Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/08/04

Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Year	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2004	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2005	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2006	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2007	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2008	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2009	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2010	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2011	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2012	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2013	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12

Year	Jan	Feb	Mar	Apr	May	Jun	Jul	Aug	Sep	Oct	Nov	Dec
2014	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2015	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2016	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2017	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2018	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2019	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2020	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2021	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2022	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2023	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12
2024	01	02	03	04	05	06	07	08	09	10	11	12

Archive August 4^th, 2017

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The Team of Professionals Escort in Beirut.jpg

advertising, out of com:SCOPE Pippobuono (talk) 07:52, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Gone - spam - thanks. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 10:23, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ELKAY.tif

I want to take it off of Wikimedia Commons because it is a private logo. Stephanie at ElkayManufacturing (talk) 21:16, 3 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: THis is PD-Text Logo -- there is no copyright involved. The advice you got on WP:EN was bad, see my comment there. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:28, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ELKAY.tif

Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:04, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in use now, withdrawn. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:21, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Requests for comment/Purplebackpack89

Work of a user that has been globally banned for vandalism or sockpuppetry. Also fails to meet criteria and does not reference anything I've done on this page. Purplebackpack89 (talk) 22:07, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Nonsense page. --Natuur12 (talk) 22:12, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Binzed Group.jpg

Logo = copyvio Arjayay (talk) 11:31, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:47, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ErectPenis.jpg

Low quality COM:PENIS photo, unlikely to be useful A1Cafel (talk) 16:59, 13 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --IronGargoyle (talk) 04:13, 20 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Indre By, Copenhagen, Denmark - panoramio (65).jpg

No freedom of panorama in Denmark Pugilist (talk) 11:49, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 15:51, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Indre By, Copenhagen, Denmark - panoramio (66).jpg

No freedom of panorama in Denmark. Bot upload Pugilist (talk) 11:49, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 15:49, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Indre By, Copenhagen, Denmark - panoramio (68).jpg

No freedom of panorama in Denmark. Bot upload Pugilist (talk) 11:50, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 15:51, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Indre By, Copenhagen, Denmark - panoramio (9).jpg

Comtempory piece of Art on exhibit at "Statens Museum for Kunst". No freedom of Panorama. Bot upload Pugilist (talk) 11:54, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 15:52, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dipanker g (talk · contribs)

User has been uploading newspaper clips and webgrabs as own work, unlikely that any of these are own work and should be deleted. I've tagged a few copyvios separately, no point in looking for every individual image.

—SpacemanSpiff 11:35, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Herby ^{talk thyme} 17:20, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joinkly83 (talk · contribs)

Out of scope - unused personal images.

--ghouston (talk) 00:03, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 18:11, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Я и магомед.jpg

Out of scope, personal image. Дима Г (talk) 00:06, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 18:11, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Джигит современный.jpg

Out of scope, personal image. Дима Г (talk) 00:10, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 18:11, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Musa 12345 6aliev.jpg

Out of scope, personal image. Дима Г (talk) 00:11, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 18:11, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Дада.jpg

Out of scope, personal image. Дима Г (talk) 00:11, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 18:11, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Важные слова.jpg

Out of scope. Дима Г (talk) 00:12, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 18:11, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bandera.png

worse copy of File:Bandera col santander.jpg. Please protect the filename. Taivo (talk) 11:34, 3 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Denniss (talk) 23:12, 20 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bandera.png

Unused personal photograph overwritten by Mexican flag emoji TFerenczy (talk) 00:20, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 18:12, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bandera.png

Unidentified and unused flag, probably out of project scope. If you delete the file, then protect the filename against upload as too generic. Taivo (talk) 10:16, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --1989 (talk) 01:22, 22 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Aviation Aqaba.jpg

out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 00:33, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 18:12, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Avijit Saha.jpg

out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 00:43, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 18:12, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Avijit.jpg

out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 00:43, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 18:12, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Avin Agarwal.jpg

out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 00:47, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 18:13, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Avinash shettigar.JPG

out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 00:48, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 18:13, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Avinashshettigar.jpg

Image is of poor quality and while in use on a user page, please read the page to see that it's blatent self-promo, outside of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 08:12, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted -FASTILY 09:33, 25 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Avinashshettigar.jpg

out of scope — unused personal image Daphne Lantier 00:49, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 18:13, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Roshan Abbas.jpg

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:20, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 18:13, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Versos.jpg

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:21, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 18:14, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sala3.jpg

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:21, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 18:14, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Tungpt01

Advertising for a company. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 07:03, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 18:14, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 我是小青龍啊 (talk · contribs)

Copyvio from http://www.o-fee.com/

Stang 08:59, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 18:20, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Michele Farelli (talk · contribs)

Promo photos and movie poster. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 18:21, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Marcelo Silveira de Souza (talk · contribs)

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 18:22, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logos uploaded by Stephanie at ElkayManufacturing (talk · contribs)

Unused promotional logos, clearly uploaded to promote various Elkay brands; out of scope.

P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:10, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --~ Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 18:24, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cocinando la guayusa.jpg

Image file is broken (shows large grey color region), subject cannot be seen clearly seb26 (talk) 19:45, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:06, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gavari performance Ayush Devpura Independence Day 2014 Udaipur.jpg

Stolen scanned image. User is not the original artist. Pepperbeast (talk) 22:07, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please offer some/any evidence for this assertion. This is getting ridiculous - User User talk:Pepperbeast has just run through the Gavari photo list claiming "stolen image" for a dozen or more pictures without any effort to authenticate his totally false charges. Don't understand his motives, but where can you report and stop systematic sabotage? Eklingdas (talk) 11:18, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry checking back, this photo sent by a friend got mixed in with my Independence Day prep photos and I posted it by mistake. Please do delete it and accept my apologies. It won't happen again.Kasarlyn (talk) 08:31, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per uploader's statement. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:59, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Charlie Petersen.jpg

Not own work. Picture found on the internet http://football-in-the-seventies.blogspot.dk/2013_06_01_archive.html Pugilist (talk) 12:52, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 00:01, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Charliepetersen.jpg

Not own work. Picture found on the Internet http://www.fodboldhistorik.dk/Fodbold-historik/nu/nu-marks/Koge_66/Koge.htm Pugilist (talk) 12:54, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 00:01, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Charlie Petersen3.jpg

Not own work; picture found on the Internet, http://datesofbirth.ucoz.ru/news/futbolnye_kluby_kjoge_bk_danija/2012-03-10-1248 Pugilist (talk) 12:59, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington ^(mail?) 00:01, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ganther In 2017.jpg

Taken from Flickr, but doesn't have a free license there. --ghouston (talk) 00:01, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:56, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Шарапова.jpg

probable copyvio Pippobuono (talk) 07:54, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:33, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Производственный остров Дю.jpg

Source site (Russian language) appears to be non-free content. Guanaco (talk) 11:35, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:43, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rajeev-Alunkal-Wikipedia-7.jpg

There are 7 (seven) of these. All the others under the same title and with numbers from 1 to 6. OoS. E4024 (talk) 15:28, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also affected

Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:08, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope. --Sealle (talk) 10:50, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Минаков Дмитрий (talk · contribs)

Low resolution, no metadata, potential copyvio.

Dmitry89 (talk) 16:56, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:50, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Navy Pier (talk · contribs)

Pretty clearly copyvios, not own work; stock photos for website use by the Navy Pier media team. But since I can't find these elsewhere online, not really candidates for speedy.

—/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 21:54, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:52, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logopach.jpg

not only geometrical shapes Ezarateesteban 22:58, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete agree that it is above threshold seb26 (talk) 14:30, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:53, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Lazy penis part II.jpg

This is techically the same as a photo of my penis LukasMuriel (talk) 23:15, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope. --Sealle (talk) 10:55, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:My hairy penis.jpg

Yo como autor original de todas las fotos de mi pene, quiero eliminarlas todas (incluyendo esta) LukasMuriel (talk) 23:30, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty decent picture. Could be used for future pages. I vote to keep them on because even though the OP now regrets it, their is no face and it could be used in the future. I personally also feel comfortable with my penis on Wikipedia and commons to. Bigman0418 (talk) 21:28, 5 August 2017 (EST)

Delete per uploader request. User Bigmanwhatsoever, your opinions on your p-thing is only trolling and could cost you another block. --E4024 (talk) 14:04, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:55, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nakahara-heiwa park , Kawasaki - panoramio (1).jpg

No-FoP in Japan. this work is created by Yoshio Hosoi (source) who was alive at least in 1986 (source), thus this is not in public domain. Kkairri (talk) 00:05, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:45, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:DJ Murci.jpg

Seems to be taken from [1]. Evidence of own work should be provided, see COM:OTRS. --ghouston (talk) 00:05, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:45, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Peru.png

Too small, superseded by multiple flags in Category:State flags of Peru. TFerenczy (talk) 00:07, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:45, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arnab sen kol (talk · contribs)

Described as stills from a movie, apparently directed by somebody else. Needs verification that the uploader is the copyright holder (see COM:OTRS.

--ghouston (talk) 00:12, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:45, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:International Revolutionary People's Guerrilla Forces patch.svg

Repetida de IRPGF Insignia Mikelelgediento (talk) 00:24, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:45, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Nakahara-heiwa park , Kawasaki - panoramio (2).jpg

No-FoP in Japan. this work is created by Katsuzo Entsuba (圓鍔勝三, source) who died in 2003, thus this is not in public domain. Kkairri (talk) 00:41, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:45, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Liam32.jpg

Given that the uploading user claims to be the subject of this photograph (see edit summary from enwiki here), this is clearly not their own work. Sir Sputnik (talk) 00:42, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:45, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Un Orgullo Mundial sostenible (07).jpg

Low quality image, with non-free elements and blurry backs of people covering most of it. Guanaco (talk) 01:04, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:45, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alt logo.jpg

It could be a copyvio. I doubt it's "own work". Jarould [talk] 04:12, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:46, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:De-Geeste.ogg

Plural of German Geest is Geesten and not Geeste -> not existing term, see German Wiktionary: Geest, jeuwre Jeuwre (talk) 05:28, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:46, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kagoshima montage.jpg

No FOP in Japan, The copyright of the left lower Okubo Toshimichi statue still continues in Japan. This image can not be kept on commons see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Statue of Okubo Toshimichi in Kagoshima.jpg. Y.haruo (talk) 06:30, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:46, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:NAK 5397.jpg

Erreur d'upload Yortog (talk) 06:49, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:46, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Arabi Jahid Logo.png

Unused personal artwork. No potential educational value. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 06:50, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:46, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:CRB@21.jpg

Personal artwork for a private club, of no interest to anyone but uploader: has no potential educational value. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 07:08, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:46, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Croftwerk, Music Video.jpg

Unused personal logo uploaded only for self-promotional purposes. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 07:09, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:46, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Boxwood PS wall drawing in hallway.jpg

There is no freedom of panorama for 2-dimensional art in Canada. OTRS-permission from copyright holder (artist? Boxwood school in Markham, Ontario?) is needed. Taivo (talk) 07:25, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:46, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:ANGE 1000 ANS de l'église de saint germain des prés (2).JPG

There is no freedom of panorama in France and the sculpture seems modern. OTRS-permission from sculptor Bruce de Jaham (if dead, then from heir) is needed. Taivo (talk) 07:32, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:46, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MD WAQUAR ALIANSARI INDIA'S NO.1 COMMUNICATION (5).jpg

Looks to me pretty much out of scope. Ju Ta 07:37, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:46, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Parveen Jiterwal.jpg

Userpage image of a so called user. Has done almost nothing in five years. E4024 (talk) 07:38, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

BTW it seems like User:ParveenJiterwal and User:Pjiterwal, both red, should be merged to avoid confusion. --E4024 (talk) 08:05, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I added Category:Businesspeople from India to the file. I'm not able to assess the notability of businessmen from India; but he has no WP art. --E4024 (talk) 08:11, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:47, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Om Sai Education Society Narwana.JPG

Unused personal file (portrait) under an institutional name. E4024 (talk) 07:41, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:47, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:CSKA3.jpg

It's a nonfree logo of PFC CSKA 1948 Sofia that's not connected to PFC CSKA Sofia and cannot use the permission we have from PFC CSKA Sofia Scroch (talk) 07:43, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:47, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:NGC 4477.jpg

Non-free content according to the source acknowledgement. —LX (talk, contribs) 07:51, 4 August 2017 (UTC) It was also partly created by NASA and many other users have uploaded imagery from the same source:https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Digitized_Sky_Survey Fucherastonmeym87 (talk) 14:55, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:47, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bhg.jpg

advertising Pippobuono (talk) 08:00, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:47, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Georges Wilson 2.png

1975 photograph from France. The source claims it's public domain but I don't see how. Guanaco (talk) 08:02, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Titre : [Recueil. Photographies. Conférence de presse. Festival d'Avignon. 1975 / Fernand Michaud]
Auteur : Michaud, Fernand (1929-2012). Photographe
Date d'édition : 1975
Sujet : Wilson, Georges (1921-2010) -- Photographies
Sujet : Puaux, Paul (1920-1998) -- Photographies
Sujet : Festival d'Avignon (29 ; 1975)
Type : image fixe
Type : photographie
Langue : Sans contenu linguistique
Format : Rec. factice : n. et b. ; formats divers
Format : image/jpeg
Format : Nombre total de vues : 4
Droits : domaine public
Identifiant : ark:/12148/btv1b53126645b
Source : Bibliothèque nationale de France, département Arts du spectacle, 4-PHO-3 (119)
Relation : http://catalogue.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb42570392c
Provenance : Bibliothèque nationale de France
Date de mise en ligne : 10/10/2016
--A VIE SAINE (talk) 11:01, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that, but we need evidence that the photographer transferred copyright to bibliothèque nationale de France or released it into the public domain before he died. Guanaco (talk) 11:08, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:47, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gtpase equilibrium.gif

unused, replaced by <math> Bdijkstra (talk) 08:05, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:47, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Timmendorfer Strand 3.JPG

Rechte nicht eindeutig geklärt 90.186.2.115 08:19, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:48, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Flatland-Skimer.jpg

Reche nicht eindeutig geklärt. 90.186.2.115 08:20, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:48, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Derwisch-Baracke.jpg

Reche nicht eindeutig geklärt. 90.186.2.115 08:20, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:48, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bauarbeiten am Strand.JPG

Reche nicht eindeutig geklärt. 90.186.2.115 08:21, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:48, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kartenraum Dogenpalast.JPG

Reche nicht eindeutig geklärt. 90.186.2.115 08:21, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:48, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Finntrader.JPG

Reche nicht eindeutig geklärt. 90.186.2.115 08:23, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:48, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Wiederbezugsmarke für Tabakwaren.jpg

Reche nicht eindeutig geklärt. 90.186.2.115 08:23, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:48, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Segelgilde des OGT.JPG

Reche nicht eindeutig geklärt. 90.186.2.115 08:24, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:48, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Palazzo del Doge.JPG

Reche nicht eindeutig geklärt. 90.186.2.115 08:24, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:48, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Canon telephoto lens.jpg

Reche nicht eindeutig geklärt. 90.186.2.115 08:25, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:48, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mare Frisium.JPG

Reche nicht eindeutig geklärt. 90.186.2.115 08:26, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:48, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Krik Vig unter Motor.JPG

Reche nicht eindeutig geklärt. 90.186.2.115 08:27, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:48, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Passat 2007.JPG

Reche nicht eindeutig geklärt. 90.186.2.115 08:27, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:48, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hansa-Jolle.JPG

Reche nicht eindeutig geklärt. 90.186.2.115 08:28, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:48, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bitterfeld (59).jpg

Reche nicht eindeutig geklärt. 90.186.2.115 08:28, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:48, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gaffelschoner Krik vig.JPG

Reche nicht eindeutig geklärt. 90.186.2.115 08:29, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:48, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ehemaliges Auslieferungslager Lück MD0C0023.jpg

Reche nicht eindeutig geklärt. 90.186.2.115 08:29, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:48, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bitterfeld (71).jpg

Reche nicht eindeutig geklärt. 90.186.2.115 08:30, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:48, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Braunlage.JPG

Reche nicht eindeutig geklärt. 90.186.2.115 08:30, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:48, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Grundriss Derwisch.jpg

Reche nicht eindeutig geklärt. 90.186.2.115 08:32, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:48, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Deck der Krik Vig.JPG

Reche nicht eindeutig geklärt. 90.186.2.115 08:32, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:48, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Files from narendramodiofficial Flickr stream

For the same reason as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Former cricketer Anil Kumble meets PM Modi.jpg.

