Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/08/01

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive August 1st, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

One, or the other. The files are, currently, automatically detected (SMA-1 identical) duplicates... I don't know Hebrew, so don't feel comfortable picking a version... for all I know the overwritten one was more correct. Geagea?

Reventtalk 04:46, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Not the same. Just revert to original version. -- Geagea (talk) 06:59, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Nationalholiday098

[edit]

Hi,

In the name of COM:PORN and regarding the very low educational usefulness of those images, I think those files should be deleted.

Best regards, --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 00:51, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: See Vovnotice. --Эlcobbola talk 15:21, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope KDS4444 (talk) 11:47, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, serial self-promoter. --Rodhullandemu (talk) 12:43, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

useless without a description

2003:45:5C6F:A801:108:1FE5:A583:7330 07:08, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --shizhao (talk) 00:21, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope 2003:45:5C6F:A801:108:1FE5:A583:7330 07:09, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 00:21, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Threshold of originality is very low in China and I believe this image is above TOO in China. Wcam (talk) 15:19, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:17, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

created by mistake Kette~cawiki (talk) 18:54, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:23, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Petrov Victor as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: http://www.rbpartners.ru Bellow the COM:TOO in Russia? Amitie 10g (talk) 21:12, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Below TOO but out of scope / advert. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:25, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by IvyShields (contribs)

[edit]

Speedy DR: Wrong author and wrong licence; image picked up around the web without permission and falsy claimed as own works.

Lacrymocéphale (talk) 23:28, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvios. --INeverCry 00:21, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is obviously not the work of the uploader. See, e.g., http://www.twistmagazine.com/posts/joey-king-has-a-scary-makeup-moment-72328. Bbb23 (talk) 23:08, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by INeverCry: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is an exact copy of a photo on TripAdvisor - https://media-cdn.tripadvisor.com/media/photo-s/0a/27/4a/88/historytoursandtravelscom.jpg Dan arndt (talk) 14:48, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Web resolution, and available on multiple places on net long before upload. --Reventtalk 11:14, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bunga200 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious "own" works without EXIF

2003:45:5C6F:A801:108:1FE5:A583:7330 05:31, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvios. --INeverCry 20:35, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

from source[1]: "©AllPosters.com. All rights reserved." shizhao (talk) 02:00, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Josve05a (talk) 22:16, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:54, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 08:23, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:28, 21 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 07:25, 27 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

VRT agent (verify):: Following a review of this ticket (#2010102710010945) on OTRS-wiki, multiple OTRS agents has concluded that the permission received back in 2010 is not sufficient, and that this release is null-and-void.

This may, among other reasons, be because there was no explicit release under a free license, or the email address that the permission came from is not associated with the location where the content was originally published.

As an OTRS-agent, I can not disclose any private information about this ticket, nor the comments which was made on the OTRS-wiki.

Josve05a (talk) 02:14, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screen grab. No evidence that the uploader is the copyright holder or has permission to reuse image here. DAJF (talk) 02:57, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing copyright details for each photo. Unclear permission. -- Tuválkin 04:05, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:49, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contentless, unmantained and obsolete haphazard gallery; its uses are much better served by Category:Palacete_de_Belomonte and by its subcategories. -- Tuválkin 04:20, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Agree No problem. --JotaCartas (talk) 15:03, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:57, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author refused to send the Email Satdeep Gill (talk) 04:34, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author refused to send the Email Satdeep Gill (talk) 04:34, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author refused to send the Email Satdeep Gill (talk) 04:34, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author refused to send the Email Satdeep Gill (talk) 04:34, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal vanity photo of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 04:52, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only for promotional purposes, out of scope. Lakokat (talk) 05:26, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only for promotional purposes, out of scope. Lakokat (talk) 05:26, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:50, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not used in any articles, not sure why it would be. Commons is not for storage of personal artwork. MSJapan (talk) 05:49, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:51, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Not used in any articles, amount of changes to file seems to show that the author is using commons as a repository for his work. MSJapan (talk) 05:50, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:51, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. not used in any articles, appears to be a composite of other work by the same editor. NOTPROMO - despite a PD license, the author appears to have signed his work. MSJapan (talk) 05:52, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:51, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS ticket required 2003:45:5C6F:A801:108:1FE5:A583:7330 05:58, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:51, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious "own work" (no EXIF ) 2003:45:5C6F:A801:108:1FE5:A583:7330 06:08, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Doesn't look like own work. http://www.tineye.com/search/f043a1de6f3dfc008a5c32dd9b988e546ffcffed/ Coderzombie (talk) 05:58, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:51, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bella.im (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal files

