Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/03/10

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive March 10th, 2017
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio from mass upload Sitacuisses (talk) 01:03, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 03:02, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Biwom as Copyvio (copyvio) Yann (talk) 04:30, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 04:31, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Mduvekot as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: deletion|photo has copyright notice in metadata: ©Patrick McMullan Yann (talk) 04:40, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 04:40, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Eartha78 as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: duplicate of which file? Yann (talk) 04:42, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, its a duplicate of this File:Meeting of Women's Social and Political Union (WSPU) leaders, c.1906 - c.1907. (22755473290).jpg . I didn't realise there was already a version on Wikicommons when I uploaded it. Eartha78 (talk) 08:14, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 10:21, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free use: Book cover --Alaa Najjar :)..! 12:53, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please, delete all user uploaded files, all of them have a copyright violation and muse uploaded them as Fair use--Alaa Najjar :)..! 12:55, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:04, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

we have no rghts to distribute this picture online. only print and only one country! please delete! Zinnif (talk) 11:20, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 13:52, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bray Wyatt s titulom....

Beacuse its downloaded from internet Sillus (talk) 13:10, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Speedy deleted – uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file. --jdx Re: 13:43, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 17:41, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jcb: You come up with this 12 years after the upload?--2003:D2:1BC1:D783:4BB0:3C57:B9D1:8C7E 18:44, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately some checks are severely backlogged. Almost daily I find obvious copyright violations that have been on our servers for over 10 years. Jcb (talk) 19:46, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
When the latest version was uploaded I put the source in the meta-data. It's http://www.bonhams.com/auctions/20923/lot/269/. The author is Mayall & Co. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 19:06, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I missed that link. Fortunately it that page provides a date, which is over 120 years ago, so that we can use {{PD-old-assumed}}. Jcb (talk) 19:46, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 19:47, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation... this file on Flickr is listed as All rights reserved Acabashi (talk) 21:53, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. FlickreviewR (an automated bot) confirmed that this was licensed under CC-BY-2.0 on Flickr on 15 November 2012. CC-licenses are non-revocable, so you can not 'change your mind' and make it more restrictive. You cna limit the distribution of a file under a free license by marking it under a more restrictive license on Flickr, but in legal terms, it is still technically allowed to be used under the most freely cc-license it has ever been licensed under. Same thing would apply if the file were to be deleted on Flickr. The bot confirmed that it existed and it was 'that' specific image, and that it was licensed under cc-by-2.0 at the specified date. See the Creative Commons FAQ on revoking licensing. (tJosve05a (c) 00:05, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio - Sports Illustrated WikiOriginal-9 (talk) 03:30, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Recreation of content deleted per community consensus

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jettmelba (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No permission for uploading these images under their present license. Also seems to be blatant advertising.

Takeaway (talk) 15:39, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Spam. --Achim (talk) 13:27, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from Daniel S. Jcb (talk) 21:19, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: resolved, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Skylt.jpg. --Jcb (talk) 22:16, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Apilstrs jothish (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope; not a selfie repository

TJH2018talk 16:46, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Apilstrs jothish (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal type photos, commons is not a photo album

Gbawden (talk) 10:07, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Apilstrs jothish (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploading pictures that are out of the scope for personal advertisement some of them are like film cover or may be edited for personal use. Commons is not a social media site.

✝iѵɛɳ२२४०†ลℓк †๏ мэ 11:39, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:31, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:31, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:31, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality Joschi71 (talk) 16:03, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:57, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, obviously taken from automobile/bus, upload of rather poor quality, small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 17:45, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:58, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of rather poor quality, small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:36, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:58, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams showing identficable details (licence plates), hence, personality rights isusses, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:40, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I don't see personality rights issues here, and the image has enough distinctive content to keep it. The coordinates make this a valuable addition to the OSM Commons layer. --Sitacuisses (talk) 04:15, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:58, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, upload for obviously personal use showing identficable individuals, hence, personality rights isusses, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:43, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:58, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyvio. On Niti Taylor's Twitter feed [1] where it is credited to Anuj kaka. Embedded logo at bottom left, no metadata. Verbcatcher (talk) 00:43, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

it's not important enough to be here Whisperingsilhouette (talk) 12:00, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 22:47, 15 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo was obviously taken from this blog. The uploader claims that the photo is his own work, while the author is actually the blog owner Anton Motolko. -Der Rationalist (talk) 22:23, 1 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:26, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Drawings by Richard Vasseur

[edit]

Files uploaded by Richard Vasseur (talk · contribs). Out of project scope per COM:EDUSE. All of these images are personal artwork of original, non-notable, characters that while creative, are not realistically useful for any instructional purposes. Seems more like simple image hosting. --Animalparty (talk) 05:24, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:27, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:PACKAGING. G I Chandor (talk) 00:20, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:27, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The food menu contains copyrighted photos. G I Chandor (talk) 00:21, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:27, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hitesh757 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal type photos with no evidence of permission, used to market a club that is at WP AfD

Gbawden (talk) 10:12, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:29, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 10:34, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:29, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 10:34, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:29, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused advertizing logo Denniss (talk) 12:13, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:30, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kolugo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

video game screenshot (en:Minecraft) → uploader does not own the copyright

El Grafo (talk) 13:20, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:30, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:31, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:33, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:33, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:33, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:33, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:33, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:33, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Isip westboro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Isip westboro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://static.panoramio.com/photos/large/45488046.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

All are for deletion. I asked the uploader on BG Wikipedia and he said that they are from Internet [2]. Probably File:Rakovski old hospital.jpg and File:Rakovski Sekirovo old church 1.png could be kept as old. File:Ricardo toscani architect.png is as well probably around 1900 [3] and could be kept. --Мико (talk) 14:29, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:07, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Isip westboro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and drawings. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Statement from the uploader

[edit]

The requested information updated. --Isip westboro (talk) 03:19, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:35, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HETAQRQIRA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Selfies and copyright violations.

