Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/03/21
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyrighted work of art. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:48, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, copyright work. — billinghurst sDrewth 03:03, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ashraf rahmani Muzaffarpur (talk · contribs)
[edit]Outside of COM:SCOPE no educational use (COM:EDUSE)
- File:Ashrafrahmani Muzaffarpur 01.jpg
- File:Ashrafrahmani Muzaffarpur(00).jpg
- File:Akhtarraza Muzaffarpur.jpg
- File:Ashrafrahmani Muzaffarpur (02.jpg
- File:Ashrafrahmani Muzaffarpur(07).jpg
- File:Ashrafrahmani Muzaffarpur (002).jpg
- File:Ashraf rahmani Muzaffarpur (003).jpg
- File:Ashraf rahmani Muzaffarpur (002).jpg
- File:Ashraf rahmani Muzaffarpur,01.jpg
- File:Ashraf rahmani Muzaffarpur 0.jpg
- File:Ashrafrahmani muzaffarpur03.jpg
- File:Ashraf rahmani muzaffarpur1.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Mifter (talk) 18:34, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 04:01, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ashraf rahmani Muzaffarpur (talk · contribs)
[edit]Outside of COM:SCOPE no educational use (COM:EDUSE) - As these are reuploads of images that were previously deleted, I am not sure how we can ensure this user understands that they should not keep reuploading images outside our scope.
- File:Ashrafrahmani Muzaffarpur 10.jpg
- File:Ashrafrahmani Muzaffarpur (002).jpg
- File:Ashraf rahmani muzaffarpur01.jpg
- File:Ashrafrahmani muzaffarpur003.jpg
- File:Akhtarraza Muzaffarpur01.jpg
- File:Ashraf swimming pool.jpg
- File:Ashraf rahmani Muzaffarpur (03).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Mifter (talk) 18:56, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:33, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ashraf rahmani Muzaffarpur (talk · contribs)
[edit]Outside of COM:SCOPE no educational use (COM:EDUSE).
- File:Ashraf Rahmani Muzaffarpur 4.jpg
- File:Ashraf Rahmani Muzaffarpur (Swimming pool).jpg
- File:Ashraf Rahmani Muzaffarpur.jpg
- File:Ashraf Rahmani Muzaffarpur 3.jpg
- File:Ashraf Rahmani Muzaffarpur 2.jpg
- File:Ashraf Rahmani Muzaffarpur 1.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Mifter (talk) 04:47, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:11, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Dletozxcbn 160.160.175.185 15:05, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Mys_721tx (talk) 17:25, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Etypppiulxbnm!n 160.160.175.185 15:09, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Mys_721tx (talk) 17:25, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Enchanted Tiki Room
[edit]No FOP for artwork in Japan
- File:Adventureland at Disneyland IMG 3846.jpg
- File:Adventureland at Disneyland IMG 3847.jpg
- File:Adventureland at Disneyland IMG 3853.jpg
- File:Adventureland at Disneyland IMG 3856.jpg
- File:In the Tiki Tiki Tiki Tiki Tiki Room (29427906376).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
Elisfkc (talk) 16:57, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept Misread Category, all images are in California or Florida, not in Japan. Elisfkc (talk) 19:45, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Promotional gif file and multiple presence in web. Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 07:19, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: spam. --Mys_721tx (talk) 20:44, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Dupliate of File:Piscina Manara1.jpg Yiyi (talk) 09:11, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
Kept: Same file. INeverCry 17:02, 5 November 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry, duplicate of File:Piscina Manara.jpg. --Yiyi (Dimmi!) 22:17, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 22:36, 7 May 2017 (UTC)
Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Holy Bible, containing the Old & New Testament & the Apocrypha (Volume 2).djvu Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Holy Bible, containing the Old & New Testament & the Apocrypha (Volume 3).djvu
copyvio, found at http://celebmafia.com/dove-cameron-vanity-fair-loreal-paris-toast-young-hollywood-west-hollywood-221-2017-699715/ Ebyabe (talk) 21:57, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:43, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Promotional purpose image and also available "https://www.google.co.in/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZis99gv5A4KcPp-dieDHHpWH6hWwDQO1-MSaywheGG3WUuPMelwhMFPW81KygDSYluSDbrR9KFcTDQlKjPZvJaxn330kkxT4TJGiJ_17jdaQXwxTG0l3RBoLFtE2Td9qsEmfUpv3h0ydvw3EbvrNonYWmhQGhS1KLsxPlo8jytPFiCu8hFMHJSM7rOu9S31umAw-vx46Ur6mzCYwh4C3xSOSHg4DhAOBDuk57xF7959-KvyA6_1aGIUfdr3rSf7eT1jKik7eaSl0zsmk6naEbRN0RsIi5ZSPde46h-6CW6TFc2R-S3IpgP6EmxwzSSPGTpr_1_1dh7EjMGzcJgr92vMvFGNcjsRkDcn6y4mjcJxFzSNi1Gyg7DJovpIg1IlTZ_1lbLn70f9EPW2pm837dEaXfnRTmHT95HG9EsQr5pPdhCWHTKihl-kZhPK2hepnj0t0NakbHhX39YHye-69XQWw9Mh7XFx-gPEYaax_1Q-aGBDUYaljQZSTT9gXwyQosvTFATs_1B5j6jzJTiNOFVnFV-okQzqL2LlQQdCq7Oc4uqGYrh2geHd8k0PpWURz5AjedOMatt8CvUDj6XbhKyXJ0V_1v9l0m8wd8ASW51zxqQTPi60ZMBOE_1LTvZFWPE-i0Jz5gmdh4oHNTTJdeeqEad2YW4H3m_1sesSCT8Afg7Q0xeZeoPQtDi5nz-5SxlCXpLJyxA-LvEEQHb7xV9ipw0FSAFsMr27YLBPLcWYezcsOVoSNklFLNb6oTqs_1xj89iGrtLyykc6dqnGyxdWubtQReQmkxeQpHjm5UcrLewLagxmucbro8aIUb7LfMS4R9YoUOxtNjevBYL_1Q_13849DKYKoELNKyVYNs28weNcQ7xo5dyC0yqPXXzW2IFQjoQAcyaF2vT9gXYRQgx5QbomB4fYSkLe3Mb1ZEuN794qCzqJefRpacj71PKP9mOCJe1YnIBOnN5XSmJY2r8gIA-qiaH6jRTlVh2HH7HXFjGuD8ynxa-lw7y6zLxH32QAh4JK1WinlkyJgrDJPaIJKx6GQpHujSABLiVPmt6VlN1OywzgY609GWmH8EXeGu6q2YBPSps0qkskij9Sd9-_1zZ3tNCz8EiGYkMhO89hBrvGqlZQ_1PyDB1CnhwiHa3dW6aCZJNC3dJazSNJBzXjXN10-KnVnfeBvfuRiCaZuqh6draTQowavVk8fjhJgIdNvX39Fq1fbNJ-o8xN-4L9tv1gdh4Ax4QOaLAm2-qnjzWdLLCjjvCUmojMS0N1x-jlgAJQdjtCIicoSWtPRajBKpsLWOKuLbKlsgPMQE0f2_1n3pr430Z7Kmn9LfiAkC0bykOLp_1Sg0CCP1PN3p66_1K8tUh6hhbaRZBYvPa2hiTW82JPguu6lFFS6907hKbzG4PY6fTieUTULU4KYEp5vTpdjLMpFtBn4mI96111BapVqcMEzeU8R0Q34CJARRkFNmlJWRYufG19_1r3YUWaEhPj-G_1IFuao5RuLrWxqQnYKtggiPyqLNHFb7OEAFUf0yA1Hs4isSxRhNIUXq0Ri8GN6Ec0od5DbqKORSzlNldI32FWnMMsZCsA0bX239qhqwthaUShqREvADNN0uClxjg-tvhPA1GQeDuG58Un_1Bw3THF8L1hji6kklakN2b9Q5NERDsmjM69Va5L4_1A_1vtMG9XD6O9kD7-_1_11oSGVemOytHHfbhFYPxKP18lghrk6W3RLtWAEgWWn7BNbz33tfuJ4Y6q7SPbD7IAKJcjBQh9AoYeuwvoVpdb1BPfmQReWEsB43-YlNgvCAKvNBOp1n4SjJNVZYMs89yfrXy03LyR4JaQ&gws_rd=cr&ei=9nLRWMzXDczQvgSUqpDADA" Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 18:39, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:09, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted image and available in external sites "https://www.google.co.in/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZiuhbLT5fbiGL2pkx0J0CjDdj5Lxy9HUwFS0iCwgDCC8ynLx_16Us900X_135GofetaNKA9ZY2C8nkcisSIPznN8_1J2EWwKf6MsVAOzBo88Qw5IxC2VAuVtD2e4O_1V9e9ZT-0TNvC_18NWrN-kDQuMC3e8FQwphgSbqmbgOnw4uLWr_1AyRhNzK3Fi7JEvsLDEw5E9VCcCGU9BHvKEMp--QbHkXTc8CGfniwTK5uWmj8c2iaIDommD7qNy56TsRNUcBxc-JO_1Qi2FafYS09NR4pL7eMb5seiK-_1FKVRXwgL4IB5-JAYC0VQUoMFyhailJ_1e6JPMejEFbga7QsmfGe1NQDuoOsw4SaJ2C1xeLUvQvX4gurprtoQken6qo6esrVjA166vs3-kBTspjzdv134a4Kb_1uBHGt30BuKSY-IHHD0MwJJ5nY6yaeotxYkHDBop3-1AROaH2wuc4NjH9-n5xBKHPY-7aQ2AY1xXAeoDyRzkAAqy9xR6I2VDxrTXtXn-F8IYZHZ-8lb3xXc-sWywH1UwgrVivg6PLRD27tDIV8N7Uv2b4xqk1UF11Y1Qb6YUvkrXLPWSk3IDY9cPbiSwC-f_1gMlXDS0AWBvUb8Xl82Rcqe9DZT_1DKy7n6S2aZto3di5_17uPn6jkTgyzAQduB9IJrdW9QanByUqDNPJ3aJ8q8XfrDiirNfSQRoNCmSNawXRROJ52t-9PAXiGUuKoWMTnClemf_1Jta6DUVRoG2uoVsWH7IPPVRI6MQgqiCPHw8mK6nDttrI0DUqpPHVHe3BXDCIYU_1Yz0UIZNRwgzIuB16HPjvH5s11ME46PbdXd5QRg9yK9ubb9NL_1cPqwOzWrkLdId4HnAvyqB1Wv7cD0YAOl7ThAzV7_1sMUs0_1qgS2kh3XMSWWIbEZgkHTFST6syQ_1qCte4-f3pYw5I3EFT95L3xKdxLGy5kxZbREERwx8A02EXwjnJDuU5aZzgHqiP6-22kafrbLvB24-pJBbpQPUSA1CfrRDfyZxsKbpDkRxs8LvQ8B_1-IBKWXJGgsGXqYm0tvaT7jNiZXZYEpev_1kJmWTTpkOw4tRUoR6pzKkCXOxV1QwrunUWLx5IBgnBjl62VykNAoeUBnNhGFflQv66QjlFVI74aBnQ5DmchbMw2bTxoVPU20W5AGrT9_14AKqslRV0fu85Z4lrvvzr47Rq_1BeOt4RDBdETxJmgcar3cZv_1NHj30k_1PPhOLZEon7Ph8s8HBvGNZeVXMi2wvqAk9E89BtmN7EWI-U2NNHQ5KKssWOUbxbSkq1iQejmio5O31XtnUUhOQvYhfeeNt5f0JcuIF5UYJgicXfhIaY11sLt-h2VSXbCI9R3ryloH2WBwPrieFtyWJSta2kIJf_1fi1ccr06lc28FCCyrh0xS2nryL2-rN1ww5CZcIa08ARLkKO_1nD4Mnb2Xt3nzpOCYIh9UObnoPChKgrCvWOxhnvws3KvsyA6_1xWlo_1j-qjrfAdRBRDhQGCf7VnxFvjb_1ZDfnNGvrHn_1nM-Tbofelw9yLeK4J3seZeBygzkcT4d--pCnbYjbdB6JBguLPLLu5nOFs-hUi41mMlQyDZ34pEafb38sLobhetB-CpGagwbpSmh2Qr8uAXxOkIbYYVtVdGXyb0hGad3OsuoPHxaqOlq4uSrwueCYXP1MzZ_1HNcBgZ-PNXH8XeeSE-GXLUjTQ-oKVEP_1rshnyGwDi8Tp_1RJkEUeGwHGfr2K9B-DsX5EDleaSpcU_1nKqMK2puAsU4UbhPuJzTgGQFuNUr8aSSWwJ-_13Pibq2tlkANyDyVsNoTdzWTzRlH0EfShqwYw&gws_rd=cr&ei=9XbRWJP9EIHYvgTquaTIBg" Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 18:56, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:10, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
"Out of scope". The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. It is a private party photo. Poeticbent talk 14:36, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Taivo: Out of project scope: small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution
п. Ярослава Мосійчук просить видалити цю фото. Mykola Vasylechko 20:52, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Delete: I requested speedy deletion by uploaders. --sasha (krassotkin) 21:05, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Speedy deleted. --sasha (krassotkin) 16:23, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Flickr Washing from an account on the bad author list. Photo is credited to Vincent Curutchet / DPPI Elisfkc (talk) 19:16, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 21:34, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Seems to be a copyvio. unfortunatly I did not find the source. Benoît Prieur (d) 08:33, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio : https://twitter.com/jjbourdin_rmc. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 12:03, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work; small size, no exif data, found elsewhere on web. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:40, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:14, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://media.licdn.com/mpr/mpr/shrinknp_400_400/p/4/005/042/262/3553c3a.jpg.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:54, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
A Public Domain Mark (PDM) tag here on flickr is incompatible with Common's licensing policies. The copyright owner retains full control over this image and does not give away any rights. Commons can be sued by the copyright owner. PDM is not really a license and therefore is not permitted on Commons except where it can be shown that the image is PD for known reasons such as a US Government image. See this flickr license table, where Commons can generally only take flickr images with Attribution, Attribution-ShareAlike or public domain dedication licenses. PDM is revocable by the copyright owner at any time. Leoboudv (talk) 06:46, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Image is licensed as public domain and can be copied, modified, distributed even for commercial purposes, all without asking permission. Kingstoken (talk) 14:12, 21 March 2017 (UTC).
