Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/12/07

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive December 7th, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

self-promo, private photo Andrei Nikolaenko (talk) 10:55, 22 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted High Contrast (talk) 08:06, 30 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Out of scope Sankoswal (talk) 10:54, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 19:08, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is a personal photo that has no educational value. It is out of scope per COM:SELFIE. KSFT (talk) 13:08, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:47, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-quality (blurred) selfie of a non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 13:54, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:34, 6 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused selfie of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 01:09, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete I suggest to protect the filename indefinitely against recreation after deletion of the photo. Overall generic filename. Taivo (talk) 09:03, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 13:24, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Romanseo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope/promotional and these seem associated with specific companies. No evidence these are own works.

~ Rob13Talk 07:26, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Blatant spam of well-known pattern. --Achim (talk) 17:20, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

porque prefiero subir trabajos propios y no trabajos de otras personas, y tambien por que no es necesario para wikipedia Jos2001 (talk) 14:24, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

por que no es una foto necesaria en wikimedia commons, ademas este no es trabajo de mi propiedad, la foto es propiedad de Rafael Costa de Melo Jos2001 (talk) 17:00, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:28, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:17, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 01:46, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:21, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 01:45, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:21, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 01:45, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:22, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 01:45, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ratna Afandi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:NETCOPYVIO - nominated here instead of speedy due to volume. File:Raquel Katie Larkin.jpeg and File:Raquel Larkin.jpeg are here; File:Yunita Siregar.jpeg is here; etc.

Эlcobbola talk 17:29, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 13:22, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ratna Afandi (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope!

Ras67 (talk) 23:35, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 15:29, 26 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copivio: https://vk.com/fk.korona.napadivka Mykola Vasylechko 18:54, 7 December 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 21:01, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nl5836 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Bulk COM:NETCOPYVIO nominated here instead of speedy due to volume; generally low res, no camera exif, on multiple sites. File:Steve Mnuchin.png and File:Steven-mnuchin.jpg are here; File:Robert-mnuchin portrait.jpg is here; File:Mnuchin Family.jpg is here; etc.

Эlcobbola talk 22:38, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Those that are not clear copyright violations are likely copyright violations. Uploader reblocked. Ed (Edgar181) 21:34, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dunno what this is, or whether it is in scope, or whether it is possibly a copyvio? PK-LMN (talk) 11:26, 3 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

either copyvio or out of scope artwork Imedeiros (talk) 01:29, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 03:40, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio http://alchetron.com/Nassim-Dehouche-495249-W S. Plaine (talk) 13:50, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedy. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:37, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio http://www.kooora.com/?player=51666 S. Plaine (talk) 13:52, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedy. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:38, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio http://www.cafonline.com/fr-fr/competitions/supercup2015/TeamDetails/playerdetails?CompetitionPlayerId=lOwbDJ5Ax4x8X%2FIpgb9nZN3d5EZRLpz9ys0mw9oLar%2FEvICjYRuBlm7v1SS7FFXF S. Plaine (talk) 13:53, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedy. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:38, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio http://lagazettedufennec.com/filinfo/mc-oujda-resiliation-de-contrat-pour-fares-hamiti/ S. Plaine (talk) 13:54, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:39, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio http://www.depechedekabylie.com/sport/101227-on-a-les-moyens-pour-pieger-le-cab.html S. Plaine (talk) 13:54, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, speedy. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:40, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Deletion requests/File:C20N555.jpg. Her death certificate is also out of scope. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:37, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:31, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mark Frankling isn't mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in fr.wiki, out of project scope. In addition, this is small unused personal photo without metadata and the uploader's only contribution, copyright violation is possible too. Taivo (talk) 18:44, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 00:27, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I'm assuming that Wikimedia Commons doesn't need to store a low-quality jpeg of the Wikimedia Commons logo. Imedeiros (talk) 00:02, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:09, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Imedeiros (talk) 00:07, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:10, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Subject in the photo is presumably the uploader. Also found on his YouTube channel, which is not notable. This is his only contribution to any project. Out of project scope. — ξxplicit 00:09, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:11, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free book cover + COM:ADVERT. XXN, 00:18, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:11, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Myabul07 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

--ghouston (talk) 00:26, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:12, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshot of copyrighted game Bultro (talk) 00:42, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:14, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshot of copyrighted game Bultro (talk) 00:42, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:14, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshot of copyrighted game Bultro (talk) 00:42, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:14, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

screenshot of copyrighted game Bultro (talk) 00:42, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:14, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, some sort of error in image processing/photo development? Imedeiros (talk) 01:21, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:12, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, missing EXIF. Unlikely to be own work. Jespinos (talk) 20:58, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: INeverCry 00:35, 21 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable copyvio, look like still from movie/TV Imedeiros (talk) 01:28, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:15, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: not educationally useful. Aleator (talk) 01:31, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:15, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: personal photograph not in use Imedeiros (talk) 01:32, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:15, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: personal photograph not in use Imedeiros (talk) 01:32, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:15, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: family vacation photograph (?) not in use Imedeiros (talk) 01:40, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:16, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Imedeiros (talk) 01:54, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:16, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: not educationally useful; raw text. Aleator (talk) 01:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:16, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possibly a promotional image Imedeiros (talk) 01:56, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:16, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused personal photograph Imedeiros (talk) 02:09, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:17, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: not educationally useful. Aleator (talk) 02:09, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:17, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, uncategorized personal images, out of scope.

Gauss (talk) 02:42, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:19, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Perfilova2000 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused, uncategorized personal images, out of scope.

Gauss (talk) 02:45, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:19, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Perfilova2000 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images, out of scope. Also potential copyright violations: no EXIF, relatively low resolution, random file names.

Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:13, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:19, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused {{Userpage image}}. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:39, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:29, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Unused personal image. Érico Wouters msg 03:12, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 20:27, 17 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: selfie not in use Imedeiros (talk) 05:14, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:30, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: selfie not in use Imedeiros (talk) 05:15, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:30, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image. — TBhagat (talk) 04:43, 4 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:44, 11 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: unused personal image Imedeiros (talk) 05:16, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:30, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvio Imedeiros (talk) 05:21, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:30, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probable copyvio Imedeiros (talk) 05:23, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:30, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: unused personal image Imedeiros (talk) 05:29, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:31, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: personal photo not in use Imedeiros (talk) 05:34, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:32, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: unused personal image Imedeiros (talk) 05:43, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 04:32, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ivana My Life (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own works, small sizes, no EXIFS, no sources for the photomontage

Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:52, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:00, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope: unused personal image Imedeiros (talk) 06:08, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:01, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DVRUS OFFICIAL (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

XXN, 11:02, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:02, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Graygray1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Non-free content, COM:DW.

XXN, 11:08, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:02, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ImNot122 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

XXN, 11:10, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:03, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RoyGBiv (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, COM:ADVERT, and probably copyvio or mislicensing.

XXN, 11:12, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:03, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These images are claimed to be own work but obviously the uploader would have to be over 80 to be the photographer. I posted a request for more information and source over 2 months ago with the original uploader but they have not responded. I can't find any source online but it could be old enough to be in the public domain but I have not been able to determine better details, such as author or publication date, if any, so I think PCP should apply.

Ww2censor (talk) 11:45, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Ww2censor: , I have found an online source here, where it is written that the photograph was taken in 1867, which means it falls under {{PD-1923}} and {{PD-India}}. I have changed the description and license of both the images accordingly, please check if its ok. Thanks. -- Bodhisattwa (talk) 12:08, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Bodhisattwa good job finding and fixing these images. Perhaps you can also check out the uploader's other files and the other images of the same people that seem related. Thanks Ww2censor (talk) 14:43, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: In public domain. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:13, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Badly credited downscale duplicate of File:Raouf Ben Aziza 1973.png Lacrymocéphale (talk) 11:54, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:13, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sapvits (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Blatant spam.

jdx Re: 11:56, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:14, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sayem.sarkar27 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images, out of scope. We are not Facebook.

Yann (talk) 12:29, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 05:41, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:07, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Actor Mohit Raj (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:NOTHOST - unused images of non-notable person (apparently uploaded for use in now-deleted vanity article on en.wiki). Also possible NETCOPYVIO issues (e.g. some from Twitter account).

