Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/11/07
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_con_el_Cónsul_de_Uruguay_en_Argentina.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Гродзинский.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.gif){kind=link}
_Budapest,_18_March_2014_-_OSCE_Parliamentary_Assembly.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_балкон.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
6 closed discussions from Commons:Deletion requests/File:Penisss.jpeg
|
|---|
|
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This user post these pictures without the permission. Other pictures of this person has been deleted uploaded by tuxdiary before. I have seen this today. 2001:250:4001:201:F1CA:23CA:3490:6418 13:44, 12 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:30, 22 October 2017 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Unauthorized Publishing. This user published unauthorized work without permission. See his posts history. 218.197.152.103 12:08, 22 October 2017 (UTC) Kept: no evidence has been provided that there would be a permission problem - in use, so in scope. --Jcb (talk) 14:29, 29 October 2017 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This picture is mine and this doctor upload it without my knowledge. 2001:250:4001:201:DDD9:D95B:CA2D:9AB2 16:24, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Most people are identified by their faces rather than by normally-hidden body parts, and I seriously doubt there is any way the requester (even if it is only the one) has any real fear of being identified. So I discount privacy as a serious reason for deletion, and if there is any residual issue here it should be dealt with by way of OTRS rather than in a public forum. I make no comment on the fact that the image has been here for five years without complaint. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 18:36, 7 November 2017 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
out of scope 207.233.110.67 19:49, 31 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: scope is irrelevant as this image is COM:INUSE. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 18:27, 7 November 2017 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Post without permission 47.74.4.188 18:17, 7 November 2017 (UTC) Kept: This request adds nothing to previous ones and is therefore speedily closed. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 18:27, 7 November 2017 (UTC) This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File is not in used 119.156.89.226 19:05, 20 January 2018 (UTC) Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 19:38, 20 January 2018 (UTC) |
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 16:19, 3 October 2023 (UTC)
Porn only used for vandalism posts at this point in time. We have plenty of images of hard cocks. No need to keep this one when it isn't being used and it is outside of scope. TonyBallioni (talk) 01:52, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
Keep Well, according to the other DRs on this image, this has been in use for a long time, so this is not a reason for deletion. And it's also old enough, so COM:PENIS doesn't apply. PaterMcFly (talk) 12:13, 3 September 2023 (UTC)- Keep Per PaterMcFly 20 upper 17:01, 3 September 2023 (UTC)
Kept|per consensus, for the seventh time. Wow... (non-admin closure) ClydeFranklin (t/c) 00:51, 10 September 2023 (UTC)}}
Files uploaded by Hammousyene fouad adan
[edit]
This file is uploaded by long-term abuser Fouadadan. --209.242.141.27 17:14, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 20:12, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RaghdaGamal (talk · contribs)
[edit]Continuation of https://twitter.com/RaghdaOfficial. Commons is no social media site, out of scope.
- File:Wikibidia Raghda Gamal.png
- File:Omi Song Raghda & Mahmoud Mohey.jpg
- File:Poster Raghda gamal Raghdaofficial.png
- File:Logo Raghda gamal Rghdaofficial.png
- File:Raghda Gamal Poster Raghdaofficial.jpg
- File:Poster Raghda gamal Raghdaofficial.jpg
- File:Raghda Gamal photo Raghdaofficial.jpg
- File:Cover By Raghda gamal & Mahmoud Shabaan.jpg
- File:Amghami Poster Fat Senen song.jpg
- File:Poster Raghda Gamal Raghdaofficial.jpg
- User:Raghdaofficial
Achim (talk) 18:38, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Delete Out of scope Ronhjones (Talk) 20:47, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvios, fan. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:33, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
If Korea.net copyrights their content, this was uploaded to flickr then to commons to by bypass flagging, logic dictates this breaches copyright. Govvy (talk) 21:15, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Speedy kept: See licensing, confirmed by OTRS. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 21:19, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Sorry! I did something wrong! Chalk19 (talk) 12:32, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:50, 12 March 2017 (UTC)
Scontent-lhr3-1.xx.fbcdn.net 19113750 2030382720522701 6991384366697281798 n.jpg Pouchkine-center (talk) 12:00, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 12:19, 11 August 2017 (UTC)
this was not the picture I wanted to upload GuillemMedina (talk) 13:46, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
Closed: accidental deletion request, removed by user. seb26 (talk) 14:03, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
I confused JulietaDerdoy (talk) 12:04, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 12:15, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
File:Andrei Icefield.jpg Volcanoguy (talk) 20:21, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense, no valid reason for deletion. --jdx Re: 23:32, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
The file was uploaded with the wrong Creative Common Licence LankasamOT (talk) 17:04, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
- This request was made by error.
- The file should be kept LankasamOT (talk) 17:11, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Kept: Withdrawn. --Achim55 (talk) 19:36, 21 August 2024 (UTC)
Not own work (http://www.zimbio.com/photos/Greg+Van+Roten/Seattle+Seahawks+v+Denver+Broncos/clOQSZPobvw) WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 00:13, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Ronhjones at 21:06, 7 November 2017 UTC: Copyright violation: http://www.zimbio.com/photos/Greg+Van+Roten/Seattle+Seahawks+v+Denver+Broncos/tzb5-rU5lQ8 --Krdbot 01:36, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Getty Images copyvio - http://www.zimbio.com/photos/Elizabeth+Debicki/London+Evening+Standard+Theatre+Awards+Red/plngwLQivMH Ebyabe (talk) 00:22, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Ronhjones at 21:06, 7 November 2017 UTC: Copyright violation: http://www.zimbio.com/photos/Elizabeth+Debicki/London+Evening+Standard+Theatre+Awards+Red/plngwLQivMH --Krdbot 01:36, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by PinkAechFas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Australian logos. Australia has an absurdly low threshold of originality.
- File:LJ Hooker Logo 1937.png
- File:LJ Hooker Logo 1948.png
- File:LJ Hooker Logo 1953.png
- File:LJ Hooker Logo 1959.png
- File:LJ Hooker Logo 1969.png
- File:LJ Hooker Logo 1993.png
Guanaco (talk) 12:53, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Hi
Thanks for the message Guanaco about the old logos of LJ Hooker that I uploaded. I am a new to uploading images. After doing even more reading about copyright, tags, free use etc I do think I have used the wrong copyright tag and I understand that the files may not meet the “Logo with only simple text” threshold. On reflection perhaps the more the appropriate tag should be “Non-free logo” accompanied by an appropriate use rationale. Regards--PinkAechFas (talk) 01:17, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- @PinkAechFas: Thanks for being willing to help fix this. I've moved the images to Wikipedia and deleted them here. I noticed that some of the descriptions are wrong, so you might take a look and clean that up. If they're named incorrectly, let me know on my talk page.
Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 01:46, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:14, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 04:37, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Test file - didn't upload with all the metadata.. Ouvrard (talk) 20:14, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:19, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Upload didn't include all the metadata Ouvrard (talk) 20:15, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:20, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Upload didn't include all the metadata Ouvrard (talk) 20:15, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:20, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Upload didn't include all the metadata Ouvrard (talk) 20:15, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:20, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Upload didn't include all the metadata Ouvrard (talk) 20:15, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:20, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Upload didn't include all the metadata Ouvrard (talk) 20:16, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:20, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Upload didn't include all the metadata Ouvrard (talk) 20:16, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:20, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Upload didn't include all the metadata Ouvrard (talk) 20:16, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:20, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Upload didn't include any of the metadata Ouvrard (talk) 20:16, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:20, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Upload didn't include any of the metadata Ouvrard (talk) 20:17, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:20, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Upload didn't include any of the metadata Ouvrard (talk) 20:17, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:20, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted 3D art, no FOP in U.S. ViperSnake151 (talk) 17:13, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- I'm okay with this.
