Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/04/10
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
![59 File:עמית חדד עו"ד.jpg](#File:עמית_חדד_עו"ד.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_27.jpg){kind=link}
_23.jpg){kind=link}
_2017-10-27.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![79 File:Сергей Герасименко на выставке "Happy Art" 17-12-2015 г.JPG](#File:Сергей_Герасименко_на_выставке_"Happy_Art"_17-12-2015_г.JPG){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_on_a_Boat_(Canoe)_(6011845125).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Commons:Deletion requests/Commons:Deletion requests/File:DMicroLatino Mercenario 717.png
Files uploaded by Ronny Raychend (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal images, out of scope.
Yann (talk) 17:23, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:24, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Files from Tony A.
[edit]Tony A. is a bad Flickr user, posts retouched images from wwe.com and imgprix.com "make money sharing pictures click here".
- File:WWE 2014-01-10 18.41.40 (11880154075).jpg
- File:WWE 2014-01-09 23.48.04 (11866988043).jpg
- File:NWA North American Heavyweight Championship Belt.jpg
- File:WWE (16928409155).jpg
- File:WWE (16736291128).jpg
- File:WWE (16902210896).jpg
- File:Millican Winged Eagle (5603585619).jpg
- File:WWE 2014-01-10 18.41.16 (11880400873).jpg
- File:WWE 2014-01-07 22.52.53 (11841818745).jpg
- File:WWE 2014-01-10 18.42.04 (11880981036).jpg
- File:NWA N American42 (2424141927).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Also (already marked copyvio)
- Alexis Jazz 18:41, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Delete as copyvios per nom and PRP, and blacklist the Flickr user. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 02:13, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Courcelles 02:26, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 06:51, 11 April 2018 UTC: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file: reason for removal goes here --Krdbot 12:38, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Urheberrechtsverletzung Darkroomduck (talk) 15:20, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by NahidSultan at 06:48, 11 April 2018 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 12:38, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Urheberrechtsverletzung Darkroomduck (talk) 15:21, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by NahidSultan at 06:49, 11 April 2018 UTC: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 12:38, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Claim as own work, through the creator mentioned in metadata is different from the uploader. ~Moheen (keep talking) 16:43, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb at 01:21, 13 April 2018 UTC: No permission since 5 April 2018 --Krdbot 06:34, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Claim as own work, through the creator mentioned in metadata is different from the uploader. ~Moheen (keep talking) 16:44, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb at 01:21, 13 April 2018 UTC: No permission since 5 April 2018 --Krdbot 06:34, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Empty image 2 1.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Empty image 4 5.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Empty image 4 3.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Erbuk51.png
Files uploaded by JanZiembicki (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern statues or sculptures in New York honoring Ernie Davis, still copyrighted with no FOP exceptions per COM:FOP#United States.
- File:Statua w Syracuse University.jpg
- File:Ernie Statue.jpg
- File:Ernie Davis Statue.jpg
- File:Ernie Davis Statue .jpg
— Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:19, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
This building was built in 1988 therefore the copyright doesn't apply per COM:FOP#United States. I also want to note that I took all of these pictures myself.
-JanZiembicki — Preceding unsigned comment added by JanZiembicki (talk • contribs) 16:13, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
- @JanZiembicki: These appear to be statues or sculptures, not buildings. According to the USCO, buildings can contain a person, can these pictured items do that? — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 23:20, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, see http://www.syracuse.com/orangefootball/index.ssf/2015/11/syracuse_unveils_plaza_44_statues_of_jim_brown_floyd_little_ernie_davis_and_ben.html for 2015 erection date. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:58, 16 May 2018 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:Esperaeer.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Esta aqui oque voce procura.png Commons:Deletion requests/File:Etihad Towers Abu Dhabi (25923852504).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
corrupted photo Artix Kreiger (talk) 11:47, 9 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:38, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:53, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:59, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:57, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:59, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: an itinerary and contact information of an unknown Rinpoche. Mys_721tx (talk) 01:57, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:59, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: an itinerary and contact information of an unknown Rinpoche. Mys_721tx (talk) 01:57, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:00, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: an itinerary and contact information of an unknown Rinpoche. Mys_721tx (talk) 01:57, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:00, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: an itinerary and contact information of an unknown Rinpoche. Mys_721tx (talk) 01:57, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:00, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of COM:SCOPE: an itinerary and contact information of an unknown Rinpoche. Mys_721tx (talk) 01:57, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:00, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Simon n samuel (talk · contribs)
[edit]Photos and signature of non notable person. Out of scope.
- File:Simon n samuel pic3.jpg
- File:Simon n samuelpic2.jpg
- File:Simon N Samuel pic1.jpg
- File:SIMON N SAMUEL SIGN.jpg
- File:SIMON N SAMUEL.jpg
Castillo blanco (talk) 09:07, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:01, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 09:13, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:01, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope.
