Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/05/21

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive May 21st, 2017
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pics moved to Category:Bollenschuur, Hillegom, which is the correct name — Preceding unsigned comment added by Joris (talk • contribs) 2017-05-15T12:13:30‎ (UTC)


Kept: as a category redirect. --JuTa 07:29, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Signature claimed to be of person named but no proof provided Geraldo Perez (talk) 13:27, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This signature is used by Kira Kosarin, in which there are many autographed material with it, you can see it here, here, here here, here, here, and here

Yasméssica (talk) 13:44, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Jcb (talk) 22:20, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Do we have any actual proof this is her signature ?, I can only find this image however this image is only available on Ebay (it's not hard to duplicate Ebay listings nor is it hard to photoshop!), I've managed to find this image but again it's not hard to photoshop,

Another concern is that it states "own work" which would be incorrect - I believe the image was illegally taken from this image and obviously photoshopped,

If proof can be found that it's actually hers then I'd be happy to withdraw, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 15:40, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as per Jcb. --Yann (talk) 14:53, 17 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bot-uploaded personal image with no apparent educational value. Out of project scope. De728631 (talk) 12:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also File:Students School (HOPLE) at Prey Veng - panoramio (3).jpg and File:Students School (HOPLE) at Prey Veng - panoramio.jpg. De728631 (talk) 12:59, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:01, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Iran and the bridge is modern. Architect's copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 16:00, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This bridge has been built in ... 1899. There's no nb of architect's copyright violation. Roland45 (talk) 20:41, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry. Error. It has been built in 1950's. But it's a very standard type of bridge without any originality of an architect (and I doubt that we could know his name!).Roland45 (talk) 20:49, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, @Roland45: , the bridge was built in 1959. I could not find architect's name and usually this complicates things. That case generally 50 years are given for architect to die and most works, where architect died in 2009, are still copyrighted. But Iranian law makes an exception: if the work belongs to legal entity. I consider very unlikely, that such bridge belongs to private person, therefore copyright expired in 1989 (30 years from construction). Taivo (talk) 08:09, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because The picture is worse — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meri 2 (talk • contribs) 2017-05-15T08:47:17‎ (UTC)


Deleted by Sealle: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The picture is worse — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meri 2 (talk • contribs) 2017-05-15T08:50:09‎ (UTC)


Deleted by Sealle: Copyright violation, found elsewhere on the web and unlikely to be own work -

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted twice before as File:خطاطات-دروس-التاريخ-والجغرافيا-السنة-الأولى-بكالوريا-شعبة-العلوم-التجريبية.pdf. Out of scope. Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:53, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Wiki Zero abuse. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 22:35, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Statue "Tellervo, Tapion tytär/ Diana" (Tellervo, Tapios daughter / Diana) [1] in Helsinki, Finland by finnish sculptor Yrjö Liipola, who died in 1971. Not in PD yet, no FOP for sculptures in Finland. Htm (talk) 08:32, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 07:01, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Japan for artistic works. The map on the sign is original enough to be copyrighted and is displayed prominently enough to make the photo a derivative work. De728631 (talk) 13:37, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 07:01, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent artwork and skyscrapers in Puteaux La Défense. But there is No Fop in France Tangopaso (talk) 21:27, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 07:02, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent giant painting or photo on a wall. But there is No Fop in France Tangopaso (talk) 22:01, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 07:03, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Advertisment Zaccarias (talk) 14:54, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, File:Yahoo Support Contact Number USA.jpg as well. --Achim (talk) 15:27, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lakmi00 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These images appear to violate copyright, coming from http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/in-pictures-26351649, http://www.dailymail.co.uk/wires/ap/article-2574947/Skeletons-uncovered-mass-graves-Somalia.html and https://somaliland1991.wordpress.com/2014/02/27/somaliland-genocide-1988/.

Cordless Larry (talk) 21:12, 20 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Lakmi00 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These images do not appear to be the uploader's to release under a CC licence - see links on indivudal image pages.

Cordless Larry (talk) 19:16, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand what picture problems are.what is uploader's to release under a CC licence — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lakmi00 (talk • contribs) 21:44, 21 May 2017 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]

‎Only the photographer has the ability to release photos under that licence, Lakmi00. They don't appear to be your photos, but rather ones that you found online, which are subject to copyright. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:39, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:56, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:57, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused screenshot of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and no license. --Yann (talk) 22:05, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, and no license. --Yann (talk) 22:06, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is the Category:Oleksandro-Kalynove, wich is of right spelling. Fototraveller (talk) 03:19, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as category redirect. --Achim (talk) 09:36, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most probably not own work. Source appears to be http://www.nasiba-zeynalova.az/bio-ru.html Siebrand 10:21, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:27, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not own work, possible but unlikely PD, can't find the original source. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:10, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:30, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 17:15, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:49, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 17:16, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 17:51, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of rights to upload this logo... probable copyright violation. If 'home-made', some here seem to make use of copyrighted font style, and all seem of little value to the project. Acabashi (talk) 00:08, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with:


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:40, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio .... Slangcamms (talk) 02:09, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:41, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely own work of the uploader as claimed. JuTa 02:18, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:41, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely own work of the uploader as claimed. JuTa 02:19, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:41, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

looks to me pretty much out of scope JuTa 02:24, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:41, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not owned by user 112.198.101.142 03:03, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:41, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not oned by user Ardiredj 112.198.101.142 03:06, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:41, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to delete my own work Trigueiro martins (talk) 03:09, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:41, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not owned by user Ardiredj 112.198.101.142 03:10, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:41, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Professional photo uploaded as 'Own work', unlikely to belong to the uploader. Neegzistuoja (talk) 03:34, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


I think the owner is someone from his party, LSI-Qender (Lsiqender).


