Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/02/10

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive February 10th, 2018
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-quality photo of subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. LX (talk, contribs) 10:01, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Green Giant (talk) 10:50, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used on Wikipedia, not real logo of REM Bill Wong (talk) 16:24, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Bill Wong: You uploaded it! I simply improved it, which you reverted. Why the hell are you bothering me? Secondarywaltz (talk) 17:17, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of recently uploaded unused file on this page and per speedy on the file page. Thats acutally a valid reason for deletion. If you want it back just ask. --Martin H. (talk) 18:42, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mistake Matrix 2 (talk) 16:54, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

mistake Matrix 2 (talk) 22:25, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploaders request. --JuTa 01:04, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

25432453453 EneaRuk1998 (talk) 11:15, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: own user page. --JuTa 01:09, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Errors in file I uploaded. Not ready to upload fixed version, and in meantime I want to delete this one Kdric (talk) 14:02, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:20, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a campaign poster so unlikely to be "own work" Number 57 (talk) 20:15, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - advert. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:20, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional content, out of scope Jianhui67 TC 16:03, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedily: Blatant spam. --Achim (talk) 10:37, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BYOMKESH NAYAK (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope, commons is not a photo album

Gbawden (talk) 13:40, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 09:36, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BYOMKESH NAYAK (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal files, out of project scope

Jianhui67 TC 15:54, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 15:59, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and:

Unused category. It will not be used in the future, either. It is replaced by Category:ACC containing 仌. Wargaz (talk) 02:44, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wargaz, should Category:ACC containing 冫 be kept as redirect to Category:ACC containing 仌? --Achim (talk) 20:55, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that it is unnecessary. In ACC, 冫 was not written as 冫 but only 仌. I also edited all ACCliencses that contain 冫, and now all of them are in the Category:ACC containing 仌. --Wargaz (talk) 21:06, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Achim (talk) 21:51, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. Small size, no metadata. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 16:22, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:16, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is listed as "Getty Images" but source is listed as self; appears to be a commercial photo TeaDrinker (talk) 02:31, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 08:44, 14 Februar 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: https://www.gettyimages.com/event/amfar-la-inspiration-portraits-october-29-2014-521223023#/actor-eddie-redmayne-poses-for-a-portrait-at-the-amfar-inspiration-picture-id458118870 --Krdbot 13:31, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a commercial photo from Getty images (author is Getty Images, uploader also claims own work); seems to be a pattern. TeaDrinker (talk) 12:22, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 08:55, 14 Februar 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: http://www.zimbio.com/photos/Graham+Rogers/Disney+Media+Distribution+International+Upfronts/Hb53mi6H_bs --Krdbot 13:32, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not correct V2common (talk) 16:09, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 11:04, 14 Februar 2018 UTC: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file: Not correct --Krdbot 13:32, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo. Unlikely to be used in a project. Commons is not a personal Webhost Afifa Afrin (talk) 17:41, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not used in any project, no reason to keep this file 37.111.201.8 18:31, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:48, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

لاني أرغب في تعديل الصورة الشخصية المرفقة Diaa rashwan (talk) 19:31, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

الصورة سيئة جدا ولم يتم تنسيقها قبل الرفع Diaa rashwan (talk) 19:41, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:19, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image without any information or description.Is is not placed in any Wiki articce at all. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Karelj (talk • contribs) 2018-02-10T12:12:26‎ (UTC)


Kept: No valid reason for deletion. Apparently taken in Lisbon. --Didym (talk) 00:40, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seems to be a TV screenshot, therefore copyrighted Al-Douri (talk) 13:35, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:05, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:04, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mericourt (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical painting. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:03, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file, out of project scope, nonsensical description Jianhui67 TC 15:51, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:03, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LevonTower (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Scans from a book and a copyrighted logo. Such work like a scan make you not to the copyright owner! Please read COM:L and COM:DW. Should you indeed be the original photographer, please send us a permission via OTRS.

Ras67 (talk) 15:51, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:03, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:52, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:02, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Larrycutty (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused files, out of project scope. Some are copyrighted logos/signs.

Jianhui67 TC 15:52, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:02, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:01, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kempor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted logos, above COM:TOO, no permission

Jianhui67 TC 15:55, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:01, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kempor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work of the uploader as claimed. No other source given to keep some as {{PD-textlogo}} or similar.

