Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/04/11
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![55 File:"Winterhell".jpg](#File:"Winterhell".jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_fires_an_M-40A1_sniper_rifle_during_an_090821-M-OW258-049.jpg){kind=link}
,_fires_an_M-4_service_rifle_during_an_090821-M-OW258-028.jpg){kind=link}
,_fires_an_M-4_service_rifle_during_an_090821-M-OW258-027.jpg){kind=link}
,_fires_an_M-4_service_rifle_during_an_090821-M-OW258-029.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![181 File:"14 - ITALY - red dress underwear (babydoll) - Intimissimi - New Year's Eve sexy breast.jpg](#File:"14_-_ITALY_-_red_dress_underwear_(babydoll)_-_Intimissimi_-_New_Year's_Eve_sexy_breast.jpg){kind=link}
ben ikzelf. fout Winand Van den Bergh (talk) 08:12, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: User's own namespace, req on day of creation. --Achim (talk) 14:52, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Is it not robbed from here: https://echo.msk.ru/blog/dodolev/823382-echo/? E4024 (talk) 15:14, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Well this picture was uploaded before that date, but that picture shows other people around. I mean, there must be an original which covered those people. --E4024 (talk) 15:17, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry, now I see we had the original image also uploaded before. --E4024 (talk) 15:19, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Can't we see this as an attack page? certainly there is some photo-montage from the beginning. --E4024 (talk) 15:21, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- E4024: No there isn't, that's just a money belt or something: http://www.newlookmedia.ru/IDNV/Fotoistoria/Stranic/1995_files/Media/DD3-8_2/DD3-8_2.jpg. - Alexis Jazz 15:33, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- I could imagine that; I have seen a couple of balls. (Thanks for the better picture though.) Still it looks like an attack page to me and if I had seen it earlier I would have DR'ed it (them) all the same. I think we should be discussing the original file that I missed at the beginning. --E4024 (talk) 15:43, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- You should nominate it first then. (add it to this DR) - Alexis Jazz 15:49, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- I could imagine that; I have seen a couple of balls. (Thanks for the better picture though.) Still it looks like an attack page to me and if I had seen it earlier I would have DR'ed it (them) all the same. I think we should be discussing the original file that I missed at the beginning. --E4024 (talk) 15:43, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- I withdraw this DR as I DR'ed the original image. Sorry, I did not notice at the beginning that it was a crop. --E4024 (talk) 15:50, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Author of https://echo.msk.ru/blog/dodolev/823382-echo/ was Evgeny Dodolev. A number of photos were uploaded first to the Russian Wikipedia with his consent. Later these photos were tranferred to Commons. ~ Чръный человек (talk) 16:19, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept, withdrawn. Taivo (talk) 16:40, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Commons:Derivative works from advertisement. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination; apparent copvio. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 17:02, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
not within Commons project scope Jenny 17:09, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: vandalism. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:48, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
personal image for wikipedia article about the student himself, also grabbed from facebook https://www.facebook.com/abubakaragwanki Out pf project scope. Migebert (talk) 11:01, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:37, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
File:Evan Craft 2017.jpg Apaulettegv98 (talk) 14:56, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 07:28, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
private content Apaulettegv98 (talk) 21:46, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 07:28, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Faby-lucky.png Commons:Deletion requests/File:Feet of Men Playing Illegal Gambling Game in Public Park - Geneva - Switzerland (5873524752).jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ffxiv 01102018 233413sfdadsf.png Commons:Deletion requests/File:FileMaz Banner.png Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fin du fn.gif Commons:Deletion requests/File:Formula fisica.png Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fotikos.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Files in Category:Karlla Naynna
[edit]Non-notable internet singer? Mostly poor quality images. Out of scope.
- File:A bela cantora Karlla Naynna.jpg
- File:A beleza natural da cantora Karlla Naynna.jpg
- File:A cantora capixaba Karlla Naynna.jpg
- File:A cantora Karlla Naynna com 16 anos e gravida.jpg
- File:A cantora Karlla Naynna com 17 anos amamentando seu filho,seu pai na foto.jpg
- File:A cantora Karlla Naynna esbanjando alegria.jpg
- File:A doce Karlla Naynna.jpg
- File:As cantoras Noynne Pink Warrior e Karlla Naynna.jpg
- File:Cantora Karlla Naynna sorrindo.jpg
- File:Cantora Karlla Naynna.jpg
- File:Capa do single Dizima Periódica da cantora Karlla Naynna.jpg
- File:Capa do single Na Chon da cantora Karlla Naynna.jpg
- File:Casa da cantora Karlla Naynna.jpg
- File:Karlla Naynna - 1º concurso de beleza que aos 5 anos a cantora ganhou titulo de beldade infantil.jpg
- File:Karlla Naynna - hits.jpg
- File:Karlla Naynna aos 5 anos.jpg
- File:Karlla Naynna aquecendo a voz.jpg
- File:Karlla Naynna cantando e dançando.jpg
- File:Karlla Naynna com 17 anos amamentando seu filho,seu pai e sua vó na foto.jpg
- File:Karlla Naynna com clave de sol.jpg
- File:Karlla Naynna decidindo repertorio do show.jpg
- File:Karlla Naynna descontraindo.jpg
- File:Karlla Naynna e Noynne Pink Warrior no aquecimento vocal.jpg
- File:Karlla Naynna e Noynne Pink Warrior no ensaio da Banda Spicy Mix.jpg
- File:Karlla Naynna e Noynne Pink Warrior.jpg
- File:Karlla Naynna e seu filho em 2015.jpg
- File:Karlla Naynna e seu filho.jpg
- File:Karlla Naynna e seu ursinho.jpg
- File:Karlla Naynna e seus beijos exuberantes.jpg
- File:Karlla Naynna e violão.jpg
Themightyquill (talk) 10:03, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:16, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aliceushakova (talk · contribs)
[edit]The subject of the photo has died in 1937. Unlikely to be own work.
Дима Г (talk) 00:07, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:36, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, personal image. Дима Г (talk) 00:11, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:37, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Cross-wiki spam by globally locked user. hiàn 02:09, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:44, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
useless photo of someone's feet Jenny 02:13, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Delete - You're right Jenny, you know, we've got 2 cats and other 74 individual female feet pictures in Category:Women's feet. If people who like female feet continue with the present pace soon we may have to open a portal or something for that part of human female body. IMHO we should choose 10 to 20 representative ones and delete the others, just like you (and I) want to do with this one. --E4024 (talk) 07:42, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:42, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
The source is a facebook page in which the license cannot be found. Py4nf (talk) 02:17, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:45, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, personal image. Дима Г (talk) 02:20, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:45, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope, personal image. Дима Г (talk) 02:21, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:45, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Chris Hall - Be What You Want (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal images, out of scope.
- File:CHRIS HALL BWYW 04.jpg
- File:CHRIS HALL BWYW 03.jpg
- File:CHRIS HALL BWYW 02.jpg
- File:CHRIS HALL BWYW 01.jpg
- File:CHRIS HALL Be What You Want CEO 4.jpg
- File:CHRIS HALL.jpg
- File:Chris Hall Be What You Want CEO 2.jpg
- File:Chris Hall Be What You Want CEO 3.jpg
- File:Chris Hall Be What You Want CEO 1.jpg
Дима Г (talk) 02:25, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:47, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Дима Г (talk) 02:26, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:47, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, personal image. Дима Г (talk) 02:31, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:48, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TheNickHatter (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope.
Дима Г (talk) 02:33, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:49, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Preethika.mathangi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope.
Дима Г (talk) 02:34, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:49, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope.
Дима Г (talk) 02:35, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:50, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, personal image. Дима Г (talk) 02:44, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:51, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, personal image. Дима Г (talk) 02:47, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:52, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, self promotion.
Дима Г (talk) 02:49, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, self promotion.
Дима Г (talk) 02:50, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:53, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:53, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope logo. Дима Г (talk) 02:51, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination+maybe above ToO. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:54, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bruno Marinaccio (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, personal images.
Дима Г (talk) 02:52, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:54, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope. Article about Chris Bolivar was deleted from Spanish Wikipedia.
- File:Cris Bolívar en la Conferencia Talentum 360, en Costa Rica.jpg
- File:Contribuciones de la psicologia al coaching.png
- File:Cris Bolivar.jpg
Дима Г (talk) 02:59, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination+ no permissions. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:56, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, personal image. Дима Г (talk) 03:00, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: *. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:56, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AntonioRuizTKM (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, personal image.
Дима Г (talk) 03:08, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:56, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, personal image. Дима Г (talk) 03:10, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:00, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, self promotion. Дима Г (talk) 03:10, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:00, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Our of scope, personal image. Дима Г (talk) 03:12, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination+no permission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:00, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope, personal image. Дима Г (talk) 03:13, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:01, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Andreeliassepulveda (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, personal images.
Дима Г (talk) 03:17, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination+ 1 is grabbed from facebook. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:03, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ludovic CHARTOUNI (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, self promotion.
- File:Logo HD V WL.png
- File:Trait WL.png
- File:Logo-weelearn.fr.jpg
- File:Logo Play.jpg
- File:F19-Linterpretation-des-rêves-Claude-de-milleville-Coffret (1).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Дима Г (talk) 03:19, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:05, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope logo. Дима Г (talk) 03:19, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:05, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope logo. Дима Г (talk) 03:20, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:05, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nursingmci (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope.
