Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/12/23
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
ticket:2009052010051757 contains no valid permission. The editor who added this template was not an OTRS agent. The content of the ticket makes it clear this is a copyright violation, although I can't expand on that due to confidentiality.
~ Rob13Talk 05:47, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- OTRS agent (verify): I agree with the OTRS agent above me. Invalid release. (t) Josve05a (c) 05:49, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- (OTRS Agent Comment){verify) I also agree that the release is invalid. Cameron11598 (talk) 06:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- These files originally existed on trwiki (possibly transferred from itwiki or another sister project). As part of a local lang community project, we were moving OTRS verified (the ones indicated as such by OTRS agents) files over to Commons. Possibly the templates such as tr:Template:Copyright Wikisky missed the eyes of local OTRS members such as @Taysin: . I am partly to blame as well, as I had noticed and edited so that the files use a fair use template tr:Template:Wikisky dosyaları adil kullanım ("adil kullanım" means "fair use"), but I striked out my comment b/c of whatever thought I had in the mind at the moment, before Taysin noticed my ping. Probably I was convinced that the OTRS situation was real and verified. Should I copy these files back to trwiki and use the fair use rationale, assuming the Wikisky template was misrepresenting an OTRS situation? --Bulgu (talk) 10:04, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Can OTRS files be fair use? --Bulgu (talk) 10:16, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Bulgu: If a work can be used under fair use is unaffected by if it has an OTRS ticket. Reventtalk 12:38, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedily. Clear copyright violations, with 4 (including me) OTRS agents agreeing the ticket is insufficent for upload on Commons. Images were tagged as PD-NASA, but are copyrighted as per http://stdatu.stsci.edu/dss/copyright.html. --Reventtalk 12:44, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
ticket:2009052010051757 is invalid permission, as agreed by multiple OTRS agents. ~ Rob13Talk 05:48, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Agreed, the permission is invalid. Cameron11598 (talk) 05:59, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedily. Clear copyright violation. See Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_uploaded_by_Hakan_Duran#ticket:2009052010051757. --Reventtalk 12:48, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
To clarify, this image is from the Sloan Digital Sky Survey. See http://www.sdss.org/collaboration/#image-use Reventtalk 12:52, 23 December 2016 (UTC)- Correction. While the filename, etc, would claim it's a SDSS image, it's actually by the physicist Nicholas Law, taken with "LAMP: LuckyCam + AO on the Palomar 200" - still, the image is copyrighted, and the license was insufficent. Reventtalk 13:02, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
This photo gives credit to Carrie Kellenberger, but it is not my photo. Can you please remove my name in the photo title as the photographer? It's not my photo. Kelly Ma (talk) 10:58, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: 
Done. Next time pleases use {{Rename}}. -- Geagea (talk) 11:04, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
unlike கடற்போரில் படகினை S.Gopina (talk) 08:16, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Polarlys: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing
May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 14:52, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: This is a speedy because it is a reupload of File:Mapa e Universidades.jpg. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:18, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Permission for publication is not given explicitely, although an OTRS ticket, ticket:2016102710026043, is provided. Hetty Pangel (talk) 13:37, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep it. In the letter written by the photographer has been given explicit permission for CCby 4.0 license. Ask any OTRS-member: they can read the photographer's permission. We not. Klaas `Z4␟` V: 14:28, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Agree to keep, an old OTRS ticket was moved today to another queue, thats why I missed the ticket with the correct permissions. Hetty Pangel (talk) 14:59, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Please check well before you threaten to delete valuable content in this case even one of a high class photographer/filmer - see his IMDB-profile linked at this file's details. Merry Christmas and Happy New Year Klaas `Z4␟` V: 16:12, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Speedy closed: Withdraw? Also, file has an OTRS permission (that can be confirmed by an OTRS member, but I don't see it necessary). --Amitie 10g (talk) 16:40, 23 December 2016 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
@Hedwig in Washington It contains a multitude of spam on it, it contains flashy advertising, and promotional edits. It's nether section G1, and it's electable nether the criteria for speedy deletion.
Deleted: speedy per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:07, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No source to support that thsi would be a work from the US army. Jcb (talk) 02:43, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Given the nature of the photo, I don't really see a reason to doubt the authorship information that it was created by Petty Officer 1st Class Alan D. Monyelle or the source information that it appeared on http://www.army.mil. More detailed source information would have been nice, but would probably not be current today anyway given that the site has been restructured since 2008. —LX (talk, contribs) 10:51, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- I did do a search before starting this nomination and I found this file on many places on the web, but not on the Navy website or on another US government website. Jcb (talk) 11:02, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Many places such as...? The only hits I got that weren't just hotlinking the image from here were Wikipedia mirrors and a couple of forum posts that were made long after the file was uploaded here. —LX (talk, contribs) 11:15, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- I did do a search before starting this nomination and I found this file on many places on the web, but not on the Navy website or on another US government website. Jcb (talk) 11:02, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Keep With the right search, i've found the original source and subjoined the information. Warm regards --Ras67 (talk) 23:15, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks! Jcb (talk) 00:03, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 00:04, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Probably copyright violation from Vogue Russia or original photographer... see http://forums.thefashionspot.com/f71/olga-dunina-fashion-director-vogue-russia-183079-4.html Acabashi (talk) 13:39, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Ellin Beltz: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing
COM:COPYVIO. Fast moving gif of a copyrighted Star Wars character. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:09, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jdx: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Giphygypha.gif: COM:COPYVIO. Fast moving gif of a copyrighted Star Wars character.
Vandalismo e ataque Mvictor talk 19:52, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Érico: Vandalism
Out of project scope. ★ Poké95 09:48, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 01:44, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
I've been able to determine that both of the screenshots from Valley of the Dolls movie trailers that Light show uploaded (one of which is now the infobox image for the Sharon Tate article) are copyrighted. The trailer can be seen here at Rotten Tomatoes: [1]. At 1:18 into the trailer, the copyright notice comes up as "Copyright ("c" in circle) MCMLXVII by Red Lion Productions, Inc". Then, at imdb [2], the trailer is longer, but the same copyright notice comes up at 3:22 into it as "Copyright ("c" in circle) MCMLXVII by Red Lion Productions, Inc." and 20th Century Fox Film Corporation." This is two trailers with copyright notices. This proves the screenshots Light show uploaded are copyright violations. Light show notated that these images are not copyrighted. This is untrue. Light show has previously been banned from uploading images at Commons because of extensive copyright vios. I'm pinging the following administrators who were involved in the Wikipedia ANI discussion re: her ban from uploading images: Calliopejen1, Diannaa, Laser brain, Moonriddengirl as well as Revent here at Commons. Since this is a major holiday weekend, I figured it would be best to notify several admins to get this dealt with ASAP. Winkelvi (talk) 23:46, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- The trailer is a separate film which requires its own copyright. The notation in the trailer says with the notice, "Released by 20th Century-Fox films , Panavision, Color by Deluxe, A Mark Robson - David Weisbart Production," which all came up alongside a photo of the novel. The trailer has no copyright registered. That notice was for the film, which does have a registration. --Light show (talk) 02:55, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- The full copyright registration for the film: Light show (talk) 03:08, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
0560. VALLEYOFTHEDOLLS. Red Lion Produc- tions. Released by Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp. 1 hr. 25 min. , sd., color, 35 mm. Panavision. Based on the novel by Jacqueline Susann. © Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp. & Red Lion Productions, Inc.; 15 Dec 67; LP55182.
Deleted: per nomination. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 06:22, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
I've been able to determine that both of the screenshots from Valley of the Dolls movie trailers that Light show uploaded (one of which is now the infobox image for the Sharon Tate article) are copyrighted. The trailer can be seen here at Rotten Tomatoes: [1]. At 1:18 into the trailer, the copyright notice comes up as "Copyright ("c" in circle) MCMLXVII by Red Lion Productions, Inc". Then, at imdb [2], the trailer is longer, but the same copyright notice comes up at 3:22 into it as "Copyright ("c" in circle) MCMLXVII by Red Lion Productions, Inc." and 20th Century Fox Film Corporation." This is two trailers with copyright notices. This proves the screenshots Light show uploaded are copyright violations. Light show notated that these images are not copyrighted. This is untrue. Light show has previously been banned from uploading images at Commons because of extensive copyright vios. I'm pinging the following administrators who were involved in the Wikipedia ANI discussion re: her ban from uploading images: Calliopejen1, Diannaa, Laser brain, Moonriddengirl as well as Revent here at Commons. Since this is a major holiday weekend, I figured it would be best to notify several admins to get this dealt with ASAP. Winkelvi (talk) 23:47, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- The trailer is a separate film which requires its own copyright. The notation in the trailer says with the notice, "Released by 20th Century-Fox films , Panavision, Color by Deluxe, A Mark Robson - David Weisbart Production," which all came up alongside a photo of the novel. The trailer has no copyright registered. That notice was for the film, which does have a registration. --Light show (talk) 02:58, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- The full copyright registration for the film: Light show (talk) 03:06, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
0560. VALLEYOFTHEDOLLS. Red Lion Produc- tions. Released by Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp. 1 hr. 25 min. , sd., color, 35 mm. Panavision. Based on the novel by Jacqueline Susann. © Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corp. & Red Lion Productions, Inc.; 15 Dec 67; LP55182.
Deleted: per nomination. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 06:21, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
This is DW rather than own work. No source of the underlying base map. Unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 22:11, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: File uploaded in 2007. See the user history before making these disruptive nominations. --Amitie 10g (talk) 22:35, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- I do not see how the year of upload has any meaning for the copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 22:47, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- The question is why nobody nominated this file previously. If you really believe that User:YassineMrabet did not created the map, provide proof. --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:02, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Because we have a huge backlog on many maintenance categories. And all those keep votes on obvious cases are really unhelpful when trying to reduce those backlogs. In this case you can see from 10 meters from your screen that this is not own work. Jcb (talk) 23:05, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep La version nl du meme contenu File:Second Punic War full-nl.svg ne fait pas l'objet d'une demande de suppression, elle precise en § Source la dérivation opérée. Je cite : "Travail personnel. La carte est vectorisée à partir de Image:Europe_topography_map.png. Les lieux sont repérés grâce à Image:Battles second punic war.png et cette carte sur Britannica. L'image des épées qui symbolisent les batailles a été obtenue à partir d'openclipart.org (Chrisdesign, public domain)."
- Thanks for this information, this will do. So it is a DW (and Amitie 10g was wrong as usual), but derived from a free source. Jcb (talk) 08:56, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 08:57, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
duplicate of File:VH-FMM Pilatus PC-12-47E Factory Demonstrator (6485866531).jpg Marc Lacoste (talk) 07:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 18:35, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 14:56, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Didym: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - Using VisualFileChange.
I, as a non-public person, want to delete photos that I have depicted. MaxBioHazard (talk) 10:33, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Also: File:Wiki-award 2016 024.JPG, File:Wiki-award 2016 007.JPG, File:Wiki-award 2016 008.JPG. MaxBioHazard (talk) 10:35, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- You must place deletion template on all photos and notify all authors. --sasha (krassotkin) 16:25, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Wiki Award Ceremony is a public show of Wikimedia Russia. We specially invite photo and video journalists and we conduct online broadcast from there. We also always make own reports to promote our movement. MaxBioHazard is a winner of Wiki Award 2016. Therefore he actually is a top of participants of the show and is presented in many photos. Furthermore I had a verbal permission to publish photos from him. These photographs were published almost half a year ago and he saw it. That's why I don't understand this nomination. But after our private discussion and a small correction of list I agree with deletion of these files.
Delete --sasha (krassotkin) 08:10, 25 December 2016 (UTC) - Delete. I agree with Sasha. DonSimon (talk) 08:14, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion and COM:PEOPLE. --Sealle (talk) 10:40, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
- Примечание на будущее: также File:Wiki-award_2016_067.JPG File:Wiki-award_2016_100.JPG MBH 14:35, 28 June 2022 (UTC)
Out of project scope: no educational value. Lymantria (talk) 13:50, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:10, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Harpal1909 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal images, out of scope.
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON 9852.jpg
- File:Harpal Singh Jadon 85.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON 556.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON 9+.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON 59.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON 1.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON 30.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON 96.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON K.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON JG.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON GG.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON GZ.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON VX.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON 989.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON JL.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON D.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON H.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON LK.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON 25.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON JFK.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON 98.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON AA.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON HJ.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON 85.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON X.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON 6.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON HK.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON CH.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON DHI.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON 23.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON FHV.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON 5.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON FHJ.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON GJ.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON JF.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON UI.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON UJ.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON UY.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON LV.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON DH.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON J.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON FI.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON FH.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON GD.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON IX.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON CGH.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON HR.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON FJH.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON XG.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON ZF.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON GA.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON UJN.jpg
- File:HARPAL SINGH JADON.jpg
- File:Harpal singh jadon HK.jpg
- File:Harpal singh jadon.jpg
- File:Harpal singh jadon FJ.jpg
- File:Harpal singh jadon YU.jpg
- File:Harpal singh jadon G.jpg
- File:Harpal singh jadon GH.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon HG.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon DGG.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon DGK.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon GS.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon IX.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon FHI.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon P.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon FHY.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon FJ.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon Y.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon GJ.jpg
- File:Harpal Singh Jadon (226).jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon HR.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon FH.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon DGH.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon FG.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon KTG.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon H,.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon H.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon GT.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon T.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon R.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon DH.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon DGU.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon RY.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon 7.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon YUI.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon DGV.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon U.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon D.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon GI.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon G.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon TJ.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon XFH.jpg
- File:Harpal singh JadonET.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon XDG.jpg
- File:Harpal singh JadonDTY.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon DEY.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon DTD.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon S B.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon DY.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon DG.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon CG.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon SWT.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon NJ.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon RYY.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon SR.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon SX.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon SF.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon DT.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon N.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon ZR.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon harpal singh Jadon S.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon QE.jpg
- File:Harpal singh JadonSR.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon X.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon XF.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon DSR.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon XS.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon B.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon K.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon S.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon DFG.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon XFR.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon CB.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon CD.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon xdst V.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadone.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon xdst.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon fdtr.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon sfd.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon fd.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon cxf.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon ee.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon +9.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon dft.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon de.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon g.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon wer.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon ft.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon dget.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon fhtr.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon frty.jpg
- File:Harpal Singh Jadon (92).jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon sf.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon ge.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon b fr.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon ry.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon ew.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon gyf.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon vd.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon v.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon gh.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon jado.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon ja.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon harpal singh Jadon.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon1.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon HD.jpg
- File:KJH.jpg
- File:GHJKL.jpg
- File:HAR.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon xxx.jpg
- File:Harpal singh jadon sdf.jpg
- File:Harpal singh jadon lo.jpg
- File:JADON.jpg
- File:SINGH.jpg
- File:20151115 092148 B.jpg
- File:Harpal singh jadon sin.jpg
- File:Harpal singh jadonHarpal singh jadon.jpg
- File:Harpal singh jadon dgi.jpg
- File:Harpal singh jadon dg.jpg
- File:Harpal singh jadon bit.jpg
- File:Harpal singh jadon bin.jpg
- File:Harpal singh jadon sf.jpg
- File:Harpal singh jadon ni.jpg
- File:Harpal singh jadon fin.jpg
- File:201Harpal singh jadon.jpg
- File:Harpal singh jadon tin.jpg
- File:Harpal singh jadon fig.jpg
- File:Harpal singh jadon ti.jpg
- File:Harpal singh jadon big.jpg
- File:Harpal singh jadon fh.jpg
- File:Harpal singh jadon rew.jpg
- File:Harpal singh jadon vin.jpg
- File:Harpal singh jadon biu.jpg
- File:Harpal singh jadon vip.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon JIU.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon TG.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon XXX.jpg
- File:Harpal singh Jadon 258.jpg
Yann (talk) 02:13, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Added subsequent similar uploads to this DR. FDMS 4 16:44, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: This user doesn't seem to understand. Blocked for a week. --Yann (talk) 17:02, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 15:02, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - Using VisualFileChange.
I uploaded and made a mistake with name and description. Please remove. Thanks. Miguel Andrade (talk) 17:00, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:21, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Fukutarō Ozawa
[edit]Withdraw nomination I've searched quite extensively but cannot find any details about when this statue was erected or who the artist was but there is no freedom of panorama exception for Japan according to Commons:Freedom of panorama#Japan and {{NoFoP-Japan}} unless they are more than 50 years pma, so probably PCP applies. Besides which none of the images are being used in any articles that might give us some clues as to its age.
- File:Fukutaro Ozawa cropped 1 彫刻9 - panoramio.jpg
- File:Fukutaro Ozawa cropped 2 彫刻9 - panoramio.jpg
- File:Fukutaro Ozawa cropped 3 彫刻9 - panoramio.jpg
- File:Fukutaro Ozawa cropped 4 彫刻9 - panoramio.jpg
- File:彫刻9 - panoramio.jpg
Ww2censor (talk) 16:51, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep The Statue of Fukutarō Ozawa was made by Naoya Takei. Takei was a very famous sculptor, and Takei died in 1940. Then the copyright of this sculpture expired. And this picture was taken by Suwakotaro. Suwakotaro says "CC-BY-SA-3.0". I think that it is not necessary to delete the image.--Scanyaro (talk) 19:27, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Comment Ww2censor said "I've searched quite extensively but cannot find any details". I don’t understand. Have you read this category page? Category:Fukutarō Ozawa has been linked the jawp page since 22:14, 14 December 2016 (UTC). The jawp page says "福太郎の業績を記念し、武井直也の手による「尾澤福太郎翁の像」が建立されている".... I don’t know what to say. --Scanyaro (talk) 19:52, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Thank you. Thanks, Ww2censor! I read Ww2censor's comments and understood his/her circumstances.--Scanyaro (talk) 00:40, 28 December 2016 (UTC) ...I was very surprised. Ww2censor says "withdraw per details provided - I missed the category link that is rather unusual to see, besides which I can't read Japanese". But Ww2censor said "I've searched quite extensively but cannot find any details" and requested the deletion of the "Files in Category:Fukutarō Ozawa" on 16:51, 23 December 2016 (UTC). In other words, Ww2censor didn't check a category and requested the deletion of the files in a category.--Scanyaro (talk) 02:54, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per Scanyaro. The statue was erected in 1936, and the author died in 1940. The 1899 Copyright Law was in effect at the time, and its protection was 30 years p.m.a., hence public domain since 1971. --朝彦 | asahiko (talk) 10:18, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: as above. --Yann (talk) 15:52, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
This is a COM:DW of non-free content F-BTSC (talk) 00:23, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:27, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
File:2015-03-17 Beechcraft 1900C Simrik Airlines Boarding Pass at Gautam Buddha Airport DSCF1935.jpg
[edit]This is a COM:DW of copyrighted content F-BTSC (talk) 00:53, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:27, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
I would say that these files are too complex for {{PD-ineligible}}.