JuTa 13:54, 14 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:56, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Job Batatu (Musician) (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:04, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:59, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:59, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work, no permission and EXIF, grabbed from the web Jianhui67 TC 16:05, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Also I found this file — File:Muzichuk.jpg. --Brateevsky {talk} 18:53, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:58, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free photo of 3D-object, photographer’s permission required. Sealle (talk) 17:03, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:58, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file; self promotion; no educational value. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 17:08, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:57, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file; self promotion; no educational value. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 17:09, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:57, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file; self promotion; no educational value. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 17:10, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 17:11, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:57, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file; self promotion; no educational value. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 17:12, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:57, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file; self promotion; no educational value. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 17:12, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:57, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:36, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:56, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:36, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:56, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:36, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:56, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather small-sized format, potentially personality right isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 17:40, 10 February 2018 (UTC)  Comment: see also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Solverfr1z, Roland zh (talk) 17:43, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:56, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal drawing; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:40, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:55, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:44, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:54, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather small-sized format, one-file-upload, potentially personality right isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: see also en:User:Thirdhill Entertainment, Roland zh (talk) 17:48, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:54, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:50, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:53, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photograph uploaded for use at promotional EN Wikipedia page, out of scope. RA0808 (talk) 18:06, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:52, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of copyrighted packaging; may be usable as "fair use" elsewhere, but not a "free" image as defined by Commons Ubcule (talk) 18:10, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:52, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free license image. Most likely a screen shot from this music video. ArturSik (talk) 18:13, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:52, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scan of a document for use in promotional EN Wikipedia article, out of scope. RA0808 (talk) 18:14, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:51, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of a non-notable band, uncategorized and not in use anywhere since upload in 2014. Out of project scope. --Martin H. (talk) 18:28, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:51, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather small-sized format, one-file-upload, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:20, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:50, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of television screen Mjrmtg (talk) 21:08, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:47, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that the copyright owner "@GradySNP Twitter account" has granted permission. John (talk) 21:11, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:47, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jpatel42 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

not within scope, unused personal photos

Rosario Berganza 23:16, 24 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:22, 1 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no evidence of permission from the photographer, Cary Whittier, nor of the artist Robert Mars Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:17, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:45, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no evidence of permission from the photographer, Cary Whittier, nor of the artist Robert Mars Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:17, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:45, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no evidence of permission from the artist (who is apparently Rebecca Tobey) Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 22:36, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:45, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotional image spam, deleted multiple times under multiple names (see File:Ismael Ogando in Prenzlauerberg.jpg and File:Ismael Ogando in Prenzlauer Berg.jpg), all of them uploaded by the subject himself (see uploader's previous user name) using multiple socks (their main account User:Cocainaenvenenada and multiple previous socks are globally blocked for cross-wiki abuse). Thomas.W talk 22:36, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:44, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found elsewhere on the Internet (https://rapunchline.fr/rap-francais/rapgame/magnifique-message-de-niro-apres-sortie-de-album-surprise.html or https://www.facebook.com/niro/photos/a.891712854200835.1073741826.268968853141908/1640907429281370/?type=3&theater), false date, missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:52, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:44, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Gabino Amaya Cacho (b. 1961). Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:08, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:44, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Gabino Amaya Cacho (b. 1961). Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:09, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:44, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Gabino Amaya Cacho (b. 1961). Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:09, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:44, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Gabino Amaya Cacho (b. 1961). Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:10, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:44, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I just uploaded this by mistake as a separate file. It need not be saperate from the main file; I have also uploaded the cropped version there. Pete Forsyth (talk) 23:18, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:43, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not notable. Out of project scope. SlowManifesto (talk) 23:41, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:42, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not notable. Out of project scope. SlowManifesto (talk) 23:41, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:41, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture taken in France. Any evidence that it has been first published in Italy. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:50, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:41, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No actual content. It is not used in other wiki. English and French wiki use #ifexist function to display this file, so delete it won't affect other wikis. Wargaz (talk) 00:10, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:43, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is not a private travel photo album.--Kai3952 (talk) 00:40, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:45, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AMARNATHJAIPUR (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal photo and selfie. Unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:09, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:45, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sanya konor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal and promotional photos. Unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:02, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:46, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:12, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:44, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lower resolution duplicate of File:Olufeko lecturing to PhD and Post docs during summer 2015 in Washington DC.jpg Jochen Burghardt (talk) 04:34, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:24, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Extracted from file that was deleted Neegzistuoja (talk) 05:42, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:21, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused pomotional photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:50, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:20, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:53, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:45, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal selfie photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:55, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:47, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CHANDAN RAJ PASAHARA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal photos and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:58, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:45, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. Unlikely to be "Own work" Sixflashphoto (talk) 05:59, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:47, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Josequesedo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal photos/selfies and unlikely to be used in a project. We are not your Webhost

Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:02, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:46, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Udahemuka125 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal photos and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:09, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:48, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:14, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:49, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by K M Golam Mortuza (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal photos and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:17, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:49, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; unused personal photo TJH2018talk 06:17, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:50, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:20, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:50, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mdhamza004 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal photos and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:21, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:52, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:23, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:51, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Olivierchaaban (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal photos and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:23, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:51, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:25, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:51, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused photo of unknown person and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:28, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:51, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kanak Yadav Actress (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: All Unused personal photos/selfies and some Adverts. Some are blurry despite decent file size. Some are screen captures. I don't think any are encyclopedic images. The best seem to be some of the smallest file sizes so if this is someone notable enough for an article than I think we could find better images.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:38, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 12:55, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is not a private travel photo album.--Kai3952 (talk) 00:46, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:50, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is not a private travel photo album.--Kai3952 (talk) 00:46, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:49, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is not a private travel photo album.--Kai3952 (talk) 00:50, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:49, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is not a private travel photo album.--Kai3952 (talk) 00:50, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:49, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is not a private travel photo album.--Kai3952 (talk) 00:50, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:44, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is not a private travel photo album.--Kai3952 (talk) 00:54, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:44, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is not a private travel photo album.--Kai3952 (talk) 00:56, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:44, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is not a private travel photo album.--Kai3952 (talk) 00:59, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:43, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is not a private travel photo album.--Kai3952 (talk) 01:01, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:02, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is not a private travel photo album.--Kai3952 (talk) 01:04, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:00, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ahmad Butt Photoshop (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal photos and adverts and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:10, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:41, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:42, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Salome0207 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused selfies and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:26, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:05, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:28, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:04, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Given the strict French laws on photographs copyrighted buildings (no freedom of panorama) it's hard to see how this could fail to violate a copyright. Jmabel ! talk 01:28, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:06, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Given the strict French laws on photographs copyrighted buildings (no freedom of panorama) it's hard to see how this could fail to violate a copyright. Jmabel ! talk 01:30, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:06, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused photo of unknown baby. Unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:30, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:06, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:31, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:06, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused, non-encyclopedic and somewhat blurry image of unknown person. Unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:32, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:07, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:34, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:07, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:34, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:03, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BANGTAN B (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyvios. No Author, No Source.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:39, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:08, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:40, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:09, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo, self promotion and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:41, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:10, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:44, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:10, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kemistiprofessori (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused selfies and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:45, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:10, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:46, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:11, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:48, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:11, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:52, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:11, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:55, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:11, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ZacraeDunno (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused selfie and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:57, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:12, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:58, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:13, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:59, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:13, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused apparent personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:00, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:14, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 02:03, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:15, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is not a private travel photo album.--Kai3952 (talk) 02:10, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:17, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Its not according to the policy. V2common (talk) 03:28, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:20, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously deleted photo. Out of scope: unused personal photo. Unlikely to be used in a project. Commons is not a personal Webhost Afifa Afrin (talk) 03:51, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:20, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:08, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:22, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:09, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:22, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:09, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:22, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:09, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:23, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal document; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:10, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:24, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal document; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:10, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:24, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:11, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:25, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:11, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:25, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

can be found at https://tommyforidaho.com/about-tommy MB298 (talk) 04:43, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:21, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://tommyforidaho.com/about-tommy MB298 (talk) 04:43, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:21, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Highly unlikely to be own work. MB298 (talk) 04:44, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 12:01, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work MB298 (talk) 04:43, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:27, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. 220.137.0.110 05:51, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:28, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused photo of little known youtuber and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:15, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:28, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vares501 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: Unused personal photos and selfies. Unlikely to be used in a project. We are not your webhost

Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:40, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:33, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused selfie and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:43, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:31, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rebyana32 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal photos and selfies and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:44, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:32, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alaa musleh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused selfies and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:45, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:34, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploading miss 秋陽 (talk) 07:22, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:34, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploading miss 秋陽 (talk) 07:23, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:35, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cropped version of copyrighted promotional video found at https://static1.squarespace.com/static/58ab2fce20099e7487a18b2a/58b5de828c60358b07cfda7d/58b5de938c60358b07cfdf04/1488314003793/21p-promo-3.jpg and other locations Walter Görlitz (talk) 07:41, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:35, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mihailo79 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused photos, possibly out of project scope. I don't see how some of the photos are related to 'insurance'.

Jianhui67 TC 08:49, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:39, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of the project's scope: Nothing but private photograph. Gretarsson (talk) 09:04, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:40, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

چون خودم این صفحه را گذاشتم می خواهم حذف کنم. Arminmofidnakhaee (talk) 14:10, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 13:40, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:OOS artwork by a non-notable artist. Category:Modern Art by David Adam Kess and its child Category:Paintings by David Adam Kess too, when empty.

  — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:19, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


artwork by a non-notable artist....um o.k.

[edit]

do not want to say a thing and have my account frozen......

have a nice day — Preceding unsigned comment added by David Adam Kess (talk • contribs) 00:59, 11 February 2018‎ (UTC)[reply]

  • Signing your posts on talk pages is required and it is a Commons guideline to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 01:14, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please don't introduce L1 headers where only L4 and below are acceptable.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 01:14, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


thanks Jeff it is a lot to be an artist and you have many leves.....

great quote...very positive....maybe you have more wikimedia friends that can chime in to keep these images of my art.

all art can be considered educational and there was a recent village pump discussion concerning the status of lesser known artists — Preceding unsigned comment added by David Adam Kess (talk • contribs) 15:35, 12 February 2018‎ (UTC)[reply]

@Donald Trung: They are out of our current Project Scope, as a matter of official policy.

i still think it is only one person going with a delte....ǃ — Preceding unsigned comment added by David Adam Kess (talk • contribs) 15:36, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

i have got to say people in wikipedia are not nice at all..:!! love the negativity!! code is great....50 50 on the crazy side — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 186.69.59.4 (talk) 14:28, 14 February 2018‎ (UTC)[reply]

That appears to have been David Adam Kess socking.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 04:31, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 17:29, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused selfie, non-encyclopedic image and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:14, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:24, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unused photo of unknown child. Unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:21, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:26, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong license, missed while uploading Vcohen (talk) 17:29, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 09:52, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, no description or related to added category. KartikMistry (talk) 08:25, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:46, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is not a private travel photo album.--Kai3952 (talk) 08:46, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:47, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False authorship claims. https://writerpictures.photoshelter.com/gallery-image/DARYUSH-Elizabeth/G000060FvV5BGp4c/I0000Xer7tNNWRLM/C0000oRQKY6s_F6w LX (talk, contribs) 09:56, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:54, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fraorsato (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploaded as "own work", Google Image search shows that they were copied from elsewhere on the internet (including a copy of a screenshot of a film).

