Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/04/30
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.png){kind=link}
-01.jpg){kind=link}
![53 File:Bérengère Bonte sur le plateau de "On n'est pas couché" diffusé sur France 2 le 6 juin 2015.jpg](#File:Bérengère_Bonte_sur_le_plateau_de_"On_n'est_pas_couché"_diffusé_sur_France_2_le_6_juin_2015.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![147 File:"What's new pussycat ..." (For Boskimano) - panoramio.jpg](#File:"What's_new_pussycat_..."_(For_Boskimano)_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
_12.JPG){kind=link}
_10.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Carl_Bosch.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#File:Na Sady Clothes.jpg
Have to delete it first before a valid undeletion request can be made! Also, copyvio. - Alexis Jazz 05:43, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Clear copyvio -- therefore this is a {{Speedy}}. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:13, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Une nouvelle copie de la photo prise par Matricia Marais et qui n'a pas donné son accord pour publication dans Commons. Voir : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Photo_officielle_PCD_6709_Patricia_Marais_fondmarron.jpg Poudou99 (talk) 16:25, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy deleted. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:01, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
DW rather than own work. No source for the base map. Unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 16:23, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
- Could you not have asked before marking it for deletion? The basemap is File:Belgique-Communes589-Provinces10.gif. It's public domain. It's also the only map of the municipalities of Belgium we have on commons. Amphicoelias (talk) 18:07, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- No, I could not have asked. We simply do not have the capacity to do that for all the hundreds of files with false 'own work' claims that get uploaded every day. We notify the uploader when nominating a file for deletion, so that they can provide the missing information. Jcb (talk) 21:03, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- Ok then. I can understand that. Sorry if I came of as standofish, and thank for explaining. Amphicoelias (talk) 21:46, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- No, I could not have asked. We simply do not have the capacity to do that for all the hundreds of files with false 'own work' claims that get uploaded every day. We notify the uploader when nominating a file for deletion, so that they can provide the missing information. Jcb (talk) 21:03, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 21:03, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Duplicate of File:Emilia - novella.pdf Ederporto (talk) 17:13, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: and rediretced. --JuTa 23:58, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Copyvio: (c) Anhui University. No permissions found. WQL (talk) 11:46, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 18:29, 30 April 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: Non-free university logo --Krdbot 00:39, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
File:PL Kieszonkowy słownik języków łacińskiego i polskiego. Cz. 1, Słownik łacińsko-polski PART II.pdf
[edit]Duplicate of File:PL Kieszonkowy słownik języków łacińskiego i polskiego. Cz. 1, Słownik łacińsko-polski.djvu i upload one file instead of two user=Matlin Matlin (talk) 22:28, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ankry (talk) 05:59, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
File:PL Kieszonkowy słownik języków łacińskiego i polskiego. Cz. 1, Słownik łacińsko-polski PART I.pdf
[edit]Duplicate of File:PL Kieszonkowy słownik języków łacińskiego i polskiego. Cz. 1, Słownik łacińsko-polski.djvu i upload one file instead of two user=Matlin Matlin (talk) 22:29, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ankry (talk) 05:58, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
May have mistaken royalty-free for free. Also, © Faust Imaging Damselfly7 (talk) 16:41, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 07:51, 1 Mai 2018 UTC: May have mistaken royalty-free for free. Also, © Faust Imaging --Krdbot 12:41, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
This looks like a screeenshot from a copyrighted video. If so, it appears to be a copyright infringement. Please delete also other photos of the same batch. NearEMPTiness (talk) 15:29, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Ellin Beltz at 19:17, 1 Mai 2018 UTC: Copyright violation, see COM:L. - --Krdbot 00:38, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
No source, no permission, no license, poor quality image, only intended to be used as vandalism (see previous usage on enwiki). {{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk} 14:28, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Support - This image is obviously used only for vandalism. In addition, the uploader is a cross-wiki vandal who is also socking. LightandDark2000 (talk) 01:31, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy deleted – uploaded by a vandal, used for vandalism. --jdx Re: 08:13, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope + promotion to Instagram account --Alaa :)..! 13:55, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, source – Facebook. Taivo (talk) 19:59, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope + promotion to Instagram account ; recreation of a photo already deleted in may 2018 Civa (talk) 12:03, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
- Also this one File:Asrararef.jpg --Alaa :)..! 00:16, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, source – Facebook. Image is the same, but previous was derivative work and this is original. Taivo (talk) 07:53, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- @Taivo: sorry, but the two pictures above uploaded again :/ --Alaa :)..! 17:56, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- The user blocked in arwiki for 1 week --Alaa :)..! 17:59, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- I blocked him/her in Commons for month (second block) and deleted all uploads. Taivo (talk) 18:07, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
- The user blocked in arwiki for 1 week --Alaa :)..! 17:59, 9 June 2018 (UTC)
Yes there is a reason for deleting MY image. I am the copyright holder and want to delete my image because it can be associated with my real name and ID (for several reasons) and that is something that I don't want, I have the right to stay anonymous here... Clever Clog (talk) 21:03, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: A DR for a DR?. --JuTa 04:05, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Fake news, per https://tw.appledaily.com/new/realtime/20180427/1342581/ 1233 (talk) 14:24, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- Note: It is fake news and out of project scope. It is of pure vandalism and it is biased.--1233 (talk) 12:45, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:01, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
duplicate of File:O Visconde do Rio Branco - esboço biographico.pdf Ederporto (talk) 17:16, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected. --JuTa 17:42, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
Nudity and inappropriate Jeffrey J Hewitt (talk) 00:12, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:27, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Nudity and inappropriate Jeffrey J Hewitt (talk) 00:12, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Why do you upload inappropriate files if you know they are inappropriate? --E4024 (talk) 08:55, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:27, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Nudity and inappropriate Jeffrey J Hewitt (talk) 00:13, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Why do you upload inappropriate files if you know they are inappropriate? --E4024 (talk) 08:56, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:28, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Nudity and wrong picture was uploaded. Jeffrey J Hewitt (talk) 20:23, 25 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:44, 1 April 2018 (UTC)
Nudity and inappropriate Jeffrey J Hewitt (talk) 00:13, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- I marked it for speedy deletion and was deleted. Why did you re-upload it? Are you playing with Commons? This is part of an education project. --E4024 (talk) 08:53, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by Turelio. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:28, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Nudity and inappropriate Jeffrey J Hewitt (talk) 00:13, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:28, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Nudity and inappropriate Jeffrey J Hewitt (talk) 00:13, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:29, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Nudity and inappropriate Jeffrey J Hewitt (talk) 00:14, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:29, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Nudity and inappropriate Jeffrey J Hewitt (talk) 00:14, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:30, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Nudity and inappropriate Jeffrey J Hewitt (talk) 00:14, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:30, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo ( https://twitter.com/mptsc2017 ) Felviper (talk) 01:14, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:31, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Patrick Rogel as no source. There is a source, but I doubt that its realy {{PD-old-100}}. JuTa 02:02, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:33, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no permission (No permission since). It doesn't need permission but it's out of scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:39, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:33, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:40, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:33, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:40, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:33, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:40, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:34, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no permission (No permission since). It doesn't need permission but it's out of scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:41, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:34, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no permission (No permission since). It doesn't need permission but it's out of scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:41, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:34, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no permission (No permission since). It doesn't need permission but it's out of scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:41, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:34, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
The file did not get deleted completely; got the bottom part truncated Saxena ashes (talk) 06:09, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:35, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 47.151.26.64 as Copyvio (copyvio)