- File:SAAF 2lt.jpg
- File:SAAF co.jpg
- File:SAAF lt.jpg
- File:SAAF capt.jpg
- File:SAAF ltcol.jpg
- File:SAAF col.jpg
- File:Bgen.jpg
- File:Ltgen.jpg
- File:SAAF Mgen.jpg
Stefan4 (talk) 20:54, 3 September 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: FASTILYs (TALK) 00:11, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Copyright violations: non-free photographs of 3D objects (COM:When to use the PD-Art tag#This does not apply to photographs of 3D works of art) and coins (COM:COIN).
- File:Lietuvos nepriklausomybės medalis 1928 rev.png
- File:Lietuvos nepriklausomybės medalis 1928.png
- File:Lietuvos nepriklausomybės medalis.png
- File:Vyties kryžius su kardais. 1-ojo laipsnio.png
- File:Vyties kryziaus ordinas III, be kardu.png
- File:Vyties kryziaus ordino zvaigzde su kardais.png
- File:Vyties kryziaus ordinas I, su kardais.jpg
- File:Vyčio Kryžiaus 1-ojo laipsnio ordinas.jpg
- File:Kryžius „Už Tėvynę“.png
- File:D.L.K.Gedimino ordinas 1TR.png
- File:DLK Gedimino ordinas II 1928.jpg
- File:DNZ 10 Gul 1935.jpg
- File:DNZ 5 Gul 1932 Port.jpg
- File:DNZ 5 Gul 1932 Boat.jpg
- File:DNZ 25 Gul 1930.jpg
- File:DNZ 25 Gul 1923.jpg
- File:DNZ 1-2 Gul 1923.jpg
- File:DNZ 5 Gul 1932.jpg
- File:DNZ 1 Gul 1923.jpg
- File:ALB 2 Lek 1989 V Day.png
- File:ALB 100 Fr 1938 Wed.png
- File:ALB 20 Fr 1938 Wed.png
- File:ALB 5 Lek 1957.png
- File:ALB 2 Lek 1957.png
- File:ALB 1 Lek 1957.png
- File:ALB 1-2 Lek 1957.png
- File:ALB 2 Lek 1989.png
- File:ALB 1 Qi Ar 1935.png
- File:ALB 2 Fr 1927.png
- File:ALB 0,50 Lek 1941.jpg
- File:ALB 0,20 Lek 1941.jpg
- File:ALB 0,10 Lek 1940.jpg
- File:ALB 0,05 Lek 1940.jpg
- File:ALB 0,20 Lek 1939.jpg
- File:ALB 2 Lek 1939.jpg
- File:ALB 1 Lek 1939.jpg
- File:ALB 10 Lek1939.jpg
- File:ALB 5 Lek1939.jpg
- File:ALB 1 Qi Ar 1935.jpg
- File:ALB 1-2 Lek 1930.jpg
- File:ALB 1 Fr Ar 1935.jpg
- File:ALB 2 Fr Ar 1937.jpg
- File:ALB 2 Fr Ar 1935.jpg
- File:ALB 1 Fr Ar 1937 Com.jpg
- File:ALB 2 Qi Ar 1935.jpg
- File:ALB 1 Lek1931.jpg
- File:ALB 1 Lek1930.jpg
- File:ALB 1 Fr Ar 1937.jpg
- File:ALB 20 Fr 1938.jpg
- File:ALB 50 Fr 1938.jpg
- File:ALB 100 Fr 1938.jpg
- File:ALB 100 Fr 1937.jpg
- File:ALB 20 Fr 1937.jpg
- File:ALB 1 Fr Ar 1927.jpg
- File:ALB 20 Fr Ar 1927 Zog.jpg
- File:ALB 10 Fr Ar 1927.jpg
- File:ALB 2 Fr 1926.jpg
- File:ALB 5 Fr 1926.jpg
- File:ALB 1-2 Lek 1926.jpg
- File:ALB 100 Fr 1926.jpg
- File:ALB 20 Fr Ar 1926.jpg
- File:ALB 100 Fr Ar 1927 II.jpg
- File:ALB 100 Fr Ar 1927 I.jpg
- File:ALB 100 Fr Ar 1927.jpg
- File:ALB 100 Fr 1926 II.jpg
- File:ALB 100 Fr 1926 I.jpg
- File:ALB 20 Fr Ar 1927.jpg
- File:ALB 5 Fr 1926 I.jpg
- File:ALB 1 Lek 1926.jpg
- File:ALB 1-4 Lek 1927.jpg
- File:1 Lek 1926 rev.jpg
- File:1 Lek 1926 av.jpg
- File:Vytautas rev.png
- File:Vytautas av.png
- File:Gediminas rev.png
- File:Gediminas det2.png
- File:Gediminas det1.png
- File:Gediminas av.png
- File:Gediminor.png
- File:Gedimino3.png
- File:Gedimino2.png
- File:Gedimino1.png
- File:Klaipeda medal a.png
- File:Kalipeda medal r.png
- File:Gedimino ordinas old revers.png
- File:Klaipėdos išvadavimo medalis.png
- File:Lietuvos kariuomenės kūrėjų savanorių medalis (det).png
- File:Lietuvos kariuomenės kūrėjų savanorių medalis (rev).png
- File:Lietuvos kariuomenės kūrėjų savanorių medalis.png
- File:Vojnički red željeznog trolista I stupanj.jpg
- File:Vojnički red željeznog trolista IV stupanj s hrastovim grančicama.jpg
- File:Vojnički red željeznog trolista III stupanj s hrastovim grančicama.jpg
- File:Vojnički red željeznog trolista II stupanj s hrastovim grančicama.png
- File:Red krune kralja Zvonimira II class.jpg
- File:Орден «За военна доблест и заслуга» II.png
- File:Орден «За военна доблест и заслуга» I.png
- File:Estonian Air force pilot badge.png
- File:LatLacpl revers.jpg
- File:Vyties kryzius (revers).png
- File:Vyties kryzius.png
- File:Vyties kryziaus ordinas.png
- File:Order of Lāčplēsis.jpg
- File:Viestura ordenis (civil).jpg
- File:Vyties kryžius.jpg
- File:World War I Victory Medal (revers).jpg
- File:Dariaus ir Girėno medalis (revers).jpg
- File:Dariaus ir Girėno medalis (avers).jpg
- File:Dariaus ir Girėno medalis.jpeg
- File:Klaipėdos išvadavimo medalis.jpg
- File:Medal of the Order of the Three Stars (silver).jpg
- File:Medal of the Order of the Three Stars (bronzer).jpg
- File:Medal of the Order of the Three Stars (bronze) rev..jpg
- File:Cross of Recognition (rev.).jpg
- File:Cross of Recognition.jpg
- File:Войнишки знак на ордена „За Храброст“ IV степен, емисия 1915 г..jpg
- File:Орден „За Храброст“ IV ст. 1912.jpg
- File:Орден «За гражданска заслуга» rev.jpg
- File:Орден «За гражданска заслуга».jpg
- File:Орден „Св. Св. Кирил и Методий“ 03.jpg
- File:Орден „Св. Св. Кирил и Методий“ 02.jpg
- File:Орден „Св. Св. Кирил и Методий“ 01.jpg
- File:Орден „Св. Св. Кирил и Методий“.gif
- File:Sv kiril i metodii revers.jpg
- File:Sv kiril i metodii avers.jpg
- File:StAlexanderIS-2.jpg
- File:StAlexanderIIIsw-2.jpg
- File:StAlexanderIIIsw1-2.jpg
- File:StAlexanderIII-2.jpg
- File:Order of the Phoenix I type.jpg
- File:Орден „За Храброст“ IV ст. avers.jpg
- File:Орден „За Храброст“ I ст. звезда 1880.jpg
- File:Орден „За Храброст“ IV ст. revers.jpg
- File:Орден „За Храброст“ IV ст..jpg
- File:Орден „За Храброст“ III ст. 1886.jpg
- File:Орден „За Храброст“ IV ст. 1 клас, 1941 г.jpg
- File:Орден „За Храброст“ IV ст. 1 клас, 1916 г.jpg
- File:Орден Св. Александръ 13.jpg
- File:Орден Св. Александръ 12.jpg
- File:Орден Св. Александръ 11.jpg
- File:Орден Св. Александръ 10.jpg
- File:Орден Св. Александръ 09.jpg
- File:Орден Св. Александръ 08.jpg
- File:Орден Св. Александръ 07.jpg
- File:Орден Св. Александръ 05.jpg
- File:Орден Св. Александръ 04.jpg
- File:Орден Св. Александръ 03.jpg
- File:Орден Св. Александръ 02.jpg
- File:Орден Св. Александръ 01.jpg
- File:Орден Св. Александръ .JPG
- File:ORDER OF SAINT ALEXANDER.jpg
- File:Order of Bravery (Bulgaria, 1948) 2nd class.jpg
- File:Aizsagru Nopelnu krusts back.jpg
- File:Aizsargu Nopelnu krusts front.jpg
- File:Aizsargu Nopelnu krusts.jpg
- File:Sauliu zvaigzde.jpg
- File:Dragunu Bat..jpg
- File:Lithuanian parachutist badges.jpg
- File:N a.jpg
- File:Sauliu Zvaigzde.jpg
- File:CarolIS.jpg
- File:Šaulių žvaigždės medalis - rev..jpg
- File:Šaulių žvaigždės medalis.jpg
- File:Šaulių žvaigždė - rev..jpg
- File:Šaulių žvaigždė.jpg
- File:Gelezinis vilkas.jpg
- File:Maremblem.jpg
- File:Koksoldukr.jpg
- File:Kokvmfsoldukr.jpg
- File:Kokvmfofukr.jpg
- File:Kokadmiralbolukr.jpg
- File:Albrechts-Orden 2.jpg
- File:Military Order of St Henry.jpg
- File:Order of Merit Saxony.jpg
- File:Order of Albrecht 1a.jpg
- File:Albrechts-Orden 1.jpg
- File:Albrechts-Orden.jpg
- File:Order of Albrecht 3.jpg
- File:Order of Albrecht 2.jpg
- File:Order of Albrecht 1.jpg
- File:Order of Albrecht.jpg
- File:Honourrev.jpg
- File:Honour.jpg
- File:ORDER OF CROWN OF PRUSSIA.jpg
- File:Order of the Red Banner of the Georgian SSR.jpg
- File:3zvg.jpg
- File:Konnik02.jpg
- File:Konnik01.jpg
- File:13VBStar.jpg
- File:13VBmini.jpg
- File:13VB.jpg
- File:RoseIrev.jpg
- File:RoseI.jpg
- File:KM03.jpg
- File:KM02.jpg
- File:KM01.jpg
- File:Klpronks.jpg
- File:Klkuld.jpg
- File:Klhobe.jpg
- File:Kleri.jpg
- File:Krvr3.jpg
- File:Klvalger2.jpg
- File:Kl1.jpg
- File:Purpleh back.jpg
- File:Purpleheart.jpg
- File:Navycross2.jpg
- File:28628.jpg
- File:32323.jpg
- File:32785.jpg
- File:40961.jpg
- File:36394.jpg
- File:47912.jpg
- File:27239.jpg
- File:51679.jpg
- File:Rus Order of the White Eagle.jpg
- File:Punanemedaltaga.gif
- File:Punanemedal.gif
- File:Punanerist5kl.gif
- File:Punanerist4kl.gif
- File:Punanerist3klD.gif
- File:Punanerist3kl.gif
- File:Punanerist2klD.gif
- File:Punanerist2kl.gif
- File:Punanerist1klD.gif
- File:Punanerist1kl.gif
- File:Maarjamaarist5kl.gif
- File:Maarjamarist4kl.gif
- File:Maarjamarist3klD.gif
- File:Maarjamarist3kl.gif
- File:Maarjamarist2klD.gif
- File:Maarjamarist2kl.gif
- File:Maarjamarist1klD.gif
- File:Maarjamarist1kl.gif
- File:Kett.gif
- File:Maarjamaristtaga.gif
- File:Maarjamaarist.gif
- File:Maarjamahobet.gif
- File:Ristpunanetaga.gif
- File:Ristpunane.gif
- File:Punanerist.gif
- File:Esti Punane Rist - Copy.jpg
- File:3klas.jpg
- File:Kotkaraudrist.gif
- File:Kotkarhobe.gif
- File:Kotkarkuld.gif
- File:Kotkarist3klD.gif
- File:Kotkarist3kl.gif
- File:Kotkarist2klD.gif
- File:Kotkarist2kl.gif
- File:Kotkarist1klD.gif
- File:Kotkarist1kl.gif
- File:Kotkarist4kl.gif
- File:Kotkarist5kl.gif
- File:Maltaristtaga.gif
- File:Maltarist.gif
- File:Hobetaht.gif
- File:Medalitaga.gif
- File:Valgemedal.gif
- File:Valgetaht5kl.gif
- File:Valgetaht4kl.gif
- File:Valgetaht3klD.gif
- File:Valgetaht3kl.gif
- File:Valgetaht2klD.gif
- File:Valgetaht2kl.gif
- File:Valgetaht1klD.gif
- File:Valgetaht1kl.gif
- File:Valgetaheteen.gif
- File:Valgeristitaga.gif
- File:Valgerist.gif
- File:Valgetahedetail.gif
- File:Riigivapp5kl.gif
- File:Riigivapp4kl.gif
- File:Riigivapp3klD.gif
- File:Riigivapp3kl.gif
- File:Riigivapp2klN.gif
- File:Riigivapp2kl.gif
- File:Riigivapp1klN.gif
- File:Riigivapp1kl.gif
- File:Riigivteenkett.gif
- File:Riigivtaga.gif
- File:Riigivapp.gif
- File:Riigiv.hmark.gif
- File:Est3.jpg
- File:Liberty1.jpg
- File:EE102e.jpg
- File:EE102b.jpg
- File:Vruus.jpg
- File:SunVI.jpg
- File:SunS.jpg
- File:SunIII.jpg
- File:Popup SVR SR ketju.jpg
- File:Popup SL R I.jpg
- File:Popup SL K miehet.jpg
- File:Chechenorden2.JPG
- File:Chechenorden1.JPG
- File:Vr sr.jpg
- File:2lk vm.jpg
- File:1lk vr rinta.jpg
- File:1lk vr mk ra.jpg
- File:Press46073.jpg
- File:Press46066.jpg
- File:The Royal Logistics Corps.jpg
- File:24616.jpg
- File:LionII.jpg
- File:AStarIII.jpg
- File:CrownIV.jpg
- File:LeoII-V.jpg
- File:LeopoldIII.jpg
- File:BEmpireIII.jpg
- File:I4large.jpg
- File:Order-of-merit.gif
- File:L7365B.jpg
- File:L7365F.jpg
- File:L15625B.jpg
- File:L15625F.jpg
- File:L1318F.jpg
- File:L11944B.jpg
- File:L11918B.jpg
- File:L11944F.jpg
- File:L15222F.jpg
- File:L11918F.jpg
- File:L11566F.jpg
- File:LV118f.jpg
- File:LV118a.jpg
- File:Latvia9.jpg
- File:5 6 uz ordino medalis.gif
- File:SwordWCrev.jpg
- File:SwordWC.jpg
- File:SwordIVrev.jpg
- File:SwordIV.jpg
- File:SwordIIS1.jpg
- File:SwordIIS.jpg
- File:SwordIIrev.jpg
- File:SwordII.jpg
- File:L15480F.jpg
- File:L15480B.jpg
- File:Bg-military-bravery-3class.jpg
- File:Type1 officer jrf.JPG
- File:Type1 knight.JPG
- File:Coroana romaniei IV l.jpg
- File:Coroana romaniei V l.jpg
- File:Steaua romaniei IV l.jpg
- File:RomaniaStarVsw.jpg
- File:Star t1 knight.JPG
- File:Star t1 officer.JPG
- File:Star t2 knight.JPG
Sealle (talk) 04:52, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Files from this list to have the most in the description of the license authorizing the publication of the images. On the data files to local law of copyright. I consider deleting these files unfounded. --Kei (talk) 05:08, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Kei, внимательно ознакомьтесь с основаниями вынесения на удаление и поясните свои намерения по-русски. Ваше сообщение нечитаемо. Sealle (talk) 05:18, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Замечательно, что тут заговорили по русски. На удаление предложены файлы скопом, при этом многие из данных файлов в своём описании имеют проставленные лицензии, в соответствии с которыми изображённые на них награды не подпадают под законодательство об авторском праве. Я считаю, что в данном случае удаление является неправомерным. --Kei (talk) 05:24, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Kei, очень жаль, что Вы всё-таки не пожелали ознакомиться с содержанием правил по приведённым ссылкам. Файлы вынесены не "скопом", а те, где фотографии объектов сделаны не загрузившим файлы, при этом - взяты из источников, не имеющих отношения к обладателям прав на оригинальные объекты. Проблема в том, что фотографирование трёхмерных объектов создаёт авторское право фотографа на производную работу, даже если объект съёмки находится в общественном достоянии. Иными словами, для размещения этих изображений нужно получить разрешения авторов этих современных фотографий. Sealle (talk) 05:31, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Я понял о чём идёт речь. Однако обращаю Ваше внимание на трактовку данного правила: "Когда фотография демонстрирует оригинальность (как правило , за счет выбора обрамления, освещения, точки зрения и так далее), он имеет право на авторское право, даже если фотографируемый объект сам не охраняемых авторским правом". Не кажется ли Вам что в данной ситуации необходимо доказать демонстрируемую оригинальность? Или же это всё таки изображение, которое можно отнести к обобщённым, простым изображениям, не несущим авторской нагрузки? --Kei (talk) 05:36, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- 1. Доказывать что-либо в этом проекте должен загружающий, см. Commons:Project scope#Evidence. 2. Внимательно прочитайте COM:COIN: Attention: a photograph of a coin has two requirements before it can be included. The first is that the design of the coin itself is not copyrighted, or permission has been obtained. The second is that the photographer agrees to license it under a free licence. Никакой трактовки нет, есть чёткие требования. Sealle (talk) 05:44, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Замечательно, что тут заговорили по русски. На удаление предложены файлы скопом, при этом многие из данных файлов в своём описании имеют проставленные лицензии, в соответствии с которыми изображённые на них награды не подпадают под законодательство об авторском праве. Я считаю, что в данном случае удаление является неправомерным. --Kei (talk) 05:24, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Kei, внимательно ознакомьтесь с основаниями вынесения на удаление и поясните свои намерения по-русски. Ваше сообщение нечитаемо. Sealle (talk) 05:18, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Награды Эстонии в диапазоне списка Punanemedaltaga.gif - Riigiv.hmark.gif взяты с государственного портала riik.ee, принадлежащего государству (также как и сайты президента, правительства, канцелярии президента), сайты там несколько раз переделывались, сейчас изображения наград находятся непосредственно на сайте президента. Т.е. они "взяты из источников, имеющих отношения к обладателям прав на оригинальные объекты". Эти изображения не несут авторской оригинальности и скорее сканы, чем фото, к тому же в таком размере, что не имеют коммерческой ценности. Borodun (talk) 18:02, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
The 2D copying say that photocopying of 2D works (where copyright has expired) is not royalty-bearing due the lack of originality of the photos. In my opinion these reasons applies also to coins and medals photographed in standard position: straight and with uniform lighting. The case excludes the photographer's creativity, he don't has the option to choose position or lighting. --Turbojet (talk) 09:18, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:42, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RickMorais (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unclear copyright status considering artworks (caricatures) by Portuguese/Brazilian artist Alfredo Cândido (1879 in Portugal—1960, ?), failing (as indicated by uploader) {{PD-old-70-1923}} and also {{PD-Portugal-URAA}} or PD-whatever. Permission needed.