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:41, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that image was sourced from Gaston Browne or originally published under the necessary license as claimed. Neegzistuoja (talk) 03:35, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:42, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Professional photo uploaded as 'Own work', unlikely to belong to the uploader. Neegzistuoja (talk) 04:03, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:42, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

living artist Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 04:25, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:42, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

equivalent to File:Olympic pictogram Boxing.png in same format, Boxlogo.png was uploaded much later than the linked photograph. Jon Kolbert (talk) 05:52, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:42, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sculpture Onni ("Happiness", unveiled in the 2000's, sculptures present location unknown) by sculptor Rafael Saifulin, born 1952. Not in PD, no FOP for sculptures in Finland. Htm (talk) 06:10, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:42, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sculpture Lukusali ("The Reading room") in Helsinki, Finland [2] by finish sculptor Kari Juva, died in 2014. Not in PD, no FOP for sculptures in Finland. Htm (talk) 06:17, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:42, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

None-free material in Japan Batholith (talk) 06:28, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:42, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free illustration Batholith (talk) 06:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:42, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

None-free material in Japan Batholith (talk) 06:44, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:42, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

None-free material in Japan Batholith (talk) 06:44, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:42, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

None-free material in Japan Batholith (talk) 06:45, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:42, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Othaworld, defunct website

[edit]

Out of Scope. This must be a defunct website because internet search gives no results. --Zaccarias (talk) 06:51, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:42, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

changing picture Pendroy (talk) 07:10, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:43, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope (of Wikimedia Commons). As a simple advertisement this image doesn't belong here. --Zaccarias (talk) 07:14, 21 May 2017 (UTC) Zaccarias (talk) 07:14, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:43, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope & assumably a violation of trademark law; windows logo itself can be used but not manipulated in a way, the trademark owner would not give permission for. Despite of that it is out of scope anyway. Zaccarias (talk) 07:28, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:43, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

None-free material in Japan Batholith (talk) 07:30, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:44, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no need for this photo — Preceding unsigned comment added by Чръный человек (talk • contribs) 2017-05-19T12:49:34‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:44, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, blurry and out-of-scope. WTH is supposed to be illustrated here ? Esprit Fugace (talk) 07:40, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:44, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

authors request — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zunter (talk • contribs) 2017-05-17T15:38:38‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:44, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly a copyright violation. Image is labeled as copyright image but it is also a derivative work because several locations are marked on the map. Zaccarias (talk) 07:47, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:43, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because it is low quality Mcjhfn (talk) 07:47, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Because it is low quality Mcjhfn (talk) 07:49, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:43, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:43, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused sunset, not enough visual or encyclopedic quality to be really useful, there is a lot of better sunsets in Category:Sunsets of Morocco.
Out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:59, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:44, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Distorted duplicate of File:Water borehole.jpg. Not realistically useful. LX (talk, contribs) 09:11, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:44, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Importancia de la tecnologia en la educacion - several images with similar descr

[edit]

similar images, allready deleted in the past:

Most likely all of them are copyright violations --Zaccarias (talk) 09:15, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:44, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of permission from the photographer or from the publisher of the magazine.The uploader claims it as "own work", but also claimed on his/her talk-page to be 61 in 2016. This is not the work of a seven-year-old. I don't know if a photograph used on the cover of a magazine counts as a "simple photograph" or an "intellectual work with creative characteristics" under Italian copyright law, but suspect it is the latter. I'm afraid all uploads by this user may need to be reviewed – a good number have already been deleted. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 09:28, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:44, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Asmabenazzouz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS.

Yann (talk) 09:45, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:45, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chasmoid (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://rvteatro.com/assets/img/team/Roman2.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:08, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copy this photo - https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:23.09.91_Gr%C3%A4fenberg_211.061.jpg Bahnhonsk (talk) 09:47, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:45, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 09:52, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:45, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF data, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 09:53, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:45, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 09:53, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:45, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Also unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 09:54, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:45, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Also may be out of scope. Yann (talk) 09:55, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:45, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Luca Varlaro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small images without EXIF data, 3 copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS.

Yann (talk) 09:56, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:45, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt this is own work, because of the artistic presentation. Wasn't able to find a source. Siebrand 10:25, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:45, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 10:40, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:46, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 10:41, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:46, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

HR here. No EXIF data. Yann (talk) 10:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:46, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF data, older copies on the web, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 10:45, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:46, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 10:45, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:46, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 10:46, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:46, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Also unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 10:46, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:46, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Manuel M (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small images without EXIF data, please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS.

Yann (talk) 10:54, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Manuel M (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No evidence of valid license in the Italian House of Deputies

Discasto talk 21:37, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:46, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:46, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 10:55, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:47, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 10:55, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:47, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF data, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 10:55, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:47, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uk Freedom of Panorama does not cover 2D artworks such as a map. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:59, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - I obviously assumed maps would be fine however looking closer it actually fails FOP and the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 which states and I quote "Representation of certain artistic works on public display.
    (1)This section applies to—
    (a)buildings, and
    (b)sculptures, models for buildings and works of artistic craftsmanship, if permanently situated in a public place or in premises open to the public.
    ",
Anyway delete, Thanks, Davey2010 (IP) 18:14, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Just want to confirm the above edit was indeed made by me and not by some IP using my name (Had I known my images were going to be nominated I wouldn't of gone on a forced wikibreak), Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 13:14, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:47, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Freedom of panorama in the UK does not cover 2D art such as a map. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:59, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - I obviously assumed maps would be fine however looking closer it actually fails FOP and the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 which states and I quote "Representation of certain artistic works on public display.
    (1)This section applies to—
    (a)buildings, and
    (b)sculptures, models for buildings and works of artistic craftsmanship, if permanently situated in a public place or in premises open to the public.
    ",
Anyway delete, Thanks, Davey2010 (IP) 18:15, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Just want to confirm the above edit was indeed made by me and not by some IP using my name (Had I known my images were going to be nominated I wouldn't of gone on a forced wikibreak), Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 13:15, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:47, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

freedom of panorama would not cover a 2D artwork such as a map. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:00, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete - I obviously assumed maps would be fine however looking closer it actually fails FOP and the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 which states and I quote "Representation of certain artistic works on public display.
    (1)This section applies to—
    (a)buildings, and
    (b)sculptures, models for buildings and works of artistic craftsmanship, if permanently situated in a public place or in premises open to the public.
    ",
Anyway delete, Thanks, Davey2010 (IP) 18:13, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  • Just want to confirm the above edit was indeed made by me and not by some IP using my name (Had I known my images were going to be nominated I wouldn't of gone on a forced wikibreak), Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 13:15, 26 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:47, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dervied from another file as indciated, which is seemingly unsourced. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:03, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Seems complex to be PD-textlogo so the TOO in the UK is very low. Fma12 (talk) 13:17, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:47, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently unsourced. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:03, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Seems complex to be PD-textlogo so the TOO in the UK is very low. Fma12 (talk) 13:16, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:47, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy here: http://cuartocentenario.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/11774663_10205581854203950_354405434_n1-500x383.jpg Copied from Facebook. Yann (talk) 11:04, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:48, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nacho BL (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS.