Эlcobbola talk 17:22, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:15, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eren.duzgun27 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:SCOPE - blurry, unused images with no foreseeable educational value. Also likely copyvios as DW of on-screen images.

Эlcobbola talk 17:57, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep Pictures of a famous child actress. One is used in Turkish WP and she may have articles in other WPs in the future. I have no idea if there is any copyvio, but tend to believe a fan (the uploader) have taken her pic. Leave at least one, if possible. Thanks. --E4024 (talk) 08:12, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • I agree. --TmѰ e12 16:35, 9 December 2016 (UTC)
With me, right? :) --E4024 (talk) 09:15, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, DW of on-screen images. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:17, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of scope. P 1 9 9   18:12, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:17, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ajayjetavat (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personnal photo, no educational. Out of scope

Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 21:56, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:00, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 21:58, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:54, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:01, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:54, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:02, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:54, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:04, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:54, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Anadarwin03 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 22:06, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:53, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:08, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:52, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:09, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:52, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, bad quality Ciaurlec (talk) 22:13, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:50, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:22, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:49, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Majeed3005 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 22:23, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:49, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:25, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:49, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:29, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:48, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AbdulHaq kayalpatnam (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 22:30, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:49, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:32, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:48, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:33, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:48, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:34, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:48, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:35, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:48, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT lNeverCry 22:36, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:48, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RBsoft (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 22:38, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:47, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:40, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:47, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:41, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:47, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 22:58, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:46, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 23:00, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:46, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abhishek.gic0 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused {{Userpage image}}s

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 21:39, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:05, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abhishek.gic0 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:06, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 00:07, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abhishek.gic0 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 23:04, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:46, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 23:05, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:46, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 23:05, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:45, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 23:07, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:45, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abhinashshah7 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 23:30, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:45, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Profooty33 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Only used on the English Wikipedia, where the subject's article was deleted via deletion discussion as non-notable in October. Out of project scope.

ξxplicit 23:53, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:40, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 23:53, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I am the uploader of File:Lake of Disney Village 2.jpg. There was already a DR about this file on june 24th 2015, a discussion and the decision was kept. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lake of Disney Village 2.jpg. Please, once, once again, dear Elisfkc, before creating the DR of a photo, give a look to the discussion page of the photo. You will see if there was not already a DR. --Tangopaso (talk) 09:25, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Tangopaso: my apologies, when I was nominating files, I did not see the previous deletion requests on any of the images that I nominated. That is my mistake. Elisfkc (talk) 16:17, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep File:Lake Disney, Paris 2013.jpg. The building is not the main object of the photo. The main object is the lake. So, the image doesn't violate COM:FOP#France. This is Commons:De minimis case. --Tangopaso (talk) 09:27, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, keeping as de minimis. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:42, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 01:42, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Speaking as the uploader of Marne-la-Vallée Wikivoyage Banner.jpg, I see the need to point out what one can also see in the description of this file: The banner is a 7:1 cut of Lake of Disney Village 2.jpg, which has already been voted on before, which resulted in it being kept. Both images display the same, so please correct me if I'm wrong, but if FOP isn't an issue for the one, it shouldn't be an issue for the other either.
-- Wauteurz (talk · contributions · Statistics) 16:38, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination; no COM:FOP in France (it includes also rooms in the building). Regarding File:Marne-la-Vallée Wikivoyage Banner.jpg, it can't be kept because the building is now the main subject of the picture (compared to the large one where it's only in the background). --Arthur Crbz (talk) 17:52, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 23:54, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I am the uploader of File:Flower bed of the hotel New-York at Disneyland resort Paris.jpg. There were already 2 DR about this file on october 6th 2013 and june 24th 2015, a discussion and the decision was kept. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flower bed of the hotel New-York at Disneyland resort Paris.jpg. Please, once, once, once again, dear Elisfkc, before creating the DR of a photo, give a look to the discussion page of the photo. You will see if there was not already a DR (or 2). --Tangopaso (talk) 09:32, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Tangopaso: my apologies, when I was nominating files, I did not see the previous deletion requests on any of the images that I nominated. That is my mistake. Elisfkc (talk) 16:17, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, keeping as de minimis. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:43, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 18:08, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

  • Most of these are focusing on the ice rink, which the photographer has the rights to (since they are apparently Xtraice, the manufacturers of the rink). However, they don't have the rights to the hotel itself, which is not de minimis in several photos... and is, unfortunately, the main reason we're using these photos... :-( --GRuban (talk) 20:42, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per GRuban, kept the photos of the rink. Ruthven (msg) 14:33, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: previously deleted Xochiztli (talk) 00:43, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 07:12, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:SELFIE. Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 21:41, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:15, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Prateek Mahajan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photo. No educational. Out of scope.

Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 21:43, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:14, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused image of non-notable athlete lNeverCry 21:43, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:11, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AashishThakor (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 21:45, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:11, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT lNeverCry 21:46, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:11, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 21:47, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:11, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT

lNeverCry 21:49, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:03, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dpy9999 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 21:50, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:03, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:SELFIE. Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 21:51, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:01, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by mistake, not sure it is legal at this time Zootsuit1941 (talk) 03:38, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Uploader requested and unused.--Fanghong (talk) 07:18, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Planet Heaven (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused advertisments in different colors, not in scope

Avron (talk) 07:50, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Planet Heaven (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Parts of different Newspapers of different authors, so "own work" is not possible

Avron (talk) 07:55, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:46, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Planet Heaven (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on this gallery of images of a "star" including a collage of over 1/2 dozen separate pictures.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:57, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 07:32, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo. Common is not a personal photo album. Wikicology (talk) 08:10, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 07:38, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Wikicology (talk) 08:15, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 07:43, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo. Mhhossein talk 10:24, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 07:52, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photos Pippobuono (talk) 15:26, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 08:05, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pawan madhu meena (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 20:38, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 08:25, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 20:49, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 08:27, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hiwaleaakash (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 21:13, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:33, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nehajay18 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 21:16, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:34, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BWAMBALE JORAM (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused, uncategorized personal images, out of scope.

Gauss (talk) 21:19, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:32, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 21:21, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:30, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Arajit Bag (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

lNeverCry 21:25, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:30, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 21:27, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:30, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE - tiny 7kb thumb lNeverCry 21:28, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:30, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 21:31, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:28, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:ADVERT lNeverCry 20:57, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:55, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 20:58, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 08:51, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 20:59, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 08:54, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 21:02, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 09:04, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 21:03, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 09:05, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 21:03, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 09:08, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 21:04, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 09:21, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 21:05, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 09:23, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 21:07, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted / Out of scope.--Fanghong (talk) 09:25, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hakan Tansel (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused images of non-notable team/athletes

lNeverCry 21:10, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:54, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bizsource (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal/self-promotional images

lNeverCry 21:12, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:52, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 21:35, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:53, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW of smartphone/app UI

Эlcobbola talk 16:53, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:42, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2009 (!) panoramio streams of imho rather moderate quality, and imho family album-orientied content (posing at a monument), file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 18:51, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:41, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2009 (!) panoramio streams of imho rather poor quality, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:07, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:40, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uselessly angled photo; replaced for all practical purposes by File:Campello MBTA station, Brockton MA.jpg Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:36, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:40, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE - flag of non-notable group lNeverCry 20:14, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete flag of a dubbious group. Not in use though haveing been uploaded almost a year ago.Kathisma (talk) 01:38, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: not per nomination but because better one present at File:Arakan State Army Flag.png and that's being used. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:39, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE - just a plain black jpg lNeverCry 20:48, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:35, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image lNeverCry 21:36, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:34, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE - badly tilted with unnatural colors lNeverCry 21:53, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:34, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elvadiana (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photo about a not notable football team. We have enough photo to illustrate this sport (i think).

Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 22:28, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 11:33, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: PDF file with raw text and not educationally useful. Aleator (talk) 01:13, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:44, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: PDF file with raw text; abstract of w:es:Violencia doméstica. Aleator (talk) 01:34, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:44, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: PDF file with raw text; abstract of w:es:Pensamiento crítico. Aleator (talk) 01:40, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:44, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: PDF file with raw text; abstract of w:es:Pensamiento crítico. Aleator (talk) 01:41, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:44, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: PDF file with raw text; abstract about w:es:La Celestina work. Aleator (talk) 01:46, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:46, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: PDF file with raw text; abstract of w:es:Sociedad. Aleator (talk) 01:56, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:46, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mabelina (talk · contribs)

[edit]

None of these is correctly licensed. Many are non-free. See COM:COA.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:42, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This file comes from Arnaud Bunel's website (copyrighted). This one seems to have already been deleted. As for this one, this other and this last, they come from European heraldry (copyrighted) and are exactly the same case as these files uploaded by this user's well identified sockpupet. Kathisma (talk) 11:31, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:47, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not complete Leekhaisin (talk) 14:36, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:48, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Etrimon (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertisement. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:49, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:50, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:33, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:50, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:50, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:34, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:50, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:50, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Okejitu1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

~ Rob13Talk 07:22, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:29, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted images.

Wikicology (talk) 08:18, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sealle (talk) 17:30, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of a company with questionable notability. Is mislicensed and may be above COM:TOO. XXN, 10:57, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Sealle (talk) 17:26, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free; see COM:COA. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:41, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Mabelina

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Emanuelbrianu2 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own works, small sizes, no EXIFS, 2 images have "FBMD" in the metadata (means they passed though Facebook). All other uploads already speedy deleted at this time.

Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:44, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:21, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fhguiñez (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Pido las disculpas correspondientes, soy nuevo en wikipedia y al momento de subir estas fotografías no sabía como cambiar el autor del archivo. Sin embargo, tengo permiso para usarlas, soy miembro de la Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile y estas fotografías pertenecen al archivo del Sistema de Bibliotecas de la universidad, institución con la que hablé para conseguir las fotografías y me concedieron el permiso para utilizarlas. Atte. Fhguiñez

Dubious claim of "own work" on this series of head shots. One with camera data, the others without, some FMDB (facebook) and small to tiny sizes suggest an internet collection rather than actual creation.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:53, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: por favor envía el permiso de los fotógrafos a OTRS. --Jcb (talk) 22:21, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 4MBrewing (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused, uncategorized banner of questionable notability : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:18, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:21, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nandinishakira (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Likely taken by numerous photographers, dubious claims of {{Own work}} and likely copyright violations. Additional likely COM:IDENT issues, and may have been uploaded as an attack, given the descriptions on most.

Storkk (talk) 10:15, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:22, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Fantasyland at Disneyland Paris

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 21:31, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Natuur12: I would have agreed a month ago. Then Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Topiary in the United States came along. If topiaries are not free in the US, they most certainly are not in France. With those big swan topiaries on the left of the image there, plus the buildings and bridges, this image is past the point of De minimus. Elisfkc (talk) 21:58, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: most, kept some per discussion. --Jcb (talk) 22:32, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Fantasyland at Disneyland Paris 2

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 17:33, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:08, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Fantasyland at Disneyland Paris 3

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 14:44, 3 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:57, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Fantasyland at Disneyland Paris 4

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 01:48, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no FOP in France. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 18:16, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Fantasyland at Disneyland Paris 5

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 18:45, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Minoraxtalk 01:51, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Files in Category:Fantasyland at Disneyland Paris 6

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 18:02, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 15:23, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The concern here is the scuplted design of the ride/attraction vehicles, which from part of the primary subject of the image. These cannot in their Disneyland Paris incarnation have been created or unveiled prior to 1992. Any photo of the sculpted design as the primary focus of the image would be derivative. France (where the primary subject of this image is located) does not have Freedom of Panorama for sculpted works..

ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 09:49, 7 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 09:22, 14 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(c) by Disney. No FoP in France, and not permanent anyway.

Yann (talk) 20:22, 15 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 12:12, 22 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Characters are copyrighted

Elisfkc (talk) 21:50, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete As previously mentionned, there is no FoP in France. Characters and architecture are protected by copyright and de minimis cannot be invoked. Kathisma (talk) 01:41, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:36, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Float (work of sculpture) , costume and character designs owned by Disney, No FoP in France ( but no clear as to how that applies to costumes.) Have attempted to filter out more 'generic' designs.

A

[edit]
Concern was the float.. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:52, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

* File:Blanche-Neige - 20150802 16h45 (10736).jpg

Cendrillon

[edit]

* File:Cendrillon - 20150802 16h44 (10734).jpg

Cinderella

[edit]

Elsa

[edit]

Elves

[edit]

Fairy

[edit]

* File:Fairy - Magic On Parade (11713415285).jpg

Items retained in this listing are due to concerns about the float design as opposed to the costumes. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:21, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fauna

[edit]

Flynn Rider

[edit]
Concern is to do with the portions of float included, not about the costume.

Can strike these if it is felt the float inclusions are minimal ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:23, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Frozen

[edit]

Frozen - Anna

[edit]

Frozen - Elsa

[edit]

Fée bleue - Pinocchio

[edit]

Concern is background architectureShakespeareFan00 (talk) 22:00, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Fée Clochette

[edit]

Fée marraine - Cendrillon

[edit]

Alice

[edit]

Block

[edit]

Mary Poppins

[edit]

Merryweather

[edit]

Mary Poppins 2

[edit]

Pinocchio

[edit]

Peter Pan

[edit]

Raiponce

[edit]
All image here listed because of concerns about the sculpted tree left, and flowers front. The costume is reasonably generic. If it's felt that the scuplted elements mimic natural forms then minded to strike ( i.e withdraw these) from the list.

Rapunzel

[edit]

S-T

[edit]
The concern about all 4 Tinkerbell images was the float design, not the costume.

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:41, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I did not include these images in my original deletion request that was mostly fur characters (ones where there was not a human face) because I was unsure if face characters would be allowed with {{Personality rights}} and/or {{Costume}}. Elisfkc (talk) 18:22, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
While recent characters and complex costumes are not OK, many of these files are just Costumes. You should be more selective, otherwise it is a burden for the closing admin. Regards, Yann (talk) 19:15, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
That is noted, where there any groupings you specifically thought could be retained on an initial assesment?Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:42, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
I'm reviewing entries individually as someone pointed out many of these might be too generic. ShakespeareFan00 (talk) 21:28, 22 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Generally more than 15 pictures - especially in different uploader's contributions - are too much to lump together. As Sfan00 has separated sections above, in future, would you split them into smaller subgroups? I am going to close these all as kept and suggest they be renominated as there are simply too many images to go through in a single sitting and do justice to all the images. Also it has been pointed out that "many of these files are just fine," by Yann & ShakespeareFan00. If there are specific ones with specific reasons to delete, please feel free to renominate those few; but please no more giant nominations on widely varying subjects and from different uploaders as here.

Kept: Per comment left in body of discussion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:23, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof provided that this is too simple for copyright in Lithuania. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:25, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:59, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof provided that this is too simple for copyright in Egypt. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:25, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:59, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof is provided that this is below the threshold of originality specifically in Czech Republic. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:39, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:57, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Godfather is copyrighted. No other explanation is provided by the uploader. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:53, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:57, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unknown author Olybrius (talk) 18:17, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:56, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ScienceGator (talk · contribs)

[edit]

If it is an own work and in scope, then a free source for each images should be provided

Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:52, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:56, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by XzRoyale (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Appears to be bulk COM:NETCOPYVIO upload, nominated here instead of speedy due to volume. File:Incomplete Prayers.jpg is here; File:TOKYOPLAYLIST.jpg is here; File:Beyallnight.jpg is here; etc.

