Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/02/21
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
._Le_Talisman,_The_Lionheart_Lies_in_his_Pavilion_(1927),_Paris.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_by_Jennifer_Hall.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Vol_1_(2016).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(14778750264).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_squats_next_to_his_cocoa_seedlings_at_Kebu_farm,_east_of_Honiara._(10687059144).jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_logo.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Alejandralcaraz (talk · contribs)
[edit]All the images appear to be copyvios. I've tagged some individually, however upon checking most via a reverse google image search they appear to be clipart and not available under a free license.
- File:Recursos.png
- File:Respaldo de informacion.gif
- File:Alarma.gif
- File:Andy Houses on the horizon - Starburst remix.png
- File:Hacker 0.jpg
- File:ANTIFUEGO.jpg
- File:SOFTWARE.jpg
- File:Informática.jpg
- File:Integridad.jpg
- File:Auditoría.jpg
- File:Administración.jpg
- File:Autorización.jpg
- File:Password.jpg
- File:Bases de la seguridad informática.jpg
- File:Ingeniería social.jpg
- File:CSRF.jpg
- File:Impostores.jpg
- File:Robots seguidores.jpg
- File:Troyanos bancarios.jpg
- File:Phishing bait.jpg
- File:Virus.jpg
- File:Amenaza.jpg
- File:Seguridad en redes.jpg
Mifter (talk) 01:23, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedily. Most are easily identifiable as widely available clipart. Being used for disruption on the Spanish Wikipedia. - Reventtalk 02:37, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
From http://cristinachaparro.es/portfolio/nerea-camacho/
Ytoyoda (talk) 04:50, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Ytoyoda (talk) 04:51, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedy. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:48, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, speedy. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:48, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Taken from this tweet: https://mobile.twitter.com/XCarlaDiaz/status/723246317229748225 Ytoyoda (talk) 04:41, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Christian Ferrer: Mass deletion of copyrighted content (grabbed from the web) - Using VisualFileChange.
This file was initially tagged by Gryffindor as duplicate (dup) and the most recent rationale was: duplicate|File:Hair by Kobayashi Kokei (Eisei Bunko).jpg grin ✎ 12:24, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- It is not an exact duplicate, the colors are pretty different. I don't have an opinion about which one should be kept, but probably one is enough. --grin ✎ 12:25, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nom; redirect after merging the two file versions, version with higher resolution on top. --Wdwd (talk) 12:53, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
著作権侵害のため。と同時に、肖像権の侵害のため、権利者として削除依頼します。 118.238.203.218 03:42, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Keep this image has been successfully reviewed (archive.is), and CC license is not revocable. and the person is public figure and the image does not harm the person's privacy. --Puramyun31 (talk) 04:12, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --INeverCry 00:18, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Deleted with the permission of Yuka Terasaki ( https://mobile.twitter.com/terachan0804/status/833358423353815040?p=v ） 14.0.180.121 01:19, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Translation of the tweet: the subject doesn't like the picture and find it embarassing. I wouldn't mind a courtesy deletion per COM:PIP. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:30, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- It seems to me that she abhorred this picture appeared on her all wikipedia pages ([1]，[2]). Please delete it. -- 14.0.180.121 03:26, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per the result of previous discussion. also there is currently no alternative image on Commons. --Puramyun31 (talk) 09:52, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Strong oppose That are not the reasons why the picture can be kept. And Yuka Terasaki had already expressed her stance obviously, you can take her photos at some events like "NISSAN あ、安部礼司〜BEYOND THE AVERAGE" の コラボ企画 if you need. Please respect her feelings first. -- 14.0.180.121 12:20, 21 February 2017 (UTC)- As Terasaki Yuka speaks twitter, she is shy about this picture and hopes to be deleted. Also, she is in trouble. As she is reflected in her photographs, her feelings should be taken into consideration to the utmost and I will positively tell you to delete it.--218.47.209.169 13:52, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
deleting the file because of simple reason such as "I don't like it" could negatively affect independency and NPOV status of wikimedia sites. so I disagree this threat. --Puramyun31 (talk) 15:37, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- In fact, the picture does not only belong to you. And Yuka Terasaki had showed her thought, everyone can represent her in order to delete the "unauthorized" picture. If you get an authentic permission of Yuka Terasaki, you can use it freely. Otherwise, you should respect her choice, putting yourself in her shoes. That is not only the problem of Wikimedia Commons. -- 14.0.180.121 16:45, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. LTA account. --Yann (talk) 18:45, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-3){kind=link}
The video cannot find on Youtube. It means the license may be wrong. 221.77.64.167 01:22, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- This link [3] is difficult to prove that the photo came from this video. -- 14.0.180.87 01:36, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Per two previous deletion request. As said before ithis image was freely licensed in youtube "(archive.is), and CC license is not revocable. and the person is public figure and the image does not harm the person's privacy." Also this file has been successfully reviewed by a license reviewer in 2015 as having a free CC license, AKA someone that saw the video and saw the same image. Also i think that this IPs are only SPA. That last deletion request was closed as keep, yestarday, so dont try to gamble the system. Tm (talk) 01:41, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Strong oppose Someone is not everyone, the source and the photo should support mutually, but it cannot check now, so the license becomes invalid. -- 14.0.180.87 01:59, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Comment No, your wrong or trying to subvert the true. The source was reviewed by Thibaut120094, a license reviewer in October 25 2015 as having CC-BY 3.0 license, as can be seen in the page. So dont try to make other fools or subvert the fact that the license was, is and will always be valid. Tm (talk) 02:35, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. LTA account. --Yann (talk) 13:18, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-4){kind=link}
画像に映っている寺崎裕香が、この動画の一時停止の写真を「消してほしい」と繰り返しTwitterアカウントで訴えているため。映る本人はこのキャプチャの写真を許可していないため。人格権・肖像権の侵害です。 トマトうどん (talk) 11:09, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Per previous deletion requests. As said before this image was freely licensed in youtube "(archive.is), and CC license is not revocable. and the person is public figure and the image does not harm the person's privacy." Also there is no alternative CC-licensed image on Commons. Puramyun31 (talk) 10:21, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
p.s. this image uploaded as an alternative by the nominator, is not licensed under CC license (Template:YouTube CC-BY) . if someone really want to upload a better image of her in order to depict the voice actress at the Wikipedia article about her, the image should be freely-licensed. Puramyun31 (talk) 10:21, 23 June 2022 (UTC)- 「Template:YouTube CC-BY」の件を教えていただきありがとうございました。以後、画像を投稿する際に気をつけます。 トマトうどん (talk) 11:44, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per Puramyun31, @Yann: Could you please close this again? --Thibaut (talk) 13:06, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: the image has survived multiple DRs already and there's still no valid reason for deletion. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:10, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
kein Copyright vorhanden--Kjc hd (talk) 16:45, 21 February 2017 (UTC) Kjc hd (talk) 16:51, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 19:42, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
thumbnail duplicate from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bell_&_Howell_Eyemo_camera.jpg Hannolans (talk) 17:40, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:41, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
F1 - No evidence of permission. -- user:Mifter Public
- I have converted from speedy, since the uploader seems to be the same as the business publishing the images. --grin ✎ 12:01, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Pi.1415926535: Page is promotional, please see our project scope
Nice personal photo but unlikely to be used for a project. Takeaway (talk) 22:38, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:36, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Freedom of panorama User 699 (talk) 17:20, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 15:39, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Freedom of pamorama User 699 (talk) 17:25, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 15:39, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
per COM:ADVERT lNeverCry 03:36, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 03:40, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 03:37, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 03:40, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 03:39, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 03:39, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 03:40, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 03:37, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 03:41, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 03:37, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Karlos Matrix (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:Karlos matrix chaqueta de cuero.jpg
- File:Karlos Matrix Black or White.jpg
- File:Karlos Matrix chaqueta radiactiva.jpg
lNeverCry 03:42, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 03:36, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 03:44, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 03:35, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 03:45, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 03:34, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bololabich (talk · contribs)
[edit]All state they are from here but none have any evidence of permission or that they are licensed under a free license.
- File:Rmn3.jpg
- File:Rmn1.png
- File:Mi3.jpg
- File:Redmi 2.jpg
- File:Redmi.jpg
- File:Mi Mix.png
- File:Lei Jun.jpg
- File:Xiaomi Redmi Note 4X.png
- File:MIUI Interface gif.gif
- File:Xiaomi Mi Max.jpg
- File:Xiaomi Redmi Pro.jpg
- File:Xiaomi Mi Pad 2.jpg
- File:Xiaomi Mi Note 2.jpg
- File:Xiaomi Mi5s Plus.jpg
- File:Xiaomi Mi5s.jpg
- File:Xiaomi Mi 5 (26666515916)-edit.jpg
- File:Xiaomi Mi4s.jpg
- File:Xiaomi Mi4 render.jpg
- File:Xiaomi Mi2a.jpg
- File:Xiaomi Mi2.png
- File:Xiaomi Redmi Note 4.jpg
- File:Xiaomi Redmi 3 Prime.jpg
- File:Xiaomi Redmi 4.jpg
- File:Xiaomi Redmi 3X.jpg
- File:Xiaomi Redmi 3S.jpg
- File:Rm3.jpg
-edit.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Mifter (talk) 03:46, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Media kit means they shared it to use in media and press so that is enough
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 03:33, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Bololabich (talk · contribs)
[edit]Mix of COM:NETCOPYVIO (e.g. File:Redmi Note 1.jpg is here); COM:DW of smartphone/game GUIs and Flickr-washing (e.g. File:RMN1 source.jpg is promotional product images uploaded by Flickr account that does not appear to be the manufacturer.).