Rahul Bott (talk) 06:13, 9 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:13, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Files from narendramodiofficial Flickr stream

For the same reason as the other images deleted previously. Some of these images are in a high-security setting which would mean that Narendra Modi's personally-employed photographer (if such a person exists) might not be allowed access to them. Other images have logos in prominence whose copyrights rest with either the Government of India or Bharatiya Janata Party. The images of Anandiben Patel are again cropped from images in which the Prime Minister is himself present.

Rahul Bott (talk) 06:41, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:09, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Files from narendramodiofficial Flickr stream

The claimed author is part of the photographs:

Suspicious or no metadata available for

Most of these files have unbelievably low resolutions to be a 21st century original image.

Files like

are either official Indian government events where the Prime Minister is unlikely to be sitting as a mere photographer while the Finance Minister presides or an international event like the East Asia Summit where his personal photographer will hardly be allowed. These can at best be Government of India works which cannot be in public domain so soon as per Template:PD-India. Also

File:Arun Jaitley launched the GoI Calendar for 2015.jpg

has a clear Indian Government art work (the calendar) in prominence which is certainly not copyfree.

Other images in this category have been previously deleted by sysops User:Jcb and User:Daphne Lantier. In summary, we need a thorough review of files coming from this Flickr user and should immediately suspend further uploads from this account pending the completion of such a review.

Rahul Bott (talk) 04:56, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:44, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Files from narendramodiofficial Flickr stream

For the same reasons as the previous nominations. Some of the files have very suspicious metadata and low file sizes.

Rahul Bott (talk) 09:01, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:45, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Files from narendramodiofficial Flickr stream

For similar reasons as in previous nominations from the category (all deleted). Also, File:Indian medal winners at the Special Olympic World Summer Games 2015.jpg has image credits to "Special Olympics Bharat Facebook page" while File:Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi in Rajya Sabha.jpg is a grab of official television recordings of Rajya Sabha.

Rahul Bott (talk) 09:09, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment With so many false licenses/ copyright violations from this Flickr account, any reason not to blacklist this Flickr account from any further uploads to Commons? -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:43, 25 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have said it before! Cannot agree more. -- Rahul Bott (talk) 04:59, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination -- acct blacklisted as well. Daphne Lantier 18:33, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Files from narendramodiofficial Flickr stream

Same reasons as for previous nominations. Many files have suspicious metadata and very low filesizes. Some others are derivative works with no proper attribution/reference to the original work and their copyright status.

Rahul Bott (talk) 05:25, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:38, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Files from narendramodiofficial Flickr stream

Same reasons as before. Few files are screen grabs of Lok Sabha Television footage while others are screenshots of private apps like Instagram, Weibo etc.

Rahul Bott (talk) 08:33, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep majority of them. Most of their previous images were low-res screenshots or instagram pics but a majority have exif information which means they were taken by actual cameras and thus they should be kept, delete the low res ones that don't look like they were taken with a camera or lack exif information, keep the rest.--Ste moc 22:11, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Stemoc: With due respect, the mere presence of EXIF data itself does not make the copyright ownership clear. More so, if these happen to be works of a Government of India employee(s) in which case the Prime Minister himself/herself does not have the power to release the files into public domain without bringing necessary changes in Indian laws. There is also the issue of false claim of authorship with most of these files. Best Regards, Rahul Bott (talk) 12:02, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:25, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Files from narendramodiofficial Flickr stream

More. Many are rightly unused with just some text and an uncredited portrait photograph as substantial part. Some are crops from already deleted files.

Rahul Bott (talk) 07:57, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:52, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Files from narendramodiofficial Flickr stream

The files have no evidence of their copyright owner as Narendra Modi (Prime minister-India). There is clear Flickr washing. Most of the images have been deleted before for the same reason. Another set of deletion can be found at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Bharatiya29 and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Former cricketer Anil Kumble meets PM Modi.jpg.

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०^{†ลℓк †๏ мэ} 07:11, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Except for files like File:Constituent Assembly of India logo.jpg which are clearly PD-India. -- Rahul Bott (talk) 12:08, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: most per nomination, kept one per discussion. --Jcb (talk) 13:00, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted per UDR since we now have {{GODL-India}}. Please feel free to re-nominate any file if GODL-India does not apply. I have left all the files in the GODL-India review category. Jcb (talk) 11:30, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Prodip Kumar Dey.jpg

There are several files about the same person; "cover page", at a "book fair" etc, but none of them are used. Therefore, if he is a notable writer or of another profession who could be subject of an article soon, it should be demonstrated ASAP. If not, all files are subject to deletion. E4024 (talk) 08:36, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:49, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Marta Higueras asiste al encuentro “Secretos de Cocina” (01).jpg

Revdel only: Old revision contains more than de minimis copyrighted logos. Guanaco (talk) 08:59, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:49, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:U1F602-img.png

The emoji to the right seems like from iOS, which is not an open source operating system, while most other emojis Wikimedia Commons have are mainly from open source software like Android, Firefox, etc. Techyan（Talk） 09:05, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK I understand .--Zest 12:47, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:49, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Organi-prueba-01.jpg

also file:REDESsociales.jpg
Unused files, bad description, no good categories, unclear educational value. Out of project scope? Taivo (talk) 09:12, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:49, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Room in Massachusetts General Hospital arranged as it was when the first ether operation was performed.jpg

I can't find evidence that this was published until recently, so it likely remains copyrighted despite being old. See Commons:Hirtle chart. Guanaco (talk) 09:18, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:50, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Kosiosusi.jpg

Derivative work of The Courting Wolf (Susi kosiomatkalla; wikidata:Q18760195), a 2007 sculpture by Eija Hänninen and Henna Onnela, located in Joensuu, Finland. The sculpture is not in Public Domain yet and FOP in Finland is for buildings only. Apalsola ^{t • c} 09:23, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The image is also part of File:Joensuu montage.jpg. ––Apalsola ^{t • c} 09:26, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What about this: http://www.finlex.fi/fi/laki/ajantasa/1961/19610404#P25 (in Finnish)? Would it be ok if this was picture was uploaded only in Finnish Wiki instead of Commons, as is the case with https://fi.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tiedosto:Toripolliisi.jpg?Niera (talk)

Yes, that would be OK: Fair-use images are allowed in the Finnish Wikipedia but not in Commons. ––Apalsola ^{t • c} 21:37, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:51, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bassgooch (talk · contribs)

Do not need 18 photos of the same frenum piercing, selected 2 to keep

Mjrmtg (talk) 10:00, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:51, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Menus de réveillon du nouvel an 2014 au Cuba Tropicana (1).jpg

Commercial advert. E4024 (talk) 10:35, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:51, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Menus de réveillon du nouvel an 2014 au Cuba Tropicana (2).jpg

Commercial advertisement. Certainly they do this every year and we have in Commons the offer, telephone numbers etc so that they may make business. E4024 (talk) 10:37, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please see also: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Menus de réveillon du nouvel an 2014 au Cuba Tropicana (1).jpg. --E4024 (talk) 10:38, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:51, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Carnaval poa cristina gehlen.jpg

Unclear copyright status considering source http://www.ebc.com.br/cultura/2013/02/carnaval-em-porto-alegre-tem-blocos-de-rua-e-desfile-de-escolas-de-samba (2013), giving credits to "Foto: Cristina Gehlen/Creative Commons)".

I could not find the image in Commons. What I found was Cristina Gehlen's Flickr stream where the image (btw, cropped) is licensed via https://www.flickr.com/photos/criscris/5504200610/ (2011) with CC BY-NC 2.0, which not compatible with COM:L. Btw, the copyright notice at https://www.flickr.com/people/criscris/ is also quite clear. The file is locally embedded in the template (pt:Predefinição:Carnaval de Porto Alegre) which explains the high wiki use.

I checked some related ptwiki entries for CommonsDelinker actions, Commons DR archive, user talk pages etc. It might be, that file was deleted after 5 February 2013... Gunnex (talk) 11:04, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:51, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Manuel Belleri AcMilanTokyo.jpg

uploader by user:"Manuel Belleri" such self portrait for a notable person, may need additional information to claim as "own work" Matthew hk (talk) 11:17, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:52, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Manuel Belleri Acmilan tokyo.jpg

uploader by user:"Manuel Belleri" such self portrait for a notable person, may need additional information to claim as "own work" Matthew hk (talk) 11:17, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:52, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:“Brilla Usera”, campaña para implicar a la ciudadanía en la limpieza del distrito (01).jpg

File is of very low quality and dubious scope Guanaco (talk) 11:25, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:52, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:‘La noche de los mercados’, cultura gastronómica y vinícola para la ciudadanía (02).png

Image is from a global campaign, and the author is unlikely to be the City of Madrid Guanaco (talk) 11:29, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:52, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Logo Emergencias Sanitarias redimensionar.gif

Licensing statement is not correct, but could be PD-textlogo instead. Otherwise should be deleted. —Marco Aurelio 11:35, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:52, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: per COM:REFUND. Storkk (talk) 10:31, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:18 JUIN 1945 pipercub survolant les Champs Elysees.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Elisfkc as no source (No source since)

It is unclear what the copyright status of this image is as it is also available here (image 5 of 11 on the French military archives website which has a copyright notice among other websites. Perhaps the uploader is the heir and can verify the author in which case they could use the {{PD-heirs}} template but File:Pierre Simonet devant son piper-Cub.jpg appears to indicate, as he also flew such planes, that he was flying the plane in this photo so he can't be the copyright holder. Ww2censor (talk) 11:47, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:52, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Indre By, Copenhagen, Denmark - panoramio (8).jpg

Paintin by Hans Scherfig (dead 1979). No freedom of Panorama Pugilist (talk) 11:51, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:52, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chara.png

possible copyrighted elements, at least design/skeleton and maybe textures. A similar and simplier character is fair use on en. Kungfuman (talk) 11:59, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:52, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:PCSC icash Card-102 rear 20121001.jpg

Perhaps designed by 711 copyrighted Cjackh (talk) 12:03, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:52, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Statue of Amakusa Shiro at Shimabara Castle 20090906.jpg

No FOP in Japan, This sculpture was created in 1972 or 1973 by Seibo Kitamura who died in 1987. [2][3] Y.haruo (talk) 12:05, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:52, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Statue of Amakusa Shiro at Hara Castle.jpg

No FOP in Japan, This sculpture was created in 1972 or 1973 by Seibo Kitamura who died in 1987. [4][5] Y.haruo (talk) 12:07, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:52, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Maxwell Billieon American Flag Photo.jpg

Dubious claim of own work Marianna251 (talk) 12:11, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:52, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:天草四郎 - panoramio (1).jpg

No FOP in Japan, This sculpture was created in 1972 or 1973 by Seibo Kitamura who died in 1987. [6][7] Y.haruo Y.haruo (talk) 12:16, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:52, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:天草四郎 - panoramio.jpg

No FOP in Japan, This sculpture was created in 1972 or 1973 by Seibo Kitamura who died in 1987. [8][9] Y.haruo Y.haruo (talk) 12:17, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:52, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:De-Spielspäße.ogg

Speaking this example I thought Spielspäße is noun inflection of Spielspaß which originally existed in German wiktionary, see history in German Wiktionary: Spielspaß. Sorry for the additional work. jeuwre Jeuwre (talk) 12:22, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:52, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:山縣有朋公像 - panoramio.jpg

No FOP in Japan, This sculpture was created in 1930 by Seibo Kitamura who died in 1987. [10][11][12] Y.haruo (talk) 12:32, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:52, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:山縣有朋公像 - panoramio (1).jpg

No FOP in Japan, This sculpture was created in 1930 by Seibo Kitamura who died in 1987. [13][14][15] Y.haruo (talk) 12:33, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:52, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Grande Arche Passerele Nanterre.JPG

no FoP in France Bloody-libu (talk) 12:47, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:52, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:OHCHR REPLY LETTER 2004 OR OHCHR LETTER PAD.jpg

I think this letter is OoS. E4024 (talk) 13:04, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:52, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

C.D. Concepción kits

These association football kits incorporate elements of non-free logos; they are inappropriate derivative works.

— ξ ^xplicit 23:58, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Edited!! without logos now — Preceding unsigned comment added by Delafuente79 (talk • contribs) 03:06, 17 December 2016 (UTC) (UTC) (UTC)[reply]

The previous revisions should still be deleted per my nomination statement. — ξ ^xplicit 00:07, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: I have deleted copyvio historic versions. However, @Delafuente79: , please also fix the File:Kit body concepcion96a.svg which has been missed out. We can then close this FfD. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:07, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per above. --Yann (talk) 16:14, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Association football

Logos of varying levels of sophistication with dubious claims of free license.

Ytoyoda (talk) 13:11, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete All above the TOO, copyrighted. Fma12 (talk) 22:12, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:53, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Association football

Redundant to images already listed at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Aek19668285

Ytoyoda (talk) 14:35, 22 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia ^{Talk ✉} 14:54, 13 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Association football

Metadata credits FELIPE OLIVEIRA, relationship to uploader not explained.

Ytoyoda (talk) 17:33, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 23:47, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tomsolosin.jpg

From https://www.sports.ru/tribuna/blogs/rodntom/853873.html Ytoyoda (talk) 13:13, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:53, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ро.png

User has uploaded several copyrighted photos claiming as their own. Unlikely this is any different. Ytoyoda (talk) 13:14, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:53, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Monumental de Nuñez.jpg

Appears to be a squished version of this image: http://us3.cdn.girabsas.com/082015/1467222661889.png Ytoyoda (talk) 13:20, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:53, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Luke Robinson Present.jpg

Appears to be a selfie, in which case the copyright belongs to the subject/photographer Ytoyoda (talk) 13:22, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:53, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jhonattanramos (talk · contribs)

Taken from a phone screenshot, unlikely to be own work

Ytoyoda (talk) 13:24, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:53, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Tripti Singh..jpg

User devoted to her own promotion. Has three files in the system. E4024 (talk) 13:29, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:53, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Shri Satpal Ji Maharaj Inaugrating the Railway Survey in Uttarakhand.jpg

No EXIF data, user with bad history, claimed to be from August 1996 with a creation date of December 2007 in EXIF, uploaded in May 2017. Please send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 13:31, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:53, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ezebonifacio.png

Cropped out of this photo: http://www.gimnasia.org.ar/futbol.php?id=9833&sec=2&fecha=2014-08-29 Ytoyoda (talk) 13:33, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:53, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Josegceron 73 (talk · contribs)

Kit images with copyrighted/trademarked elements

Ytoyoda (talk) 13:34, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:53, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Giuseppe Dello Russo (talk · contribs)

Kit images with copyrighted elements

Ytoyoda (talk) 13:35, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:53, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Camiseta ud almeria fuerza chile.png

Kit image with copyrighted elements Ytoyoda (talk) 13:37, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Es una imagen digital creada a mano, ¿de que elementos me estás hablando? es igual que una foto en la que hay elementos con copyright. De verdad que a algunos se os va de las manos la labor que realizáis aquí, rozáis el caciquismo. Sólo voy a añadir que estoy hasta las narices de Wikipedia por gente como tú, que no tiene criterio ni lo conoce, si esta imagen se borra, no volveré a contribuir más a Wikipedia.

