Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/05/26
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
Commons is not a place to advertise. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:32, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 06:08, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
loaded by mistake Antoni Nomen (talk) 21:42, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Speede kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ankry (talk) 22:36, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
published by mistake Antoni Nomen (talk) 16:19, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Speedy kept again. No valid reason for deletion. --Storkk (talk) 18:44, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
loaded by mistake Antoni Nomen (talk) 21:43, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Speedy kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ankry (talk) 22:37, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
loaded by mistake Antoni Nomen (talk) 21:43, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Speedy kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ankry (talk) 22:38, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
published by mistake Antoni Nomen (talk) 16:20, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Speedy kept again. No valid reason for deletion. --Storkk (talk) 18:42, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
File:Часть 2. Том III. — Постановления провинциальных сеймиков Юго-Западной Руси в 1698 — 1726 гг. Под ред. И. М. Каманина.pdf
[edit]loaded by mistake Antoni Nomen (talk) 08:23, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 08:58, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
loaded by mistake Antoni Nomen (talk) 08:24, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 08:52, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
I uploaded the image before actually reading guidelines so now, after reading them, I think the image doesn’t fulfil criteria for suitable - educational - content. Besides that, the photographed subject changed his mind and doesn’t want to be publicly displayed, even though he is not readily identifiable. The same applies to all 8 images uploaded. Elene Yeti (talk) 10:31, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 15:55, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Collage made up of screenshot or official poster images. No evidence that the uploader has permission to reuse images. DAJF (talk) 08:30, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:34, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Delete This is not the work of the uploader. It is cropped from image located here, which does not have a license compatiable with Commons. Hammersoft (talk) 15:19, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedy deleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:27, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Delete Not the work of the uploader. Taken from here (see image further in slideshow), which does not have a license compatible with Commons. Hammersoft (talk) 15:22, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedy deleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:33, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Twitter bird is copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 21:50, 1 January 2013 (UTC)
- Delete Complex enough to meet the threshold of originality. VernoWhitney (talk) 18:21, 6 January 2013 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:38, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Twitter bird is copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 18:04, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 00:39, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
रेखाथापा💗 37.111.13.254 00:34, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose at the deletion. --ComputerHotline (talk) 05:25, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose, aucune justification. A.BourgeoisP (talk) 21:43, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request by an IP. --Achim (talk) 09:10, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
bo go nie chce 94.254.191.75 04:52, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Achim (talk) 09:53, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
طتبؤكخعقصضش 129.45.67.211 18:48, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Nonsense request by an IP from Algeria. --Achim (talk) 09:42, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
This file is copyrighted all rights reserved not creative commons Enjaybee11 (talk) 08:08, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
- Comment The file was reviewed by a bot during upload. It had proper license at that time. Taivo (talk) 11:00, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: This was confirmed to be freely licened at the time of the upload by a bot using API. Keeping the file per ticket:2017051410004787. In case the copyright owner wants to dispute this, they would have to send a formal DMCA (Digital Millennium Copyright Act) Takedown Notice to the Legal Department at the Wikimedia Foundation. Please see foundation:DMCA Policy as how to do so. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 17:49, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
This file is copyrighted all rights reserved not creative commons Enjaybee11 (talk) 08:11, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
- Comment The file was reviewed by a bot during upload. It had proper license at that time. Taivo (talk) 11:02, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
This file is copyrighted all rights reserved not creative commons Enjaybee11 (talk) 06:27, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: This was confirmed to be freely licened at the time of the upload by a bot using API. Keeping the file per ticket:2017051410004787. In case the copyright owner wants to dispute this, they would have to send a formal DMCA (Digital Millennium Copyright Act) Takedown Notice to the Legal Department at the Wikimedia Foundation. Please see foundation:DMCA Policy as how to do so. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 17:47, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
I uploaded the image before actually reading guidelines so now, after reading them, I think the image doesn’t fulfil criteria for suitable - educational - content. Besides that, the photographed subject changed his mind and doesn’t want to be publicly displayed, even though he is not readily identifiable. The same applies to all 8 images uploaded. Elene Yeti (talk) 10:32, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 09:09, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
I uploaded the image before actually reading guidelines so now, after reading them, I think the image doesn’t fulfil criteria for suitable - educational - content. Besides that, the photographed subject changed his mind and doesn’t want to be publicly displayed, even though he is not readily identifiable. The same applies to all 8 images uploaded. Elene Yeti (talk) 10:33, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 09:09, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
I uploaded the image before actually reading guidelines so now, after reading them, I think the image doesn’t fulfil criteria for suitable - educational - content. Besides that, the photographed subject changed his mind and doesn’t want to be publicly displayed, even though he is not readily identifiable. The same applies to all 8 images uploaded. Elene Yeti (talk) 10:33, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 09:08, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
I uploaded the image before actually reading guidelines so now, after reading them, I think the image doesn’t fulfil criteria for suitable - educational - content. Besides that, the photographed subject changed his mind and doesn’t want to be publicly displayed, even though he is not readily identifiable. The same applies to all 8 images uploaded. Elene Yeti (talk) 10:34, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 09:08, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
