Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/01/03
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
out of scope; complete silence. theinstantmatrix (talk) 04:47, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy deleted – nothing to discuss, a test file uploaded by a Wikipedia Zero abuser. --jdx Re: 06:05, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Redirect with incorrect name. Brateevsky {talk} 12:28, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: nothing to discuss, should’ve been sent to speedy. --Sealle (talk) 12:40, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
porque lo subi por error UNIVERSOMATEMATICO (talk) 02:29, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 16:19, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Threshold of Originality concern in respect of centre logo , 1990 is too recent to assume it's not copyright.Claimed as own work so a clarifcation is needed as organisational logo deisgn copyrights are typically held by the organisation represented ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:31, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Withdrawn, see talk page.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:16, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. The normal procedure is indeed OTRS, but nom has chosen to assume good faith. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 14:25, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
While we allow a limited number of personal images for the user pages of active contributors, "active" and "contributor" must come first. Commons is not Facebook. See COM:SCOPE. This user has no contributions to Commons other than a User page on which he claimed, among many other things, to be a Commons Admin. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:59, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ed (Edgar181) 13:41, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
nicht aktuell Julian-Leonard (talk) 08:29, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 22:01, 18 December 2017 (UTC)
Urheberrecht Julian-Leonard (talk) 13:42, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete, while I doubt there's any copyright issue here (the image doesn't meet the threshold of originality, and even if it did, the uploader declared it his own work and released it under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; I see no reason to doubt that), it appears to be someone's personal logo, without any educational application. Out of project scope. For the same reason File:FLAKKKSCHIFF.jpg should also be deleted. Huon (talk) 14:56, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- As an aside, it would have qualified for speedy deletion by uploader request if the uploader had found the appropriate way to tag it. Huon (talk) 14:57, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, unused personal logo, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 16:17, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Exist same one 45.210.11.85 03:11, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation. --JuTa 17:28, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Address can be used for murdering 45.210.11.85 03:17, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyright violation. --JuTa 17:28, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Promo artwork - Source given at English Wikipedia as "http://i.ndtvimg.com/i/2016-10/baahubali_640x480_71475568517.jpg (C) Arka Media Works" No evidence at English Wikipedia that this is under CC style licensing ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:08, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 01:45, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Previouslay published at "http://brixmediaco.com/portfolio/linus-sebastian/" , If actually released OTRS clarifcation desirable. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:10, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 01:46, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Empty information, no content, not used Bendix.lippe (talk) 19:25, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: User's request. --Achim (talk) 14:28, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Nokia230nokia230dualsim770x494.jpg Khanhlong566 (talk) 18:22, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete Copyvio of Nokia via https://news.microsoft.com/nokia230-marketing-dsim/. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 14:18, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Copied from MS site with image on left hand phone changed. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:37, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Source:"I found this in Google"... E4024 (talk) 15:10, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb at 00:53, 5 Januar 2018 UTC: No source since 28 December 2017 --Krdbot 07:32, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
Copyright violation. E4024 (talk) 15:04, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Magog the Ogre at 20:11, 5 Januar 2018 UTC: Mass deletion of pages added by Wickedtuna: Copyright violation --Krdbot 13:31, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Copyright vio. E4024 (talk) 15:15, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Magog the Ogre at 20:11, 5 Januar 2018 UTC: Mass deletion of pages added by Wickedtuna: Copyright violation --Krdbot 13:31, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Copyright violation. E4024 (talk) 15:17, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Magog the Ogre at 20:11, 5 Januar 2018 UTC: Mass deletion of pages added by Wickedtuna: Copyright violation --Krdbot 13:31, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Author request - self revert. Figured out the issue that I thought existed and actually doesn’t. The Dales of Glendale (talk) 02:22, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- I'm not sure if we have a practice like deleting deletion requests (DR). Next time please simply "withdraw" your deletion nomination of the concerned file and do not propose the deletion of a DR. --E4024 (talk) 07:17, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: A DR for a DR??. --JuTa 03:02, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
Non-free gallerie علاء فحصي (talk) 12:20, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Jcb (talk) 15:05, 7 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Too dark to be usable. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:09, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:40, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyright violation - Getty Images Copyright claim here: http://www.zimbio.com/pictures/10zHw_TBM6p/Nabat+Photocall+71st+Venice+Film+Festival 73.54.189.183 01:20, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted by Túrelio at 08:21, 8 Januar 2018 UTC: Copyright violation: https://www.gettyimages.de/ereignis/nabat-photocall-71st-venice-film-festival-510845329#actress-fatemeh-motamed-arya-attends-the-nabat-photocall-during-the-picture-id454672798 --Krdbot 13:28, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope. Unused personal photo. — Ipoellet (talk) 00:10, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete. I agree with nom. --E4024 (talk) 07:59, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:45, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Book jacket is presumably copyrighted, so this seems a pretty clear copyvio. Jmabel ! talk 00:36, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:48, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Picture at right center of book cover is presumably copyrighted, and I think too prominent here to claim de minimis, so this is a copyvio. Jmabel ! talk 00:46, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:48, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
I believe Google Street View images would all be copyrighted, so this is a copyvio. Jmabel ! talk 00:47, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Jmabel, an image that you could have speedy deleted yourself. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:44, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:44, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Most of this is a text from the Dalai Lama. Is there any reason to think that is not copyrighted? Presuming that is copyrighted then this should be deleted as a copyvio. Jmabel ! talk 00:48, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:49, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
A page from an Israeli newspaper. Clearly, a copyrights violation. It has no place in the Commons. Ldorfman (talk) 01:10, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:49, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 01:12, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:49, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
still out of project scope Didym (talk) 16:09, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
- I think the title should be salted, if possible. --E4024 (talk) 16:11, 15 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:12, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
LTA user's own image, out of scope. E4024 (talk) 13:25, 10 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:04, 17 March 2019 (UTC)
Do I recall well having asked our good admins to deal with this kid more effectively? :) Please salt the file name and, yes, also the uploader, at least for some time. E4024 (talk) 19:55, 20 March 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 06:15, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Copyright violation -- see competing copyright claim here: http://www.payvand.com/news/08/mar/1048.html 73.54.189.183 01:16, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:50, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Pretty sure this sculpture was discussed before for other photos, and we determined that even though it is composed largely of automobiles, it is copyrighted and there is no FOP for sculpture in the US Jmabel ! talk 01:20, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:50, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