I suggest transferring to en-wiki as non-free content.I've uploaded the image to en-wiki as NFC. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:14, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones (Talk) 00:46, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Quiero modificarlo Fab flores (talk) 19:21, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 10:26, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
private photo Alton Locke (talk) 21:13, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:12, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
Advertising spam some sort of spiritual healing business. Falcorian (talk) 01:09, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, blatant spam. --Achim (talk) 09:35, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused test sound. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:32, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:32, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
copyrighted file. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 22:43, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Any evidence that this is copyrighted?86.3.174.49 00:39, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:49, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
copyvio, see source and author info that was submitted Ebyabe (talk) 00:04, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:24, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
copyvio of imdb image http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0446702/mediaviewer/rm1363847680 Ebyabe (talk) 00:06, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:24, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
insufficiently sourced image, pls see user's other uploads Ebyabe (talk) 00:10, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:24, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
copyvio, see source listed and user's other uploads Ebyabe (talk) 00:15, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:24, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
Copyviol da qua http://www.leggilo.net/180920/grande-fratello-vip-francesco-totti-in-ansia-per-ilary-blasi.html Frullatore Tostapane (talk) 00:08, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 04:26, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
The Free Art license do not have a verifiable source. The club's website has the blanket "All Rights Reserved" copyright statement. Author not credited. Thuresson (talk) 00:35, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 04:27, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 00:39, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:25, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
File:Rashmi ranjan Seth-Ravenshaw university-Cuttack - Tangi - Pg English--Nic-Chhatia college 2014-04-26 00-34.jpg
[edit]
Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 00:46, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:28, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Small hotel without notability, thus out of scope. Siyuwj (talk) 00:50, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- I disagree. Just because it is a small hotel, does not mean it is out of scope --Mjrmtg (talk) 01:57, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- The lack of notability means that the file may not observe COM:EDUSE.-Siyuwj (talk) 05:01, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, illustrates the region. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:30, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted poster of a video game. De minimis does not apply since the poster is the main object of the photo. Дима Г (talk) 01:41, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: I agree, the image is only being used because of the poster. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:33, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
No use, out of scope Sturm (talk) 01:46, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:33, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
No use, out of scope Sturm (talk) 01:46, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:33, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
No use, out of scope Sturm (talk) 01:46, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:33, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
This image can be found on the Internet and it is not his own work 
| Prismo (talk. | contr.) 02:08, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted as copyvio by Taivo (talk · contribs). --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:34, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Not own work, official logos of the COD games. Дима Г (talk) 02:29, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:34, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Sadly, the posters are most likely copyrighted. Дима Г (talk) 02:49, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep.Per COM:DM. The subject is the stand, not the copyrighted posters. Honestly, I don't really care of what will happend to this file. Esby (talk) 15:23, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: in this case, the copyrighted material is de minimis. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:35, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted video game posters Дима Г (talk) 04:03, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: poster is de minimis. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:36, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyrighted video games posters, screenshots of the game. Дима Г (talk) 04:05, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: de minimis, the photo is of the event. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:38, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work. MB298 (talk) 04:05, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:38, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Motionless Dj (talk · contribs)
[edit]No categories. No useful filenames or descriptions. This looks like unused personal art. I don't see any reason why we should keep one of these, much less eight.
- File:Motionless en (2017).jpg
- File:Motionless (2017).jpg
- File:Motionless en 2017..jpg
- File:Motionless en el 2017.jpg
- File:Tema en el Talent Pool de Spinnin' Records.jpg
- File:Motionless en su presentación.jpg
- File:Motionless en su 1era presentación.jpg
- File:Motionless.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:21, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 04:42, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Zaki-1.jpg
- File:الكاتب والباحث في الفنون والأديان.jpg
- File:كاتب وباحث في الفنون والأديان.jpg
- File:Mohammadion.jpg
- File:تفانينو.jpg
- File:محمديون.pdf
- File:زكي دعبل.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 04:38, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope.
- File:زكي دعبل.jpg
- File:المخرج زكي دعبل 05.png
- File:المخرج زكي دعبل 03.jpg
- File:المخرج زكي دعبل 02.jpg
- File:المخرج زكي دعبل 01.jpg
- File:المطران زكي دعبل.jpg
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:11, 23 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 00:20, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Noura Al Moslet (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 04:39, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Fenghua District
[edit]Shops without notability, thus out of scope.
- File:奉化市山水园林桃子市场 - panoramio.jpg
- File:奉化街景 - panoramio (18).jpg
- File:奉化街景 - panoramio (4).jpg
- File:奉化街景 - panoramio (5).jpg
- File:奉化街景 - panoramio (6).jpg
- File:奉化街景 - panoramio (8).jpg
- File:奉化街景 - panoramio (9).jpg
- File:奉化街景 - panoramio.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Siyuwj (talk) 00:39, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Seems within scope to me, shows the style of architecture within the district. Images are appropriately categorized with a location. Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:27, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - Seems also within scope to me. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:34, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Businesses without notability, hence not educational and out of scope.
- File:330国道旁边农家乐 - panoramio.jpg
- File:330国道旁边汇福农家乐 - panoramio.jpg
- File:330国道边的娇凤饭店 - panoramio.jpg
- File:一飞农家乐 - panoramio.jpg
- File:东垟路上奶粉店 - panoramio.jpg
- File:东垟路口 - panoramio.jpg
- File:中国田鱼村农家乐 - panoramio.jpg
- File:临堤农家乐 - panoramio (2).jpg
- File:临堤农家乐 - panoramio.jpg
- File:临堤农家乐里的休闲处 - panoramio.jpg
- File:临堤农家乐里的林荫道 - panoramio (1).jpg
- File:临堤农家乐里的林荫道 - panoramio.jpg
- File:临堤农家乐风光 - panoramio.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Siyuwj (talk) 05:12, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - geolocated and categoried, in scope IMO. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:40, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Small restaurant without notability, hence the photo is out of scope. Siyuwj (talk) 05:16, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - geolocated and categoried, in scope IMO. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:39, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Small restaurant without notability, hence the photo is out of scope. Siyuwj (talk) 05:20, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - geolocated and categoried, in scope IMO. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:40, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Small restaurant without notability, hence the photo is out of scope. Siyuwj (talk) 05:20, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - geolocated and categoried, in scope IMO - if the car is disturbing the image can be cropped out. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:41, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Small restaurant without notability, hence the photo is out of scope. Siyuwj (talk) 05:20, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - geolocated and categoried, in scope IMO. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:40, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Small restaurant without notability, hence the photo is out of scope. Siyuwj (talk) 05:20, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep in scope, usable. --Ralf Roleček 07:39, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- How? - Siyuwj (talk) 16:06, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - geolocated and categoried, in scope IMO. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:41, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
See COM:TOYS. We would need information about the copyright status of the toys, the clock, and The Adventures of Fat Freddy's Cat to keep this image. Guanaco (talk) 05:53, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:42, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
unused personal image out of COM:SCOPE Eurodyne (talk) 05:58, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:42, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
unused personal image out of COM:SCOPE Eurodyne (talk) 06:01, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:43, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
unused personal image out of COM:SCOPE Eurodyne (talk) 06:01, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:43, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Not outdoor art, violation of FoP. Siyuwj (talk) 07:12, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:45, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Very poor quality (extremely blurry), and there are better shawarma photos in Wiki-Commons AntonioK talk 07:46, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- delete - There weren't any when I uploaded this, IIRC, but yeah, that's not something that needs to be kept... Could also delete File:Shawarma_sandwich_closed.jpg as well. --NoCultureIcons (talk) 09:14, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - the other is used. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:46, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused small and low-res gif, have File:Tetrasilan.svg DMacks (talk) 08:20, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:47, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
per exif this is a copy of a facebook image, not used in articles either —SpacemanSpiff 08:40, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:48, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Fake license, complicated graphical logo can't be free or own Bilderling (talk) 08:42, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:53, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
cutout from copyrighted image - https://www.dailymercury.com.au/news/people-feel-the-major-parties-arent-looking-after-/3140205/ Ebyabe (talk) 09:12, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:54, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
copyvio image - source https://www.sunshinecoastdaily.com.au/topic/pauline-hanson/ Ebyabe (talk) 09:14, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:55, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Text is too small to be readable. Probably the map is not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:18, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:55, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
screenshot of a youtube video (that the video was produced by a company) is copyrighted Matthew hk (talk) 09:58, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:56, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
creenshot of a youtube video (that the video was produced by a company) is copyrighted Matthew hk (talk) 09:59, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:56, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
creenshot of a youtube video (that the video was produced by a company) is copyrighted Matthew hk (talk) 09:59, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:57, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted logo. 84.61.155.27 10:38, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete: Similar to File:Csm ALDI SUED Logo 96dpi 0ce8a47d1e.png, which has already been deleted. --84.61.155.27 11:18, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:58, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Thomas Mann (1875–1955). Copyright violation Mutter Erde (talk) 10:58, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:02, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Thomas Mann (1875–1955). Copyright violation Mutter Erde (talk) 11:00, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:02, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Amaansaifi27 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope. currently used on a promotion draft wp page that will never get to mainspace
Gbawden (talk) 11:26, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:04, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
The user has uploaded three files of their own portrait in order to make a user page in EN:WP and nothing else in the system. We should delete all three files. E4024 (talk) 11:30, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:05, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:31, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:05, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 11:31, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:06, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
RD to a UPF. E4024 (talk) 11:32, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:06, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 11:44, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:09, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 11:45, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:09, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 11:46, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Together with this one please: File:Hassan Mir.jpg. --E4024 (talk) 11:47, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:09, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 11:56, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Also File:Abdul Bhai.jpg, File:Sonu Bhai.jpg, File:Sonu Bhai ..jpg and File:Sonu h Bhai.jpg. --E4024 (talk) 12:04, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:11, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 11:57, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Also: File:Ansari Bhai.jpg and File:Sonu a Bhai.jpg please. --E4024 (talk) 11:58, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:11, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal photo, BΛXTER isn't mentioned in en.wiki, the uploader's only contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:00, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:12, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 12:06, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:12, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
_con_el_C%C3%B3nsul_de_Uruguay_en_Argentina.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_con_el_C%C3%B3nsul_de_Uruguay_en_Argentina.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photographed a panel. This is a derivative work. OTRS permission is needed from the original author. Y.haruo (talk) 12:29, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:13, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Krishnabusal16 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Please don't upload your personal photos. Wikimedia Commons is not your free web hosting. Please see project scope
- File:Krishna Busal16 3.jpg
- File:Krishna Busal16 2.jpg
- File:KrishnaBusal16.jpg
- File:Krishna Busal16.jpg
— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 15:20, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:43, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Krishnabusal16 (talk · contribs)
[edit]This horrific series of images appears to be taken from Facebook and is of questionable scope without file descriptions.
