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:47, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:55, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
https://www.flickr.com/photos/eastendcrossing/31791922796/in/album-72157676565079371/ appears to be the unattributed source of this image and its marked (C). Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:02, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:04, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely own work, looks like just another soccer player photo from soccer website. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:06, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Correct, from this page: https://fuerzamonarca.com/plantel Direct link: https://fuerzamonarca.com/media/img/jugadores/643a0aec-a2cd-424a-b715-bf513de3372e.png Greetings. --Vareloco (talk) 20:47, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:57, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Koorosh Orooj (talk · contribs)
[edit]No apparent notability of uploader, no permission if indeed notable. One image claimed as own is "Girl with a Pearl Earring."
- File:درازی عمر.jpg
- File:Lifespan.jpg
- File:My Mother.jpg
- File:شهید امیر حاج امینی.jpg
- File:Forgotten Negar - نگار فراموش شده.jpg
- File:Portrait of a Lady-1.jpg
- File:Koorosh Orooj-Self portrait.jpg
- File:Girl with a Pearl Earring (Renovation).jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:08, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Hi dear Ellin Beltz,
I'm Koorosh Orooj and owner of: https://vphotobrush.com/
Also all my works in this site
Please go to this link and click on images:
https://vphotobrush.com/works.php
Thank you for your follow up
All the best,
Hello again,
Please go and view this page for:
(Renovation) Girl with a Pearl Earring
https://vphotobrush.com/demo_fa.php
Thanks
Hi dear Ellin Beltz,
Although you do not respond,Please see this video that I've created:
Renovation training:Girl with a Pearl Earring
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BsQviAiMQ9Y
Thanks
- Two things here: First is COM:SCOPE, the other is COM:L. To provide proof of creation of these images, write COM:OTRS; however you will need to explain why they are notable enough - or why you are notable at all, to be retained. Simply airbrushing a famous work of art such as the Girl with a Pearl Earring doesn't make it notable. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:41, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Maybe you do not know about art?
"Simply airbrushing a famous work of art such as the Girl with a Pearl Earring doesn't make it notable" !!!
Please see this video that I've created: Renovation training:Girl with a Pearl Earring https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BsQviAiMQ9Y
Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:59, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Koorosh Orooj (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of COM:SCOPE people.
Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:01, 12 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk Mail 05:28, 19 February 2020 (UTC)
If author and source is correct, there's no permission for this file. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:11, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:00, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
unable to verify license with information given. Seems to be from MTV. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:12, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:00, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Fac-similé du journal La Marseillaise : non ibre
Habertix (talk) 20:36, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:00, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Previously deleted copyright violation File:Nader-Münze.jpg Ronhjones (Talk) 20:55, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:02, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted content not de minimus SecretName101 (talk) 21:40, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:02, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
I doubt the uploader (User:MABIBrands actually owns the copyright and/or understands the CC license. User:MABIBrands also uploaded File:Mike's Hard Lemonade Co..png, a 100Megapixel logo image. Jim1138 (talk) 04:47, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:07, 5 June 2018 (UTC)
Nominating my own picture for deletion. It was taken as part of a user testing for the mobile application. Flycatchr (talk) 20:39, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope, no educational value. --Storkk (talk) 07:46, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Nominating my own picture for deletion. It was taken as part of a user testing for the mobile application. Flycatchr (talk) 20:39, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope, no educational value. --Storkk (talk) 07:46, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Nominating my own picture for deletion. It was taken as part of a user testing for the mobile application. Flycatchr (talk) 20:39, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope, no educational value, used to vandalize wikidata. --Storkk (talk) 07:46, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Nominating my own picture for deletion. It was taken as part of a user testing for the mobile application. Flycatchr (talk) 20:39, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope, no educational value, used to vandalize wikidata. --Storkk (talk) 07:46, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Nominating my own picture for deletion. It was taken as part of a user testing for the mobile application. Flycatchr (talk) 20:39, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope, no educational value. --Storkk (talk) 07:46, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Two things on this image, first the uploader did not create the depicted trophies, second the image is Facebook sized, and unlikely to be own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:53, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (also part of sock-fest and likely COIspam on en.wp). --DMacks (talk) 09:33, 30 June 2018 (UTC)
Derivative work of non-free indoor artwork.
- File:Artwall in Concourse of Terminal 2 of Shuangliu International Airport Station01.jpg
- File:Artwall in Concourse of Terminal 2 of Shuangliu International Airport Station02.jpg
Wcam (talk) 17:45, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- keep. FoP-China.MNXANL (talk) 14:31, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
- FOP-China only covers outdoor spaces thus does not apple here. Even if it does, author and the name of the original work must be attributed. --Wcam (talk) 16:11, 27 May 2018 (UTC)::
- But there is no author name on the the artworks, only the work's name. And we cannot find the author name in anyway, it seems that the author name is not announced to the public. The artworks are already exhibited to the public more than 8 months, but no one claims the copyright, if the artworks infringed the copyright, public would know this. There is no instructions of text on "仙乡人居"(one of the artworks), the chinese characters on "蜀中仙境" (another one of the artworks) are"蜀中仙境 万户千门入画图，九天开出一成都——唐·李白", that text only includes the work's name and a poetry by an ancient poet who lived in A.D.700. The work's name is confirmed and respected, but we cannot attribute a nameless work to any author.--Asuracd (talk) 06:20, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
- This argument looks like those examples given on COM:PRP as unacceptable arguments. --Wcam (talk) 11:43, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
- The author is unknown, but the copyright owner is Chengdu Metro, COM:PRP--Asuracd (talk) 04:29, 29 May 2018 (UTC)
- Therefore, delete. --Wcam (talk) 19:09, 19 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:22, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
I really, really doubt that this is "own work" Sitush (talk) 16:34, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Bro who are you and why are deleting this if do not know any thing..
