Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/09/05

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive September 5th, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:12, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 11:20, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free OpenBSD logo depicted, possibly others. Very unlikely to be public domain. Derivative works are not allowed. (Re: Licensing OpenBSD artwork as CC-BY-SA?) 80.221.159.67 03:13, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 I withdraw my nomination  Comment I forgot I should have used a speedy delete template instead. 80.221.159.67 03:14, 5 September 2016 (UTC) (edited: 03:17, 5 September 2016 (UTC))[reply]


Deleted: OpenBSD logo is {{PD-textlogo}} so it's fine. The wallpaper however is probably non-free. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:11, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion crap uploaded by sock puppet of User:Alex9777777.

jdx Re: 09:32, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

See also Commons:Deletion requests/Creator:Aleksej Pechkurov. --jdx Re: 09:37, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 11:38, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion crap created by sock puppet of User:Alex9777777. See also Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Иван Сафранов. jdx Re: 09:33, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --A.Savin 11:38, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

www.glenedwards 208.131.186.37 10:33, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, vandalistic domination. Taivo (talk) 10:35, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per the notice on Category:Lucio Fontana, there's no reason to think the artwork is in the public domain. --ghouston (talk) 09:11, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: Uploader requested deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 13:20, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

http://mulpix.com/post/1165899836992362909.html BrightRaven (talk) 13:45, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Done by nominator himself. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 14:16, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jameswalter414 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional content, out of project scope

Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:49, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: blatant spam/possible copyvios. --INeverCry 20:32, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional content, out of project scope Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:56, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: spam from spambot. --INeverCry 20:27, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional content, out of project scope Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:59, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: spam uploaded by sockpuppet. --INeverCry 20:30, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of Sibiu Jazz Festival 1978 Octav Vladu (talk) 20:20, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request on same day of upload. --INeverCry 22:37, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It was a mistake OC Comics (talk) 14:34, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:11, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Nizil Shah (talk) 22:29, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by INeverCry: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ericwashermaster (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional content, out of project scope

Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:39, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: blatant spam - no need to keep this around for a week. --INeverCry 04:57, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Takemoriconsulting (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional content, out of project scope

Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:40, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: blatant spam - no need to keep this around for a week. --INeverCry 04:58, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Goldpriceau (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional descriptions and file names, out of project scope

Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:41, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: blatant spam - no need to keep this around for a week. --INeverCry 04:59, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Goldpriceuk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional descriptions and file names, out of project scope

Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:42, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: blatant spam - no need to keep this around for a week. --INeverCry 04:59, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Thekalagram (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional content, out of project scope

Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:44, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: blatant spam - no need to keep this around for a week. --INeverCry 04:59, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Deepak521 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional content, out of project scope

Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:45, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: blatant spam - no need to keep this around for a week. --INeverCry 05:01, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional content, out of project scope Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:45, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: blatant spam - no need to keep this around for a week. --INeverCry 05:02, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional content, out of project scope Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:45, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: blatant spam - no need to keep this around for a week. --INeverCry 05:03, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional content, out of project scope Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:47, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: blatant spam - no need to keep this around for a week. --INeverCry 05:04, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JamesReader (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional content, out of project scope

Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:48, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: blatant spam - no need to keep this around for a week. --INeverCry 05:05, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional content, out of project scope Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:50, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: blatant spam - no need to keep this around for a week. --INeverCry 05:07, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Prjewel77 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional content, out of project scope

Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:50, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: blatant spam - no need to keep this around for a week. --INeverCry 05:07, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Serenitymade (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional content, out of project scope

Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:50, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: blatant spam - no need to keep this around for a week. --INeverCry 05:08, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Merchantadvisors (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional content, out of project scope

Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:52, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: blatant spam - no need to keep this around for a week. --INeverCry 05:10, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional content, out of project scope Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:52, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: blatant spam - no need to keep this around for a week. --INeverCry 05:11, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Preezieaus (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional content, out of project scope

Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:53, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: blatant spam - no need to keep this around for a week. --INeverCry 05:12, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional content, out of project scope Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:53, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: blatant spam - no need to keep this around for a week. --INeverCry 05:14, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional content, out of project scope, possible copyvio Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:55, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: blatant spam - no need to keep this around for a week. --INeverCry 05:14, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional content, out of project scope Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:56, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: blatant spam - no need to keep this around for a week. --INeverCry 05:14, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Merchantadvisors1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional content, out of project scope

Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:57, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: blatant spam - no need to keep this around for a week. --INeverCry 05:16, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional content, out of project scope Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:58, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: blatant spam - no need to keep this around for a week. --INeverCry 05:16, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional content, out of project scope Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:58, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: blatant spam - no need to keep this around for a week. --INeverCry 05:17, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Verveniru (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional content, out of project scope

Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:59, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: blatant spam - no need to keep this around for a week. --INeverCry 05:18, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Figmentdesign (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional content, out of project scope

Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:00, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: blatant spam - no need to keep this around for a week. --INeverCry 05:19, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional content, out of project scope Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:00, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: blatant spam - no need to keep this around for a week. --INeverCry 05:19, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Myriadsolutionz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional content, out of project scope

Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:01, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: blatant spam - no need to keep this around for a week. --INeverCry 05:21, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional content, out of project scope Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:01, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: blatant spam - no need to keep this around for a week. --INeverCry 05:21, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gorrettamari31 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional content, out of project scope

Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:01, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: blatant spam - no need to keep this around for a week. --INeverCry 05:21, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Sunmist (talk) 09:05, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: name can be seen as offensive. --INeverCry 05:23, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is the uploader's last remaining contribution, no metadata, uploaded into Commons in June, but into Reddit 4 months ago: https://www.reddit.com/r/Anna_Faith/comments/4h21rc/red_anna/ I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:52, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 05:25, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 12:27, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 05:25, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Wikifido (talk) 12:50, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 05:26, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader is not the creator Tekstman (talk) 14:19, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

i don't exactly know how to comment here but i can say that the photograph is made during an internship at mediamatic foundation by arden de raay. i work for mediamatic too. the image has a CC license on our own website (mediamatic.net) and can be used without further worries. Willem Velthoven

The image can be found at http://www.mediamatic.net/149796/en/rih-peter-post. There is no license on that page. Your page http://www.mediamatic.net/30555/en/faq-frequently-asked-questions#1217880448-11 says different images can have different licenses. With no license shown for the image, I see no valid reason to keep. Ronhjones  (Talk) 16:36, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


ah yo are right! i've corrected the omission on our site and will start the correction process for all images that we made for that exhibition. thank you for pointing this out! Willem Velthoven (talk) 23:38, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 05:27, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted Kintetsubuffalo (talk) 14:30, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 05:28, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Johnathan6666669 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Nonsense upload, see file name and description. Already used to vandalize in en:Woking High School. Not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 14:59, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Image deleted and uploader blocked for cross-wiki vandalism. --INeverCry 05:35, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Austin.leapman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Block evasion by User:Alex9777777 (per [1]) - no use to the project to have the basic text logo of a non-notable blog.

McGeddon (talk) 20:50, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: LTA sock uploads. --INeverCry 05:49, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:41, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:09, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ipandayking0913 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 01:05, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:40, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 01:15, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:42, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 01:16, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:44, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing EXIF, not own work. kovox90      01:17, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I confirm "© All rights reserved". License review failed. Taivo (talk) 11:46, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File uploaded again by the user. kovox90      22:53, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:17, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 01:20, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:49, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kittykat6354 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 01:21, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, too bad quality. Taivo (talk) 11:51, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 01:22, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:56, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Krjitu2512 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 01:24, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:57, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Category:கவிஞர் அ. மருதகாசி existing Info-farmer (talk) 01:34, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:00, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by ALFAJR NEBIN (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 01:41, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:03, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Plain commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 15:51, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 07:05, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 01:44, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:08, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 01:49, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:10, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 01:55, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:11, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:08, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:12, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

voy a sustituirlo Jmarvelo (talk) 03:45, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 12:22, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no la usare Jmarvelo (talk) 05:12, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 12:23, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

хочу перезалить другой формат (PNG) Oles96 (talk) 05:45, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 12:26, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Trzensiok123 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal image : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:10, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 06:38, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is not encyclopedic. It is only a poster for a concert, for a probably not encyclopedic musician. Possibly a violation of copyright too. Should be deleted except the uploaded states the use of that file and sends an email granting the permission to upload this file. Sorry, it's not for a concert rather a poster for offering Cretan lyra lessons. Even more non-encyclopedic. ~~ uℂρЭ 0υĜe 08:56, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, he is not en:Elias Pavlidis and en:Pavlidis does not mention any musicians. Unused pictures about non-notable musicians are out of project scope. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 07:05, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Rodnover temple in Kaluga, Russia.png Wojsław Brożyna (talk) 08:58, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, exact duplicate. Taivo (talk) 07:09, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt this image is own work given the lack of EXIF, the size, the quality, and the copyvio record of the uploader. BrightRaven (talk) 10:06, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata and the uploader's last remaining contribution, probably copyright violation. Similar photos are found in YouTube. Taivo (talk) 07:19, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I strongly doubt this image is own work given the lack of EXIF, the size and the subject. BrightRaven (talk) 10:07, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Depicted woman is unidentified, that case the file is out of project scope too. Taivo (talk) 07:47, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Perché non rispetta le regole della Legge Sul Panorama Italiano GiacomoQuaggiotto (talk) 11:03, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 11:27, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. If this is really from 1866 as claimed, it is very likely PD. Storkk (talk) 11:06, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, I'll categorize and relicense the photo. Taivo (talk) 11:42, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by S.Hari Om Prakash (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COPYVIOs. Two-up portraits, publicity material, various photographs obviously not own work.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:52, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by S.Hari Om Prakash (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:03, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:08, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pro62992 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 01:40, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:08, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Petahavelka30

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Petahavelka30 (talk · contribs):

Mostly small photos without camera data. If camera data exist, then mostly different. Special instruvtions field in metadata begins usually with FBMD. I suspect copyright violation. In addition, the boys are not mentioned in cs.wiki (there is hockey player Petr Havelka). Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:17, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:06, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file, private image BrightRaven (talk) 11:40, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:02, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no useful description Syced (talk) 12:42, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:04, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope: no educational purpose Florn (talk) 15:13, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:03, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by K-Mite (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal images (unknow person in Wikidedia) : out of scope

Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:21, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:28, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not in scoope. personal img Saqib (talk) 07:16, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:24, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of PW2

[edit]

PW2 (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Mostly small photos and mostly without metadata. If camera data exist, then usually different. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:04, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:23, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS-permission from author Jose Martinez (look description) is needed. Taivo (talk) 11:41, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:23, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BUNTY GOND (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 15:14, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:25, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BUNTY GOND (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - Not educationally useful; unused personal images of uploader.

hiàn 02:31, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. — D Y O L F 77[Talk] 15:58, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bodysart (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Plain commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 16:44, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:25, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not notable Syced (talk) 12:26, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, INeverCry blocked uploader TAJIKISTANOFFICIAL (talk · contribs) indefinitely with reason "nothing but copyvios and self-promotion". Taivo (talk) 07:15, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by David Adam Kess (talk · contribs)

[edit]

DW of artworks by living painter Daniel Reinoso. There is FOP in Ecuador, but the paintings were on display in the park for sale. They are not permanently displayed so FOP is not applicable. So permission of the artist is needed.

