Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/09/29

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive September 29th, 2017
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Jcb as no license (No license since) Jcb (talk) 00:56, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: wrong button. --Jcb (talk) 00:57, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jason M. C., Han (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per COM:NOTHOST: Self-created artwork/personal images

Takeaway (talk) 07:26, 28 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:49, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jason M. C., Han (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Recreating previously deleted file -> https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3ADeletion_requests%2FFile%3AGrand_theory_for_Musical_Training.JPG&type=revision&diff=199484286&oldid=199398334

Takeaway (talk) 08:48, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 08:52, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jason M. C., Han

[edit]

These are all recordings of music which may not be in the public domain:

The Cowboy's (or Cowherd's) Flute was composed by He Luting (died 1999). The Cowboy's Flute appeared on the main page in 2021 and was incorrectly listed as a folk song

Under the Sunshine was composed by Wang Lisan (died 2013)

Pearl of the Orient is a pop song composed by Lo Ta-yu

Mother in the candlelight is a song composed by Gu Jianfen

Moonlight upon Lotus Pool is a pop song originally recorded by the group Phoenix Legend

Colourful clouds running after moon was composed by Wang Jianzhong (died 2016)

Johnj1995 (talk) 05:59, 14 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 06:42, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously copyvio --Alaa :)..! 12:46, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Anime/manga/comics. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously copyvio --Alaa :)..! 12:46, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Anime/manga/comics. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope watermarked image. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 13:41, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and copyvio. --Yann (talk) 13:51, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Apocheir as Speedy (SD) and the most recent rationale was: G3 Yann (talk) 13:43, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:43, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free promotional material for a commercial video game. IDV (talk) 16:53, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, copyright violations do not need a full DR. Green Giant (talk) 18:28, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

test image for sandbox need to remove Jif403 (talk) 02:43, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:12, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nadermohame60 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Obviously copyvio, photos without EXIF. This photo for living person.

--Alaa :)..! 11:45, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I add a photo for deletion due to same reason (Obviously copyvio, photos without EXIF. This photo is a website logo). --Alaa :)..! 11:46, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 00:26, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Wo st 01 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.blick.ch/people-tv/schweiz/das-projekt-von-ex-tele-zueri-frau-yvonne-eisenring-37-maenner-in-einem-jahr-id5523462.html Yann (talk) 13:55, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 23:08, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own work" claim - [Tycho] talk 22:19, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 22:40, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sweetestlacey (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos

Apocheir (talk) 20:51, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:44, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohammed Uzzal Miah (talk · contribs)

[edit]

User images only - out of scope

Ronhjones  (Talk) 17:13, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:58, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohammed Uzzal Miah (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos

Apocheir (talk) 20:59, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 04:14, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mohammed Uzzal Miah (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: Unused personal photos, user was already warned before.

- [Tycho] talk 00:04, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 04:14, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

使用Commonist軟體上傳檔案時不慎誤操作,Commons上已有相同內容檔案 File:TW_PHW1_old1.svg Kibinsky (talk) 07:46, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: replaced by file:TW PHW1 old1.svg, redir. --Wdwd (talk) 14:12, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo by Richard Hart, New York 2017 = no own work of uploader. Permission missing. Wo st 01 (talk / cont) 13:50, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:32, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Tilman2007

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously copyvio --Alaa :)..! 12:46, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: web grab. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:06, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously copyvio --Alaa :)..! 12:46, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: web grab. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:07, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The category already exists with the correct name of the hotel: Category:Copenhagen Admiral Hotel. --Castellbo (talk) 19:32, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as category redirect. --Achim (talk) 19:59, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of Creator:Ludovike Simanowiz Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 22:13, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: redirected per nomination. --Jarekt (talk) 13:00, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

better resolution of logo to upload, impossible now because it's a mime Pastratopi (talk) 18:29, 27 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

another same is uploaded Pastratopi (talk) 18:00, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, in use as well. Upload new version under new filename. P 1 9 9   14:46, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No Permissions BingoPic's (Chat) 04:32, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Just another non-free file from en-wiki en:File:Air Odisha logo.png. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:05, 5 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photos from debonairren.tistory.com

[edit]

All posts are tagged as {{Cc-by-4.0}}, but they photographer also states "2차가공 금지/로고삭제 금지", which translates as "Secondary processing (derivatives) prohibited/Logo removal prohibited", contradicting the Creative Commons license. These images are not acceptable. xplicit 00:32, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:25, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:30, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope images, a compilation of non-notable individuals, logos and/or personal images. Commons is not a webhost

Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:21, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope images, a compilation of non-notable individuals, logos and/or personal images. Commons is not a webhost

Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:08, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope images, a compilation of non-notable individuals, logos and/or personal images. Commons is not a webhost

Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:39, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:08, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:10, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused private image - [Tycho] talk 22:13, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:18, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Baground image may be copyvio if above ToO. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 23:00, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: what background? But image is text-only, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:16, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@P199: The texture on the grey background. It wasn't plain white/transparent. (Adding this comment in case future UNDEL-req.) --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 20:40, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope, no foreseeable educational use Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:01, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:13, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i want to upload this as a part of wiki loves monumments Babin Dulal (talk) 23:02, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as duplicate of File:Patan148.jpg. P 1 9 9   16:14, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unused personal photo - [Tycho] talk 23:10, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:12, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Music band poster, probably not "own work". - [Tycho] talk 23:24, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:12, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 위키봇봇 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

self-made pencil drawings, out of project scope - not encyclopedic

Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:34, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:12, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Apocheir (talk) 20:41, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:24, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nobelz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos / amateur musician spam

Apocheir (talk) 20:42, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:24, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jamal penjweny (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos

Apocheir (talk) 20:44, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:24, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal / promotional photo Apocheir (talk) 20:46, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:23, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joshuanderitu01 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos

Apocheir (talk) 20:47, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:23, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Apocheir (talk) 20:48, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:22, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Apocheir (talk) 20:49, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:22, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Apocheir (talk) 20:49, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:22, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Apocheir (talk) 20:52, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:22, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bmnurislam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos

Apocheir (talk) 20:55, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:22, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bmnurislam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused personal photo and unlikely to be used in a project.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 10:35, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:09, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Apocheir (talk) 20:55, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:21, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo Apocheir (talk) 20:58, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:21, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Mbmelinamath

[edit]

Unused personal photos --- [Tycho] talk 20:54, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:21, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: Unused personal photo - [Tycho] talk 21:47, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:20, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Own work" tag is probably a mistake, it's a scan of a newspaper. - [Tycho] talk 21:49, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, copyvio. P 1 9 9   16:20, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Movie poster, probably not "Own work" - [Tycho] talk 22:05, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:20, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mwtoews as duplicate (Duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: Slurm logo.svg

SVGs are not exact duplicates of PNGs. Converting to DR instead, as obsolete/superseded. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:17, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, superseded by File:Slurm logo.svg. P 1 9 9   16:20, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Enialskaj (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used respectively uploaded by a user who didn't make real contributions, apart from the creation of the user page.

Gunnex (talk) 19:14, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:02, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect licence. This is not CC BY-SA. Copyright violation . HombreDHojalata.talk 19:14, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: redundant and inferior to File:Citroen logo.png. P 1 9 9   16:42, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Article, out of scope. See also en:User:Eleonard74/sandbox. Achim (talk) 19:15, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:00, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion, out of scope. Achim (talk) 19:18, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:59, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie uploaded for a now deleted promotional autobiography on English Wikipedia. BethNaught (talk) 19:46, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   16:46, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abdoudou (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Suspect not "own work", appears to be scans of printed pages

Ronhjones  (Talk) 19:49, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and text-only out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:47, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flag of imaginary "micronation" apparently part of the user's fantasy life. Blythwood (talk) 19:51, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:46, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image source is unclear, google search shows a website that doesn't state a CC license. - [Tycho] talk 20:31, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:45, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Originally tagged as copyvio, but we have many others like it in Category:Citroën logos which are PD-ineligible. However, this one is redundant. Guanaco (talk) 20:35, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: redundant and inferior to File:Citroen logo.png. P 1 9 9   16:41, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong picture MariyamAftab (talk) 20:37, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9   16:38, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong picture MariyamAftab (talk) 20:38, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9   16:38, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:17, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:17, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kankhaan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:17, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:17, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:16, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CYeung (WMF) (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:16, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:16, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons:OTRS should be used instead. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:16, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: promotional, advertisement 4nn1l2 (talk) 14:51, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:15, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused selfie of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 15:03, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:13, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused selfie of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 15:07, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:13, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

هناك خطأ في الخريطة فسيتم التصحيح و الرّفع من جديد أنور بن الحسين (talk) 15:38, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. Don't upload a new version if the base map is not free and credited properly. P 1 9 9   17:12, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no longer valid since no state formation proposal Vinayakavm (talk) 05:07, 5 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

no longer valid since no new states will be formed in this region Vinayakavm (talk) 11:45, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:14, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It represents separate states out of Karnataka Vinayakavm (talk) 16:18, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per self-nomination, courtesy deletion. P 1 9 9   17:09, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, personal picture Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 16:17, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:08, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Piach One (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal files, commons is not a webhost.

Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:45, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:08, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Uneek Int (talk · contribs)

[edit]

personal files, commons is not a webhost

Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:47, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   17:08, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is wrong picture Farihatasnim150 (talk) 18:00, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9   17:05, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Nikolai Verkhovensky (talk) 07:34, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:34, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Nikolai Verkhovensky (talk) 07:35, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:34, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Nikolai Verkhovensky (talk) 07:35, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:34, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Michaelpesa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal/self-promotional images

Nikolai Verkhovensky (talk) 07:38, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:33, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Nikolai Verkhovensky (talk) 07:41, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:33, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Nikolai Verkhovensky (talk) 07:43, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:33, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Nikolai Verkhovensky (talk) 07:49, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:33, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: promotional. Advertisement in Persian. 4nn1l2 (talk) 09:52, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:32, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal pic of a globally banned ex-user. E4024 (talk) 12:24, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:30, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by אוהבספרים (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Book covers protected by copyright.

Wikicology (talk) 13:28, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:05, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational purpose, the church is not visible there, there are lot of its quality photos: category:Saints Peter and Paul Church (Prokhorovka). AndyVolykhov (talk) 13:55, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:04, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational purpose, the church is not visible there, there are lot of its quality photos: category:Saints Peter and Paul Church (Prokhorovka). AndyVolykhov (talk) 13:55, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:04, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image used only for page deleted from zh.wiki DS (talk) 01:44, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:31, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:06, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:31, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:08, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:31, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Scapii (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:09, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:32, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:13, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:32, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:17, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:32, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unidentified, useless. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:20, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:32, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 03:53, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:34, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fun upload, possible copy vio XRay talk 04:35, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope and copyvio. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:35, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry, unusable photo. kennethaw88talk 06:41, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:35, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dj Harden (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal/promotional images

Nikolai Verkhovensky (talk) 06:40, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:36, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT Nikolai Verkhovensky (talk) 06:43, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:37, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dylanyair99 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Nikolai Verkhovensky (talk) 06:46, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:38, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Babylores (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Nikolai Verkhovensky (talk) 06:47, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:39, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Nikolai Verkhovensky (talk) 06:49, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:39, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Nikolai Verkhovensky (talk) 06:50, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:39, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Nikolai Verkhovensky (talk) 06:51, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:39, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lucho Cabeza (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Nikolai Verkhovensky (talk) 06:52, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 20:40, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Nikolai Verkhovensky (talk) 06:53, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:13, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Nikolai Verkhovensky (talk) 06:54, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:13, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Nikolai Verkhovensky (talk) 06:55, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:14, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Luis Castañera (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal/promotional images