amanbisauri (talk) 20:40, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
- See also the retaliatory nomination here. - Sitush (talk) 15:13, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:43, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 16:50, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:43, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Suspected Flickrwashing. This originally had a Cc-By-Nd license, but updated to be compatible after a Flickrreview. However, it's a tightly cropped, low-res, high-quality photo with no EXIF data from a Flickr account with a single photo. Seems doubtful that this is a free image. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:24, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Correction There is EXIF data, but it's from iPhoto, an editing software, not the camera. My other concerns still stand. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:26, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for your concern. I am a fairly new Wikipedian, and still learning as I go. I was already in contact with the owner, who had uploaded it to Flickr after I'd made contact and asked them to use it for this purpose. So, after you highlighted that it was an unusable licence under Wikipedia guidelines, I just asked him to change this on Flickr. Amana22 (talk) 17:59, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for following all those steps, and I can see that you're acting in good faith. I'm just not sure if the original Flickr user is credible, seeing how tiny the image is and it shows all the signs of someone cropping a web photo and posting on Flickr as their own. Ytoyoda (talk) 18:19, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, I believe it was cropped from the original. I didn't ask him to, but I think he did it as he knew what I wanted it for. I'm pretty sure it's his own. I can't find anything remotely similar online, and I know he was often at these art events at the time. Amana22 (talk) 18:43, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks. I think it would be helpful if the Flickr uploader could show the original high-res photo (which would also be useful for other editors here). Ytoyoda (talk) 00:04, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- Ok, thanks. I'll contact him and find out what the story is. Amana22 (talk) 11:03, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks. I think it would be helpful if the Flickr uploader could show the original high-res photo (which would also be useful for other editors here). Ytoyoda (talk) 00:04, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- Yes, I believe it was cropped from the original. I didn't ask him to, but I think he did it as he knew what I wanted it for. I'm pretty sure it's his own. I can't find anything remotely similar online, and I know he was often at these art events at the time. Amana22 (talk) 18:43, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for following all those steps, and I can see that you're acting in good faith. I'm just not sure if the original Flickr user is credible, seeing how tiny the image is and it shows all the signs of someone cropping a web photo and posting on Flickr as their own. Ytoyoda (talk) 18:19, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for your concern. I am a fairly new Wikipedian, and still learning as I go. I was already in contact with the owner, who had uploaded it to Flickr after I'd made contact and asked them to use it for this purpose. So, after you highlighted that it was an unusable licence under Wikipedia guidelines, I just asked him to change this on Flickr. Amana22 (talk) 17:59, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom - a flickr user with just 1 image who then changes the licence from an unfree one to a free licence always looks like they are just trying to get the image accepted by us when they don't own the copyright. Otherwise we need an OTRS verification. Ww2censor (talk) 22:12, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks. So I should get them to provide an OTRS verification as well as an original photo? Amana22 (talk) 12:39, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- I'm not sure how long it takes to show, but he says he has now provided the OTRS verification by email - I sent him instructions. I'm still chasing him for the original photo, which he says is on another hard drive. I'll keep you up to date. Amana22 (talk) 15:20, 1 June 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks. So I should get them to provide an OTRS verification as well as an original photo? Amana22 (talk) 12:39, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, sorry with over a month since last correspondence, closing. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:43, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Surely this is not correct 212.251.218.188 18:23, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Keep This was a April fools joke from Trondheim byarkiv, apparently. The file is in fact in use on the Norwegian wiki page for April fools, so it might be better to just change the file description to make it clear this is a April fools joke. TommyG (talk) 06:39, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:42, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Not from a CC licensed paper/journal. FunkMonk (talk) 18:31, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:42, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Not from a CC licensed paper/journal. FunkMonk (talk) 18:31, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:42, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Not from a CC licensed paper/journal. FunkMonk (talk) 18:31, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:42, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
From a book:[6] FunkMonk (talk) 18:33, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:42, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
From a book, not user made: https://www.researchgate.net/figure/5-Zambia-specimens-of-Cistecephalidae-n-g-sp-and-cf-Katumbia-parringtoni-and_fig11_278716975 FunkMonk (talk) 18:34, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:42, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
No proof this is usermade, had Deviantart watermark. FunkMonk (talk) 18:35, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:42, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pandoraperez04 (talk · contribs)
[edit]No evidence of the claimed free licensing. Three of the images are book covers that are likely to be copyrighted by the respective publishers. The fourth is taken from the subject's website which does not give any licensing information. We'd need confirmation via OTRS.
- File:La nación sexuada. Abel Sierra Madero.jpg
- File:The Sexual History of the Global South.jpg
- File:Del otro lado del espejo.jpg
- File:Abel Sierra Madero.jpg
Huon (talk) 20:39, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:41, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Copyright violation: non-free screenshot of Italian TV program (notice watermarks) tagged as Own Work Dry Martini (talk) 20:48, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:40, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
File previously deleted as copyright violation File:Mannheim Rote Kultourtram.jpg - see http://web.archive.org/web/20160922093612/http://www.daniel-born.de/index.php?nr=100918&menu=1 Ronhjones (Talk) 20:53, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Yes, the previous file has been deleted due to copyright violation. That is true. But this time I, the author of this file(Moses Ruppert), published the file correctly. I am the author. It is my own work. And licsensed this file under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license. The person that uploaded it previously used my file unrightfully. This time I use my file legally. Therefore this file should not be deleted. (Talk) 10:50, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; without COM:OTRS, claim of a previously deleted image as own work remains only a claim. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:40, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Found elsewhere ( in the internet ) since 2013, not Own work. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 21:06, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:40, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Facebook image, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:13, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:39, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Photographs are atributted to "Alfonso" (Alfonso Sánchez García) and "Cortés" (Miguel Cortés Faure). They died respectively in 1953 and 1960. Apparently these photographs were first published in Spain, so they won't enter the public domain in Spain until 2033 and 2040, respectively. strakhov (talk) 21:13, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- The image is a faithful reproduction of a page from a collective work, Crónica, published on 13 December 1931 by Antonio González Linares (1875-1945). While copyright in the individual photographs will be retained by the heirs of the authors, the copyright in the collective work was owned by the publisher but expired 70 years after publication. The page may be reproduced as a whole, although the photographs may not be reproduced outside this context. Aymatth2 (talk) 00:49, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- Nop. The photographs themselves are not a collective work, since the authors are clearly identified. "Alfonso" left, "Cortés" right. In Spain copyright was retained during 80 years, not 70.
- 80 years after publication for collective or anonymous works
- 80 years post mortem for works like these two photographs.
- The 70 years are a non-retroactive, and late-XXth-centuryesque, thing.
- And these photographs don't pass as de minimis in Commons. strakhov (talk) 01:41, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- The photographs are individually covered by copyright and should not be reproduced alone, but the composite image is a collective work for which the copyright has expired, and can be reproduced as a whole. This is very different from de minimis. Inclusion of the photographs is not trivial, and is in fact essential. If they were blacked out the other parts of the collective work would no longer be presented in the original context of that work, which would be a violation. As for duration, I do not know what it was in 1931, but the 1987 law Article 28 gives a 60-year duration and the 1996 revision pushed it up to 70 years. Aymatth2 (talk) 12:05, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- Nop. The photographs themselves are not a collective work, since the authors are clearly identified. "Alfonso" left, "Cortés" right. In Spain copyright was retained during 80 years, not 70.
- Ley de 10 de enero de 1879 de propiedad intelectual: 80 años. These photographs are covered by copyright and a work using them cannot be uploaded here. It's exactly de minimis (well, more exactly not de minimis). It's sad and I'd like that being different, because if you were right we would be able to upload to Commmons any newspaper page with cool pictures (or articles) claiming "there is a little piece of text (or an advertisement or whatever) without attribution in that page, then we call the whole page "a collective work" and then we would ask only 80 years post-publication, regardless when the individual contributors died. Evidently it doesn't work that way. strakhov (talk) 18:45, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Relevant clauses in the 1879 law are articles 29-31 (Periódicos) and 33ff (Registro / Reglas de caducidad). Generally copyright in a periodical expired after 20 years. Presumably this law had been superseded by 1931. The copyright in a collective work today typically expires 70 years after publication, and it can then be reproduced in its original form. The author of a contribution to a collective work retains copyright for their contribution whether or not they are attributed, as long as they can prove authorship.
- Laws on collective works strike a balance between rights of the owner/publisher of a newspaper or encyclopedia and those of the contributors. The owner must be able to publish new editions without having to obtain permission from all the contributors or their heirs, while an author must be able to publish an anthology of their contributions. A page of a newspaper may be typically reproduced as a whole 70 years after publication, but individual items on that page may not be reproduced stand-alone or in a different context without the author's permission. Aymatth2 (talk) 12:25, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
- To put this in perspective, there is unlikely to be much demand for reproductions of a 70-year old newspaper. Even if the copyright had not expired, it would be worth very little. An anthology of contributions could have value, but the heirs of the authors would have to give permission for publication. See en:Collective work for links to various sources that discuss the subject in detail. Aymatth2 (talk) 11:40, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
Comment Relevant clauses are
La propiedad intelectual comprende, para los efectos de esta ley, las obras científicas, literarias o artísticas que pueden darse a luz por cualquier medio.