Эlcobbola talk 19:02, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:55, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"The author sent it to me via email." is not a proof for copyright transfer and not a proof for free license. OTRS-permission from photographer (not from uploader) is needed. Taivo (talk) 19:21, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:53, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyvios - one is very small with no EXIF - the other states © Sjodin Photography 2015 per EXIF - also possibly out of scope, as this gentleman may not be a notable person lNeverCry 19:52, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:53, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no has autorization for use 191.85.16.8 20:44, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:52, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Luisdeleonmusic (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyright violations - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful - also possible COM:ADVERT depending on whether or not this gentleman is notable

lNeverCry 20:46, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:52, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE - blurry with side door mirror in the way lNeverCry 20:52, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:50, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE - blurry with terrible sun glare lNeverCry 20:53, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:50, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE - sun glare makes this unuasable lNeverCry 20:54, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:50, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

School logo, not "own work" Wcam (talk) 21:50, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:49, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free university logo which includes calligraphy elements that are subject to copyright protection as per COM:TOO China. Wcam (talk) 15:35, 27 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:08, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(Argumentation en français) Gros doute concernant l'utilisateur de Flickr (ce fichier fait partie d'un album de capture d'écran). Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 22:15, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:47, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE/per COM:ADVERT lNeverCry 22:37, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:45, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Kein Interesse 2.247.246.83 22:43, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 02:45, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per source/author - not uploader's own work. Clearly scans, COM:DW, of existing photographs which, given the various ages suggested by visual appearance and the plural "Profesores", are themselves by various authors. Evidence of permission from the original photographers, not the mere scanner, is required.

Эlcobbola talk 22:48, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:44, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jaso Vitakallio (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Bulk COM:NETCOPYVIO upload nominated here instead of speedy due to volume. File:LAIMET chipper.jpg is here; File:Chips Discharge Conveyor.jpg is here; etc.

Эlcobbola talk 22:54, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Why i got to do this? I have licence to use these pictures. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaso Vitakallio (talk • contribs) 23:16, 7 December 2016‎ (UTC)[reply]
When files have been published elsewhere on the internet before being uploaded to Commons, OTRS permission from the copyright holder/s of the image/s is required. lNeverCry 01:33, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:43, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious screenshot, unlikely authorship Discasto talk 23:32, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:41, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyvio - low res, no camera exif, uploaded in batch of copyvios (all other user uploads - see talk/deleted contribs). Quack!

Эlcobbola talk 23:33, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 02:41, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Astvik (talk · contribs) has uploaded a lot of copyright violations. This is his/her last remaining upload, not nominated for deletion, and this makes me ask: Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Taivo (talk) 12:13, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:24, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is clerly not "own work" as claimed. The images may be PD, but without date or useful description we cannot keep them. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:35, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:24, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

posted by mistake, sorry Solpre22 (talk) 13:32, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:23, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Is the Kerbal space program really published under free license? I suspect copyrighted screenshot. Taivo (talk) 13:34, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:23, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not "own work" as claimed. With a 1940 date, it is probably not PD. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:45, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:23, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probable copyvio, see watermark upleft Pippobuono (talk) 14:21, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:22, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality (blurry), orphaned/replaced by better (SVG) version. Leyo 14:31, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:21, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of http://elus-paris.eelv.fr/files/2015/05/najdo.jpeg 90.85.181.209 14:37, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:21, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probable copyvio, see watermarks Pippobuono (talk) 14:48, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:21, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kumasojin 熊襲 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Provides source site didn't specify term of usage for images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:17, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:20, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Design of document is complex enough. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:21, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose The file is only simple text and the Deportivo Cali Logo. Hence copyright is inapplicable in this occasion. This document is the classical example of PD-text.-- Remux - Nunca Olvidaré, que me enamoré de la más hermosa flor. Ĉu mi povas helpi vin iel? 23:38, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose complex? I don't think the same. Is basically text with a simple logo. It is not complex enough. --Sahaquiel - Hast du eine Frage? 03:05, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:20, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:19, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Loacker AG (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.european-food-journal.com/fileadmin/_processed_/5/f/csm_from_the_heart_of_southern_tyrol_loacker_maintains_several_production_facilities_DEFAULT_4_3_5f565aa878.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:27, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:19, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 03:04, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Filho puto (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Song and video clip. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 03:04, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by CarlaCosta (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos and document. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 03:03, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 03:03, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hlavomet (talk · contribs)

[edit]

While these photos may have been taken by the uploader (complete with seal of company on top like a watermark), the products depicted were not created by the photographer thus they cannot license them. These are COM:PACKAGING and promotional, containing derivative works of the packages shown.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:01, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 03:02, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hlavomet (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unlikely to be own work. I verified a couple of the images uploaded by Hlavomet that are not deleted ATM, and the first four or so were copyvios. considering the user has a history of uploading non-free images (see their talk), I think we should delete the remaining files per the precautionary principle.

Martin Urbanec (talk) 08:55, 13 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nom and previous DR Herby talk thyme 10:49, 15 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   03:08, 2 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I see several (C) in the lower right corner and below the legend on this map. I don't think this can be licensed as it is. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:16, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 03:02, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shubert2008 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not "own work": these images are used in en:He Xiangyu as examples of artist He Xiangyu's work.

Wcam (talk) 04:18, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:44, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Gone with the Wind movie advertisement. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:01, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:43, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zilchy111 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

modern artwork, no permission from the artist, see OTRS

Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:27, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This artist is dead and so cant give permission. I am the owner of this piece but not of the copyright . --Didym (talk) 04:43, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the author's own work - note the Canadian government's name and logo in the corner Hchc2009 (talk) 06:49, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:43, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the author's own work - note the Canadian government's name and logo in the corner Hchc2009 (talk) 06:49, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:43, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Geschütztes Kunstwerk im Innenraum, keine Freigabe durch die Urheberin ersichtlich Jbergner (talk) 06:50, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, Ibergner,

es handelt sich um die von mir selbst fotografierte Abbildung auf Seite 64 des von mir 2007 verfassten Buches "Hortense von Gelmini Leben und Werk", für das mit der Künstlerin ein Verlagsvertrag vorliegt, der die Abbildung auch im Internet umfasst. Also: Keine Urheberrechtsverletzung!--Etsord (talk) 16:19, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:42, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Geschützte Kunstwerke im Innenraum, keine Freigabe durch die Urheberin ersichtlich Jbergner (talk) 06:52, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Ibergner, es handelt sich um eine Abbildung auf S. 49 aus dem von mir selbst verfassten Buch: Hortense von Gelmini - Leben und Werk, für das ein Verlagsvertrag mit der Künstlerin vorliegt, der auch die Berechtigung zur Einstellung ins Internet umfasst.--Etsord (talk) 16:17, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:42, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the author's own work - note the Canadian government's name and logo in the corner Hchc2009 (talk) 06:52, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:42, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Geschützte Kunstwerke im Innenraum, keine Freigabe durch die Urheberin ersichtlich Jbergner (talk) 06:53, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, Ibergner,

es handelt sich bei dieser und anderen diskutierten Abbildungen aus der betr. Galerie um Aufnahmen, die ich im Auftrag der Stiftung Libertas per Veritatem, mit Einverständnis der Künstlerin, selbst in der Galerie gemacht habe. Sie werden bereits seit Jahren auf der homepage der Stiftung gezeigt, die mich auch um die Bearbeitung in Wikimedia gebeten hat.--Etsord (talk) 16:13, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:41, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Geschützte Kunstwerke im Innenraum, keine Freigabe durch die Urheberin ersichtlich Jbergner (talk) 06:53, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, Ibergner,

es handelt sich bei dieser und anderen diskutierten Abbildungen aus der betr. Galerie um Aufnahmen, die ich im Auftrag der Stiftung Libertas per Veritatem, mit Einverständnis der Künstlerin, selbst in der Galerie gemacht habe. Sie werden bereits seit Jahren auf der homepage der Stiftung gezeigt, die mich auch um die Bearbeitung in Wikimedia gebeten hat.--Etsord (talk) 16:12, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:41, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Geschützte Kunstwerke im Innenraum, keine Freigabe durch die Urheberin ersichtlich Jbergner (talk) 06:53, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, Ibergner,

es handelt sich bei dieser und anderen diskutierten Abbildungen aus der betr. Galerie um Aufnahmen, die ich im Auftrag der Stiftung Libertas per Veritatem, mit Einverständnis der Künstlerin, selbst in der Galerie gemacht habe. Sie werden bereits seit Jahren auf der homepage der Stiftung gezeigt, die mich auch um die Bearbeitung in Wikimedia gebeten hat.--Etsord (talk) 16:09, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:41, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Geschützte Kunstwerke im Innenraum, keine Freigabe durch die Urheberin ersichtlich Jbergner (talk) 06:54, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, Ibergner,

es handelt sich um die Abbildung auf Seite 49 des von mir verfassten und herausgegebenen Buches "Hortense von Gelmini - Leben und Werk", der Verlagsvertrag mit der Künstlerin umfasst auch Veröffentlichung im Internet. Also: Keine Urheberrechtsverletzung.


