Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/02/20
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![133 File:Mikey "ming" Figgins -the traveling trio - in this photographic depiction we see three free spirits, father and daughters one of them performing satirical whims and the hidden jewel in the back along with thei 2014-04-18 16-39.jpg](#File:Mikey_"ming"_Figgins_-the_traveling_trio_-_in_this_photographic_depiction_we_see_three_free_spirits,_father_and_daughters_one_of_them_performing_satirical_whims_and_the_hidden_jewel_in_the_back_along_with_thei_2014-04-18_16-39.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
![161 File:"Polyhedron with no vertex visible from center.png".jpg](#File:"Polyhedron_with_no_vertex_visible_from_center.png".jpg){kind=link}
![162 File:"Polyhedron with no vertex visible from center.png".jpg](#File:"Polyhedron_with_no_vertex_visible_from_center.png".jpg_2){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
It's a own work by the depicted person. The image from a personal archive has been uploaded without the photographer's permission. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 09:19, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- почему Вы удаляете фото? Они из личного архива Сергея Глебовича Афанасьева!
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 10:27, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal art -- out of scope. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:37, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, somebody nominated the file for speedy deletion. I'll delete it, because here is no permission from author James Martin Driskill. Taivo (talk) 10:58, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
I did not mean to upload this, please take this down. 101Boss (talk) 01:33, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Taivo: Author requested deletion of page: author's request on creation day
Anormally big for this size, poor quality, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 17:49, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Image is identical to File:Toyota Van '80s.jpg so for that reason I'm OK with deletion of this particular one. But I don't see why this image (both) has to be deleted - the use cases are limited, but it won't hurt to keep it in its category. Effeietsanders (talk) 19:27, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- The other version is actually in use on the Japanese Wikipedia, btw. Effeietsanders (talk) 19:28, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Duplicate. There is suspicion that this image contrains embedded data. --Yann (talk) 20:52, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Dublette: File:Vorwort zum ”Klingenden Esel“ 1991 und 1994 - Stamm Ägypten.png Mediatus (talk) 12:02, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Speedy delete I added {{SD}} to file page. I think this can apply speedy delete as accidental uploading.--Kkairri (talk) 12:36, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, original uploader uploaded new, 180° rotated image. Taivo (talk) 22:25, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
derived work of a two-dimensional copyrighted information panel in Northern Ireland where we do not have freedom of panorama for this kind of objects. AFBorchert (talk) 23:13, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - copyvio. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 23:38, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
What's the source and copyright status of the background map? Any way, very small, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 17:46, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 02:13, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
I created this by mistake, instead of creating a category. Pititnatole (talk) 21:26, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: housekeeping. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:32, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kaunainchandiha (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused low-quality personal photos of subject with no apparent notability and one personal Word Art experiment. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope.
- File:Ashrafrahmani Muzaffarpur.jpg
- File:Ashrafrahmanijpg.jpg
- File:Ashrafrahmani3.png
- File:Ashrafrahmanij.jpg
- File:Ashrafrahmani Muz.jpg
- File:Ashrafrahmani muz1.jpg
- File:Ashrafrahmani1.jpg
- File:Ashraf rahmani Muzaffarpur (4).jpg
- File:Ashrafrahmani.jpg
- File:Ashrafrahmani (2).jpg
- File:Ashrafrahmani Muz (2).jpg
- File:Ashraf rahmani.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
—LX (talk, contribs) 16:36, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note that instead of commenting on this discussion, the uploader chose to repeatedly vandalise it in spite of warnings and to upload three more out of scope files in spite of warnings:
- The user has also vandalised English Wikipedia. They're obviously not here to contribute constructively. —LX (talk, contribs) 11:33, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: nuked, per nomination. --Ankry (talk) 14:44, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kaunainchandiha (talk · contribs)
[edit]More unused low-quality personal photos of subject with no apparent notability and unused low-quality raster alternatives to vector files already found in Category:BMW roundel logos. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope.
- File:Ashraf rahmani Muzaffarpur-0.jpg
- File:Ashraf Rahmani Muzaffarpur -3.jpg
- File:Ashraf Rahmani Muzaffarpur -2.jpg
- File:Ashraf Rahmani Muzaffarpur -1.jpg
- File:Ashraf rahmani muzaffarpur B M W logo.png
- File:Ashraf rahmani muzaffarpur BMW logo.png
—LX (talk, contribs) 17:55, 4 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:54, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
low quality: out of scope Kopiersperre (talk) 19:54, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Keep I redrew it, and re-added it to zh:价键异构体 from where it was removed without clear explanation. DMacks (talk) 02:41, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- @DMacks: Thanks for the redraw, you may scrap this deletion request now.--Kopiersperre (talk) 10:49, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: withdrawn by nom. --DMacks (talk) 20:35, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Image of user. Said user requests deletion at Ticket:2017022010011692. That said and the description would indicate that this in not "own work" (not a selfie) and was taken by Oscar Nuñez, and therefore no permisson. Ronhjones (Talk) 18:36, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedied unused file per the reasons stated in the OTRS request. --Platonides (talk) 22:56, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
although uploader pointed out that there's no copyright notice on these images published 1980, that is NOT enough to say that they're out of copyright DS (talk) 22:03, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Copyright violation: although uploader pointed out that there's no copyright notice on these images published 1980, that is NOT enough to say that they're out of copyright
Not under free license Scientific Animations (talk) 07:33, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- There is CC-BY-SA-4.0 license on source site. Taivo (talk) 10:35, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Billinghurst (talk · contribs), as explained here. Taivo (talk) 08:30, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
The source says its a 'Ukrainian Ministry of Defense photo' so it is not a US government photo and would not be Public Domain. Leoboudv (talk) 01:07, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Missing license as of 16 February 2017 - Using VisualFileChange.
unused low quality structure, replaced by e.g. File:Chavicol.png Kopiersperre (talk) 20:03, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
The file is correct and useful. Let's make friends and respect the rights of the author!!!Claudio Pistilli (talk) 21:56, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Lower quality easily replaceable by higher quality. This is not a social statement, but one of graphical and style concerns. "Correct" is not sufficient and no evidence of specific "useful"ness of this image of the structure (COM:EDUSE). DMacks (talk) 02:21, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: To have a version with CH2, too, I redrew the structure in a consistent style and according to MOS. --Leyo 21:20, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
out of scope lNeverCry 00:04, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:16, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope; Personal image(s).
- File:RAGINI ODIA FILM ACTRESS-12.jpg
- File:RAGINI ODIA FILM ACTRESS-11.jpg
- File:RAGINI ODIA FILM ACTRESS-10.jpg
- File:RAGINI ODIA FILM ACTRESS-9.jpg
- File:RAGINI ODIA FILM ACTRESS-8.jpg
- File:RAGINI ODIA FILM ACTRESS-7.jpg
- File:RAGINI ODIA FILM ACTRESS-6.jpg
- File:RAGINI ODIA FILM ACTRESS-5.jpg
- File:RAGINI ODIA FILM ACTRESS-4.jpg
- File:RAGINI ODIA FILM ACTRESS-1.jpg
- File:RAGINI ODIA FILM ACTRESS-2.jpg
- File:RAGINI ODIA FILM ACTRESS-0.jpg
MCMLXXXIX 00:19, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:16, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
May not be own work. COM:DW
- File:Water filter (5).jpg
- File:Water filter (6).jpg
- File:Water filter (4).jpg
- File:Water filter (3).jpg
- File:Water filter (2).jpg
- File:Water filter (1).jpg
- File:Old Govt Hospital.jpg
- File:Dodda Aladamara SIra town (3).jpg
- File:Dodda Aladamara SIra town (2).jpg
- File:Dodda Aladamara SIra town (1).jpg
- File:Mallik Rehan Dargah (1).jpg
- File:Mallik Rehan Dargah (2).jpg
- File:Dargah (2).jpg
- File:Dargah (3).jpg
- File:Dargah (1).jpg
- File:Doddakere (3).jpg
- File:Doddakere (2).jpg
- File:Doddakere (1).jpg
- File:Fort (08).jpg
- File:Fort 01.jpg
- File:Fort (13).jpg
- File:Fort (011).jpg
- File:Fort (10).jpg
- File:Fort (09).jpg
- File:Fort (07).jpg
- File:Fort (06).jpg
- File:Fort (05).jpg
- File:Fort (04).jpg
- File:Fort (03).jpg
- File:Fort (12).jpg
- File:Fort (01).jpg
- File:Fort (02).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
MCMLXXXIX 00:49, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:17, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Killy101010 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused {{Userpage image}}; out of the project scope.
- File:林愷欣Tina 新一代女神.jpg
- File:林愷欣 (Tina Lin).jpg
- File:林愷欣 女神.jpg
- File:林愷欣陽光女孩.jpg
- File:林愷欣奔月.jpg
- File:林愷欣愛狗.jpg
- File:林愷欣受許多人喜受.jpg
- File:林愷欣時尚.jpg
- File:林愷欣的愛犬嘟嘟.jpg
- File:林愷欣雜誌.jpg
- File:林愷欣神似高圓圓.jpg
- File:林愷欣永遠都像太陽.jpg
- File:林愷欣身材姣好.jpg
- File:林愷欣的本名叫林宥瑜.jpg
- File:林愷欣龐德女郎.jpg
- File:林愷欣好美.jpg
- File:林愷欣禮服設計師 1.jpg
- File:林愷欣婚紗設計師.jpg
- File:林愷欣捐飼料給流浪狗.jpg
- File:林愷欣禮服設計師.jpg
- File:林愷欣新女神.jpg
- File:林愷欣救援流浪狗.jpg
- File:林愷欣新一代力棒主持人.jpg
- File:林愷欣Tina.jpg
- File:林愷欣女神.jpg
- File:林愷欣.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:42, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:18, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:18, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Albahanews (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:02, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:18, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GoodOil Man (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images.
- File:Suiting-up-99e67dd2-2967-4bd9-ad83-f55dead1e223.jpg
- File:Catch-of-the-day-2cd49a0b-d654-4aee-8809-13428eeeec3c.jpg
- File:4090590-md.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 25 June 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:19, 2 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by GoodOil Man (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.tigermarinecharter.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/beach-sunset-4-shanagni-yaht-charter-phuket-700x465.jpg.
- File:Bending-ligths-1186131.jpg
- File:Bird bite.jpg
- File:4090590-md.jpg
- File:020208 033b.jpg
- File:Getting-suited-up-1056431.jpg
- File:A-vine-in-the-london-1144973.jpg
- File:Clearwater-beach-sunset-409603.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:16, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:19, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, can be found earlier on web, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:A Rico: video screenshots, promo material, Getty images grabber lile File:Blac Chyna VMA's.jpg = http://s1.ibtimes.com/sites/www.ibtimes.com/files/2016/05/09/blac-chyna.jpg (full exif available = "Photo by Frazer Harrison/Getty Images") etc. for es:Blac Chyna, an American model and entrepreneur, uploaded since 06.2016.