- File:RMN1 source.jpg
- File:Xiaomi Mi Note pro.jpg
- File:Redmi Note 1.jpg
- File:Xiaomi RedMi 1.jpg
- File:Xiaomi Mi Note 1.jpg
- File:Xiaomi Redmi 3.jpg
- File:Mi 5.jpg
- File:MIUI v4 devices.jpg
- File:3DS LL omega ruby transparent background.png
Эlcobbola talk 21:55, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
- File:Mi 5.jpg is a derived work of File:Xiaomi Mi 5.jpg and should be kept. Regarding GUIs we should be careful to consider COM:TOO and COM:DM. --AFBorchert (talk) 22:08, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
- The OTRS ticket refers only to the photograph, not the GUI. That GUI would almost certainly not be TOO in the United States (the gallery icon in and of itself would be expected to be copyrightable, and the use of all elements together forms a copyrightable work that is more than the sum of its parts, just as words are not copyrightable yet paragraphs composed of mere words are). Whoever approved that ticket is apparently unfamiliar with the definition of original. Эlcobbola talk 22:18, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
- The gallery icon consists of three arcs and three shades of green and blue. This is not eligible for copyright. In the sum of the entire image, the individual elements and their composition are de minimis as each of them is insignificant in regard to the overall design. Nobody would notice if one of them would be exchanged by another or if the icons would be arranged otherwise. Most of the elements are text (not eligible for copyright) and industrial design elements of utiliarian character. --AFBorchert (talk) 22:42, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
- United States law and thousands of Apple, Inc. iOS copyright registrations granted by the US Copyright Office disagree with you. You are, frankly, unambiguously wrong on this issue. Эlcobbola talk 22:47, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
- The gallery icon consists of three arcs and three shades of green and blue. This is not eligible for copyright. In the sum of the entire image, the individual elements and their composition are de minimis as each of them is insignificant in regard to the overall design. Nobody would notice if one of them would be exchanged by another or if the icons would be arranged otherwise. Most of the elements are text (not eligible for copyright) and industrial design elements of utiliarian character. --AFBorchert (talk) 22:42, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
- The OTRS ticket refers only to the photograph, not the GUI. That GUI would almost certainly not be TOO in the United States (the gallery icon in and of itself would be expected to be copyrightable, and the use of all elements together forms a copyrightable work that is more than the sum of its parts, just as words are not copyrightable yet paragraphs composed of mere words are). Whoever approved that ticket is apparently unfamiliar with the definition of original. Эlcobbola talk 22:18, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete all. — Jeff G. ツ 22:25, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator --Leoboudv (talk) 22:06, 28 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 08:18, 8 October 2017 (UTC)
Неверная загрузка файла. Прошу удаления. The file is loaded incorrectly. Vuqar221 (talk) 20:32, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Прошу удаления файла. Rzayev Cəlil Heydərqulu (talk) 17:48, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Прошу удаления файла. Rzayev Cəlil Heydərqulu (talk) 17:48, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
The file is loaded incorrectly. Vuqar221 (talk) 16:45, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Прошу удаления файла. Rzayev Cəlil Heydərqulu (talk) 17:46, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: No categories, no description -- therefore lost among our 36,000,000+ files. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:02, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:08, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:02, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:08, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:02, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:24, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:01, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:03, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:01, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:05, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:01, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
File:Avant-on-pouvait-se-la-raconter-avec-cette-coupe-de-cheveux-mais-ca-c-etait-avant 160969 w80.jpg
[edit]
Low resolution private photo. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:42, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:00, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal images.
- File:Silas Santos Silva 31.jpg
- File:Silas Santos Silva 32.jpg
- File:Silas Santos Silva 30.jpg
- File:Silas Santos Silva 29.jpg
- File:Silas Santos Silva 28.jpg
- File:Silas Santos Silva 27.jpg
- File:Silas Santos Silva 26.jpg
- File:Silas Santos Silva 25.jpg
- File:Silas Santos Silva 23.jpg
- File:Silas Santos Silva 22.jpg
- File:Silas Santos Silva 21.jpg
- File:Silas Santos Silva 20.jpg
- File:Silas Santos Silva 18.jpg
- File:Silas Santos Silva 17.jpg
- File:Silas Santos Silva 15.jpg
- File:Silas Santos Silva 14.jpg
- File:Silas Santos Silva 13.jpg
- File:Silas Santos Silva 12.jpg
- File:Silas Santos Silva 11.jpg
- File:Silas Santos Silva 8.jpg
- File:Silas Santos Silva 9.jpg
- File:Silas Santos Silva 10.jpg
- File:Silas Santos Silva 7.jpg
- File:Silas Santos Silva 6.jpg
- File:Silas Santos Silva 5.jpg
- File:Silas Santos Silva 4.jpg
- File:Silas Santos Silva 1.jpg
- File:Silas Santos Silva 2.jpg
- File:Silas Santos Silva 3.jpg
Érico (talk) 21:57, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:00, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mohammed.b98 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious copyright status
- File:السيد علوي المالكي.jpg
- File:زنبل.jpg
- File:السيد علوي عباس المالكي.jpg
- File:الحبيب حسن الشاطري2.JPG
- File:الحبيب حسن الشاطري3.gif
- File:الحبيب حسن الشاطري.jpg
- File:قبة الامام صاحب مرباط.jpg
- File:مرباط ترحب بكم.jpg
/St1995 22:01, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:59, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted work. Warko (talk) 22:04, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Support: Non-free movie poster. Warko, next time you can mark obvious cases like this as {{Copyvio}} directly. Épico (talk)/(contribs) 01:25, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment: Épico Yes, my mistake. I pressed the wrong button on the sidebar. --Warko (talk) 02:58, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:58, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal images.
Érico (talk) 22:07, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:58, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ahsanriaz6157 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope. Unused personal images.
Érico (talk) 22:09, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:58, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:43, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:57, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:45, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:57, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
It will be unused. WDCDECDCDC (talk) 23:53, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:57, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Blatant advertising. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 23:57, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:57, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Unused selfie, the uploader's only contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:28, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:56, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Books. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:12, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused presentation of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:12, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Part of mass upload; unremarkable picture of water, no educational value. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:34, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:11, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Part of mass upload; unremarkable picture of water, no educational value. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:11, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Part of mass upload; unremarkable picture of water, no educational value. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:36, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:11, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico (talk) 18:17, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:10, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico (talk) 18:17, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:10, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by SUNIL PAWAN (talk · contribs)
[edit]COM:COPYVIOs. No indication of user's own work on this gallery of images obviously from facebook and other sources. Collages, book covers, posters, pictures in pictures, devotionals, but the one thing there isn't is 'own work.'
- File:Yaatra Mithila Dham.jpg
- File:Sunilpawan.jpg
- File:ACHCHINJAL.jpg
- File:SUNIL PAWAN & AR REHMAN.jpg
- File:SUNIL PAWAN LIVE.jpg
- File:Sunil pawan.jpg
- File:SUNIL PAWAN MUSIC DIRECTOR.jpg
- File:MUSIC INDIA.jpg
- File:Pahun, SUNIL PAWAN.jpg
- File:MITHILA MUSIC.jpg
- File:MAITHILI FILM HALF MURDER.jpg
- File:Mithila ke Kishor ,Sunil Pawan.jpg
- File:Mahadev,Sunil Pawan.jpg
- File:LOK JATRA- SUNIL PAWAN.jpg
- File:MAHADEV- SUNIL PAWAN.jpg
- File:LIVE SUNIL PAWAN.jpg
- File:LIVE CONCERT.jpg
- File:LIVE PERFORMANCE.jpg
- File:STAGE PERFORMANCE.jpg
- File:STAGE LIVE SUNIL PAWAN.jpg
- File:Julfiwali raniyan,Sunil Pawan.jpg
- File:BHANGIYA BAURAHBA.jpg
- File:STUDIO LIVE SUNIL PAWAN.jpg
- File:SUNIL PAWAN.jpg
- File:-SUNILPAWAN.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:56, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:10, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
This picture contains a derivative work of the cover of a book, it's also unused and very small. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:10, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:08, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Facebook sized and no metadata, low quality image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:11, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:08, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Extremely small and dubious claim of own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:12, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:08, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Near duplicate of File:Pizza 20160514 140507.jpg Takeaway (talk) 19:24, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:03, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Near duplicate of File:Pizza 20160514 140507.jpg Takeaway (talk) 19:24, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:02, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
A Panoramio-bot automated upload of a picture of a mud puddle. This has no potential educational value. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:59, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:31, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Copy righted with watermark. All rights reserved. —አቤል ዳዊት?(Janweh64) (talk) 10:05, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:31, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Files of User:C-clip Beatz
[edit]
Unused personal photos. --Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 10:11, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:30, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 10:21, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:30, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 10:36, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:30, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Small unused selfie without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:38, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:30, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
copyrighted cover of book Triplecaña (talk) 10:51, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:29, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:07, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:29, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
This appears to be copyrighted material from several sources. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:09, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:29, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
No categories, no sueful description, possible invasion of the privacy of the person on the left. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:14, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:29, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Poor resolution, replaced by File:Nortriptyline.svg. Leyo 11:18, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:29, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:19, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:28, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:22, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:28, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:23, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:28, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:24, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:28, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:25, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:28, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Per COM:SCOPE: Self-created artworks. Wikimedia Commons is not a webhost.
- File:WM sketch series - Woman with Glasses.jpg
- File:WM sketch series - We are Wondermei.jpg
- File:WM sketch series - The Women.jpg
- File:WM sketch series - The Sea.jpg
- File:WM sketch series - Talking of Michelangelo.jpg
- File:WM sketch series - Sunset.jpg
- File:WM sketch series - Split.jpg
- File:WM sketch series - Starman.jpg
- File:WM sketch series - Speak Out 5.jpg
- File:WM sketch series - Speak Out 2.jpg
- File:WM sketch series - Speak Out 4.jpg
- File:WM sketch series - Speak Out 3.jpg
- File:WM sketch series - Rebel Without a Cause.jpg
- File:WM sketch series - Speak Out 1.jpg
- File:WM sketch series - Puppy Love.jpg
- File:WM sketch series - Modern Woman.jpg
- File:WM sketch series - Not a Doll.jpg
- File:WM sketch series - Needs.jpg
- File:WM sketch series - Love Not War 2.jpg
- File:WM sketch series - Love Not War 1.jpg
- File:WM sketch series - Mirror Mirror.jpg
- File:WM sketch series - In Utero.jpg
- File:WM sketch series - In the Room.jpg
- File:WM sketch series - Love Love Love.jpg
- File:WM sketch series - Evolution of Woman.jpg
- File:WM sketch series - Coffee Spoons.jpg
- File:WM sketch series - Come and Go.jpg
- File:WM sketch series - Angry Woman.jpg
- File:WM sketch series - Being There.jpg
- File:WM sketch series - A Mother's Love.jpg
Takeaway (talk) 11:28, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:28, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by M R SAMEER KHAN 422 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal photos, out of project scope, poor categorisation
Jianhui67 talk★contribs 11:52, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:25, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:11, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:25, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:12, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:24, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:12, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:24, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Low resolution private photo. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:14, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:24, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Rakehgeci (talk · contribs) uploaded two photos and made userpage in en.wiki. One of the photos was copyvio and the other is personal photo, which is used only on the userpage. His only other edit was reverted as copyvio. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:15, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:24, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:15, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:23, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:16, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:23, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:16, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:23, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Maybe not educationally useful. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:17, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:23, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:19, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:23, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:20, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:23, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:23, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:23, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:25, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:23, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:25, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:23, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:26, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:23, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
A bit dark, private photo. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:28, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:22, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:34, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:22, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:36, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:22, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 12:38, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:22, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
- also redirect file:Ralf B. Leepman 2.JPG
Unused personal photo, in my opinion not suitable for stock photo. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:44, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:22, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sebastiencharlier (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:KARIM DEBBOUZE horizontal.jpg
- File:KARIM DEBBOUZE portrait.jpg
- File:Marrakech du rire 2014.jpg
- File:Jamel & Karim Debbouze.jpg
- File:KARIM DEBBOUZE.JPG
- File:KARIM DEBBOUZE 2.jpg
lNeverCry 03:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:46, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico (talk) 03:36, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:45, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
no COM:EDUSE lNeverCry 07:33, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:45, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Steev karter83 (talk · contribs)
[edit]per COM:ADVERT
lNeverCry 07:39, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:45, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 07:40, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:45, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 07:41, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:45, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Private image, out of scope. GeorgHH • talk 06:50, 4 October 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:27, 11 October 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 07:42, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:44, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal/self-promotional images
- File:Karthikeyan3.jpg
- File:Karthikeyan4.jpg
- File:Karthikeyan2.jpg
- File:Karthikeyan1.jpg
- File:Ksosundrm.png
lNeverCry 07:45, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:44, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 07:47, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:44, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
per COM:ADVERT lNeverCry 07:48, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:44, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Candrakurniyadi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:Candrakurniyadi5.jpg
- File:Candrakurniyadi4.jpg
- File:Candra Kurniyadi.jpg
- File:Candrakurniyadi2.jpg
lNeverCry 07:51, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:44, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Lukas pinzon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:Lion kas rastafari alma.JPG
- File:Mateo Alejandro Pinzon jimenez.jpg
- File:Kas lion juan.jpg
- File:Kas ant brovas.jpg
- File:Kas lion.jpg
- File:Ant brovas.jpg
lNeverCry 07:54, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:43, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by พระเกษม มหาวีโร (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
lNeverCry 07:55, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:43, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 07:57, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:43, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 07:58, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:42, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 07:59, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:42, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 08:00, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:42, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Personal type photos, unused, out of scope
- File:Boston Cream Pie Encouragement.jpg
- File:Boston Cream Pie in my belly.jpg
- File:Boston Cream Pie Nap.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 08:01, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:38, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 08:11, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:38, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 08:12, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:38, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Erick Dos S. Gomes (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal/self-promotional images
- File:KatherineVescovi.jpg
- File:Ketherine5.jpg
- File:Ketherine4.JPG
- File:Ketherine2.jpg
- File:Ketherine3.jpg
- File:Ketherine.jpg
lNeverCry 08:14, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:38, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 08:15, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:37, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aichotoitinhyeu97 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope per en:Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CKod.