2003:45:5C6F:A801:108:1FE5:A583:7330 06:10, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:51, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like a derivative work 2003:45:5C6F:A801:108:1FE5:A583:7330 06:26, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:51, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

so-called "own work" 2003:45:5C6F:A801:108:1FE5:A583:7330 06:29, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:51, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

so-called "own work" (screenshot) 2003:45:5C6F:A801:108:1FE5:A583:7330 06:30, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:51, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission 2003:45:5C6F:A801:108:1FE5:A583:7330 06:32, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:51, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspected copyright violation, watermarked image. MKFI (talk) 06:33, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:51, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of copyrighted book cover. MKFI (talk) 06:35, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:51, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image has been published before in 2012: https://ilrasoio.wordpress.com/2012/05/14/ftof-the-world-through-my-lens-intervista-con-stefano-romano/ (at the end of the page). MKFI (talk) 06:38, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:51, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aircodes ltd (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Spam. User page on en-wiki deleted for advertisement.

MKFI (talk) 06:44, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:53, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lmschulte (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Copyright violations, taken from company marketing materials or review images: http://metro.co.uk/2016/04/01/this-is-a-tampon-you-can-wear-during-sex-5788843/, http://nicolejardim.com/the-softcup-review/, http://softcup.com/how/instructions

MKFI (talk) 06:52, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:54, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

so-called "Kongresshalle". Probably a fake (and a derivative work) 2003:45:5C6F:A801:108:1FE5:A583:7330 06:55, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:54, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio with [2] (Image). The photographer stated in the description and the uploader is not the same person - permission needed. Jarash (talk) 07:03, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:54, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file 2003:45:5C6F:A801:108:1FE5:A583:7330 07:04, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:54, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Almost definitely copyright infringement of TfL; deliberate vandalism of Tottenham Hale and Leytonstone labels. Jc86035 (talkcontributionsuploads) 07:09, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:54, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unsuitable for inclusion in almost any WMF context; nonsensical file description. Jc86035 (talkcontributionsuploads) 07:11, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:54, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 07:15, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:54, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While source is given, everything on the Loongson website is "Copyright 2010 Godson Branch Technology Co., Ltd. Beijing ICP" and there is no evidence that this particular image unlike the rest of the images is released under public domain. This image is strictly copyrighted and not released under any license. CyberXRef 07:33, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:54, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by JosephYouzarsif (talk · contribs)

[edit]

no permissions, OTRS tickets required

2003:45:5C6F:A801:108:1FE5:A583:7330 07:43, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GraceElizabethInfinity (talk · contribs)

[edit]

copyright violations

2003:45:5C6F:A801:108:1FE5:A583:7330 07:45, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

own work? (small reslution, no EXIF) 2003:45:5C6F:A801:108:1FE5:A583:7330 07:48, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hiwak82 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious "own works" (small resolutions)

2003:45:5C6F:A801:108:1FE5:A583:7330 07:56, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Багдат Б (talk · contribs)

[edit]

copyright violations

2003:45:5C6F:A801:108:1FE5:A583:7330 08:00, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photos Pippobuono (talk) 08:15, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused and not realistically useful for educational purposes given the big yellow text all over the image. Also: copyright violation for falsely taking credit for Ivar Leidus' work File:Purtse vasallilinnus 2013.jpg. LX (talk, contribs) 08:15, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

False claims of the uploader being the copyright holder. Finding a photo on the Internet does not make you the copyright holder of that photo. While the PD rationale might be true for the depicted coin, the photo is most likely protected by copyright. LX (talk, contribs) 08:22, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

looks like a derivative work 2003:45:5C6F:A801:108:1FE5:A583:7330 08:31, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source page used the photo without a credit. For the first time it was published in National Geographic 07/1993: https://teslauniverse.com/nikola-tesla/articles/lightning-natures-high-voltage-spectacle jdx Re: 08:38, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

