Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/07/28

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive July 28th, 2017
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this information is fake 2001:E68:542F:59C4:4D37:76C1:63D6:3F0A 11:14, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Clearly invalid DR. --Natuur12 (talk) 11:17, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ad, out of scope. Yann (talk) 09:24, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete, {{copyvio}} from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SEgmpvfjPI4 uploaded by a Bertrand101 sockpuppet. LX (talk, contribs) 11:37, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:26, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ad, out of scope. Yann (talk) 09:25, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:28, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 19:46, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

How the file is in our project scope? Taivo (talk) 20:38, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: spam. --Hystrix (talk) 08:12, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kinoiskusstvo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Book covers and promo photo. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Здравствуйтеǃ Я получила это сообщение, но ничего не поняла - все эти фото - мои личные. * File:Четыре книги.jpg

Помогите, пожалуйста, разместить их так, чтобы не удаляли. EugeneZelenkoЯ размещала на англ. языке, поэтому, наверное, неправильно ответила на вопросы и предупреждения. Я могу прислать Вам копию какого-нибудь удостоверяющего документа, это мои авторские фотографии. Спасибо большое. Kinoiskusstvo

Здравствуйте. Вы мне не отвечаете. Поясняю по фото - это мои фото моих авторских обложек. Я разрабатывала макеты этих обложек, фото предоставлял автор книг (Георгий Дарахвелидзе). Есть переписка с ним. Также два фото прислал автору сын Майкла Пауэлла - Коламба пауэлл, и две фото для обложки автор купил в Библиотеке Британского киноинститута. Мне подсказали написать запрос - напишу сегодня. Спасибо. Kinoiskusstvo
Необходимы разрешения от фотографов в Commons:OTRS (пример: Commons:Email templates), т. к. дизайн добавил только текст. Факт покупки скорее всего не дает покупателю авторских прав, только право на использование в конкретном случае. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 01:29, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Хорошо, спасибо. Буду писать автору. Фото на общей фотографии ( там, где четыре тома) были сделаны для 1, 2 тома - в 40-х годах прошлого века. Их подарил Коламба Пауэлл автору, когда тот был у него в гостях в Лондоне, к 3=му тому картинка - кадр из фильма "Наблюдающий", куплен в Британском киноинституте, к 4 -му тому - мишень со стрелой - заставка киностудии "Арчеры", куплен в Британском киноинституте(а кинокомпании Арчеры вот уже полвека нет существует). Снова писать в Британский киноинстиут? Или слетать туда?

Я же разрабатывала дизайн - текст, цвет, слоганы.


Подскажите, пожалуйста, как удалить эти фото. Не могу найти ссылки. Спасибо. Kinoiskusstvo


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 12:36, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dimitarkw1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertisement and promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 19:07, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded as a separate file by mistake Ранко Николић (talk) 14:44, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: dupe. --JuTa 02:12, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No encyclopedic information in this files. Picture of a shoe on someone's foot. File name is misleading as it is not a photo of that lake. Kalbbes (talk) 00:01, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:34, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright doubt: image (a) is of low resolution, (b) is not accompanied by Exif data from a camera, (c) Exif data indicates a social media tracking tag, so it is unlikely that this image is own work and if it is, a full original camera file would need to be provided given the uploader's copyright violation history seb26 (talk) 00:08, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:34, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright doubt: photograph of a page or book with a copyrighted photograph and text and design. No source attributed, assume copyrighted seb26 (talk) 00:08, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:33, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright doubt: not likely to be own work by the uploader because the image (a) is of low resolution, (b) contains JPG artifacts suggesting it is a crop of a reproduced version of the original photo, (c) appears on various other sites [1][2][3] dated prior to upload seb26 (talk) 00:18, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:33, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scope: subject of the logo, a shopping centre, has no relevant Wikipedia coverage so this logo is being used here under a false license and without potential educational reuse purposes seb26 (talk) 00:21, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:33, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope PDF Guanaco (talk) 01:14, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:33, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Are you sure that this is a free file? I see a Copyright symbol on the bottom, and I don't see the CC license on the website. Consider checking the website to comfirm whether this is a free image or not.

--Davidng913 (talk) 01:16, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:33, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope PDF Guanaco (talk) 01:20, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am sorry but this PDF is not out of Scope. This is a PUBLIC issue from City council of Lodi (with private details deleted for privacy). This publication issue SHOWN that the art installation was build under the direction of Giuliano Mauri's sons like Roberto and Mauro. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ideamediatech-fri17 (talk • contribs)

@Ideamediatech-fri17: I see that it's used on Italian Wikipedia. For copyright, this would be under {{PD-Italy-EdictGov}}, correct? You uploaded it as your own work, with CC BY-SA. Guanaco (talk) 09:49, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Guanaco: yes guanaco you are right. i am sorry but there is no this kind of copyright under wikipedia options, so i can flag only as my own work. as well i am new on this platform, so i am sorry for mistakes :)
We were all new to this once. I recommend uploading directly through the Commons UploadWizard which makes it easier. Also you can set your language at Commons to Italian in Special:Preferences. This works for a lot of project pages and image info, not just the interface.
The PDF should be okay to keep now. Is there a link to find it elsewhere online? Guanaco (talk) 10:27, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:34, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is Not Own work Tvcccp (talk) 01:42, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:34, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is Not Own work Tvcccp (talk) 01:44, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:34, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope PDF Guanaco (talk) 01:51, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:34, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Imagen con copyright Soosie. (talk) 02:11, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - copyvio, http://www.wikiwand.com/vi/Red_Velvet_(nh%C3%B3m_nh%E1%BA%A1c) - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 21:51, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:34, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong name , repeat File:Cúcuta 11 NS jul 2017.jpg EEIM (talk) 02:25, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:34, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. TV Screen Shot of movie What's Eating Gilbert Grap.--Kacir (talk) 03:00, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:34, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. TV Screen Shot of movie Titanic (1997).--Kacir (talk) 03:02, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:34, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:JONATHAN FUENTE PASCAL.jpg, watermark, no reliable source. jdx Re: 04:19, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:34, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File not legitimately in use: Private image collections Webysther (talk) 04:42, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:34, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation. Watermark on bottom right: © Njue Kevin, but dedicated to the public domain here under CC0. Both hands shown, unlikely to be self-photographed (the photographer is the copyright holder, copyright assignments aside). Submitting a ticket to COM:OTRS would be appropriate to verify permission.

