User talk:ScotXW
Our first steps tour and our frequently asked questions will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy (Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content). You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold when contributing and assume good faith when interacting with others. This is a wiki. More information is available at the community portal. You may ask questions at the help desk, village pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons (webchat). You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at the copyright village pump. |
|
-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 17:41, 20 August 2013 (UTC)
Hi, Scot! I was wondering if adding hyperlinks around certain software names like systemd be a good idea? Thanks! I am new to editing wikipedia content, so I don't know if adding hyperlinks in SVG is a good practise, hence the question.
If you want to upload new version of a file, go to the image page and click "Upload a new version of this file". But if you described the suggested changes accurately, I could make them too. --Ysangkok (talk) 16:55, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
- Okay, I made a new box. Please see if it's ok. --Ysangkok (talk) 18:01, 25 August 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, usually there is link named: "Upload a new version of this file". But miraculously, in the last couple of days there was a sentence saying: "You cannot delete this file" or something like instead of the link. Now the link is there again... ScotXW (talk) 08:16, 26 August 2013 (UTC)
Diagrams
[edit]I saw you made some informative diagrams. You might be interested in Dia, en:Graphviz, or LibreOffice Draw which are specially made for making charts and diagrams. -- Frap (talk) 14:04, 30 August 2013 (UTC)
File tagging File:Mariadb-seal-shaded-browntext-plainsvg.svg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Mariadb-seal-shaded-browntext-plainsvg.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Mariadb-seal-shaded-browntext-plainsvg.svg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
January (talk) 17:39, 10 September 2013 (UTC)
File deletion warning
|
File:Squid software artwork.png has been marked as violating policy, because it is considered unfree. This file has been, or will be soon deleted. The file is licensed under a license that does not permit unlimited redistribution, commercial use or the creation of derivative works. Wikimedia Commons is a free media repository, which means that unlimited redistribution, commercial use and the creation of derivative work must be allowed. See Commons:Licensing for more information. If you want to ask permission from the author of the file, please do so using a template from Commons:Email templates. For images, you may find it useful to read Commons:Image casebook.
|
January (talk) 14:06, 12 September 2013 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Original Barnstar | |
Your graphic layout on how Linux operates is very informative. Thank you. — Ineuw 11:38, 17 September 2013 (UTC) |
Your contribution to pl-wiki
[edit]Please do not add your very good graphics to articles without checking their contents! Articles at pl-wiki are shorter and don't describe the same elements as en-wiki very often. Also captions should be in Polish. Better way is to add an illustration at the right category on commons, but on pl-wiki side add {{commonscat}} or {{commons}} template only. Polish editors will decide if it should be added and take care about translations. --Slodki (talk) 11:04, 21 September 2013 (UTC)
File:GNOME Music 3.10.1-2.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Jespinos (talk) 15:45, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
This is a screenshot of free software, but yes, the album covers are most likely copyrighted... probably fair use, because of the low resolution. I guess we need screenshot wich only show album covers under some CC-license. TODO... ScotXW (talk) 17:25, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
File:GNOME Music 3.10.1.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may also find Commons:Copyright rules useful, or you can ask questions about Commons policies at the Commons:Help desk. If you are the copyright holder and the creator of the file, please read Commons:But it's my own work! for tips on how to provide evidence of that.
The file you added has been deleted. If you have written permission from the copyright holder, please have them send us a free license release via COM:VRT. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion. (It is not necessary to request undeletion if using VRT; the file will be automatically restored at the conclusion of the process.) Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
|
Jespinos (talk) 15:47, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
This is a screenshot of free software, but yes, the album covers are most likely copyrighted... probably fair use, because of the low resolution. I guess we need screenshot wich only show album covers under some CC-license. TODO... ScotXW (talk) 17:25, 17 February 2014 (UTC)
File:Linux kernel INPUT OUPUT evdev gem USB framebuffer.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
83.45.172.80 20:16, 9 March 2014 (UTC)
File:Periodontium.svg
[edit]Hi ScotXW
You added (and removed other) {{attrib|Periodontium.svg}}
to this file Periodontium but then it says that it "...includes elements that have been taken or adapted from..." itself, I don't understand.
Should it not be {{attrib|The Periodontium.jpg}}
to state where it picked elements from?
And why was it not OK to do it the way I had done before, I want to know to learn how to do what is best here. --Goran tek-en (talk) 13:38, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
- I guess both ways are ok :biggrin:. I'd like it done more uniformely, and using templates (the correct templates) give you advantages like auto-adding hidden categories and such. Example: {{Translate}} teaches you about the existing "switch"-support in both, the SVG specs and in commons. ScotXW (talk) 14:59, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
- And in case you are the sole author of the entire chain, you don't have to attribute yourself. Pick the link that is likely to be the most helpful for people wanting to re-use your work. ScotXW (talk) 15:00, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
- I agree that uniformity is good.
- But my main issue was that you linked the attrib on that file to it self, not to the source. I have changed it now to the source. --Goran tek-en (talk) 15:22, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
- I agree that uniformity is good.
- And in case you are the sole author of the entire chain, you don't have to attribute yourself. Pick the link that is likely to be the most helpful for people wanting to re-use your work. ScotXW (talk) 15:00, 23 March 2014 (UTC)
Please remain calm and collegial
[edit]
--Steinsplitter (talk) 20:18, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
- Yeah, thanks for this tip. ScotXW (talk) 20:28, 4 April 2014 (UTC)
The Linux Graphics Stack and glamor.svg: Valid SVG?