Deleted: per nomination. Wikimedia Commons does not accept media with the Public Domain mark as the only indicator of copyright status. We need to know why a work is in the public domain, and this must be irrevocable. --De728631 (talk) 16:07, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. Commons:Derivative works from painting. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:24, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abdus Samad Hk (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope Commons is not a social media site ✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 07:53, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:24, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:24, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.whale.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/140818-DH-OTG-LegToKeyWest-IMG_4917.jpg.pagespeed.ce.MwpT6fukJb.jpg.
- File:Paint Factory01.jpg
- File:Paint Factory02.JPG
- File:The Research Vessel Odyssey.jpg
- File:Voyage of the Odyssey map.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:24, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by El virus 007 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:23, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
This photo is non-free and copyrighted by Microsoft Corporation. 185.73.237.229 14:37, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:23, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:23, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Blasconorelys (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused documents of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
- File:VARIABLES DE ORDEN FÍSICO.jpg
- File:29 Maneras para ser creativo.jpg
- File:La gente Creativa.jpg
- File:Variables que intervienen en el PROCESO CREATIVO.pdf
- File:BLASCONORELYSTAREA2MANDALA.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Blasconorelys (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Creatividad Novedoso.jpg
- File:Mapa de las relaciones de la competencia creatividad.jpg
- File:VARIABLES COGNOSCITIVO PERCEPTUAL DE LA CREATIVIDAD.jpg
- File:VARIABLES AFECTIVAS DE LA CREATIVIDAD.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:23, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:22, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Amarracastadas (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:22, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Delete Image is apparently property of thebailybeast.com. Direct URL for the image is here. This originally appeared on an article on The Daily Beast here, from 2014, thus predating this image upload. The image on that article possibly credits Cosmopolitan, though a search of their site using google images does not turn this image up. Regardless of whether the image is property of Cosmopolitan or The Daily Beast, the image is not the property of the uploader. Hammersoft (talk) 14:49, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:22, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Charlottebzz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Commons:Derivative works from museum exposition.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:22, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Promo photos and album covers. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Martín Knye.jpg
- File:B.A.Rock de 1982, instantes previos a la presentación de la banda Tantor.jpg
- File:Pappo & The Widowmakers.jpg
- File:Kamikaze, 1985.jpg
- File:Lethal, portada del álbum Warriors.jpg
- File:Hellion en el Festivales Metálicos de Primavera.jpg
- File:Riff , en 1980 realizan el show "Adios Pappo's Blues, Bienvenido Riff".jpg
- File:Kheyvis - Local Bailable.jpg
- File:Escocia - Banda argentina.jpg
- File:Plus - Banda argentina.jpg
- File:Cuero - Banda argentina.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:21, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jahiro Cardona (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical images the author has no proofs to claim the image as own work
- File:Léon Jean Simar.jpg
- File:Léon Jean Simar 1966 a ses 57 ans.jpg
- File:14.Andrea Gritti 1.jpg
- File:13. choeur SMP-hommage L-Simar-1981a.jpg
- File:12.choeur Dpto Musica-Univalle-Bogota-Leon J Simar-1962-1.jpg
- File:11.choeur Magno-Univalle-Bogota-Leon J Simar-1962.jpg
- File:10.Piano morceau.png
- File:08.Le Jeu de la Nativité (1937).png
- File:07.La Lègia, mercredi 28 Janvier 1942 Une de ses dernières chroniques.png
- File:07.court sinfonia 1950.png
- File:04.Léon J Simar 1922 a ses 13 ans-Cantata.png
- File:05.Léon J Simar 1917 a ses 8 ans.png
- File:06.Léon J Simar 1911 a ses 17 mois.png
- File:03.Léon Jean Simar 1937 a ses 28 ans.png
- File:02.Foto de Léon J Simar a ses 30 ans.jpg
- File:01.Professeur Léon J Simar 1966 a ses 57 ans.jpg
- File:Professeur Leon J Simar 1966 a ses 57 ans.jpg
- File:Leon J Simar 29-30 Años.jpg
- File:Andrea Gritti 1.jpg
- File:Medalla Civica.jpg
- File:L.J.Simar.jpg
- File:04.L Jean Simar.jpg
- File:L. Simar.jpg
- File:Medalla S.M.P.jpg
- File:Coro Magno P Bolivar.jpg
- File:Simar a los 17 meses.jpg
- File:Coro magno en Bogota.jpg
- File:Simar a los 13 años.jpg
- File:Simar a los 28 años.jpg
- File:Simar a los 8 años.jpg
- File:09.Coro Dpto Musica-Univalle-Bogota-Leon J Simar-1962.jpg
- File:10.Coro Dpto Musica-Univalle-Bogota-Leon J Simar-1962-1.jpg
- File:08. piano.jpg
- File:05.La Lègia, 28 de Eneo 1942.jpg
- File:06.Le Jeu de la Nativité (1937)1.jpg
- File:07 Pagina de presentacion.jpg
- File:Coro SMP-Homenaje L-Simar-1981.jpg
- File:Página de presentación (1950).png
- File:NuevaLe Jeu de la Nativité (1937) Primeros compases.png
- File:La Lègia, Miercoles 28 de Enero 1942 Una de sus últimas crónicas.png
- File:Fragmento para Piano.png
- File:León J Simar 1911 (17 meses).jpg
- File:León J Simar 1917 (8 años).jpg
- File:León J Simar 1937 (28 años).jpg
- File:León J Simar 1922 (13 años)-Cantata.jpg
- File:León J Simar 1966 (57 años).jpg
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
1.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Primeros_compases.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-Cantata.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 16:02, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:19, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
no description, location unclear. no EDuse possible Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:11, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:52, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of project scope, seems to be purely promotional. –Juliancolton | Talk 05:50, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:51, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work; small size, no exif, found elsewhere on web. –Juliancolton | Talk 05:51, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:52, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Self promotion photo without EXIT meta data Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 07:15, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:52, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 10:42, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:52, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Dark private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 10:45, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:53, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 10:47, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:53, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:51, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:53, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Advertising by a single-purpose account. Has no potential educational value. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:51, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:53, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 10:53, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:54, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:53, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:54, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:54, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:54, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:58, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:54, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Low resolution private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:00, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:54, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:17, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:54, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:19, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:54, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
out of scope Homulka (talk) 11:19, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:54, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope; not a selfie repository. TJH2018talk 15:16, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:55, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope; not a selfie repository; no educational value TJH2018talk 15:17, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:55, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
copyrighted file Cisco79 (talk) 15:52, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:56, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by EPISODE STUDY (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of the scope. Commons is not a social media site
- File:RAZU KHANDOKER.jpg
- File:Razu khandoker.png
- File:Razu khandoker.jpg
- File:EPISODE BUSINESSES COM.png <--keep this
- File:EPISODE.jpg
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 15:58, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Is the ID card an official item of Facebook? then keep it, it may be useful.--ProfessorX (talk) 18:26, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - copyright situation of the FB card unknown. --Jcb (talk) 17:57, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Part of mass upload, poor composition, unusable, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:59, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:57, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by وكالة الحدث الدولية (talk · contribs)
[edit]Possibility of copyvios as some of them have news written and the other website watermark
- File:شعار مركز الحدث الاخباري.gif
- File:شعار مجموعة الحدث الاخبارية.jpg
- File:شعار صحيفة الحدث الاسبوعي.png
- File:شعار وكالة الحدث الدولية.jpg
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 16:18, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:02, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
el escudo contiene un error Jars carab (talk) 02:49, 21 March 2017 (UTC) {subst:delete2|image=File:Escudo arzo.png|reason=el escudo contiene un error}} Jars carab (talk) 19:34, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- not a valid reason, but the file is too shitty to be readable and is therefore useless. Kathisma (talk) 21:25, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 19:08, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work; small size, found elsewhere on web, and missing most exif data. I suspect the same of File:Lionel Fontagné.jpg but haven't nominated it since it is much larger and contains full exif data. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:04, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:10, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Anpanman
[edit]Copyrighted characters.
- File:Anpanman products.jpg
- File:Baby Anpanman (6844373557).jpg
- File:Hello Kitty alarm clock (2436379226).jpg
- File:Kids swag 2015 (22603821984).jpg
- File:大人厳禁 (14815676581).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
G I Chandor (talk) 23:09, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:58, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Anpanman
[edit]Copyrighted characters.
- File:2人芝居 (30821772296).jpg
- File:3つ同時進行 (30821769916).jpg
- File:Anpanman 2016 (30821771476).jpg
- File:それいけ！アンパンマンショー (527438774).jpg
- File:仲良く (30770406471).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
G I Chandor (talk) 00:16, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:11, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 00:20, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:11, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope, no conceivable educational value. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:23, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:11, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Socks
[edit]These photos contain copyrighted characters.