Yann (talk) 11:05, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:48, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm disputing the claim that this too simple as the UK threshold of originality is rather low. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:09, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:48, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

very small, unused Hiddenhauser (talk) 11:14, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:48, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The concern here is the included logo, which is the primary focus of the image, but for the inclusion of the said logo on box sign, this would otherwise be a photo of a 2D design, which isn't covered by freedom of panorama in the UK. Additionaly (see a previous DR), I had concerns about the relevant logo, being above Threshold of Originality.

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:17, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:49, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The concern is that whilst the licensing may be correct there's no source other than to a deleted image at Wikipedia. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:25, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:48, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not convinced this simple applying the UK's low standard of originality, given the stylised breaks in the 5 numeral. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:02, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:49, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a third party logo, not self as claimed. When was the crest first used? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:04, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:49, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a logo of a third party organisation, not necessarily self. However the elements shown are common symbols. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:05, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:49, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of a third party organisation, but apparently claimed as own work. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:07, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The MI5 logo has an illuminati pyramid eye? The fuck? Clearly not own work,  Delete. -mattbuck (Talk) 12:45, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That is genuinely in the logo,ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:27, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:49, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a logo fo a third party, not necessarily self as claimed. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:09, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:49, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Referal as this is a third party logo. It's not simple owing to the stylised jet trail stroke on the X. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:12, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:49, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From https://www.hermitagendowment.ru/ru/hdf_exc_det.html?num=7 MisterXS (talk) 12:24, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:49, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to this edit it was uploaded with no permission and an invalid license. It the IP is really Paula Stacey we'd need an OTRS permission from hers. Strakhov (talk) 12:37, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Copyvio, taken from here. --Discasto talk 18:28, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment File:Cabbit.jpg was uploaded in 2010 and that link you offer seems to be 2014-dated. Anyway, it's a likely copyvio. If content's creator is really keen to host the image here, as that IP-edit mildly suggests (now file description is not totally clear on that (This is not a real animal and has been mistakenly updated for public domain. This work should not be used without permission.), is that a CC BY-SA because she supposedly gave permission writing that? is that all rights reserved unless you ask her and she gives you permission?), an OTRS permission is needed, since «anonymous-editing-claiming-I-am-that-pal» is not considered a valid way to license stuff. Strakhov (talk) 20:09, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:50, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Prototypehumanoid (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious copyright status. Maps are unsorted and therefore out of scope

/St1995 12:51, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:50, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unsinnige Quellenangabe, so dass auch unklar ist, ob die gewählte Lizenz stimmt. Xocolatl (talk) 13:10, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:50, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In Litauen gibt es leider keine Panoramafreiheit. D. h., das offenbar geschützte Foto auf der Informationstafel darf nicht reproduziert werden. De728631 (talk) 13:32, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

okay sorry, wusste ich nicht. Kann dann gelöscht werden.--Danielt. (talk) 14:03, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:50, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope and likely copyvio Ariadacapo (talk) 13:33, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:50, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:50, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dlazarev (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://d3bem67vv0tpdp.cloudfront.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/MallorieleftLaurenright.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:50, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

taken from website, the image is free though but has a watermark, low resolution Triplecaña (talk) 08:44, 14 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep In use. --Discasto talk 15:39, 15 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep So what? You can easily remove the watermark, no reason for deletion. Яй (talk) 08:18, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as per COM:INUSE -- I've also corrected the license. Daphne Lantier 01:35, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The assigned license is also wrong. According to the Chilean Intellectual Property Law (see here), copyright status (70 years after death) depend on when the surviving wife died (Lynch actually died in 1936). We don't know when such spouse died. On the other hand, memoriachilena.cl states that their images can belong to two categories (see here): images in the Common Cultural Heritage (not protected) and protected images. Finally, the page where the image has been taken from (here) clearly states Propiedad intelectual: Obra protegida (Intellectual property (status): Protected work). Thus, the image, as far as we know, is still protected and therefore is not valid according to Commons policies. With regard to US legislation, we don't actually know whether the work was actually published or registered before 1923 Discasto talk 14:35, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:51, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ManKhanh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://proimage.vn/images/gallery/gioi-thieu/Giang%20vien/nguyen-thu-huong.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:51, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ManKhanh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional uploads unlikely to be own work. Variable sizes, two have cameras the rest do not, the locations and special access needed for the photos and one also has that lovely dropped shadow effect so popular on myspace.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:04, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:19, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:52, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:51, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:51, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by WVUStudentGovernment (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of project scope.

Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:51, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:52, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Paresh7771 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, not within project scope

Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:53, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:52, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, https://www.gannett-cdn.com/-mm-/7fd28953edc70dd32689dba7cedede218a60d5bf/c=17-0-7663-4320&r=x1683&c=3200x1680/local/-/media/2016/11/15/USATODAY/USATODAY/636148476870180333-nba-ps4-0110.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:54, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:52, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/736x/61/27/c8/6127c8683c46728234a54235d4963f3d.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:56, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:52, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by S nny (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyvios, the designs on the packages are more than likely copyrighted and are the sole subject of the images

Jon Kolbert (talk) 14:56, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:52, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. The image can be found on several websites with no license / author info. --Zaccarias (talk) 15:01, 21 May 2017 (UTC) Zaccarias (talk) 15:01, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:52, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. The image can be found on several websites with no license / author info. Zaccarias (talk) 15:01, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:53, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely a copyright violation. The image can be found on several websites. Zaccarias (talk) 15:03, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:53, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

test image Jon Kolbert (talk) 15:03, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:53, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Metadata contradicts Own Work claim (Presidential Palace Photo) AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 15:21, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:53, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. On several websites, no author info. Zaccarias (talk) 15:27, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:53, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The architect of the cathedral was Ioan Traianescu (1875–1964). No FOP in Romania. Turbojet (talk) 15:39, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:53, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, blurry Hiddenhauser (talk) 15:53, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:53, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The work is signed “Hang Young Joon”. Since there are no Google hits on that name, it seems likely that the work is out of scope as a personal work of art by a non-notable artist. So, in order to keep it on Commons, it must first be proven that the artist is notable. That is usually done by citing a WP article.

