Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/02/18

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive February 18th, 2018
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the original source that appears at the end of the video http://baku-media.ru shows "All rights reserved". There is no evidence the user that posted it on youtube has the right to change copyright. ELEKHHT 04:00, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:LL [1]. --Sealle (talk) 11:32, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is my image. I don't want see this anymore. NaveenGanesan (talk) 05:02, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Courtesy-deletion, per nomination, as unused, mere userpage-image. --Túrelio (talk) 08:36, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This looks like a copyrighted material Artix Kreiger (talk) 15:03, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Album cover. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 19:28, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy as copyvio - mass copyvio uploader. --Jcb (talk) 21:12, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

زنانه کون گنده دوجنسه 113.203.61.170 22:08, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: nonsense nomination. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 22:13, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Soltero- Cementerio.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Soltero-baño.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Qbaloch qb Qb production.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Qbaloch QB 23.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Qena.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:25, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:05, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 08:25, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:05, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Qqnnnn.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:^37EEDACD89673E464415C3CF871A966E1756727D229F237614^pimgpsh fullsize distr.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:À Punt la caseta d'aitana.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Álvaro Navia.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ángel de la Ciudad.JPG Commons:Deletion requests/File:ÑAÑE.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Şahin İsgəndərov.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Φωτογ.0183.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Φωτογ.0189.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Φωτογ.0188.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Φωτογ.0187.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Foluagoi 01.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified people. 141.196.202.222 22:13, 25 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, copyright violation from Facebook. Taivo (talk) 06:46, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:AgrFAce2.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Aleksii and Elspeth (close).jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Aleksii Sept Crown 2014.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Amrutha Education.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Berkeley.jpg.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality photo with no clear educational purpose Logan Talk Contributions 04:33, 28 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 12:53, 4 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Bunny1.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:El cile Gracias Lempira.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Produccion de cafe en la comunidad.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Epicoband.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Estação ferroviária de Cachoeira Paulista.JPG Commons:Deletion requests/File:Farid baghaday.JPG Commons:Deletion requests/File:Family at the Circus.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Festiv bagdad.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:FLINT HAMEL MISSIONS AFRICA ETHIOPIA NEPAL (330).jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:FullMetalBroga.JPG Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gustavo Menendez.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Guztavo diaz zamora final 2011.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Himkum 2014.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ha Neul Cho.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Min Heather Cho.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Yook Cho.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Min yook cho.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hadiebr.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Haidar 112560 20277.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hamed-Fard-biographya-com-11.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:HamedZaid.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hamidou-fi2010828x470.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Hamidou3772329928658101988 n.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Handsome Young Couple - National Kandawgyi Gardens - Pyin Oo Lwin - Myanmar (Burma) (12028384163).jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo(s). Out of scope. (Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 11:52, 26 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 13:12, 3 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Harmonisation en fonction de la fondamentale.pdf Commons:Deletion requests/File:Goalundo-goalanda-rajbaris photo.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Outsourcing.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Goalundo outsourcing.gif Commons:Deletion requests/File:Goalundo-goalanda,rajbari shoiballs photo.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:GoAnimate Evil Erika.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:God Never Sleeps.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Album cover from https://open.spotify.com/album/7djFa7TMkgrAJrs73yB4ox GeorgHHtalk   18:18, 1 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko at 04:51, 2 November 2022 UTC: Commons:Licensing: album cover --Krdbot 08:30, 2 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Goddard In The Galaxy (Music Video) (14468407570).jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Goingtomos.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gomas.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gombos-3863final12.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Gonzalo Soltero - reflejo bn.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This house in Siegen - full address unknown to me - is definitely not P.P. Ruben's birthplace. The inscription to the contrary is just a joke. The uploader agrees to a deletion. Cf. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Queeste#Geboortehuis_van_Rubens_in_Siegen. Vsop.de (talk) 00:30, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Es handelt sich vermutlich um das Wohn- und Wirtschaftsgebäude Untere Metzgerstraße 37, Altstadt Siegen, de:w:Liste der Baudenkmäler in Siegen Nr. A-033. --Vsop.de (talk) 11:33, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The house being a registered monument in Siegen, I move that the file should not be deleted but only its name corrected to

Untere Metzgerstr. 37, Siegen (2016 - detail). 2016 is the year, the photo was taken. Thank you! --Vsop.de (talk) 14:33, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 18:45, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This house in Siegen - full address unknown to me - is definitely not P.P. Ruben's birthplace. The inscription to the contrary is just a joke. The uploader agrees to a deletion. Cf. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Queeste#Geboortehuis_van_Rubens_in_Siegen. Vsop.de (talk) 00:31, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Es handelt sich vermutlich um das Wohn- und Wirtschaftsgebäude Untere Metzgerstraße 37, Altstadt Siegen, de:w:Liste der Baudenkmäler in Siegen Nr. A-033. --Vsop.de (talk) 11:33, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The house being a registered monument in Siegen, I move that the file should not be deleted but only its name corrected to
Untere Metzgerstr. 37, Siegen (2016). 2016 is the year, the photo was taken Thank you! --Vsop.de (talk) 14:30, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 18:45, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This house in Siegen - full address unknown to me - is definitely not P.P. Ruben's birthplace. The inscription to the contrary is just a joke. Cf. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File_talk:PPRubens_birthplace.JPG Vsop.de (talk) 00:34, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A sign written by Siegen's town administration can be found close to the “Oberes Schloss” ("Upper Castle") at Siegen. There is also declared that it's the birthplace of Peter Paul Rubens. --Tanneneichhorn (talk) 17:17, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Es handelt sich vermutlich um das Wohn- und Wirtschaftsgebäude Untere Metzgerstraße 37, Altstadt Siegen, de:w:Liste der Baudenkmäler in Siegen Nr. A-033. --Vsop.de (talk) 11:32, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The house being a registered monument in Siegen, I agree with User:Tanneneichhorn, that the file should not be deleted but only its name corrected to
Untere Metzgerstr. 37, Siegen (2011). The 2011 is the year, the photo was taken; the two other photos of the house should get a 2016. Thank you! --Vsop.de (talk) 14:27, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I have requested a name's change yesterday and added the information some minutes ago at the file. The building, that I visited today, is indeed located at Untere Metzgerstraße 37, signed as a historical monument clearely. --Tanneneichhorn (talk) 14:44, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 16:36, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No data EXIF , probably from Internet. Gastón Cuello (talk) 15:38, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 05:43, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No data EXIF, probably from Internet. Gastón Cuello (talk) 18:18, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Copyvio. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 05:45, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Map from Mercosur site with Copyright. Gastón Cuello (talk) 18:21, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Anna (Cookie) (talk) 05:43, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is google.hu... doesn't appear to fit the license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:22, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Created by a sock of User:Sztojka kevin3, clear copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 12:42, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused small size, low quality image, likely out of scope and possibly with copyright issues. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:12, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Changed to copyvio from here.--EMans (talk) 05:14, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Housekeeping "20 February 2018 Túrelio (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:Laje.jpg (Copyright violation: http://conapfam.pe/2017/09/19/desde-argentina-el-progresismo-como-estafa-ideologica-por-agustin-laje/)". --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:40, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unauthorized use of Ticket:2010111410016551

[edit]

Unauthorized use of Ticket:2010111410016551.