نادرستی نام Moomtaz (talk) 08:40, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work ?? 2003:45:5C6F:A801:108:1FE5:A583:7330 08:51, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographer: Jihan'Lab, no permission 2003:45:5C6F:A801:108:1FE5:A583:7330 08:52, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:56, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The painted poster seen in this photograph is a work of art created for marketing of the film and therefore copyrighted material. 84.141.17.33 08:55, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:55, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I question whether it is own work, the only contribution of user, no meta data and if in Brussels no FOP for this in Belgium Wouter (talk) 08:39, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 22:49, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Yes, there is FOP in Belgium now, but the other reasons for deletion are still valid: "I question whether it is own work, the only contribution of user, no meta data." Moreover, Belgian FOP only covers "public places". This does not seem to be a public place. BrightRaven (talk) 09:00, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:56, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

erreur de téléversement Cobalt~frwiki (talk) 09:00, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:56, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

© ETtoday.net All Rights Reserved. 2003:45:5C6F:A801:108:1FE5:A583:7330 09:09, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:56, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Uwjk360 sp2016 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

no permissions

2003:45:5C6F:A801:108:1FE5:A583:7330 09:12, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:56, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - this is not George S. Patton as was claimed - the uniform is British. Therefore, this is an unnamed subject, and isn't used n any articles. MSJapan (talk) 01:49, 19 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 00:05, 26 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is a totally different file to the one that was previously deleted. It's not used in any article, and without a date or author information, there's no way to tell if this is a government photo or not that could be PD, and whether the license is accurate as it stands.. MSJapan (talk) 05:42, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Description updated, license changed (http://zenithpress.tumblr.com/post/77996635568/patton-and-the-bocage-in-normandy, https://www.quartoknows.com/books/9780760345924/Fighting-Patton.html). --Mayyskiyysergeyy (talk) 06:19, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
That's a speedy. Clear copyright notice at the bottom of the page. CSD tagged. MSJapan (talk) 07:21, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep: No valid reason for deletion. The file is tagged as {tl|PD-USGov-Military-Army}}, so, you should provide strong proof why it is not a work from an officier of the US Army (Zenith Press is very unlikely to be the copyright holder of the photo). Also, the location is France, therefore, if the photographer is not an officier of the US Army, and if he/she is unknown, and if the photo has been published before 1946 (when the WII already ended), then, it is already in the PD anyway. --Amitie 10g (talk) 09:47, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Barring finding the original, it's difficult to say. Moreover, if this is any indication, the uploader is simply pasting URLs from various places in as sources, and that's not how this works. MSJapan (talk) 16:04, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete http://www.gettyimages.com/license/50691063 - Image was likely taken by a LIFE photographer. If it was actually an image provided by the military, we need actual evidence. Reventtalk 22:07, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Now  Keep based on actual evidence provided below that this is {{PD-USGov-Military-Army}}. @Amitie 10g: please read COM:PRP again. Reventtalk 23:16, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per above evidence. --INeverCry 01:05, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is not from the US federal government and has the wrong license. It comes from a private website and does not have the attribution, attribution-sharealike or public domain dedication license which Commons accepts. The flickr license is Public Domain mark which means the private copyright owner can change the license at any moment without consequences. He/She does not release any rights with this license. Leoboudv (talk) 09:17, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:03, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is not from the US federal government and has the wrong license. It comes from a private website and does not have the attribution, attribution-sharealike or public domain dedication license which Commons accepts. The flickr license is Public Domain mark which means the private copyright owner can change the license at any moment without consequences. He/She does not release any rights with this license. The license is not cc-zero as claimed at upload. Leoboudv (talk) 09:18, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:03, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is not from the US federal government and has the wrong license. It comes from a private website and does not have the attribution, attribution-sharealike or public domain dedication license which Commons accepts. The flickr license is Public Domain mark which means the private copyright owner can change the license at any moment without consequences. He/She does not release any rights with this license. Leoboudv (talk) 09:18, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:03, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. Wikimedia Common is not a personal photo album Wikicology (talk) 09:19, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:03, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is not from the US federal government and has the wrong license. It comes from a private website and does not have the attribution, attribution-sharealike or public domain dedication license which Commons accepts. The flickr license is Public Domain mark which means the private copyright owner can change the license at any moment without consequences. He/She does not release any rights with this license. Leoboudv (talk) 09:20, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:03, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is not clear if this is really uploader's own work. I found something similar here Wikicology (talk) 09:21, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:03, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:BSicon cSHI4c1.svg. Jc86035 (talkcontributionsuploads) 09:22, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:03, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:BSicon cSHI4c2.svg. Jc86035 (talkcontributionsuploads) 09:22, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:03, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:BSicon cSHI4c3.svg. Jc86035 (talkcontributionsuploads) 09:22, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:03, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:BSicon cSHI4c4.svg. Jc86035 (talkcontributionsuploads) 09:22, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:03, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is not clear how this is uploader's own work. I found the image on this blog. However, I am not sure the blog owns the copyright. Wikicology (talk) 09:26, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:06, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope Randykitty (talk) 09:26, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:06, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The copyright information in the wikicode seems to contradict the copyright information in the EXIF data. Stefan2 (talk) 21:44, 3 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:23, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused image that does not comply with Commons:Project scope requirement: "Must be realistically useful for an educational purpose". Codename Lisa (talk) 09:43, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:06, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader is probably not the original artist. Wikicology (talk) 09:49, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:07, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyrighted material. It was probably taken from here Wikicology (talk) 09:53, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:06, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