BrightRaven (talk) 10:04, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

keep all the picsǃ

VIVA WIKI
Yours sincerely, David Adam Kess (talk) 11:14, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
i totally contest deteting these pics, i am using them in my user pages on seven languages in wikipedia and wiimedia
I think it is unfair that you are deleting every single one of these photos, i totally contest and think that maybe a few can be kept
but i think that detail of art from quito is very important
i am also using these on many user pages of mine from many languages, so the files are being used
Yours sincerely, David Adam Kess (talk) 10:33, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]
As explained on your talk page, the permission of the artist should be sent through COM:OTRS. It is not mandatory for the artist to create and account. BrightRaven (talk) 16:31, 5 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Protest thal all 100 percent to be wiped out

[edit]

File usage The following pages on the English Wikipedia link to this file (pages on other projects are not listed): User:David Adam Kess Global file usage The following other wikis use this file:

Usage on es.wikipedia.org Usuario:David Adam Kess Usage on fi.wikipedia.org Käyttäjä:David Adam Kess Usage on fr.wikipedia.org Utilisateur:David Adam Kess Usage on lt.wikipedia.org Naudotojo aptarimas:David Adam Kess Naudotojas:David Adam Kess Usage on zh.wikipedia.org User:David Adam Kess File:(Artist Daniel Reinoso) at Parque El Ejido.JPG (Art at Parque El Ejido)

this above picture was accepted to gogle maps and google earth and should be kept in wikipedia

VIVA WIKI
Yours sincerely, David Adam Kess (talk) 8:33 pm 12th of January 2015 (UTC)

This one is in Google maps and google earth

[edit]

http://www.panoramio.com/photo/115455173

VIVA WIKI
Yours sincerely, David Adam Kess (talk) 8:43 pm 12th of January 2015 (UTC)

Google Maps, not an issue

[edit]

Google Maps is a desktop and mobile web mapping service application and technology provided by Google, offering satellite imagery, street maps, and Street View perspectives, as well as functions such as a route planner for traveling by foot, car, bicycle (beta test), or with public transportation. Also supported are maps embedded on third-party websites via the Google Maps API,[1] and a locator for urban businesses and other organizations in numerous countries around the world. Google Maps satellite images are not updated in real time; however, Google adds data to their Primary Database on a regular basis. Google Earth support states that most of the images are no more than 3 years old.[2] Protest thal all 100 percent to be wiped out[edit] File:(Artist Daniel Reinoso) at Parque El Ejido.JPG (Art at Parque El Ejido) this above picture was accepted to gogle maps and google earth and should be kept in wikipedia VIVA WIKI

the pics are in use, so why delete ǃ

[edit]

just an idea to keep the great photographs of the paintings ǃ

  1. What is the Google Maps API?.
  2. Frequently Asked Questions - Earth Help. Support.google.com. Retrieved on 2013-11-24.

Deleted: Per nom. No email found at OTRS as of today. If something does turn up, the files can easily be restored. Green Giant (talk) 16:24, 27 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by David Adam Kess (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Obvious derivative work

Discasto talk 12:31, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious derivative work:

Discasto talk 08:23, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Obvious derivative work. Maybe some of them may be deemed as simple enough for being eligible, but generally speaking, they seem to be a photograph of a copyrighted artwork

Discasto talk 09:33, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:58, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertisement? Syced (talk) 12:33, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:56, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious derivative work. The Spanish law on FoP requires that artwork is permanently exhibited in the street or any other public road.

Discasto talk 12:35, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


one has an image of Ali

so i understand the deletion


talk 12:35, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:56, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Darwinindisco (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I strongly doubt this image is own work given the lack of EXIF, the size, the subject and the copyvio record of the uploader.

BrightRaven (talk) 13:56, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Captain-tucker (talk) 08:20, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This map of Szczecin tram line is no longer used, because it has been replaced by a newer version: file:Linia tramwajowa nr 1 w Szczecinie.svg. Szczecinolog (talk) 14:24, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not duplicate. --Jcb (talk) 11:52, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TAJIKISTANOFFICIAL (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused poor-quality selfies of non-notable individual. Outside project scope.

DAJF (talk) 10:16, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by TAJIKISTANOFFICIAL (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on these two images, one of which looks very professional and the other one has overprinting.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:56, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 12 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by TAJIKISTANOFFICIAL (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, INeverCry blocked uploader indefinitely with reason "nothing but copyvios and self-promotion". Taivo (talk) 07:41, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is clearly not too simple to be copyrightable, given the animal figurines in the centre of the image, and http://www.lsu.edu/stratcomm/online-brand-guide/logos/index.php doesn't sound like a free license to me. It's possible that this seal comes from a time where copyright notices were needed, which is why I didn't tag this as {{Non-free logo}} but I didn't find any evidence of the seal being old enough. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 15:22, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:53, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old Photo, also blurry and unsuitable for publication; other photos have since taken the place of this photo on wikipedia Aquahelper (talk) 15:33, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:52, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspect copyright violation. The image is obviously from EDI, and there is no evidence it was relased. A similar version is here. Muhandes (talk) 15:54, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:51, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, creator Franz Stassen is named at the bottom, he died only in 1949, so the work is unfree until 2020-01-01 h-stt !? 16:29, 5 September 2016 (UTC) Sorry, you are right![reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:51, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non oficial Dianakc (talk) 01:14, 3 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not a valid deletion reason. Please feel free to upload an "official" logo. Green Giant (talk) 16:15, 29 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not in use Dianakc (talk) 16:32, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:50, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo without source an author created in 1940 (?). --sasha (krassotkin) 16:35, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:50, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality picture, subject not identifiable, it cannot be useful to anyone... LamBoet (talk) 22:04, 27 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. --Jcb (talk) 00:03, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low-quality picture, subject not identifiable, it cannot be useful to anyone. (NB. Not used anymore this time, renominating. LamBoet (talk) 16:36, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: the fact that is has been in use is sufficient to show that the file is in scope. Removing its usage is no justification for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:48, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