Nikolai Verkhovensky (talk) 06:57, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:14, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Nikolai Verkhovensky (talk) 06:58, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:14, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Biografiaseguras123456 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Nikolai Verkhovensky (talk) 07:00, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:14, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Nikolai Verkhovensky (talk) 07:02, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:14, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Nikolai Verkhovensky (talk) 07:06, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:15, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Nikolai Verkhovensky (talk) 07:07, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:15, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Nikolai Verkhovensky (talk) 07:09, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:15, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alfatharasy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Nikolai Verkhovensky (talk) 07:10, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:15, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Nikolai Verkhovensky (talk) 07:11, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:15, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Magdy seliim (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Nikolai Verkhovensky (talk) 07:13, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:16, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gisele Pereira Campos (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Nikolai Verkhovensky (talk) 07:14, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:16, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Nikolai Verkhovensky (talk) 07:16, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:16, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Nikolai Verkhovensky (talk) 07:17, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:16, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Nikolai Verkhovensky (talk) 07:18, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:16, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Nikolai Verkhovensky (talk) 07:20, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:16, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Nikolai Verkhovensky (talk) 07:21, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:16, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Nikolai Verkhovensky (talk) 07:23, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:16, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MassWriter (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Nikolai Verkhovensky (talk) 07:25, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:17, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MatthewJohnTV (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images from Facebook

Nikolai Verkhovensky (talk) 07:26, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:17, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Nikolai Verkhovensky (talk) 07:28, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:17, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 30 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:54, 7 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Requesting deletion as per COM:NUDE. ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 07:28, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:17, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal files: This one and File:Nedjo Osman.jpg. OoS. E4024 (talk) 07:30, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:17, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mayur Bhatt Shiv (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

Nikolai Verkhovensky (talk) 07:30, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:17, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Nikolai Verkhovensky (talk) 07:31, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:17, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Nikolai Verkhovensky (talk) 07:32, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:17, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Nikolai Verkhovensky (talk) 07:33, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:18, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image - this is in Bishonen's talk archive on WP, but I can't see her wanting this there Nikolai Verkhovensky (talk) 07:45, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:18, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

com:PENIS, enough of this stuff, the only contribution of the uploader Pippobuono (talk) 08:36, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:20, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NakedMaleTruth (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of com:EDUSE, and com:PENIS, and low quality of pics

Pippobuono (talk) 17:06, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:20, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader admits to finding this image on Google Images and being unsure of its origin. No evidence of being a free image. Anarcho-authoritarian (talk) 15:31, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This should be speedily deleted as a copyright infringement... Shouldn't it? Ralbegen (talk) 16:49, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ralbegen Because of its vague origin ("Google Images") I don't know if it is an infringement or not. It looks like the standard type of portrait of a politician used on thousands of Wikipedia articles that may be copyright-free Anarcho-authoritarian (talk) 17:28, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
COM:EVID tells us that the burden is on the uploader and defenders to demonstrate that it should be included. The uploader hasn't provided that. From COM:SPEEDY we learn that content that's an apparent copyright violation without evidence of licencing or status meets criteria for speedy deletion. I'm going to nominate for speedy deletion. Ralbegen (talk) 18:07, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, source – Google images, author – not sure. Taivo (talk) 07:35, 7 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image is a frame from a video <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6TU50Bz3Ey0> that is under a “Standard YouTube License” rather than the free license indicated here on Commons. Elyaqim (talk) 01:19, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:46, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A few remaining files, user has uploaded numerous images of this artist that have been deleted for no permission. Train2104 (talk) 02:22, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:47, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 03:25, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in scope. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:47, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation. Not found at the specified LibDem URLs, where there is no evidence of non-free files (see https://www.libdems.org.uk/terms_conditions). Found a non-free copy at https://www.theguardian.com/society/2017/may/31/public-services-parliament-candidates-westminster-general-election#img-2 Verbcatcher (talk) 03:48, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:47, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dreamsworldproperties (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Marketing drawings, should have verification of license with OTRS from the relevant company.

--ghouston (talk) 03:53, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:47, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A source is provided but I don't see evidence that the source is the author of the image. Only the author can release the image under a free license. When I use Google to translate the provided page to English, I think the message under the final picture is that the images are from the movie(s). I think it's unlikely that such a great image has been released under a free license. Dontreader (talk) 03:53, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:48, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free logo. No evidence to support the claimed authorship. Too complex to be allowable under Commons:Threshold of originality#United Kingdom Verbcatcher (talk) 03:55, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:48, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This seems to be the cover of a book [1]. I suppose the uploader of the image must go through COM:OTRS to prove that he or she is the owner. Only the owner can release it under a free license. Dontreader (talk) 03:59, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:48, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Please check all of the images uploaded by this user. They all seem to be book covers. This one can be found here [2]. We need proof that the uploader owns the images on the covers of the books. Otherwise there might be copyright violations. I suggest using COM:OTRS. Dontreader (talk) 04:06, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:48, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely non-free file which has been assigned a dubious license. Terms and conditions link from the current homepage does not indicate the presence of free files http://www.rhyddifanc.cymru/ -> https://www.libdems.org.uk/terms_conditions Verbcatcher (talk) 04:13, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:48, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

