Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/12/16

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive December 16th, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 00:09, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:54, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 00:09, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:54, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 00:13, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:54, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 00:16, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:54, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:01, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:54, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:01, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:54, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:02, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:54, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:07, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:55, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:18, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 06:55, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

In order to keep this on Commons, an authorized official of the Union must send a free license using OTRS. Also, this appears to be a 3D badge. If that is correct, then the photographer must also send a free license. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:14, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: This is a re-upload of the deleted file File:2013 Logo oficial UDT.jpg. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:16, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ROC Ministry of Economic Affairs, the authorities for copyright, said that all the images referred to Section 1 of Article 9 of the ROC Copyright Act are exempted from copyright in ROC. Thus, this flag is PD and should be kept in Wiki Commons.--Akira123 (talk) 04:12, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ROC Railway Flag (1919).svg Szm2008 (talk) 12:25, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment If this is 1919 work and copyright lasts 50 years in China, then it can very well be in public domain. Taivo (talk) 15:49, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Speedykeep – it's vandal's nomination. --jdx Re: 15:52, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion - vandalism. --Reventtalk 19:45, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

create the Deletion Request discussion page 2009szm (talk) 12:36, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept: Vandalism. --Amitie 10g (talk) 13:12, 16 December 2016 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfree image

Source: http://www.saopaulofc.net/equipe/elenco/atacantes/david-neres Alex98 (talk) 02:24, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Hedwig in Washington: Copyright violation: http://www.saopaulofc.net/equipe/elenco/atacantes/david-neres

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by EngineeringMafaz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out-of-scope: personal images with spam texts, spamming a multitude of inapplicable categories.

Takeaway (talk) 02:36, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: No way this could be in scope. --Yann (talk) 13:57, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source that this would be a work from the NOAA. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 11:46, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Matanya: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Scuba diver1.jpg: No source that this would be a work from the NOAA. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation.

  •  Delete I can't find any evidence it's a NOAA image - reverse image search doesn't show any hits for the image on any NOAA site. There's plenty of better quality, higher resolution images now available which can be used in place of this image available on Flickr under suitable licences. I'd delete on a precautionary basis. Nick (talk) 11:40, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • I can easily replace this with better, now that I know what it is. I have no objections to deletion. · · · Peter (Southwood) (talk): 11:48, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • What was the evidence on the fr-wiki image mentioned? At http://fr.wikipedia.org/upload/1/1c/Plongeur_bouteilles.jpg which is the original source. Image was uploaded in 2004; it's been here forever and is now all over the web, and finding the original source page may be difficult. I did find one copy on the web which also credited it to NOAA but that may have just been repeating our attribution. Unsure if sourcing policies which were solidified in later years should be applied, unless we have an indication that it's not NOAA. This was *heavily* used on many wikimedia projects. Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:33, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: We have many better images -- no need to keep a possible copyvio. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:05, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work, image is widely available in web. One example: http://wallsdesk.com/meghan-ory-60340/ (http://wallsdesk.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/Meghan-Ory-iphone-6.jpg). MKFI (talk) 13:06, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:49, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A personal photo which falls out of our scope. Mhhossein talk 15:48, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 19:17, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture blurred Derbrauni (talk) 16:01, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 19:17, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A Winnie the Pooh character owned by Disney. COM:TOYS MCMLXXXIX 00:47, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 22:30, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be a crop of image 22 in here Discasto talk 10:24, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Image 20 in that list. Deleted as copyvio. Ruthven (msg) 22:35, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Likely {{PD-textlogo}} Storkk (talk) 11:33, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Seems obviously a PD text logo. Reventtalk 19:12, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Revent. Ruthven (msg) 22:36, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Hugopako (talk) 16:14, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, copyvio from http://www.kpopmap.com/winner-2015/. Ruthven (msg) 22:38, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Hugopako (talk) 16:26, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 22:40, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Hugopako (talk) 16:27, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (copyvio from [2]). Ruthven (msg) 22:41, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Hugopako (talk) 16:31, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (copyvio from [3]). Ruthven (msg) 22:48, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Hugopako (talk) 16:37, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (copyvio from [4]). Ruthven (msg) 22:49, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Hugopako (talk) 16:37, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (copyvio from [5]). Ruthven (msg) 22:49, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Hugopako (talk) 16:38, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (from twitter). Ruthven (msg) 22:50, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Hugopako (talk) 16:39, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (copyvio from [6]). Ruthven (msg) 22:51, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Hugopako (talk) 16:52, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (copyvio from [7]). Ruthven (msg) 22:55, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Hugopako (talk) 16:52, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 22:55, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Hugopako (talk) 16:55, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (copyvio from [8]). Ruthven (msg) 22:57, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Hugopako (talk) 16:55, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (copyvio from [9]). Ruthven (msg) 22:57, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Hugopako (talk) 16:31, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:36, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Hugopako (talk) 16:45, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:36, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Stasiun-bulakamba.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1946. Jcb (talk) 18:02, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The unknown photographer hat taken this photo more than 100 years ago. It is impossible, that the photographer could be still alive and could demand any copyright fees. --Szczebrzeszynski (talk) 20:14, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That may be true, but in most countries copyright stays with the heirs of the author till 70 years after his/her death. That's why the question is whether the author was alive in 1946. Jcb (talk) 22:39, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Published in Russian Empire before 1917, see {{PD-Russian Empire}}, so free in Russia and USA. Also free in USA because {{PD-old-100-1923}}, also free in Russia because {{PD-Russia}} (#3). Dmitry89 (talk) 06:17, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the added information. Jcb (talk) 21:07, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 21:07, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused picture of questionable notability. Cjp24 (talk) 20:02, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:47, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i was helping the owner of this image upload it to wikicommons and uploaded to our page by mistake. Peter Serling has uploaded this image to his own account. This file on our account should be deleted. Redpoppymusic (talk) 23:04, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 22:57, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission. This 1941 work has not been published before 1923. Jcb (talk) 01:54, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ej? The cartoon is noted as being in the public domain. No permission is needed. Tabercil (talk) 04:04, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have a source for that statement? The current license is at least clearly wrong. Jcb (talk) 21:05, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Internet Archive listing for the film at [10] which itself refers to [11]. Tabercil (talk) 21:20, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I have changed the license into {{PD-US-not renewed}}. @Jameslwoodward: could you have a look to see if this is a correct license for this file? Jcb (talk) 21:33, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Given the fact that the cartoon was withdrawn by its makers because it was so offensive, I would have been surprised to find a copyright renewal. I did check, though, both halves of 1968 and 1969 and found none.
By the way, the best source for this -- although still time consuming -- is http://onlinebooks.library.upenn.edu/cce/. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:24, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Jcb (talk) 15:01, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 15:02, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Part of mass upload, unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   21:42, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:09, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized panoramio image without apparent educational purpose. Gauss (talk) 22:04, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:09, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized personal image, out of scope. Gauss (talk) 22:10, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 09:09, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

because is not correct InstitutoEspaillatCabral (talk) 13:58, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: doesn't matter, it's out of scope anyway. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 21:58, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal photo. XXN, 17:45, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:30, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Composite without sources for images, unused. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:49, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:30, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source - Internet, author - unknown. We cannot be sure that file was published under CC license. Muri (talk) 20:15, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:20, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2007 panoramio streams of imho (very) poor quality, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 21:31, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:19, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2007 panoramio streams of imho poor quality, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 21:35, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:19, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2007 panoramio streams of imho poor quality, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 21:37, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:20, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dreamcation (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:ADVERT.