Castillo blanco (talk) 09:27, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:01, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 09:57, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:30, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
non libre selon les métadonnées : Détenteur du droit d'auteur = JEAN-FRANCOIS BAUMARD / TF1 Habertix (talk) 00:13, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:32, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
copie de https://www.fernsehserien.de/profiling-paris/folgen/4x04-wahre-luegen-539539 Habertix (talk) 00:14, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:33, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
copie de https://img1.telestar.fr/var/telestar/storage/images/media/images/2015/photos/20151203-profilage-tf1/benjamin-baroche-dans-profilage/1219627-1-fre-FR/Benjamin-Baroche-dans-Profilage_width1024.jpg Habertix (talk) 00:27, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:33, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Images are under a "public domain mark". Not a copyright license. We need a specific license for the same reason we need one for Flickr PD marks (see {{Flickr-public domain mark}})
- File:Psathyrella epimyces (Peck) A.H. Sm 373856.jpg
- File:Psathyrella epimyces (Peck) A.H. Sm 373857.jpg
_A.H._Sm_373856.jpg){kind=link}
_A.H._Sm_373857.jpg){kind=link}
Majora (talk) 04:02, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Comment: If you have to delete , that's OK Majora. Mushroom Observer's comments on this PD license doesn't say if it is CC0 or PDM. I could not tell which license excatly it is. All I know is it does mention CC0 as one possibility. Best, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:14, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Delete: OK, I found out now that PDM is indeed the license for both images. Please delete them both ASAP. I request this action as the Original Uploader. I am surprised that M.O. also has PDM images. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:15, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:38, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 05:43, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:36, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Unknown publish date, It cannot be determined that it is 70 years old shizhao (talk) 08:15, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:47, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
User with nine global edits, subtract this and its allocation, seven edits left. (In two years...) E4024 (talk) 08:28, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:48, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Photo of sculpture by still living artist. Though Singapore has FoP, I wonder this obvious indorr location falls under the terms "a public place, or in premises open to the public". -- Túrelio (talk) 09:30, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- It’s clearly permanently installed in a public place in Singapore; anyone can walk up to it. Singapore law doesn’t distinguish between indoor and outdoor locations. — Cheers, JackLee –talk– 04:07, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: I think it is ok. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:00, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Claimed as own work, but nature of image sugggests a studio produced image or promotional material by a third party, no description given. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:46, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:59, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Complex logos need OTRS-permission from copyright holder. Taivo (talk) 09:58, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:59, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Neither the persons nor the actions are of any encyclopaedic relevance. Sport event lke any other. Zenwort (talk) 10:15, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- Comment This image is used as source of two other images widely used. File:Judo01cropped.jpg and File:Judo01NoBack.jpg. I think it is enough to consider it as in scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:04, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: as per my comment above. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:05, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Not own work Ymblanter (talk) 12:17, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 04:57, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 04:57, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Depicted sculptures by living artist and Italy has no FoP exception for works in the public. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:30, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:05, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Depicted sculpture by living artist and Italy has no FoP exception for works in the public. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:30, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:06, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
This photograph is not ineligible for copyright protection. Needs an appropriate license from the photographer. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:31, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - no permission. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:07, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
This photograph and text is not ineligible for copyright protection. Needs an appropriate license from the copyright holder(s) or (less likely) a valid PD rationale. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:33, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:07, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Dubious PD rationale. This logo is most likely above the threshold of originality required for copyright protection. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:35, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:07, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
File:Astrophysics Gravitation and Quantum Physics A Volume in Honour of Academician Edvard Chubaryan YSU 2012.pdf
[edit]Bogus PD rationale. Contains text and photos which are most certainly eligible for copyright protection. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:36, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:08, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Similar to https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/938042815749033984/IOZUKRf3_400x400.jpg, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:37, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:09, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Not own work Ymblanter (talk) 12:18, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Speedy delete The file itself is a cover art of an artist, thus is copyrighted and not free. I think Template:Copyvio would be appliciable here. But as you made a Deletion request, perhaps more discussion is needed.
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 05:30, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Non-free logo, not simple enough for TOO based on Australia's interpretation. Also not user's own work. Flickerd (talk) 13:20, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:17, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Non-free logo, not simple enough for TOO based on Australia's interpretation. Also not user's own work. Flickerd (talk) 13:21, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:17, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Personal images of the family members of the uploader. Out of scope. E4024 (talk) 13:45, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:17, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Personal images of the family members of the uploader. Out of scope. E4024 (talk) 13:47, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:17, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Personal images of the family members of the uploader. Out of scope. E4024 (talk) 13:47, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:18, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Personal images of the family members of the uploader. Out of scope. E4024 (talk) 13:48, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:18, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Not used. Could be out of scope (or not). Anybody knows her? Português speakers? E4024 (talk) 14:08, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - likely out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:19, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:20, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Personal files from Panoramio, according to the description, "uncle" of the photographer. E4024 (talk) 14:20, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:20, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
It shows Crimea as a part of Russia, which is an action that has not been internationally recognized, and is in violation with the decision of th UN. 139.98.2.55 08:58, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- If you need a map without Crimea, use this: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kaliningrad_in_Russia.svg Stasyan117 (talk) 10:42, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, COM:INUSE. --Sealle (talk) 04:49, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
It is propaganda Material by Russia because Crimea is depicted as part of it. Russia recognized Crimea a long time ago as Ukrainian. Guslending (talk) 08:53, 17 March 2024 (UTC)
Kept: COM:INUSE. --IronGargoyle (talk) 14:48, 24 March 2024 (UTC)
Photo taken from here where it is credited to Mark Woods, not of a member of the band Rapidgrass. Has Woods granted to claimed CC license? BethNaught (talk) 22:22, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:14, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
uploader request Javad|Talk (21 Farvardin 1397) 23:37, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:15, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:DMicroLatino_Mercenario_717.png LA IMAGEN ES DE MALA CALIDAD Y NO CUENTA CON LOS PERMISOS Antonio Ospia (talk) 07:11, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- OK, let's suppose you just learned the "permisos" issue; but did you not know the quality of this pic before uploading it yourself? --E4024 (talk) 07:22, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
PORQUE ME EQUIVOQUE AL SUBIR EL ARCHIVO. Antonio Ospia (talk) 07:29, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
REQUIERO QUE LA BORREN PORFAVOR Antonio Ospia (talk) 07:35, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- Si Ud sigue así yo voy a tener que pedir que lo bloqueen. Ya ha hecho su pedido, ahora siéntese y espere. --E4024 (talk) 07:37, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Amigos cometi un error al seleccionar el archivo, ayudenme a borrarlo. Antonio Ospia (talk) 00:50, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
- Está cometiendo más errores como repetir el DR; por favor no me obligue a hacer que lo bloqueen. Es muy difícil después volver a levantarse en Commons. Así que calladito esperando. --E4024 (talk) 15:10, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - uploader request and seems out of scope anyway. --E4024 (talk) 15:15, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 15:20, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Nothing to suggest that this is freely available. Ivar the Boneful (talk) 12:03, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:44, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
low quality penis image, there are other better ones Pibwl (talk) 12:50, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete We cannot accept low quality images of something that we already have too many. --E4024 (talk) 14:17, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:43, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
low quality amateur penis image, no educational use for this one Pibwl (talk) 12:52, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete We already have too many "low quality amateur penis image"s. --E4024 (talk) 12:58, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:42, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
אני אעלה תמונה אחרת עם שם צלם על מנת שלא יהיה בעיית זכויות יוצרים (חשוב לציין זכויות הקניין של התמונה שייכות למשרד ד"ר י. וינרוט ושות' אבל למען הסר ספק ספוט תקשורת (talk) 15:16, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
![15:16, 10 April 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/04/10#c-ספוט_תקשורת-2018-04-10T15:16:00.000Z-File:עמית_חדד_עו"ד.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Uploader request. Not in use. -- Geagea (talk) 13:55, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
![13:55, 17 April 2018 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2018/04/10#c-Geagea-2018-04-17T13:55:00.000Z-File:עמית_חדד_עו"ד.jpg){kind=link}
File:Sov-americanii-ne-conduc-total-ne-au-scos-pe-noi-sa-dam-o-palma-rusului-vom-vedea-ce-se-intampla-dar-razboi-va-fi-pentru-ca-este-o-criza-mondiala-uriasa-video-141155.jpg
[edit]
Unknown person; title is a non-sense commentary on geopolitics of Romania involving US and Russia... Gikü (talk) 16:31, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- Found the source; this is copyvio: [1]; Speedy delete Gikü (talk) 16:33, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:42, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Bixby Creek Bridge is a single spandral arch bridge. -- btphelps (talk) (contribs) 19:52, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- The location of the camera coordinates is onshore, south of the actual Bixby Creek Bridge, which would not allow this view. This image is taken off shore. This image was uploaded from Panoramio, and since that service is no longer active, the correct location can't be identified. Bottom-line, this isn't the Bixby Creek Bridge and unless the correct location can be identified, the image should be deleted. -- btphelps (talk) (contribs) 19:58, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Keep It's Big Creek Bridge in California. --Insider (talk) 06:30, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Please close this deletion request. The bridge has been identified by User Insider as Big Creek Bridge (https://bridgehunter.com/ca/monterey/440056/) - see here. I submitted a rename request.
