Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/12/18

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive December 18th, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"NASA material is not protected by copyright unless noted". Source https://www.flickr.com/photos/nasahqphoto/31563018805/ from NASA clearly does not have a PD license. Secondarywaltz (talk) 01:11, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep - since the nominator didn't bother to read the licence linked in regards to 'PD-USGov-NASA' or noticed the "Usage terms: Released to Public" in the EXIF, I think this is a good lesson for him in the future to not blindly report everything for deletion...admins, please check to see if he has not reported similar ones in the past.--Stemoc 01:18, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep The image is attibuted to NASA/Bill Ingalls. Bill Ingalls is the 'Senior Contract Photographer' for NASA Headquarters, and has been for nearly 20 years. As an official image taken by him, this image is {{PD-USGov-NASA}}. Reventtalk 01:25, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Interestingly, Bill Ingalls was discussed at that very UDR. Reventtalk 01:35, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • You are correct! What you state may be true. What is in conflict here is the Flickr license, which Stemoc kept confirming, is obviously not true. How is anybody supposed to guess that a strange set of conditions apply to these? Very confusing. I withdraw my nomination. Secondarywaltz (talk) 01:38, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
What is mandatory? A license at external service like Flickr or the U.S. legislation? Keep in mind this. --Amitie 10g (talk) 04:11, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Withdraw. Works from NASA (like any U.S. Federal Government agency) are in the PD, regardless the licensing at external services like Flikcr. --Amitie 10g (talk) 04:14, 18 December 2016 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Chapecoense players

[edit]

The pictures were taken originally by Chapecoense, which has a copyright notice on their website (chapecoense.com) --Alex98 (talk) 01:38, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: clear copyright violations. --JuTa 02:52, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickrwashed album cover. See https://www.flickr.com/photos/x1brett/14346211117/ for uncropped version Rrburke (talk) 13:17, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The CC BY 2.0 says that i can crop this image: Adapt — remix, transform, and build upon the material, why should i use all cover? Sergkarman (talk) 14:26, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, now i get it. Sergkarman (talk) 14:35, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:59, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lynnperkins (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:ADVERT? But in any case this logo probably is above COM:TOO.

XXN, 14:15, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: above TOO. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:35, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:13, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is an advertisement and has no educational use. KSFT (talk) 20:36, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Shizhao: Uploader requested deletion of a recently uploaded unused file - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nothing worthwhile visible, even when brightened. Ubcule (talk) 15:12, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:04, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of imho rather poor quality also personality rights isssues and/or "family album" oriented, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 21:15, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:04, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Masur as no permission (No permission since) May be OK, depending on COM:FOP. Which place is this? Yann (talk) 23:19, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment But this is not panorama :) It's a painting of such. The whole image is a painting (or similar artwork). And its authir (according to the dleeted pl-wiki article [1]) is: Klaudia Świątczak - Pjanka (hence KSP in the image descritpion). Masur (talk) 06:24, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:15, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from subject's official twitter profile (https://twitter.com/sagenorthcutt). D-M (talk) 22:09, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 13:18, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. D-M (talk) 22:16, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, like all other the uploader's contributions. Taivo (talk) 13:19, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mobeen 1223 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused documents of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Spam & missing license. --Achim (talk) 18:15, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JuniorEva (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:PRP, images are of different resolutions, hence different cameras. Also low resolutions and no EXIF metadata.

Poké95 10:38, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 20:01, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Identified as a copyvio by examination of its watermark. Antigng (talk) 07:49, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Storkk: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing. If you are the copyright holder, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded youtube video without getting permission Fairykk (talk) 15:16, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedily. Standard YouTube License, uploader request. --Reventtalk 15:16, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fairykk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Youtube videos uploaded by others to youtube under standard youtube license, now uploaded here on wikimedia without the required permission from the original uploaders.

Takeaway (talk) 12:39, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader opened a seperate DR for each video with the same rationale, all speedily closed as uploader request. --Reventtalk 15:20, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I Uploaded Youtube Video without getting Permission Fairykk (talk) 15:14, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedily. Standard YouTube License, uploader request. --Reventtalk 15:18, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I Uploaded youtube video without permission Fairykk (talk) 15:20, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedily. Standard YouTube License, uploader request. --Reventtalk 15:19, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not educationally useful watch discussion page Lorenzo Fiocco (talk) 17:47, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: In use. If the map is facturaly, it should be discussed at the Wikipedias where is used before deleting. --Amitie 10g (talk) 18:20, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
As noted in the file discussion page (that I already linked), the map is factually wrong and directly contradicts what the en.wikipedia article itself says. As of now, there is no reason to keep it. We can overwrite it with a correct version, but it will take time to realise it, and for the time being it should at least removed from all articles. --Lorenzo Fiocco (talk) 19:45, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Then, discusse it at the Wikipedias where is used and try to convince the Wikipedians why they shouldn't use this file first; this is a problem of Wikipedia, not Commons, and meanwhile the file is in scope (in use, in scope). Also, removing a file from Wikipedia unilaterally (by editing the Wikipedia pages to remove it) just to validate the main reason to keep a file at Commons (in use) will violate WP:POINT, even if a file is facturaly incorrect (the only valid reason to remove a file unilaterally is Copyvio). --Amitie 10g (talk) 21:33, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep: A map of laws seems educationally useful to me. It provides quick visual insight on such topics. The discussion page disputes its accuracy—something that can be improved—, not its usefulness. --Mr.Unknown (talk) 20:30, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Lorenzo Fiocco (talk) 18:32, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation as there are watermarks 198.52.13.15 13:45, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Copyright violation: There are some Watermarks

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eduardosurita (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Subject claims to be the copyright holder, although not true. OTRS permission is required from the photographer of this image.

Poké95 02:00, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:15, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lpanjwani44 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on these images or the seal front and center on all of them.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:26, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 12:13, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cristhiansanz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

It is highly unlikely that the uploader created these coins, yet they are licensed as "own work". No indication of source other than "own work" which the coins obviously are not. Other images of this type seem to be from https://www.usmint.gov/.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:31, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:16, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:52, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:24, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:54, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:24, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:59, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:24, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:28, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:29, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:29, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:29, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Emecampuzano (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 02:30, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:29, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:31, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:29, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Emiralpturgut (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 02:32, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:29, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:33, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:29, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:34, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:29, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:34, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:29, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:35, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:29, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:35, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:29, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Circusdivas (talk · contribs)

[edit]

no COM:EDUSE/per COM:ADVERT - large gallery of personal art only used on the uploader's userpage - uploader hasn't edited in 5 years