XXN, 23:01, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:18, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. XXN, 23:04, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:16, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by HarvettFox96 as Speedy (sdelete) and the most recent rationale was: Request to force delete, now superseded by vector version. Amitie 10g (talk) 23:22, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:17, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free screenshot. XXN, 23:35, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:16, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Keleis. andre. 1992 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:42, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nanaosei33 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertisement. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:45, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:42, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of our scope. Seems to be a personal photo. Mhhossein talk 15:54, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:41, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CuriousGeorge1587 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope & COM:ADVERT.

XXN, 17:05, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:40, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; Personal image(s). MCMLXXXIX 17:09, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:40, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mutalibraza (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images. Plus COM:ADVERT for the rest (CSD-ed a promo userpage in en.wp).

XXN, 17:10, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:39, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Writtenby (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Screenshots - Derivative works.

XXN, 17:42, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:37, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 00:11, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:30, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 00:15, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:30, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 00:15, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:29, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE - unused drawing by non-notable artist lNeverCry 00:18, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:29, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rasiraja (talk · contribs)

[edit]

per COM:ADVERT & possible copyvios

lNeverCry 00:21, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:29, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cri007 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 00:22, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:28, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abdi ba ba (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 00:43, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:27, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 00:44, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:27, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alaamathkor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 00:48, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:27, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 00:49, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:26, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 00:59, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:24, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sssssssssdsd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Some screenshots. No source provided. No evidence of permission. Most probably copyvio.

XXN, 15:38, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:24, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by محمدرافت طه (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative work.

XXN, 15:42, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:03, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 00:03, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:30, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 00:04, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:30, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hanzawtunmdy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 01:06, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:09, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:07, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:09, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shuceybcabdinuurislow (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 01:10, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:11, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE lNeverCry 01:23, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:12, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mkilla165 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 01:12, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:25, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Masud Tanzib (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 01:13, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:24, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:14, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:24, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:15, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:24, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:15, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:24, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sayuru amarasinghe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 01:17, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:23, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:17, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:23, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:18, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:23, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:20, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:23, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:20, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:23, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work? E4024 (talk) 17:46, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 07:16, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by M.AHMED SHAHIN (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 01:22, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:23, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:22, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:23, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:24, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:34, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:24, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:33, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tonmoy Kumar Ghosh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 01:26, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:33, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:28, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:33, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 01:30, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:33, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Say myonta ohhh (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal/self-promotional images

lNeverCry 02:07, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:19, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by VeinerSilva (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal/promo images

lNeverCry 02:10, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:19, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:11, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:20, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:12, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:26, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:13, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:26, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DayanaDeya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal/self-promo images

lNeverCry 02:14, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:26, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by William Benbow SR. (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 02:16, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:26, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:17, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:26, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:18, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:26, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Emsieleij (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 02:19, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:26, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 02:20, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:26, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 03:28, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:28, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 03:30, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:28, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Messywander (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyright violations - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful

lNeverCry 00:00, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:29, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; Personal image(s). MCMLXXXIX 00:06, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: withdrawn by nominator. --Jcb (talk) 17:55, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image I try my best (talk) 19:20, 4 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 02:05, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Diana Kamduk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyright violations - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful - also questionable notability

lNeverCry 00:13, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:55, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image under copyright, see http://gov.ro/en/legal-conditions We also have many other free alternatives. Ionutzmovie (talk) 00:15, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:56, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, unlikely to be own work. MCMLXXXIX 00:23, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:56, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Personal photo not in use by any of the projects. Out of scope. – Adrignola talk 17:01, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:17, 10 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion. Low image quality. Out of scope. Non encyclopedic value. Commons is not facebook The Photographer (talk) 17:25, 20 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:00, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, unlikely to be own work. MCMLXXXIX 00:26, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:56, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, unlikely to be own work. MCMLXXXIX 00:30, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:56, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A Winnie the Pooh character owned by Disney. COM:TOYS MCMLXXXIX 00:48, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:57, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio - own work claim doubtful lNeverCry 00:54, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Stock image being sold at [12] and [13]. 朝彦 | asahiko (talk) 10:31, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:58, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. Used on twitter at https://twitter.com/veltorbayo. --ghouston (talk) 03:40, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:59, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 03:42, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:59, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 03:46, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:59, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:33, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:58, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fmurillo26 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unsourced reproduction (photograph) with own work claim.

Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:46, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

-- copy from dr talk -- Porfavor no borrar imagen que lo falta para estar presentes porfavor dios lo bendiga gracias fernando (talk) 09:26, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:32, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fmurillo26 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The uploader seem to have a fundamental misunderstanding about Peruvian law on intellectual property rights: Commons:Copyright rules by territory/Peru. A picture is in the public domain 70 years pma

Discasto talk 21:43, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment As seen above, the uploader is pretty aware of the copyright violation and possibly most of the files were already deleted in previous deletion requests. --Discasto talk 21:46, 3 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 11:42, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fmurillo26 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work, not public domain in Peru yet.

Patrick Rogel (talk) 23:48, 2 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please Patrick Rogel the photos are for the best in history

Patrick Rogel Mr. Patrick, those photos of 4 photos are other authors who died 70 years ago,but they are unknown authors

, those images I leave in the history of Peru, to give a good biography page, those 4 photos were found in the military library of Peru in the center of Lima, and the photo of the last decade of 70, it was in the newspaper file the trade, those photo made in Peru, please do not delete those 4 photos, to make a good biography in wikipedia. In case of File:Fernando Belaunde Terry (1).jpg, it was taken in user fmurillo, which I found in the center of popular action party in downtown Lima center. they are correct in character square of peru, president of peru, fernando belaunde terry, those are from me, DO NOT ELIMINATE PLEASE PATRICK !!! Fmurillo26 (talk) 19:28, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All these images have been shot between 1962 and 1980 so are not 70 years old. --Patrick Rogel (talk) 22:05, 3 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
photographic authors, began their career in the decades of the 40s, some authors died in said disease and left unknown. Fmurillo26 (talk) 01:59, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
please, in case of File:Fernando Belaunde Terry (1).jpg, the author was juan gallegos acco, they told me this agreement for wikipedia, square photo of ex-president fernando belaunde terry, was taken in my cell samsumg j7, to pass in wikicommons Fmurillo26 (talk) 02:15, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]
What do you need in that image — File:Belaunde y Morales Bermudez.png— [[User
Patrick Rogel|Patrick Rogel]

the, was the unknown author, found in center popular action supporter, members of partisan said that the author had died in 10 years, you do not know his name, he only said saved in the gallery old photographsFmurillo26 (talk) 19:48, 3 December 2018 (UTC) Patrick Rogel[reply]

- Patrick Rogel, already sent to the perimiso of commons for the claim of license by author deceased in before 70 years in lima Peru, and added the category, are of fernando belaunde and francisco morales Bermudez are the ex presidents of the republic of perúFmurillo26 (talk) 01:26, 6 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:45, 5 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious advertising, the only contribution by the uploader, the file is not in use. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:08, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:32, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused selfie, the uploader's only contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:05, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:33, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - No educational purpose. Ralth Galth (talk) 11:06, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:33, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non-free logo ChongDae (talk) 03:59, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:35, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. XXN, 10:35, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:00, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shubhrashankha007 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal pictures, out of project scope.