- File:Myanmar - 10.jpg
- File:Myanmar - 13.jpg
- File:Myanmar - 14.jpg
- File:Myanmar - 12.jpg
- File:Myanmar - 11.jpg
- File:Myanmar - 15.jpg
- File:Myanmar - 4.jpg
- File:Myanmar - 1.jpg
- File:Myanmar - 7.jpg
- File:Myanmar - 8.jpg
- File:Myanmar - 9.jpg
- File:Myanmar - 6.jpg
- File:Myanmar - 2.jpg
- File:Myanmar - 5.jpg
- File:Myanmar - 3.jpg
Guanaco (talk) 12:41, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete obviously not own work. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 14:52, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination+ also likely some pruvacy rights issues. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:15, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Krishnabusal16 (talk · contribs)
[edit]as per Commons:Deletion requests/File:K.16.B.jpg Commons:Deletion requests/File:Krishna Busal16.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Krishnabusal16 ,doubtful claimed own work since missing EXIF data to verify origin,
- File:Krishna Busal16.png
- File:Krishna Busal16 Myanmar - 3.jpg
- File:Krishna Busal16 Myanmar - 1.jpg
- File:Krishna Busal16 Myanmar - 2.jpg
Roland zh (talk) 19:49, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Concerning these 4 remaining images:
- Delete File:Krishna Busal16.png, but
- Keep the other three, showing vegetable patches. These still need to be categorized properly, but it is clearly a matter of PRP/AGF to accept that these photos of hazy horticulture are likely the uploader’s own snapshots, in a way that snazzy logos and celebrity snapshots are clearly noy. Furthermore the former are, for us, in scope, much more than the latter.
Deleted: per nomination - the 3 vegetable pictures come from Facebook (per Exif). --Jcb (talk) 22:25, 22 January 2018 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 13:03, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Also File:Hassan Jaffer and fire cards.png please. --E4024 (talk) 13:09, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:17, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 13:06, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Also: File:Hassan Jaffer Tail Texdu.png please. --E4024 (talk) 13:08, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:17, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 13:14, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:18, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:21, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:22, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:20, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:21, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yungorphan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
- File:Yung Orphan's Instagram Photo 5.jpg
- File:Yung Orphan's Instagram Photo 3.jpg
- File:Yung Orphan's Instagram Photo 2.jpg
- File:Yung Orphan at a Party.jpg
- File:Yung Orphan's Instagram Photo 1.jpg
- File:Yung Orphan at a Party 2.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:20, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:23, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:30, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
small sizes without EXIFs : unlikely to be own works
Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:16, 11 November 2017 (UTC)
- File:Pajovic.tif has a received (but not reviewed) OTRS ticket. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:15, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
School essay, out of scope Guanaco (talk) 15:58, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:31, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Screenshot on the iOS user interface and the app 2048, a game. Fair use, yes, free use, no. Nick Moreau (talk) 16:53, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:31, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
unused personal file, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 17:14, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- include
Deleted: per nomination, File:ECakar.jpg not deleted because it was never tagged for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:32, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Wikimedia Commons is not a personal photo album. Not in use. Wikicology (talk) 18:05, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:29, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Manojfelix (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused potentially personal file, potentially personality right isusses, doubtful educational use, hence, out of scope Wikimedia Commons ?
Roland zh (talk) 18:36, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:29, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by S M M Iqbal (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious claim of own work on this series of images with same subject, but no indication who really took the images. As stated in COM:EVID, it is the job of the uploader to provide suitable permissions, these are all claimed as "own work" and are obviously not. If uploader knows who took the photos, obtain COM:OTRS permission from the photographers.
- File:Dr Iqbal delivering a lecture on Iqbal Day at Kashmir University in 2002..jpg
- File:Dr Iqbal at Abraham Lincoln's House at Springfield in 1965-66..jpg
- File:Dr Iqbal with Prof. Bernard Lewis in 1958..jpg
- File:Dr Iqbal with prof Arnold J. Toynbee in 1957-58..jpg
- File:Dr Iqbal with Justice Javed Iqbal, the son of Sir Muhammad Iqbal at Lahore..jpg
- File:Dr. S. M. Iqbal to the right of Dr Zakir Hussain Khan, V-C, AMU, to whose left are Maulana Abdul Kalam Azad and Dr. Hadi Hasan. Prof. Bad-ur-Rashid is behind Maulana Azad..jpg
- File:Dr Iqbal as Deputy Custodian, Evacuees Property, Jammu in 1950-51..jpg
- File:Dr Iqbal with H.E. Iyad Amin Madani, present Secretary-General of OIC in 1990s..jpg
- File:Dr Iqbal in 1991..jpg
- File:Dr Sheikh Mohammad Iqbal in 1990s.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:56, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:24, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Stuffed mascots of Japan
[edit]The photographs fail to meet the official guidelines of COM:TOYS, specifically:
- When uploading a picture of a toy, you must show that the toy is in the public domain in both the United States and in the source country of the toy. In the United States, copyright is granted for toys even if the toy is ineligible for copyright in the source country.
There has been no evidence presented that the toy(s) at the focus of the photograph, and named in the category or title, are public domain.
For an in-depth background and explanation of Commons copyright policies, refer to the Stuffed Animals essay and the precedent of prior closely related deletion requests: Petit tigre, Erminig, Wendy the Weasel & Percy Plush, Wikimania 2014 Day 1, Jimmy Wales meeting Mr Penguin.
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Photographs in this nomination are:
- File:Hideko-Kondoh20101010.jpg
- File:Jessica Chobot.jpg
- File:Kiwamu Ogino IMG 9545r 20160410.JPG
- File:Queen's Birthsday Party 2016 熊本地震義援金 (26829834630).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
--Fæ (talk) 17:57, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- I would argue de minimis, especially for the first photo, being used at jawiki ja:近藤英子 as a portrait for the person, who happened to be holding a mascot when she was being photographed. (It could be cropped better.) --朝彦 | asahiko (talk) 08:09, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Uploaded a cropped version of the first photo, and cropped out the mascot on the third photo by overwrite. The other two, I don't see their usefulness. --朝彦 | asahiko (talk) 08:26, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted three, revdel'd old revision of one. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:37, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Wikimedia Commons is not a personal photo album. Not in use. Wikicology (talk) 18:08, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:38, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yg Entertainments SA (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Wikimedia Commons is not a personal photo album. Not in use.
Wikicology (talk) 18:18, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:38, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Wikimedia Commons is not a personal photo album. Not in use. Wikicology (talk) 18:19, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:38, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
photo historisch proplematisch Johann Malchus (talk) 18:59, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no explanation as to why the file is problematic. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:39, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
The photograph fails to meet the official guidelines of COM:TOYS, specifically:
- When uploading a picture of a toy, you must show that the toy is in the public domain in both the United States and in the source country of the toy. In the United States, copyright is granted for toys even if the toy is ineligible for copyright in the source country.
There has been no evidence presented that the toy is public domain.
For an in-depth background and explanation of Commons copyright policies, refer to the Stuffed Animals essay and the precedent of prior closely related deletion requests: Petit tigre, Erminig, Wendy the Weasel & Percy Plush, Wikimania 2014 Day 1, Jimmy Wales meeting Mr Penguin.
-- Fæ (talk) 19:09, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:40, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 19:40, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:41, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Private image. Not used. Redundant. DavidIvar (talk) 22:14, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:42, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
screenshot of a commercial maps service.-- Urr18 (talk) 23:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Support -- Mr. Ibrahem (talk) 10:55, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:42, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image The clouds roll by (talk) 23:36, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 06:43, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
EXIF credits Andy Buchanan, not BAFTA. In any case, needs release email sent to OTRS. Ytoyoda (talk) 03:27, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Here is the release email from BAAFTA:
Forwarded message ----------
From: Jude MacLaverty <JudeM@bafta.org> Date: 9 December 2014 at 10:24 Subject: RE: BAFTA Scotland photos To: Christopher Riley <chris.riley@theatticroom.com>
Yes, that’s absolutely fine. Thanks for checking.
Jude
Jude MacLaverty Director
BAFTA Scotland 103 Trongate, Glasgow G1 5HD +44 (0)141 553 5402 Find us on BAFTA.org, Facebook, Twitter and YouTube
From: chris.d.b.riley@gmail.com [1] On Behalf Of Christopher Riley Sent: 09 December 2014 09:35 To: Jude MacLaverty Subject: Re: BAFTA Scotland photosHi Jude,
Thanks again for the pictures last week. I noticed that they are copyrighted to photographer Andy Buchanan, and wondered if I'd be able to use them under a free license on social media sites and on wikipedia.
Do let me know if that might be OK.