- File:Chyna en KUPWTK.png
- File:Blac Chyna para Lashed Bar.png
- File:Chyna para Trendy Butler.png
- File:Detras de camara para Water 138.png
- File:Blac Chyna VMA's.jpg
- File:Blac Chyna Model.jpg
- File:Blac Chyna, Rob Kardashian y Shalana Hunter Jones "Miss Toni" .jpg
- File:Blac Chyna y Amigos.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 22:05, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:52, 12 August 2016 (UTC)
Promo photos and album covers. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Vestimenta tipica de una gogo en los 60s.png
- File:Lyn May portada "Qué pasa entre los dos".jpg
- File:«Lyn May», 1985..jpg
- File:Lyn May álbum "Lyn May"..jpg
- File:Lyn May y Alejandro Alvarado.jpg
- File:Empaque del primer álbum de estudio de Lyn May «Infiel».jpg
- File:Infiel Caja.jpg
- File:Lyn May en los años 70.png
- File:Lyn May por Paulina Lavista.png
- File:Lyn May y Antonio Chi Xuo.png
- File:Lyn May en 2016.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:19, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:19, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nalideo Nalideo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial flags of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
- File:Bandera de Maskoyana.png
- File:Flag of Nagrenaledo.png
- File:Bandera de Nagreyupokno.png
- File:Brecozeismo.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:19, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nalideo Nalideo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Apparently, an "art" project by uploader: creation of a fictional country including flags, language, flora and fauna. See also https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Reino_de_%C3%91anday who is probably the same person.
- File:Emokarenday imagen satelital.png
- File:Pantalonreda.png
- File:Emokarendaya.png
- File:Alfabeto Nagrenalo.png
- File:Bandera del idioma Nagrenalo.png
- File:Muro de argentina.jpg
- File:Habitat de la especie.gif
- File:Alfabeto Nagrenalono.png
- File:Mapa de Maskoyana.png
- File:Chonidus Chonidus.jpg
- File:Veronicella Nagrenalensis.jpg
- File:Drymaeus Nagrenalensis.jpg
- File:Araña Domestica de Nagrenaledo.jpg
- File:Nagurmanuyus domesticus Nagrenalensis.png
- File:Chilomalidus Palidenreknsis.jpg
Takeaway (talk) 12:50, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:22, 5 April 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Langosta1234 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:20, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
no educational purpose due to poor quality Joschi71 (talk) 16:09, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:20, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
no educational purpose due to poor quality Joschi71 (talk) 16:10, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:20, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
no educational purpose due to poor quality Joschi71 (talk) 16:11, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:20, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
External source, no author, no permission. Druschba 4 (talk) 16:15, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:20, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal file, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 16:15, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:20, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by امین عباسیان (talk · contribs)
[edit]No indication of user's own work, look like screen captures, or copies.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:48, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:21, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Four images with FBMD in meta showing they were in and out of Facebook before being uploaded here.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:58, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:21, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
COM:COPYVIOs. Captions, watermarks, halftoning, obvious publication and file sizes, show that none of these is own work of uploader.
- File:800x2000.jpg
- File:Franco-louis.jpg
- File:1101x2456.jpg
- File:800x100.jpg
- File:Dik900.jpg
- File:1200x630bf.jpg
- File:Franco -500x200.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:00, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:21, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Antonychris1004 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used.
- File:랴오둥 반도 할양.png
- File:랴오둥 반도 점령.png
- File:삼국간섭.png
- File:프랑스령 아프리카.png
- File:프랑스령 수단.png
- File:영국령 동아프리카.png
- File:독일령 동아프리카3.png
- File:독일령 남서아프리카.png
- File:아프리카 분할.png
- File:프랑스 영국 식민지.png
- File:Shanghai International Settlement.png
- File:포위망.png
- File:프랑스령 인도차이나.png
- File:Triple Intervention.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:00, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:53, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Antonychris1004 (talk · contribs)
[edit]There is no indication of user's own work on the images in this gallery. The maps are apparently self-made or self-colored, but not in use. The images are composites without sources, images of artworks, drawings, photographs and so on. Besides copyright issues, COM:SCOPE also needs to be considered.
- File:베를린 공수 그림.png
- File:베를린 공수.jpg
- File:1914년 아시아 제국주의 열강 식민지 현황.png
- File:유관순 컬러 가상 복원 사진.png
- File:아이신기오로 푸이.png
- File:제 2 수에즈 운하 확장 개통 전후 2.jpg
- File:제 2 수에즈 운하 확장 개통 전후.png
- File:수에즈 운하 개통식 그림.gif
- File:수에즈 운하 .jpg
- File:수에즈 운하 개통식.png
- File:1959년 영국 식민지.png
- File:대영 제국.png
- File:언어권 기구.png
- File:황화론.png
- File:노르돔 궁전 - 프랑스 베트남 식민지 총독부.png
- File:이탈리아령 동아프리카.png
- File:프랑스 식민지 제국.png
- File:이탈리아령 소말릴란드 지도.png
- File:파쇼다 사건 풍자화.png
- File:세실 존 로즈 아프리카 카이로-케이프 타운 식민지 풍자화.png
- File:세실 존 로즈 초상화.png
- File:카이로 케이프 철도.png
- File:북아메리카 식민지 .png
- File:아메리카 식민지.png
- File:파쇼다 사건.png
- File:영국 아프리카 식민지 .png
- File:횡단정책.png
- File:제2차 세계 대전 직후의 세계 열강의 식민지.png
- File:속령.png
- File:1914년의 독일 제국의 지도..png
- File:프랑스 제국의 시대 변화 지도..png
- File:이탈리아 식민지.png
- File:불영 식민지.png
- File:아프리카 분할 비율.png
- File:아프리카 분할 지도.png
- File:스위스.png
- File:1회.png
- File:프랑코포니 .png
- File:프랑코포니 지도.png
- File:스털링 지역.png
- File:서부 유럽.png
- File:서유럽 연합.png
- File:서유럽.png
- File:독일어 국가 면적.png
- File:독일어 비율.png
Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:05, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:22, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Mr. Cassar did not specify the Creative Commons license on Facebook. The uploader specified a free license, but the owner of the picture is the one who first must specify a free license. Anyway, Mr. Cassar is not the owner of the picture unless he can prove that there was a formal written transfer of ownership. Otherwise, the owner is the photographer, not the subject, and we need permission from the photographer via COM:OTRS or else there could be a copyright violation. Dontreader (talk) 17:11, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
The photo is owned by Mr. Cassar as he produced the video himself. The photo is actually taken from the video itself. I was also able to contact Mr. Cassar myself. I can tell him to send an email of approval.
- Hello JeanMarion, that solution would work if Mr. Cassar is the copyright holder of the video. If he produced the video but someone else or a company is the copyright holder, then I think there would be a problem. I will quote from Commons:Screenshots#Audiovisual_works"
- "Screenshots from audiovisual works (such as films, television broadcasts, video clips) are often the property of its producer or creator and they may not be uploaded to Commons unless the work itself is in the public domain or released under a free license or unless the copyright holder is willing to release the screenshot under a free license."
- Could you please provide a link to the video so that we can see if a copyright holder is mentioned? Also, before you ask Mr. Cassar to send permission to use the screenshot, please contact an administrator here on Commons first because I'm not an expert. You can also ask a question at Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard. And as I said, please provide a link (here and there) to the video. Thanks, and good luck... Dontreader (talk) 18:18, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- JeanMarion, I found the video here [1]. I think your idea will work but please ask an expert first. If they say yes, then Mr. Cassar must include the link to the video in his written declaration of consent. Best wishes... Dontreader (talk) 18:28, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 00:23, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:23, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:26, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:27, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:27, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:27, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:27, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:28, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:23, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:28, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:23, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:58, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Alexdesouzajr (talk · contribs)
[edit]Baq quality unused files with no exif and dubious copyright status
- File:Bom dia Floripa.jpg
- File:Beira Mar de Florianópolis - Explendor.jpg
- File:Pedra branca - Santa Catarina.jpg
- File:Chuva de uma tarde qualquer.jpg
- File:Final de tarde - Florianópolis.jpg
/St1995 20:00, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:24, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by UsmanovaAnna (talk · contribs)
[edit]There is a discrepancy between the uploader's name and the authorship information in EXIF data.
- File:Sgm2015.jpg
- File:Историяпорта.jpg
- File:Морской портНачало.jpg
- File:До олимпиады.jpg
- File:СочиГрандМарина.jpg
- File:SGM light-box 122.5x183 3 preview.jpg
- File:Gm night view.jpg
- File:Svartovka sgm.jpg
- File:1boat.jpg
- File:Sgm2.jpg
- File:Sgm1.jpg
- File:Sgm port.jpg
A.Savin 22:14, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:25, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:37, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:41, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ratna Sarita Cinta (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images.
--ghouston (talk) 01:35, 11 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:35, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ratna Sarita Cinta (talk · contribs)
[edit]They looking failry out of scope to me.