I uploaded the image before actually reading guidelines so now, after reading them, I think the image doesn’t fulfil criteria for suitable - educational - content. Besides that, the photographed subject changed his mind and doesn’t want to be publicly displayed, even though he is not readily identifiable. The same applies to all 8 images uploaded. Elene Yeti (talk) 10:34, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 09:08, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
I uploaded the image before actually reading guidelines so now, after reading them, I think the image doesn’t fulfil criteria for suitable - educational - content. Besides that, the photographed subject changed his mind and doesn’t want to be publicly displayed, even though he is not readily identifiable. The same applies to all 8 images uploaded. Elene Yeti (talk) 10:36, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 09:08, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
I uploaded the image before actually reading guidelines so now, after reading them, I think the image doesn’t fulfil criteria for suitable - educational - content. Besides that, the photographed subject changed his mind and doesn’t want to be publicly displayed, even though he is not readily identifiable. The same applies to all 8 images uploaded. Elene Yeti (talk) 10:37, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 09:07, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Commons don't host selfies Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 16:38, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, Ad, out of scope. --Yann (talk) 16:06, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by ActorAshok (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons isn't Instagram
- File:Ashok Police.JPG
- File:Ashok Valentine.jpg
- File:006A3536.JPG
- File:006A3704.JPG
- File:5LR.jpg
- File:AK Talking.jpg
- File:AK Dancing.jpg
- File:AK Bridge.jpg
Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 16:42, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:04, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Not 'Own work', screenshot of copyrighted stand-up special Neegzistuoja (talk) 01:30, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- Speedy delete, obvious {{copyvio}}. —LX (talk, contribs) 08:04, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:10, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Non-free image. See en:File:2017_UEFA_Champions_League_Final_logo.jpg A2093064 (talk) 10:59, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Just another copy of en-wiki file Ronhjones (Talk) 23:42, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:09, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Delete Cropped from the image found here, top left. Image's watermark shows owner to be Vishal Beerachee Photorgraphy. This is not the apparent property of the uploader. Hammersoft (talk) 18:11, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:07, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
probable copyvio, see watermark down right Pippobuono (talk) 19:13, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:07, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
probable copyvio, see watermark down right Pippobuono (talk) 19:15, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:07, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
probable copyvio, see watermark down right Pippobuono (talk) 19:15, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:07, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Carlosastudillo211 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused photos, no localisation with minimum localisation (Belize : 22 966 km²). Commons isn't Instagram / Flickr
- File:Bellezas 05.JPG
- File:Bellezas 06.jpg
- File:Bellezas 04.jpg
- File:Bellezas 03.jpg
- File:Bellezas 02.jpg
- File:Bellezas 01.jpg
- File:AvilaHiguetore 03.jpg
- File:AvilaHiguetore 02.jpg
- File:AvilaHiguetore 01.jpg
- File:Wwbe 31.jpg
- File:Wwbe 28.jpg
- File:Wwbe 30.jpg
- File:Wwbe 29.jpg
- File:Wwbe 25.jpg
- File:Wwbe 27.jpg
- File:Wwbe 26.jpg
- File:Wwbe 22.jpg
- File:Wwbe 24.jpg
- File:Wwbe 23.jpg
- File:Wwbe 20.jpg
- File:Wwbe 19.jpg
- File:Wwbe 21.jpg
- File:Wwbe 18.jpg
- File:Wwbe 17.jpg
- File:Wwbe 16.jpg
- File:Wwbe 15.jpg
- File:Wwbe 13.jpg
- File:Wwbe 14.jpg
- File:Wwbe 12.jpg
- File:Wwbe 10.jpg
- File:Wwbe 11.jpg
- File:Wwbe 09.jpg
- File:Wwbe 08.jpg
- File:Wwbe 07.jpg
- File:Wwbe 04.jpg
- File:Wwbe 06.jpg
- File:Wwbe 05.jpg
- File:Wwbe 02.jpg
- File:Wwbe 03.jpg
- File:Wwbe 01.jpg
Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 16:36, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:38, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Watermarked videos, not own work
Ronhjones (Talk) 20:11, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 14:44, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Unused small personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 20:26, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:45, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
accidentally uploaded Olsen24 (talk) 21:56, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:39, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
requested by uploader (me) Coekon (talk) 22:39, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:39, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
requested by uploader (me) Coekon (talk) 22:40, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:39, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
requested by uploader (me) Coekon (talk) 22:40, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:39, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
requested by uploader (me) Coekon (talk) 22:41, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:39, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
requested by uploader (me) Coekon (talk) 22:42, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:39, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
requested by uploader (me) Coekon (talk) 22:43, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:39, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
requested by uploader (me) Coekon (talk) 22:44, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:39, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
requested by uploader (me) Coekon (talk) 22:45, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:39, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
requested by uploader (me) Coekon (talk) 22:46, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:39, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
requested by uploader (me) Coekon (talk) 22:48, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:39, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
requested by uploader (me) Coekon (talk) 22:51, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:39, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
File:Whitsunday Islands - Whitehaven Beach Stinger Suit Power Rangers Sand Fight (4077399060).jpg
[edit]requested by uploader (me) Coekon (talk) 22:51, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:38, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
requested by the uploader (me) Coekon (talk) 23:11, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:38, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
requested by the uploader (me) Coekon (talk) 23:13, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:38, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
requested by the uploader (me) Coekon (talk) 23:13, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:38, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
requested by the uploader (me) Coekon (talk) 23:13, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:38, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
accidentally uploaded Olsen24 (talk) 00:35, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:04, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
No permission from living artist.