Many thanks,
Chris
- —Preceding unsigned comment was added by 89.16.224.105 (talk) 05:26, November 7, 2017 (UTC)
- @Cdbr1: Thank you, but the email doesn't help us verify that Andrew Sullivan, the original copyright holder, allowed the image to go into public domain. As far as I can tell, BAFTA is only a licensee, not the copyright holder. In any case, the email needs to be sent to OTRS, not to you. Ytoyoda (talk) 17:20, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Pelase send the permission to COM:OTRS. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:02, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted video game screenshots. Дима Г (talk) 04:06, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:02, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:02, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:02, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:02, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. Used on user page. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:02, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:02, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CjqwkMiWgAE6kOi.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:02, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:02, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://empowerafricainitiative.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/IMG_1970.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:02, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Copyright infringement as a logo of an organisation. The description given is "symbol of Identitären Bewegung Deutschland", so the rationale of the image being "own work" is likely invalid. K.e.coffman (talk) 16:48, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Obviously a copyright infringement. Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:53, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:03, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Saeed Ahmad Khan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Per COM:SCOPE -> self-created artwork unlikely to be used in a project
- File:Natura morta SAG.jpg
- File:Arte sotto le stelle Sag.jpg
- File:Lampi di luce SAG.jpg
- File:Il silenzio della sera SAG.jpg
- File:La radura delle betulle SAG.jpg
- File:Il sogno SAG.jpg
- File:Lago di autunno SAG.jpg
- File:Tramonto sul mare SAG.jpg
- File:Alba sul mare SAG.jpg
- File:Giorno nascente SAG.jpg
Takeaway (talk) 17:35, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Comment The uploader has as yet not been able to establish their notability over on wp:en with this declined draft. - Takeaway (talk) 17:38, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: concerns regarding copyright as well. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:05, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Smaller version can be found e.g. here: https://www.lainer.at/projekte/mau/ darkweasel94 17:46, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:05, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Smaller version can be found e.g. here: https://www.lainer.at/projekte/iwp/ darkweasel94 17:47, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:05, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Smaller version can be found e.g. here: https://www.lainer.at/projekte/lgv/ darkweasel94 17:48, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:05, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Smaller/cropped version can be found e.g. here: https://www.lainer.at/projekte/lgv/ darkweasel94 17:49, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:05, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Smaller version can be found here: https://www.lainer.at/projekte/wika/ (click through to second image) darkweasel94 17:51, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:05, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Smaller version can be found here: https://www.lainer.at/projekte/wika/ darkweasel94 17:51, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:05, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Found here: https://www.lainer.at/projekte/pleasure/ (click next until you arrive at fourth image) darkweasel94 17:57, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:05, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Found here: https://www.lainer.at/projekte/wied135/ (click next to third image) darkweasel94 17:58, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:05, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Found here: https://www.lainer.at/projekte/mau/ (click next to fourth image) darkweasel94 18:01, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:05, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Found here: https://www.lainer.at/projekte/mau/ (third image if you click next) darkweasel94 18:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:05, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Karlboscolo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Other uploads by this user have all been found elsewhere online. It is possible that the user has permission to upload them, but COM:OTRS confirmation is necessary.
- File:Oliver Sterl.jpg.jpg
- File:Balkon Mautner Markhof Gründe Wien.jpg
- File:Wohnung Zone.jpg
- File:Wohnung Loft.jpg
- File:Wohnung Dolap.jpg
darkweasel94 18:06, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:05, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Focused on artwork. No proof of authorization. No FoP in France. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 18:33, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:06, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 19:41, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:06, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 19:42, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:06, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 19:43, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:06, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 19:44, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:06, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 19:44, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:06, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 19:46, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:06, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 19:46, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:06, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 19:47, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:06, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 19:47, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:06, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 19:49, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:06, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
[edit]
Possible COM:Flickrwashing. Flickr user only has 4 images. The Flickr user has the same name as the image subject (i.e. not possible to be both photographer and subject).
- File:Jordan French with HuffPost CEO Jared Grusd (34432500576).jpg
- File:Cheddar Jordan French (34343175561).jpg
- File:Jordan French speaks at Seeds and chips maggio 2017 (34761064066).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 19:49, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:07, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Константин Мета (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos
- File:Константин Вампила изображение 02.jpg
- File:Константин Вампила изображение 04.jpg
- File:Константин Вампила изображение 03.jpg
- File:Константин Вампила 01.jpg
Apocheir (talk) 20:41, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:07, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photos
Apocheir (talk) 20:46, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:07, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo Apocheir (talk) 20:54, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:07, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
No metadata, low resolution, possible flickr laundering. Mys_721tx (talk) 21:19, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 16:07, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Per COM:SCOPE -> self-created artwork unlikely to be used in a project Takeaway (talk) 17:30, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Steinsplitter at 16:04, 14 November 2017 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Saeed Ahmad Khan --Krdbot 19:24, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Per COM:SCOPE -> self-created artwork unlikely to be used in a project Takeaway (talk) 17:30, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Steinsplitter at 16:04, 14 November 2017 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Saeed Ahmad Khan --Krdbot 19:24, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:36, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:33, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:37, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:33, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:37, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:33, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
image taken from twitter 191.85.18.191 20:37, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:33, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:38, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:33, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo Apocheir (talk) 20:39, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:33, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:39, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:33, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:40, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:33, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:40, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:33, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:42, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:33, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:42, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:33, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:44, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:33, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:44, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:32, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:45, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:32, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:46, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:32, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:48, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:32, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:48, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:32, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:49, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:32, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:50, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:32, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:50, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:32, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:51, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:32, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:52, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:32, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:52, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:32, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:53, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:32, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:54, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:32, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:55, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:32, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:56, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:32, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:57, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:32, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:57, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:32, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:58, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:32, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 21:00, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:32, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 21:01, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:31, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 21:03, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:31, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 21:04, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:31, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 21:05, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:31, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 21:05, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:31, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 21:06, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:31, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 21:06, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:31, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 21:07, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:31, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 21:07, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:31, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 21:08, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:31, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 21:08, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:31, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:31, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:31, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 21:10, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:31, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 21:11, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:30, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 21:11, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:30, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
If Korea.net copyrights their content, this was uploaded to flickr then to commons to by bypass flagging, logic dictates this breaches copyright. Govvy (talk) 21:14, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:30, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 21:15, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:30, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 21:16, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:30, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
No metadata, low resolution, possible flickr laundering. Mys_721tx (talk) 21:16, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:30, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
No metadata, low resolution, possible flickr laundering. Mys_721tx (talk) 21:16, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:30, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
No metadata, low resolution, possible flickr laundering. Mys_721tx (talk) 21:17, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:30, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
No metadata, low resolution, possible flickr laundering. Mys_721tx (talk) 21:17, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:30, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
No metadata, low resolution, possible flickr laundering. Mys_721tx (talk) 21:18, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:29, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No metadata, low resolution, possible flickr laundering. Mys_721tx (talk) 21:18, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:29, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No metadata, low resolution, possible flickr laundering. Mys_721tx (talk) 21:20, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:29, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
No metadata, low resolution, possible flickr laundering. Mys_721tx (talk) 21:20, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:29, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
No metadata, low resolution, possible flickr laundering. Mys_721tx (talk) 21:20, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:29, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
No metadata, low resolution, possible flickr laundering. Mys_721tx (talk) 21:20, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:29, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
_%D0%93%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B7%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%D0%93%D1%80%D0%BE%D0%B4%D0%B7%D0%B8%D0%BD%D1%81%D0%BA%D0%B8%D0%B9.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Thats a scan and not own work of the uploader as claimed. Might be public domain for some reason but we need a proper source. JuTa 21:33, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
_Гродзинский.jpg){kind=link}
This file is a scan of the photograph from my family archive. The original photo was taken circa 1908.Людмила Заплетнюк (talk) 15:57, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
_Гродзинский.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination -- Owning a paper copy of a photo does not give you the right to freely licnese it. 1908 is too recent to assume that the photographer has been dead for 70 years. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:27, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
_Гродзинский.jpg){kind=link}
Guillaume Desgranges died in 1967. Not PD. — Racconish ☎ 21:36, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:26, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The fact the uploader does not know the name of the painter does not prove this painter is unknown. — Racconish ☎ 21:38, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete - I searched a long time, but I found no info. Mauricius died 43 years ago, so it is not clear if this photo of a painting is copyrighted. (per nominator). - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 23:15, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:26, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files from Themeplus photostream on Flickr
[edit]Flickr account appears to be a collection of low-res photos found around the net, not original photographs. Some of them might be free but it's impossible to tell.
- File:Real Madrid 14 (7865518082).jpg
- File:Real Madrid 3 (7865514244).jpg
- File:Real Madrid Real Madrid marcando gol (7865516296).jpg
- File:Real Madrid 9 (7865521216).jpg
- File:Real Madrid Real Madrid Campeón de la Copa del Rey 2010-2011 (7865517066).jpg
- File:Real Madrid 11 (7865520148).jpg
- File:Real Madrid 13 (7865518640).jpg
- File:Demi lovato performing.jpg
- File:Madonna kiss.jpg
- File:Real Madrid 12 (7865519448).jpg
- File:Real Madrid Fanatica del Real (7865512684).jpg
- File:Justin Bieber em 2013.jpg
- File:Real Madrid 4 (7865513462).jpg
- File:Real Madrid 10 (7865520668).jpg
- File:Real Madrid 15 (7865517584).jpg
- File:Megan Fox 2013-1.jpg
- File:Real Madrid Nueva Camiseta Del Real Madrid (7865511084).jpg
- File:லியோனல் மெஸ்ஸி.jpg
- File:Justin Bieber (recorte).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ytoyoda (talk) 21:50, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:25, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:GIANTmicrobes
[edit]The photographs listed below fail to meet the official guidelines of COM:TOYS, specifically:
- When uploading a picture of a toy, you must show that the toy is in the public domain in both the United States and in the source country of the toy. In the United States, copyright is granted for toys even if the toy is ineligible for copyright in the source country.