This seems to be a copyright violation -- the identical image is distributed on a number of Internet sites such as this one: http://mydailyfundose.co/good-job/fatemeh-motamed-arya-the-actress-of-festivals-and-awards 73.54.189.183 01:28, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:52, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Basically an unused personal photo by a Flickr user. The only thing of interest besides the photographer's own image is a copyrighted sculptural work by Trimpin, at left. Either that's de minimis, and there is no reason to keep this, or it's not, and we aren't allowed to keep this. Jmabel ! talk 02:47, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:56, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
The person from this image, Heidi Arbuckle, requested this particular picture to be deleted. Other picture of her is fine. I, the uploader, have the written request from Heidi herself. If needed, the deletion request can be forwarded. Riouwa (talk) 03:46, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
The person from this image, Heidi Arbuckle, requested this particular picture to be deleted. Other picture of her is fine. I, the uploader, have the written request from Heidi herself. If needed, the deletion request can be forwarded. Riouwa (talk) 06:53, 29 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: ok, courtesy deletion. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:01, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
I don't think we can say these posters are de minimis, since they provide the only visual interest of the image. Pretty much all of them should be copyrighted, so I believe this would be a copyvio. Jmabel ! talk 04:05, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:00, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Image does not appear to be from a Bollywood party or event but instead appears to be a professional photo shoot for this actress. Photo shoots are not part of the OTRS release so this image would not be covered under the CC license granted in that email. Majora (talk) 04:56, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:02, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
copyrighted SecretName101 (talk) 05:30, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:08, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Picture absolutely blurry. Not usefull. Identification not confirmed. Poecilotheria36 (talk) 06:05, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per nomination. Really blurry, no useful content, almost could be CSD'ed but either way; vd. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 04:02, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: the image is used therefore is useful and in scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:09, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused photo of an unknown person – out of COM:SCOPE. jdx Re: 06:12, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. no EDUSE. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 04:04, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:10, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
No Freedom of Panorama in Russia for non-architectural artworks. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 06:58, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:10, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
It's a derivative work of the copyrighted painting that has been uploaded with no copyright holders' permission. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:04, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:12, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded in error during practice session - inaccurate metadata and file already exists on Commons JacintaJS (talk) 07:30, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - see File:Oxley Golf course, bunkers at the 9th hole, 2014.JPG. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:14, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Actor Aslam Sonu (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Non educational images. Only for self promotion. Non notable person
- File:Actor aslam sonu.jpg
- File:Actor aslam sonu a s group omage.jpg
- File:Laddu imran.jpg
- File:Manouwar sonu is Best Friend of Actor Aslam sonu.jpg
- File:Actor Aslam Sonu.jpg
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 08:07, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:15, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, personal image. Дима Г (talk) 08:14, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:15, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope Commons is not a social media site
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 08:18, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:15, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope, personal image. Дима Г (talk) 08:27, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:16, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope Commons is not a social media site ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 08:36, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:16, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shiyakubot (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope pictures. Non own work, possibilities of copyvio. User has problematic uploads.
- File:Símbolo de Escritores e Poetas.jpg
- File:Sex friends dating.jpg
- File:Luck the force will help.jpg
- File:Idols and heroes.jpg
- File:Xico Xavier.jpg
- File:Brazil do not have red color.jpg
- File:The begging in the Freemasonry s.jpg
- File:Os 10 Mandamentos.jpg
- File:Oteos.jpg
- File:Quill pen not for kill of the Poet from Omaezaki.jpg
- File:Castro Coat after Christ.jpg
- File:Happy new year Yahweh Yashua Ya happy ya.jpg
- File:Astronautas Spheres.jpg
- File:Castro ASTRO.jpg
- File:Shape.jpg
- File:Giwelll.jpg
- File:Redentor my defender.jpg
- File:The poet from Omaezaki.png
- File:Quill pen of the poet of Omaezaki.jpg
- File:Kagami Jesus Christ.jpg
- File:Allah bless Muhammad.jpg
- File:Marriage necklace man fat woman fit.jpg
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 08:42, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Shiyakubot (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope images. Seems non own work. Possibilities of copyvio
- File:Quill pen of the Poet from Omaezaki.jpg
- File:Uma poesia para outro Poeta.png
- File:Escoteiro da pátria certificado.png
- File:Escoteiro da pátria.jpg
- File:A telegram of thanks from the Presidente.png
- File:My name is Tiggger.jpg
- File:Ibook OK.jpg
- File:Godfather beer India.jpg
- File:Tiggger iPet.jpg
- File:Tiggger Astroship.jpg
- File:Tiggger busy.jpg
- File:The Poet Dreams.jpg
- File:Eu & Deus.jpg
- File:Dreamers of Brazil.jpg
- File:Deus beer.jpg
- File:Machines Room.jpg
- File:Tibana Castles.jpg
- File:Tiggger in the Matrix.jpg
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 08:49, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: already deleted by Nick. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:17, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Derivative of presumably non-free, copyrighted work. —LX (talk, contribs) 23:55, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:19, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:46, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - out of scope. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:24, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for artwork. A.Savin 19:46, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:23, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Uploaded for vandalism by same user on de.wikipedia hilarmont \\ talk, talk, talk 19:56, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete – a) misleading filename; b) out of scope. -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 00:49, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:25, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Probably too unclear to be usable (not focused). Kulmalukko (talk) 19:56, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:25, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:18, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 04:15, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination+ facebook image. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:24, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Maybe too unclear to be usable. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:25, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:25, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
out of scope Ciaurlec (talk) 23:55, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:20, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Picture absolutely blurry. Not useful. There are better pictures in the category. Poecilotheria36 (talk) 05:14, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- I do not mind--Сарапулов (talk) 14:37, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:39, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
This file is tagged with "NonCommercial" since the first revision in 2013. Techyan（Talk） 05:16, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Also a corpped version: File:Ti-anna wang 8685 (cropped).JPG. --Techyan（Talk） 05:20, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
- comment hybrid license in strict accordance with Commons:Deletion requests/User:Fir0002/credits and failed Commons:Requests for comment/AppropriatelyLicensed. gain a consensus to not allow hybrid license, then delete. Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 11:32, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Keep: GFDL is an acceptable free licence. --bjh21 (talk) 13:42, 3 January 2018 (UTC)- Keep GDFL is a free license, used for more than a decade in Wikimedia Commons. Tm (talk) 06:15, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:45, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
The article where the image is linked is marked for deletion. Non notable person. Commons is not a social media site ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 08:25, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:46, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Uploader is not the author; uploader only states that the author can be reached to confirm authenticity of the image. Since we have no proof author released the picture under CC, we can't host it as CC. Gikü (talk) 08:37, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:47, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Personal photo. Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 08:44, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: notable Argentian poet with article on es.wp. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:48, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Unused non-notable selfies.