The uploader has conflict-of-interest edits (and possible copyvios) on English Wikipedia. 2001:2003:54FA:D2:0:0:0:1 04:51, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:34, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book cover, presumably copyrighted, own work claim may be invalid. --ghouston (talk) 05:25, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - copyvio indeed - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 21:54, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:34, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For the same reason as the other images deleted previously. Some of these images are in a high-security setting which would mean that Narendra Modi's personally-employed photographer (if such a person exists) might not be allowed access to them. Other images have logos in prominence whose copyrights rest with either the Government of India or Bharatiya Janata Party. The images of Anandiben Patel are again cropped from images in which the Prime Minister is himself present.

Rahul Bott (talk) 06:41, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:09, 22 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The claimed author is part of the photographs:

Suspicious or no metadata available for

Most of these files have unbelievably low resolutions to be a 21st century original image.

Files like

are either official Indian government events where the Prime Minister is unlikely to be sitting as a mere photographer while the Finance Minister presides or an international event like the East Asia Summit where his personal photographer will hardly be allowed. These can at best be Government of India works which cannot be in public domain so soon as per Template:PD-India. Also

has a clear Indian Government art work (the calendar) in prominence which is certainly not copyfree.

Other images in this category have been previously deleted by sysops User:Jcb and User:Daphne Lantier. In summary, we need a thorough review of files coming from this Flickr user and should immediately suspend further uploads from this account pending the completion of such a review.

Rahul Bott (talk) 04:56, 7 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:44, 13 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For the same reasons as the previous nominations. Some of the files have very suspicious metadata and low file sizes.

Rahul Bott (talk) 09:01, 14 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:45, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

For similar reasons as in previous nominations from the category (all deleted). Also, File:Indian medal winners at the Special Olympic World Summer Games 2015.jpg has image credits to "Special Olympics Bharat Facebook page" while File:Mukhtar Abbas Naqvi in Rajya Sabha.jpg is a grab of official television recordings of Rajya Sabha.

Rahul Bott (talk) 09:09, 21 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have said it before! Cannot agree more. -- Rahul Bott (talk) 04:59, 26 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination -- acct blacklisted as well. Daphne Lantier 18:33, 27 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same reasons as for previous nominations. Many files have suspicious metadata and very low filesizes. Some others are derivative works with no proper attribution/reference to the original work and their copyright status.

Rahul Bott (talk) 05:25, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:38, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same reasons as before. Few files are screen grabs of Lok Sabha Television footage while others are screenshots of private apps like Instagram, Weibo etc.

Rahul Bott (talk) 08:33, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep majority of them. Most of their previous images were low-res screenshots or instagram pics but a majority have exif information which means they were taken by actual cameras and thus they should be kept, delete the low res ones that don't look like they were taken with a camera or lack exif information, keep the rest.--Stemoc 22:11, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Stemoc: With due respect, the mere presence of EXIF data itself does not make the copyright ownership clear. More so, if these happen to be works of a Government of India employee(s) in which case the Prime Minister himself/herself does not have the power to release the files into public domain without bringing necessary changes in Indian laws. There is also the issue of false claim of authorship with most of these files. Best Regards, Rahul Bott (talk) 12:02, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:25, 10 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

More. Many are rightly unused with just some text and an uncredited portrait photograph as substantial part. Some are crops from already deleted files.

Rahul Bott (talk) 07:57, 11 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 08:52, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The files have no evidence of their copyright owner as Narendra Modi (Prime minister-India). There is clear Flickr washing. Most of the images have been deleted before for the same reason. Another set of deletion can be found at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Bharatiya29 and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Former cricketer Anil Kumble meets PM Modi.jpg.

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 07:11, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Except for files like File:Constituent Assembly of India logo.jpg which are clearly PD-India. -- Rahul Bott (talk) 12:08, 20 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: most per nomination, kept one per discussion. --Jcb (talk) 13:00, 27 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted per UDR since we now have {{GODL-India}}. Please feel free to re-nominate any file if GODL-India does not apply. I have left all the files in the GODL-India review category. Jcb (talk) 11:30, 21 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As we can see on this link (https://lasillarota.blob.core.windows.net.optimalcdn.com/uploads/luis/2017/mar_17/Ricardo_Yanez_chihuahua.jpg), the photograph is a crop from an official government, so probably doesn't have the proper license. Luisalvaz (talk) 05:33, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:38, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Reaganbanning (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images.

--ghouston (talk) 05:38, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:38, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Defektes Foto Jbergner (talk) 05:46, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:38, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Downloaded image. Greenbörg (talk) 05:50, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:38, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unusably small - no likely use Pi.1415926535 (talk) 06:21, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:38, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I cannot find words to present this DR. "Unused text", perhaps? E4024 (talk) 06:29, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:39, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal album made into a collage. OoS. E4024 (talk) 06:30, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:39, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No camera metadata, both hands of the subject shown. Unlikely to be own work because of this. 2001:2003:54FA:D2:0:0:0:1 07:52, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly out of project scope soon (COM:SELFIE), as the article where this work is included has been nominated for speedy deletion. 2001:2003:54FA:D2:0:0:0:1 07:54, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:39, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:SKIDZ

[edit]

Advertising. The user's other two files are in use on their user page... which is an ad, but still a user page. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 07:53, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:39, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality personal image, the uploader's only contribution, the file is not in use. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:02, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:39, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused .pdf file with unknown importance, probably out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:05, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:39, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot from a movie (The actor is apparently Gena Rowlands, for context); a copyright violation. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:30, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:39, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advert. Also include: File:Massagista Masculino.jpg. E4024 (talk) 08:32, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:39, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The metadata has detailed information about where this photo came from: The Notimex website contains copyright information pertaining to this image. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:37, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:39, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal file and indirect advert. (See the TP history of the user that uploaded). Also: File:Dr.Helal Kamaly.jpg E4024 (talk) 08:39, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:39, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No camera metadata, both hands of the subject shown. Unlikely to be own work because of this. Possibly out of project scope soon (COM:SELFIE), as the article where this work is included has been nominated for speedy deletion.