Дима Г (talk) 03:22, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:05, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, personal image. Дима Г (talk) 03:24, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
I don't see any reason for deletion, the photo is from my website about my contribution in self help and meditation practices.
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:06, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Expertos en consultoría (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, personal images.
Дима Г (talk) 03:29, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:07, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Uploads by Nina07011960
[edit]- File:Anne Gamble Portrait.jpg
- File:Gamble and Kennedy.png
- File:Matthew Kennedy, pianist.jpg
- File:Matthew Kennedy directing the Fisk Jubilee Singers.jpg
- File:Matthew Kennedy and the Fisk Jubilee Singers.jpg
- File:Nina Kennedy, pianist.png
- File:Anne Gamble pic.jpg
- File:Dr. Henry Floyd Gamble.jpg
- File:Nina Kennedy, conductor.png
- File:Nina Kennedy.jpg
- File:Matthew Washington Kennedy.jpg
Dubious claims of own work. File:Anne Gamble Portrait.jpg is clearly by Douglas. Some others are scans. Delete per COM:PRP unless OTRS verified. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:26, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - dubious own works - unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:10, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
No metadata, not sure if the photo is taken by the uploader since he had copyright violations. May be out of scope as well. Дима Г (talk) 03:39, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - grabbed from Facebook - "FBMD" is in the metadatas. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:10, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, personal image. Дима Г (talk) 03:43, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:11, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Дима Г (talk) 03:44, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:11, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, self promotion. Дима Г (talk) 04:04, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination + above ToO. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:11, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, self promotion. Дима Г (talk) 04:07, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination + above ToO. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:12, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
This is a company logo. Own work is doubtful Whpq (talk) 05:42, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - above ToO. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:13, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Bild wurde vor 1942, Todesjahr des Portraitierten aufgenommen. Da der Fotograph noch nicht 70 Jahre lang verstorben ist, ist es nicht gemeinfrei - ERGO Datei ist zu entfernen. Es ist anzunehmen, dass der Uploader dies weiß und, um falsche Tatsachen vorzuspielen, sich als Urheber des abfotographierten Originals angegeben hat. Wenn ich ein Portrait vom ihm fotographiere, darf ich es wegen (C) nicht ohne die Erlaubnis des Urhebers veröffentlichen. Es ist unwahrscheinlich, dass er schon über 70 Jahre verstorben ist. 1970gemini 08:06, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by Taivo. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:13, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:19, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:46, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
The subject of the photo has died in 1937. Unlikely to be own work. Дима Г (talk) 00:10, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 08:37, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Article about depicted ru:Терехов Павел Дмитриевич was deleted due to non-notability. Probably the photo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 07:44, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 08:38, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Not compatible with the license Jarash (talk) 12:03, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:17, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kamaljeet Singh Bawari (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-promotion, out of project scope. Aside user pages no contributions to any wiki project.
- File:कमलजीत सिंह बावरी .jpg
- File:Gul- Kamal.jpg
- File:Winning Policies.jpg
- File:Love face of God.jpg
- File:Kamaljeet Singh.jpg
- File:Kamaljeet S Bawari.jpg
- File:Kamaljeet Singh Bawari.jpg
- File:Kamaljeet.jpg
- File:कमल्.jpg
- File:Gul- Kamal Cover2 rev 2.jpg
Achim (talk) 14:15, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, self promotion.--Hindust@niक्या करें? बातें! 04:53, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:17, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Appears to be from http://rblogger.ru/2018/01/24/gonka-geroev-teper-v-evrope/ Ytoyoda (talk) 14:40, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
![14:40, 11 April 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/04/11#c-Ytoyoda-2018-04-11T14:40:00.000Z-File:"Winterhell".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 08:41, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
![08:41, 18 April 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/04/11#c-Sealle-2018-04-18T08:41:00.000Z-File:"Winterhell".jpg){kind=link}
Images with website credit directly on photo. Unlikely to be own work.
- File:Старт проекта "ЗаБег.рф".jpg
- File:Фотосессия "ЗаБег.рф".jpg
- File:Участники "ЗаБег.рф".jpg
- File:Медали "ЗаБег.рф".jpg
- File:Hero Night Out.jpg
- File:Старт проекта "Забег.рф".jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 14:41, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 08:40, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
EXIF says "© Andrea Buonadonna" Ytoyoda (talk) 14:42, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:18, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Image quality, credit in corner suggest this is not original work Ytoyoda (talk) 14:43, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 08:40, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
The image is downloaded from a web page stated in source, but it looks like it is intended for a fair use. The uploader doesn't have a permission. It is very unlikely to be his own photo. The author is stated as "Фотограф" (eng.: photographer). Jarash (talk) 15:02, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 08:41, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Not sure if own work, no camera data. Other file uploaded by the uploader was a copyright violation. Дима Г (talk) 23:01, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 08:58, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
copy of the copyrighted content [1] Bogomolov.PL (talk) 17:34, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:22, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Personal, unused photos, no educational value, out of scope
- File:Sadsaddearh.jpg
- File:Zabi 022.jpg
- File:966412cc1838c13ee0349b4a05a17802t.png
- File:Trollface.png
- File:3-2-trollface-png-image-thumb.png
- File:TROLLFACE-DEAL-WITH-IT.png
- File:Render - Laugh Face Pfftch Troll Face BaixeRenders.png
- File:Picsart2018-08-4--21-56-58.png
- File:VENOM.png
- File:Halwa.png
- File:Aououuuuoub.jpg
- File:Vip2lojooojo.png
- File:Loooofjojojo.png
- File:Malqit mansmih.jpg
- File:Aiman sadness.jpg
- File:Just face.png
- File:Zakirapper.jpg
Ronhjones (Talk) 18:46, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:24, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Not found at URL, out of COM:SCOPE. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:36, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 09:27, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by JuTa at 06:33, 18 April 2018 UTC: No license since 10 April 2018 - --Krdbot 12:28, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Copyright @ http://www.zjqzyz.com/Anthem.html Tiger (Talk) 08:58, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 15:46, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal image, out of scope. E4024 (talk) 07:34, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:49, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Unused, out of scope personal file; addition to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Abinesh-3.jpg E4024 (talk) 07:36, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:49, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal image Finavon (talk) 07:36, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:49, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal file of a smiling unknown man. Deleting admin, it also has an RD. E4024 (talk) 09:10, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:52, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 09:11, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:52, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anil Chhotu Uikey (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 09:18, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:53, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Derckforzanostra (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 09:27, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:53, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:56, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:54, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 10:12, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:54, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Family pictures, out of COM:SCOPE. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:07, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:56, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Family pictures, out of COM:SCOPE. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:08, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:56, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
- Restored: as per [2]. Yann (talk) 06:31, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
![[2]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&oldid=298170843#File:Njimele_George_Mbona.jpg){kind=link}
Family pictures, out of COM:SCOPE. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:08, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:56, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
- Restored: Quite a good portrait, and as per [3]. Yann (talk) 06:33, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE. Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:09, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:56, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
- Restored: as per [4]. Yann (talk) 06:31, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE. Steinsplitter (talk) 14:18, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:57, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of project scope Ytoyoda (talk) 14:38, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:58, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope. Bbb23 (talk) 23:36, 24 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:40, 31 July 2013 (UTC)
Deleted-uploaded-will be deleted. Looks very out of scope. E4024 (talk) 14:45, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:59, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Looks quite out of scope if those bushes are not a very rare species. E4024 (talk) 14:46, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:00, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:01, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:02, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:03, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
unused personal photo or personality rights issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? Roland zh (talk) 17:21, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:05, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Personal text document, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:18, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:44, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Available on the Web in way higher resolution: [5] Sealle (talk) 20:43, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:43, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MamaroTorres (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unconsistent EXIF data. All the remaining files uploaded by this user are copyvios. Although I haven't found the source of these ones, any other is not his. Delete per precautionary principle
- File:Jornadas AVT en Vitoria.jpg
- File:Recepción Desfile 12 de octubre.jpg
- File:Seminario Internacional de asistencia específica e integral a las víctimas del terrorismo en Europa.jpg
Discasto talk 20:46, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:41, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Randykitty (talk) 21:17, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 17:40, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
I doubt very much that this 1969 photograph is the work of the uploader as claimed. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:20, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 01:07, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
File:Pedda Cheruvu Monday, December 10 2012 ©Copyright belongs to Ramana Enaganti http-www.loneShack.com - panoramio (3).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
affected File:Pedda Cheruvu Monday, December 10 2012 ©Copyright belongs to Ramana Enaganti http-www.loneShack.com - panoramio (1).jpg File:Pedda Cheruvu Monday, December 10 2012 ©Copyright belongs to Ramana Enaganti http-www.loneShack.com - panoramio (3).jpg File:Pedda Cheruvu Monday, December 10 2012 ©Copyright belongs to Ramana Enaganti http-www.loneShack.com - panoramio (7).jpg : three unused random panoramio uploads of very poor quality, Roland zh (talk) 17:51, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:57, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
Falsch abgespeichert Lukas 91 (talk) 07:09, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Ich möchte das Foto Weinfelden Stadt löschen. Lukas 91 (talk) 10:18, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, DR withdrawn. --Wdwd (talk) 11:11, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: Self-published book categorized as fiction, not within the scope of Wikimedia Commons. We're a respository of somehow educational material, not a hosting service. Julle (talk) 17:17, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:47, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama in USA for modern sculptures. Taivo (talk) 09:33, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:49, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyright violation uploader admits it is not his work here John from Idegon (talk) 03:24, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Gone with the wind. Close it please, Krdbot. --E4024 (talk) 09:10, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: on 05:02, 18 April 2018, by Taivo. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:39, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
published in 2010 there http://travelerangela.tistory.com/131 , no evidence of permission Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:46, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:39, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Derivative work Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:48, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:39, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
I don't think the book is old enough to be published under this license Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:51, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: obvious copyvio. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:41, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Duplicate of "Leni Robredo pays courtesy call to Rodrigo Duterte 7.4.16.jpg" Howhontanozaz (talk) 05:03, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:42, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Moumou82 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: unusable due to the watermark
Converted by me to DR, as it does not qualify for SD, is a good photography and was on Commons since 2015. Needs a bit of discussion. -- Túrelio (talk) 06:55, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Good photo, but it's only really useful as an advertisement for the photographer. Guanaco (talk) 04:14, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per User:Guanaco. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:42, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Moumou82 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: unusable due to the watermark
Converted by me to DR, as it does not qualify for SD, is a historic photography and was on Commons since 2016. Needs a bit of discussion. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:08, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - cut and use it. Nice old pic. --E4024 (talk) 13:32, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per User:E4024. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:43, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
it is him wearing a t-shirt with Japanese 'rising sun' logo printed, which stands for the military flag of Imperial Japan during WW2. 118.33.62.141 07:14, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. In use. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:43, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Facebook photo according to metadata. ~Cybularny Speak? 07:20, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- This photo was made by me during recording the episode of "Gwiazdy Cejrowskiego" with Maciej. Serecki (talk) 08:32, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per uploader's claim. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:45, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
This file will not be in the public domain in its home country until 1 January 2029. The author, Giacomo Balla, died 1 March 1958. Coldcreation (talk) 07:52, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:45, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Promotional Spotify photo uploaded by a one-time visitor as "own work". Dubious own work. E4024 (talk) 07:52, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. EXIF copyright note doesn't match uploader. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:46, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
I don't see any usefulness for Commons.. maybe out of scope ?