- File:Ratna-Sarita-Apendi.png
- File:Ratna-sarita.png
- File:Mirah Rismawati.jpeg
- File:Ratna Sarira.png
- File:Ratna Putri.png
JuTa 05:07, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:42, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:43, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 10:50, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:43, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 10:51, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:43, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 10:54, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:43, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 10:56, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:43, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
out of scope Kkairri (talk) 11:19, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:44, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:57, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:44, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:58, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:44, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Elena Benítez (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:03, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:44, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Kellysandra123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://i1.wp.com/nrai.org/site/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/1-6.jpg?fit=1200%2C1200.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:44, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:30, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:45, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:30, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:45, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:32, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:45, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:38, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:45, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:39, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:45, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:41, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:45, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Unused textlogo with unknown importance. Maybe out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 21:20, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:45, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan. The statue was created by 雨田光平 (Kohei Amada) (1893-1985). [2]
- File:Fukui-C-3148.jpg
- File:Fukui-C-3153.jpg
- File:Fukui-C-3156.jpg
- File:Fukui-C-3157.jpg
- File:Fukui-C-3158.jpg
- File:Kitanosho Castle01s18.jpg
G I Chandor (talk) 03:48, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:55, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 10:06, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:56, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 10:21, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:56, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:10, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:56, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:11, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:56, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 11:12, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:56, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
out of scope. perhaps copyvio. Kkairri (talk) 11:21, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:00, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope Themightyquill (talk) 11:42, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:00, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 12:33, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:00, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, not suitable for stock photo. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:34, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:00, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 12:46, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:01, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 12:47, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:01, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
no information on location, could be anywhere Rcbutcher (talk) 12:57, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:01, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope personal photo Gbawden (talk) 13:47, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Indeed ! - Bzh-99 (talk) 19:17, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:02, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Codename Lisa (talk) 05:23, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Indeed out of scope. - Bzh-99 (talk) 19:18, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:02, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:08, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:02, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:09, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:03, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:10, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:03, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
FBMD in meta, was in/out of Facebook. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:57, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:07, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Personal images are out of COM:SCOPE plus personality rights. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:57, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:07, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Неверная загрузка файла. Прошу удаления. The file is loaded incorrectly. Vuqar221 (talk) 20:32, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Прошу удаления файла. Rzayev Cəlil Heydərqulu (talk) 17:48, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Прошу удаления файла. Rzayev Cəlil Heydərqulu (talk) 17:48, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
The file is loaded incorrectly. Vuqar221 (talk) 16:45, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Прошу удаления файла. Rzayev Cəlil Heydərqulu (talk) 17:46, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: No categories, no description -- therefore lost among our 36,000,000+ files. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:02, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Operating words (talk · contribs)
[edit]No permission (see exif of 1st file) and spam/out of scope (2nd)
/St1995 20:30, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --McZusatz (talk) 20:54, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by VikaShrivastava (talk · contribs)
[edit]Dubious own works
- File:Bisahu Das Mahant with his wife Janki Devi.jpg
- File:Bisahu Das Mahnt.jpg
- File:Dr. Charan Das Mahant.jpg
/St1995 20:39, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --McZusatz (talk) 20:53, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
almost the same and better quality : File:St Sebastien Bousselargues ext2.jpg VKaeru (talk) 21:53, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --McZusatz (talk) 20:53, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
better quality : File:St Sebastien Bousselargues st laurent.jpg VKaeru (talk) 21:55, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --McZusatz (talk) 20:52, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Only used on the Spanish Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted as spam in September 2009. Out of project scope. — ξxplicit 01:09, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:57, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 01:21, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:57, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Only used on the Spanish Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted as non-notable in April 2016. Out of project scope. — ξxplicit 01:28, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:57, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Only used on the English Wikipedia, where I've deleted the subject's two pages as spam. Out of project scope. — ξxplicit 01:30, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:57, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by NigelSoft as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Non-free logo. See [3]. Krd 18:27, 7 July 2014 (UTC)
Kept: pd-textlogo Natuur12 (talk) 20:57, 18 July 2014 (UTC)
Only used on the Chinese Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted as spam in July 2014. Out of project scope. — ξxplicit 05:06, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:58, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MD.Billal Hasan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
--ghouston (talk) 07:19, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:58, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MD.Billal Hasan (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope: unused selfie and personal Screenshot.
Sixflashphoto (talk) 06:16, 11 February 2018 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:20, 18 February 2018 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 10:37, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:59, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Probably out of scope. Unclear. Kulmalukko (talk) 10:39, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:59, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 10:40, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:59, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 10:47, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:00, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 10:57, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:00, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
This is a derivative work of a copyrighted software (S40 operating system). MsaynevirtaIMG (talk) 11:50, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:59, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
out of scope Themightyquill (talk) 11:53, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 03:59, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Kringlan
[edit]per Commons:Freedom of panorama#Iceland
Josve05a (talk) 16:33, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:06, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Kringlan
[edit]Copyrighted architecture in Iceland, a country without Freedom of Panorama provisions
- File:Great deal of force (534239778).jpg
- File:Kringlan car park 2.JPG
- File:Kringlan car park.JPG
- File:Kringlan, Reykjavik 2013-07-10 16-47.jpg
- File:Kringlan.JPG
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Themightyquill (talk) 10:57, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:02, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Smáralind
[edit]Copyrighted architecture in Iceland, a country without Freedom of Panorama provisions
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Themightyquill (talk) 10:59, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:02, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 10:59, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:05, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Personal photos. These are used in en.wikipedia but he has not contributed in it. --Kkairri (talk) 12:18, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:07, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 13:46, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep It's not out of scope. - Bzh-99 (talk) 19:16, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- What is it? Castillo blanco (talk) 05:41, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- I don't know, but it's not a reason to say it's out of scope. - Bzh-99 (talk) 14:09, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- What is it? Castillo blanco (talk) 05:41, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:08, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
this photo is taken off a motorsports magazine Sw20GT (talk) 13:46, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:08, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete Indeed out of scope. - Bzh-99 (talk) 19:18, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:08, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:09, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
My page was deleted (wrongfully, in my opinion), so you might as well remove the logo. Bmo000 (talk) 15:48, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:09, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:23, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:09, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Please explain, how this unknown thing is in project scope. Taivo (talk) 16:16, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:10, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Clearly a screenshot/photograph of a low definition broadcast Ytoyoda (talk) 16:20, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:10, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Low quality, small size. -- Geagea (talk) 00:07, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:40, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Blurred, low-resolution image not used in any projects. Does not serve any obvious education purpose. DAJF (talk) 01:37, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:41, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Low resolution private photo. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 10:49, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:39, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Shopping malls in Iceland
[edit]Copyrighted architecture in Iceland, a country with no Freedom of Panorama laws
- File:2014-04-27 12-04-37 Iceland - Kópavogi Kópavogur.JPG
- File:Akureyri 064.JPG
- File:Walking street (8321112977).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Themightyquill (talk) 10:57, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:39, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
File:Mikey "ming" Figgins -the traveling trio - in this photographic depiction we see three free spirits, father and daughters one of them performing satirical whims and the hidden jewel in the back along with thei 2014-04-18 16-39.jpg
[edit]
A bit blurred private photo. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:56, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:49, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:02, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:49, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:04, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:49, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rodrigo dodi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused low-quality personal photo (and thumbnail) of subject with no apparent notability. Based on the uploader's user talk page on the Spanish Wikipedia, apparently uploaded for use in an article there, which has been deleted. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope.
—LX (talk, contribs) 20:36, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:38, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
This is the logo for a school which is being claimed to be below the threshold of originality for copyright, however, the logo design is much more complex than some simple geometric shapes. Whpq (talk) 02:01, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:59, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Commons:Copyright_rules_by_subject_matter#Models and Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Japan. Darklanlan (talk) 02:26, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:58, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
This is a complex logo. I am opening a deletion request instead of a speedy delete, because of the amount of usage and the fact that this is almost two years old. Elisfkc (talk) 02:54, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:51, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Fails COM:EDUSE. Likely derivative of copyright stock photo. Utcursch (talk) 03:08, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:50, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright violation. Photos are copyrighted works. G I Chandor (talk) 03:08, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:50, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyright violation. The poster is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 03:09, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:49, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Copyright violation. The photo on the guide board is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 03:10, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:49, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Copyright violation. The description plate is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 03:11, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:49, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The description plate is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 03:13, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:49, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The text on the description plate is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 03:14, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:49, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The description plate is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 03:16, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:48, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The description plate is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 03:18, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:48, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The description plate is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 03:19, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment: Is it? It could be a quote from a public domain text, for example. We need proof this text is copyrighted. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 14:51, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- According to Commons:Deletion requests#Overview, "the burden of showing that the file can be validly hosted here lies with the uploader and anyone arguing that it should be kept." If you insist "keep", you need to show that this text is not copyrighted.--G I Chandor (talk) 10:07, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:48, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The guide map is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 03:20, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:45, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The guide map is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 03:22, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:45, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. These guide boards are copyrighted works. G I Chandor (talk) 03:24, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:45, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. The images on the description plate are copyrighted works. G I Chandor (talk) 03:25, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:45, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. These description plates are copyrighted works.
G I Chandor (talk) 03:27, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:44, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan. G I Chandor (talk) 03:28, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:43, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan. The statues were erected in 1998. [4] G I Chandor (talk) 03:29, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:40, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan. The statue was erected in 1993. [5] G I Chandor (talk) 03:31, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:42, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
unused logo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 06:49, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:52, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Personal artwork by uploader. Out of scope. G I Chandor (talk) 08:35, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:52, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
A bit blurred private photo. Not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 10:22, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:54, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Commons don't host selfies Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 10:25, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
![10:25, 20 February 2017 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2017/02/20#c-Sismarinho-2017-02-20T10:25:00.000Z-File:"Polyhedron_with_no_vertex_visible_from_center.png".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:54, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
![05:54, 27 February 2017 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2017/02/20#c-George_Chernilevsky-2017-02-27T05:54:00.000Z-File:"Polyhedron_with_no_vertex_visible_from_center.png".jpg){kind=link}
Unused logo. Out of scope. Johnj1995 (talk) 18:32, 3 March 2022 (UTC)
![18:32, 3 March 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2017/02/20#c-Johnj1995-2022-03-03T18:32:00.000Z-File:"Polyhedron_with_no_vertex_visible_from_center.png".jpg_2){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 12:27, 13 April 2022 (UTC)
![12:27, 13 April 2022 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2017/02/20#c-Gbawden-2022-04-13T12:27:00.000Z-File:"Polyhedron_with_no_vertex_visible_from_center.png".jpg_2){kind=link}
Bad quality, blurred, unreal, many alternatives, unused /St1995 19:49, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:56, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Low resolution private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:51, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:57, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:56, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:57, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:05, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:58, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:05, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:58, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:06, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:59, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:06, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:59, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:13, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:59, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Private photo, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:27, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:59, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused and unexplained hand-written text image. McGeddon (talk) 20:53, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:00, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
promotional Triplecaña (talk) 23:06, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:00, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
promotional Triplecaña (talk) 23:07, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:01, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan. The statue was erected in 1992. [6] G I Chandor (talk) 03:34, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:11, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan. The statue was created in 1985. [7] G I Chandor (talk) 03:35, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:12, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan. The statues were created in 2000. [8] G I Chandor (talk) 03:36, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:14, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan. The statue was erected in 1981. [9] G I Chandor (talk) 03:37, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:16, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan. The statue was erected in 1990. [10] G I Chandor (talk) 03:38, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:16, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Statues in Kagoshima
[edit]No FOP in Japan. The monument was erected in 1978. [11]
G I Chandor (talk) 03:40, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:17, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Yuki Hideyasu
[edit]No FOP in Japan. The statue was erected in 2002. [12]
- File:Fukui-C-3130.jpg
- File:Fukui-C-3132.jpg
- File:Fukui-C-3133.jpg
- File:Fukui-C-3134.jpg
- File:Fukui-C-3136.jpg
- File:Fukui-C-3140.jpg
G I Chandor (talk) 03:52, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:20, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Source page (http://web.archive.org/web/20051013061403/http://www.chainonmanquant.u-bordeaux.fr/Pages/confp.html) does not contain any information establishing the date or the authorship of this image, so the copyright status is unknown. Gamaliel (talk) 01:39, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:16, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://scontent-sjc2-1.cdninstagram.com/t51.2885-15/s640x640/sh0.08/e35/c0.93.1080.1080/16465221_240229566434622_8727999932092383232_n.jpg?ig_cache_key=MTQ0MzE4NDg4MDY4NTk5NjQ1Ng%3D%3D.2.c. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:17, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Grammyeditor (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://i1.sndcdn.com/avatars-000228554937-abzfgr-t500x500.jpg.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:13, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:17, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:18, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
This is a promotional image without the appropriate license for use in Commons and suspected of copyright violation. Joshua Zhan (talk) 16:33, 19 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Done by Dharmadhyaksha. --Jianhui67 talk★contribs 07:20, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
The image may be PD in the US, but since it is most likely a German picture (depicting a well-known German author in uniform), we need to know why it is in the PD in Germany (or under a free license). The image description tells us absolutely zero about this. Rosenzweig τ 00:08, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: There is also no reason to believe that it is PD-1923. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:07, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg/2nd&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Author requeat N-C16 (talk) 01:57, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: N-C16 is the uploader, but not the author. I see no reaon to delete this. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:08, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No FOP in Japan. G I Chandor (talk) 03:32, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:08, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by BexzyGallego (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:Temario Pre-ancla.pdf
- File:Temario Travesía Roja.pdf
- File:Temario Travesía Azul.pdf
- File:Temario de Travesía Amarilla.pdf
- File:Carta de navegación.pdf
- File:Carta 5 - La apropiación.pdf
- File:Carta 4 - Madurez humana.pdf
- File:Carta 6 - Enfrentamiento y compromiso.pdf
- File:Carta 1- Hazte todo un cristiano.pdf
- File:Carta 3 - Los valores.pdf
- File:Carta 2 - Mi carabela.pdf
- File:Convivencia de padres.jpg
- File:Campamento mision. San casimiro.jpg
- File:Convivencia de embarque.jpg
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:32, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Solicito la revisión de los documentos eliminados. Se trata de un Movimiento sin ánimos de lucro, sin recursos suficientes para publicaciones oficiales. Estos documentos estan libres de derechos de autor, precisamente porque estan hecho por colaboradores desinteresados que no figuran como autores. Los documentos han sido hechos para el uso por parte de jóvenes.