BethNaught (talk) 09:40, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:51, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 10:00, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:51, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Self-promotion, out of scope. No other contribs to any project. Achim (talk) 10:28, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:52, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, probably not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:47, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete copyvio. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:02, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:52, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
The second image (Rajendra Chola) is missing source and I'm not able to find it either. Someone might have to clip that out and replace with a PD image to retain this. —SpacemanSpiff 04:13, 18 September 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Alan (talk) 00:26, 18 October 2015 (UTC)
Collages need source and license for every used image. Taivo (talk) 11:55, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, derivative work. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:54, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Unused art of non-notable artist is usually considered out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:56, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:54, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope due to missing educational value? Taivo (talk) 11:58, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:54, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Non-free gallerie علاء فحصي (talk) 12:11, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:54, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of project scope. Depicted Mahmoud Akot isn't mentioned in en.wiki. Taivo (talk) 13:59, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:55, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Twitter image. Please take a picture yourself and upload it. E4024 (talk) 14:11, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:55, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Unused personal file. E4024 (talk) 14:18, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:56, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Extremely low quality (no COM:EDUSE). Jeffrey Beall (talk) 14:19, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:56, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Too dark. Not possible to use. E4024 (talk) 14:27, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:56, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
dubious own work Salsero35 (talk) 16:08, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete: Crop of already-deleted File:Johnny Hallyday 2017.jpg. --bjh21 (talk) 16:23, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:57, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Without description the file is out of project scope. Who are depicted people? Taivo (talk) 16:43, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Go ahead and delete it if you want.
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:57, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Photo by Noam Galai/Getty Images for TechCrunch, seems copyrighted. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:04, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep Per Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2015/07#Techcrunch vs Getty Images. Getty is a copyright agent. Not a copyright holder. If the corporate overlords at Techcrunch want to release their photos under a CC license they are perfectly within their rights to do so. --Majora (talk) 02:30, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per User:Majora. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:58, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
per Commons:Deletion requests/undefined52522100@N07 +"Getty Images" --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 16:57, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
- Keep @Josve05a: Did you read the previous DR on this file? --Majora (talk) 22:49, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
- Also I emailed them personally. Seeing as no one else was going to and everyone was just ok with the idea that everything that says "Getty" is automatically not ok. Doing multiple DRs instead of one mass one, however, is a tad annoying as I know have to go vk on all of them. --Majora (talk) 23:05, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
- I went through a maintenance page and speedies some 'real' copyvios from Getty, and when I found (most of) these in there as well. However, as I went through a list with "links" only and not thumbnails, I didn't see that there were more than one of these images until I found the next, and then the next.
- I did see it, however, it was kept based on a "
onetwo-user response" on the copyright noticeboard, while we now have a consensus which we should be consistent, or "revoke it" by undeleting files. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:18, 7 April 2018 (UTC)- What consensus do you see that says we should delete all these files? It is common knowledge that stock photo sites like Getty make a fortune off of selling "rights" to images they don't actually own. Getty is a "license facilitator" who interfaces with the actual copyright holders of images. They don't own any of these things. --Majora (talk) 23:39, 7 April 2018 (UTC)
Kept: we can consider that the photo is with a double copyright (something that the copyright holder can do): 1) on Getty "all rights reserved" 2) on Flickr with a free license. Ruthven (msg) 07:07, 13 April 2018 (UTC)
- Restored: as per [1]. Yann (talk) 05:15, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
(c) Faisal Maqsood, out of project scope. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:10, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:00, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
(c) AHMED MLEEG, out of project scope. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:11, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:00, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
(c) AHMED MLEEG, out of project scope. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:11, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:00, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
(c) AHMED MLEEG, out of project scope. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:12, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:00, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
(c) AHMED MLEEG, out of project scope. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:12, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:00, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
(c) AHMED MLEEG, out of project scope. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:12, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:00, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Website's watermark. Probably not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 17:13, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: not found elsewhere on the internet, but it is advertising and used as such on id.wp. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:02, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
(c) AHMED MLEEG, out of project scope. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:13, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:00, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
(c) Faisal Maqsood, out of project scope. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:13, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:00, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
(c) Faisal Maqsood, out of project scope. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:14, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:00, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
(c) Faisal Maqsood, out of project scope. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:14, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:00, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:15, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:02, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Tiny photo without camera data, the uploader's only contribution. Probably not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 17:17, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: unused, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:04, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 17:20, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: not found using Google Image. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:04, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Cover art can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission from copyright holder. Taivo (talk) 17:39, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:17, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Any metadata, false date, similar to http://e-k-p.fr/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/renaud-siry.jpg or http://a405.idata.over-blog.com/287x300/3/97/30/92/RS---2-logos.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:48, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:18, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Any permission, false date, dubious own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:54, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:18, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ernstol as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright violation: http://de.rodovid.org/wk/Person:101690. Regular deletion request is created, because once Yann declined speedy deletion. Taivo (talk) 11:16, 8 September 2015 (UTC)
- Nice guy. Better picture available.--188.193.234.150 15:17, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- The file was uploaded into linked site on 1st of April 2013, but into Commons earlier, on 13rd of March 2013. And I nominated the "better" photo for deletion, because "own work" is dubious. Taivo (talk) 10:30, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
- The "better picture" was deleted today. Taivo (talk) 20:01, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
- Does it make sense to delete the "better picture" and not to delete the file Prince Ferfried of Hohenzollern.jpg which is also dubious? --Ernstol (talk) 09:11, 21 September 2015 (UTC)
- The "better picture" was deleted today. Taivo (talk) 20:01, 17 September 2015 (UTC)
- The file was uploaded into linked site on 1st of April 2013, but into Commons earlier, on 13rd of March 2013. And I nominated the "better" photo for deletion, because "own work" is dubious. Taivo (talk) 10:30, 10 September 2015 (UTC)
- Who is Ferfried of Hohenzollern?
In 'English: Prince Ferfried of Hohenzollern
In German: Ferfried Prinz von Hohenzollern
Copyright violation. The Dude Germany is not the copyright holder. I saw this picture a long time before. Delete the file!--62.156.32.58 22:45, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Kept: File was uploaded here first, no reason to assume that the work isn't own work. Natuur12 (talk) 15:47, 12 October 2015 (UTC)
Copyright problematic. A picture with such a poor quality can not be the original photograph. File not used. Other pictures available. The quality of the picture is not acceptable.--Basil Dearden (talk) 18:33, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:19, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Philips E160.jpg 42.114.37.139 18:20, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Philips E160.jpg Dienthoaiquangcao39 (talk) 12:25, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
- Could it be that it is the same phone pic in File:Philips Xenium E160.jpg? --E4024 (talk) 12:56, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
- Yeah, sounds good. Delete as redundant. --bjh21 (talk) 13:10, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
- Yeah, sounds good.