educational purposes doubtful Sebari (talk) 16:36, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:49, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, creator Franz Stassen died only in 1949, so the work is unfree until 2020-01-01. h-stt !? 16:54, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:49, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio, creator Franz Stassen died only in 1949, so the work is unfree until 2020-01-01 h-stt !? 16:57, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:49, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not contributing to the aim of the project; a selfie. DatGuy (talk) 17:17, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:49, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

your opions are asked: single-file-upload, imho rather advertisements, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 17:41, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:48, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lights on Eiffel Tower are copyrighted Elisfkc (talk) 17:44, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: infringement doubtful, not main subject of the picture. Could be cropped out if needed, after which the initial version could be removed. --Jcb (talk) 11:40, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France Elisfkc (talk) 17:45, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: infringement doubtful, not main subject of the picture. Could be cropped out if needed, after which the initial version could be removed. --Jcb (talk) 11:40, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a professional photo from Picasa (see metadata). But User:Седьмой северный форт using the iPhone for other pictures for this series (1, 2, etc). --sasha (krassotkin) 17:54, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:37, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional, out of scope. Sunmist (talk) 17:56, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:37, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Map is work of others, uploader did not create the it, has no right to publish it

Elisfkc (talk) 18:06, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:36, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:The Battle of the Somme, July-november 1916 Q115.jpg which is correctly labeled based on the Imperial War Museums's website Sadads (talk) 18:07, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Both versions can be kept. The photo is PD, so the IWM watermark does no more than damage public knowledge. -- (talk) 18:36, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
What do you mean by " which is correctly labeled" ? Rcbutcher (talk) 19:10, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I thought the the description of the IWM makes no mention of the Battle of Albert: http://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/search?query=Q+115. It does, its just hidden: perhaps we should be deleting the watermarked version then, instead of the one I nominated? Sadads (talk) 20:30, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:36, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

potentially copyright issues: collage of images missing links to media used from Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 18:39, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:34, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

potentially copyright issues: collage of images missing links to media used from Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 18:40, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:34, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I am the original uploader and request that this file be removed. I should not have uploaded a .gif version, and instead have uploaded another version that is better in quality, which is in .png. The better version and this version are too similar also, so this inferior version should be removed. Lilic (talk) 18:46, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:34, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Исправил поворот снимка, загружу лучший снимок Юрий Скрипов (talk) 19:58, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:34, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image being used for spam purposes - the URL visible in the image is also being spammed on en.wikipedia C.Fred (talk) 20:20, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:33, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 20:47, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:33, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author is unknown, so according to Commons:Copyright_rules#When_the_date_is_unknown this picture is not old enough. Druschba 4 (talk) 20:52, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:32, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

suspected copyright violation ; Olegs Latisevs may not be the photographer since he's on the photograph El Funcionario (talk) 21:12, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:32, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Theroadislong (talk) 21:19, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:32, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 21:20, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:31, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 21:23, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:31, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 21:35, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:31, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 21:35, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:31, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 21:43, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:31, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation El Funcionario (talk) 21:45, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:31, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 21:48, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:31, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 21:51, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:31, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Lacrymocéphale as no permission (No permission since) maybe PD-textlogo? Thibaut120094 (talk) 22:01, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: above TOO. --Jcb (talk) 11:30, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertisement Nizil Shah (talk) 22:24, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:30, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apel·les Fenosa is dead in 1988. No freedom of panorama in France. 82.124.174.198 22:28, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:29, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly not own work, Corbis watermark. J Milburn (talk) 22:33, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:29, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Version with different cropping has already been published here. Uploader will need to demonstrate he has copyright ownership or permission to upload to Commons. DAJF (talk) 22:39, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, yes, clouds are the same. Taivo (talk) 07:38, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Nizil Shah (talk) 22:52, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:29, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio logo Nizil Shah (talk) 22:56, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:29, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This map of Szczecin tram line is no longer used, because it has been replaced by a newer version: file:Linia tramwajowa nr 2 w Szczecinie.svg. Szczecinolog (talk) 22:56, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not duplicate. --Jcb (talk) 11:28, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No exif data. I suspect copyvio. UIploader has a history of copyvio. Wikicology (talk) 22:59, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:27, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Freedom of panorama#Iran - construction on this bridge started in 2010 and finished in 2014

INeverCry 23:59, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:26, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of ProKi9

[edit]

Here are all contributions of ProKi9 (talk · contribs):

OTRS-permission from copyright holder is needed. Taivo (talk) 09:39, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:56, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Fabish14000

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Fabish14000 (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata. Only officially accredited photographers can do such photos. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:47, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:56, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Choudhary Amit Pilania

[edit]

Here are all contributions of Choudhary Amit Pilania (talk · contribs):

Why camera is always different? Maybe the photos are not own work, but copyright violation? In addition, the first and last photos have different watermarks and are out of project scope as unused personal photos. Taivo (talk) 09:51, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:58, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Wouter Langendijk

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Wouter Langendijk (talk · contribs):

I suspect not own wiork, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:56, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:58, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tulsidasah (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is not Facebook or other social media and is not a place to post resumes, identification cards, personal photos take by other people and so on.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:02, 29 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 09:07, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tulsidasah (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Collection of unused poor-quality private photos and official documents (ID cards and certificates etc) belonging to a non-notable individual. Outside project scope and more suited to Facebook.