5 years from uploading have passed and now I cannot find the photo from source site. I am not sure, that the license was ever valid. Maybe copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 07:58, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:48, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Randykitty (talk) 10:25, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: Used on an article. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 10:40, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep:I believe scanned images of receipts are well within the scope of Wikimedia Commons of an image considered "educational". It provides a snapshot in history of a particular business, product, currency and market value. Even if the image was not used in an article, the fact that entire categories have been created containing many images of receipts on Wikimedia Commons is exemplifies that many users and administrators have collectively come to the conclusion that such images are in scope and provide a value. --Amineshaker (talk) 21:29, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete The enWP article has been deleted as advertising. I cannot imagine any possible encycopedia article than might rationally use this content; even if someone can write an acceptable article on the chain, this would be an irrelevant illustration--it shows nothing to aid the understanding or perception of the subject--such articles normally contain a picture of one of the locations. And if someone were to write an article on the shoe brand, an image of the shoe would be what would be appropriate. But of course Commons can include non-encyclopedic material that might have an education or even informative purpose; however, I can not imagine any possible use of this content for any imaginable educational or informative use. It says nothing about the product except its price at a given place on a given date; it says nothing about the chain other thanthey sell shoes--if thats what the cryptic description of the item can be interpreted as indicating. About 2/3 of the other receipts in the category at least illustrate the components of a typical meal, or are minor elements in the illustration of an identifiable object, or have clear historic significance. As for the other third .... DGG (talk) 23:39, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: COM:INUSE at enwp main namescape. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:50, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

If in scope, then it lacks an OTRS permission Christian Ferrer (talk) 10:58, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:50, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted Disney toys/franchise. Kungfuman (talk) 11:09, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:50, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lacks of source to determine the copyright status Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:16, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:50, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chegemly (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos, unlikely to be uploader's own works, probably scanned paper copies in possession.

Sealle (talk) 12:37, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Chegemly (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative works, the artist's permission missing.

Sealle (talk) 12:38, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:50, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:50, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jcpalmeiras (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small, no EXIF, therefore probably copyvios. Also, there is no WP article on the subject and no Google hits on the first page, so he is probably out of scope.

.     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:45, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:51, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As a precaution, I would like an Administrator to examine if African Eye is the owner of this image and has the authority to dedicate it to the public domain. Perhaps the man in the image could be contacted about who took the picture; here is his website [3]. I suppose the burden of proof is on the uploader of the image. Just my opinion. Dontreader (talk) 03:34, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete---There is no clear evidence that "African Eye" is the copyright holder of the image. "Copyright notice" on website is not an evidence of ownership of copyright and does not implies that they owns the copyright of every contents in their domain. Wikicology (talk) 13:15, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:54, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Combojee01 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos, not realistically useful for educational purpose. Wikimedia Commons is not a personal photo album.

Wikicology (talk) 14:01, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Hystrix. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:53, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no evidence that uploader is the same person as " Harold Christiansen of Ephraim Utah". Evidence of permission should be sent to our support team. Wikicology (talk) 14:12, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:55, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ihsan Podgorica (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Ihsan Podgorica (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No evidence of permission.

Wikicology (talk) 12:27, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:55, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://cdn.noveleros.com/actors/maria-sorte_med.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:55, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CocoWhitePio (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://isfd41.bue.infd.edu.ar/sitio/upload/img/colegio_nacional_de_adrogue.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:55, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Puebla Federico (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:55, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screemshot, doubtful licence. Osado (talk) 15:21, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:56, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

appears to be flickr-washed. Not apparent that the flickr user has the rights to license David Hockney's work Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:52, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:56, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

States that it is a " revamp of the old version of the House of Al Falasi family tree.", but not historical attribution is given. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 16:56, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:57, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Says it is a "Revamped version", but no historical attribution given. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 16:57, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:56, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely own work. No EXIF data, and the uploader was blocked on the English Wiki for copyright violations. Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 16:58, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:56, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not uploader's own work, possible copyvio Jon Kolbert (talk) 16:59, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:57, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free, source http://optoacoustics.ru/ndt/laserut-basics Fedor Babkin (talk) 17:05, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:57, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication this unused complex logo was created by uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:15, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:57, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An unused file, containing derivative images on the walls for which we do not apparently have permission. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:16, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:57, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Robberto123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These are all found elsewhere on the web such as [4][5]. However the alleged source for some of these appears to be newer than the file on Commons.

Robberto123, please update the site to say these are licensed under a free license, or send an email to OTRS.

Guanaco (talk) 18:21, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Hystrix. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:57, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The flash burn on this image would lead to the suggestion that this is a rephotograph of something else, not own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:57, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this photo of some diagram. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:57, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this diagram about right and left brain abilities. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:57, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image, no EXIF. Probably in scope, but is it a copyvio? .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:35, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:58, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photo-montage of Facebook Ederporto (talk) 20:01, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:58, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DW rather than own work. No source for the underlying base map. Unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 20:37, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:58, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's not proven that the uploader is an architect of this project. ~Cybularny Speak? 21:44, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:58, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's not proven that the uploader is an architect of this project. ~Cybularny Speak? 21:44, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:58, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio sourceː http://www.whairport.com/article/news_info?articleId=185 MNXANL (talk) 21:47, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:59, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio http://www.whggjtjs.com/news/113.html MNXANL (talk) 21:51, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:59, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio http://www.xwtoutiao.cn/p/puyyr6w3/ MNXANL (talk) 21:52, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:59, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 22:50, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:59, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

logo in image is copyrighted, significant enough not to be considered de minimis Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:14, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 07:59, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 15:24, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:47, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 15:24, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:51, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. This is the art work "100 suitcases" created by the artists en:Marko Mäetamm and et:Kaido Ole in 2004. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:54, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: com:FoP#Estonia. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:54, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. This is the art work "100 suitcases" created by the artists en:Marko Mäetamm and et:Kaido Ole in 2004. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:54, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: com:FoP#Estonia. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:55, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. This is the art work "100 suitcases" created by the artists en:Marko Mäetamm and et:Kaido Ole in 2004. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 23:52, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: com:FoP#Estonia. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:06, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the picture was not to the extent koushikA 07:32, 22 September 2017 (UTC)

Repetitive duplicate images with no relevance to the title and description. Null encyclopedic value within the scope koushikA 01:26, 29 September 2017 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: cropped. Ruthven (msg) 08:16, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
[1]
42.113.33.117 02:21, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Nonsense edit by an IP. --Achim (talk) 16:34, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded an image into the wrong placeholder using the upload wizard via wikilovesmonuments. This is actually an image of 1, High Street, Harrow-on-the-Hill, as can be verified by the description at https://www.historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1358626 . I don't have an image of the Headmaster's House, which is the next building to the left.