Castillo blanco (talk) 08:16, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:37, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 08:17, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:37, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Personal photo. Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 08:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:37, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
copyrighted cover Triplecaña (talk) 09:01, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:36, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
File was previously deleted for being "Out of project scope: promotional content" see this diff on en-wp for an example. Further, no evidence of permission as the site linked in the diff does not have a compatible copyright policy Mifter (talk) 00:20, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:49, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
- Restored: as per [4]. Yann (talk) 09:36, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
![[4]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Undeletion_requests/Current_requests&oldid=240653733#File:Eosinophilia_Myalgia_Syndrome_NL.png){kind=link}
File was previously deleted for being "Out of project scope: promotional content" see this diff on en-wp for an example. Further, no evidence of permission as the site linked in the diff does not have a compatible copyright policy Mifter (talk) 00:21, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:51, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
- Restored: as per [5]. Yann (talk) 09:37, 13 April 2017 (UTC)
Similar (almost identical) files by uploaded by this user were previously deleted for being "Out of project scope: promotional content" see this diff on en-wp for an example. Further, no evidence of permission as the site linked in the diff does not have a compatible copyright policy Mifter (talk) 00:21, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: unlikely to be own work. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:51, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Seems to be copied from web and cropped a little, clearly a wrong date and no description to back up the legibility http://www.purepeople.com/media/camilla-al-fayed-au-defile-yves-saint_m16106 Haltiamieli (talk) 00:51, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Tiedot korjattu. Formian
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:53, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Seems to be copied from web and cropped a little from the bottom, the description offers no details to back up the legibility http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/food/article-3742892/Camilla-Fayed-daughter-Harrods-boss-leading-vegan-food-revolution-Notting-Hill-restaurant-remembers-Dodi.html Haltiamieli (talk) 00:54, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Tiedot korjattu. Formian
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:54, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
copyvio, cf. http://www.iltalehti.fi/uutiset/2014081218567686_uu.shtml Haltiamieli (talk) 01:04, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Tiedot korjattu. Formian
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:55, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
copyvio, cf. http://www.gallen-kallela.fi/tietoa-gallen-kallelan-museosta/tietoa-tarvaspaasta/pellavaniemen-miljoo/ Haltiamieli (talk) 01:08, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Tiedot korjattu. Formian
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:56, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
FBMD in meta, claimed as own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:09, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination+likely out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:58, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Dubious claim of own work, other uploads related to bands too Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:09, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination+likely out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:58, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Peterobijiofor (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
lNeverCry 01:10, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Indeed out of scope. - Bzh-99 (talk) 19:19, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:56, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
per COM:ADVERT lNeverCry 01:13, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:00, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope lNeverCry 01:14, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:01, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:18, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:02, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:20, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Indeed out of scope. - Bzh-99 (talk) 19:20, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:02, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:21, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Indeed out of scope. - Bzh-99 (talk) 19:20, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:03, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:23, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:03, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kabirul1990 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
lNeverCry 01:27, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Indeed out of scope. - Bzh-99 (talk) 19:21, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:04, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
no COM:EDUSE - unused personal drawing lNeverCry 01:28, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:05, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:29, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:05, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Smerfetka6994 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
lNeverCry 01:31, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:05, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal/promotional images
- File:KADDOUR BOUCHENTOUF4.JPG
- File:KADDOUR BOUCHENTOUF3.JPG
- File:KADDOUR BOUCHENTOUF2.jpg
- File:KADDOUR BOUCHENTOUF1.JPG
- File:Tarik Naïmi Chikhi2.jpg
- File:Tarik Naïmi Chikhi5.jpg
- File:Tarik Naïmi Chikhi4.jpg
- File:Tarik Naïmi Chikhi3.jpg
- File:Tarik Naïmi Chikhi1.jpeg
- File:Tarik Naïmi Chikhi.jpg
lNeverCry 01:33, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:06, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:34, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kader cheb mokhtar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
lNeverCry 01:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
lNeverCry 01:36, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:07, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Photos of Dream (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:Kadir avcı face.jpeg
- File:Kadir avcı aile tablosu.jpeg
- File:Kadir avcı sınıf.jpg
- File:Kadir avcı mobilya.jpeg
- File:Kadir avcı kimdir.jpeg
- File:Kadir avcı viki.jpg
- File:Kadir avcı ,alper yeşil.jpg
- File:Kadir Avcı.JPG
- File:Kadir avcı evrenseki.jpg
lNeverCry 01:40, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:08, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
no COM:EDUSE lNeverCry 01:42, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:09, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:42, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:09, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:57, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:10, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:58, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:10, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dhimas S Ocktory (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
lNeverCry 02:02, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:13, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
lNeverCry 02:03, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:14, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:07, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:15, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:08, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:15, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Naqeebmiani (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:Kaleem miani 4.JPG
- File:Kaleem miani 3.JPG
- File:Kaleem miani 2.JPG
- File:Kaleem miani.JPG
- File:Rizwan miani.JPG
lNeverCry 02:10, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:15, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abouakri200 (talk · contribs)
[edit]per COM:ADVERT
- File:Madiagne.jpg
- File:Deep Killah.jpg
- File:Tankuneen-Records.jpg
- File:Kambano.jpg
- File:Tankuneen Records.jpg
- File:Djaman.jpg
- File:T-Records.png
lNeverCry 02:21, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination+almost copyvios. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:16, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's two articles were speedily as non-notable in March 2015. Out of project scope. — ξxplicit 02:21, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:11, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:22, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:11, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:23, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:11, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
lNeverCry 02:24, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:11, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kanavugalacademy (talk · contribs)
[edit]per COM:ADVERT
lNeverCry 02:25, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:11, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 03:27, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:21, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 03:28, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:21, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
lNeverCry 03:30, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:21, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Karina Villabon (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:Karina villabon co.jpg
- File:Karina villabon pg.jpg
- File:Karina villabon.cor.jpg
- File:Karina villabonn.jpg
- File:Kaarina villabon.jpg
- File:Kariina villabon co.jpg
- File:Karina villabonN.jpg
- File:Karina villabon c..jpg
- File:Karina Villabon.jpg
lNeverCry 03:33, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:21, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aryamitra006 (talk · contribs)
[edit]These images appear to be self-portraits ("selfies") that are not within the project scope and have minimal usability on other projects COM:NOTUSED
- File:Aryamitra Chaudhuri in Kolkata Musium.jpg
- File:Aryamitra Chaudhuri in class IX.jpg
- File:Aryamitra Chaudhuri in class VIII.jpg
- File:Aryamitra Chaudhuri in Chowkhali.jpg
- File:Aryamitra Chaudhuri with his brother Anamitra Chaudhuri.jpg
- File:Aryamitra Chaudhuri in Class VII.jpg
- File:Aryamitra Chaudhuri in Rock Mode.jpg
- File:Aryamitra Chaudhuri.jpg
Mifter (talk) 04:18, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 10:20, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Presumably copyrighted content; no basis to re-publish this without permission. Jmabel ! talk 00:20, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:28, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely own work, two different cameras, same subject, one picture is named "by Khatuna."
Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:11, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:29, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Cropped version of this image appears at http://www.barrow6fc.ac.uk/category/bsfc-news/b6fc-latest-news/page/2/ and the EXIF for this image shows a copyright holder of Philip Hatfiled, a professional photographer. OTRS confirmaton would be needed. Whpq (talk) 02:06, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
My error with this one. I am the copyright owner but wrongly stated I took the photo when in fact we hired a professional for this shot. Please delete. I will replace with one I took myself.--Pipkin2.0 (talk) 16:09, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:34, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Not "own work", likely copyrighted and lacks evidence of permission Wcam (talk) 02:21, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:35, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Café Águila Roja
[edit]Only used on the Spanish Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted as spam in June 2015. Commons is not a place to advertise, and therefore these images are out of project scope.
