Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/05/29

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive May 29th, 2017
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Purely promotional page, outside scope. Mifter (talk) 05:41, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: spam. Daphne Lantier 06:21, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Brgesto (talk) 00:18, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Elcobbola: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Brgesto (talk) 00:18, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Elcobbola: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Brgesto (talk) 00:18, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Elcobbola: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Brgesto (talk) 00:21, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Elcobbola: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Brgesto (talk) 00:22, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Elcobbola: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Brgesto (talk) 00:22, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Elcobbola: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Brgesto (talk) 00:22, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Elcobbola: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Brgesto (talk) 00:23, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Elcobbola: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Brgesto (talk) 00:25, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Elcobbola: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Brgesto (talk) 00:25, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Elcobbola: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Brgesto (talk) 00:26, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Elcobbola: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Brgesto (talk) 00:26, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Elcobbola: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Brgesto (talk) 00:26, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Elcobbola: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Brgesto (talk) 00:26, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Elcobbola: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Brgesto (talk) 00:26, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Elcobbola: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Brgesto (talk) 00:27, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Elcobbola: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Brgesto (talk) 00:29, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Elcobbola: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Brgesto (talk) 00:29, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Elcobbola: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Brgesto (talk) 00:29, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Elcobbola: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Brgesto (talk) 00:30, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Elcobbola: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Brgesto (talk) 00:30, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Elcobbola: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Brgesto (talk) 00:30, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Elcobbola: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Falsche Metadaten im Bild und Dateiname. Wird neu hochgeladen. Svema (talk) 15:00, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per chat witth uploader: Will reupload correct version. --Raymond 15:15, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ronhjones as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.shutterstock.com/search/islamabad Yann (talk) 15:45, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fatima Hussain: I am the owner of the image as it was taken by me and I have also uploaded it on shutterstock.


Kept: Shutterstock image is smaller and with a watermark. --Yann (talk) 15:58, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to remove my image from wikipedia FHussain (talk) 18:47, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. You had a window of opportunity to revoke your license. After seven days it became a permanent license which you cannot revoke. Green Giant (talk) 20:34, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because you do not believe anything and i dont want to upload any more immages Khoshhat (talk) 17:04, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:18, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because you do not believe anything and i dont want to upload any more images Khoshhat (talk) 17:05, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:18, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:EDUSE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:22, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdrawn, computer generated picture. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 23:49, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because you do not believe anything and i dont want to upload any more immages Khoshhat (talk) 17:03, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OTRS release required. --JuTa 07:32, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because you do not believe anything and i dont want to upload any more immages Khoshhat (talk) 17:04, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OTRS release required,. --JuTa 07:30, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because you do not believe anything and i dont want to upload any more images Khoshhat (talk) 17:05, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: OTRS release required. --JuTa 07:31, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal picture from panoramio, unused, uncategorized and out of scope. Gauss (talk) 20:47, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 13:02, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Português: Este é uma biografia em homenagem a uma pessoa viva. Na data era ele meu namorido mas recentemente terminamos o relacionamento e ele já está com novo relacionamento. A pedido dos dois estou solicitando exclusão da página com foto e dizeres. Espero ser atendida o mais breve possível. Renatinha Renque (talk) 18:02, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This is a biography in honor of a living person. At the time he was my lover, but we've recently splitted up and he's with a new partner. At the request of both of us I am requesting the exclusion of that page with the photo and text. I hope that my request can be granted as soon as possible.