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 21:04, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeff G.: Done. Should i remove {{Delete}} from the checked files? What we do with ABC 1210's uploads? --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:16, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Steinsplitter: Thank you. Yes, please remove {{Deleted}} from the checked files. I think we can keep discussing most of ABC 1210's uploads (which should be deleted with extreme prejudice) right here. They already have a final warning and notice of this DR.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 15:23, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Done & @Jeff G.: Suspect this is a fake. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:30, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Steinsplitter: If by that you mean that it has fake permission, a fake source, upsampling, and looks suspiciously similar to http://www.india.com/showbiz/jodha-akbar-paridhi-sharma-rajat-tokas-show-to-go-off-air-461766/ from four years ago, I think you're right.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 00:12, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: the files with wrong replacements to 16 digits that already fixed.
Deleted: OTRS ticket added by non-OTRS volunteer. The files uploaded by ABC 1210 copyvios from television programmes. -- Geagea (talk) 22:38, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I added wrong photo Bgriffi87 (talk) 02:34, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I added wrong photo Bgriffi87 (talk) 02:40, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:24, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 1954cri (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images by artists require that the artists be notable and that they give permission, via COM:OTRS for their work to be uploaded to Commons.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:15, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:24, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is facebook. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:31, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:24, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is Facebook Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:31, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:24, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is Facebook. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:31, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:24, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is from Facebook. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:32, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:25, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is from Facebook. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:32, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:25, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is from Facebook. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:33, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:25, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is from Facebook. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:33, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:25, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded the image with the processing state incorrectly identifiable 240D:0:9D15:7D00:186F:D447:F7A0:FA76 04:37, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

すみません。ログインを忘れていました。削除理由はぼかしが薄く、氏名が判別可能だからです。 JR East E231 (talk) 05:01, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:25, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yusefyasin35 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused selfies. Unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:00, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:25, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arsalan Xcent (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal photos/selfies and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:01, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:25, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eliezer1rincones (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal photo/selfie and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:05, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:26, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hydshanawaz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 16:14, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 01:20, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hydshanawaz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal photos and selfies. None are unlikely to be used in a project. Commons is not your personal webhost

Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:08, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:26, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Khagesh Kolhe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal photos, selfies, and an advert. None are likely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:11, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:26, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Prithwijit ghosh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:17, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:26, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:20, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:27, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ademmaaouia3 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: All personal photos and selfies and personal document scans. Users only contributions are to his user page adding some of these images. I do not feel that meets the standard of an "active" participant.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:24, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:27, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:25, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:27, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Also an anonymous author could not release a photo such as this into the public domain. Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:27, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:27, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:28, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:27, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused probable personal photo and advert. Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:29, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:27, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alexzero96 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused selfies and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:32, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:27, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Iamsaifpatel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal photo and selfie. Unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:34, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:27, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RAHUL SAINI SARAGTHAL (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal photos/selfies and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:37, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:49, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by RAHUL SAINI SARAGTHAL (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal photos and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:34, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:27, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by RAHUL SAINI SARAGTHAL (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused out of COM:SCOPE personal images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:07, 30 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:54, 7 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:35, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:27, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal of unknown person or personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:36, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:27, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Unikmagar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal photos and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:41, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:27, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Salazarll (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal photos and selfies. Unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:44, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:33, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reasons for deletion request -Kankanerakhisurendra (talk) 05:45, 18 February 2018 (UTC)Inappropriate image[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:33, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Finchleyboy66 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyvios. Claimed "Own work" yet say in the description "Photo by Stephen Booth". Without otrs permission this couldn't be kept and they are copyvios as they are now.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:50, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:33, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:51, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:33, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:54, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:33, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:55, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:33, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:56, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:33, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo of unknown person and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:57, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:33, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Batch upload of photos taken from a car. I reckon that we can keep few of them to illustrate "Roads in Ethiopia", but the majority is unusable.

Ruthven (msg) 10:09, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:34, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

failed upload Hiddenhauser (talk) 11:04, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:35, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

failed upload Hiddenhauser (talk) 11:09, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:35, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, no metadata, includes watermark of an external website. Unlikely to be own work. ~Cybularny Speak? 11:36, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:35, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Close-up concert photo with low resolution and no metadata. Unlikely to be own work. ~Cybularny Speak? 11:40, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:35, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, no metadata, includes watermark of an external website. Unlikely to be own work. ~Cybularny Speak? 11:42, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:35, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. Probably poster. ~Cybularny Speak? 11:43, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:35, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blank page uploaded. This is one a series of similar images (from a book) that require deletion for the same reason. BeckenhamBear (talk) 11:53, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:35, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exists elsewhere on the web on pages dated before uploading to Commons. ~Cybularny Speak? 11:57, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:35, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exists elsewhere on the web on pages dated before uploading to Commons eg. [2]. ~Cybularny Speak? 12:00, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:35, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Selfie. Only contributions are in his own user space. I don't feel that is an "active" participant. Sixflashphoto (talk) 12:13, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:35, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unrecognisable subject The Banner (talk) 12:24, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:35, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image shows (or resembles to) a symbol of the "Islamic State" which has been banned by the Supreme Court of the United States. AyaanLamar (talk) 13:49, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@AyaanLamar: what namely was banned? Split your sentences to avoid flaws and ambiguity in grammar. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 13:55, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 04:36, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 02:37, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Urbodelumo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:17, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:42, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GILVER (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:19, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:42, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DvKavi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:20, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:42, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wweldon22 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:22, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:42, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pazyamorenvenezuela (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:27, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:42, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Djsenn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copied from Facebook, Metadata has "FBMD" mark. Please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS.