- File:K-ON! socks set by Cospa 20110121.jpg
- File:Socks (4714057803).jpg
- File:くつした Osaka 2016 (26368504722).jpg
- File:選べる3足 (28365686642).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
G I Chandor (talk) 00:31, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:12, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
No evidence of permission - footer of image gives credit to Philippe Richard. Train2104 (talk) 00:35, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:12, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:PlayStation 2 games
[edit]Copyrighted game covers.
G I Chandor (talk) 00:40, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:13, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope, personal or possible attack image. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:45, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:13, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted game covers. G I Chandor (talk) 00:45, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:13, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ayoubel111 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal screenshots, out of project scope.
–Juliancolton | Talk 00:47, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:13, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted advertisement. G I Chandor (talk) 00:48, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:13, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work; small size, found elsewhere on web at much higher resolutions. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:49, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:13, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:PlayStation
[edit]Copyrighted game covers.
G I Chandor (talk) 00:54, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:13, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:PlayStation games
[edit]Copyrighted game covers.
G I Chandor (talk) 00:57, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:13, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted character. [1] G I Chandor (talk) 00:58, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:13, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted CD covers. G I Chandor (talk) 01:01, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:14, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. Non-free artwork. G I Chandor (talk) 01:05, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:14, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted advertisements. G I Chandor (talk) 01:14, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:14, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FOP in France
- File:L'Institut du Monde Arabe on March 23, 2010.jpg
- File:Institut du monde arabe on August 29, 2009.jpg
Elisfkc (talk) 01:59, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:14, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Disputing the {{PD-textlogo}} license. The contents of this logo are clearly well above the threshold of originality. There is no evidence of this being released under a free license otherwise. ℯxplicit 02:01, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:14, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Composed image, quite probably from left side part of File:Panoramablick vom Pomonatempel - panoramio.jpg. Poor quality. Speravir 02:05, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:14, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
Previous tagged for speedy deletion, rationale: Logo by Explicit Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:17, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:14, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
unused personal picture Kayser Ahmad (talk) 02:30, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:14, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No indication this was released into the public domain by the Steve Bullock campaign. Website says "copyright all rights reserved". MB298 (talk) 02:49, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:14, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
photo of presumably copyrighted artwork Calliopejen1 (talk) 03:54, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:15, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Claimed as own work by subject of photo. This is reasonably well-posed, lighted etc. so it is unlikely this is true i.e. it was done on a timer. No evidence of the actual creator or their permission. BethNaught (talk) 07:14, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:15, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
English author, Lord Dunsany died in 1957 (c. to 2027). Somehow the fact escaped me, when I imported the file from IA. Akme (talk) 07:21, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:15, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
- File:Nissin Noodle Series (1).jpg
- File:Nissin Noodle Series (2).jpg
- File:Nissin Noodle Series (3).jpg
- File:Nissin Noodle Series (4).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
G I Chandor (talk) 07:32, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:15, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Datei wurde mehrfach hochgeladen. Die Zeichnung mit der roten Bogenkonstruktion soll bleiben. Colling-architektur (talk) 08:22, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:15, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
duplicate of other upload from me Shiv's fotografia (talk) 08:29, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:16, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
According to the authorship information provided, it seems clear that is was not first published in Tunisia Discasto talk 08:47, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:16, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Picture of a screen Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:55, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:16, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Image contain no EXIF Meta data and available in other sites "https://www.google.co.in/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZitRaSiYJ3aJVSmuydNDee3epF_1TknvI-fMmEabRFHoJAStHfLHYnJi7sCDpuJbu8YrmiCkGYF_1nav7NaY0WbX_1Qgd5B01DyZjagBtjLi7H8eOi7Cwrlmzub222pq1JjuPsw-smzG9FNuXIJteeBeLXQ2qvZ80LXVL8aPiI1QdzkWZQ4Jfnz4UX7jjQK7Dan_1nuvsw52d5zY2X0sDhyzNxEUSAg7aCwxFtySl_12CXnX_17U6Ndwr6LCCaktiOdS0Ov3fVEMkG0T22sIbgCijbA_1iEksBicVvhpBJkyn-h5bc4LCQ0Bf_1KFKKR832RMuj_1mUUVzPPd6_1OUGKKEfwqe_19OQ8LnWX-giXQL2wEuq-xp18Yt9yBYoltKkBW4wKRCOyYPvd_14taE69uj1NCFs7e7KHhZI8nSZDzYs4bxYhT4v1NnuQkbq8WjIVZFGt2VTZNRUhS4zWOh_1KJ1V_1AuE-9NlV4AlhJEP-abnVNyEOBrnEnpGIm0U_1UHpot9v1lSr5SkXmBjeF0kFvVhgH0cK1H-WwJiS6KG87PjhB9_1TQfaQXQgcqhiLP3dpzRJXjeJwCegQHUpmmWSCSLLOdm6RpuNVZyK9odvD_1KOiS0RGfPBmxqPLmlnHzwnEAWOZ9IpBtQAaEEs2szmitKT-DzDQmhHKmdFtK502rzWhsUje-mBKIPwsExe_10atMmXbbcbYXYNr3b2HLSmbXtI9nuDgk8wxNXh8sOOmwGtKYuU0DokPN8hS2qyL_1sFTKQf0w-VKREjrJesjEVt2zpFSCp8KcUny_1_1zOgJGUAdz0YbDDtQC-TOgltU_1i04l-lSjMEL_1mlrmivNHrZRSNLaXvlooLypoAcyOf-ACs3QslZo2QVDXx_1gYMj3dTIKGdoy89ZkHEPlMGeYPXehXatn-_1n_1JQl-WG4z0TRnNDIJSQUDPBMI8AOJNwlqtxuGnZ-EYLUciC-2DxwYml4vCZE0gCw-P7GpOE9EfAj22w4aIMVECmv-LNDL2WQgt_1qUolBlVbeU-FSJPUKYImXFKzypxB_141VR1LWEkhSo8KmsSnvw2qH7imrFIewBjCwZKLgUUFAG48zWX5iG2kOHo_1-CfYBvy88WbfLYLBvh32b2-yhBEvjLi2pb6qom6lvWCE8L-AF0rLr_1nBv8IN1ER3i1MeeOqtHB2TvxX6vaAhQuVqsEDoF0oTGSzOLgUJf5XXUD1OwU2cLxKxVpM8XSAw_1mk6TYxK_1kRiRp8Qi_1O4QzvGHOoAq8yTQZ7GfQ6nyeumIgderfwyFKdHrKZ1a_1u9TSw8qW9-RNxYGCf2lDcT9WtP3DterMDhZR4vHW_1dvNCToliGJTaW1b_1XnHxs8SMidxKgrDZ_1xdLtK-dbuHRAf_1D-zwNicKpGUoAk6lsgn5JkYWgg-B0pO1GC_1EDaOxpCRhDvgs9eL4nxtTioAI7FsguKXf1rJxp8NKRBR07wyEMm2z0Y5WukOA4LGrLr8JbW471u3urE8LtpxB5H1SSOsQgrdmzsZzjRErafDuYGj8lzH2F6Zx4rpf_187UnSC7dOrRT58AGTO4nL5KgO5XVlB7xGi4D6M3n51b0P5MHUlGE78azclhYawb7WdGwQG3oGJTgB7lu0MipTfHMJVxa5duj_1aANSE6MUSaZn1txXEZe126pKMQ71Pr2E_1bsqHOTgP0YeXsSM8mwyMqBRuOYlA&gws_rd=cr&ei=xO_QWPaPMMntvgSFg7_gAQ" Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 09:19, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:16, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
This jif image containt personal images and also without EXIF Meta data. Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 09:20, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:16, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Promotional Photo and without EXIF meta Data. Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 09:24, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:16, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
slightly cropped version of File:Profani.jpg; both files are low-resolution versions of File:Grupna.jpg (since all these images have poor descriptions, they are currently useless, anyway) Jochen Burghardt (talk) 09:59, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:16, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
low-resolution version of File:Grupna.jpg; see also the deletion request Commons:Deletion requests/File:Profesorishoes.jpg - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 10:02, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:17, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 10:09, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:17, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Files of User:Mukesh bijarniya shrimadhopur
[edit]
Personal photos/selfies, no potential educational value, the files are not in use. Out of Project scope. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:26, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:17, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Als Quelle ist ein Wordpress-Blog angegeben, es ist nicht ersichtlich, dass eine Freigabe zur Weitergabe unter CC-Lizenz vorliegt. Nobody perfect (talk) 10:29, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Seems to be this Flicker photo: [2], uploaded without permission from the photographer. --Nobody perfect (talk) 12:46, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:17, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Als Quelle ist ein Wordpress-Blog angegeben, es ist nicht ersichtlich, dass eine Freigabe zur Weitergabe unter CC-Lizenz vorliegt. Nobody perfect (talk) 10:29, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:17, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Redundant. Same picture (rotated) is here: File:Dibujo "No tengo miedo".jpg. Kulmalukko (talk) 10:44, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:17, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
1979 work. Copyright likely lasts until 2074 Discasto talk 11:09, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:17, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
I am the photographer/uploader.