plus all works in Category:Works by Bohuslav Reynek. Copyvio, artist died in 1971. Anvilaquarius (talk) 09:57, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:07, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Article about the company was deleted in en.wiki. I suppose, that the company is non-notable and its logo is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:09, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:07, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I simply want to delete this image file which I uploaded on wikimedia commons since there are some changes in the logo. Aquevix solutions (talk) 10:27, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related enwiki entry 3x speedy deleted. User indef blocked at enwiki. Gunnex (talk) 22:37, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:07, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Delete because bad quality, out of scope, personality rights. Atlasowa (talk) 10:35, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:07, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph of a computer screen showing part of the browser and an image of unidentified copyright status. Possible copyright violation. Takeaway (talk) 10:35, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:07, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright en marca de agua Nachosan (talk) 10:45, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:07, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks like screenshots from a TV show. If not, at least the "author field" should be filled. Anvilaquarius (talk) 10:49, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:07, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per http://imfpa.org/artist-236 , Raymond Hickey was born in 1941 and is maybe still living. He must send OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:10, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:08, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the uploader's own work. It is instead a png rendering of File:ISAF-Logo.svg, to which this image is redundant. Gabbe (talk) 11:15, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:08, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not the uploader's own work. Instead, it is a png rendering of File:Resolute Support.svg, to which it is redundant. Gabbe (talk) 11:16, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Just tag as {{Duplicate}} instead. --Amitie 10g (talk) 21:04, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:09, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 11:18, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:09, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is freedom of panorama in Japan for architecture, but not for sculpture. The sculpture can be in public domain due to age, but sculptor and his/her death year must be given. Taivo (talk) 11:26, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep this isn´t a sculpture, here is nothing protected. --Ralf Roleček 17:11, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Originally it was something else, but now it is sculpture. Please look also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Vleugels Florentijn Hofman 2006.jpg. Taivo (talk) 18:41, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This is a wheel of a train, nothing more. --Ralf Roleček 19:37, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I did not know that. If this is really wheel of train, then maybe this is permissible. Taivo (talk) 06:04, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Ralf. --INeverCry 01:10, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

(edit · last · history · watch · unwatch · global usage · logs · purge · w · search · links · DR · del · undel · Delinker log)