- File:António José de Almeida durante o tumulto na Câmara dos Deputados (1907) - Alfredo Cândido.png
- File:«Casamento Civil» (1910) - postal ilustrado por Alfredo Cândido.png
- File:Caricatura retratando Sebastião Magalhães Lima, em traje de Grão-Mestre da Maçonaria, 1910.png
Gunnex (talk) 11:04, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Nominating also:
= (as indicated) an artwork by "Ricardo Bensaúde" (Portuguese painter) who lived (following e.g. http://repositorio.ul.pt/handle/10451/11425) 1894 — 1974 (most likely son of pt:Maurício Bensaude), failing (as indicated) PD-Art{{PD-old-90}}. Gunnex (talk) 11:41, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, artists' heirs should confirm license via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 17:43, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by RickMorais (talk · contribs)
[edit]These photographs were put on Flickr by a library, and marked with a free license, but the library did not take these photos. There is no evidence that the library secured permission from the copyright holder to release these files under a free license.
- File:Visita a Figueiró dos Vinhos do Presidente da República Américo Tomás (24 de Outubro de 1963) 02 (cropped).png
- File:Américo Tomás (24 de Outubro de 1963).png
- File:Visita a Figueiró dos Vinhos do Presidente da República Américo Tomás (24 de Outubro de 1963) 04.png
- File:Visita a Figueiró dos Vinhos do Presidente da República Américo Tomás (24 de Outubro de 1963) 03.png
- File:Visita a Figueiró dos Vinhos do Presidente da República Américo Tomás (24 de Outubro de 1963) 05.png
- File:Visita a Figueiró dos Vinhos do Presidente da República Américo Tomás (24 de Outubro de 1963) 02.png
- File:Visita a Figueiró dos Vinhos do Presidente da República Américo Tomás (24 de Outubro de 1963) 01.png
- File:Visita a Figueiró dos Vinhos do Presidente da República Américo Tomás (24 de Outubro de 1963).png
Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 06:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Based on the dates these were taken, they aren't in the public domain in either the United States or the source country (Portugal). It's unlikely that the library is authorized to release these under a free license. ~ Rob13Talk 00:14, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 02:31, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Not licensed for distribution Nidentwiki (talk) 00:47, 19 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Jcb (talk) 15:41, 27 September 2016 (UTC)
Per Commons:Nudity. ·×ald·es 06:42, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 02:31, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
File is too big. Kite2017 (talk) 07:29, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: No valid reason for deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 11:45, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: missing license. --Jcb (talk) 02:32, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
File is too big. Kite2017 (talk) 07:32, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: No valid reason for deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 11:45, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: missing license. --Jcb (talk) 02:32, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jari heinonen (talk · contribs)
[edit]Those images look like copyright violations; Framed scans, press photos, posters, all this seem to come from several sources and not "own work".
- File:Jari, Gweltaz.jpg
- File:Jari, Fakir, Gweltaz.jpg
- File:A EV 2004.jpg
- File:Harri.jpg
- File:EV 2001 festival Bobital.jpg
- File:EV bar l'Espadon Concarneau.jpg
- File:Jari fête langue bretonne.jpg
- File:EV et Jim Kerr Simple Minds-Lorient Interceltique.jpg
- File:EV dans les années 1980.jpg
- File:APhotothèque - 1343.jpg
Lacrymocéphale (talk) 12:35, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 02:34, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in Ghana.
- File:Botwe Admin front view.JPG
- File:Botwe Administration front view.JPG
- File:Admin Block 2.JPG
- File:Staircase of Admin Block.JPG
- File:Adminstration Entrance.JPG
- File:Admin Block side.JPG
- File:Library complex under construction.JPG
- File:Francis Lodowic Bartels.JPG
- File:Library Complex.JPG
- File:Francis Lodowic Bartels' bust 2.JPG
- File:Francis Lodowic Bartels' bust.JPG
- File:Freeman- Aggrey House.JPG
- File:Ground floor of Freeman- Aggrey House.JPG
- File:Ground floor of Freeman Aggrey.JPG
- File:Front view of Lochart House.JPG
- File:Abruquah- Monney House.JPG
Wikicology (talk) 21:43, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
- Note to closing admin - Linking User talk:Rberchie#Notification about possible deletion, since he decided to comment there rather than here, the appropriate venue. Wikicology (talk) 09:06, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
- Note to closing admin - User:Rberchie has changed the source of the photo to "Edit Ghana". Wikicology (talk) 18:51, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
The pictures from #1 to #6 can be kept, because the architect has died presumably more than 70 years ago. The other pictures have to be deleted, unfortunately, as there is no Freedom of Panorama in Ghana at the moment. --Jcornelius (talk) 20:44, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, #7 to #16 have to be deleted, #1 to #6 can be kept. --Jcornelius (talk) 20:44, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work (small images, FBMD or no metadata), also some newspaper articles and paintings without further information on author and date of creation
- File:WLW in daily Graphic.jpg
- File:Daily Graphic.jpg
- File:Breakout @ Tesco Spintex 1.jpg
- File:Breakout @ Tedx Spintex.jpg
- File:Break out session Tedx Spintex.jpg
- File:Tedx Spintex stage.jpg
- File:Becca at Tedx .jpg
- File:Benedicta.jpg
- File:Stella Agbley.jpg
- File:OFWA log.jpg
- File:Ashesi Intro.jpg
- File:Ashesi University.jpg
- File:Ashesi souvenirs.jpg
- File:Felix at Ashesi University Intro.jpg
- File:Felix at Ashesi Intro.jpg
- File:Ashesi Intro 6.jpg
- File:Ashesi Intro 5.jpg
- File:Ashesi Intro 4.jpg
- File:Felix at Ashesi.jpg
- File:Ashesi Intro 2 2.jpg
- File:Ashesi Intro 2.jpg
- File:Ashesi Intro Session 1.jpg
- File:Zita Marie and a participant.jpg
- File:WLW and WLM.jpg
- File:Tano Subunum Fetish Priestess.jpg
- File:Zita and two particpants.jpg
- File:Zita and Regina Agyare.jpg
- File:Zita, Marie and a participant at Women in Tech Summit.jpg
- File:Zita at Women in Tech Summit.jpg
- File:Dilapidated structure.jpg
- File:Canobib gun.jpg
- File:Tree at Slave market.jpg
- File:Hunting implements.jpg
- File:Old cooking equipment.jpg
- File:Ussher Fort Door.jpg
- File:Ussher Fort Entrance.jpg
- File:Slave torture.jpg
- File:Auction picture.jpg
- File:Reinforced metal gate.jpg
- File:Ussher Fort Doors.jpg
- File:Slaves working on a plantation.jpg
- File:Slave scar painting.jpg
- File:Oware at Ussher Fort Museum.jpg
- File:Male neck shackles.jpg
- File:Ussher Fort Walls.jpg
- File:Shackles.jpg
- File:Slave wells.jpg
- File:Raphael Berchie.jpg
- File:Beads necklace.jpg
- File:Beads Around the wrist.jpg
- File:Soul Beads.jpg
- File:Contemporary beads 1.jpg
- File:Contemporary beads.jpg
- File:Rattray 13.jpg
- File:Rattray 14.jpg
- File:Rattray 12.jpg
- File:Rattray 10.jpg
- File:Rattray 09.jpg
- File:Rattray 08.jpg
- File:Rattray 07.jpg
- File:Rattray 06.jpg
- File:Rattray 05.jpg
- File:Rattray 04.jpg
- File:Rattray 03.jpg
- File:Rattray 01.jpg
- File:Rattray 02.jpg
Didym (talk) 22:53, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 02:40, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope, photo of a non-notable person. Also COM:PRP, since the metadata suggests that this image has been copied from Facebook. ★ Poké95 01:43, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:29, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope, should be converted to wikitext if useful. ★ Poké95 01:43, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:30, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 19:07, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:45, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 19:07, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:45, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 19:13, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:40, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 19:38, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:40, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 19:39, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:40, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized personal images, out of scope.
Gauss (talk) 19:58, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:40, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized personal images, out of scope.
Gauss (talk) 20:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:39, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Electryorganic (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused, uncategorized personal images, out of scope.
- File:White .1.jpg
- File:FOX clip.jpg
- File:Jámie gilbert Industry image1.jpg
- File:Jámie Gilbert image 1.jpg
- File:Ja'miegilbert™.jpg
Gauss (talk) 20:09, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:39, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized personal images, out of scope.
Gauss (talk) 20:13, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:38, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Unused, uncategorized personal images, out of scope.
- File:AlexeyFenix1.png
- File:ArMYI6nc6oMBRK 2SbLM8hihOQ-pMprc7zhniODM d8u.jpg
- File:Dexter Lag.JPG
- File:Deynis Savz.jpg
- File:Dfdgdfg.JPG
- File:Dhaval Ramani.jpg
- File:Diapola rww39hqc.jpg
- File:Dibyajyoti is not.jpg
- File:Did I Win? (3734961796).jpg
- File:Dr.Mohammad.jpg
- File:Dr.Nadeem Ahmad.jpg
- File:LagodaYaroslav-Tallin.jpg
- File:LagodaYaroslav.jpg
- File:LagodaYaroslavHimalai.jpg
- File:Lavi Malik.jpg
- File:Lucas Wood.jpg
- File:Pepopite.jpg
- File:Sas2312312.jpg
- File:SHISHIR BHOWMIK.jpg
- File:Siddhartha Puri.jpg
- File:Мухаммадмусо.jpg
- File:وائل عمروش.JPG
Gauss (talk) 20:35, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:38, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo - out of scope. --XXN, 20:38, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:36, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Looks like screenshots of a copyrighted TV show to me.
Gauss (talk) 20:40, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- The actor seems to be Uğur Güneş playing the character "Tuğtekin" on the TV series Diriliş Ertuğrul. --Bulgu (talk) 22:07, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:36, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:10, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:36, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Book cover - almost surely copyrighted. Gauss (talk) 21:12, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:36, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Files of User:Danilito55
[edit]Unused images, apparently personal images that are out of scope --Tabercil (talk) 21:58, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:34, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
my mistake, didn't want to create this page Martin Falbisoner (talk) 22:04, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:33, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, with watermarking before the cropped version, and also published at http://www.tollywoodandhra.in/stills/telugu-actress/ileana/ileana-hot-stills-3/?pid=98117 (2011) ·×ald·es 23:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:30, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anantha Padmanabha aila uppala (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of project scope
Didym (talk) 02:33, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:51, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
COM:NOTHOST - serves no useful purpose. sısɐuuǝɔıʌ∀ (diskuto) 03:11, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:51, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
COM:NOTHOST - serves no useful purpose. sısɐuuǝɔıʌ∀ (diskuto) 03:12, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:51, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
derivative work of the framed photograph Didym (talk) 03:37, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Delete unused image --47.150.89.223 02:13, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:52, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Carmen Moreno G (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of project scope
Didym (talk) 03:39, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:52, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 03:41, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:52, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 04:12, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:52, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope; Personal image(s). MCMLXXXIX 18:50, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:49, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope; Personal image(s). MCMLXXXIX 18:50, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:49, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 18:56, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:49, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
appears to be a package and two cigarettes, see COM:PACKAGING Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:49, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
COM:PACKAGING. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:59, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:49, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
vacation photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 19:00, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep I know that is not easily than make a deletion request, however, you could simply add a category and upload a cut version next time and oc course how I did. --The Photographer 13:52, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Uploader cropped photo to remove person. I now retract the deletion request. --Mjrmtg (talk) 14:06, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Only deleting old uncropped version. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:48, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 19:01, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:46, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 19:02, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:46, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 19:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:46, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 19:04, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:46, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 19:06, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:46, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:12, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:07, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:12, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:07, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Some list, not useful. See COM:EDUSE. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:07, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
screenshot of copyrighted material 4ing (talk) 08:08, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Delete as per nomination and not own work. --~AntanO4task (talk) 03:57, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 12:12, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Il est en double avec les photos du patrimoine de l'Afrique Jacques CAVAILLON (talk) 08:20, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Fait. Anthere (talk) 19:06, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 12:12, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
self promotion Cabayi (talk) 08:21, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:12, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. The person in the picture is not an actress but a common person. Non notable and therefore not relevant for Commons Discasto talk 10:55, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:13, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope personal photie of uploader Acabashi (talk) 12:39, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:14, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope poor quality blurred personal selfie photie of the uploader. Acabashi (talk) 12:42, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:14, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope personal photie of uploader's nonentity friend. Acabashi (talk) 12:45, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:14, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope personal selfie photie, and nothing to do with the added 'Myrmica' cat. Acabashi (talk) 12:47, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:14, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope personal selfie photie of the uploader. Acabashi (talk) 12:48, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:14, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope personal selfie photie of the uploader. Acabashi (talk) 12:49, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:14, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope poor quality blurred personal photie, that seems to have nothing to do with TV Azteca. Acabashi (talk) 12:53, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:14, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope personal photie of the uploader. Acabashi (talk) 12:56, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:14, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope poor quality blurred personal group selfie photie. Acabashi (talk) 12:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:14, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Unused logo, out of current scope Scoopfinder(d) 13:33, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:14, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Ubcule (talk) 13:51, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:15, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pollari boyz (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope, not in personal use.
Ubcule (talk) 14:13, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:15, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:59, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:07, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
I think will be good idea to leave only dance and remove all out of the Commons:Project scope footage. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:05, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Agree: a good compromise suggested, although the very poor quality of the vid might mitigate against keeping even the dance display bit. There are better quality vids of Esan dancing on YouTube anyway, so why keep very poor quality ones on this project. Acabashi (talk) 16:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Commons is not a Vlog. --Jcb (talk) 12:10, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. Not too relevant for artcile. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:10, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:08, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope; Personal image(s). MCMLXXXIX 14:14, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:15, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope; Personal image(s). MCMLXXXIX 14:14, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:15, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, unlikely to be own work. MCMLXXXIX 14:15, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:15, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Out-of-scope fluff. Ubcule (talk) 14:29, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:16, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jeyakumar Setty (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope; not useful for educational purposes.
- File:DCM 5043.jpg
- File:DCM 5039.jpg
- File:DCM 5038.jpg
- File:DCM 5041.jpg
- File:DCM 5035.jpg
- File:DCM 5031.jpg
- File:DCM 5034.jpg
- File:DCM 5030.jpg
- File:DCM 5027.jpg
- File:DCM 5029.jpg
- File:DCM 5023.jpg
MCMLXXXIX 14:37, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:16, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Lots of schoolwork. Not useful. See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats.
- File:M19-TABLEAUX DE BORD TER TSGE.pdf
- File:M20-STAGE EN ENTREPRISE TER TSGE.pdf
- File:M17 Marketing Strategique-AGC-TSGE.pdf
- File:M16-GESTION DE LA PRODUCTION ET DES APPROVISIONNEMENTS TER TSGE.pdf
- File:M14-DIAGNOSTIC FINANCIER TER TSGE.pdf
- File:M15-DIAGNOSTIC MARKETING TER-TSG.pdf
- File:M10-COMPTABILITE ANALYTIQUE D-EXPLOITATION TER TSGE.pdf
- File:M11-MATHEMATIQUES FINANCIERES TER TSGE.pdf
- File:M12-LOGICIELS DE GESTION COMPTABILITE PAIE COMMERCE TER-TSGE.pdf
- File:M06-STATISTIQUES TER TSGE.pdf
- File:M09-PAIE ET DECLARATIONS FISCALES ET SOCIALES TER TSGE.pdf
- File:M08-COMPTABILITE DES OPERATIONS COURANTES ET TRAVAUX DE FIN D-EXERCICE TER TSGE.pdf
- File:M07-MARKETING TER TSGE.pdf
- File:M05-concepts de base de la comptabilite generale backup.pdf
- File:M04-APPROCHE GLOBALE ET ENVIRONNEMENT DE L-ENTREPRISE TER TSGE.pdf
- File:Communication-Ecrite-et-Orale-1ère-Année.pdf
- File:M03-PRINCIPE ET FONCTIONNEMENT D-UN SGBDR TER TSGE.pdf
- File:M02-Environnement-de-lentreprise-et-qualité.pdf
- File:M02-BUREAUTIQUE TER TSGE.pdf
- File:M01-module 1 M e Formation backup.pdf
- File:Organisation des entreprises 2-1.pdf
Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:21, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:15, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by QuangNinh ViệtNam (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused, uncategorized or mis-categorized personal images, out of scope.
Gauss (talk) 10:04, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:13, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 03:51, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Blurry, easily replaceable, of questionable value to the project. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 04:05, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 04:44, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Appears to never have been put to use; it's the uploader's only contribution on any project. Commons is not a webhost and out of project scope. — ξxplicit 06:53, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:24, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted software UI. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 07:22, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy keep: This is Mozilla Firefox! --Amitie 10g (talk) 11:50, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy keep: This is chromium , an opensource browser. --Kunjumash (talk) 13:08, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Actually, it is Firefox. --Amitie 10g (talk) 14:53, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- This is Google Chrome and Windows, both copyrighted software. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 19:13, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- The getting started Firefox logo is a bookmark to Firefox's page, not what the software is. As shown in the image, the bookmarks were imported from Firefox. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 22:31, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Oops, you're right, it is Chrome/Chromium, that is also half-free. --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:20, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:24, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be an own work. Needs OTRS verification. ~ Rob13Talk 23:56, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:22, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
This photo was released online without the consent of the person(s) photographed. Therefore, the person(s) photographed is requesting a speedy deletion. Moeqas (talk) 22:32, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
- The depicted person is a public figure, the image does not show any weird situation (plain portrait). Basvb (talk) 22:55, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 22:15, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
uploaded without permission Moeqas (talk) 07:40, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- I spoke with this editor (or someone else affiliated with them) on IRC. They're claiming that the picture was taken for use as an ID at a private event, and that the photograph itself was taken in a place that was not open to the public. The picture was taken with the expectation that it would be used only for the photograph on the ID card. This seems like a plausible case where COM:IDENT could apply. The picture was apparently taken in Tanzania, and we obviously have no information on the laws specific to that country on-wiki. Personally, I'd lean delete because of the significant possibility this was taken in a private place. ~ Rob13Talk 09:04, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- This does indeed appear to be a case where, in the absence of specific information about national law, the generic rule that 'photographs taken in private places require consent' applies. Reventtalk 13:16, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- As the photographer, I have no objections with this photo being deleted. However to set things straight, this was taken at a mosque which is open to the general public and it was never meant for any id card. I took the picture with the intention of putting it up on his article. However, I'll admit it's not a very flattering picture and if the guy wants it deleted, I don't mind. - - Muhammad (talk) 02:35, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: What is going on here? Nominator is uploading an apparent copyvio to replace this picture. I see no reason to trust him more than the uploader of the nominated picture, who is a long term contributor. As far as I can see, after removal of the copyvio upload, this picture is the only one we have of this person. --Jcb (talk) 13:36, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Subject can be hardly seen. Mhohner (talk) 10:40, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:38, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Link to non-notable website, www.2barabar.com Ubcule (talk) 14:16, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:38, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Selvakarna (talk · contribs)
[edit]User's only uploads are images of himself. Out of scope, non-notable.