- File:Frant.Le jour de solde.jpg
- File:Frant. Le jour de solde.jpg
- File:Frant- La vie est terrible.jpg
- File:Endornie.jpg
- File:12.Mère et enfant.jpg
- File:Frant - artiste peintre.jpg
- File:Aide moi!.jpg
- File:La vie est terrible.jpg
Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:48, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:04, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Given that the base map and map data is taken from Google Maps, I don't believe this is eligible for a free license. Pitpisit (talk) 03:04, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: speedy delete as copyvio. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:11, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:45, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:05, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:46, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:05, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Ensayo personal; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:49, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:05, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:50, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:05, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Personal essay; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:50, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:05, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Newspaper clipping. Incorrect license. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:51, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:05, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Homework; out of scope. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:51, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:05, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Newspaper clipping. Non-free copyright. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:52, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:05, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
issue with copyright (artwork) SecretName101 (talk) 06:26, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:07, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
issue with copyright (artwork) SecretName101 (talk) 06:26, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:07, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
advertising, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 06:28, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:07, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
issue with copyright (artwork) SecretName101 (talk) 06:30, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:07, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
issues with copyright (artwork) SecretName101 (talk) 06:30, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:07, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
issues with copyright (artwork) SecretName101 (talk) 06:30, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:07, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
issues with copyright (artwork) SecretName101 (talk) 06:30, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:07, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
issues with copyright (artwork) SecretName101 (talk) 06:30, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:07, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
issues with copyright (artwork) SecretName101 (talk) 06:31, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:07, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
issues with copyright (artwork) SecretName101 (talk) 06:31, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:07, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
issues with copyright (artwork) SecretName101 (talk) 06:31, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:07, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
issues with copyright (artwork) SecretName101 (talk) 06:31, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:07, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
issues with copyright (artwork) SecretName101 (talk) 06:31, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:06, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
issues with copyright (artwork) SecretName101 (talk) 06:31, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:06, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
issues with copyright (artwork) SecretName101 (talk) 06:31, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:06, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
issues with copyright (artwork) SecretName101 (talk) 06:31, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:06, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
issues with copyright (artwork) SecretName101 (talk) 06:32, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:06, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
issues with copyright (artwork) SecretName101 (talk) 06:32, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:06, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
issues with copyright (artwork) SecretName101 (talk) 06:32, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:06, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
issues with copyright (artwork) SecretName101 (talk) 06:32, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:06, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
issues with copyright (artwork) SecretName101 (talk) 06:33, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:06, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
issues with copyright (artwork) SecretName101 (talk) 06:33, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:06, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
issues with copyright (artwork) SecretName101 (talk) 06:33, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:06, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
issues with copyright (artwork) SecretName101 (talk) 06:33, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:06, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
issues with copyright (artwork) SecretName101 (talk) 06:33, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:06, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
com:IDENT, no proof of permission Pippobuono (talk) 06:49, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:06, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
com:IDENT, no proof of permission Pippobuono (talk) 06:50, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:05, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by THISACCOUNT70 (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:CSBC.png
- File:Caidies2.png
- File:Riversue.png
- File:Shh.png
- File:Riversuerazi.png
- File:Tiddlers.png
- File:Whisper2.png
- File:Togball!.png
- File:Uhoh.png
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:58, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:34, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by THISACCOUNT70 (talk · contribs)
[edit]derivative items, probable copyvio
Pippobuono (talk) 09:13, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:07, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
out of project scope - cross wiki promo affair see nl:Wikipedia:Checklijst_langdurig_structureel_vandalisme/Mayestron MoiraMoira (talk) 09:37, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:08, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
out of project scope - cross wiki promo affair see nl:Wikipedia:Checklijst_langdurig_structureel_vandalisme/Mayestron MoiraMoira (talk) 09:37, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:08, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
out of project scope - cross wiki promo affair see nl:Wikipedia:Checklijst_langdurig_structureel_vandalisme/Mayestron MoiraMoira (talk) 09:38, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:08, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
out of project scope - cross wiki promo affair see nl:Wikipedia:Checklijst_langdurig_structureel_vandalisme/Mayestron MoiraMoira (talk) 09:38, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:08, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
out of project scope - cross wiki promo affair see nl:Wikipedia:Checklijst_langdurig_structureel_vandalisme/Mayestron MoiraMoira (talk) 09:38, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:08, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
out of project scope - cross wiki promo affair see nl:Wikipedia:Checklijst_langdurig_structureel_vandalisme/Mayestron MoiraMoira (talk) 09:39, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:08, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
out of project scope - cross wiki promo affair see nl:Wikipedia:Checklijst_langdurig_structureel_vandalisme/Mayestron MoiraMoira (talk) 09:39, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:08, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
out of project scope - cross wiki promo affair see nl:Wikipedia:Checklijst_langdurig_structureel_vandalisme/Mayestron MoiraMoira (talk) 09:45, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:08, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. Out of project scope. Depicted person isn't mentioned in en.wiki. Taivo (talk) 10:24, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:08, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
very low resolution, non usable Mjrmtg (talk) 11:48, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:09, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:50, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:09, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:50, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:09, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:53, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:09, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:09, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vega&Altaïr (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:09, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MunavvaraKhusniddinova (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:09, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Not own works, but derivatives of historical photos [1], copyright status is unclear.
Sealle (talk) 04:04, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:35, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Too low quality to be useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
- File:Зеница 20180729 220725.jpg
- File:Зеница 20180729 214153.jpg
- File:Зеница 20180729 214608.jpg
- File:Зеница 20180729 214128.jpg
- File:Зеница 20180729 212552.jpg
- File:Зеница 20180729 212542.jpg
- File:Зеница 20180729 211835.jpg
- File:Зеница 20180729 212252.jpg
- File:Зеница 20180729 211607.jpg
- File:Зеница 20180729 211024.jpg
- File:Зеница 20180729 211557.jpg
- File:Зеница 20180729 210937.jpg
- File:Зеница 20180729 210054.jpg
- File:Зеница 20180729 204804.jpg
- File:Зеница 20180728 095815.jpg
- File:Зеница 20180725 210909.jpg
- File:Зеница 20180725 210927.jpg
- File:Зеница 20180725 210955.jpg
- File:Зеница 20180725 211904.jpg
- File:Зеница 20180725 211013.jpg
- File:Зеница 20180724 223545.jpg
- File:Зеница 20180724 223604.jpg
- File:Зеница 20180712 220510.jpg
Ies (talk) 10:36, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
- @Ies: Many images can be seen as with grain-like effect and not with low quality.
- Could you check File:Зеница 20180728 095815.jpg again? --Obsuser (talk) 10:48, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
- Also, low quality to be useful for an educational purpose is not correct for probably all of the images uploaded (it can be clearly seen what is represented and can be used for educational purposes, e.g. geography, indeed). Out of project scope is a very funny joke. --Obsuser (talk) 10:50, 30 July 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 07:34, 13 August 2018 (UTC)
Derivative works of recent maps, texts, and other documents, and no FOP.