Takeaway (talk) 10:12, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:53, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by くるま

[edit]

Uploaded by User:くるま, these images are suspected copyright violations; see edf-ch.com/shop/. 153.230.132.201 12:25, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:09, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rorschach92 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Serial copyvio uploader, all files are tagged as own work, including a screenshot from the movie Kagemusha.

Underlying lk (talk) 13:54, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:54, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kitmil523 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:06, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


--Kitmil523 (talk) 23:22, 14 February 2018 (UTC) I can confirm that these photos are copyright owned by Kevin Miller and are intended for use in a wiki biography in draft and ready for submission. If further evidence is required what would this be?[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:54, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gabomirandaperez123456 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Incorrect licensing: the copyright holder is the creator, not the person who uploaded it. If this is public domain, we need proper licensing to establish this.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:57, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Commons:Currency#Mexico Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:44, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 18:56, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gabomirandaperez123456 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These all appear to be images of Mexican currency. I'm not sure if the license on this artwork would belong to the Mexican government or the actual artist, but in either case, it's likely copyrighted and non-free. Per COM:CRTMEX, most Mexican government works are not automatically public domain, and currency images do not appear to fall under the few exceptions to this law.

IagoQnsi (talk) 00:23, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for reusing an existing DR archive page -- I made this request with VisualFileChange, and didn't realize this is what it would do if a DR with the same title already existed. I'm not sure if I should try to make a new DR page or just leave it this way... -IagoQnsi (talk) 00:26, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Gabomirandaperez123456 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

More images of Mexican currency -- see my above rationale for deleting them

IagoQnsi (talk) 04:16, 8 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:25, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gabomirandaperez123456 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The files are images of Mexican pesos produced in the 80s, which is unfree according to the information from COM:CUR.廣九直通車 (talk) 01:19, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Gabomirandaperez123456 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The files are images of Mexican pesos produced after 23-07-1928, which is unfree according to the information from COM:CUR.廣九直通車 (talk) 02:38, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Gabomirandaperez123456 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The files are images of Mexican pesos produced after 23-07-1928, which is unfree according to the information from COM:CUR.廣九直通車 (talk) 03:16, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --De728631 (talk) 11:53, 13 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Überflüssig. Besseres Foto bereits in der Datenbank, das ich schlicht nicht gesehen hab. Derdadort (talk) 19:57, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file. --Wdwd (talk) 19:44, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ChadGuerrant (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal photos and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:18, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:25, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ChadGuerrant (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal files, out of project scope

Jon Kolbert (talk) 20:25, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:20, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Permission not clear: no evidence show that the uploader (Heavenheart~commonswiki) is the creator of the photo (南京市博物馆, or Nanjing Municipality Museum), which is a public museum in Nanjing, China. Siyuwj (talk) 01:21, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:20, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Permission not clear: no evidence show that the uploader (Heavenheart~commonswiki) is the creator of the photo (扬州博物馆, or Yangzhou Museum), which is a public museum in Yangzhou, Jiangsu, China. Siyuwj (talk) 01:25, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:22, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted posters included. 220.137.0.110 07:42, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:FOP#Taiwan. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:29, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted poster. 220.137.0.110 07:54, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no evidence that is free-licensed. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:30, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Varaine (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Seemingly a copyrighted image and not "own work". See watermark.

Ies (talk) 10:58, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PRP. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:27, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Varaine (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Too low quality to be useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 09:43, 30 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:36, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising content, out of scope as Wikimedia Commons is no place to advertise and files should be reasonably useful for an educational purpose.--Kai3952 (talk) 11:06, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, also copyvio. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:28, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hassan Tower is main subject of image - therefore fails Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Morocco Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:24, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 02:18, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photograph uploaded for use at promotional EN Wikipedia page, out of scope. RA0808 (talk) 18:03, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Mys 721tx at 19:03, 22 Februar 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by John Roland Mew --Krdbot 01:24, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DBSJrDigital (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal photos and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 01:22, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:34, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False own work - published elsewhere (e.g. http://www.intermedia.ru/news/318614) and the person has died today aged 76, thus the photo was definitely made long ago Tatewaki (talk) 01:38, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:34, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Commons is not a private travel photo album.--Kai3952 (talk) 02:09, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:34, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:39, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:34, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo of questionable notability : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:05, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:35, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project. Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:29, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:35, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Explanation board's illustration is a copyrighted work. Batholith (talk) 07:58, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

See overall explanation board = [1]--Batholith (talk) 14:44, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:35, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

scan of newspaper page, the date which is written on the top of this newspaper is 1969. Freshman404Talk 08:57, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-Iran. Ruthven (msg) 21:36, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