- File:EL GRANITO DE CAFÉ.png
- File:LOGO CAFÉ AGUILA ROJA.png
- File:EQUIPO ADMINISTRATIVO.jpg
- File:PROCESO DE CARGA.jpg
- File:Afueras de la Planta.jpg
- File:Distribución.jpg
- File:Proceso de Produccion.jpg
- File:GRUPO AGUILA ROJA.jpg
- File:Grupo Aguila Roja.tif
- File:CAFÉ AGUILA ROJA.png
- File:LOGO-Aguila.png
— ξxplicit 02:28, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:35, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:29, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:36, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:30, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:36, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:31, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:36, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Image imported for the sole purpose of creating two hoaxes on fr.wikipedia. Rhadamante (talk) 02:46, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:36, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Image imported for the sole purpose of creating two hoaxes on fr.wikipedia. Rhadamante (talk) 02:46, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:36, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Image imported for the sole purpose of creating two hoaxes on fr.wikipedia. Rhadamante (talk) 02:47, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:36, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
per COM:ADVERT lNeverCry 02:56, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:36, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Oliviergiraud (talk · contribs)
[edit]After doing a reverse google image search, these all appear to be copyright violations. See here and here for examples
- File:Vespa 200 Rally 1972.png
- File:Vespa 180 Rally 1968.png
- File:Vespa 150 Super 1965.png
- File:Vespa 150 Sprint Veloce 1969.png
- File:Vespa 150 Sprint 1965.png
- File:Vespa 125 TS 1975.png
- File:Vespa 125 Gran-Turismo 1966.png
- File:Vespa 125 GTR 1969.png
Mifter (talk) 02:57, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:36, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
lNeverCry 03:04, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:36, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Telugupedia (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:KPKC at WTC.jpg
- File:Screenshotteluguuu.png
- File:KPKC with PURANDESWARI.jpg
- File:KPKC with CBN first.jpg
- File:KPKC with CBN side.jpg
- File:Kaperla Pavan Kumar Choudary.jpg
- File:KPKC with CBN.jpg
- File:KPKC with BABU MOHAN.jpg
lNeverCry 03:09, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:37, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 03:12, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:37, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Arnavkapoor (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
lNeverCry 03:17, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:37, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kappersino (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
lNeverCry 03:18, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:37, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
no COM:EDUSE lNeverCry 03:19, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:37, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 03:21, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:37, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 03:23, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:37, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal/self-promotional images
- File:Karen Delchamps5.JPG
- File:Reinholder to Rainmaker by Karen Delchamps.jpg
- File:Karen Delchamps.JPG
- File:Karen10.jpg
lNeverCry 03:26, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:37, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
File:Arthur Szyk (1894-1951). Le Talisman, The Lionheart Lies in his Pavilion (1927), Paris.jpg
[edit]._Le_Talisman,_The_Lionheart_Lies_in_his_Pavilion_(1927),_Paris.jpg){kind=link}
._Le_Talisman,_The_Lionheart_Lies_in_his_Pavilion_(1927),_Paris.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
can not be CC license 97.104.135.2 03:39, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: PermissionOTRS|2015030210000935. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:44, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The map is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 03:53, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:47, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The map is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 03:54, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:47, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The map is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 03:55, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:47, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Amagasaki Station (JR West)
[edit]No FOP in Japan. The statue was erected in 1999. [6]
G I Chandor (talk) 03:56, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:47, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted character. [7] G I Chandor (talk) 03:59, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:47, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyrighted character. [8] G I Chandor (talk) 04:00, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:47, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Only used on the Portuguese Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedy deleted as a copyright violation in March 2014. Out of project scope. — ξxplicit 04:52, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:47, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted character. [9] G I Chandor (talk) 05:31, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:48, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted character. [10] G I Chandor (talk) 05:31, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:48, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted character. [11] G I Chandor (talk) 05:32, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:49, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted character. [12] G I Chandor (talk) 05:33, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:49, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyright violation. The map is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 05:33, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:49, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The text on the description plate is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 05:34, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:49, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The description plate is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 05:34, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:49, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The description plate is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 05:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:49, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The description plate is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 05:36, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:48, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Toyocky
[edit]Copyrighted character. [13]
G I Chandor (talk) 05:38, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:48, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted character. [14] G I Chandor (talk) 05:40, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:48, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Yanana
[edit]Copyrighted character. [15]
G I Chandor (talk) 05:41, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per COM:DM, this is a photograph taken at Japan Expo 2012 during a serie of other photographs, depicting the stage and the convention. The main "character"? "mask" might be copyrighted, that does not mean the copyright owner has power to forbid its usage in this context. Anyway, it's not like I really care about it or not. Usage of the photograph on the Yanana are clearly deminimis bordeline, but that does not justify the deletion of the file. Esby (talk) 14:10, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Nowhere near DM. Copyrighted character is central figure. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:50, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted character. [16] G I Chandor (talk) 05:42, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:51, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted character. [17] G I Chandor (talk) 05:43, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:51, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyrighted character. [18] G I Chandor (talk) 05:43, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:51, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted characters. [19]
G I Chandor (talk) 05:45, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:51, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted character. [20] G I Chandor (talk) 05:46, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:51, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted character. [21] G I Chandor (talk) 05:46, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:51, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyrighted character. [22] G I Chandor (talk) 05:47, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:51, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted character. [23] G I Chandor (talk) 05:47, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:51, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyrighted character. [24] G I Chandor (talk) 05:48, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:51, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Chiba Lotte Marines mascots
[edit]Copyrighted characters. [25]
G I Chandor (talk) 05:50, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:51, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Morino unpopo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Copyrighted character. [26]
G I Chandor (talk) 05:51, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:50, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_panoramio.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
art object G I Chandor (talk) 05:52, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:50, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
_-_panoramio.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Asahikawa, Hokkaido
[edit]Copyrighted character. [27]
G I Chandor (talk) 05:53, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:52, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted character. [28] G I Chandor (talk) 05:54, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:52, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Momocchi
[edit]Copyrighted character. [29]
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
G I Chandor (talk) 05:56, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:52, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted character. [30] G I Chandor (talk) 05:56, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:52, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted character. [31] G I Chandor (talk) 05:58, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:52, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted character. [32]
G I Chandor (talk) 05:59, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:51, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Self-portait. Not 70 years PMA yet. Undelete in 2025. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 07:18, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Jahobr (talk) 15:21, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:52, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope lNeverCry 07:37, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:52, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
If the photo is taken from en:Patriots (film), then it is still copyrighted. Film director Karl Ritter and cinematographer Günther Anders both died in 1977. Blacklake (talk) 07:58, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:53, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Pichon-Kun
[edit]Copyrighted character. [33]
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
G I Chandor (talk) 08:05, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep File:Pichonkun go daikin.co 01.jpg Two eyes are Automobile headlamps. --Benzoyl (talk) 10:18, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: "Two eyes are Automobile headlamps." -- so what -- the paint and scuplture are still copyrighted. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:54, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Okazaemon
[edit]Copyrighted character. [34]
G I Chandor (talk) 08:06, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:53, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Okazaemon
[edit]COM:DW of copyrighted character. [35]
- File:AK-Kita-okazaki-drink-vending-machine-with-Okazaemon.jpg
- File:AK-Naka-okazaki-with-Okazaemon.jpg
Yuraily Lic (talk) 08:44, 17 August 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:27, 27 August 2019 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is an artwork. G I Chandor (talk) 08:07, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:53, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyrighted character. [36] G I Chandor (talk) 08:08, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:53, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted character. [37] [38] G I Chandor (talk) 08:08, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:53, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted character. [39] [40] G I Chandor (talk) 08:09, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:53, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Susukino
[edit]Copyrighted character. [41]
G I Chandor (talk) 08:11, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:53, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted character. [42] G I Chandor (talk) 08:11, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:53, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted character. [43] G I Chandor (talk) 08:13, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:53, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The text on the description plate is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 08:14, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:53, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The description plate is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 08:14, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:53, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Marimokkori
[edit]Copyrighted character. [44]
G I Chandor (talk) 08:16, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Oh god, why the sudden wave of this over policing on Commons? Sigh. Where does your link say copyrighted? It's a blog on Ameblo. And besides, regardless of status, in my particular case it's not a reproduction of any possible copyrighted work itself it is a picture of the character in a real situation just like the thousands of pictures of Mickey Mouse on commons: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Mickey_Mouse Nesnad (talk) 14:30, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- http://ameblo.jp/marimokkori2005/ is "まりもっこりオフィシャルブログ" (Marimokkori official blog) by copyright holder "キョーワ" (Kyowa). These goods are copyrighted by Kyowa.--G I Chandor (talk) 09:17, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Nowhere does it say the character is "by copyright holder Kyowa" you are inventing things. You need to establish copyright of the character not of a blog or photos. But I am not debating if the character is under copyright or not, I am saying that when an item is used as part of a bigger image there has never been an issue on commons. Look at the Mickey Mouse category. I am not sure why you are specifically focusing on this one? Try to add to Commons instead of going around trying to smash things. -- Nesnad 16:38, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: First, the fact that we have other copvios does not make these right. Second, these are not part of something else -- in these images, the copyrighted character is the only thing present. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:57, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
already deleted a few days ago, and re-uploaded today. XIIIfromTOKYO (talk) 08:50, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- I added the author (myself) which was lacking --Poirotte (talk) 15:19, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- You are not the author, you are the uploader of the file. The author of the show is Mélenchon (and a bunch of speach writers) . --XIIIfromTOKYO (talk) 18:26, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- This GIF doesn't have any licence, it can be used as pleased. What's your problem there? --Poirotte (talk) 04:50, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- This gif has an author, and only this author can choose to publish this media with a CC-BY-Sa licence (or any other that we can use here). --XIIIfromTOKYO (talk) 08:36, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- This GIF doesn't have any licence, it can be used as pleased. What's your problem there? --Poirotte (talk) 04:50, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- You are not the author, you are the uploader of the file. The author of the show is Mélenchon (and a bunch of speach writers) . --XIIIfromTOKYO (talk) 18:26, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:58, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
unused text-only image, apparently written by uploader; text should better be added to appropriate wikipedia article(s), to undergo the wikipedia quality assurance process Jochen Burghardt (talk) 09:15, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:07, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Andersonn.ss (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://donaelegancia.files.wordpress.com/2016/02/felipe-cotrim-carnaval-imperio-20160207-0016-original1.jpeg.
- File:UnidosdoPeruche2016.jpg
- File:MocidadeMSPB2016.jpg
- File:Tommaiorpavilhao16.jpg
- File:Império de Casa Verde2016.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:15, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
This file uses an organization's copyrighted logo in an unapproved and inflammatory way. Sardill (talk) 17:55, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:14, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Files of User:Canaryfly
[edit]- File:Uno de los ATR-72 de Canaryfly en el aeropuerto Tenerife. Fotografía LUMA TENERIFE.jpg
- File:El ATR72-500 EC-IZO de Canaryfly aterrizando en el aeropuerto de La Palma.jpg
- File:La flota de Canaryfly está integrada por cuatro ATR-72.jpg
- File:ATR42 EC-LYZ cola.jpg
- File:ATR72 Canaryfly.jpg
- File:ATR42-300 EC-LYZ.jpg
- File:ATR 72-202 EC- GRP cola.jpg
Those files uploaded by Canaryfly are unlikely to be own work. Taken with different cameras an even on some photos, the images are from different authors. --Dura-Ace (talk) 17:56, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:14, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Clear derivative work of the photographed ad. Freedom of panorama does not apply to temporary exhibits.
- File:Bushaltestelle Kiel Werbung 20160216 220908.jpg
- File:Bushaltestelle Kiel Werbung 20160216 220911.jpg
- File:Bushaltestelle Kiel Werbung 20160216 220914.jpg
Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:48, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:13, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Poul Hermann Poulsen (07.19.1947 - 06.27.1999) was a Danish designer. He has not been dead 70 years, and as he's not alive at present, there's no possibility that these can be 'own work' of the uploader in 2017. Other uploads were newspaper articles about Mr. Poulsen.
