Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/11/04

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive November 4th, 2017
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Joke. Halibutt (talk) 00:39, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: scribble / mess. out of scope. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:49, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

aafaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa 153.185.86.231 07:16, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 09:28, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

hghghg vv Nikky5875 (talk) 17:32, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Vandalism. --Achim (talk) 17:36, 22 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is taken from a video, the copyright holder should be the video uploader, not VOA, thus the copyright status is unknown. 219.79.127.121 08:32, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violation, image is attributed to AP. --Guanaco (talk) 10:39, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As per this discussion "the image is not at the URL identified as the source, nor at an archive of this page. The image is available on Prof Hayward's website" ([1]) where there's no any associated copyright statement. Mhhossein talk 12:47, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:05, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not suitable for Wikimedia Saeedartgallery (talk) 01:24, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete CSD G7: uploader request. --bjh21 (talk) 12:28, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 20:17, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:53, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 20:19, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:53, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 20:19, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:53, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 20:19, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:53, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 20:19, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:54, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 20:19, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:54, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 20:19, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:54, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 20:19, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:54, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 20:19, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:54, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 20:19, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:54, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 20:19, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:54, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 20:19, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:55, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request and unused personal photo. Ruthven (msg) 20:20, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:55, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request and unused personal photo. Ruthven (msg) 20:20, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:55, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request and unused personal photo. Ruthven (msg) 20:20, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:55, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request and unused personal photo. Ruthven (msg) 20:20, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:55, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request and unused personal photo. Ruthven (msg) 20:20, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:55, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request and unused personal photo. Ruthven (msg) 20:20, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:55, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request and unused personal photo. Ruthven (msg) 20:20, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:56, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request and unused personal photo. Ruthven (msg) 20:20, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:56, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request and unused personal photo. Ruthven (msg) 20:20, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:56, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request and unused personal photo. Ruthven (msg) 20:20, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:56, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request and unused personal photo. Ruthven (msg) 20:20, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:56, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request and unused personal photo. Ruthven (msg) 20:20, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:57, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request and unused personal photo. Ruthven (msg) 20:20, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:57, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request and unused personal photo. Ruthven (msg) 20:20, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:57, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request and unused personal photo. Ruthven (msg) 20:20, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:57, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request and unused personal photo. Ruthven (msg) 20:20, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:57, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request and unused personal photo. Ruthven (msg) 20:20, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:57, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 20:19, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:57, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 20:19, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:58, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 20:19, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nonfree source: Wikimapia ~nmaia d 19:37, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. -- Darwin Ahoy! 20:28, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep because wikimapia distribute the content in cc-by-sa and by being in that license can be redistributed since it notifies them that it is theirs. And, by chance, it's the same license we use here --Agronopolos discussão 22:54, 4 November 2017 (UTC)

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author and copyright holder Teemumiikkatapio must send OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:41, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hei. Minä olen tuo Teemumiikkatapio, joka kuvan on ottanut. Miten todistan sen?

Teemumiikkatapio and Opetustuubi are two usernames of myself. So the photo is mine. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Opetustuubi (talk • contribs)

This is your only upload credited to Teemumiikkatapio. Commons does not know, who is behind usernames. Can you open COM:OTRS page and send confirmation e-mail into Commons permissions department at permissions-commons@wikipedia.org? Taivo (talk) 15:50, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ok. I´ll do that.--Opetustuubi (talk) 18:53, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, now we have permission. Taivo (talk) 21:42, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:22, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: seems to be withdrawn. --JuTa 00:15, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No need for redirect, created by move no incoming links to original filename - FlightTime (open channel) 22:28, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; housekeeping of unnecessary redirect. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 00:53, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:56, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ruthven at 20:20, 4 November 2017 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Saeed ahmad (124).jpg --Krdbot 01:34, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:58, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ruthven at 20:19, 4 November 2017 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Saeed ahmad (19)1.jpg --Krdbot 01:34, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not own work. Looks extracted from https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCoT1PVgnPhEPEgbVwjB-DUQ/videos Lacrymocéphale (talk) 22:38, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Magog the Ogre at 23:34, 4 November 2017 UTC: Copyright violation --Krdbot 01:37, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:51, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:52, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photograph 141.196.192.19 06:12, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted once. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:57, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, out of scope Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:31, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:39, 29 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work, small .... file size and overall image size makes this unlikely claim of own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:09, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted once. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 19:01, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have numerous better photographs of the same locomotive class of the same railroad, many of which are better framed and have locations. This poorly framed image at an unknown location is of no likely use with those photos available, and is thus out of scope. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:27, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: This is one of only two side views in that category (the other being File:NS Loco No.7550.JPG). All the others are end-on or diagonal. --bjh21 (talk) 12:36, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Fair point - I did not consider that. I will withdraw the deletion nom. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:43, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdrawing nomination per bjh21. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:44, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:30, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:35, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:31, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:30, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:31, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:30, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:31, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:30, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:31, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:30, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:31, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:31, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:31, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:31, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:31, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:31, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:31, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:31, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:31, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:31, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:31, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:31, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:31, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:32, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:31, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:32, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:31, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:32, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:32, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:32, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:32, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:32, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:32, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:32, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:32, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:32, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:32, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:33, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:32, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:33, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:32, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:33, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:32, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:33, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:32, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:33, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:32, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:33, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:32, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:33, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:32, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:33, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:32, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:34, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:32, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:34, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:32, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:35, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:32, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:51, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:20, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:51, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:20, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:51, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:20, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:51, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:20, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:51, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:20, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:51, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:20, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:52, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:20, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:52, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:20, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:52, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:20, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:52, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:20, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:52, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:20, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:52, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:20, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:52, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:20, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:53, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:20, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:53, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:20, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 11:53, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:20, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:12, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:21, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:12, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:21, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:12, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:21, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:13, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:21, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:13, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:21, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:13, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:21, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:13, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:21, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:13, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:21, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:13, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:21, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:13, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:21, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:14, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:21, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:14, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:21, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:14, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:21, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:14, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:14, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:22, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:15, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:22, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:15, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:22, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:15, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:22, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:15, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:22, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:15, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:22, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:15, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:16, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:22, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:16, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:23, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:16, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:23, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:16, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:23, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:16, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:23, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:17, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:23, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:17, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:23, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:17, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:23, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:17, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:23, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:17, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:23, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:17, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:23, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:17, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:23, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:18, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:23, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:18, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:23, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:18, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:23, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:18, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:25, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:18, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:25, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:18, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:25, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:19, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:25, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:19, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:25, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:19, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:25, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:19, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:25, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:19, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:25, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:19, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:25, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:19, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:25, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:20, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:25, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:20, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:20, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:24, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:20, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:25, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:20, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:25, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:21, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:25, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:21, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:25, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:21, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:25, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:21, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:25, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:21, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:25, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:21, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:25, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:21, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:25, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:22, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:25, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:22, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:25, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:22, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:25, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:22, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:25, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:23, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:38, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyight violation. this file clip from [2] eien20 (talk) 12:44, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:36, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:22, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:43, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because of sending me request for deletion Saeedartgallery (talk) 12:22, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:43, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:53, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb at 00:33, 6 November 2017 UTC: Copyright violation: various copyvios --Krdbot 07:33, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Speedy COM:ADVERTISING this one is urging people to make money on Facebook, complete with email adress. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:21, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Blatant spam, user indeffed by Ellin. --Achim (talk) 16:53, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Speedy More of that same old COM:ADVERTISING... complete with contact info. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:22, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Blatant spam, user indeffed by Ellin. --Achim (talk) 17:19, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

need permission - copy from http://sylvainrenard.info/index.php?post/2017/11/02/L-hommage-%C3%A0-Didier-Motchane Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 11:38, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Ce fichier a en effet été d'abord publié par mes soins sur mon blog (sylvainrenard.info). Je l'ai déposé sur Wiki Commons pour le mettre dans le domaine public. Je suis l'auteur de cette photo et je l'ai utilisée sur Wikipédia à la demande de la famille de Didier Motchane. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sylvain1949 (talk • contribs) 14:54, 4 November 2017‎ (UTC)[reply]


Kept: ticket:2017110510009064. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:33, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GypsyGold (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.sfmotors.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/home-gal_9.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 04:40, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Foul Mudames.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Caldwellc325 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Tragic, but out of the project scope

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:28, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - relevance was not explaned by keep voters. --Jcb (talk) 16:38, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently a derivative work of [3], no source on the other image. Likely outside the project scope as a hoax/useless doctored photo Guanaco (talk) 04:00, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Upload by vandalism only account using multiple accounts. Ed (Edgar181) 19:59, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:28, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:09, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:28, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:09, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:29, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:09, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 21:01, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:10, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Michelle Drake (talk) 22:42, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:10, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Michelle Drake (talk) 22:46, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:10, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong date, part of a photoshoot from 2015 (http://www.fabzz.com/britt-robertson-the-longest-ride-press-conference-in-new-york-city.html/britt-robertson-the-longest-ride-press-conference-in-new-york-city-02), the anonymous user didn't give any proof that he is the photograph. 88.77.0.255 00:05, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:13, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation S0091 (talk) 19:57, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 00:46, 29 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's under copyright, just taken from a website, http://247wallst.com/special-report/2016/02/02/the-tallest-building-in-every-state/6/. Here's the Image URL, it is identical to the uploaded image: https://247wallst.files.wordpress.com/2016/01/wyoming-financial-center-cheyenne-wyoming.jpg?w=400&h=225 Herostratus (talk) 00:47, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:15, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All of this user's uploads (Minecrafter789) are not his own work but just taken from websites. Herostratus (talk) 00:50, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:16, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All of this user's uploads (Minecrafter789) are not his own work but just taken from websites. Herostratus (talk) 00:50, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:16, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo; out of scope. Promotional file. Zhangj1079 (Saluton!) 01:43, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:05, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Akteon

[edit]

Copyvio - claimed as own work but are transcriptions of copyrighted music.