DAJF (talk) 10:25, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:58, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. The user created an article about himself here. NgYShung (talk) 10:30, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:09, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Jerzy81

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Jerzy81 (talk · contribs):

Small photos without camera data, credited to different persons. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:30, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:10, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Jjang8i

[edit]

Here are all contributions of JjangBi (talk · contribs):

Small unused personal photos about non-notable person. Out of project scope, copyright violation is possible as well. Taivo (talk) 10:38, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:10, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Mfearer94

[edit]

Here are all contributions of Mfearer94 (talk · contribs):

Out of project scope: logos of non-notable organization. Taivo (talk) 10:42, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:11, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

photoshopped version, google finds too many copies from backgroud Motopark (talk) 10:25, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --MBisanz talk 17:02, 8 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion Cabayi (talk) 10:48, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Out of project scope. A personal photograph, used only in self-promotional personal pages on English Wikipedia, now deleted, and unlikely ever to have any other use. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:08, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete also file:Raaj Vishwakarma.jpg as unused selfie with bad quality. Taivo (talk) 11:24, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:11, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Out of project scope, copyright violation is also possible. Taivo (talk) 11:03, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:11, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gumdesign (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Seemingly copyrighted cover / copyrighted packaging

Ies (talk) 14:52, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:03, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Scope: personal image with no educational purpose Florn (talk) 15:13, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:02, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

poor quality image with no educational purpose Florn (talk) 15:14, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 13:02, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture contains name tags of the students, which we, Japanese people, can read and which are showing their full names. In Japan, a consent is needed when we upload someone's picture. (Please see COM:CSCR#Japan.) And it seems that there is no consent. To protect their privacy and portrait rights, I believe this photo should be deleted. この写真は拡大すると彼女たちの氏名が読むことができ、またアップロードに際して合意形成が計られていない可能性が非常に高く、結果として肖像権を侵害している恐れが非常に高くなっています。個人情報保護の観点および肖像権の問題より、削除を依頼します。 ぷんてぃ (talk) 15:14, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Comment: See also the following similar deletion requests currently open:
--DAJF (talk) 09:52, 9 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: original version and kept blurred version. --Jcb (talk) 13:02, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:33, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:40, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 00:37, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:41, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 01:57, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:41, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possibly non-free web page depicted. © Olivier Fourdan 1996 - 2010 in Wayback Machine snapshot from February 22, 2010. (Today the page says Copyright 2003-2016 Xfce Development Team., but again with no license information.) 80.221.159.67 02:13, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:53, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:34, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:53, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:35, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:53, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:37, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:53, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bhattiprolu Kesava Rao (talk · contribs)

[edit]

See Commons:Project scope

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:38, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:53, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunatly this artwork by Hannah Ryggen, who died in 1970, is not free to use, and it is photographed inside an art institution. AHA (talk) 06:09, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:58, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

URAA restoration, and flickr uploader is a serial uploader of images they just happen to own rather than hold copyright to. -mattbuck (Talk) 06:49, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:58, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright text Saqib (talk) 07:19, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:58, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is small photo without metadata and the user's last remaining upload. This makes me suspect copyright violation. Uploading bigger version with EXIF data will disprove suspicions. Taivo (talk) 07:28, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:58, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work, per COM:TOYS --ghouston (talk) 07:34, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:58, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be an out of scope unused personal image. Is he notable in any way? --ghouston (talk) 07:39, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:58, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 07:40, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:58, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Previously published elsewhere without a free license, e.g., https://nsunews.nova.edu/habana-deco-art-and-architecture-of-cuba-in-october/ --ghouston (talk) 07:48, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:58, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by 80.221.159.67 as Speedy (Speedy) and the most recent rationale was: CSD F1: Apparent copyright violation. Incompatible license with different versions of the GPL, based on GNOME 2. (Today the source URL says this work to be under CC BY-NC-SA 4.0, though a Wayback Machine capture from April 27, 2014 claims CC BY-SA 3.0.) Not assuming good faith on this work's licensing. Replaceable with a similar free work. Taivo (talk) 08:07, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:58, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [2]. Yann (talk) 23:41, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file was uploaded into Commons on 26th of January 2014, but into Twitter on 7th of January 2014, although not in so big resolution. Small photo without metadata, the user's last remaining upload. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:24, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:58, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Maxipulse

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Maxipulse (talk · contribs):

OTRS-permission from author and copyright holder Ahmet Tokyay is needed. Taivo (talk) 08:34, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:51, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of DarkChains

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of DarkChains (talk · contribs)

Mostly small photos. Camera data is always different. Maybe this is copyright violation of different photographers? Taivo (talk) 08:38, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:30, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; not useful for any educational purpose. Sunmist (talk) 08:41, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:30, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Bobi 1985

[edit]

Bobi 1985 (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

small photos without metadata. Uploader is himself depicted and they are not selfies. Copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 08:44, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:31, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Tsaroceanaugyst

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Tsaroceanaugyst (talk · contribs):

These files have two problems. At first, they are small photos without metadata, maybe not own work, but copyright violations. At second, maybe background of the photos is copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 08:47, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:59, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

watermark with (c) up right Pippobuono (talk) 08:50, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:59, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of FeodorBezuhov