Deleted: per User:bjh21. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:20, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Private photo, maybe not notable person. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:13, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:20, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Single topic (skiing) gallery, includes logos, repeated photos, only one camera metadata, tiny sizes and etc, leading to the suggestion that these along with the one to no permission and one other nominated for deletion, are not own work of uploader.
- File:Titre ESA.jpg
- File:Logo coljog.gif
- File:Jean-barthalais.jpg
- File:Jean-barthalais copier.jpg
- File:Logo CRSND.jpg
- File:Wikimcalvat.jpg
- File:Hbonnet.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:19, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, not own work. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:21, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Uncropped version dates to 2011, see https://tunisitri.wordpress.com/2011/10/01/salah-karker-l%E2%80%99oublie-de-la-revolution-tunisienne/ Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:20, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. --Mhhossein talk 10:46, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:22, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Probably out of scope. Looks like the photo is edited with an "art" filter, which makes it unclearer. Clear images of the Tower Bridge exists in Category:Quality images of Tower Bridge. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:30, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:22, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
ฟ7
Redundant. Superseded by the similar view with better colors: File:PM12.jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:39, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:23, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope. This appears to have been used at one point on a userpage, but as {{Userpageimage}} says, it's eligible for deletion because it's not educational or informative because it's not in use. If uploader puts it back on his userpage, I'll not hesitate to withdraw this nomination. Nyttend (talk) 03:34, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
Deleted. Ilmari Karonen (talk) 14:37, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:27, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 04:16, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:23, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:35, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:23, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Website info suggests this is not original work Ytoyoda (talk) 20:37, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:24, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Delete: El Salvador stamps are copyright for 50 years form the date of issue per information at Commons:Stamps/Public domain#El Salvador. Commercial use if not allowed so they cannot be hosted on the commons. Ww2censor (talk) 00:14, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Well, at the time the file was uploaded, they were in PD, see history. --Michael Romanov (talk) 00:39, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- I don't think that was even correct and there is no record of the email on any of Jack Child's pages that I can find. Do you know where that verification is? Ww2censor (talk) 00:50, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry I don't know. I just thought that because you and other experienced wikipedists and philatelists were curating that page, the El Salvador stamps statement should have been true. --Michael Romanov (talk) 01:03, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- I'll have a look around again and see if I can find anything to confirm they are PD. Thanks for your understanding, though I'm always sorry to have to delete stamps especially from long time editors. Ww2censor (talk) 17:12, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- OK, I found it here and clearly the response from El Salvador was that commercial use was prohibited so we have to fall back on the 50-year term. Sorry Michael to not find better news. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ww2censor (talk • contribs) 17:47, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- No problem at all, Karl. I understand this. It's always my pleasure to be in touch with you. Best, --Michael Romanov (talk) 18:29, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- OK, I found it here and clearly the response from El Salvador was that commercial use was prohibited so we have to fall back on the 50-year term. Sorry Michael to not find better news. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ww2censor (talk • contribs) 17:47, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- I'll have a look around again and see if I can find anything to confirm they are PD. Thanks for your understanding, though I'm always sorry to have to delete stamps especially from long time editors. Ww2censor (talk) 17:12, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Sorry I don't know. I just thought that because you and other experienced wikipedists and philatelists were curating that page, the El Salvador stamps statement should have been true. --Michael Romanov (talk) 01:03, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- I don't think that was even correct and there is no record of the email on any of Jack Child's pages that I can find. Do you know where that verification is? Ww2censor (talk) 00:50, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:06, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Stamps/Public_domain#Hungary Regasterios (talk) 13:31, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
And:
- File:Stamps of Hungary, AZE-13.JPG
- File:Stamps of Hungary, AZE01-13.JPG
- File:Stamps of Hungary, AZE02-13.JPG --Regasterios (talk) 14:00, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:42, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Stamps of Hungary uploaded by Materialscientist
[edit]- File:Budapest Zoo 2016 stamp of Hungary.jpg
- File:György Kolonics 2016 stamp of Hungary 2.jpg
- File:György Kolonics 2016 stamp of Hungary.jpg
- File:József Simándy 2016 stamp of Hungary.jpg
- File:Károly Simonyi 2016 stamp of Hungary.jpg
- File:Frank Sinatra 2015 Hungarian stamp.jpg
- File:HU036-15.jpg
- File:HU037-15.jpg
- File:Zita Szeleczky 2015 Hungarian stamp.jpg
- File:Édith Piaf 2015 Hungarian stamp.jpg
- File:Aeshna viridis 2014 Hungarian stamp.jpg
- File:Annie Fischer 2014 Hungarian stamp.jpg
- File:Béni Egressy 2014 Hungarian stamp.jpg
- File:Carabus auronitens 2014 Hungarian stamp.jpg
- File:Dendroleon pantherinus 2014 Hungarian stamp.jpg
- File:István Sándor 2014 Hungarian stamp 2.jpg
- File:István Sándor 2014 Hungarian stamp.jpg
- File:Klari Tolnay 2014 Hungarian stamp.jpg
- File:Mantispa styriaca 2014 Hungarian stamp.jpg
- File:Szilárd Bogdánffy 2014 Hungarian stamp 2.jpg
- File:Szilárd Bogdánffy 2014 Hungarian stamp.jpg
- File:Zoltán Meszlényi 2014 Hungarian stamp 2.jpg
- File:Zoltán Meszlényi 2014 Hungarian stamp.jpg
- File:Géza Gárdonyi 2013 Hungarian stamp.jpg
- File:József Galamb 2013 Hungarian stamp.jpg
- File:Myotis myotis 2013 Hungarian stamp.jpg
- File:Robert Capa 2013 Hungarian stamp.jpg
- File:Sorex minutus 2013 Hungarian stamp.jpg
- File:Lőrinc Szabó 2000 Hungarian stamp.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Stamps/Public_domain#Hungary --Regasterios (talk) 13:35, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:43, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Chemical structure on the right is cut off mid-structure (presumably it is meant to be naphthalene, based on categorization) but in any case this is a useless image. Ed (Edgar181) 13:58, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:46, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Wron claim, copyvio image. Störm (talk) 14:20, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:48, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Category:2012 stamps of Hungary
[edit]- File:Stamp of 100 years Hungarian Greek Catholicism.tif
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 001-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 002-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 003-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 004-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 005-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 006-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 007-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 008-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 009-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 010-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 011-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 012-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 013-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 014-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 015-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 016-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 017-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 018-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 019-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 020-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 021-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 022-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 023-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 024-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 025-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 026-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 027-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 028-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 029-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 030-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 031-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 032-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 033-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 034-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 035-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 036-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 037-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 038-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 039-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 040-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 041-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 042-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 043-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 044-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 045-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 046-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 047-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 048-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 049-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 050-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 051-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 052-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 053-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 054-12.jpg