If they meet fair use guidelines, they should be hosted locally on each wiki where they're used. --Clarinetguy097 (talk) 05:57, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Clarinet guy,
I'm the creator of these files. I made them a long time ago, about 10 years ago or so. I understand your problem with them and if you have to delete them, I will not oppose any objection. I just wanted to clarify something about it not necessarilly to save them - like I said if you had to delete them, go ahead. You probably did not mean it, but I just wanted to defend myself against a possible implicit accusation about my intellectual honesty. The fact is I transcribed these examples with own my ear alone (basic music dictation), the examples have been written and edited with my own software, and the harmonic analysis is my own work. So basically, yes, I considered it my own work even if it's copyrighted material. Of course, I didn't claim ownership over the musical material itself, I claim ownership about this specific work of transcription and harmonic analysis. But I never have any intent to claim these music were mine by any mean or something. So if it happens it's a copyright infringement anyway, fine, be my guest, delete it. I will understand, but please don't imply I tried to appropriate musics that I don't belong. I did it in all honesty. I obviously was naive to assume it was not the same as to upload a direct sound extract of the songs themselves. Also note there's a fourth file you apparently did not include in the list it's the transcription of Black Sabbath song. This one should be deleted too, if it has not already be removed.
Thanks for your attention. Akteon (talk) 12:47, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Found the other file I was talking about that should be deleted as well : File: Black_sabbath_transcription.jpgAkteon (talk) 13:33, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Com:DW of © music. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:10, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image out of COM:SCOPE Eurodyne (talk) 06:38, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

also File:Kkyadav.jpg --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:11, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:11, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:46, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An obviously professional photographer does a photoshooting and wants to stay anonymously? Any proofs given? 88.77.0.255 00:26, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:35, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Error al subir IgnacioGrs (talk) 01:08, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:35, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be above Com:TOO Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:16, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:54, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems out of scope. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:25, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:54, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not own work, source = Gigatel Cyf Ltd. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:01, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:55, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not own work, source = Gigatel Cyf Ltd. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:02, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:55, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

complex logo Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:02, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:56, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vanryoko (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Seems to be above Com:TOO

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:43, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:56, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:15, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:56, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:23, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:56, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:31, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:57, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:32, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:57, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:32, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:57, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:32, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:57, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:34, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:57, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

n k nck nwksd n 77.78.0.206 07:50, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:58, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurry, unusable photo kennethaw88talk 08:21, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:58, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 10:26, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 02:58, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:35, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:01, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:36, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:01, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:37, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:01, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:37, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:01, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:40, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:01, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:41, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:00, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:41, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:00, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:42, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:00, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:42, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 03:00, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's not own work. Same picture is here 2003:DE:3EB:D2E:410C:F77E:BA45:7BF6 17:08, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per OTRS permission. --Krd 04:17, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wonderland2001 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

70 Jahre nach dem Tode des Urhebers? Wann ist denn der Fotograf Hans Friedl verstorben?

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:02, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Haben Sie die Bilder überhaupt richtig in Augenschein genommen? Es handelt sich zum großen Teil um Portraitgemälde der genannten Personen aus dem 19. Jahrhundert und nicht um Photographien. Schon garnicht ist Hans Friede Photograph, sondern er ist Herausgeber einer Biographiensammlung in der die Bilder ebenfalls veröffentlicht wurden. Ich hoffe, dies klärt den Sachverhalt. --Wonderland2001

Kept: the images of over 120 years ago in line with a recent community vote, deleted the rest. Different from what uploader claims in the file description, copyright lasts 70 years after the death of the author, not after the death of the depicted person. --Jcb (talk) 11:21, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 08:16, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:23, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 08:17, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:23, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 08:17, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:23, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:nudity 7. (talk) 08:19, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:23, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:nudity 7. (talk) 08:21, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:23, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

70 Jahre nach dem Tode des Urhebers? Wann ist denn der Fotograf Hans Friedl verstorben? Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:01, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:45, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:36, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:47, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:36, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:47, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image : out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:37, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:47, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Surajvish1995 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Scope.

Project scope : "The uploading of small numbers of images (e.g. of yourself) for use on a personal user page of Commons or another project is allowed as long as that user is or was an active participant on that project."

The only participation of the user was to create his user page, therefore he is not an "active participant ".

Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:45, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:46, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ajta1228 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Poor, unused image. They are being curved, some of them have a white shadow on the left.

B dash (talk) 02:53, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:33, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wilhelm Matzat verstarb 2016 -> © bis einschl. 2086 Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:09, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:33, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clear copyright notice in the bottom left corner; as it was published in 1967, that's all it needed to be copyright in the US. Prosfilaes (talk) 06:09, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:34, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The company is not mentioned in en:Southern States. Unused logo of probably non-notable company, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:24, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:34, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS-permission from photographer Pancho Villasmil (look bottom right corner) is needed. Taivo (talk) 08:34, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:34, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FaxxK97 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small resolution, no EXIF; probably not own work. Besides, the file "Ole-deich-1 1.jpg" was already on the net 3 ys before being uploaded here [4].

Ruthven (msg) 08:55, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:34, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Such book covers can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission from copyright holder. Taivo (talk) 10:21, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:34, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational purpose -> out of scope DCB (talk) 11:51, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:35, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work of uploader AgWoolridge (talk) 11:53, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:35, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zeus639 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The images are out of scope. They are derivative works of pages of the criminal case that had been opened in relation of a non-notable person. Also they were used fo original research.

Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:04, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:35, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:36, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical newspaper. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:36, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:36, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:36, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MoazzamBegKhans (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused books of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:36, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:36, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:36, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ANATO 4 MAHAIA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://img.purch.com/h/1000/aHR0cDovL3d3dy5saXZlc2NpZW5jZS5jb20vaW1hZ2VzL2kvMDAwLzA2MS82MzQvb3JpZ2luYWwva2lkbmV5LXN0b25lcy5qcGc=.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:36, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vishal Singh Rajput (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:37, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:37, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:37, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:37, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:59, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:37, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Françoise TOVIN (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:37, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Edneuman76 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:37, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Edneuman76 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:38, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - unidentified person. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:02, 11 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:37, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by M.rJirapat (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Files marked as Copyright Ian Fuller in their EXIF data, and already published on Flickr by the same Ian Fuller. Most of the other images uploaded by this user are also suspect due to the amazing variety of different camera models used, but just nominating the most obvious violations for now.

DAJF (talk) 03:30, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:44, 19 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

M.rJirapat's uploads of Honda Collection Hall

[edit]

Some photos in this set are obvious copyvios from Flickr.[5] The rest are very likely copyvios as well.

Paul_012 (talk) 15:10, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

M.rJirapat's uploads of Toyota Automobile Museum (and others)

[edit]

See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by M.rJirapat#M.rJirapat's uploads of Honda Collection Hall

Paul_012 (talk) 15:31, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Photos of woman in black dress uploaded by M.rJirapat

[edit]

Out of scope; questionable claim of authorship, as they are photos of a print source and uploader has a history of uploading a huge amount of copyvios.

Paul_012 (talk) 15:48, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by M.rJirapat#M.rJirapat's uploads of Honda Collection Hall

Paul_012 (talk) 16:02, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:38, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project scope. Quality is not good, the photo is not suitable for stock photo. Depicted person isn't mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in id.wiki. Taivo (talk) 15:44, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:40, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Thai Women @ Bangkok 01.jpg M.rJirapat (talk) 14:49, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:32, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful claim of authorship, as uploader has uploaded lots and lots of copyvios. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:University uniforms of Thailand 08.jpg. File also previously requested for deletion by uploader. Paul_012 (talk) 16:12, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:41, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook sized, unused personal image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:12, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:41, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work, this image is sharp, large pixel size, but small file size and in a collection where the uploader takes only pictures of contemporary automobiles. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:14, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:41, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook sized image of school mascots, seems derivative. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:14, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:41, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook sized but no metadata in a collection where uploader only takes photos of cars. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:15, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:41, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing permission, image found several places on the web : https://www.voyages-d-affaires.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/10/Trainline-Daniel-Beutler.jpg, https://media.licdn.com/mpr/mpr/shrinknp_200_200/AAEAAQAAAAAAAAm4AAAAJDA5OWRkYjIyLTU0ZGYtNGIyYi04ZmQzLTFlOWM1NmQ1NjUwNQ.jpg Patrick Rogel (talk) 16:24, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:41, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image *and its Caption* have been copied from another source, but claimed as own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:51, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:41, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Few people own satellites, please explain the "own work" on this satellite image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:52, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:41, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Foto" A Furseth" means this isn't own work of Minuth in 2017. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:54, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

However, User:Minuth's last name is Furseth, so I suspect the photo was taken by a family member. What is the right procedure in that case? --Ranveig (talk) 08:20, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
COM:OTRS just like any other case of person A uploading person B's work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:50, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:42, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Description says copied from book: "Faksimile av bilete på side 78 i boka «Fjorden, fjellet og folket» av Arild Flydal (1996)." Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:56, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:42, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The description says it was taken from a 2004 book. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:56, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:42, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Foto is credited to 2006 to A. Furseth, and then dated 2017 and claimed as own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:57, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Again, it appears that the user and the photographer are related, and the "Own work" thing misunderstood. --Ranveig (talk) 08:32, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
COM:OTRS just like any other case of person A uploading person B's work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:51, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:42, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Foto is creted to "A. Furseth" without permission. Appears to have been previously printed as it has words on it. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:57, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The two are probably related as they have the same last name. The words have been inserted to illustrate the places discussed in two articles by someone with local knowledge, such as the upploader. --Ranveig (talk) 08:34, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
COM:OTRS approval needed just like any other case of person A uploading person B's work. Captions are out of COM:SCOPE. Declarative material goes in description. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:56, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:44, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from book "Faksimile av bilete side 25 i boka Fjordfolket av Arild Flydal (2004)." Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:57, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:43, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source of base image, few people own satellites. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:00, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:43, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Foto av Eli Lannerholm, Ørsta." in description Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:00, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:42, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Fotograf Frank Furseth" is not own work of uploader Martin Furseth. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:02, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