quiero eliminar 89.176.191.20 09:17, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 21:37, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope for Commons:Project scope. Personal selfie. Commons is not a personal photo album.--Kai3952 (talk) 09:24, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. Ruthven (msg) 21:37, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Solomon203 (talk) 12:24, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 00:57, 12 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Auteur : Andreas von Einsiedel, so autorization needed, see Commons:OTRS/fr Shev123 (talk) 09:37, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: Andreas von Einsiedel 2011, All Rights Reserved. OTRS authorisation needed from the author. Ruthven (msg) 21:38, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Auteur : Andreas von Einsiedel, so autorization needed, see Commons:OTRS/fr Shev123 (talk) 09:37, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: Andreas von Einsiedel 2011, All Rights Reserved. OTRS authorisation needed from the author. Ruthven (msg) 21:38, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Auteur : Andreas von Einsiedel, so autorization needed, see Commons:OTRS/fr Shev123 (talk) 09:37, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: Andreas von Einsiedel 2011, All Rights Reserved. OTRS authorisation needed from the author. Ruthven (msg) 21:38, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Auteur : Andreas von Einsiedel, so autorization needed, see Commons:OTRS/fr Shev123 (talk) 09:37, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: Andreas von Einsiedel 2011, All Rights Reserved. OTRS authorisation needed from the author. Ruthven (msg) 21:37, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of the musem's website which is under copyright, so autorization needed, see Commons:OTRS/fr Shev123 (talk) 09:38, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: The general structure of the website, as well as the software and databases, the graphic chart, the Musée d’Art Clasique logo, the icons are the exclusive property of the Musée d'Art Classique de Mougins. Any reproduction, representation, in whole or in part, use, adaptation, provision or modification by any process, any person and any means whatsoever (particularly sales, marketing, rental, etc.) without the express authorisation of the museum, any authors or right holders is strictly prohibited and constitutes a violation of the French Intellectual Property Code. Ruthven (msg) 21:39, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small resolution, no metadata НоуФрост (talk) 09:56, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:39, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

metadata = author = V.Mertvoy НоуФрост (talk) 10:02, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OTRS authorisation needed from the author. Ruthven (msg) 21:40, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, blurry, small unused Hiddenhauser (talk) 12:35, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: good enough. Ruthven (msg) 21:41, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Page the image is sourced from does not indicate that it is licenced under CCA4 Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:12, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:41, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

è un cattivo duplicato di un file migliore caricato più recentemetne Triktrak 14:49, 10 February 2018 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:41, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any proof that photo has been first published in Italy. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:20, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 KeepAvons-nous une preuve que cette photographie (Dalida 1961.jpg) a été publiée pour la première fois en Italie? Lethiernois 10 Février 2018 11:11(UTC)

Kept: per Lethiernois + Mondadori portfolio. Ruthven (msg) 21:42, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any proof that photo has been first published in Italy. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:20, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 KeepAvons-nous une preuve que cette photographie (Dalida 1961.jpg) a été publiée pour la première fois en Italie? Lethiernois 10 Février 2018 11:11(UTC)

Kept: per Lethiernois + Mondadori portfolio. Ruthven (msg) 21:42, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any proof that photo has been first published in Italy. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:21, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 KeepAvons-nous une preuve que cette photographie (Dalida 1961.jpg) a été publiée pour la première fois en Italie? Lethiernois 10 Février 2018 11:11(UTC)

Kept: per Lethiernois + Mondadori portfolio. Ruthven (msg) 21:42, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"autorisation non-disponible" see https://www.gettyimages.fr/license/141563761 Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 07:03, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It is the second time when the debate takes place! Photos are free in Italy and in the United States. It doesn't need credit note of authorization there.--Lethiernois (talk) 09:26, 16 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per PD-Italy. 1967 non-artistic photograph taken in Italy. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 10:20, 24 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Any proof that photo has been first published in Italy. Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:21, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 KeepAvons-nous une preuve que cette photographie (Dalida 1961.jpg) a été publiée pour la première fois en Italie? Lethiernois 10 Février 2018 11:11(UTC)

Kept: per Lethiernois + Mondadori portfolio. Ruthven (msg) 21:42, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official symbol. Proper license tag should be used if it's in public domain. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:44, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown date of shooting : impossible to get evidence that it has been first published in Italy. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:44, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep. The date was changed by a volunteer editor (why?). The source says the image was taken in Rome, in the 1950s, and the copyright belongs to an Italian publisher. See {{PD-Italy}}: This photograph is in the public domain in Italy because it was first created in Italy and its term of copyright has expired. Materialscientist (talk) 02:07, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment A basic search shows no evidence that this photograph has ever been published (in Italy or somewhere else) so it will hard to be sure that Italian law applies. Anyway perhaps it could be uploaded at itwiki or enwiki as an alternative. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:03, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Italian magazines from that period are very poorly digitized. Except for covers, you won't find many inside photos online. So this is no evidence at all. Materialscientist (talk) 23:04, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment However it seems you have recently uploaded such images with first publication in Italy (from Radiocorriere) and since they're correctly described they haven't be put on DR. Concerning Dalida 1950s.jpg the burden of proof that it has been first published in Italy is on you. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:23, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, so this DR is about me and my uploads, which User:Patrick Rogel closely monitors.
Regarding this image, User:DalidaFan changed its date from 1950s to 1961, so he might know publication details. I've asked him/her on en.wiki. Materialscientist (talk) 00:18, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Dalida was not living in Italy in the 50s but in Egypt so it's likely that this session has been shot in 1961. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:29, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Negative. She was traveling around the world after becoming successful in 1957. Materialscientist (talk) 00:02, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Materialscientist. Ruthven (msg) 21:46, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GeorgianJorjadze (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No evidence these photos are PD, dubious licensing.