- File:Зеница 20190821 175555.jpg
- File:Зеница 20190821 175536.jpg
- File:Зеница 20190821 175526.jpg
- File:Зеница 20190821 175433.jpg
- File:Зеница 20190821 174951.jpg
- File:Зеница 20190821 174937.jpg
- File:Зеница 20190821 174920.jpg
- File:Зеница 20190821 174857.jpg
- File:Зеница 20190821 174846.jpg
- File:Зеница 20190821 174831.jpg
- File:Зеница 20190821 174820.jpg
- File:Зеница 20190821 174802.jpg
- File:Зеница 20190821 174318.jpg
- File:Зеница 20190821 174140.jpg
- File:Зеница 20190821 173137.jpg
Yann (talk) 04:20, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Yann: Could you give detailed rationale and cite Commons copyright guidelines for deleting File:Зеница 20190821 175526.jpg, File:Зеница 20190821 174318.jpg, File:Зеница 20190821 174140.jpg and File:Зеница 20190821 173137.jpg? It's general history text (simple sentences), nothing such as essay or literary/poetic work!? Same applies for File:Зеница 20190821 175433.jpg which is just a short description of images. Thank you.
- I see now problem with other images (Bosnian Kingdom mostly, and recent maps), graphical content is present instead of historical image content so I agree with deletion (except for those cited right above in my comment). --Obsuser (talk) 06:33, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- Hi, See Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Bosnia and Herzegovina#Freedom of panorama. The texts here are recent and too long, so they have a copyright. Regards, Yann (talk) 06:43, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Yann: The free use of the works permanently located in squares, parks, streets or other places accessible by the public shall be permitted. – These cited files in my comment above are permanently located in the Museum of Zenica City and accessible by public. Should they stay then?
- Per shall not be reproduced in three-dimensional form, used for the same purpose as the original work or used for gaining economic advantage, can I "reproduce" the files in order not to break FoP rule by retyping the text in simple free font on a white background? Not important if they are recetly created and "too long" (whatever it meant, on File:Зеница 20190821 175433.jpg they are not too long, are they!?) if they are not essays or literar works (per Template:PD-text and/or Template:PD-textlogo), so I think you missed a point here.
- Please answer both questions. Thank you.
- PS Also note Template:PD-ineligible says about "common property and contains no original authorship" and here this is the case because no author would be possibly given for a museum work/collage and its description, and text/sentences are of general historical nature. --Obsuser (talk) 07:13, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- Bosnian law allows only non-commercial reproduction, as explained on that page. For Commons, we need a permission for any use, including commercial ones. Regards, Yann (talk) 07:24, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- @Yann: Yes. But aren't both history as a science and public museum content non-comercial? I don't see anything comercial in this, so can I retype it and if not why exactly? Thanks. --Obsuser (talk) 09:01, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
- Bosnian law allows only non-commercial reproduction, as explained on that page. For Commons, we need a permission for any use, including commercial ones. Regards, Yann (talk) 07:24, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: The authors of these works hold the copyright. B&H has FOP only for non-commercial use. Commons requires that any work hosted here must be free for any use by anybody anywhere. Anything on Commons must be free, so that you could copy it and sell the copies, which is clearly not the case for works from B&H. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:01, 7 October 2019 (UTC)
Out of scope Commons is not a social media site. ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 08:14, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
On the talk page of the deletion request there is the link from where the file originated. Please term this deletion as a copyvio as no permission is granted for the use of the image. --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 09:19, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:36, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Due to pixelation I think it is very likely this photograph is not own work, as is claimed, but is taken from a printed work in stead. Lymantria (talk) 11:01, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:37, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
At the upper side of this image, we can see the border of a photograph. This is likely a scan or photograph of an existing older image. Not own work of 2013 as is claimed. Lymantria (talk) 11:03, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:38, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Pixelation of this image suggest it is a reproduction from a magazine or other printed work. Not own work of 2008 as claimed. Lymantria (talk) 11:23, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:38, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Spots and right upper border and perhaps the lower border suggest that this is not an original photograph of 2008 but some reproduction. I don't think this is own work as claimed. Lymantria (talk) 11:28, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:39, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
White spots and a white peace at the lower half of the right hand side border suggest this is not an orginal photograph, but a reproduction of some kind. I don't think this is own work as claimed. Lymantria (talk) 11:30, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 20:41, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
copyright [[2]] links // It same that photo. Pitpisit (talk) 00:24, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:57, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
I've looked through this publication of Time Magazine is NOT in the Public Domain because it was renewed with copyright. Gar (talk) 02:01, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:57, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Probably taken from the web, from [3] or [4]. --ghouston (talk) 03:32, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:57, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Not own work and not extracted from the file: Emina Jahovic, Zeljko Joksimovic, Kristina Kovac, Kiki Lesendrić.jpg as claimed. Photographer's permission needed. Sealle (talk) 03:56, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:57, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
89 Nene's Father 104.188.4.113 03:58, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Daphne Lantier 22:57, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope. EXIF data suggests it is copied from Facebook. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:08, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:57, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:09, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:57, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Seems like a photograph of a photograph, own work claim is doubtful. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:10, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
yes i took re shoot old photo from my album... should i scan it ? dont worry original also taken by me.. i have negatives ... it was old camera... taken in 2002... for uploading i have to do that
its from parbhani district parade ... i can provide any info if u want...India1277 (talk) 05:29, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep I think OTRS can prove helpful. --✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 08:34, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:57, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
The source is a 'single image' flickr account, registered under the name of the depicted person, probably flickrwashing. Previously published at [5] [6]. No photographer's permission. Sealle (talk) 04:19, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:58, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:23, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:58, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:25, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:58, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
EXIF data suggests it is copied from Facebook. Own work claim is doubtful. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:28, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:58, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Small size, Facebook EXIF, only upload, likely copyvios. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 07:45, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:58, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope Commons is not a social media site ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 07:45, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:58, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope Commons is not a social media site