Takeaway (talk) 17:46, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:36, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Also self promotion. jdx Re: 18:56, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:36, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Глеб Иванович (talk) 22:11, 15 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:58, 24 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, Vanjagenije (talk) 19:04, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:36, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Notfleg (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope; no real educational value; no nudes

TJH2018talk 22:35, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Notfleg

[edit]

Out of scope; no real educational value; no nudes Notfleg (talk) 19:25, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:37, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal pic, not within project scope Daphne Lantier 23:59, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:37, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Malf fabilane (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. User is not a contributor, his only activity is a user page at EN wiki several years ago. Also no permission from the photographers. and THOR.jpg is probably grabbed from the web.

Jcb (talk) 00:23, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:53, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 銚電神 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyrighted characters. [4] [5]

G I Chandor (talk) 00:25, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:54, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Last remaining upload of this user. Probably not own work. No authorship information, no permission. Jcb (talk) 01:20, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:55, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Meraswaraaj (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope/spam

/St1995 01:52, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:55, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PAS BESOIN 90.20.77.29 09:45, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept: Vandalism. --Amitie 10g (talk) 02:34, 17 March 2017 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Princemalcolm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:11, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:00, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:01, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Firmin Destrolle (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:01, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joshuathefootballer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://cjjlionsports.com/wp-content/uploads/photo-gallery/samuel_gilmore.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:03, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused Facebookscreenshot of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:05, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Blogger Sabbir (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://bestshampooforoilyhair.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/12088139_494760290701617_8802456217357147565_n.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:05, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:08, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andreseguz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Image appears to be from https://www.osoigo.com.ar/es/p/andres-guzman.html

Ytoyoda (talk) 15:29, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, or from https://twitter.com/osoigo_ar. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:08, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elcjng122 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:13, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elcjng122 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Web sites screenshots.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:22, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AlbertGP01 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

In this form unwanted advertising (COM:ADVERT). Might be useful with the text removed, but then we would still need a written permission via COM:OTRS.

El Grafo (talk) 10:02, 15 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 23:18, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AlbertGP01 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Many instances of these image can be found on the internet prior to upload but claimed by uploader to be "own work". Probable copyright violations.

Takeaway (talk) 16:18, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:22, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:22, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:23, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Text only image, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:27, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:23, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:29, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:24, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:30, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:24, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:30, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:24, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:33, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:24, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio https://www.bloomfield.org/schools/bloomfield-hills-high-school/new-bhhs John from Idegon (talk) 16:32, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:19, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 16:59, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:19, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 16:59, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:19, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 16:59, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:18, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:00, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:18, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:00, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:18, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:00, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:18, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

delete this image i not use in own gallery page. so i want to mediately delete Enaya Afzal (talk) 17:00, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:18, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:02, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:18, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:02, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:18, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:05, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:18, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:06, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:18, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:09, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:17, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:11, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:38, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:11, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:38, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:21, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:37, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 17:35, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:37, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 18:25, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:37, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. User is not a contributor. His only actions are the creation of a user page and the upload of this personal picture. Jcb (talk) 21:03, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:36, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image contains copyrighted photos. G I Chandor (talk) 00:22, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Yes, and the costumes themselves also have copyrights. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:14, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image contains copyrighted photos. G I Chandor (talk) 00:22, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:14, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"えべチュン" (ebechun) is licensed under CC-by-nc-sa. [6] Commons does not accept noncommercial licenses. G I Chandor (talk) 00:23, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:39, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm not going to add this photo right now on the page. Also I didn't know what I was doing. Alejandra Aguilera 00:31, 10 March 2017 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - nice image. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:40, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion. Private image. No other useful contributions from uploader. Adds nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images on the same subject. DavidIvar (talk) 01:16, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:40, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, looks like official photo MB298 (talk) 02:15, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:40, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SPAM The user uploades several pictures with comments that are intended to lead to purchases Manorainjan (talk) 02:16, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:41, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SPAM: The user uploaded several pictures with comments that are intended to lead to purchases Manorainjan (talk) 02:17, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:41, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like official photo, highly unlikely to be own work MB298 (talk) 02:17, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:41, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

SPAM: The user uploaded several pictures with comments that are intended to lead to purchases Manorainjan (talk) 02:17, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:41, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. It was erected in 2013. [7] G I Chandor (talk) 03:02, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:41, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:TOYS. G I Chandor (talk) 03:03, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:41, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted characters. [8]

G I Chandor (talk) 03:07, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The three named clearly have copyrights in both the US and Japan. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:42, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. It was erected in 1975. [9] G I Chandor (talk) 03:15, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:46, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andreiyw (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Official pictures of politicians, unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 04:34, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:46, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Andreiyw (talk · contribs)

[edit]

https://kulturologia.ru/blogs/080719/43606/

Patrick Rogel (talk) 11:06, 10 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 21:11, 30 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently a scan of an old photo, but no source or copyright details for the original. --ghouston (talk) 04:39, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:46, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work if it's from 1932. No source or copyright details. --ghouston (talk) 04:40, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:46, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - no description and unlikely to be of educational use. --ghouston (talk) 04:49, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:47, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Harjinder Singh Batth (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Some of these images are non-free screenshots of desktop/mobile operating systems and the rest appear to either be outside our scope as noneducational or promotional as this whole set appears to be promoting some form of penetration testing/exploit kit software.