XXN, 10:37, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:00, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ainaefimova (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:28, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Running ray (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:28, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photo was previously published at http://web.archive.org/web/20160223200300/http://personal.inet.fi/private/tomas.karlsson/biography.html. An OTRS ticket is required. Diannaa (talk) 16:07, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:27, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Magillaxxx (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative works.

XXN, 16:42, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:25, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation Emir of Wikipedia (talk) 16:47, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:25, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, unlikely to be own work. MCMLXXXIX 16:56, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:24, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong source, wrong author, possible copyright violation Frze > talk 15:42, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:24, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License is "non-commercial" at source, incompatible with Commons licenses. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:20, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . --Didym (talk) 02:23, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Repeatedly uploaded copyright violation --Flayer (talk) 17:38, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:21, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio -Flayer (talk) 17:42, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:20, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio -Flayer (talk) 17:43, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:20, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio -Flayer (talk) 17:42, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:20, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused part of a letter, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:46, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:20, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused part of a letter, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:46, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:20, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused part of a letter, out of scope. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:46, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:19, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

source is a companies website, wo I doubt the free license Avron (talk) 18:34, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:18, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

although I'm willing to grant that the picture of baby antoni is uploader's own work, the background image definitely looks like a commercial backdrop thing DS (talk) 18:39, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Whitemanm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I don't know, but source is a company. I don't know if we can trust the uploader. This should be backed up by OTRS

Avron (talk) 18:41, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of release under a free license. The supposed "author", Lord B, is the parrot himself and cannot have created this image nor have emailed it to the uploader. There's no indication that the real photographer has released it under a Commons-compatible free license, either. Huon (talk) 19:47, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:16, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The above pic appears at the IIM Nagpur's copyrighted official site – please see the first pic of this slide show. And it's at that site at least since April 2016. - NitinMlk (talk) 19:58, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:16, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Much higher resolution versions of the above pic have appeared on net at least since 2013, e.g. this one appeared on 6 December 2013 and got archived on 9 Dec 2013. Similarly, this one appeared in 2015. So, it doesn't seem upoader's 'own work'. - NitinMlk (talk) 20:04, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:16, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from here, although, starting with 22 June 2016, this pic has appeared numerous times on the net. - NitinMlk (talk) 20:05, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:15, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same resolution pic appeared here on 30 June 2016. It's higher resolution versions also appeared multiple times before its upload here, e.g. here & here on 10 October 2016 & here on 21 September 2016. So, it doesn't seem uploader's 'own work'. - NitinMlk (talk) 20:06, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:15, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same resolution pics have appeared multiple times on the net before its upload here, e.g. here (on 7 August 2012), here (in March 2016), and here (in September 2016). So, it doesn't seem uploader's 'own work'. - NitinMlk (talk) 20:06, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:15, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Higher resolution versions appeared here – which was first archived in May 2005 – and here, which was first archived in 2007. So, it doesn't seem uploader's 'own work'. - NitinMlk (talk) 20:07, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:15, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It first appeared here on 5 August 2012. So, doesn't seem uploader's 'own work'. BTW, the pic appears twice on the page cited by me. So, scroll down the page to see the exact match of the above pic. - NitinMlk (talk) 20:09, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:14, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

According to this post – where it appeared one year earlier than its upload at the Commons – it is copyrighted to the Inter-Services Public Relations (ISPR). - NitinMlk (talk) 20:10, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:14, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably above TOO for Argentina; it has aesthetic features, novelty, and originality. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 20:45, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I agree, it's above the TOO. - Fma12 (talk) 11:49, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:13, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I sincerely doubt it can be regarded as a simple shape Discasto talk 20:55, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:13, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No author, no source. Tekstman (talk) 21:50, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:13, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 22:12, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:13, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MatJo25 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploading official press photos/illustrations again.

Brakehorsepower (talk) 22:41, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:12, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stock clip art, dubious self work claim FastilyClone (talk) 06:25, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. (tJosve05a (c) 02:42, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE, (low quality) holiday snapshot Herzi Pinki (talk) 11:49, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:44, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by AugusteBlanqui as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: taken from undocumented source . Well, there is source "own work", but maybe this is wrong source. Taivo (talk) 11:50, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:43, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by AugusteBlanqui as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: textbook image; likely this is not a CC/public domain image . Well, there is source "own work", but maybe this is wrong source. Taivo (talk) 11:53, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:43, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1946. Jcb (talk) 11:54, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:42, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused selfie about non-notable person (no mention in en.wiki), out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:01, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:42, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Out of project scope. No metadata, copyright violation is possible too. Taivo (talk) 12:04, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:42, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. In addition, Kätlin Egors isn't mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in et.wiki, the photo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:08, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:41, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 12:25, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:41, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project scope. In addition, small photo without metadata and the uploader's only contribution, so copyright violation is possible too. Taivo (talk) 12:39, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:41, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Er Harryy (talk · contribs) has made nothing in Wikipedia, except self-promotional userpage in en.wiki and uploading a photo about himself, which is used only on his userpage. His other edits were all reverted. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:46, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:40, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph of 3D object, no photographer's permission. Bad license. Яй (talk) 13:44, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:40, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, probably not selfie as claimed, but real photographer's copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 14:40, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:39, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of http://www.karen-demaison.com/.a/6a01310fc93ca4970c017d3d50f828970c-pi 90.85.181.209 15:21, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:36, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:32, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:36, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubt that this is own work, EXIF shows photoshop, and the user was blocked on the English Wikipedia as vandalism-only account. Ymblanter (talk) 15:32, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:33, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jim slater307 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:37, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:32, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.elcorreo.com/noticias/201608/24/media/cortadas/hesian-kontzertua-knIG-U202462964392hqG-575x323@El%20Correo.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:31, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://farm6.staticflickr.com/5140/5458068561_6e6e929aaf_b.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:31, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Notgohf5 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://static.independent.co.uk/s3fs-public/thumbnails/image/2015/08/18/15/Maude1.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:30, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Last remaining upload of this user. No evidence of permission from Cătălin Ovreiu. Jcb (talk) 01:05, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:58, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable failure under COM:SCOPE & COM:COPYVIO: Appears to be a screenshot used in suspiciously-unverifiable (possible hoax) article en:Fabiò and the Mariachis. Closeapple (talk) 02:03, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1946. Jcb (talk) 02:12, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. No indication that the author would have died before 1946. Jcb (talk) 02:12, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EXIF credits AP Photo/ Evan Vucci, Pool, not the work of the State Department. Looks like it was published to the State Department Flickr feed without adjustment to the license Ytoyoda (talk) 02:34, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A similar photo by this user was deleted. This makes it unlikely this is own work, especially given the fairly small size. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 02:39, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:56, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative work of the large advertisement Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 03:00, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:56, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nonsense map, Commons is not a web host. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:21, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also:

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:55, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 7seastravel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

If not a copyvio, so it is a personal artwork (out of scope)

Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:17, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:54, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Polylerus uploaded the derivative of The Da Vinci Code movie poster filled with banners, like "Seek Jesus. He Is Truth" and "Lies Lies Lies". Also, de minimis does not apply. The photo centers on the banner adaptation. George Ho (talk) 06:26, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:54, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ghostaw1203 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's article was speedily deleted as non-notable in November. Out of project scope.