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 08:11, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:58, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope Commons is not a social media site ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 08:11, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:58, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope Commons is not a social media site ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 08:15, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
vk This photo could be used in en:Draft:Pinky Maidasani and encyclopedic articles. It may have been used in en:Pinky Maidasani. — Jeff G. ツ 05:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete The image is small and, although there is EXIF, at an UnDR today, the uploader does not claim that he or she is the photographer, but rather "the picture i had uploaded was not copy righted by anyone." This uploader has given us three images, on all of which he or sh claimed "own work". The other two have been deleted as obvious copyvios. I strongly suspect that this is not his or her work. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:41, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom and Jim. GF exhausted. — Jeff G. ツ 05:50, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:58, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
loaded by mistake Antoni Nomen (talk) 08:24, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- Comment 1991 copyright notice. What's the evidence of a free license? Yann (talk) 08:57, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:58, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
- Restored: Mentions a free license at source. Yann (talk) 17:57, 4 June 2017 (UTC)
probable copyvio Pippobuono (talk) 08:49, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:58, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
probable copyvio,unused anyway Pippobuono (talk) 09:00, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:58, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Roicherlax (talk · contribs) has uploaded some out-of-scope images and everyone of them was used for vandalism. This is his/her last remaining upload. Maybe even in scope, but small size and missing metadata makes me suspect copyright violation and the image was used for such kind of vandalism: https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lavatera&diff=prev&oldid=229377835 Taivo (talk) 09:46, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:58, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Delete: While the photo is freely licensed, France has no freedom of panorama exception for buildings or sculptures. We don't know if either is old enough to be in the public domain. More information is needed to keep this image and maybe the uploader can supply that information. Ww2censor (talk) 09:53, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- Which element or part of the photo are you talking about ? --Poudou99 (talk) 12:17, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- The building; when was it built and who designed it?
- The sculpture: when and who made it and is the artist alive or dead? These facts affect the copyright status of the image. Maybe the sculpture is just a problem, so an image without it or cropped out might be ok. Poudou99 hopefully you can answer these questions as it is a nice photo. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 12:45, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- The post office is located on the back of the town hall of the city Category:Town hall of Puteaux. The building was built around 1930 in in Stalinist architecture. I don't who is the architec of the building and if we can keep the photos in Commons. No info about the date of the death of the architec. What is your point of view in such case?
- The sculpture seems to be recent. I can crop the photo to remove it. --Poudou99 (talk) 13:26, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks again for sticking with this. It seems a pity to crop the sculpture out as it will make the building look rather lopsided. Perhaps you have another image taken from further to the left where eliminating the sculpture would not degrade the composition too much. Cropping may be the only solution without any more information. Did you, by any chance, look up the town or commune website to see if they mention the sculpture or the post office building? Or maybe email the mayor's office and ask them if they can answer the questions. Ww2censor (talk) 15:00, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- I looked up the town website and La Poste is on the corner of the same building of the Mairie, Hotel de Ville, so they should know about the building and even about the sculpture as it in the same property. Good luck. Ww2censor (talk) 15:17, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- I should be in Puteaux next week. And if we have a sunny day I will do more photos (without any recent sculpture). I will also try to get some info about the building and more. Thanks, I appreciate these constructive exchanges :). --Poudou99 (talk) 16:08, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
@Ww2censor: Unfortunately we have to delete all photos of town hall of Puteaux. Architecs are brothers Jean Niermans and Edouard Niermans [7], who are the children of the famous architect Édouard-Jean Niermans (1859-1928) [8].
The firstnames of these 3 architecs are the cause of the confusion.
Jean Niermans died in 1989 [9]. Can you launch a global delete request for all photos under Category:Town hall of Puteaux ?. Thx. Best regards, --Poudou99 (talk) 18:52, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:59, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Internet copyvio Albertus teolog (talk) 10:08, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Prof. Adam Walanus wyraził osobistą zgodę na używanie tego zdjęcia przez Wikimedia. Jeśli ktoś w to wątpi, to może go spytać korespondencyjnie. --185.97.214.107 10:15, 26 May 2017 (UTC) --Tarnoob (talk) 10:15, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- Konieczne jest więc skorzystanie z systemu OTRS Albertus teolog (talk) 13:31, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:59, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Missing permission. The same picture ( http://www.tracesecritesnews.fr/actualite/christophe-perny-imprime-sa-marque-jura-12975 cropped) is copyrighted conseil général du Jura Patrick Rogel (talk) 10:39, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
I updated the copyright holder. Permission has been granted for this reuse on wikimedia. User:Tbarthelet
Deleted: reuse on wikimedia is not sufficient licensing for Commons -- see COM:L. Daphne Lantier 23:00, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
There's no freedom of panorama in India for 2-dimensional art. The mascot tiger is copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 10:43, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:00, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:56, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:00, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
out of scope due to inferior quality Automotivnik (talk) 11:13, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:00, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
copyvio - tv screenshot Mjrmtg (talk) 11:29, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:00, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:00, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:01, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:01, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from music and historical photo. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:16, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:01, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:01, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:00, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://www.notebookcheck.net/fileadmin/_processed_/csm_Screenshot_OS_1_964e97b76d.png. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:00, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Paola Vicuña (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:01, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Collection privée Enjoymegrine (talk) 15:10, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:01, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
According to this Twitter link the photo was taken in the 1970s. I therefore question whether the colorized version in our image is the uploader's own work as stated. He states the photo was taken in 2004, but the subject has been dead since 1986. Diannaa (talk) 15:20, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:01, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
File:Army (ROCA) Lieutenant General Yen Teh-fa 陸軍中將嚴德發 (20091015 總統出席國軍八八水災災害防救有功官兵表揚大會 55f79aed9b99fa18dd9a8bb10874de086d875b65).jpg