How can uploader share permission for this image? --Ranveig (talk) 08:36, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The uploader can't. COM:OTRS permission is needed from Frank Furseth. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:52, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:44, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image appears to be copied from a printed book. Proper source is needed as this is obviously not "own work" of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:02, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:44, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader did not create the toy depicted in the image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:02, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:44, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If these are indeed from 1944, then the license of "self" in 2015 has to be wrong. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:03, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:44, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No meaningful source information provided. No evidence as to date, manner, or place of publication. Exactly zero information supporting PD claim. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 17:03, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:45, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If this is a 1935 brochure, the claim of "own work" by the uploader is obviously incorrect. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:03, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:45, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cathiavoelker (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on any of these images, the picture of people in glasses has been all over the web for years. The others are logos, claimed own work, but all so small and blurry as to be useless.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:10, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:45, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused terribly blurry personal image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:11, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:45, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alibei2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images from the 1980s of an artist and his work, require COM:OTRS from the artist to retain.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:11, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:45, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work on this bordered and captioned image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:12, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:45, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source page is marked copyright. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:13, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:45, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tiny, halftoned image claimed as own work and obviously not. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:14, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:45, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tiny illustration, obviously not created by uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:14, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:45, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tiny photo, obviously not created by uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:15, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:45, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source of basemap. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:15, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:45, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If this is own work, why does it say "@SSC" at right lower of center? Seems possibly copied from somewhere else with that. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:16, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:45, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Mohit Behl is a colleague whose permission I have taken for using this picture. His watermark is visible in the picture as well." Sorry, but permission for photos needs to be sent via COM:OTRS not just put like this in the file. Please see COM:L before making more uploads. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:17, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:45, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Giovanni Chile (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claims of own work on these two photos and one illustration (collage) all with captions.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:17, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:45, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nice try on "own work" but please see the YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IzEOn6yuGaY where this came from several years ago. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:19, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ellin Beltz,

How are you? I'm a beginner as an editor on Wikipedia. I would like to illustrate the article about the kolbastı dance. I did a print screen of kolbastı dance from a youtube video. I'm wrong to have done this. I will remove the images from Kolbastı's articles. Who will removes the image of Kolbastı from Wikimedia? There are no pictures of Kolbastı on Wikipedia. What can I do to get an image of it with a free license? How do I find out if the image is copyrighted or not? Thanks for the attention, Marcelo RosaMelo (talk)

Hi Marcelo RosaMelo: The system administrator will remove the image, you don't have to do anything else. You could take photos yourself of this dance type, then you would own the license and be able to upload it. But you can't take photos off the web and upload as own work, no matter how desperately that material is needed to illustrate an article. Please see COM:L and COM:SCOPE. Thanks! Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:21, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Dear Ellin Beltz,

Thanks for the explanation!!! Marcelo RosaMelo (talk) 23:37, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:46, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This tiny image is so blurry it would appear this image came from YouTube or similar source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:20, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Ellin Beltz, How are you? I'm a beginner as an editor on Wikipedia. I would like to illustrate the article about the philanthropist Lucy Ann Walton. I did a print screen of her from a youtube video. I'm wrong to have done this. I will remove the images from Lucy Ann Walton's articles. Who will removes the image of Lucy Ana Walton from Wikimedia? There are no pictures of Lucy Ann Walton on Wikipedia. What can I do to get an image of her with a free license? How do I find out if the image is copyrighted or not? Thanks for the attention, Marcelo RosaMelo (talk) 18:28, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please see the reply at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kolbasti dance.jpg. Cheers! Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:22, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:46, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader did not create the medals and materials depicted in this tiny photo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:24, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:46, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I found a larger version of this exact photo at http://www.namespedia.com/image/Karleskind_1.jpg Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:26, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:46, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I found this picture in use on a website http://www.fraternelle-cuisiniers.fr/ in the top banner. Also the bottom of that page says (C) copyright. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:28, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:46, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:29, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:46, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photographs fail to meet the official guidelines of COM:TOYS, specifically:

When uploading a picture of a toy, you must show that the toy is in the public domain in both the United States and in the source country of the toy. In the United States, copyright is granted for toys even if the toy is ineligible for copyright in the source country.

There has been no evidence presented that the toys at the focus of this photograph, and named in the category or title, are public domain. Photographs where there is a potential de minimis rationale, and other items or people may be the main focus, have not been selected in this request.

For an in-depth background and explanation of Commons copyright policies, refer to the Stuffed Animals essay and the precedent of prior closely related deletion requests: Petit tigre, Erminig, Wendy the Weasel & Percy Plush, Wikimania 2014 Day 1, Jimmy Wales meeting Mr Penguin.

-- (talk) 17:54, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Addendum The list of other examples used in the nomination has been reformatted in this change for better clarity, but there has been no material change to content. -- (talk) 09:15, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep all in subdirectories as none of these have not been tagged for deletion and uploaders (and other interested parties) have not been notified and it is unclear whether the nominator actually wants to delete them or not (many are trivially obviously de minimus or otherwise not problematic so the do need to be individually nominated). Thryduulf (talk) 11:46, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Info Two files are listed in the nomination, no others. -- (talk) 07:54, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Please see User:Elcobbola/Stuffed Animals & COM:TOYS. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:48, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:10, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 11:59, 21 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:52, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  • It should be safe to merge these two open DRs. Where mascots have been handmade by the uploader (or friends), this needs to be explained clearly with the copyright release, confirming they are original toys, for example the crocheted bees for wikidata and not based on a commercial pattern. -- (talk) 13:16, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep File:Wikizade Bambi Cuteness.jpg is hand mande by a friend. Hard to understand any meaning for deletion. --Nevit Dilmen (talk) 17:33, 3 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    @Nevit: Is your friend a Wikimedian? If so, they should simply make a statement here agreeing to the CC-BY-SA 4.0 and GFDL 1.2+ licenses you have chosen. (Your act of uploading the photo only releases your portion of the copyright.) If not, then they need to send a copyright release to COM:OTRS. -- King of ♥ 02:51, 25 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 12:19, 8 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photograph fails to meet the official guidelines of COM:TOYS, specifically:

When uploading a picture of a toy, you must show that the toy is in the public domain in both the United States and in the source country of the toy. In the United States, copyright is granted for toys even if the toy is ineligible for copyright in the source country.

There has been no evidence presented that the toy in this photograph, and mentioned in the title, is public domain.

For an in-depth background and explanation of Commons copyright policies, refer to the Stuffed Animals essay and the precedent of prior closely related deletion requests:

  1. Petit tigre
  2. Erminig
  3. Wendy the Weasel & Percy Plush
  4. Wikimania 2014 Day 1
  5. Jimmy Wales meeting Mr Penguin

-- (talk) 17:46, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:53, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photographs fail to meet the official guidelines of COM:TOYS, specifically:

When uploading a picture of a toy, you must show that the toy is in the public domain in both the United States and in the source country of the toy. In the United States, copyright is granted for toys even if the toy is ineligible for copyright in the source country.

There has been no evidence presented that the toy(s) at the focus of this photograph, and named in the category or title, are public domain. Photographs where there is a potential de minimis rationale, and other items or people may be the main focus, have not been selected in this request.

For an in-depth background and explanation of Commons copyright policies, refer to the Stuffed Animals essay and the precedent of prior closely related deletion requests:

  1. Petit tigre
  2. Erminig
  3. Wendy the Weasel & Percy Plush
  4. Wikimania 2014 Day 1
  5. Jimmy Wales meeting Mr Penguin

-- (talk) 17:51, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I now have confirmation by IRC that the ticket is about the photograph, and gave no confirmation about the copyright of the toy. @Wdwd: for information as the apparent OTRS volunteer who added the OTRS template. Thanks -- (talk) 13:19, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:52, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. Depicted person isn't mentioned in en.wiki. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 19:16, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:54, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Should have gone to the talk page instead. Ainali (talk) 19:16, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:55, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non used out of focus picture of a homeless person. Sturm (talk) 19:25, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:55, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF data, user with bad history, unlilely to be free. Yann (talk) 19:43, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:55, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andershus

[edit]

All these files were uploaded by User:Andershus. They appear to be photographs of works that are shown in his gallery, but these works were made by artists that are either living, either dead too recently for the works to be public domain in any jurisdiction. All files are tagged as "own work" which is clearly incorrect. I contacted the user on his talk page on the french Wikipedia and asked him to clarify the copyright status of these works but got no answer, even though he kept editing. IMO, these 31 files should be deleted as copyright violations, and the user doesn't appear to care much about the matter.

File:Anju-Chaudhuri.jpg uploaded by the same user, was already nominated for deletion two days ago.

--El pitareio (talk) 20:17, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 03:04, 13 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andershus (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on these images of Art in India. If the photos (some of them only) were own work, they would still be COM:COPYVIOs because they are images of artwork without the permission of the creator, or any indication who created them. Some images such as File:Harsh-raman(1).jpg clearly show they were taken by someone else, One of the images is large enough to be considered "big" and most are smaller than facebook.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:51, 15 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:09, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andershus (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Maps without sources, user with bad history, unlikely to be free.

Yann (talk) 19:46, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:56, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andershus (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Artists and artworks require permission of the artist for the artwork as well as from the photographer. At these file sizes, very unlikely original photos.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:06, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Polarlys (talk) 20:55, 18 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 20:38, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:56, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photographs fail to meet the official guidelines of COM:TOYS, specifically:

When uploading a picture of a toy, you must show that the toy is in the public domain in both the United States and in the source country of the toy. In the United States, copyright is granted for toys even if the toy is ineligible for copyright in the source country.

There has been no evidence presented that the toys at the focus of this photograph, and named in the category or title, are public domain. Photographs where there is a potential de minimis rationale, and other items or people may be the main focus, have not been selected in this request.