- He intentado comprender si es que los documentos pdf debo subirlos en otro lugar, pero estos, contienen imágenes referenciales del texto, asi que cabrian en wikimedia commons.
- No se si el idioma sea un impedimento en la comprensión. — Preceding unsigned comment added by BexzyGallego (talk • contribs) 15:08, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- @BexzyGallego: El idioma no es un impedimento. Bien, ya no hemos eliminado los documentos. Pero el alcance del proyecto es que proveamos los archivos para los otros proyectos de Wikimedia. No es un archivo por un movimiento. ¿Puede usted ver Commons:Lo que Commons no es#Commons no es tu alojamiento web gratuito personal? Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:59, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Comment the uploader has left comments on my talk page and on the talk page for this discussion. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 01:03, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: These are out of scope as noted by Magog. They are also copyvios, as I see no evidence of permission from the writers. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:11, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan. The monument was erected in 2001. [13] G I Chandor (talk) 03:42, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:11, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan. The statue was created by 金子篤司 (Atsushi Kaneko) (1922-2002). [14] G I Chandor (talk) 03:43, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:11, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted character. [15] G I Chandor (talk) 04:00, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:12, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted character. [16] G I Chandor (talk) 04:00, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:12, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted character. [17] G I Chandor (talk) 04:01, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:12, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted character. [18] G I Chandor (talk) 04:03, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:12, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted character. [19] G I Chandor (talk) 04:03, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:12, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted character. [20] G I Chandor (talk) 04:07, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:12, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted character. [21] G I Chandor (talk) 04:08, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:12, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Snack foods of Japan
[edit]- File:100 yen shop (3801491223).jpg
- File:100 yen shop (3801493419).jpg
- File:Baby-Star Ramen and Butamen in 2008 (2729831108).jpg
- File:Cartoon meat (5545543973).jpg
- File:Chuches (14340157647).jpg
- File:Cute in all directions (7212609742).jpg
- File:Ipponmanzoku Bar 1.JPG
- File:Japanese snacks (5047520399).jpg
- File:Snacks of Lawson convenience store.jpg
- File:Soy Kara.JPG
- File:SWEETBOX fried potato 20131204.JPG
- File:TED schwag bag zoom.jpg
- File:お菓子 (7451481936).jpg
- File:オールレーズン.jpg
- File:クレーンゲーム 2006 (1279533686).jpg
- File:暴君ハバネロ.JPG
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
G I Chandor (talk) 04:15, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:13, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
The map is copyrighted Darklanlan (talk) 05:37, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:14, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
The map is copyrighted Darklanlan (talk) 05:38, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:14, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
The map is copyrighted Darklanlan (talk) 05:38, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:14, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan. G I Chandor (talk) 07:57, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:14, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. These description plates are copyrighted works.
G I Chandor (talk) 08:04, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:10, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
The description plate is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 08:05, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:10, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation. G I Chandor (talk) 08:06, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:10, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted character. [22] G I Chandor (talk) 08:07, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:11, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Probable copyright violation. Same image as File:Looking Glass Magazine Cover Art (2012).jpg (up for deletion) and File:Looking Glass Mgazine - Cover Art (2012).jpg (already deleted), so perhaps an admin here can have a word with the uploader to either cease these actions or else get the permissions right? and Fram (talk) 08:10, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:13, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by D J Shin - My Toy Museum (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:円谷倉庫 II (Tsuburaya Warehouse Second Wave) - Star Wolf (スターウルフ) - Bacchus III (バ ツカス III).jpg
- File:Wolf Panic - Tamago World Series - Egg Plane.jpg
- File:Banpresto – Buriki Zenmai (Tin Wind Up) Tetsujin 28 Go Series – Side.jpg
- File:Banpresto – Buriki Zenmai (Tin Wind Up) Tetsujin 28 Go Series – Front.jpg
- File:Banpresto – Buriki Zenmai (Tin Wind Up) Tetsujin 28 Go Series – Close Up.jpg
- File:Osaka Tin Toy Institute – The Tin Age Collection 7th Anniversary – Tetsujin 28 Go (鉄人28号) – Blue Version – Side.jpg
- File:Osaka Tin Toy Institute – The Tin Age Collection 7th Anniversary – Tetsujin 28 Go (鉄人28号) – Blue Version – Front.jpg
- File:Osaka Tin Toy Institute – The Tin Age Collection 7th Anniversary – Tetsujin 28 Go (鉄人28号) – Blue Version – Close Up.jpg
- File:Osaka Tin Toy Institute – The Tin Age Collection 7th Anniversary – Tetsujin 28 Go (鉄人28号) – Blue Version – Box Inside.jpg
- File:Osaka Tin Toy Institute – The Tin Age Collection 7th Anniversary – Tetsujin 28 Go (鉄人28号) – Blue Version – Back Side.jpg
- File:Osaka Tin Toy Institute – The Tin Age Collection 7th Anniversary – Tetsujin 28 Go (鉄人28号) – Blue Version & Chinese Tetsujin – The Odd Couple.jpg
- File:Osaka Tin Toy Institute – Electric Powered Majin Garon (電動 魔神ガロン) – Front.jpg
_-_Star_Wolf_(%E3%82%B9%E3%82%BF%E3%83%BC%E3%82%A6%E3%83%AB%E3%83%95)_-_Bacchus_III_(%E3%83%90_%E3%83%84%E3%82%AB%E3%82%B9_III).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Tetsujin_28_Go_Series_%E2%80%93_Side.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Tetsujin_28_Go_Series_%E2%80%93_Front.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Tetsujin_28_Go_Series_%E2%80%93_Close_Up.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%E2%80%93_Blue_Version_%E2%80%93_Side.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%E2%80%93_Blue_Version_%E2%80%93_Front.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%E2%80%93_Blue_Version_%E2%80%93_Close_Up.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%E2%80%93_Blue_Version_%E2%80%93_Box_Inside.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%E2%80%93_Blue_Version_%E2%80%93_Back_Side.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%E2%80%93_Blue_Version_%26_Chinese_Tetsujin_%E2%80%93_The_Odd_Couple.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_%E2%80%93_Front.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
G I Chandor (talk) 08:12, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:13, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted character. [23] G I Chandor (talk) 08:07, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- @G I Chandor: I am aware Commons does display cosplays of copyrighted characters, but not up-close displays of product packaging with copyrighted characters, nor plush toys (as those are copyrighted too). What about a general view of merchandise with no focus on a particular one product? How do Japanese law (Shimajiro originates from Japan), Mainland Chinese law (this took place in China), and American law (as Commons is hosted in the US) apply to this case? WhisperToMe (talk) 01:18, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Copyrighted characters not indicated as free-use are not accepted in Commons. The board on which en:Shimajirō was drawn is big. Not de minimis.--G I Chandor (talk) 03:50, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- @G I Chandor: The big Shamjiro board can be cropped out. Would that be sufficient to satisfy copyright requirements? WhisperToMe (talk) 11:44, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- @WhisperToMe: I don't have authority to judge. It might be a good idea to ask administrators.--G I Chandor (talk) 00:51, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Seems to me that either a crop or a Gaussian blur would be reasonable in copyright terms, but the photo might lose its interest. - Jmabel ! talk 16:39, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- I double-checked the image... I think that while it's de minimis it's still recognizable enough as Shimajiro products to have interest. I'm interested in seeing what it's like with a blur. WhisperToMe (talk) 07:04, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- @G I Chandor: The big Shamjiro board can be cropped out. Would that be sufficient to satisfy copyright requirements? WhisperToMe (talk) 11:44, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Copyrighted characters not indicated as free-use are not accepted in Commons. The board on which en:Shimajirō was drawn is big. Not de minimis.--G I Chandor (talk) 03:50, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep and either blur or crop out the board. The resulting image will still show the way the company displays some of its products. Daphne Lantier 08:23, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- My understanding is that the subject of the image needs to be acceptable. Even if you crop out the cutout on the left, the rest of the content is still subject to copyright restrictions. A picture of two pieces of art or 10 pieces of art is no less problematic than a picture of one piece of art. You can see examples at Commons:De_minimis#Guidelines. If this image was broader, showing more of the store, you could argue that it was intended to show the store and that the display is unavoidable and essential but still de minimis. But as it stands, the photo is clearly intended to show the merchandise on display, and the merchandise is copyrighted. - Themightyquill (talk) 14:16, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- I would say this would fall under example #5 of Commons:De_minimis#Guidelines. Daphne Lantier 20:34, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- @Daphne Lantier: I can certainly see why you would say that, but in this photo, it's not the shelf that's the key subject of the image, it's the copyrighted merchandise. In the example 5 of those guidelines, the content of the banners/photos is not referenced, for example, in the title of the image. They are photos of a ceiling and a room. That's not the case with this image. - Themightyquill (talk) 12:02, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- @Themightyquill: I've seen other examples of copyrighted merchandise being presented in a "safe" way such as File:Yaoi Books by miyagawa.jpg. Do you believe that image is acceptable or not? If this image is acceptable, how does it compare with ShimajiroDisplayChina.jpg minus the poster? WhisperToMe (talk) 19:03, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- @Daphne Lantier: I can certainly see why you would say that, but in this photo, it's not the shelf that's the key subject of the image, it's the copyrighted merchandise. In the example 5 of those guidelines, the content of the banners/photos is not referenced, for example, in the title of the image. They are photos of a ceiling and a room. That's not the case with this image. - Themightyquill (talk) 12:02, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
- I would say this would fall under example #5 of Commons:De_minimis#Guidelines. Daphne Lantier 20:34, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- My understanding is that the subject of the image needs to be acceptable. Even if you crop out the cutout on the left, the rest of the content is still subject to copyright restrictions. A picture of two pieces of art or 10 pieces of art is no less problematic than a picture of one piece of art. You can see examples at Commons:De_minimis#Guidelines. If this image was broader, showing more of the store, you could argue that it was intended to show the store and that the display is unavoidable and essential but still de minimis. But as it stands, the photo is clearly intended to show the merchandise on display, and the merchandise is copyrighted. - Themightyquill (talk) 14:16, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- I'm certainly no expert here, but personally, I can't clearly see any artwork on the spines in the yaoi photo, whereas I can clearly recognize the multiple examples of a specific character in the shimajiro image, mostly in the artwork attached to tops of the shelves, but also in some of the books and on the screen. - Themightyquill (talk) 20:47, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- I viewed the yaoi pic at the full resolution. Some of the spines do show artwork of characters (who would have to be copyrighted) and I see a partial image of a book cover. It's all very low resolution. WhisperToMe (talk) 01:38, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: The only thing in the image that is in reasonably good focus is the copyrighted character to the left. If it is removed, then the rest of the image is too far out of focus to be usable. If it were in focus it wouold infringe on the various copyrights. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:23, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted character. [24] G I Chandor (talk) 08:15, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:17, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
