Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2017/02/07

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive February 7th, 2017
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I have uploaded the file but I think it's fake and irreverent to the topic so I contest it for deleting Tiven2240 (talk) 08:44, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

سنڌي: 8. Page dependent on deleted or non-existent content

 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 09:19, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Edgar183 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

vandalism mixed with copyvios

Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:11, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by Srittau. Derivative work of copyrighted cartoon characters. Taivo (talk) 20:51, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is believed to be copyrighted by the original photographer, Tibrina Hobson, and has a Getty Images watermark that shows that this comes from the stock image's website. Misterpither (talk) 00:27, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Natuur12: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph of a TV screen Ytoyoda (talk) 18:06, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 20:32, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality personal photo. Likely out of scope. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 20:44, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image used only in hoax article deleted off enwiki. DS (talk) 22:05, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Courcelles 22:09, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non free cover Bulgu (talk) 19:13, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: obvious copyvio. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:47, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality. Not useful for an educational purpose. Kkairri (talk) 23:28, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Magog the Ogre: Out of project scope

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This category is located at Category:Gauernitzer Gründe Frze > talk 07:51, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Empty remains of a move, author's request. --Achim (talk) 18:19, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's the official logo of a South African School, thus it cannot be used under Creative Commons Dodger67 (talk) 16:50, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Yann: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

How does PD-art-default/70 apply? (tJosve05a (c) 00:59, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, source site has message "All content © UnofficialRoyalty.com 2017 All rights reserved". Taivo (talk) 16:54, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an unused modification of File:Lincliff gates.jpg with a crop to make it closer to square, and a massive reduction in size — this has fewer than 15% of the pixels of the original image. Why would you use this one when the other's available at far higher resolution? The only reason I can imagine is the proportions, and simply trimming the sides to get the same proportion is triflingly easy. Nyttend (talk) 02:02, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I agree with your analysis. Please delete.Mitzi.humphrey (talk) 03:24, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader also agrees to delete. Taivo (talk) 17:14, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Badr.chraibi2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal content, out of scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:06, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Magog the Ogre blocked Badr Chraibi indefinitely for uploading out of scope content after warnings. Taivo (talk) 17:31, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no context given ASchedulingError (talk) 06:49, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 18:46, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Reuters photo, see e.g. http://www.mirror.co.uk/sport/football/match-reports/hungary-3-3-portugal-cristiano-8044855 Headlocker (talk) 07:05, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:26, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Crop of copyrighted photo, see e.g. http://index.hu/sport/futball/2015/07/20/bernd_storck_mlsz/ Headlocker (talk) 07:03, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:27, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is my old image Hemant banswal (talk) 07:57, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader requested deletion of unused personal photo. Taivo (talk) 19:29, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior to File:Insignia_of_the_Lithuanian_Land_Forces_Juozas_Lukša_Training_Center.png AND has a vector version VileGecko (talk) 10:14, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 19:53, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused duplicate of File:1919-Trotsky Lenin Kamenev-Party-Congress.gif Lacrymocéphale (talk) 11:29, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, scaled-down duplicate. Taivo (talk) 19:55, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio, non-free content. Felipebini (talk) 13:00, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, license review failed. Taivo (talk) 11:06, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bjfoth (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

Castillo blanco (talk) 13:10, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, unused and only 12×4 pixels. Taivo (talk) 11:23, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 13:31, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:33, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shoaib5in (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos. Out of scope. User has done nothing for Wikipedia apart from creating a user page in 2014.

Castillo blanco (talk) 13:41, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:41, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

falsches Lemma und bessere Bilder verfügbar file:Karbow Kirche 2008-04-24 067.jpg Mehlauge (talk) 13:44, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the file could be useful for showing, how the building looked like more than century ago, but ... uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 11:50, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 14:20, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]



 Kept, I took liberty to close the request speedily as kept. Depicted object is notable. I categorized the image. Taivo (talk) 12:14, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Castillo blanco (talk) 14:25, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, unused .pdf, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:27, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused promotional logo, out of scope and likely copyvio as well. P 1 9 9   15:08, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, as copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 12:44, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-published content. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:56, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedy, Bangladesh Facebook case. They started again. -- ~ Nahid Talk 21:00, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cátthy bohorquez caro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope/spam/likely copyvios

/St1995 00:03, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:45, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sandgland12 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Files with doubtful copyright status and unused personal files.

/St1995 02:49, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, they all are either copyright violations or out of scope. Taivo (talk) 17:21, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:46, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence this has been released under a free license. Fourfourtwo.com shows a copyright notice and based on the image url, I assume this is the owing site. Whpq (talk) 02:52, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:46, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of FG Producciones

[edit]

Here are both contributions of FG Producciones (talk · contribs):

Small photos without camera data. Probably not own works, but copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 11:10, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:47, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Picaporta

[edit]

Here are last remaining uploads of Picaporta (talk · contribs):

Propaganda materials of candidate in political elections, out of project scope. In addition, uploader is usually himself depicted and they are not selfies, but real photographers' copyright violation. Small photos without metadata. Taivo (talk) 11:15, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:47, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Are we sure that this logo is beneath the treshold of originality of Sweden? There is not much on COM:TOO#Sweden about logos. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:00, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete, not a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 11:18, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:49, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Daniel2591

[edit]

Daniel2591 (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Different resolutions, different cameras. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 12:56, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:49, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sherryphotography

[edit]

Sherryphotography (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

Small unused photos without metadata. Depicted persons are non-notable. I consider them out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 13:07, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:50, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alexander shaplov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Files uploaded in december 2014 marked as own work that look way older than de dates given and look like scans.

Vera (talk) 13:45, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:48, 13 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not simple enough, IMHO Discasto talk 19:31, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by EugeneZelenko: Commons:Licensing: non-trivial logo - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 21:29, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:31, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LayOutSounds (talk · contribs)

[edit]

personal pics not in use

Daphne Lantier 21:32, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:31, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal/vacation pic not in use Daphne Lantier 21:55, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:30, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 22:11, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:30, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal pic not in use Daphne Lantier 22:16, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:29, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Angelica Nava (talk · contribs)

[edit]

personal pics not in use

Daphne Lantier 22:21, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:30, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal pic not in use Daphne Lantier 22:30, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:29, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized personal image, out of scope. Gauss (talk) 22:41, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:29, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized personal image, out of scope. Gauss (talk) 22:52, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:28, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal pic not in use Daphne Lantier 23:41, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:28, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational value Daphne Lantier 23:42, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:26, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational value Daphne Lantier 23:43, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:27, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no educational value Daphne Lantier 23:43, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:27, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal pic not in use Daphne Lantier 23:47, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:27, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Vanity. Self promotion Fixertool (talk) 01:03, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:38, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Brahim saqat (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal content, out of scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:57, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Magog the Ogre blocked Brahim Saqat indefinitely for using Commons as file sharing site. Taivo (talk) 17:28, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:39, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Never used Der Buckesfelder  Talk  Evaluation  E-Mail  commons 06:31, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I add 4 unused personal photos for deletion due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 18:26, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:40, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some unknown guy – out of scope. jdx Re: 06:40, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:41, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 07:02, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:41, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal pics not in use