lNeverCry 02:40, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: This appears to be high-quality artwork, from the last few years, of circus/magic/freak show acts. Even though these uploads might be at a lower resolution than the originals, most artists won't donate their work at all like this under a Creative Commons Share-Alike license with no commercial restrictions. He even provided a full gallery and explanation on his user page at User:Circusdivas. The resolution is quite acceptable for the way most Wikimedia projects use images. This artist has an entire website designed for showing these images and others for free (no fee, no license) and mentions on the site that he's been drawing things like this since he was 10 years old; there is also a "shop" on the website, but it's clear that the artwork is the main focus of the site, and possibly his main work in life. Many of these illustrations are of stunts that are often performed in real life. For example:
    I suspect most of the others have been performed at one point or another also. As for the "icon" circles: They also contain art, and if they are needed to illustrate specific items without the name of the art series, they can be cropped circularly when they are needed, since the artist has been kind enough to use the CC-BY-SA license. --Closeapple (talk) 02:47, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • These are unused artworks by a non-notable artist. I'm sure a couple more of the dick, S&M, and amateur porn crew will be by shortly to put in some more keeps though. You guys will come up with any withered shred of a reason to keep this sick trash on Commons. These files have been here for 5 years with no use ever, but yeah they're super high EV. Hopefully the admin who closes this isn't weak enough to buy this "high-quality artwork" bullshit. lNeverCry 03:44, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Who is "more of" and who is "you guys"? I'm the only one here so far. I'm not from the upload-every-kinky-photo-ever-taken crowd, nor am I from the clique (now mostly blocked) that tried to get COM:SCOPE re-interpreted as meaning nothing a couple years back so they could upload their low-quality personal inside jokes and borderline harassment. Artist notability is a good reason to keep a file, but lack of artist notability is not a good reason to delete a file. These are not stick figure drawings by someone too dumb to find a friend on some hosting site; they are clearly well-developed illustrations by a professional with talent well above the majority of Commons contributors, and donated under a CC-BY-SA license even though they clearly have commercial value. At least several of them demonstrate common circus/magic/freak-show acts that happen in real life, not just theories in the artist's head, and are subjects we don't have many high-quality images of. For example, File:Madame Fortuna in Houdini's Water Torture.jpg appears to be the only image we have on Commons to illustrate Houdini's Chinese Water Torture Cell water tank escape trick. (There's also en:File:Houdini performing Water Torture Cell.jpg but it's before he's in the tank, and hasn't been copied to Commons yet.) --Closeapple (talk) 06:12, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete I seriously doubt of the usefulness of these files. In addition, none are used. Kathisma (talk) 16:40, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: indeed out of scope. --Jcb (talk) 01:27, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have undeleted File:Dwarf Clown.png as it was used at English Wikisource. Seems that the checks of usage by the nominator and deleting administrator were insufficient, on at least this occasion. Would the deleting admin please check CommnsDelinker removal logs to ensure that other incorrect deletions have not taken place. Thanks.  — billinghurst sDrewth 05:33, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Before deletion I opened about half of the files to check usage and unfortunately none of them was one of the in use files. I have checked the logs and found 4 more in use in article space. I have restored them and reverted the Delinker. Thanks for the notification. Jcb (talk) 09:07, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:42, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:30, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:42, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:30, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is already deleted Lpanjwani44 (talk) 12:47, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 01:17, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems above COM:TOO for me. Also, no permission from WorkJam to release this logo under a free license. Poké95 01:58, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:44, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shirazphoenix (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on this gallery of various sized and quality images, with three cameras spread out over 7 images.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:34, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:44, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Riska D Rollaz Ent (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 02:24, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:45, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by D.hryntsevich (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 02:26, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:45, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:26, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:45, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Singer and song writer, biography and image File:GUILLE BAREA.jpg. Queeg (talk) 08:57, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why are you raising this at DR? If you are going to nominate files, please give a reason that makes sense. -- (talk) 04:05, 3 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted. Jcb (talk) 11:54, 7 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, text contribution. Jespinos (talk) 23:37, 15 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:53, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:00, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:04, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:43, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:30, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:14, 30 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 07:08, 6 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:43, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:30, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyvio Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:44, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:30, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:46, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:30, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tomcatdog (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 02:47, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:31, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ethan Hadav (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 02:48, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:31, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ethynjadeogrady (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 02:50, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:31, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of com:EDUSE Pippobuono (talk) 14:48, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:32, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Www.melenchon.fr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No EXIF tag, rather low standard resolution, the source is given is suspicious: as a political site documenting a personnality it will publish photographies from various photographers, without regard for a workflow warranting free licensing.

An OTRS permission from the site would be useless, as they would be absolutely no proof EACH photographer accepted to transfer rights to the site.

Note: the account has also published photographies from a same coherent camera (an iPhone 5), with original size and EXIF tags. Those files are of course more trustable but source should be documented, as "www.melenchon.fr" doesn't represent an author. These files are NOT a part of this DR.

Dereckson (talk) 16:10, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:35, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:52, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:46, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dominiquejkdkf (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 02:53, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:46, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:53, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:46, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:54, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:46, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:55, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:46, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by HR BOY SUNNY SINGH (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 02:57, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:46, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsuitable media format (PDF with typeset text and logo); possible copyright issues with text content and logo. -- Tuválkin 23:55, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:54, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsuitable media format (PDF with typeset text); please re-submit as wiktext to the suitable article of wp:es. -- Tuválkin 23:56, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please see this, about the inherent scope issues of PDF and DjVu files (surprised you’re not familiar with it); the 1878 counter-example you offered is not comparable due to, at least, its age and the fact that it was printed in a newspaper, while the file at hand in this DR was generated on the fly as such: In 1878, typesetting a column of text meant the work of several people with special skills and tools and by itself it is proof of some relevance, which may translate for us as being in scope. That’s not the case of a 21st century PDF that can be generated by the lowest level of text processing that is litterally at hands’s reach for 3 billion people. On top of this is the possibility of copyright violation of the textual content, and the producing of counter examples is routinely deemed unacceptable in DRs under provisions similar to Wikipedia’s. -- Tuválkin 16:42, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - although being a PDF is on itself not a demanding deletion reason, PDF files are often out of scope. Most of the PDF files uploaded to our project will not stay. --Jcb (talk) 01:57, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. Commons:Derivative works from other photo. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: also copyvio. --Yann (talk) 02:11, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Adnatull (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on this gallery of images which promots a school and a photo studio. Most are smaller than facebook, the exception is obviously not a selfie.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:20, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:28, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Syed Ammar Mehdi Abdi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Three images of a person whose only contributions have been to upload these three photos and create an orphan category. Yes, a certain number of user images are permitted, but the user must be a contributor.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:23, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:30, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nirogini (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional / self-promotional uploads, read the description of File:T.Thuvarakan.jpg ... out of COM:SCOPE with additional difficulty that if uploader is claiming own work and appearing in all these images with both hands full, it's unlikely they are selfies.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:39, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:31, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:46, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:32, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:48, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:31, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:58, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:34, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 03:00, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:34, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Santanarmz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 03:01, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:33, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by OxesGabriel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 03:02, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:36, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 03:03, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:36, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 03:03, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:36, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Knbgroup (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal/promotional images

lNeverCry 03:05, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:36, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, uncategorized, low resolution. Out of Commons:Project scope. Hystrix (talk) 03:05, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:37, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kumargauravgi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 17:58, 5 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nom Basvb (talk) 15:37, 14 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kumargauravgi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 03:06, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:37, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 03:07, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:37, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 03:08, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:37, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 03:08, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:37, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused family image. Out of Commons:Project scope. Hystrix (talk) 03:13, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:37, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Movie poster. unlikely own work Hystrix (talk) 03:16, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:37, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pramukhgin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertisement. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:40, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 18:33, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:43, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Govind saini gvs (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 18:34, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:43, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 18:42, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:41, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 18:44, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:41, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hardhope (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 18:46, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:40, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:51, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:18, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 03:35, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:18, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BIBI SIVERI (talk · contribs)

[edit]

out of project scope

Didym (talk) 03:41, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete. I add a photo for deletion. In addition, uploader is depicted person and the photos often do not look like selfies. Camera data is usually missing, one photo is credited to Marcos Alberti Studio. I suspect real photographer's copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 16:22, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:17, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images come from film Arakure 1957

[edit]
These images come from the film "Arakure" (
あらくれ
) created by Toho Co., Ltd. in 1957 in Japan. The work will be copyrighted until 2027, 70 years after its publication. See also Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Japan. Darklanlan (talk) 12:42, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:19, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, low resolution. Out of Commons:Project scope. Hystrix (talk) 13:07, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:20, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Boren3459 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertisement. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:21, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 21:00, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:12, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 21:01, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:12, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 21:01, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:12, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 21:04, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:11, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 21:06, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:10, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 21:08, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:10, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 21:08, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:09, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It was a place of horror and nightmares 2602:304:45D4:17E0:1879:EB65:2A85:1C43 22:37, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, obviously. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:07, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kommando~eswiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:48, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination+full sentence of copyrightable text. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:04, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image inutile JJRoland (talk) 22:49, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:06, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cuervo Chabochi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope, art by non-notable artist.