[edit]

FeodorBezuhov (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

Mostly small photos and mostly without metadata. If camera data exist, then always different. Some photos are credited to other persons. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:54, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:59, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nicht mehr benötigter Verschieberest, war versehentlich falsche Dateibenennung. Joschi71 (talk) 09:05, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:59, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Henry Austen

[edit]

Henry Austen (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos as own work:

Henry Austen claimed in Commons:Deletion requests/File:NormanLacyVicStateBasketballerW200.jpg, that 1946 photo is his own work, and this makes his other uploads dubious too. Who is real photographer and does (s)he agree to publish them under free license? Can (s)he send OTRS-permission? Taivo (talk) 09:02, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:59, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Vg.nobrainer44

[edit]

Vg.nobrainer44 (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

Out of project scope due to bad composition. Taivo (talk) 09:12, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:59, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of ILFIindia

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of ILFIindia (talk · contribs):

How the files are in our project scope? Also own work is in doubt, maybe copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:24, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:59, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused low-quality photo, so out of scope Kopiersperre (talk) 09:32, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:59, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Waldoroldan

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Waldoroldan (talk · contribs):

I could not identify the team. Files are unused. If the team is non-notable, then the photos are out of project scope.

File number 2 is used in es.wiki on userpage, but as the user has no contributions in es.wiki except on userpage, probably this does not count. Taivo (talk) 09:31, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 23:59, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Screenshots. Doubtful that the displayed web page is free or ineligible for copyright. Derivative works of GPL'd works also cannot be licensed under CC BY-SA licenses, so this is likely a copyvio. 80.221.159.67 09:37, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:00, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per [3]. Yann (talk) 23:43, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As doubtful as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Ubuntu-hack-600x382.jpg. Though claims of own work, it seems unlikely given the different author name and how this file was publicized in a security incident. 80.221.159.67 09:39, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:00, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable Flickrwashing - same filename format as Flickrwashed images of the same artist at Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Jessicawilson2, and taken from a Flickr user with a single upload. McGeddon (talk) 09:49, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Oh: the uploader of this image was a sock of Jessicawilson2, according to this Wikipedia SPI.) --McGeddon (talk) 10:26, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:00, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Michel leticia gonzalez castro

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Michel leticia gonzalez castro (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata. Uploader seems to be always depicted and they are not selfies. I suspect copyright violation of real photographers. Taivo (talk) 10:13, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:00, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Šibaeco

[edit]

Shibaeco (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except sandbox in en.wiki and uploading personal photos, which are used nowhere, except on the user talkpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:17, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:00, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE. Only used on the user's English Wikipedia userpage. NgYShung (talk) 10:21, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep New user and – he really edits in en.wiki! We must give him some time and every active user is allowed to have some personal photos on his userpahe. Taivo (talk) 07:52, 7 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Taivo. --INeverCry 00:00, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Skotboard (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage and sandbox in en.wiki and uploading a personal photo, which is used nowhere, except in the sandbox. All her activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:06, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:00, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not notable, no description Syced (talk) 12:29, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:01, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not notable Syced (talk) 12:32, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:01, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, superseded, uncropped duplicate to File:Flag of Třtice.jpeg TFerenczy (talk) 12:33, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:01, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not notable, blurry Syced (talk) 12:36, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:38, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no useful description, country unknown Syced (talk) 12:38, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:01, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no description Syced (talk) 12:39, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:01, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Zoomed in (details remain the same) version of File:Vlajka města.gif, superseded by File:Flag Město Nové Strašecí.gif TFerenczy (talk) 12:39, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:01, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not notable Syced (talk) 12:45, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:01, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio of image taken from the Emirates website, see http://www.emirates.com/media-centre/emirates-launches-milestone-dubai-auckland-non-stop-route# YSSYguy (talk) 12:47, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:01, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 12:48, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:01, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no notability reason stated Syced (talk) 12:48, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:01, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted tag OSX (talkcontributions) 12:51, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:01, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

please prove at least a bit of notability Syced (talk) 12:52, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:01, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably not notable? Syced (talk) 12:53, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:32, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

dubious personal work El Funcionario (talk) 12:55, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hey El Funcionario, I spend most of my time on Wikipedia, so I'm not too familiar with the process on Wikimedia Commons. I have declared a personal connection to the person in the work on the talk page of his Wiki, and was sent the image by another friend of his, and I'm not too sure with what the process is. If this file were to be deleted, how would I go about getting another image of the subject to comply with Wikimedia Common's rules? Cheers JoshMuirWikipedia (talk) 22:51, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Hello JoshMuirWikipedia, thank you for your answer. I'm french and my english is very basic but nevertheless I will try to explain : please don't pay attention to my mistakes.
So you can't import a picture with the "personal work" label if you didn't actually take it. So this file may be erased and if you want to import another one, you can :
  • take a picture on your own if you are able to meet this person, or
  • ask someone who took a photograph to give permission to use it with a free license which allow people to use it.
You'll find further help there. Regards, --El Funcionario (talk) 23:16, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:02, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

он не получился у меня, и нигде не используется Леонид Макаров (talk) 13:04, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:02, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Клубочек (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I strongly doubt these images are own work given the lack of EXIF, the size, and the copyvio record of the uploader.

BrightRaven (talk) 14:02, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:02, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Camelia Dance Art (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos and song. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:02, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:02, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from sign. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:02, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Earthboud1960 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Japan for 2D works.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

All photos will come in to see anyone.
These are just a label, just a schematic representation.
Also, it does not infringe the copyright of the Japanese.--Earthbound1960 (talk) 17:37, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:02, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by JuTa as no permission (No permission since) Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 14:47, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I informed the uploader on the Dutch Wikipedia. I think he will need some more time than the usual. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 15:11, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


The uploaded portrait is my enhanced scan of an image in the journal Vliegwereld in 1945.