- File:08 Took this photos using my Samsung Galaxy Note 5 Camera from U. A. E. – Sharjah Corniche.jpg
- File:07 Took this photos using my Samsung Galaxy Note 5 Camera from U. A. E. – Sharjah Corniche.jpg
- File:06 Took this photos using my Samsung Galaxy Note 5 Camera from U. A. E. – Sharjah Corniche.jpg
- File:05 Took this photos using my Samsung Galaxy Note 5 Camera from U. A. E. – Sharjah Corniche.jpg
- File:04 Took this photos using my Samsung Galaxy Note 5 Camera from U. A. E. – Sharjah Corniche.jpg
- File:03 Took this photos using my Samsung Galaxy Note 5 Camera from U. A. E. – Sharjah Corniche.jpg
- File:Took this photos using my Samsung Galaxy Note 5 Camera from U. A. E. – Sharjah Corniche.jpg
- File:02 Took this photos using my Samsung Galaxy Note 5 Camera from U. A. E. – Sharjah Corniche.jpg
- File:01 Took this photos using my Samsung Galaxy Note 5 Camera from U. A. E. – Sharjah Corniche.jpg
Saqib (talk) 08:54, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: most because of extreme low quality, kept a few as in scope for Category:Photographs of flags of the United Arab Emirates. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:03, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
It's unclear, what is depicted. Out of project scope? Taivo (talk) 09:01, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:10, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Image is used for promotional purposes for a multiple-deleted article of de-WP Regi51 (talk) 11:17, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and copyvio. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:11, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Dubious own work. E4024 (talk) 13:12, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: why dubious. Atrocious quality, but in use on userpage of a (somewhat) active user. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:17, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Looks like an out of scope and unused personal image. E4024 (talk) 13:17, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:17, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
This is just wrong. Replaced with File:Eskisehir Justice Department crop.jpg. - Alexis Jazz 13:26, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, we shouldn't have raster photos embedded in SVG files. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:42, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Would anybody nominate File:Wikipedia technician.svg for deletion too? Incnis Mrsi (talk) 20:55, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Incnis Mrsi: You tell me not to go offtopic and you.. nevermind. No, can't. File:Wikipedia technician.svg should not be used by anyone, but it is needed to validate the license of File:Wikipedia technician.png. This is not the case for the file discussed here because that originates from Eskisehir Justice Department.jpg. - Alexis Jazz 21:16, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:18, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
image taken from Google Maps Estevoaei (talk) 13:52, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:21, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
image taken from Google Maps Estevoaei (talk) 13:52, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:21, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Koreaculture (talk · contribs)
[edit]unlikely to be own work
Didym (talk) 14:08, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Speedydelete: that images came from Naver. #1, #2. Thanks. --Garam talk 11:45, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:21, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Unused photo that doesn't identify the subject and appears to be taken from social media. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:39, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:22, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Appears to be personal photo, unused on Wikipedia Ytoyoda (talk) 14:42, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:22, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
copyrgithed Snowflake91 (talk) 14:56, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:22, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. Out of project scope.
- File:Mahindra group logo and footprint.jpg
- File:Quantum entanglement.jpg
- File:Picture of two great poets.jpg
- File:Ishanidas.jpg
- File:Ish Das.jpg
~Moheen (keep talking) 15:15, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: as copyvios. Kept one personal in-use photo. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:24, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep as source of Rede modelo I.svg --Ras67 (talk) 04:49, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Ras67. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:30, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:30, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:31, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
awful quality photo, suspected authorship (user has two uploads), there are other photos of this car Pibwl (talk) 16:13, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
I agree, the photo quality isn't the best, however it's a legit photo of my car in my garage at this time. I may get a better photo. Flight Risk (talk)
Deleted: upscaled copy of File:Sprite MKIII.jpg. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:34, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Low quality PNG that are unlikely to be own work, some are too distorted to be useful
- File:Alberto Jiménez.png
- File:Dani Kome.png
- File:JorgeS.png
- File:SantiLuque.png
- File:Luismilamanzanares.png
- File:Francisco Martínez (Keko).png
- File:Suso Santana.png
- File:Omar Perdomo.png
- File:Omar TT.png
- File:Juan Villar.png
- File:Álex Mula.png
- File:Álvaro Hernández.png
- File:Chechu Flores Tenerife.png
- File:Frenteblanq2.png
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ytoyoda (talk) 10:21, 15 March 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:29, 28 March 2018 (UTC)
Obviously not original work. Please provide actual source info
Ytoyoda (talk) 17:37, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:36, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Previously published at http://radiomarcatenerife.com/?p=76616 Ytoyoda (talk) 17:40, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:37, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
I uploaded this picture by mistake. And I forgot it violated the rule of Wikimedia. Zloveasia (talk) 17:40, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:38, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
From https://twitter.com/juanjo_ramos/status/943416681518510080 Ytoyoda (talk) 17:41, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:38, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
en:Andy Ezard was deleted due to non-notability 10 years ago. Probably the photo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 17:48, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:39, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
File:Pedda Cheruvu Monday, December 10 2012 ©Copyright belongs to Ramana Enaganti http-www.loneShack.com - panoramio (1).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
affected File:Pedda Cheruvu Monday, December 10 2012 ©Copyright belongs to Ramana Enaganti http-www.loneShack.com - panoramio (1).jpg File:Pedda Cheruvu Monday, December 10 2012 ©Copyright belongs to Ramana Enaganti http-www.loneShack.com - panoramio (3).jpg File:Pedda Cheruvu Monday, December 10 2012 ©Copyright belongs to Ramana Enaganti http-www.loneShack.com - panoramio (7).jpg : three unused random panoramio uploads of very poor quality, Roland zh (talk) 17:50, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: 22:57, 18 April 2018, by Shizhao. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:39, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
File:Pedda Cheruvu Monday, December 10 2012 ©Copyright belongs to Ramana Enaganti http-www.loneShack.com - panoramio (7).jpg
[edit].jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
affected File:Pedda Cheruvu Monday, December 10 2012 ©Copyright belongs to Ramana Enaganti http-www.loneShack.com - panoramio (1).jpg File:Pedda Cheruvu Monday, December 10 2012 ©Copyright belongs to Ramana Enaganti http-www.loneShack.com - panoramio (3).jpg File:Pedda Cheruvu Monday, December 10 2012 ©Copyright belongs to Ramana Enaganti http-www.loneShack.com - panoramio (7).jpg : three unused random panoramio uploads of very poor quality, Roland zh (talk) 17:51, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: 22:57, 18 April 2018, by Shizhao. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:40, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope: w:Special:Undelete/User talk:Lancervotes MER-C 17:57, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:40, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Picture is covered with a copyright watermark which does not allow its removal Moumou82 (talk) 18:08, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, image can easily be cropped. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:41, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
Poorly lit panoramio photo. We have dozens of better photos of cable cars in this exact location. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:23, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:42, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out-of-focus and weirdly angled shot with no educational value. Commons has other shots of this exact cable car. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:48, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:42, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
your opinions are asked : batch of seven small-sized files, missing exif data to verify claimed own work, but also (partially) personality and copyright issues, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ??