Poké95 02:57, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:24, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Antifascist2014b (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The "indictment" is fake, and the image is out of scope.

Venaldavid (talk) 01:08, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:24, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 20:45, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination+logo above TOO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:29, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 20:45, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:28, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anujkmaurya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos, out of project scope

Jianhui67 talkcontribs 18:45, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anujkmaurya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 20:46, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:28, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Amparsaei (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 20:48, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:27, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 20:49, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:26, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hellagood01 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 20:52, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:23, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 20:52, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:22, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of imho poor quality, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 20:53, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in scope, the only photo of the Badami station. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:22, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 20:53, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:19, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 20:54, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:19, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Manrajchauhan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 20:56, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:18, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Manrajchauhan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Although we permit users to upload a small number of personal photos, this is contingent on those users making some useful contributions. Both of these photos have only adorned the uploader’s userpage, whilst the user has not made any real contribution beyond their own userspace.

Green Giant (talk) 17:33, 10 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 10:58, 17 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 20:57, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:17, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 20:58, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:17, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Moghayed (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Taken with different resolutions, hence different cameras. COM:PRP, so OTRS permission is needed to verify if all these pictures are own work. Alternatively, uploading a higher resolution with EXIF data is ok for these to be kept, as long as the resolutions match or very similar and the cameras from the EXIF data are the same.

Poké95 02:04, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, copyvio, the 3 first I checked were previously published. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:33, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. What is this river? Also seems a screenshot of a video to me, which triggers COM:PRP. Poké95 02:07, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:35, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Magazine cover, unlikely own work. It should be moved to en:WP Hystrix (talk) 00:05, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:36, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lionel4power (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Claimed own work but all images have been taken from web. Examples: https://beegeagle.wordpress.com/2013/03/08/world-exclusive-nns-siri-p181-a-58-metre-combattante-iii-fast-attack-craft-of-the-nigerian-navyprops-chairman-maz/, http://www.aitonline.tv/post-nigerian_navy_destroys_1_500_drums_of_diesel__1_illegal_refinery_in_delta, http://www.nairaland.com/1386870/african-militaries-security-services-strictly/831, https://ourtimeiscome.com/2016/09/25/nigerian-navy-falcon-mass-surveillance-system/, http://www.kumatoo.com/nigerian_air_force_naf.html, http://www.today.careersnigeria.net/?p=10013.

MKFI (talk) 09:56, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:40, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted work, doubtful own work claim. MKFI (talk) 10:00, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:41, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope, photo of a non-notable person. Poké95 10:34, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:42, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope, photo of a non-notable person. Poké95 10:38, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:43, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-quality photo of unidentifiable subject with no meaningful description or categories. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. LX (talk, contribs) 10:53, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:44, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Michaël Lachance (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Oeuvres de Jean Gaudreau, une autorisation explicite de passage en CC-BY-SA (ou en CC0) est indispensable .

Habertix (talk) 12:29, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:47, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lucas Nascimento Pereira (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 20:44, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:31, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

An interesting photography but probably it has no value for an encyclopedia. It was taken somewhere in the Basilica of Santa Maria del Popolo in Rome but the image doesn't show a work of art. Indeed, it's hard to tell what it is at all. Zello (talk) 20:01, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:15, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 20:02, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:14, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 20:03, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:14, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 20:04, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:14, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 20:33, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:14, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 20:34, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:14, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 20:35, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:14, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 20:36, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:14, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 20:37, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:13, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 20:39, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:13, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LJoevon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 20:42, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:12, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 20:59, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:11, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very poor quality, not used, out of scope. Yann (talk) 21:05, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:11, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Watermark with (C) ANA SANZ, need confirmation through Commons:OTRS. JuTa 21:09, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:10, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 18:50, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:30, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 18:53, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:29, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Irtaza Hussain (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 18:54, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:29, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 18:54, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:29, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 18:55, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:29, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by José Mas y Rubí (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 18:57, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:29, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 18:57, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:28, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 18:59, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:28, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 19:03, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:28, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by IrzumShafiq (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 19:04, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:28, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 19:04, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:28, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ives Dairy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 19:06, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:28, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 19:07, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:27, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 19:07, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:27, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 19:08, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:27, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 19:08, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:27, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JammyCreamer (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 19:10, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:27, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 19:11, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:26, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 19:11, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:26, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jsybalaz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 19:13, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:26, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joyeuxanniversairejanet (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 19:14, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:26, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jaredmoreno (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 19:15, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:26, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JarifR (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 19:15, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:25, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 19:16, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:25, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 19:18, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:24, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 19:21, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:23, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jibinbj (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 19:23, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:23, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 19:24, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:23, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 19:24, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:23, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jofran lozano (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 19:27, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:22, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small, no Meta data, maybe not his/here own work Reda Kerbouche (talk) 19:30, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:22, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 19:33, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:22, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 19:34, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:22, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 19:35, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:22, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 19:36, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:22, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 19:36, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:22, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 19:37, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:22, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jorgenjolle (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 19:39, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:21, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 19:39, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:21, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mjkalo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal/self-promotional images

lNeverCry 19:41, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:20, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Definitively, this is not Capritour Houmouvazine (talk) 19:43, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 00:20, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 19:45, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:20, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 19:46, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:18, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 19:47, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:18, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Karthy shty (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 19:49, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:18, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Numerous previous copyright violations from this person. Including a fresh one uploaded with this. Highly suspect that this is not own work either. Majora (talk) 19:49, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:17, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Qayyum Ansari (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 19:50, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:17, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kuleshboy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 19:52, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:17, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 19:53, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:16, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 19:53, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:16, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 19:56, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:16, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Oddcastil (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 19:57, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:16, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ms.rupeshnandwal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 20:00, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:15, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:44, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:36, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:44, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:44, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free logo; http://зоопарк.екатеринбург.рф/ Vachovec1 (talk) 15:47, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:43, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:48, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The intention was to use the published text (which requires permission by rightsholder, I was told by the Wikipedia admin) in a German wikipedia biography on "Walter Hildebrandt (sociologist)" -> so license / permission should potentially be moved to German permissions section of Wikipedia?--Thora.Amend (talk) 18:37, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:42, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:50, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:42, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blatant advertising by a single-purpose account. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 16:56, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:42, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of a local business, the uploader's only contribution, the file is not in use, probably advertising, out of Project scope. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 16:57, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:42, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obviously a derivative of a photograph in a printed publication. LX (talk, contribs) 17:28, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:41, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While the depicted work may be old enough for its copyright to have expired, there is no reason to believe that the photographer's copyright has expired. LX (talk, contribs) 17:33, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:41, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO. User's other upload was credited to a different photographer File:@Pierrick Contin.jpg and was speedied. This one is credited in title and author line to Loris von Siebenthal. Since user claimed to be two photographers, obviously that is impossible and I am nominating this image for "not own work". Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:40, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:39, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Luelou (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious claim of own work on two very small images of this boat racer. Both are much smaller than facebook, one has "google" in the metadata the other one is covered in jpg artefacts.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:45, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:39, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO: See "Description ... I dont even know, personal use" -> but there is no "fair use" on Commons. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:48, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:39, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, with an odd description line, also very small and uncategorized. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:48, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:38, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GrahamHughey (talk · contribs)

[edit]