Mifter (talk) 05:25, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:47, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot so not own work Monfulta (talk) 06:09, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I took this picture. I took it off a display, so the image "FCX-001 screenshot.jpg" is not really a screenshot, but a cropped part of a photography I took. If needed I can upload the whole image. Also, note the weird resolution of the image – it was definitely not created by taken a screenshot while being on a computer. Cheers, --Chris.w.braun (talk) 13:19, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Here's the full image:
File:FCX-001 screenshot complete.jpg
Information display for the Bell FCX-001 helicopter, Heli-Expo 2017 in Dallas.
, --Chris.w.braun (talk) 16:00, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Regardless of how it was created, it would be a Bell Helicopters copyright image and not eligible to be licensed under a free licence. - Ahunt (talk) 13:43, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:50, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anmol Shetkar (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

--ghouston (talk) 06:56, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:51, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Akmmaury0 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 10:08, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:52, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artist's rendering of a proposed railway station. Published elsewhere on the web already [10] (full-size version), [11]. If the uploader is indeed the original author of this (which I tend to doubt), we need proof of that and a written permission via COM:OTRS. El Grafo (talk) 10:12, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:52, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a film poster or DVD cover that has been modified by the uploader. DAJF (talk) 10:13, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:52, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work of a brand new user. no exif info Gbawden (talk) 10:21, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:52, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from Martin Adolfsson. Jcb (talk) 10:26, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:53, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from Martin Adolfsson. Jcb (talk) 10:26, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:53, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from the photographer. Jcb (talk) 10:28, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:53, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, no permission. Jcb (talk) 10:29, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:53, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of Artistic work that is bound to still be in copyright - would need an indication that the artist was the photographer or had consented to the release WereSpielChequers (talk) 10:38, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: According to the Panaramio tags, it is in Belgium -- therefore FOP applies. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:55, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 10:48, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:55, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is from here, no grant of CC-BY-SA, indeed footer says all rights reserved. BethNaught (talk) 11:18, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:55, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photo from the building's National Register nomination found here. As such, it is not a free image that can be uploaded here. It is a copyright violation. Farragutful (talk) 14:02, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:59, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused private photo, obviously a photomontage; source not provided, so mayve even a copyvio Ankry (talk) 14:34, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Looks like the background comes from http://wallpapersafari.com/amazing-pictures-of-nature-wallpapers/ (20th image in list) Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:49, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:59, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio: image is property of Jagex Limited and goes beyond the ToO. Lordtobi () 14:46, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:59, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern painting, no permission. Yann (talk) 15:02, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:00, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:00, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from Emmanuel Klein. Jcb (talk) 16:50, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:50, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 17:01, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:50, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 17:02, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:50, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 17:10, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep [12]: "The National Library of Medicine believes this item to be in the public domain" - they took the photo from the American journal of obstetrics (from an obituary, I guess) and should have access to the source (I don't, the journal is published since 1868, but only recent volumes are online).
  • [13] Another source says that the photo is from 1899 and from Brooklyn Life. I take it as it was published there in 1899 (Brooklyn Life magazine had a short lifetime from 1890 to 1931 [14], and Skene died in 1900). Materialscientist (talk) 05:21, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion -- pre 1900 image. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:51, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Main subject of the photo seems not sunset, but modern sculpture. There is freedom of panorama in USA for architecture, but not for sculpture. The photo violates sculptor's copyright. Taivo (talk) 17:18, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:51, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Also seems out of scope. Jcb (talk) 17:21, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:51, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr user is the subject, not the photographer. We need proof of the photographer's permission to release this file under the stated license. Elisfkc (talk) 17:34, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

-The image is just a close up/crop of an already existing approved image on Wikipedia: Dr. Mercola - International Vaccine Conference 2009 Speech.jpgJustito (talk) 11:19, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Flickr user = subject. We need a free license from the actual photographer. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:53, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The sculptural work or how do you call that has most prominent place on the photo. There is freedom of panorama in USA for architecture, but not for such kind of art. Artist's copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 17:37, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Stage sets are copyrighted. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:55, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an incorrect version of the Georgia Historical Society's logo. Note the A in Historical being taller than the first A. This is an incorrect recreation of the official logo. Brendanghs (talk) 17:39, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Also, the font is wrong. While the left and right downstrokes of the A ought to be a little different, this face has them very different. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:00, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Smooth O as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Stamps of Bosnia and Herzegovina are not in public domain Wdwd (talk) 12:08, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment This stamp is from 1998, as you can see here, all stamps are copyrighted by BH Pošta (© 2009 JP BH POŠTA doo, Sarajevo), except those falling in Commons:Copyright_rules_by_territory#Bosnia_and_Herzegovina. Also designer of this stamp is Mirza Ibrahimpašić, still living painter. --Smooth O (talk) 13:45, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:31, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I can't see any indication of a BSD license on the source website. When you download and start the game, you get the following message:

Terms & Conditions
Patience Pack is released as freeware. You can download it, pass it around or distribute it. However, it's still copyrighted, so you can't decompile it or sell it as your own (as you can with a public domain program).
Patience Pack is distributed in the hope that it will be useful, but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.
If you like Patience Pack, and would like to show appreciation, then you can do so by showing someone else some tender loving care. There are lot of needy people in the world, particularly in the third world.

