Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/07/04
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_NGI_cr.jpg){kind=link}
_-_NGI_cr.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_pilota_negli_ATA_della_RAF_dal_1942_al_1945.jpg){kind=link}
_NASA_World_Wind_2005.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_1959,_MiNr_0715.jpg){kind=link}
_1959,_MiNr_0716.jpg){kind=link}
_1959,_MiNr_0717.jpg){kind=link}
_1959,_MiNr_0719.jpg){kind=link}
_1959,_MiNr_0718.jpg){kind=link}
_logo.png){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Screenshot of own Commons account. Hope not hacked anyone else's. Out of scope. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️I👨👩⋡ 07:26, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy deleted – uploaded by a WP0 abuser. --jdx Re: 07:29, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
It's a bench. As blurry and moody as it could be, but mostly likely unusable. Retired electrician (talk) 11:37, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 12:20, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Redirect to itself 4 July 2017 User:Rasbak
- No, it doesn't. But it is unnecessary. --Achim (talk) 14:14, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Empty gallery, x-namespace redirect. --Achim (talk) 14:16, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
wurde versehentlich hochgeladen Siegfried Urban (talk) 16:25, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Duplicate. --Yann (talk) 17:11, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Guanaco as Speedy (noncommercial) Yann (talk) 17:04, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- I beleive I misunderstood licensing at the time I uploaded this. I was incorrect to upload it. Please delete.SecretName101 (talk) 18:59, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:25, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 17:28, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- The source is indicated. Rama (talk) 20:19, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- Reading the description field a bit more careful I see you are right. Jcb (talk) 20:46, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 20:46, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Heisei6868 (talk · contribs)
[edit]http://fjnews.jp/%E7%A4%BE%E9%95%BF%E7%AE%80%E4%BB%8B
- File:Eto-ryoichi09.png
- File:Eto-ryoichi08.png
- File:Eto-ryoichi07.png
- File:Eto-ryoichi04.png
- File:Eto-ryoichi06.png
- File:Eto-ryoichi05.png
- File:Ryoichi-eto 03.jpg
- File:Ryoichi-eto 01.png
shizhao (talk) 01:02, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - speedy deleted. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:11, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
User with bad history, unlikely to be own works.
- File:Death Star Star Wars Minimal Illustration iPhone 6 Plus HD Wallpaper.png
- File:Death Star Star Wars Minimal Illustration iPhone 6 Plus HD Wallpaper.jpg
- File:Indian head pic.jpg
- File:9b594fcd76ed63fdf13d651429290e2a whiksey.jpg
- File:Large alice chesrire.jpg
- File:Thumb-1920-283993.png
- File:Roan ref re re re scaled.png
- File:Re scaled.png
- File:Roan sniff divider.png
- File:Freefelinebase by luyfsa-d63y5e7.png
- File:Roan headshot.png
- File:Gas-mask-sci-fi-42905.jpg
- File:Hell 1.png
- File:Finn pitbull.png
- File:Marcel headshot 2 colored.png
- File:Tumblr static grey outlined flowers.png
- File:Chibi by rinermai-d97x0j5.png
- File:Pixel flag scotland by sweetlycanada-d9kou3y.png
- File:Pixel flag united states by sweetlycanada-d9mudym.png
Yann (talk) 21:36, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Delete Can't get much more blatant than this. Guanaco (talk) 23:07, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 07:42, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
More images with nonsense author information. Uploader has repeatedly uploaded copyvios and has been warned.
Guanaco (talk) 15:43, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:31, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Nmaancor as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: ошибочно добавлен мною Yann (talk) 17:06, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: User request. --Yann (talk) 10:09, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Nominated by creator, created in error, I intended to create a category Verbcatcher (talk) 02:47, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: housekeeping -- should have been {{Speedy}}. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:19, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Іван Сопілко (talk · contribs)
[edit]Fake portraits and other stuff related to the fake family tree articles in RU-wiki. Great purge is underway there.
- File:Доротея.jpg
- File:Семья Герцогов Чарторыйских.jpg
- File:Светлейшая княжна Мария-Шарлотта-Доротея Ливен-фон-Моркова.jpg
- File:Двор Герцогов Чарторыйских.jpg
- File:Принц Виктор-Вильгельм-Константин фон-Чарторыйский.jpg
- File:Витольд Адам Чарторыйский.jpg
Bilderling (talk) 07:48, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: vandalism. --Sealle (talk) 09:22, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
This user uploaded these football-related images as "own work." Some were proven unfree, and the rest are highly suspicious. None show any evidence of original authorship. They all lack EXIF data. Let's delete them all.
- File:Žalgiris Stadium.jpg
- File:Vaidas Slavickas.jpg
- File:Logo Vilnius FK Žalgiris.gif
- File:Povilas Leimonas.jpg
- File:Robertas Fridrikas.jpg
- File:Oscar Dorley.jpg
- File:Alyaksandr Bychanok.jpg
- File:Martynas Dapkus.jpg
- File:Radanfah Abu Bakr.jpg
- File:Andro Švrljuga.jpg
- File:Linas Klimavičius.jpg
- File:Matija Ljujić.jpg
- File:Serge Komla Nyuiadzi.jpg
- File:Elivelton Ribeiro.jpg
- File:Mamadou Mbodj.jpg
- File:Rafael Gaúcho Ledesma.jpg
- File:Raimondas Žutautas.jpg
- File:Tomas Danilevičius.jpg
- File:Igoris Morinas.jpg
- File:Aurelijus Skarbalius.jpg
- File:Valdas Ivanauskas2.jpg
- File:Edgaras Jankauskas.jpg
- File:ARVI Arena 2.jpg
- File:ARVI Arena.jpg
- File:Klaipedos-stadionas-002.jpg
- File:FK Atlantas taure 2003 2.jpg
Guanaco (talk) 12:39, 1 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:32, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own works, no permission.
- File:FK Atlantas taure 2003.jpg
- File:Suduva taure 2009.jpg
- File:Sakalai 4.jpg
- File:Pietų IV.jpg
- File:Clipboard01 (3).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yann (talk) 17:33, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 08:10, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Contriaman (talk · contribs)
[edit]The images have no educational or useful purpose.
—Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 08:00, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and probable copyvios. --Yann (talk) 11:50, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:Frankl RUI.jpg
- File:RUI 1959.jpg
- File:Stemma RUI.jpg
- File:RUI.jpg
- File:Wojtyla alla Rui1974.jpeg
- File:Montini Rui 1960.jpeg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:02, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by D'hondt-hoe (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused fictions maps and posters.
- File:Nckamala7.png
- File:8nckamala.png
- File:6nckamala.png
- File:Nckamala5.png
- File:Nckamala4.png
- File:Nckamala.png
- File:2nckamala.png
- File:Nckamala3.png
- File:Msfix.png
- File:Misscuberoot.png
- File:Utahredistrict.png
- File:Utah4redistrict.png
- File:Utah1redistrict.png
- File:Utah3redistrict.png
- File:Sc bad redistrict.png
- File:Sc Columbia redistrict.png
- File:Sc charleston redistrict.png
- File:Sc myrtle beach redistrict.png
- File:Sc upcountry redistrict.png
- File:Sc Greenville Spartanburg redistrict.png
- File:Sc York county redistrict.png
- File:Colorado bad redistrict Denver.png
- File:Colorado bad redistrict.png
- File:Colorado bad redistrict 2nd.png
- File:Colorado bad redistrict 5th.png
- File:Colorado bad redistrict 3rd district.png
- File:Laborpartyleadership2018.png
- File:D'hodnt fake US parliament.svg
- File:Kzjrspecialelection.png
- File:KamalaHarrisSpecialElection.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:03, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:37, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:51, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:38, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:52, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Low quality Out of scope personal album style photograph. Acabashi (talk) 01:53, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:53, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Screenshot of Windows, non-free software UAwiki (talk) 02:39, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: com:Screenshots#Microsoft poducts. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:54, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
No freedom on panorama in France. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️I👨👩⋡ 06:11, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- France?! That's en:Brest, Belarus. No FOP there, either. Delete. Retired electrician (talk) 07:51, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- Comment: Brest city is also in France. OK, now it's clear that the image belongs to Brest, Belarus. And I see no freedom of panorama in Belarus also, so Delete it. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️I👨👩⋡ 12:50, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: com:FOP#Belarus. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:56, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
small size, no metadata Микола Василечко (talk) 09:05, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: also the image is found elsewhere in Internet. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:59, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FOP in Ukraine (see FOP in Ukraine). Kulmalukko (talk) 18:13, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:36, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
No FOP in Ukraine (see FOP in Ukraine). Kulmalukko (talk) 11:34, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:02, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии, требуется подтверждение первоначального автора. Логотипы, как правило , несвободны. Необходимо подтверждение через COM:OTRS. Dogad75 (talk) 16:57, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Re-uploaded after deletion File:Логотип Челябинского государственного университета.jpgRonhjones (Talk) 00:22, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: OTRS permission is needed. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 13:08, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope, user's only article was deleted Mjrmtg (talk) 00:35, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:27, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:37, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:27, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:41, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:27, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:43, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:27, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:45, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:27, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 00:46, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:27, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Song. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:29, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused copy of Wikipedia article. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:28, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
File:Una composizione dedicata alla rotta sudamericana dell'aeropostale tra il 1927 e il 1932.jpg
[edit]
out of scope, unused, no cat. Pibwl (talk) 14:41, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:29, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hamzaachir (talk · contribs)
[edit]The images have no educational or useful purpose, Commons is not a personal photo hosting service.