By their own titles a "Fictional" map, and two "Fake" maps, and a fake logo of a fictional political party which exists only in uploader's sandbox. Commons is not a place to play fake news games, nor post personal artworks out of COM:SCOPE.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:50, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:38, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately "Juan Serrano" is a collector of photographs not taken by self, so the Flickr review bot is correct, the image is there, but it's wrong because Mr. Serrano doesn't have the rights to license this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:11, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:37, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately "Juan Serrano" is a collector of photographs not taken by self, so the Flickr review bot is correct, the image is there, but it's wrong because Mr. Serrano doesn't have the rights to license this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:11, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:37, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately "Juan Serrano" is a collector of photographs not taken by self, so the Flickr review bot is correct, the image is there, but it's wrong because Mr. Serrano doesn't have the rights to license this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:12, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:37, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photo of a painting from Juan Serrano's flickr account. Unfortunately "Juan Serrano" is a collector of photographs not taken by self, so the Flickr review bot is correct, the image is there, but it's wrong because Mr. Serrano doesn't have the rights to license this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:12, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:37, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photograph from Juan Serrano's flickr account. Unfortunately "Juan Serrano" is a collector of photographs not taken by self, so the Flickr review bot is correct, the image is there, but it's wrong because Mr. Serrano doesn't have the rights to license this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:12, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:37, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photograph from Juan Serrano's flickr account. Unfortunately "Juan Serrano" is a collector of photographs not taken by self, so the Flickr review bot is correct, the image is there, but it's wrong because Mr. Serrano doesn't have the rights to license this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:12, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:37, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photo of a painting from Juan Serrano's flickr account. Unfortunately "Juan Serrano" is a collector of photographs not taken by self, so the Flickr review bot is correct, the image is there, but it's wrong because Mr. Serrano doesn't have the rights to license this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:13, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:37, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photograph from Juan Serrano's flickr account. Unfortunately "Juan Serrano" is a collector of photographs not taken by self, so the Flickr review bot is correct, the image is there, but it's wrong because Mr. Serrano doesn't have the rights to license this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:13, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:37, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photo of a painting from Juan Serrano's flickr account. Unfortunately "Juan Serrano" is a collector of photographs not taken by self, so the Flickr review bot is correct, the image is there, but it's wrong because Mr. Serrano doesn't have the rights to license this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:13, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:37, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photograph from Juan Serrano's flickr account. Unfortunately "Juan Serrano" is a collector of photographs not taken by self, so the Flickr review bot is correct, the image is there, but it's wrong because Mr. Serrano doesn't have the rights to license this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:13, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:37, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photo of a drawing from Juan Serrano's flickr account. Unfortunately "Juan Serrano" is a collector of photographs not taken by self, so the Flickr review bot is correct, the image is there, but it's wrong because Mr. Serrano doesn't have the rights to license this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:14, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:37, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photo of a painting from Juan Serrano's flickr account. Unfortunately "Juan Serrano" is a collector of photographs not taken by self, so the Flickr review bot is correct, the image is there, but it's wrong because Mr. Serrano doesn't have the rights to license this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:14, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:37, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photograph from Juan Serrano's flickr account. Unfortunately "Juan Serrano" is a collector of photographs not taken by self, so the Flickr review bot is correct, the image is there, but it's wrong because Mr. Serrano doesn't have the rights to license this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:14, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:36, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photo of a painting from Juan Serrano's flickr account. Unfortunately "Juan Serrano" is a collector of photographs not taken by self, so the Flickr review bot is correct, the image is there, but it's wrong because Mr. Serrano doesn't have the rights to license this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:14, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:36, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photograph from Juan Serrano's flickr account. Unfortunately "Juan Serrano" is a collector of photographs not taken by self, so the Flickr review bot is correct, the image is there, but it's wrong because Mr. Serrano doesn't have the rights to license this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:15, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:36, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photograph from Juan Serrano's flickr account. Unfortunately "Juan Serrano" is a collector of photographs not taken by self, so the Flickr review bot is correct, the image is there, but it's wrong because Mr. Serrano doesn't have the rights to license this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:15, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:35, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photograph from Juan Serrano's flickr account. Unfortunately "Juan Serrano" is a collector of photographs not taken by self, so the Flickr review bot is correct, the image is there, but it's wrong because Mr. Serrano doesn't have the rights to license this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:15, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:35, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photograph from Juan Serrano's flickr account. Unfortunately "Juan Serrano" is a collector of photographs not taken by self, so the Flickr review bot is correct, the image is there, but it's wrong because Mr. Serrano doesn't have the rights to license this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:15, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:35, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photo of a painting from Juan Serrano's flickr account. Unfortunately "Juan Serrano" is a collector of photographs not taken by self, so the Flickr review bot is correct, the image is there, but it's wrong because Mr. Serrano doesn't have the rights to license this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:15, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:35, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photo of a painting from Juan Serrano's flickr account. Unfortunately "Juan Serrano" is a collector of photographs not taken by self, so the Flickr review bot is correct, the image is there, but it's wrong because Mr. Serrano doesn't have the rights to license this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:15, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:35, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photograph from Juan Serrano's flickr account. Unfortunately "Juan Serrano" is a collector of photographs not taken by self, so the Flickr review bot is correct, the image is there, but it's wrong because Mr. Serrano doesn't have the rights to license this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:16, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:35, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photograph from Juan Serrano's flickr account. Unfortunately "Juan Serrano" is a collector of photographs not taken by self, so the Flickr review bot is correct, the image is there, but it's wrong because Mr. Serrano doesn't have the rights to license this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:16, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:35, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photo of a painting from Juan Serrano's flickr account. Unfortunately "Juan Serrano" is a collector of photographs not taken by self, so the Flickr review bot is correct, the image is there, but it's wrong because Mr. Serrano doesn't have the rights to license this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:16, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:35, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photo of a painting from Juan Serrano's flickr account. Unfortunately "Juan Serrano" is a collector of photographs not taken by self, so the Flickr review bot is correct, the image is there, but it's wrong because Mr. Serrano doesn't have the rights to license this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:16, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:35, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photograph from Juan Serrano's flickr account. Unfortunately "Juan Serrano" is a collector of photographs not taken by self, so the Flickr review bot is correct, the image is there, but it's wrong because Mr. Serrano doesn't have the rights to license this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:16, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:34, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photo of a painting from Juan Serrano's flickr account. Unfortunately "Juan Serrano" is a collector of photographs not taken by self, so the Flickr review bot is correct, the image is there, but it's wrong because Mr. Serrano doesn't have the rights to license this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:16, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:34, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photograph from Juan Serrano's flickr account. Unfortunately "Juan Serrano" is a collector of photographs not taken by self, so the Flickr review bot is correct, the image is there, but it's wrong because Mr. Serrano doesn't have the rights to license this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:17, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:34, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photograph from Juan Serrano's flickr account. Unfortunately "Juan Serrano" is a collector of photographs not taken by self, so the Flickr review bot is correct, the image is there, but it's wrong because Mr. Serrano doesn't have the rights to license this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:17, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:34, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photograph from Juan Serrano's flickr account. Unfortunately "Juan Serrano" is a collector of photographs not taken by self, so the Flickr review bot is correct, the image is there, but it's wrong because Mr. Serrano doesn't have the rights to license this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:17, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:33, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photograph from Juan Serrano's flickr account. Unfortunately "Juan Serrano" is a collector of photographs not taken by self, so the Flickr review bot is correct, the image is there, but it's wrong because Mr. Serrano doesn't have the rights to license this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:17, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:33, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a photograph from Juan Serrano's flickr account. Unfortunately "Juan Serrano" is a collector of photographs not taken by self, so the Flickr review bot is correct, the image is there, but it's wrong because Mr. Serrano doesn't have the rights to license this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:17, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:33, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, not own work as it's a wedding photo. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:26, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:32, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

