Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/10/01

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive October 1st, 2017
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE Linda Evans (talk) 04:48, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: apparent copyvio. --Guanaco (talk) 04:51, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

another same uploaded Pastratopi (talk) 16:53, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ronhjones at 22:04, 29 September 2017 UTC: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing: Non-free logo (above threshold of originality) --Krdbot 00:32, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It was deleted the day before yesterday and re-appeared yesterday. 176.239.82.15 06:26, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 06:29, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio from http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/lakme-fashion-week-2017-preity-zinta-day-3-princess-white-beautiful-falguni-shane-peacock-lifest/1/1029348.html Dodger67 (talk) 08:50, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 08:51, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Henry Douglas Leasure (talk · contribs)

[edit]

personal images - out of project scope

Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:27, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 14:30, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is my picture and I need it to be deleted Henry Douglas Leasure (talk) 14:27, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 14:30, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is my file and I need it to be deleted. Henry Douglas Leasure (talk) 14:29, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 14:30, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Animalparty as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: File is copyright Valerie Parker, not uploader Jacobmcpherson: not under a free license. https://www.flickr.com/photos/klingmann/4818782795/in/album-72157624559732812/. Checking at English Wikipedia to see if there's evidence this was ever available under a free license Guanaco (talk) 11:16, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per Hut 8.5. --Guanaco (talk) 21:04, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

High likelyhood of a copyright violation. First published at http://www.panoramio.com/photo/52537879 , with no evidence of ever having a free license and no trace of permission from Alexander Prolygin. Unless @Pavlo1: or @Antanana: (who edited the description of this file in ukwiki) know something more, it should be deleted due to lack of permission — NickK (talk) 22:41, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyvio. --Anatoliy (talk) 22:43, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No valid permission after 30 days of the first response by an OTRS volunteer. B dash (talk) 02:31, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nomination. Guanaco (talk) 03:11, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Taiwania Justo is handling but he has delayed. I am waiting his response too.Andrew Yuen Man Kit (talk) 03:14, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Passed, the reason of deletion is not exist. This is Taiwania Justo speaking (Reception Room) 00:57, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: OTRS permission accepted. --Guanaco (talk) 01:46, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio. Small photo with no metadata. Wikicology (talk) 09:18, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: showed right up on Gooogle Images. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:37, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small photo with no EXIF metadata, possibly a copyvio. Wikicology (talk) 11:53, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Showed up on Google Images as a Getty Photo. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:37, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is copyrighted song cover (see iTunes). I doubt it is work by User:ArcherJ6. Hddty. (talk) 02:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:34, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

My mistake Sturm (talk) 22:56, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Author's req, should have been a gallery. --Achim (talk) 18:04, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Kept - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 22:20, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

كاتب.محمونبيل. 129.45.51.55 21:24, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. Can you explain (in English or in French please) the reasons to ask for the deletion of this page (which I strongly object to).
Thanks
Anthere (talk) 22:19, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Does anyone see an objection if I remove the deletion notice that the anon user put on that project page ? Anthere (talk) 22:21, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No serious deletion request. I don't see an objection, please remove it, you have my 'blessing' :-). - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 22:56, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of a jewellery shop owned by Rajesh Ram 176.239.75.224 15:57, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: duplicate of File:Poovarasi Fashion Gems and Jewels.png. --Guanaco (talk) 00:03, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Twitter and pinterest 176.239.75.224 16:10, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 02:24, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Instagrid.me 176.239.75.224 16:33, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 02:23, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Speedy deleted and speedy restored. But what about the various Microsoft icons? Microsoft switched to GPL recently? Jcb (talk) 21:14, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I see your point. What about blurring the portion of the screenshot where is MS operating system? Dcavedon (talk) 11:57, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That could indeed resolve this case. Jcb (talk) 14:36, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep current version removal of non-libre/non-free element(s) of Windows 8.1, and  delete old revision.  HarvettFox  96   10:38, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Jcb (talk) 14:30, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: new version without non-free elements. --Jcb (talk) 14:30, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata suggests Facebook or a similar source Guanaco (talk) 09:05, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio at 21:07, 3 Oktober 2017 UTC: Copyright violation: a facebook page at https://www.facebook.com/SanjeetShresthaDaPro/photos/a.197455387061921.44244.197295247077935/784858914988229/?type=3&theater --Krdbot 00:30, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT Linda Evans (talk) 04:59, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by D-Kuru: outside of project scope

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused picture out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 17:23, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by D-Kuru: out of project scope

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Adds nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject. Redundant. DavidIvar (talk) 03:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - every day new penisses :-) - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 23:08, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted by D-Kuru: there are already high resoluted dicks in the database - no need for this low resoluted one

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Randykitty (talk) 11:38, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by D-Kuru: out of project scope

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image - out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:25, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 02:42, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal images - out of project scope

Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:26, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 02:43, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ibrahim kouadri (talk · contribs)

[edit]

personal images - out of project scope

Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:27, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 02:43, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Викиенот (talk) 01:50, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 02:47, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obsolete; uploaded under a superior format as File:DoDEA Logo.png. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:11, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proceed to delete; as uploader of both this and the superior image, I request this one be deleted. No need to draw it out, the other one is better. DaneGeld (talk) 08:30, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 02:49, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is John Madsen. Copyright probably does not belong to uploader, who scanned the paper.

Australian works are copyrighted for 70 years after the death of the author. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:18, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 02:51, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Don Syno (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:29, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 02:52, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Golda Greenstein (talk) 03:19, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 02:55, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own works by Panoramio user BhalalaG26 (photos · view on map)(weblinks): small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, mysteriously watermarked, found elsewhere on the web, also derived from elsewhere published content like File:- panoramio (818).jpg + File:Bhalala b.r.vadi - panoramio.jpg or scanned from photos with unknown copyright status.

The rest mostly grabbed from Panoramio like File:- panoramio - BhalalaG26 (8).jpg (2011) = http://www.panoramio.com/photo/9250362 (2008, © All Rights Reserved by rdbansiya) + File:- panoramio - BhalalaG26 (5).jpg (2011) = http://www.panoramio.com/photo/18430443 (2009, © All Rights Reserved by Bonrix Software Syst… ) + File:- panoramio - BhalalaG26 (9).jpg (2011) = http://www.panoramio.com/photo/18462087 (2009, © All Rights Reserved by Arijit Banik) + File:- panoramio - BhalalaG26 (7).jpg (2011) = grabbed from http://www.panoramio.com/photo/18577902 (2009, © All Rights Reserved by Harshal Purohit) or other sites like File:- panoramio - BhalalaG26.jpg (2011) = (watermark removed) grabbed from http://www.team-bhp.com/forum/travelogues/55814-el-do-rado-patan-wowed-booty-2.html#post1693724 (2010, by "ramkya1") = http://www.team-bhp.com/forum/attachments/travelogues/270591d1264070058t-el-do-rado-patan-wowed-booty-dsc00082.jpg or File:- panoramio - BhalalaG26 (1).jpg (2011) = (watermark removed) grabbed from http://www.team-bhp.com/forum/travelogues/55814-el-do-rado-patan-wowed-booty.html#post1234768 (2009) = http://www.team-bhp.com/forum/attachments/travelogues/116860d1238234715-el-do-rado-patan-wowed-booty-9-mod.jpg.