wrong geo coordinates MisterBee1966 (talk) 18:08, 27 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Please delete! MisterBee1966 (talk) 11:01, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: I don't understand the reason given, but it is DW and infringes the copyrioght of the map -- no FOP in Belgium.      Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 16:57, 3 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think cartography and the interior of museums is not covered by Belgian FOP, so this picture should not have been restored. BrightRaven (talk) 11:34, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:10, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is the user's last remaining upload among copyright violations, small photo without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 11:37, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:10, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader has claimed this as own work, yet image incudes no EXIF data and the image, which is clearly professional, does not include an OTRS verification. Also, image and author have same name, which makes a coyright violation even more likely (if subject of photo and uploader are same person, then who is the photographer?). KDS4444 (talk) 11:38, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:10, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:43, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:10, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very low quality. DavidIvar (talk) 11:46, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Yes, sorry for the poor quality and the neglect. the park has since closed.--A59303 (talk) 13:33, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. If you just want a thumb of the File:StationParkSkatePark.jpg you could just use [[File:StationParkSkatePark.jpg|thumb]] or if outside the wikis, something like <A HREF="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/53/StationParkSkatePark.jpg"><IMG SRC="https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/53/StationParkSkatePark.jpg/320px-StationParkSkatePark.jpg" height="80" ></A>. DavidIvar (talk) 15:52, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:39, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam, out of scope, del on de Nolispanmo 12:30, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

spam, out of scope, del on de Nolispanmo 12:30, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:11, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam, out of scope, del on de Nolispanmo 12:30, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:39, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, del on de, pers. rights Nolispanmo 12:34, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:39, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused file, private image BrightRaven (talk) 12:39, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:39, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image cropped from File:57307 Lady Penelope dragging 87019 through Water Orton.jpg which has been deleted due to 'no permisson' on 13 May 2010 Geof Sheppard (talk) 12:57, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:39, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope Randykitty (talk) 12:58, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:39, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope Randykitty (talk) 12:59, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:39, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope Randykitty (talk) 12:59, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:39, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope Randykitty (talk) 13:00, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:39, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope Randykitty (talk) 13:00, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:39, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image should be immidiately deleted as its hoax, utopian map showing that this province is such a divided in reality. Jogi don (talk) 13:02, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:39, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:52, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:39, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:54, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:39, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 13:54, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:39, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jamzy4 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:00, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:40, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:02, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:40, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Almuhandis2008 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.alarab.co.uk/empictures/slide/_56286_kalilgg.jpg.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:03, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:40, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:40, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:40, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
[edit]

Songs. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:41, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

com:Nudity Pippobuono (talk) 14:15, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:41, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

com:Nudity Pippobuono (talk) 14:15, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:41, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

com:Nudity Pippobuono (talk) 14:16, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:41, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

com:Nudity Pippobuono (talk) 14:16, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:41, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

com:Nudity Pippobuono (talk) 14:17, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:41, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

com:Nudity and dangerous manipulations Pippobuono (talk) 14:19, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:41, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. Previously used for vandalism Gbawden (talk) 14:20, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:41, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is the same as File:Beorn Ironside barrow 2009 (7).jpg and the author is Jacob Truedson Demitz. Holger.Ellgaard (talk) 14:43, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:41, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wanted to describe it as a cropped picture of an other author who allowed changing his work, but couldnt figure out how ValterUdarnik (talk) 15:19, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:42, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bobbytuerto (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal photos, out of scope

Mjrmtg (talk) 16:21, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:42, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file in evidente violazione di copyright (licenza "opera propria" incompatibile con un marchio registrato). Danyele (talk) 16:24, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:42, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file in violazione di copyright. Danyele (talk) 16:24, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:42, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Most likely not who or what the description says. The uploaders other two contributions was destructive and not useful. Individual portrayed is identifiable and has probably not given consent. DavidIvar (talk) 16:27, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:42, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image of non notable individual. Not linked, and no other contributions other than 1 similar picture. DavidIvar (talk) 16:31, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:42, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Its a movie poster, not "own work" Cap1000 (talk) 16:31, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:42, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image of non notable individual. Not linked, and no other contributions other than 1 similar picture. DavidIvar (talk) 16:32, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:42, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image of non notable individual. Self-promotion. Not used. DavidIvar (talk) 16:36, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:42, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image of unknown, unnamed individual. Only contribution. Not linked. DavidIvar (talk) 16:40, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:42, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Self-promotion. DavidIvar (talk) 16:46, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:42, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-created artwork without obvious educational use. Self-promotion. DavidIvar (talk) 16:47, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:42, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. DavidIvar (talk) 16:54, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:42, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation [3] Sakhalinio (talk) 16:54, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