ξxplicit 06:38, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:53, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some app logos have copyright/某些应用程序的标志享有版权,侵权 Shwangtianyuan (talk) 07:00, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:53, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be photoshopped. No source. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 07:17, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:52, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A screenshot/images from a website, copyrighted per the website. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 07:21, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:52, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. en:Hello Kitty (ja:ハローキティ)is a copyrighted character. Not free use. Ralth Galth (talk) 08:45, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:51, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. en:Hello Kitty (ja:ハローキティ)is a copyrighted character. Not free use. Ralth Galth (talk) 08:46, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per COM:TOYS. Might be considered utilitarian objects under Japanese law but not under US law. 朝彦 | asahiko (talk) 09:56, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:51, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. en:Hello Kitty (ja:ハローキティ)is a copyrighted character. Ralth Galth (talk) 09:15, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:50, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. en:Hello Kitty (ja:ハローキティ)is a copyrighted character. Ralth Galth (talk) 09:40, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:49, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. en:Hello Kitty (ja:ハローキティ)is a copyrighted character. Ralth Galth (talk) 09:47, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:49, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. Kamen Rider (ja:仮面ライダー)is a copyrighted character. Not free use. Ralth Galth (talk) 10:09, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:49, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image has been published before: http://thy.fi/ajankohtaista/matkoja-laukon-kartanoon-ja-kuurinmaalle/. OTRS permission from photographer (Jorma Määttä) needed. MKFI (talk) 10:17, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:48, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - No educational purpose. Ralth Galth (talk) 11:09, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:INUSE. OP's assertion that it is out of scope clearly does not hold. 朝彦 | asahiko (talk) 10:25, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: . --Didym (talk) 02:47, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 11:30, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:46, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Sismarinho as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Non educational. Out of scope.. Scope deletions require a DR, and are not "copyvio"s. Storkk (talk) 11:31, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:46, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Privat image. Out of scope. GeorgHHtalk   11:41, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:45, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE, (low quality) holiday snapshot Herzi Pinki (talk) 11:49, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:45, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Appears to be an incorrectly licensed AP photo Ytoyoda (talk) 14:49, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:49, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Stained glass window with unidentifiable subject of an unknow cathedral (or church ?) : so out of project scope because no educational usefulness ; unidentified location ; unclear description ; underexposed ; photo need probably rotation. Tangopaso (talk) 17:49, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, the “unidentified location” can be improved due to the geocoded location: it's very probably Notre Dame de Paris, so I have added the matching category. This also allows to improve the description. The image should not be rotated: very probably, it has been taken looking up from the ground to the window, so the image shows the right border of some stained-glass window. Of course, this is not the most important photograph of the world, but IMHO we do not need to delete it … There is even be some kind of “educational use”: it shows nicely the transition from unsharp to sharp to unsharp again, due to photographic depth of field. ;-)

 Keep Sorry, I apologize. I did not see the geocoded location (and there are at least 8 cathedrals in Paris...) --Tangopaso (talk) 09:38, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:46, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:FOP#United States. 2007 statue. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:47, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Sculpture is by Daniel Chester French, who died in 1931, 76 years before putative statue date. PD-1923, per EdJohnston. --Storkk (talk) 11:02, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Quark Logo (talk) 09:15, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 11:04, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dateiname nicht aussagekräftig Cvz01 (talk) 10:15, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dateiname nicht aussagekräftig Cvz01 (talk) 10:17, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: So use {{Rename}}. --Storkk (talk) 11:05, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Chybně uvedený název. Strunkovice (talk) 10:31, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion - use {{Rename}}. --Storkk (talk) 11:05, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SanDanceVR (talk · contribs)

[edit]

The copyright holder of this work is " Kevin Rack". Unless there is a compelling evidence to suggest that uploader is the same person as " Kevin Rack", this images should be deleted per our precautionary principle.

Wikicology (talk) 17:01, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • {{oppose)) deletion on this principle. Using pseudonyms have always been ok on our projects and there is no policy requesting that people create accounts under their real names. It is frequent that wikimedians upload pictures under their pseudonyms account and credit their real name. Anthere (talk)
  • {{oppose)) deletion as per Anthere above. This set of images is within scope, and there is no reason why Kevin has to identify himself. He has chosen to make his name SanDanceVR. That is all we need from him. Islahaddow (talk) 09:13, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • {{oppose)) I strongly make my position known here because the user is not mandated by any policy to disclose is identity. More so, most of the images are simple images that can be taking by anybody and not by professional photographer. Therefore, it will be too difficult to severe the identity of the user from the author of the meta. Fair enough, the user doesn't have a page on commons. The images should be kept. Olaniyan Olushola (talk) 09:40, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment - This is not an uncommon case on Wikimedia Commons but unfortunately, we usually don't resolve this kind of issues with the kind of arguments provided above. I wanted to let you know that I have opened a correspondence with the uploader of these image and I am sure this would be resolved soon. I would ask the closing admin to give us sometimes to resolve this. Thank you. Wikicology (talk) 13:41, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Update - This is to confirm that SanDanceVR is the copyright holder of these images based on the convincing evidence provided by the user through an email. On this note, I request the closure of these debate by any patrolling admin or experienced editor. Thanks to everyone who has participated in this debate. With kind regards. Wikicology (talk) 18:41, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Good. @User:Wikicology, could you also please take the time of removing the "deletion request" from all individual files ? Thanks. Anthere (talk) 10:40, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Anthere, I genuinely have no time now. Regards. Wikicology (talk) 11:13, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Is that so ? Anthere (talk)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ymblanter (talk) 10:43, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hikonyan is a copyrighted character by Hikone city, Japan [14].copyvio

Nightingale (talk) 02:35, 10 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:13, 17 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

en:Hikonyan (ja:ひこにゃん)is a copyrighted character. Not free use. (reference: http://hikone-hikonyan.jp/profile/ ) --Ralth Galth (talk) 00:18, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reference provided by Ralth Galth does not discuss the details of the copyright status of this character. In fact, the copyrighted original work is a two-dimensional artwork, depicted in the signage in File:彦根城 (滋賀県彦根市金亀町) - panoramio - gundam2345 (5).jpg.
朝彦 | asahiko (talk) 09:39, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The full costume clearly has a USA copyright and probably a Japanese one as well. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:07, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hikonyan is a copyrighted character by Hikone city, Japan [15].

G I Chandor (talk) 23:59, 14 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:15, 21 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mauvais titre Michaël Lachance (talk) 03:19, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep @Michaël Lachance: on n'efface pas les photos pour un "mauvais titre", on les renomme! Vois aussi comme fonctionne Rename. --Ruthven (msg) 22:33, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:08, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE lNeverCry 01:03, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:09, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unneeded (afterwards) render-copy of SVG File:Coa stgallen.svg. ↔ User: Perhelion 01:04, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: We generally keep pre-existing raster versions of SVGs, but not later creations. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:10, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Yuriito

[edit]

Yuriito (ja:ゆりーと)is a copyrighted character by Tokyo Metropolitan, Japan. Not free use. (reference: http://www.2020games.metro.tokyo.jp/about/yurito/ "東京都スポーツ推進大使「ゆりーと」の利用に関しては、あらかじめ申請が必要です" It means "Applications are required to use Yuriito" in English.) --Ralth Galth (talk) 03:14, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete File:Yurito in Tobitakyu Station.jpg per nomination. It is now hosted in ja.wikipedia under its Outdoor Artwork EDP as ja:File:Yuriito in Tobitakyu Station.jpg.  Keep the rest per COM:COSTUME. --朝彦 | asahiko (talk) 10:40, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: This costume with mask clearly has a USA copyright and probably a Japanese one as well. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:14, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Nebaarukun

[edit]

