Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/05/21
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
|
|
Pics moved to Category:Bollenschuur, Hillegom, which is the correct name — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joris (talk • contribs) 2017-05-15T12:13:30 (UTC)
Kept: as a category redirect. --JuTa 07:29, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Signature claimed to be of person named but no proof provided Geraldo Perez (talk) 13:27, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
This signature is used by Kira Kosarin, in which there are many autographed material with it, you can see it here, here, here here, here, here, and here
Yasméssica (talk) 13:44, 28 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Jcb (talk) 22:20, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Do we have any actual proof this is her signature ?, I can only find this image however this image is only available on Ebay (it's not hard to duplicate Ebay listings nor is it hard to photoshop!), I've managed to find this image but again it's not hard to photoshop,
Another concern is that it states "own work" which would be incorrect - I believe the image was illegally taken from this image and obviously photoshopped,
If proof can be found that it's actually hers then I'd be happy to withdraw, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 15:40, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- Pinging Geraldo Perez who previously nominated. –Davey2010Talk 15:41, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - too simple for copyright protection - file is in use, so any non-copyright-related deletion reason should be ignored - Jcb (talk) 14:37, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
Kept: as per Jcb. --Yann (talk) 14:53, 17 June 2017 (UTC)
Bot-uploaded personal image with no apparent educational value. Out of project scope. De728631 (talk) 12:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Also File:Students School (HOPLE) at Prey Veng - panoramio (3).jpg and File:Students School (HOPLE) at Prey Veng - panoramio.jpg. De728631 (talk) 12:59, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:01, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Iran and the bridge is modern. Architect's copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 16:00, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- This bridge has been built in ... 1899. There's no nb of architect's copyright violation. Roland45 (talk) 20:41, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry. Error. It has been built in 1950's. But it's a very standard type of bridge without any originality of an architect (and I doubt that we could know his name!).Roland45 (talk) 20:49, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept, @Roland45: , the bridge was built in 1959. I could not find architect's name and usually this complicates things. That case generally 50 years are given for architect to die and most works, where architect died in 2009, are still copyrighted. But Iranian law makes an exception: if the work belongs to legal entity. I consider very unlikely, that such bridge belongs to private person, therefore copyright expired in 1989 (30 years from construction). Taivo (talk) 08:09, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
because The picture is worse — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meri 2 (talk • contribs) 2017-05-15T08:47:17 (UTC)
Deleted by Sealle: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work -
The picture is worse — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meri 2 (talk • contribs) 2017-05-15T08:50:09 (UTC)
Deleted by Sealle: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work -
Deleted twice before as File:خطاطات-دروس-التاريخ-والجغرافيا-السنة-الأولى-بكالوريا-شعبة-العلوم-التجريبية.pdf. Out of scope. Ronhjones (Talk) 20:53, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Wiki Zero abuse. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:35, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Statue "Tellervo, Tapion tytär/ Diana" (Tellervo, Tapios daughter / Diana) [1] in Helsinki, Finland by finnish sculptor Yrjö Liipola, who died in 1971. Not in PD yet, no FOP for sculptures in Finland. Htm (talk) 08:32, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 07:01, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Japan for artistic works. The map on the sign is original enough to be copyrighted and is displayed prominently enough to make the photo a derivative work. De728631 (talk) 13:37, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 07:01, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Recent artwork and skyscrapers in Puteaux La Défense. But there is No Fop in France Tangopaso (talk) 21:27, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 07:02, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
File:法国巴黎 Paris, France Paris, Frankreich Parigi, Francia Париж, Франция Cina Xinjiang, Urumqi il benvenuto alla visita della - panoramio (6).jpg
[edit]Recent giant painting or photo on a wall. But there is No Fop in France Tangopaso (talk) 22:01, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 07:03, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Advertisment Zaccarias (talk) 14:54, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, File:Yahoo Support Contact Number USA.jpg as well. --Achim (talk) 15:27, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
These images appear to violate copyright, coming from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/in-pictures-26351649, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/ap/article-2574947/Skeletons-uncovered-mass-graves-Somalia.html and https://somaliland1991.wordpress.com/2014/02/27/somaliland-genocide-1988/.
Cordless Larry (talk) 21:12, 20 May 2017 (UTC)
These images do not appear to be the uploader's to release under a CC licence - see links on indivudal image pages.
- File:T-90S.jpg
- File:Berbera Neighborhood Moscow.jpg
- File:A Soviet era Naval ship at Berbera port.jpg
- File:Sacadadiin Mall.jpg
- File:Somaliland 500 SL Shilin.jpg
- File:Dhagah Nabi Galay.jpg
- File:Photograph-of-two-prominent-rock-features-at-Dhagah-Kureh.jpg
- File:Dhagah Kureh landscape-looking-northeast-from-the-rock-shelters.jpg
- File:Dhagah Kureh.jpg
Cordless Larry (talk) 19:16, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
I do not understand what picture problems are.what is uploader's to release under a CC licence — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lakmi00 (talk • contribs) 21:44, 21 May 2017 (UTC) (UTC)
- Only the photographer has the ability to release photos under that licence, Lakmi00. They don't appear to be your photos, but rather ones that you found online, which are subject to copyright. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:39, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:56, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:57, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshot of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and no license. --Yann (talk) 22:05, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, and no license. --Yann (talk) 22:06, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
There is the Category:Oleksandro-Kalynove, wich is of right spelling. Fototraveller (talk) 03:19, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: as category redirect. --Achim (talk) 09:36, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Most probably not own work. Source appears to be http://www.nasiba-zeynalova.az/bio-ru.html Siebrand 10:21, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:27, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Clearly not own work, possible but unlikely PD, can't find the original source. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:10, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:30, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 17:15, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:49, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 17:16, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:51, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
No indication of rights to upload this logo... probable copyright violation. If 'home-made', some here seem to make use of copyrighted font style, and all seem of little value to the project. Acabashi (talk) 00:08, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Same problem with:
- File:NHK World.png
- File:UNC-EX.png
- File:Create WTVI.png
- File:Rootle.png
- File:NASCAR Radio.jpg
- File:The Highway.png
- File:The Heat.png
- File:The Beatles Channel.jpg
- File:Utopia Sirius XM.jpg
- File:The Garth Channel.png
- File:No Shoes Radio.jpg
- File:NoShoesRadio2016.jpg
- File:Garth Channel.jpg
- File:RIR.png
- File:Richmond Spring Race.png
- File:BMS sponsor.png
- File:Food-city-logo.svg
- File:Bms 16.png
- File:Martinsville-Speedway.jpg
- File:LVMS o.jpg
- File:Texas 16.png
- File:Auto Club Speedway.jpg
- File:Iowa NXS and CWTS.png
- File:Gatewaymotosportslogo.png
- File:Sonoma raceway 16.png
- File:Onlinelogomaker-050517-1614-2543.png
- File:Onlinelogomaker-050517-1559-6430.png
- File:Onlinelogomaker-050517-1556-5802 (1).png
- File:Onlinelogomaker-050517-1543-5369.png
- File:Onlinelogomaker-050517-1544-9573.png
- File:Onlinelogomaker-050517-1540-3606.png
- File:Onlinelogomaker-050517-1327-8539 (1).png
- File:Cms outline 10 16.png
- File:Coca-cola600a lg.jpg
- File:Coca Cola.png
- File:Cocacola19a06.jpg
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:40, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Copyvio .... Slangcamms (talk) 02:09, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:41, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
unlikely own work of the uploader as claimed. JuTa 02:18, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:41, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
unlikely own work of the uploader as claimed. JuTa 02:19, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:41, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
looks to me pretty much out of scope JuTa 02:24, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:41, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Not owned by user 112.198.101.142 03:03, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:41, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Not oned by user Ardiredj 112.198.101.142 03:06, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:41, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
I want to delete my own work Trigueiro martins (talk) 03:09, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:41, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Not owned by user Ardiredj 112.198.101.142 03:10, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:41, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Professional photo uploaded as 'Own work', unlikely to belong to the uploader. Neegzistuoja (talk) 03:34, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
I think the owner is someone from his party, LSI-Qender (Lsiqender).