[edit]I can make the file you made: File:The Linux Graphics Stack and glamor.svg W3C-valid. Is this what you want? Because you have added the template (inkscape|IMPORTANT=1), that is: "This SVG is stored in Inkscape SVG, using some additional features." If you want me to do make it W3C-valid, drop me a note. Regards, Wereldburger758 (talk) 17:16, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
tb
[edit]Hello, ScotXW. You have new messages at Arichnad#Usage share of web servers (Source Netcraft).svg's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
|
File:Linux kernel ubiquity.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Czarkoff (talk) 13:09, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
source of r&d figures
[edit]what's your source for the percentages here? --Ysangkok (talk) 18:09, 21 March 2015 (UTC)
* http://linux.cn/ ? ScotXW (talk) 12:28, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Pay attention to licensing
|
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.
File:Xfce settings window manager.png seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file. If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.
|
The reason given by the user who added this tag is: CC BY-SA 4.0 is not backwards compatible with GPL'd software (Xfce). You also have not added Template:Free screenshot to permission with correct copying conditions of Xfce.
80.221.159.67 01:26, 5 September 2016 (UTC)
- Interesting, where can I read up on your claim? ScotXW (talk) 11:30, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
(Disclosure: I have previously edited as 80.221.159.67. I forgot to check back here, but coincidentally found other potential copyright violations today while browsing English Wikipedia.)
{{Incompatible license}}
is a place to start from. What else would you like to know?This issue is still unresolved.
WubTheCaptain (talk) 08:11, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
Pay attention to licensing
|
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.
File:GNOME Character Map 3.18.2.png seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file. If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.
|
The reason given by the user who added this tag is: GPLv3+ licensed software tagged under your choice of CC BY-SA 4.0 license. Incompatible free licenses.
Although Creative Commons licenses are irrevocable, please consider removing the Creative Commons license tag from this file or choosing a license compatible with GNU GPLv3. WubTheCaptain (talk) 08:07, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
- I took time to hopefully resolve the issue on this because it was fairly uncontroversial, to my belief. Please check the file description to make sure it's correct. WubTheCaptain (talk) 08:31, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
File tagging File:Xfce settings window manager.png
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:Xfce settings window manager.png. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Xfce settings window manager.png]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
WubTheCaptain (talk) 08:32, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
File source is not properly indicated: File:Xfce settings window manager.png
[edit]This media was probably deleted. |
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Xfce settings window manager.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file (
[[:File:Xfce settings window manager.png]] ).
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
WubTheCaptain (talk) 08:32, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
GNOME Character Map has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
WubTheCaptain (talk) 08:48, 2 August 2017 (UTC)
Pay attention to licensing
|
Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content: images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.
File:GNOME Terminal 3.12.png seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file. If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file discussion page.
|
The reason given by the user who added this tag is: GNOME Terminal 3.12.0 has been released under GPLv3+, but this image was tagged with a GPLv2+ template (
{{GPL}}
).I've changed the license template. (Disclosure: I have also previously edited on this talk page as User:WubTheCaptain.) 2001:2003:54FA:D2:0:0:0:1 17:04, 12 August 2017 (UTC); edited 2001:2003:54FA:D2:0:0:0:1 17:08, 12 August 2017 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
[edit]The Original Barnstar | |
the maps you have made are great... EFZR090440 (talk) 09:24, 28 October 2017 (UTC) |
File:Building and ship comparison to the Pentagon2.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
2605:E000:1701:412D:F415:EEB6:7EF:78A3 07:09, 15 September 2018 (UTC)
File:EmbryonicBrain.svg
[edit]Bonjour,
The French text of this image use the word diencéphame in place of diencéphale. Can it be rectified ? --A1AA1A (talk) 22:41, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
- Sure, simplest way is with fr:Éditeur de texte. ScotXW (talk) 15:09, 13 November 2018 (UTC)
File tagging File:NEC-SX-10-03.jpg
[edit]This media was probably deleted.
|
Thanks for uploading File:NEC-SX-10-03.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.
Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own). The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:NEC-SX-10-03.jpg]] ) and the above demanded information in your request. |
Estopedist1 (talk) 12:55, 21 May 2020 (UTC)
Bildchen zu: Finternet - API - unified ledger - CBDCs- & Real-World-Assets -Tokenisierung
[edit]Hi Scot,
ein Kollege ist mit meinen Bilddateien bei Digitalem Zentralbankgeld (CBDC) nicht sehr glücklich. Du kennst dich ja mit API, Tokenisierung, unified ledger etc. sehr gut aus - daher wärest du genau der Richtige, eine oder mehrere Bilder im CBDC- bzw. Finternet-Kontext zu gestalten, falls du Zeit und Muse dazu. Vom Atlantic Council mal einen Übersichtsartikel dazu. Siehe auch Seite 21 hier und siehe dieser Abschnitt. Was meinst du, wäre eine visuelle Darstellung der Thematiken für dich zu gestalten interessant? Viele Grüße, CGB, Carlbrandner (talk) 13:20, 16 July 2024 (UTC)