Gunnex (talk) 13:29, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 03:06, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dflis (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of scope. Images unrealistically useful for educational purpose.

Wikicology (talk) 09:14, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:11, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not notable topic, deleted by me on it.wiki. Melquíades (msg) 09:26, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:11, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OoS personal pic. Also File:B5bdiM4CIAALH9b.jpg E4024 (talk) 10:33, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleting all OOS images by user. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:13, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a deleted file. Rahul Bott (talk) 11:16, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:16, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: Can't be undeleted, see phab:T200121. Yann (talk) 10:00, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Wikimedia Commons is not a personal photo album. Wikicology (talk) 11:43, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:16, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

logo under copyright. Ionutzmovie (talk) 07:44, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete: too complex for {{PD-textlogo}}. — Cheers, JackLee talk 08:34, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per nom and Jacklee. This is the copyrighted logo of A.C. Milan, best represented on a Wikimedia project by fair use file w:File:AC Milan.svg.   — Jeff G. ツ 23:14, 24 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
How old is it? --PaterMcFly (talk) 09:47, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
I tried to find that information, but failed. Assistance from someone who reads the Italian language would be helpful.   — Jeff G. ツ 15:27, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Did you want someone who knows italian? Here I am ;) Obvious copyright violations, logo is copyrighted: here registration data at WIPO (n° 515896, as also reported in ) and here registration data at Ufficio italiano brevetti e marchi (UIBM) (n° 0000654039 - domada MI1992C007801). Another registration can also be found at w:OAMI (http://oami.europa.eu/CTMOnline/RequestManager/it_SearchBasic?language=en) with number 008456618. --Simo82 (talk) 16:06, 25 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
If I understand correctly, these are trademark registrations. No one is arguing that the image is not under trademark, but this has absolutelly nothing to do with copyright (and is therefore irrelevant for this decission). It's just the age that matters. --PaterMcFly (talk) 10:42, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Here there is the legal notices on AC Milan official website, in particular number 2 and 3 (but only in italian, transltion with google is good, missing "is forbidden" - è vietato - in the last sentence). This logo was first used in 1986, before there was another one (it can be seen here). I still think that this image should be deleted. --Simo82 (talk) 11:33, 26 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 12:44, 31 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. The snake is not simple. Taivo (talk) 12:06, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:17, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio. Sculptor Lucien Brasseur is dead in 1960 and no FOP in France. Jvillafruela (talk) 12:28, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Already deleted. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:17, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is an uncropped version by Peter Baldwin on Panoramio, taken in 2004 and uploaded in 2007. All rights reserved. The Commons version was uploaded in 2009 with the meaningless source "photographic software", by an uploader claiming copyright and attributing to another name. -- Asclepias (talk) 14:12, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:19, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work by the uploader, and seems to be out of scope as well. Stefan2 (talk) 14:18, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:19, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ALsmzYHe79 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep,it used for now...,118.170.195.129 00:37, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: One image used, but not essential to the article it's used in. Based on the style of these photos, it's not clear that the subjects gave consent to be photographed. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:21, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wutzu9 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from non-trivial logo.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:22, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:22, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ganesh Engineering Works (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of company of questionable notability. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:22, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:23, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:23, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:23, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like www.businessnewsdaily.com/images/i/000/013/459/original/tommys-superfoods.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:04, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:24, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image - out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:05, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:24, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

for promotional purposes, not in use anymore Achim (talk) 15:05, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:24, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

part of elon musk 29 sept. presentation, not Mwhelher's work Marc Lacoste (talk) 16:18, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:24, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

part of elon musk 29 sept. presentation, not Mwhelher's work Marc Lacoste (talk) 16:18, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:24, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From Times of India internet page 176.239.75.224 16:19, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:25, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal picture, out of scope. Jcb (talk) 16:34, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Seems to be notable on fr.wiki, thus in scope. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:26, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 16:38, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:29, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Jcb (talk) 16:39, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not out of scope - could be plausibly used to illustrate an article on manufacturing processes. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:28, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 17:27, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:30, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

JPG version of a logo that already has its SVG version uploaded Asierog (talk) 17:44, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:30, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad JPG version of a logo that already has its SVG version uploaded Asierog (talk) 17:44, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:30, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 17:57, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:30, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inappropriate file name; likely copyvio based on lack of EXIF and small size Guanaco (talk) 00:00, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Admin, I don't know anything about EXIF things. (Once I cooked a soup, ate it. The next day I uploaded the pic of the bowl here but somehow that exif thing got lost. One of your colleagues added a template no source whatsoever. I don't know. We kept it at the end.) I mean those things may get lost. This is a nice picture. I would like it to stay here. I have a couple of observations though. Of course the name is not nice. Could be witty but it is not. I changed the meaningless info sentence to "Three beautiful girls". We could do the same with the title if we can keep the file. (Of course you know better than me that we cannot delete files because they have stupid names.) The cat "Adolescent girls" do not look very adequate to me, either. The one at the back, and with some imaginative thinking the one to our left could be considered so; but the other one looks quite overdeveloped for that cat. (She looks like saying "hey you guys, no big boobs cat in your pages?" :) In short, this is a nice pic that could be used in articles about girls, young women, face painting, jokes, etc. I leave the EXIF thingy to the experts.  Keep --E4024 (talk) 08:51, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Out of scope and questionable copyright. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:37, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too complex to qualify for PD-simple Jon Kolbert (talk) 01:40, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:37, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too small to be much use; doubtful whether the uploader actually took the photo themselves. JesseW (talk) 02:24, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:38, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pretty, but I can't really see it having any educational purpose. JesseW (talk) 02:38, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per nom. Without any details, this photo isn't useful to us. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:38, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vision Continental (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Files previously published elsewhere without a free license, e.g., [1] and [2]. The licenses should be verified using OTRS.

--ghouston (talk) 02:57, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:39, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Golda Greenstein (talk) 03:20, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:39, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Svc-800 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Golda Greenstein (talk) 03:32, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:39, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jamie lola (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Golda Greenstein (talk) 03:33, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:39, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Golda Greenstein (talk) 03:35, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:39, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Golda Greenstein (talk) 03:36, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:39, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Golda Greenstein (talk) 03:37, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:40, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very bad quality, useless for Wiki Екатерина Борисова (talk) 03:39, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Poor quality, but not useless, and it currently appears to be our only image of this site. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:41, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GNS1999 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Golda Greenstein (talk) 03:39, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:40, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zilcko1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Poor quality (e.g., File:Zk.jpg, File:ZiloTché.jpg), low resolution, and unused images. Appear to be related to non-notable group Zilcko, which is also uploader name. Commons is not for promotion or a personal web host. Images also appear elsewhere on the web (see uploader talk/deleted contribs, for example) and would thus need an OTRS ticket.