Converted by me as no evidence was provided. However, here the image is credited to photographer Katie Gibbs. -- Túrelio (talk) 06:37, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - but let's first show the OTRS way to the uploader. --E4024 (talk) 13:13, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:36, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Files of User:Bree Einfalt
[edit]- File:Candyman Girlfriends - Mansion.jpg
- File:Photo 14-1-18, 6 01 46 pm.jpg
- File:Travers Beynon and Girlfriends.jpg
Out of scope - unused and no forseeable educational use. The first two formerly used in w:Travers Beynon. —Cryptic (talk) 06:42, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:37, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Low quality no exif data unlikely to be own work
- File:Nature is unique.jpg
- File:Unique nature.jpg
- File:Nature is uniqueh.jpg
- File:Moohn.jpg
- File:Lightening f.jpg
- File:Sun beauty amazing.jpg
- File:Fbhdhn.jpg
- File:Blackrosev.jpg
Perumalism Chat 07:05, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:39, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal file, a symbol invented by User:Camposjavier348 for hate speech. (Another example of what I call abusing Commons for personal/nationalist agendas.) Javier, si quiere conocer un turco de verdad estoy a su disposición. E4024 (talk) 07:32, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: likely out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:42, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused and no forseeable educational use. Formerly in w:User:Datapro karakat/sandbox. —Cryptic (talk) 07:39, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:43, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: unused and no forseeable educational use. Formerly in w:User:Datapro karakat/sandbox. —Cryptic (talk) 07:40, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:43, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal file, out of scope. Left by a one-time uploader. E4024 (talk) 07:48, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:43, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
not uploaded correclty Juniojj06 (talk) 07:57, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:44, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
- also file:Ubtphcm.png
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 08:42, 30 April 2018 (UTC) - Delete per nom, TOO, and PRP. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 12:46, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:44, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Photo of photo, not own work. When the photo was made and published, who is the photographer and when (s)he died? If the photo is anonymous – how do you know that? Taivo (talk) 09:00, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:45, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
-01.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-01.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope as an unused company logo; formerly in w:X Social Group. Also possibly above the threshold of originality, and the "own work" claim isn't credible. —Cryptic (talk) 09:02, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
-01.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:46, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
-01.jpg){kind=link}
Book cover with DW (photo). E4024 (talk) 09:11, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:47, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work Xgeorg (talk) 09:51, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:47, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Low quality out of scope unlikely to be own work Perumalism Chat 10:14, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:47, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Hoax. Such party does not exist. Taivo (talk) 10:22, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:48, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mallikarjuna123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]no exif data unlikely to be own work
Perumalism Chat 10:39, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - the fisrt I checked is a copyvio. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:49, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shanmukha varma 123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]low quality no exif data unlikely to be own work
Perumalism Chat 11:04, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:50, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
File:Bérengère Bonte sur le plateau de "On n'est pas couché" diffusé sur France 2 le 6 juin 2015.jpg
[edit]
Screencaps ? (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pMcsmOgNVYY) Supporterhéninois (talk) 11:13, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - There is also the DW poster behind. --E4024 (talk) 11:16, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:51, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Junomangalyaan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality no exif data, Unlikely to be own work
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Perumalism Chat 11:53, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:51, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
The copyright of this photo is held by Terekah Najuwan, with the name and website and phone number written into the EXIF data. Obviously not the same person as the uploader. Binksternet (talk) 01:04, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:38, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
The copyright of this photo is held by Terekah Najuwan, with the name and website and phone number written into the EXIF data. Obviously not the same person as the uploader. Binksternet (talk) 01:04, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:39, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
The copyright of this photo is held by Terekah Najuwan, with the name and website and phone number written into the EXIF data. Obviously not the same person as the uploader. Binksternet (talk) 01:05, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:39, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
The copyright of this photo is held by Terekah Najuwan, with the name and website and phone number written into the EXIF data. Obviously not the same person as the uploader. Binksternet (talk) 01:05, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:39, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
The copyright of this photo is held by Terekah Najuwan, with the name and website and phone number written into the EXIF data. Obviously not the same person as the uploader. Binksternet (talk) 01:05, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:39, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
The copyright of this photo is held by Terekah Najuwan, with the name and website and phone number written into the EXIF data. Obviously not the same person as the uploader. Binksternet (talk) 01:05, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:39, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
The copyright of this photo is held by Terekah Najuwan, with the name and website and phone number written into the EXIF data. Obviously not the same person as the uploader. Binksternet (talk) 01:06, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:39, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
The copyright of this photo is held by Terekah Najuwan, with the name and website and phone number written into the EXIF data. Obviously not the same person as the uploader. Binksternet (talk) 01:06, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:39, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
The copyright of this photo is held by Terekah Najuwan, with the name and website and phone number written into the EXIF data. Obviously not the same person as the uploader. Binksternet (talk) 01:06, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:39, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
The copyright of this photo is held by Terekah Najuwan, with the name and website and phone number written into the EXIF data. Obviously not the same person as the uploader. Binksternet (talk) 01:06, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:39, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
The copyright of this photo is held by Terekah Najuwan, with the name and website and phone number written into the EXIF data. Obviously not the same person as the uploader. Binksternet (talk) 01:07, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:39, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
The copyright of this photo is held by Terekah Najuwan, with the name and website and phone number written into the EXIF data. Obviously not the same person as the uploader. Binksternet (talk) 01:07, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:39, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
The copyright of this photo is held by Terekah Najuwan, with the name and website and phone number written into the EXIF data. Obviously not the same person as the uploader. Binksternet (talk) 01:07, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:39, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
and File:New terminal KJA.jpg. Seems to be promo photos. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- It's not a promotional photo. Real photo of our airport, which can make any traveler in the evening.--KJAport (talk) 03:01, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:52, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Official document. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- the official document is on the website of Rosreestr in the public domain: https://rosreestr.ru/site/activity/gosudarstvennyy-katalog-geograficheskikh-nazvaniy/--KJAport (talk) 02:52, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:49, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Low quality Out of Scope Perumalism Chat 07:08, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:55, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal file; out of scope. E4024 (talk) 07:15, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:56, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Out of COM:PS: COM:ADVERT 4nn1l2 (talk) 12:06, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:57, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Unknown location ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use Civa (talk) 13:07, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:58, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Unknown location ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use Civa (talk) 13:07, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:58, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Unknown location ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; Unclear description Civa (talk) 13:08, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:58, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Unknown location ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; Unclear description Civa (talk) 13:09, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:58, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Half the photo is corrupted. OceanAtoll (talk) 13:16, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:59, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
User's calling card, out of project scope. No contribs to any wiki project. Achim (talk) 13:40, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Business card. 4nn1l2 (talk) 15:32, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:59, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by WikiJeffpedia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unknown location ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; the user has uploaded only these 3 photos whose the subject is himself.