Sealle (talk) 17:06, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:48, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The sign is not permanent, therefore it is not covered by COM:FOP#Ecuador.   — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 17:47, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


you have a good eye....The sign is not permanent, therefore it is not covered by COM:FOP#Ecuador.  


have a great day


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:49, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photograph uploaded for use at promotion EN Wikipedia page, out of scope. RA0808 (talk) 18:03, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:52, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photograph uploaded for use at promotional EN Wikipedia page, out of scope. RA0808 (talk) 18:04, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:52, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photograph uploaded for use at promotional EN Wikipedia page, out of scope. RA0808 (talk) 18:05, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:52, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photograph uploaded for use at promotional EN Wikipedia page, out of scope. RA0808 (talk) 18:05, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:52, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photograph uploaded for use at promotional EN Wikipedia page, out of scope. RA0808 (talk) 18:06, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:52, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative/copy of original book cover whose authorship and copyright status are not clear. Ubcule (talk) 18:06, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I was given permission by the publisher 'Coiscéim' to allow their book covers to be used on Wikipedia.Ériugena (talk) 17:01, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ériugena: - Permission "to allow their book covers to be used on Wikipedia" (and not elsewhere) isn't sufficient for upload to Commons. Commons is *only* for images that are "free" according to its definition.
While it's a related project, Commons is not the same thing as the various language Wikipedias. There are certain images- mainly "fair use" ones as far as I'm aware- that can be uploaded to English Wikipedia, but not to Commons.
You would need them to clearly agree that their book covers can be used *freely*, as shown in the declaration of consent at OTRS, then get OTRS to archive this permission.
On top of that, this cover appears to (possibly) be a derivative of an older illustration. If so, it would also have to be shown that they had permission to use and relicense it in this manner *or* that the original image was out of copyright.
Ubcule (talk) 16:30, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Ubcule. Ruthven (msg) 21:53, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal account of Trump and not the presidential one. Consensus at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Donald Trump- 'Modern Day Presidential'.png was that such images are not PD. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 18:34, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:53, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Paul Ducuing died in 1949. No freedom of panorama in France. 90.61.233.21 21:35, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:56, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no indication temple gave him permission to take this photo. VictoriaGrayson (talk) 23:25, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Even if they hadn't, that would not be a copyright issue, but as it happens I made explicit arrangement to come in and shoot this (and a number of other photos), with the specific intention of publication. There is no reason to announce on every photo I take that I was legally in the place where I took the photo. - Jmabel ! talk 23:32, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 21:55, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2D artwork Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:29, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:55, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rusia india mexico (talk · contribs)

[edit]
English: The copyright for these images belongs to the Bank of Mexico. See COM:MONEY#Mexico.
Español: Los derechos para estas imágenes pertenecen al Banco de México. Mírese COM:MONEY#Mexico.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:54, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 12:48, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rusia india mexico (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own use - icons of various settlements in Mexico.

Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:38, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 05:53, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file. It is replaced by its higher resolution version File:Characters on Zun of Xiaochenyu.jpg. Wargaz (talk) 07:37, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 12:09, 7 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader claims the photo is from the Broward County (FL) Sherriff’s Office but there’s no link to verify the claim, and Google Image Search comes up empty. Ytoyoda (talk) 01:22, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@WolvesS: Thank you for adding a source link, but it says the mugshot is from Wake County, NC. As far as I know, North Carolina government records and documents are not in public domain. Ytoyoda (talk) 16:06, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
{ping|Ytoyoda} then I was wrong, feel free to delete the image. My apologies. WolvesS (talk)

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:40, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WolvesS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Image previously published: http://m.hitsdailydouble.com/news&id=306012

Requires OTRS ticket

Ytoyoda (talk) 01:46, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:40, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A free source must be provided for this map Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:50, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, since we created this map, please let us know why the map should be deleted. Thank you!

It is requested from where you took the base map. --Ruthven (msg) 21:35, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Google Maps screenshot. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:41, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is CC-licenced on Flickr, but originates from http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/giant-fatberg-forms-in-sewers-beneath-government-buildings-in-whitehall-9839093.html, which is credited to Thames Water. The Flickr account looks like a mood board of found images, and does not have the authority to change their licence. Lord Belbury (talk) 19:27, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:47, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality and useless Joschi71 (talk) 19:44, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:47, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality and useless Joschi71 (talk) 19:48, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:47, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jeff G. as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work: Google searchD Y O L F 77[Talk] 19:50, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: clearly {{PD-textlogo}}. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:45, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a screen shot of the designer from a video and doesn't show a clear image of her face. There are far superior images of this designer, including one found here named Mimi Plange Photo.jpg. Please use that one instead. This is not a good accepatable image for a designer and a brand and it should be removed. Other images of the designer have been added. Please help uphold the image of the brand and designer. Selimae (talk) 23:50, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Sorry, that argument isn't valid on Commons. We don't delete properly licensed material; the video you mentioned as the source is properly licenced as it's " CC BY". Tabercil (talk) 18:31, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • " Other images of the designer have been added" .... thank you, but I can find only one. Given a range of images then I can see why we would use the image we have used up till now. She is in the image business so she may chose to control the images she releases. Wikipedians respect that right but it does mean that we have to settle for the best legal image we can find. Victuallers (talk) 15:39, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
One of the images you loaded as "your work" is labelled elsewhere as "Photo copyright retained by photo owners, everything else © 2018 Design Milk®, part of the JD2 Media, LLC "Milk" family." - can you explain the rights you have over this picture which is shown available here and you offer as an alternative to our poor image.
Victuallers (talk) 15:52, 12 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:46, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work of an antist who died in 2017, so autorization needed, see Commons:OTRS/fr Shev123 (talk) 21:24, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Shev123,
I am the daughter of Georges Vriz and I took this picture myself. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zebrafix (talk • contribs)
Bonjour,
Les œuvres sont sous droits d'auteurs (70 ans après la mort de l'artiste) et il faut passer par Commons:OTRS/fr sinon toutes les images importées seront supprimées. Par ailleurs, merci de déclarer votre conflit d'intérêt sur votre page utilisateur. --Shev123 (talk) 11:17, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - we need a permission by mail to OTRS. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:57, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Propongo para borrado porque ya existe la misma imagen con mayor calidad. File:Francisco Fierro - Tapada limeña - Google Art Project.jpg Miguel Alan Córdova Silva (talk) 16:16, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, duplicated image, deleted and redirected. --Y.haruo (talk) 15:13, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1948. Jcb (talk) 17:20, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, missing legal information. --Y.haruo (talk) 15:16, 22 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright violation 41.65.47.130 12:30, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: there isn't not prove of copyright violation. --Ezarateesteban 18:30, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused file. Same function can be achieved with File:He zun inscription.jpg and {{ImageAnnotations}}. Wargaz (talk) 21:58, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ezarateesteban 18:48, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Web quality resolution, lacking EXIF data and watermarked. Other images uploaded by this user clearly came from here; this now deleted image is possibly published before and not under a free license. No evidence of OTRS permission. theinstantmatrix (talk) 02:04, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

