Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/08/02
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-with_Persian_comment.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Mascot.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Dispero Ras Siento (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unclear copyright status and unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Dispero Ras Siento (with similar no-permission deleted uploads). Uploaded since 03.2016 for en:Dispero Ras Siento, a Hellenic musician. All kinds of works available: audio files, album covers, videos and video screenshots, etc., most likely multiple photographers involved, including cropped files (watermarks removed) taken from official FB like File:Dispero live with Ug.jpg (04.2016) --> https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=378696478871010&set=t.1072873344&type=3&theater (2012) and other Facebook images like File:Dispero live with Hrizmo Alicia.jpg (04.2016) --> https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10150221629085541&set=t.1072873344&type=3&theater (2010) or File:Dispero video papa.jpg + File:Dispero video papas.jpg (04.2016) --> https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=10206654844504442&set=pb.1072873344.-2207520000.1466406663.&type=3&theater (2015, "PHOTO FROM VIDEO CLIP - O PAPAS") --> screenshotted from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q05MoH4ntDM (2015, "ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.THE COPYRIGHT IN THIS RECORDING IS OWNED BY "DISPERO" AND THE "GHETOLABEL"."), etc.
Despite of having a similar username, "Dispero Ras Siento" is not necessarily the same person as the Commons user. A verifiable connection via COM:OTRS (or by other means) must be established (multiple issues: multiple photographers etc.)
- File:Dispero - ΑΓΑΠΗΜΕΝΟ ΜΟΥ ΓΑΡΔΟΥΜΠΙ 2007.jpg
- File:Dispero - Agapimeno mou gardoumpi.ogg
- File:Dispero - Agapimeno mou gardoumpi 2005.ogg
- File:Dispero - To pexnidi feat.Hrizmo.ogg
- File:Dispero - Dose pasa feat.Sin, Zak.ogg
- File:2. ΠΟΣΟ ΛΥΠΑΜΑΙ (2005).jpg
- File:HIP-HOP SHOW (2003).jpg
- File:Dispero video papa.jpg
- File:Dispero video papas.jpg
- File:Dispero photo from album lets you go.jpg
- File:Dispero live with Ug.jpg
- File:Dispero video move it.jpg
- File:Dispero photo from album man vs woman 2.jpg
- File:Dispero photo from album man vs woman.jpg
- File:Dispero live with Hrizmo Alicia.jpg
- File:Dispero interview radio.jpg
- File:Dispero photo from album tosa tha sou po.jpg
- File:Dispero video gardoumpi.jpg
- File:Dispero live.jpg
- File:Dispero video giati.jpg
- File:DISPERO IN STUDIO.jpg
- File:Dispero - LETS YOU GO 2014.jpg
- File:Dispero - Ο ΚΑΚΟΣ Ο ΛΥΚΟΣ 2 2012.jpg
- File:Dispero - Ο ΚΑΚΟΣ Ο ΛΥΚΟΣ 2012.jpg
- File:Dispero - TA REGGAETIKA 2011.jpg
- File:Dispero - MAN VS WOMAN 2010.jpg
- File:Dispe sign.png
- File:Dispero signature.svg
- File:DISPERO SIGNATURE.svg
- File:Dispero Ras Siento.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gunnex (talk) 07:14, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
- Dispero Ras Siento
Hello my friend my names is George and i am member of "Music kitchen record". Dispero is our artist and the manager of Dispero come to us and tell us , one reporter woman want to write a article for Dispero and ask for the copyrights of all. and that why we make official account on wikipedia to upload everything to the people want, to do anything they want and no only for one person...All the copyrights is belong to us , to Dispero and the Ghetolabel who is the Dispero label... Thank you very much if you want something else to talk i am here to answer the questions Dispero Ras Siento (talk) 18:10, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
- That case company representative must send OTRS-permission. Album covers are especially valuable, but other materials are also welcomed. Taivo (talk) 17:28, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Ok my friend just give us an official mail for this things to send the copyrights or if we have a different way, i mean to contact with wikimedia for this problem.Before 3 hours we send message to commons-copyvio@wikimedia.org to stop this kind of problem and we waiting the responce of them....thank you Dispero Ras Siento (talk) 09:15, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
- Please open COM:OTRS page and you will see, what kind of e-mail must be sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Taivo (talk) 18:22, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Thank you very much Traivo we are waiting the responce from the first mail or maybe tomorow morning we are contact with this email, thank you for your help. Dispero Ras Siento (talk) 09:39, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Info Ignoring the outcome of this discussion the uploader removed deletion templates from the nominated files and continued uploading files with unclear copyright status — which I hereby nominating too:
- File:Dispero - skepsou kala 2010.ogg
- File:Dispero tha piei poli.ogg
- File:Dispero - Jah guide 2011.ogg
- File:Dispero - mariana.ogg
- File:Dispero - Paramenoume treloi.ogg
- File:Dispero - Paramenoume treloi.wav
- File:Dispero - Bomb the song 2009.ogg
- File:Dispero Skepsou kala.ogg
- File:Dispero - ΤΟΣΑ ΘΑ ΣΟΥ ΠΩ 2007.jpg
- File:Dispero Mesa sto rithmo.ogg
Gunnex (talk) 08:05, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
My friend we talk with you and you dont answer , you dont say nothing, we speak with permissions-commons@wikimedia.org and we are waiting to fix it, but we dont know why is this things need so much time,we are from the company with Dispero, Music kitchen and Ghetolabel and upload this things to give the copyrights of our work to the people , why you believe we are a spam or we dont have the copyrights?....Do you want to send to you our copyrights from the greek goverment to end this kind of problem? ...thank you Dispero Ras Siento (talk) 11:38, 28 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Files marked as having OTRS permission sent over a month ago, with no indication on any from an OTRS agent that a ticket had been opened. Kept the uncopyrightable signatures, as not needing permissions. --Reventtalk 07:05, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dispero Ras Siento (talk · contribs)
[edit]Further uploads that were omitted from the original DR, due to continued uploading after it was opened. All have been 'OTRS pending' for close to a month.
- File:Dispero - lets you go.ogg
- File:Dispero - Move it.ogg
- File:Dispero - O papas.ogg
- File:Dispero - I am on fyah feat.Dr Klay.ogg
Reventtalk 07:09, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Reclosing now that the leakers are also gone. All files deleted were KOS targets at this point, as grossly stale claims of OTRS emails having been sent. --Reventtalk 07:11, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dispero Ras Siento (talk · contribs)
[edit]Regardless of permission issues (which were discussed elsewhere), this material appears to have been uploaded for purely promotional reasons, and it's not clear whether it's within Commons' scope for image use. The music and video clips are relatively short (circa 1 minute), and the CD/album covers are not inherently useful, except with respect to an artist whose notability hasn't been made clear.
This isn't a judgement on the quality of the music. But it's not clear that these images belong here.
- File:Dispero - O papas.ogg
- File:Dispero - skepsou kala 2010.ogg
- File:Dispero tha piei poli.ogg
- File:Dispero - Bomb the song 2009.ogg
- File:Dispero Skepsou kala.ogg
- File:Dispero - ΤΟΣΑ ΘΑ ΣΟΥ ΠΩ 2007.jpg
- File:Dispero Mesa sto rithmo.ogg
- File:Dispero - ΑΓΑΠΗΜΕΝΟ ΜΟΥ ΓΑΡΔΟΥΜΠΙ 2007.jpg
- File:Dispero - Agapimeno mou gardoumpi.ogg
- File:Dispero - Agapimeno mou gardoumpi 2005.ogg
- File:Dispero - To pexnidi feat.Hrizmo.ogg
- File:2. ΠΟΣΟ ΛΥΠΑΜΑΙ (2005).jpg
- File:HIP-HOP SHOW (2003).jpg
- File:Dispero photo from album lets you go.jpg
- File:Dispero - LETS YOU GO 2014.jpg
- File:Dispero - Ο ΚΑΚΟΣ Ο ΛΥΚΟΣ 2 2012.jpg
- File:Dispero - Ο ΚΑΚΟΣ Ο ΛΥΚΟΣ 2012.jpg
- File:Dispero - TA REGGAETIKA 2011.jpg
- File:Dispero - MAN VS WOMAN 2010.jpg
- File:Dispero - Τόσα θα σου πώ 2007.jpg
- File:Dispero - Αγαπημένο μου γαρδούμπι 2007.jpg
- File:DISPERO - ΠΟΣΟ ΛΥΠΑΜΑΙ 2005.jpg
- File:DISPERO - HIP-HOP SHOW 2003.jpg
- File:Dispe sign.png
- File:Dispero signature.svg
- File:DISPERO SIGNATURE.svg
Ubcule (talk) 20:44, 16 October 2016 (UTC)
- Dear friend Ubcule all that things to upload , i do it cause one reporter need to write a article about our work , so i don't give the personal permission for this woman i upload free for all people to take what they need. Thank you Dispero Ras Siento (talk) 14:14, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- Thanks for the response. I'm still not sure whether or not these pictures are within Commons' remit or scope (Ελληνικά) though.
- (Note that Commons is not the only place that you can release free materials. Commons has restrictions on what it can accept, but you can also upload elsewhere). Ubcule (talk) 18:48, 17 October 2016 (UTC)
- @Dispero Ras Siento: Please also see COM:ADVERT. Ubcule (talk) 14:53, 20 October 2016 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for your advance my friend Ubcule, my real problem is someone reporter from Greece want to write a article about our work and she need (pictures, video and song) but we say we are upload to wikipedia for everybody to take what they want for free, so after to upload, i can't to find the way for all copyrights , i send message to wikipedia and wikimedia we are talking i send all the copyrights from the Greek goverment and then they upload again the half of our uploads and the pictures is very bad quality is not our original uploads, you can check it if you like....so i need to find a way to finish this problem, i can't spent any time for this cause all this story is from march 2016, i am very sorry but i can't understand how it works all this, someone want our stuff and we upload its simple , not for money or something else....just free... i don't know where to i upload and finish all this...thank you very much for your time Dispero Ras Siento (talk) 8:14, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
- Hi,
- I don't understand everything you said.