Civa (talk) 13:49, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:00, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope; personal image --Alaa :)..! 13:56, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:00, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 13:59, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:01, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, personal promotional image --Alaa :)..! 13:59, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:01, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, personal promotional image --Alaa :)..! 14:00, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:01, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, personal promotional image --Alaa :)..! 14:00, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:01, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Unknown location ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use Civa (talk) 14:02, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:02, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope! --Alaa :)..! 14:03, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:02, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, obvious promotion! --Alaa :)..! 14:06, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:03, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
unused personal file 2003:45:5C6F:A801:508:E2C:B18B:448A 06:53, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Unknown location ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; this photo is the only upload of the user ; photo reloaded (2018) after regular deletion (2016) Civa (talk) 14:07, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:03, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
promotion + see here --Alaa :)..! 14:07, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:04, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope --Alaa :)..! 14:07, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:04, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
out of scope, personal image --Alaa :)..! 14:07, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:04, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
out of scope + promotion --Alaa :)..! 14:08, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:05, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
out of scope + promotional --Alaa :)..! 14:08, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:05, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, unused personal image --Alaa :)..! 14:12, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:06, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal image! out of scope --Alaa :)..! 14:12, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:06, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
promotion without any meaning! --Alaa :)..! 14:14, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:06, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
unused personal image, out of scope! --Alaa :)..! 14:14, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:07, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Unknown location ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; this photo is the only upload of the user. Civa (talk) 14:15, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:07, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
unused personal image used for promotion --Alaa :)..! 14:15, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:07, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
obvious out of scope and copyvio --Alaa :)..! 14:15, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:08, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
obvious copyvio! and promotion --Alaa :)..! 14:16, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:08, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
promotion personal image! --Alaa :)..! 14:17, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:08, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:10, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:10, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Léna Brockaert (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unknown location ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; the user has uploaded only these 2 photos whose the subject is herself.
Civa (talk) 15:47, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:11, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Unknown location ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; this photo is the only upload of the user. Civa (talk) 15:50, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:11, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Unknown location ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use Civa (talk) 16:04, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:12, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Unidentified object, unclear description, unclear file name ; No use ; this photo is the only upload of the user. Civa (talk) 16:08, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:13, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AKSHAY270995 (talk · contribs)
[edit]President, CEO, manager, workers of a company or an association, but which one ? And in which country ? Doing what ? No use. So no encyclopedic value.
- File:Mr. Vijai trivedi.jpg
- File:Mr Binoy Job.jpg
- File:LFT.jpg
- File:Mr Akshay Kumar.jpg
- File:Ms Uma Parvathy.jpg
Civa (talk) 16:12, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:13, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Unknown location ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; this photo is the only upload of the user. Civa (talk) 16:14, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:14, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Unused screenshot of personal FB page, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:32, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:14, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Unused low quality personal (test?) photo without educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:34, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:15, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Low quality out of scope Perumalism Chat 17:11, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:15, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
COM:NUDE: low-quality image 4nn1l2 (talk) 17:11, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:16, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
poor quality out of scope Perumalism Chat 17:25, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:16, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Advertising. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 18:20, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:17, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope.
Hystrix (talk) 21:02, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:19, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by VANISYA GOLD (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal files.
Hystrix (talk) 21:18, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:20, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
nothing new here COM:PENIS
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Mjrmtg (talk) 21:48, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:21, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
COM:PENIS and from user's other photos, he's a school boy thus this photo is underage. Mjrmtg (talk) 22:01, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:22, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Bad dick pic Dronebogus (talk) 09:47, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; very poorly photographed image of common object. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:42, 29 May 2022 (UTC)
Commons:Nudity#New uploads of penis photo, not special enough to be educationally useful A1Cafel (talk) 02:32, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 07:48, 13 June 2024 (UTC)
Fichier utilisé pour vandaliser un article Lofhi (talk) 23:41, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:24, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - used only for promotion on enwiki (see uploader's username) Home Lander (talk) 23:44, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:25, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - used only for promotion on enwiki (see uploader's username) Home Lander (talk) 23:44, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:25, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, personal image. Дима Г (talk) 23:48, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:23, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - used only for promotion on enwiki (see uploader's username) Home Lander (talk) 23:56, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:23, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
The copyright of this photo is held by Terekah Najuwan, with the name and website and phone number written into the EXIF data. Obviously not the same person as the uploader. Binksternet (talk) 01:06, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Sealle at 10:38, 7 Mai 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Runtown photoshoot 18 Runtown photoshoot 18 .jpg - --Krdbot 12:30, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution ; missing EXIF Civa (talk) 13:05, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:58, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution ; missing EXIF Civa (talk) 13:05, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:58, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution ; missing EXIF Civa (talk) 13:06, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:58, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
obvious copyvio, also see here --Alaa :)..! 14:02, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:26, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Jerry Bingham.jpg
- File:Adam Wade Marcus.jpg
- File:Jeff Paris.jpg
- File:Thomas Willwacher.jpg
- File:Peter Keevash.webp
- File:Robin Thomas.jpg
- File:Doktor Lazarsfeld Robert.jpg
- File:Nikita Nekrasov.jpg
- File:Keen’V Partyenjoying.cf.jpg
- File:Oj da juiceman.png
- File:Николай Валерьевич Дуров.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:26, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Elisaveta P. (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical paintings, photos and newspapers. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
- File:Papazoff 02 05 1934.jpg
- File:D Nenov otziv 1932.png
- File:I Boyadzhiev otriv.png
- File:D Nenov otziv.png
- File:Vasko Abadjuev.jpg
- File:Kavarnaliev Sea.jpg
- File:Kavarnaliev Rila.jpeg
- File:Kliantitavan.jpg
- File:Kliantilandscape.jpg
- File:Klianti tavan.jpg
- File:Klianti element.jpg
- File:Klianti table.jpg
- File:Kliantihall1.JPG
- File:Rim bozhinov chudomir.jpg
- File:Chudomir 1912.jpg
- File:Selfportrait chudomir.jpg
- File:Sea gouache 1915.jpg
- File:Novo Selo 1909.jpg
- File:Mesembria 1909 1910.jpg
- File:Jordan Kjuvliev.jpg
- File:KKamenov.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:27, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
- File:Plantilla Rio Duero Soria 2016-2017.png
- File:Plantilla Rio Duero Soria 2013-2014.jpg
- File:Plantilla Rio Duero Soria 2015-2016.jpg
- File:Plantilla Rio Duero San José 2015-2016.jpg
- File:Plantilla-Rio Duero 2014-2015.png
- File:Plantilla Rio Duero San José 2013-2014.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:28, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Promo photos and movie stills. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Eia jõulud Tondikakul.jpg
- File:Anu Aun.jpg
- File:Keelatud Vili.jpg
- File:Südamest skaut.tif
- File:Looduslaps.jpg
- File:Allikas- Luxfilm.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:28, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
No information on the photographer of this 3D object, unknown copyright situation. Current license can only apply to the depicted object, not to the picture of it. Jcb (talk) 22:06, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, then redirected. --Sealle (talk) 18:24, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