There has been no evidence presented that the toy(s) at the focus of the photograph, and named in the category or title, are public domain.
For an in-depth background and explanation of Commons copyright policies, refer to the Stuffed Animals essay and the precedent of prior closely related deletion requests: Petit tigre, Erminig, Wendy the Weasel & Percy Plush, Wikimania 2014 Day 1, Jimmy Wales meeting Mr Penguin.
Photographs in this nomination are:
- File:Day 155- And You're Sure the Sushi's Fresh? (4670916228).jpg
- File:Giant Pneumonia Microbe @ Clark Planetarium (8481390057).jpg
- File:GiantMicrobes (126927537).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-- Fæ (talk) 21:54, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- It's a fair cop - OK, no contest. I might upload one from Flickr to Wikipedia under fair use as a replacement illustration. Blythwood (talk) 21:43, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- TBH, if models like this are useful, making free versions might make for a nice school project. --Fæ (talk) 21:54, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:24, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Photo is credited to someone other than uploader Elisfkc (talk) 22:04, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:23, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
picture looks stolen, also only 4 KB (!) size.-- 2003:D2:1BCF:FF2:BE5A:300A:9F5F:8370 22:59, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:23, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Russia for sculptures. Built in 1999, the architects, Ivan Dikunov (Иван Дикунов) and Elza Pak (Эльза Пак) are still alive. Дима Г (talk) 23:45, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:23, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Image looks like a stock photo, so I did a reverse Google Image search and found multiple uses before it was uploaded here. For example. Would need to go through OTRS if the uploader is the owner. — Rhododendrites talk | 23:52, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:23, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Cropped version of http://cdn.newsapi.com.au/image/v1/4adb634a7fa841ce0db0199a18de8d02?width=1024 from the Australian, no permission Neegzistuoja (talk) 23:56, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:23, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Es handelt sich hier lediglich um die Reproduktion eines Farbdruckes und nicht um ein Foto des Kunstwerkes - siehe Hinweis des Benutzers Nairem in der Diskussion. Der Fotograf des Fotos für die Vorlage des Kunstdruckes wird ebenso wenig benannt, wie der Hersteller des Kunstdruckes oder das Herstellungsjahr. Es handelt sich also hier nicht um eine fotografische Reproduktion eines zweidimensionalen Kunstwerkes! 213.187.82.186 12:55, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Art shown is from 1522, therefore Bridgeman applies. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:52, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
UPF and OoS. E4024 (talk) 13:03, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:50, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
The main subject in this photograph is a photograph, making it Derivative work Vera (talk) 13:27, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:49, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Picture of John Greenleaf Whittier rather than Hussey? David Biddulph (talk) 14:15, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
.gif){kind=link}
- Could be. If you're sure please add Category:John Greenleaf Whittier to the file and ask for its title to be changed, do not open a DR. Am I right? --E4024 (talk) 08:57, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:49, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
.gif){kind=link}
Delete: Certainly not a portrait of the man referred to in the file name, who could not have been pictured in late 19th century clothes. No reason to keep an unidentified image which may even be still in copyright, if the photographer or engraver lived long enough into the 20th century. Moonraker (talk) 00:16, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
.gif){kind=link}
used unintentionally wrong picture format; inaccidentally uploaded 194.95.59.130 15:46, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:48, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Book cover : copyrighted Patrick Rogel (talk) 15:49, 7 November 2017 (UTC) Bonjour, je suis l'internaute qui a mis en ligne la couverture de ce livre. celui-ci a été écrit par Yves Coffournic dont il est question dans l'article et publié par Le Lys Bleu Éditions dont je suis le directeur général. Les droits sont répartis entre lui et nous avons bien entendu l'autorisation de l'auteur pour la publication de cette couverture. (Je ne suis pas certain d'être au bon endroit pour répondre à votre avis de suppression). Merci.--Benoit Couzi (talk) 15:59, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Since we have no way here of knowing who you actually are, policy requires that an authorized representative of the publisher send a free license using OTRS. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:47, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted 3D art, no FOP in U.S. ViperSnake151 (talk) 17:13, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:45, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted 3D art, no FOP in U.S. Not de minimis because image title implies it is main subject of image. ViperSnake151 (talk) 17:14, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:45, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Image is only a partial upload. Takeaway (talk) 17:16, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:45, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
No FoP exception in Ghana. Evidence of permission from the artist is required. Wikicology (talk) 17:28, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:45, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Commons is not a personal photo album. Wikicology (talk) 17:34, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:45, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
_Budapest,_18_March_2014_-_OSCE_Parliamentary_Assembly.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Budapest,_18_March_2014_-_OSCE_Parliamentary_Assembly.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
File extension does not match the original file. Original file had a JPEG format, this one is PNG. B.Lameira (talk) 18:27, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Why is this an issue? Thanks, -- RickMorais (talk) 18:41, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, I have an issue with you taking screenshots of pictures and editing them with a different format rather than using the original file and work on those pictures. --B.Lameira (talk) 19:06, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- I was asking why it was wrong of me to do that, because I honestly don't know. I should note, though, that I did not take a screenshot of the picture in question and then edit it; I downloaded the picture then cropped it and chose to save the cropped version as a .png file. -- RickMorais (talk) 23:07, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Well, I think that it is acceptable to keep the image on this case but, just to make a note about this, it is always preferable to keep the file extension unchanged when doing such editing because you will make the picture larger in size without necessarily improving its quality. --B.Lameira (talk) 13:08, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: As a rule, most photographs, and particularly those of people, should be in jpg. Chaning from jpg to png is a senseless increase in size and reduction in quality. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:44, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Selected files in Category:Plush toys
[edit]The photographs listed below fail to meet the official guidelines of COM:TOYS, specifically:
- When uploading a picture of a toy, you must show that the toy is in the public domain in both the United States and in the source country of the toy. In the United States, copyright is granted for toys even if the toy is ineligible for copyright in the source country.
There has been no evidence presented that the toy(s) at the focus of the photograph, and named in the category or title, are public domain.
For an in-depth background and explanation of Commons copyright policies, refer to the Stuffed Animals essay and the precedent of prior closely related deletion requests: Petit tigre, Erminig, Wendy the Weasel & Percy Plush, Wikimania 2014 Day 1, Jimmy Wales meeting Mr Penguin.
Photographs in this nomination are:
- File:Brian Smedley.jpg
- File:Brian smedley.jpg
- File:Charlie Gúmmáhyhá.jpg
- File:Chick1.png
- File:Crestwood Center (7311970078).jpg
- File:Enjoying the view (2).jpg
- File:Grijze wolf pluusje 2015.jpg
- File:Herbert - making a cake.jpg
- File:Herbert and Paula.jpg
- File:Herbert und Paula - Winterfreuden.jpg
- File:Ivanin junior.jpg
- File:Kat pluusje in een oud weeshuis.jpg
- File:Merlion Soft Toy.jpg
- File:Mi beffis.jpg
- File:Mini TsumTsum.jpg
- File:Mr. Bingle.jpg
- File:Muzar alf.JPG
- File:Obama plush (2798661498).jpg
- File:Oso de peluche, regalo.JPG
- File:Pek in Egypt - 2008-11-06.jpg
- File:Plushie dinosaur.jpg
- File:Prince George of Cambridge with wombat plush toy.jpg
- File:Pudge 10.08.2012 (8069152422).jpg
- File:Pudge 10.08.2012 (8069153094).jpg
- File:Pudge 10.08.2012 (8069156067).jpg
- File:Pudge 10.08.2012 (8069158503).jpg
- File:Pudge 10.08.2012 (8069159219).jpg
- File:Pudge 10.08.2012 (8069159835).jpg
- File:Rondoux.jpg
- File:Rytlock.jpg
- File:Sleeping bear plush toy.jpg
- File:Smilie Kissen (cropped).jpg
- File:SpiderBoomPlushDolls(Gray&Pink).JPG
- File:Teddy bears Herbert and Paula (01).jpg
- File:Teddy bears Herbert and Paula (03).jpg
- File:Toy pony.jpeg
- File:Wietzendorf - Wilhelm.jpg
- File:WikidataCon 2017-IMG 2083.JPG
- File:WikidataCon 2017-IMG 2084.JPG
- File:WikidataCon 2017-IMG 3670.JPG
- File:WOA 2012 Plush.JPG
- File:Zombi de peluche.jpg
- File:Ásványbörze 2015, Budapest, 128.jpg
- File:Дитячий куточок для дітей в ПШБ с.Дубно.jpg
- File:遼くん (5135167958).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
--Fæ (talk) 19:26, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- This is a good time for your periodic, friendly reminder that we also delete considerable amounts of design furniture and at the same time accept photographs of cars as industrial design. Rama (talk) 20:26, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Rama: That's why we have a DR. But this pic looks that the bird (or what is it?) is self made so we could ask the creator to give us permission to publish the pic with a free license. But unfortunately in US the TOO on toys is realy pretty low and we need to delete it. The car design issue the design is also influenced by aerodynamics and other engineering aspects.--Sanandros (talk) 21:40, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- it's an owl and her creator has released it under Cc-by-sa. The engineering aspects of care is moot, you have similar constraints for chairs, that we delete; it's just that lots of people like cars, there is nothing consistent, noble or rigourous about this situation. Rama (talk) 23:10, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Rama: Can u link a DR of a deleted chair so I can check that also? I can't find in a short time the link which I recently read but in desing it's generally like this, what has no function is copyrightable.--Sanandros (talk) 05:56, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- For instance: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Little Tulip Chair - Pierre Paulin.png.