--Almju (talk) 11:07, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:53, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:243352 elestadioluispiratafuentes.jpg

Scaled down version of image that appears here: https://sites.google.com/site/clubtiburonesrojosdeveracruz/clasificacin Ytoyoda (talk) 13:37, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:54, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Foto-estadio-11.jpg

EXIF credits FERNANDO NUNEZ Ytoyoda (talk) 13:38, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:54, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Yossi Vardi 2 (cropped).jpg

my mistake בר (talk) 13:43, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:54, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Alimi Ibrahim Adewale.jpg

Re-upload of recently deleted UPF. E4024 (talk) 13:48, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:54, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:USBI, Universidad Veracruzana.jpg

Unfree license of Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/lucynieto/15124496953/ Ytoyoda (talk) 13:52, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:54, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Guangming Brand Salt Water Popsicle 光明牌盐水棒冰.jpg

Per COM:PACKAGING Njzjz (talk) 13:52, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Neutral/中立 I don't know this policy before this time, and this is the first time to know this policy. It does not matter for deleting. 在此之前我不知道这个方针，这次我终于知道这一方针了。删不删无所谓。--Shwangtianyuan (talk) 06:44, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:54, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sambhavexim logo 2012.jpg

Unused logo of non-notable thing, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:56, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:54, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Universidad Cristobal Colon.jpg

From http://www.ucc.mx/ucc/?acercade=instalaciones Ytoyoda (talk) 13:56, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:54, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Centro Comercial El Dorado.jpg

From http://www.rentasyventas.com/terrenos-en-venta-en-boca-del-rio-veracruz/fraccionamiento-el-dorado-residencial-&-marina--terreno-en-venta-fraccinamiento-el-dorado-residencial/i1311914.html Ytoyoda (talk) 14:08, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:54, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:De-hinterlegen neuer upload.ogg

dupe of De-hinterlgen.ogg, as you see in title it wasn't designed for upload but for improvement of the standard-example regards jeuwre Jeuwre (talk) 14:16, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:54, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Club de Golf, Veracruz.jpg

Uploaded by user whose contributions are almost all from third party sites. This is likely copyvio as well. Ytoyoda (talk) 14:19, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:54, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Martin Ayim (talk · contribs)

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:54, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Metro do Porto linha Bx.png

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:55, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Baseer.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:55, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ofori.jpg

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:55, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:NSD-Circuit-location.tif

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://images-na.ssl-images-amazon.com/images/M/MV5BMjRhZjdhYmQtYTE3Ni00NjljLWFhNDMtYTVjNGZkYTk3M2FlXkEyXkFqcGdeQXVyMjQwMDg0Ng@@._V1_SY1000_CR0,0,1493,1000_AL_.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:55, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:PN-Logo Horizontal Black.jpg

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:55, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:حسین علاءالدین.jpg

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:55, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:AwardSummaryConditions.png

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:55, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:EXO2016.jpg

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.allkpop.com/upload/2017/05/af_org/30145829/EXO.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:55, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:לילי מנחם בצעירותה.png

Same as File:Passport pic.jpg Mikey641 (talk) 14:49, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delition of this specific file is approved from my side, thank you. Amikamraz (talk) 18:52, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:55, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Suc de taronja.jpg

probable copyvio : artefact of an artist, unused anyaway Pippobuono (talk) 14:50, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:55, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Xavier Escorihuela.jpg

insufficient description, people associated with cinema from Spain, but what else? Pippobuono (talk) 14:52, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - This is not an own work BTW. --E4024 (talk) 15:01, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:55, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ahmed Sohail.jpg

image on facebook BukhariSaeed (talk) 15:37, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:55, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MichailKorolev (talk · contribs)

Logo can't be free

Bilderling (talk) 15:43, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:55, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by College student786 (talk · contribs)

Logos of the real business entities can't be free

Bilderling (talk) 15:45, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:56, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Safnaðarheimilið.jpg

No FOP in Iceland, architect died in 1992 Vera ^(talk) 15:52, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:56, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Informe Robinson.jpg

Tagged as ineligible USonly , on English Wikipedia due to concerns about TOO in Spain, I'm only seeing text though. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:13, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:57, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ushiku.jpg

This was apparently tagged as No-Fop Japan at English Wikipedia, How old is the statue? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:23, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:57, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Samsthan Rajapeta fort entrance.jpg

Image contains watermark and the link between the site and the uploader isn't clear. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 16:59, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:57, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Elkay-EZH2O-logo.jpg

Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:02, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:57, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:AmerCabCollection.jpg

Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:03, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:57, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:WOODBRIDGE SH.jpg

Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:06, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:57, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Yorktowne logo2.jpg

Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:06, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:57, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chagall Bella.jpg

English Wikipedia equivalent w:File:Chagall Bella.jpg had a note claiming it was still in copyright in it's home country. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:19, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:57, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:A Cultura Brasileira 2.jpg

Unused text-only screenshot, little educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:27, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:57, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:A d37f79ae.jpg

Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:28, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:57, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:A drawing i made from an actual image of Potbot-org that I drew in flash- I tend to create artistic semirealistic drawings of the technology i develope or improve- Its fun for me-) 2014-05-15 08-27.jpg

Unused personal or promotional image, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:29, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:57, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:1969-Batignolles-SNCF-central-controle-Saint-Lazare.jpg

not free (http://www.paris-unplugged.fr/1854-les-trains-aux-batignolles/) Tiraden (talk) 17:29, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:57, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:A fiction blue planet.jpg

Unused personal image, too small to be useful and little educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:30, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:57, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:A la plaça! Guanyem Barcelona (17317977114).jpg

Notable people? If not, unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:31, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:57, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:A Night Of Doo Wop With copy 2 DON 4.gif

Unused promotional logo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:33, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:57, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Chevrons Records Picture s 59-62 B.gif

Unused promotional image, out of scope, or copyrighted album cover. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:35, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:57, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:A person of Kundu clan ..jpg

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:38, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:57, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:A real good friend & I - 2014-06-07 15-06.jpg

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:40, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:57, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:A robert ritter.jpg

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:41, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:57, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Natalie Lander.jpg

This is a crop of an image from the actress's IMDB gallery http://www.imdb.com/name/nm1130176/mediaviewer/rm3332809216, where it is credited to Kathy Fields Lander - which is not very similar to the name of the uploader here. GRuban (talk) 17:43, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:57, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hampi temple ruins.jpg

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:05, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per COM:AGF and the fact that each image has consistent metadata which corresponds to each uploader. None of the uploaders has a history of copyright violations. If these were taken from different sources online, they would presumably have different metadata. I couldn't find hits on Google Images, and I'm going to assume the lack of EXIF is due to tinkering from some smartphone photo apps? The low resolution might also be explained by the mobile uploads. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:02, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 18:00, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hampi Drainage and water supply system.jpg

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:05, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per COM:AGF and the fact that each image has consistent metadata which corresponds to each uploader. None of the uploaders has a history of copyright violations. If these were taken from different sources online, they would presumably have different metadata. I couldn't find hits on Google Images, and I'm going to assume the lack of EXIF is due to tinkering from some smartphone photo apps? The low resolution might also be explained by the mobile uploads. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:02, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 18:00, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hampi Krishna temple.jpg

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:05, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per COM:AGF and the fact that each image has consistent metadata which corresponds to each uploader. None of the uploaders has a history of copyright violations. If these were taken from different sources online, they would presumably have different metadata. I couldn't find hits on Google Images, and I'm going to assume the lack of EXIF is due to tinkering from some smartphone photo apps? The low resolution might also be explained by the mobile uploads. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:02, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 18:00, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Hampi elephant caves.jpg

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:08, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per COM:AGF and the fact that each image has consistent metadata which corresponds to each uploader. None of the uploaders has a history of copyright violations. If these were taken from different sources online, they would presumably have different metadata. I couldn't find hits on Google Images, and I'm going to assume the lack of EXIF is due to tinkering from some smartphone photo apps? The low resolution might also be explained by the mobile uploads. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:03, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 18:00, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:The Broken Bridge of Hampi.jpg

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:19, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per COM:AGF and the fact that each image has consistent metadata which corresponds to each uploader. None of the uploaders has a history of copyright violations. If these were taken from different sources online, they would presumably have different metadata. I couldn't find hits on Google Images, and I'm going to assume the lack of EXIF is due to tinkering from some smartphone photo apps? The low resolution might also be explained by the mobile uploads. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:03, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 18:00, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:View through a palace ruin, Hampi.jpg

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:20, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per COM:AGF and the fact that each image has consistent metadata which corresponds to each uploader. None of the uploaders has a history of copyright violations. If these were taken from different sources online, they would presumably have different metadata. I couldn't find hits on Google Images, and I'm going to assume the lack of EXIF is due to tinkering from some smartphone photo apps? The low resolution might also be explained by the mobile uploads. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:04, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 18:00, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Temple ruins, Hampi.jpg

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:21, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per COM:AGF and the fact that each image has consistent metadata which corresponds to each uploader. None of the uploaders has a history of copyright violations. If these were taken from different sources online, they would presumably have different metadata. I couldn't find hits on Google Images, and I'm going to assume the lack of EXIF is due to tinkering from some smartphone photo apps? The low resolution might also be explained by the mobile uploads. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:04, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 18:00, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Cycling to ruins.jpg

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:22, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per COM:AGF and the fact that each image has consistent metadata which corresponds to each uploader. None of the uploaders has a history of copyright violations. If these were taken from different sources online, they would presumably have different metadata. I couldn't find hits on Google Images, and I'm going to assume the lack of EXIF is due to tinkering from some smartphone photo apps? The low resolution might also be explained by the mobile uploads. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:04, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 18:00, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Through the river Tungabadra.jpg

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:24, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per COM:AGF and the fact that each image has consistent metadata which corresponds to each uploader. None of the uploaders has a history of copyright violations. If these were taken from different sources online, they would presumably have different metadata. I couldn't find hits on Google Images, and I'm going to assume the lack of EXIF is due to tinkering from some smartphone photo apps? The low resolution might also be explained by the mobile uploads. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:04, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 18:00, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:World heritage city.jpg

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:42, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per COM:AGF and the fact that each image has consistent metadata which corresponds to each uploader. None of the uploaders has a history of copyright violations. If these were taken from different sources online, they would presumably have different metadata. I couldn't find hits on Google Images, and I'm going to assume the lack of EXIF is due to tinkering from some smartphone photo apps? The low resolution might also be explained by the mobile uploads. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:05, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 18:00, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sunset virupaksha.jpg

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:43, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per COM:AGF and the fact that each image has consistent metadata which corresponds to each uploader. None of the uploaders has a history of copyright violations. If these were taken from different sources online, they would presumably have different metadata. I couldn't find hits on Google Images, and I'm going to assume the lack of EXIF is due to tinkering from some smartphone photo apps? The low resolution might also be explained by the mobile uploads. IronGargoyle (talk) 22:05, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 18:00, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Reykjavíkurprófastsdæmi

No FOP in Iceland

Vera ^(talk) 18:49, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:58, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mytrip3.jpg

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:03, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:59, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Mytrip.jpg

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:04, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:59, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Dandeli78999.jpg

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:06, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:59, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Athani Bijapur Road.jpg

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:12, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:59, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Millwest (talk · contribs)

Scope: advertising images, no clear educational purpose for reuse

seb26 (talk) 19:14, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:59, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:DargahBadachi.jpg

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': personality right isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:14, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:00, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Badachi wrestling.jpg

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': thumbnail format, personality right isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:15, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:00, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Davalillof (talk · contribs)

Copyright doubt: unlikely to be own works because the images are of very low resolution and contain JPG artifacts, suggesting they were taken from another source. They visually appear to have been taken at different times/years (stages of the person's life), meaning it is highly unlikely that one person created both works and much more likely that these have been acquired from different unknown sources

seb26 (talk) 19:21, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:00, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Naturalismo-nao-e-naturalista-2.jpg

Duplicate: No substantial visual differences from File:Naturalismo.png to warrant a separate file, which was also uploaded by this user (perhaps they forgot they uploaded it). seb26 (talk) 19:25, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:00, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Reaktance kondenzátoru.png

Low quality equation, unused, better in TeX Apocheir (talk) 19:28, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:00, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Reaktance cívky.png

Low quality equation, unused, better in TeX Apocheir (talk) 19:29, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:00, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Voltage Drop Calc - Single Phase.png

Low quality equation, unused, better in TeX Apocheir (talk) 19:29, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:00, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Voltage Drop Calculation - 3 phase.png

Low quality equation, unused, better in TeX Apocheir (talk) 19:29, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:00, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fabián Nieves.jpg

Copyright doubt: this image appears to be a screenshot taken from this youtube video with no free license release, given its (a) strong visual similarity and (b) lack of camera Exif data if it was a digital camera photo. Other uploads from this user were also not own works seb26 (talk) 19:37, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:00, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Fabián Nieves sesionando.jpg

Copyright doubt: this image is not likely to be own work given its lack of Exif camera data, please upload the original camera file if you are the photographer seb26 (talk) 19:38, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:00, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Puma-logo-png.png

It is unlikely that the Puma shape can be considered a simple shape under Commons:Threshold of originality. A version of this logo making use of just the letters "PUMA" is already extensively used wherever reference to the brand is required on non-fair use wikis such as Spanish Wikipedia, and is appropriately licensed as PD: File:Puma marca.png. seb26 (talk) 19:53, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:00, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Criszoe (talk · contribs)

Copyright doubt: none of these logo images can be considered {{PD-textlogo}} as they are complex and sufficiently original for COM:TOO

seb26 (talk) 20:00, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:01, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Criszoe (talk · contribs)

Copyvio: Characters for a game that are protected by copyright law.