— Artículo 1
La propiedad intelectual corresponde a los autores durante su vida, y se trasmite a sus herederos testamentarios o legatarios por el término de ochenta años. También es trasmisible por actos entre vivos, y corresponderá a los adquirentes durante la vida del autor y ochenta años después del fallecimiento de éste si no deja herederos forzosos. Mas si los hubiere, el derecho de los adquirentes terminará veinticinco años después de la muerte del autor, y pasará la propiedad a los referidos herederos forzosos por tiempo de cincuenta y cinco años.
— Artículo 6
there is unlikely to be much demand for reproductions of a 70-year old newspaper.
— Aymatth2
- I agree with that. But probability isn't something Commons is concerned about, when it comes to copyright. The "work" here are two photographs, which prominently show in the file affected by the deletion request. These two photographs are copyrighted. And they are copyrighted in the same way Louvre's pyramid is, and photographs depicting it are. If you are interested in the heading, you should upload ...the heading only. If you want the text, then upload the text. The whole file is not a collective work, since individual contributions are identifiable, but a composed (or derivative) one (not even a "collaborative work" I think).
1. Los derechos sobre una obra que sea resultado unitario de la colaboración de varios autores corresponden a todos ellos. 2. Para divulgar y modificar la obra se requiere el consentimiento de todos los coautores. En defecto de acuerdo, el Juez resolverá. Una vez divulgada la obra, ningún coautor puede rehusar injustificadamente su consentimiento para su explotación en la forma en que se divulgó. 3. A reserva de lo pactado entre los coautores de la obra en colaboración, éstos podrán explotar separadamente sus aportaciones, salvo que causen perjuicio a la explotación común. 4. Los derechos de propiedad intelectual sobre una obra en colaboración corresponden a todos los autores en la proporción que ellos determinen. En lo no previsto en esta Ley, se aplicarán a estas obras las reglas establecidas en el Código Civil para la comunidad de bienes.
— Artículo 7. Obra en colaboración.
Se considera obra colectiva la creada por la iniciativa y bajo la coordinación de una persona natural o jurídica que la edita y divulga bajo su nombre y está constituida por la reunión de aportaciones de diferentes autores cuya contribución personal se funde en una creación única y autónoma, para la cual haya sido concebida sin que sea posible atribuir separadamente a cualquiera de ellos un derecho sobre el conjunto de la obra realizada.
not this cover Salvo pacto en contrario, los derechos sobre la obra colectiva corresponderán a la persona que la edite y divulgue bajo su nombre.— Artículo 8. Obra colectiva
1. Se considerará obra compuesta la obra nueva que incorpore una obra preexistente sin la colaboración del autor de esta última, sin perjuicio de los derechos que a éste correspondan y de su necesaria autorización.
this case 2. La obra que constituya creación autónoma se considerará independiente, aunque se publique conjuntamente con otras.— Artículo 9. Obra compuesta e independiente
- strakhov (talk) 18:04, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
There are various forms of multi-author work, as described in Spanish above.
- 7. A collaborative work is one where the authors work together, and there is no way to distinguish the contributions of each author. A scientific paper would be an example, as would be a work by Lennon–McCartney. All the authors are listed at the front and there is no way to tell which author contributed which part. Typically all the authors have to consent to publication.
- 8. A collective work, such as this one, is a work where several authors work independently under the overall direction of a publisher. Each author retains the right to their own contribution, but no author can claim rights to the work as a whole. Newspapers, magazines and encyclopedias are examples. Only the publisher has the copyright of the collective work. Once this has expired a faithful paper or electronic reproduction is allowed.
- 9. A compound work is one that incorporates an existing work without the collaboration of the author of that work. A translation is the most obvious example. The author of the existing work usually must grant permission to publish the compound work.
A journalist, photographer or cartoonist who contributes their work to a periodical waives any claim to copyright in the periodical as a whole, which is held only by the publisher, although they retain rights to their individual contributions. The newspaper and magazine industries depends on this basic principle, which is spelled out in the laws of each country. Aymatth2 (talk) 22:43, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
- You are mixing different things: a professional waiving his rights (or not) to the magazine, and how long these rights last: 80 years after the death of these guys, whether they belong to the magazine or not. I don't know if you read what I wrote before. Let's repeat it:
Se considera obra colectiva la creada por la iniciativa y bajo la coordinación de una persona natural o jurídica que la edita y divulga bajo su nombre y está constituida por la reunión de aportaciones de diferentes autores cuya contribución personal se funde en una creación única y autónoma, para la cual haya sido concebida sin que sea posible atribuir separadamente a cualquiera de ellos un derecho sobre el conjunto de la obra realizada. Salvo pacto en contrario, los derechos sobre la obra colectiva corresponderán a la persona que la edite y divulgue bajo su nombre.”
- This is not a collective work because it's possible to "atribuir separadamente a cualquiera de ellos un derecho sobre el conjunto de la obra realizada" (specifically to Mr. Alfonso [pic of Fermín Galán] and Mr. Cortés [pic of A. García Hernández]). strakhov (talk) 22:51, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
Se considerará obra compuesta la obra nueva que incorpore una obra preexistente sin la colaboración del autor de esta última, sin perjuicio de los derechos que a éste correspondan y de su necesaria autorización.
- This is a compound work. The magazine buys photographs ("pre-existing work=obra preexistente") to two professional photographers (although it doesn't matter at all, "photographers" not by a long shot working for Crónica, Alfonso's photos were published in [aka "sold to"] innumerable magazines in Spain for decades), uses them in the first page, creating a "new work-obra nueva" (magazine cover), regardless (sin perjuicio) of the rights related to the pre-existing work (80 years p.m.a.) and the required autorization (necesaria autorización). strakhov (talk) 23:09, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
- The phrase "sin que sea posible atribuir separadamente a cualquiera de ellos un derecho sobre el conjunto de la obra realizada" (without it being possible to separately attribute to any of them a right over the whole of the completed work) means just what it says: no author has rights to the whole collective work. Each author only has rights to their own contribution. The works published in a periodical are always preexisting: they do not pop into existence at the moment of publication. The publisher combines content commissioned for an issue with stock material. They have rights to the resulting collective work because the individual contributions were assembled under their direction into a whole. If that were not true, the author of every trivial contribution could hold the publisher to ransom.