Ubcule (talk) 14:24, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:39, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 14:54, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Agree: photo from africanmuzikmag.com. No indication that the uploader is the author of the file. Acabashi (talk) 18:10, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:41, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 14:55, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:41, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 14:55, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:41, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 14:59, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:41, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 14:59, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:41, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 14:59, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:41, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 14:59, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:41, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope; Personal image(s). MCMLXXXIX 15:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Agree: out of scope. The uploader can't think it's worth much with acronym 'WTF' and desciption 'Bhah blah blah'.
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:41, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope; Personal image(s). MCMLXXXIX 15:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Agree: out of scope. The uploader can't think it's worth much with acronym 'WTF' and desciption 'Bhah blah blah'.
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:41, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope; Personal image(s). MCMLXXXIX 15:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Agree: out of scope. The uploader can't think it's worth much with acronym 'WTF' and desciption 'Bhah blah blah'.
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:41, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope; Personal image(s). MCMLXXXIX 15:31, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:44, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Artemagacine (talk · contribs)
[edit]May not be own work. COM:DW
- File:2016-torera.jpg
- File:2016-terra-orbis.jpg
- File:2016-tatto.jpg
- File:2016-nina-en-la-playa.jpg
- File:2016-mantra.jpg
- File:2015-sueno.jpg
- File:2015-rezo.jpg
- File:2015-japonesa.jpg
- File:2014-india.jpg
- File:2014-help.jpg
- File:2016-nycdance.jpg
- File:2016-bailarina-azul.jpg
- File:2016-danza-roja.jpg
- File:2015-bailarina-en-el-agua.jpg
MCMLXXXIX 17:36, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:44, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Tiny duplicate of File:Flag of Morocco.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:38, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:45, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
File:Сын изобретателя Владимира Веклича с директорами депо во время открытия мемориальной доски.jpg
[edit]Claimed as made by a person depicted. Photographer's permission needed. Sealle (talk) 18:12, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:45, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope underexposed personal selfie photie, by name probably of the uploader. Acabashi (talk) 13:07, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:11, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:12, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:13, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
body nude. 45.26.184.50 20:48, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: No valid reason for deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 12:44, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope, we have a version with numbers, that can be used in any language. --Jcb (talk) 14:13, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work as claimed. Appears to be cover fir a single. Eg. http://kannadasongsaudio.blogspot.ca/2002/09/ninagoskara-2002-kannada-movie-mp3-songs.html Whpq (talk) 22:33, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:14, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
No obvious in-scope use (at least without further explanation). Not in use for personal purposes. Ubcule (talk) 14:08, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
photo uploaded with the name "sotos2.jpg" and used to illustrate an article on a genetic disorder (Sotos syndrome) Problems: a) no reliable source for the attributed disorder, b) no written authorization to use this underage boys photo Polarlys (talk) 08:51, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:29, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Derivative work of presumed-copyrighted content. Ubcule (talk) 21:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Probably not a free image Shev123 (talk) 22:26, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:24, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
it is not uploader's own work. it is the same photo as File:TDC.jpg Mahmoudalrawi (talk) 22:37, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:24, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Probably out of scope. The small poor quality image seems to have nothing to do with 'X not valid', whatever that is, and is a composite that doesn't state that the central image is copyright free to use. The added cat 'No' seems eroneous. Acabashi (talk) 13:24, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:35, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Probable copyvio from http://vistazo.com/seccion/gente/christopher-velez-cumple-su-sueno-americano-en-la-banda Acabashi (talk) 13:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:34, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Altered version of a copyrighted image: http://www.gettyimages.ca/license/3208762 47.186.184.179 19:27, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:31, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Judging from the BBC logo in the corner, this looks like a screenshot of a copyrighted TV show to me. Gauss (talk) 21:01, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:31, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No source information to support that this picture would be a work from the Navy. Jcb (talk) 02:36, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- I updated the image info. The author is still not known but it was located on the Navy Historical command website. They cropped the image so it doesn't have the lettering at the bottom left though. Reguyla (talk) 00:13, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you, then at least the copyright is in order, since they don't credit a third party. Jcb (talk) 00:17, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 00:17, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
File is too big. Kite2017 (talk) 07:34, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: No valid reason for deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 11:45, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope ('file is too big' is indeed not a valid reason for deletion). --Jcb (talk) 22:13, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in South Africa, so the buildings pose an issue. ~ Rob13Talk 13:08, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:30, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
No freedom of panorama in France. ~ Rob13Talk 13:16, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:16, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
No permission. see EXIF: Copyright holder is Dirk Lindner; Copyright status is Copyrighted shizhao (talk) 02:23, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 03:38, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Is this a real seal, or rather some Chinese replica, being sold in web shops? Jcb (talk) 02:29, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: source of this photo of a 3D object is unknown anyways. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 03:40, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 02:46, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: I found author attribution as "Kim Ki Sam ©Stars and Stripes", so it is not US government work. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 03:48, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own original work since the description translates to "Book cover of 'The Hobbit, or There and Back Again'". Note also the "Wiki loves e-textbooks" tag. De728631 (talk) 02:47, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Also nominated: File:Un hobbit.jpg claimed as own work by a different uploader. De728631 (talk) 02:51, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Hello, this file (File:Un hobbit.jpg) is my personal work, the other (File:Hobbit by Tolkien.jpg) is just a copy. Tan Khaerr (talk) 16:01, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment This user appears to have at least two accounts, and neither one can be linked to illustrator "Antoine Glédel" with any confidence. I Delete unless COM:OTRS establishes that any of these three accounts is actually "Antoine Glédel". Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:41, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: needs COM:OTRS permission. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 03:57, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Poor-quality image (uploader requested) Michael D. Gunther (talk) 03:27, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader request on upload day. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 03:57, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Unknown author, mysterious "free" permission (which was mapped into Free Art License, but this is ridiculous, as we don't even know the copyright holder to state that), zero links to sources, no statement that it's uploader's own work, etc, etc. Searching for this image on the web suggests that it is a part of large semi-professional photosession that involved shooting a lot of Ibanez JEM guitars (similar images are [3] or [4] - also 400×573 px). Most likely, these were part of Ibanez's non-free promo images, published on website (judging from relatively low resolution). GreyCat (talk) 03:39, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 03:58, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
The image shouldn't be able to apply {{PD-Japan-oldphoto}} and it seems a VHS tape published in 1970s or later. Copyright will remain at least until 2020s, 50 years after its publication. Darklanlan (talk) 09:29, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete The individual images must be from the 1940 movie, but the texts (and perhaps the layout) of the packaging are written when this VHS was published, and hence is still likely to be under protection. 朝彦 | asahiko (talk) 09:45, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 02:15, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
aucun auteur ; date 1961 ; used as far-right propaganda Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 09:44, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Je ne sais pas qui est cet utilisateur "Droit de retrait 03", mais il me semble que ses contributions se limitent à demander le retrait d'image ; je ne suis même pas certain qu'il ait , un jour, apporté la moindre image à Commons. vous êtes bien gentils d'accepter un tel troll. Pour en revenir à cette image, qui est un tract dépourvu d'auteur connu (les fascistes ont l'habitude d'avancer masqués), elle est, de fait, dans le domaine public dès son affichage vers 1961.
I do not know who/what is this user "Droit de retrait 03", but it seems to me that its contributions limit to ask for the retreat of image; I am not even certain that he brought, one day, the slightest image to Commons. I am very kind to accept such a troll. To return to this image there, which is a pamphlet devoid of known author (the fascists are used to moving forward masked), she is, actually, in the public domain from her display by 1961. --François GOGLINS (talk) 09:00, 26 December 2016 (UTC).- Let me stick to facts. You have uploaded this file in 2012 stating that it's a 1961 work and that the copyright has expired because the author has died over 70 years ago (=before 1942). One does not need to be a rocket scientist to see that you provided inconsistent information. Apart from your claim that the author has died at least 20 years before he produced this work, you did not provide any indication why this would be in the Public Domain. Even worse, you seem to confuse Public Domain as a copyright situation with display to the public as a location. The only thing you have managed to utter in this DR is a personal attack to the nominator. I am deleting the file. Jcb (talk) 03:00, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 03:00, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
- Jcb, Vous regarder uniquement ce que vous voulez voir. J'ai noté que l'image n'avait aucun auteur. Elle n'est pas soumise à copyright pour cette raison et non pour de raisons mathématiques fumeuses. Vous aimer bien supprimer ce que d'autres se donnent bien du mal à créer ; c'est votre fonction, certes, mais, de grâce faites la avec circonspection.
To look you only at what you want to see. I noted that the image had no author. She(it) is not subjected(submitted) to copyright for that reason and not for hazy mathematical reasons. To like you to delete(eliminate) what others well go to trouble to create; it is your function(office), certainly, but, of grace(favor) made cautiously. --François GOGLINS (talk) 18:18, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Also:
Subject of an edit war inserting and removing a {{Copyvio}} template. Proper procedure after a speedy template has been removed is to discuss and then if needed, file a DR. That said, is there evidence that this photo is the work of the German government in the sense required by {{PD-GermanGov}}? Storkk (talk) 11:35, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Das ist kein Privatfoto, was die Polizei bzw. BKA benutzt nur hat. Es wurde von einem Beamten im Zuge der erkennungsdienstlichen Behandlung angefertigt. Es wurde von einem Bundesamt veröffentlicht, damit ist es ein Amtliches Werk. Veränderungsverbot gilt ohnehin bei allen Porträts, falls dieses Argument kommen sollte. Das Bild darf nur im Kontext verwendet werden, auch sowas ist kein Ausnahmefall. Bilder von relativen Personen der Zeitgeschichte dürfen prinzipiell nicht beliebig verwendet werden. --Ralf Roleček 12:16, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- das ist die Privatmeinung von Dir. Eine Diskussion über die Details des deutschen Rechts in Zusammenhang mit diesem Bild findet derzeit hier statt: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Urheberrechtsfragen#Fahndungsplakate --Giraldillo (talk) 12:43, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- It is not public domain since it is not an "official work" made by a German authority, but a probably private picture published by German authorities to find the suspect. Since the suspect has been found according to § 45 Abs.2 UrhG even German authorities are no longer allowed to use the picture, let alone Wikipedia. --178.5.15.31 16:25, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Not 'part of a statute, ordinance, official decree or judgment'. Source unknown, may be grabbed from the web in order to find the person. --Jcb (talk) 01:45, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 14:40, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Agree delete: copyvio through VisualizeUs.com (http://vi.sualize.us/darker_sights_warrior_blood_woman_top_50_picture_5yPk.html), where it states All Rights Reserved.
- All photos from this same uploader (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Artemagacine) are suspect. Acabashi (talk) 17:32, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Acabashi: See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Artemagacine. -- MCMLXXXIX 17:38, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- @1989: Many thanks for that... good job. Acabashi (talk) 17:42, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Acabashi: See Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Artemagacine. -- MCMLXXXIX 17:38, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 02:29, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
May not be own work. COM:DW; Above COM:TOO? MCMLXXXIX 15:46, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 02:15, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
File is too big. Kite2017 (talk) 07:25, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: No valid reason for deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 11:45, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: file size way to big to be genuine. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 04:27, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
File is too big. Kite2017 (talk) 07:25, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: No valid reason for deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 11:45, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: file size way too big to be genuine. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 04:27, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
File is too big. Kite2017 (talk) 07:26, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: No valid reason for deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 11:45, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: file size way too big to be genuine. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 04:27, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
File is too big. Kite2017 (talk) 07:26, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: No valid reason for deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 11:45, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment The software between 2:54 and 4:08 may be non-free. MCMLXXXIX 15:20, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: too small to be educationally useful, also suspicious file size. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 04:04, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
File is too big. Kite2017 (talk) 07:28, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: No valid reason for deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 11:45, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: too small to be educationally useful, also suspicious file size. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 04:05, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
File is too big. Kite2017 (talk) 07:30, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: No valid reason for deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 11:45, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: too small to be educationally useful, also suspicious file size. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 04:05, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
No usage, redundant, and File:Escudo de Puerto Montt.svg.png (notice the extension) happens to be a redirection. ·×ald·es 07:31, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: unused, SVG exists. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 04:18, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
File is too big. Kite2017 (talk) 07:34, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: No valid reason for deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 11:45, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: resolution too low to be useful. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 04:45, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Doublette to File:Schierke, Hotel Fürst zu Stolberg 06.jpg and bad quality Migebert (talk) 08:05, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: worse quality, but higher resolution, can be useful for crops. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 04:46, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Doublette to File:Schierke, Hotel Fürst zu Stolberg 10.jpg and low resolution Migebert (talk) 08:06, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: slightly different version of a historic file without writing. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 04:47, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Doublette to File:Schierke, Hotel Fürst zu Stolberg 14.jpg and bad quality Migebert (talk) 08:11, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: different version of a historic file, both have their uses. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 04:48, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Vanity image used in hoax on en.wp. Beeblebrox (talk) 08:28, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 04:48, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Doubtfully own work (especially by a user who was underage then, https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gebruiker:Dirk114) Most likely taken from a medical publication, see e.g. the authorization statement in the caption Polarlys (talk) 08:31, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 04:49, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
File is too big. Kite2017 (talk) 08:32, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: No valid reason for deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 11:41, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 04:49, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
not for educational purpose, no Brocken and no Brockenbahn to see Migebert (talk) 08:32, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Photo is of decent quality, and could easily be used for topics of automobiles. The file could be renamed though. Beta8099 (talk) 20:12, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per Beta8099. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 04:50, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
File is too big. Kite2017 (talk) 08:33, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: No valid reason for deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 11:45, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 04:51, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
According to metadata "Copyright holder:All rights reserved" 202.40.137.201 08:50, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, likely copyright violation. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 04:51, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Too small to be original Macucal (talk) 09:05, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 04:52, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that this would come from the NOAA. Jcb (talk) 11:41, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 04:53, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Apparently not a work from the US government. Jcb (talk) 11:53, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: while this could be an US government work, considering it was taken during the Nuremburg trials, we have no indication that it really is. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 04:56, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Blurry, unused Hiddenhauser (talk) 12:01, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 04:56, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Very bad quality Hiddenhauser (talk) 12:05, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 04:57, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation. copyright of bandi, No permission. Not allow on commons Lazyboytommy (talk) 13:02, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- The video was uploaded to YouTube by the official account of BANDAI NAMCO Entertainment Europe under a CC-BY-3.0 license [5]. They seem to commonly do so with such material. Reventtalk 13:39, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- The video is licensed as cc-by-sa from the publisher's official account. czar 17:05, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: interesting that a large publisher does this. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:00, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
This photo is a copyright violation of Wikimedia and Wiki rules and regulations. The author has not provided any written permission or any authority on copyright holding on this photo. The author also seems to have no previous record of high level or other pictures in Wikimedia or other media outlets in India or abroad. I doubt that a comman man has been approved to have a close picture from such a close range. This picture is to be deleted if the author cannot give a written proof. Thanks, Varghese Jacob 122.176.187.104 13:34, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Proof? --Amitie 10g (talk) 12:50, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- Proof : I took the photo of Sh. Najeeb Jung, the then Vice-Chancellor of Jamia Millia Islamia, on the occasion of 4th Dr KR Narayanan Memorial lecture. The seminar was organized by Dr. K.R. Narayanan Centre for Dalit and Minorities Studies, Jamia Millia Islamia where Dr. Abusaleh Shariff, Chief Economist of National Council for Applied Economic Research (NCAER) delivered lecture on the theme “Inclusive Development Paradigm for India: Modified Human Development Framework” on March 16, 2011 and Sh. Najeeb Jung presided over the lecture. I had taken many other photos of the above function. If anyone desires I can upload them with authority as its author.
- Regarding the photograph in question, I declare with my full responsibility that I am the author of this work. In connection with my work any irresponsible statement like “I doubt that a comman man has been approved to have a close picture from such a close range. ” is sad.
- Sh. Najeeb Jung is a lovely teacher and a great human being. Good teachers keep their students close to their heart and and good students respect their teachers for their entire life. Perhaps the commentator had been unfortunate in his encounter with such goodness.
- I had been fortunate to photo graph and videograph Sh. Najeeb Jung on many other occasion from close quarters . Some of the links of my videos on youtube are given below :
Najeeb Jung Vice Chancellor Jamia Millia Islamia talking to Urdu Press
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8mKQQbQefI8
Jamia Millia Islamia Vice Chancellor Najeeb Jung talking to English Press
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJUYRKcN4fs
- I have many photos of Sh. Jung on my blog thecdmschronicle.wordpress.com The link is :
https://thecdmschronicle.wordpress.com/
- This photo was never submitted by me for publication anywhere else in print or in digital form. It is exclusive submission to Wikimedia.
Akkkanksha (talk) 16:40, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no reason given why we should doubt the uploader's claims. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:01, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
This photo is a copyright violation of Wikimedia and Wiki rules and regulations. The author has not provided any written permission or any authority on copyright holding on this photo. The author also seems to have no previous record of high level or other pictures in Wikimedia or other media outlets in India or abroad. I doubt that a comman man has been approved to have a close picture from such a close range. This picture is to be deleted if the author cannot give a written proof. Thanks, Varghese Jacob 122.176.187.104 13:35, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Proof? --Amitie 10g (talk) 12:50, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- Proof : The author took the photo of Sh. Najeeb Jung, the then Vice-Chancellor of Jamia Millia Islamia, on the occasion of 4th Dr KR Narayanan Memorial lecture. The seminar was organized by Dr. K.R. Narayanan Centre for Dalit and Minorities Studies, Jamia Millia Islamia where Dr. Abusaleh Shariff, Chief Economist of National Council for Applied Economic Research (NCAER) delivered lecture on the theme “Inclusive Development Paradigm for India: Modified Human Development Framework” on March 16, 2011 and Sh. Najeeb Jung presided over the lecture.