Who is the 'license owner'? The unknown photographer or who paid him: Vliegwereld, ATA or my aunt ?
The journal and ATA does not exist anymore. I required long ago Avia ('heir' of the journal) but received no answer.
I asked the RAF museum ('heir' of ATA) and am waiting for a response. The image has been published outside ATA in the journal.
I assume nobody can and will exploit the image against the will of the figured person (or her heirs).

For Commons I find the identification of the person important, although not requested. The identification by the article in the journal agrees my statement. I am sure.

Anybody may protest if the image should be used badly in an irrelevant article.

A suggestion for coding the 'license' for Commons is welcome. Rob Veldhuyzen van Zanten (talk) 09:39, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Rob, I hoped you could shed some light on this. But apparently you don't know either who owns the copyright. The magazine is the place to start to find out more. They printed it and there could be a colophon or something like that, that provides information on this. Basically, the artist/photographer owns the copyright, unless he waived the rights. If your aunt instructed and paid him, the copyright might be with here, but it might also still be with the photographer depending on their agreement. If the photographer is really anonymous, and the rights do not lie with someone else Anonymous-EU might apply. In any case, Commons follows a precautionary principle that where there is significant doubt about the freedom of a particular file, it should be deleted. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 19:23, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:03, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was originally uploaded to the official website of group BTS here. It does not have the appropriate license to be uploaded to Commons and is thus suspected of copyright violation. Vermeer 9 (talk) 00:02, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, license "Copyright © 2016 Big Hit Entertainment All Right Reserved". This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:06, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was originally uploaded to the official website and Facebook of group BTS here and here. It does not have the appropriate license to be uploaded to Commons and is thus suspected of copyright violation. Vermeer 9 (talk) 23:23, 24 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 02:44, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsharp, overexposed, unidentifiable Mhohner (talk) 08:29, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:01, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://pixel.nymag.com/imgs/daily/vulture/2015/06/23/23-tom-holland-2.w750.h560.2x.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:16, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of procedure undeletion by user:billinghurst - the public domain claim in the description field is incorrect. Option C of the license would apply, but then we are still missing a source for when the creator died (must be before 1955 to be PD). So unless information on the painters date of death can be provided, the file has to be deleted again. Jcb (talk) 15:18, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Umm, this is a picture of a painting of Richard Bourke, governor of colonial New South Wales, who died in 1855. Please do your maths, and I think that you will find that it will be very pre-1900, and all best intents of the painter to live into the zone of copyright, let alone to be PD-100. I am not saying that it is lacking information, I am saying that it should not be deleted as it is clearly public domain and within scope as it was used by a sister wiki. So can we please take an eyes-wide open approach and informed by reality rather than a petty bureaucratic approach which is ridiculous.
Now let us get to the real issue here. You initially nominated this as "without source" for an image that has been here for nine years, and it was deleted without conversation within a week of that nomination. As a bare minimum this should have been brought to this community for discussion as it was such a long-standing image, and it was in use by a wiki. Instead it was deleted by another admin as one of 20 others deleted in that minute, which I consider clearly see as both peremptory and with total disregard for the community. That is right ... deleted without conversation after one week after residing here for nine years when in use. What an appalling set of circumstances! So please do not start harping on to me about "out of procedure".
Further we now seem to moving towards double deletionism by a couple of administrators that sets an ugly tone for Commons. One who takes a horribly tight line on the application of {{No source}} without reality check to the evidence, and another who then deletes quickly without sufficient review or challenge of long standing images. This situation of deletionism is clearly problematic.  — billinghurst sDrewth 21:59, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, arguments of Billinghurst were convincing. Taivo (talk) 10:13, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Windows 7's Aero shown, possibly non-free in part. Per Commons:Screenshots, Microsoft's guidelines do not allow derivative works. 80.221.159.67 00:16, 5 September 2016 (UTC) (edited: 00:18, 5 September 2016 (UTC))[reply]

 Comment This is likely a case of de minimis, but consider this deletion request to be a reason to add Template:De minimis and link to this deletion request with the template. But I don't understand how this is related to Commons' "no fair use" policy.

To be exact, I don't know how to use the template to do this. English Wikipedia has a fairly in-depth template (en:Template:Non-free Microsoft screenshot) for this. 80.221.159.67 04:45, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Fortunately, we have already over this in hundreds of other DRs: Window frames and buttons created by the operating system GUI services are well below the threshold of originality. That's even less than de minimis. The part that says "Microsoft's guidelines do not allow derivative works" is also nonsense because the image is an screenshot, not a derivative work. Footnote appended to Commons:Screenshots reveals that "derivative work" here refers to what is done with the screenshot after it is taken. Fleet Command (talk) 15:10, 8 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • @FleetCommand: I agree with the de minimis part, but your 'derivative work' vs 'screenshot' argument is not going to work. All files on Wikimedia Commons, including screenshots, need to be free enough to create derivative works. Jcb (talk) 15:35, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:35, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Windows 7's Aero shown, possibly non-free in part. Per Commons:Screenshots, Microsoft's guidelines do not allow derivative works. Unknown status on wallpaper partially shown in background. 80.221.159.67 00:21, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Too simple to be copyrighted. Taivo (talk) 11:02, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: at least what is visible of the background picture is not below TOO. --Jcb (talk) 15:37, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