- I think you are saying that you want to make your images freely available, and that is why they have been uploaded here.
- However, Commons is not just a file host. Even if you offer your images and videos under a free license, they must still be usable for educational purposes.
- Material that is purely promotional cannot be uploaded here. This discussion is whether or not your files are within Commons' educational scope.
- If this is unclear, you can find out more about Commons using the help pages.
- (To be clear, your images were previously nominated because their copyright status was unclear. That is not what the current discussion is about).
- Ubcule (talk) 19:21, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 23:00, 22 October 2016 (UTC)
No exif, unclear source. Looks like a screenshot from an HD TV broadcast. Uploader's only other contributions are two other images of the same player taken from various websites. —Andrei S. Talk 07:53, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. --Josve05a (talk) 14:22, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Most likely copyrighted footage from a live broadcast. These images are already in the file https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZsUW00YV9S8 - own work claim is not credible —Andrei S. Talk 09:13, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio. --Josve05a (talk) 14:23, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Accdentally uploaded.Was meant to be uploaded for Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 Bangladesh on september . শাওন সরকার 16:04, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy per nomination/ autrhor's request. -- ~ Nahid Talk 18:11, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Accidentally uploaded.Was meant to be uploaded for Wiki Loves Monuments 2016 Bangladesh on september . শাওন সরকার 16:04, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Speedy per nomination/ author's request. -- ~ Nahid Talk 18:12, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
http://www.sigmaalphagamma.org/ reddogsix (talk) 13:47, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by EugeneZelenko: Commons:Licensing: non-trivial logo - Using VisualFileChange.
same as Commons:Deletion requests/File:Могила Миколи Хвильового.jpg Holopoman (talk) 11:10, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --INeverCry 00:57, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Files related to Rosales and Partners
[edit]This is a somewhat weird case involving five editors that may or may not be related, but which have uploaded problematic images related to a single architecture firm.
Some background - Rosales + Partners is an architecture firm in the United States which specializes in road and pedestrian bridge design. They have an active public relations and social media presence. Like many architecture firms, they produce promotional images of their projects, some of which are based on photographs taken by photographers outside the firm and used under license. These images are commonly circulated to the press, but the firm and/or the photographer retain copyright.
- Fstop222 (talk · contribs) uploaded what appear to be 2 of their own photographs in November 2012, then 8 renderings by the firm in April 2013. They claim the renderings to be their own work but there is no evidence of this.
- Wsvan (talk · contribs) uploaded dozens of photographs and renderings by the firm from May 2012 to January 2015, claiming most as their own work. Three of those files (File:Leonard P. Zakim Bunker Hill Bridge - Boston, MA.jpg, File:Liberty Bridge - Greenville, SC - 001.jpg, and File:Liberty Bridge - Greenville, SC - 002.jpg) have been released under OTRS tickets; however I don't have details as to whether that was by a representative of the firm. (It may be that Wsvan worked for the firm, but if they were doing the renderings then they might well not have the ability to release images which belong to the firm.) At least two files (File:Woodrow Wilson Memorial Bridge, Washington DC Area.jpg and File:Phyllis J. Tilley Memorial Bridge, Fort Worth, Texas.jpg) were credited to a professional photographer and have an OTRS ticket apparently from them. Many of the renderings are atop photographs by other photographers, which is its own can of worms.
- Greg Folkins Photoography (talk · contribs) uploaded two files in September 2012, claimed as their own work. I find it suspicious that:
- A professional photographer who intends to donate their images (perhaps as free advertising) would spell photography incorrectly
- The images are of a bridge that Wsvan uploaded an OTRS image of several months later, and Wsvan added a category to one image
- "Bridge Architect: Rosales + Partners" listed prominently in the image descriptions
- One image contains "Hard Copy Copyright Provided. Must present Copyright and Usage Form to reproduce." in the metadata, which seems unlikely to be consistent with release under a CC license.
- Moonwell (talk · contribs) uploaded one image (File:George Washington Carver Bridge.jpg) of a Rosales + Partners bridge in May 2013, then immediately created a user page with links to their various photography websites. Again:
- "Bridge Architect: Rosales + Partners" listed prominently in the image description
- Wsvan shows up within a day and crops the uploader's watermark from the photos
- "Copyright: Jason Bradwell, Moonwell Photography | Photo licensed to Rosales + Partners 8/29/2011 | Royalty free license for general marketing use" is in the metadata. This is not something the photographer would have put in an image they were uploading to Commons - but would have been one they were sending to the firm.
- Nionoodle (talk · contribs) uploaded one portrait of the firm's principal in June 2015, followed by 11 renderings of the firm's projects in October and November, then six photos in April 2016. The renderings are again largely claimed as their own work; the portrait (File:Miguel Rosales Portrait.jpg) is claimed to be owned by the firm but again the metadata reveals the real photographer who provided the image to the firm for marketing purposes. The latest six images are credited to a professional photographer in the area, but there is no evidence that the photographer released them under this license.
Of the five editors, only Wsvan and Nionoodle have edited enwiki where the images are primarily used. Both appear to have added the images and promotional language to the articles on the various bridges. I suspect but cannot prove that Wsvan, Fstop222, and Nionoodle may all be promotional accounts related to the firm. Additionally, based on what I've presented above, I believe that User:Moonwell and User:Greg Folkins Photoography may well be sockpuppets of User:Wsvan. That may not be a big deal as those three accounts appear to be inactive. Nionoodle is the only of the five that has been active in the past year.
Given the complicated nature of copyrights, frequent claims of own work on professionally produced renders and photos, and so on, it appears very likely to me that the vast majority of the images uploaded by these five accounts lack sufficient evidence of proper permissions to be kept on Commons. Even if some were uploaded by employees of the firm, they may not have had the actual ability to license the photos. Based on this, I propose that all images uploaded by these five accounts be deleted, save for those images uploaded by Wsvan which have OTRS permissions. Those OTRS files should be double-checked to confirm that the emailed permission is truly valid. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 19:16, 20 June 2016 (UTC)
- The editors could be different persons, some of them perhaps interns or other employees or former employees or contractors with the firm, perhaps loosely supervised by someone at the firm. Perhaps they don't understand Wikipedia/Commons processes and rules about COI and so on, but the photos and text content developed have a lot of merit, so it is worth working with them to get it done better.
- I came across the w:Port Columbus Airport Crossover Taxiway Bridge article which uses four of these photos, an article which was developed by Wsvan. I have defended the article at an AFD on it. The photos are great, and the articles have value, though promotionalism needs to be toned down by editing. I would much rather work with the editor(s) and get OTRS permissions for all of the photos, than delete them. Could OTRS be asked to check on the successful OTRS actions, and see if those could be extended? I oppose deletion of the photos if we have not played out the possibilities here. I would be willing to make formal requests and so on, if I knew the process. --Doncram (talk) 22:52, 20 July 2016 (UTC)
Comment I confirm that File:Liberty_Bridge_-_Greenville,_SC_-_001.jpg,File:Liberty_Bridge_-_Greenville,_SC_-_002.jpg, File:Woodrow_Wilson_Memorial_Bridge,_Washington_DC_Area.jpg, File:Phyllis J. Tilley Memorial Bridge, Fort Worth, Texas.jpg have a valid OTRS permission by Rosales + Partners and/or by the photographer. (BTW why are you requesting deletion for already checked files and authorizations?) --Ruthven (msg) 14:06, 1 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: No consensus for deletion. I suggest contacting OTRS to see if the ticket can be applied to more images, and then requesting OTRS be filed on the others. --Reventtalk 08:54, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deletion request by OTRS agent
[edit]OTRS agent (verify): After doing a secondary review of the following OTRS-tickets, I have concluded that the email sender is not the copyright owner of thes following files, and that they are Commons:License laundering.
- ticket:2012052310011681
- File:Leonard P. Zakim Bunker Hill Bridge - Boston, MA.jpg
- is © Andy Ryan per LoC.