~Moheen (keep talking) 16:34, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:42, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PD-Italy applies only to screenshots, not film stills. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:41, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Published by Italian magazine Grazia. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:02, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Je n'imaginais pas que vous alliez toucher à ces photos de Louis de Funès sur le tournage de L'Homme orchestre.
 Keep Cette photographie n'est ni une capture d'écran, ni un "film still" au sens traditionnel du terme (photo du tournage d'une scène ou photo "mise en scène" d'un acteur). C'est simplement une photographie prise durant une pause lors d'un tournage. La photographie ayant été prise en Italie et en 1970, elle est donc acceptable sur Commons. - Groupir ! (talk) 21:16, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept per consensus. — Racconish 06:47, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PD-Italy applies only to screenshots, not film stills. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:41, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Published by Italian magazine Grazia. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:02, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Patrick Rogel: Je n'imaginais pas que vous alliez toucher à ces photos de Louis de Funès sur le tournage de L'Homme orchestre.
 Keep Cette photographie n'est ni une capture d'écran, ni un "film still" au sens traditionnel du terme (photo du tournage d'une scène ou photo "mise en scène" d'un acteur). C'est simplement une photographie prise durant une pause lors d'un tournage. La photographie ayant été prise en Italie et en 1970, elle est donc acceptable sur Commons. - Groupir ! (talk) 21:13, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Groupir !: No Italian Job here ! ou en Français pour que ce soit plus clair : aucun indice que cette photo ait été créée par un citoyen italien, ait été publiée un jour (en Italie ou ailleurs), donc aucune raison que la loi italienne et/ou la règle du plus court terme s'applique. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:27, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
La photographie a été prise à par Marisa Rastellini, photographe italienne, pour l'agence Mondadori. La date de publication importe peu ici puisque c'est le seul fait qu'elle ait été crée en Italie, en l’occurrence à Bassano Romano, qui compte, comme nous en avons discuté. - Groupir ! (talk) 21:31, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept per consensus. — Racconish 06:49, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PD-Italy applies only to screenshots, not film stills. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:41, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Published by Italian magazine Grazia. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:02, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Je n'imaginais pas que vous alliez toucher à ces photos de Louis de Funès sur le tournage de L'Homme orchestre.
 Keep Cette photographie n'est ni une capture d'écran, ni un "film still" au sens traditionnel du terme (photo du tournage d'une scène ou photo "mise en scène" d'un acteur). C'est simplement une photographie prise durant une pause lors d'un tournage. La photographie ayant été prise en Italie et en 1970, elle est donc acceptable sur Commons. - Groupir ! (talk) 21:11, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept per consensus. — Racconish 06:51, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pornographic content AyaanLamar (talk) 17:08, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:42, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jameson129 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

artworks and portraits fo Gary Komarin, contemporary artwork. Not the place of "jameson129" to license them. Photographs of the artist himself are low resolution and stripped of EXIF data

Vera (talk) 18:12, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:42, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Olympische Winterspelen te Grenoble. Lasma Kauniste (Sovjet-Unie) in actie op de, Bestanddeelnr 921-0824.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

They’re labeled “courtesy photo” are not works of the federal government.

Ytoyoda (talk) 20:10, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:43, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nomination by uploader (image appears to be protected by copyright, despite more than 70 years passed from its creation) — kashmīrī 20:14, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:43, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Saboor Hakimi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal image without educational value and therefore out of project scope. Commons is not an arbitrary webhost.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:15, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Saboor Hakimi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope auto-promo

Lacrymocéphale (talk) 15:56, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 04:44, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image without educational value and therefore out of project scope. Commons is not an arbitrary webhost. De728631 (talk) 19:47, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by ~riley at 04:44, 24 Februar 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Saboor Hakimi --Krdbot 07:29, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE: non-notable person. 4nn1l2 (talk) 16:09, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • این یک پرتره شخصی است که به اشتباه وارد تصاویر اربعین شده است. Mostafa Meraji 21:02, 18 February 2018 (UTC)

 Comment @Mostafameraji: You can add {{speedydelete|author/uploader request}} to your photo (if you have a valid reason). SlowManifesto (talk) 22:58, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 19:06, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal information, irrelevant for the encyclopaedia. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MacedonianBoy (talk • contribs) 2018-02-12T14:46:23‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:32, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is superior in quality and smaller file size too: File:NXAdvocateClient search.png — Preceding unsigned comment added by Palosirkka (talk • contribs) 2018-02-12T06:58:21‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:33, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Misleading confused image in wrong format. Radio waves are not red etc. And should be a .png and not a .jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Palosirkka (talk • contribs) 2018-02-13T09:03:42‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:34, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unused selfie. Unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 04:59, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:35, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FBM. possible copyvio. source is facebook. I have nominated this users other images for speedy deletion. Wikicology (talk) 09:42, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:55, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no encyclopedic use case Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 09:57, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 KeepCommons is not Wikipedia. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 10:37, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no possible educational value. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:55, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of company with no apparent notability. Apparently uploaded for use in en:Brandvia, which has been deleted as spam. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. If deemed within scope for some reason and if it is above the threshold of originality required for copyright protection as asserted by the uploader, then verified permission is required. LX (talk, contribs) 11:04, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:55, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam jdx Re: 13:52, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:56, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:56, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no reasonable rationale that the author is the owner of the second work. Hakken (talk) 21:17, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:26, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - not educationally useful (file uploaded solely for promotional purpose). hiàn 21:23, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:24, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work of the uploader – it looks like a professional advertisement photo. jdx Re: 21:48, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:24, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

violación del copyright https://itunes.apple.com/ca/album/colors-ep/980949462 Tarawa (jo ta ke irabazi arte) 21:57, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:23, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any desciption : COM:SCOPE ? Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:01, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:23, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False date, found elsewhere (https://mediabask.naiz.eus/media/asset_publics/resources/000/449/254/news_landscape/1123_p06_BERTHA.jpg?1511442961). Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:05, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:22, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Atrocious quality; I seriously question whether this is usable (for Commons' educational purposes) as even as the most crude representation of the person in question. Ubcule (talk) 22:10, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:22, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very poor quality image. However, bearing in mind it's the only photo of this- presumed notable- person on Commons, do we consider this image to be of acceptable usable quality for even the most basic purpose of identifying the person in question? Ubcule (talk) 22:16, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:22, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