Second, because of the frequent claims of “own work” by people who have photographed copyrighted paintings that they did not paint, if it can be proven that the work is in scope, then the artist must send a free license using OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:54, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:53, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

First, it must be proven that the painting is in scope, useful for our educational purpose. That includes proving that the artist is notable, usually be citing a WP article.

Second, because of the frequent claims of “own work” by people who have photographed copyrighted paintings that they did not paint, if it can be proven that the work is in scope, then the artist must send a free license using OTRS. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:57, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:53, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doppelt hochgeladen Johann Malchus (talk) 16:02, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:53, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doppelt hochgeladen Johann Malchus (talk) 16:03, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:53, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Also unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 16:05, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:53, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Also unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 16:05, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:53, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image without EXIF data, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Also unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 16:08, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:53, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Also unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 16:09, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:53, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bilalbouyahia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Bilalbouyahia (serial copyright violator). Uploader related: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Satellite image of Kabylie.jpg.

Gunnex (talk) 13:11, 1 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:41, 14 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bilalbouyahia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS.

Yann (talk) 16:10, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:54, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Also unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 16:12, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:54, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 16:12, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:54, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 16:12, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:54, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doppelt hochgeladen Johann Malchus (talk) 16:17, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:54, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 16:17, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:54, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Also unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 16:18, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:54, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 16:18, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:54, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 16:18, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:54, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 16:19, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:54, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 16:19, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:54, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Robinrts143 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small images without EXIF data, please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS.

Yann (talk) 16:21, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:54, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doppelt hochgeladen Johann Malchus (talk) 16:22, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doppelt hochgeladen Johann Malchus (talk) 16:23, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Older image here: https://shevlinsebastian.blogspot.fr/2015/08/a-french-love-affair.html Yann (talk) 16:24, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Iran and the structure on the left looks modern. I suspect architect's copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 16:25, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doppelt hochgeladen Johann Malchus (talk) 16:25, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Last remaining file, user with bad history, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 16:25, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Also unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 16:26, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Also unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 16:26, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 16:27, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doppelt hochgeladen Johann Malchus (talk) 16:27, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Karenmejiara (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Press images, please send a permission via COM:OTRS.

Yann (talk) 16:28, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 16:28, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, depicted people are unknown. Maybe out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 16:59, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal image, unused, out of scope Rupert Pupkin (talk) 17:28, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Concern is the logo, UK standard of originality is low, and 2D art is not covered by Freedom of Panorama ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:38, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Concern is the third party logo, but for this being on a sign it would be 2D art, which is not covered under freedom of panorama. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:39, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Third party logo, not necessarily own work as claimed, but is it too simple? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:42, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Samiranmondall (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images, not within project scope

Jon Kolbert (talk) 17:55, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:55, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Samiranmondall (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope unused personal photos.

Lacrymocéphale (talk) 20:48, 24 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 13:09, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam - not within project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:02, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Hello,

Thank you for your revision I didn't get the mean of your comment as a spam-not within project scope, I draw this logo by my self and I registered it a brand logo. we are a registered company in Romania and we started to work in the field of clothes production and this logo was our idea as a logo for our products and we even registered it as copyrighted logo for our company.

Kind Regards

Ahmad Abu-Ziad


--78.104.123.66 18:22, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there Ahmad, and thank you for your contribution to Wikimedia Commons. As part of the project scope, files hosted on commons must meet certain criteria. One of those criteria being that the media must be realistically useful for an educational purpose - which in this case, that isn't met as there is no apparent use for this logo on any of the Wikimedia projects, as the brand isn't well-known. As such, the file does not fall within the project scope. Nonetheless, thank you for your contribution and you are welcome to provide more material given that it meets the conditions outlined in the project scope. Thank you. Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:50, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:56, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image, not within project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 18:03, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:56, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused and out of scope. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 18:19, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:56, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free photo of a 3D-object, no photographer's permission. Яй (talk) 18:34, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:56, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of a non-free newspaper page, PD claim is nonsense. Яй (talk) 18:35, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:56, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of copyrighted works. Яй (talk) 18:36, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:56, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text of questionable authorship and educational worth, contains historical photographs with no license information. Яй (talk) 18:40, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:56, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a title card to me, unlikely to be own work. AntiCompositeNumber (talk) 18:49, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:56, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of rather poor quality, replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:56, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:56, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

BH does not permit screenshots, wallpapers, vacation pictures, promotional posters, and the image is one of them. Frankie talk 18:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:56, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Paulandys

[edit]

The photos have all been copied from websites. The uploader does not have permission to do this; i.e. they are copyright violations. The uploader has stated that the website copied from is http://www.skyscrapercity.com. Though at least one photo (File:Ekaterynoslavsky_bulvard.jpg) is copied from https://morskoy.io.ua (link to File:Ekaterynoslavsky_bulvard.jpg on /morskoy.io.ua website. The morskoy.io.ua website has a statement All material © copyright by Valeriy Kravchenko. All rights reserved. --Toddy1 (talk) 18:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Retro-tram Dnipropetrovsk.jpg has a copyright mark in the bottom right corner.--Toddy1 (talk) 19:04, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:56, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same user uploaded a movie poster without permission. And this file has no EXIF data. Dubious. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 19:03, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:57, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same user uploaded a movie poster without permission. Dubious. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 19:03, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:57, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication why {{PD-GermanGov}} would apply. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:05, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded it, but it should be deleted. After seeing your message, I asked the Deutsches Historisches Museum for the right to publish the photograph on Wikemedia Commons, and they denied it. I had misinterpreted its record on the site of the Deutsche Digitale Bibliothek.