This picture is a portrait of Mukesh and not K.L. Saigal. Its filename, title and category are misleading
This picture is a low quality and cropped version of this one
This picture is not used in any article MelAntipam (talk) 08:21, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:23, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
This looks like a photograph of a screen, making it derivative work Vera (talk) 10:03, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:23, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Work by en:Vitaly Primakov, who was executed during the Great Purge and posthumously rehabilitated in 1957, see {{PD-Russia}}. Expires in 2028. Blacklake (talk) 10:21, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:24, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Work by en:Vitaly Primakov, who was executed during the Great Purge and posthumously rehabilitated in 1957, see {{PD-Russia}}. Expires in 2028. Blacklake (talk) 10:21, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:24, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Because of the title, I don't want my name on the title, I'm the one who upload this file. Dabit100 (talk) 11:45, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion -- use {{Rename}}. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:25, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Soy el AUTOR de esta fotografía y no quiero que aparezca más en Wikipedia, ya que al googlear mi nombre aparece esta fotografía que mancha mi reputación. Gracias! Dabit100 (talk) 21:15, 11 June 2018 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 23:27, 25 October 2018 (UTC)
very small pic, no metadata about taking photograph. Suspicious copyvio. Kkairri (talk) 12:02, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:25, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Is spite of the efforts of the uploader to provide "creative" source informacion and appropriate licenses, both the source and the license information are wrong and not valid. First of all, the picture does not come from any "yearbook". The image comes from a so-called "TCU Digital Repository". It's pretty obvious to deduce the picture does not come from a yearbook as (a) the picture shows the subject in his forties, and (b) the subject doesn't seem to have received any bachelor degree from this university (he did received two bachelor degrees, one from the University of Oklahoma in 1927 and other from Yale in 1929). Therefore any claim of this picture having been taken before 1923 (that is, when the subject was 17 years old or younger) is bogus. Moreover, the picture does have source information: Gittings, Houston, Texas, which didn't open operations in Houston until 1928 (see here).
Maybe {{PD-US-no notice}} is applicable, but we don't actually know whether the picture was ever published and when the author died. The admin closing the request should assess whether we can assume the picture was published and, if copyright notice was attached at publication, it was never renewed.
I have to highlight the "Marxist" way Jasonanaggie usually behaves ("Those are my licenses, and if you don't like them... well, I have others") and how keen he's on faking the source information in order to make it compliant to the randomly chosen license. Discasto talk 13:00, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- I really think that you need to check yourself before just throwing out ad hominem attacks at people you do not know. You find it easier to attack an individual, than to try to argue a point. Marxist; what a joke of a person you are; go to hell! Jasonanaggie (talk) 13:48, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- What it's not actually a joke is the amount of effort required to verify your everchanging licenses. If it were the first time, you'd be absolutely right. Provided that this is the umpteenth time you change a license (not saying anything about your invention of the source information...) I'm perfectly right when pointing out your "controversial" handling of licenses. --Discasto talk 15:33, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- This is the first such time; so you haven't a clue of what you speak of. Jasonanaggie (talk) 15:51, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Fake news!!!! LOL --Discasto talk 17:15, 20 February 2017 (UTC) PS: will you update the source and authorship information in the image or will you throw this task out as well?
- This is the first such time; so you haven't a clue of what you speak of. Jasonanaggie (talk) 15:51, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- What it's not actually a joke is the amount of effort required to verify your everchanging licenses. If it were the first time, you'd be absolutely right. Provided that this is the umpteenth time you change a license (not saying anything about your invention of the source information...) I'm perfectly right when pointing out your "controversial" handling of licenses. --Discasto talk 15:33, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:28, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Derivative work of likely non-free publication/artwork.
Wcam (talk) 13:26, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: It's nonsense. They are just photos. Therefore, don't delete them. --Pingdo (talk) 08:50, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Do you think it (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mathematics_lecture_at_the_Helsinki_University_of_Technology.jpg) is likely non-free publication/artwork? --Pingdo (talk) 08:53, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Could you please, explain how the leaflets/posters are related to the lecture photo? Ankry (talk) 19:40, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Delete likely copyrighted images. At least, no explanation why they would not be. Ankry (talk) 19:40, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. We must use {{FoP-Hong Kong}}. Journal covers, posters and photographs are not covered with freedom of panorama in Hong Kong. Taivo (talk) 20:57, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep: The copyright of these photos is owned by the man who took photos. --Bottekab (talk) 02:54, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Note that the comment above is this account's first and only activity on any Wikimedia project. —LX (talk, contribs) 14:28, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
I used {{FoP-Hong Kong}} on the both photos. Therefore, the photos should not be deleted. --Pingdo (talk) 14:26, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- No. {{FoP-Hong Kong}} does not apply because the objects in your photos are not "permanently situated in a public place or in premises open to the public". --Wcam (talk) 16:15, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
So what should I use? --Pingdo (talk) 04:12, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Keep It's a normal thing. --Kidefow (talk) 07:18, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Thse infringe on the copyrights belonging to the creators of the posters shown. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:29, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Uncited image-of-text that is not especially high resolution, and that has internal inconsistencies (example: sometimes mentions autoclavability as an advantage (or non- as a disadvantage) but sometimes doesn't mention it). Would be useful iff it were a yes/no table DMacks (talk) 05:31, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: also author is not uploader, no evidence of permission. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:00, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Having a copy of a photograph of a relative is not the same as owning copyright to it, especially when that photograph appears to relate to an official government event Sitush (talk) 13:39, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:37, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
this is a picture off a motorsports magazine. Sw20GT (talk) 13:45, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:37, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
according to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Monument by Manaf Halbouni II.jpg. No FOP for temporary art. Quedel (talk) 14:28, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
also:
- File:20170213100DR Dresden-Neumarkt Installation 3 Busse.jpg
- File:20170213125DR Dresden-Neumarkt Installation 3 Busse.jpg
- File:20170213140DR Dresden-Neumarkt Installation 3 Busse.jpg
- File:20170213145DR Dresden-Neumarkt Installation 3 Busse.jpg
- File:20170213155DR Dresden-Neumarkt Installation 3 Busse.jpg
- File:Busmonument OB.JPG
- File:Busmonument hautab.ogg (as the busses are a central subject in this video)
- File:Busmonument hilab.ogg
- File:Frauenkirche Dresden Aleppo Mahnmal Manaf Halbouni.webm
- File:Monument by Manaf Halbouni.jpg
The only file in Category:Monument by Manaf Halbouni keeping is File:Busmonument Meschwa.JPG, so the category can be deleted, too, as there could no free media relating to this artist now. --Quedel (talk) 14:39, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Ich bin Fotograf, der die Wirklichkeit der Welt abbildet. Meine Fotos können Sie gerne auf Ihren Plattformen löschen - an der Wirklichkeit ändert das nichts, es verdrängt sie nur.
--Jörg Blobelt (talk) 18:56, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- @User:Jörg Blobelt: Ich weiß nicht, was deine Aussage soll, sie ist relativ sinnfrei. Problem ist hier: es handelt sich um eine Kunstaktion, und um solche Dinge veröffentlichen (und sublizenzieren) zu können, ist die Genehmigung des Künstlers notwendig. Die liegt aber bisher nciht vor. Solange also die Einwilligung (siehe auch hier für ein Musteranschreiben an den Künstler, welches du gerne verwenden kannst) eingeholt ist, ist das ein Urheberrechtsverstoß und damit illegal. Der obige Löschantrag hat nichts mit der Aussage oder dem Inhalt dieser temporären Straßenkunst zu tun. --Quedel (talk) 12:23, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:38, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Restored per Ticket:2017050310010139 . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:35, 6 July 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gabrielmeir53 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://media.gettyimages.com/photos/thousands-gather-during-a-central-florida-womens-rally-at-lake-eola-picture-id632324282?s=594x594.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:49, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. I am concerned that the uploader knows absolutely nothing about the copyright. Yesterday, I nominated 11 of his uploads for speedy deletion. —Codename Lisa (talk) 05:26, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. Uploader seems to know absolutely nothing about copyright, and uploads images of software to here even though this (Wikimedia Commons) isn't the proper place for stuff (only an example) such as copyrighted software, of which images should be hosted on Wikipedia itself, and with proper licensing. The uploader also seems to be quite young. So I vote delete. KamranMackey (talk) 03:22, 24 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:42, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Screenshot from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bA3_s863wp0 - probably not own work Robert Weemeyer (talk) 14:52, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:42, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:42, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
There is a claim that the photograph was published with no copyright notice, but the image has no provenance, no source, and we have no idea where it came from. It could have had a copyright notice which was left off of the scan, or could have been published in a magazine or book which had a blanket copyright notice. Without provenance, the claim cannot be verified. Jayron32 (talk) 17:27, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
Deleted: Please remember that a single notice, usually on the masthead, covers all editorial material (but not advertising) in the entire newspaper. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:44, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpeg){kind=link}
The claim is made that the picture was published in The Oregonian, but that the paper did not publish a copyright notice. That strains credibility, as I see no reason to believe that a major daily newspaper would not have a copyright notice on every issue. It is the responsibility of the uploader to prove the image is free to use, and they have not met this burden. Jayron32 (talk) 17:30, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:44, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Marcia Pinto Barcelo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Bad quality, corrupted, unreal, many alternatives, unused
/St1995 20:04, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:46, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Wanderson Ramon Barbosa Andrade (talk · contribs)
[edit]Bad quality, blurred, unreal, many alternatives, unused
/St1995 20:06, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:46, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sofi Medina (talk · contribs)
[edit]Bad quality unreal blurred images with many alternatives, unused. Also images has no EXIF, and maybe copyvios. 3 good images kept.