- File:Leonard P. Zakim Bunker Hill Bridge - Boston, MA.jpg
- ticket:2013061310008772
- File:Liberty Bridge - Greenville, SC - 001.jpg
- The email sender is not the copyright owner, per attachment in OTRS-ticket
- File:Liberty Bridge - Greenville, SC - 002.jpg
- The email sender is not the copyright owner, per attachment in OTRS-ticket
- File:Liberty Bridge - Greenville, SC - 001.jpg
- ticket:2013062110007776
- File:George Washington Carver Bridge - 01.jpg
- The email sender is not the copyright owner, per attachment in OTRS-ticket
- File:George Washington Carver Bridge - 02.jpg
- The email sender is not the copyright owner, per attachment in OTRS-ticket
- File:George Washington Carver Bridge - 02.jpg
- The email sender is not the copyright owner, per attachment in OTRS-ticket
- File:George Washington Carver Bridge - 03.jpg
- The email sender is not the copyright owner, per attachment in OTRS-ticket
- File:George Washington Carver Bridge - 04.jpg
- The email sender is not the copyright owner, per attachment in OTRS-ticket
- File:George Washington Carver Bridge - 05.jpg
- The email sender is not the copyright owner, per attachment in OTRS-ticket
- File:George Washington Carver Bridge - 01.jpg
I hereby, as an OTRS-agent, request these files deletion, given that they are not released by the proper copyright owner. (@Ruthven: Please see attachments of the tickets I mentioned. The email sender discloses that they are not the owner of the images.) Josve05a (talk) 10:21, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Delete After closing the prior DR due to a lack of consensus to delete on the stated grounds, and then flagging nearly all of the described files as {{Npd}} due to the file pages making it clear that they do not belong to the uploader (who cannot, possibly, be half a dozen different people) I have no doubt that these files are not properly licensed. Reventtalk 10:30, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
- (conflicted) @Josve05a: ticket:2013061310008772 answered you there, and ticket:2013062110007776 is the same. ticket:2012052310011681 is from the same client and seems legit (no attachments), but the photographer's authorization is missing. Instead of deleting, we should ask for clarification to ROSALES + PARTNERS. --Ruthven (msg) 10:39, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
- Not having permission from the photographer is the literal definition of not being legit. Josve05a (talk) 10:50, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
- I am not saying the contrary, but this holds only for one file. --Ruthven (msg) 11:40, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
- Not having permission from the photographer is the literal definition of not being legit. Josve05a (talk) 10:50, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Delete So going through the tickets I concur with Josve05a on this. The ticket does not contain verification from the actual copyright owner. As for Ruthven's suggestion that we wait and contact them, yes to contact, no to wait. Copyright violations should not be held on to in hopes that we will get what we need. Contact them just to inform them of the situation, sure. But delete nonetheless. --Majora (talk) 23:28, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:13, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
This photo montage is a collection of copyrighted images (including http://tour.lk/images/Sri_lanka/matara/Blowhole.jpg; ) and therefore is clearly not the editors own work as stated. Dan arndt (talk) 13:59, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Mentioned web source is from 2014, long predating upload here. COM:Collages. --Reventtalk 11:17, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
This photo montage is made up of a number of copyright images sourced from other websites (including http://for91days.com/photos/SriLanka/Mulkirigala%20Rock%20Temple/Mulkirigala-Tank.jpg; http://www.srilankaview.com/Mulkirigala/images/Mulkirigala100.JPG; http://www.eva.lk/images/os_imagegallery_127/original/img1.jpg). This is clearly not the work of the editor as stated. Dan arndt (talk) 13:50, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Reventtalk 13:04, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Because, it was a misstake Falaqraju (talk) 16:33, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleterious eek sh 223.176.10.76 12:14, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading week. Taivo (talk) 19:31, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
The main subject of the image may be copyrighted. Rodrigolopes (talk) 21:49, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio per COM:DW. --INeverCry 20:46, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:55, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:26, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Shortly, this appears to be out of scope nonsense, as lacking any kind of objective factual basis. "South Sudan converted to esoteric astrology"... really? Reventtalk 21:24, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, I'm aware this is in use, however I strongly question describing any of those uses as 'legitimate'. Reventtalk 21:28, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Keep: Since the file is currently in use (therefore in scope), is better to discuss this in Wikipedia first. --Amitie 10g (talk) 21:54, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Amitie 10g: The usage on the Somali wikipedia is in a recent creation by the uploader. The two on the Japanese wikipedia have been principally edited by the uploader. All three are flagged for lacking sources and consisting of original research. The file itself does not, and has never, quoted sources, and appears to have been repeatedly added to articles on various wikis for over a year, by what appears to be various incarnations of the same person, and repeatedly removed. It's pretty clearly not 'legitimate use', but if you insist I'll unlink it first and see if anyone squawks. They won't. It's being used for cross-wiki POV pushing. Reventtalk 22:39, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
- Whm that makes sense. --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:17, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
- Note: I became aware of this problem when the uploader included it on an article he had created on Amharic wp about "Yemeni astrology", but when I asked him about the map he immediately removed it again without replying. The Amharic text of his article seems to have been done by google translate, which does not render idiomatic or correct text, aside from being full of wild and dubious claims. The "home" article for "Yemeni astrology" seems to be on Chinese wp, but he has recently introduced the topic into Amharic, Somali, Laotian and Khmer wikis as well. I think this would certainly be news to Amharic speakers that Ethiopia "believes in astrology" of any kind! Til Eulenspiegel (talk) 22:11, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
This image already exists as [1]. AKS471883 (talk) 03:39, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
![[1]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Astrology_map.png#.7B.7Bint:filedesc.7D.7D){kind=link}
- Are you asking us to add that image to this DR? It appears to just be a clone of an old version of this. Reventtalk 04:50, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete I added the other map into the request below heading. Taivo (talk) 05:21, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - utter nonsense..--Stemoc 06:24, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: The linked article en:Esoteric astrology is tagged DR as well per based on "books of nonsense". --Achim (talk) 20:20, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - and this new copy: File:States use Astrology map.svg Til Eulenspiegel (talk) 20:07, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination / nonsense. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:49, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
copyvio, source neither CC mor PD (http://www.jill2016.com/jill_stein_selects_ajamu_baraka_as_vp) 75.172.241.80 02:37, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. --Proud User (talk) 21:17, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 04:23, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Слава иванов (talk · contribs)
[edit]please see sourse provided by the uploader, clear copyright (© 2015 Газета “СП”. Все права защищены.), but not CC
Cap1000 (talk) 03:00, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 04:21, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Upload error Stobaios (talk) 15:02, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: uploaders request on upload day. --JuTa 04:24, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Unused low-resolution poor-filetype composite of text and simple diagram. Have tons of equivalent simple diagrams in high quality in Category:Carbon monoxide that could be composited with text (or placed with wikitext) for any purpose. DMacks (talk) 15:05, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 08:46, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
no esta en uso actualmente Vilcafernando2 (talk) 00:19, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
no permission 2003:45:5C6F:A801:593A:3875:FFCD:D94F 08:49, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Uploader's request one month after uploading. Unused, but maybe does not surpass threshold of originality, which is quite high in USA. Taivo (talk) 17:18, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination/COM:PRP. --INeverCry 00:17, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
promotional image, no usage Triplecaña (talk) 00:23, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:17, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Vítor as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.angers-sco.fr/ didn't ever release their logo under a commons license, as can be seen in this bit of text from http://www.angers-sco.fr/index/cgu: Ainsi toute diffusion, copie, duplication, modification, transfert, représentation ou reproduction, intégrale ou partielle, du site ou de l'un quelconque des éléments qui le composent, de quelque manière et à quelque titre que ce soit, est expressément interdite, de même que leur altération. Le non respect de cette interdiction est susceptible de constituer un acte de contrefaçon engageant la responsabilité de son auteur. Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:24, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:45, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
著作権侵害のため。と同時に、肖像権の侵害のため、権利者として削除依頼します。 118.238.203.218 03:42, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep this image has been successfully reviewed (archive.is), and CC license is not revocable. and the person is public figure and the image does not harm the person's privacy. --Puramyun31 (talk) 04:12, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per above. --INeverCry 00:18, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Deleted with the permission of Yuka Terasaki ( https://mobile.twitter.com/terachan0804/status/833358423353815040?p=v ） 14.0.180.121 01:19, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Translation of the tweet: the subject doesn't like the picture and find it embarassing. I wouldn't mind a courtesy deletion per COM:PIP. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 01:30, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- It seems to me that she abhorred this picture appeared on her all wikipedia pages ([2]，[3]). Please delete it. -- 14.0.180.121 03:26, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep per the result of previous discussion. also there is currently no alternative image on Commons. --Puramyun31 (talk) 09:52, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Strong oppose That are not the reasons why the picture can be kept. And Yuka Terasaki had already expressed her stance obviously, you can take her photos at some events like "NISSAN あ、安部礼司〜BEYOND THE AVERAGE" の コラボ企画 if you need. Please respect her feelings first. -- 14.0.180.121 12:20, 21 February 2017 (UTC)- As Terasaki Yuka speaks twitter, she is shy about this picture and hopes to be deleted. Also, she is in trouble. As she is reflected in her photographs, her feelings should be taken into consideration to the utmost and I will positively tell you to delete it.--218.47.209.169 13:52, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
deleting the file because of simple reason such as "I don't like it" could negatively affect independency and NPOV status of wikimedia sites. so I disagree this threat. --Puramyun31 (talk) 15:37, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
- In fact, the picture does not only belong to you. And Yuka Terasaki had showed her thought, everyone can represent her in order to delete the "unauthorized" picture. If you get an authentic permission of Yuka Terasaki, you can use it freely. Otherwise, you should respect her choice, putting yourself in her shoes. That is not only the problem of Wikimedia Commons. -- 14.0.180.121 16:45, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. LTA account. --Yann (talk) 18:45, 21 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-3){kind=link}
The video cannot find on Youtube. It means the license may be wrong. 221.77.64.167 01:22, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- This link [4] is difficult to prove that the photo came from this video. -- 14.0.180.87 01:36, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Keep Per two previous deletion request. As said before ithis image was freely licensed in youtube "(archive.is), and CC license is not revocable. and the person is public figure and the image does not harm the person's privacy." Also this file has been successfully reviewed by a license reviewer in 2015 as having a free CC license, AKA someone that saw the video and saw the same image. Also i think that this IPs are only SPA. That last deletion request was closed as keep, yestarday, so dont try to gamble the system. Tm (talk) 01:41, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Strong oppose Someone is not everyone, the source and the photo should support mutually, but it cannot check now, so the license becomes invalid. -- 14.0.180.87 01:59, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
- Comment No, your wrong or trying to subvert the true. The source was reviewed by Thibaut120094, a license reviewer in October 25 2015 as having CC-BY 3.0 license, as can be seen in the page. So dont try to make other fools or subvert the fact that the license was, is and will always be valid. Tm (talk) 02:35, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. LTA account. --Yann (talk) 13:18, 22 February 2017 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-4){kind=link}
画像に映っている寺崎裕香が、この動画の一時停止の写真を「消してほしい」と繰り返しTwitterアカウントで訴えているため。映る本人はこのキャプチャの写真を許可していないため。人格権・肖像権の侵害です。 トマトうどん (talk) 11:09, 22 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep Per previous deletion requests. As said before this image was freely licensed in youtube "(archive.is), and CC license is not revocable. and the person is public figure and the image does not harm the person's privacy." Also there is no alternative CC-licensed image on Commons. Puramyun31 (talk) 10:21, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
p.s. this image uploaded as an alternative by the nominator, is not licensed under CC license (Template:YouTube CC-BY) . if someone really want to upload a better image of her in order to depict the voice actress at the Wikipedia article about her, the image should be freely-licensed. Puramyun31 (talk) 10:21, 23 June 2022 (UTC)- 「Template:YouTube CC-BY」の件を教えていただきありがとうございました。以後、画像を投稿する際に気をつけます。 トマトうどん (talk) 11:44, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
- Keep per Puramyun31, @Yann: Could you please close this again? --Thibaut (talk) 13:06, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
Kept: the image has survived multiple DRs already and there's still no valid reason for deletion. --Adamant1 (talk) 00:10, 2 July 2022 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Secondarywaltz as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: Commons is not your personal free web host. Personal photograph not realistically useful for educational purposes. INeverCry 04:03, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by US493607540 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Looks like caricatures grabbed from somewhere, see title for some of them, it include "MOBILEFACEBOOKDESKTOP..."