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:57, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Editingwikipediarightnow (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely copyvios

/St1995 19:06, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:57, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

potentially, sourced "https://plus.google.com/108186415691306958577", Roland zh (talk) 19:07, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:57, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lemais8 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Too bad quality and unreal. Good images kept

/St1995 19:12, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:57, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': one-file-upload, potentially personality rights isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', but also potentially (in widest sense) 'profiling' as per description, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:12, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:57, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': one-file-upload, potentially personality rights isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:17, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:58, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded as "own work" but prior to upload to Commons also found on http://estella.info/estella/articulo.asp?f=Gigantes Takeaway (talk) 19:20, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:58, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake authorship, depicted person stated as a photo author Dogad75 (talk) 19:40, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:58, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not in use, unknown person in the foreground --> out of scope. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 19:46, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:58, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not in use, unknown person in the foreground --> out of scope. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 19:46, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:58, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not in use, unknown person in the foreground --> out of scope. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 19:47, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:58, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not in use, unknown person in the foreground --> out of scope. Rupert Pupkin (talk) 19:48, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:58, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader claims copyright but EXIF shows the photo as from jeanclaudephoto.com - OTRS confirmation would be needed Whpq (talk) 20:10, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:58, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Guadalcanal is misspelled. 2602:306:C569:EE20:B447:26A8:B5A0:F74C 20:22, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:58, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 20:23, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:58, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 20:24, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:58, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 20:24, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:58, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doppelt hochgeladen Johann Malchus (talk) 20:35, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:58, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doppelt hochgeladen Johann Malchus (talk) 20:37, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:58, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doppelt hochgeladen Johann Malchus (talk) 20:38, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:58, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doppelt hochgeladen Johann Malchus (talk) 20:38, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:59, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doppelt hochgeladen Johann Malchus (talk) 20:40, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:59, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All have links to remote site, with no evidence of permission. Also if the artist is the uploader - then who took the photograph?

Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:51, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 21:59, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubts about claimed ownership by uploader, as this image was published elsewhere already in 2013 and 2012. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:00, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:00, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubts about claimed ownership by uploader, as image was published elsewhere already in 2015: [4],[5]. -- Túrelio (talk) 21:02, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:00, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Also unused personal image, out of scope. Yann (talk) 21:06, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:00, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 21:07, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:00, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Al-Ahwazi1925 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small images without EXIF data. At least 3 copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS.

Yann (talk) 21:09, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:00, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Chourouk ben khanchouch (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small images without EXIF data, mostly copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS.

Yann (talk) 21:11, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:01, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Prodyutkdeka (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Last remaining files, small images without EXIF data, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS.

Yann (talk) 21:14, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:01, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elbairikhalid1989 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Also some files are unused personal images, so out of scope.

Yann (talk) 21:34, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:01, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from Facebook, please upload the original file, or send a permission via COM:OTRS. Yann (talk) 21:35, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:01, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Habib787 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Small images without EXIF data, please upload the original files, or send a permission via COM:OTRS.

Yann (talk) 21:37, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:01, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely own work 80.235.147.186 22:45, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:01, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright logo of Comparsa Marabú de Santo Tomé Corrientes. No evidence uploader is copyright owner. MPF (talk) 23:05, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:01, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small image unsourced, highly unlikely to be own work. MB298 (talk) 23:12, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:01, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

doppelt hochgeladen Johann Malchus (talk) 23:30, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:01, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused, doesn't seem like a notable enough to warrant encyclopedic coverage, as such, file is outside of project scope Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:32, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:01, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too blurry to be of encyclopedic use Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:35, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:01, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Minuscule photo, out of scope as no educational value MPF (talk) 23:38, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:01, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Minuscule photo, out of scope as no educational value MPF (talk) 23:39, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:01, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of rather poor quality, replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:54, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep, not poor quality (quality is a very subjective term), appropriately categorised and has coordinates, valuable for people outside of Wikimedia searching for content related to this region /St1995 20:15, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no reason for deletion, per Stas1995. --Wdwd (talk) 10:53, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of rather poor quality, replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:55, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep, 4000px - not poor quality (quality is a very subjective term), appropriately categorised and has coordinates, valuable for people outside of Wikimedia searching for content related to this region /St1995 20:16, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no reason for deletion, per Stas1995. --Wdwd (talk) 10:53, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of rather poor quality, replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:56, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep, 3000px - not poor quality (quality is a very subjective term), appropriately categorised and has coordinates, valuable for people outside of Wikimedia searching for content related to this region /St1995 20:16, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no reason for deletion, per Stas1995. --Wdwd (talk) 10:53, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of rather poor quality, replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:56, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep, nice picture of a purple sky - 4200px - not poor quality (quality is a very subjective term), appropriately categorised and has coordinates, valuable for people outside of Wikimedia searching for content related to this region /St1995 20:19, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no reason for deletion, per Stas1995. --Wdwd (talk) 10:54, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of rather poor quality, replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:56, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep, nice picture of a rainy day - 3700px - not poor quality (quality is a very subjective term), appropriately categorised and has coordinates, valuable for people outside of Wikimedia searching for content related to this region /St1995 20:19, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no reason for deletion, per Stas1995. --Wdwd (talk) 10:55, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of rather poor quality, replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:56, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no reason for deletion, per Stas1995. --Wdwd (talk) 10:55, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of rather poor quality, replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:57, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep, nice picture of a rainy day - 3700px - not poor quality (quality is a very subjective term), appropriately categorised and has coordinates, valuable for people outside of Wikimedia searching for content related to this region /St1995 20:20, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no reason for deletion, per Stas1995. --Wdwd (talk) 10:56, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, no need to have such a template. And i see no consensus at Commons:Village_pump/Proposals/Archive/2017/04#General_discussion Steinsplitter (talk) 07:21, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nomination. --Krd 08:09, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete as author, regrettably.   — Jeff G. ツ 17:04, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Better link to discussion is this where 3 support and 1 oppose in adding ticket number in OTRS template. How it can be implemented is another question. I'm disappointed to see OTRS leaders have an adamant behavior. It is expectable as OTRS is a private project and not under a community review. It is up to Commons whether they need to depend on this sub-quality service which will damage our reputation too. Jee 02:06, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Steinsplitter and Krd: These pages depend on Template:OTRS autoresponded, so if it is deleted, they should also be deleted.   — Jeff G. ツ 17:04, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:39, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pas d'autorisation du photographe (Didier Plowy) ; Ecole des Chartes ne peut pas déposer sur commons sans l'autorisation des photographes Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 09:11, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

J'envoie l'autorisation du photographe à permissions-fr@wikimedia.org. Cela vous convient ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by École des chartes - Utilisateur David (talk • contribs)

Depuis des années, l'EdC fait n'importe quoi avec ses imports de photos sur commons ; quand on fait des remarques, EdC promet de se mettre en conformité, mais EdC ne tient pas ses engagements…
Ces expériences prouvent qu'il n'est pas raisonnable de faire confiance aux services de cette école (informatique ? communication ?), qui semblent ne pas prendre très au sérieux le respect de la législation sur les droits des auteurs.
Je suggère que le photographe envoie lui-même son autorisation, avec authentification, ainsi ce sera clair.

--Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 16:33, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Bonjour Droit de retrait 03 Webmestre de l'École des chartes, je travaille au service communication. Il y a quelques années, nous avons versé des photos sur la page de l'École des chartes avec quelques négligences ou erreurs sur les licences demandées. Quelques mois, voire années plus tard, Wikipédia a supprimé les photos concernées, puis bloqué notre compte, de sorte que nous ne pouvions même plus répondre sur les pages de discussion. Bref, nous nous sommes renseignés auprès d'un administrateur qui nous a conseillé de créer un compte du type "prénom - nom de l'institution" pour personnaliser le compte. Ce que j'ai fait sous le nom "École des chartes - Utilisateur David". J'ai depuis téléchargé deux images dont nous avons bien récupéré les droits demandés auprès du photographe et transmis à l'adresse permissions-fr@wikimedia.org. Pour la première, d'ailleurs, permissions-fr@wikimedia.org m'a aussi demandé de récupérer auprès des ayant les droits des architectes du bâtiment datant de 1929. Quoiqu'il en soit, le ton accusatoire, voire diffamatoire, de votre message ne se justifie en rien et est préjudiciable à toute discussion constructive. Il serait plus respectueux pour discuter, et comme Wikipédia semble y encourager, de m'interpeller plus directement. Nous avons certes commis des erreurs, mais ne doutez pas que l'École nationale des chartes prenne au sérieux le respect de la législation sur les droits des auteurs. Le photographe a déjà envoyé l'autorisation que nous avons transmise à permissions-fr@wikimedia.org, je ne comprends plus pourquoi vous souhaitez la supprimer ! Bien cordialement, École des chartes - Utilisateur David

  1.  Keep, puisque École des chartes - Utilisateur David a certifié que le photographe avait transmis son autorisation via l'adresse idoine. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 15:44, 24 May 2017 (UTC).[reply]

Deleted: Can be restored when and if the photographer sends a free license directly using OTRS and the license is read and approved. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:44, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This was considerd simple, but applying a UK standard of originallity I'm not so sure, given that the 2 element is stylized, it not merely being overlaid on the line, but the diagonal stroke forming part of it and continuing. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 10:58, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't seem like such a complex design to me. Far more complex shapes have been covered under this license. --RaviC (talk) 21:18, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The ToO is very low in the UK. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:44, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Freedom of panorama would not cover 2D artwork, such as a line diagram. UK standard of originality is fairly low. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:01, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I felt that this was above threshold of orginality owing to the fact that specific design choices were made concerning the choice of typefaces, and line coloring, in it's construction. However if you think they aren't significant enough. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:33, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep The only thing that could be considered original is what you call the construction, the way the network is represented. But here we have a simple fork which cannot realistically be claimed to be original. — Racconish ☎ 14:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: It is well established that the Tube map is copyrighted. Similar maps such as this are also copyrighted. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:48, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

How can a crop or re-drawing of a presumably copyrighted logo be under a free license? English Wikipedia has en:File:Metrolink new logo.jpg as "fair use".

Probably this should be moved back to en-WP as "fair use". Doing so may break a few templates on other wikis. (However, most uses appear to be at en-WP.) Lupo 09:56, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If this gets moved back to en-WP, File:Victoria 2014-08-22 22-18.jpg should also be deleted. Lupo 09:59, 25 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: kept as PD-textlogo Krd 12:52, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not a simple logo based on the low standard of originality the UK applies. An image utlising this logo was under "fair-use" on english wikipedia. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:11, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose - disagree, this is a collection of cirlces. Logos are permitted on Commons - it's all explained at Commons:Threshold of originality. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cnbrb (talk • contribs) 2017-05-21 12:42 (UTC)
A collection of circles in an 'organised' pattern, bear in mind the UK has low standard for originality.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 14:34, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The UK ToO is very low. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:48, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Fictional flag of questionable notability. Used on anonymous talk page. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Commons:Project scope: the very real flag of a very real micronation. Originally entered on the page "list of micronations" Satanpope (talk) 00:29, 23 May 2017 (MTS)


Deleted: Not very real -- no Google hits. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by ISD as Copyvio (db-f9) with a rationale of I've been asked to nominate this image for deletion because I've just made an article for Wikipedia:Minami Momochi on the English language Wikipedia and nominated for Did You Know?, but we are unsure if it fits the requirements for COM:COSTUME. If it does fit, then that is fine and the image can be used. Sorry about this. Possibly a candidate for deletion, but not obvious enough for a speedy. Storkk (talk) 15:33, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think, it is No FOP in Japan. Because of its costumes.Cheetah1023 (talk) 15:52, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Costumes do not generally have copyrights unless they include masks. (Clothing is utilitarian, but masks are not). This has a mask. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:52, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AntipovSergej (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photographs since 1930s through 1980s, unlikely to be own works, probably scanned paper copies in possession.