- Keep Rename has been performed and this can be closed. --Schlurcher (talk) 22:58, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
- Please close this deletion request. The bridge has been identified by User Insider as Big Creek Bridge (https://bridgehunter.com/ca/monterey/440056/) - see here. I submitted a rename request.
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: per discussion. --Wdwd (talk) 15:03, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Bixby Creek Bridge is a single spandral arch bridge. -- btphelps (talk) (contribs) 19:52, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- The location of the camera coordinates is onshore, south of the actual Bixby Creek Bridge, which would not allow this view. This image is taken off shore. This image was uploaded from Panoramio, and since that service is no longer active, the correct location can't be identified. Bottom-line, this isn't the Bixby Creek Bridge and unless the correct location can be identified, the image should be deleted. -- btphelps (talk) (contribs) 19:59, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- Please close this deletion request. The bridge has been identified by User Insider as Big Creek Bridge (https://bridgehunter.com/ca/monterey/440056/) - see here. I submitted a rename request.
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 15:04, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
unused personal photos, along with File:Amran 06-19-06.25.05.jpg, File:Amran 06-19-06.05.58.jpg, File:Amran 06-19-05.07.06.jpg (there's one more used on a user page, which is naturally his only activity...) Pibwl (talk) 20:02, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 15:00, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
out of scope; personal photo uploaded by a globally locked spam-only account theinstantmatrix (talk) 20:10, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:57, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
This painting ha been made by Armel ar Sec'h-Keraod, a paintress who is still alive. Without proof that the creator did publish it under a free license, this file should be removed from Commons. Pymouss Let’s talk - 20:16, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:56, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Uploader did not create this map.No Permission. MTinka (talk) 20:38, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:56, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Low quality, out of scope. ~Cybularny Speak? 20:41, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:54, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
False date at Flickr (Date and Time (Original) - 2009:11:13 15:34:45), duplicate of File:Walt Whitman - George Collins Cox.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:03, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete. Small duplicate of a photo of which Commons already has several much better copies (see Category:George C. Cox). The flickr user's license claim on this reproduction of a public domain photograph just makes it worse. -- Asclepias (talk) 16:45, 17 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, add redirection. --Wdwd (talk) 14:53, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope – not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader).
hiàn 21:10, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:50, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Own work by the band is dubious, particularly because of the photographer's watermark in the right bottom corner. Has the photographer or copyright holder granted permission for this license? BethNaught (talk) 22:18, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:45, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
Personal photo. Commons is not a personal photo album Sreejith K (talk) 18:41, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:32, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
_27.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_27.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
My mistake. Uploader request. Sturm (talk) 18:53, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
_27.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file. --Wdwd (talk) 15:30, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
_27.jpg){kind=link}
_23.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_23.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
My mistake. Uploader request. Sturm (talk) 18:54, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
_23.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file. --Wdwd (talk) 15:30, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
_23.jpg){kind=link}
_2017-10-27.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2017-10-27.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A small and unused image B dash (talk) 06:08, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
_2017-10-27.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, also low quality source info. --Guanaco (talk) 16:06, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
_2017-10-27.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Part of mass upload; unused random image of a piece of wood, no educational value, out of scope P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:57, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Ehm, err. If those dome-like things on the piece of wood are some kind of moluscos, this can be an interesting picture. Normally these animals use the natural rocks and sometimes metal piles to stick to, I think sticking to wood is rare. Or maybe not. I'm not sure. --E4024 (talk) 07:57, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep "mass upload" is not a deletion rationale. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 00:38, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
- No, but "no educational value, out of scope" is. And it is hardly a worthy addition to the 1000s of images we already have in Category:Mollusca. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:17, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 20:09, 18 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
i did not authorize this 49.151.103.219 04:02, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: private photo, unused, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 11:08, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
Falsch abgespeichert Lukas 91 (talk) 07:09, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Ich möchte das Foto Weinfelden Stadt löschen. Lukas 91 (talk) 10:18, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, DR withdrawn. --Wdwd (talk) 11:11, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
Svg version available Harry-C (talk) 09:05, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, unused. --Wdwd (talk) 11:13, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
Beautiful works of art, but don't we need any OTRS for all these art uploads by the same user? E4024 (talk) 09:29, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission for shown artwork (no de minimis). --Wdwd (talk) 11:15, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marinaio56 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Bad Flickr author "The profile indicate another license than the pictures, restricting use to media and educational source, but denying commercial reproduction and general redistribution."
Elisfkc (talk) 17:56, 23 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:03, 31 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marinaio56 (talk · contribs)
[edit]No explanation as to why these would be in the public domain. The photographs are certainly eligible for copyright protection, and the logo in the lower right-hand corner includes a copyright symbol. The file on Flickr is tagged with PD Mark 1.0, but that is not a license or valid PD rationale on its own.