- We also have instances where the exact same sort of objects end up being kept: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Orange Slice Chair-Pierre Paulin IMG 5833-white.jpg
- So let's not take ourselves too seriously, Commons is a very worthy project but it is unserious about copyright as soon as we depart from very trivial cases. Rama (talk) 09:44, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- The conflict and mixed implementation is understandable, though COM:UA does specifically quote cars and furniture as "utilitarian". However if an example car had unusual artistic livery or had been custom sculptured, it may become more artwork than utility, similarly a chair that was more sculpture than function would be treated as an artwork. I believe the deletion of the Tulip chair was an error, as though classic design, the chair has no obvious features that are not there for its function.
- I suggest we avoid digging much further in this DR, as it is a tangent to the question of toys, where there is specific case law to reference (see the essay linked in the nomination). However to close this down, I have asked the deleting admin for the Pierre Paulin chair to review the case diff. Both photographs should be seen to have the same outcome. Thanks --Fæ (talk) 10:21, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Rama: Can u link a DR of a deleted chair so I can check that also? I can't find in a short time the link which I recently read but in desing it's generally like this, what has no function is copyrightable.--Sanandros (talk) 05:56, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- it's an owl and her creator has released it under Cc-by-sa. The engineering aspects of care is moot, you have similar constraints for chairs, that we delete; it's just that lots of people like cars, there is nothing consistent, noble or rigourous about this situation. Rama (talk) 23:10, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Rama: That's why we have a DR. But this pic looks that the bird (or what is it?) is self made so we could ask the creator to give us permission to publish the pic with a free license. But unfortunately in US the TOO on toys is realy pretty low and we need to delete it. The car design issue the design is also influenced by aerodynamics and other engineering aspects.--Sanandros (talk) 21:40, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: User:Rama, if you see an inconsistency here, it is not generated at Commons, but at the various copyright offices around the world. There is no place that I know of where cars have copyrights. Furniture has copyrights in some places, Toys have copyrights everywhere. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:41, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- With all due respect, that is nonsense. We are not lawyers, we a treading on complicated legal questions, and we use gross rules of thumbs that are inconsistent and often more rooted in self-serving expedience than anything else. Rama (talk) 08:24, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Plush toys 2
[edit]- File:2004 11 20 Wien Advent 016 (51062079981).jpg
- File:2004 11 20 Wien Advent 017 (51062163147).jpg
- File:2004 11 20 Wien Advent 018 (51062163122).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 20:47, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
- Comment I previously tagged all of these as "no source, derivative work", but was reverted on all of them. [2] [3] [4] I am therefore pinging User:JuTa, maybe they have additional input to offer on why these can be kept. Tokfo (talk) 21:41, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
![[2]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:2004_11_20_Wien_Advent_016_(51062079981).jpg&diff=564702727&oldid=560549328&diffmode=source){kind=link}
![[3]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:2004_11_20_Wien_Advent_017_(51062163147).jpg&diff=564702951&oldid=560549376&diffmode=source){kind=link}
![[4]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:2004_11_20_Wien_Advent_018_(51062163122).jpg&diff=564703045&oldid=560549393&diffmode=source){kind=link}
- Delete per nom. — Jeff G. ツ please ping or talk to me 22:43, 23 June 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:46, 13 August 2021 (UTC)
no educational value. out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:28, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:37, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Used in a deleted page in bn wiki Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 19:31, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:37, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 19:49, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:37, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 19:50, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:37, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 19:51, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:37, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 19:52, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:37, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 19:53, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:37, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 19:53, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:37, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 19:54, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:37, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 19:55, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:37, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 19:56, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:37, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 19:57, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:37, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 19:57, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:37, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 19:59, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:37, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 19:59, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:37, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:00, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:37, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:01, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:37, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:36, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:36, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:04, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:36, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:04, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:36, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:06, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:36, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:06, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:36, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image. Mitte27 (talk) 12:46, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 19:22, 13 January 2018 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:07, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:36, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:08, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:36, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:09, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:36, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:10, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:36, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:11, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:36, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:12, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:36, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:12, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:36, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:13, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:36, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:14, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:36, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
out of scope / spam Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:15, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:36, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:16, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:36, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:16, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:36, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:18, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:36, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
_%D0%B1%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BD.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%D0%B1%D0%B0%D0%BB%D0%BA%D0%BE%D0%BD.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:18, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
_балкон.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:36, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
_балкон.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:19, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:35, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:19, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:35, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:20, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:35, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:21, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:35, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo Apocheir (talk) 20:21, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:35, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:22, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:35, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:22, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:35, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:23, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:35, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:24, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:35, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:25, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:35, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:26, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:35, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:26, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:35, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:28, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:35, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:28, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:34, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:30, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:34, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:30, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:34, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:32, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:34, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:32, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:34, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:33, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:33, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:34, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:33, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Editora PenDragon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Self-promotion, unclear copyright status
- File:A Maldição de Lancelot.jpg
- File:Uma canção de amor.jpg
- File:A maldição de Arthur.jpg
- File:Autora Graci Rocha.jpg
Apocheir (talk) 20:34, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:33, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image Alton Locke (talk) 20:35, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:33, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Small shop without notability. The quality of the photo is also extremely low. Siyuwj (talk) 00:35, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:57, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The poster is the main subject of the image and is most likely copyrighted. Дима Г (talk) 02:41, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:56, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
One of many files uploaded by User:Скульптуры, all of them claimed as "own work". I think the chance of this book cover being "own work" is particularly low. Both User:Butko and I have tried and failed to engage the uploader in discussion. I certainly think this file should be deleted. I personally would be inclined to consider this the "thirteenth strike of the clock" and delete all of the user's uploads on a precautionary basis if he will not discuss whether any of these are genuininely his/her own work. Jmabel ! talk 02:56, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:56, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
File:Лучшему фильму всех времен и народов «Андрей Рублев» и его создателю - великому русскому режиссеру Андрею Тарковскому.jpg
[edit]
No FOP for sculpture in Russia, so this is presumably a copyright violation. Jmabel ! talk 02:59, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:56, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
This is an inferior PNG version of an existing SVG file. Tomiĉo (talk) 03:12, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:56, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted cartoon character. Sadads (talk) 03:22, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:56, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Appears to be PD-textlogo, but also out of scope as a promotional logo for a promotional Wikipedia draft Guanaco (talk) 04:38, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:56, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Not own work, film still from 1988. Дима Г (talk) 04:41, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:55, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Not likely to be "own work" and, per this discussion, quite probably not public domain Sitush (talk) 09:04, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:55, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:34, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Uploader responded on talkpage of the request: Dear Taivo, All the images in Aluísio Ferreira de Lima's profile were taken by me. I can prove it, if Wikipediaasks. Your deletion request makes no sense, since all this images are also posted publicly online. Aluísio is my father, and I took all the photos myself. Best regars, Stephanie Caroline Ferreira de Lima. Stephanie Caroline Lima (talk) 14:45, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- This is not the issue. I believe, that you are the photographer. The problem is that here's nothing to do with the photo. Aluisio Ferreira de Lima isn't mentioned neither in en.wiki, es.wiki nor in pt.wiki, he is not notable. Taivo (talk) 09:53, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- La señorita también debe decidir si es Stephanie Caroline Lima o User:Aluísio Ferreira de Lima. No? --E4024 (talk) 11:20, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- This is not the issue. I believe, that you are the photographer. The problem is that here's nothing to do with the photo. Aluisio Ferreira de Lima isn't mentioned neither in en.wiki, es.wiki nor in pt.wiki, he is not notable. Taivo (talk) 09:53, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:55, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Image was published after the URAA date in Australia (1 January 1946), therefore it is not in the public domain in the US and not appropriate for Commons. Flickerd (talk) 11:37, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:54, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Image was published after the URAA date in Australia (1 January 1946), therefore it is not in the public domain in the US and not appropriate for Commons. Flickerd (talk) 11:38, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:54, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Image was published after the URAA date in Australia (1 January 1946), therefore it is not in the public domain in the US and not appropriate for Commons. Flickerd (talk) 11:38, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:54, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Image was published after the URAA date in Australia (1 January 1946), therefore it is not in the public domain in the US and not appropriate for Commons. Note cricketers career was from 1946 to 1963, therefore it is impossible it was published before URAA date despite lack of date in summary. Flickerd (talk) 11:39, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:54, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Image was published after the URAA date in Australia (1 January 1946), therefore it is not in the public domain in the US and not appropriate for Commons. Note cricketers career was from 1946 to 1963, therefore it is impossible it was published before URAA date despite lack of date in summary. Flickerd (talk) 11:39, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:54, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Image was published after the URAA date in Australia (1 January 1946), therefore it is not in the public domain in the US and not appropriate for Commons. Flickerd (talk) 12:43, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:53, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope, example source code. Also would need evidence of permission Guanaco (talk) 12:49, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
This is an example code from our software at draglet GmbH. As the owner of the code, we are free to publish anything that is related to our code. So what is your claim here?