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:25, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is Getty Images ID #688526770 by Gie Knaeps. Missing evidence that the uploader is the same person. ticket:2017052910009843. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 13:46, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Delete unless an OTRS permission is received. Ankry (talk) 23:22, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That's a shame. It took me ages to get the matte just right for creating the lens blur. Oh well.  Delete nagualdesign 02:02, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:32, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to be a non-free image, we need more proof that uploader has the right to place it on Commons. TAnthony (talk) 17:33, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This image came from the public magazine Teen Vogue. This image is free.StarWarsGalaxy (talk) 21:57, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@StarWarsGalaxy: Have a source for saying "teen vogue" pics is copyright free ? It's not because the magazine is public the material is copyright free. on thjeTeen vogue web site Teen Vogue © 2017 Condé Nast Digital. All rights reserved. The material on this site may not be reproduced, distributed, transmitted, cached or otherwise used, except with the prior written permission of Condé Nast Digital."-- Sebk (talk) 23:21, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:35, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused uneducational selfie. Out of project scope. De728631 (talk) 23:34, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: and no license at all. --JuTa 01:59, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably, copyright violation. A lot of similar photos we can find through google search. Also date in the file 05.10.15 is incorrect too. Look - https://i.paste.pics/1PU4L.png . There are some photos that was upload earlier. Rampion (talk) 10:54, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 11:43, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fair use. Not free. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:23, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:43, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Homework. Out of scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:25, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:43, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book scan; dubious copyright. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:29, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:43, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:EDUSE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:29, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:43, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ishaanprasad1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Nonfree school logo - used under Fair Use on en.wp (link) no evidence of free licensing.

Mifter (talk) 05:32, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:42, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anton biederwolf (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Some likely recreation of previously deleted files.

— Racconish 18:49, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Anton biederwolf (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

— Racconish 18:53, 3 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 20:58, 10 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vorona-aleksander (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivatives of modern paintings, no evidence that the author is the same person as the uploader, except similar names. Secondly, name in EXIF copyright statement is different to uploader's. OTRS permission needed.

Sealle (talk) 14:11, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:37, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free and erronous data (is not taken today) http://ungvanster.se/om-oss/organisation/forbundsstyrelsen/ Yger (talk) 14:15, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:42, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aukks (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: What is still missing in existing collection of explicit media?

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aukks (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused out of COM:SCOPE personal images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:32, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Aukks (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused out of COM:SCOPE personal images.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 13:35, 2 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:43, 9 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Frankrodd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:55, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:38, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:19, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rachid1ezzin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:20, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused newspaper page photo Sakhalinio (talk) 16:25, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:41, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:28, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:40, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Risk Engineer

[edit]

These are a group of FTA presentations about construction projects and risk management. None are in use on any Wikimedia projects, nor are they likely to be of any use. I believe they are out of scope; there is no reasons for Commons to keep a bunch of contextless government presentations which do not have any particular educational or historical value.

Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:21, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:40, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:02, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 13:38, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:03, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:38, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:14, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:38, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mgcc my (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Logos appear to be sufficiently sophisticated as to be potential copyright violations, especially seeing as there is no evidence that the uploader is actually the creator/copyright holder.

Ks0stm (TCGE) 02:16, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mgcc my how to mark this as not to be deleted? This is my first time posting a page on wiki and i seriously dont know a thing. by the way the medias are legit of my creation. can even give you the ai source if you'd like to confirm them


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:37, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of another file Ishaanprasad1 (talk) 05:12, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:37, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of another file Ishaanprasad1 (talk) 05:13, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:37, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Third party logo, most likely simple but the equivalent at English Wikipedia was under non-free fair use w:File:MBC 3 logo.jpg ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:49, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Disagree Most third party logos of simple design have been uploaded on Commons as png or svg files. Those files are now considered to be free from threshold of originality, as their are composed of basic figures. The same can be said with this image, which can be vectorised and fit into this category due to its simplicity and non-complex design. --Bankster (talk) 15:59, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:36, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Alte Logoversion, nicht mehr in Verwendung Kommunikation KU (talk) 12:17, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, file is currently in use.--Wdwd (talk) 13:00, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 13:36, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Altes Logo ohne Mehrwert für den Leser, da deutliche Analogien zum aktuellen Logo vorhanden sind. KU bittet um Entfernung, da es eben wegen der Ähnlichkeit immer wieder zur Verwechslung durch User kommt. Auch auf den Seiten anderer Unis wird kein altes Logo gezeigt. PetraChrista85 (talk) 09:00, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Renaming to e.g. File:Katholische Universität Eichstätt-Ingolstadt altes Logo.svg would be sufficient to avoid the issue mentioned above. --Leyo 12:07, 14 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@PetraChrista85 and Kommunikation KU: Solange das neue Logo hier nur als Pixelgrafik vorliegt hat das "alte Logo" sehr wohl noch einen Mehrwert (gerade wegen der "deutlichen Analogie"). -- User: Perhelion 09:15, 15 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:55, 21 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:23, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:35, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Isfarr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://scontent-amt2-1.cdninstagram.com/t51.2885-15/e35/18013358_857894147682798_1825763801228640256_n.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:35, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by イエガ・ルーム (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://media.image.infoseek.co.jp/isnews/photos/shupure/shupure_60578_0-enlarge.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:34, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official symbols. If they are in public domain, proper license tag should be sued.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:34, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