Nebaarukun (ja:ねば〜る君)is a copyrighted character. Not free use. (reference: https://nebaarukun.info/ ) --Ralth Galth (talk) 03:15, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: These costumes (or toys) with masks clearly has a USA copyright and probably a Japanese one as well. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:15, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mauvais titre Michaël Lachance (talk) 03:18, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion -- use Rename. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:15, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Butadonman (ja:ぶたどんまん)is a copyrighted character (reference: http://www.tokachi.pref.hokkaido.lg.jp/ts/tss/buu/buta01.htm ). And, this photo is very similar to Butadonman official twitter icon (Butadonman official twitter) . Probably not own work. Ralth Galth (talk) 03:33, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per COM:COSTUME. 朝彦 | asahiko (talk) 10:28, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I gave it a second look and withdraw my vote. You're right, this is indeed a very similar image to the Twitter icon. Uploader could be related to the people in charge of the character, though. See their history on ja.wikipedia. If this was the case, they should send permission to COM:OTRS. / 見直した結果、存続票を取り消します。マスコットのツイッターアカウントと同一の写真のようにも見え、第三者による著作権侵害の可能性もあるため。もし投稿者がマスコット関係者ならば、COM:OTRS/jaにメールを送って使用許諾を宣言するのが良いです。--朝彦 | asahiko (talk) 06:07, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:16, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The banners containing "no DAPL" with graffiti resembling water bottles are copyrightable. Not easy to describe, but the banners are original enough to not belong in Commons. Consider them non-free. George Ho (talk) 06:23, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:17, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image Ralth Galth (talk) 01:52, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment It is not important whether it is a few or not. --Ralth Galth (talk) 07:31, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep, good illustration about clip-on sunglasses. Taivo (talk) 15:22, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: . --Didym (talk) 01:22, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographs of identifiable people Quark Logo (talk) 08:30, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Subject's consent to have his photo taken is fairly clear from the circumstances. No defamation or intrusion as well. See COM:IDENT. 朝彦 | asahiko (talk) 09:50, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete per 朝彦. But, I understand somehow, @Quark Logo mean what...
Just simple, I'm trying to find Clip-on sunglasses picturess.
But if, there is a wikipedia-particle "Clip-on sunglass", I think this photo may be not appropriate in the particle. Because of "looking at viewer"? I think maybe, side-view-shot or mannequin, or glasses-itself is suitable better picture.
About this time, I'll request deletion request of the file. Last word, Thanks to Taivo and 朝彦. --Benzoyl (talk) 10:30, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment changed my voting. --Benzoyl (talk) 12:59, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I declined speedy request. I do not understand, what's wrong with the picture. Taivo (talk) 12:54, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Consenting for a photo and consenting to have a photo published on the Internet are two different things, particularly in a country that restricts even the taking of such photos. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:20, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio - from www.indiarailinfo.com & believe previously deleted as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Trains at Raiganj Railway Station.png Arjayay (talk) 08:41, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nothing copyrightable here. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:21, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographs of identifiable people Quark Logo (talk) 08:45, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: By their mothers, maybe, but generally OK. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:22, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

display of a telephone number, and What he has is illegal advertisement in Japanese law. Quark Logo (talk) 08:50, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Where, in Commons:Deletion policy that any of the following case is applicable? telephone number. --Benzoyl (talk) 10:05, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Comment - 画像に細工して番号を見えなくする必要がある。クレジットカードの現金化は違法であり、闇金融の広告であり、宣伝になるおそれがある。また前述のように番号が別の利用の利用者によって使われている場合も、イタズラ電話などの被害を受ける可能性がある。電話番号とナンバープレートの番号を加工するのは常識である。ウィキペディアでも違法行為を奨励するような活動は、目的外利用と判断されればブロックされるわけであり、電話番号に加工を施す必要は当然あるし、残す場合でも版削除が必要でるから、これは削除して加工した別の画像をあげるべき。--Quark Logo (talk) 12:14, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    •  Comment あ、日本語の方ですか。助かります。 この番号は2012年なんで、もう使用されてない可能性高いと思います。The number gets no hits on Google.
      This photo is in 2012. There's a high possibility, This number is not used. By no means, Recommending mischief. And, 0120 is Toll-free number. It's Not personal-home use. --Benzoyl (talk) 12:37, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: I see nothing wrong here. The phone number is being advertised on the sign, so there is no privacy issue. The fact that the activity is illegal is irrelevant -- illustrations of illegal activity are certainly useful for educational purposes. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:26, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, Not educationally useful. Display of a telephone number. And this land line is still used by someone in Kyoto. Quark Logo (talk) 08:59, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unlike the previous case, this is a low quality image and it is not clear that the phone number is public. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:28, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Hello Kitty in the United States

[edit]

en:Hello Kitty (ja:ハローキティ)is a copyrighted character. Not free use. --Ralth Galth (talk) 09:26, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per COM:COSTUME 朝彦 | asahiko (talk) 10:27, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: copyrighted character. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:29, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Hello Kitty

[edit]

en:Hello Kitty (ja:ハローキティ)and its family are copyrighted character. Not free use. --Ralth Galth (talk) 09:03, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment For example, in the image in http://www.sanrio.co.jp/news/kt-sarapure-20161215/, "HELLO KITTY (c)1976, 2016 SANRIO CO.,LTD.".--Ralth Galth (talk) 10:27, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Copyrighted character. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:30, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted character.

 Keep Freedom of panorama for 3D artwork in Portugal. The object shown in the picture is not a DW So the FoP must be applied. --Cody escadron delta (d) 14:40, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete: According to COM:FOP Portugal, FOP only applies to "works, such as works of architecture or sculpture, made to be located permanently in public places". Even if the Hello Kitty toy in the picture is located permanently in a public place, I don't think it was made to be so, and hence FOP doesn't apply. --bjh21 (talk) 17:38, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete According to COM:FOP Portugal. --Cody escadron delta (d) 18:11, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Freedom of panorama for 3D artwork in Canada. The object shown in the picture is not a DW So the FoP must be applied. --Cody escadron delta (d) 14:40, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yuraily Lic (talk) 04:11, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I already told you to check if the FoP can be applied, and you don't! Do your job or stop doing mass deletion requests! --Cody escadron delta (d) 14:40, 21 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
These are not on permanent public display. FOP is not applied to them. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 07:14, 22 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Canadian FoP also requires a work to be "permanently situated in a public place or building". None of these images look as if the Hello Kitty toys/puppets are permanent installations; the Canadian one is Christmas-themed, so I suppose a time-limited placement around Christmas. --Gestumblindi (talk) 10:10, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted character.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 23:59, 5 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete – the primary purpose of uploading these photographs was to get images of Seibu-en into Commons from flickr; in performing the uploads, I must have selected these images that show copyrighted Sanrio characters. Cheers, Mliu92 (talk) 16:47, 6 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:22, 5 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted character.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 06:17, 10 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ahmadtalk 21:10, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of copyrighted characters, and Not own works probably.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 12:39, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:05, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted character.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 13:00, 18 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:05, 22 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of a copyrighted character.