Daphne Lantier 20:06, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope and probably copyvio. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:37, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal pic not in use Daphne Lantier 20:11, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:36, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:25, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:35, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 20:34, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:35, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal pic not in use Daphne Lantier 20:50, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:33, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal pic not in use Daphne Lantier 20:51, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:32, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bot-uploaded unused image that is too blurry to be of use. Out of project scope. De728631 (talk) 21:15, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 06:32, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of stated permission; no open-lience release Andy Mabbett (talk) 00:11, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No permission -- siad to be with the permission of one of the subjects which is not enough and not proven. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:27, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stated as "© Dr. Klaus Adelsberger". No evidence of permission. Andy Mabbett (talk) 00:13, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. I added for deletion three files, which are also "© Dr. Klaus Adelsberger". Taivo (talk) 18:44, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:27, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Even if Jimmy Wales releases the content of his tweets under a free license (which I don't know that he does), the Twitter UI isn't freely licensed, so this is a copyright violation. (The source is also clearly not the work of the uploader, for that matter.) TheCatalyst31 (talk) 00:50, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ooops. I had no idea that screen captures of Tweets were not allowed in the commons. JFTR it was only, "my work" as the uploader in that I screen capped it and transformed it by size a little.TeeVeeed (talk) 01:32, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The Twitter UI may be under the ToO, but the Wales text is not. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:33, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF states © 2008 AAMIR QURESHI/AFP/Getty Images. (tJosve05a (c) 01:11, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image is taken from a forum post, no evidence of being public domain. (tJosve05a (c) 01:11, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:33, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader has been warned by Admin Yann to stop uploading copyright violations but he/she still apparently does so. This image has no metadata and the source account has few images. Should the uploader be blocked? Leoboudv (talk) 01:58, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Doesn't appear to be a professional model, so privacy issues. --Yann (talk) 09:12, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader has been warned to stop uploading copyright violations. This image has no metadata and the source account has few images. Leoboudv (talk) 02:03, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: PDM is not acceptable. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:34, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Imagen personal no usada; fuera del alcance del proyecto. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:25, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:40, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no indication that this image is released under the claimed free license. The credit is given to goal.com and that site is copyrighted. Whpq (talk) 02:56, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:40, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. The sculpture was erected in 2004. G I Chandor (talk) 03:22, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:40, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. The statue was erected in 2007. [1]

G I Chandor (talk) 03:24, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Widely used but delete per nom. Projects may use these under their EDPs if they have one. Three of the files (low-res versions) are now hosted locally in ja.wp under FoP EDP: ja:File:Maeda Toshiie Statue 01-0.jpg, ja:File:Maeda Toshiie Statue 03-0.jpg, ja:File:Maeda Toshiie Statue 03-3.jpg. --朝彦 | asahiko (talk) 09:15, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:41, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. G I Chandor (talk) 03:26, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:42, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. The statue was erected in 1972. [2] G I Chandor (talk) 03:27, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Now hosted in jawiki local as ja:File:Fukuyama Tsuioku.jpg under Japan FoP EDP. --朝彦 | asahiko (talk) 09:11, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:42, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. The statue was erected in 1994. G I Chandor (talk) 03:27, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Now hosted locally under FoP EDP at ja.wp as ja::File:Hiroshima Asia Games Monument.jpg. --朝彦 | asahiko (talk) 09:24, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:42, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The guide map is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 03:28, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:42, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The text on the description plate may have copyright.

G I Chandor (talk) 03:30, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:43, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The statue is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 03:31, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:43, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The text on the description plate may have copyright. G I Chandor (talk) 03:31, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Just simple text, not copyrightable. See COM:TOO. -- Poké95 02:29, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: This is four paragraphs of text and clearly has a US copyright and probably one in Japan as well. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:46, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The text on the description plate may have copyright. G I Chandor (talk) 03:33, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:46, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The text on the description plate may have copyright. G I Chandor (talk) 03:34, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:46, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The guide board is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 03:35, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:46, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The map is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 03:35, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:46, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The text on the description plate is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 03:37, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:46, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The map is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 03:38, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:47, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The text on the description plate is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 03:38, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:47, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Japan. The statue is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 03:39, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:47, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The guide board is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 03:40, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:47, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The description plate is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 03:41, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:47, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The description plate is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 03:50, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:47, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The description plate is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 03:52, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:47, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The description plate is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 03:52, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:48, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The description plate is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 03:53, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:48, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The text on the description plate is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 03:54, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:48, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. The description plate is a copyrighted work. G I Chandor (talk) 03:55, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:48, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing legal info Fixertool (talk) 04:01, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no free license at the sourcer. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:49, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF credits Walt Beazley, a professional photographer Ytoyoda (talk) 04:46, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:49, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation - Freedom of panorama does not cover signage like this. (However this qualifies for fair use where it is allowed) SYSS Mouse (talk) 04:51, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:49, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Autopublicación. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:57, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:49, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Autopublicación. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:57, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:49, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Autopublicación. Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:58, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:50, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-publication. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:59, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:50, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-publication. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:59, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:50, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-publication. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:00, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:50, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-publication. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:01, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:50, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-publication. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:01, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:50, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted character held by Fuji television in Japan Darklanlan (talk) 06:38, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Please see License Agreement Information : Character : Fuji TV KIDS Darklanlan (talk) 07:56, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: There is no "source of "copyrighted"." -- all created works are copyrighted from the moment of creation. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:51, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While this picture was uploaded to Flickr by the account "ENERGY.GOV", it's not clear to me that they actually own the copyright of it. This picture along with all the pictures of cars in this series have ownership information in their descriptions. For this car, the copyright seems to be owned by Porsche (" The Spyder is a plug-in hybrid that goes 0-60 mph in 2.8 seconds according to the automaker. Photo | Porsche"). Badzil (talk) 06:42, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't remove your delete request because I didn't think it was a fair question, but I thought there was enough ambiguity to stop it from being deleted without any discussion. It's a fair question, I am not sure what they meant by the caption though. These captions are quite strange and often seem to lack thought when done by the government. But because they were somewhat vague in whether the attributes were being cited by Porsche or if both the photo and specs were. I would think a web search for the image should find it on Porsche's web site if it is their work. I would agree for a deletion in that case, even with how gorgeous the car does look in the photo. Thanks for understanding where I was coming from by nixing the speedy deletion notice. It's late where I am, so I will do the google search tomorrow to see what I can find out. Sayonara! Jasonanaggie (talk) 07:55, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
No worries about removing the first delete request. I do believe that there is enough ambiguity to warrant a discussion. I searched on Porsche's website ([3]) but was unable to locate this image. Google Images shows this picture being used in lots of places, also in higher resolution than the one here. Most articles don't mention a source or copyright for the picture. Fortune mentions "Photo: Courtesy of Porsche".
My feeling here is that Porsche owns the copyright to this picture, and while it allows any site to use it, it's probably not in the public domain. Badzil (talk) 09:00, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Strange; I am curious if everyone is just grabbing it from the energy department with the description that comes from the energy department as well (as we all know government images are a nice cheap way to get a free image of a vehicle safely). The pictures are not really that remarkable so it seems somewhat circumspect that these would be the kind of images that the manufacturers would be providing to the government, as they look worse than I would likely take at a car or tech show with my non-professional photography skills. But I understand if you want to err on the side of caution. If the images are being used on a wikipedia site for that vehicle I would perhaps leave it if there is nothing else available to use. As I highly doubt that any harm would come from a vehicle manufacturer if they did provide these type of photos. Either way, I understand and won't protest whoever makes the final decision on these as they could go either way. Jasonanaggie (talk) 07:26, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Most US Gov web sites host some images that are under copyright. Since this one is ambiguous, we must delete it. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:54, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It contains a comic work. It's small part of the image but very high resolution. Is this a de minimis? We need discussion... Darklanlan (talk) 06:44, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Same above. Darklanlan (talk) 07:08, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Derivative work of copyrighted character. Darklanlan (talk) 07:08, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Derivative work of copyrighted character. Darklanlan (talk) 07:08, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all. In my opinion none of them is de minimis. Taivo (talk) 18:37, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: It is clear from both the file name and the categories that this image is focussed on the copyrighted works. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:55, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no context ASchedulingError (talk) 06:46, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:56, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:TOYS lNeverCry 08:14, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@INeverCry: Is there any information about these dolls particulary?There are many dolls in Common.Is this a different case? --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 08:17, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. Probably a lot of dolls should be deleted from Commons. Taivo (talk) 19:32, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2: Other cases are mostly just images that haven't been deleted yet. There are hundreds of thousands of images on Commons right now that should be deleted. It's just a matter of time until someone tags other dolls and toys for deletion. But it takes time. I spend hours doing deletion requests and speed taggings, but with 36 million files and growing, cleaning up Commons is a never-ending process. lNeverCry 03:38, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:59, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a public domain (© 2011–2017 Stadtverwaltung Omsk), no indication that is delivered under PD license, no indication of the date of first publication. 93.180.54.66 08:43, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Source site says: "Foto aus dem Archiv des Museums für Geschichte der städtischen Selbstverwaltung". This does not give us copyright status and 1919 is too recent for PD-RusEmpire. Taivo (talk) 19:43, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:00, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jnorville01 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope. May contain copyrighted elements.