For an in-depth background and explanation of Commons copyright policies, refer to the Stuffed Animals essay.

-- (talk) 22:52, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:57, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photographs fail to meet the official guidelines of COM:TOYS, specifically:

When uploading a picture of a toy, you must show that the toy is in the public domain in both the United States and in the source country of the toy. In the United States, copyright is granted for toys even if the toy is ineligible for copyright in the source country.

There has been no evidence presented that the toy at the focus of this photograph, and named in the category or title, are public domain.

For an in-depth background and explanation of Commons copyright policies, refer to the Stuffed Animals essay and the precedent of prior closely related deletion requests:

  1. Petit tigre
  2. Erminig
  3. Wendy the Weasel & Percy Plush
  4. Wikimania 2014 Day 1
  5. Jimmy Wales meeting Mr Penguin

-- (talk) 22:55, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep File:Linx and Remux.jpg at least. Despite the file name the only subject in focus is the person and the plush is not a significant proportion of the image. Thryduulf (talk) 11:56, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note. This deletion request is misleadingly titled and only those files explicitly listed above have been nominated. Thryduulf (talk) 11:59, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Hi, this way of titling is normal practice for group deletion requests of files in a category. I presume the VFC default "Files in" is intended to be read as "(at least some) Files in" and is not deliberately misleading.
    With regard to the focus of the first Linx photograph, the focus is on both the stuffed toy and the person. The arrangement of the photograph, the title of the photograph, the description of the photograph and the fact that if the toy were cropped out of the photograph it would make little sense, indicates that the toy is the reason the photograph was taken and its intended focus. The toy can therefore not be described as insignificant. Thanks -- (talk) 12:07, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Whether the deletion request naming is intentionally misleading or not it is misleading. While I do not have a reason to assume bad faith of your intentions, your numerous past and current nominations of files in this subject area, many of which have been dubious to say the least, means that I also do not have a reason to assume good faith. Thryduulf (talk) 12:57, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    This is a tangent to the DR. If you wish to claim I am acting in bad faith and raising abusive or disruptive deletion requests, then please ask for action against me at COM:AN/U. Making these claims but providing no evidence, or following the correct process, is hounding and may be read as a personal attack. Thanks -- (talk) 13:00, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    Come on Fae, did you actually read what was written? Someone saying they feel they have no reason to assume good faith despite not having a reason to assume bad faith of your intentions is not the same as making a claim that you are acting in bad faith. You immediately jumping to conclusions because someone disagree with your nominations and accusing that person of hounding and possible personal attack however reflects more badly on you than them. -- KTC (talk) 19:06, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The allegation of bad faith is perfectly clear to anyone that cares to read the words written. All I am guilty of here is raising a valid DR. Please vote if you wish, there is no need to soapbox. -- (talk) 19:32, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
What was clear to me when reading the words written, and yes I did care to read it, was you explictly accusing Thryduulf of hounding you, and that his earlier comment should be read as a personal attack [on you]. You wrote that if someone have a problem with you, they should take it to COM:AN/U. That advice applies to you as well. -- KTC (talk) 19:36, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This is a very silly tangent. Someone accuses me of bad faith, I ask them to take it to the correct noticeboard, then you drop in to make it look like I'm the bad guy. Either vote in this DR, ask an admin to block me if you can think of a real reason with, you know, evidence, or do something else. I'll not be replying to you further here. -- (talk) 19:51, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I explicitly did not accuse of you bad faith. Thryduulf (talk) 00:58, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:TOYS in conjunction with COM:PCP. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:59, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo image, without Wikipedia article (that I can find). Out of educational scope. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:01, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:59, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sonazuk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused photo of an unidentified person/person without Wikipedia article/Wikidata entry. Out of educational scope.

--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:04, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:59, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:04, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:59, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:08, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 14:59, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Це мій власний доданий файл моя фотографія, на даний час потребую повного вилучення моїх фотографій з мережі інтернет і даного файлу також. TarasKoval (talk) 14:18, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:33, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Це мій власний доданий файл моя фотографія, на даний час потребую повного вилучення моїх фотографій з мережі інтернет і даного файлу також. TarasKoval (talk) 14:22, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:34, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Це мій власний доданий файл моя фотографія, на даний час потребую повного вилучення моїх фотографій з мережі інтернет і даного файлу також. TarasKoval (talk) 14:28, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:35, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

дані які я вносив про компанію не актуальні. прошу видалити. TarasKoval (talk) 14:30, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:37, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Randykitty (talk) 14:43, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:36, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Corrupt file Mindmatrix 14:59, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:38, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Corrupt file Mindmatrix 14:59, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:39, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Corrupt file Mindmatrix 14:59, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:39, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Corrupt file Mindmatrix 15:00, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:40, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Corrupt file Mindmatrix 15:06, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:40, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Corrupt file Mindmatrix 15:08, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:40, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Corrupt file Mindmatrix 15:10, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:41, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Corrupt file Mindmatrix 15:12, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:41, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Corrupt file Mindmatrix 15:12, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:41, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Corrupt file Mindmatrix 15:12, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:41, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:16, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:42, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:17, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:44, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:17, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:44, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:18, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:44, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:18, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:44, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:52, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:44, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Michelle Drake (talk) 22:20, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:45, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Michelle Drake (talk) 22:21, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:46, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Michelle Drake (talk) 22:22, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:46, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Michelle Drake (talk) 22:23, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:46, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Michelle Drake (talk) 22:23, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:46, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Michelle Drake (talk) 22:24, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:47, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Michelle Drake (talk) 22:47, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:49, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Michelle Drake (talk) 22:48, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:48, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Michelle Drake (talk) 22:49, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:48, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Michelle Drake (talk) 22:50, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:48, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Michelle Drake (talk) 22:50, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:48, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal unused image, out of scope. Druschba 4 (talk) 23:20, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:47, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal unused image, out of scope. Druschba 4 (talk) 23:20, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:47, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal picture, out of scope. Druschba 4 (talk) 23:33, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:48, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 21:17, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:56, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Michelle Drake (talk) 22:17, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:55, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Michelle Drake (talk) 22:18, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:55, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Michelle Drake (talk) 22:19, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:55, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Michelle Drake (talk) 22:20, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:55, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Michelle Drake (talk) 22:25, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:53, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Michelle Drake (talk) 22:25, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:53, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Michelle Drake (talk) 22:27, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:54, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Michelle Drake (talk) 22:27, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:54, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Michelle Drake (talk) 22:28, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:54, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Michelle Drake (talk) 22:28, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:54, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Michelle Drake (talk) 22:30, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:54, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Michelle Drake (talk) 22:32, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:54, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Michelle Drake (talk) 22:33, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:54, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Michelle Drake (talk) 22:34, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:52, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Michelle Drake (talk) 22:34, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:52, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Michelle Drake (talk) 22:35, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:52, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Michelle Drake (talk) 22:35, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:52, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Michelle Drake (talk) 22:36, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:52, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Michelle Drake (talk) 22:37, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:52, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Michelle Drake (talk) 22:37, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:51, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Michelle Drake (talk) 22:38, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:51, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Michelle Drake (talk) 22:39, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:51, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Michelle Drake (talk) 22:39, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:51, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Michelle Drake (talk) 22:40, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:51, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Michelle Drake (talk) 22:40, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:51, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Michelle Drake (talk) 22:41, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:50, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Michelle Drake (talk) 22:42, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:50, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Michelle Drake (talk) 22:43, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:49, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Michelle Drake (talk) 22:44, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:49, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Michelle Drake (talk) 22:45, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 17:49, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 20:46, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:03, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 20:47, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:03, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 20:47, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:03, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 20:48, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:03, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 20:49, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:03, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 20:49, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:02, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 20:50, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:02, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 20:50, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:01, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 20:51, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:01, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 20:52, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:01, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 20:53, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:01, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Failed upload? This seems to be a purely blank image, not what is in the description. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:53, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:00, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 20:53, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:00, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 20:54, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:59, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 20:55, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:59, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 20:56, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:59, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 20:57, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:59, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 20:58, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:59, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 20:59, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:59, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 20:59, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:59, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 21:00, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:59, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 21:00, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:58, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 21:02, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:58, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 21:02, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:58, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 21:03, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:58, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 21:04, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:58, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 21:04, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:57, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 21:05, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:57, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 21:05, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:57, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 21:06, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:56, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 21:06, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:56, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 21:07, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:56, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 21:08, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:56, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 21:08, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:56, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 21:09, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:56, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 21:09, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:55, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 21:10, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:55, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 21:11, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:55, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 21:12, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:54, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 21:13, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:54, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 21:14, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:54, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 21:16, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:54, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Michelle Drake (talk) 22:41, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 18:53, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:18, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:19, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:19, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:19, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:20, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:20, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:20, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:20, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:21, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:20, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:21, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:20, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:21, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:20, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:22, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:18, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:22, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:18, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:23, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:18, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:23, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:18, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:24, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:18, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:24, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:18, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:24, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:18, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:25, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:18, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:25, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:17, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:25, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:17, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:26, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:17, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:26, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:17, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:26, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:17, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:27, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:17, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:27, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:17, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:29, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:14, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:30, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:14, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:30, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:14, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:31, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:14, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:31, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:14, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:31, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:14, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:32, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:13, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:32, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:13, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:32, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:13, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:33, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:13, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:33, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:13, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:34, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:13, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:34, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:13, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:35, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:13, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:35, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:12, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image CypherPunk777 (talk) 18:37, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:12, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 18:47, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:11, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:54, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:10, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:57, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:10, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not useful. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:58, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:09, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 20:29, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:09, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 20:30, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:09, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 20:30, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:09, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 20:31, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:09, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 20:31, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:09, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 20:32, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:09, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 20:33, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:06, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 20:33, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:06, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 20:34, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:06, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 20:35, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:06, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 20:35, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:07, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 20:36, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:07, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 20:36, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:07, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 20:37, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:07, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 20:38, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:07, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 20:39, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:07, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 20:41, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:07, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 20:41, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:07, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 20:42, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:07, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 20:42, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:05, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 20:43, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:05, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 20:44, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:05, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 20:44, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:05, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 20:45, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:05, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Austen Richmond (talk) 20:46, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:05, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:51, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 21:05, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:53, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 21:05, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:53, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 21:06, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:53, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 21:06, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:53, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 21:06, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:54, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 21:06, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:54, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 21:07, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:54, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 21:07, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:54, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 21:07, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Evidently promotional, without utility for Wikimedia projects. —Alvaro Molina ( - ) 20:51, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 21:08, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from Windows. Possible Copyright Violation. —Alvaro Molina ( - ) 20:53, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 21:08, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Album cover art is not typically own wqork, but that of a third party. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:32, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:47, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Album cover art is not typically own work. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:33, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:46, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I haven't heard of Reddit releasing their logo under a free license, and this is NOT necessarily own work. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:40, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:44, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fun image made by an imagegenerator like https://photofunia.com/effects/mermaid Achim (talk) 20:54, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:44, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small, new user with last warning, quiet professional, can be found elsewere on the web: [6] and no senseful exif. Unlikely own work. Druschba 4 (talk) 21:43, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:43, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BibianaG (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Newspaper clippings, likely published around 1970. Unlikely to be public domain, certainly not own work or CC.

AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 23:07, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:42, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© Thibault Savary Delestrez. Identity of Correspondance.geoffroydidier should be veryfied via OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:34, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:42, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© Thibault Savary Delestrez. Identity of Correspondance.geoffroydidier should be veryfied via OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:35, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:42, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© Assemblée nationale. Identity of Xbouillot should be veryfied via OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:37, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:42, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Published here allready 6 months earlier. New user, no exif, small. Unlikely own work. Druschba 4 (talk) 23:38, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:41, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR (Droits réservés) aka Reserved Rights. Copy of http://www.liberation.fr/france/2013/04/09/guillaume-larrive-quelqu-un-de-l-interieur_893891, No metadata, identity of Xbouillot should be veryfied via OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:41, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:40, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© FJ, Assemblée nationale. Identity of Edward Dunkeld should be veryfied via OTRS. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:43, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:40, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, no exif data, unlikely to be an own work. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 23:52, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:40, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Msrussel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Apart from an "all rights reserved" notice in the footer of the institution's website, there does not seem to be any permission for the free re-use of their logo.

HyperGaruda (talk) 12:59, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:09, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Msrussel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Same as previous discussion of 4 to 12 November 2017

HyperGaruda (talk) 13:24, 19 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:37, 26 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Msrussel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Re-upload of deleted unfree logos: see previous discussions.

HyperGaruda (talk) 20:08, 27 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jon Kolbert (talk) 04:46, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dodge M4S Indy-500 PPG Pace Car in the Walter P. Chrysler Museum 03.jpg is an obvious copyvio from Flickr. The others very likely are as well.

Paul_012 (talk) 15:16, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:07, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 4TheWynne (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope of Wikimedia Commons

The Haz talk 01:28, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

These images are just photos of me to use for my Wikipedia user page. Both images were taken straight from my iPod. I'm not sure why these images are being nominated for deletion. 4TheWynne (talk) 03:51, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
I'd also like to add that these images were uploaded to be used in an article (or at least one of them, anyway), most likely in the not-too-distant future. Please don't delete them. 4TheWynne (talk) 05:22, 12 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: One in use, one not. We generally allow users to upload a user page image, but one of these was not in use and so is out of scope. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:38, 20 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 4TheWynne (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 00:48, 27 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nomination --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:39, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 4TheWynne (talk · contribs)

[edit]

One of the things Wikimedia Commons is not, is a place to put your "selfie of the month". A certain number of user pictures are allowed, but this collection is 90% unused and the subject is non-notable.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:06, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My sincerest apologies - if there was a way for me delete the previous image every time I upload a new one, that I knew of, then that's definitely what I'd be trying to do. The only place where I'm using these is my Wikipedia user page - it's not as though I'm trying to use them in an article or anything. Again, I apologise - I'm still a relatively "new" user to Commons, and all I really use it for is to upload a new profile picture each month, with the occasional other image to use elsewhere. 4TheWynne (talk) 22:15, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
4TheWynne: You *can* upload right on top of the existing image... go to the current image page on Commons and scroll down to where it shows the little thumbnail and your name as uploader... there's a line there that says "Upload a new version of this file"... click that, put your new one on top of your old one. With that said, the closing admin may choose to keep a series, I don't really know when we've had a month-by-month view at the changes of the average Wikipedian. Let's see what the closing administrator decides! Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:31, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If you're going to overwrite the same file, you'd obviously have to tag it {{Current}}. --bjh21 (talk) 00:14, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:06, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be copied from https://myspace.com/tangmothai/mixes/classic-mes-photos-515928/photo/246553614 . Paul_012 (talk) 04:46, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 15:36, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 15:36, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://rosehillcollege.school.nz/Upload/UserMedia/Files/68646/Sue%20Blakely.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 TC 15:36, 12 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file with the wrong name: the banner of the Russian Armed Forces actually is that. Here is the flag of the Ministry of defense of Russia. There are better quality SVG and PNG versions. -- 109.238.80.47 21:26, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:51, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Com:Redundant. Unused emblem. There are better quality PNG and SVG versions. -- 109.238.80.47 21:48, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:54, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect structure (see e.g. File:HBTU Structural Formula V1.svg); {{BadJPG}}. Leyo 21:49, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree. I have created an SVG (File:N-HBTU.svg) and replaced the one use of the JPG. I no longer have an objection to deletion. Ed (Edgar181) 14:16, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 08:13, 13 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exif data states author as Dusit Mukayaprasert Paul_012 (talk) 05:03, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, probably copyvio. --Y.haruo (talk) 04:16, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Exif data; uploader has a history of uploading copyright violations Paul_012 (talk) 05:10, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, probably copyvio. --Y.haruo (talk) 04:20, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very doubtful claim of authorship. Slightly different version of the image appears at http://www.wikalenda.com/%E0%B8%87%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%99/%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%B0-%E0%B9%80%E0%B8%9F%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%8A-%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%B5%E0%B8%9F%E0%B8%A7%E0%B8%99%E0%B8%B4%E0%B8%87-%E0%B9%81%E0%B8%AD%E0%B8%97-%E0%B8%9E%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B0%E0%B8%A3%E0%B8%B2%E0%B8%8A%E0%B8%A7%E0%B8%B1%E0%B8%87%E0%B8%9E%E0%B8%8D%E0%B8%B2%E0%B9%84%E0%B8%97-065773.html . Paul_012 (talk) 12:48, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, probably copyvio. --Y.haruo (talk) 04:23, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very likely copyvios, given lack of Exif data and user's history of uploading copyvios, especially of Thai females in university uniform. Paul_012 (talk) 13:07, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, probably copyvio. --Y.haruo (talk) 04:28, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful claim of authorship. No Exif data. Looks nothing like uploader's other uploads. Also has a history of uploading copyright violations Paul_012 (talk) 13:36, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, probably copyvio. --Y.haruo (talk) 04:31, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

None of the uploader's other photos are taken with a Canon EOS Kiss Digital X or PowerShot SD780 IS. Has a long history of uploading copyvios Paul_012 (talk) 15:24, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, probably copyvio. --Y.haruo (talk) 04:35, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful claim of authorship. Uploader has an extensive history of uploadeding copyvios. Paul_012 (talk) 15:28, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, probably copyvio. --Y.haruo (talk) 04:39, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Like File:หอประชุมใหญ่ มหาวิทยาลัยเกษตรศาสตร์.jpg, this looks nothing like uploader's own photos and is very likely a copyvio, given his history of copyvios. Paul_012 (talk) 15:42, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, facebook image. --Y.haruo (talk) 04:41, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks nothing like uploader's own photos. Exif missing. Also appears at http://klem.ru/forum/misc.php?do=showattachments&t=17112 as aiwa ca-30.jpg. Paul_012 (talk) 15:57, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, not the uploader's own work. --Y.haruo (talk) 04:45, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exif missing; looks nothing like uploader's own photos; uploader has uploaded plenty of copyvios. Paul_012 (talk) 16:00, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, probably copyvio. --Y.haruo (talk) 04:47, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the original was a copyvio, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Toothed Whale Physical Characteristics.png Kersti (talk) 18:52, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 04:56, 14 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS permission by Denis Korobkov is needed. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:15, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:52, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 13:50, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:31, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 14:15, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:31, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Vysotsky as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: license for this particular photograph doesn't permit CC-BY-SA Vysotsky (talk) 14:58, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:31, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://cosmo.lv/_mm/i/20170818/18298_072807d.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:30, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical book cover. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:01, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:30, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The historical photograph uploaded as a modern own work by the uploader. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 15:05, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:30, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://cdn.londonreviewbookshop.co.uk/media/original/590b1f9f8226b/1000x2000.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:30, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Beeld en Geluid Collecties as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: license for this particular photograph doesn't permit CC-BY-SA. Source site has correct license, but I do not find the photo from source site and the photo has never been licensereviewed. Needs discussion, maybe really copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 15:18, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded this file a couple of years ago after I found it on the Beeld En Geluidwiki. This image has catalog number 881404, as mentioned below the file description. The images seems to be recently deleted from Beeld En Geluidwiki ([7] and [8]). It says "2 nov 2017 14:10 WikiSysop (Overleg | bijdragen) heeft de pagina Bestand:881404-7 pos.png verwijderd (n.a.v. klacht)", which means: 'WikiSysop has deleted page File:881404-7 pos.png (because of a complaint)'.
For so far the background. I don't know Wikimedia Commons' policy on handling these cases, but at the time it was uploaded this image was licensed correctly. Maybe Beeld En Geluidwiki violated the photograph's copyright? Clausule (talk) 23:10, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This is correct, we were urged to remove this picture because of a complaint. We are sorry for the inconvenience. Beeld en Geluid Collecties(talk) 11:24, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination & discussion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:30, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Runab as Speedy (ek) and the most recent rationale was: copyright: owner this photo is Polsat http://www.wirtualnemedia.pl/artykul/sprawiedliwi-wydzial-kryminalny-ogladalnosc-tv4-trzecia-sezon. Maybe Gosia Stasiewicz is still author. Needs discussion. I cannot review the license (source needs registration), but wirtualmedia article is from June 2017, younger than file in Commons. Taivo (talk) 15:29, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:29, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 15:34, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:29, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a promotional image of an artist (cropped version here). Metadata shows author is Tom Lahti, a professional photographer in Tampere, Finland and copyright holder: Photo@FoTom. Htm (talk) 15:48, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Photographer website [9]. I have reason to believe that this is not uploaders own work.--Htm (talk) 15:53, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:29, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. No information on the source, authorship or copyright status of the original map, which obviously isn't the uploader's own work. LX (talk, contribs) 15:51, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:28, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work by Angus McBride (1931 - 15 May 2007) - a version of this image before the signature was cut off is available https://thelosttreasurechest.files.wordpress.com/2011/11/teutonic-order-and-mongols-at-the-battle-of-liegnitz-1241.jpg Hchc2009 (talk) 17:06, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:26, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to have been taken off the web - the user has done this with other copyrighted images Hchc2009 (talk) 17:07, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:26, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not appear to be the user's own work; no reason to believe that it is out of copyright Hchc2009 (talk) 17:08, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:26, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