- File:MOBILEFACEBOOKDESKTOPEAJSSN321882417USPassport493607540CDLClassBCommercial07-241-0537StateofCol html m78b3a512ERIKANDREJOHANSSON321882417LINCOLN (12).gif
- File:MOBILEFACEBOOKDESKTOPEAJSSN321882417USPassport493607540CDLClassBCommercial07-241-0537StateofCol html m78b3a512ERIKANDREJOHANSSON321882417LINCOLN (11).gif
- File:MOBILEFACEBOOKDESKTOPEAJSSN321882417USPassport493607540CDLClassBCommercial07-241-0537StateofCol html m78b3a512ERIKANDREJOHANSSON321882417LINCOLN (9).gif
- File:MOBILEFACEBOOKDESKTOPEAJSSN321882417USPassport493607540CDLClassBCommercial07-241-0537StateofCol html m78b3a512ERIKANDREJOHANSSON321882417LINCOLN (7).gif
- File:MOBILEFACEBOOKDESKTOPEAJSSN321882417USPassport493607540CDLClassBCommercial07-241-0537StateofCol html m78b3a512ERIKANDREJOHANSSON321882417LINCOLN (8).gif
- File:EAJSSN321882417XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX493607540CDLCommercial07-241-0537StateofROOMFULLOF.png
- File:EAJSSN321882417SUHARTO493607540CDLCommercial07-241-0537StateofROOMFULLOF.png
- File:EAJSSN321882417SYDAFRICASOUTHBOTPV493607540CDLCommercial07-241-0537StateofROOMFULLOF.png
- File:EAJSSN321882417LANGENEWZEALAND493607540CDLCommercial07-241-0537StateofROOMFULLOF.png
- File:EAJSSN321882417NELSONMADELA493607540CDLCommercial07-241-0537StateofROOMFULLOF.png
- File:EAJSSN321882417ROBERTMUGABE493607540CDLCommercial07-241-0537StateofROOMFULLOF.png
- File:EAJEAJSSN321882417CIASTATUTCARLYFIONAEOFLIBUNCLFACISM3493607540CDLClassBCommercial07-241-0537StateofColoPersonal098.png
- File:EAJSSN321882417BRIAN493607540CDLCommercial07-241-0537StateofROOMFULLOF.png
- File:EAJGOOGLFASNORTHKOREACHsCDLClassBCommercial07-241-0537StateofColoPersonal098.png
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:58, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by US493607540 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Looks a scan of something, not ownwork
2.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:59, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:20, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
obvious photomontage, lacks of sources to determine the copyright statut
Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:08, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of proyect scope, unused personal image Helmy oved 05:40, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
This is an irrelevant page for uploading P.Chengalvarayan 05:49, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
private photo Mitte27 (talk) 22:52, 30 November 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 19:32, 9 December 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: Not a hosting service for personal profile photos / self-promotion Enyavar (talk) 22:52, 10 December 2021 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:47, 17 December 2021 (UTC)
Out of proyect scope, unused personal image Helmy oved 05:55, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Private image. Self-promotion. DavidIvar (talk) 06:24, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
low resolution, no metadata. potentioal copyvio Dmitry89 (talk) 06:27, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:21, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rezneki_Rita_5555.jpg RitaRezneki1973 (talk) 06:51, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --INeverCry 00:26, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rezneki_Rita_33333.jpg RitaRezneki1973 (talk) 06:52, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --INeverCry 00:26, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rezneki_Rita_555666.jpg RitaRezneki1973 (talk) 06:53, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --INeverCry 00:26, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Ferik Bálint (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:Game One.png
- File:Tv.Marci Csoport Logo.png
- File:MOZI TV.png
- File:PNGssssssssssssssssssssssss.png
- File:Animax2logo.png
Out of scope. --Sasuke88 (talk) 07:03, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
.gif&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Bad quality. --Sasuke88 (talk) 07:03, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Administrators: Please block this vandal. --Sasuke88 (talk) 07:03, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:23, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rezneki_Rita_987.jpg 82.141.171.44 07:05, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --INeverCry 00:26, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rezneki_Rita_1212.jpg 82.141.171.44 07:05, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --INeverCry 00:26, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rezneki_Rita_692.jpg 82.141.171.44 07:06, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --INeverCry 00:27, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rezneki_Rita.jpg 82.141.171.44 07:06, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --INeverCry 00:27, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rezneki_Rita_437.jpg 82.141.171.44 07:08, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --INeverCry 00:27, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rezneki_Rita_8.png 82.141.171.44 07:08, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --INeverCry 00:27, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rezneki_Rita_628.png 82.141.171.44 07:10, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --INeverCry 00:27, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rezneki_Rita_321.jpg 82.141.171.44 07:10, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --INeverCry 00:26, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Not an original photo (there is no stadium "Школа мяча" of such capacity), likely a copytight violation (seems to be based on a stock photo of a baseball arena). In any case photo is of little encyclopaedic use. NickK (talk) 07:11, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:27, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rezneki_Rita_981.jpg 82.141.171.44 07:11, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --INeverCry 00:28, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rezneki_Rita_66661.jpg 82.141.171.44 07:12, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --INeverCry 00:28, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rezneki_Rita_88881.JPG 82.141.171.44 07:13, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rezneki_Rita_88881.JPG 82.141.171.44 07:14, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --INeverCry 00:28, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rezneki_Rita_684.png 82.141.171.44 07:15, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --INeverCry 00:29, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rezneki_Rita_345.jpg 82.141.171.44 07:16, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --INeverCry 00:29, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rezneki_Rita_892.png 82.141.171.44 07:17, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --INeverCry 00:29, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rezneki_Rita_2015.jpg 82.141.171.44 07:17, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --INeverCry 00:29, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rezneki_Rita_333456.jpg 82.141.171.44 07:18, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --INeverCry 00:29, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
selfie, out of com:EDUSE Pippobuono (talk) 08:02, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
out of com:EDUSE, used for vandalism on ko.wikipedia Pippobuono (talk) 08:05, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
This logo is either unfree or out of scope. I don't know whether it is the same picture as the one deleted in Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Tabledoornachonavarro. Stefan2 (talk) 14:41, 27 January 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. @Stefan2: The two previously deleted files of this name showed a young person and a burning hand. Green Giant (talk) 21:57, 29 February 2016 (UTC)
Commons has a lot of stop signs. This file has resolution only 80×120 pixels and it is unused. Probably out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:09, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Evgenius69 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Taken from [5]. No permission.
![[5]](http://yarnovosti.com/gallery/news1/37619/les-13.jpg){kind=link}
Sealle (talk) 08:17, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
probably no own work, cinema advertising Kürschner (talk) 08:30, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted COM:PACKAGING. Taivo (talk) 08:38, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
redundant. Wikedit109 (talk) 08:48, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
redundant. I uploaded this. not useful anymore as i have uploaded new ones. Wikedit109 (talk) 08:49, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
redundant. I uploaded this. not useful anymore as i have uploaded new ones. Wikedit109 (talk) 08:49, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
redundant. I uploaded this. not useful anymore as i have uploaded new ones. Wikedit109 (talk) 08:49, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
redundant. I uploaded this. not useful anymore as i have uploaded new ones. Wikedit109 (talk) 08:50, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
redundant. I uploaded this. not useful anymore as i have uploaded new ones. Wikedit109 (talk) 08:50, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
redundant. I uploaded this. not useful anymore as i have uploaded new ones. Wikedit109 (talk) 08:50, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
redundant. not useful anymore. Wikedit109 (talk) 08:51, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
You are not copyright holder of coat of arms of air base. The file can be in public domain due to other reasons, but correct license is needed. Taivo (talk) 08:51, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
redundant. I uploaded this. not useful anymore as i have uploaded new ones. Wikedit109 (talk) 08:52, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
redundant. I uploaded this. not useful anymore as i have uploaded new ones. Wikedit109 (talk) 08:52, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:30, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
redundant. I uploaded this. not useful anymore as i have uploaded new ones. Wikedit109 (talk) 08:53, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, found at https://www.expedia.es/Altamira-Hoteles-Caracas-Palace-Hotel.h12417762.Informacion-Hotel . I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:53, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
all images copied from the internet but uploaded as "own work". Probable copyright violations.