[edit]The title of this redirect page is irrelevant to the current file Howard61313 (talk) 15:31, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:01, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Random image of an unidentified mushroom, too small and unusable. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:18, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:01, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
1959 photograph. Own work is under doubt. Who is real photographer and when (s)he died? Taivo (talk) 16:27, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:01, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Copied from Imgur (Sep 14 2015; 38,187 views), wrong source Dispenser (talk) 16:38, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:02, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo. No educational use. Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 16:40, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:01, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Copied from Imgur (May 19, 2017; 6 views). Possible the same uploader Imgur, send an OTRS request. Dispenser (talk) 16:42, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:02, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Depicted person is not mentioned in en.wiki. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 16:51, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:02, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Помилково завантажений файл Еколог Світлана (talk) 17:06, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:02, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
unused; likely out of scope. Ankry (talk) 17:19, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:02, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
1937 Spanish photographs are protected with copyright 80 years. In addition, I am not sure, that the photo is really anonymous. Taivo (talk) 17:43, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:02, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope, was used to do a joke on wp(fr) Do not follow (talk) 18:00, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:02, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Negative kim (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, composite images, may be copyvio issues
Ronhjones (Talk) 18:54, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:02, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
The sculptor died in 1989 [10] so this artwork is still copyrighted. Since there is no freedom of panorama in France, we cannot keep this derivative photo. De728631 (talk) 19:00, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:03, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
The picture appears in several places on the web and belongs to the Intelligence Corps of the Israeli Defense Forces. As no release note has been obtained and no copyrights info can be found regrading it, there's no place for it in the Commons. Ldorfman (talk) 19:00, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:03, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Uploaded to create a (now-speedily deleted) promotional article on a non-notable individual on Wikipedia. Has no educational value for Commons. Patar knight - chat/contributions 19:17, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:03, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
This file is NOT in the public domain. It is the result of a great deal of research and includes information that is not common property. It is an original work fully protected by copyright. 134.186.197.200 19:21, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete diagram far too complex to qualify for PD-simple. Ariadacapo (talk) 05:26, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:03, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Photograph cannot be taken in 2017 because Józej Menet deceased in 1987. Probably copyright photograph taken from unknown printed source. Fallaner (talk) 20:05, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:02, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Photograph cannot be taken in 2017 because Józej Menet deceased in 1987. Probably copyright photograph scanned from unknown printed source. Fallaner (talk) 20:07, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:02, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
I uploaded this and would like to remove it. Better images have been uploaded. Family de Beus (talk) 20:07, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:03, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
- From Wikibooks, no need for a copy here Ronhjones (Talk) 20:08, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Hmm, I guess I'll just add it to wikibooks collections. It was redirecting me to commons, so I thought it meant I should add it here. Spotron 13:04, 27 May 2017 (UTC+1)
This PDF file on Wikimedia Commons can be safely deleted, since it also has been uploaded to Wikibooks:wikibooks:file:Physics Study Guide.pdf
. Nicole Sharp (talk) 01:36, 31 May 2017 (UTC)- Oh! No, no, the Wikibooks file is actually the same file as here being mirrored from Wikimedia Commons. My mistake. It needs to be re-uploaded to Wikibooks before it can be safely deleted from Commons. Nicole Sharp (talk) 01:40, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
- However, the PDF file contains some errors. I would suggest to go ahead and delete it anyway until a new version can be generated without display errors or missing content. PDF wikibooks should ideally be for complete printable works without errors. Nicole Sharp (talk) 01:47, 31 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:03, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
This is a non-free image taken from http://www.ndp.ca/leadership-2017. Madg2011 (talk) 20:14, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- It's also Pat Stogran's profile picture on Twitter. Madg2011 (talk) 20:34, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:03, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
COM:TOO in UK is very low. Modified fonts have been shown before to be copyrightable in UK - see also Commons:Deletion requests/Two British logos for example Ronhjones (Talk) 20:52, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:03, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Derivative work created from the H2G2 logo, which is original enough to be copyrighted. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 20:52, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:03, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
The publisher in YouTube is likely not the owner of the copyright. According to its profile Canal de videos de Noticiero Digital, grabados en su mayoría de la televisión venezolana ("Noticiero Digital video channel; most of the videos have been recorded from the Venezuelan TV") Discasto talk 21:22, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- @Discasto: You can delete it. I figured it would be Noticiero Digital's own since they are a somewhat noticeable source in Venezuela. Sorry for making you go through all of this trouble!--ZiaLater (talk) 02:50, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:04, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
License cannot be verified
- File:2017 Venezuelan protests beat and shot.webm
- File:2017 Venezuelan protests Miguel Castillo Bracho march.webm
Discasto talk 21:24, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- @Discasto: You can go ahead and delete them. Didn't know that they weren't from a stable source!--ZiaLater (talk) 02:33, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:04, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Poster art which includes the non-free logo en:File:Logo of 2017 Asian Athletics Championships.png. This was brought up for disussion at COM:VP/C where someone suggested that the non-free logo may actually be OK per Commons:De minimis, but I'm not sure if that's the case because the inclusion of the logo seems to be deliberate and not incidental, given the poster is an edit-a-thon to develop Wikipedia article's for the en:2017 Asian Athletics Championships. The poster would be fine with the logo removed, but the version with logo should be deleted per COM:PCP. -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:39, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:04, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
This "formal PR picture" had been in use (in sites such as this and this one) before being uploaded to the Commons. It cannot stay in the Commons without an OTRS release note. Ldorfman (talk) 23:02, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:04, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Town hall of Puteaux
[edit]Unfortunately the last architect of the building to die was fr:Jean Niermans in 1989, so because France has no freedom of panorama exception the building will remain in copyright until 2060. See: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Puteaux - 2013-01-28 - IMG 143420.jpg and this Puteaux town hall webpage.