На фото не Дмитрий Кириченко, а Андрей Каряка. DumSS (talk) 22:24, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Это мое фото. При чём тут Каряка или Кириченко? --Amarhgil (talk) 06:11, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
В статье Список гвардейцев чемпионата России по футболу это фото стояло как фото Кириченко, что, естественно, не соответствовало действительности. Фото я поменял на правильное. DumSS (talk) 23:37, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
В таких случаях переименовывают файлы, а не предлагают удалить--Amarhgil (talk) 07:06, 2 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Не вижу большой разницы - можно дождаться удаления и загрузить еще раз под правильным именем и с правильным описанием. DumSS (talk) 21:09, 3 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 12:53, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Kröller-Müller Museum page was updated. Generated link doesn't work. Possible new algorithm will not be easy to use, because one item has two page ids now. One NL version and another for EN. Additional id is only retrievable via the sozial media links. At least an equal (older, less documented) Template:KMM online exists. Plagiat (talk) 01:04, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I see. Well, this problem could be solved by using two parameters. One for the "EN number" and one for the "NL number". Something like this:
[http://krollermuller.nl/{{LangSwitch|en=en|nl=nl}}/{{LangSwitch|en={{{en|}}}|nl={{{nl|}}}}} {{LangSwitch|en=Kröller-Müller Museum online catalogue|fr=Musée Kröller-Müller : catalogue en ligne|nl=Online catalogus Kröller-Müller Museum}}]{{#if: {{{as|}}} |, {{i18n/as}} {{{as|}}}}}.
This is not ideal, but with good documentation it might do the trick. In this situation, instead of numbers you could also use text, for example http://krollermuller.nl/en/odilon-redon-the-cyclops-1 and http://krollermuller.nl/nl/odilon-redon-de-cycloop-1. So you end op with two options:
{{KMMonline|en=3112|nl=3113}}
and
{{KMMonline|en=odilon-redon-the-cyclops-1|nl=odilon-redon-de-cycloop-1}}
Regards, Vincent Steenberg (talk) 08:49, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I revoke this request. I made an update, so users can enter english pagename or one of the page ids. --Plagiat (talk) 18:09, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Revoked, noncontroversial keep. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Template:KMM online which is not revoked. --Achim (talk) 18:27, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used solely for vandalism on English Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Witchford_Village_College&type=revision&diff=782753788&oldid=782753554 Maile66 (talk) 00:19, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:06, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Taken from here. That image has a watermark on it, left to right across the middle of her torso. In this image, if you zoom it, you can make out remnants of the watermark removal. Hammersoft (talk) 00:21, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:07, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Taken from the site indicated in the summary, but there's no proof of the license indicated. See this page; look for "bellampalli". Hammersoft (talk) 00:27, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:07, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely a copyvio : no metadata, better resolution on Internet, unique import from this user H4stings (talk) 13:27, 4 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the file is used 48 times in 31 projects, but nobody has objected. Probably really copyvio. Taivo (talk) 10:36, 4 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Brgesto (talk) 00:31, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 13:37, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Kröller-Müller Museum page was updated. Generated link doesn't work. Possible new algorithm will not be easy to use, because one item has two page ids now. One NL version and another for EN. Additional id is only retrievable via the sozial media links. At least an equal (newer) Template:KMMonline exists. Plagiat (talk) 01:04, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:08, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be spam and I have a hard time believing that the uploader is the copyright holder of the image as a whole, not to mention the potentially copyright elements within the image. Ks0stm (TCGE) 01:40, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:09, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Formato non corretto Brickburger (talk) 01:58, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:09, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsure about own work claim, seems out of scope to me. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:12, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:09, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