- File:Grande rio 2016.jpg
- File:Plenario.jpg
- File:Câmara de caxias.jpg
- File:Grande Rio 2007.jpg
- File:Duque brasão.png
- File:Bandeira de Duque.png
- File:Brasãocx.jpg
- File:Duque de Caxias.png
Takeaway (talk) 09:08, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violations. Images taken from the internet but uploaded as "own work" and under a CC-BY-SA-4.0 license in violation of the copyright licenses from where they were taken.
Takeaway (talk) 15:23, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Continued copyright violations bu DHCRF
Takeaway (talk) 10:22, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:39, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Centered on copyrighted material. TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 09:08, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
_-with_Persian_comment.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-with_Persian_comment.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused and not realistically useful for educational purposes. This is just File:Slingshot (weapon).jpg with some pixelated text at the top left corner. Also: copyright violation for falsely taking credit for other people's work (which is just as illegal even if the work is published under a free license). —LX (talk, contribs) 09:21, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
_-with_Persian_comment.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
_-with_Persian_comment.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted after the consensus at Commons:Deletion requests/Uploads by Winfried Povel, so this is a candidate for speedy deletion (criterion 4), however uploader may indeed be the copyright holder, so another DR probably won't hurt. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed by following the instructions at COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 09:29, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
There is no Freedom of Panorama in Russia for 2D-artworks. Well-Informed Optimist (talk) 09:49, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
low quality image, without description, unused for three years Pippobuono (talk) 10:31, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 10:48, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:31, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 10:48, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 10:50, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:32, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook.
- File:13396882 1619180325039120 807077725 o 01.jpg
- File:13396882 1619180325039120 807077725 o 02.jpg
- File:13396882 1619180325039120 807077725 o 03.jpg
- File:Kulmak 1.jpg
- File:Kulmak 2.jpg
- File:Kulmak 3.jpg
- File:Kulmak 4.jpg
- File:Liqeni i madh.jpg
- File:Lugina e Valbones Tropoje 1.jpg
- File:Lugina e Valbones Tropoje.jpg
- File:Mountains in snow.jpg
- File:Pogradeci ,nje mrekulli natyrore 01.jpg
- File:Pogradeci ,nje mrekulli natyrore 02.jpg
- File:Pogradeci ,nje mrekulli natyrore 03.jpg
- File:Pogradeci ,nje mrekulli natyrore 04.jpg
- File:POGRADECI 01.jpg
- File:POGRADECI 02.jpg
- File:POGRADECI 03.jpg
- File:POGRADECI 04.jpg
- File:POGRADECI 05.jpg
- File:POGRADECI 06.jpg
- File:POGRADECI 07.jpg
- File:POGRADECI 08.jpg
- File:Pylli i Sodes.jpg
- File:Vizite ne malsi.jpg
- File:Vlore.jpg
- File:Zona e Kurbinit.jpg
Rodrigolopes (talk) 10:50, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 10:51, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 10:51, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 10:51, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 10:51, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Private image/Photographs of identifiable people/Request of the person in the picture 최광모 (talk) 10:51, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
No FoP Ukraine Holopoman (talk) 11:11, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:33, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook.
- File:Anaba edough.jpg
- File:Bleu green sea.jpg
- File:Bordj el mokrani.jpg
- File:Bordj ghedir.jpg
- File:Boumedfaa ain defla سد المستقبل.jpg
- File:Chez l'artisan de la Casbah.jpg
- File:Chréa-Blida.jpg
- File:Chélia 2, Batna - khenchla.jpg
- File:Chélia 3, Batna - khenchla.jpg
- File:Chélia 4, Batna - khenchla.jpg
- File:Chélia 5, Batna - khenchla.jpg
- File:Frawna Tlemcen.jpg
- File:Ghoufi Batna - Biskra.jpg
- File:Ghoufi, Batna - Biskra.jpg
- File:L'Algerie *.jpg
- File:L'Algerie***.jpg
- File:L'Algerie**.jpg
- File:L'Algerie.jpg
- File:La cote est de Tipaza ville en plein hiver.jpg
- File:Metlili chaamba palace.jpg
- File:Nature SEG 2.jpg
- File:Nature SEG.jpg
- File:Vu panoramique sur la ville de Hadjout ex Marrengo a partir du mont Chenoua.jpg
- File:Zemouri.jpg
- File:أعالي بن ياجيس بجيجل.jpg
- File:حكايات زمان.jpg
Rodrigolopes (talk) 11:14, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rosy nickolly (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused private vanity photos of non-notable individual. Outside project scope.
DAJF (talk) 11:26, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation. Not created by the uploader as mentioned. Regards, KCVelaga ☚╣✉╠☛ 11:27, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
author's request: no longer used, no longer needed. --ThomasPusch (talk) 11:30, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
author's request: no longer used, no longer needed ThomasPusch (talk) 11:32, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
1 - 5 KB images with no EXIF information. Probably not own work.
- File:3 Sisters - Blue Mountains - 9.jpg
- File:3 Sisters - Blue Mountains - 11.jpg
- File:3 Sisters - Blue Mountains - 10.jpg
- File:3 Sisters - Blue Mountains - 8.jpg
- File:3 Sisters - Blue Mountains - 7.jpg
- File:3 Sisters - Blue Mountains - 6.jpg
- File:3 Sisters - Blue Mountains - 4.jpg
- File:3 Sisters - Blue Mountains - 5.jpg
- File:3 Sisters - Blue Mountains - 1.jpg
- File:3 Sisters - Blue Mountains - 3.jpg
- File:3 Sisters - Blue Mountains - 2.jpg
Rodrigolopes (talk) 11:34, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Low-quality image, seems to be copied from a YouTube video. Einstein2 (talk) 11:57, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Unused completely blurred image which serves no educational value. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 11:58, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
- Support deletion, I was about to suggest the same. -- Nick Moreau (talk) 21:14, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
the redirect is not needed and ambiguous. Komischn (talk) 12:19, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope and possible copyvio. RIP iPad 2 (talk) 12:48, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
- Even if licensed, I can't see this being in scope. Reventtalk 13:02, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
personal photo, not used Avron (talk) 12:57, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:34, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Sporti as duplicate and the most recent rationale was: duplicate of Erinnerung an Laibach 1880 (4).jpg. They are the same image though this version has the roof and sky removed, reason unknown. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:29, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by Sporti as duplicate and the most recent rationale was: duplicate|Ljubljana z okolico 1870 (7).jpg. Same image though they are differently cropped. This has no border, though has more of the actual image cropped. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:31, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:40, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
unused screenshot of software, probable copyvio, and private datas Pippobuono (talk) 13:32, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
It doubt this image licence was ever reviewed. Tineye finds the image but it is not accessable, however, the wayback machine link works and the site is clearly copyright so we would need an OTRS verification to confirm the licence and keep the image. Ww2censor (talk) 13:34, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation: http://www.duma.bg/node/60161 Tkarcher (talk) 13:41, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 111.250.22.129 as Copyvio (copyright) and the most recent rationale was: https://new.vk.com/wall278997685_226 The watermark is the same name as the contributor, though the image is not clearly in scope. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:43, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:41, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 111.250.22.129 as Copyvio (copyright) and the most recent rationale was: https://new.vk.com/wall278997685_210 . Image would not appear to be within scope. — billinghurst sDrewth 13:44, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:41, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:54, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:55, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:57, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
No Commons:Freedom of panorama in Poland for non-permanent displays. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:59, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:1bH7DehDfVU.jpg
- File:Oa1HVX0afzc.jpg
- File:ZIu9adVptjY.jpg
- File:12783681hk.jpg
- File:OVwPJR0jCWw.jpg
- File:Girl in the Hermitage.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:00, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: text document of questionable notability used only on user page. Should be moved there as wiki-text. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
- File:Serie d'élaboration.pdf
- File:Yassin ressort.pdf
- File:Cours Master Phys des semi-conducteur.pdf
- File:Correction proposée pour l'examen de la mécanique quantique.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:35, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.
- File:Correction d'examen d'électronique analogique 2014 2015 ratt.pdf
- File:Correction d'examen d'électronique 2014 2015.pdf
- File:TDs de physique du solide.pdf
- File:Correction d'examen d'électronique.pdf
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:28, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:43, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused presentation of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:36, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by 111.250.22.129 as Copyvio (copyright) and the most recent rationale was: http://olesyavas.wix.com/olesyavas#!5/c1ya Photo probably not within scope. — billinghurst sDrewth 14:09, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:41, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Hardikpanchal2189 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logos of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private files storage. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://gwsdistribution.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/montecarlobottle1.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Commons:Derivative works from web site screenshot. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. Low quality. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:37, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Natalie Lobo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).
- File:Power Dreams foto.png
- File:Power Dreams foto 3.jpg
- File:Power Dreams Yes Sir.png
- File:Power Dreams foto 2.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:41, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Tento obraz je zobrazen asi zezadu Ivas1950 (talk) 21:15, 26 March 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:06, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Most uploads by the user can be kept, but this is clearly not PD-art since not 2-dimensional. Anvilaquarius (talk) 14:28, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:41, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Daniel Alejandro Salazar Salazar (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://diariodelosandes.com/uploads/noticias/principal1/tru13p18f11.jpg.