Photographic images to demonstrate a subject person should probably use JPEG instead of animated GIFs anyway. 2001:2003:54FA:D2:0:0:0:1 08:45, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:39, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LukasMuriel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

low quality ilages of com:PENIS, there is enough of this stuff in Category:Human penis

Pippobuono (talk) 08:46, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Almost everytime I and a few others say "delete, got enough of this stuff", others come and try to prove, no, we haven't got enough ps. Therefore my opinion/vote, which would begin with a "d" I prefer to keep to myself. That's it. --E4024 (talk) 08:51, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:39, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LukasMuriel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

There doesn't seem to be anything added to our collection of COM:PENIS in these images.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:54, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:16, 16 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertising, out of com:SCOPE Pippobuono (talk) 08:51, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:40, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:CareerCenter

[edit]

These all have in the metadata: "Author Jennie Pettersson, Copyright holder/Fotobyline: Jennie Pettersson". There is also a link to the website of that person, a professional photographer. It is a violation of copyright unless the uploader gets explicit permission to license and distribute her work. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:56, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:40, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probable copyvio, artefact about a musical group Pippobuono (talk) 09:11, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:40, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photos, out of com:SCOPE, anyway, unused on wiki

Pippobuono (talk) 09:15, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:40, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mizzvizz9 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

self promotion, out of com:SCOPE

Pippobuono (talk) 09:31, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:40, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SELFIE, out of scope. Sealle (talk) 09:33, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This file is just in the sphere--Bogdanov-62 (talk) 09:39, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:41, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of copyrighted material Michał Sobkowski (talk) 09:33, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:41, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of copyrighted material Michał Sobkowski (talk) 09:33, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:41, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Hexic Perez

[edit]

Low-quality unused selfies. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:35, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:41, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From the blog of a photographer, who doesn't indicate a license for the photo. The metadata says copyrighted, though. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:45, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:41, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, the user's only contribution, uploaded in 2013 and never used. No potential educational value to make it worth keeping. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:47, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:41, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong picture Dodoman (talk) 09:51, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete - a lot of pictures are already deleted, pictures are or privacy (young children), or promotional (in the title), or out of scope (a personal set of photo's). - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 21:31, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:41, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan, The author of this sculpture is Nakamura Shinya who is still living. [4] Y.haruo (talk) 09:53, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ja:Wikipedia:屋外美術を被写体とする写真の利用方針を利用してローカルで上げる分には問題ないと思います。今の写真をそのまま小さくするか、または個別の人物の部分を切り出すかのどちらかの処理が必要になるでしょう。--Y.haruo (talk) 18:25, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment ja:ファイル:Statue of Young Satsuma Pioneers.jpgとしてアップロードしました。--そらみみ (talk) 16:13, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:41, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan, The author of this sculpture is Nakamura Shinya who is still living. [5] Y.haruo (talk) 09:54, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:41, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan, The author of this sculpture is Nakamura Shinya who is still living. [6] Y.haruo (talk) 09:55, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:41, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan, The author of this sculpture is Nakamura Shinya who is still living. [7] Y.haruo (talk) 09:56, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:41, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan, The author of this sculpture is Nakamura Shinya who is still living. [8] Y.haruo (talk) 09:56, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:41, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong picture Dodoman (talk) 10:02, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:41, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted material Pippobuono (talk) 10:04, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:41, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probable copyvio, artefact on the image odf an artist Pippobuono (talk) 10:05, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:41, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tanya Hope? No, Tanya Ravichandran. The internet is full with this image. No hope. E4024 (talk) 12:33, 29 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Sealle (talk) 10:42, 5 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong licence Pippobuono (talk) 10:06, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:41, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EDanceFever (talk · contribs)

[edit]

copyrighted material, maybe self promotion... out of com:SCOPE

Pippobuono (talk) 10:07, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:42, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused texts Pippobuono (talk) 10:09, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:42, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unsued texts Pippobuono (talk) 10:09, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:42, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused texts Pippobuono (talk) 10:10, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:42, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan, This sculpture was created in 2010. [9] Y.haruo (talk) 10:19, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:42, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Luis fregoso (talk · contribs)

[edit]

60×60px unclear thumbnail pictures - out of scope.

XXN, 15:38, 5 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:53, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Luis fregoso (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing/inconsistent metadata, and previous publications found elsewhere.

LX (talk, contribs) 10:39, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:43, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per the title, it is supposed to somehow depict the Battle of the Garigliano in 915, but in reality this is a pastiche of two completely unrelated images from the Madrid Skylitzes. The image is therefore (intentionally?) misleading. Constantine 10:53, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:43, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely an image found on Internet, not own work. B dash (talk) 10:58, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Invalid reason. -- Music Stanislaw (talk) 09:29, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:43, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely an image found on Internet, not own work. B dash (talk) 10:58, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Invalid reason. -- Music Stanislaw (talk) 09:27, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:43, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely an image found on Internet, not own work. B dash (talk) 11:04, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Invalid reason. -- Music Stanislaw (talk) 09:26, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:43, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copied from: http://ultracars.bg/rally/article/55 Спасимир (talk) 11:33, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:44, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