This is the first of two upload errors. Bernard Burns (talk) 01:29, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Done. Good luck with the rest of your WLM uploads!. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:30, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded an image into the wrong placeholder using the upload wizard via wikilovesmonuments. This is actually an image of 3, High Street, Harrow-on-the-Hill, as can be verified by the description at https://www.historicengland.org.uk/listing/the-list/list-entry/1079688 .

Once this file is deleted, I can upload this image as 3, High, Street, Harrow-on-the-Hill, and I can upload a correct image of 1, High Street, Harrow-on-the-Hill. Bernard Burns (talk) 01:41, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Done. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:30, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I believe the resolution is poor, perhaps from a magazine or a video. Apparently this is Ursula Hayden, who was known as "Babe The Farmer's Daughter" in a wrestling TV series from the late 1980s called Gorgeous Ladies of Wrestling. There are videos on YouTube and images on Google. For example, [6] and [7]. Therefore, I think this image is unlikely to be own work. It's probably from almost 30 years ago, and it would be hard for a fan to get such a good closeup. Dontreader (talk) 03:13, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:31, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per cOM:ADVERT Nikolai Verkhovensky (talk) 07:05, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:31, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cycling infrastructure categories of former regions of France

[edit]

These regions have been abolished 1½ years ago. Content has been moved to the categories of the current regions. Cycn (talk) 07:03, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:32, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Nikolai Verkhovensky (talk) 07:33, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:33, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted poster 77.73.203.2 08:48, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Deleted. In the future, you can use a speedy delete tag for unambiguous copyvios like this. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:34, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_policy#Not_educationally_useful Malyacko (talk) 09:06, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_policy#Not_educationally_useful Malyacko (talk) 09:07, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and deprecated redirect Jc86035 (talk) 09:49, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and deprecated redirect Jc86035 (talk) 09:49, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:35, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy File:Kotelny Island 08.jpg Nickel nitride (talk) 11:03, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Done. In the future you can just use {{Duplicate}}. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:36, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of unclear notability. w:Draft:BGI - Building Global Innovators was deleted as spam (w:WP:G11). Fails c:COM:SCOPE. Also presumably wrong copyright tag. See also w:Wikipedia:Files for discussion/2017 September 23#File:Presskitphoto.jpg. Stefan2 (talk) 11:11, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:37, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata. Obviously, the file of another author. No Permission. Микола Василечко (talk) 15:00, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:38, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be user's own work image, low resolution, photo appears to the copyrighted from the Portuguese Lusa Agency. B.Lameira (talk) 15:26, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:38, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio, web-quality promo shot uploaded with no camera metadata Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:51, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:38, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Part of mass upload: Very low quality image of distant sailboats, numerous alternatives available. Unused. P 1 9 9   16:25, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:38, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Elisfkc as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: File:Apple-Apple.svg Not exactly an exact duplicate, but this file isn't needed. Guanaco (talk) 18:58, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:38, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is not used and can be easily recreated using a vector graphic if needed again. Kkaaii (talk) 19:08, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

*  Delete badpdf and very cheap sketch.  -- User: Perhelion 19:23, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:39, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is not used and can be easily recreated using a vector graphic if needed again. Kkaaii (talk) 19:43, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope, as far as I can tell. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:40, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Own work" claimed, but google image search shows some government webpages with non-CC copyright notes: http://www.wpl.gov.cn/pc-69-35849.html - [Tycho] talk 21:10, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:40, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong, correct version available: File:Katalysezyklus Negishi-Kupplung.svg Mabschaaf (talk) 19:20, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 21:31, 8 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want upload new file Ch.pongsakorn (talk) 02:00, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: author's request 15 minutes after upload. --Guanaco (talk) 22:51, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded wrong size Jif403 (talk) 02:45, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request 30 minutes after upload. --Guanaco (talk) 22:52, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uploaded wrong size found plus found was already uploaded Jif403 (talk) 02:47, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request 30 minutes after upload. --Guanaco (talk) 22:52, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT Nikolai Verkhovensky (talk) 07:49, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 22:52, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