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:41, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
No evidence that image was sourced from Gaston Browne or originally published under the necessary license as claimed. Neegzistuoja (talk) 03:35, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:42, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Professional photo uploaded as 'Own work', unlikely to belong to the uploader. Neegzistuoja (talk) 04:03, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:42, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
living artist Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:25, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:42, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
equivalent to File:Olympic pictogram Boxing.png in same format, Boxlogo.png was uploaded much later than the linked photograph. Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:52, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:42, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Sculpture Onni ("Happiness", unveiled in the 2000's, sculptures present location unknown) by sculptor Rafael Saifulin, born 1952. Not in PD, no FOP for sculptures in Finland. Htm (talk) 06:10, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:42, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Sculpture Lukusali ("The Reading room") in Helsinki, Finland [2] by finish sculptor Kari Juva, died in 2014. Not in PD, no FOP for sculptures in Finland. Htm (talk) 06:17, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:42, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
None-free material in Japan Batholith (talk) 06:28, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:42, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Non-free illustration Batholith (talk) 06:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:42, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
None-free material in Japan Batholith (talk) 06:44, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:42, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
None-free material in Japan Batholith (talk) 06:44, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:42, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
None-free material in Japan Batholith (talk) 06:45, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:42, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Othaworld, defunct website
[edit]Out of Scope. This must be a defunct website because internet search gives no results. --Zaccarias (talk) 06:51, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:42, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
changing picture Pendroy (talk) 07:10, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:43, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Out of Scope (of Wikimedia Commons). As a simple advertisement this image doesn't belong here. --Zaccarias (talk) 07:14, 21 May 2017 (UTC) Zaccarias (talk) 07:14, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:43, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Out of Scope & assumably a violation of trademark law; windows logo itself can be used but not manipulated in a way, the trademark owner would not give permission for. Despite of that it is out of scope anyway. Zaccarias (talk) 07:28, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:43, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
None-free material in Japan Batholith (talk) 07:30, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:44, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
no need for this photo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Чръный человек (talk • contribs) 2017-05-19T12:49:34 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:44, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
unused, blurry and out-of-scope. WTH is supposed to be illustrated here ? Esprit Fugace (talk) 07:40, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:44, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
authors request — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zunter (talk • contribs) 2017-05-17T15:38:38 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:44, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Possibly a copyright violation. Image is labeled as copyright image but it is also a derivative work because several locations are marked on the map. Zaccarias (talk) 07:47, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:43, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Because it is low quality Mcjhfn (talk) 07:47, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Because it is low quality Mcjhfn (talk) 07:49, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:43, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:43, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Unused sunset, not enough visual or encyclopedic quality to be really useful, there is a lot of better sunsets in Category:Sunsets of Morocco.
Out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:59, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:44, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Distorted duplicate of File:Water borehole.jpg. Not realistically useful. —LX (talk, contribs) 09:11, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:44, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Importancia de la tecnologia en la educacion - several images with similar descr
[edit]- File:Blog1.jpg, found on several websites, nowhere a license info; Uploader with 1 edit Special:Contributions/Javiermaris
- File:Importancia de la tecnologia en la educacion.jpg, found on several websites, nowhere a license info; Uploader with 1 edit Special:Contributions/Chiki_jhessy
- File:Tecnologia..png, found on several websites, nowhere a license info; Uploader with 1 edit Special:Contributions/Mirian_Tinizhañay
- File:XAVIER .. TIXI.jpg, found on several websites, nowhere a license info; Uploader with 2 edits Special:Contributions/Xavi..._tixi
- File:TIXI.jpg, same uploader
- File:Importancia de la tecnologia .jpg, found on several websites, nowhere a license info; Uploader with 2 edits Special:Contributions/Wilfrido_aucapiña
- File:Tecnología-en-Educación-.jpg, same uploader
similar images, allready deleted in the past:
- File:Importancia de la tecnologia.jpg
- File:Importancia tecnologicas.jpg, both uploaded by Special:Contributions/Jonathanbarragan234, 2 Edits
Most likely all of them are copyright violations --Zaccarias (talk) 09:15, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:44, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
No indication of permission from the photographer or from the publisher of the magazine.The uploader claims it as "own work", but also claimed on his/her talk-page to be 61 in 2016. This is not the work of a seven-year-old. I don't know if a photograph used on the cover of a magazine counts as a "simple photograph" or an "intellectual work with creative characteristics" under Italian copyright law, but suspect it is the latter. I'm afraid all uploads by this user may need to be reviewed – a good number have already been deleted. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:28, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:44, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Asmabenazzouz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS.
- File:Agadir,Casbah Maroc.jpg
- File:Ouarzazate Maroc.jpg
- File:Merzouga Maroc.jpg
- File:Taghazout Agadir.jpg
- File:Taghazout Beach Agadir.jpg
- File:Agadir, le port de pêche vu depuis la Casbah Maroc.jpg
- File:Ouarzazat Maroc.jpg
- File:Agadir Oufella maroc.jpg
- File:Taghazoute sea.jpg
- File:Taghazouthe sea.jpg
- File:Ouarzazate taourirt nature.jpg
- File:Agadir, le port de pêche vu depuis la Casbah.jpg
- File:Corniche d'Agadir.jpg
- File:Ouarzazate moroco.jpg
- File:Ouarzazate 2 morocco.jpg
- File:Taghazouth.jpg
- File:Taghazouthe.jpg
- File:Ouarzazate nature.jpg
- File:Palais Claudio Bravo Camus, Taroudannt.jpg
- File:Ouaarzazate.jpg
- File:Les gorges de Todra.jpg
- File:Warzazate maroc.jpg
- File:Ouarzazate morrocco.jpg
- File:Ouarzazate maroc.jpg
- File:Le port de pêche vu depuis la Casbah agadir.jpg
- File:Agadir Oufella.jpg
- File:Ouarzazate taourirt.jpg
- File:Ouarzazate morocco.jpg
- File:Taghazout plage.jpg
- File:Palais Claudio Bravo Camus, Taroudant.jpg
- File:Ouarzazate casbah.jpg
- File:Oarzazate.jpg
- File:Warzazate.jpg
- File:Merzouga (le coucher de soleil de Merzouga un régal).jpg
- File:Le port de pêche vu depuis la Casbah.jpg
Yann (talk) 09:45, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:45, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://rvteatro.com/assets/img/team/Roman2.jpg.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:08, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
copy this photo - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:23.09.91_Gr%C3%A4fenberg_211.061.jpg Bahnhonsk (talk) 09:47, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:45, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 09:52, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:45, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF data, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 09:53, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:45, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 09:53, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:45, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Also unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 09:54, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:45, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Also may be out of scope. Yann (talk) 09:55, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:45, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Luca Varlaro (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small images without EXIF data, 3 copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS.
- File:Spiaggia San Nicola.jpg
- File:Scoglio C.jpg
- File:Spiaggia1.jpg
- File:Scoglio Cervaro.jpg
- File:Aggfa.jpeg
Yann (talk) 09:56, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:45, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
I doubt this is own work, because of the artistic presentation. Wasn't able to find a source. Siebrand 10:25, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:45, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Recent works of art. COM:DW. No permission from the artist.
- File:Albert Papoyan-cucahandes 2015 04.jpg
- File:Albert Papoyan-cucahandes 2015 01.jpg
- File:Albert Papoyan-cucahandes 2015 03.jpg
- File:Albert Papoyan-4.JPG
- File:Albert Papoyan-6.jpg
- File:Albert Papoyan-5.jpg
- File:Albert Papoyan-1.jpg
- File:Albert Papoyan-3.JPG
- File:Albert Papoyan-2.JPG
- File:Alik Papoyan-Zabela Abelyani dimankar.jpg
- File:Aghjiky hovataknerov.jpg
- File:Alik Papoyan-Sanahini kamurj.jpg
Yann (talk) 10:40, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:45, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 10:40, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:46, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 10:41, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:46, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
HR here. No EXIF data. Yann (talk) 10:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:46, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF data, older copies on the web, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 10:45, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:46, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 10:45, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:46, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 10:46, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:46, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Also unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:46, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:46, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Small images without EXIF data, please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS.
- File:Diego lopez cagliari.jpg
- File:Marco Sau al Cagliari 2016.png
- File:Nicola Murru.jpg
- File:Storari 2016.jpg
- File:Fariascagliari.png
- File:Rafaelcagliari.png
- File:Joaopedrocagliari.png
- File:Attilio Mastino.jpg
- File:DeiolaCagliari.jpg
- File:MelchiorriCagliari.jpg
- File:BalzanoCagliari.jpg
- File:Eriksonncagliari9novembre2014.jpg
Yann (talk) 10:54, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
No evidence of valid license in the Italian House of Deputies
- File:Manuela Repetti.jpg
- File:Mariella cavanna scirea.jpg
- File:Tommaso Foti.jpg
- File:Gianni Mancuso.jpg
- File:Riccardo De Corato.jpg
- File:Giorgio Holzmann.jpg
- File:Giampiero Pietro Cannella.jpg
- File:Carlo Ciccioli.jpg
- File:Carlo Nola.jpg
- File:Elias vacca.jpg
- File:Amedeo laboccetta.jpg
- File:Giuseppe cossiga.jpg
- File:Bruno Murgia daticamera.jpg
- File:Delmastrodellevedove.jpg
- File:Settimo NIzzi daticamera.jpg
- File:Emanuele Sanna Camera dei deputati.jpg
Discasto talk 21:37, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:46, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:46, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 10:55, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:47, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 10:55, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:47, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF data, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 10:55, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:47, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Uk Freedom of Panorama does not cover 2D artworks such as a map. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:59, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - I obviously assumed maps would be fine however looking closer it actually fails FOP and the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 which states and I quote "Representation of certain artistic works on public display.
(1)This section applies to—
(a)buildings, and
(b)sculptures, models for buildings and works of artistic craftsmanship, if permanently situated in a public place or in premises open to the public.",
- Anyway delete, Thanks, Davey2010 (IP) 18:14, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- Just want to confirm the above edit was indeed made by me and not by some IP using my name (Had I known my images were going to be nominated I wouldn't of gone on a forced wikibreak), Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 13:14, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:47, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Freedom of panorama in the UK does not cover 2D art such as a map. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:59, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - I obviously assumed maps would be fine however looking closer it actually fails FOP and the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 which states and I quote "Representation of certain artistic works on public display.