My little brother has uploaded it. Please delete it. Oh, and this is newer version of this photo. 46.45.111.214 13:11, 7 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyrighted software. --King of 01:20, 15 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted to Jonatan Bertuzzi © 2012, low resolution pic uploaded to Commons in 2016, taken in 2012? and published everywhere in the internet before here https://twitter.com/lavenganzaradio/status/487295661831102464 Strakhov (talk) 00:43, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:37, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This deletion debate is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Deriv, contains Windows XP UI, although program is GPL, XP UI makes image non-free, unsuitable for commons. Vipersnake151 03:37, 6 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Kept. – Mike.lifeguard | @en.wb 21:29, 11 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Windows 7's Aero shown. Per Commons:Screenshots, Microsoft's guidelines do not allow derivative works. Recommending to create a cropped version (and possibly remove the history of existing file). 80.221.159.67 00:52, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Cropped version now available at File:Notepad++ GUI with MediaWiki source code (cropped).png, which should supersede this file. I'm not going to vote myself. 80.221.159.67 06:44, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:38, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not in scoope Saqib (talk) 07:21, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Interesting shot. We have no similar files in category:Glass floors. Taivo (talk) 20:09, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep - Excellent and instructive example for the use of a glass flor in order to exhibit a historically significant building interior without disturbing it. Couldn't be more perfectly in scope. --Latebird (talk) 16:56, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: not sure if this will ever be used in a Wikipedia article, but I could perfectly imagine a primary school making educational usage of such a picture. --Jcb (talk) 15:41, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Kevin Payravi as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Photograph of a copyright statue (no freedom of panorama in the United States) Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:04, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:42, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by DAJF as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Copyright image (with watermark) taken from http://www.re-digest.web.id/2016/03/memotret-sepur-di-pondok-cina-dan-ui.html post is from March 2016, photo was uploaded in September 2015 Thibaut120094 (talk) 08:25, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am Ikko Haidar Farozy, the original owner of the photo, and the user KujoKaren is my own account. I apologise for my negligence to not updating my user page.

Therefore I request the copyright violation tag to be removed since this is my own work, uploaded by myself --KujoKaren ( talk)

@KujoKaren: Hi, thanks for responding here. Can you upload the original version of File:Ex Nanbu Line 205 series sets 44 and 35.JPG without the watermark in the same way as you have with File:Tokyo Metro 6117F-Depok.jpg? If you can do that, I think everyone will be happy. Thanks. --DAJF (talk) 05:01, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@DAJF: Already done --KujoKaren ( talk)
  •  Keep: Now that the uploader has uploaded the original version without the watermark, it looks like any doubt has been removed. I'm glad we were able to keep this good-quality image. --DAJF (talk) 06:17, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: resolved. --Jcb (talk) 15:44, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Moheen Reeyad as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Possibly out of scope‎. No possible use.. Taivo (talk) 11:32, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This image shows the recent Cultural Fashion of Bangladesh. So in future people can learn What was the fashion at that times. So I think one can not say there is "No possible use". Thanks.--Masum-al-hasan Rocky (talk) 16:17, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:49, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Rprpr

[edit]

Incompatible licensing with derivative screenshots of GPL'd software (e.g. GNOME) being licensed under CC BY-SA licenses by author (photographer / uploader). See Commons:Screenshots. In other words, these files are copyvios as derivative works.

(Kind of bugs me too that these are claimed to be own work when I believe they should be self-photographed.)

(It would take me too much effort to tag each of these files with both {{Free screenshot}} and confirm for the appropriate license, only to find it to be {{Incompatible license}} and different copyvio notices on the user's talk page individually. Thus, this mass delete.) --80.221.159.67 15:10, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

From the colors, File:Firefox10 on Ubuntu11.10.png seems to contain only Tango icons and Wikinews images, so no problem with software, but could be with photos, unless they are de-minimis. --AVRS (talk) 07:56, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]
File:Firefox 6 on Ubuntu.png: everything is either CC BY-SA, or public domain, or very small (maybe the Home button is Tango). --AVRS (talk) 07:56, 6 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Rprpr: I see that you have added permission notices to the files now, for most of which I didn't do personally. However, the copyleft licenses are still incompatible for most part with your choice of CC BY-SA 4.0 license. Would you like to resolve this issue and avoid possible deletion by relicensing your screenshots with a compatible license? Assuming you are the copyright holder of these screenshots, that is. 80.221.159.67 05:46, 7 September 2016 (UTC) (edited: 05:49, 7 September 2016 (UTC))[reply]


Kept: all files seem to have correct license information. More than one license can be involved in one image. E.g. GPL for a software, GFDL for a depicted picture and CC-BY-SA for the arrangement. --Jcb (talk) 15:59, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source tag removed by User:LX. It seems improbable to me that the original uploader at SV.wiki would be the author of the base map as well. As long as we do not have a source for the base map, which we do not have at the moment, it's a clear delete. Jcb (talk) 21:06, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't clear at all from the tagging that that was your concern. This should probably be dealt with as a mass deletion nomination for all of User:Soman's files in Category:Election maps of India, rather than a couple of randomly selected ones. LX (talk, contribs) 21:44, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 21:20, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No source tag removed by User:LX. It seems improbable to me that the original uploader at SV.wiki would be the author of the base map as well. As long as we do not have a source for the base map, which we do not have at the moment, it's a clear delete. Jcb (talk) 21:06, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It wasn't clear at all from the tagging that that was your concern. This should probably be dealt with as a mass deletion nomination for all of User:Soman's files in Category:Election maps of India, rather than a couple of randomly selected ones. LX (talk, contribs) 21:45, 5 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 21:20, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]