Lacrymocéphale (talk) 09:06, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:00, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Curax

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Curax (talk · contribs):

Unused logos of non-notable things (no mention in es.wiki), out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:16, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:00, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I found no copyright message on source site. Maybe this is copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:26, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:00, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collages need source and author for every used image. Taivo (talk) 09:32, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:00, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:01, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Depicted persons are not mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in tr.wiki. They are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:43, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:01, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Gerardo Islas Maldonado isn't mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in es.wiki. Small unused personal photo without metadata, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:48, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:01, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Madcenvil (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyright violations

Mungoola (talk) 09:48, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:01, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The statue was created in 1983. [4] NoFoP in Japan Darklanlan (talk) 09:53, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:01, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small unused photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:54, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:01, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The statue was created in 2010 by Isao Tabata w:ja:田畑功. [5] Freedom of panorama for an artistic work is not accepted on Commons. Darklanlan (talk) 09:57, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:01, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:02, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project scope. Also maybe this is not selfie, but real photographer's copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:01, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:02, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Carl Gagitscher is not mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in de.wiki. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:05, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:02, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Judoencostarica (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpages in Commons (now deleted as self-promo) and en.wiki and uploading 2 photos about himself (one speedily deleted as copyright violation), which are used nowhere, except on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:10, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:02, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. OTRS-permission from author Leandro Viturinno is needed. Taivo (talk) 10:15, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:02, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope. personal photo Kkairri (talk) 10:19, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:02, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collages need source and license for every used image. Taivo (talk) 10:30, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:02, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like screenshot of copyrighted TV-program. Taivo (talk) 10:33, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment It does not appear to be a screenshot. It does appear to be a photograph of a television set while the TV is displaying a presumably-copyrighted program, with the stated purpose of the photograph being to show the television set itself rather than the program being displayed. To what extent Commons:De minimis#Guidelines applies here I don't know: the image of the program is one frame of a much larger work with likely zero impact on any use of the copyrighted work (i.e. it's "inconsequential"); it's not in any way essential to the photograph of the television as almost any other image would serve as well, and potentially no image would also serve; it could be blacked out and the image would still be useful, but perhaps less so since it wouldn't illustrate the TV's picture quality and would be a distracting portion of the photograph; but on the other hand it is clearly identifiable and it would be easy to avoid inclusion of any copyrighted work in a replacement photograph by having the television powered off or displaying an image that is not copyrighted. Anomie (talk) 15:33, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Yes, but -- that line of reasoning would allow us to keep any image that the uploader displayed on a TV set. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:04, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The state South Australia is labelled "Southern Australia" on this map ... this is incorrect. 101.174.165.137 10:41, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused and wrong. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:07, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Bayelharriet

[edit]

Bayelharriet (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

There is no freedom of panorama in Ghana. Taivo (talk) 10:59, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:08, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Fabrizia cezario

[edit]

Fabrícia cezario (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Own work is unlikely. Probably copyright violation of text author. Taivo (talk) 11:05, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:08, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Zahid ashraff

[edit]

Here are all contributions of Zahid ashraff (talk · contribs):

Small unused personal photos without metadata. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:26, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:08, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Yudisina

[edit]

Yudisina (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Article about depicted person en:Rajkumar Patra was deleted due to non-notability. The photos are also out of project scope. Yudisina reviewed licenses of own files, although (s)he is not license reviewer, and this is bad. Taivo (talk) 11:33, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:09, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Subject is not notable and file have no uses too. ~ Moheen (talk) 14:44, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Its not matter of notability, but Subject is notable writer, and file have uses in category, undo the nomination.


Deleted: previously. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:10, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Joshbeech77

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Joshbeech77 (talk · contribs):

Unused personal photos, depicted persons are unidentified, probably out of project scope. Small photos without metadata, own work is dubious, copyright violation is possible too. Taivo (talk) 11:48, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:10, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Zeme sharma

[edit]

Here are all contributions of Zeme sharma (talk · contribs):

Unused self-promotion, out of project scope. Copyright violation is possible too. Taivo (talk) 11:52, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:10, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Zayzaaltd

[edit]

Here are both contributions of Zayzeeltd (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata, watermark. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 12:00, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:10, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Oona

[edit]

Oona (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Oona uploaded a lot of photos about category:Ipanema beach, but some of them have bad quality. Taivo (talk) 12:05, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:10, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of 331yoo

[edit]

Here are last remaining uploadas of 331yoo (talk · contribs):

Small unused personal photos without metadata. Out of project scope, copyright violation is possible too. Taivo (talk) 12:14, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:11, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Carjoscas

[edit]

Here are last remaining uploads of Carjoscas (talk · contribs):

Small photos and mostly without metadata. Uploader is always himself depicted. I suspect not own work, but real photographer's copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 12:18, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:11, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Gissell Molina

[edit]

Here are both contributions of Gissell molina (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata. I suggest to delete due to weak educational value. Taivo (talk) 12:24, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:11, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Though the Clinton library has released the video, the speech is the copyright of Bill Clinton personally, not that of the Whitehouse or the Library. Though Clinton was the President, in this speech he is speaking as part of his campaign for President. Consequently his words are not public property and the text he is referencing requires a specific release. (talk) 12:30, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:11, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Samsujata

[edit]

Samsujata (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Unused personal photos, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:31, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:11, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In this video George Bush is giving his acceptance speech. He was later to become President. His speech is therefore not property of the Whitehouse, nor automatically public domain material. The video at the beginning gives credit to the George Bush Presidential Library, however this is not a copyright release, just a request to be credited, presumably as the source. To be retained on Commons, a specific release of the text that was prepared for the speech must be produced from George Bush. (talk) 12:35, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:12, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Sercorso

[edit]

Here are last remaining uploads of Sercorso (talk · contribs):