- File:Kakler til produktion.jpg
- File:Kakler i spisebordplade.jpg
- File:Abstrakt maleri år 1987.jpg
- File:Relief med røde sten 1982.jpg
- File:Abstrakt maleri 1987.jpg
- File:Siv trykt på pap.jpg
- File:Kakler til sofabord.jpg
- File:Bjørneklo på spejlglas.jpg
- File:Nøglebræt af ler.jpg
- File:Vase af ler.jpg
- File:Halvglaseret vase af lertøj.jpg
- File:Glaseret lerfad.jpg
- File:Askebæger af ler.jpg
- File:Gangsø Møblement.jpg
- File:Kakler i produktion.jpg
- File:Kakler under produktion.jpg
- File:Relief 1982.jpg
- File:Kakler i relief.jpg
- File:Kakler i bordplade.jpg
- File:Gangsø Møbler P.Hermann.jpg
- File:P.Herman.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:53, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:13, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Disputed authenticity. Device may be a fake, because it depicts Nougat, and does not have a Samsung logo on it. ViperSnake151 (talk) 18:57, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- strongly oppose you have no source that it is a fake version. --Panam2014 (talk) 22:05, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: No proof provided. --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:38, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- I think it looks counterfeit. Someone on the Galaxy Note 7 Wikipedia talk page also noted this. ViperSnake151 (talk) 18:39, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Image is widely used, so, fake or not, it must be kept. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:12, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
This image is credited: Source The Gene Vance Jr. Foundation Author The Gene Vance Jr. Foundation, however we don't have permission from them. Nor do we know who put up this plaque, but it would have to be after 2002. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:07, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:11, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
We do not know who created this plaque, but it's credited to a foundation, not to the uploader and it dates to post 2002. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:08, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:11, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
FBMD in meta shows this was borrowed from Pycon Taiwan and is not own work of uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:29, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:10, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
From paper: "This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License." FunkMonk (talk) 19:48, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:10, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
_by_Jennifer_Hall.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_by_Jennifer_Hall.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Uploader is not the artist. FunkMonk (talk) 19:56, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
_by_Jennifer_Hall.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:10, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
_by_Jennifer_Hall.jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Église Sainte-Hélène (Paris)
[edit]No FOP in France, l'architecte est mort en 1956.
Thesupermat (talk) 20:21, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:10, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by DGIST KOREA (talk · contribs)
[edit]No FOP in South Korea
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Elisfkc (talk) 20:37, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:09, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
_-_Vol_1_(2016).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Vol_1_(2016).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Source site says: "Articles in this journal are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License." Source site does not say anything about journal covers. Taivo (talk) 10:13, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
_-_Vol_1_(2016).jpg){kind=link}
- Delete the cover illustration is most likely copyright to the designer or the publisher and is not an article. Ww2censor (talk) 23:04, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:25, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
_-_Vol_1_(2016).jpg){kind=link}
Files in Category:Alrahim Wright III
[edit]Selfies, commercial album covers, and other photographs, all taken by the same user with "own work" as source? Doubtful/impossible.
- File:Alrahim 1.jpg
- File:Alrahim 2.jpg
- File:Alrahim 3.jpg
- File:Alrahim 4.jpg
- File:Alrahim 5.jpg
- File:Alrahim 66.jpg
- File:Alrahim 7.jpg
- File:Alrahim 8.jpg
- File:Alrahim Wright III.jpg
Themightyquill (talk) 11:25, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:23, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Small unused personal photo without metadata. Depicted person is not mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in de.wiki. Out of project scope, copyright violation is possible too. Taivo (talk) 13:28, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:22, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Unused .pdf, the uploader's only contribution. Maybe the file is out of project scope? As author is Stephanie Naranjo, maybe this is copyright violation too. Taivo (talk) 13:30, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:22, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:49, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:22, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://up.shir1mod.ir/view/914684/162885468.jpg0. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:20, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Song. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:20, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Juan.montoya777 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:20, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:20, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
and File:Polypeptide backbone.pdf
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
I fixed it! Thank you for noticing the error! --CraigClark (talk) 22:07, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:19, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from presentation. Should be blanked/cropped to keep. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:19, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Taxikuching (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of company of questionable notability.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep images 2 & 3 - Image 2 can be cropped (if need be I can crop the man out of the image, once uploaded image 2 can then be deleted if preferred?) and image 3 is the rear of the cabs - Both are within scope here as both aren't really advertising. –Davey2010Talk 16:38, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Good images of taxis. Per Davey, these aren't really advertising. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:19, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
See EXIF data, not Own work. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 22:59, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:26, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
This image was originally posted to Flickr by myalexis at https://flickr.com/photos/87306045@N05/8108093048. It has been reviewed on 2017-02-21 22:28:25 by FlickreviewR, who found the author on the bad authors list. oSeveno (talk) 23:15, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Delete according to this news site the image is attributed to reuters. Ww2censor (talk) 23:43, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- I should have checked the exif information before using this image. Good faith is not enough. Lesson learned here. --oSeveno (talk) 12:42, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- @OSeveno: No problem; it has happened to the best of us. It is worth having and using the tineye and google image lookups activated in your "Gadgets" "Preferences" as they oftentimes catch out those Flickr users who don't know any better and release copyright images under a free licence that are found elsewhere with their correct attribution. Also reviewing the Flickr user's photostream gives you an idea of what they are uploading and whether the images are copied from elsewhere or are really their own work. Good luck. Ww2censor (talk) 13:57, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for the suggestions. --oSeveno (talk) 15:22, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- @OSeveno: No problem; it has happened to the best of us. It is worth having and using the tineye and google image lookups activated in your "Gadgets" "Preferences" as they oftentimes catch out those Flickr users who don't know any better and release copyright images under a free licence that are found elsewhere with their correct attribution. Also reviewing the Flickr user's photostream gives you an idea of what they are uploading and whether the images are copied from elsewhere or are really their own work. Good luck. Ww2censor (talk) 13:57, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:26, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The file of which this one was extracted has been nominated by me for deletion. Please reas for reason at that filepage, via other versions link. oSeveno (talk) 23:17, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:26, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No Freedom of Panorama in Ukraine Mykola Vasylechko 21:22, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:35, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
_(14778750264).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14778750264).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope. Scan of part of an empty page of a book. -- Asclepias (talk) 21:45, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
_(14778750264).jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:34, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
_(14778750264).jpg){kind=link}
There is no freedom of panorama in Italy and the building is modern. OTRS-permission from architect is needed. Taivo (talk) 21:45, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:34, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
The uploader is both the copyright owner and in the image? Need evidence of work for hire. (t) Josve05a (c) 21:46, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:34, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Subject in photo has privacy concern. Not only is he identified by name and rank, but personal information is displayed for all to see. Wikicoast7890 (talk) 22:20, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Personal information can be removed when it is removed from source page. I think we can ask our Graphic Lab coleagues to remove personal info from EXIF also. If there is alredy somewhere the same resolution image with altered EXIF, it can be uploaded to overwrite this one. Ankry (talk) 22:31, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Keep. I've removed all the personal information Ronhjones (Talk) 00:15, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Personal info has been removed. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:33, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Can this image which never passed flickrreview and is now ARR at the source be replaced by this image which is free: File:British Museum Runic Silver Animal Head.jpg? Leoboudv (talk) 22:21, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- I agree, good catch. --Dbachmann (talk) 09:17, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:34, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
File:APTC hairdressing graduate Trish Dallu, owner of Trish and Ada’s Hair and Beauty works on a client. (10666594775).jpg
[edit].jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No persons of encyclopaedic relevance depicted. Zenwort (talk) 01:47, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason for deletion. The image is useful for the topic depicted, plus useful for topics relating to the Solomon Islands. Mungoola (talk) 02:01, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Image from Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade photo library, and in scope for the subject. - Reventtalk 02:18, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Commons isn't an encyclopedia. –Juliancolton | Talk 02:41, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - Images are useful, freely licensed, and within the scope of Commons. Mifter (talk) 02:48, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:29, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
File:APTC hairdressing graduate Trish Dallu, owner of Trish and Ada’s Hair and Beauty works on a client. (10666647904).jpg
[edit].jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No persons of encyclopaedic relevance depicted. Zenwort (talk) 01:48, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason for deletion. The image is useful for the topic depicted, plus useful for topics relating to the Solomon Islands. Mungoola (talk) 02:01, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Image from Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade photo library, and in scope for the subject. - Reventtalk 02:19, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Commons isn't an encyclopedia. –Juliancolton | Talk 02:41, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - Images are useful, freely licensed, and within the scope of Commons. Mifter (talk) 02:48, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:28, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
File:Bana, a Junior player for the China Town AFL team takes a leaping catch at football training at the Lord Howe settlement, Honiara. (10676737796).jpg
[edit].jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No persons of encyclopaedic relevance depicted. Zenwort (talk) 01:48, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason for deletion. The image is useful for the topic depicted, plus useful for topics relating to the Solomon Islands. Mungoola (talk) 02:02, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Image from Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade photo library, and in scope for the subject. - Reventtalk 02:20, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Commons isn't an encyclopedia. –Juliancolton | Talk 02:40, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - Images are useful, freely licensed, and within the scope of Commons. Mifter (talk) 02:48, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:28, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
File:Cocoa farmer David Kebu Jnr (known as Jnr) squats next to his cocoa seedlings at Kebu farm, east of Honiara. (10687059144).jpg
[edit]_squats_next_to_his_cocoa_seedlings_at_Kebu_farm,_east_of_Honiara._(10687059144).jpg){kind=link}
_squats_next_to_his_cocoa_seedlings_at_Kebu_farm,_east_of_Honiara._(10687059144).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No persons of encyclopaedic relevance depicted. Zenwort (talk) 01:48, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason for deletion. The image is useful for the topic depicted, plus useful for topics relating to the Solomon Islands. Mungoola (talk) 02:02, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Image from Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade photo library, and in scope for the subject. - Reventtalk 02:20, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Commons isn't an encyclopedia. –Juliancolton | Talk 02:40, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - Images are useful, freely licensed, and within the scope of Commons. Mifter (talk) 02:48, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:28, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
File:Cocoa farmer David Kebu Jnr and his son Snider Kebu display cocoa pods from Kebu farm. (10687079704).jpg
[edit].jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No persons of encyclopaedic relevance depicted. Zenwort (talk) 01:48, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Image from Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade photo library, and in scope for the subject. - Reventtalk 02:20, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Commons isn't an encyclopedia. –Juliancolton | Talk 02:40, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - Images are useful, freely licensed, and within the scope of Commons. Mifter (talk) 02:48, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:28, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
File:Junior AFL players practice their skills at a training session at Lord Howe settlement, Honiara. (10706134755).jpg
[edit].jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No persons of encyclopaedic relevance depicted. Zenwort (talk) 01:49, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason for deletion. The image is useful for the topic depicted, plus useful for topics relating to the Solomon Islands. Mungoola (talk) 02:03, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Image from Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade photo library, and in scope for the subject. - Reventtalk 02:21, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Commons isn't an encyclopedia. –Juliancolton | Talk 02:40, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - Images are useful, freely licensed, and within the scope of Commons. Mifter (talk) 02:48, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:28, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
File:Close up of Sister Doreen Awaiasi, Coordinator of the Christian Care Centre, playing a guitar (10686953024).jpg
[edit].jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No persons of encyclopaedic relevance depicted. Zenwort (talk) 01:49, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep No valid reason for deletion. The image is useful for the topic depicted, plus useful for topics relating to the Solomon Islands. Mungoola (talk) 02:03, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Image from Australian Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade photo library, and in scope for the subject. - Reventtalk 02:21, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Commons isn't an encyclopedia. –Juliancolton | Talk 02:39, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - Images are useful, freely licensed, and within the scope of Commons. Mifter (talk) 02:48, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:28, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