Recently I've re-checked the date on the back of Jizō statue, and it says:'平成廿一年十二月吉日' = built in 2009 = No-FoP Japan, and this shot is not De_minimis
Thank you for your time. Sincerely, Tokorokoko (talk) 12:23, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:18, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Very small and useless picture. And most likely a copyvio. BarnCas (talk) 12:40, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete. Badzil (talk) 07:31, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:18, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Very small and useless picture. And most likely a copyvio. BarnCas (talk) 12:40, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Badzil (talk) 07:31, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:18, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
poor quality, blurry Hiddenhauser (talk) 13:36, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:19, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
copyvio, no clear permission (after contact with the person in the photo) Hannibal (talk) 13:39, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:19, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
From the subject's Instagram account: https://www.instagram.com/p/BPboG6PjdkG/ Ytoyoda (talk) 14:12, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:19, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.topten.ph/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/Julie-Vega.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:53, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:19, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Non-free Microsoft screenshot. See Commons:Screenshots#Microsoft_products 31.1.100.106 15:29, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:19, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Very small and useless picture. And most likely a copyvio. BarnCas (talk) 15:33, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:19, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
non free image for living person --Alaa Najjar :)..! 15:36, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:19, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Own request, used nowhere, dusty and bad image. There are much better images, for example this. Smaug the Golden (talk - contributions - file list) 16:01, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:20, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Part of mass upload; little if any educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:05, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:20, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FOP for artwork in Japan Elisfkc (talk) 16:51, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:20, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FOP for artwork in Japan
- File:Critter Country Signpost, Tokyo Disneyland (9407223727).jpg
- File:Critter Country, Tokyo Disneyland (9409977662).jpg
- File:TDL Beaver Brothers Explorer Canoes.jpg
- File:TDL Critter Country Theme Park Sign.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Elisfkc (talk) 16:57, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:20, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Fantasyland at Tokyo Disneyland
[edit]No FOP#Japan for artwork in Japan
- File:Laika ac Tokyo Disneyland (7861678630).jpg
- File:Vending Machine, Tokyo Disneyland (9409894900).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Elisfkc (talk) 16:58, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete --Pierpao.lo (listening) 17:01, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:20, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Monsters, Inc. Ride & Go Seek
[edit]No FOP for artwork in Japan & copyrighted characters
- File:Monsters, Inc. Ride & Go Seek! (9409933584).jpg
- File:Monsters, Inc. Ride & Go Seek! (9409938106).jpg
- File:Monsters, Inc. Ride & Go Seek! (9409942380).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Elisfkc (talk) 16:59, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:21, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Tokyo DisneySea
[edit]No FOP for artwork in Japan
- File:DisneySea Aquasphere.jpg
- File:Maihama, Urayasu, Chiba Prefecture 279-0031, Japan - panoramio - jetsun (44).jpg
- File:Maihama, Urayasu, Chiba Prefecture 279-0031, Japan - panoramio - jetsun (68).jpg
- File:Maihama, Urayasu, Chiba Prefecture 279-0031, Japan - panoramio - jetsun (69).jpg
- File:Maihama, Urayasu, Chiba Prefecture 279-0031, Japan - panoramio.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Elisfkc (talk) 17:01, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:21, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Tokyo DisneySea
[edit]Copyrighted characters
- File:Maihama, Urayasu, Chiba Prefecture 279-0031, Japan - panoramio - jetsun (29).jpg
- File:MyFriendDuffy.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Elisfkc (talk) 21:44, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 18:51, 26 June 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Tokyo DisneySea
[edit]No FOP for artwork in Japan
- File:DisneySea 20180205.jpg
- File:Globe art in Tokyo DisneySea (Nov 2019).jpg
- File:Globe art in Tokyo DisneySea.jpg
- File:Laika ac Tokyo DisneySea (7861677380).jpg
- File:Tokyo DisneySea (47438188281).jpg
- File:Turtle Talk＠Tokyo Disney Sea.jpg
- File:ただいまファストパス・チケットは発券しておりません (414563879).jpg
- File:東京ディズニーシー - panoramio.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Elisfkc (talk) 18:25, 11 January 2021 (UTC)
Keep It's not artwork. It's actual product. File:Tokyo DisneySea (47438188281).jpg - Food samples File:ただいまファストパス・チケットは発券しておりません (414563879).jpg - Very very, simple text sign. --Benzoyl (talk)
Deleted, but one is kept, because it is very simple. File 47438188281 is still art. Taivo (talk) 15:47, 25 January 2021 (UTC)}}
No FOP for artwork in Japan Elisfkc (talk) 17:04, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:21, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
No FOP for artwork in Japan & copyrighted characters
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Elisfkc (talk) 17:04, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:21, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Arabian Coast (Tokyo DisneySea)
[edit]No FOP for artwork in Japan
- File:Laika ac Tokyo DisneySea (7861700680).jpg
- File:Maihama, Urayasu, Chiba Prefecture 279-0031, Japan - panoramio - jetsun (12).jpg
- File:ミッキーとダッフィーのスプリングヴォヤッジ開催時のエントランス前デコレーション 2013-05-08 18-46.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Elisfkc (talk) 17:05, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:21, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
No FOP for artwork in Japan Elisfkc (talk) 17:06, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:21, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
No FOP for artwork in Japan Elisfkc (talk) 17:06, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:21, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
No FOP for artwork in Japan Elisfkc (talk) 17:07, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:21, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
No FOP for artwork in Japan Elisfkc (talk) 17:07, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:21, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
No FOP for artwork in Japan
- File:20,000 Leagues Under the Sea TDS.JPG
- File:Journey to the Center of the Earth TDS.JPG
- File:Maihama, Urayasu, Chiba Prefecture 279-0031, Japan - panoramio - jetsun (32).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Elisfkc (talk) 17:08, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:21, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
No FOP for artwork in Japan Elisfkc (talk) 17:08, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:22, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Flag of Venezuela.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:09, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:22, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
No consent from the person on this picture. Requsting deletion of my file. HylgeriaK (talk) 17:25, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:22, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
I cna find no indication this is CC-licensed. FunkMonk (talk) 17:29, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:22, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Unused promotional image, unusable and out of scope. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:17, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:22, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Carlos David Cortes (talk · contribs)
[edit]Likely case of license washing. It's hardly believable that the author posting in the blog own the copyright of these varied set of photographs. {{PD-Polish}} could apply but it's unknown whether it's the case.
- File:Helena102 jpg.jpg
- File:Syrkusowa03 jpg.jpg
- File:Syrkusowa02 jpg.jpg
- File:Syrkusowa jpg.jpg
- File:Helena Syrkus jpg.jpg
Discasto talk 18:19, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:22, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of panoramio streams, randomly taken from car/bus, upload of poor quality, rather small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? 
Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:23, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:22, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
mass-upload of panoramio streams of poor quality, and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:28, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:22, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': thumbnail format, potentially personality rights isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin, hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 18:32, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:22, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': thumbnail format, potentially personality rights isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin, hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 18:33, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:22, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work': potentially personality rights isusses, but also missing EXIF data to verify origin to verify claimed 'own work', hence, potentially non-free content - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 18:35, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:23, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Promotional image and also available in external sites "https://www.google.co.in/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZiv1bfxf870ZyCrO3um7meOa8-r1sXf3AiTU70_1pYzjS3iGxy_15wufZC34NXe3GNYPMIHJWjMpT_1Y1thzwvn0bM2vYSRqhnWeP4AexeHawkzfNtqMKYCWd-JxtYqwFI6ORJ09pIJAr8L6Zy0F3MDT66GXLL8KBJ4M7voG8dbg_1gxlXDaeghNRAA8Ru9TchPklNdUcVsvuVXjDih_1J6CnpQyJNUpeL017XzdLLzSSEqSYs3D_1themvBk_1UrWnJ6exn6LZTkSGv35T_1-n8MvTifZfvO39VW5b80zxRwomkMla1j-8rb-PLVk7D3noMifkZCaB7LGhkZ232dHPLYpbmGGS1w501yV5UWIWIE73QIEMUvia5nMm-33xVfnU9b3VcXfYRUbvargbrZ1KtfInxIYwDwKUFlHCihctaNl9kxmOjNgBl-_1T4_1iX1I5IXis7OCCBgzbX4SgK09LWx4MeQ1lUcdl3c0I_1ez4wG_1pj5nfS9FFDv65OyKKdQbNqMDaAVl81kcl6kcV-MfUH4XQUwy3KcIe3DWp9Rffibm1mEujw5ihcTLFDnOMTJ3WQoXPALQAPpggBE1uNzEOOS2PBS1LK4Rsx0Yo7Cp_1Z4pg8zOguNi93yOiClRWxuDfU_1zC4JAZJKvfEI5lzmZtadQE-hmwAF8fBfZZubedaiSJIjRa1Db4UDns5Lmnj2R2sNz8-zWNtNR-kJa1Jz6r6-ynzRYTCoCLjFkf-pZ82inAfKT2XUZUTOupqUB2N-4mo3o7r0SL8_1FWlb6yemj7VUwPFWNJux_1nRpJblvYQGvm9911e1QcLu8XK5Rue5Cwz-oibGD0LD_1CUlabs-kVr9VCGSyzejLWu5Lpphq4jpULeSeTUCgOxi5HlkOayrV6SGa6cLzSycSMj42hbFpQ3IpOwvT1NhrK_1IVo22hMyPrKg2BPG1pLZUwlMd5UsobhUN_17ww_1s9W9_1zRsMTA48HfwkWAH9vLGyDydQZipBfhWQw0xsuVF_1AAbPlAi86NjI-c2IREXtC3dDMWyQfXBadqRNmBQ8l59VgbMWZ1QfmwwyfC9--c0DrwYePv66Hxjs9G86MN4uL9D3hTdW3wPmCSx2A8cm1MybXGHKX5VMACBuJhtbMn_1eTkmI4kAy6s_1XwlGPJrFWTbSxYgP858-vxP8dOSDjZLWINvXyUZOTYmBQ9xu5EI01Gw7xu2NIH-Ux3BPkhsxFNGY99gWOt4r76Zk0oVhWa5g7ltCLMIWaKdNnsmyD5S2GDO2PM89jZheTj1LzOLB70GAszSEyJN4cF-rOMwqeP6cb--PGY9LtvIwUYMTTOIRdXrwHXvQLGW1-u9PZctXuqk7xZxPZuaLuemX-Fr-oAi6vxEb0TTQR_1XRP2wVweNZA0G7unwEoQKB3JC5JXES4Q88HmGov4A_1EQ-ORnlu8UYDwRfo55aOtGxUsQDzCy-M9mFSerJFJTiyqLb84sudPRwwGp5xDwJsHWmFmqEG0D8iQ8ELsfzyw3IvTneJI9hbLDYvu5d_1jTNXWXwVSFxHDBWgJc-yQoCYcVo3shUDSPNIuCiwc-mFLADdvPWDjuK5xG8JF7WFBWShGUKIB-tRHep-fjCBdDasbkOoAlb3TxqORyS1KO-f5n7byDNQ6_1NpeNVGNwL36fIltCpKkYOUIQfPtE7D4dt9oxZ1V1bWhL1XUwu84DZjIPAIxSEhRDjsZ1e2ugw&gws_rd=cr&ei=F3TRWJ2cF8zqvATQ2ZXgBg" Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 