include

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:42, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probabaly copyright violation Sakhalinio (talk) 16:55, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:43, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Licensing conflict, this is claimed as self here, but the enwiki equivalent is a 'Non-free' logo. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:57, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:42, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image of unknown, undescribed individual. DavidIvar (talk) 16:58, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:42, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Not educationally useful. DavidIvar (talk) 17:00, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:42, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Self-promotion. DavidIvar (talk) 17:05, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:42, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. DavidIvar (talk) 17:07, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:43, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. DavidIvar (talk) 17:08, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:43, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. DavidIvar (talk) 17:08, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:43, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Self-promotion. DavidIvar (talk) 17:11, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:43, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

replaced by MoS-conform structure File:Dithiazaniniodid.svg Kopiersperre (talk) 17:22, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:45, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fully replaced by File:Kreosol.svg Kopiersperre (talk) 17:22, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:45, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:AMEER SHAIZAAD

[edit]

Private images. Self-promotion. Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Out of scope. --DavidIvar (talk) 17:24, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:45, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No useful file name or description. Self-created artwork without obvious educational value. Unused. DavidIvar (talk) 17:42, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:45, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. DavidIvar (talk) 17:43, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:45, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Not educationally useful. DavidIvar (talk) 17:44, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:45, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

private image. Not used. Users only contribution. DavidIvar (talk) 17:51, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:45, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Not used. No other useful contributions from uploader. DavidIvar (talk) 18:00, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:45, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image. Not used. No other useful contributions from uploader. DavidIvar (talk) 18:04, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:45, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded the file by mistake Ivekbeg5 (talk) 18:07, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:45, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake license, please see sourse provided by the uploader, clear copyright (© Все права защищены. 2015), but not CC BY SA Cap1000 (talk) 18:20, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:45, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I uploaded the file by mistake several times. Ivekbeg5 (talk) 18:26, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:45, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake license, please see sourse provided by the uploader, clear copyright (©1998-2016 Все права принадлежат редакции газеты «Советская Белоруссия»), but not CC BY SA Cap1000 (talk) 18:29, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:45, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho rather 'posing/profiling', as per over-categorization as per time of upload, see also en:Anjaneyulu, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 18:43, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:46, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no source, no author, unlikely own work Krd 18:48, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:46, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out-of-scope image used for personal attacks — Yerpo Eh? 19:08, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:46, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope: unused, unclear educational purpose Wcam (talk) 19:09, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:46, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho rather 'posing/profiling', see also en:Balasubbarao, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 19:16, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:46, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This category seems to be somewhat meaningless and unnecessary, since "Russian the Hun" is not a stock/classical depiction of Russia (unlike, say, Russian Bear). Besides, it contains only one file. --Buzz105 (talk) 19:16, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:46, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Personal photo used in deleted en:Abdullah Tahir Khan, which contained nothing but this image and a link to Facebook. JohnCD (talk) 19:20, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:47, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyvio, photo has a watermark copyright notice that does not appear to be related to the uploader. Parsecboy (talk) 19:21, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:47, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of company with no apparent notability with a spammy file description. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. LX (talk, contribs) 19:26, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:47, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope Randykitty (talk) 19:35, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:46, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation - the source is copyrighted. Lord Bumbury (talk) 19:50, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Please photo is not deleted. Nivelir (talk) 21:21, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:46, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably copyvio - low resolution, no metada. Dmitry89 (talk) 19:51, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:46, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyvio, promotional upload. MetaKnight93 (talk) 20:03, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:46, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation, the source is copyrighted. Lord Bumbury (talk) 20:04, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:46, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it is not clear, if the uploader is the owner of the footage, please send otrs if it is the case Queryzo (talk) 20:04, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:46, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploaded by confirmed sock of Tikeem cumberbatch uttp tcgp own. MetaKnight93 (talk) 20:06, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:47, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by BBiricik (talk · contribs)

[edit]

seems derivative works of some covers, no permissions

Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:27, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:47, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Invalid attribution. The file is an obvious derivative work as it contains a map and a coat of arms. TheStrayCat (talk) 20:29, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:57, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free logo. 95.27.140.101 21:00, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:57, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy from http://rane-brf.ru//mezhdunarodnoe_sotrudnichestvo/foto/gaidar/mau.jpg. 95.27.140.101 21:02, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:57, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nivelir

[edit]

Speedy DR: Found around the web, those images have no or incompatible licence and no permission. COM:PRP when not obvious copyvio.