©2018 OSHKOSH DEFENSE, LLC Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:33, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:20, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Atrocious quality, little recoverable detail. We have other photos of this band from same user (which aren't great themselves); but even if we didn't I'd consider this unusable quality. Ubcule (talk) 22:34, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:20, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-re image, any metadata, unlikely to be own work (Daniel Day-Lewis at the SGA Awards). Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:43, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:19, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any metadata, wrong date, unlikely to be own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:48, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: web-quality, unlikely to be own work. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:56, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE: Does Commons host pure fantasy maps? 4nn1l2 (talk) 22:53, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:57, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Matthew G. Lloyd. Permission from photographer to be sent via COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:55, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:19, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:SCOPE: very low quality personal image; unlikely to be used in a project Takeaway (talk) 22:57, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:57, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image without educational value and therefore out of project scope. Commons is not an arbitrary webhost. Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:19, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:18, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Summary data claims "own work", but the lack of any EXIF metadata in the file and the extreme compression artifacts in the image make me suspect this is a screen grab from a video. This leads me to question whether we really do have proper licensing for it. RoySmith (talk) 23:38, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:18, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo possible above COM:TOO. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:43, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:18, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found elsewhere (http://www.beliefnet.com/columnists/inspiringathletes/files/2014/02/NickGoepper1.jpg, https://images.newschoolers.com/images/17/00/74/42/54/744254_1280w_720h.jpeg, ) Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:47, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:17, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake image, non sence — Preceding unsigned comment added by Carolus (talk • contribs) 2018-02-17T18:51:28‎ (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 07:24, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"FBMD" shows this image was in and out of Facebook before arriving here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:14, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:04, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

appears to be copyrighted, see https://www.kesulat.com Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:21, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:04, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:09, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:03, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:13, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:03, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:15, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:03, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable authorship claims based on the low resolution and missing metadata. Tineye shows that a different version of the same photo was published two years before the uploader claims to have created it. LX (talk, contribs) 09:48, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:02, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low quality image of cows in an unidentified location. The very big "watermark" and the low quality make it unlikely to be used in a project. Takeaway (talk) 10:04, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:02, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It looks like a screenshot for quality and dimension. Declared license can't be faithful. Harlock81 (talk) 12:33, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:00, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused/uncategorized logo of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:13, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:59, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the author quoted in the file page "Ekaterina Solodilova" [3] must send a permission to OTRS Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:18, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:59, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:23, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:10, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of an advertisement poster. Own work is not enough reason for this to be free. 90.227.175.244 14:03, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:55, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed as 'own work'. Found several links. ~Moheen (keep talking) 14:41, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:55, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1996 newspaper, which is apparently copyrighted. Yasu (talk) 14:58, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:55, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not notable. Out of project scope. SlowManifesto (talk) 15:01, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

+ File:متین پرچین.png SlowManifesto (talk) 15:02, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:54, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo above COM:TOO, imo. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 15:15, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:54, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:08, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:53, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:15, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:52, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality screenshot from YouTube. Not used. Harlock81 (talk) 16:15, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:52, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional image uploaded here without finding any possible use. The description doesn't allow to identify the subject of the image. Harlock81 (talk) 16:20, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:52, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:21, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:51, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Shot in Paris, France, unlikely to have been first (if even) published in Italy. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:33, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:50, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no file Sgsg (talk) 16:35, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:50, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture taken in USA, unlikely to have been first (if even) published in Italy. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:35, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:49, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture taken in USA, unlikely to have been first (if even) published in Italy. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:36, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:49, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not old enough to be PD. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:37, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:48, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no author information, other imagevios by the uploader — Draceane talkcontrib. 17:07, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:47, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no author information, other imagevios by the uploader — Draceane talkcontrib. 17:10, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:47, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no author information, other imagevios by the uploader — Draceane talkcontrib. 17:10, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:47, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata. Obviously, the file of another author. Missing essential information such as license, permission or source. Nik Deleter (talk) 17:18, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:47, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of presumably non-free advertising. LX (talk, contribs) 17:34, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I was unable to comply with the requirement to provide notification at User talk:Purodha, because that page has been fully protected. LX (talk, contribs) 17:44, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:46, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The terms linked to by the source are for {{cc-by-nc-4.0}} (which is non-free), not {{cc-by-4.0}} (despite using the icons for that license). LX (talk, contribs) 17:39, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:41, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any metadata, false date, found elsewhere at http://cdn-s-www.lejsl.com/images/273B6C4E-8552-47A8-8699-7A4AD85EBECB/JSL_v1_02/gerard-touzeau-est-un-passionne-d-histoire-medievale-specialiste-du-grand-schisme-d-occident-et-de-sa-prolongation-en-rouergue-photo-dr-1462194157.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:52, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:40, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo image, without Wikipedia article (that I can find). Out of educational scope. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 17:57, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:39, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains non-free photos, including a clearly watermarked stock photo on page 11 and https://www.alamy.com/stock-photo-hair-dye-at-beauty-salon-55971906.html on page 29 and therefore cannot lawfully be published under a free license compatible with Commons:Licensing. Also, the "CC BY-NC-SA" statement in the footer on pages 23 and 39 contradict the stated licensing and are incompatible with Commons:Licensing. LX (talk, contribs) 17:59, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:11, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

B.Gourby/CNSD. Authorization from photographer to be sent to COM:OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 18:07, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:39, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work, EXIF author and copyright tags still name "Steven Tippett" as author Ariadacapo (talk) 18:56, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:36, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and

In project scope? Hystrix (talk) 19:07, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:36, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source provided. It's unlikely that a notable artist would release a photo under a Creative Commons license. Hakken (talk) 19:41, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:35, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is too complex to be PD-logo. Hakken (talk) 19:44, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:35, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright issues SecretName101 (talk) 19:47, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:34, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

logo of a school, licensed without source link as cc-by-sa-4.0. can't find backup of that. -- Deadstar (msg) 20:05, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:29, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Las imágenes fair use no son permitidas en Commons. SuZumiya (talk) 20:09, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:29, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - not educationally useful (unused personal image of uploader). hiàn 20:19, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

It is good to have an image of the respective personality whose article is been published as far as education is concern delete all celebrities pictures from Wikipedia since they are not educational also and i think outb of lacs of editors only Hian has some problem with my postings. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Source2205 (talk • contribs) 20:51, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