18:44, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:23, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted image and also available in external sites "https://www.google.co.in/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZitLhzIbySP_1v8lHVkN6OuM9HNqbQM68KopXuHIQ3Jz2k-07yT5-g2AcHv2IDbao2TAe_1K9nsGnbWytIQhQjrPDEeoFJhgqpNmt9RnJUBtcdet4kO9OoY75ej09DlcCLVJimcD-elQpJnayrZtrayYPdqvuICWQsPWE-yWnCfIFQ4yc7-MSS9DEjrXahFvHCz4Cp7HgK52VJDaKiYZnqdoLaSGxoGPtvLQX_1t89Q-ZMn3zCup-7TKE6qP-SxZCWJ-CeSqBfZ635q_14ldRqnWqeLGSpcSVwOXzGiLEnxANUW-d2DqlAOKwdHeIJcZHIgFjBYiHrHV_1bANf1j6wZuYVJ0lFyMsk6RJ1QrrlDtR6sCx8XitaBoVuyCNdaeJIJC0KhxEvBRvd_1Cij7s3P6CRmo2w2Gh84d1iP9qJdi1msI5WFFNwWgmJt6F0aa6WUWdKp5bdFYAEj8pqWIssMupp5f1wN9AoYeDWSnm6hY3tdE94lCCI5FtEAi-4I6gcYYd-XDbnbjUQWHvfmTdnXeJE8zaSkOqlEcQPHxCQjvjmMjj0RQSOGmhayhjvtT4qAmTLpWRKlh4g3s0ZSsDP29K5fJxqRBFTA9xr_1ZWbL8xWq6lxjHiMayK4Clxib0jdfLCkEI0IihpgwDPf80Eak4RXzgZGIRbIYNPBd0KiG6J48fRjkIGBp4jmLkH-YgQVGMbcVP4FTIjtAWGWd_1AkN7z2hNKTJVdh0cqKY8zeuYhG93yvJR9XPSgWa1sIg8fgTJ_1to9WqQbwPpb9dCphxRh12gIWGHcDFgVuPqHwmERZoqGIDkYT-ery-tevGaU2q2Y244dQXN_1koeWTwrheyXh5NJ6fd8nS7BfdxGr999SZMmBC88YoLB1T_1k5dt_1MVD4mOjN5ZI3Laq1XYzCPi-vc6f0TL0Jjxt1wuMLCCJCbnlXUkR1xH8vDm74bhEOk0Jn2fAG9rLMzoPZmUkXqLFSEBKqUCsJMyTtoEpZBPrDI_1ogXsAiXVloi2ImpPS0kgEoOUes3Uy8oSBjQ_1yNuY3SJGEhCMmiXgb-tFyaUcox2I4SLst_1PiP_1f0qPaz2JccSI_1tV7YV5t0wDfLYa_13zKcMoukC1PlMt96U1bhhYemGOQaDcqTcs1PxJlWpH81kZuIeXzBzvNYZM_1CR9NnwqB_1XXF5czhwvXtAfnH5V4U3BkQw-7-ZgfzN9MhPRitA4uDAVeAn8hy7C5t0F1Mjzf7FHH29OLs9Y5RyseqiD3UW-fyfbuD2-FZKzSoDzjhiWW2aMbafGaE4YARFh5WoFpEjyWiEHoNcDgwuwvuSqxmIIHT6AgRzGb8mt2nE-Yl8J04R0FBm0LkvISjKscFUEFN1mtXGlI-sGrIhKzHMAB44zSaszmmnmj9DgeiYGD-R2Ey3G4_1kzzryo_1tVojNTA31X9skTFdRf84G93YYCQPbwCFck1WS5xbtrYx6RNJZhqU9U2yIQ-gVtvqEn5eLwojjBKsAbP9qmoiTwlRBtHR96IHHRLFtXogzkG1hzTkdn8noswOe_115-iqXav9Vk9O0iRAznxSxthz_1kJsFKnKHPDGvcM7x4nozstmHz3TRJKs13azV6jgX-Rjhsa8032bxAQu4yRLTiK2xrTB_1EemvQNrpJa8KHx6VUzzLJrJkqiGpOHLt02tnNEQMqTBSsPH3NWCv7uYzUvl64ig&gws_rd=cr&ei=GHXRWPywB4jsvgTI95uwBg" Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 18:48, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:23, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Did not provide sufficient information and also available in external sites "https://www.google.co.in/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZis9Z_1EIPWjqFbDwZCBWOVgU8fIU1TlO1XWKoqHbHbbY6VBJtI_1h0hynA9EdH6LOdOkj1RaLslPvKRQLazW3BUWasra9K8psskVIl6h7xxZ25G-HqMhwPmlE38kGcj5uL1WUmnBfoYojSWWTCRP9JNivxKrjJFg6hhNE635VmM4CuKINxE5XcFLgvlxB0cahHMM8nedrrg76Vc4ie3qFahpzOItPu6LzNkm1g4A63Ubv0SNalhMchm9LJ_1eGY8AwJqQ_1xhse2y95L_1tKhqenkWcNO9Bssvw45sSM1Q9A2J9MHkgkqI7W96F19ybHUz6mKHPRbJtsMtnZn76nn_1H6hC2eeuOSukmyKb2BYN3R_1VN7C6aZX7Ok15doXFDYOLAJzALhCynMm4TNd0KKlq3WgCDRUsLdZwdTocq-2Ot_1IiGLTpweunxariFKaQjtyMAK7wW3el1cajINDMH52nMWX1eqoiejsyEE1fcSS46DHwSO4FjuXXeU_1PXK7EGIsZdJiVWP2yjm-oyrHANR7EwWbxAza6YaOE2VE-Uin5LUelj4Er-sI-v9f3ZrKvl_1PN7s3Z-7MK3nWFfvo-JSP48wGYnLO3qV-GO3QokqNKmED3F-xA9U9jJT8TQa-AX67xChz0luDVPo5N98cM2xUCQ3yv9AlEhW1NHzShrLW_1ugw5umOt7T5kHfbCkeSL41-npHLP36uKwtmEJrNQgALuklFEAqtSECt2LQRjWxK7i70TOMXJaGT4eZHo5jklwUZg6jMvON-7FKQjQtIKR8hycievryqRtXDyQmWeXAwva0hV_1z9MJ1PyfRJ41SRlvzdgfvKzlWrryyH-771iyVRjgyUAOAlKW7jP787icBouhMVEVWlPZBOYPeOyuUrrXX9ZH9Dnj-dFtsxEIaYISkC091rOtjdwUbG3H4oOxEfh_1bLGZkYaaR4RYzh40Vwni9gnsDxQo-FpYyHuudJW7KbhtbEQzMPaG7gMbJykDrcxKFMmXO0veZGMguLUT8gfrnLZXa1jZkfvpcYZGpugsSM8kW7VPkgs0xmNpRtwdr0ez5iQF38MwDL9JJaj70VKyzUt3FdA1Wxp0Crget_19RH_1jj0uhwHwlOETonoAR51Spbyf_1dALPbNJ5qjyAAJWnwCL_1xFxIfem9XqnLe6m_127k4QM78du8lvIKBUM10cEwRBbYdoRYrTthQEXYo9iNc8D0ZQc_1CUkueY89DE4-vq2RvxEk8DL0PB32Do8aPeWvHn-R7hAlJItoqdbVQFoYxoEAwDxvDto3yJ5mBRVwF1dHnUHgyOf2TblqZN7cqxULOyLhLkmIfPFcRDX17PJbEGukNnC7GBe8LZ5hxbctt7Ruh4F6IZKCqsx5_1KLPLEdoOWNZbBhweOV4QQtaeXlvzgBPnMjkuTKxvJudcgrYgbdcCo_1eciokDtb8jXFwxx9GT2iVGBfAHFvylt-k0zgLSwhMlvlOtHEO4chkyPBuU4EcseFi0hqOe94pJX9InnH0qmoe6RBU3u49JLke9aD6CERKhLDTAP2swpoEwotwqxFYzVYrxwI5BiNi0148GQHY0cqNlaXTFbCohBB4cVB3OwA1q6pQGMqrWavTeTavk3k-C_1Y1kb0LOVpiYdaLfQM4eqfA0ri9KXVVhzTNuOvuQJmMfJNN0w7HW7ycsBah0Is8573kzRj58-Atv3cSzH7lXLQINZh7su7pT94cDsjNP6-ycShk6gi6SRzbisoxD5S1gRkVLn2dnx-9Q&gws_rd=cr&ei=A3bRWICrMcT0vASRraTIDw" Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 18:52, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:23, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Photograph of a 3 dimensionnal object sold on Ebay. Copyright violation. 90.2.92.18 19:26, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:23, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
This picture is copyrighted © Apple Corps 2017, says so on the page where it was taken from, so the licensing can't be correct. Mikano (talk) 19:50, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:23, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
This pic is used nowhere on wikipedia. False text has been added to it (on the shirt). And the pic was already published on other websites before it was uploaded on Commons, like this one in 2010. Titlutin (talk) 19:57, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:23, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
No valid source. Brian Epstein is the author? Really? I don't think so. Mikano (talk) 19:58, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:24, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
I wonder whether this is own work. It is clearly a scan from a journal. The text of the next page is visible. Further it is work of the sculptor Gyula Kosice. FOP in Argentina is NOT OK. Wouter (talk) 20:39, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:24, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Possible copyvio. Photo published here [3]. Htm (talk) 20:46, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Low quality and no exif data.--Htm (talk) 20:47, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:24, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Photo credited to Maldives Dept of Defense, unsure of copyright: http://en.mihaaru.com/menk-pledges-aid-in-curbing-religious-extremism-in-maldives/ Ytoyoda (talk) 21:01, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:24, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Exif data mismatch with author/uploader. Is Superdiddly "Greg Black"? Copyright "© Queen's University" ViperSnake151 (talk) 21:02, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:24, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
taken from web Pierpao.lo (listening) 21:15, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:24, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:58, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:24, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
copyright violation, see original j.budissin+/- 22:21, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:25, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
copyright violation j.budissin+/- 22:22, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:25, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
copyright violation, see here: https://www.panoramio.com/photo/12155518 j.budissin+/- 22:24, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:25, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
copyright violation, see here: https://www.panoramio.com/photo/24171949 j.budissin+/- 22:25, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:25, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 22:54, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:25, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Japan Expo 2016
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted works.
- File:2016-07-07 15-41-51 ILCE-6300 DSC02893 (27671631313).jpg
- File:2016-07-07 15-41-57 ILCE-6300 DSC02895 (28208764491).jpg
- File:2016-07-07 15-42-53 ILCE-6300 2904 DxO (29712034425).jpg
- File:2016-07-07 15-42-53 ILCE-6300 DSC02904 (27671309464).jpg
- File:2016-07-07 15-44-25 ILCE-6300 DSC02920 (28183360302).jpg
- File:2016-07-07 15-44-30 ILCE-6300 DSC02922 (28183370872).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 01:56, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
- Keep:
File:2016-07-07 15-41-51 ILCE-6300 DSC02893 (27671631313).jpgFile:2016-07-07 15-41-57 ILCE-6300 DSC02895 (28208764491).jpg- File:2016-07-07 15-44-25 ILCE-6300 DSC02920 (28183360302).jpg
- File:2016-07-07 15-44-30 ILCE-6300 DSC02922 (28183370872).jpg
- as these have been blurred out,
- Delete the other 2 as non-savable. –Davey2010Talk 11:23, 10 February 2020 (UTC)
- It's not worth to keep photos which are blurred main subjects. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:24, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
- People browsing through these may want to know what the building sort of looked like..... The blurred images still have some scope and value to them, You nominated these due to characters being present however I have obviously resolved that so at this point there's currently no valid reason to delete them. –Davey2010Talk 21:24, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
- It's not worth to keep photos which are blurred main subjects. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 02:24, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
- Delete, waste of time blurring them, no use now.--BevinKacon (talk) 20:38, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
- BevinKacon as explained above users may want to know what the building inside looks like inside so as such IMHO there's atleast still some value to them, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 21:24, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
- Well, the question whether there is still sufficient educational value in images where integral parts have been blurred is likely neither a clear yes or no, but to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Personally, I agree with BevinKacon and Yuraily Lic that the blurred images are no longer useful and should be deleted, but in the end this is of course up to the the closing admin to decide. GFJ (talk) 12:35, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
- I've struck 2 images since both of those sort of have the same view in other images, The 2 remaining images don't have that area in it and so for that reason imho those 2 should be kept,
- These images IMHO still have some value to them and regardless of usage readers will want to know what the building inside looks like and the area in both images hasn't been taken in any other images in the main category. –Davey2010Talk 15:02, 13 February 2020
- One image is currently not blurred due to WMF constantly bringing up server errors, Until the WMF get that fixed unfortunately for the time being the image will have to remain unblurred as there's no possible way new versions can be uploaded, Thanks. –Davey2010Talk 18:27, 17 February 2020 (UTC)
- Well, the question whether there is still sufficient educational value in images where integral parts have been blurred is likely neither a clear yes or no, but to be evaluated on a case-by-case basis. Personally, I agree with BevinKacon and Yuraily Lic that the blurred images are no longer useful and should be deleted, but in the end this is of course up to the the closing admin to decide. GFJ (talk) 12:35, 13 February 2020 (UTC)
- BevinKacon as explained above users may want to know what the building inside looks like inside so as such IMHO there's atleast still some value to them, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 21:24, 11 February 2020 (UTC)
Deleted. Taivo (talk) 20:21, 2 March 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Japan Expo 2016
[edit]- File:2016-07-08 10-08-21 ILCE-6300 DSC03667 (27674992474).jpg
- File:2016-07-08 10-08-27 ILCE-6300 DSC03668 (28187139292).jpg
- File:2016-07-08 11-46-09 ILCE-6300 DSC04171 (27677750624).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 10:31, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. –Davey2010Talk 11:21, 9 June 2020 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:21, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
- Close again, page not archiving properly. --Minoraxtalk 08:05, 11 September 2020 (UTC)
Files in Category:Japan Expo 2016
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted works.
