Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/05/26

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive May 26th, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio http://tvrash.com/207/ayeza-khan-makes-mensxps-worlds-gorgeous-women.html Ebyabe (talk) 07:24, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 07:42, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/User:Desiya Makkal Sakthi Katchi

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, Glamour/Fetish pose. Questionable EV Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:50, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's a companion photo to File:French Maid Fetish.jpg, so not sure why it's being considered in isolation.  Keep if you can't come up with anything better... AnonMoos (talk) 14:26, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please justify why you think this SPECIFC mage meets an 'educational value' test. I can't immediately see why it does, and there are plenty of other images in the relevant category. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:06, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Per AnonMoos. Unused is not a reason to deletion, as per policy that you clearly do not know, as opening deletion requests of sexuality images using almost the same arguments, even when they are in use (or did you, Sfan00 IMG, open deletion requests of unused images besides images related to sexuality and erotic, like images of cats, trains, dogs, etc?). Glamour\Fetish pose is irrelevant to a deletion request but important to the scope of this image, so this images as a clear educational value. Tm (talk) 19:20, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Can you be more specfic about WHAT EV you think this image has? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 19:38, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Kept, Per the comments of contributors elswhere, images like this are within scope and within "policy" Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:19, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ass on a scanner. That's new. Half a bonus point for useless creativity. Still, I would argue this is not reasonably useful for educational purposes. Actually, it's really not useful for much of anything other than giving the scanee something idiotic to do for 6 seconds and giving Commons editors yet another asinine (a pun!) file to delete. – JBarta (talk) 04:05, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: As per handcuffed and cirt russavia (talk) 03:45, 16 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Questionable whether this has any educational content, especially given low quality Ubcule (talk) 14:37, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Given that this has already been nominated and kept (as per above), I'd like to withdraw this request. (I still think it's pretty worthless personally, though). Ubcule (talk) 14:48, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Reclose as kept; nom withdrawn by nominator. -- Infrogmation (talk) 15:49, 1 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seemingly out of scope. Unused image with no demonstrable encyclopedic or educational value. Night Ranger (talk) 06:00, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept per the above. -mattbuck (Talk) 14:54, 29 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, Seemingly out of focus. Questionable EV Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:04, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, Non-admin closure, Apparently technical quality and questionable EV are not "policy" reasons for deletion Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:15, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. KDS4444 (talk) 10:00, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

From COM:SCOPE: "A media file which is neither: realistically useful for an educational purpose, nor legitimately in use ... falls outside the scope of Wikimedia Commons." From COM:D: "Not educationally useful: The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Examples of files that are not realistically useful include... Files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality." Lastly: COM:PORN: "Commons is not an amateur porn site". Can you tell me why you feel this image is within scope? KDS4444 (talk) 05:43, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: COM:NUDITY and COM:PORN are ultimately the policies that are going to the deciding factors of requests like this. COM:PORN leads with "Low-quality pornographic images", this file is not low quality. I see no violation of COM:NUDITY. Riley Huntley (talk) 05:41, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, Not very clear what's going on. The sex position could be explained with a vector style pictogram... Sfan00 IMG (talk) 13:08, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, Per the comments of other contributors, apparently images like this are in scope and within "policy." Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:17, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational purpose, no usage on any wikipedia TünnesUndSchäl (talk) 23:25, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Nonsense DR (see above). --Leyo 22:16, 3 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Evidently non-educational motives 84.74.147.73 09:21, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]



Kept.Juliancolton | Talk 00:58, 15 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, potentially depcition of injury to buttocks, No evidence of a model release confirming this as what is assumed to be a clarly staged BDSM image. If this if felt to meet a specfic "educational/academic" value then the file description should state this. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:19, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, Non admin closure - Withdrawn on the basis of comments made by other contributors in a different discussion and off-wiki Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:32, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Evidently non-educational motives 84.74.147.73 09:22, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep; as above, "motives" aren't relevant; even if they were, the nominator has not offered any evidence for their opinions. the nominator has also offered no other rationale for deletion. commons is not censored, & the image has a variety of rathr obvious potential uses as educational material (i.e.: human: sexuality, society, art, anatomy, skin by condition, etc.) image is technically competent; at a semi-decent resolution, actually in-focus. reasonably competent as a composition. no basis for deletion. Lx 121 (talk) 03:45, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]
& it's yet another "anonymous" I.P. nomination. has there ever been a proper, serious community discussion about disallowing these? or rather, about the legitimacy/desirability of allowing them? Lx 121 (talk) 03:47, 22 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

follow-up: the IP nominator has gone on a spree of deletion noms this month, all of them questionable, & has made no other contribution to commons; disruptive activity & at least bordering on vandalism. should be investigated (& possibly blocked?) Lx 121 (talk) 06:51, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep. there is nothing at all wrong with this photograph; it has educational value, and it should not be deleted at the whim of some sanctimonious prude who doesn't bother even to explain why the image (in his or her view) merits deletion.