- Delete several websites attribute this image to Mike De Sisti, including this USA Today page. It is unlikely the work of the Flickr user Ww2censor (talk) 22:32, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per nominator. --Leoboudv (talk) 20:57, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 18:23, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Vhrs.india (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality no exif data out of scope
- File:Krishna and arjun in mahabharat images.jpg
- File:Lakshmi god.jpg
- File:Vhrs dowry.png
- File:Women safety by vhrs.png
- File:Women safety.png
- File:Cow protection.png
- File:Faceboook banner of vhrs.png
- File:Vhrs flag.png
Perumalism Chat 15:28, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:31, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by S Mohammed Ibrahim (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality no exif unlikely to be own work
- File:Fantastic sunrise.jpg
- File:Nature113.jpg
- File:Fabulous waterfall.jpg
- File:Long trees.jpg
- File:Waterfalls in america.jpg
- File:Amazing scenery.jpg
Perumalism Chat 18:18, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:32, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Photo of photo. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:44, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 06:40, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
نقض حق تکثیر Darafsh Kaviyani (Talk) 15:30, 17 December 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: Denniss (talk) 00:24, 20 December 2012 (UTC)
A file with the same title has been deleted before, just before the uploader became a Commoner. Therefore please check/discuss this. I'm not voting for anything, only asking opinions. E4024 (talk) 09:07, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mozhdeh Lavasani.jpg. I guess we can't trust this user? - Alexis Jazz 14:23, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio, no permission (used as press photo on site like tehranpress.com). --Wdwd (talk) 08:33, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
The file is a poster, which may be a fair use, which was prohibited on Commons. However, the date of publish is crucial to determine if the file is a fair use. 廣九直通車 (talk) 11:55, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- As the person shown on the poster ist still alive, the poster can't hardly be out of copyright. --Túrelio (talk) 13:13, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- Uh, as the file has already been deleted by you, I think this DR can be closed.廣九直通車 (talk) 09:03, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted, see log. --Wdwd (talk) 08:38, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Same issue as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Indian costume jewelery brampton.jpg. E4024 (talk) 12:10, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 08:38, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photograph of a card, no source for card indicated. Could be copyrighted. -- Deadstar (msg) 12:29, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
![12:29, 30 April 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/04/30#c-Deadstar-2018-04-30T12:29:00.000Z-File:"What's_new_pussycat_..."_(For_Boskimano)_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete - It's in Category:Cats in art. I understand this is considered an artwork. Then we need the OTRS process. --E4024 (talk) 12:33, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 08:40, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
![08:40, 9 May 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/04/30#c-Wdwd-2018-05-09T08:40:00.000Z-File:"What's_new_pussycat_..."_(For_Boskimano)_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
Copyright Violation of Manfook Jewellery 1233 (talk) 13:02, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: as above. ŚÆŊMØŠĀ 13:43, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: SPAM.--Willy1018（talk） 14:52, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination/discussion. --Wdwd (talk) 08:41, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution ; missing EXIF Civa (talk) 13:06, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete It's in Category:Days (?) - I understand there is a scope problem also. --E4024 (talk) 13:08, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 08:42, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by De la lombertie
[edit]De la lombertie (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) is a puppeteer from Wikipedia having also one sock here. All uploads have incomplete/garbled—where not evidently wrong—source and authorship specifications. License is probably also specified wrongly. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 13:14, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- File:Triumph herald 1200.jpg
- File:TcCunDwVyjZGNfD-556x313-noPad.jpg
- File:Fete-du-csp 733992.jpg
- File:Lombertie.jpg
- File:Sanfourche napoléon.jpg
- File:Sanfourche.jpg
- File:Bardinon2 0.jpg
- File:Trémoulet.jpg
- File:Robert Busnel et Albert Chaminade.png
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 08:53, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
I took this photo and there are better photos on wiki commons. Consider this an identifiable person policy delete even though the person is a presenter behind a lectern.. Geraldshields11 (talk) 12:57, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; In such cases specify the alternative/better photo by filename. --Wdwd (talk) 09:32, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
identical with File:Blouza, tenue traditionnelle de Tlemcen, fin du XIXe siècle..jpg --Alaa :)..! 13:54, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, add redirection. --Wdwd (talk) 09:27, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Fair user photo, because it is a logo, also see here --Alaa :)..! 13:57, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 09:28, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
copyvio- see here --Alaa :)..! 13:58, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:28, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
_12.JPG){kind=link}
_12.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I am nominating the photo I took and there are better photos on wiki commons. Consider this an identifiable person policy delete even though the person is a presenter. Geraldshields11 (talk) 13:59, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
_12.JPG){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; In such cases specify the alternative/better photo by filename. --Wdwd (talk) 09:32, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
_12.JPG){kind=link}
_10.JPG){kind=link}
_10.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
per en:user:Geraldshields11 policy — Preceding unsigned comment added by Geraldshields11 (talk • contribs) 2015-11-12T14:27:01 (UTC)
Kept: What policy? That's not a reason to delete. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:51, 21 November 2015 (UTC)
_10.JPG){kind=link}
_10.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
I am nominating the photo I took and there are better photos on wiki commons. Consider this an identifiable person policy delete even though the person is a presenter. Picture # (Group L) 11 looks much better. Geraldshields11 (talk) 14:00, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; In such cases specify the alternative/better photo by filename. --Wdwd (talk) 09:31, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
copyvio- see here --Alaa :)..! 14:01, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:34, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
copyvio- fair user, also see here --Alaa :)..! 14:03, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:36, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
copyvio- see here --Alaa :)..! 14:04, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:36, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
copyvio- see here --Alaa :)..! 14:05, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:29, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:37, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
copyvio- see here --Alaa :)..! 14:05, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:37, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope + copyvio see here --Alaa :)..! 14:09, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 09:37, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Prashant cage (talk · contribs)
[edit]low quality no exif data unlikely to be ownwork
Perumalism Chat 14:10, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 09:38, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
copyvio- see here --Alaa :)..! 14:10, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:38, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
I am nominating the photo I took and there are better photos on wiki commons. Consider this an identifiable person policy delete even though the person is a presenter behind a lectern. Geraldshields11 (talk) 14:13, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; In such cases specify the alternative/better photo by filename. --Wdwd (talk) 09:33, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
obvious copyvio! --Alaa :)..! 14:16, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:40, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
obvious copyvio! --Alaa :)..! 14:16, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:40, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
promotion personal image! --Alaa :)..! 14:17, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:40, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Appears to be a slightly edited version of product shot here: http://www.thehockeyshop.com/salming-aero-floorball-ball-white.html Ytoyoda (talk) 14:23, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 09:41, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Copyright info on image doesn't match file description Ytoyoda (talk) 14:25, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission. --Wdwd (talk) 09:42, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Photo credited to Magdalena Małaczyńska Ytoyoda (talk) 14:26, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no permission. --Wdwd (talk) 09:43, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
watermark: ©Pascalito Jmax (talk) 15:19, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 09:44, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Police lcpd (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality no exif data unlikely to be own work
Perumalism Chat 15:38, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 09:45, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rulerofuniverse (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality no exif data unlikely to be own work
Perumalism Chat 16:23, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 09:48, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Not free use, taken from http://versionfinal.com.ve/deportes/penaranda-se-lesiona-durante-derrota-del-granada/. Mattythewhite (talk) 17:06, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 10:53, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
File:O Assassinato do Coronel Gentil José de Castro- (subsidios para a história do regimento republicano no Brazil).pdf
[edit]duplicate of File:O Assassinato do Coronel Gentil José de Castro - (subsidios para a história do regimento republicano no Brazil).pdf Ederporto (talk) 17:15, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, add redirection. --Wdwd (talk) 10:54, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tarun kumar 1234 (talk · contribs)
[edit]low quality no exif unlikely to be own work
Perumalism Chat 17:15, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 10:54, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
not interactive 74.130.61.49 17:38, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 11:00, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
speedy bad Thomas44705 (talk) 17:46, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy keep I don't see a basis for deletion in the above requests. I see "not interactive" and "speedy bad", which are not cogent or legitimate bases for deletion as provided for in Commons:Deletion requests. To review the principal reasons for deletion, given in that guidance:
- Copyright: The original upload confirms that the work was a work prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as part of that person’s official duties under the terms of Title 17, Chapter 1, Section 105 of the US Code.