Under the the Help → About PatPack menu item you'll find:

Patience Pack (freeware)
Version 9.0.1
Copyright 1992-2012 (c) Maurice Abraham

Collection of different patience and solitaire games,
written for fun and distrubuted [sic] as FREEWARE.

Freeware does not imply Free Software, and it certainly does not imply that it is available under a BSD license. El Grafo (talk) 13:40, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  • File was transferred from the English Wikipedia, so, it should be restored there and the info updated to indicate Fair use before deleting from here. A good, free replacement like AisleRiot screenshot should be uploaded. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:01, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:31, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ceylankosker (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and book. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:29, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image has been previously published elsewhere online, for example here. An OTRS ticket is required. Diannaa (talk) 15:14, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Dianna Asharam Bapu is a very famous spiritual public figure in India & it is very much possible that his photographs have been used in different places/newswebsites /his own websites . I agree to the fact that establishing a copyright claim is difficult because many photographers click a lot of his pictures which are later posted elsewehere. If the community think , I may change the copyright status to fair usage one .Also most of his pictures are copyright free --Uddalak Aruni (talk) 16:52, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Please do not claim "own work" for an image that is not. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:29, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Musiceditormk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:20, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:28, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JohnP53 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: different cameras, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://exomotive.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/DBR1_Replicar_Arizona_highway_rear.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:28, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Seekiu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical posters, photo and movie screenshot. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Seekiu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in France.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:26, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of otherwise copyrighted material (photo, text, etc) Monfulta (talk) 15:36, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:28, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr caption says it is a screenshot. Likely someone else's work, making it Flickr washing Elisfkc (talk) 17:57, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


That is false. This image appears to have been uploaded from someone within the INFICON corporation. therefore not a screenshot. nor do i see this caption which is noted above. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Merica1z (talk • contribs) 18:23, 13 March 2017‎ (UTC)[reply]

"False" is a strong accusation -- it suggests that you think Elisfkc is deliberately lying. I think "incorrect" might be better. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:04, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: The EXIF at Flickr names the Flickr user. It does not appear elsewhere on the web and, in particular, it does not appear on the Inficon web site. I think we can keep it. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:13, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FoP in Ukraine. Main building's authors died in 1958 and 1961, the suburban station (the one with the clock-tower) was built in 1954—1955, and southern station (the bluish building) and northern platforms building are relatively recent. --BaseSat (talk) 18:30, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

BaseSat (talk) 18:30, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Frankly, I'm really tired of these no-FoP related marginal deletion requests based on thin law with neither complainant, nor the state showing any intention in the last 50 years of stopping anyone from publishing their holiday photos, or even putting professional photos on the front of magazines or post-cards. I am not saying that the rationale is incorrect but I do believe these are pointy liminal technical deletions when buildings are as well photographed, published and as unremarkable as this. Were there a legal case precedent, or an architect or state department that cared, this would be entirely different for me. Show me a small sign of any sort that an architect cares about their additions to the building being freely photographed, and I would vote to delete immediately. -- (talk) 19:26, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Моя фотография - Kiev7938.JPG - была загружена в рамках украинской части конкурса "Вики любит памятники" с использованием соотстветствующего загрузочного шаблона. Информацию о загрузке именно в рамках конкурса можно увидеть на странице этой фотографии. Украинская сторона в лице жюри конкурса не предъявила никаких претензий к фотографии. Я искренне не понимаю, почему претензии возникают сейчас. Мне кажется, логично для начала обратиться с претензиями к тем людям, которые отвечали за формирование конкурсных (загрузочных) списков, а не к юзерам, которые руководствовались этими списками, отправляя фотографии на конкурс. Пишу уже второй подобный комментарий, первый был здесь: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Simferopol_Railway_Station "Вчера газовая камера, сегодня газовая камера - голова начинает болеть" (с) Жванецкий Екатерина Борисова (talk) 22:15, 11 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: It's the law -- if you don't like it, change the law. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:46, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Привокзальная площадь, Киев - 2.jpg, File:Привокзальная площадь, Киев - 5.jpg, File:Kiev7938.JPG have permission from architect, so I restore them.--Anatoliy (talk) 12:49, 18 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Kyiv-Pasazhyrskyi_Railway_Station: no FOP in Ukraine.

Kulmalukko (talk) 19:11, 3 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 23:43, 17 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bendixo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Artwork of painter who died in 1968. The works are not yet in public domain. Also, uploader uploaded these works as "own work".

Takeaway (talk) 18:47, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:15, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Atlı lobya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work

Didym (talk) 19:38, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:15, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. The {{PD-HU-unknown}} license is only valid if a proper explanation is given who it would be impossible to know who the author is, otherwise the image has to be deleted. Jcb (talk) 21:10, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A kép circa 1871 körül készült. Elég nehéz lenne kinyomozni, ki a szerzője. A forrásban nem lehet megtalálni. Tambo (talk) 18:36, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have a source that this would be from around 1871? He does not look 26 years old at the picture. Just looking at the picture, I would rather say 1900 or 1905. 1871 would be old enough for {{PD-old-assumed}}. Jcb (talk) 20:44, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I put {{PD-old-assumed}} -- that means the image is ealier than 1897, when he would have been 52. I think he looks younger than that, and 1871, when he would have been 26, seems at least possible. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:19, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Danevpl1956 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Probably not own work. Only one has EXIF and all others have small or very small resolution.