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:41, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only used on the French Wikipedia, where the subject's article was deleted as spam and for being non-notable in 2011. Out of project scope. — ξxplicit 07:09, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:39, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in scope. Ks0stm (TCGE) 07:09, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:39, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No own work, copyright violation Tkkrd (talk) 07:44, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • The uploader matches the band, so is very likely to be own work. However, article where is used has been nominated for deletion.  Keep until the DR for the article at the German Wikipedia is closed. --Amitie 10g (talk) 11:33, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
There is no proof, that the user is part of the band. Just because his username is similar to the band, doesn't mean that he is really part of them. --Tkkrd (talk) 07:26, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
German page was deleted because the band aren't notable enough. --Tkkrd (talk) 16:31, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:39, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyrighted image. The copyright holder is "Susanne Hartung". This image should be deleted per COM:PRP unless there is a compelling evidence to suggest that uploader is the same person as "Susanne Hartung". Wikicology (talk) 08:08, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:38, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image of an ad. Needs OTRS ticket Jim1138 (talk) 10:05, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:38, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Depicted person participated in en:Hell's Kitchen (U.S. season 14). In my opinion he is still out of project scope. No article exists about other contestants, not even about the winner. Taivo (talk) 10:09, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:37, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not useful for Wikimedia contents. Thatonewikiguy (talk) 10:27, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:37, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed as PD for "author's life plus 70 years or less", but the author is unknown. (Photo was taken ~70 years ago, so would require the photographer to have died immediately afterwards.) McGeddon (talk) 10:43, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:36, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of com:EDUSE Pippobuono (talk) 10:50, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:36, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope and probably mislicensed and above COM:TOO. XXN, 10:59, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:36, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mislicensed logo. Is original enough, above COM:TOO, can't be in PD. XXN, 11:14, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:35, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work. XXN, 11:16, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:35, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Elisardojm as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: copyright logo of Nestea. Regular deletion request is created, because the file is heavily used and has been in Commons for 8 years, but actually I support deletion. Taivo (talk) 11:37, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:33, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you describe and categorize the file correctly? Taivo (talk) 11:53, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:33, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright issue. Uploader is definitly not the creator of this image. It is a crop of a parody image that actually depicts a penis. /人 ‿‿ 人\ 署名の宣言 01:35, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:46, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio per Commons:When_to_use_the_PD-Art_tag#Photograph_of_an_old_coin_found_on_the_Internet Brianann MacAmhlaidh (talk) 01:42, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:46, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably of of scope, can't see how it would be useful Imedeiros (talk) 02:01, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:45, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free; see COM:COA. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:40, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 04:45, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© Gretel Herrera. Con la tecnología de Blogger. Jos1950 (talk) 00:08, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And this © Gretel Herrera. I have seen the picture somewhere else and with better quality, but also ©. --Jos1950 (talk) 17:15, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, I can use that the next opportunity. --Jos1950 (talk) 19:05, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per Amitie 10g: PD image (BTW, I uploaded a better resolution version). Ruthven (msg) 09:45, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Third party logo, sourced to http://www.cscec.com.cn/ at English Wikipedia, The next question would be if it's above TOO Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:42, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Isn't this file in the public domain ? It consists on text and a simple shape. I suggest to change the license instead. — Sincerely Issimo 15 21:12, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:11, 17 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:TOO#China (PRC). Even text is copyrightable. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:26, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: it is not a calligraphy, so it doesn't fall under Copyright Law of the PR China:. Ruthven (msg) 09:49, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not necessary Frze > talk 08:34, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:53, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Almost the same as this one. Should be deleted per COM:Redundant. Mhhossein talk 10:29, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as per Tm. Ruthven (msg) 09:55, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily Stinglehammer (talk) 22:55, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9   15:31, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Almost the same as this one. Should be deleted per COM:Redundant. Mhhossein talk 10:31, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I can't figure out why we might need both of the two closely similar images. --Mhhossein talk 11:07, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sportler des Jahres Österreich 2016 Eva-Maria Brem Marcel Hirscher Bernhard Maier 2.jpg. Tm (talk) 00:23, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: as per Tm. Ruthven (msg) 09:56, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleting similar pic out of courtesy to people in the pic - so as not to have too many released unnecessarily Stinglehammer (talk) 22:55, 30 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: courtesy deletion of recent upload. P 1 9 9   15:31, 6 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ce logo est une marque déposée soumise au droit d'auteur. This logo is a registered trademark subject to copyright like this one : https://fr.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fichier:Logo-AFD.jpg Turlin.frederic (talk) 13:25, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 09:57, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Agamitsudo as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Murals are subject to copyright. No FoP in France. Yann (talk) 09:59, 30 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Les peintures murales sont soumises aux droits d'auteur si elles existent encore. Or dans ce cas, la maison n'existe plus, elle a été démolie en 2007. Elle était située rue Victor-Lastella à Grenoble.

Milky (talk) 15:00, 4 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Image of mural on demolished building, per Archaeodontosaurus. Ellin Beltz (talk) 01:07, 14 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False reason for Kept : destruction of artwork doesn't extinguished author right (example : Ephemeral art) Loreleil (talk) 14:00, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Same comment here : @Archaeodontosaurus: I've never heard of such extinguishement of copyright. If it's confirmed, it would change a lot the deletion requests. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 09:31, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep By erasing you destroy it a second time. Conscience is above the laws. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:51, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

there is no such a thing as conscience in copyright ! Loreleil (talk) 10:23, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The idea that destruction of the original 'extinguishes' the copyright seems completely novel. I'd be quite interested in seeing some evidence for that (like any law, or court decision, that says so). Reventtalk 16:31, 10 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination: there is no FOP in France, see COM:GRAFFITI. Ruthven (msg) 10:00, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