- A newspaper or magazine is by definition a collective work. Aymatth2 (talk) 00:00, 3 June 2018 (UTC)
- Nop. It doesn't mean that. Do not miss the preceding para la cual haya sido concebida. The whole sentence means that a work is collective if it's conceived without being possible to attribute "separately" a right to a 'single' creator (Not this case, I'm gonna tell you why: Because the photograph on the left side is attributed to "Alfonso Sánchez García" and the one on the right to "Miguel Cortés Faure"). Por lo tanto es posible atribuir separadamente a alguno (en concreto a dos) de ellos un derecho sobre el conjunto de la obra realizada, so this magazine cover no es una obra colectiva. I'm a Spanish speaker. Are you? strakhov (talk) 21:29, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
- The concept of a collective work is common to all Berne Convention countries. It covers newspapers, magazines, encyclopedias etc., where the publisher pulls together material provided by several different authors. The contributors have rights to their own work, which they may publish elsewhere, but not to the work as a whole. The publisher can issue fresh editions of the collective work without needing permission from each contributor. When copyright on the collective work expires it may be freely reproduced, but individual contributions may not be extracted and published outside the context of the collective work without the author's permission. There is nothing mysterious about the law: publishers of collective works must have sole have ownership of the work as a whole, or they could not function. Aymatth2 (talk) 11:10, 26 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, the copyrights will expire in 2033 and 2040 for "Alfonso" and "Cortes" respectively. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:39, 19 July 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope (not educationally useful). I found the image in the "People with partially unzipped or unbuttoned clothes" subcategory (which also has other files that seem to be private images/out of scope) of the Buttons (clothing) category and it seems marginally relevant to that. 2602:306:C414:CDC0:143C:DAF4:7D46:A357 01:07, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep I think this a good demonstration image of male masturbation from an unusual perspective. If it's in a "wrong" category, please suggest removing it from there. The image is over eight years old and hasn't been nominated for deletion before.Richiex (talk) 09:15, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete wieviele dieser bilder braucht es denn noch, um in diesem nachschlagewerk das mastrubieren zu erläutern. DARUM geht es doch, um´s erläutern.--217.255.134.53 07:02, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep No issue with the image. How somebody finds the image on Commons is not a reason for deletion. If category tree is misleading somehow or leads to overcategorisation, that issue should be addressed elsewhere. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ ✍ ⏿) 04:34, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --DMacks (talk) 21:16, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
This picture is of no use. The person who has taken this picture take lots of sexual subjects. This picture is not used by Wikipedia. Éric Messel-2 (talk) 21:16, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: I just closed this as keep, after discussion had been open 2 months; prompt renom that raises no valid reasons for deletion. --DMacks (talk) 21:21, 24 July 2018 (UTC)
Source: https://pubs.usgs.gov/bul/2062/report.pdf Author is U.S. Geological Survey and Corporacion Venezolana de Guayana, Tecnica Minera, C.A. Works authored solely by USGS are public domain in USA. No evidence found that copyright licence is CC-BY-SA as claimed by uploader. No evidence found that this work by Corporacion Venezolana de Guayana is either public domain or CC-BY-SA. Copyright licence is unlikely to be compatible with use on Wikimedia Commons. GeoWriter (talk) 15:52, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
On May 22, 2018 at 12:22 PM "U.S. Geological Survey" <gs_answers_incoming@usgs.gov> wrote: -- reply above this line -- Hello xxx,
All USGS products, including Bulletin 2062, are in the public domain and can be freely used without permission. All we ask is that you acknowledge the USGS as the source. For more information, see our Copyrights and Credits statement.
Please be aware that some of our publications and websites include copyrighted images or diagrams that we are using with permission of the owners, but those should be clearly marked.
I hope that helps!
Sincerely, Liz Colvard
Please take a moment to tell us how we did!
U.S. Geological Survey Science Information Services Toll Free 1-888-ASK-USGS You can contact us live on Webchat Find us on Facebook and Twitter and see other USGS social media accounts.
We hope this response has sufficiently answered your questions. If not, please reply to this email for additional details about your inquiry. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pi3.124 (talk • contribs) 20:00, 22 May 2018 (UTC) (UTC)
User:Pi3.124, the message above, forwarded from the USGS, satisfies my concerns about the copyright status of this image.
I request withdrawal of my request for deletion for this image. According to Commons:Deletion_requests#Closing_discussions, I must not close this discussion because I created it. Therefore, I hope an administrator will close this discussion.
The copyright licence of this image is currently CC-BY-SA on Wikimedia Commons. I suggest that this should be changed to CC-PD as granted by the USGS.
GeoWriter (talk) 16:24, 26 July 2018 (UTC)
My request for closure of this deletion request is at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Request to withdraw Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kuroko Massive Sulfide Cross section.png.
GeoWriter (talk) 09:56, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn (AN). — regards, Revi 10:50, 27 July 2018 (UTC)
possible source: https://www.dreamstime.com/stock-photo-seven-sisters-chalk-cliffs-sussex-england-image14072870 Royalty-free image but no evidence found on website that licence is CC-BY-SA as claimed by uploader. Source website appears to offer 2 licences (Standard RF and Extended). Image probably has a copyright status that is not compatible with Wikimedia Commons. GeoWriter (talk) 15:20, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 09:53, 29 July 2018 (UTC)
This is cropped from a page from a 1941 issue of Life magazine, which is in copyright. — WFinch (talk) 00:59, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Pretty clear copyright violation from the looks of it. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ ✍ ⏿) 04:32, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:31, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
freedom of panorama not in place Slywire (talk) 17:39, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:30, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
freedom of panorama not in place Slywire (talk) 17:40, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:30, 11 August 2018 (UTC)
Closed discussions from Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Disneyland Paris
|
|---|
|
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No FOP in France
Elisfkc (talk) 20:35, 6 December 2016 (UTC) 
Deleted: most, kept some. Note that all architecture is covered by copyright, not just unusual architecture. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:24, 13 December 2016 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
copyrighted site plans.