- Applicability of any relevant Commons policies: None was cited in the nomination. The image is clearly educationally useful, regarding the water cycle, and is used across multiple Wikipedia articles. The image contains no depictions of people.
- Other relevant facts: None are offered in the nomination.
- Sincerely, HopsonRoad (talk) 22:35, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- Speedy Keep - USPD image, educational usage WhisperToMe (talk) 15:15, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 11:00, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
A book cover was uploaded to Flickr with a usable Creative Commons license, but the book cover itself is copyrighted by the publisher of the book, which is not the author; would need permission from the publisher (Pearson) to relicense a copyrighted image. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 17:43, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:01, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
From a blog, which has no licensing information. There is no indication of where the Creative Commons license came from, and because it is not "own work" it would need information about the photographer and license. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 17:51, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 11:02, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vivekkumarpaneer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low size no exif data unlikely to be own work
Perumalism Chat 18:08, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:06, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dharesh Polishi (talk · contribs)
[edit]low quality no exif data unlikely to be own image
- File:4-Nature-Wallpapers-2014-1 ukaavUI.jpg
- File:Path-1129590 960 720.jpg
- File:616748-hd-green-nature.jpg
Perumalism Chat 18:10, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:07, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
wrong license claim, screenshot from artwork by another person Alpöhi (talk) 18:48, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 11:08, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
wrong license claim, screenshot from artwork by another person Alpöhi (talk) 18:48, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 11:08, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
wrong license claim, screenshot from artwork by another person Alpöhi (talk) 18:49, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 11:08, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
taking my image down Sorcerer81 (talk) 16:41, 3 November 2015 (UTC)
Kept: Beautiful image, in use in several places. The CC-BY-SA license which you gave is irrevocable. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:46, 11 November 2015 (UTC)
copyright issue Sorcerer81 (talk) 10:53, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: unsubstantiated copyright issue, all other version I could find of this image on the net are smaller and newer, have no EXIF or have a watermark. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 02:12, 16 December 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Gopala Krishna A as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: This image is copyrighted. I have connected with Owener of this image and confirmed. The file is ineligible for speedy deletion, because it has survived a regular dleetion request. Taivo (talk) 18:58, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete In retrospect, considering the other deleted, watermarked upload by the user, and no other contributions, we can not assume this to be the user's own work. Delete per the COM:PRP. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:33, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
@Taivo: From the EXIF itself we know that image is belongs to different author. I personally connected Navneeth Unnikrishnan over Instagram and he confirmed he did not release this image under CC BY-SA 4.0. So it is copyrighted. Before image uploading to commons it was uploaded to 500px on 23 April 2015. Link is here. You can check the full image. Here the uploader removed the watermark. And this image uploaded to commons on July 1st 2015. So it should be deleted. I dont know why it survived in ptevious request. --Gopala Krishna A (talk) 02:34, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
- I'm surprised as well, but as this happened even twice, the file was ineligible for speedy deletion. But I support deletion myself. Taivo (talk) 07:36, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
@Taivo: I marked for speedy deletion because it servived from previous request. Later read the deletion policy and guidelines and understood it can only marked for deletion. Anyways Taivo 
Thank you..--Gopala Krishna A (talk) 05:42, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion and info vom Gopala Krishna -> copyvio, no permission. --Wdwd (talk) 11:13, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Watermarked images (multiple versions in file history). Unlikely to be own work. IronGargoyle (talk) 19:17, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:16, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Serves no educational purpose IagoQnsi (talk) 19:24, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 11:23, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal artwork, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:40, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:24, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Redundant to File:Coat of arms of the Philippines.svg. And what is the point of having the COA without the name? Out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:41, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:25, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Files in Category:Inna
[edit]The source Flickr account posts random images from around the web. Very unlikely the Flickr upload was legitimate.
