Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/01/30

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive January 30th, 2018
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of focus for commons, uploader permanently blocked for copyright violations and aggressive charge of subsequent users for minor license violations. Achim Raschka (talk) 09:33, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: com:dw et al. --Krd 09:38, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

неправомерный источник ElenaRuch (talk) 12:06, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sealle (talk) 13:34, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW, No evidence that the dw is freely licensed. Steinsplitter (talk) 12:43, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Emha (talk) 12:59, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://cs.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedie:N%C3%A1st%C4%9Bnka_spr%C3%A1vc%C5%AF#Smazání/Úprava_fotografie OJJ (talk) 08:38, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@OJJ: Proč to na Commons normálně nepřesunout? --Jan Polák (talk) 08:40, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please deny this request. User asked for renaming and if not possible, for deleting. I've requested the filemove. --Martin Urbanec (talk) 08:41, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Courcelles 16:04, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of focus for commons, uploader permanently blocked for copyright violations and aggressive charge of subsequent users for minor license violations. Achim Raschka (talk) 09:30, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Marcus Cyron (talk) 15:53, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of focus for commons, uploader permanently blocked for copyright violations and aggressive charge of subsequent users for minor license violations. Achim Raschka (talk) 09:31, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Marcus Cyron (talk) 15:54, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of focus for commons, uploader permanently blocked for copyright violations and aggressive charge of subsequent users for minor license violations. Achim Raschka (talk) 09:32, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Marcus Cyron (talk) 15:54, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of focus for commons, uploader permanently blocked for copyright violations and aggressive charge of subsequent users for minor license violations. Achim Raschka (talk) 09:33, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Marcus Cyron (talk) 15:55, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of focus for commons, uploader permanently blocked for copyright violations and aggressive charge of subsequent users for minor license violations. Achim Raschka (talk) 09:33, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Marcus Cyron (talk) 15:55, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of focus for commons, uploader permanently blocked for copyright violations and aggressive charge of subsequent users for minor license violations. Achim Raschka (talk) 09:33, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Marcus Cyron (talk) 15:55, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of focus for commons, uploader permanently blocked for copyright violations and aggressive charge of subsequent users for minor license violations. Achim Raschka (talk) 09:33, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

out of focus for commons, uploader permanently blocked for copyright violations and aggressive charge of subsequent users for minor license violations. Achim Raschka (talk) 09:38, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Marcus Cyron (talk) 15:56, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Marcus Cyron (talk) 15:56, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of focus for commons, uploader permanently blocked for copyright violations and aggressive charge of subsequent users for minor license violations. Achim Raschka (talk) 09:40, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Marcus Cyron (talk) 15:57, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of focus for commons, uploader permanently blocked for copyright violations and aggressive charge of subsequent users for minor license violations. Achim Raschka (talk) 09:41, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Marcus Cyron (talk) 15:57, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of focus for commons, uploader permanently blocked for copyright violations and aggressive charge of subsequent users for minor license violations. Achim Raschka (talk) 09:42, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Marcus Cyron (talk) 15:57, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of focus for commons, uploader permanently blocked for copyright violations and aggressive charge of subsequent users for minor license violations. Achim Raschka (talk) 09:44, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:03, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derived work of a copyrighted work, i.e. the coin. This is not de minimis. AFBorchert (talk) 11:01, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Marcus Cyron (talk) 16:04, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of focus for commons, uploader permanently blocked for copyright violations and aggressive charge of subsequent users for minor license violations. Achim Raschka (talk) 09:42, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Marcus Cyron at 16:00, 30 Januar 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Wuestenigel --Krdbot 19:39, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of focus for commons, uploader permanently blocked for copyright violations and aggressive charge of subsequent users for minor license violations. Achim Raschka (talk) 09:43, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Marcus Cyron at 16:01, 30 Januar 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Wuestenigel --Krdbot 19:39, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of focus for commons, uploader permanently blocked for copyright violations and aggressive charge of subsequent users for minor license violations. Achim Raschka (talk) 09:43, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Marcus Cyron at 16:00, 30 Januar 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Wuestenigel --Krdbot 19:39, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image may be on vrfund's website, but I would assume each company shown is the actual copyright holder of their own logo, and many are not simple enough to be public domain. Chris857 (talk) 19:44, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. After checking, it's already been deleted once today. I notified the user (User:Didym) who deleted it. Chris857 (talk) 19:48, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 19:48, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof that it had been created in Italy ("scattata in Italia") since it's an all-French feature shot in France. COM:PCP should apply. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:12, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Copyright merely managed by an Italian company. — Racconish ☎ 13:38, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 03:55, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of unfree work Steinsplitter (talk) 16:16, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:45, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of unfree work Steinsplitter (talk) 16:16, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:46, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright protected tatoo pursuant to § 2 Abs. 1 Nr. 4 UrhG. Steinsplitter (talk) 16:19, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:46, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW, no evidence that the derivative work is freely licensed. Steinsplitter (talk) 16:21, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:46, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW and personal unused below. Steinsplitter (talk) 16:22, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 06:47, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wuestenigel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Com:DW of (c) background, toys, games, movie props.

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:42, 13 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . Materialscientist (talk) 02:50, 20 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Files uploaded by Wuestenigel (talk · contribs)

images of Star Wars characters and props. Copyright violation.

Takeaway (talk) 23:06, 17 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

  • Some of these are taken in countries with freedom of panorama for 3D art (such as Germany). Also, some of them depict concept art, which is not final, and therefore there would not be copyright to their likeness alone. FunkMonk (talk) 04:30, 5 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: part 1: By Materialscientist / Part 2: Per nominator. Alan (talk) 15:35, 7 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wuestenigel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

derived work of a copyrighted work, i.e. the coin. This is not de minimis.

Emha (talk) 12:57, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Out-of-scope files uploaded by Wuestenigel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All these files appear out of scope as they are just photos of words, created from scrabble tiles, beans, or other items. Most of them are related to current events, probably in the hope that they will be used for blog postings etc. This is specialized stock photography which appears to be pretty useless in regard to our project aims.

AFBorchert (talk) 19:34, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Emha (talk) 13:51, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wuestenigel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

derived work of a copyrighted work, i.e. the coin. This is not de minimis.

Emha (talk) 14:17, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:31, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wuestenigel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All these images show a tiny globe, usually with a finger pointing to a possible destination. These appear to be of the stock photo kind that are not really educational and thereby out of COM:SCOPE.

AFBorchert (talk) 08:51, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Wuestenigel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Arranged stock photos refering to online poker, of no educational value and thereby out of COM:SCOPE.

AFBorchert (talk) 09:19, 24 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Emha (talk) 02:35, 26 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wuestenigel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All of the following pics are just stock pictures outside of COM:SCOPE, optimized for SEO, transferred from flickr, not used and not useful for our projects. None of them has a description. Some of them are duplicates, uploaded with a German and again with an English filename.

--Stepro (talk) 19:23, 5 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Reinhard Kraasch (talk) 09:00, 6 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW Steinsplitter (talk) 16:23, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Krd at 06:47, 31 Januar 2018 UTC: Derivative of non-free content --Krdbot 13:38, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW Steinsplitter (talk) 16:23, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Krd at 06:47, 31 Januar 2018 UTC: Derivative of non-free content: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Halo @ Gamescom (14768169710).jpg: COM:DW --Krdbot 13:38, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Did this book was really published in USA? EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @EugeneZelenko: , I'm sorry, I'm responsible for this mistake ; it wasn't, it was published in France in 1842. I thought it was the correct answer to certify that this book is in the public domain, including the USA. What can I do for now ? SyB~Anicium (talk) 15:46, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Hi again, I've read this help page, and found that the copyright tag *{{PD-1923}} was for something « published anywhere before 1923 and public domain in the U.S. »
So, where is the problem ? I've added an other copyright tag maybe more convenient : {{PD-old-70}} Am I Right ? SyB~Anicium (talk) 17:42, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
EDIT for @EugeneZelenko: : I've looked at an other book I'm working on FRWS, which was renamed by a Commons'administrator, and I think I can use the following copyright tag :
Public domain

The author died in 1844, so this work is in the public domain in its country of origin and other countries and areas where the copyright term is the author's life plus 100 years or fewer.


This work is in the public domain in the United States because it was published (or registered with the U.S. Copyright Office) before January 1, 1929.