画像の中に文字が入ったものを誤ってアップロードしてしまったため。 KANSEI 03:21, 29 May 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:09, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a PR photo (reverse Google) no evidence of free licensing or that the image is the uploader's own work Mifter (talk) 05:28, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:09, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Widely used PR image (reverse Google) - no evidence of free license or that it is the uploader's own work. Mifter (talk) 05:37, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:09, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amritaparna Saha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Appears to be a PR image - no evidence of free licensing (reverse Google)

Mifter (talk) 05:43, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:09, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unacceptable derivative work. The design of the award is copyrighted. xplicit 05:44, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:09, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be a PR image - no evidence of free licensing (reverse Google) Mifter (talk) 05:44, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:09, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo for self promotional. en:Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Akbaralighazi/Archive Saqib (talk) 06:37, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:09, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии, маленькое разрешение, сомнительный вклад здесь https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/Служебная:Список_файлов/Sosiska Dogad75 (talk) 07:15, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:09, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of a third party, Logo element left may be non-trivial , equivalent at English Wikipedia w:File:J Air logo.png under non-free fair use. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:46, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Just another non free image from en-wiki Ronhjones  (Talk) 15:40, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:09, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is clearly a third poster , equivalent at English Wikipedia under non-free fair use w:File:Love in the Moonlight-official poster.jpg ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 07:48, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Just another non free image copied from en-wiki Ronhjones  (Talk) 15:41, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:09, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no free picture, as it can be downloaded from german authority-site, it isn't a government work. Using only for media-purposes, not free and no license compatible to our projects Quedel (talk) 08:08, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:10, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Double upload with wrong name. Berthold Werner (talk) 08:20, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:10, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tiny size, unsharp, unidentifiable Mhohner (talk) 08:52, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:10, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not the flag of the Donets Basin. It is just one of the flags of pro-Russian separatists of the Donets Basin. There is a SVG version, which was loaded earlier than this file. Ιγκόρ (talk) 08:59, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:10, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This was first published in the UK, not US. No indication it would be PD. FunkMonk (talk) 09:02, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:10, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This was first published in the UK, not US. No indication it would be PD. FunkMonk (talk) 09:02, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:10, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This was first published in the UK, not US. No indication it would be PD. FunkMonk (talk) 09:03, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:10, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This was first published in the UK, not US. No indication it would be PD. FunkMonk (talk) 09:04, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:10, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This was first published in the UK, not US. No indication it would be PD. FunkMonk (talk) 09:05, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:11, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Since he lived in the US, it is unlikely this was first published in Lebanon. FunkMonk (talk) 09:54, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep no evidence that this image was taken in USA.--Maher27777 (talk) 20:15, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
There is no evidence of any kind about the image, which is a problem, per Commons:Precautionary principle. FunkMonk (talk) 21:17, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination/COM:PCP. Daphne Lantier 21:11, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Francescosaverio50 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

First published in the USA and likely to be still copyrighted there. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Loy-myrna whipsaw 1936.jpg; Commons:Deletion requests/File:Young-loretta ramona 1936.jpg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Jolson-al 1934.jpg.