Kept. Wknight94 talk 01:41, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No model release evident for what appears to be a staged BDSM image, The uploader seems to be a semi professional fetish/BDSM photogrpaher and should thusly already be aware of issues around model consent and privacy in relation to this area. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:27, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, Non admin closure - Withdrawn on the basis of comments made by other contributors in a different discussion and off-wiki, and wrt to the previous disscussion. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:33, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Evidently non-educational motives 84.74.147.73 09:21, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Kept. Wknight94 talk 01:40, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is unused, There is no evidence of a model relase, which is something the uploader (given they seem to be run a site hosting fetish/BDSM material) ought to be aware of. As the image is unused it's harder to judge context, and thus whether this image has "educational/academic value". Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:30, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, Non admin closure - Withdrawn on the basis of comments made by other contributors in a different discussion and off-wiki, and wrt to the previous disscussion. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:33, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Evidently non-educational motives 84.74.147.73 09:22, 7 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Spanking has always to some extent educational motives - however I do not understand the deletion request in principle: everything is in proper order

 Keep speedy keep. 1. commons is not censored. 2. "motives" are irrelevant as a rationale for deletion. 3. nominator has given no legitimate rationale for deletion. 4. nominator is an "anonymous" IP & has gone on a spree of questionable deletion noms.

Lx 121 (talk) 06:48, 23 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

fixing typo in my comment/vote; & isn't there a bot on commons, that fills in "unsigned" comments (i.e.: the one above mine)? Lx 121 (talk) 05:28, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Kept. Wknight94 talk 01:42, 9 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image seems to be unused, and is unused, so evaluation of context in respect to educational /academic value is harder to do. At the very least this should be re-categroised. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:32, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, Per comments of other contributors in another disscusion and off-wiki, and wrt to previous DR. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:35, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused. Does not necessarily show a 'safe' BDSM position, but would be willing to accept the guidance of others on this, also there doesn't seem to be any form of model release, for the model shown (and thus could be identified.) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:16, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, Non admin closure - due to comments from other contributors off wiki, and the fact that Commons seemingly doesn't actually require Model releases. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:21, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is not an amateur porn site, per COM:PORN Magnolia677 (talk) 16:29, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep It might be in scope here: Category:Female genital torture --High Contrast (talk) 17:04, 27 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per High_Contrast Krd 11:17, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused, Explict image which may present an issue for users in certain jurisdictions as it apparently shows 'genital torture' albiet in a staged BDSM context. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 17:21, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, Non-admin closure, Per off wiki comments from other contributorsSfan00 IMG (talk) 20:29, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Error with the licence, apple isn't a member of american administration. Olivier LPB (talk) 19:38, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, above TOO. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 19:40, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/Template:Potd/2014-09

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ho sbagliato a caricarlo Chrismnrv (talk) 21:56, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader request. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:45, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope (more TICS spam) Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:05, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:58, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope (more TICS spam) Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:05, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:58, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Empty category, not needed. Category:Viertola exists for this district in the city of Vantaa, Finland. There is no need for another category name for the same location. Bäckby is the Swedish name for Viertola. If somehow this empty category is not deleted, you could consider creating redirect to Category:Viertola instead.--Paju~commonswiki (talk) 20:06, 25 May 2016 (UTC) (This username is currently going through all the district categories for the city of Vantaa. Kindly note that this is local username for Commons, not used elsewhere. Any attempt to autologin this user is considered elsewhere without any acceptance by the user is an illegal act.)[reply]


Kept: as category redirect because of links. --Achim (talk) 18:32, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i don't want to share my picture publicly. 103.16.153.240 21:57, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion of a user gallery. --Achim (talk) 18:40, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 11:12, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Copyright violation: Images taken from Facebook