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:26, 13 December 2016 (UTC) I'm not going to withdraw this, because I would like opinions from others, but I think it is possible that these are, in fact, "own work" as claimed, and not scans or photos of Disney produced maps. They could also be derivative works made from Disney maps. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:20, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: as above. --Yann (talk) 13:54, 22 December 2016 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No FOP in France
Elisfkc (talk) 17:22, 19 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: 4, Kept: 2. --Yann (talk) 21:00, 26 January 2017 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No FOP in France
Elisfkc (talk) 17:35, 23 February 2017 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. Kept a general view and a DM. Ruthven (msg) 13:01, 8 March 2017 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No FOP in France
Elisfkc (talk) 01:46, 5 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion for most of those files. Two of them actually violate FoP. Ruthven (msg) 22:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No FOP in France
Elisfkc (talk) 17:06, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as per above. --Yann (talk) 14:03, 1 June 2017 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No FOP in France
Elisfkc (talk) 18:51, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per FoP in France, but only the buildings. Kept are the trees, and boats, and non architectural elements of the park. File:Disneyland Paris - panoramio (16).jpg is borderline for me, but was deleted to be coherent with Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Alice's Curious Labyrinth at Disneyland Paris. Ruthven (msg) 09:14, 25 June 2017 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No FOP in France
Elisfkc (talk) 03:37, 14 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, except 2, as per O.Taris. --Yann (talk) 09:35, 21 August 2017 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
No FOP in France
Elisfkc (talk) 02:52, 6 October 2017 (UTC) Deleted: per nomination. Kept those there there was no central architecture artifact. Ruthven (msg) 20:30, 14 October 2017 (UTC) |
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 10
[edit]No FOP in France
- File:File by Alexander Baranov - IMG 3735 (15978502417).jpg
- File:File by Alexander Baranov - IMG 3738 (16162374911).jpg
- File:File by Alexander Baranov - IMG 3741 (15976966130).jpg
- File:File by Alexander Baranov - IMG 3747 (15544508613).jpg
- File:File by Alexander Baranov - IMG 3797 (15978215869).jpg
- File:File by Alexander Baranov - IMG 3803 (15976834748).jpg
- File:File by Alexander Baranov - IMG 3830 (16164269265).jpg
- File:File by Alexander Baranov - IMG 3860 (15976833358).jpg
- File:File by Alexander Baranov - IMG 3865 (16163522682).jpg
- File:File by Alexander Baranov - IMG 3906 (15976961540).jpg
- File:File by Alexander Baranov - IMG 3912 (16164267475).jpg
- File:File by Alexander Baranov - IMG 3936 (15976831288).jpg
- File:File by Alexander Baranov - IMG 3945 (15541918874).jpg
- File:File by Alexander Baranov - IMG 3972 (15978494307).jpg
- File:File by Alexander Baranov - IMG 3999 (15978493667).jpg
- File:File by Alexander Baranov - IMG 4009 (15541916704).jpg
- File:File by Alexander Baranov - IMG 4015 (15976957390).jpg
- File:File by Alexander Baranov - IMG 4017 (16162365941).jpg
- File:File by Alexander Baranov - IMG 4040 (15976826268).jpg
- File:File by Alexander Baranov - IMG 4050 (15976955490).jpg
- File:File by Alexander Baranov - IMG 4282 (15541906594).jpg
- File:File by Alexander Baranov - IMG 4285 (16162356521).jpg
- File:File by Alexander Baranov - IMG 4287 (15541905574).jpg
- File:Lights, Motors, Action - panoramio.jpg
- File:Toon Studio Ratatouille area.jpg
- File:Walt Disney Studios entrada principal.jpg
Elisfkc (talk) 17:57, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, partly as out of scope, but one file is kept, because in my opinion copyrightable details are de minimis. Taivo (talk) 17:48, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 12
[edit]No FOP in France
- File:City Hall - panoramio (5).jpg
- File:Discoveryland - Autopia - panoramio.jpg
- File:Discoveryland - panoramio.jpg
- File:Discoveryland - Space Mountain - panoramio.jpg
- File:DisneyLand - panoramio - Yurij.jpg
- File:DisneyLand - panoramio.jpg
- File:Disneyland Parijs - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Disneyland Parijs - panoramio.jpg
- File:Disneyland Paris park entrance - panoramio.jpg
- File:Disneyland Paris, Francia - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:Disneyland Paris, Francia - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Fantasyland - panoramio (9).jpg
- File:Hollywood Tower Disney - panoramio.jpg
- File:OLVIDADOS - panoramio.jpg
- File:Walt Disney Studios - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:Walt Disney Studios - panoramio.jpg
Elisfkc (talk) 18:59, 1 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:48, 21 February 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Disneyland Paris 19
[edit]No COM:FOP in France. Pictures are of copyrighted buildings, characters, topiaries, and/or parade floats
- File:5 de treboles (5071099862).jpg
- File:Disney Stars on Parade at Disneyland Paris (2022).jpg
- File:Disney Stars on Parade at Disneyland Paris (2024).jpg
- File:Disneyland Hotel 2.jpg
- File:Images from Paris Project DSC 9071 01.jpg
- File:Images from Paris Project DSC 9071 02.jpg
- File:Images from Paris Project DSC 9071 03.jpg
- File:Images from Paris Project DSC 9071 04.jpg
- File:Images from Paris Project DSC 9071 05.jpg
- File:Images from Paris Project DSC 9071 07.jpg
- File:Images from Paris Project DSC 9071 10.jpg
- File:Images from Paris Project DSC 9071 11.jpg
- File:Images from Paris Project DSC 9071 13.jpg
Elisfkc (talk) 21:19, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:17, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
copyvio from http://iae.univ-lyon3.fr/m-louis-patrick-97762.kjsp - cf mentions légales http://iae.univ-lyon3.fr/mentions-legales-iaelyon-school-of-management-32026.kjsp?RH=ANNU_IAE&RF=1512661224883 Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 15:12, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 15:35, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
dubious claim of own work on this image and associated logos. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:05, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 15:37, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
Images appear copied from gun manufacturer product shots, not own work.
- File:MA-5-MK2.jpg
- File:MA-Sniper.svg
- File:MA-12.jpg
- File:MA11 Assault rifle.jpg
- File:BA72 Assault Rifle.jpg
- File:BA63 Battle Rifle.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:09, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
It is not and they were photos taken and edited by myself. You should not assume just because they look like product shots, which in fact they are not. This is hard work of other people and you shouldn't assume without knowing the full details.
The images were photographed first, then edited in the following flow in photoshop to achieve the look. First, the image was loaded on the layer with pure white as background, then everything else in the picture was cut out apart from the gun. Then gun layer was copied onto another layer and used High Pass filter to have rugged looked. Then all layers were combined into another layer, then used Gradient to turn black & white for the result. It's hours of hard work and stupid for you to assume and accuse that "not own work". Do you even realised how much hard work that has gone into create these images? This is the kind of reaction that put off people from contributing to Wikipedia. It's shocking!!Okkar2018 (talk) 16:57, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- The reason they suggest not own work, are size, quality, file size and variability of quality between the various images, as well as the metadata. Calling names of others is not COM:AGF. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:09, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
- The size, quality and file size are reduced in post production to reduce time it takes to load the picture. You should not assume without knowing technical reasoning behind. The quality was purposely reduce to ensure the speed in loading images. Okkar2018 (talk) 07:40, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
- The image for the MA-5 MKII is right here. Ominae (talk) 15:42, 4 August 2018 (UTC)
- Similarity does not mean its the same. Get over it!Okkar2018 (talk) 07:40, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
- Other B&W images of the stuff are found here. The shot of the MA-S DMR resembles this shot. Has the same riflescope in the image. Also mate, you'll have to explain why a well-known firearms blog in North America has the same MA-5 MK II pistol that's in the commons.
- Similarity does not mean its the same. Get over it!Okkar2018 (talk) 07:40, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
Also found the shot on where the pic of the sniper rifle came from. Ominae (talk) 08:28, 5 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Sealle (talk) 15:41, 19 August 2018 (UTC)
No FOP in France
Elisfkc (talk) 00:08, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete No FOP in France --mikani (to talk) 16:32, 2 August 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 02:29, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
Not sure if images made by the Illinois General Assembly are PD. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 00:29, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- They are not, unless specifically released under a commons license. Some states have laws that make such works of their government automatically part of the public domain. Illinois is not one of those states. SecretName101 (talk) 05:20, 6 September 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 02:29, 9 September 2018 (UTC)
I would like to delete this original version (File:2015 Fazura.jpg) and maintain the smaller version (File:FAZ-CloseUP.jpg) —IejaMohamedSaleh (talk) 01:20, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- If the OTRS is for this larger original it should not be deleted. Why would you want to remove it anyway? Secondarywaltz (talk) 03:33, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: I think this photo should be keep because it can used on other projects. Fandi89 (talk) 23:30, 31 May 2018 (UTC)
Neutral I am split on this one. This is a great image and should be kept if possible. However, per policy, when the uploader asks within a day we usually delete. The reason why I am not going all the way and voting delete is because I am unsure how OTRS aspect of the whole thing relates here. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ ✍ ⏿) 04:38, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: we have OTRS permission for the file. Ruthven (msg) 07:45, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
On original website, this is listed as CC-BY-NC content (http://www.imagens.usp.br/?p=13100) Joalpe (talk) 01:21, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Keep. This is a derivated version from File:Brasao usp1.png (in use on several pages and uploaded four years ago). Both images were uploaded with {{Insignia}} and {{PD-BrazilGov}} rationale's. Érico (talk) 03:43, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Appears to be public domain per Érico. ℺ Gone Postal (〠 ✉ ✍ ⏿) 04:42, 11 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 07:46, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
The author of the sculpture depicted in the picture, Gyula Skultéty, died in 2010 (that is less than 70 years ago). There is no sign that he or his heirs gave any sort of permission to use the likeness of the sculpture. According to the description, the author of the picture is not the uploader (whose name, according to his Hungarian Wikipedia user page, is Péter Tóth), but an acquaintance of the uploader by the name of László Szabó. Mr. Szabó has not licensed his picture either. According to a conversation on Mr. Tóth's huwiki talk page (hu:Szerkesztővita:Onogundur) about a similar image, Mr. Tóth "doesn't want to bother" Mr. Szabó with a request for a license, Mr. Tóth never even attempted to contact the Skultéty family before uploading the picture, and he chose to claim that the picture was his own work "to keep things simple."