God fucking dammit. If you had bothered reading my request rationale, you would have read the policy. How the hell is this actor notable? Unsourced, no claim of notability -> non-notable. Read up on relevant policies, then proceed in arguing. hiàn 21:21, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
what the hell with you read the article first he is not an actor he is director and i have provided the links the sources everything about his work, do you know all the entire world people as you are telling me about the policy ? Wikipedia is the way to tell about people who are making their ways out from the society and becoming something, dont argue over something you have no idea and by the way show some manners before writing next time while writing on a professional platform i think you need education first (God fucking dammit.) whats this ? and if you have guts enough show me by deleting my page. try with your friends also who are poking with the same notifications
I do not have the sufficient tools to delete the page. Regardless of the sources, the actor (fine, director) is not notable. If you feel as if you'd like to make up details as you go along, then leave. Wikipedia does not need people like you. Wikipedia is NOT a place to "tell about people who are making their ways out from the society", despite what you decided to make up. If you seriously believe that I, as an active editor, still do not know Wikipedia's scope, I'd think common sense and reality needs to give you a real slap in the face.
"I know! Let's make up things to defend someone that doesn't fall into Wikipedia's scope!" Go to hell. hiàn 23:12, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:29, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

complex work, copyright SecretName101 (talk) 20:27, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:12, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

complex work, copyright SecretName101 (talk) 20:27, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

complex work, copyright SecretName101 (talk) 20:28, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:12, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

heavy motion blur, unused file Rupert Pupkin (talk) 20:29, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:28, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

background likely copyrighted SecretName101 (talk) 20:50, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:27, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

background likely copyrighted SecretName101 (talk) 20:52, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:27, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Autrisation de l'auteur nécessaire, Commons:OTRS/fr Shev123 (talk) 21:15, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:27, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False date, not own work, perhaps PD anyway. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:07, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 07:27, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate - I uploaded a reprocessed version of NGC 891. Both images are my work. SeanXCurry (talk) 22:10, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 07:27, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Atrocious quality, ridiculously low resolution and complete loss of highlight detail due to overexposure. Not likely to be usable by any reasonable standards. Ubcule (talk) 22:21, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 07:27, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry mess; typical example of uploader's complete lack of quality control going back years. We have a photo of Isabelle Brouillette elsewhere; we don't have another of Sandra Dumaresq, but that doesn't excuse this photo if it's of unacceptably poor (and unusable) quality. Ubcule (talk) 22:24, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 07:27, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

New better files uploaded for the same subjects (in the same category: Category:Catalogue of the ethnographic collection of Museo delle Grigne - First edition).

Yiyi (Dimmi!) 22:43, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Agree, unused as well. ~riley (talk) 07:26, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful Aloneinthewild (talk) 17:02, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:52, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derived from File:DK DO Skyline 300ppi CC BY NC SA-20140223-3068.jpg, which has been deleted. LX (talk, contribs) 17:47, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:46, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Focused on contemporary artwork (half of the shot). No FoP in France. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 18:07, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:44, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains non-free content, including https://www.alamy.com/image-details-popup.asp?imageid={5800F567-C701-48C5-B41E-BDB77C23F385} on page 2, http://www.nue.okstate.edu/Hand_Held/DCP_0803.JPG (grabbed from http://www.nue.okstate.edu/Hand_Held/Alternative_Uses.htm, with no sign of any free licensing) on page 4 and a screenshot of a non-free website (Greenpeace) on page 5, and therefore cannot lawfully be published under a free license compatible with Commons:Licensing. Also, the "CC BY-NC-SA" statement in the footer on page 33 contradicts the stated licensing and is incompatible with Commons:Licensing. LX (talk, contribs) 18:08, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:43, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As noted on page 7, this file contains non-free content on the front cover, page 3 and page 5. LX (talk, contribs) 18:27, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:40, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains http://www.flickr.com/photos/65327964@N00/3696428278/, which is non-free, on page 5. LX (talk, contribs) 18:43, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:38, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this logo isn't PD ineligible, it isn't plain textlogo — Draceane talkcontrib. 19:52, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - the logo is above ToO. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:32, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the logo isn't plain, so it can't be in PD — Draceane talkcontrib. 19:58, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - the logo is above ToO. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:31, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the logo isn't plain, so it can't be in PD — Draceane talkcontrib. 19:58, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - the logo is above ToO. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:31, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the logo isn't plain, so it can't be in PD — Draceane talkcontrib. 19:58, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - the logo is above ToO. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:31, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo was taken by a photographer from Reuters, as noted in this article. The image is copyrighted by Reuters and is ineligible for a commons release by the Tasnim News Agency. CentreLeftRight 20:02, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - I don't think Tasnim News Agency can license this photo made by a freelance photojournalist. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:30, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader did not create 3D object depicted. Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:34, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ellin Beltz: , What does it mean. What 3D objects has to do with an image in Commons? --TohaomgTohaomg (talk) 21:52, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Tohaomg: Please read COM:L about licensing uploads. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:24, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:42, 2 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a notice board. Yasu (talk) 14:56, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --whym (talk) 13:47, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a notice board. Yasu (talk) 14:58, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --whym (talk) 13:47, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

same as File:BUElux.GIF ZellmerLP (Diskussion) 20:55, 13 February 2018 (UTC)


Deleted: Redirected. @ZellmerLP: , next time just use {{Duplicate}}. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:18, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A free source must be provided Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:42, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Google Maps copyvio. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:18, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per this discussion, all images without explicitly watermarked attribution to agency photographers are presumed to be outside this license. SlowManifesto (talk) 10:28, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:18, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per this disscusion, works submitted to VOA‌ by citizen journalists (User-generated content) are not in the public domain. 4nn1l2 (talk) 15:53, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete as copyrighted by the person with the camera: It is a still frame from the same video that was deleted in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Protesters Overturn Iranian Police Van.webm as a copyrighted work. In detail:

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:18, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I believe the named uploader Arrivisto (he was selling these bikes from this listing[4] at this time) who has uploaded many pics he did not have copyright to, has taken this pic from a sale on Ebay UK here [5] by business seller unit5moto[6]. He uploaded the pic on June 1 2017 the sale of this bike ended July 25 2017. You can plainly see this is the exact same bike with the exact same backdrop. Therefore i believe he is not the copyright holder. 72bikers (talk) 16:11, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:19, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication about the author of this file : it might be a modern work imitating the medieval manuscript miniature style. --Guise (talk) 13:00, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Found a source that says it's a 14th century miniature. Ruthven (msg) 19:18, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The previous nomination was closed as keep because someone found a link attributing the file to a 14th century manuscript; this attribution can almost certainly be traced back to Wikipedia itself. We have nothing solid about the source, author or copyright status of this image, other that it looks like it might be an ancient miniature. Underlying lk (talk) 16:28, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: It's from an illuminated manuscript here. I can't imagine a reasonable scenario where it would be copyvio. It would be disruptive to delete given widespread image usage. -- GreenC (talk) 04:17, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep per GreenC, but it would be better to replace it with a crop of the new image (the top half misses the watermark). Though clearly the same image, the current one is a much inferior version. Johnbod (talk) 12:34, 3 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9   16:41, 21 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

il y a une faute et je veux la corriger en poster une autre image — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mohammed Lagmah (talk • contribs) 2018-02-15T22:25:32‎ (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: @Mohammed Lagmah:  Tu peux écraser le fichier existant: COM:Overwriting_existing_files/fr. Ruthven (msg) 19:15, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplication file-- Leonardo.G G (talk) 04:17, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