Эlcobbola talk 17:00, 21 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:22, 28 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zilcko1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Golda Greenstein (talk) 03:41, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:41, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Emreagin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Golda Greenstein (talk) 03:43, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:41, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Golda Greenstein (talk) 03:44, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:42, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Flou band (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal/promo images

Golda Greenstein (talk) 03:46, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:42, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Trykwood (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Golda Greenstein (talk) 03:48, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:42, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Golda Greenstein (talk) 03:48, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:42, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marius Şuiu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Golda Greenstein (talk) 03:51, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:43, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Golda Greenstein (talk) 03:52, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:43, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal/promo images

Golda Greenstein (talk) 03:54, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:43, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Golda Greenstein (talk) 03:55, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:44, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Golda Greenstein (talk) 04:05, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:44, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Golda Greenstein (talk) 04:05, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:44, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AMBCo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Golda Greenstein (talk) 04:07, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:44, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by عبده السالك (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Golda Greenstein (talk) 04:07, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:43, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF, probably copyvio Guanaco (talk) 04:42, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:44, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

When I belonged to this school, I copied the picture from http://town.yukarigaoka.jp/townguide/12 I'm very sorry. Nekoraji (talk) 05:11, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:44, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - small with no EXIF - professional portrait Linda Evans (talk) 05:39, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 09:44, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 18:09, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by D-Kuru: out of scope, probably copyvio of some sort of magazine

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Luca.trancer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal image

Golda Greenstein (talk) 03:38, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:28, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT Linda Evans (talk) 05:00, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:28, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT Linda Evans (talk) 05:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:29, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT Linda Evans (talk) 05:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:29, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT Linda Evans (talk) 05:02, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:30, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 09:31, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:25, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 09:32, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:31, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 09:32, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:27, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo. Out of scope. Hindust@niक्या करें? बातें! 09:33, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:31, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Randykitty (talk) 12:00, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:32, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:32, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wekiman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:33, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:34, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image - out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:09, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not notable topic, deleted by me on it.wiki. Melquíades (msg) 16:42, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not notable topic, deleted by me on it.wiki. Melquíades (msg) 16:43, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:51, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:36, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 18:15, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:37, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 18:16, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:37, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 18:22, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:37, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 18:23, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - Out of scope and that is a nice way to tell it like it is :-) . - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 23:05, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:38, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 18:24, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - Out of scope indeed, just like the other files nominated by user Welcome to Pennsylvania.. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 23:06, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:38, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 18:24, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:38, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico (talk) 02:17, 4 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:40, 11 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 18:25, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:38, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 18:27, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:38, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jmpatel95 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per COM:NOTHOST -> personal images which are unlikely to be used in a project.

Takeaway (talk) 18:32, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:39, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 18:35, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:40, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 18:37, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:40, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 18:38, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:40, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not within scope, unused personal photo Rosario Berganza 07:32, 28 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 00:57, 5 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope - unused personal image Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 18:42, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:41, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 18:42, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:42, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 18:43, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:43, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 18:44, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:43, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 18:45, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:43, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 18:48, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:44, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 18:50, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:44, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 18:51, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:45, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 18:52, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:46, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 18:53, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:46, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 18:58, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:45, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 18:59, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:45, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Welcome to Pennsylvania (talk) 19:00, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:45, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image - out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:31, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:48, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Batees (talk · contribs)

[edit]

personal images - out of project scope

Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:34, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:48, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not notable topic, deleted by me on it.wiki (and probably copyviol, because it's a logo without permissions). Melquíades (msg) 16:43, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:56, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not notable topic, deleted by me on it.wiki. Melquíades (msg) 16:44, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:56, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not notable topic, deleted by me on it.wiki. Melquíades (msg) 16:44, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:56, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not notable topic, deleted by me on it.wiki. Melquíades (msg) 16:44, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:56, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not notable topic, deleted by me on it.wiki. Melquíades (msg) 16:45, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:56, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not notable topic, deleted by me on it.wiki. Melquíades (msg) 16:45, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:57, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not notable topic, deleted by me on it.wiki. Melquíades (msg) 16:45, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:57, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not notable topic, deleted by me on it.wiki. Melquíades (msg) 16:45, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:57, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not notable topic, deleted by me on it.wiki. Melquíades (msg) 16:46, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:57, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not notable topic, deleted by me on it.wiki. Melquíades (msg) 16:46, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:58, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not notable topic, deleted by me on it.wiki. Melquíades (msg) 16:46, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:58, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not notable topic, deleted by me on it.wiki. Melquíades (msg) 16:46, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:58, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:52, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:58, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image - out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:31, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:48, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE Eurodyne (talk) 22:10, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:49, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of COM:SCOPE Eurodyne (talk) 22:15, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:49, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image out of COM:SCOPE Eurodyne (talk) 22:16, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:49, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems that has no relevance... Sturm (talk) 22:31, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:50, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image - out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:43, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:50, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andrew Vamour De Wamaza (talk · contribs)

[edit]

personal images - out of project scope

Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:45, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:51, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

logo of non-notable entity, out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:12, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:52, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no clear encyclopedic value, out of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:13, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:51, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unofficial facebook logo, no foreseeable encyclopedic use Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:20, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:52, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Headphoney (talk · contribs)

[edit]

spam uploads, likely not uploader's own work

Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:21, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fondomat logos

[edit]

Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 13:52, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While this video was uploaded to Vimeo, it is a product of KVUE and protected by copyright. Heyyouoverthere (talk) 10:16, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: CC by 3.0. Ruthven (msg) 06:52, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While this file was uploaded by the reporter featured in it, Shawn Clynch, the actual video product belongs to KVUE news. A broadcast television company who holds the copyright on the material. Neither Vimeo nor Wiki has obtained the clearances from KVUE. The file not only has the KVUE mike flag in the video, it was originally posted here: http://www.kvue.com/sports/high-school/football/anderson-trojans-protecting-house-park-from-harvey/467491858 Heyyouoverthere (talk) 03:43, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:17, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marked All Rights Reserved: https://www.flickr.com/photos/piperspickstv/6748245343/in/photolist-coy3gb-coxZFN-coy1C1-coy4XN-bhjweD-dX7DKd-pTgZ7u-bhjvvk-bhjrfn-bhjqAV-bhjuhZ-bhjwLF-bhjtJM-bhjssR-bhjq4F-bhjrWX-bhjsXV-bhjuNp-bhjwJF Ytoyoda (talk) 04:19, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. The Flickr source is older than the alleged date used on Commons. Guanaco (talk) 04:22, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep. The Flickr source has been updated to allow for use. TeamPiper (talk) 04:22, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@TeamPiper: We don't allow non-commercial licenses on Commons. Can you change the license to Attribution-ShareAlike? Guanaco (talk) 06:05, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Guanaco: I'm a bit confused. We want to allow it for the Piper Reese Wiki page, but not to be used for commercial uses without permission. I haven't really used Wiki Commons.TeamPiper (talk) 06:05, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@TeamPiper: The mission of Wikipedia is to create an encyclopedia that can be reused by anyone for any purpose, and therefore all the content, including pictures, must be free of copyright restrictions. That’s why if you want an image to be on Wikipedia, you have to allow commercial use. Ytoyoda (talk) 01:44, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That said, the license on the Flickr page looks good now. BY-SA 2.0 is the way you want to go? Ytoyoda (talk) 01:55, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
(Edit conflict) I see you've changed the license on Flickr. Thank you for that. I understand why you're hesitant. One reason we insist on this is that Wikipedia-based books might be printed and sold in poor countries for the cost of printing, which a non-commercial license. Another major reason is that our project follows the tradition of free software, and on principle we want our content to be usable by anyone for almost any purpose. Even with the BY-SA license, there are other rights which must be respected such as personality rights. For example, it's not allowed for someone to take this image and use it in an advertisement to claim Piper and Selena endorse their product. Guanaco (talk) 01:58, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: License on Flickr is now ok. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 14:56, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small blurry photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Out of project scope, copyright violation is possible too. Taivo (talk) 07:11, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