- File:New Biginning.. From Aruviyodu.jpg
- File:താളത്രയം ഗ്രന്ഥശാലയുടെ ഉദ്ഘാടനം.jpg
- File:Ente Thalathrayam.jpg
- File:ചിറ്റാർ.jpg
- File:Aruviyodu bridge.jpg
- File:Aruviyodu.jpg
- File:താളത്രയം.jpg
Roland zh (talk) 19:07, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: consistent quality and size, all taken at same place - own work is therefore likely. Deleted one collage as DW. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:47, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope: Grainy, poorly framed photo; the cable car is unidentifiable; and we have plenty of better historical images of the SF cable car system. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:50, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:48, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:U.S. Marine Corps Cpl. Thomas R. Hammond, a Special Reaction Team member, Provost Marshall's Office, Headquarters Battalion, Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center (MCAGCC), fires an M-40A1 sniper rifle during an 090821-M-OW258-049.jpg
[edit],_fires_an_M-40A1_sniper_rifle_during_an_090821-M-OW258-049.jpg){kind=link}
Greetings, I am the person in this photo and am requesting a courtesy deletion for the defense of my identity and protection of my family. Thank you. 2607:FB90:2841:E7F1:A1DC:7F04:234C:D8DE 15:15, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Info Personal name trimmed from filename and text as a courtesy. The image was released as PD 9 years ago and is not of itself intrusive or overtly identifiable to an individual. It does not exist on DVIDS, but may still exist on DIMOC for those with military access. --Fæ (talk) 15:30, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
@2607:FB90:2841:E7F1:A1DC:7F04:234C:D8DE: Rather than raising more DRs, please list them here. It creates fewer public records.
- File:U.S. Marine Corps Cpl. Thomas R. Hammond, a Special Reaction Team member, Provost Marshall's Office, Headquarters Battalion, Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center (MCAGCC), fires an M-40A1 sniper rifle during an 090821-M-OW258-049.jpg
- File:U.S. Marine Corps Cpl. Thomas R. Hammond, a Special Reaction Team member, Provost Marshall's Office, Headquarters Battalion, Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center (MCAGCC), fires an M-4 service rifle during an 090821-M-OW258-028.jpg
- File:U.S. Marine Corps Cpl. Thomas R. Hammond, a Special Reaction Team member, Provost Marshall's Office, Headquarters Battalion, Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center (MCAGCC), fires an M-4 service rifle during an 090821-M-OW258-027.jpg
- File:U.S. Marine Corps Cpl. Thomas R. Hammond, a Special Reaction Team member, Provost Marshall's Office, Headquarters Battalion, Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center (MCAGCC), fires an M-4 service rifle during an 090821-M-OW258-029.jpg
- File:USMC-090729-M-4150N-149.jpg (this image found and added by Ww2censor (talk) 22:04, 11 April 2018 (UTC))
,_fires_an_M-4_service_rifle_during_an_090821-M-OW258-028.jpg){kind=link}
,_fires_an_M-4_service_rifle_during_an_090821-M-OW258-027.jpg){kind=link}
,_fires_an_M-4_service_rifle_during_an_090821-M-OW258-029.jpg){kind=link}
By the way, checking on DVIDS, your personal name is quoted in the description of some of the photographs of you at the same location. --Fæ (talk) 15:42, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Keep No personal rights were violated.--Sanandros (talk) 21:00, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Keep but rename: How many times must we go through the same type of request. This is a US government image, properly released into the public domain as US government work and no matter what we do here it will stay, with the person's name exposed on the US military websites, even if we change it here. This is no reason to delete, but out of courtesy we can rename these files to exclude the person's name (one has been done}. Also see the listed deletion nominations that I know of, all of which were kept and some renamed:
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:U.S. Army Capt. Ryan Boom, center, the commander of the 191st Military Police Company, North Dakota Army National Guard, discusses traffic control with Sgt. Josh Dvirnak, left, and Spc. Ashley MacNaughton as 130423-Z-WA217-259.jpg - December 2017/January 2018
- Two images in this request: Commons:Deletion requests/File:US Navy 110902-N-BT887-049 Airman Logan Grady secures the tail of an MH-60R Sea Hawk helicopter aboard USS John C. Stennis (CVN 74).jpg - December 2017
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:US Navy 080718-N-6999H-039 Machinist's Mate 1st Class Joel Dones, left, works with Machinist's Mate 3rd Class Howell Smith to rebuild a waste water pump.jpg - July 2017
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:US Navy 100705-N-4135M-077 Lt. Cmdr. Eugene Trelles, from Ft. Myers, Fla., reads a book to his three-year old twins while participating in the United Through Reading program.jpg - March 2015
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Australian army Pvt. Naomi Gangell, right, with the 10th Force Support Battalion, fires at a 300-meter target while U.S. Army Staff Sgt. Aaron Paul, with the 2nd Brigade, 25th Infantry Division, records her 120507-F-MQ656-070.jpg - June 2014
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:US Navy 030304-N-1512S-120 Engineman 3rd Class Conary Beckford performs checks on a Diesel Rack Alignment aboard the amphibious assault ship USS Kearsarge (LHD 3).jpg - January 2014
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:US Navy 090813-N-5207L-087 Information Systems Technician 1st Class James Paisley assigned to Command Logistics Group Western Pacific, works with Republic of Singapore Navy Capt. K.C. Teo.jpg - October 2013 -
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
This was closed as a keep but was renamed File:US Navy 090813-N-5207L-087 Information Systems Technician assigned to Command Logistics Group Western Pacific, works with Republic of Singapore Navy Capt.jpg without leaving a redirect.
As I stated each time, the images are still found on US military's websites, so our deletion is irrelevant. Removing it from wikimedia really makes absolutely no difference in identifying the person and I have yet to see the US military actually remove any image we are asked to delete. I doubt they will remove such images from their websites now or in the future. Ww2censor (talk) 21:03, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- This image was not found at DVIDS and may not be on any military image sites. I have not checked for all of them. --Fæ (talk) 21:29, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Actually Dvids appears to be under a major revamp right now so finding any images will likely be impossible until they finish. Ww2censor (talk) 22:04, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Delete per the original request. Kelly (talk) 04:34, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Per other users and previous DR of similar images and requests. These are image of public record. Tm (talk) 05:49, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept, per discussion. Taivo (talk) 09:08, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
File:U.S. Marine Corps Cpl. Thomas R. Hammond, a Special Reaction Team member, Provost Marshall's Office, Headquarters Battalion, Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center (MCAGCC), fires an M-4 service rifle during an 090821-M-OW258-028.jpg
[edit]I am the person in this photo and under the social issues category am requesting a courtesy deletion and for photographs of identifiable people. 2607:FB90:2841:E7F1:A1DC:7F04:234C:D8DE 15:22, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Keep No personal rights were violated.--Sanandros (talk) 20:57, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Keep: per the deletion discussion on Commons:Deletion requests/File:U.S. Marine Corps Cpl. Thomas R. Hammond, a Special Reaction Team member, Provost Marshall's Office, Headquarters Battalion, Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center (MCAGCC), fires an M-40A1 sniper rifle during an 090821-M-OW258-049. where all the images with this person are listed together. Ww2censor (talk) 21:22, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept, per discussion. Taivo (talk) 09:57, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
File:U.S. Marine Corps Cpl. Thomas R. Hammond, a Special Reaction Team member, Provost Marshall's Office, Headquarters Battalion, Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center (MCAGCC), fires an M-4 service rifle during an 090821-M-OW258-027.jpg
[edit]I am the person in this photo and under the social issues category am requesting a courtesy deletion and for photographs of identifiable people. 2607:FB90:2841:E7F1:A1DC:7F04:234C:D8DE 15:23, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep No personal rights were violated.--Sanandros (talk) 20:58, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: per the deletion discussion on Commons:Deletion requests/File:U.S. Marine Corps Cpl. Thomas R. Hammond, a Special Reaction Team member, Provost Marshall's Office, Headquarters Battalion, Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center (MCAGCC), fires an M-40A1 sniper rifle during an 090821-M-OW258-049. where all the images with this person are listed together. Ww2censor (talk) 21:23, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept, per discussion. Taivo (talk) 09:56, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
File:U.S. Marine Corps Cpl. Thomas R. Hammond, a Special Reaction Team member, Provost Marshall's Office, Headquarters Battalion, Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center (MCAGCC), fires an M-4 service rifle during an 090821-M-OW258-029.jpg
[edit]I am the person in this photo and under the social issues category am requesting a courtesy deletion and for photographs of identifiable people. 2607:FB90:2841:E7F1:A1DC:7F04:234C:D8DE 15:26, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep No personal rights were violated.--Sanandros (talk) 20:58, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: per the deletion discussion on Commons:Deletion requests/File:U.S. Marine Corps Cpl. Thomas R. Hammond, a Special Reaction Team member, Provost Marshall's Office, Headquarters Battalion, Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center (MCAGCC), fires an M-40A1 sniper rifle during an 090821-M-OW258-049. where all the images with this person are listed together. Ww2censor (talk) 21:24, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept, no real problems with the file. Taivo (talk) 09:49, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
I am the person in this photo and under the social issues category am requesting a courtesy deletion and for photographs of identifiable people. 2607:FB90:2841:E7F1:A1DC:7F04:234C:D8DE 15:27, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Well, if the pic is not in use after six years here it means it is not an indispensable image. Frankly I feel good when I see less arms pictures -anywhere- as I read the news. Of course Commons is not censured and having the pics here does not mean it promotes arms. (Indeed arms manufacturers could say the same: We produce the things, but do not tell anybody to buy and use them.) Anyhow, I know I will be opposed to, but it gives me a feeling like the person who threw one of the sea stars back to the sea. Sorry for the headache it may have given you to read this much of nonsense and thanks for the patience. --E4024 (talk) 15:38, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: per the deletion discussion on Commons:Deletion requests/File:U.S. Marine Corps Cpl. Thomas R. Hammond, a Special Reaction Team member, Provost Marshall's Office, Headquarters Battalion, Marine Corps Air Ground Combat Center (MCAGCC), fires an M-40A1 sniper rifle during an 090821-M-OW258-049. where all the images with this person are listed together. Ww2censor (talk) 21:31, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept, no real problems with the file. Taivo (talk) 08:56, 7 May 2018 (UTC)
Files depicting the 6th plenary meeting of 1st session of 13th National People's Congress in Beijing
[edit]- File:6th plenary meeting of 1st session of 13th NPC held in Beijing (1).jpg