first, seriously personality rights issues showing an identificable child, imho rather 'family album' content, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 18:27, 18 December 2016 (UTC)  Comment and btw: file is also missing EXIF data to verify claimed 'own work', Roland zh (talk) 18:32, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:32, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lack of authorship/date information; very likely far too recent to qualify for PD-India. Uploader is serial copyright offender. Fut.Perf. 18:31, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:31, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 18:47, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:31, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 18:48, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:30, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 18:49, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:30, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 18:49, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:30, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertisement. S.K. (talk) 08:03, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:57, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inappropriately copied from enwp, where the sources are listed as [2] & [3]. Dubious self-work claim/missing evidence of permission, probable copyright violation FastilyClone (talk) 09:26, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:57, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful own work claim, original photographer unknown. MKFI (talk) 09:50, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:56, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspected copyright violation, smaller resolution version found here: https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Blerim_Kamberi MKFI (talk) 10:03, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:55, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

coming from what book ? who is the real author ? no information about author and publish Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 11:44, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:55, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is a German book from 1943, author Franz Daniel died in 1985. Part of a collection allegedly licensed cc-by-nc-sa, but even there, there is no indication that the BHL or the Smithsonian have the right to apply any license to the work. In any case, we do not accept noncommercial licenses. See COM:L. Storkk (talk) 11:56, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


I support deletion. When I uploaded the file I thought it was from 1910. When I realized it was actually from 1943 and under copyright I requested deletion. Source: http://www.biodiversitylibrary.org/bibliography/15739#/summary. Volume 33 has this copyright notice:

License Type: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ Rights: http://biodiversitylibrary.org/permissions Copyright Status: In copyright. Digitized with the permission of the rights holder. ThorbyTech (talk) 07:21, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Support There should not be a question here, it is pretty self explanatory.. Uploaded concurs - --Don (talk) 17:04, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:55, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Improbable claim of "own work". See [4]. Rrburke (talk) 11:59, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:53, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed as "own work" by the EN uploader, who appears to be the subject of the image, not the photographer. Doesn't appear to be a self-portrait. Needs permission from the photographer. Is also the subject's Twitter profile pic: https://twitter.com/ashishsemwall Rrburke (talk) 13:13, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:53, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No clear in-scope usage, arguably spam. Ubcule (talk) 14:03, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:53, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Was published here and here before being uploaded to Commons. Vanjagenije (talk) 14:16, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:52, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image was previously deleted under title Ramzi Maqdisi .jpg KDS4444 (talk) 14:31, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:51, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Disclaser (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images and/or limited potential usage.

Ubcule (talk) 14:42, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:51, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable copyvio, user has only two uploads, this is extremely low resolution and available in better quality here Ubcule (talk) 14:45, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:51, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Beyond examples needed to demonstrate QR codes themselves, do we really need them on Commons? They can be dynamically generated anyway. Ubcule (talk) 14:48, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:51, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm sorry that the guy has died, but this doesn't make what appears to be a personal image in-scope for Commons; there are better places to upload this. Ubcule (talk) 14:52, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:50, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jdishroom (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images apparently of uploader, formerly used in rejected article submission at en.wikipedia, no longer in use.

Ubcule (talk) 14:55, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:50, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture of uploader, self-promoting description, out of scope, not in personal use. Ubcule (talk) 14:58, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:50, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be generic foliage; without a better description, this image is not very useful. Ubcule (talk) 15:02, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:49, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality FlughafenSTR (talk) 15:15, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:49, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake based on apparently generic image (versions elsewhere with different people). Search on "Krzysztof Stamblewski" gives this image as first match(!) Ubcule (talk) 15:18, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:48, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted to someone else (EXIF), no indication of connection with uploader. Should possibly check uploader's other images as well, those aren't entirely clear. Ubcule (talk) 15:20, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:48, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No clear in-scope use. Ubcule (talk) 15:24, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:47, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Yemre41 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Significant indications that these are not user's own work as claimed, see individual images for specific examples. Note meaningless/sparse descriptions typical of lazy copyvio uploads.

Ubcule (talk) 15:28, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:47, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation ? No photo data.. Supporterhéninois (talk) 15:28, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:46, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:35, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:46, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo above COM:TOO. I don't see any indication on the website that this logo is released under a free license. Permission is required from the website. Poké95 02:19, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:14, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While I found this image older http://hoy.com.do/eddy-rambaldy-presenta-nueva-coleccion/ the quality is not as good as this one. However, it was not taken 16 December, 2016 and with other uploads COM:COPYVIOs, COM:PRP. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:40, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:14, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO Looks like google maps, complete with cute red pointer. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:43, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:13, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

To retain this image would require the artists permission as well as permission of photographer Gregory Maillot. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:44, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:13, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of own work on this image which appears to be rephotographed from some unnamed source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:45, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:13, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:ADVERTisement, complete with phone number Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:47, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:13, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO. I see a watermark which says (C) on this image of a _____. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:48, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:13, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Minecraft game spam, all of Minecraft is copyright. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:48, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:12, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this "statue" or "display", or the photo - no metadata. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:49, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:12, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this drawing on top of a photo or drawing from a photo. The permission of the original image creator would be required. Notice also black band at bottom showing copied from letterboxed source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:52, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:12, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this old black and white portrait. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:52, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:12, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, uncategorized. Out of Commons:Project scope. Hystrix (talk) 00:54, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:11, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, low resolution. Out of Commons:Project scope. Hystrix (talk) 01:22, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:11, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 01:27, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:11, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, uncategorized, low resolution, no description. Out of Commons:Project scope. Hystrix (talk) 01:36, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:11, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:02, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:10, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:04, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:10, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:04, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:10, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:11, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:09, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:13, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:09, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT lNeverCry 02:15, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:09, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader removed the CC-license claiming: This is not my picture. JuTa 02:26, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:08, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ein Party-Bildchen. Auf Flickr lese ich: (C) alle Rechte vorbehalten. Hystrix (talk) 03:22, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:08, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. My Melody (ja:マイメロディ) is a copyrighted character. Not free use. Ralth Galth (talk) 04:32, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:07, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The watermark on the photo indicates the uploader is not the author. Venaldavid (talk) 05:11, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:06, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Since the original publication is unknown, we cannot know that the author is unknown. This is quite likely in copyright in its home country. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:48, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:06, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof the author is unknown. No proof this was taken 70+ years ago, let alone the author died then. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:53, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:06, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nikita SEREBRON (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Author != uploader, potential copyvio from web, as minimum no permission.

Dmitry89 (talk) 06:19, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 01:05, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fair use images:copyrighted logo --ديفيد عادل وهبة خليل 2 (talk) 07:39, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: some of the files seem to be acceptable, some have individual DRs now. --Didym (talk) 01:04, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, based on a single individual's fantasy, reductionist and with obvious inaccuracies. Nonetheless used all over as if it were accurate. 42.61.217.253 00:32, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, Widely in use. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:38, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
What does "roughly following Samuel P. Huntingon" mean in this map's description? Either you follow the source or this is Original Research.
I'm not sure the nomination for deletion is appropriate, as there is no rule against uploading Original Research to Wikimedia as far as I know. But this map clearly shouldn't be including in Wikipedia articles.
Here is the original map found in The Clash of Civilizations for comparison: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Clash_of_Civilizations_mapn2.png.
Forget the nomination for deletion. I've removed it from the English Wikipedia; this is probably enough.