- File:Stamps of Hungary, 055-12.jpg
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Stamps/Public_domain#Hungary --Regasterios (talk) 14:23, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:54, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
License says Standard YouTube License, not CC Ytoyoda (talk) 20:51, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:24, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Images sem to be taken from the web - several are still watermarked with logos
- File:Zamora jumi.jpg
- File:Zamora jumilla.jpg
- File:Zamora melilla.jpg
- File:Zamora recre.jpg
- File:Zamora eji.jpg
- File:Zamora mirando.jpg
- File:Cara Zamora.jpg
Ytoyoda (talk) 20:53, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:20, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
According to EXIF data the photograph is copyrighted by MFedin. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:10, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:27, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Photo appears on Pac-12.com in Oct 24, 2017 article at http://pac-12.com/article/2017/10/24/pac-12-football-coaches-teleconference-coaches-discuss-don-james-legacy-khalil Photo uploaded on Jan 2, 2018 and is first file from editor. Special:Contributions/Melanyesm UW Dawgs (talk) 08:01, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:27, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
As per COM:PACKAGING
- File:Myungin Trarin.jpg
- File:Mirtapin.jpg
- File:Abilify 2mg.jpg
- File:Cymbalta.jpg
- File:Seroquel XR.jpg
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 08:51, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:28, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
This photo contains the copyrighted poster of the 2010 Feng Fei-fei concert. Therefore, without explicit permission from the poster's copyright holder (http://www.dadaarts.com.tw) shown on the poster, the image should be deleted. George Ho (talk) 09:13, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Where is the copyrighted part of this photo?克勞棣 (talk) 09:54, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- @克勞棣: Click here and then the ">>" button to go to the last page. You'll see a photo of her there. George Ho (talk) 10:49, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- But I took the photo of the flag PERSONALLY in PUBLIC area where everyone who passed through it could see the flag. And I didn't use it in business purpose. I earn no money from it.克勞棣 (talk) 11:30, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Still, copyright of the photo of the artist belongs to either DaDa Arts, her music company, or another company. Also, it contains a calligraphic phrase, which is discouraged per COM:TOO#Taiwan (Republic of China). George Ho (talk) 19:45, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Meanwhile, if you don't have the photo in your possession, you can download the photo and save it into your hard drive or your mobile phone. George Ho (talk) 19:47, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- I mailed to DaDa Arts yesterday, and they reply this. Is it permission?克勞棣 (talk) 02:32, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
- If they can grant permissions, please tell them to read COM:OTRS, COM:Licensing, and COM:Email templates. George Ho (talk) 02:42, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
- I mailed to DaDa Arts yesterday, and they reply this. Is it permission?克勞棣 (talk) 02:32, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
- But I took the photo of the flag PERSONALLY in PUBLIC area where everyone who passed through it could see the flag. And I didn't use it in business purpose. I earn no money from it.克勞棣 (talk) 11:30, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- @克勞棣: Click here and then the ">>" button to go to the last page. You'll see a photo of her there. George Ho (talk) 10:49, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Alternatively, there is a non-free image of her, which you can upload at en.WP if you want. George Ho (talk) 12:51, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright holder must send a free license using OTRS. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:29, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
This image was uploaded probably without proof of permission. It appears in Ian Urbina's official website without stating a license or a photographer's name. The image should be deleted. George Ho (talk) 09:49, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:29, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not covered by freedom of panorama in the USA. Lymantria (talk) 14:29, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:30, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files by User:Erbabu
[edit]- File:Shreemaha Devi Bhagavatham.jpg
- File:Rajarajavarma.jpg
- File:Teachers of Pandit K.K.Panicker.jpg
- File:Bhagavad Geetha - Pandit K K Panicker.jpg
- File:Pandit K. K. Panicker.jpg
Likely copyright violations. According to a conversation I had on IRC with Erbabu, the photographs are his own work, but the underlying works - the book covers, the documents, and the original photo of Panicker that's the basis of the last one - are not. The copyright holders of the underlying works are unknown, and it seems unlikely that those works have been released under a free license. Huon (talk) 14:37, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:30, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by FIO UNICEN (talk · contribs)
[edit]No permission and promotion.
- File:FIO 9.jpg
- File:FIO 8.jpg
- File:FIO 7.jpg
- File:FIO 6.jpg
- File:FIO 5.jpg
- File:FIO 4.jpg
- File:FIO 3.jpg
- File:FIO 2.jpg
- File:FIO 1.jpg
- File:FIO UNICEN.jpg
- File:FIO - UNICEN.jpg
- File:Facultad de Ingeniería - UNICEN.jpg
Edslov (talk) 17:21, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:09, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Koredu
[edit]Koredu (talk · contribs) – all uploads borrowed from various South Korean sites. Implausible cc-by-sa-3.0, let aside {{self}}. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 21:37, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- File:오르비 2 스크린샷.jpg
- File:오르비 3 스크린샷.jpg
- File:오르비 1 스크린샷.jpg
- File:오르비 5.1 스크린샷.jpg
- File:오르비 4 스크린샷.jpg
- File:오르비 6.1 스크린샷.jpg
- File:오르비 7.1 스크린샷.jpg
- File:오르비 10.10 스크린샷.png
- File:오르비 8.1 스크린샷.jpg
- File:오르비 9.0 스크린샷.jpg
- File:오르비 13.2 스크린샷.PNG
- File:오르비 14 스크린샷.PNG
- File:오르비 11 스크린샷.png
- File:모르비 15 스크린샷.png
- File:오르비 15 스크린샷.PNG
- File:프래서지움 포털 스크린샷.jpg
- File:오르비 마켓 15.0 초기화면 스크린샷.PNG
- File:오르비 클래스 15.0 초기화면 스크린샷.PNG
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:10, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by B dash as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: From [2], image upload on July 2014, before it was uploaded to Commons. B dash (talk) 10:15, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep:according to exif data, the picture is taken on 13 April 2017. It seems the blog is illegally upload my photo without permission.--Wpcpey (talk) 10:17, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Comment: After checking, not all the images are uploaded in 2014. However, there are no evidence that when the image was uploaded. So, I change to DR for discussion. --B dash (talk) 10:19, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Please see the link of the image, the file name is same with my version. Most of the picture of this website is copy from others. --Wpcpey (talk) 12:35, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: as per original uploader User:Wpcpey. Looks like a case of reversed copyvio. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:48, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Inferior to, and superseded by, File:SWVA Counties.png. This was in use at the French Wikipedia, but I've replaced it with the PNG. Nyttend (talk) 01:40, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- keep, it can still be used. MB298 (talk) 02:40, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Why would someone prefer to use this image rather than the PNG? Nyttend (talk) 05:42, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, replcaed by PNG version. --Wdwd (talk) 15:11, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
|
File:Flag map of Easter Island, Chile.svg is a vector version of this file.
File:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/01/03 → File:Flag map of Easter Island, Chile.svg
For more information, see Help:SVG. |
 |
Janitoalevic (talk) 02:51, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: unused and redundant, replaced by SVG. --Wdwd (talk) 15:20, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
|
|
File:Flag map of Easter Island.svg is a vector version of this file.
File:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/01/03 → File:Flag map of Easter Island.svg
For more information, see Help:SVG. |
 |
Janitoalevic (talk) 02:52, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: unused and redundant, replaced by SVG. --Wdwd (talk) 15:20, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
|
|
File:Flag map of Magallanes y Antártica Chilena.svg is a vector version of this file.
File:Deletion requests/Archive/2018/01/03 → File:Flag map of Magallanes y Antártica Chilena.svg
For more information, see Help:SVG. |
 |
Janitoalevic (talk) 02:52, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: unused and redundant, replaced by SVG. --Wdwd (talk) 15:22, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Files of User:Anna Vasilkova
[edit]Promo photos of bottles of whiskeys uploaded by Anna Vasilkova (talk · contribs). --Smooth O (talk) 10:38, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvios. --Wdwd (talk) 15:24, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, uploader has problems with copyright. Probably not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 12:55, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 15:30, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Despite the affirmation of the User, apparently a copy of the Jumo Aquis 500 CR. Yotwen (talk) 14:15, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 15:42, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, no EXIF data, single upload. Smooth O (talk) 15:21, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 15:44, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
file in copyviol, cf. metadata (work by Daniele Badolato/Juventus FC, not a free file). Danyele (talk) 16:09, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 18:16, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
watermark on the right suggests this is not original work Ytoyoda (talk) 20:48, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:33, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
(c) Paul Chinn / SF Chronicle Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:36, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence of permission. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 18:03, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Threhsold of Originality query in regard to grpahical logo element top center. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:12, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Withdrawn - Comment on talk page indicates good faith. I will suggest they file appropriate paperowrk with OTRS. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:17, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: by JuTa. Ruthven (msg) 19:09, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Collages need source and license for every used image. The lion photo is found everywhere in the web, probably this is copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:51, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:09, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No Author and no evidence for licensing (publication or public presentation) MasoodHA (talk) 13:25, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: extracted from File:Jahan ara 2.jpg. Ruthven (msg) 19:10, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Found on Imgur, only 60 views. Dispenser (talk) 15:43, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:10, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Copyright violation, see thereː http://figramotnost.blogspot.cz/ Awewewe (talk) 16:16, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:10, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Found there : https://www.edrmartin.com/photo-jean-pascal-beintus-7447.jpg. Any source, author or permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:59, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:11, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 17:00, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:11, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Complex logos can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 17:07, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:11, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
© Ulrika Malm. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:24, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:11, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
© Ulrika Malm. Identity of Dagjoakimvonanka should be verified via OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:25, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:11, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
© Ulrika Malm. Identity of Dagjoakimvonanka should be verified via OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:25, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:11, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Previously published photo: http://www.africatopsports.com/2017/12/06/patrice-neveu-soudan/ Needs OTRS ticket Ytoyoda (talk) 19:07, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: File has been first published here. The link you provided is almost 1 year after the upload on Commons. Ruthven (msg) 19:21, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
- Post mortem discussion: the file has been uploaded after 6 dec 2017. I'm speedy deleting it. --Ruthven (msg) 18:39, 28 July 2018 (UTC)
Image was previously published here: http://news.gogo.mn/r/206015 Is this actually original work? Ytoyoda (talk) 20:38, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: OTRS authorisation needed from the author. Ruthven (msg) 19:12, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Appears to be an official club portrait, very low res Ytoyoda (talk) 20:53, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Need permission from Potenza calcio at least, as indicated in the source. Ruthven (msg) 19:12, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Found elsewhere (https://farm9.static.flickr.com/8309/8065098634_c5b21ec87d_b.jpg), no source link, unvalid author's name. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:45, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 19:14, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Book cover : copyrighted. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:10, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Claims Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Portada_Tsafiqui_9.jpg & Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Portada_Economía_y_Negocios.png
License: https://revistas.ute.edu.ec/index.php/tsafiqui/about/submissions
License: https://revistas.ute.edu.ec/index.php/economia-y-negocios/about/submissions
PS: I work with the publisher.
--Aganon77 (talk) 01:10, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: publisher releases it under CC-by] license. Ruthven (msg) 19:16, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Book cover : copyrighted. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:11, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Claims Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Portada_Tsafiqui_9.jpg & Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Portada_Economía_y_Negocios.png
License: https://revistas.ute.edu.ec/index.php/tsafiqui/about/submissions
License: https://revistas.ute.edu.ec/index.php/economia-y-negocios/about/submissions
PS: I work with the publisher.
--Aganon77 (talk) 01:10, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Portada Economía y Negocios.png. Ruthven (msg) 19:17, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
low quality, unauthorized by the National Gallery in Prague, duplicit file NoJin (talk) 23:13, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ludvik Kohl 14. 4. 1746-21. 6. 1821 - Interier antickeho chramu se sochou Pallas Atheny.jpg. Ruthven (msg) 19:19, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Ludvik Kohl 14. 4. 1746-21. 6. 1821 - Interier antickeho chramu se sochou Pallas Atheny.jpg
[edit]
low quality, unauthorized by the National Gallery in Prague, duplicit file NoJin (talk) 23:27, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Please link to the duplicate file in question when creating such deletion request. Authorization is not necessary in PD-art files by the way, and your own upload of a file of the same picture does not show any authorization either, by the way. --Anvilaquarius (talk) 08:51, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: File in the public domain. Use {{duplicate}} in the file page to point to the duplicate file. Ruthven (msg) 19:18, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
low quality, unauthorized by the National Gallery in Prague, duplicit file NoJin (talk) 23:46, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: File in the public domain. Ruthven (msg) 19:17, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Policy was created by an RFA candidate who's seemingly annoyed with them being accused of CANVASSING, In short we've survived without it for many many years and not every Wikimedia policy needs spelling out especially when for instance canvassing here is next to none, Thanks, -–Davey2010Talk 17:38, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. [Edited for clarity]
- The concept is in use on Commons with a specific meaning. Definition and treatment of canvassing on Wikimedia sites has specificities which diverges from IRL definition and treatment
- We cannot use a concept to take down votes or exclude editors's opinion on the basis of canvassing AND not document nor define this local jargon here on Commons.