On the user's talk page, the bot actually mentions another remaining picture named Roomy.jpg which, strangely enough, redirects to this one. Not sure what is going on there. --91.34.38.251 14:38, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:17, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a picture of me that has been uploaded without my consent and the person who has uploaded it does not have the rights to use this photo. I'm not sure how they got this photograph, but this is a photo from my personal facebook I would rather not see on the internet as I am not a public figure. Thanks for your understanding Carlota17 (talk) 07:36, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - We rarely remove images at the request of the subject and only then if we receive an appropriate request via OTRS so that we know that the request actually came from the subject. The subject here is clearly a public figure -- among other things, she has an IMDB article. The image is large and has full EXIF, so it is unlikely lifted from the Internet as claimed above. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:22, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The interested person has opened a new DR in November 2018 but somehow it was not visible. Therefore I try to help her. Her argument is that she is just a student, someone uploaded her pic and gave her unwanted visibility. Elcobbola has deleted similar files of hers. I do believe we should do the same with this one. (BTW maybe the user who made her a WD item although she has no articles may give some insight.) E4024 (talk) 20:55, 6 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: again. --JuTa 18:09, 27 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Agpoke (talk · contribs)

[edit]

1960s Egyptian movie posters. Public domain in Egypt but not in the US due to the 1996 URAA restoration. This is noted on the {{PD-Egypt}} tag.

Guanaco (talk) 09:30, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:23, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Agpoke (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not PD in source country

— Racconish 12:10, 15 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:08, 22 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted painting of contemperary artist. Op dit schilderij van een eigentijdse kunstenaar rust auteursrecht. Daarom kan het niet gepubliceerd worden onder de CC-BY-SA4.0 licentie Elly (talk) 09:39, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:24, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kaitha Poo Manam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work by the uploader.

Stefan2 (talk) 11:31, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Stefan2, How can you define these all are Unlikely uploads by me.Kaitha Poo Manam (talk) 11:46, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
These are unlikely to be own work by the uploader because they look like newspaper pages and such things. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:08, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep - Stefan2, You are absolutely right, these files are about a newspaper. I have this newspaper copies and I have just scanned and print out using adobe photoshop soft. There are many files here like this. Eg: [3], [4], [5], [6]. I am following such these files and I don't know whats the wrong with me. Please tell me how can an User upload such these type files here? Does need the newspaper owner directly upload these files?Kaitha Poo Manam (talk) 15:42, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Can I change its license as 'PD-self' like this upload: [7].Kaitha Poo Manam (talk) 06:41, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No. See w:WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:30, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If there is no other way to exist these files here, what benefit leads on this discussion? I found other more files here: [8],[9], [10], [11], [12], [13], [14], [15], [16],[17], [18], [19],[20], [21], [22],[23], [24], [25],[26], [27], [28],[29]. These are just examples and the line of such these files is very long. I think, Wikipedia can allow this kind of uploading also. Kaitha Poo Manam (talk) 17:11, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • I think, in the case of own work file, the uploader may consider as a copyright holder. There is no need any evidence of permission from the newspaper. Because, these uploads are own created things, not downloaded from any site. See:Copyright and licensing:- Own work: You own all rights to the image, usually meaning that you created it entirely yourself. In case of a photograph or screenshot, you must also own the copyright for all copyright-protected items (e.g. statue or app) that appear in it Kaitha Poo Manam (talk) 08:17, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Stefan2, Sorry for the Inconvenience to you by the lack of my Assumption about the Image use policy. I read Image use policy. But, I can't find, what do you mean here. So, can you please indicate the headline and a little sentence what phrase is providing about 'don't upload' a self creating image of a newspaper or a printed media through own work uploading. Kaitha Poo Manam (talk) 14:10, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - Newspapers are copyrighted and these images infringe on that copyright. You cannot freely copy newspapers any more than you can freely copy books or other created works. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:27, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nickey13mod (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Songs and album cover. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:29, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rhodyca (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:29, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fathibaity (talk · contribs)

[edit]

University course and non-trivial logos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Fathibaity (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused documents of questionable notability.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Fathibaity (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:30, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fake poster, not within project scope. Also seems to be derived from copyrighted works Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:07, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:31, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a file deleted due to copyright suspicions. Rahul Bott (talk) 22:25, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; see Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Shaik Mydeen. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 15:01, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cropped from an image published in November 1st, 2016: http://olajornal.com.br/dom-aloisio-dilli-visita-o-municipio-nos-proximos-dias/ Py4nf (talk) 22:54, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 15:00, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of software not authored by the referenced flickr user - possible copyvio Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:19, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 15:00, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-notable website logo, no foreseeable encyclopedic use Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:21, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Headphoney. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 14:59, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Also:

These derivative works incorporate substantial pieces of writing that are not known to be under free license. Writer's permission is required. 90.191.76.154 19:07, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:34, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by João Vitor Nunes (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 21 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Didym (talk) 14:06, 28 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by João Vitor Nunes (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unidentified map provider (Google Maps?). Unclear copyright status.

--Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:45, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by João Vitor Nunes (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 13 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:32, 20 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

half the file is corrupted Artix Kreiger (talk) 21:46, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Withdraw please since the person uploaded the file correctly. Artix Kreiger (talk) 12:00, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Imgur (11 Aug 2017, 238 views) Dispenser (talk) 18:19, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:20, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ایجاد امکان برای بارگذاری دوباره آرم دانشگاه غیرانتفاعی علامه محدث نوری طراح و توسط مدیریت و مسئولین موسسه با توضیح چند زبانه و کاملتر. با درخواست تکمیل کردن اسامی مدیریت و تصاور مربوط به موسسه دربرای برای مسئولین دانشگاه و هیات رییسه بنیاد گذاری دانشگاه فرستاده شد. Emails با درخواست تکمیل کردن اسامی مدیریت و تصاور مربوط به موسسه برای مسئولین دانشگاه و هیات رییسه بنیاد گذاری دانشگاه فرستاده شد. حذف عبارت Template:بهبود منبعTemplate:منبع نامعتبر از صفحه wikipedia پیشنهاد شد. NK (talk) 09:27, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


دلیل درخواست حذف: ایجاد امکان برای بارگذاری دوباره آرم دانشگاه غیرانتفاعی علامه محدث نوری طراح و توسط مدیریت و مسئولین موسسه با توضیح چند زبانه و کاملتر

nikrouz kianouri


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:10, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Gyanendra_Singh_Chauhan (photos · view on map)(weblinks)(http://www.panoramio.com/user/4238458)

Already deleted per copyvio:

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, found elsewhere on the web. Also considering:

Oh man... and now this Gyanendrasinghchauhan (photos · view on map) = Gyanendra_Singh_Chauhan (photos · view on map)

weblinks = http://www.panoramio.com/photo/41416707 (09.2010, by Gyanendra_Singh_Chauhan) + http://www.panoramio.com/photo/42581337 (10.2010, by Gyanendrasinghchauhan) --> File:Shri Mahakaleshwer Temple Kund at ujjain - panoramio.jpg
Probadly both users uploaded the same copyvio shit that I am checking here...

...