File:2011-07-09- Edson Gomes - Reggae Festival - 2011.jpg; see. --2804:D49:1209:13B7:0:0:0:1 01:01, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: deleted the duplicate. Ruthven (msg) 19:19, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate file erase: The file never belonged to me and already has another file equal and is in use.-- Pedro201112 (talk) 21:47, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination. P 1 9 9   18:38, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

FOP doesn not include public sculptures. The sculpture is a work by Brjörn Weckström. Estormiz (talk) 07:16, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:19, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 1Veertje as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: source=http://www.panhellenicgames.org/vip__athletes/index.html
Converted by me to DR, as the nominator-provided external hit is not at all convincing, because it is undated and the image far smaller than our version. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:50, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
However, http://usa.greekreporter.com/2012/03/06/spotlight-on-the-greek-american-trainer-of-george-soros-and-the-wall-street-elite/ has the image in the same resolution as our version and was published several months earlier than at Commons. So, if we assume that the uploader despite of his name being identical to the depicted person, is not really him, it might be copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 08:52, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per -Túrelio. Ruthven (msg) 19:20, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Subject requested deletion of svwp page, and page was deleted. He is not notable, and the image has no other educational value. Therefore a private image, which is not used, other than on wikidata, which is probably gonna be deleted. DavidIvar (talk) 09:25, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use on Wikidata. Ruthven (msg) 19:20, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in use, personal file. Wikidata has seemingly now been deleted. Kissa21782 (talk) 07:23, 20 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:24, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No verifiable source. The supposed source link is just a generic Google search link with no relevant results. Contradictory copyright claims. The uploader claims both that the copyright of the photo has expired and that it is covered by a free copyright license. Since there is no source information, there is no evidence to support either claim. Supposedly, the photo was taken in 1920, which is too recent to assume that the copyright has expired. LX (talk, contribs) 09:35, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-Hungary. Ruthven (msg) 19:21, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

How did you verify the publication details? LX (talk, contribs) 19:28, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per previous DR by LX. Unfortunately previous closer forgot to explain why this would be PD-Hungary, there is no evidence for that. No indication that the author would have died before 1948 and no indication that the author was unknown at the time. Jcb (talk) 20:40, 15 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Insufficient information to verify the stated PD rationale. This also applies to File:Darnay Kálmán.jpg. LX (talk, contribs) 21:38, 19 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - unambiguous COM:EVID failure. --Эlcobbola talk 20:40, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Better version available here. --Flappiefh (talk) 10:59, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:23, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader Pagedit123 claims as own work. Yet the Author is given as Carlos Delgado - cf. File:Peter jarvis snow 01.jpg and File:Jarvis peter 04.jpg uploaded by same editor and with authors given as Jadia Xayashi and Dan Patrowski repectively. Smerus (talk) 12:12, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: very bad quality, possibly a screenshot of a video. In any case, OTRS permission is needed. Ruthven (msg) 19:24, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader Pagedit123 claims as own work. Yet the Author is given as Jadia Xayashi - cf. File:Jarvis peter 04.jpg and File:Peter01.jpg uploaded and claimed by same editor and with authors given as Dan Patrowski and Carlos Delgado respectively. Smerus (talk) 12:23, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: very bad quality, possibly a screenshot of a video. In any case, OTRS permission is needed. Ruthven (msg) 19:24, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader Pagedit123 claims as own work. Yet the Author is given as Dan Patrowski - cf. File:Peter jarvis snow 01.jpg and File:Peter01.jpg uploaded and claimed by same editor and with authors given as Jadia Xayashi and Carlos Delgado respectively. Smerus (talk) 12:25, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: very bad quality, possibly a screenshot of a video. In any case, OTRS permission is needed. Ruthven (msg) 19:24, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a derivative work and no source or permission of the original work is provided. SlowManifesto (talk) 12:42, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: can be considered de minimis. Ruthven (msg) 19:25, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for modern sculptures.

Sealle (talk) 14:11, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:26, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work by sculptor Churyo Sato († 2011). Copyright is still in effect and COM:FOP#Japan doesn't allow such artworks. Yasu (talk) 14:58, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:28, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PD-Italy applies only to screenshots, not film stills. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:41, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Patrick Rogel, je ne comprends pas pourquoi vous tenez absolument à ce que la photographie ait été publiée en Italie, alors qu'elle ne doit qu'avoir été prise en Italie. Mais si vous y tenez tant, sachez que la photographie a été publié par un magazine italien Grazia - Groupir ! (talk) 04:39, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Je n'imaginais pas que vous alliez toucher à ces photos de Louis de Funès sur le tournage de L'Homme orchestre.
 Keep Cette photographie n'est ni une capture d'écran, ni un "film still" au sens traditionnel du terme (photo du tournage d'une scène ou photo "mise en scène" d'un acteur). C'est simplement une photographie prise durant une pause lors d'un tournage. La photographie ayant été prise en Italie et en 1970, elle est donc acceptable sur Commons. - Groupir ! (talk) 21:16, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Racconish (it's a not creative photograph, PD both in Italy and in the US). Ruthven (msg) 19:33, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

je me suis trompée de numèro de photo. Roxaneweb (talk) 17:43, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion; @Roxaneweb: voir {{Rename}}. Ruthven (msg) 19:33, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

{{delf}

J'ai téléchargé une image que je ne voulais pas télécharger car la photo ne correspond pas au titre, la bonne est 0076.jpg Merci.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a fleuron. Bottom of a map, now available at File:1783 Map of Iceland.jpg -- Deadstar (msg) 19:38, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:34, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, this image is not under a free license or public domain. 2A02:C7F:9659:4500:B4B3:7D4A:6D27:9735 19:43, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: taken from https://news.shpock.com/media. Ruthven (msg) 19:34, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparent Copyrighted statue - no freedom of panorama Alanscottwalker (talk) 22:44, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: recent sculpture from Erik Blome. Ruthven (msg) 19:36, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Weil das nicht die Mündung des ehemaligen Weißeritzmühlgrabens ist. Die bis 1937 bestehende Mündung lag etwa auf Höhe des Congress Centers. Siehe dazu meine Website www.weisseritzmuehlgraben.de (Wolfgang Müller) 2003:4A:EF75:D14:26:93AD:E0BA:368 10:17, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Bild hat zu bleiben! Then just correct the explanation - know-it-all without clue! Do not delete image as long as no new one is available. --2003:C2:73EB:F55F:5885:E13D:489A:F777 14:15, 18 February 2018 (UTC)Neutralisimo[reply]