File:Canadian Army Capt. Withny Dagrain, center, examines a patient as Dr. Leslie Bunabo, left, a dentist, looks on during Pacific Partnership 2013 in Gizo, Solomon Islands, Aug. 2, 2013 130802-N-SP369-229.jpg
[edit]
No persons of encyclopaedic relevance depicted. Zenwort (talk) 01:55, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep US Navy image, and in scope for the subject. - Reventtalk 02:22, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Commons isn't an encyclopedia. –Juliancolton | Talk 02:41, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - Images are useful, freely licensed, and within the scope of Commons. Mifter (talk) 02:48, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:28, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
File:A Project HOPE volunteer, right, checks a man's blood pressure during a Pacific Partnership 2013 health fair in Gizo, Solomon Islands, Aug. 2, 2013 130802-N-GI544-161.jpg
[edit]
No persons of encyclopaedic relevance depicted. Zenwort (talk) 01:55, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep US Navy image, and in scope for the subject. - Reventtalk 02:22, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Commons isn't an encyclopedia. –Juliancolton | Talk 02:41, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - Images are useful, freely licensed, and within the scope of Commons. Mifter (talk) 02:49, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:28, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
File:A New Zealand sailor, left, and a U.S. Sailor unload donated supplies at a church in Gizo, Solomon Islands, Aug. 2, 2013, during Pacific Partnership 2013 130802-N-GI544-026.jpg
[edit]
No persons of encyclopaedic relevance depicted. Zenwort (talk) 01:55, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep US Navy image, and in scope for the subject. - Reventtalk 02:24, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Commons isn't an encyclopedia. –Juliancolton | Talk 02:38, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - Images are useful, freely licensed, and within the scope of Commons. Mifter (talk) 02:49, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:28, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
File:US Navy 070820-N-9421C-011 A Soldier from the Indian army tightens a lug nut on a foundation for a hut being built during an engineering civic action program at the Sasamungga Hospital, in support of the Pacific Partnership mis.jpg
[edit]
No persons of encyclopaedic relevance depicted. Zenwort (talk) 02:00, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep US Navy image, and in scope for the subject. - Reventtalk 02:24, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Commons isn't an encyclopedia. –Juliancolton | Talk 02:38, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep - Images are useful, freely licensed, and within the scope of Commons. Mifter (talk) 02:49, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep, as per above. -- Tuválkin ✉ ✇ 03:28, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:28, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 08:36, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:31, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Not drawn according to MOS, better alternatives in Category:Ethyl carbamate. Leyo 11:06, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:31, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Uploader is not the artist. FunkMonk (talk) 19:56, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
I don't understand the motive of this deletion request. The cropping is substantial, so a second file had to be uploaded according to Commons:Overwriting existing files, Substantial crop or un-crop. As you can read in the file name, I cropped it to get a good picture for Category:B54 (road sign, France). And I think it is the best, or second best with P1310595 Paris XX cite de Genes rwk.jpg. Marc Mongenet (talk) 02:07, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- If cropping is allowed, then excuse me, it's a mistake on my part. Gzen92 [discuter] 08:03, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
I do not understand. What is the problem ? Cropping is now forbidden ? H4stings (talk) 20:50, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- If cropping is allowed, then excuse me, it's a mistake on my part. Gzen92 [discuter] 08:03, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:22, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Poor quality, many better alternatives in Category:Quinazoline. Leyo 11:19, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:32, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Low quality image with untrue colors, better quality images of this painting are available on commons. Tremendo (talk) 12:37, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:33, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
- also file:RegressIt logo 2.jpg
Unused textlogos. I do not find the company from en.wiki, probably out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:14, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:40, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
The image was not made by the uploader. Hundreds of similar ones exist on Google. Mateussf (talk) 13:16, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:44, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:24, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:45, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:45, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:45, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:46, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:46, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Guyvanvolen1998 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused fiction flag, mand and coat of arms of questionable notability.
- File:Location of Dolmenia within NorthAmerica.svg.png
- File:Coat of Arms of Dolmenia.svg.png
- File:Flag of Dolmenia.svg.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:47, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:47, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 21:24, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 17:49, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 08:25, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:01, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Derivative of Copyrighted material. No proper license —አቤል ዳዊት?(Janweh64) (talk) 09:17, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:01, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Superseded by File:USA Governor Election Results by County, 2016.svg MB298 (talk) 01:17, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:23, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Actually i do not believe own work without evidence. It can very well be work of NASA, but this needs evidence too. Taivo (talk) 22:29, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:24, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
No attribution of images used in derivative work. ViperSnake151 (talk) 18:59, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Missing source as of 20 February 2017 - Using VisualFileChange.
Low quality, many better alternatives in Category:Carbazole. Leyo 11:11, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --DMacks (talk) 14:54, 3 March 2017 (UTC)
- Is it a joke that vector file made without any unnecessary nodes is "low quality"? Krzysiu (talk) 15:34, 14 October 2017 (UTC)
Image is listed as pd-ineligible however with the Lion logo I believe it passes the threshold of originality. Mifter (talk) 03:54, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. (t) Josve05a (c) 22:28, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
uploaded the wrong photo/logo image border issue Indiecollector (talk) 06:10, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. (t) Josve05a (c) 22:28, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
This file uses an organization's copyrighted logo in an unapproved and inflammatory way. Sardill (talk) 17:57, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per copyvio. Possible non-free logo. (t) Josve05a (c) 22:26, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
No source, no license Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:15, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:16, 8 March 2017 (UTC)
Por subido el autor falso , falta verdadera foto nueva para el francisco morales bermudez fernando (talk) 03:13, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: the source indicates: "© Biografías y Vidas, 2004-2017". Ruthven (msg) 09:15, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Not own work, this can be found on the web, see [45] ✎kovox90 04:51, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:16, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Verletzung von Persönlichketsrechten. Das Nummernschild des Opel Corsas ist sehr gut zu erkennen. Bitte zumindest das Nummernschild ausgrauen. 91.38.62.5 06:11, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Google Translate: "Violation of personal rights. The number plate of the Opel Corsa is very easy to recognize. Please at least the number plate gray."--Juandev (talk) 09:33, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Keep, that is not the reason. Moreover you cannot get any personal information from car number plate, such information are not public. But, I can remove that information, from this version.--Juandev (talk) 09:33, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, but the original version with the plaque number has been deleted. Ruthven (msg) 09:17, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Copyviol from http://www.aptbasilicata.it/San-Chirico-Nuovo-Foto-Aeree.1451+M554c179ff43.0.html Threecharlie (talk) 13:34, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: copyvio. Ruthven (msg) 09:19, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
From https://twitter.com/Juezcentral/status/830601913213272065 Ytoyoda (talk) 15:40, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:19, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Taken from http://www.alriyadh.com/1567715 Ytoyoda (talk) 15:44, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:20, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
mistakenly uploaded- don't have ownership of image Dunclutha7 (talk) 16:06, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 09:20, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Unused non-photographic JPEG, superseded by an SVG. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 17:12, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:21, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
better quality: File:The Knife Grinder Principle of Glittering by Kazimir Malevich.jpeg Carl Ha (talk) 18:15, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination Carl Ha, next time please use template {{Duplicate}}. Ruthven (msg) 09:23, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Vandalised version of File:Sainte-marie Madeleine2.jpg; one face has been "photoshopped" Haltiamieli (talk) 19:05, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:24, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Vandalized version of File:Spirit of Chartwell.jpg, one face in the crowd has been photomanipulated into another Haltiamieli (talk) 19:12, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:26, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Vandalised version of File:London Barbican Hall LSO Haitink.jpg, one face has been photomanipulated Haltiamieli (talk) 19:20, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:27, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Unused logo. claim of own work is highly doubtful given http://www.barrow6fc.ac.uk/bsfc-information/hire-our-facilities/#! Whpq (talk) 01:58, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
It is actually my own work but as it's unused, it can be deleted.--Pipkin2.0 (talk) 15:52, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per Pipkin 2.0. Ruthven (msg) 09:35, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
_logo.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_logo.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
The image is listed as pd-ineligible however I believe that the stylized 'U' might push the image over the threshold of originality thus making it copyrightable. Mifter (talk) 01:26, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
_logo.svg){kind=link}
_logo.svg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
I have removed the pd-textlogo tag per your concern, it may be mis-classified. The file is created by the public (i.e. crowd-sourced). Ubi.gg (talk) 11:11, 20 February 2017 (EST)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:40, 17 March 2017 (UTC)
This chess player is not notable. No title, no database entries, no tournament wins. 129.13.72.198 10:16, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- He was notable enough for the newspaper in 1962, he is also coauthor of two books about chess.[46][47] --Sporti (talk) 17:07, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Sporti. Ruthven (msg) 08:52, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Se conoce que ha estafado desde 1996 al menos a 62 mujeres y a dos hombres. En total, sin contar ordenadores, móviles y otros aparatos electrónicos, la estafa de Rodrigo asciende a más de 60.000 euros entre todas las personas a las que ha engañado. Juan Pedro 123 (talk) 12:14, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: done by Nyttend. Ruthven (msg) 08:52, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Copyvio from http://www.ci.wausau.wi.us/Portals/0/Site/Images/HomeBanner/Wausau_CityFromSky1.jpg. I couldn't notice it when I brought this file from English Wikipedia. Yassie (talk) 14:31, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: It seems that www.ci.wausau.wi.us did the copyviol, as they used this image only recently. Might be taken from https://global.britannica.com/place/Wausau, but as long as we have the EXIF data, possibly the original upload was on en.wiki. Ruthven (msg) 09:00, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
possible copyvio (https://jseikkailee.blogspot.fi/2013/06/espoon-rantaraitin-nakymia.html) Msaynevirta (talk) 15:59, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. In any case, we need OTRS permission from Jarkko Metsajoki. Ruthven (msg) 09:34, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Depicts the same data as File:Yvette 2016 track.png, which is the correct name Keith Edkins (talk) 16:45, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:35, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Looks like a copyvio manufacturer image; higher-res versions exist on commercial websites (eg. http://www.phonearena.com/phones/Alcatel-Flash-2_id9660/photos?image=55493) McGeddon (talk) 16:55, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:35, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Прошу удаления файла с сервера. I ask to remove the file. Rzayev Cəlil Heydərqulu (talk) 17:45, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per author's request. Ruthven (msg) 09:35, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Duplicate of File:Ketjutie 78 Oulu 20150614.jpg Estormiz (talk) 17:52, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: not exact duplicate. Ruthven (msg) 09:36, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
This image appears to be halftoned as if it were copied from a previously published source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:02, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio from Univ. of Ferrara publication. Ruthven (msg) 09:39, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work, small size, low quality, and claimed to be of a notable person. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:02, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio from linkedin. Ruthven (msg) 09:39, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
missing information on author and license of the used photograph Didym (talk) 13:27, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks Didym, I am the photographer of the cover photo, which I licensed with {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}}. Can I do anything to resolve the conflict? --Rudolf Simon (talk) 09:46, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- @RudolfSimon: Please follow the procedure at COM:OTRS. The best thing would be the publisher confirm that you own the copyright (or that they agree in publishing the cover under free license). Thanks --Ruthven (msg) 08:55, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Ruthven: That photo is actually on Commons and now mentioned in the description, so Keep. --Didym (talk) 13:00, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Didym: We're still missing the authorization. --Ruthven (msg) 13:16, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Ruthven: That photo is actually on Commons and now mentioned in the description, so
- @RudolfSimon: Please follow the procedure at COM:OTRS. The best thing would be the publisher confirm that you own the copyright (or that they agree in publishing the cover under free license). Thanks --Ruthven (msg) 08:55, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: My mistake, it's a derivative work of a free license image. Ruthven (msg) 13:17, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
copyrighted image, or it's not Borussia Dortmund logo? http://www.bvb.de/ Zac Allan (talk) 17:53, 7 November 2012 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. Yann (talk) 14:39, 15 November 2012 (UTC)
Sehr geehrte Damen und Herren, in der vorbezeichneten Angelegenheit zeigen wir die anwaltliche Vertretung der BVB Merchandising GmbH, Rheinlanddamm 207-209, 44137 Dortmund an. Unsere Mandantin ist Inhaberin der geschützten Marke "BVB 09" und hat der Benutzung nicht zugestimmt. Wir bitten das Logo von der Internetseite zu entfernen. Mit freundlichen Grüßen Dres. Lohner, Fischer, Igwecks & Collegen, Ottostraße 9, 80333 München, Thomas Stenzel, Tel. 089 51 70 23 41 79.214.33.23 12:36, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- The IP is requesting deletion as a law firm representing the owner of the "BVB 09" trademark. Trademark is not a valid grounds for deletion, however.