aspect ratio, watermark Hiddenhauser (talk) 11:34, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:44, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be Copyvio. Steak (talk) 11:52, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:44, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of FIle:Alaeddin and the Enchanted Lamp.djvu Jellby (talk) 12:00, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:44, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no own work sure Pitpisit (talk) 12:14, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:44, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It has no simple geometric shapes. TGE-927364 (talk) 12:21, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:44, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. Pitpisit (talk) 12:30, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:44, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This the official logo of FK Panevezys with someones nickname written on it with Paint. Povilasz (talk) 12:33, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:44, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. Pitpisit (talk) 12:37, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:44, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The label (specifically, the artwork of the camera) may be copyrighted. A version with that artwork cropped out is already available at File:British Museum 2nd century bronze jug.jpg. Mike Peel (talk) 12:55, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This DR should be considered controversial and should stay open for at least 7 days. The simple camera icon in the sign may be such a small component that it is de minimis. The camera icon is unlikely to be the property of the museum and some searching may reveal its use elsewhere, it may well be copyright free or be on a suitable licence for reuse. -- (talk) 13:01, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Some quick research shows the camera icon to be free clipart, very widely used. Now uploaded to File:Camera-pictogram.jpg. -- (talk) 13:38, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per consensus. Daphne Lantier 17:45, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The label (specifically, the artwork of the camera) may be copyrighted. A version with that artwork cropped out is already available at File:British Museum Fortuna statue.jpg. Mike Peel (talk) 12:55, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This DR should be considered controversial and should stay open for at least 7 days. The simple camera icon in the sign may be such a very small component of the photograph that it is de minimis. The camera icon is unlikely to be the property of the museum and some searching may reveal its use elsewhere, it may well be copyright free or be on a suitable licence for reuse. -- (talk) 13:01, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Some quick research shows the camera icon to be free clipart, very widely used. Now uploaded to File:Camera-pictogram.jpg. -- (talk) 13:38, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm reading the words "public domain" as compatible with applying CC0, certainly a different PD license may be better if someone would like to suggest it. There is no indication in the terms that the source website owners created this icon (in fact they state they did not) or are the people that originally released it, consequently their request for non-competitive use or attribution is not legally meaningful. They are responsible for ensuring that their current use and release on this clipart image is legally correct. Other websites that host this same image and other format versions of the same icon, make various copyright claims, however we are well aware of how public domain imagery gets recycled this way for profit, we see this happen with Commons content all the time. The choice of freeclipartnow as a source is partly due to their straightforward statement about copyright and the fact they have been running since 2007 - in fact the icon has a date of release at freeclipartnow of "2008/03/26 04:20", in internet terms making it medieval. It could be that other sources are even clearer, I don't see the point of investing a lot more volunteer time in research on this icon unless it becomes a matter of significant doubt, rather than hypothetical. Thanks -- (talk) 18:57, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Having previously heard the words "public domain" used in contexts that are well-meaning but legally incorrect, I'm not convinced by this argument. However, I trust the commons community as a whole to have a much better understanding of copyright than me. So let's see what others think. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 21:57, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The alternative source on the image page, later but still 6 years old and so stable in internet terms, gives a license of CC0, and even links to the Creative Commons site to explain what it means. There's not much potential for ambiguity in those circumstances. It could all be deliberate lies, but there would be no obvious motivation and that could be said about 90% of what is on Commons, so it's not significant doubt as we normally understand that concept. The image has been around freely, or at least declared as public domain, and stable for 9 years with no attempted take-down; even though the process for removal is clearly explained in the website terms for both sources linked. -- (talk) 22:41, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The alternative source at [11] that you've added looks more reliable, and there are more images on commons that use that as a source than the other. So this reduces my concerns. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 01:06, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per consensus. Daphne Lantier 17:45, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

دچار مشکل شده ام Sensi sirvan moradi (talk) 13:10, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:46, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted non-trivial logo. XXN, 13:13, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:46, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

violación del copyright foto bajada de google Tarawa 13:15, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete, {{copyvio}} with false licensing claims. Raster copy of en:File:Levante Unión Deportiva, S.A.D. logo.svg, which is clearly marked as non-free. LX (talk, contribs) 23:04, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:46, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 13:23, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:46, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 13:24, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:46, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doesn't look like a notable actor; rather the uploader's own promotion. E4024 (talk) 13:24, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:46, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 13:26, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:46, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted [12] Mikey641 (talk) 13:50, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:46, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by UGB2005 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:11, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:46, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by UGB2005 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Game Screenshots

Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:38, 30 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:39, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artist died in 1979 and the painting is still protected with copyright. The file can be restored after copyright expiring in 2050. Taivo (talk) 14:12, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Uploader Bernd Mengel stated in talkpage of the request, that artworks are not protected in Germany at all. This is simply wrong. Taivo (talk) 07:15, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My answer is reflected wrong! I did NOT say that artworks are not protected. HERE is my answer -at least you should try to understand a complex content:

In Germany the artist (WALTER HEMMING) is NOT protected with copyright at all. And seriously if it's not ruled in Germany where the artist lived and worked -where should be a copyright violation? Please have a look at the http://www.bildkunst.de/en/service-for-users/search.html All artists with Reproduction Right or Resale Royalty Rights are listed -if not there is no copyright problem. Just put the artists name in the search file and have a look at the result http://www.bildkunst.de/en/service-for-users/artist-search/reproduction-rights.html Please use a prominent artist like Günther Uecker and do the reverse test.

If you would like to insist on the deletion the second JPG should also be deleted as act of non discrimination act. Otherwise this good artist will be forgotten if art experts like me can not do a good job ;) —Vorstehender, nicht signierter Kommentar stammt von Bernd Mengel (Diskussion • Beiträge) 21:33, 28 July 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:47, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:47, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:47, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. Also, subject and uploader are the same, so this is probably not own work as claimed. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:47, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by חתואל12 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photo and document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:47, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

One or another of them may be an artist who made some of the uploaded works; but notability is quite doubtful. E4024 (talk) 14:23, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:47, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free photo on the bulletin board Batholith (talk) 14:26, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:47, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
At the website http://datos.gob.es/es/aviso-legal does not mention that the Spanish Gov. data is released on the public domain. Even if uploaded as a Creative Commons artwork, at the website this statement can be read:

Son de aplicación las siguientes condiciones generales para la reutilización de los documentos sometidos a ellas:
1. Está prohibido desnaturalizar el sentido de la información.