- Search query on Commons otherwise returns confusing list of debates with various treatments across the years.
- A minimal page is needed on Commons, with relevant references for further reading. As apparently follow policies of the English Wikipedia, which may diverge from other ones, we need links to these ressources. Yug (talk) 17:46, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Discussion between Dave & Yug
|
|---|
|
- My feeling is that this should be kept and improved. If it's strongly held enough by the community to have the force of policy, and it seems to be, then it should be policy. GMGtalk 18:28, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Discussion between GreenMeansGo, Yug and Dave
|
|---|
|
- Delete per norm. Wikicology (talk) 21:49, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
- Wikicology : "Canvassing is unacceptable." (12/29 19:45) "I am suggesting speedy close as candidate is canvassing for support !vote." (12/29 19:44). This principle seems pretty important to you, and pretty powerful as well since you request RfA closure on its basis. Then, how can you both actively USE canvassing accusations as an important rule or policy to take out proposals AND vote to DELETE documentation about it ? This seems basic logic. Note: This is a loophole is worth and cheap to fix : accessible documentation must exist on the site and is easy to add to a wiki. This rule being dear to you, I encourage you support it and push for it to become an official policy on Commons so you can coolly counter that practice based on clean documentation. Life easier for everyone. Yug (talk) 13:35, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- Comment - I have no objections to this being deleted and then recreated as a redirect back to en:WP:CANVASSING. –Davey2010Talk 21:42, 8 January 2018 (UTC)
- Comment I don't dislike Davey2010's last idea. Delete this and recreate it as a redirect back to en:WP:CANVASSING or something else the community chooses. We don't have to have our policies be identical to WP but it's the best compromise idea I've heard since I do like policies being spelled out for everyone to see. Black and white. Reduce the gray areas. That's not a bad thing. -- Sixflashphoto (talk) 04:14, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep. No real deletion reason given (you don't need to have a problem before putting a policy in place). --P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:15, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- The precedent you are setting here is that someone can wake up one day to create their own policy. Yug is allow to write an essay which may one day be promoted to policy/guildeline following a community consensus but this is certainly not the best way to go about it. Wikicology (talk) 19:04, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Making a page to create a point is more than a valid reason for deletion, Aside from that CANVASSING is never an issue here so in this case it's a useless policy to have here, As I suggested above redirecting is better than having a non-used policy here. –Davey2010Talk 17:55, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- CANVASSING is never an issue here - - - You didn't create this because it doesn't exist .... You created it because you CANVASSED GMGtalk 18:52, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Many thanks for your extremely helpful and insightful comment!, Pointing out flaws in my comments just makes you a very sad person, Point is it's almost never an issue here. –Davey2010Talk 20:35, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- @Davey, If canvassing is a concept defining the rules of communications in votes and discussions (→it is), if it's used as rational to vote down or take out proposals (→it is), if it's diverging from IRL definition and specific to wikis and/or commons (→it is), if it's changing along times (see RfA in the 2000s and my own in 2005 when the practice was completely ok) (→it is), then it's complex and impacting enough the community ... so to deserve an introduction page.
- I find strange that you as an very active user want both to delete documentation of this local commons concept you yourself use as a rule. You should be rooting to keep the current presentation page and make it a clear policy. Yug (talk) 09:41, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- I've used COM:CIVIL, COM:DIVA and WP:IDONTLIKEIT over at EN too .... do these exist here ? ... No, Why would I want to keep something I've only gone by once in the 3-4 years of being here ? .... I still believe Deleting and redirecting to en:WP:CANVASSING is better. –Davey2010Talk 13:58, 11 January 2018 (UTC)
- I mean, no reason to get snippy. You've made an internally inconsistent argument. There's nothing wrong with pointing that out. The main problem with redirecting to enwiki is that this is a multilingual project, and enwiki isn't. The main advantage of working together to make solid guidance here, rather than there, is that it can then be translated into multiple languages, whereas on enwiki it cannot. GMGtalk 14:58, 12 January 2018 (UTC)
- Many thanks for your extremely helpful and insightful comment!, Pointing out flaws in my comments just makes you a very sad person, Point is it's almost never an issue here. –Davey2010Talk 20:35, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- CANVASSING is never an issue here - - - You didn't create this because it doesn't exist .... You created it because you CANVASSED GMGtalk 18:52, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep The page existing is an irrelevance, the community will need to decide whether it wishes to formalise the current informal understanding it is working under concerning canvassing (which is 'don't canvass'). Redirecting to the English Wikipedia page is, in such circumstances, highly inappropriate, we either have a local policy, here on Commons, or we don't. We don't tag along with another project where we have no say in any changes being made there. Nick (talk) 13:25, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept, I could argue against the consensus all day however the only traction this DR's getting is keeps so it's easier to accept the consensus instead of arguing against it, Nick makes a very valid point we either have a local one or we don't .... I obviously believe in the latter however consensus is to have the former so the former it shall be. –Davey2010Talk 16:11, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Stamps/Public_domain#Hungary Regasterios (talk) 12:52, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
And:
- File:60th anniversary of Hungarian Revolution 2016 stamp fiú.jpg
- File:60th anniversary of Hungarian Revolution 2016 stamp 3.jpg
- File:60th anniversary of Hungarian Revolution 2016 stamp 2.jpg --Regasterios (talk) 12:58, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:26, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Stamps/Public_domain#Hungary Regasterios (talk) 13:10, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:23, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Stamps/Public_domain#Hungary Regasterios (talk) 13:22, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:26, 24 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Carlosp14619 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Image taken from https://thelionwire.com/2017/06/06/self-defined-how-am-commerce-qb-luis-perez-defined-himself-in-his-time-and-in-his-way/
Ytoyoda (talk) 20:42, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- I am not sure whether these files are the work of the uploader or not. Just noting some things. These files were uploaded in Feb. 2017 and that source is from June 2017. The uploader also uploaded File:Luis Perez Throwing a Pass.jpg but doesn't say that it is his own work. He has a source listed in that case. WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 23:24, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- You’re right about the upload dates - though I still think these uploads are derivative works, given the PNG format and the closer crop. I just don’t know where they came from. Ytoyoda (talk) 01:42, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: probably taken from [3] (December 2016). --Sealle (talk) 12:09, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 21:30, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:10, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
False date, dubious own work. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:39, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:12, 25 January 2018 (UTC)
background is incorrect (black, non transparent) MP Maier (talk) 10:05, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 21:55, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