Ok. That is enough. In shortest time I detected around 1.500 – 2.500 copyvios, uploaded by Panoramio upload bot (talk · contribs) from Panoramio without caring size/exif information/etc. (which could be checked by bot) = Category:Panoramio images reviewed by trusted users: no. Just check User:Gunnex/Panoramio-bot uploads with 500px width (September 2017) --> 500px is usually the standard size of Panoramio/Flickr files in width (and height) and checking these and other uploads by related users is quickely leading to suspicious accounts.

There are so many open gapes in Commons which I tried to help to close --> cross-wiki uploads (here from ptwiki: bad ratio = + 85 % in 2016 and probadly not changing in 2017, considering 07.2017, mostly still unckecked), millions of unchecked files grabbed from Facebook via User:Gunnex/Per FBMD grabbed from Facebook (01.01.2016–27.08.2016) (part I), unresolved projects like FOP for Brazil (which is IMHO not allowed for commercial use, considering related court decisions), license changes of Agência Brasil/EBC and others, Angola/Bangladesh Facebook cases and all the other mass deletions. Since returning in 07.2017 from a +/- 1 year wikibreak (see also @Christian Ferrer: here = "I got wasted") I engaged in thousands of copyvios, mostly historic ones and mostly only ptwiki related, trying to ignore what is happening on other battle zones in Commons. Considering all this, I can't support morally anymore a project which in its surface (considering media used effectively on Wikipedia articles) might be consistent and recognised (and may have also a quick deletion reaction for new uploaded, used but copyvioed files), but which reveals in it's dark and hidden archives millions of files grabbed from Internet. Most of the 1.500 – 2.500 copyvios by Panoramio upload bot I detected recently were not used in any project. That's all. Bye & thx.

Gunnex (talk) 17:11, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:46, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality Lasthib (talk) 10:51, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: confirmed, not usable. --Achim (talk) 19:59, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality Lasthib (talk) 10:54, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No. This shot against the light isn't that poor. --Achim (talk) 20:02, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:20, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. Used on user page. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:22, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this page wasn't supposed to be on this site 2602:304:CDDC:89D0:319C:F4FE:CFDC:7C61 18:51, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. It's educational and it's in use on Wikipedia. Guanaco (talk) 21:25, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know what that's supposed to mean -- only User:Lamilli could say that it was uploaded by mistake, and even he/she couldn't retroactively withdraw the free license... AnonMoos (talk) 21:27, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep In scope and in use in id:Rambut kemaluan. Tm (talk) 22:16, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:22, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is serious doubt that the uploader on Panoramio holds the copyrights of this image. 4nn1l2 (talk) 11:56, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:08, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Imgur (Jul 10 2016, 6,805 views) Dispenser (talk) 18:35, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:18, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Imgur (Jul 10 2016, 6,500 views) Dispenser (talk) 18:35, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:18, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Imgur (Jul 10 2016, 9,095 views) Dispenser (talk) 18:35, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:18, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Imgur (Jul 10 2016, 7,540 views) Dispenser (talk) 18:35, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:18, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sonijob (talk · contribs)

[edit]

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects,

Roland zh (talk) 20:08, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:17, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GRUPOPEDAGOGIAYLASTIC (talk · contribs)

[edit]

not own work

Eurodyne (talk) 22:19, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:49, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://townfeeling.com/conde-crooner-en-la-niebla/ Tarawa 08:29, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:15, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcornelius (talk) 14:19, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files from narendramodiofficial Flickr stream. Other files are derivative works of such and other deleted files.

Rahul Bott (talk) 11:24, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:15, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: {{GODL-India}} except one, see phab:T200121. Yann (talk) 09:58, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

small/middle size without EXIFs : unlikely to be own work Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:26, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:15, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source field says in Persian that the image has been taken from Google maps. 4nn1l2 (talk) 13:27, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:16, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcornelius (talk) 14:25, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. The description is also misleading. I am based in Lagos, commercial bus in Lagos are painted yellow. Wikicology (talk) 13:41, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:16, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcornelius (talk) 14:25, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Imgur (May 27, 2017, 1,974 views) Dispenser (talk) 18:13, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:13, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Imgur (Dec 30 2014, 131 views) Dispenser (talk) 18:15, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:13, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Imgur (Uploaded same day posted to Imgur, 254 views). Need photographer to confirm non-copyright violation. Dispenser (talk) 18:17, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I am the photographer and can verify I took this picture. I am new to uploading/ editing wiki articles but have used IMGUR to upload for quite some time. Sorry if I did anything wrong here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GregB90 (talk • contribs) 07:01, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@GregB90: Since you published the file before (to Imgur), you'll need to send an email to COM:OTRS team. Dispenser (talk) 11:49, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:13, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Imgur (same day, 3 views). Likely same uploader on both, but we need him to confirm. Dispenser (talk) 18:26, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:12, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Imgur (Sep 24 2013, 119 views) Dispenser (talk) 18:32, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:14, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Keine originale Quelle, kein Artikel der diese Datei weiterhin nutzt. 2003:C6:33D7:B555:19BC:BCF2:3DB3:7D28 18:32, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File is ineligible for Copyright ({{PD-ineligible}}). It doesn't matter if the file is in use or not. --D-Kuru (talk) 22:11, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: einfaches Textlogo. --Hystrix (talk) 19:57, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Keine originale Quelle, Logo auch vom Verlag des Labels unerlaubt genutzt, 2003:C6:33D7:B555:19BC:BCF2:3DB3:7D28 18:34, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: einfaches Textlogo. --Hystrix (talk) 19:57, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quelle nicht mehr verfügbar (source not available) + unerlaubte Benutzung seitens des Verlages. 2003:C6:33D7:B555:19BC:BCF2:3DB3:7D28 18:37, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File is ineligible for Copyright ({{PD-ineligible}}). It doesn't matter if the file is in use or not. --D-Kuru (talk) 22:11, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: einfaches Textlogo. --Hystrix (talk) 20:28, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Keine Quelle (no source) + Unerlaubte Benutzung seitens des Verlages. 2003:C6:33D7:B555:19BC:BCF2:3DB3:7D28 18:40, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: einfaches Textlogo. --Hystrix (talk) 20:29, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Keine Quelle (no source available) + unerlaubte Benutzung seitens des Verlages. 2003:C6:33D7:B555:19BC:BCF2:3DB3:7D28 18:41, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: einfaches Textlogo. --Hystrix (talk) 20:30, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Keine Quelle (no source available) + unerlaubte Benutzung seitens des Verlages. 2003:C6:33D7:B555:19BC:BCF2:3DB3:7D28 18:41, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To me this looks like it is ineligible for copyright ({{PD-ineligible}}). It's just some text and japanese (?) words arranged in a rectangle --D-Kuru (talk) 22:08, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: einfaches Textlogo. --Hystrix (talk) 20:31, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Keine Quelle (no source available) + unerlaubte Benutzung seitens des Verlages. 2003:C6:33D7:B555:19BC:BCF2:3DB3:7D28 18:43, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File is ineligible for Copyright ({{PD-ineligible}}). It doesn't matter if the file is in use or not. --D-Kuru (talk) 22:11, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: einfaches Textlogo. --Hystrix (talk) 20:32, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category:Food of Italy! 176.239.75.224 18:40, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Inappropriate use of user pages:. --Hystrix (talk) 20:38, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

lower-resolution copy of File:سریال یک روز قبل.JPG 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:02, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:41, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Morteza harandi02.jpg 4nn1l2 (talk) 19:13, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 20:53, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : thumbnail format, one-file upload, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:14, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 21:00, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:37, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 21:05, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': small-sized format, one-file-upload, potentially personality right isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 20:31, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 21:08, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Human face is not a simple geometric shape. 176.239.82.15 06:39, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:27, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcornelius (talk) 14:16, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation (photo of video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pYRaLoDoQ0c) Хоббит (talk) 07:23, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:25, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcornelius (talk) 14:16, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted per nom. JGHowes talk - 17:56, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Licensing and date on page are incompatible Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:42, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused dup of the matched-style set in Category:Dichloroaniline DMacks (talk) 07:34, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcornelius (talk) 14:17, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused duplicate of:

Perhaps my original nom was not worded clearly enough. Per COM:EDUSE, this file does not appear "educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject". DMacks (talk) 04:41, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, redundant. P 1 9 9   16:05, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is clearly not a "own work" as claimed so it cannot be placed under CC license. This picture can be found in a Youtube video Duch (talk) 07:51, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcornelius (talk) 14:17, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

vandalismo, copyright https://www.cbsnews.com/news/justin-timberlake-announces-tour-second-20-20-album/ Tarawa 08:35, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcornelius (talk) 14:19, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata ? Copyright violation ? Supporterhéninois (talk) 08:46, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unclear source. --Jcornelius (talk) 14:20, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

perche' non e' esatto Luis fois (talk) 08:59, 1 October 2017 (UTC) non e' esatto Luis fois (talk) 09:04, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

cosa non è esatto? --Achim (talk) 19:38, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcornelius (talk) 14:21, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No information about when this work of art was originally created Guanaco (talk) 09:52, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Guanaco I added dates. What can I do now for keep picture? --Drabdullayev17 (talk) 10:09, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I uploaded a much higher resolution version and changed a couple things. It should be good to  Keep now. Guanaco (talk) 10:40, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. If the carpet was made in the 19th century its 2D photo can be kept under PD-old. --Interfase (talk) 19:11, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcornelius (talk) 14:21, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image with no metadata. Possible copyvio. Wikicology (talk) 10:30, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcornelius (talk) 14:22, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio, image with no metadata. Wikicology (talk) 10:32, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcornelius (talk) 14:22, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality Lasthib (talk) 10:51, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, it's still good enough to be used. --Jcornelius (talk) 14:23, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality Lasthib (talk) 10:51, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: agreed; per nomination. --Jcornelius (talk) 14:23, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality Lasthib (talk) 10:52, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: agreed, per nomination. --Jcornelius (talk) 14:23, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality Lasthib (talk) 10:52, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, can be used despite the quality. --Jcornelius (talk) 14:24, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Solomon203 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: An unclear picture. Solomon203 (talk) 14:10, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcornelius (talk) 14:25, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://en.elbalad.news/upload/photo/gallery/0/6/280.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcornelius (talk) 14:26, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by MifterBot as no license. Well, there is a license, but the museum is likely not the author and copyright holder of it. JuTa 02:57, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 02:26, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have a svg version of this file Julius Cæsar (talk) 08:02, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: superseded by higher-quality SVG by the same user. --Guanaco (talk) 02:25, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have a svg version of this file Julius Cæsar (talk) 08:03, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: superseded by higher-quality SVG by the same user. --Guanaco (talk) 02:25, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have a svg version of this file Julius Cæsar (talk) 08:04, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: superseded by higher-quality SVG by the same user. --Guanaco (talk) 02:25, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have a svg version of this file Julius Cæsar (talk) 08:05, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: superseded by higher-quality SVG by the same user. --Guanaco (talk) 02:24, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have a svg version and new design of this file Julius Cæsar (talk) 08:06, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: superseded by higher-quality SVG by the same user. --Guanaco (talk) 02:24, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have a svg version of this file Julius Cæsar (talk) 08:10, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: superseded by higher-quality SVG by the same user. --Guanaco (talk) 02:24, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have a svg version of this file Julius Cæsar (talk) 08:11, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: superseded by higher-quality SVG by the same user. --Guanaco (talk) 02:24, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have a svg version of this file Julius Cæsar (talk) 08:11, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: superseded by higher-quality SVG by the same user. --Guanaco (talk) 02:24, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have a svg version of this file Julius Cæsar (talk) 08:12, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: superseded by higher-quality SVG by the same user. --Guanaco (talk) 02:24, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have a svg version and new design of this file Julius Cæsar (talk) 08:13, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: superseded by higher-quality SVG by the same user. --Guanaco (talk) 02:24, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have a svg version and new design of this file Julius Cæsar (talk) 08:15, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: superseded by higher-quality SVG by the same user. --Guanaco (talk) 02:24, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Person who submitted this uploaded it by mistake. 80.220.75.188 09:11, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment In that case, they should add {{SD|G7}} to the image page. --bjh21 (talk) 00:42, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Guanaco (talk) 02:26, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Person who submitted it uploaded it by mistake. 80.220.75.188 09:12, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no commercial FoP in Finland for such a sign. --Guanaco (talk) 02:27, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Person who submitted this uploaded it by mistake. 80.220.75.188 09:12, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no commercial FoP in Finland for such a sign. --Guanaco (talk) 02:27, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Licensing issue. There are two things to consider. First of all, this celebrity commented about releasing the photo under CC-BY license. But to do that, she has to be the author of the photo, which she clearly isn't. Only the author can release it under CC license. Secondly, she did not annonce releasing the media under CC license when she uploaded. By then, Facebook's ToS kicks in, which grants facebook an irrevocable, anf non-exclusive right of the media, granting it the right to the photo, and hence, granting right of the media to the company too. acagastya 10:39, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The original posting has since been deleted so I can't comment about a lot of it, but I will say that your mention of the Facebook terms of service is a distraction. As you said it's a "non-exclusive" right and thus separate from whatever rights that Grey herself has. Tabercil (talk) 05:59, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
(though she is not the author), she granted Facebook to sub license and reuse it, per their TOS, before releasing it in CC license(which she can’t). That is the problem.
acagastya 11:14, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
What?!! That makes no sense and is a legalistic distraction. The same logic then would apply to Flickr and we draw tons of shots from there. Tabercil (talk) 12:23, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Flickr, seriously? Those tonnes of photos are released under CC license at the time they were uploaded. Besides, in this case, that celebrity can not even release the media in CC license as she is not the author.
acagastya 23:24, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: We need permission from the photographer. --Guanaco (talk) 02:28, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Piripituliflan (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage (and occasional vandalism) in es.wiki and uploading a photo about himself, which is used only on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:02, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 02:29, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely authorship claims considering the nature of the image and the uploader's track record so far. LX (talk, contribs) 11:13, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 02:30, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Originally tagged by B dash as copyvio from Kade Chan Origami Blog. It appears the versions we have on Commons are higher resolution than the alleged source. I think there's a good chance the uploader either took these photographs or is otherwise connected to Kade Chan. Guanaco (talk) 11:29, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The user has uploaded multiple copyright violations related to Kade Chan in the past. I asked the uploader about their affiliation with the subject. If they are affiliated, they're in violation of English Wikipedia's policies on conflicts of interest. If they aren't, their remaining uploads are more likely to be copyright violations. So I guess it's understandable that they chose not answer.  Delete in accordance with Commons:Project scope/Precautionary principle, along with the duplicate File:Kade Chan (Chan Pak Hei 陳柏熹).jpg. LX (talk, contribs) 12:08, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I tagged en:Kade Chan for proposed deletion. Guanaco (talk) 12:14, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per LX. --Guanaco (talk) 02:31, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in Iran. 4nn1l2 (talk) 11:42, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 02:33, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in Iran 4nn1l2 (talk) 11:44, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 02:33, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this upload is a mistake, since the source blog just copied the photo here:http://weibo.com/u/5847794625?refer_flag=1005055014_&is_hot=1 Puramyun31 (talk) 11:46, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 02:34, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this upload is a mistake, since the source blog just copied the photo here:http://weibo.com/u/5847794625?refer_flag=1005055014_&is_hot=1 Puramyun31 (talk) 11:47, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 02:34, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in Iran 4nn1l2 (talk) 11:47, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 02:35, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this upload is a mistake, since the source blog just copied the photo here:http://weibo.com/u/5847794625?refer_flag=1005055014_&is_hot=1 Puramyun31 (talk) 11:47, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 02:35, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in Iran 4nn1l2 (talk) 11:47, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 02:35, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio. See here Wikicology (talk) 11:48, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 02:35, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that this would be Crown Copyright. Jcb (talk) 12:05, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agree that this propably is not crown copyright. But definitively older than 70 years. Does this help? --JuergenKlueser (talk) 12:12, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately in the UK copyright lasts 70 years after the death of the author. If we don't know who the author was, we use 120 years from creation. Jcb (talk) 12:25, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Then we should delete the picture here. --JuergenKlueser (talk) 16:38, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 02:36, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that this would be Crown Copyright. Jcb (talk) 12:05, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agree that this propably is not crown copyright. But definitively older than 70 years. Does this help? --JuergenKlueser (talk) 12:12, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately in the UK copyright lasts 70 years after the death of the author. If we don't know who the author was, we use 120 years from creation. Jcb (talk) 12:25, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Then we should delete the picture here. --JuergenKlueser (talk) 16:39, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 02:36, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that this would be Crown Copyright. Jcb (talk) 12:05, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 02:36, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 12:10, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 02:37, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although I do not understand the language, in my opinion this is advertizing. Taivo (talk) 12:18, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 02:37, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 12:37, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 02:38, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo features a model of Milad Tower. No COM:FOP in Iran. 4nn1l2 (talk) 12:56, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 02:39, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source filed says in Persian that the image has been taken from Google results 4nn1l2 (talk) 13:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 02:39, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source and author fileds say in Persian that the image has been taken from Google results. 4nn1l2 (talk) 13:03, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 02:39, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor image, and there is another better image, which was taken 1 minutes later. Actually they are probably duplicate, the uploader just place it at a wrong time. B dash (talk) 13:05, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 02:43, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor image, and there is another better image, which was taken 1 minutes later. Actually they are probably duplicate, the uploader just place it at a wrong time. B dash (talk) 13:06, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 02:43, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files from narendramodiofficial Flickr stream. Rahul Bott (talk) 14:01, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 02:44, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: {{GODL-India}} Yann (talk) 14:23, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.thefairyplay.com/wp-content/themes/kingsize/images/upload/fairyplay.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:08, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Housekeeping, file deleted by admin Ruthven. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:33, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Erected in 1979 (the 54th year of the Showa era) [30]. Not yet in PD, and COM:FOP#Japan doesn't allow such statues. Yasu (talk) 14:56, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:09, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from commercial packaging. Should be blanked/cropped to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:10, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