Mostly small photos and mostly without metadata. If camera data exist, then usually different. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 12:37, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:12, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Superfruit1

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Superfruit1 (talk · contribs):

SF7X and SF-7x are not mentioned in en.wiki. I think, that the files are therefore out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:44, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:12, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The speech is being read from notes prepared by the President of Kiribati. A suitable release for the text of that speech is needed, not just a release of the video. (talk) 12:50, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:12, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Socialitech

[edit]

Socialitech (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Mostly small photos without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 12:47, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:13, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image, presented as a logo, cannot be considered too simple not to be copyrighted. As such, it has no place in the Commons without a specific OTRS release note from the owner. Ldorfman (talk) 13:03, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:14, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Logos - unfree. However, it may be deemed as simple enough Discasto talk 13:16, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Venus Theory is not mentioned in en.wiki and the file is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:30, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:14, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Logos - unfree. However, it may be deemed as simple enough Discasto talk 13:16, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. Venus Theory is not mentioned in en.wiki and the file is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:31, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:14, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted movie poster. MKFI (talk) 13:47, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:15, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted movie poster. MKFI (talk) 13:47, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:15, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ahrtkswkd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

either a personal artistic creation or some kind of video game character (none of the 3 are used)

Daphne Lantier 20:16, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:24, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Roland zh as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: montage missing links to images from Wikimedia Commons (imho not) used for, Yann (talk) 20:27, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:25, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Roland zh as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: potentially, as linked to tektab.com, Yann (talk) 20:29, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: freely licensed, but no description or cats. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:26, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An edited graphic that uses as its basefile a figure from Jourdan, F., et al. (2006). "Basement control on dyke distribution in Large Igneous Provinces: Case study of the Karoo triple junction". Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 241 (1-2), 318. If you have access to that article, the basefile is Fig 9b. It's visible in colorized form in fig. 3 here. Note the faint letter R on the ocean-land border below "Lebombo dyke swarm". The linked journal article is not licensed under a free license. Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 20:36, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:26, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image all over internet at different size pre upload date. Appears to be a stock photo. www.google.co.uk/search Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:45, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Image was used to promote the sale of Mont SUTTON, sent out to specific media outlets to cover the event in early 2016. Was taken in 2004 by a photographer paid by Mont SUTTON who released the image's rights to the company at that time. User:MontSutton (Talk) 21:09, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: That may be, but since we don;t know who you are, this will require a free license from an authorized officer of the copyright holder via OTRS. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:28, 14 February 2017 (UTC). .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:28, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Oolesya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

New account, 3 files: 1 small copyvio without EXIF, 2 HR images from 2 different FX cameras (Nikon & Canon). Unlikely to be own works.

Yann (talk) 20:53, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:28, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not a U.S. postal stamp, image copyrighted by Marvel. CensoredScribe (talk) 21:15, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete there are not even postage stamps, but cinderellas. Copyright belongs to the author or publisher, most likely Marvel, for at least 70 years. Can we even confirm the 1974 publication date? Ww2censor (talk) 10:35, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:29, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative images in Category:Fiumicino

[edit]

There is no freedom of panorama in Italy, so we cannot host derivative photographs of non-free sculptures.

De728631 (talk) 21:29, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:29, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am fine with deleting it. I am making SVGs for these anyways. Huji (talk) 23:53, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:55, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, only used on a userpage that is uploader's only contribution. Not an active participant. Out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:44, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:55, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:46, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:55, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

2D artwork by John Piper (died 1992), not "own work", as claimed. Andy Mabbett (talk) 17:56, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:54, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image of 2D artwork by Alexander Mackenzie (died 2002), so not "own work" as claimed Andy Mabbett (talk) 18:02, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:54, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality dog photo. Apparently from the "US government" with no source specified. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 18:36, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:54, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artist (Josep Renau) died in 1982. In 1932 Spanish law was set at 80 years p.m.a. Asumming this poster was 'published' in Spain in the thirties (1932) there is no clear reason why this image would be freely available (FOP -> not plausible, file description says "lithography" // free licensed by copyright owner -> not claimed, unlikely). Strakhov (talk) 18:48, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:53, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bennaceur sidahmed (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Bad quality and doubtful copyright status

/St1995 19:10, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:53, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Evandro Ordonez (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Probably out of scope

/St1995 19:16, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:52, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Отрок 12 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copivio, all files has different metadata with different authors, easily can be found on the internet

Stolbovsky (talk) 19:32, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:51, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably invalid license, see the discussion. Yann (talk) 19:58, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:51, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No COM:FOP in Ukraine. No known date of undeletion.

russavia (talk) 17:30, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Киев Фелармония 2010.jpg may be DM as main object of photo is kiev Philharmonic (according the filename). And arc itself may be TOO. It is simple geometric figure.--Anatoliy (talk) 18:24, 15 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Kept one, per Anatoliy . I agree that the arc is DM, but not that it is too simple. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:52, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Ukraine (see FOP in Ukraine).

Kulmalukko (talk) 10:46, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm, why may it be kept? --Kulmalukko (talk) 12:11, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This part of the building does not bear any artistic value. --Insider (talk) 12:37, 6 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination + 2 kept per Insider. Ruthven (msg) 08:16, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Ukraine. Built in 1982.

Kulmalukko (talk) 15:01, 19 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination plus kept 2 per @Insider: . --Green Giant (talk) 11:26, 2 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Freedom of panorama#Ukraine, this is Category:Monument to the Friendship of Nations Daphne Lantier 20:02, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:48, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:Youtube washing. The video is not a work of Political USA. Thumbnail Credit To CNN? Rodrigolopes (talk) 22:12, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Rodrigolopes: As a uploader of this file i would like to make some statements
  1. I have uploaded this file which I found on YouTube and has creative Commons Licensing on it.
  2. Regarding the video it's shooted by the US govt officials and released into public domain and has a license of PD-USGov-POTUS
  3. to support the same have a look to this File File:20170110 President Obama Farewell Speech HD.webm
  4. As i have some knowledge about Youtube channel workings i would like to share with you some tips
  • If a video is in public domain it is advisable to add creative Commons Licensing to it.
  • Even copying of thumbnail can give a Copyright strike to the video
  • In order to overcome the same it's advisable to give credits to the Copyright Holder .To support the same have a look at This link
I am a volunteer to the Copyright revolution on the marathi Wikipedia and have excess information about Copyrights correct me if I am wrong i would be pleased
--Tiven2240 (talk) 02:09, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hi @Tiven2240: , you can see the full speech recorded by CNN here This particular part is at 41.45s. IMO it´s not an USGov work. In the video of wh.gov you cannot see another camera focusing Michelle (43.00). Rodrigolopes (talk) 02:34, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Rodrigolopes: I am truely aware of the effort u are taking about this file. I appreciate the same. Just to brief you about the same I have contacted original authority of the file and would like to inform Wikipedia that the original source which the YouTuber upload the file is Independent news it is a case of YouTube Washing or not I am not aware but as I am in contact with the press for the rights of the file for usage on Wikipedia I would suggest NOT TO DELETE the file I uploaded as to keep it under the User policy of the news company which states its contents use for non-commercial use.