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope.    FDMS  4    11:23, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File has been added to my user page. It is also entered in the Wiki Loves Earth 2016 Australia competition, as a picture of Mount Gibbo, Upper Murray River catchment, and perhaps cloud formations. leighblackall (talk) 02:00, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Withdrawn. Your face, children and car cover roughly ~3/4 of the photo and thus make it hardly useful for illustrating any of the mentioned subjects. Also, user page images generally only fall within our scope if they were uploaded for that purpose. Still, as a longstanding contributor (thanks!), you probably deserve to have that photo kept as a user page image.    FDMS  4    16:08, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is not free of rights (http://www.dla-ca.org/fichiers/document/pdf/324/epernay.jpg)

Voir les Mentions légales du site http://www.dla-ca.org/
Toute utilisation non autorisée des contenus ou informations du site, notamment à des fins d’exploitation commerciale, pourra faire l’objet de poursuites sur la base d’une action en contrefaçon et/ou d’une action en concurrence déloyale et/ou parasitisme de la part des titulaires des droits en cause.
 Keep - PD-textlogo - Jcb (talk) 14:53, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I agree that it's PD-textlogo, but is it in scope? It's currently unused. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:46, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: {{PD-textlogo}} Can be useful in Épernay articles. -- Geagea (talk) 07:57, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While we have OTRS approval for this image, this doesn't seem to within the scope of the project. It's only usage is at wikidata and at a draft for the English page although the mainspace version has been deleted 10 times already Ricky81682 (talk) 23:03, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep per COM:INUSE. (Wikiquote is a Wikimedia project, not the English Wikipedia draft namespace …)    FDMS  4    23:09, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep per "It's [sic] only usage is at wikidata": Wikidata is a legitimate project. Rama (talk) 18:29, 28 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: inuse. -- Geagea (talk) 08:04, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo of someone's best friend; out of scope Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 04:23, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:15, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality selfie, out of scope Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 04:24, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:15, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:54, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:16, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:55, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:16, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:56, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:16, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:57, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and probably copyvio. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:15, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:59, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:16, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:00, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:17, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:01, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:17, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:02, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:17, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo. The only contribution by uploader. Out of project scope. -- Geagea (talk) 05:06, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:17, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope IagoQnsi (talk) 05:49, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:34, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope IagoQnsi (talk) 05:49, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:34, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope IagoQnsi (talk) 05:49, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:34, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope IagoQnsi (talk) 05:49, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:34, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unauthorized reproduction http://m-fm.jp/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/184e629e122cd3f63eee538c7a9f8275.jpg 愛されて100年コストパフォーマンス抜群 (talk) 05:51, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:18, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unauthorized reproduction http://m-fm.jp/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/25dea7a00e1f0dd69100046e5170839b.jpg 愛されて100年コストパフォーマンス抜群 (talk) 05:52, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:18, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused logo - likely out of scope. Doubtfull own ownership too. JuTa 06:01, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:18, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

looks to me fairly out of scope. JuTa 06:03, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:18, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These files are all associated with a fantasy organisation of the Reichsbürgerbewegung which is not notable. The corresponding article was speedily deleted at de:wp. They were not used elsewhere and appear to be out of scope.

AFBorchert (talk) 06:03, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:19, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion and likely out of scope. JuTa 06:05, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:19, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion and likely out of scope. JuTa 06:06, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:19, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self promotion and likely out of scope. JuTa 06:07, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:19, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claim made that uploader did not take the photo; it is oddly low resolution. JesseW (talk) 06:42, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Looking at the account's talk page on the English Wikipedia, it is clear they did not understand what they were claiming when they uploaded the images they did. As such, sadly we need to take them all down. If some kind person lives near Lindenhurst, and wanted to work with the library to understand Wikipedia and free content, that would be great -- but until that happens, we have a problem. JesseW (talk) 06:48, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PRP. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:19, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bizarely small size for something supposedly created by the uploader; also other images by the same uploader have been questioned as to their ownership of them. JesseW (talk) 06:43, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PRP. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:20, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hallo, es ist eine weitere von mir hochgeladene Datei von einem Bild in meinem Besitz. Deshalb werden keine Urheberrechte berührt. Mich stört, dass bei "Eigenschaften" der Fotograf erscheint. Ich habe vorher die "Eigenschaften" nicht gelöscht. Auch hier besteht kein Konflikt mit Urheberrecht. Ich würde gerne dieses Bild (und noch ein weiteres "Egon Tschirch Studie") löschen und danach neu hochladen mit weniger Informationen über den Fotografen. Ursache ist : es war mein erstes upload überhaupt, jetzt bin ich schon schlauer. isomatte 06:45, 26 May 2016 (UTC)