According to his username and his Wikipedia draft, this actually is the photographer in question. And do we ask OTRS from every single photographer who makes nice pictures? And how should the OTRS work in this case? He doesn't own the 500px.com domain. I personally wasn't even able to find him with search engines, I only found 500px through his Wikipedia draft. Making me wonder what that proves. If we want to verify he is the same guy as the 500px guy, it would make much more sense to ask him to upload a selfie with Commons in the background. - Alexis Jazz 03:22, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
See my response here. Thanks. theinstantmatrix (talk) 05:06, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:13, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arghyadip photographer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per this, this, and this.

theinstantmatrix (talk) 04:01, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Alexis Jazz, you should know that everything that you see on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here, unless the author explicitly says anyone can use it without permission, or as long as they attribute the author and/or share alike, and these images listed above are no exception. Nothing this user mentions on the 500px website that anyone can use his image either under a Creative Commons license on 500px or that he has released it to the public domain. You said in your recent edit that goes along the lines of "this MUST be the photographer because of his username and the fact that he created a draft" but is he REALLY the photographer? Was he actually the one who took the photos himself? That's what OTRS is for; to prove that you're actually the one who took the photo. But so far, he has provided zero proof of it, and after discovering the website where the photos originate, and given the web resolutions and a possibly edited EXIF data, I tagged 2 photos for obvious copyvios and 1 nominated because I can't find that image on the website, hence I assume it was "deleted" on that website. To answer your question, NO, I didn't do it just because "I hate that guy so much" (besides, how I can hate a guy where I don't know who he actually was??), but because that's what the rules says so, in a nutshell: Only free content is permitted; copyrighted content and fair use claims are not allowed.
However, Alexis Jazz, you've contested those deletions by removing speedy deletion tags I've placed. I have nominated them now in response and I expect you to provide an answer WHY do you not want those images to be deleted, however, remember the one fact that those images are already found on the web, and are copyrighted, and is therefore not suitable here on Commons. Also, please see this; a standard 500px License equates to "All rights reserved" and therefore obviously incompatible here w/o OTRS proof from the author. theinstantmatrix (talk) 05:04, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Don't twist my words. I never said he must be, I said it was plausible. And I've heavily altered that reply. I was too harsch on you, sorry for that.
Just because an image has appeared in nonfree form before doesn't mean the uploader is not also the rights holder. And if they are, they could give permission. Through OTRS mail for example or by providing proof of identify in another way, in which case speedydelete is not the right way to go. If an author publishes a book (copyrighted) and ten years later decides to release it as Creative Commons, you would say "sorry, we don't want it"? I'll re-check the exact letter of the policy, but it makes no sense.
It's not really surprising he hasn't provided proof yet. I'm not sure he has even logged in yet since the first OTRS request. - Alexis Jazz 05:19, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Do not see any pretext to wage flame wars. Without permission obviously delete as copyrighted content, whereas in case of permission from the rights holder obviously keep. If the rights holder wants to have images hosted here, then he must confirm release of rights due to previous publication. If the rights holder is indifferent, then I am indifferent too. @Alexis Jazz: why should Commons volunteers spend their time to investigate identity and rights of every photographer uploading their produce there, here, and elsewhere? There are established practices of digital rights, and every artist behaving contrary to them prompts—by an own choice—troubles for his/her artworks. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 08:02, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to fight it anymore. Just delete it. Don't care if it's the photographer or just somebody who bought the image without watermark and uploaded it here. In fact, you might as well speedy it again. I mean, why not. I won't revert it. - Alexis Jazz 09:57, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:53, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bcohennl (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

These are pictures I took of a monument that was commissioned by a foundation of which I am chairman. Please do not delete. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bcohennl (talk • contribs)