- File:Virgen del Carmen zulia.jpg
- File:Virgen del carmen bocono trujillo.jpg
- File:Virgen del carmen petare.jpg
- File:Virgen DEL CARMEN DE MIRANDA.jpg
- File:Virgen del carmen margarita.jpg
- File:Virgen del carmen, montalban ejido merida.jpg
- File:VIRGEN DEL CARMEN lara.jpg
- File:Virgen del carmen apure y la guardia nacional.jpg
- File:Virgen del carmen aragua.jpg
- File:Virgen del carmen, San Joaquin, Carabobo.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LuthernBCCM (talk · contribs)
[edit]Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by LuthernBCCM (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, watermarks.
- File:Sabah Theological Seminary Colleges.jpg
- File:Sabah Theological Seminary.jpg
- File:331115259 1280x720.jpg
- File:1026-sem-p.jpg
- File:BCCM Elder.jpg
- File:BCCM Tuaran.jpg
- File:BCCM KK.jpg
- File:BCCM Leader.png
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:42, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Direct copy image from Central Weather Bureau ROC without permission.--FRG2 (talk) 05:57, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Government Website Open Information Announcement (Information Utilization Policy of the Central Weather Bureau World Wide Web): "In order to facilitate the public to better utilize the website information, all of CWB's publicly posted information and materials that are protected under copyright provisions may be reauthorized for public use without cost in a non-exclusive manner. The users are not limited to time and by region to reproduce, adapt, edit, publicly transmit or utilize with other methods, and as well as to develop various products or services (herein known as derivations). This authorization will not be retracted hereafter, and the users do not have to acquire any written or other methods of authorization from the Administration. However, when using it, the user should state the source." Also, please see Template:PD-ROC-official/en: "The constitution, acts, regulations, or official documents (including proclamations, text of speeches, news releases, and other documents prepared by civil servants in the course of carrying out their duties)."- Earth Saver (talk) at 07:42, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per Earth Saver. --INeverCry 00:47, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial flag of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:48, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Copyright: Imperial War Museum (IWM) http://www.iwm.org.uk/collections/item/object/205247304 2003:45:5C6F:A801:40E0:C54F:B605:913D 14:45, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
- 1914 work, the museum cannot (in most of cases) take the copyright of an old work. --Amitie 10g (talk) 16:26, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: 1914 image widely published at the time and since. --INeverCry 00:49, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Private photo. Unused file. Cjp24 (talk) 15:02, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
derivative work 2003:45:5C6F:A801:40E0:C54F:B605:913D 15:12, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Unused picture of questionable notability. Cjp24 (talk) 15:17, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Dubious "own" work 2003:45:5C6F:A801:40E0:C54F:B605:913D 15:33, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Suspected copyvio: watermark photo credit and uploader not the same. P 1 9 9 ✉ 15:41, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Haile Selassie in 1930. Getty Images claims copyright: http://www.gettyimages.pt/evento/ras-tafari-assumes-title-emperor-haile-selassie-52037697#2nd-november-1930-emperor-of-ethiopia-haile-selassie-i-originally-picture-id3291705 2003:45:5C6F:A801:40E0:C54F:B605:913D 15:42, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Twitter bird is copyrighted. Fry1989 eh? 15:58, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Speedy delete: Clearly a Speedy case. Changed to {{Copyvio}} --Amitie 10g (talk) 16:07, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Derivative work of this picture Léna (talk) 16:01, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per Commons rules which seem not to allow this kind of derivative work of a protected work. Hégésippe | ±Θ± 16:15, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
- Il n'est en rien interdit pour un artiste de s'inspirer d'une photographie... Vanoot59 (talk) 02:17, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- Il s'agit d'un travail dérivé basé sur une photographie, lire Commons:Œuvre_dérivée et Commons:Guide_de_référence#Dessins_bas.C3.A9s_sur_des_photographies : une telle œuvre ne répond pas aux exigences de Commons sur les licences. Si l'auteur de la photographie décidait de la placer sous licence libre ou dans le domaine public, l'import du dessin (et de la photographie, du coup) deviendraient possibles. El pitareio (talk) 11:00, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- Il n'est en rien interdit pour un artiste de s'inspirer d'une photographie... Vanoot59 (talk) 02:17, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Request the end of the otrs procedure. Olivier LPB (talk) 17:14, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Olivier LPB : Autorisation OTRS du peintre confirmée, maintenant si cette image est acceptable ou non sur Commons est du ressort de la communauté. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 06:07, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Que l'auteur de l'oeuvre dérivée accepte les licences libres ne changent pas que l'image initiale est une oeuvre protégée par le droit d'auteur jusqu'à preuve du contraire. HaguardDuNord (talk) 14:04, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:Derivative works, as the level of similarity is very high between the two media, and as the drawing does not contain "sufficient new, creative content" to be considerate as a derivative work itself. Kumkum (talk) 14:54, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
- Seul la position du prêtre est inspiré de la photographie ; ni les couleurs, ni le fond, ni le contexte, etc. A qui de décider que c'est une œuvre dérivée ou non ? Vanoot59 (talk) 15:33, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
- Position du corps, geste, traits du visage, regard... Soit plus de la moitié de la peinture, donc oui, ça semble dépasser beaucoup l'inspiration. HaguardDuNord (talk) 16:03, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
- Je veux dire que c'est plus proche de l'hommage, comme le serait une caricature... La position est la même mais le prêtre est ici auréolé, les jeux fermé, semblant être dans une sorte de béatitude, devant un fond noir... Il n'est plus simplement en train de lire comme sur la photo... Le fair use empèche ici la suppression, comme pour une parodie... Vanoot59 (talk) 16:11, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
- Bonjour Vanoot59. Simplement, non. Cette peinture est un travail dérivé, qui recopie la composition d'une photo soumise au droit d'auteur, qui elle est un travail original. Et le fair use ne s'applique pas sur Wikimedia Commons, et est interdit sur Wikipédia par une prise de décision communautaire. Vous pouvez toujours prendre connaissance des pages Commons:Fair use/fr Aide:Licences des fichiers importés. Cordialement, -- Fʊɠỉtɾoŋ ‘‘talk’’, 17:25, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
- Je veux dire que c'est plus proche de l'hommage, comme le serait une caricature... La position est la même mais le prêtre est ici auréolé, les jeux fermé, semblant être dans une sorte de béatitude, devant un fond noir... Il n'est plus simplement en train de lire comme sur la photo... Le fair use empèche ici la suppression, comme pour une parodie... Vanoot59 (talk) 16:11, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
- Position du corps, geste, traits du visage, regard... Soit plus de la moitié de la peinture, donc oui, ça semble dépasser beaucoup l'inspiration. HaguardDuNord (talk) 16:03, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
- Seul la position du prêtre est inspiré de la photographie ; ni les couleurs, ni le fond, ni le contexte, etc. A qui de décider que c'est une œuvre dérivée ou non ? Vanoot59 (talk) 15:33, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: Derivative work of copyright picture. --Nouill (talk) 16:28, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:Derivative works, exact same composition as the original photo. -- Fʊɠỉtɾoŋ ‘‘talk’’, 17:32, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep the Otrs has give the riht, The file is in good quality Olivier LPB (talk) 21:01, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per COM:Derivative works. Tant que le nom du photographe de l'original manque, et l'autorisation de ce photographe manque, l'autorisation du peintre est insuffisant. Jurisprudence: nl:} https://www.vn.nl/fotos-schilderen-plagiaat-of-fair-use/ --Havang(nl) (talk) 12:42, 5 August 2016 (UTC) PS. Si le photographe se fait connaître, il pourra télecharger la photo originelle, et alors on n'aura même pas besoin de cette peinture. La photo source de [6] vient du site web diocèse de Rouen: [7], c'est une photo dans lequel le micro n'a pas été supprimé par photoshop. Il y a une copie dans LA CROIX qui est signé DR (Diocèse de Rouen?). --Havang(nl) (talk) 12:51, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
- DR = Droits réservés, souvent utilisé par les journaux quand ils piquent une photo et qui ne savent pas qui en est l'auteur. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 10:50, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
- (conflit d'édition) Pour la mention DR, voir w:fr:Droits réservés : cela veut dire que La Croix a utilisé la photo sans savoir à qui l'attribuer. El pitareio (talk) 10:51, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
- Conserver The file is in good quality Mike Coppolano (talk) 16:08, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
- Attendre. J'ai envoyé ce soir un message au site du Diocèse de Rouen, avec mes condoléances et la demande de me mettre en contact avec le photographe. --Havang(nl) (talk) 20:28, 5 August 2016 (UTC)
- Havang(nl), contacter la paroisse serait peut-être plus utile ? Ils doivent toutefois être submergés de courriels (comme l'évêché), Vanoot59 (talk) 12:45, 13 August 2016 (UTC)
- Initial closure: Kept: has OTRS ticket. --INeverCry 00:51, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
- @INeverCry: hi, the issue here was not about attribution, but about a probable fraud as the picture is almost the same as a photograph taken by someone else. Kumkum (talk) 02:33, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
- If fraud is suspected, the OTRS agent handling the ticket, @Thibaut120094: , would be better able to address that concern than non-OTRS members who can't review the ticket. Thibaut120094 states above that the permission is from the painter. Thibaut120094 is an experienced admin and OTRS member, so I would suggest asking him about this. The ticket could also be posted for review at COM:OTRS/N. Léna has already brought this up at my talk, so further questions for me should be posted there. But I'm not an OTRS agent either. I saw an OTRS ticket processed by a highly trusted OTRS agent, and I trusted in his judgement, since he placed the OTRS ticket on the image after this DR was opened. INeverCry 03:49, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
- OTRS agents are trusted by definition.