نام فایل اشتباه میباشد و بنام شخص پدرشان درج گردیده است Maracanazo53 (talk) 15:04, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

متاسفانه نام فایل اشتباهاً بنام شخص پدرشان "شکرالله بابان" درج گردیده است و یک پرونده با نام صحیح "فؤاد بابان" ایجاد شده است. Maracanazo53 (talk) 15:13, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


متاسفانه نام فایل اشتباهاً بنام شخص پدرشان "شکرالله بابان" درج گردیده است و یک پرونده با نام صحیح "فؤاد بابان" ایجاد شده است. Maracanazo53 (talk) 15:16, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. {{Rename}} استفاده. Ruthven (msg) 20:12, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:54, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: actually it's used. Ruthven (msg) 20:15, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Magog the Ogre as no license. Well there is a license for the US, but one for its home country is mising. JuTa 02:52, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, these copyright rules are way too difficult to understand for me... Maybe I did wrong, I apologize --Friday83260 (talk) 03:25, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per {{PD-SG-photo}}. Ruthven (msg) 20:39, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Saudi Arabia Guanaco (talk) 12:42, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: nothing really copyrightable here, and the building is under construction. Ruthven (msg) 20:37, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://fr.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikip%C3%A9dia:Demande_de_suppression_imm%C3%A9diate&diff=141128904&oldid=141127978 Skull33 (talk) 17:38, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination + Out of scope. Ruthven (msg) 20:19, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

source website is licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA, this is not a compatible license 79.251.135.90 17:43, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:25, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

source website is licensed under CC-BY-NC-SA, this is not a compatible license 79.251.135.90 17:44, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:26, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work Eurodyne (talk) 18:12, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: complex logos need evidence of own work, e.g. OTRS ticket. Ruthven (msg) 20:26, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Keine Quelle (no source) + unerlaubte Benutzung seitens des Verlages ohne Freigabe. 2003:C6:33D7:B555:19BC:BCF2:3DB3:7D28 18:36, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Einfaches Textlogo. Quelle und Urheber sind angegeben. Und was bedeutet „unerlaubte Benutzung seitens des Verlages ohne Freigabe“? Der Verlag nutzt sein eigenes Logo unerlaubt? Hystrix (talk) 20:18, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Hystrix : text logo. Ruthven (msg) 20:27, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted logo, above COM:TOO. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:39, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:36, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of possibly copyrighted logo. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:51, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination + odder. Ruthven (msg) 20:36, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable copyvio by paid firm; see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Yaplipa/Archive#13_September_2017 Bri (talk) 21:09, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; moreover the uploader seems to be the person in the image. Ruthven (msg) 20:27, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work https://www.mercyships.org/ Eurodyne (talk) 22:13, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 20:35, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. The logo is in en.wiki, fr.wiki and ru.wiki as fair use, but fair use is prohibited in Commons. Taivo (talk) 11:08, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:32, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In this November 2014 blogpost, it is attributed to http://www.devendrafadnavis.in/media/photos/ which asserts copyrights. A possible copyright violation? Rahul Bott (talk) 11:51, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:32, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://i1.sndcdn.com/avatars-000330136449-i3vx4q-t500x500.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:35, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not appear to the uploader's own work. The "M4R" watermark in the upper-left part of the image suggests that this was part of an ad for an iPhone ringtone (which uses the .m4r file format) NewYorkActuary (talk) 15:14, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:35, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshot without permission. Harry Huo (talk) 15:32, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:37, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