Sixflashphoto (talk) 00:29, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete Clear copyright violation. Dispenser (talk) 23:54, 31 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 16:51, 4 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gordon Ramsay and Lamb.jpg

Suspicious Flickr account that appears to simply upload photos from elsewhere on the web. This looks like a professional publicity photograph; I doubt the Flickr user owns the rights to it. J Milburn (talk) 20:18, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:01, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gordon-ramsay-11.jpg

Suspicious Flickr account that appears to simply upload photos from elsewhere on the web. This looks like a professional publicity photograph; I doubt the Flickr user owns the rights to it. J Milburn (talk) 20:28, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:01, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ahmed Al Ghanem.jpg

unused personal photos, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 20:29, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:01, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gordon-ramsay-1.jpg

Suspicious Flickr account that appears to simply upload photos from elsewhere on the web. This looks like a professional publicity photograph; I doubt the Flickr user owns the rights to it. J Milburn (talk) 20:31, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:01, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by N.sagarkota (talk · contribs)

Unused personal photos, out of scope

Mjrmtg (talk) 20:32, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:01, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MAx alexander.jpg

Unused personal photos, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 20:37, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:01, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:MODDD.jpg

Unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 20:39, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:01, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:WhatsApp Image 2016-08-04 at 10.57.54.jpg

Unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 20:40, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:01, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:WhatsApp Image 2016-08-04 at 5.23.26 PM (2).jpg

Unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 20:41, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:01, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:IEMG Escola Normal.jpg

It's not free image. 189.105.186.220 09:54, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: 1920 image. Was PD in 1990. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:02, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:IEMG Escola Normal.jpg

Low resolution image. Família paixão (talk) 01:53, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:14, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:IEMG Escola Normal.jpg

Não será usada em nenhum verbete da Wikipédia. Not in use. Família paixão (talk) 23:57, 22 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - if you nominate this again, you will be blocked from editing on Commons. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:37, 29 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:IEMG Escola Normal.jpg

Existe uma foto na Wikipédia muito mais nítida e que mostra como era o edifício no início do século XX. Família paixão (talk) 16:33, 22 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:02, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:23882 Ojibwe Woman1.jpg

This file has been on Commons almost 10 years now, but the license states "Images from the collection of the Milwaukee County Historical Society are copyrighted and may be used only for educational purposes." This actually is not compatible with Commons licensing. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 00:41, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. This looks like a case of copyfraud to me. It might be worthwhile to follow up with either the Milwaukee County Historical Society or the Wisconson Historical Society (where the image is sourced to) to determine things like the image's date. It looks old enough to quite likely be in the public domain. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:31, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- A good point, we might be able to just call it public domain for now. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 02:59, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The image is either a color photograph or a colorized B&W photograph. Therefore it is most likely a 20th century image and its copyright status depends entirely on its publication history, about which we know nothing. Therefore we cannot keep it. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:47, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Commissioning of Baku.jpg

Very unlikely the Indian navy was present at the commissioning of the Baku. This is likely a Soviet image Solarbrisk (talk) 11:52, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Wikimedia has received an e-mail confirming that the copyright holder has approved publication under the terms mentioned on this page. This correspondence has been reviewed by an OTRS member and stored in our permission archive. The correspondence is available to trusted volunteers as ticket #2013090610005872." Seems like OTRS needs double checking. Hohum (talk) 13:17, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Although we have blanket permission to use images from the Indian Navy site, that cannot include images for which the Indian Navy does not own the copyright. I doubt very much that when the Indian Navy purchase the Baku that they also licensed this photograph of her commissioning. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:53, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:W SZ1706 2717786533d97f7ca5b3e475cedcc7d0.jpg

Also listing File:20170714-0257 ef67e8e413e775328c2aecdda128a630.jpg

Appears to be copyrighted photo, based on watermark, appearance here: http://www.arka.gdynia.pl/news,17305-licytuj-zloty-medal-trenera-ojrzynskiego.html Ytoyoda (talk) 13:15, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I took this photograph, we put watermark on all photos being published on our website to protect ourselves from unauthorised usage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kacper Milczarek (talk • contribs) 10:10, August 4, 2017‎ (UTC)

The issue is that on the first photo, the photographer credited is "Wojciech Szymanski" and on the second, it's "Tomasz Duc" - I can't imagine they're the same person. Ytoyoda (talk) 18:30, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: In both cases we need a free license from the actual copyright holder using OTRS. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:57, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:W SZ1706 2717786533d97f7ca5b3e475cedcc7d0.jpg

Also listing File:20170714-0257 ef67e8e413e775328c2aecdda128a630.jpg

Appears to be copyrighted photo, based on watermark, appearance here: http://www.arka.gdynia.pl/news,17305-licytuj-zloty-medal-trenera-ojrzynskiego.html Ytoyoda (talk) 13:15, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I took this photograph, we put watermark on all photos being published on our website to protect ourselves from unauthorised usage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kacper Milczarek (talk • contribs) 10:10, August 4, 2017‎ (UTC)

The issue is that on the first photo, the photographer credited is "Wojciech Szymanski" and on the second, it's "Tomasz Duc" - I can't imagine they're the same person. Ytoyoda (talk) 18:30, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: In both cases we need a free license from the actual copyright holder using OTRS. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:57, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sarah Nur Kamilah, its me.JPG

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: In scope for Category:School uniforms of Indonesia ∪ Category:Hijabs in Indonesia‎ and also not bad quality. -- Tuválkin ✉ 11:12, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: INeverCry 01:17, 22 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Sarah Nur Kamilah, its me.JPG

Unused selfie, out of scope per COM:SELFIE. Uploader is inactive since more than two years. AFBorchert (talk) 15:56, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I just notice that this has been nominated & kept before. Please let me add that a deletion protects also the uploading user. The uploader was active for a very brief moment only, with two edits and one upload. Newbies easily mix up our projects with social media sites where uploads are not put under a free license. Please consider COM:PEOPLE as the uploader identifies herself with her real name. We should protect young people who are not familiar with the goals of this project. --AFBorchert (talk) 16:06, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Protect from what, exactly? If mentioning her name is problematic, it’s easy to change the filename and expunge any reference to it. Of course, it may have spilled into third part use and into archival services in the meanwhile, but that’s not helped with the removal of the photo here in Commons.

On the other hand, the value of this photo (and others, such as this) is evident and refering to COM:SELFIE is, at best, naïve: Without photos such as this, all the imagery we’ll have in Commons depicting girls with hijabs will be 19th century ethnographic shots and objectifying scenes such as protests, war theaters, or refugee camps. Obviously spontaneous, cheerful, and internalized wearing of hijabs by girls and young women is a situation that needs to be documented, regardless of how one feels about it.

-- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 09:04, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: This DR comes shortly after a radical uncategorization of this photo. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 09:04, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, per previous discussion, AFBorchert’s input not withstanding. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 09:04, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Info: See also this other analogous, parallel DR. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 08:47, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not active since two years, "radical uncategorization", hijabs ets are misleading. Was she active two years ago? We do not have a "user" here, one. Two: Of course the unused personal file (UPF) should be placed in Category:Unused personal files. Three: Wearing a hijab or a hat or a blue jean does not make a UPF in scope. --E4024 (talk) 13:57, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Since you like numbered lists, here’s one, with proper tallying:

Lack of activity by the uploader was mentioned as a reason to delete. You seem to think that it is misleading (to mention it?) but yet you also vote for deletion.
Radical uncategorization is an apt description for removal of all categories, as done. You say it is misleading (to mention it?), yet it would be misleading to try to get this file deleted for lack of categories.
(Hijabs: see point 7.)
(Back to mentioning activity — see point 1.)
You are the first one to mention the word "user" in this discussion. Nobody’s argueing whether this person is, or is not, a Wikimedia user.
(What you call 2…) Yes (after a fashion), as discussed elsewhere. The issue was not adding that category, but removing all others. However this is a DR concerning one photo, not an analysis of EugeneZelenko’s (de)categorizations.
Yes, it does. Being on scope is determined by the contents of a file. The way people are dressed, especially in a portrait, is relevant. And this image (see above), was previously found to be in scope by means exactly of the attire combo it depicts.

-- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 00:09, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete If scope were the only concern with this photo, I would say keep. However, the uploader is the subject, and it's not a selfie. This means we have no permission from the photographer. Guanaco (talk) 22:52, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What about COM:AGF over the sentence «it’s me», expressed in two languages? This photo can reasonably be accepted as a single-author self portrait, created with a number of possible implements (tripod, cellphone holder, etc.). -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 00:09, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't doubt that it's her in the photo. If she had said "I took this with a tripod," I'd accept that claim as fact. But with no such claim and no established history of understanding copyright, we have delete under COM:PCP. I do want to be very clear that I strongly oppose deletion on scope grounds. This photo does fill a role that none of the others we have do. Guanaco (talk) 05:31, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Guanaco, I agree that there is room for some doubt, but between COM:AGF and COM:PCP, in this case I favour the former option. It is also, in a way, a matter of COM:PCP, because it can be deleted later upon more certain evidence of third-party authorship, while if deleted now, it would never be undeleted even upon more certain evidence of self authorship. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 09:06, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: It's an unused personal image AND it is probably a copyvio. We might stretch for one of these, but not both. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:03, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:DasWeltAuto fr-logo.png

French copyright law infringement gpesenti (talk) 04:33, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. In use and clear example of {{PD-textlogo}}. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:37, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Promotional/advertising and no educational value, out of scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:56, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Also not in use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:35, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Jan Kościuszko (11629935944).jpg

There are three pictures of a not notable -to the best of my knowledge- person. Only one may be considered in scope, but I propose just one of the two remaining that IMHO are OoS. E4024 (talk) 09:10, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep In scope of Category:Jan Kościuszko. He may be notable, no harm in keeping 100 photos of the individual. Let people decide which one they want to use Solarbrisk (talk) 19:36, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Krakowian restaurateur,

Keep --Fæ (talk) 08:25, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It's good to have contributed to the opening of a new cat. Now someone has to write an article on the gentleman. Six images used nowhere is a pity. --E4024 (talk) 12:20, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:34, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

hidden: two previous discussions concerning a meanwhile deleted file of the same name

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rahma.jpg

Unused private image, no educational value → out of scope. Jahobr (talk) 13:47, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, for obvious uniqueness and reuse value. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 14:38, 18 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Tuvalkin Alan ^(talk) 00:32, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rahma.jpg

Unused personal photo, out of scope per COM:SELFIE. Uploading user is inactive since nearly five years. AFBorchert (talk) 15:58, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I just notice that this has been nominated & kept before. Please consider the uploader wrote “pacar” in the description field. Google translate understands this as “girlfriend”. This is confirmed by the corresponding Wiktionary entry. Hence, this is apparently not a selfie. This has been photographed in a private setting, the uploader's name appears to be a real name, the title of the photo could be the given name of the depicted person. All this is very problematic in regard to COM:PEOPLE and the inexperienced uploader (this was the very only edit in all our projects) was very likely not familiar with free licenses and personality rights. --AFBorchert (talk) 16:15, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It would be problematic if this photo were, per se, anyway problematic. But without a recognizable background, any EXIF or other metadata with spoofable information, and lacking an unflattering or compromising pose — we have nothing. What this photo shows is that she was smiling while taking a photo, and that’s a very low bar for being problematic.

That leads to the second argument: Is this a selfie, or was the photo taken by someone else and is therefore a copyvio? I’d say that the depicted scene shows, as much as it could, a typical arm outstretch indicative of a selfie by phone; the text description "pacar" is not evidence enough; interpreting it to mean "this is my girlfriend" is an unsbstantiated leap: "pacar" can be used to refer to oneself and does not imply necessarily a standing romantic relationship.

Even so, both the filename (suspected person name) and the description can be edited and expunged without incurring in the loss of this image from Commons — please read my argument for its value in this other, parallel DR.

-- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 09:18, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: This DR comes shortly after a radical uncategorization of this photo. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 09:18, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, per previous discussion, AFBorchert’s input not withstanding. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 09:18, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used, low quality. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per EugeneZelenko. --E4024 (talk) 14:00, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, low quality personal image. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:33, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rahma.jpg

I am renominating this file as the last DR was closed with delete but subsequently restored on base of this discussion outside the DR. In my opinion neither the closure nor the restoration addressed the point that this picture is not a selfie as the uploader's description designates the depicted person as “pacar”, i.e. as girl-friend. This is problematic as this photo has been taken in a private setting and we have no proof that this photo was published with the consent of the depicted person, see COM:PEOPLE#The right of privacy. This is a serious problem, most legislations protect the right of privacy. AFBorchert (talk) 16:33, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: It is a selfie: Her arm is outstretched, holding the camera. As said in the previous discussion, I think you’re overinterpreting a single word in a language you do not master, used in a context you do not know. COM:AGF would have us accept that this is a selfie uploaded by the photographer, who called herself a sweetheart in the description. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 17:48, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment As the subject depicted is from Indonesia, I think Crisco 1492 can add something on country specific requirements. J e e 03:33, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The pose is clearly a selfie, and the fact that the uploader labeled the image "Pacar" does not mean the uploader took the photograph or owns the copyright to the image. If this image was uploaded without a release from the photographer (the subject), then it is a copyright violation.

Even if this were not a selfie, it is still clearly out of scope. It is not an image of an editor, nor is it used on a user page. It is not an image of a notable person. It is of poor quality, rendering it much less suited than other selfies for use illustrating the concept. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:47, 13 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Crisco 1492, given your command of Indonesian, though, please clarify: Does the use of pacar as a single-word description for this photo implies the uploader is the subject, or does imply that it is not, or is it unclear? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 12:54, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader uses the name "Jasman-amatiran" ("Jasman the amateur"); Jasman is a male name, while the subject is clearly female. The one-word pacar would most likely mean pacarku (my girlfriend/~~boyfriend~~). In other words, there is no doubt in my mind that the uploader is not the subject. Barring a release from the photographer herself (you already said it's clearly a selfie) the licensing is doubtful at best. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 13:14, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Low quality personal image of a person who is neither notable nor a user of WM projects. Whatever the result of this discussion is, please do not overrun community decision that will be reached, without opening a new DR (in the case of keep) or an Undeletion request (in the case of delete). As a user I expect my vote to be respected. --E4024 (talk) 07:06, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You voted for deletion, above, upon a second DR. How was that respecting community decisions? Lets be honest and admit that you’re voting to persue a deletionist agenda, or maybe just to spite people you have grudges against (unless the real reason is something even worse). -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 12:54, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per Chris. It was tricky but he picked it well. J e e 11:47, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:Jkadavoor, you would never vote for keep in a DR about such a low res photo of a trivial subject. Your vision of Commons has no place for this kind of images, and that’s why there will always be a conflict: We (people who think Commons has a wider goal) do approve of your work and keep away of your discussions and contests, while you (people who think Commons has room only for selected instances of high quality photography) see us as a nuisance, at best. This is a sorrow state of affairs and I see no practical solution. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 12:54, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Tuválkin, I rarely vote on a DR unless saw it in some other places. Here I saw it the acting admin's talk. I pinged Chris first to know more about country specific requirements. Later I'm convinced by his explanation on possible permission issues that he more explained now as a reply to you. I don't consider low resolution as an issue if no better image(s) available. I'm not seeing you as a nuisance. J e e 15:54, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. --Jcb (talk) 09:58, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rahma.jpg

Commons proje kapsamında olmayan kişisel fotoğraf. E4024 (talk) 09:25, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

User:E4024, why file this DR with a rationale in Turkish when the photo was taken in Mozambique? -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 17:19, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- @Tuvalkin: This is a multilingual project where everyone is free to use any language. Google Translate delivers Personal photographs not covered by the Commons project. --AFBorchert (talk) 17:44, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

AFBorchert, thanks for your explanation of what Commons’ laguage policy is; you have however wasted your time, as I am quite aware of it, and I do not question User:E4024’s right to express himself in the language of his choice. I however have the right to criticize that choice. This is not a case of User:E4024 exercising his right to use the language he prefers: User:E4024 user is proficient in English and the image subjected to this DR has an English language description, therefore chosing Turkish to compose this DR is either a copy&paste blunder (that should be corrected) or an attempt to confuse and hostilize the uploader.

As for the meaning of the sentence, well, I can use Google Translater too (not to mention that I share lodgings with a native speaker of a Turkic language), and I knew what that sentence means; it’s a lie, regardless of the language it is conveyed in.

-- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 20:16, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment This is another photograph by another user which is not related to the previous deletion requests. But this (and the other uploads of the same user) appear to be personal photos which are unused. --AFBorchert (talk) 11:10, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, it is. Looks like that the tendency to file DRs on photos depicting brown people is so pervasive it even affects twice the same filename by sheer happenstance. As for the rest, User:AFBorchert, most of Commons is «personal photos which are unused» (and that’s not a bad thing.) -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 17:19, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Meanwhile I took a look at the mentioned other uploads of User:Kigona. @AFBorchert: you really think that photographic material documenting Agronomy studends’ field work at the most important university in Mozambique to be off scope, don’t you?… -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 20:16, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: In scope. (How many photos of class lectures being prepared we have? And in Africa?) -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 17:19, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: clearly a personal photo, but User:Tuvalkin wants to keep it. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:14, 31 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Rahma.jpg

This file was discussed before and deleted/kept in various occasions. (If there was another file with this same name sorry about that.) The last time the closing admin, P 1 9 9, said: "Kept: clearly a personal photo, but User:Tuvalkin wants to keep it." I am sure no individual user would like to impose an own preference on others, but let us leave it apart. This is a small file without camera EXIF and which means it is a dubious "own work". We do delete many files everyday for only this "precaution". (Personally I see no educational use, or scope, in the image, but that is not so important now. For some reason the image is not used.) E4024 (talk) 02:51, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, obviously: I have nothing more to add to the previous DR, other than correcting my typo *"studend" with "student". (Please note, as said, that a different file with the same filename was similarly the target three DRs; this DR is the second affecting the current file). The amount of bad faith being heaped on here is staggering, but its motivation is transparent. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 18:49, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: There’s nothing dubious about the own-work claims in Kigona (talk · contribs)’s uploads. The lack of metadata might not be due to a copyright pirate’s devious machinations, as the OP implies, but merely to the use of a cheap feature phone (such as post-Microsoft pseudo-Nokias made by HMD Global). -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 19:57, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note for the closing admin: The uploader's camera EXIF may be seen at their selfies, for example File:Bioshar 03.jpg. Therefore they did not take this pic. Also if you notice any personal attacks here, please kindly deal with them. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 20:05, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, oh admins — if you note any personal attacks or any other kind of ethically reproacheable activities, please kindly deal with them, or even unkindly. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 20:42, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@E4024: Why is your argument in support of your precaution claim directed to the closing admin? Isn’t it passible of general discussion? I’d say it is: So the four Bioshar photos by this user were taken with an iPhone 6s, as per their metadata, while this one has no metadata therefore you conclude it was not the same uploader’s work? You can see it is the same person (which we assume is User:Kigona, per COM:AGF), and the photo has same exact pixel count. That suggests that this is also from an iPhone 6s (so I was wrong about it being a cheap feature phone) and the lack of metadata might be due to its loss caused by the use of subpar software for axis rotation or contrast correction or some such. The one photo from this uploader that is not obviously a selfie, File:Bioshar 01.jpg, seems to show intact metadata and might have been taken with timer and tripod. I frankly cannot see any good reason to chose COM:PRP over COM:AGF concerning this photo. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 20:42, 8 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no reason to suspect copyvio: clearly a selfie in the same resolution as File:Bioshar 03.jpg. When some users see value in this photo and explain why, I will need to put aside my opinion and consider it in scope. --P 1 9 9 ✉ 20:26, 2 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Library Photo.jpg

Uploader says 'own work' however this photo is an exact copy taken from [16] Gab4gab (talk) 16:10, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As the Dean of the UAA/APU Consortium Library I am authorized to post the image of the Consortium Library building using the image posted at the Library's website. I am replacing the incorrect image that was on the LIbrary's wikipedia page. The incorrect image was the College of Arts and Sciences Building.

Thank you for considering this request to use the image.

Steve Rollins Dean, UAA/APU Consortium Library

Deleted: per nomination. File was taken from website, no COM:OTRS permission only the statement above. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:32, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:Hockei/license-4.0

This license reaches beyond CC-BY-SA-4.0. The requirement "When using both online- and in print-media, is to specify next to the picture my name as author, the license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.en) " Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0)" and the link to this original page, as the source of this file or "wikimedia"." is not required by the CC license and is not used in many places, including WP. It also makes print use of any image with this license essentially impossible. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:14, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep The ~~additional~~ more precise conditions for using of my pictures are my decisions. Many other photographer have this. What do you have to do with my pictures? These are mine and stay mine and belongs neither to you nor to wikimedia. You should not begin with things like that. Then I'll stop uploading more pictures right now. In my opinion you want to profile yourself at my expense. You arrogant guy never talked to me before. I beg the administrators to stop this deletion request instantly. --Hockei (talk) 13:42, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Info I've given a hint on my user page. When you ignore it then it will be the end. --Hockei (talk) 15:58, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Just modifying "specify next to the picture" to "specify next to the picture or in any reasonable manner" is enough. Keep after that. I failed to see a previous discussion with Hockei prior to this DR which is not good. J e e 17:15, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

~~{{Vd}}~~ Keep The extra requirements ~~make~~ made this template and every one of the user's uploads which use this template incompatible with hosting here. I strongly encouraged Hockei to offer a compromise which allows reasonable use in print, as well as in wikis such as this one, Wikipedia, and other WMF projects. — Jeff G. ツ 17:20, 4 August 2017 (UTC) Modified given the new changes as of 14:43, 5 August. — Jeff G. ツ 16:58, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What is complicated on it to write next to my picture eg. "Photo Andreas Eichler, CC BY-SA 4.0, wikimedia"? And what makes you all to legal experts? Are you all fight for me when anybody uses picture(s) of me in a wrong way? Certainly no. It will be only my problem and the decision is made by a judge and not by you or the wikimedia. And my site is in my userspace. This is no "template". --Hockei (talk) 18:15, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Hockei: When you transclude any page, you are using it as a template. Besides, your own use of your photos on your userpage violates your license. Go sue yourself. — Jeff G. ツ 18:29, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Hockei, the issue raised is about the manner of attribution. No one is saying you can't recommend that people attribute you in that way, but I don't think it is responsible to word this template in a way that makes it look like people are required to place your attribution credit directly next to the image. Note the difference between a polite recommendation and a requirement. People are not required to do what your template currently says. Section 3 on attribution says reusers can comply with the requirement to attribute "in any reasonable manner based on the medium, means, and context". This is how Wikipedia complies: by providing a URL link, because that is reasonable given its content medium as a series of HTML web pages. I can't speak for the German version of the template but the English version is not clear enough and it is not grammatically correct either leading to further confusion. You should look at adjusting it so it says that you are recommending that people attribute you in that way, but you can't imply it is necessary because that is misleading in terms of the actual contents of the license. You may also wish to draft the wording and allow someone else to review it so as to make sure the right impression is given for the version in English. seb26 (talk) 18:35, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- @Seb26: Thank you for your analysis, and sorry for the edit conflict. — Jeff G. ツ 18:41, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment Transform the meaning by changing the text slightly can be a compromise, this kind of thing can be tolerated IMO: "Even if it is not required by the license of this file I will appreciate if, when using both online- or in print-media, may be to specify next to the picture my name as author....". Though I'm not sure about my use of the English language on this case. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 18:40, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Language I have used successfully includes "Please credit this photo Jeff G. in the immediate vicinity of the photo". — Jeff G. ツ 18:47, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- Christian Ferrer, this is a big improvement and looks OK. I will appreciate if, [...], my name as author is specified next to the picture is a grammar suggestion. Jeff, that wording looks initially misleading/unclear to me. 'Please' is written but it risks not coming across as a recommendation. seb26 (talk) 18:57, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - Revision: "Attribution recommendation: Jeff G. / Wikimedia in the immediate vicinity of the photo". — Jeff G. ツ 19:04, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Info I want to have these three things written so that the relation to my picture is clearly visible. I want that the licence is written so that any other people know, that they can use it too. And I want that other people find the picture, therefore the source. I don't believe in a collision with the cc by-sa 4.0 because it is ~~in addition~~ as a clarification to see. And when you mean it collides with using by the wikimedia I can add "When using outside of wikimedia ...". But this would be wordplay in my eyes. My English certainly is not perfect. So I wonder that nobody till now have said to me that there are maybe spelling or grammar problems. --Hockei (talk) 19:19, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- If you are adding additional requirements to the license, then it is no longer the Creative Commons license (and you should not be using their trademarks to reference it), but an altered one. At that point, if it's deemed non-free, then we would regrettably delete the license and any works uploaded under it. "Using outside of Wikimedia" is not acceptable -- others need to be able to use it on the same terms as us. (Say, copying a Wikipedia article elsewhere.) The CC licenses require basically that same set of information, but allow it to be implemented in any reasonable manner. The license lets the author specify the "manner" (i.e. the wording of a copyright notice or credit, for example), but it is not intended to be able enforce a particular position etc. You are essentially removing "in any reasonable manner" from the license and making it more restrictive. At that point, it would be a debate if that crosses the line into non-free territory. Anything which is a request (instead of a requirement) is fine; that does not change the license. I think if you took out "next to the picture" it would also be fine, as at that point you are probably just re-stating what is required by the license. But a book for example may want to put credits at the end, or at the beginning in an "illustration index", not next to the picture, etc. Carl Lindberg (talk) 23:54, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Info I refer to the conversation on my talk page in German.

Bitte übersetze mal jemand den folgenden Text fehlerlos ins Englische:
Ich habe hier den Praxisleitfaden zur Nutzung von Creative-Commons-Lizenzen von Dr. Till Kreutzer. Und der sagt eindeutig, und das ist auch der Sinn des Ganzen, dass die Namensnennung so zu gestalten ist, dass ein eindeutiger Bezug zu dem Foto zu erkennen ist. Er schreibt unter anderem: "... Selbst wenn der Lizenzgeber eine bestimmte Methode der Namensnennung vorschlägt/vorschreibt, ist dies für den Lizenznehmer nur dann bindend, wenn er dies in angemessener Weise erfüllen kann. ....". Also kann ich die Art und Weise grundsätzlich vorschreiben und es ist bindend. Nur wenn es so nicht möglich ist, dann muss es in einer anderen Weise geschehen, die den gleichen Zweck erfüllt. Das ist aber immer so in Gesetzen, Verordnungen und der Rechtsprechung. Der Zweck ist entscheidend. Der Löschantrag ist daher nicht gerechtfertigt wenn nicht sogar rechtswidrig.

Hier der Link zur pdf-Datei: https://www.unesco.de/fileadmin/medien/Dokumente/Kommunikation/Open_Content_Praxisleitfaden_2.Aufl._2016.pdf

Ich bitte die Admins noch einmal, den Irrsinn zu stoppen. Vielleicht gibt es ja eine deutsche Rechtsabteilung bei der Wikimedia, die man hinzuziehen kann? Hier ist sicher kein Jurist am Werk.

I'm waiting for the requested translation. Also I've clarified more my licence text. --Hockei (talk) 08:39, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the sleepless night and the ruined weekend. --Hockei (talk) 06:04, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Info I changed my expressions from addition(al) in more precise and clarification. --Hockei (talk) 06:41, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hockei, I tried to improve the wording in English. Feel free to revert if not good. J e e 12:11, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Jkadavoor: Thanks you. But I made some own changes again. I want to have "next to the picture" --Hockei (talk) 13:01, 5 August 2017 (UTC)next to the picture" because I have my reasons for this. Please see here on the discussion page of Jameslwoodward. --Hockei (talk) 13:01, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hockei, 1. please see https://creativecommons.org/faq/#can-i-insist-on-the-exact-placement-of-the-attribution-credit regarding attribution placing. 2. The license name is "Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International" ; not "Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International" J e e 13:18, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Comment The CC licenses ([17]) does not allow any obligation for the placement of the attribution. But our policies, as well as the CC licenses, allow the multi licensing, including with more restrictive licenses. A CC license can be used, here, with another more restrictive licensing terms, but the person who will potentially use the image must be able to chose the less restrictive of the licenses of the files, the conditions are listed in out policies. Secondly a modified CC license is no longer a CC license and can not be called as a CC license. Therefore the text needs to be clarified as to whether it is a separate license (Multi-licensing is allowed here as long as we have the choice to use the less restrictive license) or it is simply a request and not a requirement (see my comment above. I think our policies can be improved from this case. Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 08:02, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Info New version. I removed next to the picture as condition. --Hockei (talk) 14:43, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
OK for me. J e e 15:52, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The English is acceptable now, but still somewhat awkward. The wording in English (subjectless use of the verb "is") is still strange, I suggest changing "is to specify my name" to "the reuser is to specify my name" and "If this way is impossible, is to be chosen another appropriate way which fulfills the same purpose." to "If this way is impossible, the reuser should choose another appropriate way which fulfills the same purpose." Also, I suggest changing 'the link to this original page, as the source of this file or "wikimedia"' to 'the link to this original page (as the source of this file) or "wikimedia"'. — Jeff G. ツ 16:51, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jeff G.: Thanks for your help. It is not my intention to address a specific group. Therefore I would like to dispense with the term reuser. I made some changes proposed/encouraged by you. I think it's OK now, isn't it? --Hockei (talk) 07:09, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Hockei: That is progress, thank you. How about "I suggest you specify" instead of "is to be specified"? — Jeff G. ツ 10:33, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. The term "suggest" would demote the licence to a wish. I already find many pictures of mine in the internet where the people don't care about the licence. Most of them are willing to rectify after I wrote to them but not all. I'm so sick of this ignorance. Therefore if the grammar OK now and everything licence conform, I'll leave it that way. --Hockei (talk) 14:51, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think this still overreaches with "If this way is impossible, is to be chosen another appropriate way which fulfills the same purpose." Let's say I want to use an image with this template in a book. All of the image credits in the book will be on a single page at the end. However, it is certainly not "impossible" to put the credit for the one image on the page with the image. Therefore, I must either break the method used for all other images or not use the image with this template. Hockei can suggest and request anything he wants, but he cannot dictate terms other than those specifically set forth in the CC license. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:00, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jim, I didn't get your point. Perhaps you may miss that Hockei removed the "next to the image" clause. Now the only condition is "with clearly identifiable reference to the photo". That means, if you use this photo in your book, you can either attribute 1. "Copyright: Andreas Eichler/Wikimedia, CC BY-SA 4.0" near the image or 2. "Photo of 'Western willow spreadwing' ©Andreas Eichler is used at page xyz under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. The original work is available at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2016.10.30.-01-Wagbachniederung_Oberhausen-Rheinhausen--Weidenjungfer-Maennchen.jpg" in the last page. I think "If this way is impossible, is to be chosen another appropriate way which fulfills the same purpose." is not necessary now; but still adds a bit more flexibility. J e e 12:22, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about that. I think that the sentence I cited is unnecessary and confusing, but does not go against the license. I think this, and other aspects of the English version of the template might well be cleaned up by a native English speaker. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:24, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes; the language seems to be improved. Colin, W.carter, could you help on this? J e e 11:30, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If no native English speaker feels like doing this, I could give it a try since I also understand German and could make the texts match, but I think that journalist and author Daniel Case could fix this text far better than I could; if he feels like it. --cart-Talk 11:51, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@W.carter: I'll take a look during Wikimania ... I think I will be able to. Daniel Case (talk) 06:08, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Info I've changed the wording of the template somewhat, Hockei approved the changes on his discussion page. I'm no native speaker of English though and I didn't reword every phrase, so further fixing might be a good idea. --Rosenzweig τ 13:14, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As you all know, I do not read German, but here's my touch up of Rosenweig's version:

I, Andreas Eichler, am the author of the photo published here. It can be used freely, including for commercial purposes, under the license terms stated here. When using the image both online and in print media (including e-books), the following must be specified with clearly identifiable reference to the photo:

1) my name as author,

2) the license in any one of three ways:

A) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/deed.en,

B) Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International, or

C) CC BY-SA 4.0, and,

3) either the link to this original page (that is: the source of this file) or "Wikimedia Commons".

I prefer that the credit be next to the picture: "Photo: Andreas Eichler, CC-BY-SA 4.0, Wikimedia Commons" but that is not required.

When using the image both online and in print publications (including e-books), I request (but do not require) that you send me the relevant link or ISBN/title/author by email and that you send me a copy in recognition of my work if applicable.

If you have any questions regarding my work or if you are interested to use this photo or other photos by me under other conditions, please contact me by email.

I have removed

"If this is not possible, another appropriate way of attribution which fulfills the same purpose must be chosen."

because it is just confusing -- the three points above must be fulfilled, so there is nothing for "this is not possible" to refer to. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:45, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am a native English speaker. Beyond what I wrote above, I like Jim's version of 13:45, 8 August 2017 (UTC) above better. — Jeff G. ツ 14:24, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I compared the above with the current text (edited 13:00, 8 August 2017‎). Other than having a nicer layout 1/2/3 items, I prefer Rosenweig's text. His text "If this is not possible, another appropriate way of attribution which fulfills the same purpose must be chosen."' is needed per the CC licence terms and it isn't valid to restrict the wording so precisely as above in Jim's version. Also I like how Rosenweig's version has the "next to the picture" as an example rather than the longer-worded text above. That's a subtle way of nudging the usage in the direction you want. I think the line above's "but that is not required" is quite ambiguous -- it isn't clear that is only commenting on the placement rather than anything else. What I don't understand in Rosenweig's text is "voucher copy". Above this is just "a copy". Are you actually asking for a copy of the book, magazine, poster, etc? If so, then I think this needs to be done more humbly than all the other requests, as it is the one least likely to be practical and by far the biggest favour. Personally, I would write it:

I love to find out about how my works are used, so would appreciate if you could let me know by email, along with details such as URL, title or ISBN. If it is possible to send me a copy of the work that includes my photo, that would be wonderful.