- File:Hamza20171236.jpg
- File:Hamza201713.jpg
- File:Hamza201712.jpg
- File:Hamza20171.jpg
- File:ثبيصث.jpg
- File:شخصية.jpg
—Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 19:12, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hamzaachir (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is not social media. It is not here to publish every selfie and family picture on Earth. None of these images appear to fit the COM:SCOPE of Commons. Also it is not clear that all these images really were created by the uploader, some of the beach series, it's obvious he's too far away to have pushed the button.
- File:Beinsport555.jpg
- File:Hamza555.jpg
- File:Hamzaachir55.jpg
- File:Hamzaachirr2.jpg
- File:Hamzaandmohmmed.jpg
- File:Jalalandhamza2017.jpg
- File:Brotherforbb.jpg
- File:Hamzaachir99.jpg
- File:Hamzaachire4858.jpg
- File:Jawadhh2016.jpg
- File:Hamzaachir455.jpg
- File:Hamza8764.jpg
- File:Hamzzachireé.jpg
- File:Achir225.jpg
- File:Hamzaachiraa.jpg
- File:Hamzaachu.jpg
- File:Hamza201718.jpg
- File:2hamza.png
- File:Hyazmazaf5.jpg
- File:Jefv,edov55.jpg
- File:Hamzaaazszad.jpg
- File:Hamza44.jpg
- File:Hazùasz555.jpg
- File:Hamzaaac551.jpg
- File:Haùmza555.jpg
- File:Cecsd.jpg
- File:Vervc.jpg
- File:Fcezvc.jpg
- File:Fcezce.jpg
- File:Fzefe.jpg
- File:Fezfd.jpg
- File:Fezfv.jpg
- File:Fezfzs.jpg
- File:Fzsef.jpg
- File:Achir2000.jpg
- File:Hamza78845.jpg
- File:Photohamza4.jpg
- File:Achir777.jpg
- File:Achir77.jpg
- File:Achir277.jpg
- File:Achir27.jpg
- File:Achir08.jpg
- File:Achir07.jpg
- File:Achir06.jpg
- File:Achir25.jpg
- File:Achir24.jpg
- File:Achir23.jpg
- File:Achir233.jpg
- File:Achir22.jpg
- File:Achir21.jpg
- File:Achir19.jpg
- File:Achir20.jpg
- File:Achir18.jpg
- File:Achir16.jpg
- File:Achir17.jpg
- File:Achir15.jpg
- File:Achir14.jpg
- File:Achir.jpg
- File:Achir13.jpg
- File:Achir11.jpg
- File:Achir12.jpg
- File:Achir10.jpg
- File:Achir8.jpg
- File:Achir9.jpg
- File:Achir6.jpg
- File:Achir7.jpg
- File:Achir5.jpg
- File:Achir4.jpg
- File:Achir2.jpg
- File:Achir1.jpg
- File:Achir3.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 14:26, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:51, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN GOPANG 3J.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN GOPANGGF.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN GOPANG My6.jpg
- File:4MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN GOPANG7.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN GOPANG BH.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN GOPANG My5.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN GOPANG My4H.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN GOPANG J.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN GOPANG My1.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN GOPANG HJ.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN GOPANG.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN 10.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN 9.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN 7.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN 8.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN 6.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN 5.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN 4.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN 3.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN 2.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN73.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN3.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN2.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN GOPANG GG.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN GOPANG GK.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN GOPANG 7.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN GOPANG g28.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN GOPANG GhH.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN GOPANG H.jpg
~ Nahid Talk 19:20, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN GOPANG et.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN GOPANG Ete.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN GOPANG Et.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN GOPANG a.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN GOPANG U.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN GOPANG iaa.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN GOPANG Asi.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN GOPANG AS.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN GOPANG S.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN GOPANG S 5.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN GOPANG S 3.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN GOPANGS 4.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN GOPANG 1.jpg
- File:(N.Z) roset.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN GOPANG 3.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN GOPANG3.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN GOPAN.jpg
- File:Mohammad Asif Khan Gopang Phone No 03012982258.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN GOPANG h.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN GOPANG 2.jpg
- File:Mohammad Asif Khan Gopang4.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN GOPANG NEW.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN GOPANG N5.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN GOPANG N4.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN GOPANG N3.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN GOPANG N2.jpg
- File:MOHAMMAD ASIF KHAN GOPANG.jpg
_roset.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
~ Nahid Talk 19:23, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:55, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:Krup24cmKL35-Puerto Belgrano.png
- File:24 cm L 40 K 97 Skoda twin turret.jpg
- File:French battleship Condorcet NH 42847-crop.jpg
- File:Cannons of SMS Prinz Eugen-7cmk16.jpg
- File:Cannon-190-39-Tripoli-32015.jpg
- File:Cannon-190-39-Tripoli-32011.jpg
- File:Cannon-190-39-Tripoli-31989.jpg
- File:Cannon-190-39-Tripoli-32003.jpg
- File:Mb-2-180.jpg
- File:Alighieri5.jpg
- File:76-30 lancia ro.jpg
- File:76-40 R.M. MDICAT.jpg
- File:76-40 R.M. Navale.jpg
- File:Breda Mod. 31 binata.jpg
- File:Breda Mod. 31 binata puntamento vincolato.jpg
- File:Breda mod.31.jpg
- File:Cannoni Dante Alighieri.jpg
- File:Salva di artiglierie.jpg
- File:Interno torre trinata.jpg
- File:Garibaldi155.jpg
- File:Phyrexian - Marina militare 064.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 01:00, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Historical photo and documents. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:Tarnovski-Tsar-Selo.jpg
- File:Bathurst class corvette armament-2.png
- File:Bathurst class corvette armament-1.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:31, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope Randykitty (talk) 15:14, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:32, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope Randykitty (talk) 15:14, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:32, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope Randykitty (talk) 15:14, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:32, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope Randykitty (talk) 15:14, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:32, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ahmed Guesmi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Advertising for soccer kit generator site.
.webp&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Achim (talk) 16:27, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:32, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
resized copy of a pictured found in many places [1], sole upload, Pibwl (talk) 16:59, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:13, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Abuse of Commons for promotional purposes, out of scope. Achim (talk) 18:01, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:12, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
[2] KediÇobanı🐈 18:37, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
![[2]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bah%C3%A7emdeki%C3%87i%C3%A7ek.JPG){kind=link}
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bah%C3%A7emdeki%C3%87i%C3%A7ek.JPG KediÇobanı🐈 18:37, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bah%C3%A7emdeki%C3%87i%C3%A7ek.JPG KediÇobanı🐈 18:37, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, uploader request to remove reversed duplicate. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:12, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Missing permission : photography by Jean-Jacques Pussiau (https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10200362490379223&set=pb.1663942421.-2207520000.1499207922.&type=3&theater) Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:40, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:10, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Pointless for encyclopedia KediÇobanı🐈 00:22, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- Young actor with roles in three cinema films. What other "point" should he have? I bet he will soon be as famous as so many actors and actresses with articles today in Turkish WP. When you consider the guy "notable" and want to make his article, will you be able to reach him and take a pic? Commons is a file archive and an actor sure is in scope.
Keep. --E4024 (talk) 15:13, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- Selamlar @E4024: , ben internette pek bir şey bulamadım, dün kullanıcı sayfalarını etiketledim ve bu görsele bir kullanıcı sayfasında rastladım. Kullanıcılar kendi fotoğraflarını Commons'a yükleyip, kullanıcı sayfalarında tanıtım yapıyorlar, bu da onlardan birisi. Eğer durum yazdığınız gibi ise kalabilir, ben öyle olduğunu bilseydim eklemezdim. ( Bunları yazacak kadar İngilzcem yok :) ) --KediÇobanı🐈 16:38, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for the kind reply. According to IMDb he has taken roles in three films. He is no star or jeun premier yet, but all the roles have a name (not a "figüran"). Therefore we face a young actor who may or not become famous/notable. My concern is, when these guys get famous it is difficult to reach them and get their pics, but if we have the photo at hand, when you think he is notable and decide to make his article, you can add the picture, which is an important element in an internet encyclopedia. If you agree with me you may simply write "Keep per E4024", as you confess a lack of proficiency in English. (Who has it really? :-) All the best. --E4024 (talk) 08:39, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
- Bu konuda beni aydınlattığınız için teşekkür ederim. Keep. --KediÇobanı🐈 16:19, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
- Bu konuda beni aydınlattığınız için teşekkür ederim.