@Bcohennl: Please write to OTRS service to clarify the permission. --Ruthven (msg) 21:44, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, still no permission. --Sealle (talk) 19:42, 24 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nice painting, but the painter died in 1985 so it's still in copyright and can be undeleted in 2056 Multichill (talk) 20:51, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wether it's a nice painting or not isn't relevant. The web page from which I copied the picture claims that its copyright status is CC BY-SA 3.0, which is. Magere Hein (talk) 08:15, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I sincerely doubt they have the rights to these paintings and the right to relicense them. If you look at https://museumrotterdam.nl/collectie/zoekresultaten/0/16/&search=objecttrefwoorden%3A%22schilderij%22&sort=eindjaar%20desc you'll see that they basically seem to have put cc-by-sa-3.0 on every work that is not yet in the public domain yet. Multichill (talk) 11:12, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I understand your doubts, but that search result doesn't disprove Museum Rotterdam's claim it has such a licence. OTOH it doesn't prove it does. As far as I know the museum owns those works, which may or may not include their copyright. Perhaps we should ask? Magere Hein (talk) 15:46, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You can go ahead and ask them, but they probably just messed it up. Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle applies here. Multichill (talk) 15:58, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Because of this deletion request I did realize the museum has a lot of paintings that are in the public domain. I uploaded a lot of them, see d:Wikidata:WikiProject sum of all paintings/Collection/Museum Rotterdam. Multichill (talk) 16:49, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination - the website license is understood to refer to the photograph of the painting, not to the painting itself. --Эlcobbola talk 16:37, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nice painting, but the painter died in 1985 so it's still in copyright and can be undeleted in 2056 Multichill (talk) 20:52, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Wether it's a nice painting or not isn't relevant. The web page from which I copied the picture claims that its copyright status is CC BY-SA 3.0, which is. Magere Hein (talk) 08:17, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination - the website license is understood to refer to the photograph of the painting, not to the painting itself. --Эlcobbola talk 16:35, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged (twice) by Batreeq as duplicate (Duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: File:Windows Voice Recorder app icon.svg|This is a low-resolution raster version of the linked SVG. They are exact duplicates, except that this is blurry. (in my opinion there is matching nothing exactly). -- User: Perhelion 09:49, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • The first time, the SVG was low-quality and did not warrant the deletion of the better file, the PNG. This has since been corrected. Batreeq (talk) 21:06, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • I remember a request in the graphic lab for this. So the SVG is probably traced, but it looks fine. Considering the PNG was uploaded 22 december 2017 and not in use anywhere at this moment I say "meh". Keep it, delete it, I don't really care. - Alexis Jazz 21:22, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:15, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence to support the claim that the photographer died more than 70 years ago. LX (talk, contribs) 09:41, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, the claim is that the painter died more than 70 year ago as this is a faithful photographic reproduction of a two-dimensional, public domain work of art. May be it would be best to change the licensing template to {{PD-art-70}}?--Алиса Селезньова (talk) 11:05, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The depicted work is a three-dimensional work of architecture with obvious shadows being cast. Therefore, the photograph itself is eligible for copyright protection and cannot be distributed without permission from the photographer. Please see Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag#When should the PD-Art tag not be used? LX (talk, contribs) 11:27, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You are right about the original but there is a new version with the 3D objects being cut off.--Алиса Селезньова (talk) 12:13, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Is the arch above the landscape painting a flat surface? Note that {{PD-Art}} must not be used if there are any three-dimensional elements in the photo, including things like frames. LX (talk, contribs) 15:26, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
It is hard to tell because of the low resolution, but it does seem to be either part of the painting itself or probably some sort of gold ornamentation, yet still flat enough to not produce any recognizable edges or shadows.
— Luchesar • T/C/U 17:46, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Appears to be flat enough for PD-Art. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:16, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:03, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unfortunately, without verification this is PD, we cannot keep it. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 18:17, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

6 Files uploaded by Solverfr1z (talk · contribs)

[edit]

as per File:Biby Mathew.jpg, rather small-sized format, potentially personality right isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?

Roland zh (talk) 17:42, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Roland zh:

All six images are my own work there is no copyright claim or ownership from external sources, I need your help on explaining the term 'EXIF', also give me a day or two to do the changes. thank you for the review Solverfr1z (talk) 20:17, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Solverfr1z: He means that these are not the original files as they came out from the camera. You should replace them with the original files. Moreover, Image i01.jpg is a collage, but where the source is not indicated (meaning that you have to say from where comes every single image). --Ruthven (msg) 21:52, 23 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Ruthven: That I can do! Solverfr1z (talk) 11:39, 26 February 2018 (UTC)

I have re-uploaded the files and added EXIF data on description please do check

Solverfr1z (talk) 12:22, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Solverfr1z: Fine, thanks. We still have doubts with the first image of Justin James, and the source of his photo in the collage. Can you clarify? --Ruthven (msg) 15:12, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Kept some, deleted others. The last image in File:Image i01.jpg clearly originated elsewhere (e.g., here) and thus requires OTRS. Issues with File:Justin James (music director).jpg have also not been explained (this is also the person whose image is a copyvio in File:Image i01.jpg, which may further suggest neither is in fact free.) File:4musics mangalam awards.jpg is here and also requires OTRS. --Эlcobbola talk 20:15, 27 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]