- File:2016-07-08 09-52-55 ILCE-6300 DSC03628 (28186902252).jpg
- File:2016-07-08 09-52-56 ILCE-6300 DSC03629 (28186909032).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Yuraily Lic (talk) 22:59, 15 April 2021 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Fails DW and Out of scope anyway. (Not that it needs reiterating but these were all uploaded as part of an album and limitations at Flickr2Commons meant they all had to be uploaded IE couldn't pick and choose). –Davey2010Talk 00:15, 16 April 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 20:40, 27 May 2021 (UTC)
Personal image, out of project scope. –Juliancolton | Talk 00:25, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Using this image to make my friend's Wikipedia page which is not up yet User:Michael Muratov
Deleted: The subject is nowhere near the required notability for a WP:EN article. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:29, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of Scope as no usable content; even the undergrowth is unidentified. Rodhullandemu (talk) 11:41, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
- With the others from Upper Pitt street as context it shows the rather overgrown and neglected state, beyond that it has very little use. It was uploaded for completness.--Irate (talk) 17:47, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:31, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Files in Category:Paintings by Xesko
[edit]Out of project scope
- File:Xesko - Abraço 4.5.jpg
File:Xesko - Cunhal o Homem.jpgIn use- File:Xesko - Dispersionism Transitions.jpg
- File:Xesko - Firebeer.jpg
- File:Xesko - Kita.jpg
- File:Xesko - LOL.jpg
- File:Xesko - Memories of the Past.jpg
- File:Xesko - Recall Memory.jpg
- File:Xesko - The Girl of the Pink Cap.jpg
— Racconish ☎ 12:05, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Either autopromotionnal or copyvio. In both cases, these have nothing to do on commons. Kathisma (talk) 21:27, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: These are in scope, see Francisco Santos (swimmer), but there is no evidence that our uploader is actually the artist and has the right to freely license them. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:52, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
This is not me..I took this photo and there are no photo credits with my name attached so please remove this picture. I didn't give permission for this picture to be used without my name attached as photographer. Thank you! 97.95.101.34 14:09, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:01, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
No own work, picture of cd-cover 109.46.2.13 14:12, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:02, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:K-On!
[edit]These photos contain copyrighted works.
- File:2013TIBE Day4 Hall2 Proware Multimedia 20130202b.JPG
- File:Azusa Nakano and Mio Akiyama on a cherry tree 20100418.jpg
- File:Cospa booth, Tokyo Game Show 20090927.jpg
- File:K-ON @ Yodobashi Akiba, 20090704.jpg
- File:K-ON! paifang in Ximending 2.jpg
- File:K-ON! paifang in Ximending 3.jpg
- File:K-ON! paifang in Ximending 4.jpg
- File:K-ON! paifang in Ximending.jpg
- File:Proware in Comic Exhibition 20130817.jpg
- File:とらのあな 秋葉原店B タイトーステーション側ショーウィンドウ けいおん!! 制作終了 (4496371835).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
G I Chandor (talk) 00:27, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Keep File:2013TIBE Day4 Hall2 Proware Multimedia 20130202b.JPG was Showing All Proware Booth, not any one copyrighted Item Close-up. --玄史生 (talk) 02:12, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: ? The named image is essentially all copyrighted posters. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:31, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
The photo was previously published at http://www.leadershipdelaware.org/index.cfm?ref=20300&ref2=335. An OTRS ticket is required. Diannaa (talk) 22:07, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
As the director of communications for the Treasurer, I request that you do not delete this. The headshot has been uploaded directly from the office files and Leadership Delaware has permission to use the image but ultimately, the image is sourced and owned by the OST of Delaware.
- If the copyright holder wishes to release this material to Wikipedia under license, please see the instructions at en:WP:Donating copyrighted materials. There's a sample permission email at en:WP:Consent. Diannaa (talk) 19:18, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - Note that the information above applies to WP:EN and not to Commons. Please have an authorized official of the copyright holder send a free license using OTRS. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:39, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:King James Bible
[edit]Note: The UK Copyright Act 1775 established a type of perpetual copyright under which the King James Bible was allowed to be printed only by the Royal printer and by the printers of the Universities of Oxford and Cambridge. This provision was abolished by the Copyright, Designs and patents Act 1988, but under transitional arrangements (Schedule I, section 13(1)) these printing rights do not fully expire until 2039. However, images of King James bible pages are allowed on Commons since electronic copies do not infringe this printing right.
Notwithstanding the claims made in good faith, these are still potentially copyright in the origin country of the work (until at least 2039, assuming the claims made are accurate.) If Commons Policy is applied in it's strictest sense, then these are not copyright-free in both the US and the origin country, and should not be hosted until that time.)
- File:1612 First Quarto of King James Bible.jpg
- File:1631 KJV New Testament titlepage 2.jpg
- File:1631 KJV New Testament titlepage.jpg
- File:1760 Cambridge Edition King James Bible.png
- File:Author Hebrews.jpg
- File:Bible-KJV.JPG
- File:Book of John.jpg
- File:Cyrenius Parenthetical.jpg
- File:Exodus 4 - reference to spiritual possession putting words in mouths.jpg
- File:John 1.jpg
- File:King James Bible 1772 - Genesis 3.jpg
- File:King James Bible 1772 - Matthew 25 (1).jpg
- File:King James Bible 1772 - Matthew 25 (2).jpg
- File:King James Bible 1772 - Psalm 90.jpg
- File:King James Bible 1772 - Romans 10 (1).jpg
- File:King James Bible 1772 - Romans 10 (2).jpg
- File:King James Bible 1772 - Title page.jpg
- File:King James Bible map.jpg
- File:King James Bible.djvu
- File:KingJamesBible1612-1613.jpg
- File:Kjv bible rl.jpg
- File:KJV Genesis.jpg
- File:KJV Revelation end.jpg
- File:KJVGenesispg1.gif
- File:Psalm 71 (84280341).jpg
- File:The Book of Genesis.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:12, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Sorry, but this is all nonsense. Do you have any legal backup for your DR? Thanks, Yann (talk) 09:21, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
- Did you read the header comment on the category? That says it's potentially copyright until 2040 ( per the Act it specifies.), If you want to keep it your entitled to your opinion, but don't call mine nonsense. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:00, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
- Quoting from the Wikipedia article...""..All provisions granting copyright in perpetuity were abolished by the en:Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988, but because the Authorized Version is protected by royal prerogative rather than copyright, it will remain protected, as specified in CDPA s171(1)(b) . .."
Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:16, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for the links. Is this really a copyright restriction, or something else? Honestly, I think we should throw away these restrictions, like the sweat of the brow doctrine. Regards, Yann (talk) 11:22, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
- It'a a quasi copyright/distribution control, given that at the time of original publication copyrights as they exist in their modern form had yet to be enacted or granted. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:47, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
- See also User:Nick' comments here, Commons:Deletion requests/File:The Holy Bible, containing the Old & New Testament & the Apocrypha.djvu and
w:King_James_Version#Copyright_status which doesn't mention the claimed exception. I would be delighted to be proved wrong on this, if someone digs up where the claimed exception came from. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:06, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Copyright issues are well covered on images of the bible. --ThatPeskyCommoner (talk) 09:36, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, it even says in the category header, "images of King James bible pages are allowed on Commons since electronic copies do not infringe this printing right."— Preceding unsigned comment added by Beleg Tâl (talk • contribs)
- It would be nice to know where that claim came from, can you link a previous discussion giving the logic behind that claim. In any event the 2040 claim may prove to be inaccurate based on the precise wording of a section linked by the relevant Wikipedia article. If one claim may be wrong, it's perhaps wise to review the logic behind others? ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:45, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:King James Bible (1611)
[edit]Owing to the concerns raised in respect of the parent category, these have additonally been nominated for DR.
- File:1911 Britannica-Bible-Authorized Version.png
- File:Biblefrontisbarkerdetail.jpg
- File:King James Bible (1611) page A2r.xcf
- File:King James Bible (1611) page A3r.xcf
- File:King James Bible (1611) page A3v.xcf
- File:King James Bible (1611) page B2v.xcf
- File:King James Bible (1611) page D4v.xcf
- File:King-James-Version-Bible-first-edition-title-page-1611.png
- File:KJV-King-James-Version-Bible-first-edition-title-page-1611.jpg
- File:KJV-King-James-Version-Bible-first-edition-title-page-1611.xcf
Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:15, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Owing to concerns raised about the parent category, these have also been nominated. However, it should be noted that these seem to be fairly standard illuminated letters, that any printed work of the period might use.
- File:King James Bible (1611) page A1r (I).xcf
- File:King James Bible (1611) page A1v (T).xcf
- File:King James Bible (1611) page A2r (G).xcf
- File:King James Bible (1611) page A2r (N).xcf
- File:King James Bible (1611) page A3v (Z).xcf
- File:King James Bible (1611) page D4v (E).xcf
- File:King James Bible (1611) page D4v (G).xcf
- File:King James Bible (1611) page D4v (M).xcf
Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:17, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:King James Bible (1769)
[edit]Per concerns raised about the parent category, namely that owing to some unique circumstances this work is not necessarily free in it's origin country until at least 2040. As Commons, requires that works be free in the US and in their country of origin, it can't necessarily be hosted on Commons until then because of the unique circumstances concerned.
Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:20, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Pursuant to concerns about the lack of author credits raised in a previous DR ( the DJVU re-listed here because of the artwork issue), and consequently no indication of when the author died. Thusly there's no way to be sure if these fully meet Commons criteria until 2031 ( 1911+120).