However, that aspect of the page, provided it is clearly optional, is not really our concern at this DR, and Hockei can word it how he likes. -- Colin (talk) 07:41, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Colin, again, I don't understand what "If this is not possible" refers to. My points 1-3 are required by the CC-BY license, so if it is not possible to fulfill 1-3, then you cannot use the image -- there can be no "[an]other appropriate way of attribution which fulfills the same purpose". . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:47, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Jim, it refers to all the conditions given previously, which is the entirety of the previous sentence. CC 4.0 makes every effort to be reasonable about attribution and so, points 1..3 are not precisely required by the licence. For example, the source link is "to the extent reasonably practicable". The licence details can be made in various ways, including embedding the entire licence text or linking to a copy of it (not necessarily the URL in A above). And "You may satisfy the conditions [above] in any reasonable manner based on the medium, means, and context in which You Share the Licensed Material". In a video, someone could say it! Really, this is why we should discourage home-grown attempts to summarise a complex legal document. All that Hockei is adding above the basic licence is his name, which then the licence requires to be mentioned. Actually, if Hockei is concerned then really he should also supply a copyright notice, which the licence then also requires is given. So that would be "© Andreas Eichler". It does help to remind people that the material is still under copyright. -- Colin (talk) 12:38, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the clear explanation. We still need the "voucher copy" changed. If that is fixed, I will withdraw this DR. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:28, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Info I changed the expression Belegexemplar because I myself wasn't satisfied with this and I wasn't sure how the equivalent is in English. So I chose now free copy. Anyway, I wonder how one of the admins in wikimedia can blackmail me without consequences. I can wish what I want. Even if they were balloons. This is my decision and does not concern anyone.

BTW, this DR opened my eyes very widely. --Hockei (talk) 16:51, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hockei, there is a difference between "wish" and "require". -- Colin (talk) 16:57, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

With blackmail I referred to the last what Jameslwoodward wrote about the expression voucher copy he wants me to change before he would withdraw the DR although it is clearly a wish. --Hockei (talk) 17:35, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

BTW, I just noticed that the own wikimedia template says:

You are free:

to share – to copy, distribute and transmit the work

to remix – to adapt the work

Under the following conditions:

attribution – You must attribute the work in the manner specified by the author or licensor (but not in any way that suggests that they endorse you or your use of the work).

share alike – If you alter, transform, or build upon this work, you may distribute the resulting work only under the same or similar license to this one.

Can it be, that Jameslwoodward ignores the rules of wikimedia and wants to force his own rule to other users? --Hockei (talk) 18:00, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

First, Jim is just one person and admins have no special authority, so any threat/blackmail or whatever you perceive coming from him is only of limited worth in the face of community consensus otherwise. The Wikimedia template is probably out-of-date, and should be updated to reflect the increasing flexibility that CC has permited in v3 and especially v4 of their licences. The CC legal document is the only document that matters, and there are no "rules of wikimedia" that are worth a grain of salt in this regard. We get you are annoyed, and we also get that Jim hasn't got everything right, but your attitude here is not helpful. Go read the full CC legal document. It does not permit you to demand attribution next to the photo, for example, or to specify the exact wording of any part other than your name. A lot of people have spent time trying to help improve your licence notice, and you frankly don't come across as being worth the effort. -- Colin (talk) 19:23, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Many users rely on these templates. This isn't a bagatelle. Independently of this somebody has to close this DR. There is no more reason for the deletion of it. --Hockei (talk) 20:06, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no reason for deletion. Please continue the discussion elsewhere if necessary. --Yann (talk) 00:14, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ballin Stadt Hamburg.jpg

Reche nicht eindeutig geklärt. 90.186.2.115 08:22, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Und was ist der Grund des Löschantrags genau? Bitte beachte, das einmal erteilte Lizenz nicht zurückgezogen werden kann, siehe Commons:License revocation.--Wdwd (talk) 18:13, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, no substative doubt cited that original uploader was the photographer. --Storkk (talk) 08:04, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:StatischeBerechnung Dillingen.jpg

Illegible hand-written note, unused Apocheir (talk) 20:19, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is not illegible, it is Kurrent. Kurrent was usual in german speaking location up to the year 1915. --LoKiLeCh (talk) 19:12, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Could you explain how this image is useful for an educational purpose? Was this calculation made by a notable engineer? Can you describe the method the engineer is using? As it stands, all I get out of this image is "in 1910, someone who speaks German did some kind of calculation for someone's cellar." -Apocheir (talk) 00:53, 7 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I translated from Kurrent in German:

Statische Berechnung 
zum Hausbau einer Doppel-Villa
für Herrn Fr. Wilh. Vogt zu Dillingen
Werderstraße

Kellergeschoß

1) Deckenträger freie Länge 4,10 + 0,30 = 4,40
P = 4,40 x 1,00 x 6,00 = 2460 kg
W = 2460 x 440 = rd. 113 cm^3
Gewählt N.P.16. mit W = 117 cm^3

2) Deckenträger freie Länge 3,90 + 0,30 = 4,20
 
P = 4,40 x 1,00 x 6,00 = 2340 kg
W = 2340 x 420 = rd. 102 cm^3
Gewählt N.P.16. mit W = 117 cm^3

3) ...träger freie Länge 1,20 + 0,30 = 1,50

P = 1,20 x 1,00 x 6,00 = 720
W = 720 x 150
W = 45 cm^3

I think the area of the roof is calculated and then the minimum of the Section modulus. The next greater standard Section modulus will be choosen. But i am not very sure for two reaons:

1) I am not an Civil engineer

2) The calculation is made half a century bevor i was born. Times are changing to Finite element method

The facsimile can serve to explain the historical development of this kind of calculation. Wikipedia also describes the past.

--LoKiLeCh (talk) 19:20, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The argument “illegible” is, to put it kindly, subjective. With the same right I could declare any texts in Korean, Chinese, Japanese and many other languages as “illegible”. By the way, the word before “freie Länge 1,20” reads “Balkenträger”. -- Renardo la vulpo (talk) 19:55, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Storkk (talk) 08:06, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Miles Doleac in glasses.jpg

No evidence of permission from the photographer. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:43, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I have mailed the copyright permission I got from Mr. Miles Doleac. Here is the Ticket ID: 2017080510008197. Mr RD (talk) 13:14, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Ticket:2017080510008197 --Arthur Crbz (talk) 16:51, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: ticket currently insufficient. Arthur Crbz requested clarification a week ago, to no avail. Another email was sent today, and if a satisfactory reply is received, the file will be restored. --Storkk (talk) 08:17, 12 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2009 7-11 icash with PFG-1103 face.jpg

Copyrighted by ROC Navy and President Chain Store Corporation. Cjackh (talk) 14:53, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:ROCN Cheng Ho (PFG2-1103) 20091130.jpg has been released into the public domain by ROC Navy in 2009.--Solomon203 (talk) 00:53, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Solomon203. Ruthven (msg) 18:07, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:2009 7-11 icash with PFG-1103 face.jpg

The file is originally kept, claiming that the Taiwanese navy has released the image of the frigate into public domain. However, there are neither clear evidence showing that the author is the Taiwanese navy, nor evidence showing that the author gives out a public domain permission (free license). Therefore before there are clear evidence (such as OTRS ticket) showing that the author is Taiwanese navy and it gives out a free license, the source and permission of the file is still unknown. 廣九直通車 (talk) 08:25, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ruthven: Also pinging administrator who kept the file.廣九直通車 (talk) 08:26, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Comment The photo appears on Alamy, tagged as "UtCon collection", whatever it means. BTW, the photo comes from a Taiwanese Government site: http://ship.nmmst.gov.tw/ship/detailprint/127/863, no need of an OTRS ticket to prove that. --Ruthven (msg) 08:53, 7 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Info@Ruthven: Please be reminded that according to Template:PD-ROC-exempt, only the constitution, laws, orders, official texts, and their official translations by Taiwanese authorities are eligible for Taiwanese public domain. As the file is actually not any of these documents, the image is not under public domain. Also, the source page given by you stated that "本圖片引用自國防部軍事新聞通訊社網站，請勿轉載", which means "This image was cited from the website of Military News Agency, Ministry of Defense, and should not be reproduced." Therefore, it is clear that the file is unfree.廣九直通車 (talk) 11:39, 13 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ruthven: Alamy nicked that from File:ROCN Cheng Ho (PFG2-1103) 20091130.jpg. Completely meaningless. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 13:06, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Guys, please do not ping me here: I'll not close a second time this DR. Let's have another sysop evaluate the case. I just gave an information. Thanks --Ruthven (msg) 16:06, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Ruthven: And I explained to you (and anyone else reading this thread) that this photo appearing on Alamy is meaningless. You should know that, it probably won't be the last time Paul Fearn tries to fool you. This DR for example, Paul Fearn. (now there's another DR for a crop of that) I don't expect you to close this DR, but when I reply to you with information, it's reasonable to ping, no? - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 18:47, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

@Alexis Jazz: Yes, it is reasonable :) However, we all known that Alamy puts shamelessly it's own copyright on public domain images. So, yes, I agree: the fact that it's on Alamy (in that form, i.e. without a proper reference to the author) is meaningless. --Ruthven (msg) 20:58, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly, many people don't know and still consider existence on Alamy as proof of copyvio. - Alexis Jazz ^{ping plz} 21:05, 21 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:03, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Ricardo Ferro-026.jpg

File:Ricardo-ferro.jpg

Copyright doubt: unlikely to be own work as it appears at [18] dated prior to upload, and at [19] (a Twitter profile display picture) without a free license seb26 (talk) 20:04, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I own the picture, and shared it with www.ondasdeibague.com, you can note my picture had a better resolution. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dgsa82 (talk • contribs) 20:23 4 ago 2017‎ (UTC)

Dgsa82, if this photograph is yours, can you (a) upload the original camera file over the top of this file or (b) follow the instructions at Commons:OTRS (en español). seb26 (talk) 20:30, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seb26, i just uploaded the original picture File:Ricardo Ferro Ibague.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dgsa82 (talk • contribs) 20:42 4 ago 2017‎ (UTC)

Dgsa82, that's not the same photo? seb26 (talk) 21:15, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Seb26, what about this picture? is this one good for you?

File:Ricardo Ferro-026.jpg

I voluntarily updated the article and put the picture i took. Now you say its not my picture? You should prove that, show me who is the one that took the picture. --Dgsa82 (talk) 21:45, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dgsa82, thanks for your efforts but I don't think you understand. Wikimedia Commons is a project that hosts copyright free or freely licensed images. We have the responsibility to delete files where there is significant doubt that the images are not available under a free license (precautionary principle). When users upload low resolution thumbnails, it leads our volunteer community to the conclusion that those images came from the Internet. This is especially so when those images match those held on other sites with the same dimensions, with low quality/JPG artifacts, or with sites dated prior to the time of the Commons upload. In the case of this specific photo of File:Ricardo-ferro.jpg, as I described above, it appears at a news site dated 26 May 2017 and on a Twitter profile. So I asked you to provide an original camera file that has Exif metadata (i.e. a JPG created from the original RAW file without settings to remove metadata and without changes/scaling to dimensions). This is because typically photographers are the only ones that have access to this file. You have now provided an image which is not the same (the person is wearing different clothes?) and then another image which is again not the same. These two second files you have provided look fine to me to keep on Wikimedia Commons so thank you for uploading them, but they do not serve as evidence about File:Ricardo-ferro.jpg. According to the precautionary principle, it is not my responsibility to "prove" who the owner is, it is the uploader's responsibility (i.e. yours.): if not, the file in question should be deleted. Spanish Wikipedia is a separate project with its own rules, but it is connected to Wikimedia Commons to access images and media, so images and media are bound by the rules we have here. Please see Commons:Licensing for more background information. Thanks, seb26 (talk) 21:59, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, & COM:PRP. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:33, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Karen-abudinen-abuchaibe.jpg

This file was initially tagged by Seb26 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://soundcloud.com/educabarranquilla/karen-abudinen-normal-audio (direct link) Uploader said "he owns it" seb26 (talk) 20:21, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I own this image, why it have been marked as copyright violation? — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 186.28.130.4 (talk) 20:14, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above comment was made at [20] and has been copied to this page by seb26 (talk) 21:13, 4 August 2017 (UTC).[reply]

To user Dgsa82 or 186.28.130.4, if this photograph is yours, can you (a) upload the original camera file over the top of this file or (b) follow the instructions at Commons:OTRS (en español). seb26 (talk) 20:29, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To user Seb26 i juest uploaded the picture File:Karen Abudinen en cañahuate.jpg — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dgsa82 (talk • contribs) 20:35 4 ago 2017‎ (UTC)

Dgsa82, this isn't the original camera file. We need to see the original camera file at full resolution with Exif data. There's no other way to tell that the images have not just been taken from the Internet. Please provide it and use the "Upload a new version of this file" function at File:Karen Abudinen en cañahuate.jpg instead of creating a new entire file. seb26 (talk) 21:19, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:38, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gavari drama on Krishna courting princess.jpg

Stolen scanned image. User is not the original artist. Pepperbeast (talk) 21:49, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand or like this claim. I took this photo and many others during Udaipur, Rajasthan trip in September 2016. I give free use of my pictures to people working to help Gavari like gavari.info and wanted to share some here. I did not expect thanks but really did not expect being called thief. Ryuichi! (talk) 11:04, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Ryuichi!: On the website, the license statement is not very clear. Can you help us see where it is said that the file is released under free license? --Ruthven (msg) 18:09, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:57, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gavari Badalya Hindawa scene with haughty guru and disciples - Jaisamand.jpg

Stolen scanned image. User is not the original artist. Pepperbeast (talk) 21:49, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand or like this claim. I took this photo and many others during Udaipur, Rajasthan trip in September 2016. I give free use of my pictures to people working to help Gavari like gavari.info and wanted to share some here. I did not expect thanks but really did not expect being called thief. Ryuichi! (talk) 11:12, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:57, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gavari male player portraying Krishna's feisty lover.jpg

Stolen scanned image. User is not the original artist. Pepperbeast (talk) 21:49, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand or like this claim. I took this photo and many others during Udaipur, Rajasthan trip in September 2016. I give free use of my pictures to people working to help Gavari like gavari.info and wanted to share some here. I did not expect thanks but really did not expect being called thief. Ryuichi! (talk) 11:14, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:57, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gavari kids playing apprenticeship roles as bandit extras.jpg

Stolen scanned image. User is not the original artist. Pepperbeast (talk) 21:50, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:57, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gavari possession scene at edge of arena - Jadhol.jpg

Stolen scanned image. User is not the original artist. Pepperbeast (talk) 21:50, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand or like this claim. I took this photo and many others during Udaipur, Rajasthan trip in September 2016. I give free use of my pictures to people working to help Gavari like gavari.info and wanted to share some here. I did not expect thanks but really did not expect being called thief. Ryuichi! (talk) 11:16, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:57, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gavari possession scene in audience - Jadhol.jpg

Stolen scanned image. User is not the original artist. Pepperbeast (talk) 21:50, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand or like this claim. I took this photo and many others during Udaipur, Rajasthan trip in September 2016. I give free use of my pictures to people working to help Gavari like gavari.info and wanted to share some here. I did not expect thanks but really did not expect being called thief. Ryuichi! (talk) 11:17, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:57, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Urban Gavari arena in Udaipur.jpg