(1)This section applies to—
(a)buildings, and
(b)sculptures, models for buildings and works of artistic craftsmanship, if permanently situated in a public place or in premises open to the public.",
- Anyway delete, Thanks, Davey2010 (IP) 18:15, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- Just want to confirm the above edit was indeed made by me and not by some IP using my name (Had I known my images were going to be nominated I wouldn't of gone on a forced wikibreak), Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 13:15, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:47, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
freedom of panorama would not cover a 2D artwork such as a map. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:00, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete - I obviously assumed maps would be fine however looking closer it actually fails FOP and the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 which states and I quote "Representation of certain artistic works on public display.
(1)This section applies to—
(a)buildings, and
(b)sculptures, models for buildings and works of artistic craftsmanship, if permanently situated in a public place or in premises open to the public.",
- Anyway delete, Thanks, Davey2010 (IP) 18:13, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- Just want to confirm the above edit was indeed made by me and not by some IP using my name (Had I known my images were going to be nominated I wouldn't of gone on a forced wikibreak), Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 13:15, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:47, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Dervied from another file as indciated, which is seemingly unsourced. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:03, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Seems complex to be PD-textlogo so the TOO in the UK is very low. Fma12 (talk) 13:17, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:47, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Apparently unsourced. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:03, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Seems complex to be PD-textlogo so the TOO in the UK is very low. Fma12 (talk) 13:16, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:47, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Copy here: http://cuartocentenario.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/11774663_10205581854203950_354405434_n1-500x383.jpg Copied from Facebook. Yann (talk) 11:04, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:48, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS.
Yann (talk) 11:05, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:48, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
I'm disputing the claim that this too simple as the UK threshold of originality is rather low. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:09, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:48, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
very small, unused Hiddenhauser (talk) 11:14, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:48, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Manchester Metrolink branding
[edit]The concern here is the included logo, which is the primary focus of the image, but for the inclusion of the said logo on box sign, this would otherwise be a photo of a 2D design, which isn't covered by freedom of panorama in the UK. Additionaly (see a previous DR), I had concerns about the relevant logo, being above Threshold of Originality.
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:17, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:49, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
The concern is that whilst the licensing may be correct there's no source other than to a deleted image at Wikipedia. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:25, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:48, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Not convinced this simple applying the UK's low standard of originality, given the stylised breaks in the 5 numeral. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:02, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:49, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
This is a third party logo, not self as claimed. When was the crest first used? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:04, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:49, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
This is a logo of a third party organisation, not necessarily self. However the elements shown are common symbols. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:05, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:49, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Logo of a third party organisation, but apparently claimed as own work. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:07, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- The MI5 logo has an illuminati pyramid eye? The fuck? Clearly not own work, Delete. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:45, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- That is genuinely in the logo,ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:27, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:49, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
This is a logo fo a third party, not necessarily self as claimed. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:09, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:49, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Referal as this is a third party logo. It's not simple owing to the stylised jet trail stroke on the X. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:12, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:49, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
From https://www.hermitagendowment.ru/ru/hdf_exc_det.html?num=7 MisterXS (talk) 12:24, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:49, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
According to this edit it was uploaded with no permission and an invalid license. It the IP is really Paula Stacey we'd need an OTRS permission from hers. Strakhov (talk) 12:37, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Delete Copyvio, taken from here. --Discasto talk 18:28, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- Comment File:Cabbit.jpg was uploaded in 2010 and that link you offer seems to be 2014-dated. Anyway, it's a likely copyvio. If content's creator is really keen to host the image here, as that IP-edit mildly suggests (now file description is not totally clear on that (This is not a real animal and has been mistakenly updated for public domain. This work should not be used without permission.), is that a CC BY-SA because she supposedly gave permission writing that? is that all rights reserved unless you ask her and she gives you permission?), an OTRS permission is needed, since «anonymous-editing-claiming-I-am-that-pal» is not considered a valid way to license stuff. Strakhov (talk) 20:09, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:50, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Prototypehumanoid (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious copyright status. Maps are unsorted and therefore out of scope
- File:Woman in bangladesh.jpg
- File:A woman in bangladesh.jpg
- File:Bride in the Subcontinent.jpg
- File:Bridal jewelry.jpg
- File:Model on ramp.jpg
- File:Indian1.jpg
- File:Woman in India 5.jpg
- File:Woman in rural Bangladesh.jpg
- File:Indian bride.jpg
- File:Indian Bridal Jewellery Set 2.jpg
- File:Indian Bridal Jewellery Set 1.jpg
- File:LocationAsia1.png
- File:Missile Technology Control Regime2016.png
/St1995 12:51, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:50, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
unsinnige Quellenangabe, so dass auch unklar ist, ob die gewählte Lizenz stimmt. Xocolatl (talk) 13:10, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:50, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
In Litauen gibt es leider keine Panoramafreiheit. D. h., das offenbar geschützte Foto auf der Informationstafel darf nicht reproduziert werden. De728631 (talk) 13:32, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- okay sorry, wusste ich nicht. Kann dann gelöscht werden.--Danielt. (talk) 14:03, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:50, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope and likely copyvio Ariadacapo (talk) 13:33, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:50, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:50, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://d3bem67vv0tpdp.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/MallorieleftLaurenright.jpg.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:50, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
taken from website, the image is free though but has a watermark, low resolution Triplecaña (talk) 08:44, 14 May 2017 (UTC)
Keep In use. --Discasto talk 15:39, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
Keep So what? You can easily remove the watermark, no reason for deletion. Яй (talk) 08:18, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: as per COM:INUSE -- I've also corrected the license. Daphne Lantier 01:35, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
The assigned license is also wrong. According to the Chilean Intellectual Property Law (see here), copyright status (70 years after death) depend on when the surviving wife died (Lynch actually died in 1936). We don't know when such spouse died. On the other hand, memoriachilena.cl states that their images can belong to two categories (see here): images in the Common Cultural Heritage (not protected) and protected images. Finally, the page where the image has been taken from (here) clearly states Propiedad intelectual: Obra protegida (Intellectual property (status): Protected work). Thus, the image, as far as we know, is still protected and therefore is not valid according to Commons policies. With regard to US legislation, we don't actually know whether the work was actually published or registered before 1923 Discasto talk 14:35, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:51, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://proimage.vn/images/gallery/gioi-thieu/Giang%20vien/nguyen-thu-huong.jpg.
- File:Ms. Thu Hương.png
- File:Sự kiện lễ khởi công Cơ sở mới trường Bắc Mỹ - SNA.jpg
- File:Ms. Huong lam tu thien.jpg
- File:Mark of Respect 2012.jpg
- File:Phong Cách Doanh Nhân Top 100.jpg
- File:Top 50 Nu Lanh Dao 2017.png
- File:Ms. Thu Huong - Chuyên gia tư vấn Thương Hiệu và Nhân Hiệu.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:51, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Promotional uploads unlikely to be own work. Variable sizes, two have cameras the rest do not, the locations and special access needed for the photos and one also has that lovely dropped shadow effect so popular on myspace.
- File:Vinh danh top 50 nữ lãnh đạo.jpg
- File:Top 10 Nữ Lãnh Đạo Quốc tế.jpg
- File:Logo WLIN.jpg
- File:Buổi học Catwalk.jpg
- File:Đăng quang Hoa Hậu Bản Sắc Việt 2016.jpg
- File:Top 12 Hoa Hậu Bản Sắc Việt 2016.jpg
- File:Logo Proimage.png
Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:04, 1 June 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:19, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:52, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:51, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:51, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by WVUStudentGovernment (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of project scope.
- File:Blake Humphrey and Shannon Smith Official Portrait.jpg.jpg
- File:Blake Humphrey and Shannon Smith in Morgantown.jpg.jpg
Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:51, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:52, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Paresh7771 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, not within project scope
Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:53, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:52, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, https://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/7fd28953edc70dd32689dba7cedede218a60d5bf/c=17-0-7663-4320&r=x1683&c=3200x1680/local/-/media/2016/11/15/USATODAY/USATODAY/636148476870180333-nba-ps4-0110.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:52, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/61/27/c8/6127c8683c46728234a54235d4963f3d.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:52, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Copyvios, the designs on the packages are more than likely copyrighted and are the sole subject of the images
- File:태국 MAMA 새우맛.jpg
- File:중국 홍소우육면.jpg
- File:종이용기.png
- File:닛신 컵누들.jpg
- File:튀김우동.jpg
- File:왕뚜껑.jpg
- File:새우탕 큰사발.png
- File:도시락 팔도.png
- File:육개장 사발면.jpg
- File:사발면.png
- File:참깨라면.jpg
- File:최초의 컵라면.jpg
Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:56, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:52, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Most likely a copyright violation. The image can be found on several websites with no license / author info. --Zaccarias (talk) 15:01, 21 May 2017 (UTC) Zaccarias (talk) 15:01, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:52, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Most likely a copyright violation. The image can be found on several websites with no license / author info. Zaccarias (talk) 15:01, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:53, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Most likely a copyright violation. The image can be found on several websites. Zaccarias (talk) 15:03, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:53, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
test image Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:03, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:53, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Metadata contradicts Own Work claim (Presidential Palace Photo) AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:21, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:53, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. On several websites, no author info. Zaccarias (talk) 15:27, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:53, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
The architect of the cathedral was Ioan Traianescu (1875–1964). No FOP in Romania. Turbojet (talk) 15:39, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:53, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
poor quality, blurry Hiddenhauser (talk) 15:53, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:53, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
The work is signed “Hang Young Joon”. Since there are no Google hits on that name, it seems likely that the work is out of scope as a personal work of art by a non-notable artist. So, in order to keep it on Commons, it must first be proven that the artist is notable. That is usually done by citing a WP article.