— Racconish ☎ 11:00, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Non c'è alcuna prova che le immagini - tutte degli anni 1934 - 36 (82 anni fa !!!) - siano ancora coperte da copyright Esse sono caricate con il tag di copyright not renewed. Tu puoi dimostrare il contrario ?? No, infatti scrivi likely = forse, may be. Non capisco questo accanimento a contestare il lavoro altrui. Non è la prima volta. Non cancellare per non impoverire Commons.--Francescosaverio50 (talk) 17:31, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
For example File:Crawford-joan 1935.jpg is a crop of a still of Joan Crawford in No more ladies [1], wearing a bathing suit designed by Adrian. How exactly did you check MGM's copyright had not been renewed in the USA ? — Racconish ☎ 18:23, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:12, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Francescosaverio50 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unsustained claim of anonymity, based on the sole fact a cropped uncredited version was published by an Italian magazine. Publicity stills of Brigitte Helm, such as this one or this one were notoriously photographed by Emil Otto Hoppé who died in 1972.

— Racconish ☎ 12:53, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Francescosaverio50 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

La Kermesse héroïque is a French film, not PD in France since not 70 years pma after the death of the director, Jacques Feyder.

— Racconish ☎ 16:43, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:42, 26 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in Iran. 4nn1l2 (talk) 11:01, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:12, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low res image in unusual png format, no or invalid exif, uploader with 3 of 4 uploaded images deleted as copyvios Denniss (talk) 11:05, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:12, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted interface of Adobe Reader. 94.140.45.210 11:13, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:12, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright because from facebook photo do not free. Pitpisit (talk) 12:13, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:12, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Actually I would like it if it were deleted because I was trying to use Internet Archive for OCR and for some reason the embedded text comes up garbled when it has been extracted from the pdf file. I have asked to its deletion at the community section at Icelandic Wiki Source but there doesn't seem to be any activity there. There is also a lack of information about uploading to Icelandic Wiki Source.

The file itself is public domain according to section 9 of the Icelandic copyright act of 1972. That section states that laws and court rulings are exempt from copyright. I believe similar laws are in effect in most places.

--Óli Gneisti (talk) 15:19, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:12, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://i2.wp.com/edmjoy.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/05/Statik-Link-MFI1.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:13, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Video is not from source quoted (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pWNlg0QS7XM), also fake media of the day banner Ronhjones  (Talk) 15:01, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also File:اسمع وابكي على نفسك خالد الراشد.webm

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:13, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's exactly the same as FishAndBrewisWithScrunchions.jpg but is cropped a bit too aggressively and is unused. Pomakis (talk) 15:07, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:13, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in Saudi Arabia Slangcamms (talk) 15:20, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:13, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by IM3847 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: image taken for personal use, may be the person shown in the picture is a family member and doesnot meet Notability guidelines Yann (talk) 15:38, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:13, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GrafiQa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Stills from the movie. http://www.diaryofabeholder.com/?en_photo-gallery,47 Copyright © 2017 grafiQa.pl

Yann (talk) 15:43, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

As the owner of uploaded files and owner of copyrights to these files, I agree to post them on DIary of a Beholder wikipedia pages. Jaroslaw Migon director and producer of DIary of a Beholder. — Preceding unsigned comment added by GrafiQa (talk • contribs)

@GrafiQa: As these were previously published (in a film), please send a permission via COM:OTRS. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:19, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:13, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Ronhjones as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.qiriminsesi.com/dobrucadaki-kirim-tatarlarinin-onder-sahsiyetlerinden-mehmet-niyazi-bey-1878-1931.html May be old enough, more info needed. Yann (talk) 15:45, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:14, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused retouched picture with misleading description. Out of scope. Badzil (talk) 15:46, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:14, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. Picture is stated (c) Vlaamse Gemeenschap on the page stated as source. Henxter (talk) 15:56, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:14, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of component of Microsoft-copyrighted Windows operating system ViperSnake151 (talk) 16:01, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:14, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable own work: very low resolution, EXIF contains no camera info. Wcam (talk) 16:05, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:14, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a photo of a 2d printed work. DR with no source info. Wcam (talk) 16:08, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:14, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:21, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:14, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blatant advertising: please upload without watermark Pyrophyt (talk) 16:21, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:14, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused version of File:GBSFClogo.jpg Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 16:27, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:14, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: with this quality you barely see that it's maize Pyrophyt (talk) 16:38, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:14, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of commons scope. Saqib (talk) 16:42, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:14, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of commons scope. Saqib (talk) 16:47, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:14, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