- File:Mairie de Puteaux vue de la Défense 2000.jpg
- File:Puteaux - 2013-01-28 - IMG 143806.jpg
- File:Puteaux - 2013-01-28 - IMG 143858.jpg
- File:© Céline Sturm - Mairie1.jpg
- File:©Céline Sturm-Mairie2.jpg
- File:©Céline Sturm-Mairie3.jpg
Ww2censor (talk) 23:22, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:04, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Copivio, can be easily found on the internet Stolbovsky (talk) 17:12, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Daphne Lantier: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:1 classe quarto.jpg
photos on mynewsdesk are not free Yger (talk) 04:22, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:31, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
No source link - previously deleted before Commons:Deletion requests/File:Andreas Hatzigeorgiou.jpg Ronhjones (Talk) 01:07, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:46, 27 June 2017 (UTC)
Logo devrait être sur WP France Pierrette13 (talk) 05:18, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:32, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
Links to facebook, no indication this is a public domain photo BlueboyLI (talk) 07:32, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, can be found on archived congressional website (November 2016). MB298 (talk) 18:32, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: The fact that it can be found on a Congressional Web site says nothing about its copyright status. Many congressional portraits are done by private photogaphers. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:34, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
loaded by mistake Antoni Nomen (talk) 21:46, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Speedy kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ankry (talk) 22:47, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
loaded by mistake Antoni Nomen (talk) 08:25, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Copyright notice, what's the evidence of a free license? Yann (talk) 08:43, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep License is clearly stated at the source page. It is a scientific service publishing books that authors agreeed to free license them under various licenses: some are free for anybody, some are non-commercial only. Each book page contains clear copyright info.
- The book is also available in CEON Repository under the same license. Ankry (talk) 10:19, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- @Antoni Nomen: I wonder whose mistake is suggested by nominator? Definitely not mine. I uploaded the book intentionally. Ankry (talk) 08:58, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Added {{Licensereview}}. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:40, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
pas d'autorisation du photographe see https://opc.mfo.de/detail?photo_id=18973&would_like_to_publish=1#request (fakes informations published on commons) Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 12:41, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Delete: seems to be a copyvio. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 13:17, 26 May 2017 (UTC).- À toutes fins utiles, je précise que j'interviens sur les PàS qui m'intéressent, que ce soit sur Wikimedia Commons, Wikipédia ou Wikiquote ; et c'est mon droit le plus strict. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 17:32, 26 May 2017 (UTC).
- Je demande à Nomen ad hoc de cesser de fliquer mes interventions sur commons, et de ne plus intervenir sans cesse sur mes demandes.
- Cet utilisateur m'a fliquée sur le dictionnaire, il sabote mon ancien travail sur fr:wikipedia (en ajoutant des erreurs). Stop. --Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 16:42, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- Conserver : il doit y avoir une erreur ou un loupé quelque part car jusqu'à présent les photos prises à Oberwolfach ont toutes été versées avec succès sur Commons. Il vaudrait mieux chercher à réparer cette erreur que supprimer...--Cbyd (talk) 18:27, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- Effectivement. Il semble bien qu'on doive pouvoir faire confiance à Oberwolfach. Espérons que la situation soit rapidement régularisée. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 19:01, 26 May 2017 (UTC).
Je suggère de lire correctement les indications concernant les droits de ré-utilisation pour les images du site Oberwolfach. Il est bien précisé que certaines images sont protégées par un © ; c'est d'ailleurs mentionné sur les métadonnées des images (notices).
For this picture : Copyright: Boris Hasselblatt https://opc.mfo.de/detail?photo_id=18973 [that is not good for commons].
@ Nomen ad hoc Merci de faire attention à ne pas écrire n'importe quoi : depuis le temps que vous intervenez sur commons, vous auriez pu faire l'effort de vous renseigner un minimum sur les droits des images (droits moraux et patrimoniaux). Vous intervenez souvent sur les PàS que je lance, et vous écrivez très souvent de grosses âneries. C'est de la désorganisation. Je m'efforce de faire supprimer de "commons" les images qui y ont été déposées sans respecter les droits des auteurs. --Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 21:10, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- Bonjour, si je comprends bien, il faut demander à MFO ce qu'il en est des droits de photos de Hasselblatt. Je viens de le faire, mais je n'ai pas encore de réponse ; je propose d'attendre que les vacances de pentecôte soient terminées en Allemagne. --ManiacParisien 05:13, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
- Proposition sage, mais je doute que DDR3 en ait la patience. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 08:20, 28 May 2017 (UTC).
Deleted: The source site says, at https://opc.mfo.de/
- "The Mathematisches Forschungsinstitut Oberwolfach gGmbH (MFO) owns the copyright to most of the images used on this website. Those images labelled with "Copyright: MFO" can be used on the terms of the Creative Commons License Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Germany."
However, this image, which appears at https://owpdb.mfo.de/detail?photo_id=18973, is clearly marked "Copyright: Boris Hasselblatt". That is not the required notice for the CC-BY license. Therefore, we cannot keep the image on Commons without a free license from Boris Hasselblatt.
. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:56, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
where is the autorization of the author (photographe) ? https://owpdb.mfo.de/detail?photo_id=2478 Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 16:31, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
The same as with hundreds other Oberwolfach Pictures with label MFO, inform yourself before you place such a request.--2A02:8108:9E3F:D8D4:E0F2:DB53:4052:2DDB 16:50, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Je me suis informé. Le problème est que une association n'est pas ayant-droit des droits moraux des photographes. Centaines de photos qui ne respectent pas le droit des auteurs. --Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 17:33, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
They have the rights, see here (and the photo has label MFO). By "inform yourself" I mean simply looking at the Category Information "Category:Pictures from Oberwolfach Photo Collection".--Claude J (talk) 05:26, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: The source site says, at https://opc.mfo.de/
- "The Mathematisches Forschungsinstitut Oberwolfach gGmbH (MFO) owns the copyright to most of the images used on this website. Those images labelled with "Copyright: MFO" can be used on the terms of the Creative Commons License Attribution-Share Alike 2.0 Germany."
This image shows "Copyright MFO' and is, therefore, OK for Commons. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:04, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
Bad image quality Derbrauni (talk) 12:26, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. Good composition and usable quality /St1995 11:28, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: seems to be in scope. --Sealle (talk) 12:58, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
always the same : book covers (see user talk Heurtelions, specialised in copyvios) https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Heurtelions Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 07:09, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Kindly refrain from comments on the contributor. What exactly is the concern here, aside from the obviously wrong license ? The illustration ? — Racconish ☎ 08:28, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- Pas d'autorisation des éditions Picard : la couverture est une création (composition originale), qui n'a été utilisée que pour les tomes du Manuel de Folklore de Van Gennep. Elle n'est pas dans le domaine public. --Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 10:29, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
- Comment The composition of the cover in general and the fonts in particular are likely below the threshold of originality (per [11]) and the latter were certainly not created for this particular publication. We need more information on the origin of the illustration : in view of the nature of the subject it may be PD, but in the absence of clarification, the precautionary principle would apply. — Racconish ☎ 11:02, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - not below TOO. --Jcb (talk) 23:22, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
No disrespect meant to the uploader, but only the "4 Provinces" badge was official from 1867-1921. Therefore this vice-regal standard did not exist. The badge with added provinces were all unofficial. Fry1989 eh? 18:00, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
That is true, however it is probably likely that such a flag did exist. Red Ensigns with anywhere from 4-9 provinces were created quite often and I would daresay it was the norm, so I find it likely that the vice-regal standard may have been created with such a badge. The CSOTK eh? 6:30, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
- The red ensigns with the added quarters in the badge were all unofficial. This flag was an official standard, so the GG's office stepping outside regulations seems unlikely. Fry1989 eh? 16:37, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Official government flags often did have the 9-province shields. I personally have seen in a war exhibit at the Legislative Buildings of Alberta, WWI Victory Loan flags, produced by the Government of Canada in 1918, exactly the same as the one shown here: https://flagspot.net/flags/ca_vlf.html The CSOTK eh? 10:21, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:37, 16 June 2017 (UTC)
copyright violation from http://americanindian.net/kusi/POD/a2.html Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:01, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: That is the uploader's own personal website; he is the photographer. --Closeapple (talk) 02:58, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Comment Closeapple, although I believe that what you say is probably correct, we don't actually know that. According to policy, User:Philkon must either (a) send a note to OTRS from an email address traceable to him or (b) post a note on his Web site saying that he his User:Philkon on WMF. Without that it is entirely possible that User:Philkon is actually a fan. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:28, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- Has User:Philkon not mentioned this to OTRS before? I seem to remember him having to defend his own uploads before. (And considering the contents of User:Philkon, if it's not him, "fan" is not the word I'd use — it's certainly someone who claims to be him. And it also says he'll be traveling for a year.) --Closeapple (talk) 09:54, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: I am Phil Konstantin Philkon (talk) 18:46, 11 June 2017 (UTC) This is my photo. I personally took it while working at KUSI. It is NOT a screen capture. I have covered this issue many times in the past. I took my own photos, and do not copy other peoples. My profile shows that Philkon (talk) 18:46, 11 June 2017 (UTC) Philkon and Phil Konstantin are the same person. I wish people would research stuff before the file deletion requests.
Philkon (talk) 18:55, 11 June 2017 (UTC) Yes, I have mentioned this to OTRS in the past. As far as I knew, this was resolved years ago. I don't check into Wikipedia much, because as my profile says, I am on the road and do not have reliable internet access. Phil Konstantin = Philkon = Philkon (talk) 18:55, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
- Comment In response to comments left on my talk page here and on the English project, I did do the research. Don't scold me for nominating this image as it has no OTRS attribution and there is a copyright on the website ( © Phil Konstantin - 2005-2013), which means the actual copyright is not compatible with the one applied here. Without a compatible copyright at the site or OTRS attribution, we must assume delete until one of those is applied. Walter Görlitz (talk) 20:33, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - if this would really have been resolved via OTRS, I would have expected to read a ticket number on the user page of the uploader or in this discussion. --Jcb (talk) 14:41, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
Restored: It was resolved via OTRS, please AGF. OTRS has been added to his user page. - Alexis Jazz ping plz 22:24, 28 July 2019 (UTC)
Signature claimed to be of person named but no proof provided Geraldo Perez (talk) 13:27, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
This signature is used by Kira Kosarin, in which there are many autographed material with it, you can see it here, here, here here, here, here, and here
Yasméssica (talk) 13:44, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Jcb (talk) 22:20, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Do we have any actual proof this is her signature ?, I can only find this image however this image is only available on Ebay (it's not hard to duplicate Ebay listings nor is it hard to photoshop!), I've managed to find this image but again it's not hard to photoshop,
Another concern is that it states "own work" which would be incorrect - I believe the image was illegally taken from this image and obviously photoshopped,
If proof can be found that it's actually hers then I'd be happy to withdraw, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 15:40, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- Pinging Geraldo Perez who previously nominated. –Davey2010Talk 15:41, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - too simple for copyright protection - file is in use, so any non-copyright-related deletion reason should be ignored - Jcb (talk) 14:37, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
Kept: as per Jcb. --Yann (talk) 14:53, 17 June 2017 (UTC)