- File:6th plenary meeting of 1st session of 13th NPC held in Beijing (2).jpg
- File:6th plenary meeting of 1st session of 13th NPC held in Beijing (3).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Apparent copyright violation per metadata: “Copyright [c] 2014(8) Xinhua News Agency All Right Reserved.” See also similar cases:
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Zhao Leji(Chinese politician) 2013.jpg
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Xi Jinping, Kim Jong Un hold talks in Beijing.jpg
_2013.jpg){kind=link}
--Spring Roll Conan ( Talk · Contributions ) 13:57, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:58, 10 May 2018 (UTC)
File:Dipl.-Theater-Pädagogin Frouwa Kebschull, hier am Holzmarkt als bäuerliche Marktfrau verkleidet im Auftrag von Stattreisen Hannover e.V.jpg
[edit]
das bild wird missbraucht Bleistiftmine (talk) 11:46, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Das Foto zeigt eine vor dem Historischen Museum Hannover im öffentlichen Raum wirkende Schauspielerin, die erkennbar gesehen werden wollte. Für einen Mißbrauch des Bildes andernorts kann der Fotograf und auch Commons nicht verantwortlich gemacht werden. Dennoch wurde erst soeben die Bitte auf Wahrung der Persönlichkeitsrechts nachgetragen. Da das Foto aber laut User:Bleistiftmine andernorts "mißbraucht" wurde und die Dargestellte möglicherweise verunglimpft wurde, erklärt sich der Urheber und Stifter des Fotos, das in Absprache mit der Dargestellten enstand, mit einer Löschung einverstanden. --Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 19:49, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per author. --Amada44 talk to me 10:09, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
File:Dipl.-Theater-Pädagogin Frouwa Kebschull, hier vor dem Historischen Museum als bäuerliche Marktfrau verkleidet im Auftrag von Stattreisen Hannover e.V.jpg
[edit]
das bild wird missbraucht Bleistiftmine (talk) 11:48, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Das Foto zeigt eine vor dem Historischen Museum Hannover im öffentlichen Raum wirkende Schauspielerin, die erkennbar gesehen werden wollte. Für einen Mißbrauch des Bildes andernorts kann der Fotograf und auch Commons nicht verantwortlich gemacht werden. Dennoch wurde erst soeben die Bitte auf Wahrung der Persönlichkeitsrechts nachgetragen. Da das Foto aber laut User:Bleistiftmine andernorts "mißbraucht" wurde und die Dargestellte möglicherweise verunglimpft wurde, erklärt sich der Urheber und Stifter des Fotos, das in Absprache mit der Dargestellten enstand, mit einer Löschung einverstanden. --Bernd Schwabe in Hannover (talk) 19:48, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per author. --Amada44 talk to me 10:09, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Auflösung falsch EikeBecker Architekten (talk) 12:44, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 10:06, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Auslösung falsch EikeBecker Architekten (talk) 12:46, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Bild wird auf de.wikipedia benutzt und kann deshalb nicht gelöscht werden. --Amada44 talk to me 10:03, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Per copyright remark in EXIF data. We would need OTRS permission to keep this file. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 10:30, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Lizenz mit dem Fotograf nicht einig. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EikeBecker Architekten (talk • contribs) 14. Mai 2018, 13:36 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 09:54, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Auslösung falsch 195.226.109.237 12:47, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 10:06, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
File is huge. Superseded by the much smaller SVG version File:Flag of Los Angeles County, California.svg. Should be replaced across all Wiki projects by the latter. Xeror (talk) 13:34, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Insufficient reasons. File is still COM:INUSE. Nominator should have used the SVG file as a replacement BEFORE filing this DR. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:33, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Would be much more efficient to replace them by script or bot since the number of uses is large. Deletion can be done right after. --Xeror (talk) 22:01, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Xeror: Good luck with that. Try not to get blocked on enwiki for running an unapproved bot. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:59, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: I'm not saying that I'm running any bot or script and I'm currently owning none. There are existing ones used by admins to replace file names globally. And no one has time to replace that many manually. --Xeror (talk) 01:05, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Xeror: Good luck with that. Try not to get blocked on enwiki for running an unapproved bot. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:59, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Would be much more efficient to replace them by script or bot since the number of uses is large. Deletion can be done right after. --Xeror (talk) 22:01, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: still in use. The script for admins does not allow a change from a png to a svg. --Amada44 talk to me 10:11, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
derivative work (photo of a photo) Magnus (talk) 13:51, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 10:14, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
copy vio - certainly not own work h-stt !? 15:20, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 10:16, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
copyvio - certainly not own work h-stt !? 15:21, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 10:16, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
Wikipedia is not an acceptable source for images. Please provide the original publication. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:36, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 10:22, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
This photo is a protest photo against the participation of North Korea in the 2018 PyeongChang Winter Olympics. However, this photo contains an insulting phrase that expresses the Korean president, Moon Jae-in, as a "catastrophe". This photo is not a pure demonstration. A photo uploaded by a Korean extremist to mock the Democratic President. Mobius6 (talk) 00:52, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Typical criticism of the President. No reason for censorship of free speech. --130.126.255.203 04:17, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- The attack on someone is beyond the scope of the project. It has an attacking content for a specific person. And this user has removed the removal request.--Mobius6 (talk) 04:40, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Calling a president a "catastrophe" sounds like valid criticism to me. @-revi: As a native speaker, maybe this is something you could comment on? Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:53, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- You’re correct. Calling political figures as ‘disaster’, ‘chicken’, etc is valid criticism imo as well. — regards, Revi 05:55, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- I respect users' opinions. I also understood that this did not violate the rules of the Wikimedia Commons.--Mobius6 (talk) 07:46, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Keep An attempt for censorship. @-revi: Can you translate to english the billboard content? Thank you.--Kacir (talk) 07:50, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Translation below. — regards, Revi 07:53, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Translation of the billboard in the image
No PYONGYANG (Nb.: Not Pyeongchang) Olympic Moon Disaster
— regards, Revi 07:53, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. The photo is used in multiple projects and cannot be deleted due to any other reason than copyright violation. I do not see copyright violation here. Taivo (talk) 09:08, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per COM:CENSOR and COM:INUSE. Instead of the removal of the speedy template and the edit warring that ensued, a regular DR should have been started. Thank you Sebari for keeping a cool head. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 10:35, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep There is no inappropriate language on the banner. No reason for censorship. --Cyberdoomslayer (talk) 22:04, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: Maybe it is not a typical demonstration, but it is real one. I don't see here any problem. (revi, thanks for translation) --Packa (talk) 22:16, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no consensus for deletion. — regards, Revi 16:22, 15 May 2018 (UTC)
All these photographs were not taken by the uploader but by professional photographers (who are in most of the cases named in the filename). Unfortunately, there was never an attempt to send the permission to our support team for these pictures for nearly 10 years. See here for a related discussion.
- File:Konzerthaus Berlin Werner-Otto-Saal 3 ©Roland Halbe ECE.JPG
- File:Konzerthaus Berlin Musikclub Flügel ©Udo Lauer.JPG
- File:Konzerthaus Berlin Kleiner Saal 1 ©Udo Lauer.JPG
- File:Konzerthaus Berlin Besucherservice Dussmann-Hörsäulen 4 ©Konzerthaus Berlin Archiv.JPG
- File:KON 7518 Vermietung Weber-Saal ©Christian Nielinger.jpg
- File:DSC 4868 Vermietung KS ©Christian Nielinger.jpg
- File:DSC 3835 Vermietung GS ©Christian Nielinger.jpg
- File:DSC 3823 Rundgänge ©Christian Nielinger.jpg
- File:DSC 3694 Vermietung Beethoven-Saal ©Christian Nielinger.jpg
AFBorchert (talk) 22:26, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- @AFBorchert: Ich hatte gestern Kontakt mit Christian Nielinger. Er teilte mir mit, dass er noch nie Fotos in die Wikipedia oder auf Commons hochgeladen und auch keine Genehmigung an OTRS geschickt habe. An die Fotos von Herrn Zagrosek wie File:Zagrosek Lothar 3 lachend klein DSC 4288 Christian Nielinger.jpeg konnte er sich erinnern. Er will sich in einigen Tagen wieder melden, da er im Urlaub ist. Es bleibt auch noch zu klären, wie die Genehmigung 2008 von seinem E-Mail-Account an das OTRS-Team kam. Hystrix (talk) 14:55, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Hystrix: Hm... ich habe mal einen Link auf Deinen Kommentar bei ticket:2008061010093418 hinterlassen und etwas Analyse hinzugefügt. Mich würde es sehr überraschen, wenn das nicht von Christian Nielinger kam – aber leider lässt sich das nach einer so langen Zeitperiode (knapp 10 Jahre) nicht mehr vollumfänglich verifizieren. Wenn er sich erneut an das Support-Team wendet, sollte sich das klären lassen. Wenn Du mit ihm in Kontakt stehst, wäre es vielleicht interessant zu erfahren, wie er zu den oben genannten Bildern von ihm steht, für die wir überhaupt keine Korrespondenz vorliegen haben. Viele Grüße, AFBorchert (talk) 20:17, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Though it's not the subject of these files, I think it is vanishingly unlikely that ticket:2008061010093418 was fraudulent, instead I think the submitter has much more likely just forgotten having given permission for that file 10 years ago. In any case, while it would be great to get the photographers' permission, until we have it, these cannot be kept. --Storkk (talk) 13:02, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
There is no evidence that the painting is out of copyright. A 1934 European work would still copyrighted because of URAA even if the painter had died the same year. So this derivative photo is questionable. De728631 (talk) 23:28, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Artist or their heirs should confirm license via OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 12:56, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
No FOP in the United States. This previously had a FOP tag for Trinidad and Tobago, but it's in Colorado. Themightyquill (talk) 12:17, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- What is an FOP?