Lacrymocéphale (talk) 21:14, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I do not select absolutely all user's images because some seem old enough to may be in public domain. Two above could be in the public domain. Anyhow, I do not understand his licence choices. --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 21:25, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe I'm wrong licenses. Please images can not be erased.Nivelir (talk) 21:29, 6 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:57, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Theroadislong (talk) 21:21, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:58, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality. Out of focus. Zinnmann (talk) 21:40, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:59, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement( — Preceding unsigned comment added by TonJ (talk • contribs) 2016-07-28T17:31:55‎ (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 01:59, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Clearly screenshot of a television program, copyvio. Sjoerd de Bruin (talk) 22:18, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:00, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably not own work, incorrect tag 186.135.137.73 22:52, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:00, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

1. Файл или страница имеют неясный правовой статус. 2. Файл имеет слишком низкое качество или разрешение. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sergsho (talk • contribs) 2016-08-01T20:29:20‎ (UTC)

  • Не понимаю, в чем именно проблема. Правовой статус ясен, есть надлежащим образом оформленное разрешение. Качество файла достаточно для использования в статьях и на других онлайн-ресурсах. Я не вижу валидной причины для удаления этого фото — NickK (talk) 21:59, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • Если перейти по указанному источнику, то там нет фотографии :( Sergsho (talk) 07:17, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
      Да, они в 2012 году изменили структуру сайта, после чего ссылки перестали работать. Это никак не может отменить разрешение, выданое в 2008 году на фото, загруженное в 2010, поскольку лицензию Creative Commons невозможно отозвать — NickK (talk) 23:09, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
      Ок. Тогда извиняюсь, что отнял Ваше время. Буду знать, спасибо за внимание! Sergsho (talk) 07:02, 5 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per NickK. --INeverCry 02:03, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i gradi dei cappellani partono da quello di "cappellano militare addetto" che è equivalente a quello di "sottotenente di vascello", e non da quello di guardiamarina — Preceding unsigned comment added by Marinaio56 (talk • contribs) 2016-08-01T11:51:00‎ (UTC)


Kept: per COM:INUSE. --INeverCry 02:02, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Right (I mean that image as an example for the colour not a real distinctive), but than supersede it with your image. --F l a n k e r (talk) 12:06, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
PS: for the next time, you could also replace the original image without any problems, it would have been more immediate. In case of any mistake, one can always restore the original. --F l a n k e r (talk) 12:15, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

miserably quality, svg available — Preceding unsigned comment added by ScotXW (talk • contribs) 2016-07-29T13:24:56‎ (UTC)


Kept: in use on userpage of creator. --INeverCry 02:02, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook.

Rodrigolopes (talk) 23:00, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 02:01, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Licence of image on Flickr was changed Albh (talk) 23:54, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Amitie. --INeverCry 02:01, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Scan of a newspaper photo. There's a copy of a permission email on the file description page. The email does not specifically mention the image, only the obituary, and regardless an OTRS ticket is required. Diannaa (talk) 17:06, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This file should not be deleted because the obituary contains this photo. The permission obtained from the copyright holder is for the obituary that includes this photo. As including the obit in full does not look good. So I cropped the photo from the obituary. Just to make my point I included the full obit in Dr. Rao's page.