Yuraily Lic (talk) 21:53, 29 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Please see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Minnie Mouse at Disneyland and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Chip 'n' Dale at Disneyland. Photos of the performer wearing character costume have been deleted. --Yuraily Lic (talk) 09:44, 30 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   05:33, 15 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free logo. XXN, 16:34, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 13:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source that this would indeed be an official USCG badge. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 16:50, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 13:57, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. XXN, 16:54, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is not a derivative work!--Freshman404Talk 17:29, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Freshman404: you are the author of this photograph, but the author of original art work is not you probably. This is why such images are not allowed here - you don't have permission to publish under a free license the original art work. --XXN, 19:24, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I'm the photographer and my friend, Parisa, is the author of original art work. Parisa and I agree to publish this image under CC4 license.--Freshman404Talk 02:52, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: until permission comes. --Sealle (talk) 13:59, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mhmrodrigues (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Series of stamps issued in 1997 in Monaco (see [16]). Not PD as stated by the uploader.

Ruthven (msg) 08:39, 14 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:28, 20 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mhmrodrigues (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyright violations: non-free photographs of 3D works of art (COM:When to use the PD-Art tag#This does not apply to photographs of 3D works of art) and coins (COM:COIN). Among the sources three have Creative Commons licenses, but two of them are under CC-BY-NC and the third one - under CC-BY-ND.

Sealle (talk) 17:54, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


those from "MERZ, Walther, "Die Lenzburg", 1904" seem to be ok for me (scans of an early 20th's century book). Some of the Polish seals seem also to be old engravings. An individual checkup is necessary. Kathisma (talk) 15:57, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 13:45, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Michał99 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I believe all of these are past the threshold of originality. However, I am opening a normal deletion request so that more input can be generated about whether they all cross the threshold.

Elisfkc (talk) 22:12, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep File:Eleven extra.jpg, File:Radio silesia.png, File:8tv.jpg, File:Tv tilma.jpg, File:Mnews tv logo.jpg, File:Lovelogo.png, File:Love tv hd.png, File:Discovery science hd.jpg, File:Ginx eSports TV logo.png, File:Boska tv logo.png, File:4fun-tv.jpg, File:4 fun hits.png, File:4FUN DANCE.png, File:Id hd.jpg, File:Tvs-hd.jpg, File:Cmx2.png, File:Stopklatka HD 300.png. Fry1989 eh? 01:42, 22 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: most of, including having shadows on. Some kept: below COM:TOO. --Sealle (talk) 14:52, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, non notable artist, see here. Also the picture itself seems grabbed from the web. No evidence of permission. Jcb (talk) 16:01, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:31, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader is not the copyright holder of the banknote artwork. Unsure if Tunisian currency is Public Domain or not, that's something that needs to be demonstrated. Venaldavid (talk) 16:41, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:43, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of publication before 1923. Unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 16:42, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:43, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyright holder of this work is " Kevin Rack". Unless there is a compelling evidence to suggest that uploader is the same person as " Kevin Rack", this images should be deleted per our precautionary principle. Wikicology (talk) 16:57, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:44, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture blurred Derbrauni (talk) 15:23, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:04, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio. Work of de:Barbara Klemm without permission Karsten11 (talk) 15:43, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:MAL-BarbaraKlemm-2-2016-2.jpg is a copy.--Karsten11 (talk) 15:44, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:04, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

垂幕に個人情報が表示されているため。削除後、加工済みのファイルを上げ直します。 Suz-b (talk) 16:30, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: The personal information is displayed on a public notice. I see no problem with a photograph of it here. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:03, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I wish I could have found a source for this image, but I did not. It's an illustration, title says its from the FAA, but there's no way to confirm that by reverse searching. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:31, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It might be from "(2004) Airplane Flying Handbook, U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D.C.: U.S. Federal Aviation Administration " as we have another image from there with similar title, see File:FAA-8083-3A Fig 12-16.PNG. Maybe WPPilot can get his mitts on a copy of that book and check for this illustration? The current version "3B" is posted at https://www.faa.gov/regulations_policies/handbooks_manuals/aviation/airplane_handbook/media/airplane_flying_handbook.pdf Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:33, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I will see if that book is on our shelves at my flight school, we keep everything and have a whole lot of "Books on Aviation".... Cheers! --Don (talk) 17:42, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Airplane Flying Handbook - 2004 is the source but the image that is current should be used, not a out dated one....--Don (talk) 19:57, 18 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: It's in use, so cannot be deleted except for copyvio. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:47, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

patinho antues 2001:8A0:F323:C401:406F:8F12:DE7:21E8 17:52, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:52, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 18:10, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Based on the automobiles, this is a post-WWII image, so likely still under copyright. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:54, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LAZAR1789 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images non libres.

File:Atbypperret.png et File:Aturboust.png sont "travail personnel"" mais ont deux auteurs différents.

File:Dessin-at-pp.png est un doublon de File:Atbypperret.png

File:Imat.jpget File:Imat3.jpg sont des logos.

Habertix (talk) 21:11, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:51, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in Morocco. Guideline states that "for a work permanently located in a public place if it is not the main subject of the image, however, the studio (including its interior) seems to be the main subject.

(Talk/留言/토론/Discussion) 16:59, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 17:40, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Former_Soviet_Union, this artwork is subject to copyright in Kazakhstan. Therefore, the image does not belong in Commons. George Ho (talk) 22:41, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination -- User:Bogomolov.PL, you were the last to edit the image, so the "Nominate for Deletion" script notifies you automatically. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:50, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Look like it is a derivative work of this. -- Geagea (talk) 15:03, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept Hmm. It's a 1905 work in an Israeli museum. However there are no useful Google hits on the sculptor named in the image sources, Henrik Hanoch Glitzenstein. There is a sculptor named Chanoch Glicenstein who died in 1942, at age 72 (http://www.billgladstone.ca/?p=5868). He was also known as Henryk Glicenstein (http://www.invaluable.com/artist/glicenstein-henryk-den8njwo04) and Enrico Glicenstein. (This runs on because it's the order in which I found the names). He died 1942, so it is PD-old.

Geagea, would you please take a look at the file description? The Google translation reads as if it is not very relevant to this work. Also, I could not figure out where the sculpture is located.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:23, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jim, I meat that the photograph look like DW as we have FoP in Israel. But I've checked now the camera used in this photo and other photos from the same user and look like it's ok.-- Geagea (talk) 20:04, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Geagea, Sorry for the misunderstanding, but it's good to have the proper sculptor named, especially since he has articles on both WP:HE and WP:EN. The background is dropped way out on the Commons image, but I think it is different from the one you cited.
Again, how about cleaning up the description? .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:44, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No information on the bear picture in the middle, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 01:00, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:30, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission, no indication that the depicted software would be under a free license. Jcb (talk) 01:10, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:PRP, unused. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:31, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence of permission from Gravesen and Henriksen Jcb (talk) 01:51, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:32, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE shadow of a non-Commoner, encyclopaedic use? Herzi Pinki (talk) 02:10, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Good picture for Category:Shadow of the photographer which may be useful for someone. --Sitacuisses (talk) 12:58, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
It is only in use, as I collected images in and near to Austria to allow selective categorization. It will be removed from the temp gallery after categorization. So this argument is not valid in this case. --Herzi Pinki (talk) 18:18, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: two people consider this in scope, good enough for me. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:34, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sorry, wrong. It means to be replaced :) Nino Marakot (talk) 06:56, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: overwrite was not in line with COM:OVERWRITE, therefore kept the cropped file as a separate version. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:37, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. en:Hello Kitty (ja:ハローキティ)is a copyrighted character. Ralth Galth (talk) 09:45, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:40, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SGenin (talk · contribs)