seems not very useful and big watermark Saqib (talk) 16:48, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:14, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': one file upload, potentially personality rights isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 17:44, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:15, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': one-file-upload, potentially personality rights isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 17:45, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:15, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': one-file-upload, potentially personality rights isusses, or posing, hence out of scope, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 17:46, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:14, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': one-file-upload, potentially personality rights isusses, or posing, hence out of scope and potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 17:47, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:14, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EdlP47y6av8 is copyrighted ("standard youtube license") thus this would only qualify as "fair use" which is not allowed on Commons. The uploader, per the username, might be related to the production, but evidence of permission should be sent to OTRS then for this to stay. —MarcoAurelio 18:16, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:14, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation. Property of RCD Mallorca Brgesto (talk) 18:19, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:14, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Non-notable subject, unused. Commons is not a private photoblog. —MarcoAurelio 18:23, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:15, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work is unlikely. —MarcoAurelio 18:34, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:15, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work is unlikely. Admitted TV screenshot. Fair use is not allowed on Commons. —MarcoAurelio 18:37, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:15, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work is unlikely. Might fall under {{logo}}. Also, bad quality which suggest it's being simply grabbed from the Internet without permission. —MarcoAurelio 18:41, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:15, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work is unlikely and the date from which this photograph was taken is unknown. COM:CRT#Brazil states that works are protected for 70 years. —MarcoAurelio 18:50, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:15, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FSG1997 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

IMHO out of scope per {{nopenis}} due to bad quality and already a large base of male genitalia in the project.

MarcoAurelio 18:56, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:15, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ñon fre and not taklen today https://www.thelocal.se/20161107/katrin-ottarsdottir-loneliness-gives-me-inner-strength-nordic-council-tlccu Yger (talk) 19:21, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:15, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyright violation, taken in the same set of pics as the main image on artist's main page at http://gabrielgarzonmontano.com/ ···日本穣Talk to Nihonjoe 19:42, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:15, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication that the file has been released under the claimed license. Since the map is by a third party outside Commons, OTRS verification is needed. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:49, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:15, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Improper use of PD-USGov template. State governments are separate from the federal government and claim copyright. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:50, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:15, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

nice clouds, but trees and mountains are blurred. no special location, not worth keeping. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 20:17, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:15, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not too simple for copyright. See COM:TOO Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:26, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Just another non free image from en-wiki en:File:Shopriteold.jpg Ronhjones  (Talk) 21:13, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:15, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear license situation. Seems not to be the uploaders own wirk and there is no further evidence given that this photograph of this super secret Iranian radar would be in he public domain 92.75.45.236 20:34, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:15, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is "a picture of a picture" made by W. W. Biddle. As he is not the original photographer and because the picture is not in PD, the autorisation provided with OTRS doesn't work because it's not from the original photographer. Arthur Crbz (talk) 20:42, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:15, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurred. there are many pictures from similar perspective. See: category:Nanga Parbat (Rakhiot face). Rupert Pupkin (talk) 20:54, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:15, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Redmen007 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Apparent copyvios; multiple cameras (e.g., Canon EOS 7D Mark II, iPhone 6, Canon EOS 60D, Canon EOS 5D Mark III, Canon EOS DIGITAL REBEL XS, etc.); several low resolution; several blatant COM:DW (e.g. File:Big East Trophy.jpg, File:Viewbook.jpg); several clearly scans of older photos (e.g., File:SJU City Hall.jpg, File:Lapchick Years (7).jpg, etc.); many elsewhere on internet before Commons (e.g. File:Mullin and team.jpg is here). Quack?