This point means that there are limitations for the generation of derivative works. So data created by the Spanish Gov. is under the Creative Commons CC BY-ND licence, thus, non eligible to be uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. Dura-Ace (talk) 14:27, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:47, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry boys. maybe one day you will become famous and I'll be ashamed of having proposed the deletion of some of your early pics. Alas, life is full of surprises, if you get to succeed we will upload them again. E4024 (talk) 14:27, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:47, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Felippemota17 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.gazetadopovo.com.br/ra/media/Pub/GP/p4/2015/11/18/VidaPublica/Imagens/Vivo/Couto%20e%20Vila.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:47, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Crop of a web photo: https://graphicpolicy.com/2016/03/11/mixed-martial-arts-legend-george-st-pierre-to-attend-wizard-world-philadelphia-june-4-5/ Ytoyoda (talk) 14:36, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:48, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo has two problems. At first, there is "Photo © Sigrid Estrada" in bottom right corner, copyright violation. At second, Antonio Portanet isn't mentioned neither in en.wiki, es.wiki nor in pt.wiki, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 14:36, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:48, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the uploader's work, this is National Review's file photo for Buckley (another version appears here: http://www.nationalreview.com/article/432007/william-buckley-hillsdale-college) Ytoyoda (talk) 14:39, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:48, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:48, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What is status of Minnesota government works? EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:48, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As the article about HARCO Die & Mold Manufacture is deleted, I believe that so it must be done with the photos included to it. Werkzeugbauneues (talk) 14:49, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:48, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo collage, derivative work (original files are unknown). It's quite probably that the original files aren't uploader's own work. XXN, 15:07, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:48, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Rights violation. 46.152.49.175 15:19, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:48, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is an old photo that is no longer needed and provides confusing information in the descriptions Leliloro (talk) 15:20, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:48, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We have another image with greater width, see File:Поклон стеллы.jpg 109.172.98.69 16:18, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:48, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains copyrighted images such as airline logo and mascot — Sunnya343✈ (háblamemy work) 16:22, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:48, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Keith-264 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Better copy in png here: File:5th Australian Division operations 17 March - 6 April 1917.png Yann (talk) 16:33, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:48, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 16:39, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:48, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Тимур112343

[edit]

All files taken from social network vk.com (see "Source"). In the field "Author" in the translation from the Russian stated "I do not know". --109.172.98.69 16:40, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:48, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable copyright violation. Album cover, licence is probably spurious, no evidence that uploader owns the rights Verbcatcher (talk) 17:11, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:49, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable copyright violation. License is probably spurious, no evidence that uploader owns the rights. See http://www.clashmusic.com/reviews/gwenno-y-dydd-olaf Verbcatcher (talk) 17:13, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:49, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Album notes leaflet. Licence is probably spurious, no evidence that uploader owns the rights, see http://www.clashmusic.com/reviews/gwenno-y-dydd-olaf Verbcatcher (talk) 17:17, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:49, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable copyright violation, no evidence that uploader own the rights, licence probably spurious. See https://joannagruesome.bandcamp.com/album/weird-sister-lp Verbcatcher (talk) 17:19, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:49, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable copyright violation. Uploader has added several suspect images. On several websites, e.g. http://www.cardiff.ac.uk/news/view/390631-visit-us-at-the-national-eisteddfod-of-wales Verbcatcher (talk) 17:24, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:49, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, unlikely that uploader owns the rights. Uploader has added several suspect images. On several websites, e.g. http://www.dailypost.co.uk/whats-on/arts-culture-news/15-things-you-never-knew-9736625 Verbcatcher (talk) 17:26, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:49, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a photograph of a map on an information board. So presumably it's a derivative of unfree work. 62.65.58.165 17:32, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:49, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather thumbnail format, one-file-upload, potentially personality right isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 18:20, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:49, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not notable topic, deleted by me on it.wiki. Melquíades (msg) 18:21, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:49, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:37, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep. Undue suspicion, not found elsewhere using Google Image. Moreover, uploader seems to be a wildlife photographer, and this image is comparable to his/her other uploads. --P 1 9 9   13:57, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per P199. Daphne Lantier 17:49, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nothing notable. 88.10.42.42 19:09, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:50, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License at original source [13] says "Copyright by respective production studio and/or distributor. Intended for editorial use only", which is not compatible with commons. DrKay (talk) 19:18, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:50, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Christophe Dumont is born in 1960. No FoP in France. 90.61.232.87 19:40, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:49, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Forwarding page from meaningless file name that was renamed oSeveno (talk) 19:53, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:49, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no FOP for buildings in Iceland FASTILY 20:10, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

jrg1000: I shot this photo myself while on a trip to Iceland. I have given full rights to the public to use this photo however the public sees fit. Whoever is behind automating this deletion happy bot needs to check their .
Please take a moment to review Commons:Freedom of panorama#Iceland. Thanks, FASTILY 02:36, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:49, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cecília Pinheiro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, found elsewhere on the web like File:Artursoareshangar.jpg + File:Artur no Prêmio Hangar de Música 2013.jpg = probadly grabbed fromFacebook and previously published via (example) http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-EEmmK33ZzEk/UlZ0LP-McVI/AAAAAAAAB_w/wAZYcX1h6mk/s1600/artur-soares.jpghttp://www.ochaplin.com/2013/10/premio-hangar-de-musica-2013-arregacou-demais.html

Gunnex (talk) 20:42, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:50, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free licenses, missing legal information Lyndonbaines (talk) 22:23, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose Its in Public Domain Because the works out of copyright where the author has been dead for over 70 years (Which is Karuth draw it by 1858) which means the author/creator is dead for morethan 70 years (Jasper0070 (talk) 00:35, 30 July 2017 (UTC))[reply]