While in process I have received an email from the independent news representative and he has asked me to contact the source of the file which is something called AP (associated press) I am expecting an reply from them too...Tiven2240 (talk) 10:29, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that Wikimedia Commons does not accept fair use justifications: see Commons:fair use. Media licensed under non-commercial only licenses are not accepted either. Rodrigolopes (talk) 17:38, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Rodrigolopes: I know the same and I didn't mentioned fair use i have contacted the owner associated press and waiting for the answer after that I will use OTRS system for the same --Tiven2240 (talk) 17:54, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Sorry, but "which is something called AP" makes it impossible to take anything you say here seriously. If you don't know the AP, then you cannot possibly be familar with the details of US copyright law. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:37, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No information about the artwork´s author. Is this piece freely licensed or PD? Rodrigolopes (talk) 22:20, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It is mostly Old --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 06:44, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: With no useful description or cats, it is out of scope. It may also be a copyvio. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:39, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hocine Bellatre (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Looks like it's a screenshot of a website or app, probably under an unfree licence.

Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 22:51, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Hocine Bellatre (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Looks like it's a screenshot of a website or app, probably under an unfree licence. Second run. Can uploader explain what is this website or app ?

Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 17:58, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:32, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright issues SecretName101 (talk) 22:52, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:32, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

What's the background ? Google maps ? Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 22:55, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I don't see the Google watermark, but it very unlikely to actually be "own work". .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:41, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

First, just saying that the author is "anti-copyright" doesn't establish that the author has actually issued the necessary release. Second, this is a derivative work, a portrait of a comic book character under copyright, and therefore requires a license from the creators of the underlying work. The Big Bad Wolfowitz (talk) 23:20, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:42, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hasan Sami Bolak (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private child image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 05:50, 10 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:38, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hasan Sami Bolak (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploader claims to be author of these images of himself. Also, these appear to be personal images, which we do not allow.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:46, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Book covers -- these require a free license from the publisher via OTRS.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:48, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Personal images of children -- out of scope.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:51, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Personal images

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:53, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Hi, Jim. There seem to be many useful photographs in this list. For example, File:1967-1968 Alpaslan Türkeş-Hasan Sami Bolak Yukarıköşkerli-PINARBAŞI (Kayseri).jpg is useful for the article en:Alparslan Türkeş, File:Osman Kavuncu - Celal Bayar.jpg is useful for the article en:Celal Bayar. File:Hasan Sami Bolak-Necip Fazıl 17-04-1965 Kayseri Tren İstasyonu.jpg is useful for the article en:Necip Fazıl Kısakürek etc... I want to "investigate" all of those photographs. Thank you. Takabeg (talk) 00:50, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not sure what you mean by "investigate", but by all means go to it. Both of the images you cite may be useful, but are obviously not "own work" as claimed and can't be kept here without without knowing the author and source. "Useful" does not allow us to keep a copyvio. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:31, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Thanks Jim, I can go along with all given reasons for deletion. These out-of-scope pictures are clear cases, also the ones marked as copyright infringements like the book covers. Cheers from Germany --GeoTrinity (talk) 17:33, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I think Hasan Sami Bolak should be the copyright holder of these photograhs per Commons:Assume good faith. Hasan Sami was one of oldest members of the Grey Wolves, and served as the chairperson of the Kayseri branch of Nationalist Movement Party. Now he is the president of a local daily newspaper named Erciyes (official website). But some photographs may be out of Commons:Project scope. Takabeg (talk) 01:54, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In the first place, we don't know that our user actually is the person in question. Second, Hasan Sami Bolak may be a very respectable and solid citizen, but many such people come to Commons without understanding copyright law and do things that break the law or our rules. Taking the four batches in order:
Assuming that User:Hasan Sami Bolak is in fact Hasan Sami Bolak of whom you speak, then he is almost certainly not the copyright holder for the first group -- the images of himself. The copyright will be held by the photographer. If User:Hasan Sami Bolak is not Hasan Sami Bolak then it is even less likely that he owns the copyright to these images taken at many different times and places with at least four different cameras, many of which do not have EXIF.
The copyright to the book covers is almost certainly held by the publisher, but even if he does hold them, our rules require an OTRS license for them.
The last two batches are certainly out of scope. Even if Hasan Sami Bolak is notable, the people pictured in them are not. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:29, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment found at the File:Beş torun bir arada.jpg, deleted in October 2015:
Türkçe: "Buraya, kendim bizzat çektiğim ve hepsinin de bu ansiklopedi için faydalı olduğum resimleri yüklemekteyim.. 10 yıldan fazla bir zamandır bu ansiklopediye katkılarda bulunmaktayım.. Neyin ansiklopedik olduğunu, neyin olmadığını çok iyi bilirim. Dört yıl kadar önce yine burada, Benim "siyasi görüşlerime karşı olan" bir kullanıcı yüzünden dört yıl buradan uzak kaldım.. Yoksa şimdiye kadar en az 4000-5000 değişiklik daha yapacaktım.. Gücendim ve uzak durdum.. Benim yazdıklarımım BİR KISMINI HAKSIZ YERE SİLMEYİ DÜŞÜNÜYORSANIZ, DİĞERLERİNİN DE "HEPSİNİ" SİLİNİZ VE BÖYLELİKLE BENİM İSMİMDEN KURTULMUŞ OLUNUZ. HAKSIZ SİLMELERİNİZİN DEVAMI HALİNDE ANSİKLOPEDİNİN SAHİBİNE KONUYU GÖTÜRECEĞİMİ VE AYRICA HUKUKİ YOLLARDAN DAVA AÇACAĞIMI ÖNEMLE DUYURURUM. HASAN SAMİ BOLAK"
English: Google Translate: "Here, myself I am to install in the pictures I be useful for this encyclopedia also personally I took and all .. it is more than a 10 years old HAVE contributed to this encyclopedia .. is encyclopedic what, I know very well that what is not. almost four years ago here again, my "against my political views" user I stayed away because four years here .. Or ever going to make at least 4000-5000 changes .. I offense, and I stay away .. My yazdıklarım I ANY PORTION the inequity DELETE If you THINK the others "ALL" to CLEAR AND SO MAKE KURTULMUŞ out my name. IF MORE CLEAR Encyclopedia of your UNFAIR AND ALSO I HAVE THE TAKING OF REMEDIES ON HIGHLY I'm from CASE NOTICE. HASAN SAMİ BOLAK"
Copied by --Jarekt (talk) 13:32, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment A lot of those images are used in wikipedias on personal pages and in the main articles. Contributors to wikipedia are allowed to keep some personal images per Commons:Project_scope#File_in_use_in_another_Wikimedia_project policy, but probably not that many. --Jarekt (talk) 13:54, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Commons does indeed permit active contributors to keep a limited number of personal images for user pages. However, the user pages these images are used on reveal that this user has very few (perhaps zero) contributions to WMF projects other than the images above and spamming his personal images on to pages. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 20:48, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:39, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hasan Sami Bolak (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Multiple reasons: unused personal files and images of non-notable persons with doubtful copyright status (uploaded by serial copyvio-violator). I kept big photos with metadata.