Once this issue is resolved, I may delete the full obit

Kautilya1


Deleted: per nomination - OTRS ticket required to stay. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 23:55, 8 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I just processed OTRS 2016060810002621, which covers permission for the photograph only. This mural is in Montreal, Canada, which does not have FoP for 2D works. Accordingly, this is would be derivative requiring permission from the mural's artist. (Image restored for purposes of discussion.) Эlcobbola talk 21:22, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Elcobbola: See note on ticket. BU Rob13 (talk) 13:25, 4 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - ticket is clearly aboiut the photograph and not the subject. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:05, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt whether this is own work, it seems more like a screenshot from a tv-show Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 21:25, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Just for reference, I made the same assumption when I tagged the file with {{No permission since}} because it does look like a screenshot/scan. The file was initially deleted per the template by INeverCry, but was quickly restored based upon this discussion started by DMacks at User talk:INeverCry#File:Mac McGarry - It's Academic.jpg. I think the EXIF data for this file and another similar file show that it's most likely not a screenshot, but a photo. Whether it is the "own work" of the photographer may be debated, but I couldn't find this image used anywhere online prior to it's upload. I understand COM:PCP, but I think that we have to try and pin down something more specific as to why this is not "own work". -- Marchjuly (talk) 21:59, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: The same uploader contributed File:It's Academic 2009-12-12.jpg. The photo artifacts look more like the "grain" of a digital camera taking photos at high ISO (which these photos are), not artifacts of video captures. I think these are direct photos. --Closeapple (talk) 00:49, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Keep: File:It's Academic 2009-12-12.jpg, by the same uploader, explicitly says that one is own-work of the taping of the program, which means he's claiming to have taken it himself while in the studio. That's a pretty strong and oddly-specific statement to make if it were just something he found on the internet or screencapped, and it appears to be from a studio-audience perspective with studio details that would not commonly be seen on-air. And at least currently (2015–2016), the DC It's Academic TV listings are for 10:30 airing,[4] whereas EXIF says 12:15. This nom'ed image has EXIF and other details consistent with that image, so that supports this one also being an actual live photograph by the uploader as well. DMacks (talk) 01:52, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The pictures are real, original shots that I took during a taping of a show in Studio A at NBC's facilities in Upper Northwest Washinton, DC. I used a Pentax istD with the flash disabled to take them during a taping of several shows on a Saturday. I did not use flash since that would mess up the taping. Faces are very yellow because the camera did not have enough gain in the blue channel to compensate for the approximately 3200 Kelvin studio lighting. If these pictures were shot from a TV screen they would tend to be balanced or blue since professional monitors are noramlly 5600 K and most home sets are more like 9300 K. How did I get into the studio during a taping? There is a studio audience. But taking pictures is normalling prohibited since flashes mess up the video. But as far fetched as it may be, I have been a maintenance engineer at NBC Washington since 1986. As a senior engineer and expert electronic troubleshooter. I know the director, the entire crew, the producers, etc. In other words I have had a lot of experience in live studios and am welcome in the studio at almost any time. I just walked in, waved Hi to the crew and producers, walked around, and took some pictures without flash. I don't know how I can prove this considering all the Internet fakery. I just happen to be blessed with exceptional technical talent. I most ways I am just another ordinary person. Euclid Coukouma — Preceding unsigned comment added by EuclidC~commonswiki (talk • contribs) 14:46, 2 August 2016‎ (UTC+9) (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:08, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

porque no sirve para nada Goyojona 10:55, 1 August 2016 (UTC)

 Comment Cheers. This template isn't trash because it's using for localization in Valued Image template; so, it is necesary for best compression to spanish speakers.--Diego Sanguinetti (talk) 21:21, 2 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion, see main template. czar 00:52, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fotografer is Tânia Rêgo, what is the source and is there any permission? Goesseln (talk) 08:33, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Goesseln: I have tried something, is it better ? VateGV (talk) 18:12, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: cropped from image with compatible license. P 1 9 9   19:48, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is a better file: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Amoklauf_in_M%C3%BCnchen_%E2%80%93_Karte.png Charmbook (talk) 17:06, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep these files are different as they have a different design.--Sanandros (talk) 21:54, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per discussion. --MBisanz talk 17:48, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright owned by Reading FC (or similar). No evidence that uploader has permission to upload file or that it may be licensed as CC. Mattgirling (talk) 09:57, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I took this photo for Reading FC. There are no copyright concerns; this photo was also distributed widely as part of the press release. --Rckd (talk) 10:10, 1 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep our file has the highest resolution so probably the uploader is probably the author.--Sanandros (talk) 21:52, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Not true: You can find even higher resolution on this page: [5], direct link to the image: [6]. Also the file uploaded on Wikipedia has no EXIF. If the uploader is really the author, he should just send permission to OTRS. Dudek1337 (talk) 20:45, 11 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:40, 13 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]