Jcb (talk) 21:23, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:20, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Insufficient authorship information, unknown copyright situation. The artwork is clearly signed, but difficult to read. No indication that the author of the artwork would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 21:33, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Here are the information: [15] -- User: Perhelion 00:52, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Unfortunately, that page does not tell when P. Van Brempt died. I have tried to find it with Google, but unsuccessful. If the author was alive in 1947, which is perfectly possible, then the image is still copyrighted. Jcb (talk) 01:28, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, I found also no information about both authors (the page claims copyright). -- User: Perhelion 12:52, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:21, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from Dennis van Zuijlekom. Jcb (talk) 21:36, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, no permission. Uploader apparently received a physical copy of the picture, with the signature of the depicted person. Jcb (talk) 22:14, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 22:16, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and incorrect geometry for the hydrogen atoms at the ring fusions. They need to be distinctly "up" at the A/B ring junction and "down" and the B/C ring junction. File:General Ladderane.png has it correct geometrically, and File:Tricyclo(4,2,0,0,(2,5))-octane.svg has the structural idea with no geometry (which is better than wrong) if the use-case is solely about bonding. DMacks (talk) 22:17, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, it seems you right - delete it -Titou (talk) 05:41, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image copyrighted by two photographers; doesn't appear to match up with release by a single account Hchc2009 (talk) 22:33, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:23, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work; small, no exif data, found elsewhere on web. –Juliancolton | Talk 23:09, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:25, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 23:14, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:25, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality file from mass upload Sitacuisses (talk) 01:00, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:47, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality file from mass upload. Sitacuisses (talk) 01:08, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:48, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Indrajit Das 08:38, 10 March 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:48, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private photo, not used. Indrajit Das 08:40, 10 March 2017 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:50, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Depicted person is not mentioned in en.wiki and only once mentioned in id.wiki, because she played minor role in film, which has no article in en.wiki. She can be out of project scope. Small photo without camera data and the uploader's only contribution, copyright violation is possible too. Taivo (talk) 08:58, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:50, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non free from http://www.vikingaliv.se/om/press/#/ Yger (talk) 09:04, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Speedy delete: previously deleted content (File:Vikingalivbyggnad.png, File:Vikingaliv.jpg), recreated outside of process. LX (talk, contribs) 09:47, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:51, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 10:08, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:52, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseded by File:Logo of NAVAIR.png Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 10:09, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:52, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseded by File:Fs logo.svg Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 10:33, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:53, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of com:EDUSE Pippobuono (talk) 11:18, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:54, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Hilarmont as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Wrong licence Wdwd (talk) 11:59, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded it and have no copyright HP25 (talk) 19:28, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Clearly not own work. Copyright status is unknown. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:33, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: This doctoral dissertation is already cited in two Wikipedia articles ([16],[17]). Now that its author has kindly released it under a free license, it will likely find its way to additional articles and possibly other WMF projects. Please explain why this particular dissertation is less notable than others listed under Category:Academic_theses_and_dissertations, and why should they be stored in Commons while it moved to Wikitext. Thanks, ליאור (talk) 09:46, 12 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. Being cited in an article is not an inclusion criteria. Commons is not for publishing own theses. P 1 9 9   15:01, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Undeleted per requuest. Natuur12 (talk) 16:38, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tagged by Geagea as "no permission". Previously undeleted. — Racconish💬 18:22, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdraw. -- Geagea (talk) 21:42, 28 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stock photography found all over the internet, source unknown Ytoyoda (talk) 15:47, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:02, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality Joschi71 (talk) 15:54, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not great, but no alternatives available. P 1 9 9   15:03, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry image of an unidentified puppy. Unlikely to be used in a project. Takeaway (talk) 15:57, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Plenty of better alternatives available. P 1 9 9   15:03, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality + frame Joschi71 (talk) 16:16, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: sufficient quality, in scope. No equivalent available. P 1 9 9   15:06, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseded by File:USS Carney (DDG-64) ship crest.png Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 17:49, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:07, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 17:52, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:07, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseded by File:USS Columbus (SSN-762) Ship crest.png Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 17:52, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:08, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseded by File:USS Santa Fe (SSN-763) Ship crest.png Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 17:54, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:08, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, maybe using Commons for file storage? — regards, Revi 17:56, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:08, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, probably using Commons for hotlinking? — regards, Revi 17:56, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:08, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseded by File:Vanillin proton NMR.png Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 17:58, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:08, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of poor quality, small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:36, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Plenty of better alternatives available. P 1 9 9   15:11, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of rather poor quality, small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:37, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Plenty of better alternatives available. P 1 9 9   15:11, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of poor quality, replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:41, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Many better alternatives available. P 1 9 9   15:12, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of poor quality, replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 19:16, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, blurry. Better alternatives available. P 1 9 9   15:13, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a place for photos that have general use and not for personal photos. There is no use for this picture and it is self promotion, therefore is has to be deleted. Pkbwcgs (talk) 19:28, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:13, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of rather poor quality, small-sized and replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 17:47, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: adequate quality, in scope. No equivalent available. P 1 9 9   15:23, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because i uploaded the wrong file Laurens D (talk) 20:09, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Author request within 7 days of upload. Green Giant (talk) 15:59, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising/promotional. Achim (talk) 21:08, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio, readily found on internet. P 1 9 9   15:19, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader is probably not the copyright holder since this is a logo for a published magazine. Steel1943 (talk) 21:14, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. The uploader can upload this image directly to Wikipedia as a non-free logo. Green Giant (talk) 15:58, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant/unused icon superseded by File:JR JU-01 station number.png. DAJF (talk) 00:56, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:42, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Redundant/unused icon superseded by File:JR JK-12 station number.png DAJF (talk) 01:00, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:42, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published elsewhere, such as http://ceramistes-contemporains.over-blog.com/article-nino-caruso-italie-91620928.html. Needs confirmation of author and license. --ghouston (talk) 04:28, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:41, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infriction Tokota (talk) 08:27, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, the source has a compatible license, no matter the watermark for this case. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:53, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo for a television program is unlikely to be the uploader's own work. Themightyquill (talk) 09:56, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, logo above TOO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 17:43, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality image of com:PENIS Pippobuono (talk) 11:16, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:04, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imagevio from the official website ([18]) — Draceane talkcontrib. 21:16, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: complex logo. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:43, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Template:PD-Cambodia states that the author must be dead for 50 years. This work is only 44 years old. Meiloorun (talk) 01:04, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:31, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I plan on cropping the source image in a better manner than this. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:15, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:31, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yet another botched attempt at cropping the source image. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:17, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:32, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Crosswiki Spam from MediaWiki.org Mainframe98 (talk) 07:52, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:32, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably copyvio: http://www.meloman.ru/composer/artyom-ananev/ Bilderling (talk) 08:32, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:33, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, uploader's last remaining contribution. Probably copyright violation like his/her other uploads. Taivo (talk) 09:01, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:33, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without camera data, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:06, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:33, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