- They receive and handle permissions, but they don't substitute the community for DR.
- As such, I defer the closure. --Dereckson (talk) 08:30, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
- For me the authorization of the painter is enough, because the original photo is just an inspiration not a copy. You can see it in the details. So the OTRS is enough for a keep of the photo Olivier LPB (talk) 16:20, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
- The page Commons:Derivative works is very clear on the definition of what a derivative work is. The painting reproduces the layout of the photo, and the angle of view is exactly the same. We cannot say the painting was just “inspired” by the photo. Therefore, this is a copyright infringement and the picture has to be deleted if the photographer does not react. ▸Fugitron‘‘❗’’, 20:01, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
- For me the authorization of the painter is enough, because the original photo is just an inspiration not a copy. You can see it in the details. So the OTRS is enough for a keep of the photo Olivier LPB (talk) 16:20, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
- If fraud is suspected, the OTRS agent handling the ticket, @Thibaut120094: , would be better able to address that concern than non-OTRS members who can't review the ticket. Thibaut120094 states above that the permission is from the painter. Thibaut120094 is an experienced admin and OTRS member, so I would suggest asking him about this. The ticket could also be posted for review at COM:OTRS/N. Léna has already brought this up at my talk, so further questions for me should be posted there. But I'm not an OTRS agent either. I saw an OTRS ticket processed by a highly trusted OTRS agent, and I trusted in his judgement, since he placed the OTRS ticket on the image after this DR was opened. INeverCry 03:49, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
- @INeverCry: hi, the issue here was not about attribution, but about a probable fraud as the picture is almost the same as a photograph taken by someone else. Kumkum (talk) 02:33, 10 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. 10 days after my message, there has been still no response from the website of the Diocèse de Rouen. Permission of the photographer is still lacking. If the photographer gives the permission later, the picture may be restored. / Dix jours après mon message, il n'y a toujours pas de reponse du site du Diocèse de Rouen. Il manque toujours la prermission du photographe. Si cette permission arrivera par la suite, l'image pourra être restauré. --Havang(nl) (talk) 08:36, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per Havang(nl). --Thibaut120094 (talk) 11:30, 16 August 2016 (UTC)
Dubious own works from a TV show, no EXIF . OTRS tickets required. See also https://twitter.com/caroline917
- File:Bunny World.jpg
- File:LL4.jpg
- File:00006.MTS.18 21 03 02.Still005.jpg
- File:Caroline (1 of 1).jpg
- File:Caroline Elliott - web.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
2003:45:5C6F:A801:40E0:C54F:B605:913D 16:09, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:51, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Dubious "own"work (12 KB, no EXIF) 2003:45:5C6F:A801:40E0:C54F:B605:913D 16:15, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:51, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
no permission 2003:45:5C6F:A801:40E0:C54F:B605:913D 16:16, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:51, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Dubious "own" work (6 KB, no EXIF) 2003:45:5C6F:A801:40E0:C54F:B605:913D 16:18, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:51, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
no permission 2003:45:5C6F:A801:40E0:C54F:B605:913D 16:24, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:51, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
File:040c8fbd98a03c5f5bae7ba1641336000b23a03690a37d42f0cbb6cfe1a81974f1595931c2418c6c7326b71bd867282b2419e945e319755 copy.jpg
[edit]
Dubious "own"work (22 KB, no EXIF) 2003:45:5C6F:A801:40E0:C54F:B605:913D 16:25, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:51, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted image, please see sourse provided by the uploader Cap1000 (talk) 16:26, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:51, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by CivilityofCinnamon (talk · contribs)
[edit]OTRS tickets required
- File:Wikipedia SHaimhausen.jpg
- File:BIS-04-2006-Outside-2 600dpi.jpg
- File:BIS-Logo blue Kopie.png
- File:BIS City Campus Primary School.jpg
- File:BIS-Logo blue Kopie Kopie.jpg
- File:BIS 04-2006 Outside 2.jpg
- File:068 BIS event munich 10-2014.jpg
2003:45:5C6F:A801:40E0:C54F:B605:913D 16:32, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:51, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
IT IS AGAINST THE LAW TO ABUSE HUMANS OF THE SAME KIND SEXUALY - ESP. YOUR FATHER DOES IT TO YOU THEN HE IS AN ANTICHRIST 220.244.214.116 17:20, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Vandalism. --jdx Re: 07:54, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:52, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of Scope. No encyclopaedic use. Dandelo (talk) 17:21, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:53, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
self promotion For (;;) (talk) 17:24, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
-2016-08-02T17:24:00.000Z-File:Ronan_Rice_x_.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:53, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Dubious "own" work (54 KB, no EXIF) 2003:45:5C6F:A801:40E0:C54F:B605:913D 17:25, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:53, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Focus of photo is "The Address" a new building, still under copyright, in a country without Freedom of Panorama. I don't see how the building, centered in the photo, included in the title, and mentioned in the description, could be considered de minimis. Themightyquill (talk) 17:27, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:53, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Own work ?? 2003:45:5C6F:A801:40E0:C54F:B605:913D 17:28, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:53, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
_Mascot.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Mascot.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Own work ?? 2003:45:5C6F:A801:40E0:C54F:B605:913D 17:29, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
_Mascot.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:53, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
_Mascot.jpg){kind=link}
Dubious"own" work (115 KB, no EXIF) 2003:45:5C6F:A801:40E0:C54F:B605:913D 17:31, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:53, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
(c) Brad Buckman - OTRS ticket required 2003:45:5C6F:A801:40E0:C54F:B605:913D 17:32, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:53, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Meta data shows a copyright from a name that doesn't match the contributors name Niteshift36 (talk) 17:40, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:53, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
out of scope Kopiersperre (talk) 17:40, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:53, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 17:58, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:53, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope (non-educational); likely copyright violation with the owl photo ~Kevin Payravi (talk) 18:07, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:53, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
unused personal file out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 18:15, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:53, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 18:21, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:53, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 18:53, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
- include
- File:21 hayal Güneşim Olurmusun - HD-CLİP - 2015.jpg
- File:Hıçkıra hıçkıra ağlardım.jpg
- File:21-hayal-sensiz-olmuyo-canim-annem .jpg
- File:Ali Yıldırım.jpg
- File:Seviyorum Seni Can Tanem.jpg
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:53, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
no licence Bujo (talk) 18:55, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:53, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
duplicate of File:NYC Subway train inside vc.ogv Vcohen (talk) 19:08, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:53, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
unused personal file out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 19:12, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:53, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 19:17, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:53, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Fehlerhaft und unnötig angelegt....Sorry.... Frank Lemon (talk) 19:31, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:53, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Small image, not sharp; after identification on german Wikipedia I see there are many better images in Category:Andrena fulva, so this ist probably useless for Wikimedia projects. Biodehio (talk) 19:42, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:54, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Small image, not sharp; after identification on german Wikipedia I see there are many better images in Category:Andrena fulva, so this ist probably useless for Wikimedia projects. Biodehio (talk) 19:43, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:54, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Poor quality (pixelated); orphaned/replaced. Leyo 19:51, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:54, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope. RIP iPad 2 (talk) 19:55, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Quite good photo about actor, who got one of en:Bhojpuri Film Awards in 2007. Taivo (talk) 19:52, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per Taivo. --INeverCry 00:54, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Low quality, e.g. weird/non-standard angles; orphaned/replaced by File:Methylisopropyl ether Structural Formulae.svg. Leyo 19:55, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:54, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Taken from Akgül's Instagram account (https://www.instagram.com/p/yuy7uTmPgr) Sayginer (talk) 19:58, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:54, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Incorrect chemical structure: C—O—C groups are not linear. Orphaned/replaced by e.g. File:Trimethoxyamphetamine structure.svg. Leyo 19:59, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:54, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Poor quality (low resolution, pixelated); orphaned/replaced by e.g. File:3,4-DMA.svg. Leyo 20:04, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:54, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
The original file is an old logo. I replaced it with the new logo, but have been advised it would be better to delete the file altogether. Mdknyc (talk) 20:04, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Delete This is just a duplicate of File:SourceMedia-2016.jpg --Malatinszky (talk) 20:14, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:54, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Poor quality/resolution; orphaned/replaced by File:3-Methylcyclopropene.svg. Leyo 20:06, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:54, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
The architect, Hora Maicu, lived until 1975, and there is no freedom of panorama in Romania. Poco2 20:12, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
- Sames applies to these pictures, all my work:
- File:Edificio en la plaza de la Prensa Libre, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-30, DD 16.jpg
- File:Casa de la Prensa Libre desde el parque Herastrau, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-30, DD 07.jpg
- File:Casa de la Prensa Libre, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-30, DD 14.jpg
- File:Casa de la Prensa Libre, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-30, DD 17.jpg
- I'd keep File:Casa de la Prensa Libre, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-30, DD 19.jpg as it shows rather a detail without much than can be subject to copyright instead of the whole architectural work. Poco2 20:17, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:54, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
- Well, INeverCry, my proposal was actually to keep the last one as stated above. Was I wrong? Poco2 05:43, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
- I don't think nearly the whole front of building can be considered COM:DM, but I could be mistaken or too strict in my interpretation. Feel free to ask Jim Woodward about this one as he's much more of an FoP specialist than I am.
These are the nicest FoP deletions I've ever done by the way, and I've done more than any other admin on Commons, maybe even Fastily...