- Reply: Sehr geehrter Herr Kollege Stenzel, bitte beachten Sie, dass es sich hier nicht um eine Benutzung im geschäftlichen Verkehr handelt, so dass das Markenrecht keine Anwendung findet. Gruß, --Gnom (talk) 15:23, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Unabhängig von der sachlichen Frage benötigen wir natürlich die Bestätigung, dass es sich bei dem Eröffner des Deletion Requests auch wirklich um die angegebene Anwaltskanzlei handelt und diese in der Tat die Rechte des Markeninhabers vertritt. Dies kann nur durch unser OTRS-System erfolgen. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:00, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- In der Tat. @Gnom: hat sich Herr Stenzel bereits irgendwie legitimiert? Abgesehen davon sollte trotz der aktuellen Rechtsprechung zur Schöpfungshöhe ein Kreis mit drei Buchstaben und einer Zahl immer noch keinen urheberrechtlich Schutz hervorrufen, so dass hier lediglich die Benutzung der Marke BVB im Raum steht. De728631 (talk) 19:42, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- @De728631: Nö, ich wollte hier nur eine Antwort hinterlassen, da der Fall ja so einfach gelagert ist. Gruß, --Gnom (talk) 19:45, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- In der Tat. @Gnom: hat sich Herr Stenzel bereits irgendwie legitimiert? Abgesehen davon sollte trotz der aktuellen Rechtsprechung zur Schöpfungshöhe ein Kreis mit drei Buchstaben und einer Zahl immer noch keinen urheberrechtlich Schutz hervorrufen, so dass hier lediglich die Benutzung der Marke BVB im Raum steht. De728631 (talk) 19:42, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Unabhängig von der sachlichen Frage benötigen wir natürlich die Bestätigung, dass es sich bei dem Eröffner des Deletion Requests auch wirklich um die angegebene Anwaltskanzlei handelt und diese in der Tat die Rechte des Markeninhabers vertritt. Dies kann nur durch unser OTRS-System erfolgen. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:00, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo, no valid reason for deletion, see Commons:Non-copyright restrictions too. --VIGNERON (talk) 15:09, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
Not simple enough Discasto talk 13:13, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:08, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-5jSzpq9bT14/VpzsBOd2f_I/AAAAAAAAATU/j3vmkY4iITs/s1600/ss.png. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:08, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/media/C4RMq4ZW8AAcjL0.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:08, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pp.vk.me/c604718/v604718378/13e0/Hty31SFdJcY.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:39, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:08, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:09, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:09, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Not own work and not PD, because the authors (Kirshon, Averbakh) were rehabilitated in late 1950s. Sealle (talk) 19:24, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:09, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Not larger, but older at https://pycontw.blogspot.com/2015_05_01_archive.html where it would appear to be an official event photo and not credited to uploader. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:28, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:09, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No FoP in Russia for non-architectural artworks Dogad75 (talk) 22:23, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:10, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unsharp version of File:Cammenbert 20161023 181003.jpg Takeaway (talk) 22:25, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:11, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
The article asserts the image is copyright ineligible however given the stylization I believe it might be protectable by copyright and thus a potential copyright violation. Mifter (talk) 01:11, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Strong oppose : The logo contains simple colored text only and is thus in the public domain. — Sincerely Issimo 15 13:32, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination with note it was not just letters, and also source was given as "Arabic Wikipedia" which is not a valid source. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:01, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Unused logo. Claim of won work is doubtful given this is an official logo for http://vle.furness.ac.uk/ Whpq (talk) 02:00, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Don't know why all my work is suddenly being identified but it is my own work and I am the copyright holder. However, as this is unused, it can be deleted. --Pipkin2.0 (talk) 15:58, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:01, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Same image appears as [art of advertising for Funess College at https://www.choosecumbria.co.uk/partners/furness-college - would need OTRS confirmation uploader is the copyright holder Whpq (talk) 02:10, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
My photo - took it myself. No idea what OTRS is but I am the copyright holder. Reverted the image to another that I took. --Pipkin2.0 (talk) 16:11, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- See COM:OTRS, and in particular, the section marked "I am the copyright owner but my file has been previously published without a free license on a medium I can't alter." At issue is that the images have been published without a free license on the school's web site and so there needs to be verification that you indeed hold the copyright and that the free license applied is valid. -- Whpq (talk) 02:56, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Comment If no permission is sent to OTRS, maybe it would be good to keep the version uploaded later, as it is unpublished, while deleting the initial version of the file/page. --Ruthven (msg) 09:14, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Ruthven, kept the most current, removed the one in the middle, and highly recommend the simple email at COM:OTRS for any previously published images. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:04, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyrighted character. [48] G I Chandor (talk) 08:03, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:04, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Nyan-Mage
[edit]Copyrighted character. [49]
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
G I Chandor (talk) 08:04, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:04, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. In addition, depicted person is unknown, maybe out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:05, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:04, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
I originally created this to get round a bug in IE6 that caused the SVG to render incorrectly (see file talk page). I think this only applied to the now obsolete classic skin. At the time I argued for its retention, but I suspect very few use IE6 now, and classic skin is no longer available, so this can be deleted as File:Aiga railtransportation.svg is available instead. Optimist on the run (talk) 12:44, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:05, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Look file source: "my friend took picture of me to me". That case the friend must send OTRS-permission to Commons. Taivo (talk) 13:23, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:05, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Unused non-photographic JPEG, superseded by PNG. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 17:13, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:06, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
No link provided to verify authenticity, and I highly doubt that the uploader is Britney Spears herself (contrary to the "own work" claim) SNUGGUMS (talk) 17:19, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:06, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Redundant. Superseded by similar image with colors. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:27, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:06, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- also file:Alberto Núñez Feijóo.jpg
OTRS-permission from author Xoan Crespo is needed. Taivo (talk) 21:02, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:07, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
copyviol da https://books.google.com/books?isbn=8883404394 e non è opera propria Emmepici (talk) 21:12, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:11, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
No required license templates were detected at this file page. Mykola Vasylechko 21:20, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:11, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Published allready here (deeplink) with copyright claim of 2014. Druschba 4 (talk) 21:21, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Of course, they used our (my) pictures, because it is one of our dealers in the Czech Republic. These photos was taken directly by me. Our company is the official representative of GAZ (Nižnij Novgorod, RU) in the Czech Republic!
- In a case like that, when the picture has been published before somewhere in the internet without a free license, please read Commons:OTRS (also in czech avalible) carefully and follow the introductions given. --Druschba 4 (talk) 09:28, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
I told to our dealer to delete that Copyright thing from their page. So they promise me they will do it next week. But ofcourse if it neccesery I will do OTRS...
- It is not nessessary to delete the picture at the webpage. But Commons needs an OTRS-permission to ensure that you are the author or at least the copyright holder. All the best, --Druschba 4 (talk) 12:10, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- I've added the information to the file that you are working on an e-mail for OTRS-permission. That will give you two weeks time, also because the OTRS-team will usually need some to check your e-mail. If you have not send the permission in time, the file will be deleted. And in case it arrives later and the permission is ok, it will be undeleted. In case of any questions you can ask at Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. --Druschba 4 (talk) 12:22, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. OTRS verification completed. Please see ticket:2017022310005631 or information provided in file. --Mates (talk) 13:58, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- That's of course ok than also for me. --Druschba 4 (talk) 21:22, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: PER OTRS ticket as stated. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:13, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Published allready here, new user with a minimum of 5 cameras and pretty special exif-data (from 2004 to 2012 everything). Druschba 4 (talk) 21:23, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. OTRS verification completed. Please see ticket:2017022310005631 or information provided in file. --Mates (talk) 13:59, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- That's of course ok than also for me. --Druschba 4 (talk) 21:23, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: PER OTRS ticket as stated. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:13, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Copyright holder : Bruno Preschesmisky Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:46, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:14, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Claim of own work is doubtful given this is a college logo. Whpq (talk) 02:01, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
This is my own work (as I stated) and I am the copyright holder. Please do not delete. --Pipkin2.0 (talk) 15:59, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- It's unusual for an individual to hold the copyright to the logo for a college. Can you clarify?-- Whpq (talk) 02:57, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, I really do not believe, that you are copyright holder of school logo. The logo is not simple and surpasses threshold of originality. If school representative will send OTRS-permission, that Pipkin is copyright holder of school logo, then the logo can be restored. Taivo (talk) 18:39, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. It's an historic image, I'm converting it to DN in the hopes that one of our avid researchers can find the source of this obviously older image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:20, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
I originally posted the image, however, I copped out and got this image from the internet. I do have access to original images of Heileman and other Heileman related buildings/objects - through the company I work for. If the community would want to delete this particular image, I can add a new one with updated and better copyright information, if that's allowable? -- Kellypm94 (talk) 19:30, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- ping Kellypm94Can we have the "from the internet" source perhaps? The age of the image would seem allowable, do you have the date of the image (maybe from the book?), photographer's name, any other information? See COM:HIRTLE for help with the proper license for this image, I think it will be old enough to be kept personally. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:33, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Ellin Beltz, now I cannot find the original internet source I took this image from because I was too lazy to scan it in :( The image is actually taken from a Corporate Bond dated to the early 1990s, but the subject of the photograph ~died~ in 1878, so that's the absolute latest the image could have been taken. As to who the photographer was, that information is lost. -- Kellypm94 15:15, 22 February 2017 (UTC)~
- Keep As subject died in 1878 (139 years ago), it's unlikely that the image is still in copyright. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:26, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep; something created in the United States in 1878 by an anonymous author has been in the public domain for a number of years now, and if this is pre-1878, it's even public-domainer, to coin a word :-) Nyttend (talk) 04:30, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept, per Nyttend. Taivo (talk) 18:48, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Flickr Washing suspected, based on title of image on Flickr and the low amount of images Elisfkc (talk) 20:38, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- From the talk page Español: Buenos días, La foto en cuestión ha sido colgado en la cuenta oficial que el CRYF tiene en Flick, y cumple con la licencia para poder estar en Wikipedia. He subido ya unas cuantas fotos que aparecen en las cuentas oficiales que diversas intiruciones tienen en Flick y no he tenido problemas al respecto, salvo el caso de fotos antiguas. Pienso que, siguiendo la coherencia llevada a cabo por Wikipedia desde hace tiempo, habría que dejarla. Muchas gracias. Un cordial saludo, --Hard (talk) 09:24, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- @Hard: English: My issue is that it does not appear to be an official account. This appears to be an instance of license laundering.