Second, because of the frequent claims of “own work” by people who have photographed copyrighted paintings that they did not paint, if it can be proven that the work is in scope, then the artist must send a free license using OTRS. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:54, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:53, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
First, it must be proven that the painting is in scope, useful for our educational purpose. That includes proving that the artist is notable, usually be citing a WP article.
Second, because of the frequent claims of “own work” by people who have photographed copyrighted paintings that they did not paint, if it can be proven that the work is in scope, then the artist must send a free license using OTRS. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:57, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:53, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
doppelt hochgeladen Johann Malchus (talk) 16:02, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:53, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
doppelt hochgeladen Johann Malchus (talk) 16:03, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:53, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Also unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 16:05, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:53, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Also unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 16:05, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:53, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Small image without EXIF data, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Also unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 16:08, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:53, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Also unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 16:09, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:53, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bilalbouyahia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Bilalbouyahia (serial copyright violator). Uploader related: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Satellite image of Kabylie.jpg.
Gunnex (talk) 13:11, 1 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:41, 14 December 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bilalbouyahia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS.
Yann (talk) 16:10, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:54, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Also unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 16:12, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:54, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 16:12, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:54, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 16:12, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:54, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
doppelt hochgeladen Johann Malchus (talk) 16:17, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:54, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 16:17, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:54, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Also unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 16:18, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:54, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 16:18, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:54, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 16:18, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:54, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 16:19, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:54, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 16:19, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:54, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Robinrts143 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small images without EXIF data, please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS.
Yann (talk) 16:21, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:54, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
doppelt hochgeladen Johann Malchus (talk) 16:22, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
doppelt hochgeladen Johann Malchus (talk) 16:23, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Older image here: https://shevlinsebastian.blogspot.fr/2015/08/a-french-love-affair.html Yann (talk) 16:24, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Iran and the structure on the left looks modern. I suspect architect's copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 16:25, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
doppelt hochgeladen Johann Malchus (talk) 16:25, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Last remaining file, user with bad history, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 16:25, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Also unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 16:26, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Also unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 16:26, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 16:27, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
doppelt hochgeladen Johann Malchus (talk) 16:27, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Karenmejiara (talk · contribs)
[edit]Press images, please send a permission via COM:OTRS.
- File:Ldl .jpg
- File:Luis .jpg
- File:Ahora soy yo .jpg
- File:Luis De León.jpg
- File:Ahora Soy Yo.jpg
- File:Luis De León 2016.jpg
Yann (talk) 16:28, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 16:28, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, depicted people are unknown. Maybe out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 16:59, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
personal image, unused, out of scope Rupert Pupkin (talk) 17:28, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Concern is the logo, UK standard of originality is low, and 2D art is not covered by Freedom of Panorama ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:38, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Concern is the third party logo, but for this being on a sign it would be 2D art, which is not covered under freedom of panorama. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:39, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Third party logo, not necessarily own work as claimed, but is it too simple? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:42, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Samiranmondall (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal images, not within project scope
Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:55, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Samiranmondall (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope unused personal photos.
Lacrymocéphale (talk) 20:48, 24 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:09, 3 October 2017 (UTC)
spam - not within project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:02, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Hello,
Thank you for your revision I didn't get the mean of your comment as a spam-not within project scope, I draw this logo by my self and I registered it a brand logo. we are a registered company in Romania and we started to work in the field of clothes production and this logo was our idea as a logo for our products and we even registered it as copyrighted logo for our company.
Kind Regards
Ahmad Abu-Ziad
--78.104.123.66 18:22, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- Hello there Ahmad, and thank you for your contribution to Wikimedia Commons. As part of the project scope, files hosted on commons must meet certain criteria. One of those criteria being that the media must be realistically useful for an educational purpose - which in this case, that isn't met as there is no apparent use for this logo on any of the Wikimedia projects, as the brand isn't well-known. As such, the file does not fall within the project scope. Nonetheless, thank you for your contribution and you are welcome to provide more material given that it meets the conditions outlined in the project scope. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:50, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:56, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
unused personal image, not within project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:03, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:56, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
unused and out of scope. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 18:19, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:56, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Non-free photo of a 3D-object, no photographer's permission. Яй (talk) 18:34, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:56, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Derivative work of a non-free newspaper page, PD claim is nonsense. Яй (talk) 18:35, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:56, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Derivative of copyrighted works. Яй (talk) 18:36, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:56, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Text of questionable authorship and educational worth, contains historical photographs with no license information. Яй (talk) 18:40, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:56, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Looks like a title card to me, unlikely to be own work. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 18:49, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:56, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of panoramio streams of rather poor quality, replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:56, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:56, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
BH does not permit screenshots, wallpapers, vacation pictures, promotional posters, and the image is one of them. Frankie talk 18:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:56, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Files of User:Paulandys
[edit]- File:Skyline Dnipropetrovsk.jpg
- File:Tunnel valley.jpg
- File:Seafront Dnipropetrovsk city.jpg
- File:Ekaterynoslavsky_bulvard.jpg This file is a copy of [3]
- File:MENORAH.jpg
- File:Retro-tram Dnipropetrovsk.jpg
- File:Yavornitsky Park.jpg
The photos have all been copied from websites. The uploader does not have permission to do this; i.e. they are copyright violations. The uploader has stated that the website copied from is http://www.skyscrapercity.com. Though at least one photo (File:Ekaterynoslavsky_bulvard.jpg) is copied from https://morskoy.io.ua (link to File:Ekaterynoslavsky_bulvard.jpg on /morskoy.io.ua website. The morskoy.io.ua website has a statement All material © copyright by Valeriy Kravchenko. All rights reserved. --Toddy1 (talk) 18:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
File:Retro-tram Dnipropetrovsk.jpg has a copyright mark in the bottom right corner.--Toddy1 (talk) 19:04, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:56, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Same user uploaded a movie poster without permission. And this file has no EXIF data. Dubious. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 19:03, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:57, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Same user uploaded a movie poster without permission. Dubious. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 19:03, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:57, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
No indication why {{PD-GermanGov}} would apply. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:05, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
I uploaded it, but it should be deleted. After seeing your message, I asked the Deutsches Historisches Museum for the right to publish the photograph on Wikemedia Commons, and they denied it. I had misinterpreted its record on the site of the Deutsche Digitale Bibliothek.
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:57, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Editingwikipediarightnow (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely copyvios
/St1995 19:06, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:57, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
potentially, sourced "https://plus.google.com/108186415691306958577", Roland zh (talk) 19:07, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:57, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Too bad quality and unreal. Good images kept
- File:Torre este de Parque Central, Caracas..png
- File:Torrre este de Parque central, Caracas..png
- File:Puesta de Sol Caracas, la Candelaria..JPG
- File:Un día oscuro de Caracas, la Candelaria..JPG
- File:Cielo azul Caracas, la Candelaria..png
- File:Nubes rebeldes en Caracas, la Candelaria..JPG
- File:Atardeces Caracas, la Candelaria..JPG
/St1995 19:12, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:57, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': one-file-upload, potentially personality rights isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', but also potentially (in widest sense) 'profiling' as per description, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:12, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:57, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': one-file-upload, potentially personality rights isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:17, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:58, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Uploaded as "own work" but prior to upload to Commons also found on http://estella.info/estella/articulo.asp?f=Gigantes Takeaway (talk) 19:20, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:58, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Fake authorship, depicted person stated as a photo author Dogad75 (talk) 19:40, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:58, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
not in use, unknown person in the foreground --> out of scope. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 19:46, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:58, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
not in use, unknown person in the foreground --> out of scope. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 19:46, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:58, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
not in use, unknown person in the foreground --> out of scope. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 19:47, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:58, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
not in use, unknown person in the foreground --> out of scope. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 19:48, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:58, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Uploader claims copyright but EXIF shows the photo as from jeanclaudephoto.com - OTRS confirmation would be needed Whpq (talk) 20:10, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:58, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Guadalcanal is misspelled. 2602:306:C569:EE20:B447:26A8:B5A0:F74C 20:22, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:58, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 20:23, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:58, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 20:24, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:58, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 20:24, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:58, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Too bad quality and unreal
- File:San Juan Azulado.jpg
- File:Plaza del Panteón Nacional.jpg
- File:Panteón Nacional.jpg
- File:Ocaso en Catia desde el observatorio.jpg
- File:Llgando a Caracas.jpg
- File:Los morros de San Juan1.jpg
- File:Plaza Bolivar de San Juan.jpg
- File:Iglesia de San Juan de los Morros.jpg
- File:Entrada al Panteón Nacional.jpg
- File:Desde la carretera vieja Caracas-LaGuaira.jpg
- File:En el Waraira Repano.jpg
- File:De San Juan PA' Caaracas1.jpg
- File:De San Juan PA' Caaracas.jpg
- File:Cerca de Playa Caribe1.jpg
- File:Cerca de Macuto.jpg
- File:Cerca de Playa Caribe.jpg
- File:Carretera Caracas-La Guaira.jpg
/St1995 20:28, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:58, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
doppelt hochgeladen Johann Malchus (talk) 20:35, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:58, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
doppelt hochgeladen Johann Malchus (talk) 20:37, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:58, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
doppelt hochgeladen Johann Malchus (talk) 20:38, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:58, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Likely copyvios!