/St1995 23:20, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

File:Necip Fazıl-Hasan Sami 17.4.1965.jpg is a rare picture of the famous Turkish poet Necip Fazıl Kısakürek. He has articles in several WPs. --E4024 (talk) 14:38, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The guy is a journalist, gives lecturesi I suppose File:İt yarenliği.jpg is the cover picture of a book that he wrote or compiled from his articles. --E4024 (talk) 14:50, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Given this user's terrible record and the number of obvious copyvios here, I see no way to keep any of his images. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:44, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems to me that this image is extracted from such as certain poster. See lower left in image. Suspicious copyright status. Kkairri (talk) 23:48, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:47, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not an image of free use. The original artwork was made by Misaki Ouchida: http://www.washington.edu/news/2017/01/24/prized-fossil-find-the-oldest-most-complete-iguanian-in-the-americas-illuminates-the-lives-of-lizards-in-the-age-of-dinosaurs/ Rextron (talk) 07:27, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:46, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie. private image. not notable individual. only contribution. not used DavidIvar (talk) 19:52, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 21:57, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The supposed source http://desktopcollector.com/ does not indicate a free license. Nevermind that the file source is vague. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:54, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 01:02, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad resolution Der Buckesfelder  Talk  Evaluation  E-Mail  commons 14:27, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no permission. --JuTa 01:15, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 02:53, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Žádám o odstranění mnou zveřejněného oznámení o úmrtí mého otce pana Václava Čubára.Myslím,že jsem dostatečně prokázala,že k úmrtí došlo a nevidím dále důvod,aby tento doklad koloval po netu.děkuji Sandorova74 (talk) 19:13, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Sealle (talk) 18:36, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own" work (9 KB) 2003:45:5C3B:BC01:B9F7:73CF:FF07:BE51 19:31, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Sealle (talk) 18:37, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own" work (22 KB) 2003:45:5C3B:BC01:B9F7:73CF:FF07:BE51 19:34, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Sealle (talk) 18:37, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear provenance, EXIF suggests Picasa Andy Mabbett (talk) 00:09, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: original photo was File:Ozal.jpg: the scan of a print (you can see the frame and read in the EXIF "LEAD Technologies Inc. V1.01") and there is no reason not to suppose the release under PD-self. Ruthven (msg) 08:34, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is copyrighted by YouTube and Lenovo. I don't see any evidence that indicates that the uploader owns these rights. FallingGravity (talk) 05:26, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

See also: Commons:Deletion requests/Files of Dgetdc. FallingGravity (talk) 01:32, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:35, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Rather crude orphan picture that is currently subject to use by vandals. Currently (having done a quick check) isn't in use on other Wikis. Nordic Nightfury (talk) 08:51, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Big resolution, EXIF exists. The file can be used as stock photo. Vandals should be blocked. Do not bring problems from other wikis into Commons. Commons needs such kind of photos too and you did not show a better one. Taivo (talk) 19:40, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Taivo. Ruthven (msg) 08:42, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Near duplicate and inferior version (and without scale) of https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Titanus_giganteus_MHNT_dos.jpg , which now have been cropped by the author, keeping the scale, from the RAW file and there is no need to keep those both versions. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:59, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The crop is not as tight as it could be, but it's certainly an improvement. Chiswick Chap (talk) 13:41, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: not exact duplicate: this tighter cropped version can be useful. Ruthven (msg) 08:44, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Useless lower scale duplicate of File:Jason Robinson Department of Materials Science Cambridge University.jpg Lacrymocéphale (talk) 12:16, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per Lacrymocéphale. Next time, please use {{Duplicate}}. Ruthven (msg) 08:45, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio of https://www.tripadvisor.ch/LocationPhotoDirectLink-g189167-d7350534-i137792898-Forte_Sao_Jose-Funchal_Madeira_Madeira_Islands.html GoEThe (talk) 12:47, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:45, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence provided that this logo is actually under a CC license. It probably qualifies as PD-1923 iff it can be proven that it is PD in Italy, however. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:10, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Correcting myself; the logo may not be from 1920. If it is free despite this, the it:File:Empoli FC 1920.png file should probably be marked for deletion as well. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:13, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete. "en.wikipedia" is not a real source. Real source is needed. Taivo (talk) 11:27, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; @Jo-Jo Eumerus: File:Empoli FC 1920.png is used on itwiki as fair use, which cannot be done on Commons. Ruthven (msg) 08:47, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not CC : embraer promo pic Marc Lacoste (talk) 13:29, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, i.e. copyvio. Ruthven (msg) 08:48, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless, lost picture Mehlauge (talk) 13:54, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: it has a source, an author and a category. Ruthven (msg) 08:50, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Ayaadocument.png Der Buckesfelder  Talk  Evaluation  E-Mail  commons 14:20, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. @Der Buckesfelder: next time please use {{Duplicate}} Ruthven (msg) 08:51, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate, see [6] Der Buckesfelder  Talk  Evaluation  E-Mail  commons 14:45, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment at moment the file is used. Taivo (talk) 12:37, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment: Invalid rationale. This it's not an exact duplicate. The two other existent logos in Category:Bosch_logos are without that stylized symbol, just the simple text. But, there may be a problem with COM:TOO. --XXN, 14:56, 11 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per XXN. Ruthven (msg) 08:52, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from http://ideastations.org/science-matters/steam-rising/build-robots-and-see-world-part-1 Ytoyoda (talk) 15:13, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:52, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Source: https://www.eemskrant.nl/marije-oosterhuis-6/ Alice2Alice (talk) 15:15, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 08:52, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no EXIF data, unlikely to be own work. Yann (talk) 20:35, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pymouss Let’s talk - 23:22, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

New version (as png in better quality and in color): File:Landscape Racing By.png Carl Ha (talk) 15:45, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

New version (as png in better quality and in color): File:Landscape Racing By.png Carl Ha (talk) 16:29, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, use File:Landscape Racing By.png.  — billinghurst sDrewth 14:19, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The National Archives of Estonia on Flickr Commons (copyrighted images)

[edit]

Less than 70 years old, so copyright hasn't expired and no reason to assume that the archive holds the rights. See: Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Files uploaded by Meisam (cleanup).

Following image is older than 70 years, but another archive database entry[7] suggests that auhtor was student at the time (1937) of this event, so it's unlikely that the copyright has expired.