From [19], needs permission via COM:OTRS. El Grafo (talk) 10:15, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:33, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be a crop of a photo used elsewhere as a publicity shot: http://www.btp.org.tr/content/view/3424/tam-bagimsiz-turkiye-mitingi-izmir McGeddon (talk) 10:43, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is cropped from File:Haydar bas.jpg, which was uploaded on 2015-04-28 by User:Muratcorbaci as that account's only activity on this project. The low resolution, lack of metadata and entries in the filter log showing attempts to upload files with names like 143022102864610537412345_d78a9e260c_z.jpg (indicating they were taken from some social media or image sharing site) do not inspire confidence in the original uploader. LX (talk, contribs) 17:13, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:34, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be from http://www.myjoyonline.com/opinion/2016/july-19th/dwarves-and-gorillas-message-from-the-morning-man.php Ytoyoda (talk) 15:28, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:37, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:38, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Barcedona (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Spain for temporary displays.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:38, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, no permission. Jcb (talk) 16:29, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:38, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 16:30, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:38, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work, probably copied from this link Biplab Anand (Talk) 16:32, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:38, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Probably not own work, very small resolution, no EXIF. Jcb (talk) 16:35, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:39, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Current license is only valid if this is an official depiction of the CoA. Jcb (talk) 16:38, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:39, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission from Odd E. Nerbø. Jcb (talk) 16:42, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:39, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 16:43, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:39, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, no permission. Jcb (talk) 16:46, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:39, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted poster SANCAN112 (talk) 18:03, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:39, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation https://dev.swisstennis.ch/fr/node/6227 SealMan11 (talk) 18:06, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:39, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images from the same camera set in August 2014 were deleted at enwp for repeated copyright issues czar 18:35, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 19:42, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bonjour, étant débutante sur Wikipedia, j'ai ajouté ce fichier ainsi que plusieurs autres logos par erreur (dont je vais également demander la suppression)... Merci par avance pour votre aide. Ocomes96 (talk) 16:47, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:14, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bonjour, étant débutante sur Wikipedia, j'ai ajouté ce fichier ainsi que plusieurs autres logos par erreur (dont je vais également demander la suppression)... Merci par avance pour votre aide. Ocomes96 (talk) 16:47, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:14, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bonjour, étant débutante sur Wikipedia, j'ai ajouté ce fichier ainsi que plusieurs autres logos par erreur (dont je vais également demander la suppression)... Merci par avance pour votre aide. Ocomes96 (talk) 16:48, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:13, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseded by File:Leova rajon coa.png Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 18:08, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete supersed, universally replaced. Kathisma (talk) 21:12, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:12, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseded by File:Navy Civilian Valor Ribbon.png Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 18:11, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:11, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseded by File:USAF Civilian Service Ribbon.png Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 18:13, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:11, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseded by File:Vowels of the Cham script.png Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 18:19, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:10, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseded by File:Nietzsche contra Wagner - titlepage.png Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 11:12, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:18, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseded by File:Pacific Northwest trail route overview.png Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 11:13, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:19, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseded by File:Pokébuck sign.png Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 11:17, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:17, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseded by File:Polyphemus.png Sebastian Wallroth (talk) 11:19, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:17, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Erreur dans le fichier : la courbe est celle de la mortalité maternelle et non de la périnatale Daniel AC Mathieu (talk) 20:09, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:42, 24 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality, no educational purpose Joschi71 (talk) 16:07, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:26, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Breach of COM:DW Alex Spade (talk) 20:11, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:26, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is a duplicate file. VMetalMedia (talk) 22:16, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:23, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is a duplicate file. VMetalMedia (talk) 22:18, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:23, 25 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file won't be used nor is necessary to keep since a new file with the same information has been created; https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Icelandic_Opinion_Polling,_30_Day_Moving_Average,_2016-2020.svg Avopeas (talk) 11:15, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:19, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