2A01:CB1C:854:3600:8C44:2FB9:7F5E:75AC 20:43, 18 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - the file is widely used. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:30, 1 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 03:52, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, unused logo of questionable notability. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:28, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of project scope Didym (talk) 03:56, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 07:30, 25 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Better quality image is available (Francisco de Zurbarán - The Child Virgin Asleep - Google Art Project.jpg) Tremendo (talk) 17:44, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 21:14, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

.jpg duplicate of non photo .png that isn't in use anymore File:Coat of Arms of Ternivskyj raion.png Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 17:57, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 21:13, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

duplicate of non photo .png that isn't in use anymore File:Central City Raion Coat of Arms.png Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 17:59, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 21:12, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

.jpg duplicate of non photo .png that isn't in use anymore File:Саксаганський.png Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 17:59, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 21:11, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

.jpg duplicate of non photo .png that isn't in use anymore File:Dolgintcevskiy Rayon gerb.png Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 18:00, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 21:11, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

.jpg duplicate of non photo .png that isn't in use anymore File:Zhovtnevyj raion.png Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 18:01, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 21:10, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

.jpg duplicate of non photo .png that isn't in use anymore File:Metalurgiyniy district Krivoy Rog.png Andrew J.Kurbiko (talk) 18:01, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 21:09, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake used for political propaganda (OAS terrorist organization) [photo of a grafitti in France, coming from twitter] Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 11:37, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please provide the source on twitter? --Ruthven (msg) 10:58, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 21:29, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it states the photorgrapher is Ulf Sirbom, bit it is uploaded by soemone else Yger (talk) 14:28, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 21:22, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PNG version available File:Wunderman logo.png. There are also 2 JPGs (check Special:Contributions/Wundermanglobal). XXN, 14:32, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 21:21, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Jest kilka zdjęć wykonanych z tego miejsca, to zdjęcie jest gorszej jakości niż inne wykonane z tego miejsca; na prośbę autora — Preceding unsigned comment added by ETR (talk • contribs) 2016-08-08T11:43:51‎ (UTC)


Kept: 'author request' is only a valid reason for deletion within a few days after upload. --Jcb (talk) 21:05, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Kept: no valid reason for deletion;. --Wdwd (talk) 21:18, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Istnieją lepsze zdjęcia wykonane z tej pozycji, np.: File:KWK Ziemowit Lędziny 2.JPG ETR (talk) 11:21, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept No valid reason fro deletion. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:17, 10 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:51, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This image is not unused. You can see it here whereas it is an english site. There is no other free of use example of persona in french. For french people who want to teach what is a persona to other people, they don't have anything in french, so it's very difficult for french people to understand what is a persona. I had tu build a fake persona by myself, I just want other people ti benefit from it.


Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 21:41, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 03:45, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio, no permission for original photo. --Wdwd (talk) 21:39, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 03:49, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 21:38, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very very tiny and IMHO useless file. There is a (little bit) better version at File:Apollo aerial.jpg, so let us keep the latter one and delete this one. Aristeas (talk) 07:32, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 21:36, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

com:IDENT Pippobuono (talk) 09:35, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, +out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 21:35, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the owner of this file and don't want it listed on here anymore. It's not in use so won't be missed. Hazz~commonswiki (talk) 00:25, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 21:49, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the owner of this file and don't want it listed on here anymore. It's not in use so won't be missed. Hazz~commonswiki (talk) 00:26, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 21:50, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader requested. New alternative file under the name File:SADC road sign W317.svg. Fry1989 eh? 01:09, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 21:46, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader requested. New alternative file under the name File:SADC road sign W316.svg. Fry1989 eh? 01:09, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 21:45, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader requested. New alternative file under the name File:SADC road sign W315.svg. Fry1989 eh? 01:10, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 21:45, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Noppon

[edit]

Derivative work. Noppon is the mascot characters of Tokyo Tower. (reference: https://www.tokyotower.co.jp/event/noppon/en.html ) No evidence of free use. --Ralth Galth (talk) 04:36, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The consent of Nippon Denpato Ltd. is required in advance for any photography or media-related business on the Tokyo Tower premises. So two images featuring th ecopyright mascotte has been deleted. "Tokyo Tower Mascot.jpg" is kept because the photo doesn't focus primarily on the mask or other separable element of the costume. Ruthven (msg) 12:53, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted characters.

G I Chandor (talk) 03:40, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:44, 22 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. Yurimo is the mascot character of en:Yurikamome (ja:ゆりかもめ東京臨海新交通臨海線). (reference: http://www.yurikamome.co.jp/more_fun/yurimo/ ) No evidence of free use. Ralth Galth (talk) 05:52, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per COM:COSTUME. 朝彦 | asahiko (talk) 10:21, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:53, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mejiron (ja:めじろん) is the mascot character of Ōita Prefecture, Japan. (reference: http://www.pref.oita.jp/site/mejiron/profile.html ) To use, application is necessary (http://www.pref.oita.jp/site/mejiron/borrowing.html). Not free use. Ralth Galth (talk) 06:03, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per COM:COSTUME. 朝彦 | asahiko (talk) 10:21, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:55, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I did not know that in Italy there is not a free horizon. I'd hate to have problems with lawyers. Zde (talk) 09:56, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: no FOP in Italy. Ruthven (msg) 12:55, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

without information clean (author, publish, date) … image uses as politic demonstration on wikipedia, can be a fake Droit de retrait 03 (talk) 11:28, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 12:56, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to 五日市町 (東京都), this photo may have come from the book 五日市 風の催事記 published by 五日市 public office in 1995. Also, this photo was taken in 1955. Template:PD-Japan-oldphoto doesn't apply this work, so this work will protected until 2045 in Japan. Darklanlan (talk) 12:05, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright might be held by the original author, but we cannot confirm it and author's death. It should be deleted under the precautionary principle. Darklanlan (talk) 12:18, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; to be undeleted in 2045. Ruthven (msg) 12:59, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to this photo the owner of this panoramio account is Arie Marmary (אריה מרמרי) which is consistent with his user name. But 3 of the photos have no Exif and contain the watermark: Haim Hecht (חיים הכט). Not sure anout this one but the rest should be deleted.

-- Geagea (talk) 12:14, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:33, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image was not found at the *.org website claimed, no way to tell it's "state of California" as author as claimed, and if it were State of California, the license is wrong. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:50, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: Official photo of a State of California officier. The photo is exactly the same as the depicted in the banner of the website but mirroed and with fancy background. Wrong license? Juchs correct it, this is a Wiki! --Amitie 10g (talk) 04:21, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment Please provide a link to a State of California website showing the exact photo with the flags. These two images are of the same person and possibly from the same photo shoot (evidence clothes and cheek light on same side in both photos showing that neither one was mirrored as suggested above), but they are not the same picture. Examples to check are the collar height, ear size, smile size, eye wrinkles and lighting. Even if this were the same picture, which they are obviously not, derivative works of an original image like this one cited by Amitie 10g cannot be cited as sources and a source showing the source to be from state of California is needed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:15, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:11, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has strange coloring. Would it be possible to upload the original without the odd yellow color wash? Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:51, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: In use. No valid reason for deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 04:16, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • If it's an original photo from life, those colors weren't there. It's possibly reflection from a cover at an exhibit, or an artefact of a bad upload, shine from a magazine page, anything is possible. It's a brand new image and we have the opportunity to get it fixed soon after upload. Also please read COM:L, we have no valid metadata on a photo claimed as recent. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:21, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per Amitie 10g. --Yann (talk) 11:37, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Johnj1995 as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: https://www.noovo.ca/emissions/expedition-extreme Yann (talk) 19:46, 13 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: source of image identified and would appear to be copyvio.  — billinghurst sDrewth 09:06, 9 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to upload the file in PNG format instead. I do not want the pdf format to be uploaded. (I am the uploader of this file) Matheny6 (talk) 01:19, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:38, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license. Uploader added {{PD-old-70}}{{PD-1996}}. Its a 1967 polish image. I doubt both licenses are valid. JuTa 02:01, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

THE FILE is a scan from my family album (private archive). The rights are clarified: PD!