--90.191.109.9 13:47, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 22:41, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is "all rights reserved" on FLickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/nymatringe/27426624412/ Ytoyoda (talk) 15:28, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, license review failed. Taivo (talk) 22:59, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, only used on a userpage that is uploader's only contribution. Not an active participant. Out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:45, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:38, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal image, portrait with no use nor category Ruthven (msg) 17:01, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:37, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of Ashwin Kumar's flickr streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 18:52, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:36, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Out of scope. GeorgHHtalk   19:36, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:36, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of Ashwin Kumar's flickr streams, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, bad quality, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:37, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:36, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not used. Kulmalukko (talk) 19:56, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:35, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 20:14, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:35, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams, randomly taken and of poor quality, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 22:29, 7 February 2017 (UTC) Roland zh (talk) 22:29, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:35, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to ask your opinions: imho rather 'profiling' ("...Marketing Manager...") or 'family album' ("...spouse...") oriented upload, but also potentially personality rights isusses and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons ? btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 22:36, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:34, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams (taken with Nokia N73) of poor quality, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 22:38, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:34, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams, poor quality and rather thumbnail-format, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons, file not in use at Wikimedia projects - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 22:43, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:34, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams of very bad quality, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 22:44, 7 February 2017 (UTC) Roland zh (talk) 22:44, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:33, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like it's a screenshot of a website, probably under an unfree licence. Framawiki (please notify) (talk) 22:48, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:33, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality. Kkairri (talk) 23:43, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:33, 22 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Never used. Der Buckesfelder  Talk  Evaluation  E-Mail  commons 08:47, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I wad in the middle of sth. I will make it 'used' right now.--Super Wang (talk) 10:21, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I removed the request right now, since the files are used for wiki purpose. --Der Buckesfelder  Talk  Evaluation  E-Mail  commons 06:58, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. P 1 9 9   02:00, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This pic: Own work Super Wang (talk) 03:04, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:04, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Never used. Der Buckesfelder  Talk  Evaluation  E-Mail  commons 08:47, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I was just in the middle of sth. I will make it 'used' right now. -- Super Wang (talk) 10:18, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I removed the request right now, since the files are used for wiki purpose. --Der Buckesfelder  Talk  Evaluation  E-Mail  commons 06:57, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: withdrawn. P 1 9 9   02:01, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This pic: Own work Super Wang (talk) 03:03, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: uploader's request. Ruthven (msg) 09:04, 11 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is nothing on COM:TOO that suggests that this logo is not copyrightable in Thailand. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:40, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. COM:TOO does not mention Thailand at all. But here we have only red square, red circle and letters "V" and "TH". In my opinion this is simple logo. Taivo (talk) 13:57, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
By which standards? By US ones? Well, probably yes, but if we don't know about Thailand, why do we assume it'd be OK there? Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:24, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm standard myself. I have no talent for art at all. If I am able to redraw the logo, then it's simple. :-) Taivo (talk) 11:37, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Looks simple to me. When there is no TOO entry for a country, we are supposed to use are own intuition. A V in a circle doesn't cut it IMO. Fry1989 eh? 21:45, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per discussion. P 1 9 9   03:09, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I hadn't seen this logo before uploading; now the file is orphan. Umberto NURS (msg) 14:54, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   03:07, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:29, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   02:12, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture of a picture. Unclear who is the photographer, when it was taken and under which license it is published. Badzil (talk) 17:06, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   02:17, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yeasir123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused photos are out of project scope. Quality is bad.This photo some eding and mark zuckerberg photos copied from http://www.vox.com/2014/11/30/7300019/how-peter-thiel-repackaged-conventional-wisdom-as-bold-contrarianism

CAPTAIN RAJU (✉) 17:33, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   03:02, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mass-upload of panoramio streams (taken with Nokia C3), small-sized and of poor quality, hence, doubtful educational usefulness and out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? btw: file not in use at Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 22:21, 7 February 2017 (UTC) Roland zh (talk) 22:21, 7 February 2017 (UTC)  Comment: may be kept as potentially a 'rare' photograph, Roland zh (talk) 22:25, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in scope, no alternatives. P 1 9 9   03:04, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Steff Signer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Songs, promo photos and album covers. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

All the Songs, former promo photos and album covers added by the user Steff Signer are historical materials, i.e. cultural heritage of the Kanton Appenzell Ausserrhoden in Switzerland. We will support the user Steff Signer to improve the informations on his user page as well as to improve his media-uploads. We need the media for the article about him and his archive, written in German. Thank you. -- Kantonsbibliothek AR (Diskussion) 17:08, 10 February 2017 (CET)

Deleted: OTRS required. --Didym (talk) 15:59, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://nationales-versandhaus.de/product_info.php?info=p2935_aufkleber---arbeit-freiheit-brot.html Sounds like a copyvio to me. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 15:32, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Used for vandalism on ES Wikipedia; See es:Especial:Contribuciones/Zyklonb --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 15:36, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:53, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, Commons is no archive for disappeared web pages. Achim (talk) 16:26, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The original website full page print screen: http://www.hkauthors.com.hk/ssl/2/a.jpg. Moreover, here has a text copy: http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_50d2b1f10100aoai.html --Arimani0225 (talk) 01:57, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Fine, and why should it be kept? --Achim (talk) 15:07, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This reference is to prove that this chinese author "鄭炳南"(https://zh.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E9%84%AD%E7%82%B3%E5%8D%97) has taken received a awards in 2008. --Arimani0225 (talk) 10:10, 9 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:52, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrright violation Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 16:26, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:51, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture published on several other websites like this one. No OTRS authorization. Titlutin (talk) 17:50, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Français : Photo déjà publiée sur de nombreux autres sites web non libres de droit. Il faudrait donc un email d'autorisation de la part du photographe pour que Commons puisse héberger légalement cette image - voir pour cela Aide:Republication/Image --Titlutin (talk) 17:52, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:50, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image of 2D artwork by Bryan Wynter (died 1975), so not "own work" as claimed Andy Mabbett (talk) 18:03, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:51, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photograph is found commonly in many web sites. Probably this file is not the uploader's own work. Y.haruo (talk) 18:29, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:50, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the photographer would have died before 1947. Jcb (talk) 23:13, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:48, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

hit same image by google image search. Unknown copyright status. Kkairri (talk) 23:52, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 15:47, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, poor quality and composition, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   15:05, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:05, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wily0824 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://college.oceanmate.co.kr/data/file/school/1888487320_BQXCmEWK_201291104_1252825C125B625C825AD25B725CE25BF25EE_25C125A425B725C42529.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:22, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:05, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tibo54000 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.asnl.net/upload/images/modules/visuels_photos/stadeaerien2.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 16:05, 2 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious license. Uploader claims it is logo for a business, but claims "own work" nevertheless. No ticket. Pugilist (talk) 16:38, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This is the logo for a business I'm working at. Therefore it's a businesslogo but I also made it. What should I say then? Noopy2394 (the uploader).

The picture has the following attached: "© Leah-Anne Thompson - all rights reserved.Please check your licence for grant of usage rights and usage limitations for this photograph". This is not compliant with a CC license. If you are Leah-Anne Thompson you can send a ticket through OTRS. --Pugilist (talk) 16:57, 20 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. (tJosve05a (c) 22:12, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, no evidence of authorship Andy Mabbett (talk) 00:21, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My photo, I uploaded it, following what seemed to be procedures at the time so far as I could tell. I can fill in missing paperwork if people point me in the right direction. (no idea if I'm going to get attribution on this comment right either) Dd-b (talk) 00:46, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Let's assume good faith. I added infobox template. The problem arised, because all other uploads of Dd-b were claimed own work and this was not claimed. Taivo (talk) 20:09, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Question Dd-b, you say "my photo". Were you yourself the actual photographer? If so, fine, I agree that we can assume good faith. If not, then we must delete it because owning a paper or digital copy of a photo does not give you the right to freely license it. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:31, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: AGF. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:54, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
File:A photo for Mafar Band members in their first Photo session (3).jpg
A photo for Mafar Band members in their first Photo session (3)
Mafar Band (talk) 17:07, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: likely copyvio. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:07, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Smaller duplicate of File:AK-103-1.png, only used on the uploader's page. Out of scope. Yann (talk) 17:13, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:06, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Smaller duplicate of File:AK-103-1.png, and duplicate of File:AK-103-1-2.png, only used on the uploader's page. Out of scope. Yann (talk) 17:14, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:05, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 200.149.202.112 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.eteignezvotreordinateur.com/andreja-pejic-mannequin-change-sexe-photos/ Yann (talk) 20:14, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: professional looking, no EXIF, small size, copyvio fairly likely. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:03, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

has been uploaded by bot, better images are here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Maggie_Gyllenhaal_01_-_Clinton_Global_Citizen_2010.jpg, https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Maggie_Gyllenhaal_03_-_Clinton_Global_Citizen_2010.jpg Queryzo (talk) 21:44, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:01, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: unfree graffitti. Eleassar (t/p) 21:50, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:00, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it is not an own work. Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 22:54, 4 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:32, 10 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non free image (image for living person) --Alaa Najjar :)..! 21:57, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --miya (talk) 06:31, 16 February 2017 (UTC) You can find the same file in the news page of Feb 05, 2015.--miya (talk) 06:35, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

higher resoluted picture is here: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Martina_Gedeck_-_Berlinale_66_(24883129391).jpg Queryzo (talk) 22:44, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:58, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It seems that this file is from this magazine. Unknown copyright status. Suspicious copyvio. Kkairri (talk) 23:33, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: "built in 1937", so the photo is newer. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:58, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tjoseph999 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Does Commons:Freedom of panorama in source country allow this?