- File:Italian light aircraft carrier GARIBALDI.jpg
- File:Mogherini Cavour.jpg
- File:Garibaldi EUNAVFOR MED.jpg
- File:EH 101 Cavour.jpg
- File:EH 101 EUNAVFOR MED.jpg
- File:Cavour EUNAVFOR MED.jpg
—LX (talk, contribs) 10:46, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:21, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
Obvious copyright violation. Surtsicna (talk) 11:46, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 11:24, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
I'd like to change the name of the image! Bks-WMIL (talk) 11:57, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep: @Bks-WMIL: You can request renaming using the "Move" item on the "More" menu, or by adding a {{Rename}} template to the file page. See COM:FR for more details. --bjh21 (talk) 18:17, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no reason for deletion -> request rename to an adequate name. --Wdwd (talk) 11:25, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope: Self-published book categorized as fiction, not within the scope of Wikimedia Commons. We're a respository of somehow educational material, not a hosting service. Julle (talk) 12:58, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- Additionally, the file has been used to spam elsewhere, see mw:Special:Diff/2755586. /Julle (talk) 12:59, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: Promotional. --Achim (talk) 13:06, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 11:47, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
Previously published on Facebook here before stated date. Uploaded as own work by "Rapidgrass", the depicted band; would need more info on the photographer, copyright assignments and permission, etc., through OTRS if this were to be kept. BethNaught (talk) 22:10, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
An OTRS request was sent to Rapidgrass today. The band said that they will do a creative commons license with Wikipedia and respond to my email tomorrow.Hhuffake (talk) 00:13, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: To be processed through OTRS. --Green Giant (talk) 23:15, 19 April 2018 (UTC)
Filename and description do not give any information about what is depicted. Even country is unknown. That way the photo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:06, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gestumblindi (talk) 15:38, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright. Not in public domain. Proposed by uploader, AMPERIO (talk) 15:18, 8 April 2018 (UTC)
.gif){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:40, 22 April 2018 (UTC)
.gif){kind=link}
Incorrect spelling Lotje (talk) 09:44, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- Dan pas je het aan. Dit is geen reden voor verwijdering GerardM (talk) 10:03, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, just fix it. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:42, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
out of scope SecretName101 (talk) 14:33, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:45, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:45, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Book pages. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:46, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:46, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
xwiki spammer, out of scope Chrissymad (talk) 14:49, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:47, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Emperor MEWL (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused fictional diagrams of questionable notability.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:47, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:47, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Looks like an unused out of scope personal file to me. E4024 (talk) 15:08, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:48, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Looks like an unused out of scope personal file to me. (Indeed there is another one by the same uploader.) E4024 (talk) 15:12, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:48, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
"I do what I want" is the description of this out of scope unused personal image. E4024 (talk) 15:13, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:48, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:52, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:49, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of COM:SCOPE Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:58, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:49, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
And also:
- File:NEMANYA PALAIOLOGOS DYNASTY.png
- File:Papua principality.jpg
- File:Photograph of H.M. Don Vincenzo Davide I.jpg
- File:Treaty constituting the pss region of papua new guinea 03.jpg
- File:Treaty constituting the pss region of papua new guinea 02.jpg
- File:Treaty constituting the pss region of papua new guinea 01.jpg
- File:Geodetic site features of the territory of thepss region of papua new guinea.jpg
- File:Administrative and political territorial subdivisions 03.jpg
- File:Administrative and political territorial subdivisions 02.jpg
- File:Administrative and political territorial subdivisions 01.jpg
- File:Paraguai principality.jpg
Self portraits, fictional arms and "documents" of fictional principality, no educational value; self promotion of self proclaimed "prince". --Stegop (talk) 16:35, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:52, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
no educational value; self promotion of self proclaimed "prince" Stegop (talk) 16:24, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:52, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Just a group of completely irrelevante people presented as "princes" Stegop (talk) 16:25, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Same case of Commons:Deletion requests/File:Brasão Oficial de Sua Majestade Don Vincenzo Davide I.jpg --Stegop (talk) 16:33, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:53, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
no educational value; self promotion of self proclaimed "prince" of non existant principality Stegop (talk) 16:26, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:53, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
No educational value; self promotion of self proclaimed "prince" of non existant principality Stegop (talk) 16:27, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:53, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
No educational value; self promotion of self proclaimed "prince" of non existant principality Stegop (talk) 16:28, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:53, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo Gikü (talk) 16:45, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:54, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo of a non-notable Romanian company Gikü (talk) 16:48, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:54, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo Gikü (talk) 16:58, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:55, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo Gikü (talk) 16:58, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:54, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
non-notable Romanian DJ Gikü (talk) 17:08, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:55, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
personal photo of a non-Wikimedian Gikü (talk) 17:14, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:55, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
no idea how to use ..? can the founder make it simple please! 71.38.78.66 17:58, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:56, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Small size, blurry. Out of project scope due to bad quality. Taivo (talk) 18:04, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:57, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
I don't know why it is in a scope, unused, one of few uploads Pibwl (talk) 18:18, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:58, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope – not educationally useful (unused personal image[s] of uploader). hiàn 20:57, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:59, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unidentified people at party. Out of scope. Themightyquill (talk) 21:56, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:03, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Uploader did not create 3D object depicted. No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Created 1992, sculptor K. Sikorsky, architect S. Kalashnik. No Permission. MTinka (talk) 19:28, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:22, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
This is a screenshot from a SpaceX video, false authorship claim and licence! Ras67 (talk) 21:03, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 10:23, 24 April 2018 (UTC)
False date, similar to https://ifkgoteborg.se/wp-content/uploads/2018/02/poya1600.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 20:54, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, likely to be copyright violation. --whym (talk) 03:32, 3 May 2018 (UTC)
Wrong author. Not 'own work'. Should be a Flickr author. KittyLover (talk) 03:58, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: fixed author, no deletion necessary. --Amada44 talk to me 15:02, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
How can someone's signature be "own work" of someone else? I cannot ask it to to the uploader because they have been blocked for uploading unfree material. E4024 (talk) 07:49, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 15:07, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
File:John Glenn Low Res.jpg is a higher resolution version of the same image. Makes sense to delete this version and replace with the higher quality version. Kees08 (talk) 07:55, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: duplicate. --Amada44 talk to me 15:54, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Hallo,
ich bitte um die Löschung dieser Logodatei da diese nicht mehr der aktuellen Logogestaltung entspricht.