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:41, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, PRP. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:22, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
- Disagree this file is a crop copy from here. INNAjm (talk) 02:32, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
- @INNAjm: Both files are listed above. How do you know INNA? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:38, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom --Alaa :)..! 09:47, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
- Disagree INNAjm (talk) 22:50, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
Also:
- File:INNA Award.jpg (which was extracted from the source image)
Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:33, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete File:INNA Award.jpg, too. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 01:02, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 11:32, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Skin singer of Skunk Anansie.jpg is identical except the fileExtension Klaas `Z4␟` V: 20:54, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, duplicate file & uploader request. --Wdwd (talk) 11:39, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
French/Belgian poster of an Italian film : seems copyrighted. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:29, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 11:40, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
False date, blogdorobertosilva.zip.net/images/sidicleikyoto2.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:34, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 11:41, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Any metadata, low-re image, unlikely to be own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:36, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:41, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Any metadata, false date, unlikely to be own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:38, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 11:42, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:19, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 11:44, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
out of scope + copyvio see here --Alaa :)..! 14:04, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 09:29, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
The logo and text may be copyrighted. I also have my doubts if the file is within the project scope. It looks like promotion to me. 4nn1l2 (talk) 12:11, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- Text is probably not eligible for copyright. Logo can be found at http://wartaeskpres.blogspot.com/2015/11/kalpa-yogini-turangga-batin-lembu.html and seems to be specific to w:en:Mulawarman University. The name on the diploma matches the username of the uploader so it's kind of promotion. May still be relevant though to illustrate what a diploma from that university looks like. I've cropped the decorations and logo. - Alexis Jazz 12:56, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:26, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
pas interesant 83.134.129.81 12:18, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- Hmmm. Tell us more: Is it in scope or not? --E4024 (talk) 12:24, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Speedy keep Bullshit nomination. E4024: yes, this is in scope as a typical modern cover for porn. Is also in use on many wikis. And it has OTRS. Did I mention this is a bullshit nomination? - Alexis Jazz 12:27, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Keep No valid reason for deletion given. (Note: I'm the one who arranged for the pic in the first place though). Tabercil (talk) 23:44, 3 May 2018 (UTC)- Keep DR pas interesant. Also not valid, etc. Tm (talk) 05:07, 9 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:26, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
One month and one week after it was kept in discussion, I propose its deletion. Reasons:Unused personal file. In the discussion only one user asked for it to be kept, therefore "per discussion" it should have been deleted. Last but not the least, "informally": This would mean to other young men from the subcontinent: "They delete my pic because I've got no bike". IMHO. E4024 (talk) 13:59, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- Please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Krishna Panjimar.jpg for a somewhat similar case. --E4024 (talk) 14:13, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Just for a broader view of this story: user talk:Jameslwoodward/Archive17 #Selfies. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 20:09, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:29, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Unknown location ; Personal image ; No notability ; No use ; this photo is the only upload of the user. Civa (talk) 14:11, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete and please see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Khan sahab azeem 25.jpg for a similar case. --E4024 (talk) 14:15, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:30, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 47.151.26.64 as Copyvio (copyvio), but no supporting information was provided. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:21, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep there does not seem to be any reason to delete this. No indication of what was copied was given. The claim that it was made by the original uploader in povray seems to be quite believable. Such images are close to being public domain due to simplicity anyway. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:47, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Graeme Bartlett. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:32, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 47.151.26.64 as Copyvio (copyvio), but no supporting information was provided. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:21, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep there does not seem to be any reason to delete this. No indication of what was copied was given. The claim that it was made by the original uploader in povray seems to be quite believable. Such images are close to being public domain due to simplicity anyway. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:49, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Graeme Bartlett. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:32, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 47.151.26.64 as Copyvio (copyvio), but no supporting information was provided. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:21, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep there does not seem to be any reason to delete this. No indication of what was copied was given. The claim that it was made by the original uploader in povray seems to be quite believable. Such images are close to being public domain due to simplicity anyway. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:47, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Graeme Bartlett. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:32, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 47.151.26.64 as Copyvio (copyvio), but no supporting information was provided. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:21, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep there does not seem to be any reason to delete this. No indication of what was copied was given. The claim that it was made by the original uploader in povray seems to be quite believable. Such images are close to being public domain due to simplicity anyway. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:47, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Graeme Bartlett. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:32, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 47.151.26.64 as Copyvio (copyvio), but no supporting information was provided. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:21, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep there does not seem to be any reason to delete this. No indication of what was copied was given. The claim that it was made by the original uploader in povray seems to be quite believable. Such images are close to being public domain due to simplicity anyway. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:48, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Graeme Bartlett. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:32, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 47.151.26.64 as Copyvio (copyvio), but no supporting information was provided. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:21, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep there does not seem to be any reason to delete this. No indication of what was copied was given. The claim that it was made by the original uploader in povray seems to be quite believable. Such images are close to being public domain due to simplicity anyway. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:48, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Graeme Bartlett. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:32, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 47.151.26.64 as Copyvio (copyvio), but no supporting information was provided. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:21, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep there does not seem to be any reason to delete this. No indication of what was copied was given. The claim that it was made by the original uploader in povray seems to be quite believable. Such images are close to being public domain due to simplicity anyway. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:48, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Graeme Bartlett. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:32, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 47.151.26.64 as Copyvio (copyvio), but no supporting information was provided. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:22, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep there does not seem to be any reason to delete this. No indication of what was copied was given. The claim that it was made by the original uploader in povray seems to be quite believable. Such images are close to being public domain due to simplicity anyway. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:49, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Graeme Bartlett. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:32, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 47.151.26.64 as Copyvio (copyvio), but no supporting information was provided. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:22, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep there does not seem to be any reason to delete this. No indication of what was copied was given. The claim that it was made by the original uploader in povray seems to be quite believable. Such images are close to being public domain due to simplicity anyway. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:49, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Graeme Bartlett. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:32, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 47.151.26.64 as Copyvio (copyvio), but no supporting information was provided. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:22, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep there does not seem to be any reason to delete this. No indication of what was copied was given. The claim that it was made by the original uploader in povray seems to be quite believable. Such images are close to being public domain due to simplicity anyway. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:49, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Graeme Bartlett. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:32, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 47.151.26.64 as Copyvio (copyvio), but no supporting information was provided. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:22, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep there does not seem to be any reason to delete this. No indication of what was copied was given. The claim that it was made by the original uploader in povray seems to be quite believable. Such images are close to being public domain due to simplicity anyway. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:49, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Graeme Bartlett. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:32, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 47.151.26.64 as Copyvio (copyvio), but no supporting information was provided. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:22, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep there does not seem to be any reason to delete this. The claim that it was made by the original uploader in povray seems to be quite believable. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:44, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Graeme Bartlett. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:32, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 47.151.26.64 as Copyvio (copyvio), but no supporting information was provided. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:23, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Stock texture photo. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:39, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 47.151.26.64 as Copyvio (copyvio), but no supporting information was provided. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:23, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Stock texture photo. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:39, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Two text files uploaded as images and three copies of a very small and unclear image of the moon, all are out of scope, but the "black hat" image may also be some form of gaming as it is in use.
- File:Captured.png
- File:Black Hat.png
- File:مانگوگهورهبوونی.png
- File:مانگی 35 ههزار كیلۆمهتر.jpg
- File:Kتیmk1.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:25, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The "Black Hat" logo was really misplaced in the article anyway. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:37, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 47.151.26.64 as Copyvio (copyvio) but no supporting information was provided. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:27, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. In use (for now). P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:40, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 47.151.26.64 as Copyvio (copyvio) but no supporting information was provided. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:28, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:41, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 47.151.26.64 as Copyvio (copyvio) but no supporting information was provided. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:28, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Not found online but all other images by same uploader were already deleted as stock texture photo. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:43, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
Random image of trash Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:20, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:37, 11 May 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Small image ; unknown location (a beach in France ? Which beach ?) ; unknown people with small definition ; no use ; on Commons, there are already many photos of people on a beach. Civa (talk) 15:05, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Comment France 1941-1942, likely WW2 related. The other photos from the same box appear to give some possible clues about its origin. I really don't understand why the church didn't scan the photos with slightly higher resolution.