- File:Ningwu Railway Station.jpg
- File:Sipingdong Railway Station.jpg
- File:Dazhou Railway Station.jpg
- File:Jishou Railway Station.jpg
- File:Zuoying South Station.jpg
- File:Emeishan Railway Station.jpg
- File:Zibo Railway Station.jpg
- File:Kaifeng Railway Station.jpg
- File:Kunmingnan Railway Station.jpg
- File:Ibus-72.jpg
- File:Ibus-77.jpg
- File:IBus-72.jpg
- File:Siaogang Bus Transfer Station.jpg
- File:Fengshan Bus Transfer Station.JPG
- File:G-bus 7.jpg
- File:Ubus-100.jpg
- File:Stbus R36.jpg
- File:G-Bus 205.jpg
/St1995 20:38, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:59, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
doppelt hochgeladen Johann Malchus (talk) 20:38, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:59, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
doppelt hochgeladen Johann Malchus (talk) 20:40, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:59, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Gopakumar R. P.
[edit]All have links to remote site, with no evidence of permission. Also if the artist is the uploader - then who took the photograph?
Ronhjones (Talk) 20:51, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:59, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Doubts about claimed ownership by uploader, as this image was published elsewhere already in 2013 and 2012. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:00, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:00, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Doubts about claimed ownership by uploader, as image was published elsewhere already in 2015: [4],[5]. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:02, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:00, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Also unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 21:06, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:00, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 21:07, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:00, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Al-Ahwazi1925 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small images without EXIF data. At least 3 copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS.
- File:Die Hinrichtung des ahwazischen Volkes.jpeg
- File:Ahwazischen Manschen auf Demonstration.jpeg
- File:Alahwaz1.jpg
- File:Стоп иранской оккупации!.jpeg
Yann (talk) 21:09, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:00, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chourouk ben khanchouch (talk · contribs)
[edit]Small images without EXIF data, mostly copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS.
- File:Kasseb Béja.jpg
- File:Oued Kasseb.jpg
- File:Barrage Kasseb Béja.jpg
- File:Barrage oued Kasseb-Béja.jpg
- File:Spring in Béja.jpg
- File:Thugga temple.jpg
- File:Spring in Dougga.jpg
- File:Djebba ( Beja ).jpg
- File:Dougga paysage.jpg
- File:Thugga flowers.jpg
- File:Dougga nature.jpg
- File:Djebba,béja.jpg
- File:Djebba Beja.jpg
- File:Djebba.jpg
- File:Djebba -Beja.jpg
- File:Djebba à Beja.jpg
- File:Djebba,Beja.jpg
- File:Thugga.jpg
- File:Ouéd Zitoun bizerte.jpg
- File:Oued Zitoun- bizerte.jpg
- File:Forest Aïn Soltan - jendouba.jpg
- File:Forest Aïn Soltane- jendouba.jpg
- File:Forest Aïn Sultane , jendouba.jpg
- File:Aïn Soltan , jendouba.jpg
- File:Forest ain soltan.jpg
- File:Foret Aïn Soltan.jpg
- File:Aiin Soltane.jpg
- File:Aïn Soltane forest.jpg
- File:Foret Aïn Soltane.jpg
- File:Forest Aïn Soltane.jpg
- File:Aïn Soltane.jpg
- File:Forest Aïn Soltan.jpg
- File:Forest Aïn Sultan.jpg
- File:Forest Aïn Sultane.jpg
- File:Heart of nature.jpg
- File:Seeker of beauty.jpg
- File:Fadeaway.jpg
- File:Deafening silence.jpg
Yann (talk) 21:11, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:01, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Prodyutkdeka (talk · contribs)
[edit]Last remaining files, small images without EXIF data, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS.
Yann (talk) 21:14, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:01, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Elbairikhalid1989 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Also some files are unused personal images, so out of scope.
- File:Beni mellal region.jpg
- File:Ain Aserdoun area.jpg
- File:In the deep nature.jpg
- File:Courses of Biochemistry at Medical school of Oujda.jpg
- File:Jbel El Hamra Forest.jpg
Yann (talk) 21:34, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:01, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 21:35, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:01, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Small images without EXIF data, please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS.
Yann (talk) 21:37, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:01, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
unlikely own work 80.235.147.186 22:45, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:01, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Copyright logo of Comparsa Marabú de Santo Tomé Corrientes. No evidence uploader is copyright owner. MPF (talk) 23:05, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:01, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Small image unsourced, highly unlikely to be own work. MB298 (talk) 23:12, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:01, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
doppelt hochgeladen Johann Malchus (talk) 23:30, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:01, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
unused, doesn't seem like a notable enough to warrant encyclopedic coverage, as such, file is outside of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:32, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:01, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
too blurry to be of encyclopedic use Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:35, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:01, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Minuscule photo, out of scope as no educational value MPF (talk) 23:38, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:01, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Minuscule photo, out of scope as no educational value MPF (talk) 23:39, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:01, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of panoramio streams of rather poor quality, replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:54, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, not poor quality (quality is a very subjective term), appropriately categorised and has coordinates, valuable for people outside of Wikimedia searching for content related to this region /St1995 20:15, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no reason for deletion, per Stas1995. --Wdwd (talk) 10:53, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of panoramio streams of rather poor quality, replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:55, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, 4000px - not poor quality (quality is a very subjective term), appropriately categorised and has coordinates, valuable for people outside of Wikimedia searching for content related to this region /St1995 20:16, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no reason for deletion, per Stas1995. --Wdwd (talk) 10:53, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of panoramio streams of rather poor quality, replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:56, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, 3000px - not poor quality (quality is a very subjective term), appropriately categorised and has coordinates, valuable for people outside of Wikimedia searching for content related to this region /St1995 20:16, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no reason for deletion, per Stas1995. --Wdwd (talk) 10:53, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of panoramio streams of rather poor quality, replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:56, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, nice picture of a purple sky - 4200px - not poor quality (quality is a very subjective term), appropriately categorised and has coordinates, valuable for people outside of Wikimedia searching for content related to this region /St1995 20:19, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no reason for deletion, per Stas1995. --Wdwd (talk) 10:54, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of panoramio streams of rather poor quality, replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:56, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, nice picture of a rainy day - 3700px - not poor quality (quality is a very subjective term), appropriately categorised and has coordinates, valuable for people outside of Wikimedia searching for content related to this region /St1995 20:19, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no reason for deletion, per Stas1995. --Wdwd (talk) 10:55, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of panoramio streams of rather poor quality, replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:56, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete /St1995 20:21, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no reason for deletion, per Stas1995. --Wdwd (talk) 10:55, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of panoramio streams of rather poor quality, replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:57, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, nice picture of a rainy day - 3700px - not poor quality (quality is a very subjective term), appropriately categorised and has coordinates, valuable for people outside of Wikimedia searching for content related to this region /St1995 20:20, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no reason for deletion, per Stas1995. --Wdwd (talk) 10:56, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Unused, no need to have such a template. And i see no consensus at Commons:Village_pump/Proposals/Archive/2017/04#General_discussion Steinsplitter (talk) 07:21, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nomination. --Krd 08:09, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete as author, regrettably. — Jeff G. ツ 17:04, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Better link to discussion is this where 3 support and 1 oppose in adding ticket number in OTRS template. How it can be implemented is another question. I'm disappointed to see OTRS leaders have an adamant behavior. It is expectable as OTRS is a private project and not under a community review. It is up to Commons whether they need to depend on this sub-quality service which will damage our reputation too. Jee 02:06, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Template:OTRS autoresponded/doc, Template:OTRS autoresponded/en, Template:OTRS autoresponded/layout, and Template:OA
[edit]@Steinsplitter and Krd: These pages depend on Template:OTRS autoresponded, so if it is deleted, they should also be deleted. — Jeff G. ツ 17:04, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:39, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
pas d'autorisation du photographe (Didier Plowy) ; Ecole des Chartes ne peut pas déposer sur commons sans l'autorisation des photographes Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 09:11, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
J'envoie l'autorisation du photographe à permissions-fr@wikimedia.org. Cela vous convient ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by École des chartes - Utilisateur David (talk • contribs)
- Depuis des années, l'EdC fait n'importe quoi avec ses imports de photos sur commons ; quand on fait des remarques, EdC promet de se mettre en conformité, mais EdC ne tient pas ses engagements…
- Ces expériences prouvent qu'il n'est pas raisonnable de faire confiance aux services de cette école (informatique ? communication ?), qui semblent ne pas prendre très au sérieux le respect de la législation sur les droits des auteurs.
- Je suggère que le photographe envoie lui-même son autorisation, avec authentification, ainsi ce sera clair.
--Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 16:33, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Bonjour Droit de retrait 03 Webmestre de l'École des chartes, je travaille au service communication. Il y a quelques années, nous avons versé des photos sur la page de l'École des chartes avec quelques négligences ou erreurs sur les licences demandées. Quelques mois, voire années plus tard, Wikipédia a supprimé les photos concernées, puis bloqué notre compte, de sorte que nous ne pouvions même plus répondre sur les pages de discussion. Bref, nous nous sommes renseignés auprès d'un administrateur qui nous a conseillé de créer un compte du type "prénom - nom de l'institution" pour personnaliser le compte. Ce que j'ai fait sous le nom "École des chartes - Utilisateur David". J'ai depuis téléchargé deux images dont nous avons bien récupéré les droits demandés auprès du photographe et transmis à l'adresse permissions-fr@wikimedia.org. Pour la première, d'ailleurs, permissions-fr@wikimedia.org m'a aussi demandé de récupérer auprès des ayant les droits des architectes du bâtiment datant de 1929. Quoiqu'il en soit, le ton accusatoire, voire diffamatoire, de votre message ne se justifie en rien et est préjudiciable à toute discussion constructive. Il serait plus respectueux pour discuter, et comme Wikipédia semble y encourager, de m'interpeller plus directement. Nous avons certes commis des erreurs, mais ne doutez pas que l'École nationale des chartes prenne au sérieux le respect de la législation sur les droits des auteurs. Le photographe a déjà envoyé l'autorisation que nous avons transmise à permissions-fr@wikimedia.org, je ne comprends plus pourquoi vous souhaitez la supprimer ! Bien cordialement, École des chartes - Utilisateur David
- Keep, puisque École des chartes - Utilisateur David a certifié que le photographe avait transmis son autorisation via l'adresse idoine. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 15:44, 24 May 2017 (UTC).
Deleted: Can be restored when and if the photographer sends a free license directly using OTRS and the license is read and approved. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:44, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
This was considerd simple, but applying a UK standard of originallity I'm not so sure, given that the 2 element is stylized, it not merely being overlaid on the line, but the diagonal stroke forming part of it and continuing. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- It doesn't seem like such a complex design to me. Far more complex shapes have been covered under this license. --RaviC (talk) 21:18, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: The ToO is very low in the UK. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:44, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Freedom of panorama would not cover 2D artwork, such as a line diagram. UK standard of originality is fairly low. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:01, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- Comment What exactly do you consider to be above the threshold of originality in this picture ? — Racconish ☎ 12:53, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- I felt that this was above threshold of orginality owing to the fact that specific design choices were made concerning the choice of typefaces, and line coloring, in it's construction. However if you think they aren't significant enough. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:33, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep The only thing that could be considered original is what you call the construction, the way the network is represented. But here we have a simple fork which cannot realistically be claimed to be original. — Racconish ☎ 14:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: It is well established that the Tube map is copyrighted. Similar maps such as this are also copyrighted. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:48, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
How can a crop or re-drawing of a presumably copyrighted logo be under a free license? English Wikipedia has en:File:Metrolink new logo.jpg as "fair use".
Probably this should be moved back to en-WP as "fair use". Doing so may break a few templates on other wikis. (However, most uses appear to be at en-WP.) Lupo 09:56, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
- If this gets moved back to en-WP, File:Victoria 2014-08-22 22-18.jpg should also be deleted. Lupo 09:59, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
Kept: kept as PD-textlogo Krd 12:52, 9 September 2014 (UTC)
This is not a simple logo based on the low standard of originality the UK applies. An image utlising this logo was under "fair-use" on english wikipedia. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:11, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- Oppose - disagree, this is a collection of cirlces. Logos are permitted on Commons - it's all explained at Commons:Threshold of originality. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cnbrb (talk • contribs) 2017-05-21 12:42 (UTC)
- A collection of circles in an 'organised' pattern, bear in mind the UK has low standard for originality.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:34, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: The UK ToO is very low. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:48, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Fictional flag of questionable notability. Used on anonymous talk page. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: the very real flag of a very real micronation. Originally entered on the page "list of micronations" Satanpope (talk) 00:29, 23 May 2017 (MTS)
Deleted: Not very real -- no Google hits. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by ISD as Copyvio (db-f9) with a rationale of I've been asked to nominate this image for deletion because I've just made an article for Wikipedia:Minami Momochi on the English language Wikipedia and nominated for Did You Know?, but we are unsure if it fits the requirements for COM:COSTUME. If it does fit, then that is fine and the image can be used. Sorry about this. Possibly a candidate for deletion, but not obvious enough for a speedy. Storkk (talk) 15:33, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- I think, it is No FOP in Japan. Because of its costumes.Cheetah1023 (talk) 15:52, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Costumes do not generally have copyrights unless they include masks. (Clothing is utilitarian, but masks are not). This has a mask. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:52, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AntipovSergej (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photographs since 1930s through 1980s, unlikely to be own works, probably scanned paper copies in possession.
- File:Aleksandr Potapov 470sailing.jpg
- File:Aleksandr Potapov 1983.jpg
- File:Leningrad Lobach 1962.jpg
- File:Pilchin Victor Vladimirovich.jpg
- File:Polyakov Zybin Keep onSoling1983.jpg
- File:The sailors parade on Palace square in Leningrad.jpg
- File:Chuchelov Soling 1975.jpg
- File:Shelkovnikov Aleksandr 1963.jpg
- File:Pinegin Shutkov 1963.jpg
- File:Belov German Vitalevich 2004.jpg
- File:Matveev Lavrov 1976.jpg
- File:Spartakiada1969.jpg
- File:Pinegin Aleksandrv Stayson Ivanva Novoder1959.jpg
- File:Balashov Chuchelov 1975 vTalline.jpg
- File:Moskvin Tolstikhin 1972.jpg
- File:Russ 1955 sail team.jpg
- File:Matveev Ivan Petrovich1936 2.jpg
- File:Shugayi Vasilyev 1963.jpg
- File:Chumakov Vasilyev Shugayi.jpg
- File:Lobach Zhuchenko Boris 1956.jpg
- File:Strelna Vitt Tolstikhin 1977.jpg
- File:Antipov Yuriy Aleksandrovitch.jpg
Яй (talk) 18:45, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- Я, Антипов Сергей Михайлович, 1950 года рождения и мой покойный отец 1916 года рождения и мой покойный дед 1886 года рождения были так или иначе связаны с парусным спортом и авиацией и были фотографами-любителями. Так, например, мою фамилию вы найдёте в 10-й строке снизу в официальном документе Всероссийской федерации парусного спорта: [6]. Ответственно заявляю, что всё, что загрузил на Викисклад, это либо мои фотографии, либо фотографии из семейного архива. Так, в частности, фотографию моего родного дяди Антипова, Юрия Александровича я сделал будучи у него в гостях, в посёлке Чкаловский, на окраине города Щёлково фотоаппаратом «Зоркий». AntipovSergej (talk) 11:45, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
- @AntipovSergej: почитайте ru:ВП:СЕМАРХИВ. Иметь доступ к бумажной копии и быть правообладателем оригинального снимка - две разные вещи. --Яй (talk) 12:15, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
- File:Shelkovnikov Aleksandr 1963.jpg- upload 2017-03-30 - 1 + 1 = 2 --НоуФрост (talk) 10:09, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
- Отвечаю. Первое. Я являюсь законным наследником своего отца и деда. Второе. фотографию File:Shelkovnikov Aleksandr 1963.jpg выполнил мой отец. Это готова подтвердить вдова Александра Шелковникова. AntipovSergej (talk) 05:30, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