- Thanks for the kind reply. According to IMDb he has taken roles in three films. He is no star or jeun premier yet, but all the roles have a name (not a "figüran"). Therefore we face a young actor who may or not become famous/notable. My concern is, when these guys get famous it is difficult to reach them and get their pics, but if we have the photo at hand, when you think he is notable and decide to make his article, you can add the picture, which is an important element in an internet encyclopedia. If you agree with me you may simply write "Keep per E4024", as you confess a lack of proficiency in English. (Who has it really? :-) All the best. --E4024 (talk) 08:39, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
- Selamlar @E4024: , ben internette pek bir şey bulamadım, dün kullanıcı sayfalarını etiketledim ve bu görsele bir kullanıcı sayfasında rastladım. Kullanıcılar kendi fotoğraflarını Commons'a yükleyip, kullanıcı sayfalarında tanıtım yapıyorlar, bu da onlardan birisi. Eğer durum yazdığınız gibi ise kalabilir, ben öyle olduğunu bilseydim eklemezdim. ( Bunları yazacak kadar İngilzcem yok :) ) --KediÇobanı🐈 16:38, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. Daphne Lantier 17:55, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Pointless. KediÇobanı🐈 00:46, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:57, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Pointless for encyclopedia KediÇobanı🐈 00:47, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:57, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Pointless for encyclopedia KediÇobanı🐈 00:47, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:57, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Pointless for encyclopedia KediÇobanı🐈 00:47, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:57, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope. user's only contribution was user page 1 year ago. Mjrmtg (talk) 01:06, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:58, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Unused file that can be replicated using wikitext. KAP03 (talk) 01:43, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete I am the author of this file and agree that it should be deleted. Jimjmc (talk) 22:14, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
- @Jimjmc: Don't create a new deletion request while one is running for the same file. -KAP03(Talk • Contributions • Email) 17:19, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:58, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Unused file that can be better replicated using wikitext. KAP03 (talk) 01:46, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:59, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии, файл встречается в Интернете до загрузки на Викисклад http://logo-football.ru/load/lfk/nizhegorodskaja_obl/fk_lokomotiv_gzhd_nizhnij_novgorod/30-1-0-1573 Dogad75 (talk) 01:52, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:59, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Duplicate of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Martin_Luther_King_Jr_NYWTS.jpg and not Own Work ~AntanO4task (talk) 02:05, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:59, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Duplicate of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Edward_VI_of_England_c._1546.jpg and not Own Work ~AntanO4task (talk) 02:07, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:59, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Duplicate of https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Hans_Holbein,_the_Younger,_Around_1497-1543_-_Portrait_of_Henry_VIII_of_England_-_Google_Art_Project.jpg and not Own Work ~AntanO4task (talk) 02:10, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:59, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
"The copyright holder of this file allows anyone to use it for any purpose, provided that es zu Pressezwecken dient, bei Zusendung eines Belegexemplars." Google Translate English: "...It is used for press purposes, when sending a document copy"
This doesn't seem to be free use.
Guanaco (talk) 02:11, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:59, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Not Educational media. The user has another image of himself ~AntanO4task (talk) 02:12, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:59, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Uploader request. Accidental upload. I meant just to upload the crop File:2017 Fremont Solstice Parade - cyclists 118.jpg. I didn't notice till now, and since it's been two weeks I figure I shouldn't just delete it myself without giving anyone a chance to object. Jmabel ! talk 03:07, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:59, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
COM:SELFIE jdx Re: 03:10, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:59, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Multiple COM:COPYVIO photos of the Empire State Building; user has logos and other things falsely tagged as "own work" also.
- File:Tower State.jpg
- File:Tower lights-rrg 1.jpg
- File:Empire State-St. Patrick's Day.jpg
- File:Empire State-colorido.jpg
- File:Empire State Building-amarelo.jpg
Also these since the deletion discussion opened on 2017-07-04:
- File:4f63b58197f6c.image.jpg
- File:Encore-Las Vegas.jpg
- File:Ernst & Young.jpg
- File:GasCompanyTower-Oct08-007a.jpg
- File:Onecaliforniaplaza photo onecaliforniaplazagallery1 1.jpg
- File:BuildingDenver.jpg
Closeapple (talk) 01:01, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per own nomination. A couple of examples:
- File:Tower State.jpg has 6000×5020 versions elsewhere on the Internet: for example empire-state-building-at-night-christmas-wallpaper-3.jpg via http://pcwallart.com/empire-state-building-at-night-christmas-wallpaper-3.html
- File:Tower lights-rrg 1.jpg is larger at tower_lights-rrg_0.jpg via https://www.esbnyc.com/tower-lighting-2015-10-28-000000-0/
- I haven't bothered checking the rest. I'll be nominating other subjects from this uploader separately. --Closeapple (talk) 04:43, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Comment: I added 5 new uploads, these from the western United States, and all from after this deletion discussion was opened. An example: citigroup-center--01_hres_web.jpg via https://www.hines.com/properties/citigroup-center-los-angeles is a blatant one. Also, the uploader seems to be trying to disguise the file origins by requesting 0° or 1° rotation on the images. So much for that. I've now warned the user at User talk:Kauan2404#Stop uploading copied files. --Closeapple (talk) 06:01, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
- Another one on July 9: File:BuildingDenver.jpg is Building.jpg also building.jpg, and also [3] via https://www.pinterest.com/pin/575334921118125267 --Closeapple (talk) 01:01, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
![[3]](https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/23/ec/cf/23eccf63ccbe4ca7b8ba7cc1d03b06b4.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete all per nom. — Jeff G. ツ 01:13, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:59, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Looks to me like out of scope. JuTa 05:11, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:59, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
False author, source, and license: Reduced versions of Brazilian government publicity photographs. Possible COM:COPYVIO. Closeapple (talk) 05:40, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
The uploader's source and license are false, but I can't tell if the files are salvageable as {{PD-BrazilGov}}. There are two questions here:
- Is Beto Barata's photography in this case a work of the Brazilian government?
- If so, then: Are publicity photographs from the Brazilian government exempt from copyright, or are only edicts of government exempt?
These are smaller versions of 2 files available at http://www2.planalto.gov.br/acompanhe-planalto/imagens/2016/coletiva-de-imprensa-com-o-porta-voz-alexandre-parola for viewing and download from the Brazilian government's official website. Both contain EXIF and IPTC Information Interchange Model that don't have copyright messages, but credit the photo as "Brasília - DF, 11/10/2016. Coletiva de Imprensa com o Porta Voz Alexandre Parola. Foto: Beto Barata/PR" Beto Barata is a professional photographer; he appears to have his own business, but I don't know if he is also a government employee. The page itself does not have a copyright or specific usage rights for the photo. The site's terms of use at http://www2.planalto.gov.br/termos-de-uso/termos-de-uso prohibits "selling, reselling or commercially exploiting all content on this site." {{PD-BrazilGov}} appears to contradict this, but I don't know if that template is reliable, because the "Government works" section of Commons:Copyright rules by territory#Brazil is strangely translated and unclear in English, and seems and one would think that section would be clear and detailed before a template was made. --Closeapple (talk) 05:43, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:59, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Image used to promote a YouTube channel. It has no educational or useful purpose. —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 06:38, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:00, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
This is a low quality file. There is another image File:Landscape in Car-Nicobar Village of Sawi.jpg which is the same image but much better quality. DreamLinker (talk) 06:43, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:00, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sam1000samd (talk · contribs)
[edit]Images without an educational or useful purpose, Commons is not a personal photo hosting service.
—Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 06:44, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:00, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Architect César Pelli still alive. No freedom of panorama in Italy. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️I👨👩⋡ 06:44, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:00, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Reopened. The "dead architects" exception as claimed by Italian parliament pronouncement is already deprecated: see COM:FOP Italy for full information. Architect Cesar Pelli died in 2019, still within 70 years of his posthumous copyright. See also the latest successful DR on an Italian architectural work by dead architects, Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Tomba Brion. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 10:48, 31 May 2023 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. —Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:52, 15 June 2023 (UTC)
Image without an educational or useful purpose, Commons is not a personal photo hosting service. —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 06:54, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:00, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violence. There is no evidence show that this pic is work from US Navy. See here (http://english.vov.vn/society/recalling-final-hours-of-the-fall-of-saigon-291639.vov), this pic (which is titled "A man tries to get on a helicopter") is from History.com 27.32.122.230 07:04, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:00, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Ambiguous file name and description. Not usable in any Wikimedia project. It seems it's a logo of Apple company. But we have similar useful logos on Commons. Out of scope. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️I👨👩⋡ 07:04, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:00, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violence. There is no evidence show that this pic is work from US military. See here (http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2990655/Eyewitness-apocalypse-Fifty-years-ago-week-troops-went-Vietnam-MAX-HASTINGS-saw-humbled-army-peasant-fanatics-amid-horrors-haunt-day.html), this pic (which is titled "In April 1975, the highway outside was strewn with combat boots and uniforms abandoned by South Vietnamese soldiers, hoping to hide their status after the loss of the war") is from Associated Press image 27.32.122.230 07:13, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:00, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Calimed as own work, but English Wikipedia gives http://www.enciclopediapr.org/ing/article.cfm?ref=11062005 as a source. The English Wikipedia equivalent is also non-free w:File:Lydia Cabrera.jpg ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:45, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Just another non-free image from en-wiki Ronhjones (Talk) 01:16, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:00, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
La presente richiesta di cancellazione viene formalmente presentata nell’interesse di Arnoldo Mondadori Editore S.p.a. titolare dei diritti di sfruttamento economico dell’immagine creata da Giorgio Lotti. L’immagine contestata è dotata di valore artistico e tutelata quindi dalla normativa italiana sul diritto d’autore sino a 70 anni dopo la morte dell’autore. L’immagine è chiaramente tutelata come da link a portfolio Mondadori cfr. http://www.mondadoriportfolio.it/it/asset/id/1782278/walter-bonatti-has-lunch-while-talking-and-gesticulating/fromSearch/1/initiatorAction/fullTextSearch/mosaicCount/1/thumbIndex/0/popup/1/bypassnavigation/1 Dragotti&Associati (talk) 07:46, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. Threshold of originality for Italian photographs had been discussed in several discussion debates. See, e.g., the closing rationale in this DR. Materialscientist (talk) 08:12, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: as per Materialscientist. Daphne Lantier 18:01, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Sourced to " (Photo by Bongarts/Bongarts/Getty Images)" in meta-data. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:48, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:01, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
The image have no educational or useful purpose. —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 08:02, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:02, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
The image have no educational or useful purpose. —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 08:02, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:02, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
The image have no educational or useful purpose. Possibly used for self-promotion. —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 08:08, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:02, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Image possibly used to promote the company. —Alvaro Molina (✉ - ✔) 08:10, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:02, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Per COM:PACKAGING. — Racconish ☎ 08:28, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- Hi! I am the author as well as the uploader of the image in question. I was not familiar with the derivative work rule here when i uploaded the picture. So it is reasonable to delete this image if it's considered a derivative work. Mayimbú (talk) 21:47, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 14:42, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:02, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
It doesn't look like own work of the uploader, it looks like a photo of an unknown (at least to me) work of art. jdx Re: 08:41, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:02, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
taken from http://www.cultuurbosch.nl/cache/_9024/-0-0.png Agora (talk) 08:56, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as an obvious copyvio. EXIF data states different author to the uploader's name and the image can already be found on the Internet. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 14:44, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:02, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Fritz Fehling (talk · contribs)
[edit]private theory, not within COM:SCOPE
- File:Democracy Constitution-10.png
- File:Democracy Constitution-09.png
- File:Democracy Constitution-08.png
- File:Democracy Constitution-07.png
- File:Democracy Constitution-06.png
- File:Democracy Constitution-05.png
- File:Democracy Constitution-04.png
- File:Democracy Constitution-03.png
- File:Democracy Constitution-02.png
- File:Democracy Constitution-01.png
Magnus (talk) 09:08, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- File:Democracy Constitution.pdf - out of project scope. --Pentachlorphenol (talk) 07:16, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. private theories, out of project scope, files stamped "urgent" thus unusable anyway. --Pentachlorphenol (talk) 15:03, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete according to Commons:scope. Wo st 01 (talk / cont) 12:06, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Agreed. Commons does not keep images of text. If relevant, this should be set in Wiki markup at the applicable project. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:42, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete the png files, they were just a workaround. Keep the pdf file, if only as an object of ridicule. 3 Presidents? "Parlament"? Please. — Jeff G. ツ 12:49, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:02, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Exif data suggests the author is one Radu Bădoiu, which does not seem to be the same as the uploader. —Andrei S. Talk 09:11, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:02, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:53, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 03:07, 7 February 2015 (UTC)
internet image without proper source, author = Maria Sharapova = subject, very unlikely Magnus (talk) 09:18, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:02, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 09:53, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:03, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
1905 photograph (compare [4]), so obviously not the uploader's own work. Not old enough for {{PD-old-assumed}}, so we need to know when the original photographer died. El Grafo (talk) 10:12, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete too many unknowns to keep and the uploader is certainly not the author. Ww2censor (talk) 11:55, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:03, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
It is no longer the current logo for this company. Logo file exists seperately. Cheapdayrtn (talk) 10:34, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:03, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
These were uploaded as copyrighted free use without providing a rationale. The uploader then started using {{Attribution}}, so it's likely that's their intent. However, the precautionary principle means I can't simply make the correction without confirmation.
- File:Ala-aste 402.jpg
- File:Asema 402 (2).jpg
- File:Asema 403.jpg
- File:Atelje Heljä 402.jpg
- File:Enttu 401.jpg
- File:Entun lammet 401.jpg
- File:Huhtaan hevoset 401.jpg
- File:Huhtaan koulu ja mylly 401.jpg
- File:Huhtaan maisema 401 (2).jpg
- File:Huhtaan maisema 401.jpg
- File:Huhtaankylä peltomaisema 401.jpg
- File:Humppilan kylä aluetta 402.jpg
- File:Kauppila 402 (2).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Guanaco (talk) 10:48, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:03, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Available elsewhere on the web [5][6], per information at the file description page the uploader doesn't seem to be the author. El Grafo (talk) 11:00, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete too many unknowns to keep and the uploader is certainly not the author. Ww2censor (talk) 11:54, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:04, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
As per David Reich's request Arielinson (talk) 11:23, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:04, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Singer ajay singh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 11:37, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:04, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LUVAJULESYPA (talk · contribs)
[edit]These were uploaded as copyrighted free use without providing a rationale. The uploader then started using {{Attribution}}, so it's likely that's their intent. However, the precautionary principle means I can't simply make the correction without confirmation.
Guanaco (talk) 11:48, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:04, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
_-_NGI_cr.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_NGI_cr.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I didn't see this far superior version when I uploaded my photo. There's no need to keep mine. Illustratedjc (talk) 12:04, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
_-_NGI_cr.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:06, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
_-_NGI_cr.jpg){kind=link}
Promotional image being used on a promotional user page on the English Wikipedia Whpq (talk) 12:10, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete I agree. --E4024 (talk) 14:57, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:06, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
The file is marked as own, but the EXIF says Picasa. No other source available. Ruthven (msg) 12:13, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:06, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
_-_NGI_cr.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_NGI_cr.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
I failed to see this much better version when I uploaded my file. There's no reason to keep mine. Illustratedjc (talk) 12:15, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Daphne Lantier 18:05, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
A (better) version of this fair use image. We need a proof via OTRS that the uploader is the true copyright owner! Ras67 (talk) 12:20, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:04, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Same reasons as with Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Ed Alava Discasto talk 12:54, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:06, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope: advertising or self-promotion. Only in use on the user page of a user without useful contribution to the project. BrightRaven (talk) 13:06, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:06, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Copyrighted free use provided that by Alex Tora
[edit]"The copyright holder of this file allows anyone to use it for any purpose, provided that original naming wil be preserved." This appears to refer to the file names, which would be impractical to use in print or in web applications which rename files by design.
- File:Alex K Bohdan Chmelnickyi prapor-horisontal.svg
I withdraw my nomination - File:Alex K Chornomorske Kozacke Viysko-01.svg I withdraw my nomination
- File:Alex K Chornomorske Kozacke Viysko-02.svg I withdraw my nomination
- File:Alex K Chornomorske Kozacke Viysko-03.svg I withdraw my nomination
- File:Alex K Chornomorske Kozacke Viysko-04.svg I withdraw my nomination
- File:Alex K Chornomorske Kozacke Viysko-05.svg I withdraw my nomination
- File:Alex K Chornomorske Kozacke Viysko-06.svg I withdraw my nomination
- File:Alex K Chornomorske Kozacke Viysko-07.svg I withdraw my nomination
- File:Alex K Chornomorske Kozacke Viysko-08.svg I withdraw my nomination
- File:Alex K Chornomorske Kozacke Viysko-09-1.svg I withdraw my nomination
- File:Alex K Chornomorske Kozacke Viysko-09.svg I withdraw my nomination
- File:Alex K Chornomorske Kozacke Viysko-10.svg I withdraw my nomination
- File:Alex K Chornomorske Kozacke Viysko.svg
Unsure - File:Alex K Kozaks flags 1651-00.svg Unsure
- File:Alex K Kozaks flags 1651-02.svg I withdraw my nomination
- File:Alex K Kozaks flags 1651-03.svg I withdraw my nomination
- File:Alex K Kozaks flags 1651-04.svg I withdraw my nomination
- File:Alex K Kozaks flags 1651-05.svg I withdraw my nomination
- File:Alex K Kozaks flags 1651-06.svg I withdraw my nomination
Guanaco (talk) 13:13, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Some of these we can Keep because they're public domain. Guanaco (talk) 02:49, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
I've tagged all but two as public domain. The other two are compilations, and there might be some element of originality to them. Guanaco (talk) 20:30, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn -- the two marked "unsure" can have a DR of their own if needed. Daphne Lantier 18:11, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Saab drawings
[edit]License prohibits any use that is contrary to the interests of Saab.
Guanaco (talk) 21:32, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
Must be "reproduced accurately", restricting derivative works.
Guanaco (talk) 21:40, 19 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: That it is reproduced accurately may just mean that the object or its location is identified correctly--in Karnak, Egypt. The author did not say that the photo Not be used in any other website except Wikipedia or wikicommons. That is why he said it should not be used in a misleading way. The image is just an ancient gate, nothing more. The photos are important historical images and I too would not want it to be inaccurately reproduced if I took the photo. But I let the closing Administrator decide. Secondly, we have very few images in this category. Please note that the two images have been on Wikipedia since July 2005 or 12 years. --Leoboudv (talk) 21:51, 20 July 2017 (UTC)
- What if I did an oil on canvas piece, clearly copying one of these photos, but taking a few artistic liberties? On the back of the painting, I write "based on a photograph by Lasse Jensen, available at https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Precinct_of_Montu_002.jpg". Then I sell the painting for $1 million. Would this not risk a copyright infringement lawsuit? Guanaco (talk) 17:20, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
- Taking a few artistic liberties on people is one thing...and a serious thing... but on an old architectural gate seems unlikely. Its just a gate not a person. The uploader is still periodically active on Wikipedia (maybe once every 6 months only or once a year) and this DR will likely not reach him but he has not requested that these 2 images be deleted even once in 12 years. That is more important to me. --Leoboudv (talk) 18:41, 21 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:21, 25 July 2017 (UTC)
Pyrkomania files
[edit]These files are from 2007 and are not grandfathered old files. They have email permission on the file pages, but OTRS permission is needed.