In summary, this is a non-free picture of a non-free sculpture where the uploader misuses the self|Cc-zero template because getting permission is too bothersome. Please delete the image. Malatinszky (talk) 03:12, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 07:46, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Unauthorised reproduction from ja:ファイル:東急6000系6106F.jpg (no source). If ja:user:モスギス and user:ぬべすこん are not the same person, copyright of other person is infringed. Moreover, ja:ファイル:東急6000系6106F.jpg is now under discussion for deletion. (Please visit ja:Wikipedia:削除依頼/無断転載が疑われる写真群.) 郊外生活Kogaiseikatsu (talk,contribs) 05:56, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 07:47, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
No verifiable source information to confirm the claim that the unknown author of this work, published on an unknown date, has been dead for more than 70 years. How can you know that if you don't know who it is? The subject died 115 years ago, but that proves nothing, since there is no evidence that this is even a contemporary portrait. —LX (talk, contribs) 08:17, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 07:48, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Erstellungsdatum und Urheberrecht unklar (1920 oder 1930?) Elmar Nolte (talk) 13:05, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - Better if it's 1920, the older the more PD. --E4024 (talk) 13:07, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Work by Josef Hunstiger (d. 1960), not PD yet. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:48, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per Patrick. Ruthven (msg) 07:50, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Not own work. Drawing by Michel-Alain de Muyser Lantwyck (1945-1988). BrightRaven (talk) 13:22, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 07:51, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
too blurry to know if it is from 1969 Triplecaña (talk) 15:28, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: in use. Ruthven (msg) 07:52, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
False date, found as early as 2017 at https://www.acteurspublics.com/2017/11/13/une-nouvelle-mission-a-l-international-pour-magali-lafourcade Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:05, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 07:52, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
logo a été changé Université casa (talk) 16:51, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 07:52, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Previously published at http://oradio.rs/sr/vesti/drustvo/intervju/goran-obradovic-uvek-na-najvise-domete-4740.html, this requires COM:OTRS now for permission. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:46, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 07:53, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work on highschool logo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:00, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 07:53, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
copyright Deshumanizado (talk) 14:29, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:58, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
Found everywhere such as https://www.n-ix.com/news/garage48-empowering-women-hackathon-n-ix-boosting-female-entrepreneurship-lviv/ Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:07, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry, Patrick, can't understand what you mean. I've took this picture from this article https://dou.ua/forums/topic/23467/. What is the issue? The pic is originally used in the Ukrainian article about the Estonian ambassador in Ukraine. --Comic Fantasy (talk) 11:20, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Hi. This image has been found with a larger resolution at https://www.n-ix.com/news/garage48-empowering-women-hackathon-n-ix-boosting-female-entrepreneurship-lviv/ with the mention Copyright © 2002 - 2018 N-iX LLC or with © 2005—2018 DOU.ua at the website you mention, so it's not free of use. If you are the photographer please send an authorization via COM:OTRS. Yours, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:02, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Thanks for explanaition, Patrick. I've sent the request email. Have a nice day! --Comic Fantasy (talk) 15:00, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Hi. This image has been found with a larger resolution at https://www.n-ix.com/news/garage48-empowering-women-hackathon-n-ix-boosting-female-entrepreneurship-lviv/ with the mention Copyright © 2002 - 2018 N-iX LLC or with © 2005—2018 DOU.ua at the website you mention, so it's not free of use. If you are the photographer please send an authorization via COM:OTRS. Yours, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:02, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Can be undeleted if and when proper permission is received. --Majora (talk) 01:30, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
likely copyright violation, proshot image by user with low amount of uploads, no license info or metadata. Ringerfan23 (talk) 14:09, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 01:30, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
Derivative work of train ticket art Ytoyoda (talk) 14:13, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 01:30, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
I really, really doubt this is "own work", although I cannot read the Hindi text Sitush (talk) 16:33, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- See also the retaliatory nomination here. - Sitush (talk) 15:13, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Majora (talk) 01:37, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
keine Freigabe des Fotografen (https://www.photograph-erfurt.de/impressum/); Möglicherweise URV Olaf Kosinsky (talk) 09:58, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Note: DR seems to be withdrawn - see here. --JuTa 16:37, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per User:JuTa. --Y.haruo (talk) 19:32, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
image is used in february 2018 on http://24binodonbd.com/bn/2018/02/24/%E0%A6%B6%E0%A6%BF%E0%A6%95%E0%A7%8D%E0%A6%B7%E0%A6%BF%E0%A6%95%E0%A6%BE-%E0%A6%A8%E0%A6%BE%E0%A6%9C%E0%A6%AE%E0%A6%BF-%E0%A6%AF%E0%A6%96%E0%A6%A8-%E0%A6%AE%E0%A6%A1%E0%A7%87%E0%A6%B2/ So possible copyvio and uploader not the author Migebert (talk) 15:16, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- from discussion page: No, actually it was uploaded in somewhere else and than this news portal which is in Bengali Language stole it and published it. I can offer the link to high resoulation or RAW file if you want. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Emonkhan (talk • contribs) 22:53, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- So why you are uploading a file with lower resolution to Commons? Please give a link to the file with higer resolution. --Migebert (talk) 07:43, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
- Ok, I am providing a link.