Эlcobbola talk 20:59, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I initially thought this uploader's images were copyvio too, but I believe the user and "Wendell Cruz" found in most of the EXIF data are the same person. Ytoyoda (talk) 01:22, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination/COM:PCP. Daphne Lantier 21:17, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurred. There are better pictures of that cannon. See: category:Baltit Fort cannon Rupert Pupkin (talk) 21:10, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:17, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': thumbnail format, one-file-upload, potentially personality rights isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 21:22, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:17, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Je n'ai pas l'accord signé du modèle humain. Merci d'avance. LesPetitsSuisses (talk) 21:49, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:17, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 22:22, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:17, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image from mass upload with no educational value. Sitacuisses (talk) 22:53, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:17, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation from [2] Foreign Species (talk) 23:38, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

to clarify that, copyright for this picture added at http://www.meile-der-innovationen.de/impressum-datenschutz/ (at the end of the Page)


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:17, 4 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obvious attempt of advertising for a meanwhile no longer existing furrier shop Kasimix (talk) 07:30, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Das ist kein vernünftiger Löschgrund. --Kürschner (talk) 19:27, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
ich denke aber wohl, es steht in den englischsprachigen Löschgründen als "advertising or self-promotion":commons:Deletion_policy#Self-promotion_or_vandalism/attack--Kasimix (talk) 07:16, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Es ist Teil der Dokumentation von Kürschnerbetrieben (Category:Furriers by city) im Rahmen der Dokumentation der Pelzbranche allgemein (Category:Furs). -- Kürschner (talk) 09:58, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
So weit es um die Dokumentation des traditionsreichen Kürschnerhandwerks geht, insbesondere dessen Geschichte, ist das ja OK, aber m.E. nicht mehr, wenn einfach nur ein Ladengeschäft fotografiert wird, wenns geht mit Internetadresse u. Telefonnummer. - Dann ähnelt es mehr einem Branchentelefonbuch mit Werbecharakter. Wo sollen wir da die Grenze ziehen? Im aktuellen Fall ist das Foto auch deswegen obsolet, weil der Geschäftsbetrieb dort nicht mehr existiert.--Kasimix (talk) 09:22, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Kasimix, gerade mit dem Inhalt des letzten Satzes konnte ich von Anfang an nichts anfangen. Das Foto ist obsolet, weil der Geschäftsbetrieb dort nicht mehr existiert? Ich verstehe Dokumentation andersherum, etwas dokumentieren, insbesondere für die Zeit, wo es nicht mehr besteht. Und Werbung ist es ohnehin nur, wenn der Betrieb noch existiert (ich habe das jetzt gar nicht geprüft, ich halte das überhaupt nicht für relevant). Denken wir uns die Firmenbeschreibung weg, ist es die Dokumentation eines Teils eines Gebäudes. Schön wäre es, wenn dafür, zusätzlich zu dem einen, alle Ladenpächter oder Hausbesitzer seit Bestehen aufgeführt werden könnten (mein Lieblingsgedanke ist, alle Häuser einer Straße in regelmäßigen Abständen erneut zu fotografieren, aus New York besitze ich so ein Werk). Ich könnte meine Argumentation beliebig weiter führen - meinst du nicht, dass du dich hier doch etwas verrannt hast? Schönen Tag vom -- Kürschner (talk) 09:59, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo Kürschner, wenn es darum geht, die Veränderung eines Hauses oder einer Straße zu dokumentieren, bin ich voll auf deiner Seite. Vielleicht wär es eine Lösung, wenn in der Beschreibung, z.B durch "Pelzgeschäft bis 2017", klar würde, dass das ein früherer Status des Hauses/Geschäftes ist. Gruß,--Kasimix (talk) 10:36, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in scope. If the description is too much like advertising, then change the description. P 1 9 9   13:54, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obvious attempt of advertising for a meanwhile no longer existing furrier shop Kasimix (talk) 07:31, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Das ist kein vernünftiger Löschgrund. --Kürschner (talk) 19:28, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
ich denke aber wohl, es steht in den englischsprachigen Löschgründen als "advertising or self-promotion":commons:Deletion_policy#Self-promotion_or_vandalism/attack--Kasimix (talk) 07:17, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Es ist Teil der Dokumentation von Kürschnerbetrieben (Category:Furriers by city) im Rahmen der Dokumentation der Pelzbranche allgemein (Category:Furs). -- Kürschner (talk) 09:57, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