Um es vornweg zu nehmen: Das Bild bleibt und wird nicht gelöscht - es verstößt gegen keinerlei Urheberrechtsverletzung und ist ein Zeitdokument! Habe mich seinerzeit vor dem veröffentlichen des Fotos beim Amt für Stadtentwässerung erkundigt. Dabei wurde mir versichernd erklärt, dass das eine Kanaleinbindung eines der mehreren Weißeritzmühlgrabenverzweigungen ist. Siehe auch: Stadtarchiv Dresden, Akten des Tiefbauamtes 2.3.13, Sch 30, Band III. Sollte meine damalige Recherche heute nicht den Fakten entsprechen, dann ist der Bildtext anzupassen und nicht das Foto zu löschen die Alternative. Denn es stellt immerhin ein Zeitdokument dar.--Bybbisch94 (talk) 10:34, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Antwort von W. Müller: Natürlich muss dieses Bild nicht gelöscht werden. Ich wusste nur nicht, wie ich mit dem Urheber dieses Fotos (Bybbisch94|Bybbisch94) in eine Diskussion kommen könnte. War vermutlich der falsche Weg. Entschuldigung! Nach meinem über viele Jahre hinweg erforschten Erkenntnissen, hat der Dresdner Weißeritzmühlgraben an dieser Stelle nie direkt in die Elbe, sondern erst in die Weißeritz gemündet. Und man hat diesen Abzweig auch nicht Weißeritzmühlgraben, sondern "Abschlaggraben" genannt. In der Überschrift ist das wohl verwechselt worden. Aufgrund dieser Überschrift wurde ich bereits von einigen Stadtgeschichtsfreunden angesprochen. Herr Männig von der Stadtentwässerung Dresden GmbH sagt dazu: "Das ist der sog. „Regenauslass Pieschner Allee“, der bei stärkeren Regen überschüssiges Mischwasser in die Elbe bringt. Er beginnt auf der Kreuzung Weißeritz-/Magdeburger Str. und endet wie fotografiert." Um künftige Irritationen zu vermeiden, wurde die Überschrift geändert. Die mindestens 500 Jahre bestehende Einmündung des ehemaligen Weißeritzmühlgrabens befand sich etwa auf Höhe des heutigen Congress Centers, zu sehen auf meiner Website: http://www.weisseritzmuehlgraben.de/chronologie_2.htm#Schmelzm:252hle

Danke für Ihre Bemühungen.--Bybbisch94 (talk) 14:36, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nun müssten nur noch die Korrekturen vom Urheber vorgenommen werden,dann ist alles i.O. (WM)

Den Löschantrag kann ich nicht zurücknehmen, das müssten Sie bitteschön selbst beantragen und begründen. Die Bilderklärung habe ich angepasst. Den Bildtitel ändern müssten Sie ebenfalls beantragen und begründen.--Bybbisch94 (talk) 16:06, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
File moved per request of the uploader. --DCB (talk) 12:05, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, problems seem to be resolved. --Rosenzweig τ 15:27, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Josve05a as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work: google search
Converted by me to DR, as the provided hits are not copyvio-suggestive, as they are all after upload to Commons and have far lower resolution. -- Túrelio (talk) 16:04, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hm, I do not remember tagging this file; I ment to tag another file open in another tab. This file does not seem to have any older versions pointing to copyvio. Sorry, my bad! --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 16:07, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Gestumblindi (talk) 22:08, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Esta obscura Carlos Rodolfo Ramos (talk) 16:44, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep La imagen está en uso en un proyecto, por lo que no puede borrarse por mala calidad a menos que se convenza primero al proyecto de usar otra (o ninguna). Además, si se usa es que no es tan mala. De hecho, no queda mal en la página donde está.--Pere prlpz (talk) 18:56, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Pere prlpz. Ruthven (msg) 02:42, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this site prohibits the use of its material; edition: მასალების გადაბეჭდვა/რეპროდუცირება აკრძალულია, იხილეთ მასალის გამოყენების პირობები Mehman 97 20:42, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 02:43, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this site prohibits the use of its material; edition: მასალების გადაბეჭდვა/რეპროდუცირება აკრძალულია, იხილეთ მასალის გამოყენების პირობები [7] Mehman 97 20:43, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 02:43, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

زمانی که این عکس را آپلود میکردم از ممنوعیت تصاویر شخصی در ویکی اطلاعی نداشتم. این عکس باید حذف گردد. Mostafa Meraji 21:04, 18 February 2018 (UTC)


جناب معراجی، چون شما از کاربران ویکی‌مدیا هستید، می‌توانید این تصویر را برای صفحهٔ کاربری‌تان نگه دارید. ممنوعیت تصاویر شخصی برای کسانی است که نه مشهور هستند، و نه کاربر پروژه‌های ویکی‌مدیا. 4nn1l2 (talk) 11:54, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


تشکر از شما دوست ارجمند

[edit]


ببخشید من در ابتدای راه هستم و ناشی. سپاسگذارم از شما و تذکرهای سازنده و به جاتون (Mostafa Meraji (talk) 21:11, 3 March 2018 (UTC))[reply]


Kept: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 02:46, 30 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

svg画像があるため EVandRailway (talk) 14:18, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: We don't need a PNG version with baseless copyright claim. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:08, 3 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Rechtschreibfehler im Bildnamen. Fehlende Beschriftung. Bild wurde durch beschriftetes Duplikat mit korrekter Schreibeweise ersetzt. Sciencia58 (talk) 09:38, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment Regarding the problem of the name, in fact it is the correct writing in English, therefore the current name is not really an issue, otherwise a renaming would be enough. With regard to labels, the image without labels can be useful to serve as a basis for images with labels in different languages. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:45, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per my comment above. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:46, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The plaque was set up in 1992 (the 4th year of the Heisei era). Text is not in PD. Yasu (talk) 14:58, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:37, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The explanation board was set up in 2010 (the 22nd year of the Heisei era). Text is not in PD. Yasu (talk) 14:58, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:38, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any evidence that picture has been created/First published in Italy. In any case, PD-Italy applies only to screenshots, not film stills. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:47, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Weak keep The film was also shot in Italy. --Ruthven (msg) 19:30, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - first published in France http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0058533/releaseinfo. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:13, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The American Hockey League can't license one of its teams logos under a free license, since it is the team that owns their intellectual properties, and not the league itself. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 15:52, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:15, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:11, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:17, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Был загружен новый формат файла. Egorik H (talk) 13:18, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, the uploader requested deletion of page:Courtesy deletions. --Y.haruo (talk) 16:27, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