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 19:41, 20 September 2018 (UTC)
too blurry to know if it is from 1969 Triplecaña (talk) 15:29, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 11:38, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
Removed file request; it is on a user page on incubator.wikimedia.org Kalbbes (talk) 22:46, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
- I agree with the original delete proposal. There is a personal page on Incubator but this user has only uploaded this one image as his single edit, and hasn't edited anything for two years. He set up a Wikipedia user page at the same time and hasn't edited there since 2016, and then only on his own user page. I suspect the start of an Incubator and Wikipedia page is to circumvent any observation of a WM self-aggrandizing selfie and personal social media style WP bio blog. Acabashi (talk) 13:25, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
- Would you mind adding the title back, please? You can vote "keep" if you so wish. --E4024 (talk) 13:27, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
- File link removed by Kalbbes... I've added it back. Acabashi (talk) 13:40, 29 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:51, 23 September 2018 (UTC)
This image is of some dragon sculpture, which is subject to COM:FOP#Taiwan. Without knowing the author or the year of the artwork, let's take the sculpture as presumably copyrighted especially per COM:PRP. George Ho (talk) 05:41, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- I think it is a public art. And the photo is taken by me myself. By the way, it is not a dragon, it is a snake.克勞棣 (talk) 06:18, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Being a "public art" is not a sufficient reason for keeping this image. Public art or not, the sculpture was or is located in Taiwan. Regardless of a photographer, the copyright of the sculpture exclusively belongs to the (unknown or unnamed) sculptor, who may have the authority to decide how photographs of the sculpture is commercially used and distributed. --George Ho (talk) 06:56, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Since this, should you request deletion to File:Taiwan Kaohsiung Lantern Festival.jpg, File:臺灣燈會吉羊康泰.jpg, File:2014 Taiwan Lantern Festival main lantern 20161209.jpg, File:2016年臺灣燈會主燈齊天創鴻運.jpg, File:2017 TLF main lantern 03.jpg in the same time, which are also the photographs of Taiwan Lantern Festival main lanterns? I see no differences between my photograph and them.克勞棣 (talk) 05:32, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- I should have (re-)read COM:FOP#Taiwan (Republic of China) and CT:FOP#FOP in Taiwan. Seems that they are attempting changes to the rule for clarity. --George Ho (talk) 19:14, 10 June 2018 (UTC)
- Since this, should you request deletion to File:Taiwan Kaohsiung Lantern Festival.jpg, File:臺灣燈會吉羊康泰.jpg, File:2014 Taiwan Lantern Festival main lantern 20161209.jpg, File:2016年臺灣燈會主燈齊天創鴻運.jpg, File:2017 TLF main lantern 03.jpg in the same time, which are also the photographs of Taiwan Lantern Festival main lanterns? I see no differences between my photograph and them.克勞棣 (talk) 05:32, 6 June 2018 (UTC)
- Being a "public art" is not a sufficient reason for keeping this image. Public art or not, the sculpture was or is located in Taiwan. Regardless of a photographer, the copyright of the sculpture exclusively belongs to the (unknown or unnamed) sculptor, who may have the authority to decide how photographs of the sculpture is commercially used and distributed. --George Ho (talk) 06:56, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per depending on the modified Commons:Freedom of panorama#Taiwan (Republic of China). --Y.haruo (talk) 14:40, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Taiwan Intellectual Property Office (TIPO) finally reverted to the original standpoint by Wikimedia Commons before 2018: that public artistic works cannot be freely used commercially if main subjects or themes of the photos (see Commons:Village pump/Copyright/Archive/2023/01#FOP Taiwan). The sculpture appears recent, its sculptor likely not yet dead for more than 50 years. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:43, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 11:54, 7 February 2023 (UTC)
Please provide source of image, or what it actually is, to support this license. Is it a placque, an award, is is on display? Where? and so on. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:58, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing legal information. --Y.haruo (talk) 14:52, 24 September 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SCF-Arquitectos (talk · contribs)
[edit]Architectural renderings without permission of creator/s . Also some photos, one is 288x 214, the other is 4384x2466... unlikely claims of own work.
- File:I08g129 Pabellón Nacional de Puerto Rico Expo-92 Sevilla plantas.jpg
- File:I09c16 2006 Portal de El Yunque elevation.jpg
- File:E05c24 UPR Law School Expansion site.jpg
- File:E05c25 UPR Law School Expansion ground floor plan.jpg
- File:I08g09 Pabellón Nacional de Puerto Rico Expo-92 Sevilla axon.jpg
- File:SCF Arquitectos Logo.png
- File:Casa punta-02 sketch SC.jpg
- File:Casa Punta Sketch Plan SC.jpg
- File:BPPR Urban Hub Aerial View 01.jpg
- File:Place de la Cathedrale. Port-au-Prince. Design by Segundo Cardona FAIA.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:04, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Reply to "Files uploaded by SCF-Arquitectos (talk · contribs)"
The above files were indeed created by SCF Architects or SCF Arquitectos (formerly known as Sierra Cardona Ferrer Arquitectos). Please indicate if we should submit some type of confirmation and what evidence would be acceptable by Wikipedia). Thanks. --SCF-Arquitectos (talk) 14:16, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- Please fill in the simple form at COM:OTRS. Special editors will assist you. Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:05, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
- These images have been published in our website www.scf-arquitectos.com, on newspapers, in books and magazines. We're not clear which form at COM:OTRS is the one we have to fill out. Who may assist us in this process? Thanks.--SCF-Arquitectos (talk) 18:05, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:12, 30 September 2018 (UTC)
© UNESCO World Heritage Centre 1992-2018 Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:01, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- This image has been downloaded from http://whc.unesco.org/en/documents/124030, as the website offer this option. I mean, the image has not been taken from the source code. Let me know if I'm missing any point. Thank you. --Caterina certezza (talk) 17:17, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Hi @Caterina certezza: Yes, this file is © UNESCO World Heritage Centre 1992-2018 and there's no evidence that it's available under a free license. Unless you provide such an evidence by modifying the image description, file will be speady deleted. Yours, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:57, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: Is it possible that this falls under direct UNESCO property? If so it would be {{Cc-by-sa-3.0-igo}} per their image use policy. --Majora (talk) 01:42, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Majora: I don't know. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:17, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: Is it possible that this falls under direct UNESCO property? If so it would be {{Cc-by-sa-3.0-igo}} per their image use policy. --Majora (talk) 01:42, 16 September 2018 (UTC)
- Hi @Caterina certezza: Yes, this file is © UNESCO World Heritage Centre 1992-2018 and there's no evidence that it's available under a free license. Unless you provide such an evidence by modifying the image description, file will be speady deleted. Yours, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:57, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per Majora. I changed the license. Ruthven (msg) 03:17, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
No OTRS permission for the logo, that I can tell. It is included intentionally, hence not de minimis. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:59, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Logo removed from the file. Ruthven (msg) 03:28, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Para evitar un escándalo publico al futuro presidente del Peru. Foto publicada sin aprobacion. 181.133.154.174 21:53, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 03:31, 11 October 2018 (UTC)
Similar to https://www.amazon.fr/Jenn-Brandt/e/B07694TB45 Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:30, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Hi @Patrick Rogel: I asked the photographer and owner of this photo to uploaded it to Commons under a CC-BY SA 4.0 License. He has also given permission for its use on the above mentioned Amazon page. I'd like to dispute any issues of copyright violation. Thank you - Jlbrandt (talk) 18:05, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Jlbrandt: Photographer should send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yours, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:59, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Patrick Rogel: Will the email be accepted if his email is not associated with the content being released? Jlbrandt (talk) 00:32, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Jlbrandt: Photographer should send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yours, --Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:59, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Undelete if OTRS ticket is ever received. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:48, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
This is not an image from the set that Nationaal Archief released. Source does not show the CC0 license Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 21:12, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Correct detected. Although quite some photographs by Harry Pot from the Dutch National Archives are open data and licensed with a creative commons license/waiver, This specific image isn't. The open data images from the Dutch National Archives can be identified on its detailpages by a creative commons logo with link to the (Dutch) creative commons website and its license/waiver. For example this image has such a logo http://proxy.handle.net/10648/abd635f4-d0b4-102d-bcf8-003048976d84 and is available as open data. And this image http://proxy.handle.net/10648/6cad647c-1ad9-102f-a76c-003048944028 hasn't got one and can't be identified as open data. --Timmietovenaar (talk) 13:29, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
This applies as well to the following files:
Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 14:55, 24 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:49, 15 October 2018 (UTC)
Wrong file type for BSicons (should be SVG); not really a correct BSicon name Jc86035's alternate account (talk) 08:22, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Ok, I make a new one as SVG - are there any pages were I can look for right names and how can I get them into a railway map on a Wikipedia page?