- Español: Mi problema es que no parece ser una cuenta oficial. Esto parece ser una instancia de lavado de licencias. Traducido con Google TraductorElisfkc (talk) 19:29, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- @Hard:
- Regardless of the fact of that flickr account being legit or not (probably it is, User:Hard has proven he's quite good at convincing institutions (or at working for them, who knows))... is not that logo simple enough? Strakhov (talk) 22:38, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Reitero que se trata de la cuenta oficial del CRYF. No sé si habría alguna manera adicional de demostrarlo. Un cordial saludo,--Hard (talk) 12:33, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: Enough simple, no Flicrwashing, no valid reason for deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:08, 9 March 2017 (UTC)
- Keep; the claimed license is irrelevant when the image deserves to be retagged as {{PD-simple}}. Nyttend (talk) 04:31, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept, I assume good faith, no Flickrwashing. Taivo (talk) 19:03, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
No es la verdadera imagen , de la señora Consuelo Gonzales , es la ultima persona zona izquierda de la foto fernando (talk) 20:56, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept, if depicted person is not Consuelo Gonzales Posada, then it is Elena Ceaușescu. She is notable too. We can always change filename and description. Taivo (talk) 19:15, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Fake. The woman in this picture is Elena Ceaucescu Ravave (talk) 13:37, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- You're right. We should rename the file. Is there any valid reason for its deletion? --E4024 (talk) 14:24, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- Don Fernando, cuando dice "No es la verdadera imagen de la señora Consuelo Gonzales, es la ultima persona zona izquierda de la foto" en la anterior discusion, quiere decir "Consuelo Gonzales está a la izquierda de la foto" o "Consuelo Gonzales está a la derecha de la foto"? Gracias. --E4024 (talk) 14:34, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
- At E4024 My point of view is that the file may lead to confusion cause the name, although, if you suggest to rename it, it could be fine for me. --Ravave (talk) 17:13, 21 November 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. — billinghurst sDrewth 12:41, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
- Rename
Done to file:Elena Ceaucescu.png — billinghurst sDrewth 12:44, 23 December 2018 (UTC)
Este diagrama no está aumentado como debería y, por tanto, no me ha quedado bien. Solicito que se elimine de Wikimedia Commons lo antes posible para poder subir una nueva versión. Gracias. Cofrade2016 (talk) 22:34, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 19:19, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in France. This infringes on the copyright for the text. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:57, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
This is a public information text (in Belgium), right next to the concerned chapel. I do not see what copyright it infringes. I am the author of the photo. --Grentidez (talk) 13:07, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted, the photo is made in Belgium, not in France (you see, that the sign is bilingual: French and Dutch text). Freedom of panorama in Belgium is quite broad, but it does not cover texts. The photo violates copyright of text author. Taivo (talk) 19:25, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Фото 1927 года, не может быть собственной работой участника, то есть автор, скорее всего, неизвестен. В Интернете фото не ищется, невозможно установить дату происхождения и обнародования файла Dogad75 (talk) 20:25, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:34, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Сомнения в авторстве и лицензии. Карта из ЦГАМО, автор не указан Dogad75 (talk) 20:27, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:34, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
- also file:Hatong International - Company Structure.jpg
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 20:49, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:34, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
최진석(the person in the pic)'s direct request to me (by mobile messanger, friend) 최광모 (talk) 05:30, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment @Kwangmo: Can you please ask him to forward the request to COM:OTRS? --Ruthven (msg) 23:20, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
- ticket:2017032010000997, on SIsterproject::Commons. — regards, Revi 07:07, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:22, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
It's nearly identical (with minor differences) to {{HRV}}. Though, it can be kept as a redirect to the mentioned template. Russian Rocky (talk) 09:10, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- I agree we should go with {{HRV}}, and a redirect is not a bad idea. Josh (talk) 10:50, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: redirected. --Daphne Lantier 18:26, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Mynewsdesk automatic (re-)license problem: The contact person for the upload is not the same as the photographer of the picture - and because of that there is a huge risk that a copyright violation has taken place. If I search the photographers name I cannot find any picture the photographer has put under a CC-license, only copyrighted pictures. At least OTRS from the photographer is needed. Vätte (talk) 14:10, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment Well, this is not something new. Stora Journalistpriset has been uploading photos by Bergström at least since 2013, see e.g. File:Lisa Irenius 2013-10-29 001.jpg. We seem to have dozens of these Bergström/Journalistpriset images at Commons. This one was even reviewed by @Revent: who participated in a discussion about this general problem. So either Bergström has not yet noticed this relicensing of his works for the past three plus years or he has in fact granted his permission to do so. As a precaution I wouldn't mind if we deleted all of these images with a combination of Magnus Bergström, Mynewsdesk and Stora Journalistpriset. De728631 (talk) 00:19, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Since there was never really a consensus about how to deal with these, my license reviews of mynewsdesk images have basically been at the level of 'yes, the source does indicate that license'. Honestly, I'm not crazy about the source at all, as it seems to cause repeated issues. These seem somewhat likely to have been 'paid for' (I've actually found examples off the wiki of him photographing this event as far back as 2009) but that does not 'prove' that the licensing was proper. Unfortunately, I think the options are either to try start contacting people in Sweden (and this applies to a lot more from that source) or apply the PRP. Either way, we should decide on something consistent, at least for particular 'groups' of images. @Josve05a: , as a local who might be able to help. - Reventtalk 00:36, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- I actually had a really interesting discussion about Mynewsdesk-washing with Axel Pettersson (WMSE) yesterday, so I'm ure he would like to add a comment and propose a mass-deletion of all mynewsdesk-imagery not explicitly propen to be (a) owned by the individual uploader (PR manager) with authority to license a companies material; or (b) where we have evidence that the photographer has agreed to such a license. I had different opinions, but I digress. In this case it seems as the organization has a lot of similar images from the same event, and seems to be working somehow with the photographer (and not just using Google images/email provided images) for their press releases. However, as you said we have no evidence of work-for-hire. But neither would we if they put it on an official website (with a cc-by mark either; however it was practice that all images were automaticly marked as cc-by on mnd until recently for new user). So, I don't see how the work-for-hire prp-deletion argument would stand, but I do believe that this release may be questionable given the automatic tagging of cc-by and that most likely the uploaders are not at liberty to license company IP (goes for all mnd-imagery). But as said, we do not have consensus for any opinion of mynewsdesk as of yet. (t) Josve05a (c) 01:04, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks for the ping. For the record, I'm not for a mass deletion, but rather having MyNewsDesk help their costumers either verify via OTRS or delete if the licenses are not OK. In this specific case I've asked Stefan Mehr, Stora journalistpriset, for a clarification. I also noted that some of their images (1, 2 also from Magnus Bergström) are CC BY-ND, indicating that they at least know that they can change the license as all others I looked at are CC BY. I'll get back to this when I know more. /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 09:35, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- (Adding a search for storajournalistpriset resulting in 36 images as a reminder. /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 10:32, 23 February 2017 (UTC))
- This is a better search... 115 hits. - Reventtalk 01:36, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- I actually had a really interesting discussion about Mynewsdesk-washing with Axel Pettersson (WMSE) yesterday, so I'm ure he would like to add a comment and propose a mass-deletion of all mynewsdesk-imagery not explicitly propen to be (a) owned by the individual uploader (PR manager) with authority to license a companies material; or (b) where we have evidence that the photographer has agreed to such a license. I had different opinions, but I digress. In this case it seems as the organization has a lot of similar images from the same event, and seems to be working somehow with the photographer (and not just using Google images/email provided images) for their press releases. However, as you said we have no evidence of work-for-hire. But neither would we if they put it on an official website (with a cc-by mark either; however it was practice that all images were automaticly marked as cc-by on mnd until recently for new user). So, I don't see how the work-for-hire prp-deletion argument would stand, but I do believe that this release may be questionable given the automatic tagging of cc-by and that most likely the uploaders are not at liberty to license company IP (goes for all mnd-imagery). But as said, we do not have consensus for any opinion of mynewsdesk as of yet. (t) Josve05a (c) 01:04, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Since there was never really a consensus about how to deal with these, my license reviews of mynewsdesk images have basically been at the level of 'yes, the source does indicate that license'. Honestly, I'm not crazy about the source at all, as it seems to cause repeated issues. These seem somewhat likely to have been 'paid for' (I've actually found examples off the wiki of him photographing this event as far back as 2009) but that does not 'prove' that the licensing was proper. Unfortunately, I think the options are either to try start contacting people in Sweden (and this applies to a lot more from that source) or apply the PRP. Either way, we should decide on something consistent, at least for particular 'groups' of images. @Josve05a: , as a local who might be able to help. - Reventtalk 00:36, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Unfortunately the response from the people responsible for images at Stora Journalistpriset was to change the licenses for all images to "All rights reserved", as their intention was not in line with the CC BY license. I'll leave the discussion on if all images in the previous search should be deleted or not to the community (Ping @Vätte: , @De728631: , @Revent: and @Josve05a: ), but I'll also ask again if they can release some of the images under a free license. /Axel Pettersson (WMSE) (talk) 15:39, 21 March 2017 (UTC)
-2017-03-21T15:39:00.000Z-File:Gellert_Tamas_2016-11-02_001.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination -- any other images can be addressed in a separate request. --Daphne Lantier 18:28, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Portrait de "AZ" par "MG", aussi visible sur http://www.galerie-annickzufferey.ch/annick-zufferey/ : il manque l'autorisation explicite de "MG" qui que soit cette personne. Habertix (talk) 21:11, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Bonjour,
Merci de votre message. Les deux photographies déposées sur Wikimedia commons sont celles de l'artiste elle-même Annick Zufferey, qui donc donne les droits de l'utilisation pour illustrer l'article. En espérant que cette explication permette de valider le bien fondé de cet article. Merci !--Garance2016 (talk) 10:52, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- PS : l'auteur de la photo et ayant-droit est Magali Girardin et copie de https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10204580191958374&set=a.1535114691418.2078298.1041353112&type=1&theater et donc pas un travail personnel de Garance2016. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:39, 27 February 2017 (UTC) PS 2 : même photo déjà supprimée de Commons le 15 février. Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:01, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 18:29, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