- Это очень интересный кейс. Во первых в открытых источниках ищется, кем работали ваш отец и дед. Отец точно был невыездным во времена СССР - в этом нет никаких сомнений, а уж в разные страны точно не мог ездить чтобы фотографировать Олимпийские игры в Канаде, например, которые присутствуют на вот этой фото - File:Aleksandr Potapov 470sailing.jpg , или в Хельсинки в 1955 году, вот тут - File:Russ 1955 sail team.jpg. Я учился в том заведении, где он работал и точно знаю, что такое "первый отдел" и всё что с ним связано... Во вторых вы не единственный ребёнок в семье и даже если фото в архиве сделаны всё же вашими родственниками, а не другими фотографами, то нужно разрешение и от других родственников., оформленное через систему ВП:ДОБРО. Далее. Структура фото сильно неоднородна, ищется в интернете более половина фото. В нескольких местах указано, откуда они. Ну вот "из личного архива И. П. Матвеева", "Из личного архива Сергея Перфильева" (этот сайт имеет странную неиндексируемую структуру и недавно её менял - может оттуда и дата.), вот ещё архив "Потапов Виктор Яковлевич - из личных архивов". Ну ещё можно найти фото из вами приведённых и немало. Но не все. Нигде нет авторства этих фото = "Из личного архива Антипова". Нет и всё. Складывается впечатление, что вы имеете доступ к этим фото где то в Федерации. Например в связи с тем, что сейчас как раз идёт [7] сбор материалов для онлайн музея. Но вот что то мне не верится совсем, что их конкретно делали ваш отец и дед и что вы можете обогатить Википедию этими фото на законных основаниях. Поэтому прошу коллег Sealle, Dogad75, Krassotkin поучаствовать в этом кейсе. Во первых я не знаю английский, чтобы общаться с англоязычными админами, во вторых я готов по запросу на википочту предоставить некие интересные данные, которые не могу огласить публично во избежание разглашения ЛД, в третьих я конечно в конфликте с участником и могу быть не совсем нейтрален. Заранее спасибо за участие. --НоуФрост (talk) 17:34, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
- Отвечаю. Первое. Я являюсь законным наследником своего отца и деда. Второе. фотографию File:Shelkovnikov Aleksandr 1963.jpg выполнил мой отец. Это готова подтвердить вдова Александра Шелковникова. AntipovSergej (talk) 05:30, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
- Фото File:Aleksandr Potapov 470sailing.jpg и File:Russ 1955 sail team.jpg выполнены в СССР, фантазий не надо. Всё остальное домыслы. Отец, кстати, бывал за рубежом. Не часто, но бывал. Насчёт разрешения от родственников - я подумаю над вашим предложением. Сергей Перфильев готов дать разъяснения по-поводу происхождения фотографий из своего архива. AntipovSergej (talk) 18:29, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
- Он был на олимпиаде летней 1976 года в Монреале и на воде делал фото гонки с другой яхты самостоятельно? Какие домыслы то? В приведённом источнике фотография имеет характерное название - "21_ol.igry_kanada_aleksandr_i_viktor_potapovy_590. jpg" , так же есть ещё статьи, где она используется в качестве иллюстрации этих Олимпийских игр. На второй фотографии в архиве Перфильева написано, что это Хельсинки. Это было СССР? Надо изучить вопрос... --НоуФрост (talk) 18:36, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
- Ещё раз: Перфильев и Потапов готовы дать показания, при условии, что этот запрос поступит к ним официально. Готовьте запрос и фамилию свою поставить не забудьте. AntipovSergej (talk) 19:04, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
- "Ещё раз" - эти файлы все удалят и не будут слушать более ваши инсинуации. Бремя доказательства вашего творчества в Википедии лежит на вас. Успехов. --НоуФрост (talk) 19:08, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
- Ещё раз: Перфильев и Потапов готовы дать показания, при условии, что этот запрос поступит к ним официально. Готовьте запрос и фамилию свою поставить не забудьте. AntipovSergej (talk) 19:04, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
- Он был на олимпиаде летней 1976 года в Монреале и на воде делал фото гонки с другой яхты самостоятельно? Какие домыслы то? В приведённом источнике фотография имеет характерное название - "21_ol.igry_kanada_aleksandr_i_viktor_potapovy_590. jpg" , так же есть ещё статьи, где она используется в качестве иллюстрации этих Олимпийских игр. На второй фотографии в архиве Перфильева написано, что это Хельсинки. Это было СССР? Надо изучить вопрос... --НоуФрост (talk) 18:36, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
- Так, вот ещё нашёл - источник прямой трансляции - все файлы загружены на Викисклад в день публикации Перфильевым или на следующий день. --НоуФрост (talk) 08:39, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
- File:Soloviev Victor Vladimirovich ok.jpg - 24 апреля загружен на Викисклад - 20 апреля грузит в Фэйсбук Соловьёв --НоуФрост (talk) 08:47, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
- Given the obviously false data on the authorship of the photos indicated by the majority listed, taking into account the participant's statements about the legal status of photographs that are clearly untrue, I think that you should block this account on the Wikimedia Commons. --НоуФрост (talk) 10:31, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
- Falsification of information about the image by colleague НоуФрост. Quote: "Отец точно был невыездным во времена СССР - в этом нет никаких сомнений, а уж в разные страны точно не мог ездить чтобы фотографировать Олимпийские игры в Канаде, например, которые присутствуют на вот этой фото - File:Aleksandr Potapov 470sailing.jpg… Translation to English= … Dad obviously was banned during the Soviet era - this is no doubt, and even to different countries just could not ride to photograph the Olympic games in Canada, for example, which are present in this photo File:Alexander Potapov 470sailing.jpg...". My answer. In the Summary section for this image, there is no a one word about my dad: [8]. AntipovSergej (talk) 20:50, 30 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. "Family archives" is rarely an acceptable source. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:56, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AntipovSergej (talk · contribs)
[edit]It is improbable that this professional portraits are own work. Please send a proof via OTRS that you are the photographer (not the one who scanned this) of that portrait photographies!
- File:Ukhin Sergey Ivanovich.jpg
- File:Likhushin Valentin Yakovlevitch 2.jpg
- File:Zybin Alexander Sergeevich 1978.jpg
- File:Antipov Yuriy Aleksandrovich.jpg
Ras67 (talk) 17:12, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:03, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AntipovSergej (talk · contribs)
[edit]No freedom of panorama in Russia for non-architectural artworks!
- File:Mozzhorin Yuriy Aleksandrovitch grave.jpg
- File:Avramenko Rimiliy Fedorovitch grave.jpg
- File:Mishin Vasiliy Pavlovitch grave.jpg
- File:Ivashutin Petr Ivanovitch tomb.jpg
- File:Rodionov Igor Nikolayevidch tomb.jpg
- This Work Permanently Situated in Place NOT Open for Free Attendance. AntipovSergej (talk) 05:20, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
- We need the permission from the sculptor not only from the necropolis' carrier. --Ras67 (talk) 13:29, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
- This Work Permanently Situated in Place NOT Open for Free Attendance. AntipovSergej (talk) 05:20, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
- File:Kovalyov Nikolay Dmitriyevidch grave.jpg
- This Work Permanently Situated in Place NOT Open for Free Attendance. AntipovSergej (talk) 05:20, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
- File:Brish Arkadiy Adamovidch tomb.jpg
- This Work Permanently Situated in Place NOT Open for Free Attendance. AntipovSergej (talk) 05:20, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
- File:Blagov Viktor Dmitriyevidch grave.jpg
- This Work Permanently Situated in Place NOT Open for Free Attendance. AntipovSergej (talk) 05:20, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
- File:Gorbatko Viktor Vasilyevitch tomb.jpg
- This Work Permanently Situated in Place NOT Open for Free Attendance. AntipovSergej (talk) 05:20, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
- File:Novozhilov Genrikh Vasilyevitch grave.jpg
- This Work Permanently Situated in Place NOT Open for Free Attendance. AntipovSergej (talk) 05:20, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
- File:Sloka Viktor Karlovitch tomb.jpg
- This Work Permanently Situated in Place NOT Open for Free Attendance. AntipovSergej (talk) 05:20, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
- File:Alexander Solomonowitsch Kompanejez tomb.jpg
- File:Ryazanskiy Mikhail Sergeevitch tomb.jpg
- File:Pamyatnik Leninu Voznesenie2.jpg
- File:Likhushin pamyatnaya doska.jpg
- This Work Permanently Situated in Place NOT Open for Free Attendance. AntipovSergej (talk) 05:20, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
- File:Patsayev memory Dolgoprudnyi.jpg
- File:Людмила Пахомова надгробный памятник.jpg
- File:Shelkovnikov Aleksandr tombstone.jpg
- File:Nakhimov Kosino Shadrin Mikhl.jpg
- File:Ordin Naschokin Shadrin Mikhl.jpg
- File:Belov German Vitalyevich memory.jpg
- File:Pinegin T A mogila.jpg
- File:Ievlev VM pamyat.jpg
- This Work Permanently Situated in Place NOT Open for Free Attendance. AntipovSergej (talk) 05:20, 4 February 2020 (UTC)
- File:Mogila Antipova Y A.jpg
- File:Gird Sad Spassk19 1.jpg
Ras67 (talk) 17:39, 3 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Where freedom of panorama exists, we do not need permission from the artist/architect/sculptor. In Russia there is only FOP for buildings. --Green Giant (talk) 17:21, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Uday Shankar
[edit]The artist en:Uday Shankar died in 1977, the musicion en:Ravi Shankar in 2012. This is much too recent for a {{PD-old}} license.