This file has been identified as being free of known restrictions under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights.
.
Is it ok ? SyB~Anicium (talk) 17:51, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Please also mention country of origin/publication in description. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. I have updated with the template for books, I thought it was automatically added in place of the more general Template:Informations. I've added several infos, I will use this template next time. SyB~Anicium (talk) 15:45, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Description nad license tag were fixed. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:59, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Copyright violation of Getty Images repository. See source, held at [1]. This image is not a pixel-for-pixel match, but is a blatant derivative. Hammersoft (talk) 20:45, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. @Hammersoft: You can ask speedy deletion for such files using {{Copyvio}}. Ruthven (msg) 19:49, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

subpage del 최광모 (talk) 22:47, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Own userspace. --Achim (talk) 20:59, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Similar to http://www.letelegramme.fr/ar/imgproxy.php/images/2015/08/06/gerard-garouste-expose-ses-oeuvres-personnelles-et-celles_2479398.jpg?article=20150806-1010730344&aaaammjj=20150806 : Photo Archives Le Télégramme © Le Télégramme (http://www.letelegramme.fr/ille-et-vilaine/dinard/exposition-gerard-garouste-aux-roches-brunes-06-08-2015-10730344.php). Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:00, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ronhjones at 00:06, 2 Februar 2018 UTC: Previously deleted file File:Portrait de Gérard Garouste © Hugo Miserey.jpg --Krdbot 01:35, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Better version is color available at: File:Tulsi Bhagat with Satdeep Gill at TTT2018 - Fortune JP Palace 2018-01-26.jpg Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk · mail) 07:09, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, not in use. --E4024 (talk) 07:15, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah ! Sure.TBhagat (talk) 08:35, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 04:43, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

according to the description, this is a fair-use image; it should be moved to en.wikipedia, since it is used there Jochen Burghardt (talk) 07:44, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to Wikipedia Entangled_quantum_reach.jpg Kouwenfeld (talk) 06:17, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:27, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derived work of copyrighted toys. AFBorchert (talk) 19:39, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Krd at 06:21, 3 Februar 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 13:31, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS. AFBorchert (talk) 19:40, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Krd at 06:21, 3 Februar 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 13:31, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:TOYS. AFBorchert (talk) 19:40, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Krd at 06:22, 3 Februar 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 13:31, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not covered by COM:FOP#United States and there is no proof provided that this sculpture is in the public domain. AFBorchert (talk) 19:45, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Krd at 06:22, 3 Februar 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 13:31, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photo of a sculpture taken in Chicago (check location). This is not covered by COM:FOP#United States and there is no proof provided that this is in the public domain. AFBorchert (talk) 19:47, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Krd at 06:22, 3 Februar 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 13:31, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a derived work of the photo on the packages which is eligible for copyright. This is not de minimis. AFBorchert (talk) 19:48, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Krd at 06:21, 3 Februar 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing --Krdbot 13:31, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

this is photo of Abdu'l-Bahá's sister. it's been published about 1944 in iran. according to copy right of iran, now it's in General Ownership. --Dandamayev (talk) 15:47, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The author was ahmad kasravi whom was assassinated in 11 March 1946. --Dandamayev (talk) 15:57, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Could you please also add English description to file? --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
i added a few description for photo. --Dandamayev (talk) 15:39, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Description and license were fixed. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:39, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

TV screenshots January 2018

[edit]

--Kacir (talk) 06:59, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:04, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Alththrdpqlcls. Mys_721tx (talk) 05:38, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb at 00:02, 4 Februar 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 01:29, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Alththrdpqlcls. Mys_721tx (talk) 05:38, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb at 00:02, 4 Februar 2018 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - --Krdbot 01:29, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:09, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 03:09, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 14:53, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 03:09, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo by Umberto Cicconi, authorization needed. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:03, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep L'autorisation n'est pas nécessaire puisque la photographie est tombée dans le domaine public, ayant été créée il y a plus de 20 ans ! Décidément ! - Groupir ! (talk) 17:11, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: it's a bit more complicated. I'm not sure it can be named an "Italian" picture since there's no proof it has been first published in Italy (or published at all) hence I'm not sure PD-Italy could apply. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:25, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Patrick Rogel: It only needs to be made in Italy. Please read the template, and the discussion on COM:VPC. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:05, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Materialscientist (talk) 04:35, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT Winter sunshine (talk) 20:04, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:46, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably too dark and blurred to be usable. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:07, 30 January 2018 (UTC) Dziękuje za umieszczenie mojego zdjęcia w WIKIMEDIA COMMONS.Ponieważ panoramio już nie istnieje proszę o wykorzystanie innych moich zdjęć z panoramio z poważaniem Zdzisław Hanik (dzidek)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:47, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nagur Meeravali (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:ADVERT - promotion of a non-notable organization

Winter sunshine (talk) 20:08, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep per w:en:WP:DENY and the fact that this request was started by the long-term abuse troll @INeverCry: . It's best to close this DR as invalid and let an established user nominate this file 📁 for deletion if any actual member of the Wikimedia Commons community wish 🌠 to see it deleted. Sent 📩 from my Microsoft Lumia 950 XL with Microsoft Windows 10 Mobile 📱. Also this is of an educational institution, even if it's an advertisement it still has an educational value. --Donald Trung (Talk 💬) ("The Chinese Coin Troll" 👿) (Articles 📚) 11:19, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:49, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An orphaned image wih no source permission. Leoboudv (talk) 20:21, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:49, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Winter sunshine (talk) 20:21, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:49, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Winter sunshine (talk) 20:22, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:50, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Winter sunshine (talk) 20:25, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:50, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Winter sunshine (talk) 20:26, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:50, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Winter sunshine (talk) 20:27, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:50, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Winter sunshine (talk) 20:28, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:51, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image seems to be breaking the thumbnailer and does not fully load for me even in the full version. The upper half of the full version suggests that this is a corrupted version of File:Hauptbahnhof Wien - Nachtaufnahme des Haupteingangs am Südtiroler Platz im Jänner 2018.png. darkweasel94 20:30, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:52, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Winter sunshine (talk) 20:30, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:52, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:43, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:53, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Winston.linford (talk · contribs)

[edit]

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : affected three rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?

Roland zh (talk) 20:45, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already published in Facebook "FBMD". --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:53, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Redundant to better images. BeckenhamBear (talk) 20:53, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons is not a image repository for Wikipedia only, the reason for delete must be more than simplly a subjective opinion of what is or what is not educational, good quality, etc. --The Photographer 21:15, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: good visual quality. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:02, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Redundant to better images. BeckenhamBear (talk) 20:55, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons is not a image repository for Wikipedia only, the reason for delete must be more than simplly a subjective opinion of what is or what is not educational, good quality, etc. --The Photographer 21:15, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: good visual quality. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:02, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Redundant to better images. BeckenhamBear (talk) 20:55, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons is not a image repository for Wikipedia only, the reason for delete must be more than simplly a subjective opinion of what is or what is not educational, good quality, etc. --The Photographer 21:16, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: good visual quality. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:01, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Redundant to better images. BeckenhamBear (talk) 20:55, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons is not a image repository for Wikipedia only, the reason for delete must be more than simplly a subjective opinion of what is or what is not educational, good quality, etc. --The Photographer 21:16, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. Does not conform COM:EDUSE, COM:PS, COM:SCOPE. There is no merit to be had here, not even technically. In addition this model/girl has an entire category devoted to her. This is verging on soft porn, and the text reads as if it's publication is part of some sleazy chat up line by the photographer. An Encyclopedia wants no part of this. See WP:NOT and WP:NOTGALLERY. This file violates several guidelines in COM:PS, COM:SCOPE, COM:NOTUSED etc. The aim of Wikimedia Commons is to provide a media file repository: that makes available public domain and freely-licensed educational media content to all, and that acts as a common repository for the various projects of the Wikimedia Foundation. The expression "educational" is to be understood according to its broad meaning of "providing knowledge; instructional or informative". Scope of Commons: To be eligible for hosting on Wikimedia Commons, all files and other content must fall within the Commons scope. Anything uploaded here which falls outside this scope will be deleted. This image is emphatically not within scope. Sorry! --BeckenhamBear (talk) 12:20, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: good visual quality. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:01, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Bad quality unused file. BeckenhamBear (talk) 21:21, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Done by Jameslwoodward. --Jianhui67 TC 09:52, 25 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Redundant to better images. BeckenhamBear (talk) 20:56, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons is not a image repository for Wikipedia only, the reason for delete must be more than simplly a subjective opinion of what is or what is not educational, good quality, etc. --The Photographer 21:16, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: good visual quality. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:01, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Redundant to better images. BeckenhamBear (talk) 20:56, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons is not a image repository for Wikipedia only, the reason for delete must be more than simplly a subjective opinion of what is or what is not educational, good quality, etc. --The Photographer 21:16, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: good visual quality. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:01, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Redundant to better images. BeckenhamBear (talk) 20:57, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons is not a image repository for Wikipedia only, the reason for delete must be more than simplly a subjective opinion of what is or what is not educational, good quality, etc. --The Photographer 21:16, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: good visual quality. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:00, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Redundant to better images. BeckenhamBear (talk) 20:57, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons is not a image repository for Wikipedia only, the reason for delete must be more than simplly a subjective opinion of what is or what is not educational, good quality, etc. --The Photographer 21:16, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: good visual quality. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:00, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Redundant to better images. BeckenhamBear (talk) 21:03, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons is not a image repository for Wikipedia only, the reason for delete must be more than simplly a subjective opinion of what is or what is not educational, good quality, etc. --The Photographer 21:18, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:58, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-trivial logo, above COM:TOO. jdx Re: 21:04, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:57, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je doute qu'il s'agisse d'un travail personnel. Il est indiqué décédé en 1965, qui est l'auteur du cliché ? vip (talk) 00:28, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:39, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je doute qu'il s'agisse d'un travail personnel au vu de https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Leon_TURCAT.jpg vip (talk) 00:29, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:40, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Extremely poor image quality and unused. Trivial to express in TeX. GKFXtalk 02:07, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:40, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very pixelized. TeX equivalent is straightforward to write. GKFXtalk 02:09, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:40, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:10, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - also possible copyvio of photographs. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:41, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:12, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:41, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 4nn1l2 as no permission (No permission since). It doesn't appear to require permission, but it is out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:13, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:41, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It was a mistake, I accidentally uploaded the image instead of just cutting it out. ElisonSeg (talk) 02:34, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:41, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright ss SecretName101 (talk) 02:45, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:42, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright ss SecretName101 (talk) 02:47, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:42, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope as an unused personal photo. Formerly in w:Devendra Kumar Vyas. —Cryptic (talk) 02:52, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:42, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, out of scope, possibly above threshold of originality. (Also misnamed.) Formerly in w:Naijasole. There's a w:Draft:Naijasole, but realistically, that'll never be accepted. —Cryptic (talk) 03:12, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:42, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Notice Due to the extreme length of this page the previous four DR requests under this title have been archived to Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photos from Panoramio ID 2875355/Archive.