- Regarding the photograph in question, the author declare with full responsibility that the work belongs to her. In connection with this work an irresponsible statement like “I doubt that a comman man has been approved to have a close picture from such a close range. ” is sad.
- Sh. Najeeb Jung is a lovely teacher and a great human being. Good teachers keep their students close to their heart and and good students respect their teachers for their entire life. Not all are fortunate in their encounter with such goodness.
- The author had been fortunate to photo graph and videograph Sh. Najeeb Jung on many other occasions from close quarters . Some of the links of videos uploaded by the author on youtube are given below :
Najeeb Jung Vice Chancellor Jamia Millia Islamia talking to Urdu Press
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8mKQQbQefI8
Jamia Millia Islamia Vice Chancellor Najeeb Jung talking to English Press
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VJUYRKcN4fs
- The author has also put up many photos of Sh. Jung on her blog thecdmschronicle.wordpress.com The link is :
https://thecdmschronicle.wordpress.com/
- This photo was never submitted by the author for publication anywhere else in print or in digital form. It is exclusive submission to Wikimedia.
- More proofs can be provided on demand.
Akkkanksha (talk) 16:40, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no reason given why we should doubt the uploader's claims. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:02, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Image of uploader, no clear notability, not in use for personal purposes. Ubcule (talk) 13:49, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:07, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Ankry as no permission (No permission since) Reventtalk 13:53, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- The file was speedily deleted on the basis of an expired 'no permission'. I've undeleted it, and opened this DR, as it seems quite arguable this is PD. (I was asked to look at this by another editor. The argument seems reasonable). Reventtalk 13:55, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep "Other editor" here. The copyvio was at this webpage. While the webpage releases its contents under a suitable license (CC-BY-SA-4.0), it also notes that the entire page is an excerpt from a book, so that release is probably invalid (not from copyright holder) in this situation. I do think the picture in question is in the public domain in Paraguay, though. The URL of the image file itself is http://hohenau.gov.py/uploads/media/2016/08/casa-dos-pisos-puerto-hohenau-1912.jpg, indicating the picture is dated to c. 1912. {{PD-1923}} for the US. The author is unknown/anonymous, so this enters the public domain in Paraguay 70 years after creation or publication, whichever is later. I've been unable to find any record via reverse Google searches to indicate publication before this image was used in the aforementioned book, which was in 2000.
I see two possibilities here. First, the picture was published in or around 1912, when it was created. In this case, it's in the public domain. Second, the picture was first published in 2000, in which case it is public domain because first publication occurred over 70 years after creation. Either way, it's public domain. It's remotely possible that it was published sometime between 1946 and 1982, in which case it's still under copyright, but this seems highly unlikely based on the evidence available. ~ Rob13Talk 14:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Info I have no objection if it is PD-because-of-some-reason licensed. My objection concerned its CC-license that I see no rationale for. Ankry (talk) 14:49, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Ankry: I don't think anyone would say that your npd'ing the image was 'wrong' (I certainly don't, as the site license clearly doesn't apply to material on a page that stated to be an excerpt from a copyrighted source). I just thought that discussing this particular file as a DR made more sense than holding it at UDR. Reventtalk 15:06, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Yeah, definitely a good deletion, Ankry. I just happened to notice the potential PD status when processing an OTRS ticket. The license currently listed on the file description page is definitely invalid. ~ Rob13Talk 15:16, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Ankry: I don't think anyone would say that your npd'ing the image was 'wrong' (I certainly don't, as the site license clearly doesn't apply to material on a page that stated to be an excerpt from a copyrighted source). I just thought that discussing this particular file as a DR made more sense than holding it at UDR. Reventtalk 15:06, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per analysis by User:BU Rob13. Rob, can you clean up the license?. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:10, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope and unused (formerly in use at en.wikipedia sandbox only) Ubcule (talk) 13:54, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:10, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Relatively low-quality image of subject we have countless examples of. Water effect appears to be synthetic and hence adds nothing to utility of image. Ubcule (talk) 13:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:10, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Relatively low quality with clipped highlights and loss of detail. More importantly, the lack of background detail- i.e. *what* flowers are these, anything else that might be relevant- reduces the usefulness of this image, which might otherwise be worth keeping. Ubcule (talk) 13:59, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:12, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 14:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Agree: You would think that the uploader would know this man as, or the author of the photograph as, Alexander Chepalov... note file name as 'Photos on Wikipedia' and the description as 'portrait with background photos'. Looks like a cropped version of that on http://www.fotokiev.info/past2015.htm. I would assume copvio. Acabashi (talk) 20:14, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- It is Self-portrait. Look: [6] Григорий Ганзбург (talk) 04:29, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- It may or may not be a self portrait, but there is no real evidence that the uploader is Alexander Chepalov under an assumed name, or that this Чепалов has the right to claim it as their own to offer under licence. Still reasonably presume the cropped image is copyvio from the link provided above, or other sources. Acabashi (talk) 04:44, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- Watch the report on an author's photo exhibition: [7]. Григорий Ганзбург (talk) 04:52, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- Still no proof that User:Чепалов is Alexander Chepalova, even though he/she uses the Chepalova family name as a user name (anyone can do that), or that User:Чепалов is the photographer or publisher with rights to offer this file. Acabashi (talk) 05:24, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- Professor Alexander Chepalov loaded this photo at my request - for an illustration of my article about it in the Russian Wikipedia. Григорий Ганзбург (talk) 10:48, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- You say then that uploader User:Чепалов is the Alexander Chepalov in in this article, begun 22/12/2016. There is no proof for this, nor is there any proof I can see that the same image published on the web states that it is creative commons free-to-use. If Alexander Chepalov took and owns the picture under User:Чепалов, it would be useful if Alexander Chepalov contacted Wikimedia by email stating his ownership. I notice that your photos I have seen have camera EXIF details. This photo only shows it was edited (perhaps as a cropped composite from a web example), with the Picassa program. EXIF details would go some way to prove authorship, so if you are in contact with Alexander Chepalov as you say you are, you could suggest to him that he uploads the original photograph with EXIF details. Until this is cleared up, the picture should be seen on balance as probably not the own work of User:Чепалов.
- I state again that because one-upload User:Чепалов has a name similar to the subject doesn't prove him to be the subject... User:Чепалов might just as easily be an account set up by another established Wikimedia user to circumvent their copyright problems. Although a notification has been given on his/her discussion page, User:Чепалов has not commented here, which might be telling. Thanks. Acabashi (talk) 14:00, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Hello.
I, Alexander Chepalov, do confirm that the rights to this self-portrait belong to me.
This photo was published on the cover page of my book "A Midsummer Night Insomnia'. I cut it to focus on the center (portrait) part for displaying it on my page on Wikipedia, . Please do not doubt the authenticity of the words of G. Ganzburg and my respect for the rules of Wikimedia Commons.
Best regards! Alexander Chepalov
- Strange that this last message above is from an IP address (77.244.36.89 located near Troitska Square, Kiev), and not from User:Чепалов, who is, according to User:Григорий Ганзбург, Alexander Chepalov. Anyone can leave an anonymous IP message or set up a user account under any name. So, this last comment is no proof at all, and deepens suspicion. If the IP comment is taken at face value, we can probably assume that the picture is from a book dust jacket, which would almost certainly make it copyright violation... if so a deletion of the image would be most appropriate. Also, the credibility of the User:Чепалов account has to be in question... it might be a sock puppet to circumvent copyright issues. Acabashi (talk) 15:09, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
- I explain. Alexander Chepalov wrote the answer in Russian. In order that was comfortable to read to you, the text is translated into English. At the request of A. Chepalov, the translation was executed by his son in Kiev. It also placed the text here. Григорий Ганзбург (talk) 15:41, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
Dear Acabashi. I would like to dot in a discussion about copyrights by a photo which was offered for a publication in Wikipedia. I confirm once again, that all rights on this photo belong to me. If necessary you can put question personally to me to address of chepalovst@mail.ru or chepalovst@gmail.com
Deleted: Too many open questions. To assert the copyright status, you can use the OTRS process. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:14, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 14:05, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: also out of scope the way it is arranged. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:14, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Chestnut213 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Uploader has no clear connection with the subject. The archive photo of "The Tiaras" in particular looks like a commercial/promo photograph taken some time ago, and has clearly been scanned from a printed source. Even the newer one appears to be the better part of a decade old (long predating its upload here).
Unless the uploader took these images his/herself and/or clearly knows- and has the rights to- the copyright, these should probably be deleted as possible copyvios.
Ubcule (talk) 14:06, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:15, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Mediocre photo of a glass with nonsense description. Plenty of better examples. Ubcule (talk) 14:07, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:15, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, unlikely to be own work. MCMLXXXIX 14:09, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:15, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, unlikely to be own work. MCMLXXXIX 14:09, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:15, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 14:11, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Agree: The uploader first added their name as the author, then removed it.... so presume not the author. This image is on the web as colour with colour and black & white derivatives, such as the image here, and publicity page: http://file.chiharumk.blog.shinobi.jp/A4_retake3_ura.jpg. The photo might be owned by Chiharu MK herself or by promo sites such as http://www.studio-cplus.net/chiharu_mk.html, but I can find no copyright releases... I would presume copyvio. Acabashi (talk) 19:43, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:16, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyvio (contains map material copyrighted by Columbus Verlag Paul Oestergaard GmbH) Stoffdelphin (talk) 14:15, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:17, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyvio (contains maps copyrighted by Räthgloben 1917 Verlag) Stoffdelphin (talk) 14:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Stoffdelphin: Hallo Stoffdelphin, woran erkennst du das es ein Räthglobus ist? Ich seh zwar die Kartusche an der rechten Seite, aber kann sie nicht entziffern. Ich müsste zu Hause erst mal nach schauen ob du recht hast. Meines Wissens war das eher von eine süddeutsche Firma, aber ich weiß es gerade nicht genau. - Selbst wenn es so wäre, meinst du im Fall dieses Fotos zieht das Copyright? Es ist ja nicht zum Vervielfältigen der Karten geeignet, sondern soll ja den Herstellungsprozess von Globen zeigen. Ich würde nach den Weihnachtstagen/Neujahr mal mit dem "richtigen" Verlag des Globus Kontakt aufnehmen und eine Freigabe verlangen, obwohl ich nicht wirklich die Notwendigkeit dafür sehe. -- sk (talk) 15:06, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Stefan Kühn: Du hast Recht, war eine Verwechselung meinerseits. Das ist natürlich ein DUPLEX von Columbus. Das Problem ist, dass Globen Karten enthalten und diese widerum urheberrechtlich geschützt sind. Alternativ kann man natürlich auch einen unbedruckten Rohling zeigen. --Stoffdelphin (talk) 01:03, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Stoffdelphin: Ich hab mal eine Anfrage unter de:Wikipedia:Urheberrechtsfragen#Globushälfte gestellt. Bitte Diskussion dort abwarten, bevor hier gelöscht wird. -- sk (talk) 05:46, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Stefan Kühn: Danke. --Stoffdelphin (talk) 21:40, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Stoffdelphin: Ich hab mal eine Anfrage unter de:Wikipedia:Urheberrechtsfragen#Globushälfte gestellt. Bitte Diskussion dort abwarten, bevor hier gelöscht wird. -- sk (talk) 05:46, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Stefan Kühn: Du hast Recht, war eine Verwechselung meinerseits. Das ist natürlich ein DUPLEX von Columbus. Das Problem ist, dass Globen Karten enthalten und diese widerum urheberrechtlich geschützt sind. Alternativ kann man natürlich auch einen unbedruckten Rohling zeigen. --Stoffdelphin (talk) 01:03, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and the linked discussion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:18, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Probable out of scope personal group selfie photie of members of the Pankratov family. The Pankratovs have a banner tagged stub article in Russia Wikipedia, where the only 'refs' are to their own social media pages. So as notability is suspect, we may just have to go on this pic being out of scope selfie. Welcome other input on this one before decision is made. Acabashi (talk) 14:26, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Здравствуйте о том что фото нарушает авторские права и не может быть речи то селфи где я со своей семьей было зделано на мой телефоный аппарат. User talk:Виктор гегс.
- Machine translation of comment above: "Welcome on the photo that violates copyright and can be no question that selfie where my family and I had been made on my phone." There is no suggestion that the photo is copyvio. As there is an acceptance that this is a group selfie, it might be out of scope, although the upload appears to be in good faith. The questioned notabilty of the Pankratovs might make this photo not educational under scope. Acabashi (talk) 15:15, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: personal photo, now unused. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:19, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
The vote tallies of South Carolina and Alabama are incorrect. Need to update map with correct vote tallies. Tnmbrown (talk) 14:37, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Just update with the correct information. --Amitie 10g (talk) 16:37, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
How do I do that if Wikipedia keep rejecting my updated map? It keeps saying that my map is a "duplicate".
Kept: per Amitie, @Tnmbrown: maybe someone over Commons:Help desk can help?. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:21, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted image: http://beyazgazete.com/haber/2010/6/13/tbb-baskanligina-vedat-ahsen-cosar-secildi-979095.html yabancım 14:49, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:21, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 14:49, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: This same photo of the English David Bowers has multiple uploads on the web, none found crediting a 'Meteorych', but almost exclusively thumbnails, with none I've seen giving any copyright release information... presumption of copyright. This is larger than any other, but still no evidence of authorship from the Russian source. Acabashi (talk) 19:11, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:26, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope; Personal image(s). MCMLXXXIX 14:50, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: There is such a person as Amir Hassan, but there is no evidence given that the uploader is the true author, or that the photo is anything other than copyright. Adding an author name implying authorship is no evidence... so possible copyvio as well. There are two more, and selfies, of the subject by the same uploader (https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Amirhassan568). Acabashi (talk) 18:44, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:28, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 14:53, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- What's the issue with this? The information submitted is correct and it's the work of the artist De Boss. Link: https://open.spotify.com/track/2NYy4OPeBKKNwMiv4IwJuz and this was done by his management YMR NIG
- Agree with nom: The Spotify link doesn't cut it for authorship. This file is on four sites, including africanmuzikmag.com (http://africanmuzikmag.com/de-boss-talks-on-working-with-tony-yayo-young-buck-samini-on-new-album/), and on none of them is an indication that the image is copyright free or creative commons... the assumption has to be that it is copyright. There is no evidence given by the uploader that he/she is the author of the graphic, or has been allowed this upload by the author. Acabashi (talk) 18:24, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, also out of scope. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:32, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope; Personal image(s). MCMLXXXIX 15:04, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:33, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 15:05, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:33, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Berthe Mouchel is dead in 1951. No FoP in France. 83.204.147.206 15:10, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, undelete in 2022. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:34, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Berthe Mouchel is dead in 1951. No FoP in France. 83.204.147.206 15:10, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, undelete in 2022. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:35, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 15:28, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:37, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 15:28, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:37, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
An unidentified toy that may be non-free. COM:TOYS MCMLXXXIX 15:30, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:38, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Robert Delandre is dead in 1961. No FoP in France. 83.204.147.206 15:32, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, undelete in 2032. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:38, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Robert Delandre is dead in 1961. No FoP in France. 83.204.147.206 15:32, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Looks like a bit of a mix-up in the description. However, a good pic, well categorized, and linked to 14 Wikis, so should keep. Acabashi (talk) 15:42, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, undelete in 2032. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:41, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
out of date -2011 2001:1C04:1B00:9900:89A4:E5A9:97B1:EE7A 15:33, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. There is no reason for deletion of an image which is "out of date". Elly (talk) 15:50, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep, as out of date is no reason to delete images that were once given out on a free license. Edoderoo (talk) 19:27, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:42, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope; Personal image(s). MCMLXXXIX 15:35, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:42, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 15:36, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:43, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 15:37, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:43, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Small size, no metadata, unlikely to be own work. MCMLXXXIX 15:44, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:43, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
artwork without permission Naschpaul (talk) 15:46, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: FoP in the UK is OK for 3D works and 2D works of artistic craftsmanship, and includes buildings, and sculptures, models for buildings and works of artistic craftsmanship (if permanently situated in a public place or in premises open to the public). Acabashi (talk) 15:55, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: I am the uploader. It is a 3D work on permanent display in a public museum - covered by UK FoP. Rept0n1x (talk) 17:53, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Rept0n1x: May you please voluntarily retreat this photo due to quality reasons?--Naschpaul (talk) 18:56, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry, I don't have the ability to unilaterally do that as removal of this image is now a community decision. This is because I have published the photo on Wikimedia Commons under perpetual free licenses. Of course if the community decides to delete this photo on quality grounds, I really have no objection. It could perhaps do with cropping at least. Rept0n1x (talk) 21:27, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- There are two user who voted to keep the file, and I'll be the third one. --Amitie 10g (talk) 22:48, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per Acabashi and Rept0n1x. No valid reason as covered by FOP and quality (quite low but not crappy). --Amitie 10g (talk) 22:48, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Rept0n1x: May you be fine with a low quality tag?--Naschpaul (talk) 09:55, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Naschpaul: Yes, that is absolutely fine, please feel free to tag the image. It is of course low quality so if adding the tag may encourage some contributor to replace it with a better quality one I am happy with that - the project can only benefit by this. What I would say though is that there are tens of thousands of images on Commons taken inside museums which suffer similar problems, many of them much worse quality even than this image, so to tag a meaningful number of them would be a huge task.
- The main problem is that lighting conditions in many museums is deliberately set very low. Also, the use of a flash is often prohibited or undesirable due to reflections from glass casings etc.. so where a compact camera has been used by a member of the public in a museum setting you will often find pictures with noise on them or perhaps too dark etc.. If someone can take a shot either with a larger aperture lens (i.e. a bigger camera) or maybe a longer exposure shot with use of a tripod then it would make for a much better photo under challenging lighting conditions. However, until that happens it is generally regarded on Commons that any reasonable photo of a subject not otherwise covered is better than no photo at all. This is why these grainy indoor photos would not likely be deleted whilst no better alternative currently exists. I know there were some dedicated projects where museum staff professionally photographed some collections under better lighting conditions specifically for Commons - not sure if there is anything like that planned for the Natural History Museum in London. It would be good if that could eventually happen though. Rept0n1x (talk) 21:34, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:44, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Embedded photo authoring suggests a Muhammad Ishaq, for Latoon Productions. The pic looks like it's from avtkhyber.com. So upload is on balance probably copyvio. Acabashi (talk) 16:31, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Deleted by Jcb. (t) Josve05a (c) 05:37, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Picture of an old photo. We don't have the name of the original photographer nor the original date. Not sure if this picture is truly free. Titlutin (talk) 21:43, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. (t) Josve05a (c) 05:43, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
copyrighted packaging Didym (talk) 22:34, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- I think the packaging is not the focus of this and there are many food items that show some of their packaging on Commons? Nesnad (talk) 03:21, 24 December 2016 (UTC) EDIT: added a trademark warning in regards to "sea chicken". That is what many other packaging pictures do? Not sure why this image was nominated. Nesnad (talk) 03:24, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination and COM:PACKAGING // COM:DW. The packaging is the main focus, hence not COM:DM. (t) Josve05a (c) 05:40, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 15:49, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:45, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 15:49, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:45, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 15:50, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:46, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 15:50, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:46, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope; Personal image(s). MCMLXXXIX 15:51, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Agree: blurred low quality selfie. Acabashi (talk) 16:05, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:47, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 15:52, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- I think that this photo belongs to the user who uploaded it. Now I am explaining this user about OTRS at his page, see w:ru:Обсуждение участника:Mishanya9. Thank you! -- Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 15:21, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: photo is in line with other uploads of same image, only other version found online is smaller, only thing that is a bit suspect is the lack of EXIF. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:53, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 15:58, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:55, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Above COM:TOO? [8] MCMLXXXIX 16:00, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:57, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:12, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: unclear copyright situation. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:58, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:15, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:58, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 16:15, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:58, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
No indication of own work HerrAdams (talk) 16:16, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:59, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
[Out of project scope: unused personal picture Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 03:01, 16 May 2015 (UTC)]
- Removed nomination: file is used. Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 03:03, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: INeverCry 20:37, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Unused low quality selfie. User has not returned since this upload. Note this was nominated once before, and nomination withdrawn as the page was in use. This is no longer the case. Optimist on the run (talk) 16:29, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Agree: Out of scope selfie using 'Candy Camera for Selfie' app. Acabashi (talk) 16:48, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:51, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Joannetlmq (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope!