- File:Sol detrás.jpg
- File:Fusiones de cielo.jpg
- File:Cielo naranja.jpg
- File:Sierras.jpg
- File:Naranja y negro.jpg
- File:Atardecer pampeano.jpg
- File:Sol cayendo.jpg
/St1995 20:13, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:47, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
cover of a copyrighted book, not own work, Triplecaña (talk) 21:07, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Estimado triplecaña, gracias por la atención a la página. Mi criterio se ha basado en que esa cubierta de libro está disponible en libre acceso en la Red. Ahora bien, naturalmente convendría eliminarla si su situación legal fuera restringida. Un cordial saludo.
Deleted: Almost everything on the Web may be freely accessed, but very little is freely licensed. Please read COM:L to learn the difference. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:48, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Le Kiosque des noctambules
[edit]no FoP in France, artwork from 2000 // pas de liberté de panorama en France, œuvre récente
- File:2009 newsstand Paris 3332712115.jpg
- File:Comédie-Française.jpg
- File:Le kiosque des Noctambules (8742186372).jpg
- File:Métro comédie française.jpg
- File:Nice Parisian metro station, 2012.jpg
- File:Noctambules-1.jpg
- File:Noctambules-2.jpg
- File:Palais Royal - Musée du Louvre (Paris Metro) 2010.jpg
- File:Palais Royal - Musée du Louvre Metro, Paris 2010.jpg
- File:Palais Royal - Musée du Louvre, Paris Metro 2010.jpg
- File:Paris Place Colette 036.JPG
- File:Station de Métro Mandelbrot 1, 4 June 2013.jpg
- File:Station de Métro Mandelbrot 2, 4 June 2013.jpg
- File:The Louvre Metro stop (8424527930).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2010.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 15:49, 11 October 2015 (UTC)
- Opposed – Re: File:Comédie-Française.jpg. This is a picture of the Comédie-Française, not the work of art. The work of art just happens to interpose itself in the photo, which is not sufficient reason to require the deletion of the file. In addition, this is an indiscriminate nomination. Each file should be nominated and discussed separately. The nomination should be withdrawn. --Robert.Allen (talk) 16:47, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
- Hello, there are 3 files for which 'de minimis' could be used : File:Comédie-Française.jpg, File:2009 newsstand Paris 3332712115.jpg, and File:Paris Place Colette 036.JPG ; but we can discuss these cases on the current talk page. kvardek du (la plej bela nombro) 20:40, 13 October 2015 (UTC)
- Opposed – Re: File:Paris Place Colette 036.JPG. This is a picture of street musicians. The work of art just happens to be in the background. --Robert.Allen (talk) 20:38, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
- Comment – I reviewed the other pictures listed here and have no objections to deleting them. --Robert.Allen (talk) 20:38, 14 October 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Delete except File:Comédie-Française.jpg, File:2009 newsstand Paris 3332712115.jpg, and File:Paris Place Colette 036.JPG that are De minimis PierreSelim (talk) 05:25, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Files in Category:Le Kiosque des noctambules
[edit]There is an original sculpture above the metro entrance. This is a recent artwork. And there is no FoP in France. I did not select photos with overview of the artwork which are Commons:De minimis exceptions.
Civa (talk) 21:29, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:48, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Probably not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 21:37, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:49, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
This is an original artwork by Alexandre Joly in 2010. But there is no FoP in France. Civa (talk) 21:41, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:49, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
This is an original artwork by Alexandre Joly in 2010. But there is no FoP in France. Civa (talk) 21:41, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:49, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Modern paintings in Paris. But there is no FoP in France. Civa (talk) 21:44, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
This is a photography from the inside space from "Grande Arche de la Défense" in Paris were occured the most historical exhibition with graffity Art in Paris in december 1991 : Art Co'91.
Deleted: That may be, but it still infringes on the copyrights of the works shown. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Book Cover Jasonanaggie (talk) 22:00, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:59, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Extrait d'une œuvre non libre de 1991 (ou 1995 ?) voir ici. En tout cas, c'est ce qu'affirme le contributeur qui a chargé l'image (et qui a changé de pseudo depuis). Habertix (talk) 22:07, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Recopié depuis la page de discussion Commons_talk:Deletion_requests/File:Coghlan-cesar-medaillon.jpg
Le dessin en question et le texte qui l'accompagne n'ont été donnés que comme citation et preuve de discussion, les sous-lignages ne figurant pas sur l'image originelle. Ceci est conforme à la loi du 11 mars 1957 qui autorise " .. analyses et courtes citations dans un but d'exemple et d'illustration". Cette illustration et le texte qui l'accompagne ne concernent que le quart haut de la page 145, qui en comporte 256. Son importance est qu'elle extrêmement explicite sur l'erreur de ciblage du Jules César de la légende arthurienne.--Jean-Claude EVEN / Marikavel 14:16, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Bonjour
- Le débat porte sur la conformité avec la licence libre de Commons.
- La loi du 11 mars 1957 ne concerne que la France et vous n'avez même pas fait l'effort de la respecter puisqu'à propos des analyses, elle précise "Sous réserve que soient indiqués clairement le nom de l'auteur et la source".
- -- Habertix (talk) 19:07, 25 February 2017 (UTC).
Deleted: The quoted law allows certain uses -- Commons requires that works be free for any use anywhere. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:58, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Italian photos have short copyright, but this is text. It will be copyrighted until 2087 (70+1 years after author's death). Taivo (talk) 22:13, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:50, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Donald Trump attacks Judge (20170204-0512).png Discasto talk 23:05, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: The image has a copyright and, since we know it was in use before the inauguration, even if it is a selfie (unlikely), it is not PD-Gov. The text probably would have a copyright, but coming from the President, it is almost certainly PD-gov. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:55, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan. The statue was erected in 2003. [25] G I Chandor (talk) 23:35, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:55, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan. The statue was erected in 1974. [26] G I Chandor (talk) 23:36, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:55, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
No FOP in Japan. The statue was erected in 1991. [27] G I Chandor (talk) 23:36, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:56, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
COM:TOYS G I Chandor (talk) 23:36, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:56, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Instant ramen
[edit].jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
G I Chandor (talk) 23:38, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:56, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Files in Category:Domo (NHK)
[edit]Copyrighted character. [28]
- File:Domo DVD Box Set (3937387284).jpg
- File:Doumo Kun.JPG
- File:Festival do Japão - 2015 (20254862788).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
G I Chandor (talk) 23:40, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep File:Domo DVD Box Set (3937387284).jpg Eyes and Mouth (Teeth), only consists of simple geometric shapes. --Benzoyl (talk) 10:21, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: Everything in the image has a copyright. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:57, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
COM:COPYVIOs. "Source Arbeiten des Fotografen & Author Reiner Metzger" is not own work, OTRS from Mr. Metzger would be needed to keep these images.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:02, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:24, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 22:06, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 16:21, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
low quality Salicyna (talk) 04:46, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, no alternatives. Original upload was overwritten, so maybe a split is in order. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:23, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Too bad quality /St1995 18:21, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Superseded by numerous better ones in its categories. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:24, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Copyrighted photo, see source // Gikü said done Monday, 20 February 2017 11:10 (UTC) 11:10, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:25, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
poor quality, apparently no educational purpose Derbrauni (talk) 12:36, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, numerous better ones in its category. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:25, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Poor quality, replaced by File:Sodium stearate.png. Leyo 13:57, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:26, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Netflix Copyright. The serie is Narcos. 