May not meet the requirments of COM:SELFIE, and this image may be found on Internet similar to this. B dash (talk) 07:51, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Taiwania Justo, Wcam, Guanaco, Thibaut120094, and Mys 721tx: This is an original photo that never appears on the Internet and it is used to here [8]. It is "providing knowledge; instructional or informative", everyone can know that Anthony Ho is helping to develop arts of Hong Kong (include environmental protection) after seeing the subtitle of "戲劇教育" in his Chinese Wikipedia page & "description" of the photo. Two photos were taken in the "same day" but "different places", just Anthony Ho "didn't change his clothes". These images are also similar to the above picture which B dash points out [9][10] with his unreasonable conjecture. Gm King (talk) 08:48, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Guanaco (talk) 22:53, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Presumably copyrighted building, no freedom of panorama in France. --ghouston (talk) 11:13, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 22:54, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1942. Jcb (talk) 12:15, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I do not remember at the moment, but it seems that I made a mistake while transferring the image from trwiki by not editing the top parts back then. There are other free images of Galiyev, and they are now being used instead of this image. The original description indicates "Yukarıda bulunan fotoğraf kendisine aittir." which means that " the photo above belongs to himself", which I doubt. This image is most likely cropped version of File:Mirsaid Sultan-Galiev, F. Erzin, I.K. Firdevs.jpg (transferred from http://www.archive.gov.tatarstan.ru/_go/anonymous/print/?id=11693&type=article), which may also need further details. If that image is free, we can consider this image as the cropped version of File:Mirsaid Sultan-Galiev, F. Erzin, I.K. Firdevs.jpg which is taken in 1919 and may currently belong to the Tatarstan state archive. --Bulgu (talk) 12:39, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. To be undeleted in 2039. Ruthven (msg) 17:44, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:59, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:47, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : thumbnail format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects; affected: File:Pdamanabhapuram Palace view from window, Thuckalay.jpg, File:Padmanabhapuram Palace entrance, Thuckalay.jpg, File:Padmanabhapuram Palace, Thuckalay.jpg. Roland zh (talk) 19:02, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:47, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects; affected: File:Pdamanabhapuram Palace view from window, Thuckalay.jpg, File:Padmanabhapuram Palace entrance, Thuckalay.jpg, File:Padmanabhapuram Palace, Thuckalay.jpg. Roland zh (talk) 19:02, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 17:47, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects; affected: File:Pdamanabhapuram Palace view from window, Thuckalay.jpg, File:Padmanabhapuram Palace entrance, Thuckalay.jpg, File:Padmanabhapuram Palace, Thuckalay.jpg. Roland zh (talk) 19:02, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; EXIF indicating "google" worries me. Ruthven (msg) 17:48, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is not used and can be easily recreated using a vector graphic if needed again. Kkaaii (talk) 19:04, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 17:45, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is not used and can be easily recreated using a vector graphic if needed again. Kkaaii (talk) 19:05, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 17:45, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is not used and can be easily recreated using a vector graphic if needed again. Kkaaii (talk) 19:07, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 17:45, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dudenopants (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A series of personal photographs of one or two naked people usually in front of scenery or signs. Commons isn't a personal photographic album.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:46, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The uploader left a message on the discussion page instead of here. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:12, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep only 2 files of the list for me : File:Nudist woman walking in forest 01.JPG and File:Nudist couple at Terra Cotta Inn, Palm Springs, CA.JPG, those 2 photographs could be used to illustrate articles.  Delete all the others files. Jiel (talk) 19:28, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I agree with Jiel: these two photos are normal, the others are bad. But even some bad photos are in use somewhere. Taivo (talk) 21:49, 21 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: 2 kept, the rest deleted. INeverCry 20:36, 23 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dudenopants (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:37, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Several of the images have been used in various media, here: http://sexeducationstation.com/Sex%20menstruation%20and%20menopause.html And here: http://www.scotsman.com/news/environment/summer-nudist-camp-to-be-held-in-dumfriesshire-forest-1-3747098 And here: https://nl.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naturistencamping And the cover of a book here:. https://www.amazon.com/Sombras-escaldantes-Portuguese-João-Franco/dp/1522874755

I believe I've contributed legitimate nudist images to the community and some of the images have found use. I imagine that some of the images will find use in the future.

--Dudenopants (talk) 13:13, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete the files which are not used. --176.239.64.180 20:50, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination the ones that are unusable; kept better quality ones. Ruthven (msg) 17:50, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader is claimingto be copyright holder although the user name does not seem to be related to the asserted author of the photo which is credited to Matuschka. The authorship claim is also dubious as the image doe snot appear to be a selfie and the purported author is the subject of the photo. OTRS confirmation of proper permission would be required. Whpq (talk) 23:04, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: OTRS received; keeping it meanwhile the ticket is being processed. Ruthven (msg) 17:54, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DoriaStrait (talk · contribs)

[edit]

File:Napoleon Marseille 2001.jpg was not own work. Suspicious uploads.

Yann (talk) 20:59, 20 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Yann, I think these may be OK. The deleted one was obviously scanned from a halftone -- you can see the artifacts. These are all fairly high resolution and show no half-tone artifacts. Also, the first one is unlikely to be a commercial shot because the smoke she is showing is illegal -- the company would never buy that for their advertising or other use. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:03, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as per Jim. Yann (talk) 20:06, 28 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted logos uploaded by DoriaStrait (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Those logos may be sophisticated enough for copyright protection.

- [Tycho] talk 23:18, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I was taking a look at Corsica ferries sardinia ferries logo.png and that's how I saw this DR, I did not see the other files, just comment on this one. IMHO, such file is not original enough. The head might look "original", but it is a very common theme of the Corsica and Sardinia flag, the rest is just a color background with some very common words. Without the head you'd have no doubt is not original but again the head is just a traditional image. if I draw a similar symbol on another logo, I am not violating any copyright.--Alexmar983 (talk) 05:29, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

For File:Logognv.svg, File:SNCMlogo88.jpg, File:SNCMlogo76.jpg  Keep. Below ToO.
Agastya (talk) 14:44, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; kept the ones indicated by Agastya. Ruthven (msg) 17:53, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

picture not clear koushikA 01:23, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

Has this file been nominated in two different DRs? --E4024 (talk) 11:51, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: already kept in another DR. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:13, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

не собственная работа Barbarian (talk) 12:00, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination -copyvio. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:35, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Wiktoryn as Speedy (speedydeletion) and the most recent rationale was: http://zamosc.naszemiasto.pl/artykul/11-sierpnia-zamosc-przywita-biskupa-mariana-rojka,1497517,art,t,id,tm.html Yann (talk) 13:44, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:25, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Wiktoryn as Speedy (speedydeletion) and the most recent rationale was: http://przemyska.pl/biskupi/ Yann (talk) 13:44, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:22, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 2602:302:D1A2:C740:BD73:C0A2:500:8CE7 as Copyvio (Copyvio) Yann (talk) 13:54, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - no evidences of copyvio. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:21, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Primo_rudere.jpg Gabriele Diana (talk) 14:18, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The link goes to the same file. Is there a better version of this image? --E4024 (talk) 14:24, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: corupted file, duplicate of File:Rudere1.jpg. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:18, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-commercial free use image. B.Lameira (talk) 14:38, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:17, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