Ras67 (talk) 16:53, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:45, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by SalsamidasPower (talk · contribs)
[edit]No authorship information, unknown copyright situation.
Jcb (talk) 17:28, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:46, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Tiny duplicate of File:Flag of Morocco.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:41, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. unused poor duplicate. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:52, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Promotional picture for a mongolian mobile network provider. Out of project scope, no possible educational use. Latebird (talk) 20:11, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 05:54, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Government document, not clear that the photo is "own work" by uploader, or released with a free license. --ghouston (talk) 22:37, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: AMSA is governement agency however in Australia government works copyright expires 50 years from the date of creation, and this work is from 1996, thus not yet free. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:56, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
The picture is not old enough to be in the public domain Discasto talk 23:37, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:52, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
No authorship information for the picture, unknown copyright situation. Who took the picture of this 3D object? Jcb (talk) 17:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 06:00, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Personenfoto - Naturpuur (talk) 17:07, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: uploader's request. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 06:00, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Probably not own work. Small size, no EXIF. Jcb (talk) 17:13, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 06:00, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 17:38, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 06:01, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
No permission from Kaiserslautern American Newspaper Jcb (talk) 17:45, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: unclear source. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 06:02, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 17:48, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 06:02, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of permission from stated author Jcb (talk) 17:53, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 06:03, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 17:56, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 06:04, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
This is a sculpture in the zoo of Kharkiv, Ukraine. There is no freedom of panorama in the Ukraine and while the statue was probably meant to look like an ancient Mayan or Aztek sculpture, it is most likely a modern interpretation. De728631 (talk) 18:54, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 06:06, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
While the picture may be correctly licensed at flickr, it would seem to be a product shot or advertisement of the Absolut products shown in the image, and thus COM:ADVERTISING. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:00, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 06:06, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Pictures of whisky bottles in a proprietary whisky bottle holder, COM:PACKAGING. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:01, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 06:06, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
This pixelated image was collected at flickr, but it contains "FBMD" in the transfer metadata, and thus it's possible the flickr user didn't take this photo but got it from Facebook. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:04, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: I found the original image here on Instagram. It is from an account connected with this music website. If you scroll to the bottom of any page of the website, it says the website is under Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC-SA 3.0).
- Unfortunately "NonCommercial" is not compatible with Commons licenses. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:56, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
- I know. I just wanted to bring more concrete info to the discussion.--Esprit15d (talk) 14:41, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per discussion. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 06:07, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
FBMD in metadata, likely copied from Facebook. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:05, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:01, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
The artist of this plaque is Marian Brackenridge according to the inscription at bottom of inner circle under the words "Pony Express". She died in 1999, according to this biography, which states she designed the Pony Express plaques. So, as there is not freedom of panorama exception in the United States, this image, as a derivative work, require the permission of the artist or their heirs until 2070 even though the photo is freely licenced. Ww2censor (talk) 19:07, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:03, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
possibly exceeds the threshold of originality Bulgu (talk) 10:18, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: I am not aware of the case law regarding COM:TOO in Turkey. But this should be beyond the threshold in most jurisdictions as the design of the flame and the book appear to be sufficiently original. --AFBorchert (talk) 08:16, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
See footnote: ©2016 Diretoria de Tecnologia da Informação - Todos os direitos reservados (All rights reserved) Rodrigolopes (talk) 10:28, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Olá, eu falei com email para a prefeitura, onde fica essa imagem eles me responderam o seguinte veja meu dialogo.
Forwarded message ---------
From: Webdeveloper DTI <dti.web@arapongas.pr.gov.br> Date: seg, 4 de abr de 2016 às 1:21 PM Subject: Re: Contato pelo site da Prefeitura Municipal de Arapongas To: Contato
Prezado cidadão
As imagens do brasão e da bandeira estão localizadas em nosso
Portal no menu Cidade -> Símbolos: http://www.arapongas.pr.gov.br/simbolos
Você pode efetuar o download da
versão vetorial clicando no link de download, ou pode clicar sobre a imagem com o botão direito e clicar em "Salvar imagem como", fazendo assim com que consiga ter as imagens para utilizá-las na Wikipedia como disse.
att
Prefeitura do Município de Arapongas
(43) 3902 - 1000
Mensagem: Bom dia, queria fazer um pedido, e só a prefeitura ou quem administra o site municipal pode fazer, é de fazer o upload da bandeira e brasão da cidade na wikipédia para o artigo Arapongas em https://pt.wikipedia.org/wiki/Arapongas , bom, para enviar a imagem da bandeira e brasão para a wikipédia precisa ser a prefeitura mesmo que está mandando por que eles levam a serio os direitos autorais das imagens, tem bastante informação em como enviar imagens para a enciclopédia, eu mesmo editei todo esse artigo e está no nivel de um dos melhores do brasil pela quantidade de informação com fontes e informações corretas, se não tiver fontes ou alguma coisa errada, um dos administradores removem.
Queria fazer esse pedido para enviarem a imagem na wikipédia, outras cidades como Londrina, Curitiba, Maringá, Apucarana, todas tem imagens da bandeira e brasão, até mesmo Sabaúdia, façam isso pela cidade, é um pedaço da historia da cidade que o mundo todo está em acesso, creio de vocês não souberem mandar a imagem, peçam ajuda as outras prefeituras que já fizeram isso, é importante isso.
Muito Obrigado.
Esta mensagem passou pela Ferramenta AntiSpam CanIt e acreditamos estar livre de perigo, entretanto caso julgue seu conteúdo suspeito, encaminhe a mensagem para dti.abuso@arapongas.pr.gov.br
Essas imagens são públicas, em site do governo (.pr.gov.br) os direitos autorais são cedidos pelo autor, visto que foi a prefeitura que a fez a imagem. E pedi a permissão para a publicação. Att --AppleApolo (talk) 14:09, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
E também a própria prefeitura se manifestou em email dizendo que as imagens podem ser usadas, pois são postadas em sites públicos, cujo a reprodução é permitida, divulgação da cidade, o "diretoria de tecnologia e informação" é apenas o sistema do site que é padrão em prefeituras. Vejo muitas imagens em outros artigos com quase nenhuma informação de fontes (municipios ao redor), e as imagens não são eliminadas, por que essa com fontes e autorização, precisa ser removida ? É só olharem os artigos de Londrina, Apucarana, Maringá, veras que quase nenhuma cita fonte, e a minha cita, com autorização e link.--AppleApolo (talk) 14:22, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- AppleApolo, o site da prefeitura é claro, todo seu conteúdo possui copyrights, veja no rodapé: "©2016 Diretoria de Tecnologia da Informação - Todos os direitos reservados". Se tiver curiosidade veja como exemplo o site da Agência Brasil, o rodapé mostra a permissão para utilização das imagens. Rodrigolopes (talk) 17:20, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
--AppleApolo (talk) 15:32, 25 December 2016 (UTC) Bom eu queria somente ajudar, isso é um site de uma prefeitura, veja outros artigos de cidades, também tem o link da imagem não só na prefeitura, quanto também em outros sites de terceiros, não-governamental, mas ok, se quiser remover, ok, minha intenção era somente ajudar o artigo Arapongas--AppleApolo (talk) 15:32, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: The cited copyright notice is to be found at the source page. There is no proof that this was released into the public domain as claimed. In cases like this we need a written permission that is forwarded to our support team. --AFBorchert (talk) 08:23, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
No evidence of permission. Not PD-ineligible. Jcb (talk) 11:22, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Did you considered the previous DR resolved as Kept? --Amitie 10g (talk) 11:38, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Such unmanagable large DRs will often let slip things through. For this picture, at least the part on the left must be cropped out to make it PD-ineligible. Jcb (talk) 11:46, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Then, crop it! Crop Tool link seems more useful than Nominate for deletion one. --Amitie 10g (talk) 13:45, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- I am not going to crop it, but if somebody uploads a cropped version over it, I will remove the copyvio version and keep-close the DR. Jcb (talk) 15:39, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Then, crop it! Crop Tool link seems more useful than Nominate for deletion one. --Amitie 10g (talk) 13:45, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: This ticket is ineligible for copyright and the left border appears to be as a case of de minimis considering the low resolution as details are barely recognizable. --AFBorchert (talk) 08:26, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Heinrisky is the pseudo of "Henry de Lesquen" ; this picture can be an "autoportrait" ; name of the photograph and authorization (always the same with this pseudo and this man, instrumentalisation of wp, and copyvios) Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 12:19, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Heinrisky doesn't seem to be Henry de Lesquen himself (I know HdL is keen on new technologies, but I don't think he would himself upload a photograph on Commons...). The license is right. No particular reason to wait, so keep immediately. Nomen ad hoc (talk) 13:11, 23 December 2016 (UTC).
Deleted: This appears to be derived from some screen shot and the uploader is apparently associated with Henry de Lesquen, see this statement. It appears best to clarify this in contact with our support team. --AFBorchert (talk) 08:33, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
missing OTRS 178.197.235.119 13:49, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: This requires indeed a written permission passed to our support team. --AFBorchert (talk) 08:35, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
missing OTRS 178.197.235.119 13:50, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: This requires indeed a written permission passed to our support team. --AFBorchert (talk) 08:35, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
These photos of 3D objects come from a non-governmental organization, so {{PD-RU-exempt}} does not apply. Two permissions needed - the first must be from the copyright holder for design and the second - from the photographer.
- File:Medal VOOP.jpg
- File:Medal VOOPIiK.jpg
- File:Nagrudny znac VOOPIiK 1988 01.png
- File:Nagrudny znac VOOPIiK 1988 Revers.png
Sealle (talk) 13:50, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Спасибо за предупреждение, Sealle, извините, но ВООПиК — это государственная организация на тот момент: “Юридическая регистрация общества была оформлена Постановлением № 882 Совета министров РСФСР от 23 июля 1965 года.” В 1988 году на момент выпуска нагрудного знака организация продолжала оставаться государственной. Реорганизация состоялась в 2002 году. Или я что-то упустил?? Что касается медалей, то у организации попробую запросить OTRS разрешение и новые качественные сканы! То есть сейчас прошу снять с удаления файлы File:Nagrudny znac VOOPIiK 1988 01.png и File:Nagrudny znac VOOPIiK 1988 Revers.png (сканировал лично). Спасибо! — Niklitov (talk) 14:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Во всех доступных источниках, включая сайт самой организации, указан её общественный статус на всём протяжении её существования. Не уловил оснований для выводов - общественные организации также подлежали и подлежат регистрации в госорганах. Sealle (talk) 14:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Вопрос в том, что ВООПиК с 1965 по 2002 год была государственной структурой или я не прав? Если прав, два файла можно сразу снять с удаления. — Niklitov (talk) 12:36, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- Во всех доступных источниках, включая сайт самой организации, указан её общественный статус на всём протяжении её существования. Не уловил оснований для выводов - общественные организации также подлежали и подлежат регистрации в госорганах. Sealle (talk) 14:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Photographs are not covered by {{PD-RU-exempt}}. We need indeed a permission by the photographer passed to our support team. --AFBorchert (talk) 08:45, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
missing OTRS 178.197.235.119 13:51, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: This photograph requires indeed the identification of the copyright holder and a written permission passed to our support team. --AFBorchert (talk) 08:47, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 14:51, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Agree: this file seems to be lifted from http://zenkannon.org/fr/roland-yuno-rech-3/ where there is no indication of any release rights. Acabashi (talk) 18:35, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Our version is much larger than the online version. I think we should require OTRS permission nevertheless. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:31, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: This requires indeed a written permission passed to our support team. --AFBorchert (talk) 08:57, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
May not be own work. COM:DW MCMLXXXIX 15:56, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Image from the early 20th century, according to the page it is used on. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 05:54, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: This has been published before and it is indeed unlikely to be the own work by the uploader as claimed. --AFBorchert (talk) 09:04, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 14:12, 16 September 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:46, 22 September 2016 (UTC)
These have as their only Category either Category:Underwater photographs of scuba divers or Category:Scuba diving, which, of course, they are not. The Google translations of the source and file descriptions do not yield useful information. We have more than thirty million images on Commons, so images without good categories cannot be found and are useless. I think these are both useless and possible copyvios.
- File:2016年7月31日東京都お台場綺麗な時のグリーンゾーン（2006年）.jpg
- File:2016年7月31日東京都お台場 綺麗な時のメバルとシマイサキの稚魚.jpg
- File:2016年8月24日東京都お台場調査範囲.jpg
- File:2016年6月27日 東京都お台場の生態調査.jpg
- File:2016年6月27日 東京都お台場水中地形・状態をを記録.jpg
- File:2006年3月19日 お台場のアナジャコ.jpg
- File:2016年9月6日 式根島松の下天然温泉.jpg
- File:2016年9月6日 海豚倶楽部海洋実習後式根島松の下天然温泉にて.jpg
- File:2016年9月7日 海豚倶楽部海洋実習.jpg
- File:2014年9月22日 須賀次郎先生の出版記念パーティ.jpg
- File:2016年1月11日 千葉県館山市波左間にて.jpg
- File:2015年11月15日 JAUS水中調査撮影研究 波佐間魚礁の中でROVを撮る.jpg
- File:2015年11月16日 波佐間人工漁礁にて撮影記録調査.jpg
- File:1978年7月フォトグラフィック潜水と水中撮影入門書.jpg
- File:ユジニ・クラーク.jpg
- File:高校時代.jpg
- File:潜水士制度.jpg
- File:1967年 日本潜水会.jpg
- File:1963年08月09日 100m潜水.jpg
- File:東京水産大学 潜水部クラブ.jpg
- File:2015年1月12日 特定非営利法人水中科学協会の活動.jpg
- File:東京水産大学（現：海洋大学）潜水部の学生.jpg
- File:2007年08月19日佐渡ツアー.jpg
- File:1965年.jpg
- File:赤沢のイセエビ.jpg
- File:トラック島.jpg
- File:2006年4月26日 熊とダイバー.jpg
- File:シンポジウム 関東学生潜水連盟、５０周年を迎え、これからの５０年を考える.jpg
. Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:04, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Some of the files are actually in use, such as File:1963年08月09日 100m潜水.jpg (I haven't checked them all), and this should be an individual DR. Some descriptions mention the name of wildlife that appears in underwater photos, and it is possible to categorize them accordingly. All of the photos mention as the source the title of (but lacks the URL to) the same website [9], where it says "authorized to post to Wikipedia". --朝彦 | asahiko (talk) 10:05, 26 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: This images come apparently from the blog of Jiro Suga, a renowned diver. While the blog has a notice that the uploader is free to upload these images for Wikipedia, this is not sufficient as we need a documented permission for a free license per COM:L by the copyright holder. And this collection of photographs includes older shots, apparently from the private collection of Jiro Suga, where we need to identify the photographer. All this needs to be clarified in contact with our support team. --AFBorchert (talk) 09:21, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
listed as own work, definitely not own work. Other than these, the user also added some maps. Probably they have problems as well.
- File:Tughra of MehmedVI.jpg
- File:Tuğra of Abdülmecid.jpg
- File:Tuğra of Abdülaziz.jpg
- File:Tughra of SüleymanII.jpg
- File:Tughra of MuradIV.jpg
- File:Tughra of AhmedII.jpg
- File:Tughra of OsmanIII.jpg
- File:Selim 3.jpg
- File:Osman3.jpg
- File:Mehmed4.jpg
- File:Mustafa.1.jpg
- File:Bayezid1.jpg
- File:Selim1.jpg
- File:Mehmed3.jpg
- File:VatanımSensin.png
- File:SULTAN-II.AHMED.jpg
- File:MehmedIV.jpg
- File:Mustafa I.jpg
Bulgu (talk) 21:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- As can be seen on the talk page, this user has been warned previously. (though might not know English, so I added a Turkish warning, hoping s/he knows at least one of two languages). Maybe the user knows Polish. --Bulgu (talk) 21:28, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 10:48, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Similar to the previous discussion Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Garbarius, the user uploads and lists not owned work as self work. The images themselves may be in public domain for some clauses related to being old enough, but the source etc. is not indicated, and the public domain status (if exists) is not proven.
- File:Selimiii.jpg
- File:Osman2.png
- File:Tughra of mustafa2.jpg
- File:Tughra of mustafa3.jpg
- File:Tughra of ahmed1.jpg
- File:Tughra od abdülhamid1.jpg
- File:Tughra of mustafa4.jpg
- File:Tughra of selim3.jpg
- File:Tughra of murad5.jpg
- File:MuratV.jpg
- File:Abdülazizottoman.jpg
Bulgu (talk) 11:19, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 14:49, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Once again wrong license etc. The source given are either "own work" (definitely wrong) or a (non-existing ?) commercial website; these files serve as an ad for that site. Some of the files are cropped from other Commons images. File:Selim 1.jpg is already nominated for deletion.