Kept: as per P199. Daphne Lantier 17:50, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused JPEG logo, should be SVG if useful, out of scope. Yann (talk) 22:27, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:50, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CarlsonsProd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 22:31, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:50, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr washing This is only picture by someone who joined Flickr in July 2017. The source file has a lower resolution and no metadata which would be expected from something of this quality. Secondarywaltz (talk) 22:31, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If the account is new that dose not mean that they dont have the right to license. The source file and uploaded file is the same size and the pic is in good quality. GoodName (talk) 23:10, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete, very obvious, very blatant Flickrwashing and a sloppily manipulated version of http://www.tollywood.net/public/Gallery/tollywood-gallery-haripriya-new-stills-230039.jpg, grabbed from http://www.tollywood.net/telugu/Gallery/Album/7273/ACTRESS/Haripriya+New+Stills. GoodName, didn't your parents teach you not to lie? LX (talk, contribs) 23:29, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yup, that's pretty blatant given http://www.tollywood.net/telugu/Gallery/Album/7273/ACTRESS/Haripriya+New+Stills (which wasn't provided in the earlier request for speedy deletion or the discussion on the Village pump). Although I had opposed a speedy deletion that was based just on newness of accounts and lack of EXIF data, I'd say this is the clincher. Speedy delete. - Jmabel ! talk 05:37, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No- I don't think anyone is dumb.GoodName (talk) 12:00, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@jmabel, 'Lack of EXIF data' is not a good reason to delete this image because anyone can create EXIF data.GoodName (talk) 12:15, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:50, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Friends for ever Minnesota souvenir 176.239.11.77 22:32, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:50, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pablomathias01 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF (per * probadly grabbed from Facebook) + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted.

Gunnex (talk) 22:35, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:51, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Smtsm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Professional portraits, please upload the original files with EXIF data, or send a permission via COM:OTRS.

Yann (talk) 22:38, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:51, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Benvindo Samuel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted.

Gunnex (talk) 22:41, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:51, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete this is a screenshot of Ellen Page in the film Inception - the same scene as this image. It's highly unlikely the uploader was on the film set with such access, then uploading a low quality image lacking metadata. Ww2censor (talk) 22:47, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:51, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted and in use-can br hosted locally but not at Commons Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 22:49, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:51, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-res image claimed as "own work" by account with no other edits. Image is all over the Internet, and appears to be what Maloney himself uses as a portrait. E.g. https://www.ovguide.com/drew-maloney-9202a8c04000641f800000001b571df5, http://www.rmc.edu/news-and-calendar/current-news/2010/11/01/randolph-macon-college-welcomes-four-new-trustees, so I doubt claim about "own work". Still, it's been on here long enough that it is possible that the other sites got it from here. I consider that a bit improbable, because it was never included in the Wikipedia article on him. Jmabel ! talk 22:55, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:51, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Automated upload of public domain photos, I am nominating this file for deletion mainly because it is a useless snapshot of people standing around doing nothing. Secondarily, it was uploaded by the US Fish and Wildlife service for the sole purpose of making fun of the stupid look on its employee's face, which is unnecessary. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 23:56, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete It's hard to see any educational purpose in this, and I think we should respect the subject's right not to be publicly lampooned- he is not Donald Trump, for example. He is entitled to some privacy and respect. Rodhullandemu (talk) 00:37, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:51, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio and photoshoped image. Greenbörg (talk) 05:57, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Why copyvio? --Saqib (talk) 17:26, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This is his portrait professional shoot done by a professional photographer - Dr Arif Alvi uses this image for his public profile - i hope this is not deleted as it is genuinely him --Drawab (talk) 06:43, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: This photo is to be found at the personal page of Dr. Arif Alvi. This needs to be processed through our support team where we need a written permission from the photographer. Once this is clarified, this photograph can be restored. --AFBorchert (talk) 17:04, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. image. Greenbörg (talk) 07:49, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Greenbörg: Can you explain? Who is the actual source or copyright holder? Guanaco (talk) 10:08, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: This picture appears in this publication from 17 September 2015 which predates the upload time from 30 December 2016. This needs to be processed through our support team. --AFBorchert (talk) 17:09, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong picture Dodoman (talk) 09:55, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Neutral Support - Deletion reason isn't very clear as to what the real reason for deletion is, but the images isn't used. Mbch331 (talk) 12:09, 28 July 2017 (UTC)After receiving an e-mail by the user it's clear what the reason is. User uploaded wrong pictures. Mbch331 (talk) 13:51, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Support - Unidentified woman with nothing special. --E4024 (talk) 12:16, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
User:Mbch331 (ping) - A lot of pictures are already deleted, this are a set of personal pictures, some of theme are private (young children), some of them promotional and a lot of them out of scope (just personal pictures of a woman, sometimes with a political filenames about a city that has bus stops that need to be improved (or something like that)). The nominator is also the uploader and I agree that all the files should be removed, I have seen family portraits that just don't belong here, just like all the pictures of the woman. Maybe she agreed to upload the pictures here, but the situation can be different now. Commons is not a personal photo album with it's own point of view in some filenames.. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 21:41, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Richardkiwi: I don't object to the removal, but "wrong picture" isn't a very descriptive deletion reason. That's all. Mbch331 (talk) 05:35, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That's true, I already responded to an earlier discussion of an image, where you also said something, I agreed that 'wrong picture' is not a valid reason, but it was clear that all the images were ready for deletion, but didn't know there were more (after last week).. - Richardkiwi (talk) (talk) 10:25, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per self-nomination, unused. P 1 9 9   13:33, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as per COM:DW Daphne Lantier 18:54, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete As uploader. --Discasto talk 14:50, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per discussion. P 1 9 9   13:34, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Guanaco as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: I've received an email which convincingly shows that this is not freely licensed.