basically out of scope meme image with inadequate source/author info; the uploader is also a vandal at enwiki: 1, 2, 3 -★- PlyrStar93. Message me. 17:12, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:26, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

To me, the photo is meaningless. Kalbbes (talk) 17:24, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:26, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incomplete image kennethaw88talk 18:12, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Insider fixed it. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:23, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Album label art is not typically own work, however this is mostly text ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:32, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:22, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Newspaper ads are typicalyl designed by third parties, is the uploader claiming these as his own examples? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:45, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:22, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Underlying map layer not identified, Looks like Google style map, not OSM. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:00, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Per deletion

[edit]

 Disagree

Well, I don't disagree completely. I do not have an understanding for OSM, and frankly, how to use it, so it would be nice if a professional swept in and fixed the picture. With that being said, I can't be blamed here because I tried to turn off all the map features as to avoid this scenario (didn't work out), and I feel it's a useful image. So? Well, I think this image can be removed, but ONLY AFTER the OSM is used. Zanygenius (talk) 17:40, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:21, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FoP in US 2014 Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 21:06, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:20, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source.No date.And Japanese vandal user. Los688 (talk) 21:09, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:19, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FoP US 2008 http://visionlampasas.com/page/TheMurals Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 21:09, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:20, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source.No date.And Japanese vandal user upload. Los688 (talk) 21:11, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:19, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FoP US http://do512.com/hihowareyoumural Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 21:11, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:19, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source.No date.And Japanese vandal user upload.JP(携帯電話による撮影とあるが、絶対に実物を携帯で撮影したものではない。) Los688 (talk) 21:15, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:19, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FoP US 2008 Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 21:15, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:19, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source.No date.And Japanese vandal user upload.JP(携帯電話による撮影とあるが、絶対に実物を携帯で撮影したものではない。時期的にも合わない。) Los688 (talk) 21:16, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:19, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source.No date.And Japanese vandal user upload.JP(携帯電話による撮影とあるが、絶対に実物を携帯で撮影したものではない。) Los688 (talk) 21:17, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:18, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FoP US 1997 Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 21:18, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:18, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FoP US October 2004. https://www.flickr.com/photos/wallyg/8049263177 Slowking4 § Sander.v.Ginkel's revenge 21:21, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:18, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The same picture, but published with the real name and with more quality, was deleted because there is not evidence that the picture is public domain. https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Jaime_Alberto_Parra_-_El_M%C3%A9dico_Farc.jpg MarioJime (talk) 06:10, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:35, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

apparently a copyrighted material photographed without proper license Sushiya (talk) 08:07, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:34, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small unused photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Quality isn't so good as well. Taivo (talk) 10:10, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:33, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In my opinion this is incorrect logo. Correct is file:Fox Telecolombia logo.svg. Taivo (talk) 10:29, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:33, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image from PDF extracted to JPG: File:Diagramo s-F.jpg Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 11:15, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:33, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely purely "own":

  1. probably derivative of this photo
  2. Unused own works of this kind are likely out of scope.

Ankry (talk) 12:34, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:32, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No exif data, uncommon and low resolution, turns up all over the internet. Everything seems to point towards the uploader's lack of ownership. HyperGaruda (talk) 12:53, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:32, 17 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although the video is licensed under the YouTube Creative Commons license, this upload contains audio of copyrighted music, and it is very unlikely that the license covers this aspect of the video. xplicit 00:51, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Once a work (the music video) is published under a Creative Commons license (by the musicians themselves(The dresscodes/ドレスコーズ) via their official channel), the license of all aspect of the work is not revocable (there is no such otherwise note the exception of Creative Commons license in this case as ℯxplicit said). --Puramyun31 (talk) 02:25, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Per Puramyun31 (but a license review tag would be good to have). --whym (talk) 14:28, 18 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : thumbnail format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 18:35, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Derivative works, missing legal information. --Y.haruo (talk) 15:23, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': one-file-upload, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:47, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: probably copyvio. This image was found at various places since before it was uploaded in commons. --Y.haruo (talk) 16:27, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The name Bundestag_2013.svg is a more accurate name for the file Deutscher_BT.svg, which is currently redirect to from here. Therefore, this redirect should be deleted so that Deutscher_BT.svg can be moved to here. Tomiĉo (talk) 04:34, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and moved, per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 17:58, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Clarinetguy097 (talk) 06:02, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 17:56, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor colors and odd angle. I don't see any likely educational or historic value; it is neither a good illustration of the (unidentified) subway station nor of the surrounding buildings. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:56, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep EV is a subjetive concept. IMHO commons acept black and white images too, and the color are irrelevant. The wide angule in this case was necesary to show the station interior and Buildings in the same time. The may problem here is the image noise, however, poor quality is not a raison to delete --The Photographer 23:40, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Per The Photographer. | Prismo (talk. | contr.) 22:09, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Then I want you to answer the same question that I pose for every out-of-scope image: What do you see this image actually being used for, now or in the future? Educational value may be subjective, but unless you can come up with a plausible case where this image would actually be a useful illustration on a Wikimedia project, then it's fundamentally not in project scope. As for the colors: true color and B&W are both reasonable color schemes for an image; the artificially desaturated colors on this are not. Commons is not a repository for every single free image from flickr; it is a curated archive of useful images. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 05:40, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Who define what is useful and what is not useful is the common sense and what is interesting and with hight EV can be diferrent from someone who come from a different culture. My recommendation is that you can't use your personal opinion how argument to delete a image. And yes it's true, commons is not a repository for every single free image from flicker, however, also is true that every image in commons is not meant to be on Wikipedia because it's for free use on any Wikimedia Project or out from WM. As for the colors, also is true that true color and B&W are both reasonable colors schemes for an image in commons, however, there are a endless range of accepted schemes because there is no such thing as real color, in the photographic development the color change because the camera internal algorithm to interpreter the colors is different from a Camera and another, and in the same way each person interprets their reality in their own way, because the ability to see the different and the difference in brightness of each area on the earth planet. For example, good look nominating to deletion (or simply deleting) every image on Category:HDR_images --The Photographer 14:39, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Per COM:SCOPE, "A media file which is neither: realistically useful for an educational purpose, nor legitimately in use as discussed above falls outside the scope of Wikimedia Commons." If you, as the uploader, cannot provide a single example of a plausible educational use, then it's not just my personal opinion that the image is out of scope. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:11, 10 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: We generally interpret "educational use" fairly broadly. While this may be unsuitable for Wikipedia, one could reasonably foresee someone using it for writing about NYC subways. Commons is a collection of such valuable images in its own right and is not merely subservient to other WMF projects. --Guanaco (talk) 18:08, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Newspaper ads are typically by a third party, Is the uploader claiming they made this back in 1962? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:46, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: I think this should be {{PD-US-no notice}}. See COM:CSM#Advertisements. --bjh21 (talk) 00:06, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: license changed to PD-US-no notice. --Guanaco (talk) 18:13, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) Getty Images (http://www.gettyimages.co.uk/license/186175824) Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:36, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This image can't be free since Getty Image are still selling it ! Patrick Rogel (talk) 12:41, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Getty (and others) sell all kind of images, even if they can't possibly hold copyrights for them. Try searching their antiques. Materialscientist (talk) 22:24, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know if it's true but the licence of this image (http://www.gettyimages.co.uk/eula#RM) clearly forbids commercial use or alteration of the picture, meaning incompatible with a CC license. Furthermore the tag PD-Italy apply only to "simple photographs" (Art. 2, § 7) and not "works of photographic art", which are protected for 70 years after the author's death. Yours, Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:40, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Getty copyrights ALL images their host, even when they can't possibly hold the copyright (same is with other major image databases). As to 70 years, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Walter Bonatti 1964.jpg. Materialscientist (talk) 01:09, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Once again, I don't know if what you're saying is true. Perhaps you should discuss directly with Getty about what it seems to be a copyright dispute about the Mondadori catalog. Concerning File:Dalida 1961.jpg, since it's a picture from a photo session, since it has involved lightning, make-up and hair-dressing and the model posing for the photographer, it's not a "simple photograph" but truly a "work of photographic art" and PD-Italy could not apply. Patrick Rogel (talk) 14:40, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep. Nothing on the cited Getty page indicates Getty claims copyright on the image; and even if it did, making a claim of ownership is not the same thing as actual ownership.
The terms of the Getty license and the purported non-commercial restriction is immaterial. Because the photo is not subject to copyright, the license is inapplicable. TJRC (talk) 22:52, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
User:DalidaFan I want the photo to be deleted because of Dalida's aestethical look at first place. I am very well introduced with her career and I am part of her offical fanclub that is working since 1958. Second, photo on Getty Page has watermark that someone photoshopped(erased), and that is illegal! The proof that someone did not buy this photo ia because that Getty sells this photo woth quality 2000px +, and this is photo able to download with qual of less than 1500px.
 Keep It's worth noting the role Getty Images plays for its clients (my employer is one). When companies want to use third party images, they usually don't have the time or resources to hunt down accurate license information, so stock image houses like Getty act as clearinghouses, and treat every image as under copyright. Businesses would rather pay Getty Images a licensing fee, even if the image is in public domain, than to expose themselves to potential legal action, so they're essentially paying places like Getty Images for legal cover. But Commons has a relatively rigorous process of checking copyright and we know that this photo is out of copyright because it was originally published in Italy. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:58, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Getty does not claim copyright for images which are in the public domain, even though they still host any such works. As a Getty/iStock photographer myself, I know that they do not claim ownership or copyright, but rather charges a "finders fee" or a fee for providing customers with a copy, as well as legal support in case of legal issues with using their images (but only if you follow their terms when using the image; their terms do not apply to the image itself, only for their services). This image is in the public domain since it was first published in Italy and has fallen out of copyright. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 16:19, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No reason to believe this photo is a work of the US Government. -mattbuck (Talk) 08:31, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Info I see that there are confusing rules for these photographs. We can normally presume that on a U.S. gov website all photographs are public domain unless indicated otherwise, which is read as being stated next to the photo. Digging through an FAQ is not sensible, and it's no surprise that reusers get confused. -- (talk) 11:38, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. The man was for many years in list of ten most wanted fugitives. Thinking logically, if FBI is able to take the photo, then he is not most wanted fugitive anymore. Taivo (talk) 07:58, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Themightyquill (talk) 08:42, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 09:02, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