Viele Grüße Swhl-online Swhl-online (talk) 11:24, 17 April 2018 (UTC) Swhl-online Swhl-online (talk) 09:30, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Das Logo wird auf Ihrer Homepage noch verwendet. Also - NICHT LÖSCHEN!! Woehlecke (talk) 12:41, 20 April 2018 (UTC)
Dieses Logo wird so nicht mehr auf der Homepage verwendet! Wenn Sie sich das aktuelle Logo der Stadtwerke Lübeck GmbH ansehen, erkennen Sie, dass der Stadtwerke Lübeck Schriftzug nun außerhalb des Symbols sitzt und über 2 Zeilen verläuft! Beim alten Logo startet der Schriftzug innerhalb des Symbols und wird in einer Zeile abgebildet! Das ist NICHT mehr aktuell!!! Deshalb bitte ich um LÖSCHUNG DIESES ALTEN LOGOS.= Swhl-online (talk) 10:59, 24 April 2018 (UTC) Swhl-online (talk) 13:30, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: svg auf neue Version aktualisiert. --Amada44 talk to me 15:29, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
This appears to be a photograph by the photographer Maciej Kucia, so the author cited is incorrect and it likely does not have a Creative Commons license. This needs to be cleared before it can be allowed on Wikipedia. https://przemeksobocki.wordpress.com/2009/09/22/adset-design-nobuki-hizume-portrait-collaboration-with-maciej-kucia/ Michitaro (talk) 09:39, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: has been already deleted. --Amada44 talk to me 15:30, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ratna Sarita Efandi.jpg. E4024 (talk) 06:16, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- Please see Category:Ratna Sarita. This lady is only uploading her own pictures, and through different (similar) user names. --E4024 (talk) 06:18, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- Well, the user name was not so similar as I thought (of course if I don't remember another one. :) Please see: User talk:Nadia Anggraini. --E4024 (talk) 06:21, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 16:09, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Sorry, in my opinion the photo has no educational value. Taivo (talk) 11:02, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: keep. has some educational value. --Amada44 talk to me 16:15, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
personal picture, please delete of privacy reasons 77.250.42.242 11:30, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: unused, courtesy deletion. --Amada44 talk to me 16:26, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in South Korea Ymblanter (talk) 12:17, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 16:59, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:17, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Illustrative of the campaign. --Fæ (talk) 15:23, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Per Fæ; also: in use. (Still wasting everybody’s time with bogus DRs, P199?) -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 16:12, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- @Tuvalkin: Of the 1000s of images nominated for deletion, you are bothered by 4 borderline nominations??? Obviously we don't agree on the educational value of some images, so similar nominations will occur again in the future. If you feel this is wasting your precious time, maybe you shouldn't participate here. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:37, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Don’t you worry about my schedules and focus instead on the subject matter. This is a bogus DR and you know it. Either you didn’t really notice what this photo is about (in which case {{withdraw}} is your friend), or your idea of Wikimedia Commons scope excludes documenting awareness campaigns about missing persons — in which case I am, yes, pretty much bothered. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 16:46, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- I would have quietly withdrawn if it wasn't for your snarky comment. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:59, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- So, pissing me off is more important for you than making/keeping Commons a suitable media repository?, more important than your own reputation as an admin? And all that to punish me? Why am I chuckling, then? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 19:30, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Amada44 talk to me 16:28, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
File:Aankomst Pools elftal op Schiphol 15 Tomaszewski, kop, 16 Deyna, kop, Bestanddeelnr 928-2029.jpg
[edit]
Source is missing Jcb (talk) 15:38, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: source has been added. --Amada44 talk to me 16:31, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Taken from https://www.indiannavy.nic.in/content/samar-seva-star, with no evidence there that it is PD. The Licensing section says "Contents featured on this website belongs to Indian Navy. Contents of this website should not be reproduced partially or fully, without due permission from the Indian Navy. Its content, if referred to and/or forms part of content of another website, the content-source must be appropriately acknowledged. The contents of this website cannot be used in any misleading or objectionable context", taken from https://www.indiannavy.nic.in/content/copyright-policy, which is clearly not compatible with Commons policy. (The article it was used for on en.wiki was a straight copy of the site too, and deleted as a copyvio.) Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 15:51, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 16:32, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
The source and Author is specified as വിക്കി, which is the translation of Wiki in Malayalam. So this has to be treated as unknown source and hence a copyright violation. Sreejith K (talk) 18:49, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 16:41, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
copie de http://www.fft.fr/actualites/fil-d-infos/frederic-bernes-remporte-le-prix-denis-lalanne-2014 Habertix (talk) 19:57, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Amada44 talk to me 16:48, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Part of mass upload; unused random image of a post, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:56, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep "mass upload" is not a deletion rationale. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 00:37, 14 April 2018 (UTC)
- Hmm? Did you stop reading after "mass upload"? --P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:10, 15 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: a fence post has some educational value. --Amada44 talk to me 16:56, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_on_a_Boat_(Canoe)_(6011845125).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_on_a_Boat_(Canoe)_(6011845125).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:17, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
_on_a_Boat_(Canoe)_(6011845125).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:27, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
_on_a_Boat_(Canoe)_(6011845125).jpg){kind=link}
Image depicted a copyrighted logo at a wall. However, depending on the country, where this image has been shot, it might be covered by freedom-of-panorama exception. So, where has this photo been shot? -- Túrelio (talk) 12:52, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- I found the picture on Flickr and uploaded it here on Commons. It has a license on Flickr that is suitable for Commons. I don't know here the photo was taken. Based on your comment I think the photo should be deleted from Commons. --SimpleSimpleSimple (talk) 20:58, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:FOP#Denmark and the fact that en:File:Novo Nordisk.svg is considered non-free. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:10, 21 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete in accordance with Jeff G. (logo not free, panorama can't be applied) Olivier LPB (talk) 07:47, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
- how about cropping the image to the text only logo part? Amada44 talk to me 16:08, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --99of9 (talk) 07:09, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Derivative of a non-free logo and not simple enough for TOO based on Australia's interpretation. Previous icons featuring this monogram have also been deleted. Also not user's own work. Flickerd (talk) 13:19, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --99of9 (talk) 07:16, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Derivative of a non-free logo [2], not simple enough for TOO. Also not user's own work. Flickerd (talk) 13:20, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
![[2]](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:West_Coast_Eagles_logo_2017.svg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --99of9 (talk) 07:16, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --99of9 (talk) 07:09, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from historical photo. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and the subject was not born long enough ago to assume the photo is PD. --99of9 (talk) 07:15, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in USA for 2D works. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --99of9 (talk) 07:13, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
Breach of UK law to scan current bank notes. Adam37 (talk) 15:38, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete as a copyvio, but that version of the £10 note was withdrawn earlier this year. --bjh21 (talk) 18:21, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --99of9 (talk) 07:10, 14 May 2018 (UTC)
False date (2014), not sure it's a work from the US Government (this one is) Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:10, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Unlikely to be a work by an employee of the US federal government, no indication of who the photographer was or that it is actually PD or freely licensed. --Storkk (talk) 12:15, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
False date (2014), not sure it's a work from the US Government (this one is Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:12, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Unlikely to be a work by an employee of the US federal government, no indication of who the photographer was or that it is actually PD or freely licensed. --Storkk (talk) 12:15, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Krämer.Rolf (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Undelete in 2026 per PD-old-assumed. --Storkk (talk) 12:18, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Found elsewhere : https://i.pinimg.com/564x/76/66/2b/76662b2b5c20bcc3472f84f0af438791.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:06, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. Invalid license. The "TeleTomas" Youtube user's videos apparently consist entirely of slideshows of non-free photos. —LX (talk, contribs) 11:59, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. License laundering. --Storkk (talk) 12:42, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
No FOP in Romania Gikü (talk) 16:49, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, building appears to be main subject, thus violating Romanian FOP. --Storkk (talk) 12:41, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
{{FoP-Venezuela}} allows to take photos only about permanently installed objects. These sculptures are not permanently installed. Taivo (talk) 17:43, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 12:22, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
copy right Amir.roustaei (talk) 18:52, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Storkk (talk) 12:37, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
These images where taken without my consent and I request you to delete them I talked to my lawyer and he said I can appeal their usage here 178.165.131.205 21:15, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- This public figure is leader of the "New Right Movement" in Austria and has to expect to be photographed at the Frankfurt Book Fair, especially if the person acts in its public function. This is evident from the photo. In the background clearly a person can be seen who has his right hand raised to the fascist salute. See judgment "Von Hannover v Germany", the so called "Caroline-Urteile". MagentaGreen (talk) 09:00, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
Crops that have been nominated for deletion by the same IP:
- File:Martin Sellner Buchmesse 2017 (cropped).jpg
- File:Martin Sellner Buchmesse 2017 (cropped to head only) retusche.jpg
- File:Martin Sellner (Porträt Buchmesse 2017).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
_retusche.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
I will redirect those related deletion requests to this one.