Stolen scanned image. User is not the original artist. Pepperbeast (talk) 21:50, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand or like this claim. I took this photo and many others during Udaipur, Rajasthan trip in September 2016. I give free use of my pictures to people working to help Gavari like gavari.info and wanted to share some here. I did not expect thanks but really did not expect being called thief. Ryuichi! (talk) 11:18, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:57, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gavari Budia figure - Ghati village Jaisamand.jpg

Stolen scanned image. User is not the original artist. Pepperbeast (talk) 21:50, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please offer some/any evidence for this assertion. This is getting ridiculous - User talk:Pepperbeast has just randomly run through the Gavari photo list claiming "stolen image" for a dozen or more pictures without any effort to authenticate his totally false charges. Don't understand his motives, but where can we report and stop systematic sabotage? Eklingdas (talk) 11:26, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand or like this claim. I took this photo and many others during Udaipur, Rajasthan trip in September 2016. I give free use of my pictures to people working to help Gavari like gavari.info and wanted to share some here. I did not expect thanks but really did not expect being called thief. Ryuichi! (talk) 11:19, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:56, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gavari Budia figure from Gogunda troupe performance in Udaipur.jpg

Stolen scanned image. User is not the original artist. Pepperbeast (talk) 21:50, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please offer some/any evidence for this assertion. This is getting ridiculous - User talk:Pepperbeast has just randomly run through the Gavari photo list claiming "stolen image" for a dozen or more pictures without any effort to authenticate his totally false charges. Don't understand his motives, but where can we report and stop systematic sabotage? Eklingdas (talk) 11:30, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand or like this claim. I took this photo and many others during Udaipur, Rajasthan trip in September 2016. I give free use of my pictures to people working to help Gavari like gavari.info and wanted to share some here. I did not expect thanks but really did not expect being called thief. Ryuichi! (talk) 11:20, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:56, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Young Gavari apprentice awaitng arena entry - Udaipur.jpg

Stolen scanned image. User is not the original artist. Pepperbeast (talk) 21:51, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please offer some/any evidence for this assertion. This is getting ridiculous - User talk:Pepperbeast has just randomly run through the Gavari photo list claiming "stolen image" for a dozen or more pictures without any effort to authenticate his totally false charges. Don't understand his motives, but where can we report and stop systematic sabotage? Eklingdas (talk) 11:50, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand or like this claim. I took this photo and many others during Udaipur, Rajasthan trip in September 2016. I give free use of my pictures to people working to help Gavari like gavari.info and wanted to share some here. I did not expect thanks but really did not expect being called thief. Ryuichi! (talk) 11:21, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:56, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gavari audience elder elevated by ambient spiritual power.jpg

Stolen scanned image. User is not the original artist. Pepperbeast (talk) 21:51, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand or like this claim. I took this photo and many others during Udaipur, Rajasthan trip in September 2016. I give free use of my pictures to people working to help Gavari like gavari.info and wanted to share some here. I did not expect thanks but really did not expect being called thief. Ryuichi! (talk) 11:22, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:56, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Possessed Gavari audience member - Jharmal Nagpur troupe performance.jpg

Stolen scanned image. User is not the original artist. Pepperbeast (talk) 21:51, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please offer some/any evidence for this assertion. This is getting ridiculous - User talk:Pepperbeast has just randomly run through the Gavari photo list claiming "stolen image" for a dozen or more pictures without any effort to authenticate his totally false charges. Don't understand his motives, but where can we report and stop systematic sabotage? Eklingdas (talk) 11:46, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't understand or like this claim. I took this photo and many others during Udaipur, Rajasthan trip in September 2016. I give free use of my pictures to people working to help Gavari like gavari.info and wanted to share some here. I did not expect thanks but really did not expect being called thief. Ryuichi! (talk) 11:23, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:56, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Yong Talent- GAVARI.jpg

Stolen scanned image. User is not the original artist. Pepperbeast (talk) 21:56, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please offer some/any evidence for this assertion. This is getting ridiculous - User talk:Pepperbeast has just randomly run through the Gavari photo list claiming "stolen image" for a dozen or more pictures without any effort to authenticate his totally false charges. Don't understand his motives, but where can we report and stop systematic sabotage? Eklingdas (talk) 11:49, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:56, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Invocation-GAVARI.jpg

Stolen scanned image. User is not the original artist. Pepperbeast (talk) 21:56, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please offer some/any evidence for this assertion. This is getting ridiculous - User talk:Pepperbeast has just randomly run through the Gavari photo list claiming "stolen image" for a dozen or more pictures without any effort to authenticate his totally false charges. Don't understand his motives, but where can we report and stop systematic sabotage? Eklingdas (talk) 11:45, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:56, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Final Gavari ceremony scene - immersion of the Goddess icon.jpg

Stolen scanned image. User is not the original artist. Pepperbeast (talk) 22:00, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for delay response, but my computer broken a while. but I am author of this picture and own copyright myself. Some my pictures published in my Gavari book, but most never before published. I don't understand problem. I just wanted to share Gavari with Wikipedia people and other international people. If problem about name - my director-artist name is Harish Agneya, my birth name is Harishankar Meghwal and national identity card name is Harishanker Meghwal. I also make Gavari films you can see about on my website http://gavarimewar.com and work on team with http://gavari.info giving my pictures to help. Please help me understand what problem is and what you want.

I am copying this to other pbjectioned photos because information same. Harish-Agneya (talk) 07:07, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. here is link to my Gavari book Harish-Agneya (talk) 07:27, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:56, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gavari Bhanjara scene with gypsy trader being blocked by Meena bandits.jpg

Stolen scanned image. User is not the original artist. Pepperbeast (talk) 22:01, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Ticket:2017080410019507 is being proceeded. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 12:50, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for delay response, but my computer broken a while. but I am author of this picture and own copyright myself. Some my pictures published in my Gavari book, but most never before published. I don't understand problem. I just wanted to share Gavari with Wikipedia people and other international people. If problem about name - my director-artist name is Harish Agneya, my birth name is Harishankar Meghwal and national identity card name is Harishanker Meghwal. I also make Gavari films you can see about on my website http://gavarimewar.com and work on team with http://gavari.info giving my pictures to help. Please help me understand what problem is and what you want.

I am copying this to other pbjectioned photos because information same. Harish-Agneya (talk) 07:09, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. here is link to my Gavari book Harish-Agneya (talk) 07:28, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: has OTRS permission. --Jcb (talk) 14:56, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Villagers gather to greet Gavari troupe arrival -.jpg

Stolen image. User is not the original artist. Pepperbeast (talk) 22:01, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please offer some/any evidence for this assertion. This is getting ridiculous - User talk:Pepperbeast has just randomly run through the Gavari photo list claiming "stolen image" for a dozen or more pictures without any effort to authenticate his totally false charges. Don't understand his motives, but where can we report and stop systematic sabotage? Eklingdas (talk) 11:48, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for delay response, but my computer broken a while. but I am author of this picture and own copyright myself. Some my pictures published in my Gavari book, but most never before published. I don't understand problem. I just wanted to share Gavari with Wikipedia people and other international people. If problem about name - my director-artist name is Harish Agneya, my birth name is Harishankar Meghwal and national identity card name is Harishanker Meghwal. I also make Gavari films you can see about on my website http://gavarimewar.com and work on team with http://gavari.info giving my pictures to help. Please help me understand what problem is and what you want.

I am copying this to other pbjectioned photos because information same. Harish-Agneya (talk) 07:10, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. here is link to my Gavari book Harish-Agneya (talk) 07:29, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Harish-Agneya: On the website, I can read: "Copyright © 2013 Tuneer Films - All Rights Reserved", which means that we cannot accept the files taken from there, unless the author gives us the rights to do so. You should send a mail to OTRS to clarify the copyright status of those files that have been already published elsewhere. But please do not write personal details here, as this website is public. Thanks --Ruthven (msg) 18:12, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mr. Ruthven, I don't understand again. If you see Contact page on my website you see I am director and owner of Tuneer Films with my wife. I own copyright to website and photographs and films myself. Mr. Crombez at OTRS already understand this. Please talk to him. Beside this image not on my website I think.Harish-Agneya (talk) 12:29, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Arthur Crbz and Harish-Agneya: If you've sent an email, Mr. Crombez at OTRS will answer you and help you calrifying the question. Mind that the files can be undeleted, so nothing is lost. In any case, if this image isn't from your website, there are no issues in deleting it, right? --Ruthven (msg) 14:08, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Ruthven and Harish-Agneya: Harish, you sent us a permission only for File:Gavari Bhanjara scene with gypsy trader being blocked by Meena bandits.jpg (see Ticket:201708041001950 for OTRS agents). If you are the author of other files, please send us a permission by email mentioning files names. Plus, as Ruthven said, files can be restored easily if they are deleted. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 17:17, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is now very strange. First, Mr. Pepperbeast call me thief and liar with no proof and no Wikipedia people say anything. Then Mr. Ruthven say this photo no good because it come from copyright protected website. I show website and copyright are mine and this photo not there anyway. Then he say it OK to delete photo because it NOT on website. Then Mr. Crombez from OTRS who I write to about other Gavari picture and he say OK, he "assume my good faith". Now he say he does not and all my pictures must get OTRS approved. If all pictures need OTRS approving why allow anyone to upload in beginning? Is this special rule for Indians? I show you I am 25-year Gavari photographer, make a Gavari book and Gavari films. I have many thousand Gavari photographs. Why would I steal someone else' pictures? What is motive or profit for me? Is everyone at Wikipedia like you people? This is turning into nightmare. Harish-Agneya (talk) 18:32, 17 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Harish-Agneya: No special rules for Indians, copyright is a complicated matter for everyone :) Effectively, I wasn't able to find the photograph anywhere on the Net, so it appears that Pepperbeast's assertion has been made on no ground.

Keep for me. --Ruthven (msg) 09:16, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am suspicious of these images because four accounts (all claiming to be different people) and all containing only images for use in the Gavari Wikipedia article were created in quick succession and many of the images seem to be low-quality scans from books or magazines. Pepperbeast (talk) 21:19, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:55, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Village shamans invoking Goddess permission to perform Gavari ritual.jpg

Stolen scanned image. User is not the original artist. Pepperbeast (talk) 22:01, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please offer some/any evidence for this assertion. This is getting ridiculous - User talk:Pepperbeast has just randomly run through the Gavari photo list claiming "stolen image" for a dozen or more pictures without any effort to authenticate his totally false charges. Don't understand his motives, but where can we report and stop systematic sabotage? Eklingdas (talk) 11:47, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for delay response, but my computer broken a while. but I am author of this picture and own copyright myself. Some my pictures published in my Gavari book, but most never before published. I don't understand problem. I just wanted to share Gavari with Wikipedia people and other international people. If problem about name - my director-artist name is Harish Agneya, my birth name is Harishankar Meghwal and national identity card name is Harishanker Meghwal. I also make Gavari films you can see about on my website http://gavarimewar.com and work on team with http://gavari.info giving my pictures to help. Please help me understand what problem is and what you want.

I am copying this to other pbjectioned photos because information same. Harish-Agneya (talk) 07:11, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. here is link to my Gavari book Harish-Agneya (talk) 07:30, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:55, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gavari cast of demon warriors prepare to enter arena.jpg

Stolen scanned image. User is not the original artist. Pepperbeast (talk) 22:02, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please offer some/any evidence for this assertion. This is getting ridiculous - User talk:Pepperbeast has just randomly run through the Gavari photo list claiming "stolen image" for a dozen or more pictures without any effort to authenticate his totally false charges. Don't understand his motives, but where can we report and stop systematic sabotage? Eklingdas (talk) 11:32, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for delay response, but my computer broken a while. but I am author of this picture and own copyright myself. Some my pictures published in my Gavari book, but most never before published. I don't understand problem. I just wanted to share Gavari with Wikipedia people and other international people. If problem about name - my director-artist name is Harish Agneya, my birth name is Harishankar Meghwal and national identity card name is Harishanker Meghwal. I also make Gavari films you can see about on my website http://gavarimewar.com and work on team with http://gavari.info giving my pictures to help. Please help me understand what problem is and what you want.

I am copying this to other pbjectioned photos because information same. Harish-Agneya (talk) 07:12, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. here is link to my Gavari book Harish-Agneya (talk) 07:31, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:55, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Appearance of bold temple thieves in the Gavari Goma drama.jpg

Stolen scanned image. User is not the original artist. Pepperbeast (talk) 22:02, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for delay response, but my computer broken a while. but I am author of this picture and own copyright myself. Some my pictures published in my Gavari book, but most never before published. I don't understand problem. I just wanted to share Gavari with Wikipedia people and other international people. If problem about name - my director-artist name is Harish Agneya, my birth name is Harishankar Meghwal and national identity card name is Harishanker Meghwal. I also make Gavari films you can see about on my website http://gavarimewar.com and work on team with http://gavari.info giving my pictures to help. Please help me understand what problem is and what you want.

I am copying this to other pbjectioned photos because information same. Harish-Agneya (talk) 07:12, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. here is link to my Gavari book Harish-Agneya (talk) 07:31, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - please provide evidense of permission via OTRS. --Jcb (talk) 14:50, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gavari village youths play supporting roles as Meena bandits.jpg

Stolen scanned image. User is not the original artist. Pepperbeast (talk) 22:02, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please offer some/any evidence for this assertion. This is getting ridiculous - User talk:Pepperbeast has just randomly run through the Gavari photo list claiming "stolen image" for a dozen or more pictures without any effort to authenticate his totally false charges. Don't understand his motives, but where can we report and stop systematic sabotage? Eklingdas (talk) 11:43, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for delay response, but my computer broken a while. but I am author of this picture and own copyright myself. Some my pictures published in my Gavari book, but most never before published. I don't understand problem. I just wanted to share Gavari with Wikipedia people and other international people. If problem about name - my director-artist name is Harish Agneya, my birth name is Harishankar Meghwal and national identity card name is Harishanker Meghwal. I also make Gavari films you can see about on my website http://gavarimewar.com and work on team with http://gavari.info giving my pictures to help. Please help me understand what problem is and what you want.

I am copying this to other pbjectioned photos because information same. Harish-Agneya (talk) 07:13, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. here is link to my Gavari book Harish-Agneya (talk) 07:32, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:54, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gavari performers' "green room".jpg

Stolen scanned image. User is not the original artist. Pepperbeast (talk) 22:03, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please offer some/any evidence for this assertion. This is getting ridiculous - User talk:Pepperbeast has just randomly run through the Gavari photo list claiming "stolen image" for a dozen or more pictures without any effort to authenticate his totally false charges. Don't understand his motives, but where can we report and stop systematic sabotage? Eklingdas (talk) 11:36, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for delay response, but my computer broken a while. but I am author of this picture and own copyright myself. Some my pictures published in my Gavari book, but most never before published. I don't understand problem. I just wanted to share Gavari with Wikipedia people and other international people. If problem about name - my director-artist name is Harish Agneya, my birth name is Harishankar Meghwal and national identity card name is Harishanker Meghwal. I also make Gavari films you can see about on my website http://gavarimewar.com and work on team with http://gavari.info giving my pictures to help. Please help me understand what problem is and what you want.

I am copying this to other pbjectioned photos because information same. Harish-Agneya (talk) 07:14, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. here is link to my Gavari book Harish-Agneya (talk) 07:33, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:54, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Bhil village chief welcomes return of Gavari troupe to home village.jpg

Stolen scanned image. User is not the original artist. Pepperbeast (talk) 22:03, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for delay response, but my computer broken a while. but I am author of this picture and own copyright myself. Some my pictures published in my Gavari book, but most never before published. I don't understand problem. I just wanted to share Gavari with Wikipedia people and other international people. If problem about name - my director-artist name is Harish Agneya, my birth name is Harishankar Meghwal and national identity card name is Harishanker Meghwal. I also make Gavari films you can see about on my website http://gavarimewar.com and work on team with http://gavari.info giving my pictures to help. Please help me understand what problem is and what you want.