Low quality, unusable, many alternatives available

Mitte27 (talk) 16:28, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Strongly oppose and  Keep This files and undelete the thousands of reasonable or good quality images deleted by a sloppy job of the nominator that nominate thousand of images and deletionist administrator, that deletes the same files less than the required 7 days. If fact there were several deleted files that were of low or very low quality, that fact is that there were several thousand files of good quality. Such a shotgun approach to deletion requests, if copied to all Commons, would leave only the FP and QI and not much else. Tm (talk) 23:09, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    @Tm: you miss the point. There was no “less than the required 7 days”, there were four previous mass delreqs on the same page. See the page history. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 05:32, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    Commons:Deletion requests states clearly "Anything older than 7 days may be closed. Obvious closures (e.g. speedy deletions) may be done earlier". And as this DR were not obvious, as seen by the opinions below and above, two of this four DR should been left opened more than 2 days, in a case, and 4 days, in another case. DR should be left open 7 or more days when is not an obvious case, such as this. So what is here to affirme that i miss the point? Tm (talk) 06:06, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • As in previous case, at least partially  Keep. While they are probably not QIs, they don't seem useless. For instance, File:Автовокзал - panoramio (19).jpg is the only photo of the entrance of Bakhchysarai bus station we have on Commons. Surely entrance of Bakhcysarai bus station is not the sexiest topic and will never be a FP, but the photo may be useful for some purpose. Given how Panoramio upload bot works it would be very hard to identify the images to undelete if we ever need them as information such as location or coordinates is only visible on description page and is not in the file name. I would support deleting files where we have a clearly superior alternative but looking at a few examples like File:Автовокзал - panoramio (19).jpg I don't think this is the case — NickK (talk) 01:16, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep all and block Mitte27 for attempted vandalism and misuse of others’ volunteer time. Also investigate how could Jcb be duped into deleting all the many files in the other DRs with the same title. -- Tuválkin 04:37, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
    • Basically over 99% of these files were useless. Till now only very few files out of several thousands were identified as usefull. These files were criticlessly mass uploaded, apparently without any human review. The DR is so large that it e.g. makes the day page hardly accessible. That's why I closed the 3rd DR a few hours early (not after 4 days as Tm somehow wrongly calculated, but after six and a half days). In the fourth DR I saw that all the files were uploaded by User:Panoramio upload bot, so that any comment on individual files was not to be expected. In e.g. the 1st DR, two manual transfers by NickK were involved, which I kept. Flooding Commons with thousands of useless files in the hope that a handful of usefull files will be between them is disruptive rather than helpful. Individual usefull files can be identified and kept (or undeleted), but they are like a needle in a haystack. Calling for a blcok of Mitte27, who spends so much time in cleaning up after mass uploads of useless files, is ridiculous of course. Jcb (talk) 16:15, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
      @Jcb: The issue for me is that the files I transferred were neither better nor worse than other files nominated for deletion, just for some reason they were not transferred automatically. The only difference was that they were clearly identified and described, while those transferred automatically are poorly identified and described. The latter issue is easy to resolve for existing files but much harder to resolve for already deleted ones. Looking at a few examples I can see that in most cases there are alternatives by the same uploader but from a different angle (this Panoramio photographer took a dozen of photos in each place he visited). For instance, for File:Автовокзал - panoramio (19).jpg there is no more photo of the main entrance of Bakhcysarai bus station, although there is still a photo of exit from the building towards buses File:Вход - panoramio (15).jpg which was not nominated for deletion. This is better than nothing but still bad given that the image we need is (was) already on Commons. I don't think Mitte27's actions are vandalism, but I would ask not to delete photos where there is no exact alternative — NickK (talk) 21:51, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
      • "The only difference was that they were clearly identified and described" - that's a major difference IMHO. It's the difference between 'filling our disk space' and 'forming part of our collection'. Jcb (talk) 22:06, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
        @Jcb: It might be a major difference now, but this problem can be solved. For instance, I am regularly using tools visualising Commons images on the map and categorising and possibly describing the ones I find in areas I am interested in, I am pretty sure other people do this as well. Adding an image to a relevant category already significantly increases chances of its use and of getting a meaningful description. Of course this cannot be easily done in a few days but it will never be done for deleted images. For instance if I were to find an image of a ru:Самострой in Simferopol I would hardly find that it is File:Notitle - panoramio (1385).jpgNickK (talk) 22:35, 25 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • @Jcb: You said that «over 99% of these files were useless». This DR affects 2682 files so you need to explain why are you allowing Mitte27 to vandalize 27 photos. Either way, I so far clicked at random items from this huge, untractable list (any serious admin would have closed immediately the DR as all-keep for that reason only) and I only hit good images: None of them being «Low quality, unusable, many alternatives available». It seems to me that either I’m incredibly lucky or your 1% estimate is too low. -- Tuválkin 09:12, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Some examples of false DR claims
  1. File:Zapadnyy okrug, Krasnodar, Krasnodarskiy kray, Russia - panoramio (68).jpg
  2. File:Автовокзал - panoramio (19).jpg
  3. File:Veliky Novgorod, Novgorod Oblast, Russia - panoramio (532).jpg
  4. File:Zapadnyy okrug, Krasnodar, Krasnodarskiy kray, Russia - panoramio (58).jpg
-- Tuválkin 09:12, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
I did not yet take a big sample of this batch (for the other batches I did a 200 file check before closure), so it may as well be e.g. 98% here. The point is that it's disruptive to flood us with mainly useless files. If flooding us with those files with a robot is no big deal, then flushing the files should not be a big deal either. Regarding your selection: 1. may be in scope but has a different problem: there's no FOP in Russia. 3. and 4. are out of scope. 2. is not high quality, but in use so in scope. Jcb (talk) 10:52, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment File:Zapadnyy okrug, Krasnodar, Krasnodarskiy kray, Russia - panoramio (68).jpg = File:Zapadnyy okrug, Krasnodar, Krasnodarskiy kray, Russia - panoramio (71).jpg (this file not delete). —Mitte27 (talk) 11:36, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Translation from Simferopolean to English: “deletion is not requested for this latter file”. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 13:13, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:28, 28 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality, unusable, many alternatives available