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:39, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license Uploader added {{PD-old-70}}{{PD-1996}}. Its a 1969 polish image. I doubt both licenses are valid. JuTa 02:02, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:39, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license. Uploader added {{PD-old-70}}{{PD-1996}}. Its a 1969 polish image. I doubt both licenses are valid. JuTa 02:06, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:39, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license. Uploader added {{PD-old-70}}{{PD-1996}}. Its a 1969 polish image. I doubt both licenses are valid. JuTa 02:07, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:40, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license. Uploader added {{PD-old-70}}{{PD-1996}}. Its a 1969 polish image. I doubt both licenses are valid. JuTa 02:08, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:40, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by EugeneZelenko as no license. Uploader added {{PD-old-70}}{{PD-1996}}. Its a 1960 polish image. I doubt both licenses are valid. JuTa 02:09, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:40, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:18, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The idea behind the image is not to showcase the individual, which would be fairly primitive, but, instead, to showcase a "sneer".--Achim Hering (talk) 01:33, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of deleting, how about a bit of elbow grease?--Achim Hering (talk) 02:22, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:41, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free projection as background Didym (talk) 03:55, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as per Amitie 10g. --Yann (talk) 11:41, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unlikely to be own work Didym (talk) 03:58, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:42, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

here is orignal version of this file File:Khowar.jpg which is sharped and cropped small space. I want to delete this image — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mikro Nekros (talk • contribs) 2016-12-14T13:43:30‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:43, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

data from user template moved to files Arnd (talk) 11:59, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:43, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

-palese copyvyol: è un marchio registrato, non certo una "opera propria" sotto licenza Creative Commons... Danyele (talk) 18:51, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:44, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A *pdf document of unknown provenance is out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:18, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:45, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work featuring a non-free character (Pikachu). The airport can, no doubt, claim the local variant of free use; we can't, because Commons is for free images. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 19:16, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Whm, I see it as a borderline de minimis case, since the main subject is the prohibition warning by itself, and the Pikachu is essential part of it, but blurring it will not affect the main subject. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:54, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Image cropped and Pikachu pixelated. Should this be enough? --Amitie 10g (talk) 21:16, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Seems ok to me. Presumably the original version is still up for deletion, though, but I'd imagine the pixelated version can stay if it's of any use. Blood Red Sandman (Talk) (Contribs) 18:57, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per Amitie 10g. --Yann (talk) 11:46, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2009 panoramio streams of imho rather poor quality, imho randomly taken from train/car/bus etc, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 21:20, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: This one looks OK. --Yann (talk) 11:48, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused template created by a newbie, seems to be copied from elsewhere. Achim (talk) 21:29, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:48, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

作者とライセンスが正しくない。 Orange5 (talk) 21:32, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: If useful, should be SVG, or PNG at least. --Yann (talk) 11:49, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This template from 2012 was (currently) used only once - apparently for template test reasons. Because it did not allow necessary parameters either complicated expansions are required, or its replacement with the standard Information. The replacement seemed the easier method, also more safe for the future; which obsoleted this template. To avoid any erroneous usage it seems better to delete it. sarang사랑 07:02, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 11:49, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex, copyrighted logo. Not a PD at all. Texniths (talk) 23:20, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 11:50, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't see how the CC0, 1.0 license applies to this image without a source to check. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:52, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is a digital version of a photo of my great great grandfather Joe Dobson. Have I selected the wrong licence?

Hi BLDobson (assumed); Please provide the full citation for the book from which this was copied including photographer's name, author's name and any other information you have about it. If it was unpublished, please provide photographer's name and as much information as you have about the photo. Owning a copy of an image is not the same thing as owning its copyright... but there are so many fine points, that whole pages have been posted of the details, perhaps the easiest to read is COM:HIRTLE, and of course COM:L. Please sign your correspondence with four ~~~~ tilde characters! And don't forget to login. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:28, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: For now this fails com:EVIDENCE. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:18, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. MaxBioHazard (talk) 01:19, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Does there exist the rule about "scope and out of scope" at Commons?
  • This image is a caricature about a movement from closed to open licenses with the help of CC licenses. It could be used in some articles about licenses at Wikibooks or Wikiversity, I hope. -- Andrew Krizhanovsky (talk) 09:15, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Seems to be some use for it. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:16, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. This photo contains copyrighted characters. Not free use. Ralth Galth (talk) 04:33, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:COSTUME. 朝彦 | asahiko (talk) 10:08, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyrighted costume. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:15, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Robert Sunhes (talk · contribs)

[edit]

False "own work" at least for these two paintings (of Lentulow and Kandinsky), cannot currently find previous publications for the rest of uploads but considering his reposts in RuWP (obvious copipasting from book or books) - likely to be taken from copyrighted books on color theory as well.

Tatewaki (talk) 20:42, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, I've found some other works e.g. at [5] (compare File:Физика цвета.png) and [6] (compare File:Цветовой шар.png, File:Цветовые шары.png) − so please check all his contribution. Tatewaki (talk) 01:00, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:19, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Robert Sunhes (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images of 2 squares, no clear COM:EDUSE

Nutshinou Talk! 08:52, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 23:58, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2011 panoramio streams of imho rather poor quality, imho randomly taken from train/car/bus etc, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 21:02, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:19, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2009 panoramio streams of imho rather poor quality, imho randomly taken from train/car/bus etc, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 21:18, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:19, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. My Melody (ja:マイメロディ) is a copyrighted character. Not free use. Ralth Galth (talk) 04:32, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

De minimis? --Amitie 10g (talk) 04:42, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep COM:COSTUME de minimis. 朝彦 | asahiko (talk) 10:07, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per 朝彦 | asahiko. Ruthven (msg) 11:34, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

CC BY 2.5で利用を許諾されていないロゴ。(証拠が無い) Orange5 (talk) 21:26, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (see [7]). Ruthven (msg) 11:33, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ewelwlewcscsccs Aparico Lopez (talk) 06:24, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Jcb (talk) 13:56, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

라이선스가 알맞지 않은 것 같습니다. DalR (talk) 13:18, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:58, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

알맞은 라이선스가 없습니다. DalR (talk) 13:18, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:58, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

상업적으로 이용되어서는 안된다고 판단 되어 삭제를 요청합니다. DalR (talk) 13:19, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:58, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

상업적으로 이용이 되어서는 안된다고 판단이 됩니다. DalR (talk) 13:19, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:58, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

상업적으로 이용이 되어서는 안 됩니다. DalR (talk) 13:20, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:58, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

상업적으로 이용이 되어서는 안 됩니다ㅣ. DalR (talk) 13:20, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:58, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