The picture shows a copyright note (inserted as text directly into ple picture) which is not compatible with CC-BY-SA. (If the person named there is identical to the uploader "corfabbos", he is requested to upload a version without the copyright note, then the deletion request can be withdrawn) Karl432 (talk) 13:18, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Copyright and watermark are compatible with license, of course. Ruthven (msg) 22:16, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
User violating copyright (the image should be deleted) or user claiming to be "à Punt Mèdia, CVMC" (the image should be deleted until OTRS permission is provided) strakhov (talk) 16:23, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 22:15, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Not found at the URL = missing source + missing permission. Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:36, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 22:15, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cocowind123
[edit]Cocowind123 (talk · contribs) – three screenshots from www.teacher.com.cn, copyrighted. Yet another upload was deleted five years ago, but no investigation ensued. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 22:02, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 22:12, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
The file has two problems. At first, collages need source and license for every used image. At second, unused personal photos are out of our project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:46, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - out of project scope. -★- PlyrStar93. →Message me. ← 05:49, 14 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete - No license/evidence of permission for constituent images, out of scope. -- Begoon 04:11, 17 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 22:17, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Similar to https://media.licdn.com/mpr/mpr/shrinknp_200_200/AAEAAQAAAAAAAAorAAAAJDg2ZWIyZGQyLWViZmItNDFjYS1iZDM4LTQ5NTgyMmZhYjE4NQ.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:06, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. No EXIF data, no permission. Ruthven (msg) 22:18, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Looks like stolen from the web, e.g. http://www.schleiz.de/News/lesung.html — ThomasO. 17:48, 3 January 2018 (UTC) The Copyright belongs to Channel21 - we have the permission to use it. How can I change it?
Deleted: per nomination. @Omerzu: , next time use {{Copyvio}} in teh page directly. Thanks. Ruthven (msg) 22:19, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
File:Bigg-Boss-11-Arshi-Khan-Hot-Unseen-Topless-Sex-Nude-Photos-www.actressnudephotos.com-7.jpg
[edit]
Multi-tagged, copy of http://www.tamilcinemaz.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/actress-arshi-khan-stills-001.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 17:58, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Delete: No own work by User:Waleedjamshid. Without watermark in the middle of the pic it was uploaded named File:Arshi Khan Photoshoots.jpg by the same User and speedy deleted on 30th December 2017. I suspect a copyright violation once again. ....HMS (talk) 06:24, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
- Probably the other image uploaded as well, given their history. Ravensfire (talk) 05:39, 10 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. @Patrick Rogel: Next time, use directly the template {{Copyvio}}, thanks. Ruthven (msg) 22:20, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
This is a derivative work of a pub sign - late 20th century if from the same time as the building, although it could be based on an older work. It is probably still copyrighted. If the policy still applies as in Commons:Deletion requests/Pub signs in England depicting trains this should also be deleted. Peter James (talk) 20:26, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 22:20, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
no evidence of uploader taking the photo to release it under CC licence. However, may be in PD per File:Aldo Moro br.jpg as it was taken during illegal activity (the rebel group pictured is illegal in Iraq); also note that Iraq has not signed Berne Convention according to {{PD-Iraq}} Al-Douri (talk) 21:20, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 22:20, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Threhsold of Orignaility query, given that w:File:Cryptic Donc Pvt Ltd Logo.jpeg was non-free ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:09, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:10, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 14:49, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 22:53, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Pratap Somvanshi is not mentioned in en.wiki. Unused photo about non-notable person, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 17:24, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:17, 8 February 2018 (UTC)
Might be government work but this pic is from the internet with no details of the who the author actually is. Certainly not own work Gbawden (talk) 12:34, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: License OK now. --Yann (talk) 15:11, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
low quality, unauthorized by the National Gallery in Prague, duplicit file NoJin (talk) 23:03, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: PD-Art. --Yann (talk) 15:14, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
Incorrect (Old) Logo - Should have been ND, not Share Alike. Stjaymz (talk) 23:55, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 15:15, 12 February 2018 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that crown copyright would apply. Jcb (talk) 22:25, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 01:40, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Bogus license. No indication that the author would have died before 1948. Jcb (talk) 22:35, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- (uploader) Undelete the enwiki file with the same name and then delete this copy. Jc86035 (talk) 03:56, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 01:37, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Bogus license. No indication that the author would have died before 1948. Jcb (talk) 22:37, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- (uploader) Undelete the enwiki file with the same name and then delete this copy. Jc86035 (talk) 03:56, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 01:37, 13 February 2018 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Martin Sg. as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: artist died in 2000, no fop in germany
Converted by me to DR, as FoP-cases should usually go into regular DR. The question to be discussed here is whether the inner space of the church is above COM:TOO. -- Túrelio (talk) 13:12, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep IMHO, nothing copyrighted. Classic structure. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 23:12, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per D Y O L F 77. Ruthven (msg) 10:45, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Art not for permanent display in public space in Belgium Is it artwork (certainly not finished or recognisable) or an artist working? Smiley.toerist (talk) 14:20, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - Performance of an artist who is working, part of a public event. No reason to delete. --Livenws (talk) 20:19, 5 January 2018 (UTC)
- Keep - per Livenws. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 22:57, 27 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. Ruthven (msg) 10:46, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
artist died in 2005, no fop in germany Martin Sg. (talk) 21:32, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
Kept: Photos should be proposed here, no galleries. Ruthven (msg) 10:47, 14 February 2018 (UTC)
Copy of https://pbs.twimg.com/media/DDfSMRYVYAAhNGj.jpg, not a work from the US military, out of project scope. Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:08, 3 January 2018 (UTC)
- Strong Keep The image may have been found on Twitter, but its origin is most certainly with the US military. It is the official photo that every enlistee gets taken of them, in uniform and in front of the flag. Greggens (talk) 19:54, 4 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted, the photo is in scope, but Twitter is not acceptable source and I am not convinced, that this is official photo. If evidence is given, that this is really work of US Army, then the file can be undeleted. Taivo (talk) 18:04, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