I am copying this to other pbjectioned photos because information same. Harish-Agneya (talk) 07:20, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:54, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gavari dance drama maiden played by young Bhil farmer.jpg

Stolen scanned image. User is not the original artist. Pepperbeast (talk) 22:03, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please offer some evidence for this assertion. I personally know the photographer/uploader Harishankar Meghwal (aka Harish Agneya) - he has about 9000 original Gavari photos he's taken over the last 25 years, he's a man of great generosity & rectitude, and he doesn't have a scanner. He also published the only foreign language intro to Gavari using only his own pictures, many of which he's releasing now on the Commons to spread knowledge of this ancient tradition. Eklingdas (talk) 11:00, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for delay response, but my computer broken a while. but I am author of this picture and own copyright myself. Some my pictures published in my Gavari book, but most never before published. I don't understand problem. I just wanted to share Gavari with Wikipedia people and other international people. If problem about name - my director-artist name is Harish Agneya, my birth name is Harishankar Meghwal and national identity card name is Harishanker Meghwal. I also make Gavari films you can see about on my website http://gavarimewar.com and work on team with http://gavari.info giving my pictures to help. Please help me understand what problem is and what you want.

I am copying this to other pbjectioned photos because information same. Harish-Agneya (talk) 07:21, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:54, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gavari Budia figure flanked by Rai goddess avatars.jpg

Stolen scanned image. User is not the original artist. Pepperbeast (talk) 22:04, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please offer some/any evidence for this assertion. This is getting ridiculous - User talk:Pepperbeast has just randomly run through the Gavari photo list claiming "stolen image" for a dozen or more pictures without any effort to authenticate his totally false charges. Don't understand his motives, but where can we report and stop systematic sabotage? Eklingdas (talk) 11:28, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for delay response, but my computer broken a while. but I am author of this picture and own copyright myself. Some my pictures published in my Gavari book, but most never before published. I don't understand problem. I just wanted to share Gavari with Wikipedia people and other international people. If problem about name - my director-artist name is Harish Agneya, my birth name is Harishankar Meghwal and national identity card name is Harishanker Meghwal. I also make Gavari films you can see about on my website http://gavarimewar.com and work on team with http://gavari.info giving my pictures to help. Please help me understand what problem is and what you want.

I am copying this to other pbjectioned photos because information same. Harish-Agneya (talk) 07:21, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:54, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gavari pilgrimage scene.jpg

Stolen scanned image. User is not the original artist. Pepperbeast (talk) 22:04, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please offer some/any evidence for this assertion. This is getting ridiculous - User talk:Pepperbeast has just randomly run through the Gavari photo list claiming "stolen image" for a dozen or more pictures without any effort to authenticate his totally false charges. Don't understand his motives, but where can we report and stop systematic sabotage? Eklingdas (talk) 11:38, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have not done anything random. I believe Eklingdas has created several sockpuppet accounts in order to claim the work of at least three protographers as their own. Pepperbeast (talk) 20:08, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for delay response, but my computer broken a while. but I am author of this picture and own copyright myself. Some my pictures published in my Gavari book, but most never before published. I don't understand problem. I just wanted to share Gavari with Wikipedia people and other international people. If problem about name - my director-artist name is Harish Agneya, my birth name is Harishankar Meghwal and national identity card name is Harishanker Meghwal. I also make Gavari films you can see about on my website http://gavarimewar.com and work on team with http://gavari.info giving my pictures to help. Please help me understand what problem is and what you want.

I am copying this to other pbjectioned photos because information same. Harish-Agneya (talk) 07:22, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:54, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gavari village-arena scene.jpg

Stolen scanned image. User is not the original artist. Pepperbeast (talk) 22:04, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please offer some/any evidence for this assertion. This is getting ridiculous - User talk:Pepperbeast has just randomly run through the Gavari photo list claiming "stolen image" for a dozen or more pictures without any effort to authenticate his totally false charges. Don't understand his motives, but where can we report and stop systematic sabotage? Eklingdas (talk) 11:44, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for delay response, but my computer broken a while. but I am author of this picture and own copyright myself. Some my pictures published in my Gavari book, but most never before published. I don't understand problem. I just wanted to share Gavari with Wikipedia people and other international people. If problem about name - my director-artist name is Harish Agneya, my birth name is Harishankar Meghwal and national identity card name is Harishanker Meghwal. I also make Gavari films you can see about on my website http://gavarimewar.com and work on team with http://gavari.info giving my pictures to help. Please help me understand what problem is and what you want.

I am copying this to other pbjectioned photos because information same. Harish-Agneya (talk) 07:23, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:54, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gavari Badalya scene.jpg

Stolen scanned image. User is not the original artist. Pepperbeast (talk) 22:04, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for delay response, but my computer broken a while. but I am author of this picture and own copyright myself. Some my pictures published in my Gavari book, but most never before published. I don't understand problem. I just wanted to share Gavari with Wikipedia people and other international people. If problem about name - my director-artist name is Harish Agneya, my birth name is Harishankar Meghwal and national identity card name is Harishanker Meghwal. I also make Gavari films you can see about on my website http://gavarimewar.com and work on team with http://gavari.info giving my pictures to help. Please help me understand what problem is and what you want.

I am copying this to other pbjectioned photos because information same. Harish-Agneya (talk) 07:24, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:54, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gavari Bhinyavad scene showing avatar Kali's magic powers.jpg

Stolen scanned image. User is not the original artist. Pepperbeast (talk) 22:04, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please offer some/any evidence for this assertion. This is getting ridiculous - User User talk:Pepperbeast has just run through the Gavari photo list claiming "stolen image" for a dozen or more pictures without any effort to authenticate his totally false charges. Don't understand his motives, but where can we report and stop systematic sabotage? Eklingdas (talk) 11:24, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for delay response, but my computer broken a while. but I am author of this picture and own copyright myself. Some my pictures published in my Gavari book, but most never before published. I don't understand problem. I just wanted to share Gavari with Wikipedia people and other international people. If problem about name - my director-artist name is Harish Agneya, my birth name is Harishankar Meghwal and national identity card name is Harishanker Meghwal. I also make Gavari films you can see about on my website http://gavarimewar.com and work on team with http://gavari.info giving my pictures to help. Please help me understand what problem is and what you want.

I am copying this to other pbjectioned photos because information same. Harish-Agneya (talk) 07:24, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:54, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gavari village invocation rite.jpg

Stolen scanned image. User is not the original artist. Pepperbeast (talk) 22:05, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please offer some/any evidence for this assertion. This is getting ridiculous - User talk:Pepperbeast has just randomly run through the Gavari photo list claiming "stolen image" for a dozen or more pictures without any effort to authenticate his totally false charges. Don't understand his motives, but where can we report and stop systematic sabotage? Eklingdas (talk) 11:42, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry for delay response, but my computer broken a while. but I am author of this picture and own copyright myself. Some my pictures published in my Gavari book, but most never before published. I don't understand problem. I just wanted to share Gavari with Wikipedia people and other international people. If problem about name - my director-artist name is Harish Agneya, my birth name is Harishankar Meghwal and national identity card name is Harishanker Meghwal. I also make Gavari films you can see about on my website http://gavarimewar.com and work on team with http://gavari.info giving my pictures to help. Please help me understand what problem is and what you want.

I am copying this to other pbjectioned photos because information same. Harish-Agneya (talk) 07:25, 8 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:54, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gavari dance performance at Shilpagram.jpg

Stolen scanned image. User is not the original artist. Pepperbeast (talk) 22:07, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please offer some/any evidence for this assertion. The photographer happens to be my wife and I helped edit the pic (to reduce resolution) before she uploaded it. Eklingdas (talk) 11:05, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:53, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gavari at Shilpagram.jpg

Stolen scanned image. User is not the original artist. Pepperbeast (talk) 22:07, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:53, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gavari player as Shiva at Shilpigram.jpg

Stolen scanned image. User is not the original artist. Pepperbeast (talk) 22:08, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please offer some/any evidence for this assertion. This is getting ridiculous - User talk:Pepperbeast has just randomly run through the Gavari photo list claiming "stolen image" for a dozen or more pictures without any effort to authenticate his totally false charges. Don't understand his motives, but where can we report and stop systematic sabotage? Eklingdas (talk) 11:38, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is indeed my photo taken at Udaipur's Shilpgram on September 22, 2014. I do not understand why you have questioned its authenticity.Kasarlyn (talk) 06:52, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:52, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gavari shamans invoking goddess Gauri.jpg

Stolen scanned image. User is not the original artist. Pepperbeast (talk) 22:08, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please offer some/any evidence for this assertion. This is getting ridiculous - User talk:Pepperbeast has just randomly run through the Gavari photo list claiming "stolen image" for a dozen or more pictures without any effort to authenticate his totally false charges. Don't understand his motives, but where can we report and stop systematic sabotage? Eklingdas (talk) 11:41, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is indeed my photo taken at Dhaddha Farm, Sajjangarh, Udaipur on September 22, 2013. I do not understand why you have questioned its authenticity.Kasarlyn (talk) 06:53, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:52, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gavari player carrying ritual sankaal chain.jpg

Stolen scanned image. User is not the original artist. Pepperbeast (talk) 22:08, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please offer some/any evidence for this assertion. This is getting ridiculous - User talk:Pepperbeast has just randomly run through the Gavari photo list claiming "stolen image" for a dozen or more pictures without any effort to authenticate his totally false charges. Don't understand his motives, but where can we report and stop systematic sabotage? Eklingdas (talk) 11:39, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is indeed my photo taken at Dhaddha Farm, Sajjangarh, Udaipur on September 22, 2013. I do not understand why you have questioned its authenticity.Kasarlyn (talk) 06:55, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Found at http://www.gavari.info/gallery/men-of-gavari/, published prior to this upload. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:58, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:52, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gavari shamans invoking Goddess Gauri 2.jpg

Stolen scanned image. User is not the original artist. Pepperbeast (talk) 22:09, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please offer some/any evidence for this assertion. This is getting ridiculous - User talk:Pepperbeast has just randomly run through the Gavari photo list claiming "stolen image" for a dozen or more pictures without any effort to authenticate his totally false charges. Don't understand his motives, but where can we report and stop systematic sabotage? Eklingdas (talk) 11:40, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is indeed my photo taken at Dhaddha Farm, Sajjangarh, Udaipur on September 22, 2013. I do not understand why you have questioned its authenticity.Kasarlyn (talk) 06:57, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Found at http://www.gavari.info/gavari-introduction/, from 2016. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:57, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:52, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Gavari performer carrying peacock sceptre.jpg

Stolen scanned image. User is not the original artist. Pepperbeast (talk) 22:09, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please offer some/any evidence for this assertion. This is getting ridiculous - User talk:Pepperbeast has just randomly run through the Gavari photo list claiming "stolen image" for a dozen or more pictures without any effort to authenticate his totally false charges. Don't understand his motives, but where can we report and stop systematic sabotage? Eklingdas (talk) 11:35, 6 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is indeed my photo taken at Dhaddha Farm, Sajjangarh, Udaipur on September 22, 2013. I do not understand why you have questioned its authenticity.Kasarlyn (talk) 06:58, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I found a copy of it at http://www.gavari.info/gallery/men-of-gavari/. Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:56, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Kasarlyn: Because the files have already been published in a website, so we suppose that the copyright belongs to its owner. --Ruthven (msg) 18:14, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:52, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logos in Category:Unidentified logos which meet the threshold of originality

The license on these logos is PD-textlogo, however I beleive that these specific logos do actually meet the threshold of originality

Basvb (talk) 23:10, 8 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:33, 15 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logos out of use with own work claim which are either unlikely own work or out of scope

These logos are all unused and claimed to be own work. The issue with these self-licensed and unused logos is that a lot of them are not actually own work, this is mainly the case with the more interesting logos (of notable subjects). It is very easy to download the logo of a company from their website, thus if they are going to be actually used they can be re-uploaded with correct license information. A lot of the logos are not even PD-ineligible (they contain creative work) and are therefore copyright violations, some of the logos of notable companies have multiple uploads of the same logo, of which another version is already in use. The other logos which are actually own work (I believe this will be a small subset) are mainly of non-notable subjects and therefore not in scope of commons (all nominations are of unused logos). These 56 logos are from a set of 100 logos in Category:Unidentified logos, depending on the arguments raised in this nomination I would take a look at the other logos in similar categories. I believe these categories are cluttered with material either unusable; in violation of copyrights of their rights owners or containing incorrect source and author attributions.

Basvb (talk) 14:39, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Many are too simple for copyright and should be renominated on an individual basis. Fry1989 ^eh? 21:01, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My argument is that they are either out of scope or incorrectly licensed. I'm not arguing that a large part (not all) of those logos isn't PD-textlogo. Mvg, Basvb (talk) 21:04, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted per nomination. --Krd 13:49, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Unidentified logos

Unused logos of companies with no apparent notability, out of scope.

Sealle (talk) 03:46, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, as the argument about no apparent notability is false for the following:
- File:1992 New Zealand America's Cup Bid - R19592797 Embossed Logo (9811978716).jpg: it is also categorized as Category:1992 America's Cup; recategorized
- File:30262732996_2c8003ebed_okk.jpg: notability of subject; authenticity of design; recategorized (though: might be wrongly licensed; has a terrible filename; {{Badjpg}})
- File:2017 Houlihan Lokey logo.jpg: notability of subject; recategorized

There may be more cases. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 05:49, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep the notable ones and Delete the others. --E4024 (talk) 07:20, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep as to File:2011-365-26 Limited Logo (5391865931).jpg. On closer inspection, this is not merely a "logo" but is actually a photograph of that portion of the wing of the aircraft. It should be used, or available to use. BD2412 T 11:46, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- @BD2412: Continental's logo is non-free. Sealle (talk) 12:52, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - By itself, it would be non-free, but this is a picture of the wing, which happens to have the logo painted on it - not materially different from this picture of the plane, which happens to have the logo painted on the tail. An object does not fall out of the public domain merely because a logo is painted on the object. Otherwise, we would have to delete every photograph of an airplane (or bus, car, product package) that happened to capture the company logo painted on it. BD2412 T 13:08, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    - BD2412, please see COM:DM. Whole plane doesn't violate copyright, but this cropped photo of stabilizer (not a wing to be 100% accurate) does. Sealle (talk) 13:15, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
      - What if someone wants to use it to illustrate this portion of a stabilizer? Or the application of livery to a stabilizer? I would add that this image is not the entire logo, and that this logo is merely a geometric shape - the contours of a sphere - which hardly expresses much originality, if any. It may be subject to trademark protection, but it is a dubious proposition that it is even subject to copyright. BD2412 T 03:30, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
If you don't mind, please also consider File:Hriaou.jpg for deletion. --E4024 (talk) 13:02, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
- @E4024: Mark 5:9. There are tens of thousands of those to review. Sealle (talk) 13:31, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I could review only one. Have we also got thousands of volunteers in Commons? --E4024 (talk) 13:32, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please don't delete File:002 Logo RGB.svg, because it is the logo of an existing institute (HIIG) in Berlin and has it's own wikipedia entry. Thanks! — Preceding unsigned comment added by FlorianLuedtke (talk • contribs) 2017-08-08 17:20:38 (UTC)
- @FlorianLuedtke: this svg looks broken/of bad quality. Should be fixed and then included in article, otherwise it can be deleted. XXN, 10:42, 12 August 2017 (UTC) P.S. it may be copyrighted and above the COM:TOO, but eventually this could be discussed in a separate DR[reply]

Deleted: most, kept some per discussion, I also found usage for two more. --Jcb (talk) 21:03, 2 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]