Яй (talk) 18:45, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Я, Антипов Сергей Михайлович, 1950 года рождения и мой покойный отец 1916 года рождения и мой покойный дед 1886 года рождения были так или иначе связаны с парусным спортом и авиацией и были фотографами-любителями. Так, например, мою фамилию вы найдёте в 10-й строке снизу в официальном документе Всероссийской федерации парусного спорта: [6]. Ответственно заявляю, что всё, что загрузил на Викисклад, это либо мои фотографии, либо фотографии из семейного архива. Так, в частности, фотографию моего родного дяди Антипова, Юрия Александровича
File:Antipov Yuriy Aleksandrovich.jpg
я сделал будучи у него в гостях, в посёлке Чкаловский, на окраине города Щёлково фотоаппаратом «Зоркий». AntipovSergej (talk) 11:45, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@AntipovSergej: почитайте ru:ВП:СЕМАРХИВ. Иметь доступ к бумажной копии и быть правообладателем оригинального снимка - две разные вещи. --Яй (talk) 12:15, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
File:Shelkovnikov Aleksandr 1963.jpg- upload 2017-03-30 - 1 + 1 = 2 --НоуФрост (talk) 10:09, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Отвечаю. Первое. Я являюсь законным наследником своего отца и деда. Второе. фотографию File:Shelkovnikov Aleksandr 1963.jpg выполнил мой отец. Это готова подтвердить вдова Александра Шелковникова. AntipovSergej (talk) 05:30, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Это очень интересный кейс. Во первых в открытых источниках ищется, кем работали ваш отец и дед. Отец точно был невыездным во времена СССР - в этом нет никаких сомнений, а уж в разные страны точно не мог ездить чтобы фотографировать Олимпийские игры в Канаде, например, которые присутствуют на вот этой фото - File:Aleksandr Potapov 470sailing.jpg , или в Хельсинки в 1955 году, вот тут - File:Russ 1955 sail team.jpg. Я учился в том заведении, где он работал и точно знаю, что такое "первый отдел" и всё что с ним связано... Во вторых вы не единственный ребёнок в семье и даже если фото в архиве сделаны всё же вашими родственниками, а не другими фотографами, то нужно разрешение и от других родственников., оформленное через систему ВП:ДОБРО. Далее. Структура фото сильно неоднородна, ищется в интернете более половина фото. В нескольких местах указано, откуда они. Ну вот "из личного архива И. П. Матвеева", "Из личного архива Сергея Перфильева" (этот сайт имеет странную неиндексируемую структуру и недавно её менял - может оттуда и дата.), вот ещё архив "Потапов Виктор Яковлевич - из личных архивов". Ну ещё можно найти фото из вами приведённых и немало. Но не все. Нигде нет авторства этих фото = "Из личного архива Антипова". Нет и всё. Складывается впечатление, что вы имеете доступ к этим фото где то в Федерации. Например в связи с тем, что сейчас как раз идёт [7] сбор материалов для онлайн музея. Но вот что то мне не верится совсем, что их конкретно делали ваш отец и дед и что вы можете обогатить Википедию этими фото на законных основаниях. Поэтому прошу коллег Sealle, Dogad75, Krassotkin поучаствовать в этом кейсе. Во первых я не знаю английский, чтобы общаться с англоязычными админами, во вторых я готов по запросу на википочту предоставить некие интересные данные, которые не могу огласить публично во избежание разглашения ЛД, в третьих я конечно в конфликте с участником и могу быть не совсем нейтрален. Заранее спасибо за участие. --НоуФрост (talk) 17:34, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Фото File:Aleksandr Potapov 470sailing.jpg и File:Russ 1955 sail team.jpg выполнены в СССР, фантазий не надо. Всё остальное домыслы. Отец, кстати, бывал за рубежом. Не часто, но бывал. Насчёт разрешения от родственников - я подумаю над вашим предложением. Сергей Перфильев готов дать разъяснения по-поводу происхождения фотографий из своего архива. AntipovSergej (talk) 18:29, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Он был на олимпиаде летней 1976 года в Монреале и на воде делал фото гонки с другой яхты самостоятельно? Какие домыслы то? В приведённом источнике фотография имеет характерное название - "21_ol.igry_kanada_aleksandr_i_viktor_potapovy_590. jpg" , так же есть ещё статьи, где она используется в качестве иллюстрации этих Олимпийских игр. На второй фотографии в архиве Перфильева написано, что это Хельсинки. Это было СССР? Надо изучить вопрос... --НоуФрост (talk) 18:36, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Ещё раз: Перфильев и Потапов готовы дать показания, при условии, что этот запрос поступит к ним официально. Готовьте запрос и фамилию свою поставить не забудьте. AntipovSergej (talk) 19:04, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
"Ещё раз" - эти файлы все удалят и не будут слушать более ваши инсинуации. Бремя доказательства вашего творчества в Википедии лежит на вас. Успехов. --НоуФрост (talk) 19:08, 24 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per discussion. "Family archives" is rarely an acceptable source. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:56, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AntipovSergej (talk · contribs)

[edit]

It is improbable that this professional portraits are own work. Please send a proof via OTRS that you are the photographer (not the one who scanned this) of that portrait photographies!

Ras67 (talk) 17:12, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 10:03, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AntipovSergej (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No freedom of panorama in Russia for non-architectural artworks!


Ras67 (talk) 17:39, 3 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Where freedom of panorama exists, we do not need permission from the artist/architect/sculptor. In Russia there is only FOP for buildings. --Green Giant (talk) 17:21, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The artist en:Uday Shankar died in 1977, the musicion en:Ravi Shankar in 2012. This is much too recent for a {{PD-old}} license.