--Akwhitacre (talk) 20:34, 4 November 2017 (UTC) I'll be honest, I just read the the OTRS process, and it's difficult/time consuming enough that I'm not going to bother, even though I did have permission to use/share this logo at the time I uploaded it, since I was the copyright contact for the Center.[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Themightyquill (talk) 08:43, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If this dates to 1929, it's not own work. More information is needed, particularly name and dates of the artist. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:21, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The paint watercolor has been made in 1929 by Filippo de Pisis. It is a typical and significant pictorial work by De Pisis. Authentic work certified by Renato Cardazzo dated 1992. I have no conflict of interest to declare. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lollibus76 (talk • contribs)

Very paradigmatic and illustrative watercolor by de Pisis.


Bellissimo ritratto eseguito da de Pisis nel suo periodo Parigino

Beautiful watercolr by Filippo de Pisis!

Filippo de Pisis died in 1956, so his artwork is not yet in the public domain. Ownership of the work does not confer ownership of the copyright. Delete, to be undeleted in January 2027. - Themightyquill (talk) 08:54, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Themightyquill (talk) 08:56, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably under licence. OTRS necessary. [[Utilisateur:Daehan|Daehan]] <sup>&#91;[[Discussion Utilisateur:Daehan|p&#124;d&#124;d]]&#93;</sup> (talk) 22:20, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Themightyquill (talk) 09:00, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file should not remain in Commons because it has too many mistakes and the uploader have not made any effort to address this. Furthermore there is now a vector replacement (File:Coat of arms of New Zealand (1911–1956).svg) and the image is no longer in use.

  • Quoting the Talk page, @Grutness: “This coat of arms is incorrect - New Zealand's coat of arms never looked like that in the image. These are several of the mistakes in it: The supporters were always depicted facing forward, never to the side. The female supporter (Zealandia) was always depicted with a bun of dark reddish-brown hair. Her gown was shown with long sleeves and a rounded collar, never with a tunic top The torse under the demi-lion is always in New Zealand's national colours of black and white, never red and white The country's motto, as shown on the scroll, was "Onward", not "Forward" See the small image at File:New_Zealand_Coat_of_Arms_old.gif for a more accurate (but much smaller) representation.”

Sodacan (talk) 01:05, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Given the existence of a more accurate SVG file (File:Coat of arms of New Zealand (1911–1956).svg) I don't see any reason to keep this. - Themightyquill (talk) 08:41, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and Themightyquill. Green Giant (talk) 07:29, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I was the creator and uploader; I found now this (unused) flag as phoney, I have uploaded a more sensible U.S. communist fictional flag:

--Carnby (talk) 11:46, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Both are hypothetical flags. I don't see how either can me more accurate or phoney. - Themightyquill (talk) 08:45, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Themightyquill. The differences can be noted in the file summary. Green Giant (talk) 10:30, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This ca. 1935-1944 1930 German photo is claimed to be in the PD with the Anonymous-EU tag. But that tag isn't applicable to German works, since German law says that pre-1995 anonymous works are only really anonymous if the author (here: the photographer) was never publicly disclosed anywhere, not even in a lecture or similar. One cannot prove that, so pre-1995 "anonymous" works from Germany are not suitable for Commons (or de.wp). 1935-1944 1930 is also not old enough to assume that the photograph must be in the PD anyway, since the photographer easily could have lived beyond 1946. So the file should be deleted per the precautionary principle. Rosenzweig τ 12:33, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Update: The source the image was taken from says it's from ca. 1935 to 1944. --Rosenzweig τ 12:36, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 10:20, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Це мій власний доданий файл моя фотографія, на даний час потребую повного вилучення моїх фотографій з мережі інтернет і даного файлу також. TarasKoval (talk) 14:35, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Author request. Green Giant (talk) 10:33, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Taken from Akerneset (2008)" says this was copied from a published source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:55, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No, it means it was photographed from the place Åkerneset in 2008. --Ranveig (talk) 08:21, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Ranveig. Green Giant (talk) 10:45, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pour une modification GuineaMall (talk) 16:33, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion; @GuineaMall: vous pouvez télécharger une nouvelle version sur cette image, sans besoin de l'effacer. Ruthven (msg) 08:31, 7 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

J'ai modifié mon logo GuineaMall (talk) 17:06, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that you changed it doesn't matter. I've added it to Category:Old logos. However, neither this nor your new logo (File:G-Mall.jpg) is being used by any wikipedia article. I wonder if they should be deleted as out of scope. - Themightyquill (talk) 08:49, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
At this point I tend to agree:  Delete because Out of scope for both. --Ruthven (msg) 12:43, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of project scope. Green Giant (talk) 10:48, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of free license at the original source: http://www.jasonlisle.com/about-lisle/ . The creationwiki site claims fair use, not Public Domain, and some random person named Ashcraft is not the author of this photo. Animalparty (talk) 22:38, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It did say it's a publicity photo. He may not be the author, but he is the (at least alleged) copyright holder. If this photo violates any copyright, that's on the shoulders of user Ashcraft.Oldstone James (talk) 22:44, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
And I'm the Queen of England, because it now says so on the Internet. People upload media with wrong licences all the time, and/or falsely claim ownership. This is likely a case of License laundering. We need better evidence that the true photo creator actually published this image with a compatible license. Fair-use files cannot be hosted on Commons, and non-free files must be removed. Animalparty (talk) 23:25, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Commons does not host fair use files. You might be able to upload the file to Wikipedia if it meets the non-free content criteria. Green Giant (talk) 11:04, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Koska en pidä tästä kuvasta. Tulikukka12 (talk) 13:37, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. If you don’t like the photo, perhaps don’t look at it?. Green Giant (talk) 12:20, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found larger version of this image with a watermark at https://www.google.com/imgres?imgurl=https://cdn0.mariages.net/emp/fotos/3/0/1/9/1_3_143019.jpg&imgrefurl=https://www.mariages.net/traiteur-mariage/karleskind--e143019/fotos/0&h=540&w=540&tbnid=S0Pb_Rk0c1371M&tbnh=225&tbnw=225&usg=__pdUIBW0ZfbBnZWplMHHZvepK92U=&docid=kHn5HfgaG-2LkM&itg=1 Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:24, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete unless author clarifies source. Indeed, the external version of the photo is cropped but has a larger effective resolution, so there's probably an unknown uncropped full resolution common source for the two. — Preceding unsigned comment added by B jonas (talk • contribs) 11:42, 15 December 2017‎ (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and B jonas. Green Giant (talk) 12:16, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What is copyrights status of currency of Venezuela? Will be good idea to expand Commons:Currency. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unclear copyright status. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:48, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

texte sous droit d'auteur X-Javier (talk) 15:25, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:48, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:00, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not less in scope than the other images in Category:Million Hoodies Rally. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:50, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:00, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not less in scope than the other images in Category:Million Hoodies Rally. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:50, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:00, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not less in scope than the other images in Category:Million Hoodies Rally. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:50, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Despite being Flickr reviewed and approved, these images contain either photographs of full documents, and/or photographs of other photographs, and as such are Derivative Works which cannot be held by Commons. Other images in this category may also need additional review.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:04, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I am the author of File:Berkeley Free Speech Week protest 20170924-8639.jpg and File:Berkeley Free Speech Week protest 20170924-8781.jpg. You can check the metadata and my user profile (which contains my real name and link to my web site) for verification. I upload all of my photos to Flickr and then upload a portion of them to Commons as well. Funcrunch (talk) 16:06, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Re-reading the message I see that the problem is not authorship but a photo contained within a photo. For File:Berkeley Free Speech Week protest 20170924-8781.jpg surely the photo on a sign someone is holding is small enough in size that this should not be grounds for removal? Funcrunch (talk) 16:09, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete These all contain significant text or photographs or both. The de minimis test requires that an average observer would not notice if the copyrighted works were removed from the image. The only thing in the first three is a solid page of text. Claiming that that does not have a copyright is just silly. Even a single sentence can have a copyright if it is creative. The whole point of the remaining images is the posters being carried by the crowd. If you blanked the posters, the images would be meaningless. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:32, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The whole point of each of these images is the copyrighted posters