상업적으로 이용이 되어서는 안 됩니다. DalR (talk) 13:20, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:58, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It describes as "an photo in 1954", but we don't determine whether it means published date or photographed date. If it means photographed date, copyright may not be expired because its term is 50 years after its publication or photographer's death. Darklanlan (talk) 14:10, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 On hold According to the source page, this photo was a part of a photo book published in 1996. We do not know if that was the first time this photo was published, but let's assume so for lack of evidence to the contrary. Since 50 years have not passed since creation (1954) at that point in time, copyright will last 50 years from that year; i.e. it will enter public domain in 2047. / 原典として示されているページによれば、1996年に出版された資料集に含まれていたということです。その時が初公開になるかどうか情報がありませんが、その他特に記載がみつからないのでそうだと仮定するなら、著作権は1996年から数えて50年間存続し、2047年に利用可能になります。朝彦 | asahiko (talk) 04:53, 21 December 2016 (UTC) Ballot on hold while I clear up my understanding. 09:38, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment @朝彦: 間違えだらけの英文を読まれてしまい恥ずかしい限りです。それはさておき、この画像はCategory:PD-Japan-organizationのファイルを巡回している過程で見つけたものですが、他にも撮影日だけを挙げて公表日が分からず権利状態が不明なファイルは数十件あり、File:Hagerty Incident 03.jpgのようにDisputedを付けて周知させているところです。1947年以降1956年までに撮影された写真は撮影日から10年以内かつ1957年以降に公表されていない限り著作権は失効しており、また同一投稿者の古い写真をくまなく指摘するのは野暮かと思いNOT-PD-US-URAAを付けるにとどめたものもあります。テンプレや文書での注意喚起の方法に工夫が必要かもしれません。 Darklanlan (talk) 08:24, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
すみません、この時期は、保護期間延長や旧法から新法への切り替えなどいろいろあったのに、すっかり忘れてしまい{{PD-Japan-organization}}の簡単な文言のみに基づいて発言してしまいました。
  1. 1954年に撮影されて、もしその後10年間発行されていなかったら、1964年に失効して、その後延長措置も受けず。1996年の発行はもはや関係ない。
  2. 1954年に撮影されて、10年以内 ( - 1964) に発行されていたなら、そこから10年起算。
    • もし発行が1957 - 58年なら、1967年の延長措置で発行後12年になり、遅くとも1970年末に失効。
    • もし発行が1959 - 60年なら、1969年の延長措置で発行後13年になり、1971年の新著作権法施行時に著作権存続。発行後50年に延長され、日本国における著作権は2009 - 2010年末で失効。しかしURAAで米国における著作権は発行後95年に延長されるので2054 - 2055年末まで存続。
    • もし発行が1961 - 64年なら、1971年の新法で発行後50年に延長され、日本国における著作権は2011 - 14年末で失効。しかしURAAで米国における著作権は発行後95年に延長され、2056 - 2059年まで存続。
…ということになりますでしょうか? 朝彦 | asahiko (talk) 09:34, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
団体著作物であればそのようになると認識していますが。この写真の出所と見られるページ(写真で見る滋賀の20世紀)を見たところ、草津市が写真を所有していて1954年に撮影されたことは確かのようですね。となると、写真著作権の失効期限ぎりぎりで1964年に公表されたとしても2014年末には権利が失効しているため、このファイルのアップロード時点では著作権が不確かな状態ですが、2016年現在はもう失効していると断定可能?削除依頼は私の早とちりだったかもしれません。この推定に誤りがなければ依頼を取り下げたいと思います。 Darklanlan (talk) 11:08, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
米国著作権法としてはどうなるのだろうと考えてみたのですが、日米それぞれの新旧法が絡む、団体著作物の可能性がある写真の、米国法に基づく解説などという都合のいいものは存在しませんでした。以下述べるのは、en:History of copyright law of the United Statesなどを斜め読みしただけの素人の戯言です。必然的に混乱気味ですし、間違っていないか確認していただけると幸いです。さて1954年本写真撮影時点では、米国では1909年旧著作権法が有効でした。この法のもとでは、法に定められた著作権表示とともに発行されなければ保護の対象となりませんでした。また、著作権は当局に申請して登録するものでした。外国の著者も米国当局に登録することはできたようですが、おそらくこの写真でそれはなされなかったでしょう。その後、(i) 日本法において1964 - 1970年の範囲内で著作権失効した場合だと、1976年新著作権法で保護されず、米国でも失効。PD-US。 (ii) 初発行が 1959 - 64年の範囲内であった場合、上記の通り日本法において新著作権法による保護に入り、URAA基準日を迎えることになる。 そして、現在わかっている情報としては、(i) の方が可能性が高そうだということになりますでしょうか(撮影後5年以内に何らかの形で公表されたか、1996年に収録されるまで公表されなかった?) 5年放置されてなおかつ10年以内に公表されるっていうケースはなかなかレアだと思うのです。(もちろん、そういう証拠があがってきたなら浅慮を認めることになるでしょうが。)さて、さすがにこの事情にぴったり対応する米国著作権テンプレートってないんですよね。深く考えすぎず {{PD-1996}} を単純にはるか、同テンプレートreason欄にこの事情をいっぱい書くかでしょうか。--朝彦 | asahiko (talk) 11:12, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
URAAのタグは予防策で貼りましたが、確かに日本で71年施行の著作権延長が行われた可能性はかなり低いです。米国著作権法は正直把握できていませんが、当時は著作権局への登録制だったとなるとそちらで著作権が有効である可能性も低いですね。そのような推定が許されるなら特記事項として記載した上で{{PD-US-1996}}を付けていいかもしれません。この議論は日本の1899年版・1970年版著作権法の両方の適用対象になりうる写真について著作権延長やURAA適用対象を判断する場合に有用と思われますので、文書化してCommons:Copyright rules by territoryあたりに掲載できないか検討したいと思います。 Darklanlan (talk) 12:48, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no evidence that this was published before 1957 or taken before 1946, see {{PD-Japan-oldphoto}}. --Jcb (talk) 13:54, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [8]. Yann (talk) 10:24, 3 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Published date is not described. If the photograph was published in 1957 or later, the copyright might remain. See Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Japan. Darklanlan (talk) 15:04, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:00, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The original author and published date are not described. Copyright might be remain if this photograph was published from 1957 to 1958 and the photographer held copyright. Darklanlan (talk) 15:31, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:00, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of the film production company. Description of the source is not enough. If the image come from a film published after 1953, it's still copyrighted in Japan. Darklanlan (talk) 15:39, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:00, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of the film production company. Description of the source is not enough. If the image come from a film published after 1953, it's still copyrighted in Japan. Darklanlan (talk) 15:40, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:00, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Has the wrong license. A 2d copy of an original does not create a new license so this is incorrectly licensed. Spartaz (talk) 15:45, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:01, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to description, the image was photographed in 1961. But publication date is unknown. If this photograph was published in 1966 or later, its copyright may remain. Darklanlan (talk) 15:48, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence to support the claim that the author – who is not identified by the uploader – has been dead for more than 70 years. LX (talk, contribs) 17:37, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Hello,

Here is a picture of the tomb of Monsieur Valentin, he died in 1939 (September 22, 1939 precisely)

1939 → 2016 = 77 years

cordially--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 09:39, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry if I was unclear. The question is when the author of the image (not the subject) died. I doubt this is a selfie. LX (talk, contribs) 10:30, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:02, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No information on the copyright status of the painting – presumably not the uploader's own work. LX (talk, contribs) 10:24, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The work is in the corridors of the hotel of city of Dunkirk, and it's me who is taking the picture--Dunkerqueenflandre (talk) 11:40, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The question is who the painter is. You do not become the copyright holder of someone else's work by photographically reproducing it. LX (talk, contribs) 12:12, 28 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:52, 4 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PD-textlogoの範囲を超えた非フリーロゴ。 Orange5 (talk) 21:18, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:03, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Souhait de maintien du fichier (téléversement d'un fichier libre) --FructidorAn3 (talk) 23:14, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 14:04, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I feel it is inappropriate for Commons to host a gallery largely consisting of documents whose copyright belongs to others (i.e. they should go). That would leave only one image of Murphy, which is already adequately represented in Category:Jon Murphy. The documents themselves do not contribute to his en:WP article Jon Murphy. Rodhullandemu (talk) 22:31, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: nominate the files for deletion first. As soon as only one image is left at the gallery, it can be nominated for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 14:06, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image in gallery is already covered by Category:Jon Murphy as copyright-violating documents have been deleted. Rodhullandemu (talk) 14:23, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:25, 29 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]