Mitte27 (talk) 03:55, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

-- Tuválkin 09:50, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: one and one per discussion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:47, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See bottom of this page "Copyright (c) 2017 Cameron Beccario", EarthWindMap are copyrighted 219.79.126.215 03:57, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep – neither the image from Flick nor any revision in File:Ex-Tropical Cyclone Debbie, wind map (33552585322).jpg#filehistory have a copyright notice, and the Flickr page explicitly specifies {{CC BY-SA 2.0}}. Presumed origin on earth.nullschool.net for the image in question was not demonstrated. Neither could 62938898@N00, the NSID of http://www.flickr.com/photos/tgerus/ , be found in User:FlickreviewR/bad-authors, a registry of known Flickr forgers and liars. It is hard to assume good faith for this nomination and, in any case, nominator did not demonstrate due diligence composing a case. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 08:44, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - While I agree with @Incnis Mrsi: that the case isn't exactly compelling, for a number of reasons I can clearly see that this is from Earth Winds. For starters, the image shows that the author uploaded the image when the system was active and also declares in the description that it's taken from Earth Winds. Now if I am meant to assume good faith that the author releases it under CC-BY-SA-2.0, I seriously struggle to believe that he had permission from Earth Winds to do so. This is because the about page describes Earth Winds as a visualization of global weather conditions [that is] forecast by supercomputers [and] updated every three hours.Jason Rees (talk) 23:00, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - very clear case of Flickrwashing -- the Flickr users says explicitly that the image comes from EarthWindMap and the look of the image clearly matches the images there. EarthWindMap is copyrighted. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:52, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See bottom of this page "Copyright (c) 2017 Cameron Beccario", EarthWindMap are copyrighted 219.79.126.215 03:58, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - The image is quite clearly attributed to Earth Winds in the description and I strongly suspect that the author did not have permission from Earth Winds since he calls it sattelite imagery which it isnt.Jason Rees (talk) 23:08, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:52, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See bottom of this page "Copyright (c) 2017 Cameron Beccario", EarthWindMap are copyrighted 219.79.126.215 04:00, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:52, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mort en 1948 - pas dans le domaine public Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 04:05, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:53, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted since the copyright term has expired. De728631 (talk) 12:55, 19 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From this website. The website's licensing information is here, states "You may download, share, comment on, refer to or print information from this site for personal non-commercial use" and "You may not distribute or use the content of this site for commercial purposes... you should assume that anything you see or read on this site is copyright unless otherwise disclosed and may not be used except as described in these terms and conditions." This is not compatible with Commons. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 04:08, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:54, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claims the photo is from the New York Times; need information about the photographer and copyright status of the photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 04:19, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - NYT clearly copyrighted. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:55, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The metadata states "Author: Quentin V.Scales, Copyright holder: CandleLightPlatoon." Need evidence of permission to license a copyrighted photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 04:21, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:55, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, TV Azteca's rules strictly prohibits photograph in the studios. Alx 91 (talk) 04:22, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - THis may violate TV Azteca's rules, but that is not a concern for Commons. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:56, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph of a book, need information about the copyright status of the material in the photo or permission from the publisher to license it. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 04:22, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:57, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 18:55, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Google and TinEye didn't yield any external re-uses. --Túrelio (talk) 16:49, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:16, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 18:55, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Come on, just delete these photos. I do not want them on here any more. Otherwise I'll start posting the ones you don't like again with criticisms of this site (only 80% accurate) Markheffron2 (talk) 04:44, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: I was neutral before, but that kind of threat makes me feel that a courtesy deletion would be excessively courteous. --bjh21 (talk) 16:46, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Come on people, delete my files! I want them gone. <censored>. Markheffron2 (talk) 00:27, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:16, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 18:56, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 18:56, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 18:56, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 18:57, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 18:57, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 18:58, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 18:58, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 18:58, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:17, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 18:59, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:18, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 18:59, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:18, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 18:59, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:18, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:42, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:13, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:00, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:18, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:42, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:13, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:01, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:18, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:41, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:13, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:01, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:18, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:41, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:13, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:02, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:18, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:40, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:13, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:02, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:40, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:12, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:02, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:39, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:12, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:03, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:39, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:12, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:03, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:39, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:12, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:04, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:38, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:12, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:05, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:38, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:12, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:05, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:37, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:12, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:05, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:37, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:11, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:06, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:36, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:11, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:06, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:36, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:11, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:07, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:35, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:11, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:08, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:35, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[duplicate listing snipped] Listing for deletion once is sufficient, repeat listings of the same thing are not useful. Why don't you want it here? (And why did you upload it here?) -- Infrogmation (talk) 02:58, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:11, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:08, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:25, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 CommentUploading to Commons granted an irrevocable license. Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:08, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:09, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:08, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:09, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:09, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:10, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:10, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:10, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:11, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:11, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:12, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:12, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:12, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:13, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:13, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:13, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:14, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:15, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:16, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:16, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:17, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:17, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:17, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:18, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:18, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:18, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:19, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:19, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:20, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:20, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:20, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:21, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:21, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:21, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:22, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:22, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:23, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:23, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:23, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:24, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:24, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:25, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:25, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:25, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:26, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:26, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:27, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:27, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:27, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:28, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:28, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:29, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:29, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:29, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:30, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:30, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:30, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:31, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:31, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:31, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:32, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:32, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:32, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:33, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:33, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:34, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:34, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:34, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:35, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:35, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:36, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:36, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:36, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:37, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:37, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:37, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:38, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:38, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Google and TinEye didn't yield any external re-uses. --Túrelio (talk) 16:58, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:38, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:39, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:39, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Google and TinEye didn't yield any external re-uses. --Túrelio (talk) 16:56, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:24, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:40, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Google and TinEye didn't yield any external re-uses. --Túrelio (talk) 16:56, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:25, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Winter sunshine (talk) 19:59, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:25, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:12, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Asone32 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Stadium photos taken from all over the web.

Ytoyoda (talk) 16:53, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:42, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, see http://www.alejandroarras.com/portraits#/id/i12424536 for an image from the same photo shoot Elisfkc (talk) 17:17, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I'm the onwner of the page www.alejandroarras.com where the image appear. We can use the image with out copyrights problems. --Elmoledro (talk) 18:33, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Elmoledro: Please send proof via the COM:OTRS system then. --Elisfkc (talk) 02:17, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:46, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Iran. SlowManifesto (talk) 17:26, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:52, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, out of scope. Jcb (talk) 18:10, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:53, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, meaningless withoud description Robot Monk (talk) 18:46, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:54, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MrMuddyPig (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused maps of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:09, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:07, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Homeboy1197 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal, unused photos; failing COM:EDUSE

Ruthven (msg) 21:01, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Homeboy1197 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal photos and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:39, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:09, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio - Magazine cover --Alaa :)..! 04:25, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
هذا غلاف مجلة إخبارية تصدر عن المجلس الشعبي البلدي لبلدية المعذر - ولاية باتنة ، العدد الثالث منها بتاريخ جانفي فيفيري 2011، لأنها مجلة تصدر كل شهرين طوال سنوات2009-2014، وهي تحمل رقم التسلسل: 2170-1407، أما رقم إيداعها القانوني فهو: 2433-2009. وشكرا لكم--ⴰⵏⵣⴰⵔ (talk) 22:13, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not free. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 22:56, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Il n'est plus à jour, nous avons changé la couleur du logo 147.94.35.47 09:02, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Il n'est plus à jour, nous avons changé la couleur du logo. J'ai modifié toutes les pages où se trouvait l'ancien logoClesselingue (talk) 10:05, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:05, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work: COM:DW. Yann (talk) 09:36, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 22:58, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work: COM:DW. Yann (talk) 09:37, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 22:58, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The metadata has the author as "Christ Keeney" and "Copyright holder: © Chris Keeney PhotographySan Diego, California (phone number)." It is not clear that this is the uploader or that they have permission to license a copyrighted photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:38, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 22:59, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work: COM:DW. Out of scope. Yann (talk) 09:39, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:00, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph of a publication, would need information about the copyright status of the contents, including the photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:05, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:06, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

My friend is angry at me Saiaravind186 (talk) 11:23, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Your friend is right. You should not upload out of scope files here. --E4024 (talk) 11:27, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:29, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof that it had been created in Italy ("scattata in Italia"). COM:PCP should apply. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:04, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete  Keep Published by Grazia [6] and likely shot in Italy. Per comment below — Racconish ☎ 13:42, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment according to this description photo has been shot in New York January 16, 1960 so not created in Italy. Note that it can be found elsewhere (https://www.pinterest.fr/pin/42995371422159933/?lp=true). Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:20, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:31, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Gerardo Lupo

[edit]

Out of scope for the project (pictures of a user's school reunion). Other four files (listed below for completeness) have already been proposed for deletion individually:

--Rojelio (talk) 14:01, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:34, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photos, not used.