- 70.114.194.12 Freedom of Panorama. The sculpture is under copyright since the author hasn't been dead for 70 years. In some countries, it's okay to take photos of public sculptures under the rules of "Freedom of Panorama" but the United States has no such exemption to copyright restrictions. -- Themightyquill (talk) 11:10, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Kaldari (talk) 13:14, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
Porque es un archivo antigüo que nada tiene que ver con el objeto actual de la pagina MDLRAM (talk) 21:31, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Keep Being "old" or "having nothing to do with the current subject" is not a valid argument for deletion. --Discasto talk 21:32, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Keep Someone seems to have problems with the "old" People's Party for some reason I cannot begin to fathom. Sad. But not a problem for Commons.--Asqueladd (talk) 22:23, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
DeleteEste archivo debería eliminarse porque una de las chicas que está en esa foto no quiere que esa foto aparezca por motivos personales, laborales. Creo que es suficiente razón Ladypumuky (talk) 06:13, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
Comment Problem solved. Next?--Asqueladd (talk) 08:25, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Storkk (talk) 14:24, 30 May 2018 (UTC)
Copyright is actually held by BBC, not Rubaduck1989 [6] Duffbeerforme (talk) 07:33, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 15:39, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Modern art works need OTRS to be sure of the "own work" claim. E4024 (talk) 08:02, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- OK, we will make an OTRS permission. --Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 12:28, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: added OTRS permission. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:08, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Белан Валерий (talk · contribs)
[edit]No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks.
- File:Памятник В. Эмирову.jpg
File:Обелиск строителям дороги Порт-Петровск-Темирхан-Шура.jpgkept. Sealle (talk) 17:01, 12 April 2018 (UTC)- File:Памятник Атлы-Буюнским крестьянам, восставшим в 1905г с Ленинкент.jpg
- File:Памятник хирургу Хаджи-Омару Булачу.jpg
- File:Памятник хирургу Пирогову НИ.jpg
- File:Памятник хирургу Вишневскому АВ.jpg
- File:Памятник Ленину ВИ у здания Дагестанского пед.института.jpg
- File:Памятник Пушкину АС респ библ им Пушкина.jpg
- File:Бюст героя Советского Союза Магомеда Гаджиева в порту.jpg
- File:Памятник артисту Татаму Мурадову кладбище.jpg
- File:Памятник художнику Муэтдину-Араби Джемалу кладбище.jpg
- File:Памятник композитору Гасанову ГА кладбище.jpg
- File:Памятник композитору Агабабову СА кладбище.jpg
- File:Памятник ученому Халилу Фаталиеву Даггосуниверситет.jpg
- File:Памятник борцу за Власть Советов Ермошкину ЕГ.jpg
Sealle (talk) 09:04, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- It is also possible to violate the copyright of the photographer. See talk page of uploader. --Insider (talk) 09:16, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- File:Обелиск строителям дороги Порт-Петровск-Темирхан-Шура.jpg is seems to be {{PD-RusEmpire}}, per [7] and text on monument itself. --Bok (talk) 16:51, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:17, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
neue Bilddatei Büro Rita Hagl-Kehl (talk) 12:52, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:29, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Chire as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.uni-heidelberg.de/einrichtungen/rektorat/kum/corporatedesign/logo.html
Converted by me to DR to allow for a discussion. Though it's clear that the source does not give a license/permission, the combination of an old seal and mere text might be ineligible/below TOO. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:37, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- The original seal has been professionally edited, and the file is not an independent recreation of the logo by the uploader, but a downloaded copy of the file. It is part of a larger corporate design work, which may in its entirety pass TOO.
- You can see what the original seal looks like here: http://www.uni-heidelberg.de/universitaet/geschichte/universitaetssiegel.html - so you cannot just consider this to be a "combination of the old seal with some text".
- Here is a Google translation of the legal notice on the web page this was downloaded from:
- The logo of the University of Heidelberg is exclusively for use for university purposes. Any other use must be coordinated with the Communications and Marketing department. Logos and seals may not be changed.
- and obviously, the uploading user does not care much about copyrights... Chire (talk) 14:55, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Agree to your last point. ;-) --Túrelio (talk) 20:22, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- However, your before-last point refers to trademark-rights, which we usually "ignore" on Wikipedia (TM-template added), but not to copyright.
- WRT to the decisive TOO question, I've asked one of our TOO experts from :de for an assessment: he confirmed my suspicion that combining an old/PD work (seal) with a few words of text does not create a copyright-protected work, as it is missing a personal intellectual creation (my rough translation from German), which is required for copyright by §2 of UrhG (copyright law of Germany). Contrary to UK, the workload for designing/creating something is not considered in the copyright-evaluation in UrhG.[8] I've focussed on copyright-law of Germany in this case, as the logo belongs to a German university. --Túrelio (talk) 20:40, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted by User:Jcb. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:38, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
No source information for CC license // sikander { talk } 15:11, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing legal information. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:40, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Official document. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing legal information. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:42, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
no sign, that this is own work - own scan by John Lloyd rather from original publication Pibwl (talk) 16:37, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:50, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
batch of 5 (partially unused) files, profiling (="tejaswi madivada instagram") or personality right issues, but also missing exif data to verify claimed 'own work', hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ??
- File:Tejaswi Madivada తేజస్వి మాడివాడ 5.jpg
- File:Tejaswi Madivada తేజస్వి మాడివాడ 4.jpg
- File:Tejaswi Madivada తేజస్వి మాడివాడ 1.jpg
- File:Tejaswi Madivada తేజస్వి మాడివాడ 2.jpg
- File:Tejaswi Madivada తేజస్వి మాడివాడ 3.jpg
Roland zh (talk) 17:34, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, images from Instagram probably. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:59, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
possible copyright issues with screen SecretName101 (talk) 19:58, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 18:03, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
content not de minimus SecretName101 (talk) 03:45, 2 January 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:40, 7 February 2020 (UTC)
Following a request in my he.wiki talkpage. Although there is a FoP in Germany, it does not include derivative works. -- Geagea (talk) 20:40, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 18:04, 16 June 2018 (UTC)
Clearly not an "own work". E4024 (talk) 09:12, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:01, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by WomeninWiki (talk · contribs)
[edit]These are apparently the work of Marline Fritzius who died in 2006 and therefore will be under copyright until January 1, 2077. In order for them to remain on Commons, we will need a free license from the copyright holder, who is probably an heir.
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:24, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Dear Jameslwoodward,
I have mailed to creative commons, sending a mail from the copyright holders: Stichting Marline Fritzius (she never had children) and all her rights and material went to her Foundation (stichting) Ticket#2018041110011301 and Ticket#2018041110011337
Geachte heer/mevrouw,
Hierbij verleen ik namens de Stichting Marline Fritzius toestemming voor het gebruik van de foto’s voor Creative Commons: Virapa en Mossen 3 Licentie: CC BY-NC-ND 4.0
Hartelijke groet,
Hanna Velthoen
Project-manager Stichting Marline Fritzius Brouwersgracht 222-1 1013 HE Amsterdam www.stichtingmarlinefritzius.nl info@stichtingmarlinefritzius.nl http://www.facebook.com/AtelierMarlineFritzius kantoor: 06-16772396 (aanw: ma, di, do, vrij) atelier: 06-38733095 (taxi’s, afmelding les, alle dagen behalve di och)
Deleted: 21:10, 18 April 2018, by JuTa. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:02, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 105.27.172.198 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: incorrect classification model
Converted by me to DR, as it does not qualify for SD. Needs discussion whether nominators claim is true. -- Túrelio (talk) 14:21, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:03, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
The source of this image is https://apod.nasa.gov/apod/ap130208.html and it was created by Stephen Leshin and it is copyrighted Easy n (talk) 08:41, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, not a NASA image, not under a free license as described.--BevinKacon (talk) 22:23, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:30, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
ce blason n'est pas le bon de la part du maire de taninges 74440 YVES LAURAT 2A01:CB15:250:1C00:90F0:4A38:A470:34E7 10:27, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
- Keep Il semble effectivement y avoir une erreur dans la représentation du 1er quartier (les chevrons sont inversés et devraient suivre la partition). Toutefois, cela n'impose pas la suppression du fichier qui doit seulement être corrigé.- Bzh-99 (talk) 17:10, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion as stated above. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:31, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Logo sous Copyright. Indiqué comme "Travail personnel". FelixINX (talk) 12:22, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
In english. Logo under Copyright. Indicated as "Personal work". --FelixINX (talk) 23:55, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep, tag as pd logo. It is Institut de tourisme et d'hôtellerie du Québec logo.--BevinKacon (talk) 21:47, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
Kept: far below TOO. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:32, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
It may have been uploaded a century ago but I just saw it today. To me it looks quite an attack image, even if unintendedly. (Now I remembered a joke about someone having just learned the crucifixion but better no jokes here. Sometimes people misunderstand a cheerful approach.) If I'm exaggerating, an admin can close it earlier than a week. No problem. E4024 (talk) 15:48, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Full disclosure
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:Иван-Демидов.jpg
- Commons:Village pump#Ivan Demidov - what's this about?