не собственная работа Barbarian (talk) 12:00, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Christian Ferrer at 09:38, 12 Oktober 2017 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Director Ovsyannikov.jpg --Krdbot 12:19, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio: This is the work of the San Diego Community College District. Doubtful the uploading user can claim it as their own. Additional copyright info: https://www.sdccd.edu/about/copyright.aspx

GrapefruitSculpin (talk) 02:24, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: not own work. Potentially acceptable as below TOO. --Basvb (talk) 09:19, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Winning Eleven 3 Final Ver." cover. Solomon203 (talk) 04:47, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: DW. --Basvb (talk) 09:20, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Die ältere Version des Bildes enthält einen Schreibfehler und sollte gelöscht werden Avernarius (talk) 06:02, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: I don't see the issue. You can upload a new version, or is there a new version of the file at a different name (they can be merged). --Basvb (talk) 09:21, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The EXIF data says that the copyrights belong to Press Trust of India. Permissions? Rahul Bott (talk) 06:33, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 09:21, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Its against human emotions and that's why humanity. No one has right to utter a single word against any religion....if you dont like it dont follow it but pls dont make fun of any religion 83.110.250.192 12:18, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This file has been previously deleted, and restored, see Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2010-08#File:Mohammed by meco.png. __meco (talk) 13:31, 30 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: No new reaons for deletion. russavia (talk) 07:38, 10 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in scope; Commons doesn't exist for users to upload their own personal drawings. Pete F (talk) 18:35, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]



No consensus to delete -FASTILY 06:51, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I read the previous discussions. Nothing in there convinces me that we should keep this offensive material from a user banned for child porno! If I had drawn such a pic for that user or anybody else, I would very possibly be blocked for personal attack and this is mass attack against any believer, irrespective of their religion. Let's keep the useful contributions of the banned user but also clean the dirt they left behind. Would you keep any child porn for "not censuring"? Please let's all / always be more sensitive on sensitive issues. Thanks. E4024 (talk) 12:53, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Religious criticism is one of the tennents of free speach and democracy, like Piss Christ and this cartoon by Carlos Latuff about the Israeli occupation of Palestine and anti-semitism, depicting a stereotyped jew. Not hatred speech, like some seen on extreme religious channels be it Muslim, Christian, Jewish or Buddhist, where the "preacher" appeals to the faithfulls to kill, behead, burn, explode with the unfaithfull.
Hate speech is not being able to be a christian in the Middle East because you can be killed for it, the same with muslims and christians in India, being rammed by a car on a mosque on france just for being a muslim, be stabbed for being a christian woman in Finland, etc. That is what is hate speech, to appeal to the physical destruction of others, not the depiction of Muhammad. Tm (talk) 13:49, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use. --Basvb (talk) 09:24, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Iceland, per Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Iceland. Gapfall (talk) 07:46, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 22:33, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Iceland, per Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Iceland. Gapfall (talk) 07:46, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 22:32, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non pertinente Maurizio Bianchi (talk) 09:31, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 22:34, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the image owner and wish to remove it. Subvertc (talk) 03:47, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. License is irrevocable and image is in use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:05, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the administrator who kept this after a prior request. I failed to notice that there are two versions of this file. The older one has a (C) mark on it and the name of the photographer which does not match the name of the uploader's account. I request deletion of this image because I missed the (C) on the initial upload. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:18, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Do you have a particular reason to think the account who uploaded doesn't belong to the named individual? Personally, I don't care if the file is deleted or not, but it seems to me that the best thing to do would be to confirm that instead of presuming. Now, I admit that it seems to me unlikely that this contributor and the photographer are one and the same, but given the photographer's rather substantive internet presence (and complete lack of celebrity status) it would be be very easy to get their email address and ask them.
Of course, if there is a commons policy which addresses this particular situation and encourages the assumption that they're not the same, I am unaware of it. MjolnirPants (talk) 04:57, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It's a case of COM:PCP "Precautionary Principle" at this point. The image contains a derivative image of a logo as well as a (C) mark on the initial version. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:47, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, that works for me. It certainly seems to fall into the "...where there is significant doubt about the freedom of a particular file..." clause. Delete it. MjolnirPants (talk) 19:18, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 22:34, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is attributed to Anton Perich with a CC-BY-SA 4.0 license. However there is no evidence provided that this image has been released under such a license. OTRS confirmation would be needed. Whpq (talk) 23:00, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: OTRS ticket has arrived. Ruthven (msg) 22:38, 14 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No information on the photographer of this 3D object. Unknown copyright situation. Picture is not old enough for PD-old. Jcb (talk) 20:50, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, clearly this is a "manuscript" and not depicted as a "3D object" (of course everything in this universe is "3d", the question is if the information conveyed makes use of the property of three-dimensionality). Also, do not delete images proactively based on unclear legal situations, let the courts decide on how to apply the law and then follow suit with deletions, not the other way round. --Dbachmann (talk) 09:37, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
We have the long standing practice to not ignore the copyright of the photographer of 3D objects. Compare e.g. Commons:Currency#Important_points. A picture of a coins would probably be a "manuscript" too in your point of view I suppose? Jcb (talk) 11:06, 1 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: This is similar to cave paintings (see e.g. Commons:Deletion requests/Image:Box c500BC.jpg). COM:PDART only covers 2D-works while 3D-works can be represented from different angles and give different representations of the subject in question, where with 2D work can't do so. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 22:57, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Reddogsix as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://mobile.twitter.com/eaglenaran
Not clear case. Sanandros (talk) 07:39, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Guanaco (talk) 04:09, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation. Not found at the specified LibDem URLs, where there is no evidence of non-free files (see https://www.libdems.org.uk/terms_conditions). Found a non-free copy at https://www.ceredigion.gov.uk/English/Your-Council/Councillors-Committees/Councillors/Pages/Aberaeron-Ward.aspx Other questionable uploads by this contributor Verbcatcher (talk) 03:58, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Missing legal information. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:06, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