Kulmalukko (talk) 14:32, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:32, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Denis Demidenko (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:37, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zaamouche fateh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:36, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 16:00, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:39, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mike leicester (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF/different cameras, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://img.retro-rides.org/i/v/tremor63/537a1913348c.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:02, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:40, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no general interest of any kind M&A (talk) 13:44, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Dyolf77 at 23:34, 6 Februar 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files of User:Gerardo Lupo --Krdbot 01:27, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

general interest non-existent M&A (talk) 13:45, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Dyolf77 at 23:34, 6 Februar 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files of User:Gerardo Lupo --Krdbot 01:27, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no possible use M&A (talk) 13:46, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Dyolf77 at 23:34, 6 Februar 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files of User:Gerardo Lupo --Krdbot 01:27, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From http://www.arka.gdynia.pl/index.php?typ=podstrona&id=9 Ytoyoda (talk) 16:43, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Hystrix at 20:42, 6 Februar 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Asone32 --Krdbot 01:27, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From http://www.propertydesign.pl/przestrzen_publiczna/108/stadion_miejski_w_tychach_juz_otwarty,5011-18821.html Ytoyoda (talk) 16:51, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Hystrix at 20:42, 6 Februar 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Asone32 --Krdbot 01:27, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:19, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What do people think of this file? I mean is it in scope? Normal to have dot.com on it? Own work? Sorry, I'm confused. E4024 (talk) 16:40, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I support. Why this file? Advertising? --Nik Deleter (talk) 16:43, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:19, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 19:38, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:20, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 19:55, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 08:20, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Redundant to a better images. BeckenhamBear (talk) 21:40, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:02, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:41, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 16:01, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:50, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 16:00, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:54, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 16:00, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:55, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 15:56, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:58, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 15:56, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Web screenshot. MB298 (talk) 22:11, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:54, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Used for self-promotion. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:23, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 15:54, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logo of a basketball club. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:38, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:53, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:40, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:52, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of a photograph. Derivative work without permission. Warko (talk) 22:49, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:51, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality image. Plenty of decent images of this person that we can use on Wikipedia. Ytoyoda (talk) 23:45, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused duplicate, replaced by File:Adriano fla2009.jpg. --Wdwd (talk) 15:50, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

artist died in 2001, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 23:50, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:46, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

artist died in 2005, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 23:58, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:46, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

artist died in 2005, no fop Martin Sg. (talk) 23:58, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 15:45, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published photo, appears on the subject’s Google+ profile, for example https://plus.google.com/104495100286816679583 Ytoyoda (talk) 12:04, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedily deleted as copyvio. P 1 9 9   18:59, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published at https://www.onthego.to/blog/onthego-talks-6-questions-dane-smith/ Ytoyoda (talk) 12:07, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedily deleted as copyvio. P 1 9 9   18:59, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photos, not used.

Kulmalukko (talk) 18:51, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:26, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A duplicate for File:Dinays 2016.jpg. SkоrP24 19:04, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Kept, isn't exact or scaled down duplicate. --Hystrix (talk) 20:30, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Facebook stuff. Not notable enough. BeckenhamBear (talk) 21:12, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This photo is very interesting because its one of a series of images of U.S. veterans, the great majority of which are "not notable". Each file is named as the "Sitters Name". Examples just starting with the letters "DA".

These photos have already been assigned various random categories. These particular photos are in [Category:Files uploaded by The Photographer needing categories]. That's 9 similar photos and we're just talking about the letters DA, and there's the whole alphabet out there. And that is not to say that this represents all the DA series photos its just the ones in that one category. There may be other DA's not in that CAT. It looks like the "Bureau of Land Management" uploaded all their employees who are vets onto Flickr, and that's where that project should have stayed. They are all here for no better reason than they are CC-BY-2.0. Again they are not useful for an educational purpose. Not notable people. There are millions of Vets. They are personal images, bordering on Self Promotion, Selfie image making, and are Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, if that subject is "Bureau of Land Management and U.S. Military Vets". This is obviously not malicious you just indiscriminately upload what's available on Flickr. I could easily give you the names of site where you could do better with better class images that are appropriate for an Encyclopaedia, which this is emphatically not. Its down to you to justify uploading reams of clutter/stuff like this; of no interest whatsoever to the general public. Oh! then there's copyright of this "Art project" to think about. Presumably the U.S.Department got permission to distribute these images to the PD. Something they would not be allowed to do in Europe. Also each individual is holding a photo that is their personal property and presumably they hold the copyright to, and their permission to use those images is not mentioned here, anywhere. If I had uploaded this stuff, you as an Admin would be the first to rush to speedy deletion. If this stuff is worthy of the project then we need a mugshot photo of every living person. --BeckenhamBear (talk) 11:07, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope. Image from a non relevant U.S Navy people The Photographer 19:19, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:03, 7 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ronhjones as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: COM:SSD Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:39, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hystrix (talk) 16:42, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo without educational use GeorgDerReisende (talk) 23:49, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 16:43, 8 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 04:56, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:54, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 04:56, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:54, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 04:57, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:55, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not need any more Gogaggg (talk) 06:05, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination. P 1 9 9   18:56, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not need any more Gogaggg (talk) 06:06, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete It's over ToO and seems like never passed OTRS. Not used either. --E4024 (talk) 11:38, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per self-nomination. P 1 9 9   18:56, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal logo. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. LX (talk, contribs) 06:40, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:56, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and unusable personal photo from w:User:Prafful gadhavi careerguru. —Cryptic (talk) 06:52, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:57, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and unusable personal photo from w:User:Prafful gadhavi careerguru. —Cryptic (talk) 06:53, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:57, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and unusable personal photo from w:User:Prafful gadhavi careerguru. —Cryptic (talk) 06:53, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:57, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted program, no evidence that logo is under a free license, unused anyway. Ixfd64 (talk) 07:00, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:57, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image out of COM:SCOPE Eurodyne (talk) 07:12, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:59, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of COM:SCOPE Eurodyne (talk) 07:12, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:59, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope and unused personal file. Please see Category talk:Unused personal files. E4024 (talk) 07:18, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:59, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very small. There is a large version. Is this a marriage ceremony? E4024 (talk) 07:18, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:59, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not "first created in Italy". — Racconish ☎ 07:28, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clearly copyvio. P 1 9 9   18:59, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Not copyvio. Just not "created in Italy". - Groupir ! (talk) 03:45, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope and unused personal file. Please see Category talk:Unused personal files. E4024 (talk) 07:28, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   18:59, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file by a one-time uploader. E4024 (talk) 08:14, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:00, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I found this cute boy in Category:Biographies. I guess he is out of scope. E4024 (talk) 08:20, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:00, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused user page image (Commons:Project scope). Varied Surf Igloo (talk) 02:25, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Natuur12 (talk) 15:36, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File without a description by a one-time uploader. I cannot understand why not deleted before. E4024 (talk) 08:40, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:01, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The text is pre-1923, the illustration shown is much later (re-edition, not the original illustration!) Fram (talk) 09:30, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:01, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Yann (talk) 09:40, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Most of this user's activities are out of scope, no meaningful edits. P 1 9 9   19:15, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Yann (talk) 09:43, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Most of this user's activities are out of scope, no meaningful edits. P 1 9 9   19:16, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo. Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 10:57, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:16, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. We have black squares in Category:Black squares. Kulmalukko (talk) 15:01, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:22, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 15:12, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:22, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 15:16, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:22, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 15:22, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:22, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 15:23, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:22, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:22, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 15:32, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:22, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:22, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:23, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious screenshot from social media, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 15:58, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:23, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collages need source and license for every used image. Taivo (talk) 16:00, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:24, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:41, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:25, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:42, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:25, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:49, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:25, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:49, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:25, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertisments, as per tag, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 21:01, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:26, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:07, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:27, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably too non-focused to be useful. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:29, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:27, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Redundant to a better images. Useless. BeckenhamBear (talk) 21:32, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:30, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Redundant to a better images. Useless. BeckenhamBear (talk) 21:33, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:30, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Redundant to a better images. Useless. Selfie? BeckenhamBear (talk) 21:34, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:30, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Redundant to a better image. Could be anywhere. BeckenhamBear (talk) 21:37, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:30, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Redundant to a better image. Could be anywhere. BeckenhamBear (talk) 21:37, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:30, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Redundant to a better image. Could be anywhere. BeckenhamBear (talk) 21:38, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:30, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Redundant to a better image. Could be anywhere. BeckenhamBear (talk) 21:38, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:30, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Redundant to a better images. BeckenhamBear (talk) 21:39, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:30, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Redundant to a better image. Could be anywhere. BeckenhamBear (talk) 21:39, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:30, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate. Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Redundant to a better image. BeckenhamBear (talk) 21:41, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:30, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. BeckenhamBear (talk) 21:42, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:30, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Redundant to better images. Could be anywhere. BeckenhamBear (talk) 21:43, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:30, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Redundant to better images. Could be anywhere. BeckenhamBear (talk) 21:43, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:30, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:54, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:30, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Original uploader: Unsure about the license. Arghya1987 (talk) 10:50, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no license. --Jcb (talk) 00:18, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Redundant to better images. Incomprehensible. BeckenhamBear (talk) 20:58, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons is not a image repository for Wikipedia only, the reason for delete must be more than simplly a subjective opinion of what is or what is not educational, good quality, etc. --The Photographer 21:17, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. It's dew on some petals. Ruthven (msg) 18:52, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Redundant to better images. BeckenhamBear (talk) 20:59, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons is not a image repository for Wikipedia only, the reason for delete must be more than simplly a subjective opinion of what is or what is not educational, good quality, etc. --The Photographer 21:17, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: can be kept: not so bad quality after all. Ruthven (msg) 18:53, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. BeckenhamBear (talk) 21:02, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons is not a image repository for Wikipedia only, the reason for delete must be more than simplly a subjective opinion of what is or what is not educational, good quality, etc. --The Photographer 21:17, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: not per nomination, but because the painting needs a permission from its author (which it hasn't). Ruthven (msg) 18:54, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Redundant to better images. Advertising. BeckenhamBear (talk) 21:04, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons is not a image repository for Wikipedia only, the reason for delete must be more than simplly a subjective opinion of what is or what is not educational, good quality, etc. --The Photographer 21:18, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. The writing on the jar seems simple enough. Ruthven (msg) 18:47, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Redundant to better images. BeckenhamBear (talk) 21:05, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons is not a image repository for Wikipedia only, the reason for delete must be more than simplly a subjective opinion of what is or what is not educational, good quality, etc. --The Photographer 21:18, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per The Photographer. BTW: File should be renamed. Ruthven (msg) 18:53, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Redundant to better images. BeckenhamBear (talk) 21:05, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons is not a image repository for Wikipedia only, the reason for delete must be more than simplly a subjective opinion of what is or what is not educational, good quality, etc. --The Photographer 21:18, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per The Photographer. Ruthven (msg) 18:48, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. BeckenhamBear (talk) 21:08, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons is not a image repository for Wikipedia only, the reason for delete must be more than simplly a subjective opinion of what is or what is not educational, good quality, etc. --The Photographer 21:18, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 18:45, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Let Flickr keep the art. No location, Scotland maybe. Plenty already. BeckenhamBear (talk) 21:10, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons is not a image repository for Wikipedia only, the reason for delete must be more than simplly a subjective opinion of what is or what is not educational, good quality, etc. --The Photographer 21:18, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. Does not conform COM:PS, COM:SCOPE. You don't even know where it is a scene of? --BeckenhamBear (talk) 11:40, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per The Photographer. Nice photograph. Some user will categorise it even more, eventually (this is a wiki). Ruthven (msg) 18:44, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