[edit]

low-res, no exif, unlikely to be own work

Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:10, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: one image was found here in larger resolution, COM:PRP. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:43, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Použití chybné fotografie. Strunkovice (talk) 11:21, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request on upload day. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:44, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Hedwig in Washington as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: unsourced collage. source - wikimedia commons isn't good enough. Sources are listed in the description. For convenience, they are File:DBCooper.jpg and File:Robert Rackstraw military id photo 1970.jpg. Storkk (talk) 11:27, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Collage relies on File:Robert Rackstraw military id photo 1970.jpg. Wait until processed. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:17, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Robert Rackstraw military id photo 1970.jpg. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:50, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Hedwig in Washington as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: No indication that this indeed is an official army document. not sourced.. The claim that this is a US military ID photo is enough, in my opinion, for it to be not clear enough to speedy. Storkk (talk) 11:30, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Agree I just don't see any indication that this actually is a US-GOV-made photograph. Could be from a local PD or wherever photo-ids are made. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:15, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:PRP. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:50, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Likely {{PD-UKGov}}. Storkk (talk) 11:33, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: probably superseded by File:Women of Britain Say - "Go" - World War I British poster by the Parliamentary Recruiting Committee, art by E J Kealey (Restoration).jpg, File:7_Collection_Eybl_Great_Britain_-_E._Kealey_-_Women_of_Britain_say_–_GO.jpg. Storkk (talk) 12:18, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded it by mistake, I would like to delete it, please. --Emina Mujagic (talk) 13:43, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: two higher resolution versions available, uploader's request. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:51, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source provided that this would be a US government work. A web search seems to show that this is a Chinese fake creation rather than a real emblem. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 11:37, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: real badge looks a bit different. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:52, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source that this would be the real emblem, a web search seems to indicate that is is a hobby creation. No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 11:53, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Au contraire, this is clearly taken from Endicott, Judy G. (1998) Active Air Force Wings as of 1 October 1995 and USAF Active Flying, Space, and Missile Squadrons as of 1 October 1995, Air Force History and Museums Program, Washington, D.C.: Office of Air Force History, p. 82 Retrieved on July 2, 2014. Not sure what a "hobby creation" is but the copyright status is given in the licensing information. --Lineagegeek (talk) 12:38, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The version in that document seems indeed to be the real emblem, but it's different from the version uploaded here. Look e.g. at the colors and at the details of the leaves on the left side. We do have the official version already on our servers: File:USAF - 24th Wing.png. Jcb (talk) 13:35, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as unused duplicate of File:USAF - 24th Wing.png. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:56, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Alpha 09 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely false authorship claims based on the low resolutions, missing metadata/file format used, previous publications found elsewhere, and the uploader's history.

LX (talk, contribs) 12:06, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


I do not know where to write so I do not delete my photos. I write here

I really do not give credit. Delete my images for not being a professional and not having a camera of 3,000 euros. This is painful. I have a normal camera of 50 euros. What you say. Do I have to upload the photos with the original size? There is no copyrighted photo but we are still looking for copyrigt underneath the stones. —El comentario anterior es obra de Alpha 09 (discusión • contribuciones), quien olvidó u omitió firmarlo. 12:25, 16 December 2016


1st Photo: Are you really telling me that this photo and mine are the same? Look at the helmet: https://life-hacking.net/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/tdf2015-16th-11.jpg Mine: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/71/Peter_Sagan%2C_%E2%80%9CThe_Wolf_of_Wall_Street%E2%80%9D%2C_2nd_place%2C_stage_16_%28TDF%C2%B415%29.png --Alpha 09 (talk) 13:37, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

2nd Photo: This photo is a joke Https://i.ytimg.com/vi/_yTSfn_q4gM/hqdefault.jpg I am a magician and I remove black borders. Mine 361x405. That photo 480x360. I have the photo in my pc in 564x405. And I have another very similar in the same pose that you see up to the pants. In my photo are 5 lines of the jersey. In that photo you see three.


5th Photo: The fifth photo has gotten into the bag because yes. --Alpha 09 (talk) 13:58, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have other photos on my Richmond PC that I have to upload. It was a very special moment. The logical thing is that there are similar photos. I believe

My BQ Aquaris M4.5 mobile phone has 540 x 960 Vertical resurrection.

I have a picture very similar to this. (https://www.google.es/imgres?imgurl=http://static.cdn.markiza.sk/media/a501/image/file/14/0155/VRoM.peter_sagan.jpg&imgrefurl=http://tvnoviny.sk/sport/galeria_1806320_sagan-do-medaily-hryzol-a-hryzol-az-ju-odhryzol/178982&h=190&w=286&tbnid=TWJChmHsqQDGCM&tbnh=152&tbnw=228&usg=__9ct_0wOYXAfCCtbH8BQWFNCJOXs=&hl=es&docid=xMGmQ54iaK-VDM) In my photo you can see the doll. Does it mean that my photo is copyrighted? Of course not. --Alpha 09 (talk) 13:58, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Only two photos with alleged copyright. The others... --Alpha 09 (talk) 13:58, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You're obviously uploading screenshots of videos. Not all of them are exactly the same as the examples above, but they're clearly taken from the same videos. I know you're frustrated that free photos are hard to come by, but that is not an excuse to go breaking the rules and telling us fairy tales about you using your €50 camera from the same vantage point as the official camera motorcycle. LX (talk, contribs) 14:29, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
jajajaj


The argument of the photo of the black edges is to laugh. And if I have to explain the resolution that the mobile phones have to the professional cameras ...--Alpha 09 (talk) 14:36, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Solid arguments. Few. I remove black borders to photos ... Magic--Alpha 09 (talk) 14:38, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

We are talking about whether or not to have copyright. And here from what I see is talk of theories of cospiration. Black borders, photos that we put to eliminate because if (yellow jersey) ...--Alpha 09 (talk) 14:40, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


The last photo of this discussion does not have nor similar in Internet. Well ... Let's say it's copyright --Alpha 09 (talk) 14:48, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The second picture ..... The arguments speak for themselves. Resolutions do not agree. It has black borders ... etc etc. Of course there are photos that match. The strange thing is that they do not match. We are talking about the World Championship on the Road !!! This is not Doha, Qatar. That there was not even a cat. It's Richmond--Alpha 09 (talk) 14:54, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Doha? What are you on about? The second screenshot is a screenshot from the same footage as https://i.ytimg.com/vi/_yTSfn_q4gM/hqdefault.jpg, also seen in https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WkeMn7saUT4&t=3m39s. Exact same angle. Either that or you'd have to be perched right on top of the official TV camera with your phone that apparently only produces low-resolution PNGs. And apparently, you only remembered having taken that photo after you complained about not being able to find free photos of the subject. Cool story, bro. LX (talk, contribs) 12:59, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: obvious copyvios. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:58, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source to support that this would be the real official badge. No information on the photographer of this 3D object. Unknown copyright situation for both the depicted object and the picture itself. Jcb (talk) 13:48, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:59, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm the author of this image and I want please to delete it. אמיר בן ארי (talk) 14:37, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:00, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused of PNG version of File:US Presidential Recount 2016.svg (or, more precise, File:Presidential election recount 2016.svg, which has been deleted since) Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 01:07, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 12:00, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Just joking photo. Quark Logo (talk) 08:56, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Looks like a fine photo of a street scene to me. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:37, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Sebari. Ruthven (msg) 11:16, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Quark Logo (talk) 09:05, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 11:17, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional photo. Advertisement for Velib' with the URL in the file name and the description. Tangopaso (talk) 15:01, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 11:57, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too dark photo. The principal part of the photo is black. Tangopaso (talk) 15:02, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Eiffel Tower illumination by night is copyrighted. Ruthven (msg) 11:57, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All of these photos are recent sculptures in Paris (less than 30 years). But there is No COM:FOP#France. According to French law, it is not allowed to publish picture whose the main subject is an original sculpture until 70 years after the death of its author. Unless prior authorization by the author or his heirs.