licence not valid anylonger Zinnif (talk) 09:05, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain? Are you the photographer, as stated on upload? Jcb (talk) 16:29, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: CC-license cannot be revoked, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thomas Muster Kitzbühel.jpg. --Jcb (talk) 16:22, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

we have no rghts to distribute this picture online. only print and only one country! please delete! Zinnif (talk) 11:21, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So you are saying that you were lying at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thomas Muster Kitzbühel.jpg where you declared to be the copyright holder? Jcb (talk) 13:54, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:19, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

licence not valid any longer Zinnif (talk) 09:06, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please explain? Are you the photographer, as stated on upload? Jcb (talk) 16:29, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: CC-license cannot be revoked, see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thomas Muster Kitzbühel.jpg. --Jcb (talk) 16:23, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

we have no rghts to distribute this picture online. only print and only one country! please delete! Zinnif (talk) 11:22, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

So you are saying that you were lying at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Thomas Muster Kitzbühel.jpg where you declared to be the copyright holder? Jcb (talk) 13:54, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

not lying but lawyers have warned us that we have no online rights for these black & white pictures, we did not know that before and we are not experts with rights: please delete all black & white pictures i have uploaded; thanks

Yes, lying. Or you are the copyright holder, or you are not. In the other DR you say you are, in this DR you say you are not. Who is the author of these pictures? Jcb (talk) 16:34, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

please jcb, can you delete the black and white pictures; the arthur ashe picture has also been deleted; i have no rights to upload them here; thank you


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:20, 26 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ich habe dasselbe Bild erneut hochgeladen mit der Lizenz gemeinfrei. Das hatte ich beim ersten vergessen anzuklicken, dass es gemeinfrei sein soll. Sciencia58 (talk) 14:12, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:00, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF credits Dale MacMillan, no permission shown Ytoyoda (talk) 15:44, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry. I ask to the rugby sport woman a photo of herself and she send me this one. I'll contact the author to ask permission to use Creative Commons license. Mentxuwiki (talk) 16:36, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:00, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 07:48, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have replaced the {{PD-logo}} with the {{PD-FinlandGov}} and {{insignia}}. --N. F. S. Grundtvig (talk) 09:46, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per {{PD-FinlandGov}} and {{Insignia}}. --Daphne Lantier 20:01, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Chiyako92 as Copyvio (copyviol) and the most recent rationale was: Vapp is a streaming app, this is most likely a screenshot, not an own work Wdwd (talk) 12:10, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:00, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknow author. Not sure licence is available Presse82 (talk) 15:58, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:01, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspected press image copyvio ViperSnake151 (talk) 16:15, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Picture is not a press image/copyvio and was taken, and released, by the uploader under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International license. Owen1962 (talk) 18:51, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Firstly, it says PD. Secondly, do you have affirmed proof that this image was entirely your work? ViperSnake151 (talk) 19:55, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Additionally, your choice of words are suspicious. Even though you were the uploader, you do not refer to yourself as such, implying its another person. ViperSnake151 (talk) 20:29, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Do you want me to upload a picture of me taking the picture? I don't know what else to say, what kind of proof do you want? Running the image through Googles reverse image search brings up nothing and you can clearly see that I used the same camera and lighting to take the other pictures of the console that I've uploaded, why didn't you flag those? As for my "suspicious" choice of words, I'm new to uploading images on Wikipedia and was just trying to use the proper syntax. Owen1962 (talk) 18:01, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Oh, okay. It's a bit less suspicious when you at least make it clear that it was your own work. Consider all these DRs withdrawn; nice work, by the way. ViperSnake151 (talk) 03:41, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I consider the fact that you thought it was an official image a compliment. It's certainly the look I was aiming for. Cheers! Owen1962 (talk) 12:40, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. --Daphne Lantier 20:02, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image looks like a press image and potential copyvio. Uploader has had numerous image copyright problems on English Wikipedia ViperSnake151 (talk) 16:19, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Running the image through Google Image Search brings up no results that are identical to Owen1962's image. His images are most likely authentic. Philip Terry Graham 05:29, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per Philip. --Daphne Lantier 20:03, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It looks like the uploader is claiming to be two different persons. See the EXIFs on this and this. Asclepias (talk) 18:26, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:03, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of poor quality, replaceable by any image within the related category, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ?  Comment: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 18:47, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:03, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently, this is a self-created artwork. Unlikely to be used. Takeaway (talk) 19:33, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:03, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is already a .svg vectorised and updated version of this coat of arms. CreiterAdam45z (talk) 19:37, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The SVG file is not equivalent. Kathisma (talk) 21:11, 23 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per Kathisma. --Daphne Lantier 20:04, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a professional photo, so most likely non-free. Steel1943 (talk) 21:04, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:04, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission, also terrible quality and out of project scope. –Juliancolton | Talk 23:07, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Agreement over image as a stand alone large format file, correct pixel size for viewing as is the case on multiple listing services is 100px. Large it does not look or is ever intended to be crystal clear - streaming presence has not been clear since 1998, when I first began internet broadcasting with a company called Radiostorm. This image was created by me using Adobe Photoshop. I am the sole owner of it's creation, and it is in public use.