 Comment I declined to Speedy Delete, believing that this disputed rationale should be reviewed at DR, in view of previous License Review by Daphne Lantier. JGHowes talk - 14:01, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
To clarify the situation, I emailed a press representative at LIGO, because they have a wealth of content on their site which, at the time, was available under the terms of Template:LIGO. Some of the content there was released by third parties under non-commercial licenses, and I thought it important to determine which. I had some doubts about this file in particular, after I had already uploaded it. In response to my email, they ultimately updated their Image Use Policy to require further permission for commercial uses.
Finally I received an email from Les Guthman, who directed this video. He explained that his organization, XPLR Productions, holds the copyright, rather than LIGO itself. To support this, he pointed to a XPLR Productions copyright notice at the end of the video. Guanaco (talk) 18:56, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Three points: Firstly, I've asked Daphne Lantier to comment on this DR. Secondly, Guanaco, could you please forward your correspondence to permissions@wikimedia.org with full headers, if possible. Please refer in the email to this DR and leave a notice here as soon as you have done this. Thank you. Thirdly, if there was an update of the license, we need to determine if the movie has been legitimately put under a free license or if this happened by accident, i.e. without consent of the copyright holder. We have to keep in mind here that a free license, once legitimately granted, is irreversible. The point of a license review is to verify a free license shortly after its upload to Commons to be prepared for later updates of the terms. --AFBorchert (talk) 17:33, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • When I reviewed this, it appeared to conform to the requirements of COM:L, and so I passed it. If this has changed, then I'm sure that Guanaco will get it figured out, and the file can be deleted or kept as needed. I trust Guanaco's judgement, as he's very conscientious with the work he does here. Daphne Lantier 18:08, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Considering the statements by Guanaco and Daphne Lantier this movie was apparently put accidently under a free license. And indeed the copyright statement at the end of the movie points to XPLR and not to LIGO. --AFBorchert (talk) 19:18, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small images without EXIF data, please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS.

Yann (talk) 23:11, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep most of these: first four are from Wikimapia, so may be tagged with {{Wikimapia}}, others look like self-made by an old-fashioned/noname cell phone. At the same time some are likely not in scope due to bad quality. --Яй (talk) 09:17, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Mixed Close Kept the four from wikimapia, and the others which could be kept on quality. Did not keep, dark, blurry, white cats in dusty alley, blurry food, etc. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 23:33, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

cropped and mirrored from this video - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=P1TOBQ_R9Sw (see at 2:33). See also http://roadcontrol.org.ua/node/2297 - same photo with blurred face. 109.172.98.69 22:21, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

jepp they are the same but it's not from that video. On the pic down right corner is some watermark which is not appearing in the vid. Furthermore the vid doesn't have a publication date. So for me that is not a clear copyright violation. Maybe the soldier took a screenshot of his own vid and uploaded it and gave it to some colleagues uploaded the vid to YT. Or some colleagues uploaded the pic and the author uploaded the vid.--Sanandros (talk) 07:14, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: It appears a screenshot to me. Ruthven (msg) 12:00, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Gallaudet Regular font seems to be under copyright according to this page. Not sure about the SVG versions of the same font. -- Geagea (talk) 22:46, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The Author's page is here, and it seems that he disagrees to share or contribute his fonts. I also sent an email to him and got no reply. Borochov edit (talk) 00:31, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The SVG files are public domain, and are suitable for Commons. Borochov edit (talk) 22:30, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Geagea, please delete the file File:AslFingerSpell.png. L'Aquatique did not reply, and more than 7 days passed. Borochov edit (talk) 00:04, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Borochov edit, Please be patient until any other admin close this DR.-- Geagea (talk) 01:57, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:00, 9 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no website state / copyright Pitpisit (talk) 12:15, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The website states "License Creative Commons Attribution license (reuse allowed)". It's the cover photo for this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pF8lyMyMhvk which I assume to be also covered under that CC license. Ueutyi (talk) 21:08, 28 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It this photo included in the video? If yes, at which time? This is a video with a length of more than 3 hours. The source field must specify the exact location. Otherwise it cannot be verified. If this photo is not included in the video, I do not see how this is covered. --AFBorchert (talk) 17:19, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; unable to locate this image in the video. Did not find it as cover image even searching the uploader's gallery page. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:29, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Pino Presti

[edit]

Many of these pictures are older than 20 years and not artistic... they will uploaded on itwikipedia without any issue. Here you are more critical but at least for some of those before 1976 Template:PD-Italy can be used. Ask the Italian village pump before this type of deletion. It is more wiki approach and it might save time. Also, with photos that users have in their family some confusion in the attribution might occur, I suspect the simplest thing in these cases is to ask directly.--Alexmar983 (talk) 02:41, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