- File:Holybiblecontain01ball 0591.png
- File:The Holy Bible, containing the Old & New Testament & the Apocrypha (Volume 2).djvu
- File:The Holy Bible, containing the Old & New Testament & the Apocrypha (Volume 3).djvu
- File:The Holy Bible, containing the Old & New Testament & the Apocrypha pg 1.jpg
- File:The Holy Bible, containing the Old & New Testament & the Apocrypha pg 108.jpg
- File:The Holy Bible, containing the Old & New Testament & the Apocrypha pg 12.jpg
- File:The Holy Bible, containing the Old & New Testament & the Apocrypha pg 125.jpg
- File:The Holy Bible, containing the Old & New Testament & the Apocrypha pg 144.jpg
- File:The Holy Bible, containing the Old & New Testament & the Apocrypha pg 161.jpg
- File:The Holy Bible, containing the Old & New Testament & the Apocrypha pg 180.jpg
- File:The Holy Bible, containing the Old & New Testament & the Apocrypha pg 197.jpg
- File:The Holy Bible, containing the Old & New Testament & the Apocrypha pg 216.jpg
- File:The Holy Bible, containing the Old & New Testament & the Apocrypha pg 233.jpg
- File:The Holy Bible, containing the Old & New Testament & the Apocrypha pg 28.jpg
- File:The Holy Bible, containing the Old & New Testament & the Apocrypha pg 564.jpg
- File:The Holy Bible, containing the Old & New Testament & the Apocrypha pg 61.jpg
- File:The Holy Bible, containing the Old & New Testament & the Apocrypha pg 72.jpg
- File:The Holy Bible, containing the Old & New Testament & the Apocrypha pg 89.jpg
- File:The Holy Bible, containing the Old & New Testament & the Apocrypha.djvu
Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:04, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
- File:The Holy Bible, containing the Old & New Testament & the Apocrypha (Volume 2).djvu
- File:The Holy Bible, containing the Old & New Testament & the Apocrypha (Volume 3).djvu
Per an IRC disscussion, this has an ambiguous status outside the US - See w:King_James_Version#Copyright_status ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 23:25, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Delete the problem I have is that the djvu allows UK reusers to print the file (for personal or commercial use) and without seeing the letters patent, I don't know what the legal ramifications would be if I was to print the bible from the djvu file. I also don't know how this all sits with the fact that permission was given in 1911 for the edition we're discussing to be printed and published and whether that might still subsist. Nick (talk) 00:00, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
- I'd also note (though not expressly connected with the DR) that the illustrations are a potential issue. I've been unable to identify the artist, but based on the publishing date of 1911 and the 120 year period from date of publishing until we can assume the works to be in the public domain, the artwork should be assumed to be protected under copyright in the UK until at least 2031. Nick (talk) 00:13, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Nick: For clarity of the argument, can you please better qualify/cite the 120 years that you quote. At the moment it is unclear the provision to which 120 years applies from 1911. — billinghurst sDrewth 00:38, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- The illustrations and the unidentified artist who created the illustrations. I'm working on the assumption that the artist can be identified given the requirements surrounding the publication of the bible in 1911, but also working on the basis that we may not know when he died, rather than the artist never being identifiable, hence the 120 years rather than 70 years from date of publication. I wasn't clear on that. I'll have another look for any details of the artist though, as it would be useful to get that resolved too. Nick (talk) 11:10, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- OK, did quite a lot of digging this morning, and through various book seller and eBay listings, some library catalogue records, and double checking the signatures on the illustrations in our djvu scan, the credits given are R. Talbot Kelly, J. Fullove, et al. That's consistent with the work credited to w:Robert Talbot Kelly, who has a death date of 1934, so for practical purposes his work within the book would enter the public domain on 1 January 2005, subject to the usual work for hire provisions. I can't find any information on the J Fullove, other than his name, but will keep looking to see what I can find. I would think, in a worst case scenario, there might be a small number of illustrations to remove from the djvu file, but nothing significant or serious, and most likely, none at all needing removed. Nick (talk) 14:42, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- The illustrations and the unidentified artist who created the illustrations. I'm working on the assumption that the artist can be identified given the requirements surrounding the publication of the bible in 1911, but also working on the basis that we may not know when he died, rather than the artist never being identifiable, hence the 120 years rather than 70 years from date of publication. I wasn't clear on that. I'll have another look for any details of the artist though, as it would be useful to get that resolved too. Nick (talk) 11:10, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Nick: For clarity of the argument, can you please better qualify/cite the 120 years that you quote. At the moment it is unclear the provision to which 120 years applies from 1911. — billinghurst sDrewth 00:38, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- I'd also note (though not expressly connected with the DR) that the illustrations are a potential issue. I've been unable to identify the artist, but based on the publishing date of 1911 and the 120 year period from date of publishing until we can assume the works to be in the public domain, the artwork should be assumed to be protected under copyright in the UK until at least 2031. Nick (talk) 00:13, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. According to the blurb on the category, "images of King James bible pages are allowed on Commons since electronic copies do not infringe this printing right." (Images might be a different story.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Beleg Tâl (talk • contribs)
- As said above, it would be nice to have some indication where the claimed exception for 'electronic copies' originated, so it can be linked in the category header, otherwise it could be considered a good faith guess. The claim about expiry in 2040 proved to possibly be inaccurate, so other claims should be re-examined as a precaution. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 12:55, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
General discussion
[edit]General comments and opinions regarding all of the above media can be added here.
Keep This is a perennial issue that seems to come up for discussion every few years. Although a very minor and esoteric point, it seems that some editors do have strong views, and we ought to settle this once and for all.
By way of background, I was the editor who added the note on the category page after the last round of discussions. It was not a "good faith guess" as suggested above, but a statement from one of the copyright texts I was using at the time. Unfortunately, it seems that I did not make a note of the source, and if there are realistic legal concerns about its accuracy I would be happy to carry out some more detailed legal research.
Looking at it again now, one concern I have is that it appears to conflate powers claimed under the Crown's prerogative with the entirely statute-based perpetual monopoly on the printing of certain books donated ‘for the advancement of useful learning’ to the universities of Oxford and Cambridge and some other colleges (15 Geo III, cap LIII, (1775)). The 1775 act is not so far as I can see at all relevant to this, and in any event is on the general principles of statutory construction highly unlikely to extend to electronic copies given that one of the stated penalties is that unlawfully printed sheets shall be handed over to the relevant college who shall "forthwith damask and make waste paper of them" (not sure what ‘damask’ means in that context).
Any claim to royal prerogative must predate the birth of modern copyright law as we now understand it in the Statute of Anne 1710. Prior to that date, the executive controlled all printing and the granting of licences to printers; licensing was generally not for the benefit of the author but for the purposes of censorship and control.
The copyright act 1911 abolished the common law concept of copyright, and set up a new statutory Crown copyright regime for government-created works. However, it did preserve the ancient prerogative rights in connection with the Bible.
I would argue that any residual prerogative right claimed by the UK government to license the printing of the King James version is not a ‘copyright restriction’ as we understand it, but an assertion of control over publication of a work that for all other purposes we would without question consider to be in the public domain. For Commons purposes, I think we should treat that claim in the same in the same way that we handle other non-copyright restrictions, for example government restrictions in some countries forbidding the commercial use of self-taken photographs of monuments of classical antiquity. This specific prerogative, of course, is (almost) entirely UK specific, and in virtually every other country of the world the King James version is undoubtedly in the public domain. A warning could be provided, if need be, to re-users who might want to use the images in the UK.
If we could agree that claims of royal prerogative can be ignored for the purpose of hosting images here, we can amend our help pages accordingly. On the other hand, if there is a general view that we ought to be deleting these images, I would like before doing that to have the opportunity to carry out more research in some of the more detailed legal resources at the British Library. That is a fairly significant task, however, for what is ultimately a relatively obscure issue, and I would prefer it if we could simply agree to ignore claims of royal prerogative on Commons.
For those reasons I would vote keep. MichaelMaggs (talk) 14:49, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Keep I fully agree with the above arguments. --Clarice Reis (talk) 15:45, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you for the response, I can't say that I could support a position of ignoring a restriction like that, given that Commons is supposed to be hosting 'free' works, but I will let the DR run it's course. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:08, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
- I could support keeping the file and providing a specific warning for UK re-users if we're actually capable of giving UK re-users precise and accurate legal advice on the use of the file in the UK. No objection to keeping the files whilst you do any research needed to write up a suitable disclaimer or similar. Nick (talk) 17:56, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per all the keeps above, with a suitable warning for potential UK printers. — Jeff G. ツ 03:48, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep all KJV Bible images, with a note for UK printers how the university copyrights per 1988 law, Section 13(1) extend 50 years from end of 1988, as expiring on 1 January 2039 to allow unlimited printing then (as 50 years after 31 Dec 1988). -Wikid77 (talk) 16:30, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Michael's position is detailed, convincing, and sound - we don't need to tie ourselves up in knots over this. (Also, by the way - "damask" is "deface" - stamp over it to obscure the text.) Andrew Gray (talk) 16:58, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per MM et al. Andy Mabbett (talk) 17:46, 25 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - The restriction is a non-copyright restriction. No one else can print the KJV in the UK until 2039, but the work itself predates copyright law and therefore never had a copyright. see Copyright_law_of_the_United_Kingdom#Unusual_grants_of_rights. We host many images that may have a copyright in one place or another, but these have never had a copyright anywhere. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:17, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
it is a duplicate of the file MTA Bus 6650 on the M106 Olsen24 (talk) 02:34, 20 March 2017 (UTC)
it is a duplicate of File:MTA Bus 6650 on the M106.jpg Olsen24 (talk) 02:38, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:25, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:25, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Special:Contributions/Anar511
[edit]Dubious own works (small size, no EXIF) /St1995 11:52, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:27, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There is no evidence that the Flickr user created this display and has the right to freely license it. The image infringes on the copyright for the display. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:46, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- This is petty. You are just trying to attack my uploads now because you have something "against" me. This is sad. Rotting, sigh. It's not the focus and mostly text, the focus is on the candles for the display. Nesnad (talk) 13:26, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- When any of us run across a user who repeatedly shows that he either does not understand copyright or chooses to push its boundaries beyond what is appropriate, we check all of his contributions for problems. So, while I reject the word "vendetta", I certainly did go through all of your uploads and nominated those that appeared to be problems. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:45, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:29, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This image infringes on the copyrights for all of the photographs shown. There is no evidence that the Flickr user has the right to freely license them. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:47, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Have you established that the photos aren't taken by the user who uploaded the image? If so, I would agree with you although it is clear this is just a vendetta. Nesnad (talk) 13:28, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- It's not up to me to prove that the image is OK -- the burden of proof is with you and you have not proven that the photos in the image were taken by the uploader.
- When any of us run across a user who repeatedly shows that he either does not understand copyright or chooses to push its boundaries beyond what is appropriate, we check all of his contributions for problems. So, while I reject the word "vendetta", I certainly did go through all of your uploads and nominated those that appeared to be problems. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:48, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:29, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Fotograf hat nicht in die OTRS-Permission eingewilligt Rarotonga2 (talk) 11:50, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:29, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Fotograf hat nicht in die OTRS-Permission eingewilligt Rarotonga2 (talk) 11:50, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:30, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Unused and therefore useless file redirect. Smaug the Golden (talk - contributions - file list) 16:10, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:19, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Created by Nipponese Dog Calvero LTA 173.12.56.169 13:28, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. This is not a reason to delete anything. Depicted person is notable. The photo is properly licensed and has complete EXIF. Taivo (talk) 15:04, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: as per Taivo. --Daphne Lantier 18:42, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo 100.35.73.190 03:08, 9 October 2017 (UTC)
- Delete: Self-promotion.--Lanwi1(Talk) 16:40, 10 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep en:Peter Huang is still notable. Jason can be cropped away. Taivo (talk) 11:34, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
- Comment: No problem if can remove attention seeker. --Lanwi1(Talk) 11:42, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep (revised) only if cropped as proposed by Taivo, which I've done here for this discussion. The Chinese-wiki article is here zh:黃文雄 (人權活動家). JGHowes talk - 13:09, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
the infomration just on the person could be useful. Artix Kreiger (talk) 14:09, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per above - The subject has an EN article and as such this image could be used, No valid reason for deletion. –Davey2010Talk 20:04, 15 October 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:36, 16 October 2017 (UTC)
Special:Diff/731504130 Kadı Message 18:04, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Also: File:Peter Huang and Jason Lin 2018-03-25.jpg Kadı Message 18:05, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep, courtesy deletions are usually only for subjects who either didn't choose to have their images uploaded or for uploaders a fortnight or so after the original upload. This image has been up for years and is the source file for an image of a notable individual. The uploader chose to irrevocably release this file to the Wikimedia Commons where it has been for years, it would set bad precedent to delete it now simply because the subject changed his mind years later. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 18:07, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Delete：A certain man of letters once said something like this:"Is it right because it has always been like that?"