New nomenclature for audio files to allow easy uploads for viquiprojecte:esmuc Enricguaus (talk) 14:28, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ruthven at 19:43, 13 Februar 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Enricguaus --Krdbot 01:21, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

New nomenclature for audio files to allow easy uploads for viquiprojecte:esmuc Enricguaus (talk) 14:28, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ruthven at 19:43, 13 Februar 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Enricguaus --Krdbot 01:21, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

New nomenclature for audio files to allow easy uploads for viquiprojecte:esmuc Enricguaus (talk) 14:29, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ruthven at 19:43, 13 Februar 2018 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Enricguaus --Krdbot 01:21, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The license is for a PD-Art (faithful reproduction of a public domain 2D work). The object is not 2D. Cold Season (talk) 05:01, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:36, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

iPhone photo of a screen, not own work. Mys_721tx (talk) 05:33, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:36, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What? CR violation? Facebook... E4024 (talk) 08:22, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per ADVERT. Ruthven (msg) 17:39, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CR violation of Facebook, Youtube, everything. E4024 (talk) 08:23, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:39, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The metadata says "Author: Nick Harvey", and "© Nicholas Harvey 2011 All Rights Reserved." It is not clear that this is the uploader or that they have permission to license a copyrighted photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:41, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OTRS authorisation needed from the author. Ruthven (msg) 17:39, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The metadata states "Author: www.dandavisstudios.com, Copyright holder www.dandavisstudios.com." It is not clear that this is the uploader or that they have permission to license a copyrighted photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:48, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OTRS authorisation needed from the author. Ruthven (msg) 17:40, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The metadata suggests it was taken from Instagram and it is labeled "Copyright holder ©Louis Amore©". It is not clear that this is the uploader or that they own the copyright. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:19, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OTRS authorisation needed from the author. Ruthven (msg) 17:40, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free, taken from http://www.nepal24hours.com/sandip-become-first-nepali-cricketer-play-ipl/ Lugnuts (talk) 09:30, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:40, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Navidcyir (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Taken from the subject’s Facebook profile: https://m.facebook.com/dr.omid.homayoon/posts/ms.c.eJxlkMkNxAAIAzuKMJeh~;8aifa1ivqPBYGAoWwMieoLkgz8h50vSoASmxE1yMlJJuZJuJaNOme4qrDp5nNJeNcdZzenTqz2UnBbNUmf1hzS9h65TDP~_RF7~;7UrU~-.bps.a.10150901133073777.435841.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%3D/?photo_id=10150901134203777&mds=%2Fphotos%2Fviewer%2F%3Fphotoset_token%3Dms.c.eJxlkMkNxAAIAzuKMJeh~%253B8aifa1ivqPBYGAoWwMieoLkgz8h50vSoASmxE1yMlJJuZJuJaNOme4qrDp5nNJeNcdZzenTqz2UnBbNUmf1hzS9h65TDP~_RF7~%253B7UrU~-.bps.a.10150901133073777.435841.826433776%26ei%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%25253D%26photo%3D10150901134203777%26profileid%3D635196935%26source%3D48%26_ft_%3Dtop_level_post_id.10150901137328777%26__tn__%3DEH-R%26cached_data%3Dtrue%26ftid%3D&mdf=1

Ytoyoda (talk) 12:41, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Subject had supplied all the photos including their copyright directly him self. Go get a life Ytoyoda and stop waisting everyone's time!!! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Navidcyir (talk • contribs) 11:01, 8 February 2018‎ (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OTRS authorisation needed from the author (+ original file, if possible). Ruthven (msg) 17:42, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

foto di classe di nessun interesse collettivo; school photo, no general interest M&A (talk) 13:43, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Io credo... I mean we should delete "all" uploads of this new user. They are all out of scope, of course IMHO. --E4024 (talk) 14:01, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed: in the meantime I had created this request covering all the ones M&A hadn't already submitted. :-) -- Rojelio (talk) 14:07, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Dyolf77. Ruthven (msg) 17:44, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:51, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:51, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per {{PD-Algeria-photo-except}} : 1908 anonymous photo. Ruthven (msg) 17:53, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:58, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: no information. Ruthven (msg) 17:44, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:14, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per {{PD-Brazil-URAA}} (info provided). Ruthven (msg) 17:46, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant. Superseded by similar image with better light File:妄想大富豪のフォーマット例.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:00, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:51, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photos at lower left and lower right are presumably copyrighted. They can't be de minimis, because without them this file would have no interest at all. As far as I can tell, we do not have a license from the artist who took those photos, so this is a copyvio. Jmabel ! talk 23:15, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:50, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Request by subject at OTRS ticket:2018013010010951. Subject told photographer, she did not want it to be used. Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:26, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:50, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File uploaded by a one-time uploader. Seems to me as the image of a person who is not in scope. E4024 (talk) 08:05, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:30, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sandbox-draft item. I doubt any scope but also respect other people's opinions. E4024 (talk) 08:25, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:30, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work: COM:DW. Yann (talk) 09:38, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:30, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader is not the copyright holder, so license is invalid Fram (talk) 09:41, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:29, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work: COM:DW. Yann (talk) 09:41, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:29, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of focus for commons, uploader permanently blocked for copyright violations and aggressive charge of subsequent users for minor license violations. Achim Raschka (talk) 09:42, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:29, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently a photo of the uploader, who goes by both User:Laraine Herring and User:CalebHaynes?, but the metadata lists the photographer's information: "Author: MH Ramona Swift, Copyright holder: MH Ramona Swift." Need evidence of permission to license that person's copyrighted photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:43, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:29, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.