Greetings Chemnitzer Eisenbahner (talk) 17:00, 23 May 2018 (UTC)
The new one - Chemnitzer Eisenbahner (talk) 19:24, 25 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Chemnitzer Eisenbahner: The SVGs are fine for now, although the icon names (and maybe icon geometries) should be changed.
~Lactually means that an object is moved to the left edge of the icon by half of the icon width.- Currently there are no other BSicons which have a line drawn at 400px from the left. I think this is technically possible with current naming patterns but it's something like
exKSTRe+uexv-~KSTRe~KSTRefor
(exKSTRe-uexKSTRe~L). (I think it works like this. Having tildes is a very recent thing – the idea is that you separate 50px lines with~.) If you move the light blue line 25px to the viewer's left, so that it's at x=375, then you get some more sensible names likeexKSTRe+uexv-KSTRefor that icon. Normally, in most diagrams the lines are at least 250px apart, so you might have something like
(exmvBHF) (or
(exv-KSTRe) with
(uexvKSTRe-)). However, I suppose it's also possible to put the lines closer, as you have. - The station icon you uploaded is more complicated because there is no precedent for having a connected station with two lines that close together. I don't really know how the naming logic works for them, or how
+affects connections between stations. It would probably be something likeexBHF-L+uexv-~BHF-R~BHF(line at 400px) orexBHF-L+uexv-BHF-R(line at 375px). - The curves in the other two icons you uploaded are not standard, since the naming structure for regular curves is based on having the line go from a point on the icon edge to another point on the edge. I think since the curves don't connect to anything in your diagram you could get away with using a curve like
(v-SHI2l), which is supposed to be a 250px shift to the (train driver's) left – so
(exSTRr-uexSTRl~L) would becomeexSTRr+uexv-~SHI2l~SHI2l(line at 400px) orexSTRr+uexv-SHI2l(line at 375px). - Useddenim, Tuvalkin, do you have any suggestions? Jc86035's alternate account (talk) 16:05, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
- WRT naming, there could be a precedent with the triple-mixed (
) parallel icons (that I can't seem to locate right now). Useddenim (talk) 19:29, 26 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Useddenim: The only one left,
(bubKBFCCe), is obviously not currently named correctly, so I would say that in the current system there is no precedent. Jc86035's alternate account (talk) 06:47, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Useddenim: The only one left,
- WRT naming, there could be a precedent with the triple-mixed (
(xABZgr-uexSTR+l~L) →xABZgr-uexv-STR+l- (
exSTRr-uexSTRl~L) →exSTRr-uexv-STRl - (
exKSTRe-uexKSTRe~L) →exKSTRe-uexv-KSTRe 
(exHST-uexHST~L) →exHST-uexv-HST
- I know that the double - construct looks odd, but I think it correctly defines these icons. (Of course, if we could convince wp:de to accept overlays, this would be completely unnecessary.) Useddenim (talk) 15:53, 27 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Useddenim: As noted, these are affected by the tracks being at 400px, although we could re-upload them to move the track to 375px (I hope you read my comments). Wouldn't "+" be used instead of "-", as in
(fvHST-+fexv-HST)? Jc86035's alternate account (talk) 06:06, 28 May 2018 (UTC)- Well, yes, I was assuming that the geometry would be standardised; however, in (
fvHST-+fexv-HST) I thought the + indicated a colour combination. Useddenim (talk) 06:32, 28 May 2018 (UTC)- @Useddenim: As I've understood it,
+when not part of a suffix is always supposed to be a literal overlay of two objects (e.g.
(STR+GRZq)), right? Jc86035's alternate account (talk) 07:06, 28 May 2018 (UTC)- OK; as long as it's consistent. (I'm still getting used to the reorganized connectors.) Useddenim (talk) 08:01, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
- @Useddenim: As I've understood it,
- Well, yes, I was assuming that the geometry would be standardised; however, in
- @Useddenim: As noted, these are affected by the tracks being at 400px, although we could re-upload them to move the track to 375px (I hope you read my comments). Wouldn't "+" be used instead of "-", as in
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![100 File:Manuel "Manu" Avenido, Jr..jpg](#File:Manuel_"Manu"_Avenido,_Jr..jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_2017.jpg){kind=link}
_2017.jpg){kind=link}
.webp){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(3152759505).jpg){kind=link}
_(3152760035).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(16375095884).jpg){kind=link}
_Lajos.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
![17:51, 22 May 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/05/22#c-P199-2018-05-22T17:51:00.000Z-File:Manuel_"Manu"_Avenido,_Jr..jpg){kind=link}
![10:02, 29 May 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/05/22#c-Jianhui67-2018-05-29T10:02:00.000Z-File:Manuel_"Manu"_Avenido,_Jr..jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_2017.jpg){kind=link}
_2017.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_2017.jpg){kind=link}
_2017.jpg){kind=link}
_2017.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2017.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_2017.jpg){kind=link}
_2017.jpg){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.webp&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.webp){kind=link}
.webp){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(3152759505).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(3152759505).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(3152759505).jpg){kind=link}
_(3152759505).jpg){kind=link}
_(3152760035).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(3152760035).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_(3152760035).jpg){kind=link}
_(3152760035).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(16375095884).jpg){kind=link}
_(16375095884).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
,_termin%C3%A9s.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Lajos.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Lajos.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_Lajos.jpg){kind=link}
_Lajos.jpg){kind=link}
-2018-05-22T08:22:00.000Z-File:BSicon_exmvHSTschmal-r.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:43, 16 October 2018 (UTC)
Ausschnitt aus http://www.eisenbahn-stolberg.de/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/1931_BfMuensterbusch_Ga_mitNebengebaeude_F.jpg, Bild von 1931, daher Urheber nicht zweifelsfrei seit 70 Jahren tot. Falsche Lizenz? Jbergner (talk) 07:27, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- diese lizenz, die sich auf den tod des urhebers bezieht, ist wohl in den seltensten fällen referencierbar. Ansonsten müssten der autor namentlich bekannt und ein sterbenachweis erbracht werden können. Sehr unwahrscheinlich. Also ich hab keine andere lizenz und sehe auch keine möglichkeit, eine andere zu liefern. Sollten Sie ggf. einen vorschlag machen können, setzte ich diesen gerne um--Albert Gr. (talk) 15:41, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keepweil: ich lese unter Commons:Lizenzen#Gemeinfreies Material folgendes: Bei anonymen Werken oder Werken mehrerer Urheber, die nicht im einzelnen genannt werden (z.B. Lexika) gilt nach der Berner Übereinkunft eine Frist von 70 Jahren nach Veröffentlichung.??? Und das ist doch gegeben.? Nur, wie lautet dann die Lizenz?--Albert Gr. (talk) 16:05, 22 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - pma rationale requires an author, and anon claims require the author be unknown to anyone, not merely unknown to us (i.e., reasonable, non-trivial research is required); see also COM:PRP - "no one knows" claims are explicitly disallowed. --Эlcobbola talk 18:29, 17 October 2018 (UTC)