So weit es um die Dokumentation des traditionsreichen Kürschnerhandwerks geht, insbesondere dessen Geschichte, ist das ja OK, aber m.E. nicht mehr, wenn einfach nur ein Ladengeschäft fotografiert wird, wenns geht mit Internetadresse u. Telefonnummer. - Dann ähnelt es mehr einem Branchentelefonbuch mit Werbecharakter. Wo sollen wir da die Grenze ziehen? Im aktuellen Fall ist das Foto auch deswegen obsolet, weil der Geschäftsbetrieb dort nicht mehr existiert.--Kasimix (talk) 09:20, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: in scope. If the description is too much like advertising, then change the description. P 1 9 9   13:54, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The author is known, so hardly anonymous. FunkMonk (talk) 09:02, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • The author of the photograph is indeed known, but the image first appeared in print in a British newspaper piece "Monsters" Caught and Not Yet Caught: A Record Tunny and-What? The Illustrated London News. September 1, 1934. This was an anonymous article which printed the photograph. Rebecca Bird (talk) 10:26, 31 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:51, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This was first published in the UK, not US. No indication it would be PD. FunkMonk (talk) 09:05, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The photo (and most/all other Nessie photos) was first published in the UK[3], which is all that matters here. FunkMonk (talk) 17:52, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
It does not matter if the first Surgeon photograph was published in the UK, I am not citing that photograph! The photograph I cited is obviously a slightly different version than the original Surgeon photograph, and it is taken directly from Popular Science, 1934. You can see it is slightly different from the photograph in the link you cite. Popular Science is an American magazine. These are bogus deletion requests. It is like taking a reprint photograph of Charles Darwin published in America and then saying you can't have those because the first ever one was taken in the UK. What a load of nonsense. If a photograph if reprinted in an American source, it is American. Show us otherwise in Wikicommons policy.Rebecca Bird (talk) 18:04, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The silhouette is very slightly different but it is clearly the same photo, the waves are identical. Whether someone manipulated the head slightly later I don't know, but it is meant to be the same photo. FunkMonk (talk) 18:12, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as per my comment above. --Yann (talk) 19:49, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This was first published in the UK, not US. No indication it would be PD. FunkMonk (talk) 09:05, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • This was not published in the UK. It was published in an American source. Camera Proves Loch Ness Sea Serpent Is Just A Whale. Popular Science. July, 1934. Popular Science is an American magazine. Rebecca Bird (talk) 17:57, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The surgeon's photo is still problematic, as it was first published in the UK. FunkMonk (talk) 18:36, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:53, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This was first published in the UK, not US. No indication it would be PD. FunkMonk (talk) 09:06, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Does not matter where it was first published, I am not citing the original publication! I took the photograph directly from Showdown for Loch Ness. LIFE Magazine. 20 September, 1963. Life magazine was an American magazine. Rebecca Bird (talk) 18:11, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Commons goes by the country of first publication. Wikipedia goes by US law, so you can upload it there instead. Like for example this image:[4] FunkMonk (talk) 18:14, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:54, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not anonymous, the author is mentioned in the description. FunkMonk (talk) 09:08, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • The source is an anonymous article Pictorial Notes On Current Topics: The Loch Ness Monster; Railway Signals. The Illustrated London News. January 6, 1934. (no author). I am very tired of these bullshit deletion requests from FunkMonk. He has not read the article. The picture that appears in the above article is anonymous. Marmaduke Wetherell found the footprints but he was not the author of the above article, nor took the photograph. Rebecca Bird (talk) 17:46, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have not read the article, but it is up to you as the uploader to provide evidence that backs such claims up. FunkMonk (talk) 17:57, 30 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Likely photographed by Wetherell, and I could not find the year of his death. If found, the appropriate undeletion category should be added to this DR. --Storkk (talk) 14:36, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]