source et auteur douteux. Ce portrait de Michelle Sapori ne semble pas avoir été pris par Michelle Sapori elle-même, qui ne peut donc en détenir les droits Jebulon (talk) 17:27, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. OTRS ticket is needed. Ruthven (msg) 10:03, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof provided that this is too simple for copyright in Slovakia. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:21, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Without a section for that country in Commons:Threshold of originality I fail to see a significant doubt in case of that rather simple shape. --Leyo 21:04, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: simple design. Ruthven (msg) 10:05, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Work by state, not US government. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:58, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 10:55, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP#Japan. Statue of Hachikō was created by Takeshi Ando (ja:安藤士). He is alive. Ralth Galth (talk) 08:20, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Since 1948 「忠犬ハチ公」の彫像を広告に使っても問題ないか? - JARO 日本広告審査機構 [4]
著作権上の保護期間(50年)が既に経過していると思われるため、撮影した写真を使用することは著作権法上問題になることはないと思われる。 --Benzoyl (talk) 08:29, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
その解説ページは起算日を誤っており無効なものでしょう。正しくは「没後から50年」ですから、存命の著作者による著作物の著作権が存続していることは明らかです。もし、職務著作物だと主張された場合(この解釈においてはJAROの見解は正しいです)でも、アメリカの著作権では職務著作物を公開から95年間保護する(2016年現在、70年すら経過していない)と定めているため、(アメリカの著作権法が適用される)コモンズでの維持は不可能です。The web page that Benzoyl provided has error in reckoning date, so it seems to be invalid. Correctly, duration of copyright is reckoned from 50 years from “author's death”(wikisource), so work that the author is alive is, obviously, copyrighted in Japan.--Kkairri (talk) 11:55, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Sculptor must consent to the license via OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 10:56, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP#Japan. Statue of Hachikō was created by Takeshi Ando (ja:安藤士). He is alive. Ralth Galth (talk) 08:20, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 10:56, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP#Japan. Statue of Hachikō was created by Takeshi Ando (ja:安藤士). He is alive. Ralth Galth (talk) 08:21, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 10:56, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:FOP#Japan. Statue of Hachikō was created by Takeshi Ando (ja:安藤士). He is alive. Ralth Galth (talk) 08:22, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 10:56, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 23:54, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I am the uploader. I am very careful about no FOP in France. In all these images (except perhaps File:Rhododendrons in the park of the hotels of Disneyland Paris 03.jpg), the building is not the main object of the photo. The main object is a plant, a tree or a lake. The building is never in the name of the file. So, these images doesn't violate COM:FOP#France. They are Commons:De minimis case. --Tangopaso (talk) 09:04, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Tangopaso: if that is the case, please add the De minimis template to these pictures. Elisfkc (talk) 16:23, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Elisfkc: If you take a look to the picture, you will see that there is already such a template : Template:noFoP-France, formerly Template:FoP-France. It is more appropriate because typical of the problem in France. I put it on the photos where there is a problem. But for photos like File:Bald cypress in the park of the hotels of Disneyland Paris.jpg and File:Park of the hotels of Disneyland Paris 1.jpg, the building is quite invisible ! --Tangopaso (talk) 17:08, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Are kept the ones where de minimis is applicable. Ruthven (msg) 10:16, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As per Commons:Freedom_of_panorama#Japan, photographs of artwork located outdoors in Japan are not free enough to be used on Commons. -- DAJF (talk) 03:40, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:03, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrongly licensed. See COM:COA. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:40, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: "o be used freely with any company-associated matters" is not a free license. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:04, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://www.mod.go.jp/gsdf/about/emblem/ faso (talk) 04:02, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The OTRS pending label was added by the uploader at the time of the upload. There is no recent OTRS ticket with "JGSDF" or "Japan Ground" in it. Since the license must come from the JGSDF, I doubt that it will be quick, if at all. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:10, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:FOP#United States. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:20, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Kept: 1973 work. According to SIRIS there is no inscription and, therefore, no notice. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:13, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

bad distribution map; i made good file https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mantella_aurantiaca_map.jpg OJJ (talk) 05:31, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:35, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. I did a search and found the image at http://www.metmuseum.org/art/collection/search/548577. The original of this reproduction is certainly out of copyright; I seek consensus that the 1930 research painting did not create a new copyright at that time. Ellin Beltz (talk) 05:59, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The picture is the reproduction of an image in a tomb in Egypt. Acdallago (talk) 11:43, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Although we use Bridgeman as our standard for photographs of 2D art that is out of copyright, it is important to remember that in most countries even a photograph of a PD 2D work has its own copyright. There is no case law anywhere that supports the theory that a painting reproducing a PD work does not itself have a copyright. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:38, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:TOO#United Kingdom. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:25, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:45, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:TOO#Chile. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:29, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:45, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof this is below the threshold of originality in Egypt. See COM:TOO. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:11, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:45, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I don't believe this is too simple for copyright. See COM:TOO#United States. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:49, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: I'm sorry but I am with Magog on this one. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:46, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Eigenes Werk" als Urheberrechtshinweis? Wohl kaum Jbergner (talk) 06:59, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, Ibergner,

auch diese Fotografie, die auf Kosten des Abgebildeten erstellt wurde, ist von mir technisch bearbeitet und gehört zu meinem Erbe. Also: Keine Urheberrechtsverletzung!--Etsord (talk) 16:20, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The photo is clearly PD, not CC, but we do not keep PDFs of photographs. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:47, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Eigenes Werk" als Urheberrechtshinweis (1925)? Wohl kaum Jbergner (talk) 07:00, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, Ibergner,

es handelt sich um meine Bearbeitung eines Fotoabzugs von einer Aufnahme auf Kosten des Abgebildeten, dessen Nachlass in meinem Besitz ist. Also: keine Urheberrechtsverletzung!--Etsord (talk) 16:21, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The copyiright belongs to the heirs of the photographer -- owning a photograph does not give you the right to freely license it. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:49, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Eigenes Werk" als Urheberrechtshinweis (1913)? Wohl kaum Jbergner (talk) 07:01, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Ibergner,

diese Datei ist eine Bearbeitung aus einer schon 1913 veröffentlichten Serie von Kunstpostkarten und stammt aus dem Nachlass des Auftraggebers, den ich geerbt habe. Also: Keine Urheberrechtsverletzung!--Etsord (talk) 16:22, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The copyiright belongs to the heirs of the photographer -- owning a photograph does not give you the right to freely license it. Also, the editing makes it unusable. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:50, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Eigenes Werk" als Urheberrechtshinweis? Wohl kaum Jbergner (talk) 07:01, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo, Ibergner,

auch diese Originalaufnahme, die von einem Fotostudio im Auftrag der Abgebildeten erstellt wurde, gehört zu meinem Erbe und wurde von mir technisch bearbeitet. Also: Keine Urheberrechtsverletzung!--Etsord (talk) 16:23, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The copyiright belongs to the heirs of the photographer -- owning a photograph does not give you the right to freely license it. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:51, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Eigenes Werk" als Urheberrechtshinweis? Wohl kaum Jbergner (talk) 07:01, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hallo Ibergner, diese Originalaufnahme des Abgebildeten, die auf seine Kosten von einem Fotostudio erstellt wurde, ist mein Erbe und wurde von mir selbst bearbeitet. Also: Keine Urheberrechtsverletzung!--Etsord (talk) 16:24, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The copyiright belongs to the heirs of the photographer -- owning a photograph does not give you the right to freely license it. Also, we do not keep PDFs of photographs. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:51, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Eigenes Werk" als Urheberrechtshinweis (1920)? Wohl kaum Jbergner (talk) 07:05, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Es handelt sich um meine eigene Bearbeitung einer Originalaufnahme aus dem in meinem Eigentum stehenden Erbe des Abgebildten, die er in einem Fotostudio auf seine Kosten erstellen ließ. Also: Keine Urheberrechtsverletzung!--Etsord (talk) 16:24, 13 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The copyiright belongs to the heirs of the photographer -- owning a photograph does not give you the right to freely license it. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:52, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Though this drawing is seemingly done by the uploader, but there is no historical evidence that this is a legit portrait, thus I would say this drawing is fan-made and shouldn't be regarded as the valid image for the Crown Prince Sado. George6VI (talk) 08:49, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment probably not authored by the uploader. A Google Image search shows this is a simple color modification of another image that has previously been uploaded elsewhere (e.g. unknown date, 2014, and the same base image with a watermark in 2010). It may be PD, but all relevant pages seem to be in Korean, and I cannot tell, even with the help of Google Translate. @-revi: do you have an opinion? Storkk (talk) 11:07, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think this image is under PD,  Delete. — regards, Revi 11:16, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:52, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful own work claim given uploader's history of copyright violations. Storkk (talk) 10:19, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:53, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:Stamps#Austria, Austrian stamps are not free enough for Commons. This stamp is from 1975, and the design is not likely to be PD. Storkk (talk) 12:43, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:46, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image taken from misenlaceseducativos.blogspot.fr, where there is no specificed license, so we should assumed that the image is copyrighted. Ruthven (msg) 12:53, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:46, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Bad JPG}}, orphaned/probably replaced by better version. Leyo 14:27, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:46, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Bad JPG}}, orphaned/probably replaced by better version. Leyo 14:27, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:46, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Bad JPG}}, orphaned/probably replaced by better version. Leyo 14:28, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:47, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{Bad JPG}}, orphaned/probably replaced by better version. Leyo 14:29, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:47, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:47, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The original picture was taken on Thursday, April 16th 2015 with a Canon OES 60D camera in Turin, Italy at around 9 PM. The original file size is 7,2 MB and the original resolution is 3456x5184 px: the file which was uploaded to wikimedia commons is a snippet cut from this image. Culpafelix 19:40, 7 December 2016


Deleted: The image has various words drawn on top of it. If you actually have the original image, please upload a clean version using this file name. If you can't do that, we will conclude that this image came from somewhere else. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:57, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is a somewhat better version at File:Buies - La Province de Québec, 1900, illust 02.png. Not likely to be used. -- Asclepias (talk) 15:44, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:48, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Smaller size duplicate of File:Fleure rose plus belle.jpg, perhaps test upload? Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:10, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:48, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I didn't find this license at source given. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:17, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Not PD. Regional gov that didn't release their logo. --Natuur12 (talk) 15:52, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Quarth (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Per Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard#.232009051410061605_.28File:Radmor5100.png.29, these were all uploaded with an OTRS ticket, however it appears that ticket is deficient.