User:178.165.131.205, please email our Support Team at info-de@wikimedia.org to verify your identity. They speak/write German.
Besides that our community's administrators cannot verify the IP's claim that the depicted person is actually requesting the deletion: Sellner is a political activist and had been scheduled as a speaker at that event (source 1, source 2. There is a picture of the same person, acting as a political activist at the same event. Sellner (enWP) is a "public figure". German and Austrian law grants "public figures" less control over the publication of images taken of them and published, specifically if these pictures have been taken in a public place (versus a private situation). In my opinion, in this specific case the question might be if the Leipzig Book Fair is considered a public or a private place. The fair had about 280.000 visitors, media were present, it is an indoor event organized by a private business "Leipziger Messe Gesellschaft mbH", and visitors need to purchase a ticket. This is not a totally clear situation. I therefore recommend that an administrator closes this deletion request and the related DRs on the crops, and refers the matter to the German/Austrian/Swiss Support Team and finally the Foundation. Keep --Martina talk 04:55, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Delete: First of all we should >>respect moral rights<<. Furthermore, the picture was heavily revised. --Benqo (talk) 22:14, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, even if random IP was verified to be the person concerned, this appears to be a public figure out in public. If Mr. Sellner does have a valid legal problem with the photo, he or his lawyer should contact legal@wikimedia.org. --Storkk (talk) 12:36, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
These images where taken without my consent and I request you to delete them I talked to my lawyer and he said I can appeal their usage here 178.165.131.205 21:15, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- This public figure is leader of the "New Right Movement" in Austria and has to expect to be photographed at the Frankfurt Book Fair, especially if the person acts in its public function. This is evident from the photo. In the background clearly a person can be seen who has his right hand raised to the fascist salute. See judgment "Von Hannover v Germany", the so called "Caroline-Urteile". MagentaGreen (talk) 09:00, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
Crops that have been nominated for deletion by the same IP:
- File:Martin Sellner Buchmesse 2017 (cropped).jpg
- File:Martin Sellner Buchmesse 2017 (cropped to head only) retusche.jpg
- File:Martin Sellner (Porträt Buchmesse 2017).jpg
I will redirect those related deletion requests to this one.
User:178.165.131.205, please email our Support Team at info-de@wikimedia.org to verify your identity. They speak/write German.
Besides that our community's administrators cannot verify the IP's claim that the depicted person is actually requesting the deletion: Sellner is a political activist and had been scheduled as a speaker at that event (source 1, source 2. There is a picture of the same person, acting as a political activist at the same event. Sellner (enWP) is a "public figure". German and Austrian law grants "public figures" less control over the publication of images taken of them and published, specifically if these pictures have been taken in a public place (versus a private situation). In my opinion, in this specific case the question might be if the Leipzig Book Fair is considered a public or a private place. The fair had about 280.000 visitors, media were present, it is an indoor event organized by a private business "Leipziger Messe Gesellschaft mbH", and visitors need to purchase a ticket. This is not a totally clear situation. I therefore recommend that an administrator closes this deletion request and the related DRs on the crops, and refers the matter to the German/Austrian/Swiss Support Team and finally the Foundation. Keep --Martina talk 04:55, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Delete: First of all we should >>respect moral rights<<. Furthermore, the picture was heavily revised. --Benqo (talk) 22:14, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, even if random IP was verified to be the person concerned, this appears to be a public figure out in public. If Mr. Sellner does have a valid legal problem with the photo, he or his lawyer should contact legal@wikimedia.org. --Storkk (talk) 12:36, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
These images where taken without my consent and I request you to delete them I talked to my lawyer and he said I can appeal their usage here 178.165.131.205 21:15, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- This public figure is leader of the "New Right Movement" in Austria and has to expect to be photographed at the Frankfurt Book Fair, especially if the person acts in its public function. This is evident from the photo. In the background clearly a person can be seen who has his right hand raised to the fascist salute. See judgment "Von Hannover v Germany", the so called "Caroline-Urteile". MagentaGreen (talk) 09:00, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
Crops that have been nominated for deletion by the same IP:
- File:Martin Sellner Buchmesse 2017 (cropped).jpg
- File:Martin Sellner Buchmesse 2017 (cropped to head only) retusche.jpg
- File:Martin Sellner (Porträt Buchmesse 2017).jpg
I will redirect those related deletion requests to this one.
User:178.165.131.205, please email our Support Team at info-de@wikimedia.org to verify your identity. They speak/write German.