- File:Bhajana.ogg
- File:Raga Adana.ogg
- File:Raga Bahar.ogg
- File:Raga Bhairava.ogg
- File:Raga Durga.ogg
- File:Raga Malkounsa 2.ogg
- File:Raga Malkounsa.ogg
- File:Raga Mishra-Kaphi.ogg
- File:Raga Sinhendra.ogg
- File:Raga Tilanga.ogg
- Keep. In terms of copyright law, these are recordings of traditional music, not music compositions. Uday Shankar was a dancer and choregrapher, not a composer. Ravi Shankar, aged 17 at the time of the recordings (1937), was merely an interpret. Pre 1972 sound recordings are not protected by copyright in the US. According to Indian law (which in my opinion should not apply here), the duration of copyright on sound recordings is 60 years. Please note these files are coming from Gallica, which not only assesses they are in the public domain, but has published on its blog an article on their exceptional educatonal value written by Audrey Viault, an archivist specialized in sound recordings (see here). It is very unlikely Bibliothèque nationale de France would draw the public's attention on these holdings without checking carefully its assessment of their copyright status. In any case, I have added {{PD-US-record}} to these files and replaced {{PD-old}} by {{PD-traditional}}. — Racconish ☎ 07:28, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- Correction: the article on Gallica's blog is co-signed by Pascal Cordereix, who is the director of BNF's division of sound recordings [9] and wrote this article on BNF sound archives, which makes it even more unlikely the copyright assessment has not been carefully checked by BNF. — Racconish ☎ 10:12, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- Comment The evidence seems contrary, but Racconish may have a point. Are there other recordings of this type and from this time in Gallica, or is this an exception? Regards, Yann (talk) 09:37, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- The same blog article by Audrey Viault on Gallica's web site mentions 2 other famous recordings assessed by BNF to be in the public domain, one of traditional Japanese music and one of traditional African music (some of which I have uploaded on Commons). Another case is the collection of Philippe Stern's recordings of traditional African music during the 1931 Colonial exhibition, assessed by BNF to be in the public domain, presented here and on BNF's paper periodic (Chroniques, n° 79, p. 30 [10]), some of which I have also uploaded on Commons. Closer to our case (but not as famous as the previous ones), there is also a PD recording from the 30s of traditional Indian music here and another undated PD recording of Indian music here. In 2009, Cordereix stated here BNF had about 1000 sound documents in the public domain, 40% of which was "world music". — Racconish ☎ 09:52, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep The source says these are in the public domain. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:06, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- The same blog article by Audrey Viault on Gallica's web site mentions 2 other famous recordings assessed by BNF to be in the public domain, one of traditional Japanese music and one of traditional African music (some of which I have uploaded on Commons). Another case is the collection of Philippe Stern's recordings of traditional African music during the 1931 Colonial exhibition, assessed by BNF to be in the public domain, presented here and on BNF's paper periodic (Chroniques, n° 79, p. 30 [10]), some of which I have also uploaded on Commons. Closer to our case (but not as famous as the previous ones), there is also a PD recording from the 30s of traditional Indian music here and another undated PD recording of Indian music here. In 2009, Cordereix stated here BNF had about 1000 sound documents in the public domain, 40% of which was "world music". — Racconish ☎ 09:52, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- Delete I think the discussion above has ignored the fact that Ravi Shankar had a copyright in his performance. That is separate from the copyright for the recording, which lasts sixty years after creation. Such copyrights apparently last for fifty years after the performance if the performance was in India (1957 Act at Section 38). However, if the performance was outside India, which is likely according to Ravi Shankar, then it would probably last 70 years pma. I think that there is a significant doubt here. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:34, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Not sure what you mean. There is no composer copyright on traditional music and there are no claims of composition of these pieces by Ravi Shankar. If you mean the performer's right, it is not a statutory right in the USA, where the performance was recorded [11], for pre 1972 recordings. There is no such thing as a 70 years pma performer's right, even in Europe [12]. I suppose one could argue there could have been a 50 years performer's right derivated from the TRIPS agreement which would have been assigned to the US publisher of the record, but this right is not opposable any more. — Racconish ☎ 15:01, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: as per Racconish above. --Yann (talk) 19:29, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
User:Hazhk removed the license with the comment: The image is no longer present on the source website, but there's no proof that it was freely licensed. The copyright belongs to either the National Party or the NZ Government JuTa 02:07, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep doesn't matter if its no longer on their website, the licence is still cc-by-3.0..websites die or get updated, we don't delete images because of that.--Stemoc 04:27, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Keep Hmm. There was no license review here, so we cannot prove that this image was actually taken from the web site, which is, indeed, licensed CC-BY. Under a strict reading of our rules, that calls for deletion of the image, but I an inclined to keep it and add a note to the file description explaining the reasoning. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:38, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: as per above. --Yann (talk) 19:30, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
the National Party does not publish content under a free license Schwede66 18:19, 26 December 2021 (UTC)
- did you even read the previous DR?--Stemoc 00:41, 27 December 2021 (UTC)
- No, I did not. That is indeed the first time that the National Party has released anything under a suitable license. Fantastic. Schwede66 07:46, 31 December 2021 (UTC)
Kept per previous -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:35, 18 February 2022 (UTC)
This is a third party logo, and as 2D art would not necessarily be covered by Freedom of Panorama. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:06, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- Keep OK due to age, the Joint Railway was created in 1906, so its logo is almost certainly PD. FOP is irrelevant here.--Nilfanion (talk) 11:44, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- Can you add the relevant PD-art tag for the subject then? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:15, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: as per above. --Yann (talk) 19:30, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Refferal, due to the low standard of originality the Uk applies, a printed design on a tie is effectively a 2D design, which is not necessarily covered under UK FoP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:14, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Keep The shapes and colours of these ties are way too simple to be under copyright, They are the same shapes and colours that Metrolink uses on it's trams which also have 2D designs on them, I can't see all Metrolink trams being deleted, so can't see why an image of a tie would not be covered by FoP because it is the wrong kind of object. Oxyman (talk) 11:35, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: as per above. --Yann (talk) 19:30, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Rail Alphabet
[edit]Refferal, as in the course of some off-wiki researches, it transpired that the BR logo, prominently featured in these was still a trademark, and nominally owned by the Department of Transport (in the UK). (On a related note it would appear that Rail Alphabet as a typeface may may also be owned.)
I am perfectly willing to withdraw this if someone else, preferably from OTRS or GLAM is able to get an official clarification or permission from the Department of Transport on logo inclusions like this. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:29, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- File:Bryn railway station (1).JPG
- File:Rainford railway station (9).JPG
- File:Severn Beach railway station MMB 02C.jpg
- File:Sign outside Little Sutton railway station.jpg
ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:29, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- Also affected would be Category:Railway station signs with the British Rail double arrow, which contained too many files to nominate individually.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:32, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Keep The BR logo is PD-shape.--Nilfanion (talk) 12:21, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
@Mattbuck:
Comment As uploader of three of the above photos, I am neutral on whether they are kept or not, as long as the outcome is consistent with relevant contemporaneous DRs like Commons:Deletion requests/File:National Rail logo.svg. Since that discussion appears to be attracting a higher volume of comments than this one, maybe this DR can be folded into that one if possible? Since the underlying issue appears to be the same. Or even better, fold the whole lot into one big DR as I don't see much advantage to having multiple separate discussions about the single issue. Rept0n1x (talk) 12:29, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
- I would agree, but I'm not sure how DR's can be merged. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:30, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
- No worries, as long as the closing admin(s) are aware of multiple, related DRs being affected by a definitive decision in one of them, then I am sure common sense will prevail here. Rept0n1x (talk) 12:38, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
- Deletion Stayed - A clarification has been sought from the relevant party, but the relevant contacts have stated they may not respond until June 19th.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:43, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: as per above. --Yann (talk) 19:31, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Stolbovsky as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: File:Karl Bistrom.jpg Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 15:19, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- Not the same, but is it useful to keep this one? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 15:20, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Not duplicate, no space saved when deleting. --Yann (talk) 19:33, 28 May 2017 (UTC)
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks
- File:Park memcenter.jpg
- File:Torzhesvenny zal.jpg
- File:Memcentre musey1.jpg
- File:Monument Goncharov2.jpg - transferred by Atsirbot
- File:Monument Goncharov1.jpg - transferred by Atsirbot
- File:Divan Tapochki.jpg - transferred by Atsirbot
- File:Memorial plate.jpg
- File:Monument I Y Yakovlev.jpg
- File:Monument Denis Davydov.jpg
- File:Monument Karl Marx Ulyanovsk2.jpg
- File:Monument Karl Marx Ulyanovsk1.jpg
- File:Monument I N Ulyanov2.jpg
- File:Monument I N Ulyanov1.jpg
- File:Monument Bogdan Khitrovo2.jpg
- File:Monument Bogdan Khitrovo1.jpg - transferred by Atsirbot
- File:Monument Leontieva.jpg
- File:Кавалерка.jpg
- File:Monument Ё2.jpg - transferred by Atsirbot
- File:Леонтьева.jpg
Dogad75 (talk) 20:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- I've been told by Atsirlin on my talk that these need to be transferred. I don't know how to do that. I had deleted them a bit early by mistake, but I've restored them for transfer. It looks like a few have been transferred by Atsirbot. I've marked them. Daphne Lantier 23:01, 27 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:52, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather small-sized format, potentially personality rights isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: affected File:Vishal-Krishna-S-receiving-Malayala-Puraskaram-2016.jpg and File:Vishal-Krishna-Kerala-Film-Critics-Award-2016.jpg, Roland zh (talk) 19:02, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:24, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather thumbnail format, potentially personality rights isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Comment: affected File:Vishal-Krishna-S-receiving-Malayala-Puraskaram-2016.jpg and File:Vishal-Krishna-Kerala-Film-Critics-Award-2016.jpg, Roland zh (talk) 19:02, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:24, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
Inclusion of third party swan logo left, 2D art is not covered by Freedom of panorama in the UK. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:33, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
@Mattbuck:
- Keep a) Which artist's copyright is being violated? b) Feel free to crop the logo as you see fit - this is a Wiki after all. best, Sunil060902 (talk) 19:06, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: the swan logo is de minimis here. Ruthven (msg) 11:33, 7 June 2017 (UTC)
I don't think the licence is valid. It consists of more than text and "simple geometric shapes". It consists of rather elaborate graphics. Hence I don't see how it is automatically in the public domain. Citobun (talk) 13:41, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- I am the author, so I guess I am all for Keep. Please consider [[13]] and [[14]]. Look at the Google Chrome logo. It has very simple shapes and a few gradients. Just like the BRF logo. I am, of course, happy with using another license-tag, but I, at this moment, believe this is the one most appropriate.---Lommes (talk) 18:33, 21 May 2017 (UTC)
- I think you were the author of the previous version, but not the current version? Citobun (talk) 12:44, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:54, 15 June 2017 (UTC)