- File:Pyrkomania1.jpg
- File:Pyrkomania2.jpg
- File:Pyrkomania3.jpg
- File:Pyrkomania4.jpg
- File:Pyrkomania5.jpg
- File:Pyrkomania6.jpg
- File:Pyrkomania7.jpg
- File:Pyrkomania8.jpg
Guanaco (talk) 06:15, 5 August 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:14, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
https://artitious.com/artist/karina-smigla-bobinski/ BrightRaven (talk) 13:15, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:11, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Obvious copyvio. Taken, for instance from here, where the image is available with far better resolution (click on the image) Discasto talk 13:16, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:11, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely claim of own work on these historical images, some of which may be old enough to be retained, but all of which require proper licensing and other information.
- File:FAF Erretratua.jpg
- File:ESP07462 01.jpg
- File:ESP00373 01.jpg
- File:JUNIO 2.jpg
- File:Caballo oros 1902.jpg
- File:As oros 1908.jpg
- File:PORTADA 3(4).jpg
- File:PORTADA 3(3).jpg
- File:PORTADA 3 (1).jpg
- File:MARZO 2.jpg
- File:Fábrica de la calle del Sur.jpg
- File:Heraclio Fournier.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:32, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Delete Per nomination. --Discasto talk 23:14, 3 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:57, 10 February 2017 (UTC)
Given the background of Ed Alava (plenty of copyvios) and the look and feel of the images (in fact identified as postcards), it's unlikely they're his work
Discasto talk 13:17, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:11, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Very similar to [7]. I strongly doubt this image is own work given the lack of EXIF, the size, and the copyvio record of the uploader. BrightRaven (talk) 13:23, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:12, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
It looks like the user has dedicated major part of their activities in WP projects to promote themselves. I believe all the personal photos of this user could be deleted, without losing any benefit for the Commons. E4024 (talk) 13:23, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:12, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be his own work. A smaller, but much older version of the same picture can be found in this newspaper: El Correo Discasto talk 13:25, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:12, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Not the uploader/s own work. Check google images and anyone can see it 88.66.253.38 13:40, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:12, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Possible advertise with political purposes. No metadata to verify that the author correspond to the user. Luisalvaz (talk) 13:54, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:12, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://naviny.by/sites/default/files/001_volia_20170319_.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
File:4 febbraio 1946 guardia d'onore a Val De Grace per Maryse Hilsz ed i suoi tre colleghi.jpg
[edit]
unknown copyright (the uploader is not an author), unusable bad quality Pibwl (talk) 14:35, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://1.bp.blogspot.com/_SBXkhocNlQ8/R72oXIiB1WI/AAAAAAAACmQ/TFn89DF75r4/s320/Virgen+de+los+Dolores.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
smaller duplicate of the same, larger image - my error! Szczebrzeszynski (talk) 14:47, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
No evidence of licence on website Farchering (talk) 14:51, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
No evidence of licence on website Farchering (talk) 14:51, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
No evidence of licence on website Farchering (talk) 14:52, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
No evidence of licence on website Farchering (talk) 14:52, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
No evidence of licence on website Farchering (talk) 14:52, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
no free licence found on source Farchering (talk) 14:55, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
unusable quality, definitely not an own work, along with its non-encyclopaedic back File:Foto pilota tedesca, retro.... Help me... please....jpg Pibwl (talk) 14:59, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:13, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
_pilota_negli_ATA_della_RAF_dal_1942_al_1945.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_pilota_negli_ATA_della_RAF_dal_1942_al_1945.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unusable quality, definitely not an own work Pibwl (talk) 14:59, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
_pilota_negli_ATA_della_RAF_dal_1942_al_1945.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:14, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
_pilota_negli_ATA_della_RAF_dal_1942_al_1945.jpg){kind=link}
File:Madeleine Charnaux con i colleghi del Groupe de Chasse I-2 in una foto dell'inverno 1939-1940.jpg
[edit]
unusable quality, definitely not an own work Pibwl (talk) 15:00, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:14, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
definitely not an own work, unknown persons Pibwl (talk) 15:00, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:14, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
bad quality, definitely not an own work Pibwl (talk) 15:02, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:14, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
File:Dalla partenza da Gibilterra al 340° Squadrone della RAF 7 piloti francesi delle FAFL.jpg
[edit]
unusable quality, definitely not an own work Pibwl (talk) 15:03, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:14, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
unusable quality, definitely not an own work Pibwl (talk) 15:03, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:14, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
unusable quality, definitely not an own work. Same for File:Centro di addestramento militare di Avignon-Pujat il capitano Henri Sauvagnac si complimenta con Geneviève Lefebvre prima classificata tra le ragazze del corso da paracadutista.jpg, File:Escadrille BR 111 (GR I-52) fine maggio inizio giugno del 1940.jpg, File:Oscar Jeanne De Leydet e il suo Spitfire al 340° Squadrone RAF.jpg Pibwl (talk) 15:04, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
_fine_maggio_inizio_giugno_del_1940.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:14, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
nwspaper scan, unclear copyright Pibwl (talk) 15:05, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:14, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
per COM:ADVERT Hystrix (talk) 15:07, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:14, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
unknown copyright (movie poster), sole upload Pibwl (talk) 15:10, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:14, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
unknown person, unused, no useful description, sole upload, authorship doubts Pibwl (talk) 15:12, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:14, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
_NASA_World_Wind_2005.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_NASA_World_Wind_2005.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
If this is NASA World Wind why is GOOGLE logo evident? Doubtful PD Farchering (talk) 15:13, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
_NASA_World_Wind_2005.jpg){kind=link}
- Features «Image © 2011 DigitalGlobe» — obviously not {{PD-NASA}}. Incnis Mrsi (talk) 07:42, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
Support Something went wrong, it seems I have had made a copyvio. I have taken it somewhere from the net without checking the license. In addition, the NASA World Wind does not have this kind of picture on stock. Deletion is ok. Sorry --Mattes (talk) 17:37, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
_NASA_World_Wind_2005.jpg){kind=link}
The uploader is not the author. The licence is not valid. This 1980 anonymous poster should enter the public domain in France in 2051. BrightRaven (talk) 15:15, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Oversight - Deletion agreed. User:Tfitzp
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
doesn't seem to be in a scope, unclear copyright, one of two uploads (the other one is used) Pibwl (talk) 15:18, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
out of scope and/or autopromo Pibwl (talk) 15:18, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
unknown notability, unused, thumbnail size raizes doubts about authorship, one of two uploads Pibwl (talk) 15:19, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
unused personal? photo, unknown notability, one of two uploads - the other one File:کارت ویزیت.jpg is out of scope and/or autopromo Pibwl (talk) 15:21, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
out of scope, unknown person - along with the second upload File:9btNBQ XhJw.jpg Pibwl (talk) 15:22, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Russia. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️I👨👩⋡ 15:30, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
no educational purpose Joschi71 (talk) 15:32, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
- File:Памятник А.П.Чехов в Улан-Удэ.jpg
- File:Памятник В. Терешковой, первой в мире женщине-космонавту.jpg
No freedom of panorama in Russia. --Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️I👨👩⋡ 15:52, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:Участники пеше-лыжного перехода Улан-Удэ - Москва. Из фондов Государственного архива Республики Бурятия.jpg
- File:Вид Верхнединска с аэроплана. Предположительно 1930-ые гг. Из фондов Государственного архива РБ.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
see http://www.koopvanner.se/classes.html?class=29, no info it is free or that the user is photographer Yger (talk) 16:16, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
wurde versehentlich hochgeladen Siegfried Urban (talk) 16:26, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:15, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
FAM78B gene images
[edit]
These files were transferred from en.wikipedia and they had a PD tag claiming GeneAtlas (URL unknown, maybe http://slidebase.binf.ku.dk/biogps_atlas/) had released them into the public domain. The second file, the same except with "Gene Cards" (https://genecards.org). However, I couldn't find any indication from the source links provided on these pages that they were PD. I invite anyone who knows more about this kind of scientific imagery to clarify who might have authored them. To my eyes, this is not a threshold of originality issue. I can see copyright (c) all rights reserved taglines for the whole website links for The Scripps Research Institute, and for Weizmann Institute of Science.
Caught up in the confusion was a ticket ticket:2017062810022426 which alleged permission for this file but the message was not received from a person authorised to release copyright of the work.