- There are a couple issues here:
- This is source code in image format, generally considered outside the project scope. If it's needed for a Wikimedia project such as Wikipedia, it should be placed as text rather than an image.
- We currently have no verification that you represent draglet GmbH. We require evidence of permission for all previously-published files. The easiest way to address this may be to edit your website's copyright notice to say "© Copyright 2017 draglet GmbH. Images on this site are licensed CC-BY-SA 4.0." (or similar). You can also send us an email at permissions-commons
wikimedia.org, agreeing to license specific content. For more information on the email process, see COM:OTRS.
- Guanaco (talk) 14:43, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:53, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
Obviously, this picture seems to be taken from somewhere else. As it is a "professional one", it cannot stay in the Commons without an OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 13:03, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: not in use, file is corrupt. --Jcb (talk) 23:00, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Not proven that it's own work, see metadata. ~Cybularny Speak? 11:31, 23 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:09, 30 October 2017 (UTC)
Deleted only a week ago. Is the problem solved now? E4024 (talk) 13:17, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- This is another photo by the same uploader. Ankry (talk) 19:00, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Copied from [5] should be for speedy deletion. --Fallaner (talk) 19:04, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- There is an OTRS ticket. Let's wait for client explanation. It is likely to be accepted, but not sure yet. No need for speedy however, standard DR should be OK. Ankry (talk) 10:08, 8 November 2017 (UTC)
- Copied from [5] should be for speedy deletion. --Fallaner (talk) 19:04, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: for now, leaving it to the OTRS process. --Jcb (talk) 23:03, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
There is no reasonable rationale that the author is the owner of such work Hakken (talk) 14:12, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:03, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Not free to use Copyright Kamil Janowski; All rights reserved. [6] Skivsamlare (talk) 14:53, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Yes it is free to use! A mistake led to that the photo was originally marked as copyrighted due to default settings in the photoedit software. This photo is taken of the band The Soul Exchange with the sole purpose of being free to use. Questions? contact the photographer info@janowski.com or the bands management helena@rocknrollagency.com / Posted by Pytonia who is a friend to the band.
Deleted: please ask the photographer to contact OTRS. --Jcb (talk) 23:04, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:05, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Could be categorized within Category:Bookshops, but I've got the impression that Hassan is the focus of the image, therefore it is more a personal file than anything else, and is not used. E4024 (talk) 12:51, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Keep illustrative. Photography of people is not all "personal". --Fæ (talk) 13:09, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Keep You E4024, besides being a sockpuppeteer, are now marking images for deletion merely for its purported sexual imagery or purported personal kind, even not understanding the context and not caring to understand it. See who is the author and you will why is this important and read the description to see the context. Tm (talk) 14:20, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 20:57, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
no educational value... out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 21:01, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work. Small size, no exif. QBear (talk) 18:36, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 21:07, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Possible copyright violation. This symbol is a version different from the Sigil of Baphomet used by the band Cradle of Filth on their 1994 album The Principle of Evil Made Flesh, created to circumvent the trademark of the Church of Satan. Sources: [7], [8]. There is no occurrence of this symbol with this hebrew lettering before 1994 know to me. —הגות414 16:41, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
![[7]](http://www.coversresource.com/cd_covers/Cradle-Of-Filth---The-Principle-Of-Evil-Made-Flesh-Cd-Cover-10830.jpg){kind=link}
![[8]](http://www.coversresource.com/covers/Cradle-Of-Filth---The-Principle-Of-Evil-Made-Flesh-Front-Cover-10830.jpg){kind=link}
- Is changing letters enough to create a copyrightable work? // Liftarn (talk) 07:22, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - not only the letters are different, also the depiction of the animal/beast. --Jcb (talk) 21:01, 19 November 2017 (UTC)
I do not want to use this photo. Instead, I might want to use another photo of this artwork. Soroush.Gholami (talk) 06:02, 17 September 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; File is in use. Missing alternative filename. --Wdwd (talk) 07:25, 25 September 2017 (UTC)
The author wants to get copyright for this installation artwork. The U.S copyright office needs the artwork unpublished in order to copyright it. Otherwise, they won't do it. Soroush.Gholami (talk) 14:53, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per metadata "Author Tahereh Vahedian Copyright holder Tahereh Vahedian". --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:10, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Needs to be updated to give correct source: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Diagram_of_the_human_heart_(cropped).svg Stenemo (talk) 15:49, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
Kept: I changed the one line of information... please feel free to fix this yourself next time!!. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:08, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
TinEye finds 48 results where this was previously published, e.g. https://www.e-architect.co.uk/vienna/therme-wien (attributed to Hubert Dimko, who also appears in this version's EXIF) and apparently this was already deleted in 2012 at File:Haus mit Veranden.jpg darkweasel94 17:42, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:07, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
Grabbed from Facebook (see EXIF), unlikely to be own work. Sealle (talk) 21:09, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- I own the copyright on the photo. Okanfan (talk) 09:49, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Okanfan: if so, please re-upload this in original size&resolution. Sealle (talk) 10:18, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- That's the original size (960x720). I took this picture 9 years ago. Okanfan (talk) 13:38, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Okanfan: if so, please re-upload this in original size&resolution. Sealle (talk) 10:18, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination; if the uploader took the picture, a copy without FB metadata is not impossible. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:06, 22 November 2017 (UTC)
This is not a photograph, it is a signature, which qualifies as an artistic work under Common law countries. This is not free in Australia. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:15, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:30, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Triplecaña as Speedy (speedy deletion) and the most recent rationale was: promotional usage, article deleted GRuban (talk) 02:14, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Roughly half of the images from the series Category:KARtv Dance Awards 2013 have associated articles. That's a high enough ratio that it's worth keeping the series. --GRuban (talk) 02:16, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Maybe it's even more than half: here are the first 5, alphabetically, for example:
- Asia Monet Ray
- Autumn Miller - no article
- Benji Schwimmer
- Cassidy Wolf
- Chelsie Hightower
- That's 4 out of 5. --GRuban (talk) 02:22, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per -GRuban. Ruthven (msg) 13:31, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
it looks like the File:Flag_of_Commander-in-chief_of_Russia.svg, and it doesn't confirm whether it accord with the standard of Flag of Commander-in-chief of Russia. Cwek (talk) 02:46, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Kept: in use. Ruthven (msg) 13:31, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Possible copyright infringement. The image depicts a logo of the organisation; "Own work" licensing is therefore invalid. K.e.coffman (talk) 03:00, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep See [9], this logo is too common. Fry1989 eh? 17:28, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Commonality does not overcome copyright. Beyond My Ken (talk) 00:54, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Except that it does. It lowers the originality of a work. Originality is the argument upon which a copyright is granted or denied. Fry1989 eh? 17:10, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Lacks sufficient originality. —LLarson (said & done) 19:32, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- I also don’t think the claim that “licensing is . . . invalid” because the file “depicts a logo of the organisation” is quite right. The UK government outlawed the organisationin 1940.¹ —LLarson (said & done) 19:48, 12 November 2017 (UTC)
- I also don’t think the claim that “licensing is . . . invalid” because the file “depicts a logo of the organisation” is quite right. The UK government outlawed the
Kept: per Fry1989. Ruthven (msg) 13:32, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
The copyright status is not up to the uploader, no evidence that this flag is available under a free license. Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:04, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:32, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Duplicates File:Samahita Thera.jpg. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 08:36, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: the duplicate has been deleted. Ruthven (msg) 13:33, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MH09Forecasting (talk · contribs)
[edit]Low quality, unused image, photo are being curved.
- File:Aqua Terra satellite image of Hurricane Tomas. October 30, 2010.jpg
- File:Crefl1 143.A2010266123000-2010266123500.2km.jpg
B dash (talk) 10:02, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Keep - (1) The images are 677 × 1,015 pixels, they may not be HD but they are not low quality. (2) We do not have higher quality images uploaded that show the same amount of area at that same point of the hurricane. (3) Not valid reason for deletion. Offnfopt(talk) 00:21, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Offnfopt. Ruthven (msg) 13:33, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
"Unlike the owner must not be used for commercial purposes without permission." in the description doesn't work, although might not meet threshold of originality Basvb (talk) 22:03, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 11:00, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
In my opinion this is not a textlogo. It is in en.wiki and de.wiki as fair use. Taivo (talk) 11:03, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- weak keep - borderline IMHO - Jcb (talk) 23:01, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Sorry, but IMHO the shape of the logo is not too simple. Not a textlogo. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 21:11, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Jcb (!). Ruthven (msg) 13:34, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
photo historisch problematisch Johann Malchus (talk) 19:10, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: pd old assumed. Ruthven (msg) 13:36, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
I do not understand, what is happening here. That way the photo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 20:19, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Fishermen cutting a tuna. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 21:59, 17 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per D Y O L F 77; can be used. Ruthven (msg) 13:34, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Please remove the latest file I uploaded by mistake, it is not the same version of the painting. Tremendo (talk) 21:17, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Hola Tremendo,
- I restored the previous version: is it what you wanted?