- https://www.flickr.com/photos/mennonitechurchusa-archives/6238950832/in/photostream/ (photo from the same box/folder) has a comment from Simone ESCUDIER 7y "M. Jesse W. Hoover et les enfants de la Villa St Christophe - Canet en Roussillon - France". This leads us to https://mennonitemafia.wordpress.com/tag/world-war-ll/. - Alexis Jazz 15:49, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- Collected the Flickr comments: Category talk:Mennonite Church USA Lois Gunden. - Alexis Jazz 16:11, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep The archives have a complex history, it would be better to retain this as part of the larger collection with the hope that someone will make some later identification. --Fæ (talk) 09:00, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: A better scan might be found; more info may be found; it is useful as it is (as stated above). Civa, if you want to delete stuff, start with PDF and GIF files: lots of cruff there. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 01:44, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, too bad quality. Taivo (talk) 08:20, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Falsche Weiterleitung - die Datei sollte Pohlandstraße 21, Dresden (961).jpg heißen! Derbrauni (talk) 14:02, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 16:40, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Map is likely copyrighted OceanAtoll (talk) 13:28, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination (no Freedom of Panorama in South Korea. --Storkk (talk) 16:13, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
All this user's other footballer uploads have been copyvios—seems unlikely that this one isn't IagoQnsi (talk) 19:21, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Photographer should confirm license via OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 14:06, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
Not own work Nidentwiki (talk) 21:44, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Speedy delete – COM:CSD #G7, see File:Nude male barefoot outside.jpg #filehistory. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 21:50, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Unused, uploader requested within 7 days. Additional scope and copyright concerns, given stated DR rationale. --Storkk (talk) 14:05, 20 May 2018 (UTC)
_Carl_Bosch.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Carl_Bosch.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
wrong PD: unknown author for a picture of about 1930 Goesseln (talk) 16:06, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
_Carl_Bosch.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 23:38, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
_Carl_Bosch.jpg){kind=link}
wrong PD (80) of a picture of about 1930 Goesseln (talk) 16:09, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Materialscientist (talk) 23:28, 2 June 2018 (UTC)
Das Foto, insbesondere mit der Dateibeschreibung, finde ich genial. Noch ein Sound dazu, das wäre perfekt. Leider, leider unused single upload since 2016. With big watermark. Hystrix (talk) 00:10, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:52, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
User:Diyako kazm, what is your "own work" here? Did you make the tiles? If you only took this photograph and call it "own work", indeed it is called "Derivative work" and is forbidden here. Please read Commons:DW. (It is also in reply to your unanswered question at the file's TP.) Regards. E4024 (talk) 07:13, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- Dear User talk:E4024 there is plenty of pictures here in Commons that somebody took them and the original thing behind the pic is created by someone else, when I said my won work , I was talking about the picture, So please , what I have to do about such things , for example, I took a picture from Taj Mahal, and I want to upload it here, how I should share the picture? or for the mentioned picture now! I was the photographer and since there is no other Picture like that in here, I like to share it here, let me know how I should share or what I should change, that helps to not delete the pic, or let me know if there is another thing behind that you want to delete the pic ?! --(Deioces) ,Talk 05:56, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
- The Taj Mahal is too old, cultural heritage of the world; in that case there is no violation of the rights of an artist. (Mimar Ahmed -or whatever his name was- passed away too long time ago.) Look at my other edits, I'm a "deletionist". Best. --E4024 (talk) 06:12, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: No freedom of panorama in Iraq. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:54, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
One week to present an e-mail to OTRS. No need to speedy. E4024 (talk) 07:35, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: derivative work. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:56, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
It is my pic and no longer I use it in my profile page . I want to be somewhat anonymous and thereby requesting you kindly delete it. So that no one can trace me from my photograph... thanks. --William (talk) 10:51, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:58, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Not own work and not public domain. The copyright belongs to the Japanese municipality. Batholith (talk) 11:21, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
I was careless when I uploaded it. I’m agree with the deletion. Sorry. うらにわ (talk) 14:20, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:58, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
information incorrecte hokusai. Aucun lien avec le contenu Vincntjacquet (talk) 11:55, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request, unused. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:59, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Modern artwork. It was marked as "copyvio" by an IP. Discuss here please. (A week to get OTRS.) E4024 (talk) 13:06, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 16:59, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Was tagged {{No permission since}} by User:4nn1l2. I have no idea why? Because the diploma is in the image? That would arguably be DM. - Alexis Jazz 13:24, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- I tagged it with {{Npd}} because Ananda Sukarlan is most probably the subject of photography, not the photographer and the copyright holder. He is most probably the person who is receiving the diploma from the king. He has uploaded the diploma here with his name on it. 4nn1l2 (talk) 13:36, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- @4nn1l2: That's probably true but for photos not made by professional photographers a technicality we would rarely care about. And this is a phone pic, so not professional. I wonder how permission should be obtained according to you? Let's say his mother or father took that picture. (quite likely) Should OTRS now process a mail from MamaSukarlan@live.com and add the OTRS tag? There are so many problems with that. What's the point of tagging a file "No permission" when it is highly unlikely OTRS would even be capable of processing a permission statement for the work in question? - Alexis Jazz 14:08, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Alexis Jazz: Once there was a proposal on photos taken by bystanders which was not adopted, as far as I know: Commons:Village pump/Proposals/Archive/2017/01#Bystander selfie.
- I understand your points. Such tickets are hard to process. However, I have accepted such permission statements and I have seen other OTRS agents who have also approved such tickets. When corresponding, there is a chance that the uploader becomes more familiar with copyright law and changes their mind. There is also a possibility that the correspondence goes well and everybody is satisfied. And of course there is a possibility of lying. I think the first paragraph of our model letter is of paramount importance. If the person who is sending the permission statement claims that they are the copyright holder while they are not, then they are defrauding and the burden is on their shoulders, not ours. And we do not need to police them.
- Please also note that Ananda Sukarlan has not even claimed that this is their own work. He has chosen the option "somebody else's work" when uploading the file. Something needs to be done. We cannot just turn a blind eye. 4nn1l2 (talk) 15:08, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- Actually we could, but that's beside the point.. Too bad https://tools.wmflabs.org/relgen/ is only available in English so they will have to manually edit the Indonesian consent template. - Alexis Jazz 15:34, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- @4nn1l2: That's probably true but for photos not made by professional photographers a technicality we would rarely care about. And this is a phone pic, so not professional. I wonder how permission should be obtained according to you? Let's say his mother or father took that picture. (quite likely) Should OTRS now process a mail from MamaSukarlan@live.com and add the OTRS tag? There are so many problems with that. What's the point of tagging a file "No permission" when it is highly unlikely OTRS would even be capable of processing a permission statement for the work in question? - Alexis Jazz 14:08, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per 4nn1l2. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:01, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Was tagged {{Fair use}} by User:廣九直通車. Not sure why we should question the copyright of this? I don't find it anywhere on the web. You might as well remove my photos saying no permission/fair use? I don't really get it. - Alexis Jazz 13:29, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- DeleteThere is a c in a circle on the image. --E4024 (talk) 13:34, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
InfoThe file is a cover of a piano book, and it's design is likely out of the range of COM:TOO. Moreover, the file has a note of "Copyright © Ananda Sukarlam, 2016". Therefore I thought that the file is copyrighted and was likely a fair use. If I have any mistakes on this decision, please tell me.廣九直通車 (talk) 13:37, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- 廣九直通車: Another upload from Ananda Sukarlan shows their degree with their name on it: File:Kutai4.jpg. (Ananda Sukarlam) So I'd say we can reasonably assume the user is who they say they are. The image is not found elsewhere. (I haven't been able to find it) So as far as we know it has not been published before, the author is who they say they are and © means nothing. - Alexis Jazz 13:40, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- E4024: So what? CC licenses are copyright licenses, and depend on the existence of copyright to work. - Alexis Jazz 13:40, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
QuestionYou mean that, as the book is not openly published, the copyright status is undeterminable (if it is a © or in free license). Just similar to those images with a © but published with a free license?廣九直通車 (talk) 00:26, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
- @廣九直通車: The copyright status is not "undeterminable", I think we agree the uploader actually is Ananda Sukarlan. That means the "own work" claim is valid and the copyright symbol does not invalidate the Creative Commons license. A copyright symbol can be suspicious if there is reasonable doubt whether or not the uploader is also the author, but we don't doubt that in this case. Independent from this, Commons requires anything that is uploaded as "own work" not to have been published before. (or get OTRS) A reverse image search yields nothing and searching for the title all I find are references from Sukarlan himself. I haven't found any place where you can buy this book or proof that more than one copy would even exist. So on what ground should it be deleted?