INeverCry 06:07, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
- Well, thank you, INeverCry for your words, but it's at the same time a pity. James, could you confirm whether File:Casa de la Prensa Libre, Bucarest, Rumanía, 2016-05-30, DD 19.jpg can be saved or it has to remained deleted until 2045?. Rather than COM:DM I was thinking about COM:TO Poco2 21:42, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
- @Jameslwoodward: If I'm wrong here (I hope I am ), please feel free to undelete this. INeverCry 21:46, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
- I don't think nearly the whole front of building can be considered COM:DM, but I could be mistaken or too strict in my interpretation. Feel free to ask Jim Woodward about this one as he's much more of an FoP specialist than I am.
User:INeverCry, User:Poco_a_poco, it seems to me that DM cannot apply and that unless the TO is very high in Romania, TO cannot apply either. I have no idea how high it is, so PRP says we must delete. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:58, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
This file can be found on several web-sites before July 2016. I think that uploader have not created this file, and he have just copied it form Internet as well he have copied all other his uploads. Alex Spade (talk) 20:13, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:54, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
copyvio: faithful 2-dimensional rendition of a comic strips cover still under copyright Henxter (talk) 20:26, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
- also: File:Duel dans la mache .jpg, another version of the same cover Henxter (talk) 20:30, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:54, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
The main videos is Standard YouTube License. Rodrigolopes (talk) 21:35, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
- @ Rodrigolopes. Standard YouTube License does not mean anything if the author has written his own license in the description text. Please read the descriptions of this videos given by their author properly (screenshots)
- For the main video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9Gj0wkWOQkY
- Original description text in Russian:
Произведение «Зацепинг на Сапсане МСК-Бологое | High-speed trainsurfing 230 km/h in Russia» созданное автором по имени Леха Неизвестный, публикуется на условиях лицензии Creative Commons «Attribution» («Атрибуция») 4.0 Всемирная.
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ - Translation into English:
The work « » created by the author Alexey Neizvestny is published under the license Creative Commons «Attribution» 4.0 International.»
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- You can see the same text in the description of his another video: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JfFF0iyzDXg
- Basically, YouTube allows users to mark their videos only with the CC-BY 3.0 free license, so if author wants to select another CC license or doesn't know about this option, he usually uploads video under Standard license and adds license information into description. Also, if YouTube detects copyrighted content in a CC-licensed video, it automatically changes the CC-BY license to the Standard without possibility to change it by uploader. In this case, this 2 videos on YouTube contains copyrighted music — I've removed it and replaced with a CC-licensed music from SoundCloud with adding fragments from video with YouTube CC-BY 3.0 License. Because the copyright holder of camera-recorded video and sounds (Alexey Neizvestny / Лёха Неизвестный) is the YouTube uploader which permits usage of his videos under CC-BY 4.0 International license, there is no copyvio in this file.
- See also this and this talks about two files of the same author, which had been marked for deletion by reviewer and deleted, but soon undeleted after discussion. — Xenotron (talk) 22:00, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
- Keep, @Xenotron: you are right. sorry fot that. Rodrigolopes (talk) 23:04, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 00:55, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
out of scope Pleclown (talk) 19:21, 21 May 2013 (UTC)
- Keep The photo is used on user page in en.wiki. Taivo (talk) 10:06, 27 May 2013 (UTC)
Kept: in use on a user page FASTILY 05:36, 1 June 2013 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:53, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:57, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:54, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:57, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abdullah Tunahan Koyuncu (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of project scope
Didym (talk) 21:55, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:57, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Not likely to be the work of the uploader as claimed. The photo has a watermark that says "Sky Cinema Max", the name of an Italian premium TV channel, meaning it's probably a still from a television show or movie and might not be free of copyright. clpo13(talk) 21:56, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:57, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:56, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:57, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:57, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:57, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:57, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:56, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
out of project scope
- File:Raschuck ün sanatçı için çizdiği çizgilerden oluşan resme örnek resim .jpg
- File:Bir şahsın çizdiği resim rasconun tuvale çizdiği resim e örnek.jpg
- File:Rasconun ailesine iyi olduğunu söylemek için attığı fotoğraf.jpg
- File:Bir TEAM HR üyesinin yaptığı rasconun çizgilerden oluşan sanat akımı.jpg
- File:Rascophoto123.jpg
Didym (talk) 21:58, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:56, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 22:00, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:56, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 22:03, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:56, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Adil Albayrak (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of project scope
Didym (talk) 22:03, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:56, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 22:05, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:56, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 22:05, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:56, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Virendra pandey mumbai (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of project scope
Didym (talk) 22:07, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:56, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 22:08, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:57, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Selfie, non notable? Syced (talk) 11:54, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: in use. P 1 9 9 ✉ 18:30, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 22:09, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:57, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 22:11, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:57, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
out of project scope Didym (talk) 22:13, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:57, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
out of project scope Didym (talk) 22:15, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:57, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Unnecessary gallery Khilletzbal (talk) 22:16, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:57, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
out of project scope
Didym (talk) 22:18, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:58, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Sabh2singh (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of project scope
Didym (talk) 22:20, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:58, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 22:21, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:58, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 22:22, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:58, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 22:23, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:58, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
out of project scope Didym (talk) 22:27, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:58, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
See OTRS 2016080210016659 - Official e-mail from NARA that states "not a work of the U.S. Government - unknown source, probably the People's Daily newspaper" Ronhjones (Talk) 22:31, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:58, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rezneki_Rita_678.jpg RitaRezneki1973 (talk) 22:57, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --INeverCry 00:58, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Not necessary Khilletzbal (talk) 23:04, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:58, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Rezneki_Rita_9.jpg RitaRezneki1973 (talk) 23:18, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --INeverCry 00:58, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Clearly not their own work Ritual Spirit (talk) 23:31, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Not nesessary Khilletzbal (talk) 23:37, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:59, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Apparent copyright violation. Photo at http://www.wac.ma/Portail/en/node/166 Gasheadsteve (talk) 21:47, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by INeverCry: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:237912 med amine atouchi.png
out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:48, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by INeverCry: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:3pp.jpg
out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:50, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by INeverCry: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:AARDS user image.png
out of project scope Didym (talk) 21:51, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by INeverCry: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:AAEAAQAAAAAAAAbWAAAAJDhhNmU0OTY2LTE5MjItNDU5MS05MDkyLTA3NmJlZGViMDMyNw.jpg
Files uploaded by Reinhard js (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 20:29, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:51, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Reinhard js (talk · contribs)
[edit]unused, uncategorized, probably out of scope.
Estopedist1 (talk) 07:19, 15 June 2020 (UTC)
- Comment Category:Handshake icons is possible. Taivo (talk) 18:10, 16 June 2020 (UTC)
Kept: categorized now, could be usable and I think in scope. --rubin16 (talk) 15:25, 23 March 2021 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image/logo INeverCry 20:30, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:51, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:32, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:52, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:39, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:52, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:40, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:52, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:41, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:53, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:58, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:53, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 20:59, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:53, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
"source = Facebook". No date given, so can't determine copyright status. Liliana-60 (talk) 07:08, 30 November 2012 (UTC)
Deleted: INeverCry 23:50, 6 December 2012 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:05, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:54, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope
INeverCry 21:08, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:55, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:23, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:55, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:23, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:56, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:36, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:56, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:37, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:56, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:38, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:56, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Oscar Kim Oca (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 21:40, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:57, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 21:42, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:58, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
out of project scope
- File:001.bestofall (640x480).jpg
- File:This is me, Sunder̠in̠Mumbai.jpg
- File:Logo-st.red cap.060114.jpg
- File:Logo-jpg.TWA (320x240).jpg
- File:My best photo.jpg
- File:20151220a.selfiepoint, SP.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Didym (talk) 21:46, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 19:59, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
possible copyvio - Jake Udell is the subject, and this doesn't look like it was self-taken INeverCry 23:57, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Could be Flickr washing as well. --,Lewis Hulbert (talk) 13:16, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:21, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
Iranian copyright is irrelevant here since the interview was broadcast by the American CBS Corporation in 60 Minutes. So we need to evaluate whether was aired with a copyright notice or not. In the latter case it would be {{PD-US-no notice}}. Apart from that, fair use is not allowed on Commons. De728631 (talk) 21:00, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
- @De728631: thank you so much for mentioning me. AmirMuhammad1 (talk) 21:47, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
- Also i couldn't find the video in CBS . i found mike Wallace interview with shah of Iran in 1976 but nothing about 1974(this video). it seems they didn't put it in the site archive, and i think it considers as a no notice US work, but if its not eligible to keep it in here please mention me to share it in a fair use(its only 20 sec sample) license in wiki or if you can do it for me that will be nice of you . it will can be so useful in Persian gulf naming dispute which start only 10 years before this video article. health and wealth and happy editing.bye AmirMuhammad1 (talk) 19:06, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
- If the interview clip turns out to be copyrighted we could always upload this extracted bit at the English Wikipedia with a fair use claim. But it would be interesting to know from other users if 60 Minutes used to have a copyright notice at the time. De728631 (talk) 19:21, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
- @De728631: yes. but here is so emptiness. i don't know really what kinda license CBS had/have for kinda short video. isnt better to delete it and upload it in a fair use claim??
- We've had lots of similar deletion discussions before and somebody from the US might actually know the habits of CBS regarding copyright notices in the 1970s. So let's just wait for the full discussion period to run out. It could be that in the end somebody provides evidence that CBS didn't use any such notices at all which would make the file useable for Commons. De728631 (talk) 20:21, 6 August 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:42, 13 August 2016 (UTC)