Remux - Nunca Olvidaré, que me enamoré de la más hermosa flor. Ĉu mi povas helpi vin iel? 14:49, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:27, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
External source, no permission. Bookcover, most likely to be copyrighted. Druschba 4 (talk) 16:17, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:27, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
rubbish ... 2003:45:5C3B:BC01:784D:8065:CD86:A8B5 16:31, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination, numerous better ones in its category. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:28, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
وةمنتههنمةمكمكممم 160.157.77.171 16:35, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:30, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Aninhaleitao (talk · contribs)
[edit]Bad quality (all) and dubious copyright status (1,2)
- File:Rio 180 graus.jpg
- File:Ponto de vista para o Corcovado.jpg
- File:Gigante deitado em berço esplendido.jpg
/St1995 19:45, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:32, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
unused JPG structure: out of scope Kopiersperre (talk) 19:56, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
The file is correct and useful. Please respect the rights of the file creation.Claudio Pistilli (talk) 21:53, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- You just copied this {{BadJPEG}} file from Sigma Aldrich. It is now used since you added it to two articles. --Leyo 22:28, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- One article. I removed one as a ridiculous en:WP:POINT! DMacks (talk) 02:27, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- I've have now a deal with Claudio, that I draw the structures for him (according to MoS): File:Terpinyl acetate.svg.--Kopiersperre (talk) 07:35, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- You are very kind, thank you very much and a strong hug. Have a friend in me as I have a friend in you. Our difficulties are many and hands that work together make a better world.Claudio Pistilli (talk) 18:33, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- I've have now a deal with Claudio, that I draw the structures for him (according to MoS): File:Terpinyl acetate.svg.--Kopiersperre (talk) 07:35, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Info The SVG version is not correct. Please compare the positions of the oxygen atoms. --Leyo 22:41, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- What have you smoked? Sigma-Aldrich is as correct as Kopiersperre's version. Be a good boy.Claudio Pistilli (talk) 09:59, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
Please take a look at this file and think better:
File:Kopiersperre.png
You may delete kopiersperre.png later. So the file is correct. Please, don't delete it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Claudio Pistilli (talk • contribs)
- Kopiersperre will surely fix his mistake soon. --Leyo 22:13, 23 February 2017 (UTC)
- @Leyo: Yes, sorry for everyone's inconvenience.--Kopiersperre (talk) 10:08, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete, with thanks to (and no worries or need for appologies from) User:Kopiersperre. DMacks (talk) 03:57, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion, superseded by File:Terpinyl acetate.svg. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:37, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
very low quality structure, also wrong. See File:Reaktion Menthol V2.svg for comparison.--Kopiersperre (talk) 20:11, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
The file is correct and useful. Let's make friends and respect the rights of the author!!!Claudio Pistilli (talk) 21:55, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete. "Wrong" is a pretty damning statement, and I agree that there is at least one actual chemical problem: no stereochemistry on the reactant, so it's not clear even that it is menthol (and the correct one) at all (compare to File:Mentholisomere.svg). Commons is not just a dumping ground for whatever anyone wants, and your rights are limited to using this server in accord with its policies. The proposed alternative is high quality (the manual of standards is good reading...surely you've been pointed to it before!) and also chemically better. The nominated file does have a different (or specific) reagent used, but there are too many other problems, and the nominated file suffices. DMacks (talk) 02:13, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:34, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
proche mais moins intéressante que File:Andelat-Eglise-St-Cirgues-dpt-Cantal-DSC 0729.jpg VKaeru (talk) 21:48, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:39, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
better quality : File:Façade St Ferréol Lorgues3.jpg VKaeru (talk) 21:51, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:38, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
reupload in better quality : File:St Sebastien Bousselargues vierge.jpg VKaeru (talk) 21:54, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:40, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
better quality : File:St Sebastien Bousselargues st roch.jpg VKaeru (talk) 21:55, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:40, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
better quality : File:St Sebastien Bousselargues st seb.jpg VKaeru (talk) 21:56, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:40, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Nobody has reviewed the license for 5 years. Now the source site is dead. Probably we must now delete the logo. Taivo (talk) 21:56, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: unused, spam. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:41, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
better quality : File:Lachenal annecy 2.jpg VKaeru (talk) 22:00, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:42, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Book Cover Art Jasonanaggie (talk) 22:01, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: copyrighted book. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:43, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
same than File:Dolmen de Touls 3.jpg VKaeru (talk) 22:03, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per self-nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:43, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Not correct (fails COM:EDUSE); or only correct for a limited subset of structures (unstated what the scope is, so it's similarly not useful without that detai). Examples: File:Phosphorus-trichloride-difluoride-2D.png is "no/no" but is non-polar; en:Xenon difluoride is "yes" but nonpolar. DMacks (talk) 05:29, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 22:14, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
better quality : File:Eglise de Léotoing dpt Hte Loire DSC 0212.JPG VKaeru (talk) 21:57, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: acceptable quality and quite different. P 1 9 9 ✉ 21:47, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
No evidence of being released under a free license. I am concerned this is a case of Commons:License laundering Mifter Public (talk) 19:52, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Someone screwed with the sourcing of the image. This has been fixed. ENEAS DE TROYA is a legit source. Mungoola (talk) 01:59, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept, fixed. Thank you, Mungoola! Taivo (talk) 09:08, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
no educational purpose due to poor quality Joschi71 (talk) 18:48, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 13:16, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
Unclear that this logo actually fails to pass the threshold of originality. Pitpisit (talk) 21:51, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. (t) Josve05a (c) 22:30, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 22:03, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. (t) Josve05a (c) 22:30, 4 March 2017 (UTC)
Unused bad nonphotographic JPEG superseded by PNG. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 09:57, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:49, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Unused bad nonphotographic JPEG superseded by PNG. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 09:58, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:50, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
It seems to me, that some logos, for example Shell, surpass threshold of originality and need OTRS-permission from company representative. Taivo (talk) 10:25, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:51, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Bad unused nonphotographic JPEG superseded by an SVG. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 10:36, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:51, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Unused bad nonphotographic JPEG, superseded by SVG. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 10:44, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:52, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Bad unused nonphotographic JPEG, superseded by an SVG. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 10:47, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:53, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Bad nonphotographic JPEG, unused, superseded by PNG and SVG. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 11:04, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:53, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Logo not free / Logo non libre Supertoff (talk) 11:20, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment As a courtesy I have notified the enwp user, too. --grin ✎ 12:01, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:54, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
Question of correct licensing, NO OTRS TICKET, photographer, sender, model, and uploader are all three different persons. This leads to a formal copyright infringement issue and can be healed either with an OTRS ticket or the deletion of this picture. Zeitungsente0815 (talk) 14:47, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Permission given in ticket:2005091610003236.--DCB (talk) 15:04, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per DCB. Ruthven (msg) 23:19, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:51, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Talk page correspondence received appears to confirm 'not own work'. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:27, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 23:15, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:51, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Talk page correspondence received appears to confirm 'not own work'. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:27, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 23:14, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
No indication of user's own work on this closeup image of a sports figure. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:06, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 23:15, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
peu de différences avec Hashima 2.jpg VKaeru (talk) 21:44, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 23:17, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
Image showing painting with untrue colours, better quality image is available on commons. Tremendo (talk) 22:07, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep. Are you sure are untrue colors? Last but not least it is in use. Since the picture does not represent any violation if you want to delete it first change it with another image in the wikis where is used--Pierpao.lo (listening) 06:43, 1 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Pierpao. Ruthven (msg) 23:17, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
Photo from a e-shop, with no proof of authorization. Trizek from FR 18:05, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Indeed, photo from an e-shop. I am authorized to use and publish this photo under CC BY 4.0 licence, but have no idea of how to prove it. Could you give me any way to prove this permission? For example: should I fill the "|permission=" field with an extract of email by the owner of the e-shop? --Olivier Martinet (talk) 21:26, 6 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Olivier Martinet: There is no proof of that authorization unless if you complete this process. Trizek from FR 18:48, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Ticket OK now. --Yann (talk) 15:01, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
- Sorry for editing one more time: Just would like to thank Trizek for helping to resolve the situation. The owner sent an email to OTRS team before I notify in this discussion page that the process was under way, I didn't think it would be so fast. Thank you all, I've learned something more for the next contributions, I'll follow the correct process in the future BEFORE uploading new medias--Olivier Martinet (talk) 19:29, 10 March 2017 (UTC).
Files uploaded by Jose Miguel Rodriguez de Carvalho (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical paintings. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:María Reparadora.jpg
- File:María Madre de Misericordia y Paz Estampa Mexicana.jpg
- File:Apoteosis de San Pablo de la Cruz.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:26, 23 October 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jose Miguel Rodriguez de Carvalho (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical paintings. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:Nuestra Señora de la Santa Esperanza.jpg
- File:Nuestra Señora del Consuelo.jpg
- File:Virgen del Buen Camino S.J.jpg
- File:Nuestra Señora de la Altagracia.jpg
- File:María Auxiliadora Entera.jpg
- File:Nuestra Señora del Perpetuo Socorro.jpg
- File:Beato Vicente Eugenio Bossilkov.jpg
- File:Nuestra Señora de Kazan.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- File:María Auxiliadora Entera.jpg. This is a painting of Mary Help of Christians (ca. 1867) by Tomas Andres Lorenzone (1824-1902), at the request of Don Bosco [29]. It is located in the Basilica of Our Lady Help of Christians, Turin, Italy. --Gabriel Sozzi (talk) 02:40, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- @Gabriel Sozzi: Can you add the correct author (with dates) in the relative pages? Thanks --Ruthven (msg) 23:14, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Ruthven: Thank you for your attention. Here it is. There are at least two more files on this matter: 1 and 2. Regards. --Gabriel Sozzi (talk) 22:15, 10 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Gabriel Sozzi: Can you add the correct author (with dates) in the relative pages? Thanks --Ruthven (msg) 23:14, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: all but one are PD old. Template:Eugene Zelenko can you please refrain nominating file that are PD for more than 10 centuries please :). Ruthven (msg) 07:22, 11 March 2017 (UTC)
Suspicious copyvio. Original uploader in cinematreasures.org, Ken Roe, mentioned that it was from postcard view from the early 1950’s. This building is located in Morocco, so this work may be applied Moroccan Copyright Act. (as photographic work) According to this copyright act, Moroccan works is copyrighted for 70 years from publication (if it is anonymous work, see {{PD-Morocco}}). This photo was taken in later than 1950, so 7570 years has not passed yet. Kkairri (talk) 11:45, 20 February 2017 (UTC)correct typo.--Kkairri (talk) 14:58, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Marked to be undeleted in 2021. Ruthven (msg) 08:08, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
False claim of identity, Identity claimed has been editing Wikipedea for over 10 years as Xyxyboy as has self identified as Tres Watson. Xyxyboy claims no connection with this account. Images were copied from Watsons website to support a paid sockfarms article. Article was not created by Watson. Duffbeerforme (talk) 12:23, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion if it comes from Tres Watson's website: public domain image, as per www.treswatson.com: ©2016 Any information contained herein is hereby released to the public, and any images or graphics that appear on this page are owned by Tres Watson, who releases them to the public domain and forfeits any claim to copyright.. Ruthven (msg) 08:12, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
False claim of identity, Identity claimed has been editing Wikipedea for over 10 years as Xyxyboy as has self identified as Tres Watson. Xyxyboy claims no connection with this account. Images were copied from Watsons website to support a paid sockfarms article. Article was not created by Watson. Duffbeerforme (talk) 12:23, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 08:14, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
False claim of identity, Identity claimed has been editing Wikipedea for over 10 years as Xyxyboy as has self identified as Tres Watson. Xyxyboy claims no connection with this account. Images were copied from Watsons website to support a paid sockfarms article. Article was not created by Watson. Duffbeerforme (talk) 12:24, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: public domain photo. Re-licensing. Ruthven (msg) 08:17, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Doppelt vorhanden: identisch mit "001 1997 10 18 Barns.jpg" F. Riedelio (talk) 13:11, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Delete converted to {{Duplicate}} --Herzi Pinki (talk) 07:33, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: done by JarrahTree. Ruthven (msg) 08:21, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
its copy righted and i don't want to make it free for use to everybody. Arnill Ashraf (talk) 14:47, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- It seems to be below Commons:TOO. --Der Buckesfelder Talk Evaluation E-Mail commons 12:10, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- In fact it's below COM:TOO, but this logo can be deleted probably due to the lack of notability, the fact that it's not in use, and it's in .jpg format. --XXN, 14:45, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: deleted because OOS, per XXN. Ruthven (msg) 08:22, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Previously published photo available elsewhere: https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CQ_cxodUsAAgn2Y.jpg Ytoyoda (talk) 16:22, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: copyvio. Ruthven (msg) 08:23, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata. Probably not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 21:27, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- User replied on 2017022110014508 justifying it. Platonides (talk) 00:21, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: per Platonides (and OTRS ticket). Ruthven (msg) 08:24, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 22:05, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 02:06, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Files of User:Eduandrerojherrer
[edit]
Eduandrerojherrer (talk · contributions · Statistics) is uploading files of Manuel Suárez in the Chilean soccer team (File:Manuel Suárez cantando el himno nacional de Chile.jpg and File:Manuel Suárez junto a Pizzi en Colombia.jpg) copyrighted by Carlos Parra and ANFP (Chilean Soccer Association) as "own work". --Warko (talk) 03:30, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment I wasn't able to find these photos on http://www.anfp.cl. Maybe Warko you can help providing a source. --Ruthven (msg) 08:07, 14 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:56, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
This is not a simple logo. OTRS-permission from company representative is needed. Taivo (talk) 09:08, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:56, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
copyvio of [30] Bzh-99 (talk) 12:37, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:57, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Also:
- File:Rådhuspladsen - fundamentalism.jpg
- File:Unbearable - Christiansborg - opening.jpg
- File:Unbearable - Christiansborg.jpg
Picture of copyrighted work. No freedom of panorama in Denmark. Uploader has uploaded this picture previously (I assume it is File:The sculpture "Fundamentalism" - Copenhagen.jpg or maybe File:The sculpture "Fundamentalism".jpg). Pugilist (talk) 13:36, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
The owner of the sculpture and the picture has uploaded a declaration stating, that he has giving a Creative Commons Attribution-share Alike 4.0 International license to the picture. See it here: http://www.galschiot.com/pictures-copyright/ The picture should therefore not be deleted. Henry2430 14:48, 20 February 2017.