上傳者從別處自行複製上傳,沒有注意到未經同意更改授權的問題 KOKUYO (talk) 06:33, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, the uploader requested deletion of page: author's request on creation day. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:14, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files from narendramodiofficial Flickr stream. Rahul Bott (talk) 08:41, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:21, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: {{GODL-India}} Yann (talk) 12:46, 20 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

With discouraged watermarks on the image. There is an alternate version which has no watermarks on the image. B dash (talk) 09:44, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, Redundant quality file. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:29, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

крайне сомневаюсь, что собственная работа Barbarian (talk) 11:59, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, probably copyvio. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:34, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author field has PM Modi's name but metadata attributes it to the uploader. The Flickr account narendramodiofficial has been blacklisted because of unclear copyright status of the uploaded works there. Rahul Bott (talk) 12:48, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:36, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: {{GODL-India}} Yann (talk) 12:41, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This work is by Parikas per [11] and per inscription on original image at BNF, and so copyright hasn't expired. There's no reason to believe that Agence Meurisse holds (hold) the rights eventhough BNF claims that latter organization is the author. Per Commons:Bistro/archives/2017/09#Fichiers haute définition sur Gallica it seems that author/copyright info at BNF is generally problematic. --90.191.76.154 14:43, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your claim here is Agence Meurisse IS the author, so the copyright expired 70 years after its publication.
Since Agence Meurisse was an organization it can't be the author. In theory it only could have hold economic rights for given image. Only evidence that we currently have suggests that photo was taken by Parikas brothers. Since 1910 they had a private photo studio in Tallinn, far from France, and it isn't known that they had ever worked for French news agency. So a scenario that French agency obtained rights for an individual image from Estonian photographers before 1937 when Agence Meurisse was dissolved and when copyright licenses probably weren't common, is very unlikely. I believe some sort of evidence is required of the agency acquiring these rights since this being the case isn't beyond reasonable doubt.
Also, source country for this work is probably Estonia and per Estonian copyright act there's only way that copyright for an individual work could expire 70 years after publication, namely work is anonymous or pseudonymous (§ 40, 41 (4)). Otherwise its the usual 70 p.m.a (§ 38). Here author is neither anonymous nor pseudonymous. 90.191.76.154 20:51, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Where did you see that Parikas brothers are the authors? Regards, Yann (talk) 22:44, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
See the museum database entry link above in the first sentence. At this entry click "Rohkem" to uncollapse extra details, it says "fotograaf: Parikas, Johannes ja Peeter". Secondly, if you zoom the image at the BNF entry, you see superscription "PARIKAS FOTO" in the bottom right corner. 90.191.76.154 06:30, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK, delete. Yann (talk) 09:49, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as above. --Y.haruo (talk) 17:44, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This work is either by Parikas (per [12]) or by August Vannas (per [13]). Vannas died in 1964 per [14]. 70 p.m.a. term has passed for neither and so copyright likely hasn't expired. 90.191.76.154 13:30, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 18:09, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files from narendramodiofficial Flickr stream. Rahul Bott (talk) 18:29, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Y.haruo (talk) 18:19, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: {{GODL-India}} Yann (talk) 20:21, 19 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Repetitive duplicate images with no relevance to the title and description. Null encyclopedic value within the scope koushikA 01:25, 29 September 2017 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 22:33, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Repetitive duplicate images with no relevance to the title and description. Null encyclopedic value within the scope koushikA 01:26, 29 September 2017 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 22:33, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Repetitive duplicate images with no relevance to the title and description. Null encyclopedic value within the scope koushikA 01:27, 29 September 2017 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 22:33, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Repetitive duplicate images with no relevance to the title and description. Null encyclopedic value within the scope koushikA 01:28, 29 September 2017 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 22:33, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this is not a public domaine photo but has a copyright note on this site [15] Domdeparis (talk) 15:55, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Neutral? - The text under the photo says: © The Great Famine and Genocide in Persia. Not a name or something. It's made in 1918, the photographer is possibly not alive anymore for many years.. So I doubt if this is really copyrighted, but there is no proof. Perhaps a tough decision for the moderator :-) . - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 17:01, 30 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Richardkiwi: The copyright refers to a book on the subject [16] from which this photo was probably taken. --Domdeparis (talk) 15:15, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep According to PDIran law and the date of photo which have been taken, this photo basically does not have any copyright to be protected by... and the deletion nominating have no mean for it... Thanks.--ن.عامری (talk) 20:20, 28 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: PD. Ruthven (msg) 22:34, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo is from Hungary during world war 2 and does not represent what the caption says it does. https://www.pinterest.fr/pin/549228117027998433/ on this version the star of David sown on to the clothes is clearly visible. Domdeparis (talk) 09:14, 27 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Hoax, bad quality. --Yann (talk) 17:37, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Freedom of panorama#Lebanon

ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 16:48, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Two photos 2 and 3 are cropped from the original photo with name Portrait du cheikh Ahmed al-Assir à Tripoli.JPG ; if we read the law about Freedom_of_panorama#Lebanon we concluded that "The media shall be permitted, without the authorization of the author and without obligation to pay him compensation, to publish pictures of architectural works, visual artistic works, photographic works or works of applied art, provided that such works are available in places open to the public."

See Law on the Protection of Literary and Artistic Property* (No. 75 of April 3, 1999) the Article 31 by that the request for deletion is not necessary you can download the PDF law in english :http://www.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/en/lb/lb001en.pdf or in arabic :http://www.wipo.int/edocs/lexdocs/laws/ar/lb/lb001ar.pdf --Bachounda (talk) 18:05, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Commons is not a media. Ruthven (msg) 22:40, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A. Tõnisson by Parikas

[edit]

These photos are by Parikas, respectively per [18] and [19]. So copyright hasn't expired since 70 p.m.a. term has not passed.

--90.191.76.154 17:51, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 22:48, 1 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]