- Just because something has always existed does not mean that it should be accepted. It seems to me that the vandal's act of uploading the document was for one reason only - to promote himself, this is also in some ways contrary to the foundation's policy.and the fact that he was photographed with a well-known figure in the photo was just a cover, similar to "the fox standing in front of the tiger and claiming to be the king of the forest".Why do we have to use this when there are more documents available?——維基百科最忠誠的反對者 (talk) 20:51, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- I assumed that the Nipponese Dog Cavero requested his own photographs to be taken down because of privacy when I first saw this request. Regardless of the intent of these photographs, they could still be taken to be "An example of a well-known human rights activist posing with other human rights activists". The main question here is "Can these files be realistically used in an educational context?" And I think that the answer easily is "Yes", we've had several discussions about this in the past and every time the answer is "Yes". Please see: "Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Jason Lin". Also, you can start a request to globally ban him yourself, he currently isn't globally banned and if you want to do this you can easily start a request. --Donald Trung 『徵國單』 (No Fake News 💬) (WikiProject Numismatics 💴) (Articles 📚) 21:07, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
- Keep per discussion above, no valid reason for deletion. –Davey2010Talk 21:49, 10 February 2023 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 23:28, 20 February 2023 (UTC)
Quelle hat keine freie Lizenz. Urheberangabe offensichtlich falsch. Iogos82 (talk) 13:37, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:30, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Bonjour a l'attention du regulateur "Ce fichier ne reprséente pas le terril cité c'est un dépot de cendre provenant de l'usine Compagnie Royale asturienne des mines rien à voir avec l'objet mentionné 176.128.2.27 15:40, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Then we change the title and definition of the file, not delete it. E4024 (talk) 17:14, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Daphne Lantier 18:32, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
The source of the image is own work which is baselessly and there are possibility of copyvios under COM:Currency
- File:Reverso billete de 100 nuevos pesos México serie B Banxico.jpg
- File:Billete de 100 nuevos pesos México serie B Banxico.jpg
- File:Reverso billete de 20 nuevos pesos México serie B Banxico.jpg
- File:Billete de 50 nuevos pesos México serie B Banxico.jpg
- File:Reverso billete de 50 nuevos pesos México serie B Banxico.jpg
- File:Billete de 20 nuevos pesos México serie B Banxico.jpg
- File:Billete de 10 nuevos pesos México serie B Banxico.jpg
- File:Reverso billete de 10 nuevos pesos México serie B Banxico.jpg
- File:Reverso billete de 20000 pesos mexico serie A Banxico.jpg
- File:Reverso billete de 100000 pesos mexico serie A Banxico.jpg
- File:Reverso billete de 50000 pesos mexico serie A Banxico.jpg
- File:Reverso billete de 2000 pesos mexico serie A Banxico.jpg
- File:Reverso billete de 10000 pesos mexico serie A Banxico.jpg
- File:Reverso billete de 5000 pesos mexico serie A Banxico.jpg
- File:Billete de 5000 pesos México serie A Banxico.jpg
- File:Billete de 2000 pesos México serie A Banxico.jpg
- File:Billete de 10000 pesos México serie A Banxico.jpg
- File:Billete de 100000 pesos México serie A Banxico.jpg
- File:Billete de 50000 pesos México serie A Banxico.jpg
- File:Billete de 20000 pesos México serie A Banxico.jpg
- File:Reverso billete de 500 pesos mexico serie AA Banxico.jpg
- File:Reverso billete de 50 pesos mexico serie AA Banxico.jpg
- File:Reverso billete de 20 pesos mexico serie AA Banxico.jpg
- File:Reverso billete de 10 pesos mexico serie AA Banxico.jpg
- File:Reverso billete de 1000 pesos mexico serie AA Banxico.jpg
- File:Reverso billete de 100 pesos mexico serie AA Banxico.jpg
- File:Reverso billete de 5 pesos mexico serie AA Banxico.jpg
- File:Billete de 10 pesos México serie AA Banxico.jpg
- File:Billete de 50 pesos México serie AA Banxico.jpg
- File:Billete de 100 pesos México serie AA Banxico.jpg
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 16:09, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep:All of these currency are before 2003, therefore, them are in the PD. --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:41, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: as per {{PD-Mexico}}. --Daphne Lantier 18:33, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Com:Currency. Possibility of copyvios
- File:Billete de 5 pesos México serie AA Banxico.jpg
- File:Billete de 1000 pesos México serie AA Banxico.jpg
- File:Billete de 500 pesos México serie AA Banxico.jpg
- File:Billete de 20 pesos México serie AA Banxico.jpg
- File:Reverso billete de 500 pesos México serie AA ABNC.jpg
- File:Reverso billete de 10000 pesos México serie AA ABNC.jpg
- File:Reverso billete de 1000 pesos México serie AA ABNC.jpg
- File:Reverso billete de 100 pesos México serie AA ABNC.jpg
- File:Reverso billete de 10 pesos México serie AA ABNC.jpg
- File:Reverso billete de 20 pesos México serie AA ABNC.jpg
- File:Reverso billete de 50 pesos México serie AA ABNC.jpg
- File:Reverso del billete de 5 pesos México serie AA ABNC.jpg
- File:Reverso billete de 1 peso México serie AA ABNC.jpg
- File:Billete de 1000 pesos méxico serie AA ABNC.jpg
- File:Billete de 500 pesos México serie AA ABNC.jpg
- File:Billete 10 pesos México serie AA ABNC.jpg
✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 16:13, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep:All of these currency are before 2003, therefore, them are in the PD. --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:42, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: as per {{PD-Mexico}}. --Daphne Lantier 18:34, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Not in the Public Domain. Zentralbibliothek Zürich wants to be asked for a permission , see [4] 2003:45:5C3B:BC01:7C6A:D07A:CC56:FD9 17:29, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry, I want to reject this DR, because I have not seen the upoloader 2003:45:5C3B:BC01:7C6A:D07A:CC56:FD9 17:32, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn. --Daphne Lantier 18:35, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
{{Pd-textlogo}} does not apply for the background which appears to be copyrighted and not the work by the uploader. AFBorchert (talk) 17:46, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Background depicts public space, it does not meet the threshold of originality. Willi P (talk) 17:57, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Please read COM:TOO or Schöpfungshöhe. In general, a photo is with very few exceptions (like faithful reproductions of other works) eligible for copyright. Whether a photo depicts a public space or not does not matter. Please do not mix this up with freedom of panorama. --AFBorchert (talk) 18:36, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- You would need a permission by the copyright holder, i.e. by the photographer or camera operator who took the background image, as this background is clearly eligible for copyright. Alternatively, you could blur or blacken the background. --AFBorchert (talk) 20:42, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Well, I still can't grasp the idea of this cutout being eligible for copyright. Whatever. So I can just blacken the background, upload it as a new version and it won't get deleted? Willi P (talk) 21:10, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- In this case the file would be kept, just the previous version revision-deleted. --AFBorchert (talk)
- OK, will do. Now, if I upload a new file with manipulated background, wouldn't it become my own work? Under which licence should I release it? Willi P (talk) 13:34, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
- This will become {{PD-text}} when the background is blackened. --AFBorchert (talk) 20:18, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
- You think this will work now? Please let me know. Thx, Willi P (talk) 23:12, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
- Hm... you did not blacken the background entirely, just darking it significantly. It could be well argued that this is now a case of de minimis as the original background image can no longer be recognized at this resolution, just the pattern with some stretches of light survives. --AFBorchert (talk) 07:01, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- See, I find the background pattern quite charming, that's why I am reluctant w/ completely blacken it. But I do not want anybody to get in trouble, so I won't insist. So do you think this version is acceptable? Willi P (talk) 14:27, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
- I fully understand your motivation to preserve this pattern. It is now a borderline case where, I think, COM:DM applies as the copyrighted photograph can no longer be recognized (given the resolution), even if some of its pattern survive. Hence, I wouldn't have it nominated in its current form and I would be inclined to keep it (with the earlier version revision-deleted) if I would be the one to close this deletion request. (But I will not close it for obvious reasons.) --AFBorchert (talk) 19:03, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
I'm sporry, I am not familiar with common's customs - you as an admin cannot close this case? Who can and why? Willi P (talk) 21:30, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: original version has been deleted. --Daphne Lantier 18:37, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
"File:Shaved vulva by Flickr-user Nude Pictaker.jpg" hat kaum etwas mit dem Artikel zu tun. Zu obszön und pornografisch. 2003:72:4D20:DF00:3029:5D46:6F0:4A0 18:53, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: file is in use. --Daphne Lantier 18:38, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Possible Flickrwashing (by the U.S. Army, no less!); image posted on Flickr with CC-BY-1.0, but Exif data mentions "Arizona State University Prospectus April 2006" and copyright credit to "Phillip Spears" ViperSnake151 (talk) 21:00, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. The flickr image description reads One of the hot items featured in the Army Strong Zone will be flexible displays. The U.S. Army funds the Flexible Display Center at Arizona State University. I think everything is correct, except for the Flickrwashing claim - yes, the image comes from Arizona State University (indeed, Phillip Spears was apparently affiliated with Arizona University [5]), and yes, U.S. Army had a right to release it as CC-BY. Materialscientist (talk) 00:59, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: as per Materialscientist. --Daphne Lantier 18:39, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Per source page copyright status is unknown and must be verified by any users. RA0808 (talk) 21:02, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: Taken in Canada before 1949. --Amitie 10g (talk) 21:52, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Is there any specific evidence beyond the uploader's word that this photo was taken before January 1, 1949? According to Our Ontario the date is unknown and can only be approximated as "between 1931 and 1958". RA0808 (talk) 17:27, 24 March 2017 (UTC), edited 17:34, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as per COM:PCP. --Daphne Lantier 18:40, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
Redundant. Almost similar image is File:Cafeteria2.JPG. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:13, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:40, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
copyright violation, see here j.budissin+/- 22:27, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: Original file (that you linked) was released to the PD by its author. --Amitie 10g (talk) 00:40, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Daphne Lantier 18:40, 28 March 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Parair as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: violated copyright|internet unload without rights --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:02, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Maybe PD by age? --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 03:02, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- For example, but this's unload of internet whitout copyright. Also PD. --Parair (talk) 16:01, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- If it is in the public domain the source doesn't matter. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:37, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Fry1989: Could you have a quick peek? Thx! --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:56, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
- It looks too complicated for me for PD-Shape. Does anyone know the age? Fry1989 eh? 22:02, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
@Fry1989: @Hedwig in Washington: I'm convincing it's after Concilium (1965). But if you don't persuade this search: Logo in internet --Parair (talk) 11:52, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, this is not a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 09:23, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Odia loves Wikipedia
[edit]Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 10:44, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: {{Personality Rights}} is for the description page, no valid reason for deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 10:50, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- * Keep: It has been done due to malfunction of my laptop defective keyboard. Needs to be roll back. Indrajit Das (Talk - Contribs) 10:56, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- *
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Withdrawn, it seems. --Jonatan Svensson Glad (talk) 18:28, 29 March 2017 (UTC)
Urheberrechtsverletzung 188.97.145.163 08:53, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:21, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Delete Picasabot could not find these images and a human review of the copyright status is uncheckable because Google is no longer hosting picasa and does not display a copyright tag on the image pages at the users albumarchive. Unless someone knows a workaround, PCP should apply.
Ww2censor (talk) 15:30, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- Comment these images were released under cc-by-sa-3.0 license along with numerous other similar images that I have uploaded by this photographer from his Picasa account. Looks like the licensing info for these specific images was lost when Picasa was changed. Dannys-777 (talk) 19:49, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Dannys-777: Thanks for mentioning that, so I looked at some of your previous uploads by the same Picasa user and see that I, and the Picasabot, had given them good reviews. In this case I suppose we can assume good faith in these images from that user. However, proceeding from here I doubt we can do so in future because we are unable to verify the copyright even if we know the Picasa user did release images under a free licence. I raised this lack of a viewable copyright on the Village Pump some time ago but it seems like the foundation would have to exert pressure on Google to display the copyright in future, an event that seems unlikely to happen. I think it best if the closing admin makes the decision to give a good or bad review. Ww2censor (talk) 10:15, 22 March 2017 (UTC)
- Weak keep: As is almost impossible to get the licensing from Google Photos (even using the Picasa API), if the uploader claimed these files are licensed under the given license, just trust him; this is a problem with Google. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:36, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Sorry but without a license review we cannot keep those files. --Natuur12 (talk) 14:38, 31 March 2017 (UTC)