این تصویر حاوی برچسب سایت سیمرغ(در بالا گوشه سمت راست) میباشد که ناقض حق کپی رایت است. Maracanazo53 (talk) 15:54, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Maracanazo53: , Please Write Your request in English Again. Thanks.--Mbazri (talk) 10:53, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

این تصویر حاوی برچسب سایت سیمرغ(در بالا گوشه سمت راست) میباشد که ناقض حق کپی رایت است. Maracanazo53 (talk) 15:54, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Per Nominator--Mbazri (talk) 10:51, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; file is watermarked appears to be copyright violation. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:37, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nonstandard BSicon naming and nonstandard geometry (at-grade tracks over a tunnel do not need bridges at the crossing); semantically identical to File:BSicon umtKRZ.svg. JJMC89 bot and CommonsDelinker can replace uses before deletion, or alternatively the file can be deleted and redirected. Jc86035 (talk) 15:22, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As creator of BSicon umtKRZu.svg, I am happy for it to be deleted and replaced by umtKRZ.svg. Bob1960evens (talk) 08:52, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
=
[edit]

Deleted after running Delinker again. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:46, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very small Rajesh Ram photograph. Could be useful if bigger. 176.239.75.224 15:55, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:47, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

part of elon musk 29 sept. presentation, not Mwhelher's work Marc Lacoste (talk) 16:16, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:47, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from Yuri Tokarev Jcb (talk) 16:35, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:47, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 16:44, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination & found at http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-NvXpbDjZOs4/TYZQL_KHTRI/AAAAAAAALpE/jKHKoystJG0/s400/Laonseccion.jpg from 2011. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:48, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : small-sized format, one-file-upload, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:14, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:49, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Imgur (Same day as upload, 2 views). Likely dirived from CC-BY Flickr source, but would like to run this by someone else. Dispenser (talk) 18:22, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean "likely derived", I have posted the source of the image where requested and it has been reviewed by Elisfkc. I, in accordance with the licensing which allows me to "remix, transform, and build upon the material for any purpose, even commercially" screenshotted a section of the image which automatically uploaded to imgur. I don't really see the issue? WolvesS (talk)
Its possible changes non-CC-BY-SA content was added in the Imgur step. And I'm unsure how it should be handled. Also, why are you posting to Imgur before uploading it here? Dispenser (talk) 19:55, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Elisfkc: Dispenser (talk) 18:14, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I reviewed and passed the license because it looked to just be cropped from the Flickr image, and I've given up on uploading the original and then using crop tool on every image that this happens on. Elisfkc (talk) 22:49, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Dispenser: I didn't use snipping tool originally when I uploaded the image, I screenshotted it with an application which uploaded it to my imgur account. I didn't make any changes as you can see. I don't know why this is even being considered for deletion. It's in accordance with the license. WolvesS (talk)

Withdrawn Its clear edge cases such as this are a time sink for otherwise delete happy users. Better tools would be nice (e.g. Upload to: Flickr, Imgur, Commons), so uploads aren't conducted in roundabout ways to copyvio haven websites. But improvements amplify other deficiencies the Wikimedia Foundation doesn't want to spend money on yet. —Dispenser (talk) 16:47, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:50, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image uploaded under a false copyright claim of Creative Commons. It is taken from http://www.ourcommons.ca/, the website of the Canadian House of Commons, but the Canadian government does not release its MP headshots as CC -- it releases them under Crown copyright, a model which does not allow commercial reuse and has therefore been deemed incompatible with Wikipedia's copyright requirements. We have received takedown orders in the past for uploading and using Crown-copyrighted Canadian government materials, so we're simply not allowed to do it. Bearcat (talk) 18:26, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:50, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable copyvio by a hired firm; see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Yaplipa/Archive#13_September_2017 Bri (talk) 21:09, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:51, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Internet site 176.239.75.224 16:17, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 22:51, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unsinniger Eintrag Gerhard Haubold 16:46, 1 October 2017 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 22:52, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status and license tags corrected. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:31, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image with no Exif metadata. Possible copyvio. Wikicology (talk) 18:27, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:31, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I didn't see this image until now, since it wasn't properly categorized until late 2016, but unfortunately it appears to violate the particular form of the triskelion emblem claimed to be copyrighted by Quagmyr. See URL http://emblemproject.sagcs.net/Is.html and the notes on pages Category:BDSM triskelion symbols and File:BDSM logo.svg -- AnonMoos (talk) 23:29, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The file can be deleted. Beause of quagmyr's copyright I created the 2D alternative files seen in the same category. I'm sure they don't violate his rights. Eryakaas (talk) 16:50, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:31, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is my own work I took it at a public interview Mario held back in July 13 of 2017 . I don't have the best camera so the resolution is pretty low.

Link to the interview I attended http://wildfireradio.com/paradelphia-radio-165/


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:11, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted. --Ezarateesteban 22:07, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

your opinions are asked : missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, pls see also related uploads, Roland zh (talk) 20:39, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 21:46, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:06, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: TinyEye says it's from FLickr, but no link. Ruthven (msg) 21:52, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : rather small-sized format, one-file-upload, PNG format, hence, also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 21:38, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: looks like a TV screenshot. Ruthven (msg) 21:53, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, see Commons:Collages. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 18:35, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Die Bestandteile sind vermutlich unter PD-USGov-Military-Badge lizensiert. Hystrix (talk) 20:08, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe, but source information is missing. Jcb (talk) 20:18, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, Missing legal information. --Y.haruo (talk) 09:29, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, see Commons:Collages. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 18:36, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Die Bestandteile sind vermutlich unter PD-USGov-Military-Badge lizensiert. Hystrix (talk) 20:09, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe, but source information is missing. Jcb (talk) 20:19, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, Missing legal information. --Y.haruo (talk) 09:31, 4 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted. --Ezarateesteban 22:09, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incompatible license with date given on page Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:41, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Which date? The upload date, or the date on the image? It says 1963 on the image, but 2017 as the upload date. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 14:53, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This archive from 2016 shows that the date given is not correct, but it still isn't clear whether 1963 is when the image was created or not. KSFT (talk) 01:31, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
per COM:COA - an individual depiction can change. It is plausible the first coat of arms was drawn in 1963, but another was drawn later. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:09, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Wikimandia. --Ezarateesteban 22:09, 7 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Автор фото и изображенное лицо один человек? Необходимо прояснения через COM:OTRS Dogad75 (talk) 16:57, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:36, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Permission from depicted person, not from author. Depicted person is not the photographer, both hands are clearly visible. Jcb (talk) 22:03, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment ticket:2013041510006738 should be examined by an hebrew reader. --Ruthven (msg) 20:30, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe @Geagea: could take a look? Jcb (talk) 20:44, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I am sorry, i did not received this notification. Anyway, this ticket includes permission from Michael Behagen, the film director of the movies "המכתב", "השורד", "סיפורים לשעת לילה מאוחרת", under CC-BY-SA-3.0. -- Geagea (talk) 20:19, 22 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep No reason to doubt the ticket validity. Yann (talk) 09:44, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please explain why not. It's established procedure to doubt authorship claims by default if the depicted person claims to be the depicted person and it's clearly not a selfie. The 'bystander selfie' proposal has obviously failed, so that it cannot be applied. Jcb (talk) 15:37, 25 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I dont think it show him. Compare i.e. with File:Michael Behagen while shooting film.jpg. --JuTa 17:39, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]