Storkk (talk) 17:20, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:06, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof provided that this is too simple for copyright in Estonia. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:25, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:06, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof provided that this is too simple for copyright in Peru. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:26, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:06, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof is provided that this is below the threshold of originality specifically in Latvia. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:38, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:07, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:TOO#Common law countries Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:40, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:23, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [5]. Yann (talk) 18:36, 25 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof is provided that this is below the threshold of originality specifically in Russia.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:40, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep This image only consists of simple geometric shapes or text. It does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection,This work includes material that may be protected as a trademark in some jurisdictions. Delete repeat logos .--EEIM (talk) 21:54, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per Magog. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:24, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No proof is provided that this is below the threshold of originality specifically in Russia. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:42, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 16:24, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mandovi1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on any of these files, three of which are described as composites. No metadata, the bell picture was obviously cut out of a background as was the statue which appears in three other images.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:43, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above files were created by me.  I took the picture of the statue in Goa in  April 2013  and  the picture of the bell  and in Colombo Sri Lanka last month ( Oct 2016). I cut the background from  the bell picture because the back ground picture had captured the images of other items in the church, not related to the bell story.  Mandovi 1
BELL THAT HUNG IN THE CHURCH OF OUR LADY OF MIRACLES JAFFNA 1648-1658

Secondly in regard to the comment there is no Metadata, please click on the link. I have cut and pasted This file contains additional information such as Exif metadata which may have been added by the digital camera, scanner, or software program used to create or digitize it. If the file has been modified from its original state, some details such as the timestamp may not fully reflect those of the original file. The timestamp is only as accurate as the clock in the camera, and it may be completely wrong. Short title Print Date metadata was last modified 12:30, 18 November 2016 File change date and time 22:30, 18 November 2016 Date and time of digitizing 12:30, 18 November 2016 Software used Adobe Illustrator CS6 (Windows) Unique ID of original document uuid:5D20892493BFDB11914A8590D31508C8 Hide extended details

 The same camera ( canon power shot A560) was used by me to the the picture of the statue on April 5, 2013 inside the church, situated along the MANDOVI   river  in Goa. India. see below

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Statue_of_Our_Lady_of_Miracles_Jaffna.jpg

I created the above two art work( Easter morning 1622 and the town of Jaffna during Portuguese rule) using this picture of the statue taken by me- to illustrate those two events associated with the statue. I merged the photo of the moon( https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:The_Moon_of_July_13_2014_Toronto_Canada.jpg ) taken by me using Canon Powershot A560 on July 13 2014 with the statue photo I took using same camera to create the artwork


I therefore request the withdrawal of the nomination to delete my creative and original work


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:00, 25 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mandovi1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused montages, out of scope.

Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 20:49, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Srittau: Hello, I am a bit confused here with Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Mandovi1. Why is this nomination here? -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 20:54, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
That was explained in the UnDR. The deletion turned out to be based on the wrong reasons, those are not copyright violations. The scope issues were never discussed. This DR gives us a chance to do this properly. It didn't help that the UnDR discussion was really hard to follow. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 21:13, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That is fine, I included a gallery above for convenience. -- とある白い猫 ちぃ? 18:03, 10 December 2016 (UTC)

Deleted: The first is out of scope because it has a caption in English and because it is out of context. The original image is a good addition to Commons. The second is a combination of two PD objects. Such creations are out of scope. The last two are PDFs. Commons does not keep PDF images. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:21, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jameslwoodward: The images are not deleted yet. (Also, the original photo for the first image is already on Commons, see the image in the DR above.) Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 18:42, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I was distracted. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:39, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: the facade of the house that is the subject of the image was designed by M. Fabiani (d. 1962). Eleassar (t/p) 20:50, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:21, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately there is no freedom of panorama for modern monuments in Russia. The file has been transferred to Russian Wikivoyage where it is in use. Ymblanter (talk) 21:12, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:21, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"I have the artist's permission." Let's see it. Palnatoke (talk) 23:27, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Sent: 2. december 2016 11:06 To: Uffe Gram Wilken Subject: RE: Painting of Eske Willerslev...

Dear Uffe

I would be honoured and delighted for Eske to use the image.

Best wishes

Enrico

Enrico Coen John Innes Centre Colney Lane Norwich NR4 7UH

tel: (censored) fax: (censored) homepage http://rico-coen.jic.ac.uk/index.php/Main_Page

From: Uffe Gram Wilken [6] Sent: 02 December 2016 08:59 To: enrico coen (JIC) <(censored)> Subject: Painting of Eske Willerslev...

Dear Enrico Coen,

On behalf of Professor Eske Willerslev I would like to know if it is ok to use your painting of Willerslev (attached) on his Wikipedia page? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.225.98.210 (talk • contribs)

Thanks. Did you also get permission to publish the image under the relevant license? --Palnatoke (talk) 15:08, 9 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
what you have to do, is to forward this mail thread to COM:OTRS permissions address, with an acceptable license. --Ruthven (msg) 10:13, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Actually, the artist himself must send a free license to OTRS. We do not generally accept forwarded messages because it is too easy to forge them. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:23, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by VEO15

[edit]

Although the YouTube license is OK, the video the images have been extracted from seems to come from dartfreakz.nl, and not by the person that uploaded the video to his channel:

Discasto talk 10:43, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Keep: YouTube user is journalist Pieter Verbeek for dartfreakz.nl with his name during the interviews at 10 seconds in the first video and 3 seconds in the second. The YoutTube about section connects to his Twitter and WordPress and videos can be seen and linked back to his various sites. That YouTube account also has its videos embedded on dartfreakz.nl as seen here with the YouTube id aUZGs95MYVs at the bottom of the article. 80.235.147.186 06:17, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Pieter Verbeek of those videos has a website at [7], which links to a different YouTube channel. Potential YouTube-washing. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:26, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

com:PENIS, only contribution of the uploader to vandalize es:Martín Liberman Pippobuono (talk) 10:46, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is one of the very few photo's of red male pubic hair. I do not think this should be deleted. Alice2Alice (talk) 15:16, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: vandalism image. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:29, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Blurry and unused; any possible use is replaced by File:Inbound Red Line platform and train at Porter.JPG Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:04, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:31, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2009 (!) panoramio streams of imho rather poor quality, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:06, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:31, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

random mass-upload of 2009 (!) panoramio streams of imho rather poor quality, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons - your opinions ? Roland zh (talk) 19:07, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:31, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obsolete, replaced with WikiMiniAtlas. E rulez (talk) 19:59, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:31, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France and/or copyrighted character

Elisfkc (talk) 21:33, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, kept one that does show only internal machinery. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:33, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Reichstag (dome) - Exterior Elisfkc (talk) 21:34, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:34, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 21:35, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:34, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted character Elisfkc (talk) 21:43, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:35, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no FoP in the UAE lNeverCry 22:27, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:37, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France Elisfkc (talk) 23:24, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:38, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted characters Elisfkc (talk) 23:25, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:38, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative works