- http://www.newlookmedia.ru/IDNV/Fotoistoria/Stranic/1995_files/Media/DD3-8_2/DD3-8_2.jpg item is a money belt or something.
- As for copyright, https://echo.msk.ru/blog/dodolev/823382-echo/ is low resolution, http://www.newlookmedia.ru/IDNV/Fotoistoria/Stranic/1995.html is low resolution (I see no way to get highres?) and creative commons, https://www.flickr.com/photos/80728032@N00/270164277/in/dateposted/ is high resolution and creative commons. - Alexis Jazz 15:55, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Happy to provide a better crop, but can't while this DR is open. - Alexis Jazz 16:00, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- On Commons:Deletion requests/File:Иван-Демидов.jpg User:Чръный человек says "Author of https://echo.msk.ru/blog/dodolev/823382-echo/ was Evgeny Dodolev. A number of photos were uploaded first to the Russian Wikipedia with his consent. Later these photos were tranferred to Commons.". The upload log:
- 2009-08-07 18:10 FHMRUSSIA 1762×1177× (758295 bytes) {{Изображение | Описание = Демидов и Додолев в Ирландии (декабрь 1995) | Источник =http://www.flickr.com/photos/80728032@N00/270164277/in/set-1405725/ | Время создания =
- So source if Flickr. - Alexis Jazz 17:09, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- This Flick'r account owner (https://www.flickr.com/photos/80728032@N00/) is Evgeny Dodolev. ~ Чръный человек (talk) 17:43, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Чръный человек: is that also the photographer? If not, who is? - Alexis Jazz 17:47, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- He published his own photos, but he never wrote about author. ~ Чръный человек (talk) 07:35, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Чръный человек: is that also the photographer? If not, who is? - Alexis Jazz 17:47, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- This Flick'r account owner (https://www.flickr.com/photos/80728032@N00/) is Evgeny Dodolev. ~ Чръный человек (talk) 17:43, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- We have the face only crop made by Jeff (thanks) that I'm adding somewhere around here (I never know in which part of the page it will appear :) and I dare ask -although I'm not sure if that is possible- that we delete the strange looking original file and another crop which are in Category:Ivan Demidov (TV) and leave only this small portrait. Is that feasible or "legitimate" within our rules? --E4024 (talk) 08:13, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
{{Vd}} per nom, File:Ivan Demidov 2.jpg is now independent. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 11:47, 26 April 2018 (UTC)- Keep @Jeff G.: @E4024: IMHO it wasn't really needed, but I removed the money belt. - Alexis Jazz 13:51, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep without the money belt / fanny pack, thanks Alexis Jazz. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:54, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:35, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Jytdog as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Description of the license in the record below based on the Flikr page is not accurate; see the actual accession record at the Smithsonian which says "All requests for duplication and use must be submitted in writing and approved by the Smithsonian Institution Archives. Contact SIA Reference Staff for further information (email OSIAREF@si.edu)". Jytdog (talk) 20:40, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Raising for a more detailed review in order to establish a possible precedent. Fæ (talk) 16:31, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Based on a fairly brief review, my understanding is that this photo was uploaded 6 years ago by myself from the Flickr Commons account used by the Smithsonian. As the Smithsonian chose to release the file as no copyright known, and the photograph is available today at the Flickr source as no copyright known, they must be comfortable with this release. The date is uncertain, but if there were doubt about copyright, then it would be reasonable to consider this covered by {{PD-US-not renewed}} based on the subject's apparent age. Even if the date were later, this would be covered by {{PD-US-1978-89}}. The file was initially marked for speedy deletion, but was ineligible for that process as it is in use. --Fæ (talk) 16:37, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Just a guess, but noting that the image appeared on Flickr in the year Rebstock died, I suspect the restrictions might have to do with personality rights—not a copyright issue. (The other image of her is dated 1951; this one is probably contemporary.)—Odysseus1479 (talk) 17:03, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- If that is the reason, then their IP lawyer would seem highly misguided as to how to make a financial claim for compensation under personality rights law for the commercial asset that is the deceased Rebstock's face. --Fæ (talk) 18:39, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Just a guess, but noting that the image appeared on Flickr in the year Rebstock died, I suspect the restrictions might have to do with personality rights—not a copyright issue. (The other image of her is dated 1951; this one is probably contemporary.)—Odysseus1479 (talk) 17:03, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Yeah it seems to me should delete this. In my view the primary record for this image is the Smithsonian page; I get it that somebody from the Smithsonian uploaded it to Flickr. The license at Flikr is "No known copyright restrictions" which links to this explanation there, has in all caps "BY ASSERTING "NO KNOWN COPYRIGHT RESTRICTIONS," PARTICIPATING INSTITUTIONS ARE SHARING THE BENEFIT OF THEIR RESEARCH WITHOUT PROVIDING AN EXPRESSED OR IMPLIED WARRANTY TO OTHERS WHO WOULD LIKE TO USE OR REPRODUCE THE PHOTOGRAPH. IF YOU MAKE USE OF A PHOTO FROM THE COMMONS, YOU ARE REMINDED TO CONDUCT AN INDEPENDENT ANALYSIS OF APPLICABLE LAW BEFORE PROCEEDING WITH A PARTICULAR NEW USE.". In my view that "independent analysis" means (at minimum) looking at the Smithonsian page itself, which could not be more clear: "All requests for duplication and use must be submitted in writing and approved by the Smithsonian Institution Archives. Contact SIA Reference Staff for further information (email OSIAREF@si.edu)". In any case I have emailed the folks at Smithsonian. It may be that they are unaware of the discrepency and will fix one or the other. But in the meantime we should delete this and any similar one. Jytdog (talk) 20:11, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- The doubt is well below any common understanding of "significant doubt" per PRP. The fact that https://www.flickr.com/commons/institutions/ links directly to the Smithsonian's copyright statement and it was the Smithsonian that still declared this photograph as No Copyright Known on their official Flickrstream, meaning that license must be the opinion of their experts. There is no need to ask another expert in the Smithsonian to second guess their own official representative. --Fæ (talk) 20:17, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Having worked in large institutions, I am well aware that sometimes one hand doesn't know what the other is doing; for all we know it was some intern who went off the rails uploading stuff to Flikr. I understand why you would want to ignore the primary copyright/license notice at their own website, but I do not think that is what we should do. Jytdog (talk) 20:23, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- We have no obligation to teach the Smithsonian about copyright law. We have an image with a correctly verified release. Further, a PD license can be applied to it. If the Smithsonian wishes to make a public statement that they made a mistake and their release was incorrect, that has to come from them. --Fæ (talk) 21:24, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Of course we don't. We do have an obligation to follow copyright law and to listen to everything the Smithsonian says -- which is two different things -- not just the thing you want to hear. Per the precautionary principle that you cited, we should follow the most restrictive statement they made. Let's each stop repeating ourselves, shall we? Jytdog (talk) 13:26, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
- It's better to stick to the facts.
- The Smithsonian have made a statement about this image. They have made a generic statement about copyright on their website. The specific statement about this image is the only one we need to worry about getting right, and that is their assurance that they do not know of any copyright constraint that stops it being no known copyright.