La maggior paerte delle immagini sono state scattate con la mia Nikon e secondo le mie indicazioni da persone non professionali nel ruolo di fotografo. Altre le ho scattate io personalmente File:Shirley Bassey2.jpg, File:Shirley Bassey.jpg ‎, File:Astor Piazzolla e Gerry Mulligan in studio.jpg. --Pino Presti (talk) 16:06, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I declare, under my own responsibility, that I am the copyright holder of all images, except for File:Maynard Ferguson2.jpg, File:Funky-Bump2.jpg (producer for Atlantic Records); File:Smile2.jpg (producer for Wea Italiana; File:You Know the Way-label.jpeg (producer for Emergency Records). --Pino Presti (talk) 18:57, 31 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PD-Italy only applies to pictures created before 1976 and published before 1978. This means that the picture must have been published (in a book, newspaper, album cover etc.) before 1978. The publication should be identified. This licence does not apply to unpublished photographs.
Ownership of the camera used is not relevant, neither is the professional status of the photographer.
The pictures that show Pino Presti are clearly not selfies, so he is not the author. In each case the author (i.e. the photographer) should be stated with evidence of permission. A similar issue has come up with images uploaded from Narendra Modi's Flickr account, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Former cricketer Anil Kumble meets PM Modi.jpg.
I will comment on each file:
Pino Presti does not now claim ownership of these images, so they should be deleted.
Pino Presti is included in these images. These requires credible evidence of the photographer and of their permission, or evidence that they were published before 1978 (not just that the photograph was taken before 1978).
Pino Presti does not claim to have taken this photograph personally, but he is not pictured so he could have.
The file page says "Photograph by Karin Hemp" but gives the author as Pino Presti, which is contradictory. This file has a OTRS ticket, but this was added[17] before Karin Hemp was named as the photographer, so the OTRS ticket may be invalid.
Album label of Deep Colors (2004). The MAP / Paper Moon appears to be a minor label, which make it more likely that Pino Presti would own the rights to the artwork. However, Discogs credits the artwork to Valentina Aguzzi. If this is accurate then she should be listed as Author, and an OTRS ticket may been needed to confirm the licence.
The lettering in the image suggests that this is a crop from artwork such as an album cover or a magazine advertisement. "Ferré" could be the fashion designer Gianfranco Ferré. This requires credible evidence of the photographer and of their permission. This could qualify as a "work of photographic art", in which case {{PD-Italy}} would not apply.
This is a picture of Pino Presti's father, probably taken in 1930 (before Pino Presti was born). If the photographer was a family member who has since died then it might be acceptable to assert that Pino Presti has inherited the ownership rights, but I am unclear on this issue.
Pino Presti says that this is one of the few photographs that he took personally. I see no reason to challenge this
This has the look of a publicity photograph, but Pino Presti says that this is one of the few photographs that he took personally. All the copies of this I have found on the web have the same signature, this supports Pino Presti's claim. Shirley Bassey's signature probably does not cause a copyright problem if the {{PD-signature}} tag is used.
Pino Presti's claim that I am the copyright holder of all images is insufficient: we need an explanation of the reasons why he holds the copyright of the photographs that he did not personally take. This may need to be supported by an ORTS ticket. Please understand that I am not questioning Pino Presti's good faith, I am trying to protect Commons from images with unreliably licensing.
I withdraw my nomination of File:Astor Piazzolla e Gerry Mulligan in studio.jpg, File:Shirley Bassey.jpg ‎ and File:Shirley Bassey2.jpg. Verbcatcher (talk) 01:45, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Two photos were taken using my Nikon camera by random and unknown people, not professionals.

Once a German sound engineer during a recording session with Mina (File:Pino Presti tsh.jpg; File:Pino Presti tsh2.jpg. Even a hotel waiter was a photographer for a minute when he took the photo (File:Pino Presti Tullio De Piscopo 1972.jpg; File:Pino Presti e Tullio De Piscopo 1972 2.jpg. I gave my camera, they "pressed the button" as I told them to do and they were not paid for it :) Most photos were taken by my wife, Karin Hemp - the only one who knew what a camera was. She taken all the pictures that show me on bass: File:Mina & Pino Presti Orchestra 1978.jpg; File:Mina-Presti a Bussoladomani.jpg; File:PPresti.Ka.jpg; File:PPresti 1978; File:PPresti Jazz Bass.jpg; and also File:W.Pickett-P.Presti.jpg; File:Pino-Presti G-Mulligan A-Piazzolla.jpg; File:Pino Presti 1972.jpeg; File:Pino Presti 1973.jpg; File:Mulligan meets 2.jpg; File:Mulligan meets.jpg; File:Presti-Ferguson.jpg; File:With Gerry Mulligan and Astor Piazzolla.jpg: File:P.Presti with H.Shirai 2.jpg.

Karin Hemp died on July 1998.

NB: All photos have been modified, often radically, with cuts and anything else by myself.

File:George Aghedo.jpg is my own work. --Pino Presti (talk) 03:03, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

From Art. 7 of Legge 22 aprile 1941 n. 633:
Italiano: «E' considerato autore dell'opera collettiva chi organizza e dirige la creazione dell'opera stessa.»
English: "who organizes and directs the creation of a collective work is considered the author of the work itself".
Can a photograph taken by a bystander, by request of its subject, be considered as a collective work? If was so, Pino Presti would be the copyright owner of much of these pictures and may tag them as PD-Self, if he wants. --Harlock81 (talk) 17:49, 1 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
There must be some limits to the applicability of the "organizza e dirige la creazione" clause. Many professional visual artists use studio assistants and the principal artist is considered to be the creator of the artworks. This clause could reasonably be applied to a formally posed photograph, particularly if the camera was mounted on a tripod, where pressing the button on the camera is a simple mechanical task. A photograph of musicians performing on a stage seems unlikely to qualify under this clause because the composition of the picture and the exact moment the picture is taken are vital creative contributions that are under the control of the person pressing the button. Handing a camera to bystander, showing him or her how to operate the camera and asking him or her to take a photograph is unlikely to qualify as "dirige la creazione".
Making significant modifications to a photograph generates a derivative work. Both the creator of the original photograph and the person who made the modifications are authors of the derivative work, and both of then must licence it.
The photos taken by Karin Hemp should show her as the author. As her widower Pino Presti may have inherited the copyright. If so then the Author (Autore) on the file pages should be "Karin Hemp" and the licence should specify the transfer of copyright. {{Cc-by-sa-3.0-heirs}} may be a suitable license tag. Verbcatcher (talk) 13:12, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This article exists for the professional photographers or the collective works like movie shots. In that case, the employees of the photographer or the people working for the movie production do not hold the rights, but the professional photographer or the film director. If we are in this case: Pino Presti directed a group of photographers for one of his projects, he holds the rights (though, he should have the contracts that binds him to the photographers that he can submit to OTRS). --Ruthven (msg) 13:34, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Pino Presti not known as a photographer, see w:it:Pino Presti and w:en:Pino Presti. He did not "direct a group of photographers", he lent his camera to his wife or to a bystander, showed them how to use it and asked them to take a photograph. Verbcatcher (talk) 13:52, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've deleted File:Maynard Ferguson2.jpg per this comment by Pino Presti. I've kept and fixed File:Funky-Bump2.jpg, File:Smile2.jpg, and File:You Know the Way-label.jpeg which are not eligible for copyright as they consist of text only of no literary value, see COM:TOO. I do not have time right now to go through the other pictures. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:11, 4 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination - most files have clearly false authorship claims and implausible copyright claims. Deleting the rest also per PCP, except for the files already kept. --Jcb (talk) 19:18, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]