- Regards, --[[Utilisateur:Daehan|Daehan]] <sup>[[[Discussion Utilisateur:Daehan|p|d|d]]]</sup> (talk) 11:30, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Hello, meanwhile I managed to do it myself and removed the request, but that's OK anyway, I will upload the new file separately. Tremendo (talk) 12:23, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Kept: please sort it out with the versions of the file. Ruthven (msg) 13:38, 6 December 2017 (UTC)
Cropped out of a copyrighted image: http://www.swinburne.edu.au/news/latest-news/2017/11/the-most-ancient-spiral-galaxy-confirmed-using-cutting-edge-technique.php Lithopsian (talk) 16:56, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
Not their image. Several other monochrome and infrared images can be found in a paper addressing the galaxy. https://arxiv.org/pdf/1710.11130.pdf Bryan C. W. 17:05, 7 November 2017 (UTC) (talk)
Deleted: copyvio anyways, even if taken from the preprint. Ruthven (msg) 22:27, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no permission (No permission since) Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:45, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- I changed the license to PD-Textlogo. Should be fine now. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:50, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- There isn't much information on TOO for Hungary, other than that this image was considered copyrightable. Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:30, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Grin, Rakás, and Hungarikusz Firkász: Could you please help out? How far does the threshold of originality go in HU law? Thanks for your time! --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:32, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
This is a trademark(ed logo), in current use by the company (companies, actually). It doesn't matter that it contains a letter, I would believe, nowhere in the world. It would require a permission, as a logo and trade mark, but I do not have the time to pursuit it. I'd say it worths a try, if someone's willing. Legally it doesn't have a permission as of now. --grin ✎ 13:22, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and comment by User:Grin. Green Giant (talk) 21:33, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no permission (No permission since) Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:55, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- I changed the license to PD-Textlogo. Should be fine now. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:01, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- As per the other file, this could be above the TOO in Hungary as this file is above the TOO there. Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:32, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
- @Grin, Rakás, and Hungarikusz Firkász: Could you please help out? How far does the threshold of originality go in HU law? Thanks for your time! --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:32, 14 November 2017 (UTC)
I believe this logo is not in use anymore, and possibly its trademark status is not active either, but no assurances with my opinions. :-) It is a graphical art, so it's been possibly copyrighted but I have no knowledge about the details. I'd guess it's fair use in the US and "try to get permissions" elsewhere. --grin ✎ 13:26, 16 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and comment by User:Grin. Green Giant (talk) 21:33, 22 December 2017 (UTC)
No metadata, low resolution, possible flickr laundering. Mys_721tx (talk) 21:22, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: Students for a Free Tibet is a famous and reliable NGO/NPO with her sources from all around the world who support Tibet and Tibetan people. Actually, these pictures were released just by this organization on 2012-2-3 and this fact was reported by major media. There were no such pictures can be found by Google before that moment. I didn't see anything to prove any problem here. SFT has published or released a huge number of first-handed pictures on the internet while maintaining their good faith and global reputation. Chinese always want to censor and delete these images which recorded what the dictator communist party colonial regime did in the occupied Tibet. I don't believe Wikimedia should kill history for them. There is no doubt that these files can be reasonably kept on wiki commons for human beings. -- Wildcursive (talk) 23:49, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- The photos were "provided" by SFT. If by "first-handed [sic] pictures" you meant the photographer is associated with SFT, then reasonable amount of EXIF metadata are expected. Unfortunately, none of the images in this series of DRs has that. The unclear authorship is the problem here. -Mys_721tx (talk) 15:51, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- There were countless agencies/institutions/organizations had uploaded files to Flickr without mentioned individual author and a huge number of them have existed on wiki commons. It's reasonable and even necessary here to avoid the persecution from those dictators and their bloody machines. Students for a Free Tibet had chosen "Some rights reserved - CC-BY" which is ok here and already passed the review. As a famous NGO/NPO which always faces kinds of threats by/from Chinese communist party regime and some Chinese, SFT knows her moral and legal responsibility. The quality of the series of pictures and other of their related images on Flickr albums are obviously great, clear, and continuing. I don't believe there was any reliable challenge to their statement of the copyright so far. It's others who need the pictures from SFT, not vice versa. I absolutely believe they deserve the presumption of legality and legitimacy unless proven not. -- Wildcursive (talk) 12:05, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- The purpose of this DR is to challenge the Flickr review. If a photographer took a photo on some organization's behalf, the photo does not have to be attributed to that photographer. SFT's choice to not name any author is irrelevant to the discussion. The lack of metadata, not the author's name, casts doubt on the authorship. Please address this issue and avoid any digressions. -Mys_721tx (talk) 16:55, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- There were countless agencies/institutions/organizations had uploaded files to Flickr without mentioned individual author and a huge number of them have existed on wiki commons. It's reasonable and even necessary here to avoid the persecution from those dictators and their bloody machines. Students for a Free Tibet had chosen "Some rights reserved - CC-BY" which is ok here and already passed the review. As a famous NGO/NPO which always faces kinds of threats by/from Chinese communist party regime and some Chinese, SFT knows her moral and legal responsibility. The quality of the series of pictures and other of their related images on Flickr albums are obviously great, clear, and continuing. I don't believe there was any reliable challenge to their statement of the copyright so far. It's others who need the pictures from SFT, not vice versa. I absolutely believe they deserve the presumption of legality and legitimacy unless proven not. -- Wildcursive (talk) 12:05, 13 November 2017 (UTC)
- The photos were "provided" by SFT. If by "first-handed [sic] pictures" you meant the photographer is associated with SFT, then reasonable amount of EXIF metadata are expected. Unfortunately, none of the images in this series of DRs has that. The unclear authorship is the problem here. -Mys_721tx (talk) 15:51, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep--A ri gi bod (talk) 13:08, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. EXIF metadata is not needed, especially not the kind that contains the camera's unique serial number when the individual photographer who made the image is already hiding their identity because the government wants to censor their images. – b_jonas 13:06, 15 December 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: I doubt very much that SFT has a written license from the photographer here. If it does, it can proveit with OTRS. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:31, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
No metadata, low resolution, possible flickr laundering. Mys_721tx (talk) 21:22, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: Students for a Free Tibet is a famous and reliable NGO/NPO with her sources from all around the world who support Tibet and Tibetan people. Actually, these pictures were released just by this organization on 2012-2-3 and this fact was reported by major media. There were no such pictures can be found by Google before that moment. I didn't see anything to prove any problem here. SFT has published or released a huge number of first-handed pictures on the internet while maintaining their good faith and global reputation. Chinese always want to censor and delete these images which recorded what the dictator communist party colonial regime did in the occupied Tibet. I don't believe Wikimedia should kill history for them. There is no doubt that these files can be reasonably kept on wiki commons for human beings. -- Wildcursive (talk) 23:52, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:31, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
No metadata, low resolution, possible flickr laundering. Mys_721tx (talk) 21:22, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: Students for a Free Tibet is a famous and reliable NGO/NPO with her sources from all around the world who support Tibet and Tibetan people. Actually, these pictures were released just by this organization on 2012-2-3 and this fact was reported by major media. There were no such pictures can be found by Google before that moment. I didn't see anything to prove any problem here. SFT has published or released a huge number of first-handed pictures on the internet while maintaining their good faith and global reputation. Chinese always want to censor and delete these images which recorded what the dictator communist party colonial regime did in the occupied Tibet. I don't believe Wikimedia should kill history for them. There is no doubt that these files can be reasonably kept on wiki commons for human beings. -- Wildcursive (talk) 23:52, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep keep image- there is adequate information under current policies and the image resolution is fine for a quick photo by someone that could be arrested for taking this photograph. --A ri gi bod (talk) 13:15, 15 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:31, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
No metadata, low resolution, possible flickr laundering. Mys_721tx (talk) 21:22, 7 November 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: Students for a Free Tibet is a famous and reliable NGO/NPO with her sources from all around the world who support Tibet and Tibetan people. Actually, these pictures were released just by this organization on 2012-2-3 and this fact was reported by major media. There were no such pictures can be found by Google before that moment. I didn't see anything to prove any problem here. SFT has published or released a huge number of first-handed pictures on the internet while maintaining their good faith and global reputation. Chinese always want to censor and delete these images which recorded what the dictator communist party colonial regime did in the occupied Tibet. I don't believe Wikimedia should kill history for them. There is no doubt that these files can be reasonably kept on wiki commons for human beings. -- Wildcursive (talk) 23:52, 9 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:31, 24 December 2017 (UTC)
Reasons for DR: Images are copyright infringements of
- page 24, Fif. 1 from arxiv.org/pdf/0706.0622.pdf#page=24
- page 52, Fig 2.3 from arxiv.org/pdf/0711.4416.pdf#page=52
- The file was already deleted once in 2016, see the uploader's talk section
- --77.118.239.105 02:31, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. Ruthven (msg) 22:26, 16 December 2017 (UTC)