- File:Sultan Mahmud2.jpg
- File:3.selim.jpg
- File:Abdülhamid 1.png
- File:Mustafa I.jpg
- File:Ottoman sultans.jpg
- File:2. osman.jpg
- File:Mehmet 4.jpg
- File:Mustafa 2.jpg
- File:Mustafa II.jpg
- File:2. meşrutiyet.jpg
- File:Ahmed 1.jpg
- File:Abdülmecid sultan.jpg
- File:Haçova savaş.jpg
- File:1. abdülmecid.jpg
- File:Merzifonlu kesik baş.jpg
- File:6. mehmed.jpg
- File:Alemdar mustafa paşa intihar.jpg
- File:Mehmed 5 cülus.jpg
- File:3. selim ve 2. mahmud.jpg
- File:Alemdar mustafa paşa.jpg
- File:Ayastefanos antlaşması.jpg
- File:Fazıl ahmet paşa.jpg
- File:Mahmud 2.jpg
- File:Murad 3.jpg
- File:Zurnazen mustafa.jpg
- File:Fazıl ahmed paşa.jpg
- File:Abdülhamid2.jpg
- File:Abdülmecid1.jpg
- File:Abdülhamid1.jpg
- File:Misakımilli.jpg
- File:Abdülhamid 1.jpg
- File:Mehmed VI cülus.jpg
- File:Murad5.jpg
- File:Murat 5.jpg
- File:Abdülmecid.jpg
- File:Mustafa 3.jpg
- File:28 çelebi mehmed.jpg
- File:3. mustafa ve şehzade selim.jpg
- File:Mehmed 4.jpg
- File:3. selim.jpg
Bulgu (talk) 23:51, 17 April 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:02, 20 April 2017 (UTC)
I'm going to assume original sign is probably copyrightable- and presumed copyrighted unless we know otherwise. Ubcule (talk) 21:46, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Just an informational sign. It's not the Mona Lisa.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 22:09, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - sufficient text to be eligible for copyright. --Jcb (talk) 12:59, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Volimistoriju (talk · contribs)
[edit]Another (?) Ottoman sultan image own worker (tineye images date back to 2008, etc.) . The author of the first photo is 'public'. The paintings are likely to be quite old, and the owners might have died enough years ago for PD clauses, but there is no indication to the real owner.
Bulgu (talk) 21:52, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hystrix (talk) 11:01, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Swiss copyright lasts for 70 years pma or 70 years for anon works per Commons:Copyright rules by territory#Switzerland, so a 1954 stamp will be freely licensed at the earliest in 2035. Ww2censor (talk) 19:15, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Agree Arno-nl (talk) 08:20, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:21, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Cannot verify age of image's publication due to lack of source information. Steel1943 (talk) 19:16, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: Well, this is only conjecture, but since the pageant was annual event, and this looks like a publicity photo, a common sense guess would be that this was published in 1937. --Paul_012 (talk) 07:49, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:20, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
definitely not own work, probably copyighted to the Turkish parliament. Tineye finds a news article from May 2015 with this image. Bulgu (talk) 20:40, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:58, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Per this nomination. Rapsar (talk) 20:54, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:58, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Derivative work of presumed-copyrighted content. Ubcule (talk) 21:31, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:21, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
File:Section of difference engine designed by Charles Babbage at the Computer History Museum.JPG
[edit]Re-photographed reproduction of (presumably) someone else's photograph which looks recent enough to be within term of copyright (and must be since it was reconstructed around 1990). Ubcule (talk) 21:43, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep nope -- I took this photo of the difference engine. It's my photo. Public domain.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 22:07, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Tomwsulcer: - The Computer History Museum's own online copy credits it to the "Science Museum (London)". The London Science Museum themselves credit it to "Science Museum / SSPL" as well.
- Can you please clarify the background to this image so we can confirm your claim? Was the image created by you for the Science Museum, or are the Science Museum incorrectly requiring your public domain image to be credited to them?
- I have to admit I'm slightly baffled as to why you'd re-photograph your image (that was obviously very professionally lit and set up) like that, but I'm sure there's a good reason.
- Much appreciated, thank you. Ubcule (talk) 14:57, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- This engine was on display at the museum. It's not a photograph of a photograph.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 16:02, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Tomwsulcer: - It's apparently true that the exhibit- or a copy of it- was on display at the Computer History Museum. But "your" photograph is quite definitely and provably a copy of the photo above, not original:-
- * The perspective isn't what you'd expect photographing a 3D object from a different angle. It's *exactly* what you'd expect if you re-photographed a 2D image from an angle.
- * The focus doesn't fall off in the way you'd expect from a 3D object. It does so as one would expect if you re-photographed a 2D image from an angle... again. Odd that.
- Not proof enough? Okay...
- * The 3D positioning of the various cogs, bars, etc. is *exactly* the same in "your" photo. (Anyone can confirm this by comparing a given detail.) Incredibly unlikely unless you photographed it from exactly the same angle.
- * The lightning and reflections are *exactly* the same in "your" photo. Again, incredibly unlikely to have happened by coincidence.
- * The source image can be made to line up almost exactly with "your" photo by simple use of Photoshop's geometric "distort" tool. Shockingly unlikely unless you'd simply reproduced the original image.
- I guess what I'm saying is, in your own words... "nope". It's a photo of a photo, please don't insult our intelligence. Ubcule (talk) 18:27, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Tomwsulcer: - It's apparently true that the exhibit- or a copy of it- was on display at the Computer History Museum. But "your" photograph is quite definitely and provably a copy of the photo above, not original:-
- This engine was on display at the museum. It's not a photograph of a photograph.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 16:02, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. Per nomination. See also at SSPL. -- Asclepias (talk) 17:39, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:06, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Derivative/reproduction of copyrightable (and hence presumed copyrighted) work. Ubcule (talk) 21:45, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Public map in a public museum; no copyright issues.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 12:51, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:06, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Derivative of presumed-copyrighted prose on sign. Ubcule (talk) 21:48, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:02, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Reproduction of presumed copyrightable (and hence presumed copyrighted) prose. Ubcule (talk) 21:51, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Informational sign in a Rutgers geology museum with no copyrightable value.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 22:12, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:00, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Derivative work of presumed-copyrighted content. Ubcule (talk) 21:52, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Informational sign in museum.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 22:13, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Tomwsulcer: - No-one is disputing what it is; that doesn't inherently make it not copyrightable. It's not a simple one-line sign. Both photograph and prose potentially fall into that category. There *may* be reasons why either or both are exempt from copyright, e.g. due to age and/or being works of government agencies(?) etc. If so, that would be your responsibility as uploader to make that clear, not mine (or anyone else's) to guess. Ubcule (talk) 12:46, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:01, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Is this copyrightable, and is it (or is it not) in-scope for Commons? Ubcule (talk) 21:54, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep just a letter. There is no monetary value and it was never intended as artwork.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 22:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 14:01, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Text copyrighted by Optus, the ISP. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 23:48, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep. This is legitimate content, as shown by the entire commons category Category:Screenshots_of_Internet_censorship. In addition, this is a needless duplication of the discussion at English wikipedia. Pratyeka (talk) 00:01, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- Being legitimate content does not affect the copyright status of the text. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 00:10, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- Legitimate by which I (would have though I obviously) meant acceptable for upload under copyright law. Pratyeka (talk) 00:14, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- Oh. Why do you believe that the text is not copyrighted? Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 00:26, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- It is not a substantive work of art, but merely a simple public notice. Pratyeka (talk) 00:44, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- Being a public notice does not affect the copyright status. Everything is copyrighted unless there is a specific exemption or it does not meet Commons:Threshold_of_originality#Australia. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 00:47, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- Copyright is not just a binary system - 'it is copyright or it is not copyright' - but rather about context and use. There is clearly significant existing acceptance of this type of use - see the entire commons category Category:Screenshots_of_Internet_censorship - so I don't see the point of discussing this any further. Pratyeka (talk) 00:54, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- It is binary. By "context and use" you are thinking about fair use, which is not allowed on Commons. If you were to upload this to the English Wikipedia, it would be allowed. I will go through that category sometime later and nominate the files that can't be hosted here. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 00:56, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- Copyright is not just a binary system - 'it is copyright or it is not copyright' - but rather about context and use. There is clearly significant existing acceptance of this type of use - see the entire commons category Category:Screenshots_of_Internet_censorship - so I don't see the point of discussing this any further. Pratyeka (talk) 00:54, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- Being a public notice does not affect the copyright status. Everything is copyrighted unless there is a specific exemption or it does not meet Commons:Threshold_of_originality#Australia. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 00:47, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- It is not a substantive work of art, but merely a simple public notice. Pratyeka (talk) 00:44, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- Oh. Why do you believe that the text is not copyrighted? Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 00:26, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- Legitimate by which I (would have though I obviously) meant acceptable for upload under copyright law. Pratyeka (talk) 00:14, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- Being legitimate content does not affect the copyright status of the text. Ramaksoud2000 (Talk to me) 00:10, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: PD-ineligible. --Yann (talk) 14:04, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Screenshot of presumed-copyrighted content Ubcule (talk) 22:01, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Puh-leeze. If this wild-eyed overzealous Ubcule has his way, he'll delete half of Wikimedia Commons. Come on, this is just a photo of an onboard screen. Sheesh.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 22:15, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Tomwsulcer: - I nominated a *very* small percentage of your uploads over several years, primarily relating to copyrightable signs, as we discussed. (And I'm sure I haven't nominated all of those).
- While skimming your uploads for these, I noticed a small number of other cases that were fairly straightforward. Here, it's that screenshots of copyrighted software are usually considered copyrighted themselves. This is a widely-used policy; it's not "overzealousness" on my part.
- If it seems like I nominated a lot of your images, it's because you've uploaded a *lot* of them over the years (thank you) so even a relatively small percentage of nominations in one go is going to add up.
- As we've already discussed, Commons is not Flickr, or DeviantArt, or whatever- it's a resource site for genuinely free *and* educationally-useful images.
- Aside from a few which are fictitious- and probably out-of-scope- I'd guess that the majority of your uploads are okay and won't be deleted. Ubcule (talk) 15:24, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:47, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
File:Paul Herrmann vor seinem Bild - Plenarsaal des Reichstags nach der Brandstiftung 27.2.33.jpg
[edit]unbekannter Fotograf 1933 Goesseln (talk) 22:56, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: If the photographer is actually unknown, then, {{PD-anon-70-EU}} apply. --Amitie 10g (talk) 12:42, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- how make you sure of Template:PD-anon-70-EU:
- Please use this template only if the author never claimed authorship or his/her authorship never became public in any other way.
- ?
- --Goesseln (talk) 11:37, 28 December 2016 (UTC)
- how make you sure of Template:PD-anon-70-EU:
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:45, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Would this building pass French COM:FOP laws? Any views anyone. Leoboudv (talk) 21:48, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I'm not sure the architect died more than 70 years ago. --Leoboudv (talk) 21:50, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:58, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Is this copyrightable, or copyrighted? I would assume yes, but it's possible there's some exception in this case? Ubcule (talk) 21:48, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Outdoor informational sign with no copyrightable value.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 22:11, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- No Freedom of panorama in the U.S. for sculptures (and it includes this plaque). If it is a work from the National Park Service, then, it is in the PD. --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:58, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Amitie 10g: - Personally, I couldn't be sure that a plaque would legally be considered a "sculpture" anyway, simply because of the physical bas-relief. Then again, this is academic, since if what you say is correct it wouldn't make any difference whether this was a 2D or 3D work of art, only if it was- or wasn't- the work of a particular government agency. (Which was what I had in mind when I mentioned a possible exception). Ubcule (talk) 13:41, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Tomwsulcer: - If the sign simply said "Mary Ellen Kramer Great Falls Park", you'd probably be right that it would be too simple and obvious to be copyrightable, regardless of source. That's not the case, though, there's a massive great block of text. Ubcule (talk) 13:43, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- Puh-leeze. Get a life Ubcule.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 16:03, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- When this plaque was made? Yann (talk) 14:03, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: no Freedom of Panorama in the US, most likely a work by the government of New Jersey, considering the seal. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:03, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 22:44, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- As Secondo Pia born and lived in Italy, is very likely that this photo has been taken in Italy, then, {{PD-Italy}} apply (simple photo, only the location matters). --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:49, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per Amitie 10g. Ruthven (msg) 21:34, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope, please use external file hosting.
Sealle (talk) 16:53, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Please delete my files:
Ig1967 (talk) 22:28, 20 February 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 00:55, 27 February 2015 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
- File:Владимир Веклич докторская диссертация.jpg
- File:ЮМЗ Т1 с автографом Михаила Галася.jpg
- File:Владимир Веклич c министром ЖКХ 1985.jpg
- File:Владимир Веклич с французской делегацией 1985.jpg
- File:Владимир Веклич поздравляет строителей 1983.jpg
- File:НИКТИ ГХ 80-е.jpg
- File:Владимир Веклич докторская.jpg
- File:Веклич Владимир Филиппович.jpg
- File:Троллейбусный поезд 9 Тр Киев.jpg
- File:Владимир Веклич в рабочем кабинете в депо № 2.jpg
- File:Американская делегация в киевском троллейбусном депо № 2.jpg
- File:Троллейбусный поезд МТБ-82 в киевском депо № 2. Пятое колесо.jpg
- File:Троллейбусный поезд МТБ-82 в киевском депо № 2.jpg
- File:Система Владимира Веклича на троллейбусном поезде Škoda 9Tr.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:12, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Сегодня получил уведомление, что вы выставили на удаление десяток моих "исторических фотографий". Насколько я понимаю английский претензия ко мне "за неопределенный копирайт статус". Все эти фотографии сделаны мною лично, что я и указал при их загрузке. Все негативы этих фотографий я никому не передавал и храню у себя. Авторские права на эти фотографии я тоже ни кому не передавал. Никаких претензий со стороны третьих лиц на авторские права по этим фотографиям я не получал. Вчера с негатива мне удалось распечатать с большей выдержкой в лучшем качестве фотографию File:Владимир Веклич докторская.jpg, которую я загрузил под другим именем, т.к не знал как заменить ее под старым именем, поэтому File:Владимир Веклич докторская.jpg мне не нужен и буду рад если вы поможите мне его удалить, что бы он не засорял Викпедию. С остальных файлов, которые я использую в своих статьях, пожалуйста снимите шаблон на удаление. С уважением Ig1967 (talk) 18:38, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
Не совсем согласен насчет новизны моей учётной записи. Моя учетная запись не такая уж и новая(Время регистрации: 19:10, 30 мая 2014), только в русской части Википедии я написал ряд статей и имею более 350 правок.
Вы пытаетесь заставить меня что то, кому то доказывать, несмотря на то, что я ничего не нарушил. Зачем мне это делать. Это мои фотографии и ни кто до сих пор не ставил под сомнение мое авторское право на них. Я загрузил их в полном соответствии с регламентом Википедии и планирую по мере написания статей загружать новые. Никакой регламент не требует для своих фотографий делать действия которые вы мне предлагаете. Что я нарушил? Если вы имеете претензии по авторским правам к моим фото, то я в суде готов доказать их неправомочность. Если у Вас нет таких претензий, то пожалуйста снимите шаблон на удаление с моих фотографий. Ig1967 08:55, 16 марта 2015 (UTC)
- В Commons довольно часто загружают исторические фотографии как свои собственные. Думаю, что дополнительное подтверждение не помешает. --EugeneZelenko 14:07, 17 марта 2015 (UTC)
- Евгений! Этот аргумент не имеет силы. Что значит "не помешает"??? Если нет обоснованных аргументов и ссылок на то, что эти снимки когда-то где-то были опубликованы, то нет никаких разумных причин требовать от загрузившего участника идти в OTRS, поскольку там он не сможет доказать и показать ничего существенного в дополнение к уже указанной им информации. От себя лично хотел бы попросить вас извиниться перед участником. --Kaganer (talk) 17:22, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Я не виноват в том, что как вы пишите:"В Commons довольно часто загружают исторические фотографии как свои собственные". Тут нет моей вины. Это не дает Вам право номинировать все 14 моих фотографий на удаление!!!!! Я исчерпывающе объяснил вам три раза, что это мои фотографии и ни кто их авторство у меня не оспаривал. Я объяснил Вам, что готов письменно или через суд опровергнуть такие притензии если Вы их можите мне предъявить. Я действовал четко по регламенту Википедии при их загрузке и ни чего не нарушил. Эти фотографии улучшили качество и наглядность десятка статей Википедии. Вы без всяких оснований перечеркиваете мой труд. Даже для реализации Вашего суждения:"Думаю, что дополнительное подтверждение не помешает" (которое как я понимаю, вы трактуете как единственную претензию ко мне) не нужно удалять мои фотографии. Прошу Вас удалить с моих фотографий установленный Вами шаблон на их удаление. Ig1967 21:13, 17 марта 2015 (UTC)
- Думаю, что в этом обсуждении мы к решению не придём, поэтому лучше будет, если Вы будете обсуждеть проблему в запросе на удаление. --EugeneZelenko 14:07, 18 марта 2015 (UTC)
Уважаемый EugeneZelenko! Объясните мне пожалуйста почему "в этом обсуждении мы к решению не придём" на Вашей странице обсуждения и нам необходимо перейти на англоязычную страницу запроса на удаление? Почему Вы лишаете меня права получить от Вас ответ в чем неправомерность моих действий из-за которых вы номинировали 14 моих фотографий на удаление!!!!!
В статье ru:Википедия:Лицензирование изображений#Какие изображения можно загружать на сайт Википедии одназначно сказано: "если вы являетесь его автором и согласны с распространением своего произведения под приведёнными ниже свободными лицензиями;" Я многократно сообщал Вам что я автор изображений и ни кто на мои авторские права не оспаривает. Вы тоже не предъявили мне никаких претензий насчет моего авторства, которые могли бы оправдать Ваши действия. Вместо них вы мне абстрактно отвечаете "В Commons довольно часто загружают исторические фотографии как свои собственные." Но этот Ваш постулат не дает Вам право на удаление моих фотографий. Более того в статье Википедии ru:Википедия:Не доводите до абсурда#Не играйте с правилами прямо говориться о вольных трактовках правил: "с помощью некорректных трактовок правил решения, которые очевидно базируются на правилах, — всё это представляет собой «игру с правилами», рассматриваемую как форму деструктивного поведения."
После того как я указал Вам на не легитимность Ваших действий Вы, пытаетесь навязать незнакомый мне регламент OTRS. Я прочитал статью о нем. Там четко сказано: When contacting OTRS is unnecessary[edit] I took the image myself and it hasn't been previously published (and there is no other copyright involved)., что прямо указывает на абсурдность такого совета.
В очередной раз прошу Вас конкретно ответить мне какое требование Википедии я нарушил или если здесь нет моей вины удалить с моих фотографий установленный Вами шаблон на их удаление, а не отсылать меня куда-нибудь. Ig1967 22:55, 18 марта 2015 (UTC)
Keep. No reasonable arguments for deletion. No reasonable arguments for OTRS procedure (no links to previously publications). All people have rights for keeping and publishing historical photos, what is owned his. Maybe need more correctly provide information in "source" field, but this no reason for deletion.--Kaganer (talk) 17:22, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
Keep.
- Во-первых, у вас вроде как есть компьютерная программа, выискивает, не засвечена ли в интернетах фотография. Возьмите и проверьте, не передрал ли участник Ig1967 эти фотографии откуда-нибудь из всемирной помойки.
- А как в Википедии обстоит дело с презумпцией невиновности, одним из основных постулатов американской дерьмократии? А никак, каждый имеет право подозревать другого участника а не на*б*л ли ты белого хозяина? Боитесь, что белого хозяина загнут и вдуют ему по самое нехочу, мол, не своими фотографиями торгуешь?