In the absence of info, we should delete these.
seb26 (talk) 16:31, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:17, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
out of scope and/or unclear copyright Pibwl (talk) 16:37, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:17, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
out of scope Pibwl (talk) 16:38, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:17, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
unused personal(?) photo, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 16:39, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:17, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
is it in a scope? along with File:7 is a magical number tonight. Shot via a fisheye lens. (30438576600).jpg and File:7 is a magical number tonight. Shot via a fisheye lens. (30650895421).jpg (no category) Pibwl (talk) 16:44, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- this is a baseball reference Victorgrigas (talk) 23:58, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- Is it enough to make these photos encyclopedic?... Pibwl (talk) 17:46, 9 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:17, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
no real educational use Pibwl (talk) 16:45, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete per nom. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 14:53, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:17, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
out of scope Pibwl (talk) 16:45, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:17, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
unused, out of scope, along with the other upload File:Loxotron Grief.gif Pibwl (talk) 16:46, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:17, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
out of scope, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 16:47, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, also a likely copyvio. --Lewis Hulbert (talk) 14:54, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:17, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
"source:weibo" - unknown copyright, sole upload, Pibwl (talk) 16:52, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:18, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
along wih File:MH Shakil.png, unused personal photos Pibwl (talk) 16:56, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:18, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Guanaco as Speedy (noncommercial) Yann (talk) 17:03, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:18, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Guanaco as Speedy (noncommercial) Yann (talk) 17:03, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:18, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Guanaco as Speedy (noncommercial) Yann (talk) 17:04, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:18, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Self-made music. Out of scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:05, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:18, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by P wang90 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Restricted terms of use Yann (talk) 17:14, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:18, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by P wang90 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Restricted terms of use Yann (talk) 17:14, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:18, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by P wang90 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Restricted terms of use Yann (talk) 17:15, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:18, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by P wang90 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Restricted terms of use Yann (talk) 17:15, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:18, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by P wang90 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Restricted terms of use Yann (talk) 17:15, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:18, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
_1959,_MiNr_0715.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1959,_MiNr_0715.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
License does not apply, see here. No indication that this stamp would be PD for other reasons. Jcb (talk) 17:16, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
_1959,_MiNr_0715.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:18, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
_1959,_MiNr_0715.jpg){kind=link}
_1959,_MiNr_0716.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1959,_MiNr_0716.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
License does not apply, see here. No indication that this stamp would be PD for other reasons. Jcb (talk) 17:16, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
_1959,_MiNr_0716.jpg){kind=link}
- Are you sure that ruling also applies to GDR stamps? They weren't issued by Deutsche Post, were they? Who would the copyright holder be, if any? Aridd (talk) 09:03, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
- Yes, this also applies to GDR. The files were previously assumed to be PD as a government work, but unfortunately a court ruled differently a few years ago. Now the stamps are only free if copyright has expired. E.g. if the author of the image on the stamp has died more than 70 years ago, then this image is PD and the additional text may be below TOO. Jcb (talk) 15:00, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:18, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
_1959,_MiNr_0716.jpg){kind=link}
_1959,_MiNr_0717.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1959,_MiNr_0717.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
License does not apply, see here. No indication that this stamp would be PD for other reasons. Jcb (talk) 17:16, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
_1959,_MiNr_0717.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:18, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
_1959,_MiNr_0717.jpg){kind=link}
_1959,_MiNr_0719.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1959,_MiNr_0719.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
License does not apply, see here. No indication that this stamp would be PD for other reasons. Jcb (talk) 17:16, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
_1959,_MiNr_0719.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:18, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
_1959,_MiNr_0719.jpg){kind=link}
_1959,_MiNr_0718.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_1959,_MiNr_0718.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
License does not apply, see here. No indication that this stamp would be PD for other reasons. Jcb (talk) 17:16, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
_1959,_MiNr_0718.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:18, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
_1959,_MiNr_0718.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Shafaqatsas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons is NOT facebook, out of scope.
- File:Shafaqat Ali (34)Shafaqat Ali SAS.jpg
- File:Shafaqat Ali (33).jpg
- File:Shafaqat Ali (27).jpg
- File:Shafaqat Ali (28).jpg
- File:Shafaqat Ali (26)Shafaqat Ali SAS.jpg
- File:Shafaqat Ali (25)Shafaqat Ali SAS.jpg
- File:Shafaqat Ali (24)Shafaqat Ali SAS.jpg
- File:Shafaqat Ali (23)Shafaqat Ali SAS.jpg
- File:Shafaqat Ali (22)Shafaqat Ali SAS.jpg
- File:Shafaqat Ali (21).jpg
- File:Shafaqat Ali (20).jpg
- File:Shafaqat Ali (19)Shafaqat Ali SAS.jpg
- File:Shafaqat Ali (31).jpg
- File:Shafaqat Ali (15).jpg
- File:Shafaqat Ali (17).jpg
- File:Shafaqat Ali SAS.jpg
- File:Shafaqat Ali (16).jpg
- File:Shafaqat Ali (30).jpg
Shafaqat_Ali_SAS.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Shafaqat_Ali_SAS.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Shafaqat_Ali_SAS.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Shafaqat_Ali_SAS.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Shafaqat_Ali_SAS.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Shafaqat_Ali_SAS.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Shafaqat_Ali_SAS.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Steinsplitter (talk) 17:18, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:19, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Scan from probably copyrighted map. No permission. Jcb (talk) 17:19, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:19, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Diplodoco~commonswiki (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work, no evidence of permission.
Jcb (talk) 17:21, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:19, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Internet image --- not the uploaders own work 88.66.253.38 17:21, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:19, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
_logo.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_logo.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No source to support that the license would apply. Unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 17:31, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
_logo.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:19, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
_logo.png){kind=link}
Out of scope. Jcb (talk) 17:33, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:19, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 17:47, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:19, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 17:47, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:19, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 17:48, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:19, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : rather small-sized format, GIF format, hence no EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 17:52, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:19, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in Greece. Mr. Smart ℒION ⋠☎️I👨👩⋡ 18:01, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:19, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
CERG Logos
[edit]
These images were all uploaded by User:Melaniebckr. I believe this user has no right to publish these logos. --Jvillafruela (talk) 18:13, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:19, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
This file should be deleted as it is a file that can be replicated using wikitext (and is unused). -KAP03(Talk • Contributions • Email) 18:44, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:20, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
The logo seems to be above ToO IMO
Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:44, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- If U think so, please delete the file. --Arjoopy (talk) 08:07, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:20, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
There is no Freedom of Panorama in Russia for monuments. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 18:53, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:20, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
It has the wrong name for the file name. I mixed up some data when I created it. MJBillings (talk) 19:29, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:20, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
No evidence of release under CC license C.Fred (talk) 20:08, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:20, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Possible nonfree, due to "no hacer mal uso de ellas" (don't make bad use of the photographs) Guanaco (talk) 20:14, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:20, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Commons is not a photo album; also the last four of these for the same reason as this previous request.
- File:TDSNabeel.jpg
- File:NabeelTDS.jpg
- File:NabeelTDS1.jpg
- File:NabeelTds.jpg
- File:Nabeel.jpg
- File:Nabeel Ahmed Khan4.jpg
- File:Nabeel Ahmed Khan3.jpg
- File:Nabeel Ahmed Khan1.jpg
- File:Nabeel Ahmed Khan2.jpg
Mahir256 (talk) 20:14, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:20, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
- File:Sheyene Gerardi ehealth.jpg
- File:Sheyene Gerardi Attends The New York Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children Gala 2015.jpg
Copyright doubt: the (a) various appearances of this photograph in other sources dated before this upload [8][9][10] and (b) the artificial scaling up of this file to a large RAW file-like resolution, make it likely that this is not own work or is too doubtful for us to otherwise accept the claim of CC seb26 (talk) 20:21, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- I'm adding the second file to this discussion. This photo has less Internet presence but I strongly doubt it is genuine own work. The camera EXIF data for both files shows the same serial number
2571401640, even though they have been uploaded by different users: Image 2 in 2015 by Dhermeswalter (talk · contribs) and Image 1 in 2016 by Juancamilosantos (talk · contribs). Either the EXIF data is false (and it's not that difficult, open up a RAW file, put a new photo on top of it as a layer in Photoshop, crop, and save the file as a JPG, and you now have 'borrowed' EXIF data), or they are the same person. In the case that they are actually the genuine photographer(s), we need original camera RAW files and statements from both, because it really doesn't look like they are. seb26 (talk) 20:47, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:20, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Possible copyvio photo, Sakhalinio (talk) 20:23, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:21, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
unused logo out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 20:23, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:21, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Non trival third party logo, not necessarily own work as claimed. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 18:59, 6 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: by Christian Ferrer at 05:46, 7 November 2017 UTC: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Kizilyildiztim.png. --Y.haruo (talk) 12:27, 1 December 2017 (UTC)
unused logo out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 20:23, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:21, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Copyvio logo Sakhalinio (talk) 20:23, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:21, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
2006 sculpture in Moscow. No freedom of panorama. Retired electrician (talk) 20:28, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:22, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
(Inappropriate?) Redirect from gallery page to category redirect. This redirect (the one in question) was only used in places where it is not necessary at all by almost one user. Speravir 20:30, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- Two examples: Special:Diff/250293179 (and more with music instruments) and even weirder Special:Diff/250293394. — Speravir – 20:33, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- Oh my god. Now after my edit due to the deletion request the funny Russbot changed the redirect: Special:Diff/250309642/250361314. — Speravir – 18:41, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:22, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Radiohead~commonswiki (talk · contribs)
[edit]Permission was: "After consulting with the appropriate offices, we have no problem that you use the information from our Web site, as long as you indicate it as the source." This may not be a blanket permission for anyone to use it under the same terms.