代用できるSVG画像があるため EVandRailway (talk) 14:21, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep This logo seems to me below threshold of originality and can be kept. Elly (talk) 10:32, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Ellywa: He/She said that there are SVG image that can be substituted.--Y.haruo (talk) 16:36, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Oke, thanks I should have tried to read the text. Elly (talk) 17:53, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. --Y.haruo (talk) 18:26, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have taken this picture, and the uploader has stolen it from me Mr.mush3 (talk) 12:53, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Mr.mush3: How was it "stolen"? --Ruthven (msg) 19:26, 14 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Ruthven: I don't know how to explain, I had taken it via my mobile phone, and then he get the photos and publish it in course of competition in Arabic Wikipedia, that's it--Mr.mush3 (talk) 00:42, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - unreliable uploader, uploaded multiple copyvio. --Jcb (talk) 12:29, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I haven taken this picture and the uploader أبو بكر السوري has stolen it from me in addtition to this file Mr.mush3 (talk) 12:53, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Related to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Al-Basel School for superiors in Aleppo.jpg. --Ruthven (msg) 07:54, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:29, 6 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Re-uploaded with a new nomenclature to become part og the "Uploaded files from the School of music...". Pages that use this audio file are also updated. Thanks! Enricguaus (talk) 16:32, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - the system does not detect a duplicate - if the file name would need to be changed, use {{Rename}} instead. --Jcb (talk) 14:12, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hi, You mentioned "system do not detect duplicate". Right: I changed the codification setup at the .ogg in order to re-upload it! It was my first upload and I didn't know how exactly it works... Right now, its duplicated until it's deleted. Enricguaus (talk) 11:00, 15 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please provide a link to the other file. Jcb (talk) 15:52, 4 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I took a couple of minutes trying to find the duplicate, but was unable to. ℺ Gone Postal ( ) 04:07, 4 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, in that case it will be a keep for now. Jcb (talk) 18:11, 11 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Majora (talk) 22:39, 1 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate and deprecated Enricguaus (talk) 12:07, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - don't renominate!. --Jcb (talk) 13:41, 8 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A better version is uploaded, described right on that Bill Wong (talk) 16:58, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You can also see the better version refers to this file as the source, therefor it should be kept to preserve the attribution chain. --Svgalbertian (talk) 23:44, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
There is no attribution required: public domain images can be attributed to anyone and anything, or not attributed at all. The threshold of originality means that basically anyone with some time of their hands can recreate this without any effort. --spider (talk) 10:11, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep since the originality of this one is way below that of, say, File:Sony logo.svg, and thus does not cross the threshold or even come close to it. --spider (talk) 10:11, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 14:13, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of source (I have not been able to find it here) and no evidence the film was first shown after Jan 1, 1929. — Racconish ☎ 11:53, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep - There is licence: {{PD-Russia-2008}} connected with this video and I do not see any reason, why not to belive it. --Karelj (talk) 21:17, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment As explained in the nomination rationale, the template explicitely limits the lack of copyright to films first shown after January 1, 1929. I don't see any evidence this 1920 sequence meets this criterion. Beside, the source is not clear. — Racconish ☎ 21:30, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I've fixed link to source --Butko (talk) 08:22, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. The PD issue remains though.— Racconish ☎ 10:10, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You may be right, I removed my keep vote. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:45, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:08, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Jako autor zdjęcia proszę o usunięcie zdjęcia, ponieważ nie chcę aby dalej znajdowało się w zbiorach zdjęć WIKIMEDIA COMMONS. Wiktor0610 (talk) 15:27, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - you cannot simply revoke your contribution. --Jcb (talk) 18:08, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mexican politician. If photos was made in Mexico, {{PD-Art}} is incorrect. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:09, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Jean-Pierre BONNOTTE / Gamma-Rapho. Unlikely to have been first (if even) published in Italy. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:27, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep La photographie ayant été prise en Italie et en 1969, elle est acceptable sur Commons. Le copyright "Jean-Pierre BONNOTTE / Gamma-Rapho" est donc ici invalide, comme souvent avec Getty Images. @Patrick Rogel: la date de publication importe peu ici puisque c'est le seul fait qu'elle ait été crée en Italie qui compte, comme nous en avons discuté. - Groupir ! (talk) 21:27, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hormis le copyvio de https://www.gamma-rapho.com/fr/asset/fullTextSearch/search/Henri+Verneuil/page/2, de toutes manières la loi italienne n'a pas à s'appliquer puisque le photographe est français et l'agence aussi. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 21:37, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Mais, @Patrick Rogel, du moment que la photo a été prise en Italie, ces lois s'appliquent indépendamment de la nationalité du photographe ou de l'agence, comme expliqué par @Ruthven ici ! - Groupir ! (talk) 21:43, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. Après examen attentif des clauses et spécificités du droit italien en la matière, cette photo répond aux critères requis. Tisourcier (talk) 17:40, 23 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Jcb (talk) 18:06, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

On a second look I think my closure was wrong. This picture is taken by a French photographer, for a French photo agency, so that PD-Italy cannot be applied. The French copyright term is PMA+70, so that this picture needs permission. Jcb (talk) 11:52, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Per nomination. — Racconish💬 12:13, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep If this photo is taken in Italy, Italian copyright law applies. The nationality of the photographer or the home address of the photo agency is of no importance. If I make a photograph in France, French copyright laws and French rules re FOP are applicable. Vysotsky (talk) 12:21, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • You are confusing two things. If e.g. a Dutch photographer takes a picture of a statue in France, indeed the French (lack of) FoP applies, because the statue was published in France. Regarding the picture, Dutch copyright will apply, unless the Dutch photographer first publishes the picture in France. Jcb (talk) 12:37, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete First of all, copyright for photographs rests with the photographer irrespectively where the photo was taken. This means that the copyright law of the photographer's home country is applicable. Additionals consideration need to be made if the photo is first published outside his home country, or if foreign artwork is the subject of the photo, but this does not seem to be the case here. So, as we need to apply French law, the image is not yet out of copyright. De728631 (talk) 12:30, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Italian copyright law applies independently of the nationality of the photographer or the agency. - Groupir ! (talk) 15:49, 3 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:51, 13 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The original file was improperly identified as the wrong person, and since no pages link to this one, this redirect can be safely deleted to avoid confusion. Slon02 (talk) 17:03, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:02, 8 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]