Я порылся в компьютере и тоже кое-что из собственного архива закинул, фотографии сделаны более 30 лет назад. Претензии у белого хозяина ко мне будут? Если возникнут претензии, пусть сам мне напишет, только я с ним общаться буду на великом и могучем русском языке, которым я владею в совершенстве.
-
Владивосток, лето 1977 года, корабли в бухте Золотой Рог. -
Владивосток, февраль 1982 года, корабли в бухте Золотой Рог. -
Владивосток, танкер в бухте Золотой Рог, июль 1982 года. -
Владивосток, Спортивная гавань, ноябрь 1982 года.
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_DSCF1978.jpg){kind=link}
![58 File:"KHexEdit-0.8.6.png.jpg](#File:"KHexEdit-0.8.6.png.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![137 File:"equis" no es valido.jpg](#File:"equis"_no_es_valido.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![143 File:"Frankfurter Pfanne" in South Africa.jpg](#File:"Frankfurter_Pfanne"_in_South_Africa.jpg){kind=link}
![144 File:"Frankfurter Pfanne" in France.jpg](#File:"Frankfurter_Pfanne"_in_France.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
_Artwork.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_image_number_119_sign_about_Coopers_Island_Nature_Preserve.jpg){kind=link}
_images_(45)_number_44.jpg){kind=link}
_image_number_239_map_of_arboretum.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_DSCF1978.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_DSCF1978.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_DSCF1978.jpg){kind=link}
_DSCF1978.jpg){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_rev..jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2nd_class.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Alfredo_C%C3%A2ndido.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_postal_ilustrado_por_Alfredo_C%C3%A2ndido.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-_Ricardo_Bensa%C3%BAde.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_02_(cropped).png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_04.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_03.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_05.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_02.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_01.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
![03:12, 23 December 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/12/23#c-Avicennasis-2016-12-23T03:12:00.000Z-File:"KHexEdit-0.8.6.png.jpg){kind=link}
![08:51, 29 December 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/12/23#c-Dharmadhyaksha-2016-12-29T08:51:00.000Z-File:"KHexEdit-0.8.6.png.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![13:24, 23 December 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/12/23#c-Acabashi-2016-12-23T13:24:00.000Z-File:"equis"_no_es_valido.jpg){kind=link}
![18:35, 29 December 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/12/23#c-Ellin_Beltz-2016-12-29T18:35:00.000Z-File:"equis"_no_es_valido.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![13:08, 23 December 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/12/23#c-BU_Rob13-2016-12-23T13:08:00.000Z-File:"Frankfurter_Pfanne"_in_South_Africa.jpg){kind=link}
![00:30, 30 December 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/12/23#c-Jcb-2016-12-30T00:30:00.000Z-File:"Frankfurter_Pfanne"_in_South_Africa.jpg){kind=link}
![13:16, 23 December 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/12/23#c-BU_Rob13-2016-12-23T13:16:00.000Z-File:"Frankfurter_Pfanne"_in_France.jpg){kind=link}
![22:16, 29 December 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/12/23#c-Jcb-2016-12-29T22:16:00.000Z-File:"Frankfurter_Pfanne"_in_France.jpg){kind=link}
![[3]](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_9SBRas9XXZE/TTypcqdiv_I/AAAAAAAABTE/gkFuKxV7r_k/s1600/Ibanez+Jem+7PBK+Prototype.jpg){kind=link}
![[4]](http://1.bp.blogspot.com/-TYPZfGQkXRs/UOjxXaKc9fI/AAAAAAAAE-M/z7SId7EQ5KM/s1600/guitarra+electrica+ibanez+jem7rb+de+steve+vai.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
_Artwork.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Artwork.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_Artwork.jpg){kind=link}
_Artwork.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_image_number_119_sign_about_Coopers_Island_Nature_Preserve.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_image_number_119_sign_about_Coopers_Island_Nature_Preserve.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_image_number_119_sign_about_Coopers_Island_Nature_Preserve.jpg){kind=link}
_image_number_119_sign_about_Coopers_Island_Nature_Preserve.jpg){kind=link}
_images_(45)_number_44.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_images_(45)_number_44.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_images_(45)_number_44.jpg){kind=link}
_images_(45)_number_44.jpg){kind=link}
_image_number_239_map_of_arboretum.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_image_number_239_map_of_arboretum.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
_image_number_239_map_of_arboretum.jpg){kind=link}
_image_number_239_map_of_arboretum.jpg){kind=link}
Keep.
Я учел замечания пользователя Kaganer и внес их в описания 2 фотографий (их делал Владимир Веклич в 1966 году) . Автором остальных фотографий являюсь я. Авторские права на все фотографии (включая упоминаемые две фотографии Владимира Веклича) после его смерти в 1993 году принадлежат мне, что оформлено юридически. За 22 года прошедшие после его смерти ни кто не подвергал сомнению мои авторские права на них. Ig1967 (talk) 22:43, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Kept as per discussion. --A.Savin 13:43, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Historical photos, not own works. OTRS permission given by a person with no authority to do it. Photographers' permissions needed.
- File:Троллейбусные поезда Владимира Веклича на техобслуживании в киевском депо № 2 в 1970-х.jpg
- File:Первый авторский стенд Ливинской Л.А. посвящённый киевской линии скоростного трамвая и инициаторам её строительства Владимиру.JPG
- File:Исследовательский поезд Владимира Веклича из двух троллейбусов Шкода 9 Тр в депо № 2.jpg
- File:Бензотрамвай в Киеве в 1920.jpg
- File:Коллектив киевских трамвайных мастерских в 1912 году.jpg
- File:Киевское трамвайное депо имени Красина в начале 20 века.jpg
- File:Трамвайный музей Киев.JPG
- File:Владимир Веклич на торжественном собрании в Октябрьском депо 1966 год.jpg
- File:Владимир Веклич проводит планёрку в депо рубеж 1970-х.jpg
- File:Инициаторы строительства первой в СССР киевской линии скоростного трамвая Владимир Веклич и Василий Дьяконов 1966 год.jpg
- File:Троллейбусный поезд на котором Владимир Веклич исследовал динамические параметры в аварийном и обычных режимах 1966 год.jpg
- File:Сталино улица Артёма конец сороковых. Почтовая карточка СССР.jpg
- File:Изобретатель троллейбусного поезда Владимир Филиппович Веклич.jpg
- File:С чего начинался троллейбусный поезд Владимира Веклича.jpg
- File:Троллейбусный поезд Владимира Веклича в Киеве.jpg
- File:Памятник первому киевскому трамваю.jpg
- File:Брамский Казимир Антонович.jpg
- File:Владимир Веклич в лондонском метро 1976.jpg
- File:Линия диагностики Владимира Веклича во львовском ТТУ 1985 год.jpg
- File:Изобретатель троллейбусного поезда Владимир Веклич и Владимир Мышакин.jpg
- File:Строительство опытного производства НИКТИ ГХ.jpg
- File:Виктор Глушков в гостях у Владимира Веклича в НИКТИ ГХ.jpg
- File:Владимир Веклич докторская диссертация.jpg
- File:ЮМЗ Т1 с автографом Михаила Галася.jpg
- File:Владимир Веклич c министром ЖКХ 1985.jpg
- File:Владимир Веклич с французской делегацией 1985.jpg
- File:Владимир Веклич поздравляет строителей 1983.jpg
- File:НИКТИ ГХ 80-е.jpg
- File:Веклич Владимир Филиппович.jpg
- File:Владимир Веклич проводит совещание по внедрению диагностических комплексов.jpg
- File:Троллейбусный поезд 9 Тр Киев.jpg
- File:Владимир Веклич в рабочем кабинете в депо № 2.jpg
- File:Американская делегация в киевском троллейбусном депо № 2.jpg
- File:Троллейбусный поезд МТБ-82 в киевском депо № 2. Пятое колесо.jpg
- File:Троллейбусный поезд МТБ-82 в киевском депо № 2.jpg
- File:Система Владимира Веклича на троллейбусном поезде Škoda 9Tr.jpg
Sealle (talk) 18:13, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Часть файлов вынесено повторно, поскольку, как OTRS-агент, заявляю, что ticket:2016112810024283 закрыт без попытки выяснить авторство данных изображений. Sealle (talk) 18:18, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Участник Ig1967, сразу несколько пояснений для Вас, чтобы Вы не тратили время на реплики, подобные сделанным выше. 1) Да, согласно правилам этого проекта именно Вы должны доказать возможность размещения изображений под свободной лицензией. В данном случае доказать своё авторство. См. COM:EVID. 2) Ваши оппоненты как раз ничего доказывать не должны, для удаления этих файлов вполне достаточно наличия обоснованных сомнений, см. COM:PCP. По этой же ссылке Вы легко найдёте ответ на аргумент "мои авторские права много лет никто не оспаривал". А сомнений здесь хоть отбавляй - фото сделаны в разные годы, в разных городах и странах, в помещениях и на территориях с ограниченным доступом. Пожалуйста, поясните, в каком качестве и каком возрасте Вы присутствовали на встречах с министрами и секретарями компартии, на защите диссертации, на испытаниях и встречах с иностранными делегациями, в зарубежных поездках и в фотоателье, делая документальные фото; как Вам удалось создать этот печатный документ. Sealle (talk) 21:23, 23 December 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Присоединяюсь к сомнениям Sealle. Кроме того, File:Инициативное письмо по разработке системы автоматики в НИКТИ ГХ для первой в СССР линии скоростного трамвая.jpg, File:Владимир Веклич. Подарок Михаилу Галасю с посвящением автора.jpg и File:Диплом c отличием Веклича Владимира Филипповича.jpg и т.д. и прочие документы не являются собственными работами, но могут быть государственными документами. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- В файлах по ticket:2016112810024283 шаблоне указан автор Владимир Веклич
- File:Троллейбусные поезда Владимира Веклича на техобслуживании в киевском депо № 2 в 1970-х.jpg
- File:Исследовательский поезд Владимира Веклича из двух троллейбусов Шкода 9 Тр в депо № 2.jpg
Файлы фото начала века из архива моего деда размещены под соответствующей лицензией. а не разрешения от OTRS.
- File:Бензотрамвай в Киеве в 1920.jpg
- File:Коллектив киевских трамвайных мастерских в 1912 году.jpg
- File:Киевское трамвайное депо имени Красина в начале 20 века.jpg
- File:Трамвайный музей Киев.JPG
Файл, приведенный ниже, это стандартная почтовая открытка Министерство связи СССР 1949 года на какую я проставил соответствующий тип лицензии
Файлы, приведенные ниже, я делал в музее электротранспорта, где нет запрещения на съёмку экспонатов.
- File:Первый авторский стенд Ливинской Л.А. посвящённый киевской линии скоростного трамвая и инициаторам её строительства Владимиру.JPG
- File:Изобретатель троллейбусного поезда Владимир Веклич и Владимир Мышакин.jpg
Файлы, приведенные ниже, делал в разное время на территории выставки новой техники ЖКХ со свободным входом и отсутствием запрета на съёмку, где участвовал в создании многих экспонатов и семинарах, находящейся на восьмом этаже НИКТИ ГХ по адресу ул. Урицкого 35 и во дворе этого здания где строилось опытное производство и стояла экспериментальная техника:
- File:Строительство опытного производства НИКТИ ГХ.jpg
- File:Виктор Глушков в гостях у Владимира Веклича в НИКТИ ГХ.jpg
- File:Владимир Веклич c министром ЖКХ 1985.jpg
- File:Владимир Веклич с французской делегацией 1985.jpg
- File:Владимир Веклич поздравляет строителей 1983.jpg
- File:Веклич Владимир Филиппович.jpg
- File:Владимир Веклич проводит совещание по внедрению диагностических комплексов.jpg
- File:С чего начинался троллейбусный поезд Владимира Веклича.jpg
Файл, приведенный ниже, делал в Москве в институте ЖД транспорта. Вход на любую защиту диссертации по закону свободен для любого желающего.
Файл, приведенный ниже, делал в Киеве в управлении КП "Киевпастранс". Несмотря на пожилой возраст Казимир Антонович ещё работает в техотделе КП "Киевпастранс" и эту информацию можно проверить у него. http://kpt.kiev.ua/information/contacts/
Файл, приведенный ниже, делал во Львове, во время проведения наладочных работ на тормозном стенде
Файлы, приведенные ниже, делал на улице в Киеве
- File:Троллейбусный поезд Владимира Веклича в Киеве.jpg
- File:Система Владимира Веклича на троллейбусном поезде Škoda 9Tr.jpg
- File:Троллейбусный поезд 9 Тр Киев.jpg
- File:Памятник первому киевскому трамваю.jpg
Этот печатный документ создал не я, а ракетный конструктор Галась. Однако очевидно, что это подарок Векличу и имущественные права на написанное его рукой переходят к одариваемому. Недавно мне объяснили, что я ошибочно считал, что при сканировании, так же как и фотографировании автором файла является его создатель и неправильно прописал шаблон нескольких файлов, что исправлю.
Файлы, приведенные ниже, от сканировал с рукописи воспоминаний Веклича. В подписях под фотографиями фотограф не указан. На переданных им перед смертью в музей копиях этих фото указаны только даты. До моего размещения на складе, фото нигде не публиковались поэтому фотографа вряд ли удасться установить.
- File:Владимир Веклич на торжественном собрании в Октябрьском депо 1966 год.jpg
- File:Владимир Веклич проводит планёрку в депо рубеж 1970-х.jpg
- File:Инициаторы строительства первой в СССР киевской линии скоростного трамвая Владимир Веклич и Василий Дьяконов 1966 год.jpg
- File:Владимир Веклич в лондонском метро 1976.jpg
- File:Изобретатель троллейбусного поезда Владимир Филиппович Веклич.jpg Ig1967 (talk) 16:37, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Ig1967: ещё несколько комментариев. Вы раз за разом сбиваетесь в понятии прав на изображение. Охотно верю, что Вы или упомянутые Вами люди владеете / владели бумажными экземплярами этих фотографий и иных документов. Однако имущественное право на экземпляр не означает наличия авторского права на оригинальную работу. По старым снимкам - Вы поменяли версию: раньше Вы говорили, что это фото из архива Ваших родственников, теперь заявляете, что это их собственные работы. Какие основания позволили Вам изменить описание? Вы являлись свидетелем, что Ваши предки собственноручно сделали эти снимки? Были ли эти изображения ранее опубликованы? Sealle (talk) 17:00, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- Чесно говоря я и сам путаюсь в этой истории. Архив попал к деду в конце 1920-х, когда его одинокий дальний родственник за политически неверный снимок сгинул в недрах НКВД. Поселившиеся в квартиру арестованного люди передали деду (как единственному родственнику) какое то барахло, 7 дореволюционных альбомов разных коммунальных предприятий Киева и кучу отдельных, зачастую пересекающиеся с альбомными фотографий. Учитывая, что погибший в НКВД был профессиональным фотографом, логично предположить что он был автором всех этих фото. Так как дед был единственным наследником, то он, как я понимаю, помимо самих фото он унаследовал авторские права умершего. Дед передаёт альбомы во вновь открывшийся в Киеве первый всесоюзный трамвайный музей, а часть фото оставляет себе. Во время войны немцы полностью разграбливают музей. В 1956 году при ремонте крыши Киевского завода электротранспорта чудесным образом находятся три слегка подпорченных альбома и пачка фотографий. Их и оставшуюся у меня часть архива активно использует в своих публикациях ведущий в Киеве историк электротранспорта К.Брамский. С утра ему позвоню и узнаю не использовал ли он какую-нибудь из этих четырёх фото в своих публикациях и Вам напишу. Я давал ребятам из автоконсалтинга три фото (два из которых загрузил на склад):
- File:Коллектив киевских трамвайных мастерских в 1912 году.jpg
- File:Трамвайный музей Киев.JPG и они их использовали в статье http://www.autoconsulting.com.ua/article.php?sid=35621. Но это было после загрузки на склад. Так, что у склада однозначный приоритет по двум фото. Учитывая, что фотограф умер более 86 лет назад, думаю можно для фото использовать лицензию: {{PD-old-70-1923}}. Я сейчас восстанавливаю 12 удачных старых фото по трамвайным депо из этого архива и хотел бы понимать, под какой лицензией их правильно выложить на склад, т.к я в этом вопросе действительно плаваю. Ig1967 (talk) 20:01, 24 December 2016 (UTC)
- Проверил все имеющийся у меня книги по трамваю и поговорил с Казимиром Антоновичем. В 2011 он использовал два фото:
- File:Бензотрамвай в Киеве в 1920.jpg
- File:Киевское трамвайное депо имени Красина в начале 20 века.jpg
в книге Димы Ермака "Трамвай на улицах Киева", консультантом которой он являлся. В подписях под фото автор не указан. Приведенные фото в книге урезаны, а я выложил полный вариант. Ig1967 (talk) 10:34, 25 December 2016 (UTC)
- See also new ticket:2016122610008454. --sasha (krassotkin) 08:31, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- Ради COM:AGF часть можно переоформить с этим тикетом, указанием автора и {{Cc-by-sa-4.0-heirs}}. Sealle (talk) 09:17, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- @Sealle: Я не совсем понял смысл Вашей фразы. Я правильно понимаю, что все фотографии, правоприемником авторских прав на которые я являюсь, я должен оформить с лицензией {{Cc-by-sa-4.0-heirs}}? И разрешение по ticket:2016122610008454 проставить в пяти фотографиях:
- Ради COM:AGF часть можно переоформить с этим тикетом, указанием автора и {{Cc-by-sa-4.0-heirs}}. Sealle (talk) 09:17, 27 December 2016 (UTC)
- File:Владимир Веклич на торжественном собрании в Октябрьском депо 1966 год.jpg
- File:Владимир Веклич проводит планёрку в депо рубеж 1970-х.jpg
- File:Инициаторы строительства первой в СССР киевской линии скоростного трамвая Владимир Веклич и Василий Дьяконов 1966 год.jpg
- File:Изобретатель троллейбусного поезда Владимир Филиппович Веклич.jpg
- File:Сын изобретателя Владимира Веклича с директорами депо во время открытия мемориальной доски.jpg
(информации по этому тикету на свою почту я еще не получил, но первые восемь цифр номера этого тикета соответствуют дате отправки моего запроса OTRS на эти файлы)? Ig1967 (talk) 10:13, 29 December 2016 (UTC)
- К сожалению, у агента, рассматривающего этот тикет, возникли вопросы. Для одних и тех же файлов в разных письмах упоминаются совершенно разные авторы и обстоятельства создания фотографий, что, скажем так, не повышает уровень доверия к этим противоречивым заявлениям. Sealle (talk) 13:47, 31 December 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Owning a copy of a photo or of a document does not give one the right to freely license it. That right belongs to the photogrpaher or creator. In order for these to be free of copyirght and eligible for Commons, it must be proven beyond a significant doubt that they created by persons who died before 1947. While that may be true of a few of these, it has not been proven for any of them. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:20, 2 January 2017 (UTC)