Tangopaso (talk) 12:01, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Elisfkc: As you see, me too I put DR for actual recent sculptures in Paris. Thanks for the cancellations of some of your DRs in Disneyland Paris. --Tangopaso (talk) 12:05, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 02:27, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The ensign is a drawing with an original design. But there is no COM:FOP#France. According to French law, it is not allowed to publish picture whose the main subject is an original creation until 70 years after the death of its author. Unless prior authorization by the author or his heirs.

Tangopaso (talk) 12:33, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 02:27, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These are original and recent buildings in Paris. But there is no FoP in France. It is forbidden to publish photos of buildings less than 70 years after the death of their architect.

Civa (talk) 14:06, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, kept a few de-minimis images. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 02:29, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent buildings, but there is No Fop in France

Tangopaso (talk) 15:45, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Trop, c'est trop : ces rafales de demandes de suppresssion inapropriées pour des photos montrant des immeubles quelconques comme on en voit des centaines en France. Aucune originalité, style reproduit à l'infi. Toutes ces demandes de suppression sont des croisades pour défendre obstinément/aveugleugment le "noFop" et le brandir en étendard... mortel pour Commons. C'est du Don Quichottesque. C'est quoi ou qui les moulins ici ? --Poudou99 (talk) 20:30, 19 December 2016 (UTC).[reply]
I think that most of these DR are abuse. Proposal: every unsuccesfull DR should end with consequences for the nominator for deletion: one week OUT !--Jebulon (talk) 23:26, 19 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment The actual French statute copyrights all architecture, as does US law. The French case law is all over the map and our understanding of it is evolving rapidly. While I think some of these are well above whatever the French ToO actually is, I'm not expert enough to confidently close these. However, I think it should be made clear that these are perfectly legitimate deletion requests, all of which would have been closed as deleted a year ago. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 17:00, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Que ce soit clair, le droit d'auteur ne fait pas de jugements sur la valeur architecturale d'un bien. Tout architecte doit pouvoir exercer son droit d'auteur et donc toute photo d'immeuble sans l'autorisation de l'architecte est en copyvio. Ici ont été gardées les images où l'immeuble peut être considéré de minimis par rapport au sujet de la photo. Ruthven (msg) 11:54, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ajuste según los requisitos de Wikipedia Javiergoma (talk) 15:36, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 13:01, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Incorrect image. Pegaptanib is not a simple organic compound like this one. It's a polynucleotide with ca. 50 kDa of weight and has much much more complicated structure. ∼Wostr (talk) 14:52, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pinging Leyo, was ist denn hier dargestellt? Umbenennen wäre ja die einfachste Lösung. --Achim (talk) 11:22, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 14:59, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creators will 최광모 (talk) 10:11, 4 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:48, 11 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 11:26, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete as a courtesy. Unused, depicted person probably non-notable. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:46, 24 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Request probably doesn't come from the depicted person, this user has a history of massively nominating his own uploads for this reason, sometimes even when the picture doesn't depict any person at all. This uploader finally has to learn that a CC license cannot be revoked. --Jcb (talk) 13:40, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the subject of photographs, strongly wants to delete the photo. he is my familiy and argued that this is published without his consent. this is against his right of publicity and privacy, and also violates wikimedia commons policy. 최광모 (talk) 14:13, 25 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 16:53, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replace by better Version ArishG (talk) 12:13, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 13:36, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm the author of this image and I want please to delete it. אמיר בן ארי (talk) 14:39, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 13:44, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. ליאנה בוירשטיין (talk) 14:23, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I agree — Preceding unsigned comment added by אמיר בן ארי (talk • contribs) 22:16, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

עברית: תוכלו להסביר למה? -- Geagea (talk) 23:10, 2 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Uploader states they are the authore and do not explain why the photo should be deleted after 6 years. --Ellywa (talk) 20:23, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm the author of this image and I want please to delete it. אמיר בן ארי (talk) 14:40, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 13:44, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm the author of this image and I want please to delete it. אמיר בן ארי (talk) 14:41, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 13:42, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm the author of this image and I want please to delete it. אמיר בן ארי (talk) 14:42, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 13:44, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm the author of this image and I want please to delete it. אמיר בן ארי (talk) 14:43, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 13:44, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This Facebook maybe doesn't belong with the uploading person. 181.203.117.81 01:35, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:INUSE, also no sign of indirect copyright violation. A09090091 (talk) 18:39, 13 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 16:33, 26 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm the author of this image and I want please to delete it. ליאת סלע (talk) 14:44, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 13:44, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. ליאנה בוירשטיין (talk) 14:17, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: why? Has the file been published elsewhere before?. Ruthven (msg) 11:50, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm the author of this image and I want please to delete it. Yaniv tamir (talk) 14:47, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 13:44, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. ליאנה בוירשטיין (talk) 16:01, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: personal photo of no noticeable person. Ruthven (msg) 14:43, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm the author of this image and I want please to delete it. Yaniv tamir (talk) 14:48, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 13:44, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. 2A01:73C0:503:B065:0:0:3206:1178 15:48, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion and no doubt this photo was made by the uploader. --Ellywa (talk) 20:28, 27 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm the author of this image and I want please to delete it. Yaniv tamir (talk) 14:50, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 13:44, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This photo cannot stay in the Commons without a proper OTRS release note. ליאנה בוירשטיין (talk) 16:00, 12 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: personal photo of no noticeable person. Ruthven (msg) 14:43, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm the author of this image and I want please to delete it. אמיר בן ארי (talk) 14:51, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 13:44, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Quark Logo (talk) 09:13, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: indeed out of scope. Also be aware that Japan has stricter rules on taking pictures of people in public space than most other countries. --Jcb (talk) 15:47, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong Format Lpanjwani44 (talk) 13:07, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:45, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent street art and there is No Fop in France Tangopaso (talk) 14:46, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:49, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ajuste según los requisitos de Wikipedia (Es una foto personal) Javiergoma (talk) 15:39, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Javiergoma: ¿Por qué quieres borrar la foto? Si explicas mas en detalle lo que pides, podemos entender cuales son los ajustes que quieres.--Ruthven (msg) 13:02, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no permiso, el fotógrafo mencionado es en verdad el persona en la foto. --Jcb (talk) 15:51, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ajuste según los requisitos de Wikipedia (Es una foto personal) Javiergoma (talk) 15:39, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no permiso, el fotógrafo mencionado es en verdad el persona en la foto. --Jcb (talk) 15:51, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ajuste según los requisitos de Wikipedia (Es una foto personal) Javiergoma (talk) 15:39, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no permiso, el fotógrafo mencionado es en verdad el persona en la foto. --Jcb (talk) 15:51, 28 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No authorship information, unknown copyright situation. Jcb (talk) 11:41, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

When I interpret the source comment correctly, this image was taken from this book by an author that dies in 1912. I think a Hungarian speaker should review this book for potential authorship information of the image. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 06:12, 30 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Indeed, the source is indicated as that book with the editor's date of death in 1912. --Dami (talk) 23:15, 2 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: PD-HU. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 16:19, 5 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]