Besides that our community's administrators cannot verify the IP's claim that the depicted person is actually requesting the deletion: Sellner is a political activist and had been scheduled as a speaker at that event (source 1, source 2. There is a picture of the same person, acting as a political activist at the same event. Sellner (enWP) is a "public figure". German and Austrian law grants "public figures" less control over the publication of images taken of them and published, specifically if these pictures have been taken in a public place (versus a private situation). In my opinion, in this specific case the question might be if the Leipzig Book Fair is considered a public or a private place. The fair had about 280.000 visitors, media were present, it is an indoor event organized by a private business "Leipziger Messe Gesellschaft mbH", and visitors need to purchase a ticket. This is not a totally clear situation. I therefore recommend that an administrator closes this deletion request and the related DRs on the crops, and refers the matter to the German/Austrian/Swiss Support Team and finally the Foundation. Keep --Martina talk 04:55, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Delete: First of all we should >>respect moral rights<<. Furthermore, the picture was heavily revised. --Benqo (talk) 22:14, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, even if random IP was verified to be the person concerned, this appears to be a public figure out in public. If Mr. Sellner does have a valid legal problem with the photo, he or his lawyer should contact legal@wikimedia.org. --Storkk (talk) 12:36, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
These images where taken without my consent and I request you to delete them I talked to my lawyer and he said I can appeal their usage here 178.165.131.205 21:15, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- This public figure is leader of the "New Right Movement" in Austria and has to expect to be photographed at the Frankfurt Book Fair, especially if the person acts in its public function. This is evident from the photo. In the background clearly a person can be seen who has his right hand raised to the fascist salute. See judgment "Von Hannover v Germany", the so called "Caroline-Urteile". MagentaGreen (talk) 09:00, 12 April 2018 (UTC)
Crops that have been nominated for deletion by the same IP:
- File:Martin Sellner Buchmesse 2017 (cropped).jpg
- File:Martin Sellner Buchmesse 2017 (cropped to head only) retusche.jpg
- File:Martin Sellner (Porträt Buchmesse 2017).jpg
I will redirect those related deletion requests to this one.
User:178.165.131.205, please email our Support Team at info-de@wikimedia.org to verify your identity. They speak/write German.
Besides that our community's administrators cannot verify the IP's claim that the depicted person is actually requesting the deletion: Sellner is a political activist and had been scheduled as a speaker at that event (source 1, source 2. There is a picture of the same person, acting as a political activist at the same event. Sellner (enWP) is a "public figure". German and Austrian law grants "public figures" less control over the publication of images taken of them and published, specifically if these pictures have been taken in a public place (versus a private situation). In my opinion, in this specific case the question might be if the Leipzig Book Fair is considered a public or a private place. The fair had about 280.000 visitors, media were present, it is an indoor event organized by a private business "Leipziger Messe Gesellschaft mbH", and visitors need to purchase a ticket. This is not a totally clear situation. I therefore recommend that an administrator closes this deletion request and the related DRs on the crops, and refers the matter to the German/Austrian/Swiss Support Team and finally the Foundation. Keep --Martina talk 04:55, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
Delete: First of all we should >>respect moral rights<<. Furthermore, the picture was heavily revised. --Benqo (talk) 22:14, 16 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, even if random IP was verified to be the person concerned, this appears to be a public figure out in public. If Mr. Sellner does have a valid legal problem with the photo, he or his lawyer should contact legal@wikimedia.org. --Storkk (talk) 12:36, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Claimed own work by Rapidgrass, the depicted band. Dubious—needs more detailed information on photographer, copyright status if to be kept. BethNaught (talk) 22:15, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, photographer should confirm license via OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 12:37, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Non-free logo, not simple enough for TOO. Also not user's own work. Flickerd (talk) 13:18, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. The uploader does not seem to understand copyright at all based on his edits at en.Wikipedia. --AussieLegend (✉) 02:54, 11 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 09:45, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
outdated version Luca Gibelli (talk) 13:30, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 09:46, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
copyvio http://report.hebei.com.cn/system/2017/11/12/018542381.shtml MNXANL (talk) 14:21, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 09:46, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
copyvio http://p3.pstatp.com/large/46d00003c46af9f5b763 MNXANL (talk) 14:23, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --James F. (talk) 09:46, 19 May 2018 (UTC)
Depicted work by living sculptor. Though Colombia has FoP exception for works in the public, I doubt that the content of a museum falls under the required terms "found situated in permanent form in a place open to the public". -- Túrelio (talk) 10:49, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- Would a museum not be a place which is open to the public? - Amada44 talk to me 16:14, 12 May 2018 (UTC)
- It depends on the jurisdiction. In Germany, likely not. In UK, likely yes. In Colombia... we'd need some kind of legal definition or court decision to know. Storkk (talk) 12:17, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Delete All other related DR have been deleted: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Colombian_FOP_cases Amada44 talk to me 15:48, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:28, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Загружен по ошибке, прошу изъять из общего доступа Archive vn (talk) 11:23, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:41, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
wrong title there is picture that need this name Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 14:37, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- See this File:L.A. Ring, Husmandsfolk aftensskumring, 1905, OPC 8, Statsministeriet (should be renamed later).jpg --Villy Fink Isaksen (talk) 14:40, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:43, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Taken from Sangram Singh Foundation's internet site. E4024 (talk) 15:42, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:31, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Non-free image. Uploader does not own copyright. Does not look too simple to apply {{Pd-simple}} either. Sreejith K (talk) 17:05, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:32, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Proposed (by the uploader) regions of Romania; this is original research and should be deleted unless it can be sustained by good sources. Gikü (talk) 17:17, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:33, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
This is a derivative work with no source. These photos can't be prepared by an officer or employee of the United States Government as Iran doesn't have relationship with USA. Slow 18:39, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- https://fas.org/irp/world/iran/mois-loc.pdf page 21. "Source: Compiled from multiple sources used in the preparation of this report." The US government must have photos of these mens :) L'amateur d'aéroplanes (talk) 19:06, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- It will be at least in 2023 PD in Iran. In the US it is already PD, now the queestion is what is the country of origin. US as the document is an US-Document or Iran as the subjects are Iranians.--Sanandros (talk) 19:53, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- I'm sure that "an officer or employee of the United States Government" couldn't take these photos. Didn't they use this as fup? Slow 20:27, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- It will be at least in 2023 PD in Iran. In the US it is already PD, now the queestion is what is the country of origin. US as the document is an US-Document or Iran as the subjects are Iranians.--Sanandros (talk) 19:53, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Very questionable who took these photos. "Compiled from multiple sources" means "Google images". Just because they appear in a USGov document doesn't suddenly make them PD. - Alexis Jazz 17:10, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:37, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