Discasto talk 23:33, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The London at night image was uploaded several times, one time it had overprinting and was a book cover. "Español: Tapa de un libro del escritor y abogado uruguayo Gabriel Pombo ; el diseño gráfico de esta portada fue realizado por el ilustrador y portadista Alejandro Colucci." Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:31, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:39, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 23:42, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I am the uploader of File:Sequoia Lodge.jpg. There was already a DR about this file on september 22th 2010, a discussion and the decision was kept. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Sequoia Lodge.jpg. Please, dear Elisfkc, before creating the DR of a photo, give a look to the discussion page of the photo. You will see if there was not already a DR. --Tangopaso (talk) 09:17, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Tangopaso: my apologies, when I was nominating files, I did not see the previous deletion requests on any of the images that I nominated. That is my mistake. Elisfkc (talk) 16:17, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, concerning the third image: there were several other DRs for similar cases that eventually resulted in a deletion. In this case the whole resort (including the lake, the fence in the foreground etc.) is potentially copyrighted. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:46, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 23:42, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:47, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 23:45, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:46, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 18:21, 11 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 14:33, 29 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 18:42, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. ƏXPLICIT 10:49, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 17:35, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 17:49, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 15:21, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 22:43, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 01:49, 27 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: for some images DM applies or nothing copyrighted is depicted at al, but these all all unused and IMO unusable, so out of scope. --Krd 04:34, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 23:45, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:47, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 23:47, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:47, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France Elisfkc (talk) 23:48, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:47, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 23:49, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:48, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 23:50, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:49, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 22:57, 26 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 03:11, 2 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France Elisfkc (talk) 23:51, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:50, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France and/or copyrighted characters/dolls

Elisfkc (talk) 21:37, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:23, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 17:37, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:54, 27 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no COM:EDUSE - strangely edited photo of I don't know what lNeverCry 21:57, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This looks like a 360 panorama of a roof top with a dome on top. As such I can maybe, possibly see some educational use. Third opinion welcome. Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 19:37, 14 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: indeed a 360 pano, I added the viewer link in the file page. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:18, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 23:25, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Kept one -- no copyright on cars.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:08, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 17:40, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 21:02, 26 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 23:40, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:05, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 17:36, 23 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Ruthven (msg) 13:02, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 18:54, 18 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:08, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 21:34, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Buildings are copyrighted. In some parts of the world, there are exceptions in copyright law for items visible from public places. These exceptions are called Freedom of Panorama. France has no such exceptions, and thus photos of architectural works in France are encumbered by the copyrights of the underlying works and can only be hosted here if the underlying architecture has fallen into the public domain or has been licensed freely itself. --Storkk (talk) 09:42, 5 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 23:46, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Alvesgaspar: the buildings/facades in the background constitute architectural pieces. Elisfkc (talk) 22:33, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment I don't think so, for three reasons: First: not all buildings are subject to FOP restrictions, only those with a creative or artistic component, which is obviously not the case. If those restrictions applied to all buildings in France no photos showing them would be allowed, even partially or as background,, which is ridiculaous; second, the subjects of most of these pictures are not the buildings: thus the principle de minimis applies; third, most of the buildings shown are most probably not real houses but part of a scenery. I would advise to remove this nomination. Alvesgaspar (talk) 23:26, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Alvesgaspar: I strongly disagree with you on all aspects of this argument, except the final. These facades were designed by someone to give the look of a Mediterranean village. This means that these are someone's artistic work. Second, most of the images have the facades either as the main focus or as a large part of the image, making them fail de minimis. Finally, I do agree with you that most of the buildings are of facades or scenery. However, this further proves my point, because they are then considered a work of art, which is most definitely not allowed. Elisfkc (talk) 01:01, 12 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Whether these are actual building or stage sets, they are copyrighted. There is no evidence that architecture has a ToO. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:02, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 23:18, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyrighted architecture & sculpture. Per nomination, France has no freedom of panorama. --Storkk (talk) 17:43, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 23:19, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyrighted architecture and scuplture. As mentioned by the nominator, France has no Commons-compatible Freedom of Panorama exemption. --Storkk (talk) 17:45, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 16:08, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I don't think there is a copyright on the train. Regards, Yann (talk) 16:41, 31 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Yann. Ruthven (msg) 16:35, 25 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 18:39, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete all. Images infringe the copyright of the architects and artists who created or designed the individual components of this French theme park, including the Big Thunder Mountain. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 13:57, 15 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 11:05, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 18:04, 6 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 15:23, 13 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 22:17, 22 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Min☠︎rax«¦talk¦» 01:09, 31 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 23:21, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyrighted architecture and scuplture. As mentioned by the nominator, France has no Commons-compatible Freedom of Panorama exemption. --Storkk (talk) 17:52, 15 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 01:49, 21 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination; recent buildings. --Arthur Crbz (talk) 17:55, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 23:53, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep I am the uploader of File:Fort Apache in EuroDisney.jpg. There was already a DR about this file on june 24th 2015, a discussion and the decision was kept (under threshold of originality). See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Fort Apache in EuroDisney.jpg. Please, once again, dear Elisfkc, before creating the DR of a photo, give a look to the discussion page of the photo. You will see if there was not already a DR. --Tangopaso (talk) 09:22, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Tangopaso: my apologies, when I was nominating files, I did not see the previous deletion requests on any of the images that I nominated. That is my mistake. Elisfkc (talk) 16:17, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment After checking, there were DRs on june 24th 2015, a discussion and a final decision kept for the three photos. --Tangopaso (talk) 17:16, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Nominator withdrawing nomination Elisfkc (talk) 21:35, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Lutheraner as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Es handelt sich hier um die Abbildung eines Kunstwerks des tunesischen Künstlers Brahim Konstantini, bei welchem sicher die Schutzfristen noch nicht abegelaufen sind, daher kein ""eigenes Werk" Yann (talk) 18:58, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ich heiße Skander Konstantini und bin der Sohn des Künstlers Brahim Konstantini und habe sein Einverständnis, seine Werke zu veröffentlichen." User:skander69 21:16, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Skander69: FYI, you didn't notify the uploader. Regards, Yann (talk) 09:21, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Yann: Sorry, I need your help. I´m the uploader, I´m the picture owner and my father is the Artist. How can I make sure the picture will not be deleted. Regards, User:skander69 22:48, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Skander69: Could you please ask your father to send a permission with the procedure at COM:OTRS/de (in German). Thanks, Yann (talk) 21:57, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: waiting for OTRS permission. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:56, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidence that these photos would be free for Commons. The FOP in Slovenia does not allow for commercial reproductions. Some photos are out of scope (photos of friends) or otherwise unusable.

Full list of files
* File:2009 Ljubljana (131) (3896767029).jpg

Eleassar (t/p) 10:43, 18 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: INeverCry 18:59, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: unfree architecture (work by J. Plečnik, d. 1957).

Eleassar (t/p) 20:29, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: the bridge photos kept a photo of Roman ruins. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:58, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As per COM:FOP#Slovenia: non-free architectural and sculptural works in Ljubljana.

TadejM (t/p) 02:40, 25 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 05:18, 1 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: the Central Market in the background is an important component of the image's composition. Eleassar (t/p) 20:32, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 00:59, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

English Wikipedia's equivalent of this attributes "Hubert Croes.", and has this logo as non-free, However it looks very simple... Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:15, 3 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: simple. --INeverCry 00:42, 10 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dutch law has a low threshold of originality; Aruban law is based on Dutch law, and as such this is likely to be non-free. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 17:28, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 12:18, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Professional logo, bad license. No proof provided that this is too simple for copyright in Russia. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:25, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: PD-textlogo. --Yann (talk) 12:19, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France

Elisfkc (talk) 23:23, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Most of these are not original enough to get a copyright. Machines and vehicles (i.e. boats) design are no copyright. --Yann (talk) 12:23, 16 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source, unknown copyright situation. May by a DW with still a copyright holder alive. Jcb (talk) 23:40, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Sebari – aka Srittau (talk) 09:24, 17 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Worldwide, official work copyright exemptions generally do not apply to universities. Absent a text proving otherwise, we should treat these as copyrighted.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:25, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep these:

Reason: These institutions are state universities. This work is not an object of copyright according to the law of Azerbaijan Republic No.: 115-1Q of 5 June 1996 on Copyright and Neighbouring right; this image is in the Public domain worldwide.

Article 7. Works Which are not Objects of Copyright
The following are not subjects of copyright:
b) State emblems and official signs (flags, armorial bearings, decorations, monetary signs and other State symbols and official signs) --►Cekli829 17:29, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 02:13, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:TOO#United Kingdom. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 20:19, 7 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, although this may be borderline. --Jcb (talk) 02:10, 23 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]