I'm trying to assume good faith but I do question the timing of this request coinciding with the start of Refuse Fascism's largest protests to date. I am not formally affiliated with that group, but I did take photos at their November 4 protest in San Francisco, and the outcome of this discussion may affect which of my protest images I contribute to Commons going forward. Funcrunch (talk) 14:34, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Timing of the nomination had to do with opening a page and finding images to look at. I noticed the large amount of type on the ones (three copies same one), and looked at gallery of Category after that. If you'd like to make a conspiracy out of everything, please be my guest, but in reality there was none. I never heard of your group before the other day, and had no knowledge of them at all but what you write here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:16, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Refuse Fascism is not "my group"; as I clearly stated, I have no formal affiliation with them, I have simply photographed rallies that they've participated in just as I have photographed dozens of other rallies. I hardly implied that there was any sort of "conspiracy" to suppress these photos; the timing of the request simply seemed questionable given the date and the fact that all three of the photos currently on their Wikipedia page (only one of which I took FWIW) are included in this deletion request. Funcrunch (talk) 02:00, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - kept 2 images borderline De minimis IMO. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:03, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:50, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 14:06, 17 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, no source to know if this is anything real. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:07, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Looks identical to File:Flag_of_Democratic_Progressive_Party.jpg which is used on two wikipedia articles. I'm not sure I see the point in keeping a png and a jpg though. - Themightyquill (talk) 08:52, 14 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jusjih (talk) 00:54, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The location of this image seems to be permanently unidentifiable. That takes away any likely educational value of the image, and makes it out of scope. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:55, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have never seen a file being deleted for such a reason. Anyway, if there is a rule for that, I support the deletion. Vcohen (talk) 11:48, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I am sorry, but it doesn't seem so hopeless. It's one of the IND Eighth Avenue Line or IRT Eastern Parkway Line stations. For somebody living in NYC it would not take more than half a day to find the exact point. Vcohen (talk) 18:55, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
See COM:EDUSE: files "must be realistically useful for an educational purpose." I don't see how this file is likely to have a viable educational or historical use. Even if it could be identified to a specific station, what does it usefully illustrate? Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:29, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It illustrates an express track at a local station. Yes, there are files that do it better, but as far as I know files are usually kept if they are not duplicates of other files. OK, if there is a rule for such cases, I support the deletion. Vcohen (talk) 21:17, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. The file remains uncategorised and died not show the tracks. Educational use is dependent on someone actually visiting a number of stations . Not very likely to happen soon. Green Giant (talk) 22:19, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The equivalent media at English Wikipedia was non-free w:File:Seal of the President of South Africa.png , however It was my understanding certain South African govt works were under OGL like provisions, does that include insignia and seals? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 08:11, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Most government creations are copyrighted for fifty years. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:46, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lower-resolution duplicate of File:Iraq and Afghanistan Memorial unveiling - 01.png Ham II (talk) 09:00, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:47, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photograph is marked at source as "Crown Copyright". The OGL applies at gov.uk unless specified otherwise. (talk) 10:08, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it looks like you're right. While the article at https://www.gov.uk/government/news/iraq-and-afghanistan-memorial-unveiled-in-london is released under OGL, the photos are Crown Copyright and as such cannot be hosted at the Commons while that copyright is in force. Apologies, as the uploader I am normally pretty diligent about checking such things but clearly got it wrong here. Greenshed (talk) 14:18, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I've added a  Delete there too based on my long term experience with uploading official MOD photographs. -- (talk) 18:17, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:47, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source for this file. It could have come from en: wiki as there is a talk page there with the same filename, but the image was deleted. en:Image talk:I1a_europe.jpg -- Deadstar (msg) 14:24, 2 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Kept Jcb (talk) 11:00, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Map has no reference source, also some of the claim it makes do no correlate to historical facts, as with the high concentration of the I1a in Poland on the Baltic cost (most of the Poles living there today were expelled form the east after WWII, in turn the German inhabitants were expelled further west into Germany by the Communists). E-960 (talk) 13:30, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use, so it cannot be deleted except for copyvio. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:50, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious claim of own work on this illustration, appears to be copied from somewhere else. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:01, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The user assures me he has made the picture himself. He's a competent contributor on Nynorsk Wikipedia. --Ranveig (talk) 08:24, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: If he made it himself, it is out of scope as personal art from a non-notable artist. If he copied from elsewhere, it is a copyvio unless proven otherwise. Either way, we can't keep it. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:52, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by The Big Bad Wolfowitz as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Obvious copyvio. Recording a speech by another person does not give the person recording it any copyright or other authority to license it.

very inappropriate for speedy deletion. The "speech" isn't actually complicated enough to get copyright protection. The audio technician does get copyright Vera (talk) 17:57, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm sorry, but you're absolutely, dead wrong here. (And I don't think you should have removed a speedy from a file you uploaded ypurself, but that's a different issue.) The file is audio of the article subject reading or reciting a paragraph of text he had composed. It it were text taken from his website, there'd be no question that it couldn't be incorporated verbatim into the article. "Complicated" is not really a copyright criterion in this context' the banality or generality of text does not render it public domain. If the subject were reciting the alphabet, or counting to 30, it wouldn't be copyrightable -- but that's due to lack of originality, not for simplicity. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 02:39, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The one being dead wrong is you. Quotes of this length are regularly included in Wikipedia articles. Works have to meet a level of complexity to get copyright protection, see Commons:Threshold of originality. "my name is [name], I'm a [profession] at [employer] and [other job]. I've written books [list a couple of book]" is a format of introducing oneself you will find all throughout history. --Vera (talk) 13:14, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The page you refer to deals predominantly with images, not to prose. There's no doubt that the speech as a whole is subject to copyright; slicing out a piece of it and saying "I don't think this paragraph is particularly original" doesn't make the text public domain. The "threshold of originality" page is based on many court decisions, and not even one of those deals with text. Quotes of this length are regularly included in many wikipedia articles -- but as "fair use" materials, not as free/PD text. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 11:06, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
yeah, it's a mystery why a guidance on policy page in a media database that's 95% consisting of pictures mostly deals with pictures. Read the actual text for the #Netherlands. Threshold of originality is fairly high here. Vera (talk) 13:18, 9 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyrighted words. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:55, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:30, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Keep That doesn't sound like enough reason to delete. I often downsize my photos before publication if they don't have enough image quality to worth keeping the full resolution, and it's easy to lose the EXIF data when doing that. I don't much care about the EXIF data, especially for mobile phone photos. This happens more often for vacation pictures that I share with family than with educational pictures on Commons, because I typically just don't upload the bad quality photos to Commons, but when the photo is hard to replace, I still do this on Commons too, eg. File:Vác emléktabla Lipovniczky László.jpg and File:Wikimeetup 2013-07-13 Budapest cake F 0.png. I believe this is original photo by uploader. – b_jonas 11:59, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: We virtually always assume theat small images lacking EXIF are not "own work" unless the uploader can convince us otherwise. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:58, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo is not necessarily own work, TOO concern with logo element right. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 20:50, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:59, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Com:Redundant. Unused map: Volga-Urals military district doesn't exists since December 2010. There is more high-quality SVG version. -- 109.238.80.47 23:22, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:00, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Com:Redundant. Unused map: North Caucasus military district doesn't exists since December 2010. There is more high-quality SVG version. -- 109.238.80.47 23:25, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:00, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 14:12, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Autoren benannt.--ΣΙΓΜΑ (talk) 18:58, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
When did these people die? Jcb (talk) 23:01, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Das Fotostudio gab es von 1886 bis 1921. Julius C. Klinkhardt † 1889, Friedrich Eyssen ? Siehe auch hier: hier --ΣΙΓΜΑ (talk) 17:39, 5 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Since the authors are known, in order to keep this, we must know their date of death. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:55, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This 1965 photo was taken by French photographer Dominique Berretty, who died in 1980 (see [10] and [11]). France is pma+70, as such, it will not be in the public domain in its country of origin until 2051. As a professional photojournalist who worked with TIME-Life from 1958 to 1968 (see [12]), it is also unlikely that this photo was published without a copyright notice, as such its US copyright will not expire until 1965+95+1 = 2061. —RP88 (talk) 17:42, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:03, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dutch general elections 2017 coalition negotiations

[edit]

Several images have been uploaded by @User:1Veertje in this category from the website of the Dutch "House of Commons" (Tweede Kamer). On this website it is stated that: The House of Commons of the Netherlands makes these photographs available for publication. The subject is the making of the new government. The pictures can be used freely and can be reused. Please add as the source 'Tweede Kamer van de Staten-Generaal' (translation by Ellywa).

I personally think this is not in accordance with the Template:Attribution which is added to the images, because the text on the website does not say derivative works may be made.

More comments on this issue: Commons:Village_pump/Copyright/Archive/2017/11#Can_we_use_images_which_are_.22free_of_rights.22.3F.

Elly (talk) 20:01, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: all but one per nomination. - Kept the one mentioned above. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:04, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why are the videos in this category deleted? File:Presentatie regeerakkoord 2017.webm and File:Informateur Zalm biedt eindverslag aan.webm had a valid license as they were from https://www.kabinetsformatie2017.nl/copyright that allowed the re-use of videos. please re-add them. I don't understand that those files are not deleted case by case. --Hannolans (talk) 23:57, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have restored the two mentioned above as they are CC-0. It would have been better if you had pointed this out before the deletion -- after all, this DR has been open for seven weeks. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:06, 23 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I was unaware as this discussion was about the photogaphs of the Dutch parliament and that there was contact with them about licensing. --Hannolans (talk) 19:53, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]