- File:ComponentesCP.jpg
- File:Atlanticcrossing.jpg
- File:Acptimeline.jpg
- File:Acpmaxdemand.jpg
- File:Acpfigure1.jpg
- File:Acpcost.jpg
- File:Acpcompetitors.jpg
Guanaco (talk) 20:41, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:22, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
"The copyright holder of this file allows anyone to use it for any purpose, provided that there is no document assembly, signing and/or creation of template pages of the original work"
Guanaco (talk) 20:45, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:22, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
"The copyright holder of this file allows anyone to use it for any purpose, provided that Authorization." Does this mean each use requires authorization? Guanaco (talk) 20:48, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:22, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
"The copyright holder of this file allows anyone to use it for any purpose, provided that authorized copyright - povoleno." Unclear what this means. Guanaco (talk) 21:00, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:22, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
"The copyright holder of this file allows anyone to use it for any purpose, provided that written permission." Seems to be legally equivalent to "Wikimedia only"
- File:Cyllarus.jpg
- File:My Melody Batz-Maru.jpg
- File:Celebrity Morph.jpg
- File:Amour Amour Dog.jpg
- File:Mootools.jpg
- File:The Rise of the Living Standard of the Working Class II..jpg
- File:Dog Eat Dog.jpg
- File:Your Chain-Reactions can only be lost on your own, don’t just speculate, master life!.jpg
- File:My Face Loosely Dissolves, Fly-Transplantation DJ Scratches the Virus.jpg
- File:Human Flesh Energy Source Soul-Video Club.jpg
- File:Escape from Nirvana I..jpg
- File:Embrio-Keeping Absolved in Grand Total.jpg
Guanaco (talk) 21:16, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:23, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Security guard added his passport size photo. 141.196.195.218 21:29, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:23, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Personal photo of an unknown personality. 141.196.195.218 21:31, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:23, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Not useful to Wikimedia Commons. 141.196.195.218 21:44, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:23, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyrights 141.196.195.218 21:45, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:23, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Juan Prado
[edit]Artist died in 2003. Unless a proper permission from the holders of the copyrights is provided, no reason to overcome the copyright, I guess
- File:Iglesia antigua.jpg
- File:Plaza Mayor de Valdemoro..jpg
- File:Torre del reloj moderna.jpg
- File:Vista trasera de la iglesia.jpg
Discasto talk 22:05, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:23, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Repeat File:Río táchira 2013.jpg EEIM (talk) 22:07, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:23, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Near-duplicate of File:Blaenau ffestiniog north train station 1863501 4a39db51.jpg, but with a watermark. Watermarks are discouraged per COM:WATERMARK. bjh21 (talk) 22:12, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- As the image's metadata gives due credit to Ben I have no objection to substituting the unwatermarked version and chucking the watermarked version away.DavidAHull (talk) 05:32, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:23, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
unused autopromo logo, along with File:Logo-neopolia-2.png (and the 3rd one used in a sandbox only) Pibwl (talk) 22:22, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:24, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 22:23, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:24, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
out of scope advert, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 22:24, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:24, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
File:Будинок, в якому жив і працював В. Гренджа-Донський, письменник і культурний діяч зображення 3.JPG
[edit]
No FoP in Ukraine. Jmabel ! talk 22:25, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:24, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
unused personal? photo, sole upload, no useful description Pibwl (talk) 22:27, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:24, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
out of scope, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 22:28, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:24, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unused photo of a person, source is not an uploader, sole upload Pibwl (talk) 22:32, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:24, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Author falsely claims this is their own original work. The image was taken and edited from A Historical Atlas of South Asia. Reference here: Joseph E. Schwartzberg (Ed.) 1978 University of Chicago Press. Specifically page 55, Plate VII.A.2. See: http://dsal.uchicago.edu/reference/schwartzberg/fullscreen.html?object=092 Rvmedia (talk) 22:34, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:24, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Only the previous version of the picture, where the face of the driver is visible Lev. Anthony (talk) 22:45, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:24, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Ich habe diese Datei aus Versehen zum falschen Nutzen und unter ungeklärten Lizenzen hochgeladen. Der Urheber erlaubt mir zwar, due Datei bei Wikipedia zu verwenden. Jedoch kann ich nicht mit Sicherheit sagen, ob er die von mir angegebenen Lizenzen genau so besitzt. IlsevonWesthagen (talk) 23:00, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:24, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
According to the source it's his self-portrait. He died in 1977, so it can't be a public domain. Texniths (talk) 23:05, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:24, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Delete. Out of scope. Not a notable person or scientist. Just a writer of a couple of popular history essays which appeared in "pulp", mass-market editions sold in kiosks. Self promotional photo, may be by Varvounis himself, to be used as an illustration in Greek WP in the article about himself, now speedily deleted (14:36, 2nd July 2017 UTC) as lacking notability. —— Chalk19 (talk) 23:26, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:24, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
copyrighted file. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 23:35, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:24, 10 July 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 4 July 2017 (UTC) Удивительно, что комментатор взял под сомнение авторство и авторские права моей статьи. Тем более, что представлена прямая ссылка на источник: elibrary. Статья представлена в полном и свободном доступе. Разместил в википедии я сам, обладая авторскими правами. Возражаю против удаления как необоснованного. Комментатору пожелание: внимательно просматривайте то, что комментируете. С уважением Шкунов Владимир Николаевич
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 05:25, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
Not free, FC Bayern work HerrAdams (talk) 07:55, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep @HerrAdams: Bayern's logo is contains simple shapes and geometric figures and text. It is not copyrightable, and thus, it is under public domain.
acagastya 08:00, 4 July 2017 (UTC) - Delete the logo itself might be PD-ineligible but surely that does not apply to the photo of this shirt with the logo on it. -- 79.251.133.235 12:19, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
- +1 --HerrAdams (talk) 17:12, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Dumb logic! Do you find any element of creativity to say it is above COM:TOO and is copyrightable?
acagastya 13:59, 7 July 2017 (UTC)- Photos are always creative, no matter what. (Exceptions would be cases like {{PD-Art}} which obviously are not applicable here) -- 79.251.133.235 22:29, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
- Clearly, you don't understand what I say: there is no element of creativity. The logo is too simple and it's background, red colour can not be copyrighted. Read about COM:TOO.
acagastya 05:48, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
- Clearly, you don't understand what I say: there is no element of creativity. The logo is too simple and it's background, red colour can not be copyrighted. Read about COM:TOO.
- Photos are always creative, no matter what. (Exceptions would be cases like {{PD-Art}} which obviously are not applicable here) -- 79.251.133.235 22:29, 7 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: below TOO. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:08, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
Dark photo of random houses. There are better ones in Category:Nowodwory Panek (talk) 10:58, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. Rare picture of smoky sunset. Very good quality /St1995 09:09, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per User:St1995. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:10, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather small-sized upload, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 17:40, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
The picture was taken by me on a cameraphone and transferred onto my new phone before posting it. That accounts for its small sized format and lack of EXIF data. This is not copyright material or someone else's work.
- Keep. EXIF is valid. No reason to delete /St1995 09:19, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: adequate quality, in scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:20, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work' : rather small-sized format, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 17:42, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
The picture was taken by me on a cameraphone and transferred onto my new phone before posting it. That accounts for its small sized format and lack of EXIF data. Im not a photography buff and these pictures were taken randomly during a hike. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nikhilrabade (talk • contribs) 00:31, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: adequate quality, in scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 13:23, 11 July 2017 (UTC)
worse copy of File:Flag of Kropyvnytskyi.svg Glovacki (talk) 11:55, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Keep Superseded image.--Anatoliy (talk) 19:49, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:43, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
Parce que pas encore utilisable Razafindravahy Edgard Marie Noé (talk) 12:41, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- What do you mean? --E4024 (talk) 13:27, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: self promo, rejected article. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:44, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
When we have a portrait picture from an unknown lady we propose to delete it because it is out of scope. What makes it in scope when an easy-going lady opens her legs? Is she an actress? A physician that saved lives? A swimsuit model? Do we have a special tolerance to people who might be using Commons as a social web for commercial or personal purposes? I really don't think there is any "real educative value" in the file. If we need a picture of this kind of bathing suit, it would be better to find a pic whose use would be more respectable for WPs; and I am not talking about censure, simply about encyclopedic content or scope. E4024 (talk) 13:51, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- So this answers the question of scope of this image vetted by OTRS, as this image depicts a swimsuit model - and has model release - and so it answers about who is depicted and also answers also how this image of this swimsuit is in scope has it shows a particular type of swimsuit that has no other image.
- About the considerations of encyclopedic value, Commons is not Wikipedia, and so Commons:Project scope states nothing about encyclopedic value. As stated in Commons policies, Wikipedias are not the single Wikimedia project Commons serves (e.a. Wikisource, Wikivoyage, Wikinews, Wikidata), besides all outside use of images in Commons. If states nothing about encyclopedic value, it states about educational value of images and as stated above it is explained the educational value of this image.