Besitz heißt nicht Urheberschaft. Ist das Bild von Egon Tschirch? Wenn ja, braucht es eine Freigabe des Urhebers. --Schiwago (talk) 15:32, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Already speedy deleted by Jcb. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:20, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

QR code for a non-notable journal. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 07:19, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:21, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-notable journal PDF, out of scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 07:20, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:21, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-notable journal logo, out of scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 07:20, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:21, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No EXIF data, small, not used, and maybe not her/his own work Reda Kerbouche (talk) 07:40, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PRP. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:21, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising/ self promotion — out of scope Senator2029 ➔ “Talk” 09:37, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:36, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work; twiter profile pic Biplab Anand (Talk) 09:53, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:36, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:55, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:36, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by RUKMINI MARTHAND B (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These seem to be unused photos of the uploader and friends of the uploader. Out of project scope.

Stefan2 (talk) 11:07, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:23, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 11:10, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:23, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 11:11, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Used on en:Gabriel Manu. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:24, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Graphikamaal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images with heavy editing and unused mainly featuring the uploader: promotional content.

Basvb (talk) 12:11, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Per What Wikimedia Commons is not this files are out of project scope COM:PS. --PierreSelim (talk) 22:50, 31 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Graphikamaal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

I can find nothing on this name in Google, other than website of uploader. Therefore: Unused personal image(s). This image is considered out of scope as it is not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Uploading a small number of images for use on your user pages is allowed (if your contributions stretch further than just creating a user page). If you feel that this image was incorrectly nominated please respond.

Basvb (talk) 19:03, 17 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The same goes for all files at Category:Camaal Mustafa Sikander, which I propose we delete too. Ariadacapo (talk) 07:21, 21 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 09:49, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Graphikamaal (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status / out of scope.

   FDMS  4    12:21, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Visibly all out of scope, as discussed in the previous debates above. Ariadacapo (talk) 15:40, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:30, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wait for OTRS Rayukk (talk) 09:17, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:38, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused photo from Facebook/Instagram/etc. this person is not a Bona-Fide journalist. Just a snapshot. Senator2029 ➔ “Talk” 10:01, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:40, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photograph — out of scope Senator2029 ➔ “Talk” 10:04, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:40, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused selfie of non-notable individuals better suited to Facebook. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 10:09, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:39, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Faedchen (talk · contribs)

[edit]

These look a lot like personal or promotional photos.Other files with the same name were deleted for copyvio. I believe that they are out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 10:12, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:39, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it's my photo and I don't like it! Hotamr (talk) 10:12, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Uploader request. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:41, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 10:15, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:41, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pinkponey (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Claimed as own work but extremely unlikely. Cant confirm copyright as the site given as the source is unavailable

Gbawden (talk) 10:17, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PRP. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:41, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, despite the claim. Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 10:19, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:42, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks suspiciously like an advert Gbawden (talk) 10:20, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: it is. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:42, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 10:21, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:42, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is all over the web, unlikely to be own work. COM:OTRS permission needed. Steinsplitter (talk) 10:23, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:42, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NOBODY CLAIMED THIS AS A SELFIE, OR A SLEFIE (AS JIM MISPELLED) IN HIS REQUEST TO DELETE MY WORK OF ART. HIS REASONING BEING: "Reason for the nomination: Subject is uploader, claims "own work", but this is not a slefie. Also, article on the subject has been removed from WP:EN for lack of notability" The Photography is not the work of art, and the photographer is not the artist in this rendition of a copyrighted insignia of my company: 5TH UNIVERSE HOUSE©2011 . THIS IS A COMPANY INSIGNIA! Not just a portrait smart-guy (who can't spell.) No need to fight with a sour administrator. My point has clearly been made and my company insignia is all over MY WORKS OF ART @www.djdramacide-5thuniversehouse.webs.com . This is clearly more than just a portrait or selfie. Don't undermine my intelligence again please, you jerk. ALSO THE COMPANY INSIGNIA I'VE CREATED IS MY WORK OF ART, NOBODY ELSE'S. AND IT WAS CLEARLY NOTED IN THE DESCRIPTION OF THE INSIGNIA POSTED. IT'S CLEARLY AND OBVIOUSLY MORE THAN JUST A PICTURE OR SELFIE. I'D LIKE TO KNOW HOW YOU CAN REFUSE OR DENY THAT FACT NOW AS I POINT THAT OUT SIR JERK-FACE! I'd Also like to know how he got his job because he is obviously lacking in knowledge assuming this is just a portrait art.