JuTa 01:40, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep. In terms of copyright law, these are recordings of traditional music, not music compositions. Uday Shankar was a dancer and choregrapher, not a composer. Ravi Shankar, aged 17 at the time of the recordings (1937), was merely an interpret. Pre 1972 sound recordings are not protected by copyright in the US. According to Indian law (which in my opinion should not apply here), the duration of copyright on sound recordings is 60 years. Please note these files are coming from Gallica, which not only assesses they are in the public domain, but has published on its blog an article on their exceptional educatonal value written by Audrey Viault, an archivist specialized in sound recordings (see here). It is very unlikely Bibliothèque nationale de France would draw the public's attention on these holdings without checking carefully its assessment of their copyright status. In any case, I have added {{PD-US-record}} to these files and replaced {{PD-old}} by {{PD-traditional}}. — Racconish ☎ 07:28, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Correction: the article on Gallica's blog is co-signed by Pascal Cordereix, who is the director of BNF's division of sound recordings [9] and wrote this article on BNF sound archives, which makes it even more unlikely the copyright assessment has not been carefully checked by BNF. — Racconish ☎ 10:12, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment The evidence seems contrary, but Racconish may have a point. Are there other recordings of this type and from this time in Gallica, or is this an exception? Regards, Yann (talk) 09:37, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
    The same blog article by Audrey Viault on Gallica's web site mentions 2 other famous recordings assessed by BNF to be in the public domain, one of traditional Japanese music and one of traditional African music (some of which I have uploaded on Commons). Another case is the collection of Philippe Stern's recordings of traditional African music during the 1931 Colonial exhibition, assessed by BNF to be in the public domain, presented here and on BNF's paper periodic (Chroniques, n° 79, p. 30 [10]), some of which I have also uploaded on Commons. Closer to our case (but not as famous as the previous ones), there is also a PD recording from the 30s of traditional Indian music here and another undated PD recording of Indian music here. In 2009, Cordereix stated here BNF had about 1000 sound documents in the public domain, 40% of which was "world music". — Racconish ☎ 09:52, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
     Keep The source says these are in the public domain. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:06, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete I think the discussion above has ignored the fact that Ravi Shankar had a copyright in his performance. That is separate from the copyright for the recording, which lasts sixty years after creation. Such copyrights apparently last for fifty years after the performance if the performance was in India (1957 Act at Section 38). However, if the performance was outside India, which is likely according to Ravi Shankar, then it would probably last 70 years pma. I think that there is a significant doubt here. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:34, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
     Comment Not sure what you mean. There is no composer copyright on traditional music and there are no claims of composition of these pieces by Ravi Shankar. If you mean the performer's right, it is not a statutory right in the USA, where the performance was recorded [11], for pre 1972 recordings. There is no such thing as a 70 years pma performer's right, even in Europe [12]. I suppose one could argue there could have been a 50 years performer's right derivated from the TRIPS agreement which would have been assigned to the US publisher of the record, but this right is not opposable any more. — Racconish ☎ 15:01, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per Racconish above. --Yann (talk) 19:29, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:Hazhk removed the license with the comment: The image is no longer present on the source website, but there's no proof that it was freely licensed. The copyright belongs to either the National Party or the NZ Government JuTa 02:07, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Hmm. There was no license review here, so we cannot prove that this image was actually taken from the web site, which is, indeed, licensed CC-BY. Under a strict reading of our rules, that calls for deletion of the image, but I an inclined to keep it and add a note to the file description explaining the reasoning. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:38, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as per above. --Yann (talk) 19:30, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the National Party does not publish content under a free license Schwede66 18:19, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept per previous -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 17:35, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a third party logo, and as 2D art would not necessarily be covered by Freedom of Panorama. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:06, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Can you add the relevant PD-art tag for the subject then? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:15, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per above. --Yann (talk) 19:30, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Refferal, due to the low standard of originality the Uk applies, a printed design on a tie is effectively a 2D design, which is not necessarily covered under UK FoP ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:14, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The shapes and colours of these ties are way too simple to be under copyright, They are the same shapes and colours that Metrolink uses on it's trams which also have 2D designs on them, I can't see all Metrolink trams being deleted, so can't see why an image of a tie would not be covered by FoP because it is the wrong kind of object. Oxyman (talk) 11:35, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as per above. --Yann (talk) 19:30, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Refferal, as in the course of some off-wiki researches, it transpired that the BR logo, prominently featured in these was still a trademark, and nominally owned by the Department of Transport (in the UK). (On a related note it would appear that Rail Alphabet as a typeface may may also be owned.)

I am perfectly willing to withdraw this if someone else, preferably from OTRS or GLAM is able to get an official clarification or permission from the Department of Transport on logo inclusions like this. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:29, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:29, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Also affected would be Category:Railway station signs with the British Rail double arrow, which contained too many files to nominate individually.ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 11:32, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep The BR logo is PD-shape.--Nilfanion (talk) 12:21, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Mattbuck:

 Comment As uploader of three of the above photos, I am neutral on whether they are kept or not, as long as the outcome is consistent with relevant contemporaneous DRs like Commons:Deletion requests/File:National Rail logo.svg. Since that discussion appears to be attracting a higher volume of comments than this one, maybe this DR can be folded into that one if possible? Since the underlying issue appears to be the same. Or even better, fold the whole lot into one big DR as I don't see much advantage to having multiple separate discussions about the single issue. Rept0n1x (talk) 12:29, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I would agree, but I'm not sure how DR's can be merged. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:30, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No worries, as long as the closing admin(s) are aware of multiple, related DRs being affected by a definitive decision in one of them, then I am sure common sense will prevail here. Rept0n1x (talk) 12:38, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per above. --Yann (talk) 19:31, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Stolbovsky as duplicate (duplicate) and the most recent rationale was: File:Karl Bistrom.jpg Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 15:19, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Not the same, but is it useful to keep this one? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 15:20, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Not duplicate, no space saved when deleting. --Yann (talk) 19:33, 28 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Oblam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks

Dogad75 (talk) 20:43, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • I've been told by Atsirlin on my talk that these need to be transferred. I don't know how to do that. I had deleted them a bit early by mistake, but I've restored them for transfer. It looks like a few have been transferred by Atsirbot. I've marked them. Daphne Lantier 23:01, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 23:52, 29 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather small-sized format, potentially personality rights isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: affected File:Vishal-Krishna-S-receiving-Malayala-Puraskaram-2016.jpg and File:Vishal-Krishna-Kerala-Film-Critics-Award-2016.jpg, Roland zh (talk) 19:02, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:24, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work': rather thumbnail format, potentially personality rights isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin and claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ?  Comment: affected File:Vishal-Krishna-S-receiving-Malayala-Puraskaram-2016.jpg and File:Vishal-Krishna-Kerala-Film-Critics-Award-2016.jpg, Roland zh (talk) 19:02, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:24, 5 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inclusion of third party swan logo left, 2D art is not covered by Freedom of panorama in the UK. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 17:33, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Mattbuck:

Keep a) Which artist's copyright is being violated? b) Feel free to crop the logo as you see fit - this is a Wiki after all. best, Sunil060902 (talk) 19:06, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion: the swan logo is de minimis here. Ruthven (msg) 11:33, 7 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't think the licence is valid. It consists of more than text and "simple geometric shapes". It consists of rather elaborate graphics. Hence I don't see how it is automatically in the public domain. Citobun (talk) 13:41, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am the author, so I guess I am all for  Keep. Please consider [[13]] and [[14]]. Look at the Google Chrome logo. It has very simple shapes and a few gradients. Just like the BRF logo. I am, of course, happy with using another license-tag, but I, at this moment, believe this is the one most appropriate.---Lommes (talk) 18:33, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I think you were the author of the previous version, but not the current version? Citobun (talk) 12:44, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:54, 15 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]