- Another thing that i see in this Deletion Request is the use of the Slut-shaming type language in the use of derogatory descriptions like "(...) n easy-going lady opens her legs?" or "If we need a picture of this kind of bathing suit, it would be better to find a pic whose use would be more respectable for WPs", demeaning and underating the work of this swimsuit model in comparison with other professions with the questions "Is she an actress? A physician that saved lives?". Is this really the kind of language expected from WMF projects that are trying to be a safe space for women or other persecuted people? Tm (talk) 19:30, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 16:36, 12 July 2017 (UTC)
CCで許可されていないロゴ。不適切なライセンス。 BlueBull7 (talk) 14:01, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:32, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
CCで許可されていないロゴ。不適切なライセンス。 BlueBull7 (talk) 14:15, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 10:33, 14 July 2017 (UTC)
While this video was published by NASA on their YouTube channel (and was broadcast by NASA TV), the vast majority of footage comes from SpaceX. For SpaceX launches of NASA missions, NASA rebroadcasts elements of SpaceX's in-house broadcast. Any video element from on-board the rocket, and some elements of the rocket launch itself, is SpaceX video, and our OTRS statement from the company does not explicitly cover video. The fact that NASA also broadcast this footage does not make it free from copyright. — Huntster (t @ c) 05:40, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- See previous such DRs at Commons:Deletion requests/File:NASA CRS-10 Launch.webm, Commons:Deletion requests/File:SpaceX CRS-8 Falcon 9 Rocket on Dragon Return to Flight.webm (another NASA-only video was uploaded under the same filename), and Commons:Deletion requests/File:SpaceX Launches Tenth Cargo Mission to the International Space Station.webm. — Huntster (t @ c) 05:44, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- Please delete only the file's first (older) version (of 11 June 2017). The current video contains only material from NASA's camera sites. --Ras67 (talk) 15:51, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
Question Can a native english speaker ask SpaceX via email or social networks regarding the copyrights of its video footage? It's a pity to delete this very interesting material. Warm regards --Ras67 (talk) 15:51, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
- Please delete only the file's first (older) version (of 11 June 2017). The current video contains only material from NASA's camera sites. --Ras67 (talk) 15:51, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: old revision deleted. Daphne Lantier 21:06, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ellin Beltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.ioby.org/blog/learn-from-a-leader-how-to-capture-and-report-sneckdowns Steinsplitter (talk) 09:46, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Also previously published here and all over the web. --Steinsplitter (talk) 09:51, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Hi, Wiki Folks:
OK... Hopefully I am posting this in the correct place in the correct way.... So, I chased down the origins of this Sneckdown image and I didn't have it quite right the first time.
This Sneckdown photo was originally shot by my friend and colleague Doug Gordon from his office window in Lower Manhattan. Doug goes by the Twitter handle @BrooklynSpoke and has a blog of the same name.
I just emailed Doug to have him write in and verify that he is happy to have the image used as the uber-example of a Sneckdown on Wikipedia. The image has been used all over the place already (ioby, Transportation Alternatives, Streetsblog, Streetfilms...) and Doug produced it specifically for the purposes of non-commercial advocacy, education and mass distribution.
I should be hearing back from Doug some time after the July 4th holiday, I imagine.
Anyway... There are loads of great Sneckdown images out there now. This is a particularly nice illustration though. I think it would be a very nice one to use for the Sneckdown wikipedia page. Have I mentioned that I kind of invented the word, "Sneckdown?!" Big claim to fame. Here is the origin story of Sneckdown, which is kind of fun, though probably not super relevant to this discussion...
http://www.streetfilms.org/the-complete-origin-of-the-sneckdown/
Naparstek (talk) 18:21, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:05, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Occcomercial (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: artworks without obvious educational use, advertising or self-promotion. Only in use on the user page of a user without useful contribution to the project.
- File:Entre Yuccas.jpg
- File:Rejoneador.jpg
- File:El Charro.jpg
- File:Fernando Barba.jpg
- File:A. Pharoah.jpg
- File:La carrera.jpg
BrightRaven (talk) 13:29, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- (El) "Rejoneador" es un elemento importante de la tauromaquia. It has an article in EN:WP with this title. The picture is certainly in scope. --E4024 (talk) 13:34, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- (+) The only rejoneador photo that we have got -as far as I could see in five minutes- is this File:Rejoneador Guillermo Pérez Cardoso.jpg and it has no bull in sight. Therefore this painting is important (quite in scope) to keep. Got no idea if there is any other pending issue with it. --E4024 (talk) 13:44, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as per COM:PCP. Daphne Lantier 21:07, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
PD-textlogoの範囲を超えてるロゴ。 BlueBull7 (talk) 13:59, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:07, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
"One may use or reproduce data and information from this site with an appropriate acknowledgement to the source of data. One may not charge any subsequent fee for these data." https://www-nds.iaea.org/copyright.html
- File:Uranium-238 Chain.jpg
- File:Half Life Valley of Stability.jpg
- File:Binding Energy Valley of Stability.jpg
- File:Decay Mode Valley of Stability.jpg
Guanaco (talk) 16:47, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
- What? I don't understand what the problem here is. Does it not seem a matter of perhaps merely correcting the license statement? The implication in the argument is that a fee is being charged for the data, which is wrong and baffling... The data and figures used were from a government website with a fairly open license, as stated on the figure pages. Bdushaw (talk) 11:58, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
- The figures acknowledge the source of the data and no fee is being charged. The figures therefore appear to me to be consistent with the stated copyright. The nominator makes no argument??? Bdushaw (talk) 12:09, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
- @Bdushaw: The problem here is that "non-commercial only" licensing is disallowed on Commons. Guanaco (talk) 13:47, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
- Ah, well... I did not take notice of the rules... :( Bdushaw (talk) 14:20, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
- @Bdushaw: We could email IAEA and ask for permission to use their content under {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} or a similar license. I don't want to lose these files if we can help it. Guanaco (talk) 15:02, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
- The figures are heavily modified from what is available at the IAEA website - the notion of claiming "fair use" went through my mind. I am, however, very foggy about how to go about licensing. The copyright says fee cannot be applied to "data", but I'm fairly certain such information is in the public domain. I was just looking at http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/nudat2/indx_sigma.jsp as a way to download the data itself and compute my own similar figures. The figures don't actually convey the "data", which are quite precise scientific values, but a vague representation of the various values, which is the point of the Valley of Stability. The license explicitly separates "data" from "information", with the non-commercial aspect pertaining only to "data". Figures such as these are quite common and accessible elsewhere, e.g., http://www.nndc.bnl.gov/nudat2/ . Can we argue the figures show only information without giving the actual data? Hence non-commercial/no fee does not apply? Bdushaw (talk) 21:53, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
- @Bdushaw: We could email IAEA and ask for permission to use their content under {{Cc-by-sa-3.0}} or a similar license. I don't want to lose these files if we can help it. Guanaco (talk) 15:02, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
- Ah, well... I did not take notice of the rules... :( Bdushaw (talk) 14:20, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
- @Bdushaw: The problem here is that "non-commercial only" licensing is disallowed on Commons. Guanaco (talk) 13:47, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:08, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
"The copyright holder of this file allows anyone to use it for any purpose, provided that the original image author and image description are credited." But it's unclear what this image description is, and if we even have it on the file page. Guanaco (talk) 21:04, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
Oppose @Guanaco: That information was added in this edit over ten years ago. It was nonsense, so I just reverted that edit. I'm sorry it took me so long. Kindly consider withdrawing your nomination. — Jeff G. ツ 04:20, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Unfortunately I don't see any evidence of permission to license this under GFDL. Just plain Bill has been active recently; maybe he can provide something to OTRS? Guanaco (talk) 13:35, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
- @Guanaco: It's in the original upload edit. — Jeff G. ツ 14:21, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: My understanding is that for images uploaded after 1 January 2007, claims of "X gave me permission to use their image" must be verified by OTRS, unless proof can be established from online sources. I'm not saying the original upload edit is lying, but it doesn't appear to constitute proof. Guanaco (talk) 14:30, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
- @Just plain Bill: please present proof of your assertion via an online source or OTRS and reply here. — Jeff G. ツ 14:55, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
- [ec] Yes, well... it was ten years ago. The image came from the artist's press page, which explicitly invites downloads. If memory serves, I sent them a courtesy email asking permission for this use. The reply, again IIRC, gave the photographer's name, asking that she be credited. That's the only way I would have known the photographer was Irene Young, whose name I do not see in the source of the site. Just plain Bill (talk) 15:11, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
- @Just plain Bill and Guanaco: Thanks for that info, Bill. I emailed the address on the contact page, starting Ticket:2017070610002406. — Jeff G. ツ 03:25, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: My understanding is that for images uploaded after 1 January 2007, claims of "X gave me permission to use their image" must be verified by OTRS, unless proof can be established from online sources. I'm not saying the original upload edit is lying, but it doesn't appear to constitute proof. Guanaco (talk) 14:30, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
- @Guanaco: It's in the original upload edit. — Jeff G. ツ 14:21, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
- @Jeff G.: Unfortunately I don't see any evidence of permission to license this under GFDL. Just plain Bill has been active recently; maybe he can provide something to OTRS? Guanaco (talk) 13:35, 5 July 2017 (UTC)
Kept: OTRS. Daphne Lantier 21:08, 24 July 2017 (UTC)