- Thanks for clarifying. I see that the copyright notice/CC licence was added just after last deletion. With the CC licence it should be sufficient. --Pugilist (talk) 16:45, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Delete There are two copyrights which must be licensed here, the one for the photographs and the other for the sculptures. I don't know if it is inadvertent, or if the sculptor is being too careful, but the cited release is only for the photographs and does not release the copyright in the sculptures:
- "PICTURES - COPYRIGHT
- I hereby affirm that I Jens Galschiot, the creator and sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the following pictures...."
- "PICTURES - COPYRIGHT
Without his giving a clear release for the copyright for the sculptures, we cannot keep the images of them on Commons. I can understand why he might not want to give such a release using our standard form, since it would allow people to make and sell 3D copies of his sculptures.
Let's keep this on hold for a few days to see if Henry2430 can get Jens Galschiot to give us a complete release. He might want to consult counsel, but something along these lines would do it, I think:
- "I hereby affirm that I, Jens Galschiot, am the creator and sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the following photographs and of the sculptural works shown in them. With respect to the sculptural works, this license covers only their appearance in the photographs licensed hereby and does not permit any other use.
- I agree to publish the above-mentioned content under the free license:
- Creative Commons Attribution-share Alike 4.0 International.
- I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.
- I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites.
- I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by me.
- I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project."
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:34, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, it's now 23 March and no additional on this case. Images can be restored if OTRS is accepted. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:58, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rådhuspladsen - fundamentalism 2.jpg . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:35, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:58, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rådhuspladsen - fundamentalism 2.jpg . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:35, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:58, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Rådhuspladsen - fundamentalism 2.jpg . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:36, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:58, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.cesel.com.pe/webin/images/137100_nueva_sede_banco_de_la_nacion.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:24, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:58, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
OTRS permission is preferable. 178.45.211.134 17:00, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:59, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Vector file available, File:National Seal of Brazil.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:22, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:59, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Copyright violation; the media in question is logo of a football club whho holds the copyright on the media and this image is not just a text logo, but contains geometric shapes which can't be classified as simple geometric shape. Canopus Grandiflora 19:34, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:00, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
Dubious own work /St1995 20:31, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:00, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
A recent contributor to the file description claims that this 1923 British photo is in the public domain because the photo's author is dead for at least 70 years. But he also says that the author is unknown! If the author is indeed unknown, he could well have lived beyound 1946, which would mean the photo is still protected by copyright. So the file should be deleted per the precautionary principle.
And yes, I know that pre-1957-06-30 anonymous British photos are protected for 70 years after creation if unpublished or 70 years after publication if published within 70 years. But we'd need way more information about source, publication status etc. to determine if this actually is an anonymous photo and if one of those terms applies. Rosenzweig τ 18:36, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. No response over month. Taivo (talk) 17:31, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Incompatible license; the official website of this football club <inter.it>'s Terms and Conditions are governed by (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 IT) and thus, the content of the website, this logo can't be used for commercial purpose and the content can not be edited. Also to add, this logo is not made using only simple geometric shapes. Canopus Grandiflora 18:50, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Organisations like sports clubs almost never states that their logo is too simple to meet the threshold of originality. Therefore the eligibility of a media file for {{Pd-textlogo}} is established by consensus between editors. --XXN, 00:00, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- But the content is governed by CC BY NC-ND 3.0, and thus the media can not be used commercially or even modified.--acagastya 📷 00:04, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Someone can not grant a license on something that is not protected. Therefore, if this logo indeed falls below the threshold of originality (personally, I do not like to judge TOO cases), that license would be invalid. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:03, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep We don't have any general information about the threshold of originality in Italy, but this article suggests that "the threshold for an industrial design product to enjoy copyright protection is still quite high and even famous industrial design products have been denied such protection by Italian Courts." While a logo is probably not an industrial design, it is still a work of applied art and the same principles should apply. De728631 (talk) 19:36, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment I do not understand how can we just "assume" in this case if things are not clear. Club would consider knowing the copyright laws of their country before licensing anything in under CC BY NC-ND license.--Canopus Grandiflora 13:23, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
- You'd be surprised to learn what types of works companies like to claim as copyrighted even if there is clear evidence that it is too trivial for copyright. So if the Cc by ND licence means anything it is just that Inter doesn't want others to change or distort their logo. Likewise there are many user, even professional companies, that do not associate CC with copyright – but to grant a CC licence you need to hold the copyright of the work in the first place. If there is no copyright to be had, you cannot grant a CC licence either. De728631 (talk) 14:17, 2 March 2017 (UTC)
- Someone can not grant a license on something that is not protected. Therefore, if this logo indeed falls below the threshold of originality (personally, I do not like to judge TOO cases), that license would be invalid. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:03, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- But the content is governed by CC BY NC-ND 3.0, and thus the media can not be used commercially or even modified.--acagastya 📷 00:04, 25 February 2017 (UTC)
- Seems simple for Me, and I would vote Keep if I know the TOO in Italy. Also, the SVG itself can be perfectly licensed under a CC license (and if it is actually own work by th original author of this SVG, the license is perfectly valid), but it does not remove the copyright for the logo. --Amitie 10g (talk) 06:21, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
- This file has non derivative license, and none of the participants in this discussion know about the threshold of originality in Italy. So, we should not place our opinions as we don't know the rules. Besides, Inter os a famous and successful club who would have thought about copyrights, and TOO before choosing a bin derivative creative commons license. Distribution of the modified versions of this file is not permitted, si if any Wikimedia project(s) wants to use it, they can it do a fair use with a rationale. But in the project, skid we keep a file with a controversial TOO and ND license?--Canopus Grandiflora 07:03, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Kept, nobody wants to close this request. OK, I am today bold and do it. Per http://limegreenip.hoganlovells.com/article/46/copyrights-copyright-protection-italy I decide, that threshold of originality is high in Italy and this logo qualifies for simple one. Taivo (talk) 18:08, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Too complex for PD-Text Logo. Cosidering the discussion for another Italian football club's logo, Commons:Deletion requests/File:AC Milan.svg and Commons:Deletion requests/File:Acm.png, I think the logo is above ToO in Italy and thus it is copyrighted. And since it is not in Public Domain, it can be copyrighted and the club uses CC BY-NC-ND 3.0 IT. Quoting "copyright protection is still quite high and even famous industrial design products have been denied such protection by Italian Courts." is not justified if logos in question were not provided for example. In Italy, it depends on creative character and artistic value and this file contains both. Canopus Grandiflora 16:53, 27 April 2017 (UTC)
Kept: Do not reopen DRs without new arguments. The TOO arguments have been discussed before. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:45, 4 May 2017 (UTC)
es existiert eine neue, bessere Version dieser Karte. Diese Karte ist überflüssig geworden sidonius (talk) 20:28, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Hast du einen Link zur neueren besseren Karte? --Quedel (talk) 16:04, 18 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, superseded by file:Mehrheitssprachen GR 2000.png. Taivo (talk) 17:46, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Es existiert eine bessere, neuere Version dieser Karte. Diese ist damit überflüssig geworden sidonius (talk) 20:29, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted, superseded by file:Mehrheitssprachen GR 1860.png. Taivo (talk) 17:49, 24 March 2017 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. I declined request for speedy deletion and created regular request, because maybe the logo is considered simple. Taivo (talk) 21:54, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as per COM:PCP. --Daphne Lantier 18:33, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
Mifter Public (talk · contribs) nominated the file for speedy deletion, saying: "No evidence of permission, as it is a logo the image is likely copyrighted.". I declined speedy deletion request, because maybe the logo is considered simple. Taivo (talk) 22:17, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
- Please consider it as the official logo of oms group s.p.a, an italian society. And, anyway: do you have any proof that Ismael72 (the uploader) is the owner of the logo, as stated by him in the file's page? Do you have any proof that this logo is licensed under CC-BY-SA? --Roberto Segnali all'Indiano 12:01, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Actually this does not matter. Only threshold of originality matters. Of course, Ismael is not copyright holder of the logo, but if the logo is simple, then the license can be changed into {{PD-simple}}. Taivo (talk) 13:20, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: as per {{PD-Textlogo}}. --Daphne Lantier 18:38, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
no indication of own work on this which apparently was copied from a publication (see caption). Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:50, 20 February 2017 (UTC)
Hi, the copyright of this document belongs to the daughter of its author, who agreed to its publication under the Wikimedia PermissionOTRS| Ticket:2011111510033305 — Preceding unsigned comment added by YA1901 (talk • contribs) 11:54, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Signing your posts is required on talk pages and it is a Commons policy to sign your posts on deletion requests, undeletion requests, and noticeboards. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and a timestamp will then automatically be added when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). Thank you.
- @Jameslwoodward: Hi Jim. Can you take a look at the mentioned OTRS? Daphne Lantier 18:40, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
- It's from a gmail address, so the OTRS volunteer who looked at it in 2011 asked for more information, which was not supplied and therefore it was not accepted.
- Although I insist that people who have their own web sites must use an identifiable address, and not gmail, I tend to be a little easier on this kind of thing, where they may be no practical way for the daughter to prove that she is who she says she is. However, since I don't read Russian, I'm reluctant to overrule Rubin16, who dealt with it in 2011. Perhaps one of our OTRS colleagues who reads Russian can get more out of it. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:50, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
- @Krassotkin: Can you take a look at this? Daphne Lantier 20:54, 26 March 2017 (UTC)
- We have the confirmed permission (ticket:2011111510033305) from daughter of Yusup Abdrakhmanov for his diaries ("произведение [Юсуп Абдрахманов. Дневники.]" -> s:ru:Дневники (Абдрахманов)) but not letters. We need additional permission for this file. --sasha (krassotkin) 07:23, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: as per Krassotkin -- additional permission is needed. --Daphne Lantier 18:21, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