Model Samir Crush

[edit]

Two identical (now not anymore 09:12, 3 February 2018 (UTC)) images:

Meanwhile, EXIF indicates Samir Crush himself as author. Let the delrequest determine who of the three (if any) tells the truth. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 09:49, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@JuTa: so what? They are likely the same photo anyway and are virtually indistinguishable. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 09:12, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:28, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of focus for commons, uploader permanently blocked for copyright violations and aggressive charge of subsequent users for minor license violations. Achim Raschka (talk) 09:54, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:25, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of focus for commons, uploader permanently blocked for copyright violations and aggressive charge of subsequent users for minor license violations. Achim Raschka (talk) 09:54, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:25, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata and the uploader's only contribution, found at subject's Twitter account @FraserNo1. Probably this is copyright violation. Article about the subject en:Fraser Hobday was twice deleted due to non-notability. Taivo (talk) 09:59, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:24, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrongly piblished Soniagowtham (talk) 10:02, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination & metadata (C) statement. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:24, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to have copyright information watermarked right on it. Uploader states it is "own work" so needs to clarify they took the photo and have the copyright. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:13, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:24, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The metadata contains the name of the author and copyright holder ("all rights reserved"), this does not appear to be the uploader. Need permission to re-license it. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:17, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:24, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This computer master made a good use of categories to place his ad. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 10:35, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:24, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Allowed to use it on other web sites without Alteration." Does it conform with Commons standards? The file has a dot.com watermark on it, for example; according to this restriction, I understand, we cannot remove that watermark. Admins? E4024 (talk) 11:14, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: The purported public domain dedication conflicts with the condition, making me doubt that the uploader really intended to release all their rights. --bjh21 (talk) 12:51, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:23, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Frans Masereel, the author, was dead in 1972. Hence, this image is not in the public domain. [[Utilisateur:Daehan|Daehan]] <sup>&#91;[[Discussion Utilisateur:Daehan|p&#124;d&#124;d]]&#93;</sup> (talk) 11:29, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:23, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I cannot verify the license. OTRS-permission from author Zīmējis A. Buks is needed. Older version is found at http://ftpmirror.your.org/pub/wikimedia/images/wikipedia/lv/archive/d/d8/ since August 2009 and this image comes from Wikipedia. Real source and evidence for free license is needed. Taivo (talk) 11:32, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:23, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kaikkienkaveri10 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyvios and out of scope images

Takeaway (talk) 11:39, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:23, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Drawing dated 1966 by Hubert Andrew Freeth, 1912-1986. Unlikely Wellcome Foundation owns the copyright to this image? -- Deadstar (msg) 12:16, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Zeromonk: Can you find an answer to the copyright of modern portraits in the released collection? This DR and this one are most recent. Thanks -- (talk) 12:25, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep See this page. Apparently the heirs of H.A. Freeth have released this under a CC-by licence. So the Wellcome Foundation is only a host sharing a free image. De728631 (talk) 12:58, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Cool - thanks for that. Please close request as keep. -- Deadstar (msg) 15:41, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:21, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Under copyright on flickr 46.218.9.198 09:45, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: LR failed Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:23, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same image already on Commons, not own work anyway Shev123 (talk) 12:53, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:21, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from http://m.ogcnice.com/fr/actualite/31242/qui-es-tu-ignatius- Ytoyoda (talk) 12:58, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:20, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof that it had been created in Italy ("scattata in Italia"). COM:PCP should apply. Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:03, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Merely managed by an Italian copyright management company on behalf of the Spanish magazine Bolero Film [7]. — Racconish ☎ 13:49, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:20, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an artistic exhibition by Christian Boltanski. But Christian Boltanski was born in 1944 and he is still alive and there is no COM:FOP#France : it is not allowed to publish photos whose the main subject is an original creation until 70 years after the death of its author.

I did not put a DR on File:Christian Boltanski - Monumenta 2010 (3).jpg, because on that photo the artworks are not visible. We see only the glasshouses of the Grand Palais.

Civa (talk) 13:11, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:20, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong description Ira wasi (talk) 13:45, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Let's correct the description then. Why delete a nice pic? --E4024 (talk) 13:54, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:19, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

does not belong to me Ira wasi (talk) 13:49, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Is this a confession? --E4024 (talk) 13:51, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:19, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright issues Ira wasi (talk) 14:08, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Without an explanation as to why there are "copyright issues," there doesn't seem to be any reason to delete this large size image. I would not oppose a re-nomination, just more information needs to be provided. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:20, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright issues Ira wasi (talk) 14:10, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Without an explanation as to why there are "copyright issues," there doesn't seem to be any reason to delete this large size image. I would not oppose a re-nomination, just more information needs to be provided. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:20, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright issues Ira wasi (talk) 14:10, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Without an explanation as to why there are "copyright issues," there doesn't seem to be any reason to delete this large size image. I would not oppose a re-nomination, just more information needs to be provided. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:20, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Toughpigs (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from copyrighted character.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:00, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded the Mickey Mouse watch pictures from Flickr because I'm working on a draft article for enwiki on the Mickey Mouse watch. If the only possible illustration for that article involves a picture of the character, is it the case that we just can't have any illustrations on that article? -- Toughpigs (talk) 01:35, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Toughpigs: You might be able to upload them directly to English Wikipedia under their rules for non-free content. --bjh21 (talk) 12:58, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Bjh21: Thanks. I see that this file -- File:Mickey's Fun Wheel (6991796036) (cropped).jpg -- which is used on enwiki's Disney California Adventure article has a "De minimis" template that says:
Warning: One or more elements in this image are protected by copyright
Some parts of this file... are not fully free but believed to be de minimis for this work. Derivatives of this file which focus more on the non-free element(s) may not qualify as de minimis and may be copyright violations. As a direct consequence it might be needed to review the copyright status if you crop the picture.
The reason given is: Copyrighted character of The Walt Disney Company.
Would that apply to my pictures as well? Would it help if I add that template to my file pages? -- Toughpigs (talk) 17:46, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Toughpigs: I'd suggest reading Commons:De minimis and making your own decision. Personally, I don't think File:Mickey's Fun Wheel (6991796036) (cropped).jpg is an appropriate use of de minimis. On the other hand, I think the copyright material in File:Wonderground gallery.jpg is probably de minimis (the subject being the building), and it's possible that the same is true of File:Vintage Ingersoll Mickey Mouse Watch (W.D.P.) in Original Box (8108162702).jpg. Your other two pictures clearly exceed de minimis, though: neither would make much sense without Mickey Mouse. --bjh21 (talk) 18:26, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Bjh21: , thanks for your reply. I put the de minimis template on the Wonderground Gallery picture. I'll look into the non-free content rules on English Wikipedia for the watch pictures. I appreciate your help. -- Toughpigs (talk) 17:36, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
So for the closing admin, my opinion is:

Deleted: Split close: 3 deleted, one kept as "de minimus". --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:17, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine. Building after 1950. And also small size, no metadata. Obviously, the file of another author. No Permission. Nik Deleter (talk) 16:33, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:14, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation http://aamaadmiparty.org/teams/deepak-bajpai/ Fitindia (talk) 16:35, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:14, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata. Obviously, the file of another author. No Permission.

See also photo this user:

Nik Deleter (talk) 16:39, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:14, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark is so large that there hardly remains a realistic chance for educational use. Plenty of alternatives to the photo exist, including some of the same aircraft type in the same place. Ariadacapo (talk) 16:48, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

+ Delete, for given reasons.--Uli Elch (talk) 17:55, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:14, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of copyrighted work. — Racconish ☎ 19:07, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:13, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 20:55, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:13, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. BeckenhamBear (talk) 21:02, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons is not a image repository for Wikipedia only, the reason for delete must be more than simplly a subjective opinion of what is or what is not educational, good quality, etc. --The Photographer 21:17, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No FOP in the US for sculptural objects or toys. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:12, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. BeckenhamBear (talk) 21:03, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons is not a image repository for Wikipedia only, the reason for delete must be more than simplly a subjective opinion of what is or what is not educational, good quality, etc. --The Photographer 21:17, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Its an objective opinion Christian, its a meaningless macro shot of which we have plenty. Taken by a well meaning amateur (read the text) who cant get the back off the camera... --BeckenhamBear (talk) 10:20, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, not realistically useful. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:11, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no FOP in Taiwan for "artistic" works. This board is very probably copyrighted Ruthven (msg) 21:05, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:11, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:05, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:10, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems the photo of a photo. An authorisation/explanation should be required. Ruthven (msg) 21:06, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:10, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Let Flickr keep it. BeckenhamBear (talk) 21:07, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons is not a image repository for Wikipedia only, the reason for delete must be more than simplly a subjective opinion of what is or what is not educational, good quality, etc. --The Photographer 21:18, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment The photo has been removed from Flickr apparently. Maybe the account was closed for copyvio? --Ruthven (msg) 18:47, 13 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:10, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Better version uploaded. This has highlighted text and misspelling in title. The better version is [File:Broca Triboulet February 1880 Blass.png] I uploaded both versions. Rybkovich (talk) 21:12, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:10, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False date : found elsewhere on the INternet (http://www.cafepedagogique.net/SiteCollectionImages/2706161.jpg, http://www.nova.fr/sites/default/files/styles/ratio_1_460/public/podcasts_episodes/images/capture_decran_2016-12-19_a_16.51.26.png?itok=fz-2sjiS, http://statique.lamarseillaise.fr/media/k2/items/cache/413fd1751d1dc4d7fa34dba0af98fdc4_XL.jpg), any metadata. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:37, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:10, 19 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From Twitter, no evidence of a Creative Commons license. Would also need information about the photographer and if they agree to license the photo. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 05:13, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:39, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is this image from elpais.com free? this is the uploader's only image on Commons. Leoboudv (talk) 09:55, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:38, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