- To further clarify something: when you say "if it is a © or in free license" you are confused. CC licenses (free licenses) are copyright licenses, and depend on the existence of copyright to work. So there is no reason a work with CC license couldn't have a copyright symbol. Sometimes people put a copyright symbol on their CC licensed work on purpose to make it perfectly clear they did not release their work into the public domain and the CC license should be respected. All works licensed as Creative Commons (except CC0) are in copyright. - Alexis Jazz 21:53, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
- And let's add File:Alicia's Sixth Piano Book ( Content ).jpg to the discussion as well as it's related to this. - Alexis Jazz 14:13, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- KeepOK, thank you for the reminders and ideas. I think as the user behind the account is the same person, he/she is free to, and has the right to upload his/her originally copyrighted file to Commons with a CC license.廣九直通車 (talk) 08:49, 4 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Out of scope. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:03, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Esteghlal_F.C. - Football Club Logo UnitedPowersTalk 13:38, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:03, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
It from FB EZBELLA (talk) 13:49, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:03, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
There seems to be no evidence that this file is in the public domain (and much less to suggest that it is CC-by-sa licensed), sorry. See COM:L. If the photo is in the public domain for a specific reason, please specify it in the permission field and tag the file appropriately. Thank you. Ariadacapo (talk) 13:57, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- Comment It is in Public Domain in 2019, taken by Keturah Collings (1862–1948). If the two third year "non PD" is too long, please undelete it in 2019. --Ras67 (talk) 15:18, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Undelete in 2019. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:05, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution ; missing EXIF. Probable copyvio of an original poster. Civa (talk) 14:12, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:05, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Previously published at https://www.zoobrno.cz/en/our-animals/animals-kept/reptiles/heloderma-horridum. Claiming "own work" and there's an OTRS ticket pending template, though that doesn't really clear up ownership. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:23, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:06, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Explanation board for an event held in 2012. Possible infringement of literary copyright. Yasu (talk) 15:02, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:06, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Words by Japanese legal scholar Hiroshi Suekawa (末川博, † 1977). Copyright is still in effect. Yasu (talk) 15:04, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:06, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
pas de source ; pas d'auteur => déclarer que cette photo est "domaine public" est une blague Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 15:09, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:07, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Kagaoua as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: copyvio manisfeste ... information as to why an image is copyright violation must be provided if you speedy the image. "Obvious copyvio" is not sufficient reason. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:26, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: no EXIF small size, only upload, copyvio very likely. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:16, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 47.151.26.64 as Copyvio (copyvio) but no supporting information was provided. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:27, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:16, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Google search (https://www.google.com/search?q=sail&tbm=isch&tbs=simg:CAQSlQEJciOhgGC1g2YaiQELEKjU2AQaAggVDAsQsIynCBpiCmAIAxIo_1hS-Cr8K_1BSYFv0UkBbmHZkWghWgILoiuyKwKpMqvyK8Ir4i5T7IIhowXiICZKTwxCK5k2QcSSHHDTGE-fgOVPl1fEwlpQfAYoBfp1sAfV0pfKxXH8D3atfJIAQMCxCOrv4IGgoKCAgBEgRqXXYrDA&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwi5t6uIt-LaAhVi2IMKHRvdARQQ2A4IJygB&biw=1297&bih=926) finds multiple uses of this image not by "DefectedUpdates". Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:36, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:17, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Photo of the uploader, not a self-portrait, requires the photographer's permission. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 17:54, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:17, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Violation de droits d'auteur Vincntjacquet (talk) 18:23, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Undelete in 2022. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:17, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope. Please see description. Hystrix (talk) 20:58, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:18, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
copyvio- see here --Alaa :)..! 21:12, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:19, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
No permission from John Angelo Jackson. Jcb (talk) 22:08, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:19, 15 June 2018 (UTC)
wrong PD: unknown author of a picture of 1931 Goesseln (talk) 16:08, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- I do not understand the point. Your short sentences are not arguments. The author is unknown. And more than eighty years have passed. Goesseln, can you explain better the reason why you propose the deletion?--Chamarasca (talk) 20:24, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
- quote:
- Reasonable evidence must be presented that the author's name (e.g., the original photographer, portrait painter) was not published with a claim of copyright in conjunction with the image within 70 years of its original publication
- How can you be sure? What evidences are there?
- How can you be sure, that it wasn't Pablo Luís Torrents (died 1966), who took the photo for Mundo Gráfico?
- Who would hinder you from evidenceless granting the Template:PD-EU-no author disclosure to lots of pictures of the 1930'?
- Sorry, but I can't help you with that, other people might agree with you. --Goesseln (talk) 18:21, 1 May 2018 (UTC)
- quote:
- Goesseln. Well. If the author is unknown, nobody can be sure that the author was Pablo Luis Torrente (died 1966), José-Luis Demaría López «Campúa» (died 1936) or John Doe. It is unknown. And it is unkown because the magazine where I found the photograph (Mundo Gráfico) does not say the name of the author. You can see it here. There is no name under the photograph itself or under the other photographs in the page. And I know (because of my experience) that Mundo Gráfico usually said the name of the author. I think this is a "reasonable evidence". I did not put the tamplete just because I felt like it.
- Of course, if you had any proof that the author was Pablo Luis Torrents I would accept your argument. But you do not say the author is Torrents; you only suggest the author could be Torrents.
- In these circunstances, I think the image must not be deleted.--Chamarasca (talk) 13:54, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: author is unknown. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 15:07, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
No valid source, OTRS permission required. EXIF hints to Facebook as source. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 21:33, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Martin H. (talk) 09:49, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Temporary installation, Freedom of Panorama does not apply. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:14, 30 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per COM:FOP#Germany. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:22, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}