No relevance. Sturm (talk) 19:02, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:37, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Es un color marron claro, mas que avellana. Ademas la calidad de la imagen es muy mala. Vocoder (talk) 20:46, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- Image is in use in polish wiktionary. Storkk (talk) 12:39, 18 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: in use and no valid reason for deletion (Google translate: "It is a light brown color, rather than hazel. In addition the quality of the image is very bad"). P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:39, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Can someone be so kind and delete this photo please? I didn't know I couldn't delete it anymore when I uploaded it and I did so to practice and try something. I did not want this photo to remain on this website forever. Please, delete it. I promise, I can upload higher quality photos of places and species, instead of a photo of someone's face. We all make things that then we want to erase or we all do things thinking we can take them back (especially online and when we are young) there should be an option to delete old photos especially when they are not high-quality ones or very useful and they involve someone's identity. Thank you. Please, understand. I do understand the license and regulation issue, but there should be some consideration. People change, our minds change, etc. We need to consider sometimes we don't want the same things anymore. By just deleting one photo that it doesn't contribute much knowledge, I am not harming anybody and you are making someone more comfortable, so everybody wins. Thank you, I would really appreciate it. I don't want to contribute with people's faces or body parts anymore. I would only contribute with objects, places, animals and vegetation. Please, I beg you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vocoder (talk • contribs) 2021-06-03T21:19:54 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - Image is in use. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:52, 25 July 2021 (UTC)
The source does not show the corresponding picture and furthermore the source has no copyright notice. La source n'a pas de mention de copyright et l'image n'est pas visible dans le site Malosse (talk) 14:51, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, dubious source and author. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:47, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Photo : Lior Mizrahi (http://www.israelhayom.co.il/sites/default/files/styles/566x349/public/images/articles/2013/04/06/13652810680817_b.jpg), missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:22, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:50, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Found at http://ais.badische-zeitung.de/piece/04/ff/dd/07/83877127-h-720.jpg, false date, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:23, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:50, 28 May 2018 (UTC)
Загружен по ошибке, прошу изъять из общего доступа Archive vn (talk) 11:22, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, the uploader requested deletion of page: author's request on creation day. --Y.haruo (talk) 11:52, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, missing legal information. --Y.haruo (talk) 11:58, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jiehfan
[edit]- File:Left Plaque of Ren-An Temple.jpg
- File:Main Plaque of Ren-An Temple.jpg
- File:Right Plaque of Ren-An Temple 01.jpg
There is chinese calligraphy works, author is "李谷声" (The signature is on the left side of the work), is live. copyvio shizhao (talk) 08:10, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
This is the gift from the author "李谷声" to Master St. Nord. (See Main Plaque of Ren-An Temple.jpg) I think it should not consider as copyright violation. Jiehfan (talk) 13:25, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, OTRS permission from the author is needed. --Y.haruo (talk) 13:58, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Unused fictional COA, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:53, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, self-created artwork without obvious educational use. --Y.haruo (talk) 14:16, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Unused fictional flag, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:53, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, self-created artwork without obvious educational use. --Y.haruo (talk) 14:18, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Unused fictional flag, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:54, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, self-created artwork without obvious educational use. --Y.haruo (talk) 14:21, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Belarus. This photo shows a modern sculpture and either needs an OTRS permission from the sculptor or should be deleted Jarash (talk) 18:32, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Former Soviet Union. --Y.haruo (talk) 14:54, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. In addition, derivative work of probably copyrighted screenshot. Taivo (talk) 19:43, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 14:57, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
The BVS says, in its internet site: "© 1995 – 2015 Any page on this site may be reproduced for non-commercial use if left intact with credit given to the Boston Vegetarian Society and linked to www.bostonveg.org". This means the logo is not apt to use in Commons. Remember the "İETT case" please. E4024 (talk) 14:57, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:29, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo Gikü (talk) 17:15, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:30, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by John9474 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: <scaled-down duplicate of File:Seal_of_Stamford,_Connecticut.svg> Comment This file is png but its size is very big. Y.haruo (talk) 17:44, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uploader request. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:57, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Please delete photo due to right to privacy. The photo was used for political campaign purposes. I, Mary Kim Titla, am no longer a candidate for public office and have not been for the last 8 years. Thank you. Mktitla (talk) 18:13, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; and file is in use. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:00, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
As per description, this is only a test. Only used in a sandbox page where it is clearly used as a fantasy or test. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:46, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
This is only used as I post on an Alternate History Forum.User:Ocean912345 ✉ 1:12 pm, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, apparently uploader also agrees to delete. Taivo (talk) 16:00, 21 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I can't see an educational use of this low quality Polaroid nude photo Pibwl (talk) 12:57, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Kargaltsev often uses himself as a model, along with casual photographs taken by polaroid or camera phone to give an insight into his life and work in New York. These photographs range from intimate personal shots to posed compositions and are often homoerotic, political, or provocatively sexual. All types and quality of photograph feature in his gallery exhibitions and publications. --Fæ (talk) 14:13, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- Delete. In my opinion quality is still bad. Taivo (talk) 09:29, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
- Refer to http://www.thepinksnout.com/2015/11/13/alexander-kargaltsevs-polaroids/, which shows the specific image as part of his published artwork. Perceived quality does not overrule the realistic value of illustrating this aspect of his homoerotic artwork. --Fæ (talk) 09:50, 13 May 2018 (UTC)
- Delete We are not discussing Kargaltsev here, but a pic. I agree with Taivo that it is bad quality. --E4024 (talk) 07:53, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
- Does this being a dick pic override the fact that it is typical of the artist's direct approach to illustrating gay life as the central theme of his artworks that actually appear in gallery exhibitions? A lot of his best works are male nudes in provocative poses, this example is not the most graphic we host on Commons and all have value to illustrate homoerotic and LGBT+ themes. --Fæ (talk) 08:13, 7 June 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:23, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Author is Arnold Chencinski, born 1900, date of death unknown, we don't know whether 70 years have passed from his death. Gikü (talk) 16:57, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:24, 28 June 2018 (UTC)
This picture is probably a scan from a magazine. Please enlarge this image, the fold of the page is on the left side. Y.haruo (talk) 18:03, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
No it's not it was taken at a live event in 1998. https://www.flickr.com/photos/42014225@N08/6916002973 side. Edge4life42 (talk) 19:03, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- No, the picture which was taken in 1998 on the live ivent will not be taken in 2012. The image before the correction is clearer. Also look at this. Obviously it is not the work of Flickr user.--Y.haruo (talk) 22:19, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- In addition, the flickr user uses "All rights reserved" licenses for photographs taken by her truly. For example, [3], [4]. --Y.haruo (talk) 14:44, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
- Keep, reviewing the Flickr users profile, looks like a fan as there are photos with the subject with other figures from that industry. I suspect they are scans of originals by the Flickr user. There are also plenty of scans of bad quality pictures, and no other obvious copyright violations.--BevinKacon (talk) 22:17, 20 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per User:BevinKecon. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:30, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
One of the sources has been deleted. So this could be a derivative of a non-free map. Slow 20:02, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Doesn't look like anything substantial from http://www.explorethemed.com/Crusades.asp?c=1 has been used. All the copyrightable bits are from File:Map Crusader states 1135-en.svg. - Alexis Jazz 16:57, 8 May 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per Alexis Jazz. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:27, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
copie de https://www.ouest-france.fr/bretagne/saint-malo-35400/la-maison-cristel-editeur-etait-roland-garros-817882 Habertix (talk) 20:15, 10 April 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:26, 12 July 2018 (UTC)