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It's India, Images of 3D objects are OK. I've deleted two images as perfect scaled down duplicates. Ronhjones  (Talk) 20:53, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: deleted per Commons:Project_scope#PDF_and_DjVu_formats. Ruthven (msg) 14:54, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

accidentaly duplicated 1957birth (talk) 16:29, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: dupe of Ełk EPB-OWT 08.1989 B (8).jpg. Ruthven (msg) 14:46, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non educative political promotion. No really relation with category neither. Guilloip (talk) 16:46, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 14:47, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non educative political promotion. No really relation with category neither. Guilloip (talk) 16:46, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 14:47, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non educative political promotion. No really relation with category neither. Guilloip (talk) 16:46, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion: photo of the politician. Ruthven (msg) 14:48, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non educative political promotion. No really relation with category neither. Guilloip (talk) 16:47, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 14:48, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Permission should go to COM:OTRS. Out of scope. Yann (talk) 17:07, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Already sent permission there. Got no response of any kind, sadly. --RussianTrooper (talk) 00:12, 18 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Please see Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#Request from RussianTrooper. Yann (talk) 09:44, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:48, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture already published on this twitter account. No OTRS authorization. Titlutin (talk) 18:29, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Français : Photo déjà publiée par le compte Twitter @BernardLoiseau. Or Twitter n'est pas un site libre de droit. Il faudrait donc un email d'autorisation de la part du photographe pour que Commons puisse héberger légalement cette image - voir pour cela Aide:Republication/Image--Titlutin (talk) 18:31, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:49, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture already published by this twitter account. No OTRS authorization. Titlutin (talk) 18:33, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Français : Photo déjà publiée par le compte Twitter @BernardLoiseau. Or Twitter n'est pas un site libre de droit. Il faudrait donc un email d'autorisation de la part du photographe pour que Commons puisse héberger légalement cette image - voir pour cela Aide:Republication/Image--Titlutin (talk) 18:33, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:49, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture published on several other websites like this one. No OTRS authorization. Titlutin (talk) 18:38, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Français : Photo déjà publiée sur de nombreux autres sites web non libres de droit. Il faudrait donc un email d'autorisation de la part du photographe pour que Commons puisse héberger légalement cette image - voir pour cela Aide:Republication/Image --Titlutin (talk) 18:39, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:49, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture already published on amazon.fr. No OTRS authorization. Titlutin (talk) 18:43, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Français : Photo déjà publiée sur le site amazon.fr, qui n'est pas libre de droits. Il faudrait donc un email d'autorisation de la part du photographe pour que Commons puisse héberger légalement cette image - voir pour cela Aide:Republication/Image --Titlutin (talk) 18:45, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:49, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: unfree architecture (Cobblers' Bridge); work by. J. Plečnik (d. 1957). Eleassar (t/p) 21:57, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That's not clear. Bridges do not have a copyright in the United States because they are not "architecture". Do they have a copyright in Slovenia? Even if they do, there is little of the bridge in the image. The lights are utilitarian as is the railing. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:31, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, bridges are copyrighted in Slovenia. As to the rest, could be true, could be not.. --Eleassar (t/p) 00:31, 16 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: de minimis here. Ruthven (msg) 14:49, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a smaller version of en:File:Maull & Fox - Fanny Bullock Workman.jpg which is kept there as "do not move to Commons" on the grounds that the uploader is not clearly known and it may thus not be free in the UK. If it is free (say, through PD-UK-anonymous) then the enwiki copy should be transferred here as the bigger one. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:53, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The problem isn't that the uploader isn't known; it's that the creator isn't; however, I can say this: If this is a copy of the one on en-wiki, and not a crop from the version at the Library of Congress, then it's plagiarised: The version on en-wiki is a restoration I did - not a particularly extensive one, and one I'm happy to release - but it's not crediting Maull & Fox or me, it's claiming it's the own work of someone else. Adam Cuerden (talk) 17:14, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Much larger version available as noted. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:50, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Almost certainly not an "own work" and no clear source information. If this is a free image after all en:File:Francine Mussey.jpg should be tagged as {{subst:rfu|reason=Commons file on the same subject and same name was deemed a free image by a deletion discussion}}, otherwise the shadowscommons template removed Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 12:58, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The in-image caption says "211 Cinemagazine Edition", and there's an eBay listing for the May 23, 1923 edition of Cinemagazine that appears to be about her. That publication also seems to have ads for photographs of various stars. I certainly don't think it's uploader's own work. It's possible it's {{PD-France}}, but we'd have to know the source in order to determine if it's anonymous (likely >70 years since pub) or not (artist likely is deceased but not unreasonable to be <70 years ago). DMacks (talk) 14:10, 8 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: 50/50 that it is PD, which is way beyond "significant doubt". .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:52, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There does not appear to be evidence on the website of the AUI that the logo is freely licensed, and it's not very clear to begin with where the file comes from. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:46, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:52, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no evidence on the sourcepage given or elsewhere that the logo is indeed a free image. More likely, the logo was simply copied from enwiki where it is a non-free logo. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 13:52, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. This is simple logo. Olympic rings are in public domain and here are two words added with standard font. Taivo (talk) 12:02, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Hmm. 36 USC 220506 gives the US Olympic Committee the exclusive right to use the rings. Both the International Olympic Committee and the USOC have been aggressive in enforcing their rights. This is, however, a non-copyright restriction. We routinely ignore those. However, given the breadth of this restriction it is clear that there can be no use whatever of the rings except, perhaps, fair use, so it seems to me there is little point in keeping them on Commons. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:22, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Looks simple to me. Fry1989 eh? 21:44, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination -- The fact that it is simple is probably the reason for 36 USC 220506 -- to make it clear that no one else can use it without permission. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:54, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

At least one of the photos comes from an external source: http://www.pratosesia.com/fotodeipratesi/archiviophoto.html Ytoyoda (talk) 15:31, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, yes i know, but all two photos was made by me. I consented Comune di Prato Sesia upoload my photo on your institutional official web around on 2008-2010.

Therefore this file can stay on wikimedia commons. Thank you very much. --Orcsos 17 (talk) 15:54, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Orcsos 17: that's not so simple, as we have no way to verify that you are the author. Please follow COM:OTRS instructions to send an authorization; this can be done in Italian by writing to permissions-it@wikimedia.org. --Ruthven (msg) 08:55, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
@Ruthven: Ok, don't worry, i follow your instructions asap. Thank you very much! :-) Bye!--Orcsos 17 (talk) 09:22, 17 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No OTRS found. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:56, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted coin, see https://www.usmint.gov/consumer/indexf8be.html?action=circCoinPolicy

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:51, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note, Jim. I know the US Mint has been copyrighting designs for a few years now. I guess this applies the the First Spouse medals. There are also a few other images here. Hoshie (talk) 21:19, 7 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 20:36, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]