IMO, the depicted amout of text can't be below TOO, whereby the choosen license would be invalid. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:56, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:37, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission, unlikely to be own work of the uploader. jdx Re: 12:28, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:37, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': small-sized format, potentially personality right isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 22:16, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 22:35, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

illustration signée ; auteur inconnu (attribution fantaisiste de la création au contributeur) ; principe de précaution Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 04:03, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

la mauvaise qualité de l'image rend impossible l'identification de l'illustrateur ; la basse définition s'explique par le fait que l'image a été téléchargée depuis un site de vente en ligne. --Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 11:05, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:50, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Фотография из семейного архива, автор и правообладатель неизвестен. SealMan11 (talk) 06:01, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:51, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No rights for redistribution (copyvio). 2A02:908:F35B:4FC0:41EC:DE33:5E56:902A 06:48, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The image was taken from a video with a CC BY license, thus is eligible for redistribution. – Rhain 09:19, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Rhain. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:53, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to {{FoP-Singapore}}, "freedom of panorama in Singapore does not apply to, among other things, two-dimensional works such as billboards, murals, paintings in art galleries and museums, posters and sign" HaEr48 (talk) 07:31, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Mosaics are "works of artistic craftsmanship", and hence covered by FoP in Singapore. At least, we treat them as such for the purposes of UK FoP law, and I can't see any reason why Singapore would mean something different by the same phrase. --bjh21 (talk) 12:46, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Bjh21: Because for Singapore, according to {{FoP-Singapore}}, there is an explicit caveat that "a work of artistic craftsmanship does not include a painting, drawing, engraving or photograph. Therefore, freedom of panorama in Singapore does not apply to .. murals". HaEr48 (talk) 18:56, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
You're right that there's a slight difference in definitions, but I don't think that caveat makes any difference here: the artwork in this case is not a painting, drawing, engraving, or photograph. The Oxford English Dictionary says that a mural is “A painting executed directly on to a wall or ceiling,” so I suspect that the author of the template may not have considered mosaics to be murals, even if the person who named this file disagreed. I've checked the Copyright Act, and while the first sentence you've quoted seems like an accurate statement of the law, there's no mention of murals anywhere in the Act. --bjh21 (talk) 19:33, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per the PRP. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:53, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is known, so license is invalid Fram (talk) 09:44, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: license was corrected. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:54, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dead in 1949 not PD - auteur mort en 1949 pas dans le domaine public Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 11:10, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:57, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dead 1949 not PD - auteur morte en 1949 pas dans le domaine public Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 11:12, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This image is from a US publication from 1905 and therefore is free of copyright. Jane023 (talk) 16:25, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, must be free in country of origin as well. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:57, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There's no freedom of panorama for 3D works of art , even publically displayed ones, in the Philippines per COM:FOP#Philippines so the copyright status of the eagle shown in this photograph needs to be take into account. If it can be shown that it is either in the public domain for one reason or another, or has been released under a free license, this photo can be kept. Otherwise, I think it probably needs to be deleted per COM:PCP and COM:DW. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:52, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:58, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There's no freedom of panorama for 3d works of art , even publically displayed ones, in the Philippines per COM:FOP#Philippines so the copyright status of the statue shown in this photograph needs to be take into account. If it can be shown that it is either in the public domain for one reason or another, or has been released under a free license, this photo can be kept. Otherwise, I think it probably needs to be deleted per COM:PCP and COM:DW. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:54, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:58, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

and also File:Bird-rattler. Pastel by W. Langdon Kihn. Wellcome V0018121.jpg, same image with frame. Painter died in 1957, I presume the copyright isn't owned by the Wellcome foundation? -- Deadstar (msg) 12:12, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:58, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I DONT KNOW 180.249.210.225 05:50, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Vandalism, no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 14:24, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The license isn't valid. Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 12:44, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: License seems valid. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:59, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This video is tagged with a caption: źródło T-Mobile Ekstraklasa, which means "source T-Mobile Ekstraklasa". Interview parts of this video seems to be taken from official Ekstraklasa league website videos. In 3:27 professional caption with Ekstraklasa logo appears in this video.

Oleola (talk) 14:17, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 22:59, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In der Blasonierung des saarländischen Wappens von 1948 (vgl. Amtsblatt des Saarlandes Nr. 95 (S) - 1948) sind Seitenverhältnisse sehr genau definiert. Dies lässt (in diesem speziellen Falle) wenig Spielraum für gestalterischen Interpretationen. Die vorliegende Grafik weicht davon tlw. deutlich ab und zeigt damit eben nicht das, was es vorgibt zu zeigen. File:Wappen Saarland 1948.svg dagegen zeigt dies und stellt eine deutliche Verbesserung zur hier vorliegenden Datei dar. Fränsmer (talk) 15:32, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

OK, ich stimme dem Antrag zu. Hätte es aber besser gefunden, wenn eine neue Version der ursprünglichen Datei erstellt worden wäre, statt einer Neuanlage. Jetzt müssen einige Links angepasst werden. Das hätte man sich ersparen können. --Pierre Audité (talk) 14:43, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 23:00, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In der Blasonierung des saarländischen Wappens von 1948 (vgl. Amtsblatt des Saarlandes Nr. 95 (S) - 1948) sind Seitenverhältnisse sehr genau definiert. Dies lässt (in diesem speziellen Falle) wenig Spielraum für gestalterischen Interpretationen. Die vorliegende Grafik weicht davon tlw. ab und zeigt damit eben nicht das, was es vorgibt zu zeigen. Zudem ist weder der Schrftzug "Sarre", noch die zusätzliche schwarze Umrandung Teil des saarländischen Wappens von 1948. File:Wappen Saarland 1948.svg dagegen zeigt dieses Wappen und stellt eine deutliche Verbesserung zur hier vorliegenden Datei dar. Fränsmer (talk) 15:35, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 23:00, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. {{PD-Polish}} is likely license, but evidence is needed, that the photo was ever published in Poland during 20th century. Taivo (talk) 15:58, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 23:01, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Christian1895 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos, logo and painting. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:10, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, kept one with is clearly PD-old. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 23:02, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't want it on here. Markheffron2 (talk) 20:36, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:11, 5 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requests deletion. Markheffron2 (talk) 19:07, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Redundant to better images. BeckenhamBear (talk) 21:00, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Commons is not a image repository for Wikipedia only, the reason for delete must be more than simplly a subjective opinion of what is or what is not educational, good quality, etc. --The Photographer 21:17, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Useful as a stock for, for example. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 23:06, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bagus dwicaksono (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Non-trivial logo, above COM:TOO.

jdx Re: 21:06, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 23:06, 4 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 22:07, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete for reasons above. Comment: Google tells me the image is posted on http://aviationweek.com/technology-milestones/100-top-technologies-aerodynamic-experiments-modern-monoplanes : can anyone climb over the paywall and see which source is given there? Ariadacapo (talk) 07:06, 31 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. If someone finds a source behind the paywall, please do let us know. --Green Giant (talk) 22:24, 13 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file uses the {{PD-ROC-exempt}} template but the source is a bare image on the website of a Hong Kong organization, that appears to be otherwise copyright. What is the original source of this image and why does this PD template apply? Green Giant (talk) 23:01, 30 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Tenbeens: Ah, yes I see it is one of those problematic pages. Thank you for the IMGUR guide. For this kind of file, you should include the starting page and give instructions on how to find the relevant map plus the URL of the raw image. What concerns me is that I can see it says Copyright and All rights reserved at the foot of the page but am I missing the license? Can I ask our resident master of knowledge, @Jusjih: for help on whether this image is licensed for reuse? Green Giant (talk) 11:44, 1 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as per COM:PRP. Nearly 2 months have gone by and uploader has not replied to the concerns of User:Green Giant. P 1 9 9   13:05, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]