Domain owner: Mark Baker, established 2000, and published This image has been designed as a logo by Me, and is not intended to be viewed as a large format image; however it was created at a high resolution. It is best viewed at a resolution of 150x150 and not much larger and is here to support the station/broadcaster's identity. Currently it can be found on devices as diverse as Roku, Android, iPhone, iTunes tunable, and any web browser capable of supporting jpg MIME types. This logo appears usually at between 50 - 100 pixels as each listing service has their own requirements for logo and icon upload and definition.

The logo conveys the changing landscape of Digital Streaming in a way that presents an ever changing image, thus Blur. The end to end points are indicative of egress and ingress or source and destination points with the center point being the feed.

This image is used at various listing services and is know to Shoutcast, Tune-in, and other radio listings. I designed it to be slightly unsettling and to be immediately recognizable to TUNE IN and gain FOCUS of broadcast. It was designed by Barbwires for barbwires.com for which I am the DOMAIN holder since 2000 when it originally started broadcasting and defining what streaming is in both audio and video.

If misunderstanding the purpose of the project, which is only to promote images of very high quality, then perhaps it is misplaced here in this project. I seek any guidance or direction as to where a company logo would be uploaded to allow for use in a wiki page.

this is the work of ZzeonBlue (talk) 16:21, 14 March 2017 (UTC)ZzeonBlue and should be allow to represent the company logo of Barbwires.Com Radio which I solely created and grant permission to be freely used.[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 20:05, 27 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Roblespepe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These files are either new uploads using {{Not-PD-US-URAA}} which per the template is not allowable on commons for new uploads as the images are still copyrighted in the United States or derivative works of copyrighted images, newspapers, etc. with no evidence of permission.

Mifter (talk) 05:41, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No. All of them are pictures taken by me. The "Mariposa...", the "CSP-Documento..." and the "UFA-Volante", are not art works protected by copyright laws. The photographs were taken and published in Argentina more than 25 years from January 1st 2017, and are in the public domain, because of Law 11723, art. 34.--Roblespepe (talk) 22:06, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Roblespepe, per Commons policy, images must be in the public domain in both their country of origin and in the United States. Due to the Uruguay Round Agreements Act (URAA) the United States retroactively reinstated the copyright of a number of images that had previously fallen into the Public Domain (95 years after the date publication) therefore as they are in the public domain in Argentina but not the US they are not permitted on Commons. This is indicated in the license template you utilized (see Template:Not-PD-US-URAA stating that new files using it are not permitted) which also references the URAA and at Commons:Hirtle chart. Concerning the other photographs you took, they are considered to be derivative works as they are photographs of other objects which are granted copyright protection and therefore themselves also are subject to the original copyright. From the dates in the file titles, they likely also unfortunately had their copyrights reinstated by the URAA and are not in the Public Domain in the US and are derivative works of items that are likely still copyrighted in the US. Mifter (talk) 02:21, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete by default. If anyone wishes to keep any of these images, find a relevant US public domain tag and slap it on them. I think for the purposes of ease of this discussion, we should strike any images from the discussion which receive any US PD tag. We can evaluate the veracity of those tags in later, more specialized discussions. No claim of free licensing or public domain in the United States is an easy delete, though. ~ Rob13Talk 02:20, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I have just speedily deleted many of these, on the basis that COM:L requires that works be freely licensed or PD in the US, and that COM:EVID requires that the uploader provide evidence that the work complies with the licensing policy. If the uploader asserts that the work is not in compliance with COM:L, then it must be deleted. - Reventtalk 06:50, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
My speedy of these was questioned by the uploader, on my talk page. The ones I deleted were, specifically, marked with {{Not-PD-US-URAA}}.... the uploader basically 'said' they are copyvios in the US, though apparently he did not understand specifically that he was doing so.
In general, however, the vast majority of published post-1964 works from Argentina are copyrighted in the US, regardless of the URAA. This is due to the en:Buenos Aires Convention, which Argentina joined in 1950. Any work published in Argentina, and not simultaneously published in the US, required only a 'statement of reservation of rights' (usually the phrase All Rights Reserved) to become copyrighted in the US. The 1992 copyright act made renewal automatic for works that were still in their first term (hence 1964), and so such works are simply 'still under copyright' in the US. Since the US does not use the rule of the shorter term, they will be copyrighted in the US long after the Argentinian copyright expires. - Reventtalk 18:34, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination & discussion. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:52, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Roblespepe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images come from here. No explicit indication about license

Discasto talk 13:46, 19 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: file sources given is this, which is licensed as CC-BY-4.0. Possibly copied from here to FB? --P 1 9 9   18:20, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Unlikely. The FB page is from a grassroots movement that, according to the FB post, was in Pu Lof when everything happened. Libres del Sur web page just reports the reaction from an activist not directly involved in the protest. While the FB post dates from August 2nd, Victoria Donda's reaction is dated several days after the original event (see here, for example). IMHO, who copied to whom is clear. --Discasto talk 20:29, 26 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 21:57, 23 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Verschieberest - Datei ist unter File:Geschwister-Scholl-Gedenkstätte Schule Ruhland, Einweihung 14.10.2016 05.jpg Wilhelm Zimmerling PAR (talk) 15:30, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - same file named in both places. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:58, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The animation has a company watermark of http://www.hapesoft.cz/. I could not find the image on this website, but i find doubt the claim of "own work". The image is in use. In some cases it could be replaced with File:Gearbox Animation.gif. Jahobr (talk) 20:06, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:59, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]