- With regard to Wikimedia Commons policies, COM:PRP asks for an assessment of "significant doubt". The question about the generic Smithsonian website statement is not "significant" as there is nothing in the rubic that either states or implies that it must invalidate their own specific public and published official releases for individual photographs. --Fæ (talk) 14:51, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
- yes it is best to stick to all of the facts, not just the ones that please you. You just keep repeating the same half-truths over and over. Your remarks in the comment above are actively misleading; the statement on the archive-record for this image at the Smithsonian website is just as specific (or just as generic) as the statement on the Flikr page. Jytdog (talk) 19:43, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
- Of course we don't. We do have an obligation to follow copyright law and to listen to everything the Smithsonian says -- which is two different things -- not just the thing you want to hear. Per the precautionary principle that you cited, we should follow the most restrictive statement they made. Let's each stop repeating ourselves, shall we? Jytdog (talk) 13:26, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
- We have no obligation to teach the Smithsonian about copyright law. We have an image with a correctly verified release. Further, a PD license can be applied to it. If the Smithsonian wishes to make a public statement that they made a mistake and their release was incorrect, that has to come from them. --Fæ (talk) 21:24, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Having worked in large institutions, I am well aware that sometimes one hand doesn't know what the other is doing; for all we know it was some intern who went off the rails uploading stuff to Flikr. I understand why you would want to ignore the primary copyright/license notice at their own website, but I do not think that is what we should do. Jytdog (talk) 20:23, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep per Fae, Sadads (talk) 20:44, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: The restrictions & rights statement at the primary source is merely an instruction to submit requests for duplication but doesn't say anything about its copyright status. On the other hand, the official Smithsonian Flickr account does release it without copyrights. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:58, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
File:"14 - ITALY - red dress underwear (babydoll) - Intimissimi - New Year's Eve sexy breast.jpg
[edit]_-_Intimissimi_-_New_Year%27s_Eve_sexy_breast.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Intimissimi_-_New_Year%27s_Eve_sexy_breast.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Cellphone photo via Commons app, poor composition, poor lighting, low image quality, no educational value, COM:NUDITY?, context is cut-off and shaky seemingly taken in non-public setting, uploader has questionable track record of whether this is their own work, or possibly uploaded without the author's or depicted person's knowledge of what would happen with the photo. 82.102.18.14 19:35, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, unremarkable.--BevinKacon (talk) 21:49, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:47, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
Small file without EXIF data. Can we trust the source? i.e. I wouldn't trust this as own work, especially for a user with 2 uploads. Yann (talk) 01:57, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
1: This is a public domain image/file. All you have to do is look at the source and it clearly shows this. (That's how public domain images work). The source States such so that way you won't have to go asking someone with a Copyrighted image for permission to use it. Public domain Allows anyone to redristbute a work piece without permission. 2: I never claimed it was "my work". & Uploading two other files has nothing to do with this subject either as to the point. 3: Given that it is in the public domain it requires no evidence other than the source itself (which is the evidence as it should show the public domain attribution in the header somewhere-as this exactly does). 4: I have no idea what you mean by file is small ither. Or without exif data. A public domain image is the least of all types of attribution-based images that require much information about it. Also everything fundamental about the info of this file is there; it might be simple but for a public domain image that is really all that is needed. MORNINGSIDE ( talk)
- Comment This Pixabay account is highly suspicious. It claims to have 8 cameras: [9]. Most images in this account have probably been copied from other sources, some from Commons. Regards, Yann (talk) 02:33, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Yes and it also has 1049 followers and almost 10,000 likes, so what!? that doesn't mean anything to the type of attribution that this image needs or if it's reliable or not. I've done advanced search on some of his images as well as on this AS50 rifle before I ever even uploaded it (and his account/web page was the only one that featured it; making it obvious that it is his own work) even regardless if some of his other images are not his own, which even if some were is IRREVALENT TO THIS IMAGE WE'RE TALKING ABOUT. This AS-50 image is also partly animated/edited. It is not a full blown 3d object. I also forgot to add that Pixabay is a "public-domain" server/website with intent on allowing general folk to re-distribute their work. People upload and share images there for free-use as that is the purpose of this website. MORNINGSIDE( talk)
- Comment What the fuck.
- Is it just me? https://pixabay.com/en/accuracy-international-as50-872190/ (which offers a 4236×1410 resolution image, but forget that) shows user https://pixabay.com/en/users/WikimediaImages-1185597/. Obviously this account was created to upload photos found on Commons. https://pixabay.com/en/pincushion-tomato-needles-sewing-2202284/ is actually File:Pincushion-Tomato.jpg. https://pixabay.com/en/vga-cable-plug-computer-technology-2202321/ is File:Vga-cable.jpg. Both are public domain. The AS50 image was uploaded to Pixabay on Aug. 4, 2015. So there has probably been a deletion request before that.
- Commons:Deletion requests/File:L115A3 side.jpg is quite possibly that DR or otherwise likely related. - Alexis Jazz 03:19, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
- Not the same image, but also a rifle of the same style. Source mentioned is http://www.accuracyinternational.com/ Yann (talk) 04:53, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, higher image is available as shown on Tineye results, and likely already deleted before.--BevinKacon (talk) 21:44, 9 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:48, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted before - no new reasons to keep Commons:Deletion requests/File:Accuracy-international-872190 1280.jpg Ronhjones (Talk) 16:59, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
Speedy delete per G4. I'd like to use the opportunity to spam COM:CLONE. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 17:07, 15 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:33, 16 July 2018 (UTC)
COM:COIN: non-free photo of PD 3d-object. Sealle (talk) 11:00, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:03, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
- File:Delegation of Turks which was sent to Lausanne.png
- File:Delegation of Turks which was sent to Lausanne.svg
- File:Vertrag von Lusanne Tuerkische Delegation.jpg
1923, this photo should have been 1 year older I think. - Alexis Jazz 13:39, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep and don't think too much (x). See File:Vertrag von Lusanne Tuerkische Delegation.jpg please and you will understand everything. Well, you will understand why it is PD. (x) From a quote of writer Haldun Taner in Turkish, let me try to translate: "Düşünen kafalara zararlı fikirler üşüşür. Büyüklerimiz herşeyi bizden iyi düşünür." No, it's too difficult; I have translated poetry but this is more complicated. Forget it. Or ask Google and let us laugh altogether. :) I hope this DR could be closed by the only Turkish speaking admin -AFAIK- and maybe those words translated correctly. Right, Beyaz kedi? --E4024 (talk) 14:09, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- @E4024: I'm not sure that license is valid either. Who the heck is the photographer? Anyway, perhaps this is {{PD-1996}}? - Alexis Jazz 14:14, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- @E4024: PD-USGov is likely invalid: http://www.loc.gov/pictures/item/90715422/
- "The Library of Congress generally does not own rights to material in its collections and, therefore, cannot grant or deny permission to publish or otherwise distribute the material. For further rights information, see "Rights Information" below and the Rights and Restrictions Information page ( http://www.loc.gov/rr/print/res/rights.html ).
- Rights assessment is your responsibility."
- E4024, if you want to keep it, do the math for {{PD-1996}}.
- - Alexis Jazz 14:22, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Firstly these pictures are used in so many pages and illustrate so many historic personalities, you will not be able to sleep with a peaceful mind if they are deleted. (Joke. :) Secondly my math and other sciences sucked, therefore I studied letters. Please do it yourself as a small service to history. Last but not the least, thanks for not pinging me this time. (Everytime I see the red light, my heart beats faster that some admin who follows me everywhere will warn me or do something worse. :) Never mind, I follow my watchlist. Regards. --E4024 (talk) 14:29, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- I like pings, I don't always notice replies otherwise. It won't be deleted for long, assuming Trump doesn't go nuts and changes the copyright law. Oh, shit, Trump. This is what needs to be answered:
- Was it first published outside the United States (and not published in the U.S. within 30 days)? (seems likely?)
- Was it first published before 1 March 1989 without copyright notice or before 1964 without copyright renewal or before the source country established copyright relations with the United States? (the latter, probably?)
- Was it in the public domain in its home country on the URAA date (January 1, 1996 for most countries)? (probably?)
- I know nothing about this photo so I can't really say. As a "small service to history",
if the license is validatedI will upload a better quality version. I will upload it anyway, even if these are deleted they should be undeleted next year. (if Trump doesn't go nuts, so fingers crossed) - Alexis Jazz 14:39, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- I like pings, I don't always notice replies otherwise. It won't be deleted for long, assuming Trump doesn't go nuts and changes the copyright law. Oh, shit, Trump. This is what needs to be answered:
- Firstly these pictures are used in so many pages and illustrate so many historic personalities, you will not be able to sleep with a peaceful mind if they are deleted. (Joke. :) Secondly my math and other sciences sucked, therefore I studied letters. Please do it yourself as a small service to history. Last but not the least, thanks for not pinging me this time. (Everytime I see the red light, my heart beats faster that some admin who follows me everywhere will warn me or do something worse. :) Never mind, I follow my watchlist. Regards. --E4024 (talk) 14:29, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete all three as too young until 2019-01-01, and don't restore the SVG because we don't keep photos in SVG format. A source is at http://loc.gov/pictures/resource/cph.3c02035/. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:56, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- USD 500. Shall we make crowd funding? I can pay 100 bucks. Jeff, Alex? --E4024 (talk) 15:07, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- @E4024: Here you go, the third version at File:Vertrag von Lusanne Tuerkische Delegation.jpg, that'll be $100, please. :) — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:04, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Accept şehriye for payment? --E4024 (talk) 16:07, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- It's on Getty!! It must be in the public domain then!! - Alexis Jazz 16:18, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Yeah, who DR'ed these free images? :) --E4024 (talk) 16:21, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Being on Getty is not actually proof they are PD, but these sites are such a mess that it makes you wonder. Can you really not provide some more background information so we can see if PD-1996 aplies? I'll take your noodles by the way. - Alexis Jazz 16:39, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Yeah, who DR'ed these free images? :) --E4024 (talk) 16:21, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- @E4024: Here you go, the third version at File:Vertrag von Lusanne Tuerkische Delegation.jpg, that'll be $100, please. :) — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 16:04, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Noodles: This group photography seems to be the only group pic of a delegation to the Conference; therefore I think it was originally made for the Turkish press. PD-Ottoman Empire is more than enough, IMHO. Due to change of alphabet in 1928 it is a bit difficult to find sources. --E4024 (talk) 13:13, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
- E4024: Commons also needs a US license. And how do we know PD-Ottoman even applies? PD-Ottoman was 30pma which certainly had not expired before the empire dissolved. Wiki says "The period of the defeat and end of the Ottoman Empire (1908–1922)" so this photo couldn't even have been taken in the Ottoman Empire because that didn't exist anymore? - Alexis Jazz 16:08, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
- Its existence formally ended with this Treaty. FYI. --E4024 (talk) 16:11, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
- E4024: Commons also needs a US license. And how do we know PD-Ottoman even applies? PD-Ottoman was 30pma which certainly had not expired before the empire dissolved. Wiki says "The period of the defeat and end of the Ottoman Empire (1908–1922)" so this photo couldn't even have been taken in the Ottoman Empire because that didn't exist anymore? - Alexis Jazz 16:08, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - copyright situation remains unclear. --Jcb (talk) 16:08, 13 July 2018 (UTC)