  •  Delete This seems to be a photo of the uploader, and the uploader claims that it is not a selfie. As there is no evidence of permission from the photographer, this is a copyright violation. Additionally, the picture seems to be out of scope. --Stefan2 (talk) 10:42, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:43, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photos, out of scope

Gbawden (talk) 10:38, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:43, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope.    FDMS  4    10:59, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused logo. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:43, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope Randykitty (talk) 11:06, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 17:44, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

красный оттенок от фильтра Aleksandr Abrosimov (talk) 23:15, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: author's request, unused. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:25, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's a Supplement Claiming to be a real steroid. It's a black hat SEO technique. ALL SUBMISSIONS by this user Should be Deleted 24.247.72.45 02:54, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope and likely copyrighted. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:26, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted map, no indication that the map itself was released under a free license. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 03:26, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:27, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; Excluded educational content, containing only text Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 04:19, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:28, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal artwork for self-promotion not otherwise useful for any educational purpose Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 04:26, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:29, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photograph of a poster. Derivative work. -- Geagea (talk) 05:23, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:29, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Missing license as of 26 May 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Missing license as of 26 May 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This logo is sufficiently creative to be given copyright protection. It does not just consist of simple geometric shapes. The font for "cotton" is unique and the cotton bulb is creative enough that the precautionary principle needs to be considered. AHeneen (talk) 05:25, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:08, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Complex logo, likely to meet Germany's lowered threshold of originality. User:Faktor 3 AG Food and Retail: If your customer wants to keep those files on Wikimedia Commons, they would have to release the logo under a free license (either on one of their websites or via OTRS), which is not recommended.

   FDMS  4    11:46, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:13, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NDX;GOOGL (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COPYVIOs, no indication of user's own work on the images in this gallery. There are logos, charts, diagrams, and so on.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:04, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

So, does SimpleFX holds the copyright of the Shakespeare's XVII century painting or the Google Picasa logo? --Amitie 10g (talk) 05:35, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: the PD ineligible files, deleted the rest. --Jcb (talk) 10:20, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NDX;GOOGL (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Poor quality duplicate logos and out of context graphs. Per COM:NOTUSED.

Kissa21782 (talk) 08:45, 12 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Pi.1415926535 (talk) 02:59, 30 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because this is a usless information. Farload (talk) 02:42, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:31, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Generally per COM:NUDITY: Out-of-scope, unused image depicting the female anus and vulva from behind, no context other than "Here's a butt!", confrontational framing, text drawn across it makes no rational sense even within the concept of nude portrayals of computer technology. Furthermore, the image is photographically poor in execution (who the hell shoots something like this at ƒ/22??? And on top of that fails to properly knock out the cheap air mattress in the background) despite what appears to be extensive planning. The text and painting makes it utterly useless as a depiction of anal bleaching, which is too bad because it would be an excellent depiction of the results otherwise. Commons just isn't a repository for everything available under a free license on Flickr. This was part of a mass nom before that was kept but not on individual grounds. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 03:17, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

But, alas, the setup was carefully planned, as you mostly dont see the background matress, the text and painting are usefull to pass the ideia of this image as a 400 Bad Request HTTP and the "question of who shoot this at ƒ/22 (that by the way doesnt shows any diffraction can be answered by two aspects, the first being to control the exposure as the center of this image was illuminated with strong lighting and second so that the all image could be in focus. Also depictions of "female anus and vulva" are in scope and what the hell is "confrontational framing" if not irrelevant to the scope of an image? Instead we judge, not on its shocking or not shocking value (as in images of death and mutilated corpses Commons hosts) of an image but if it has educational value, wich this one has, per previous deletion requests. Tm (talk) 04:11, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sometimes, less is more. The poor effort to keep the cheap air mattress in the shadows only makes it far more distracting, as it's just barely visible. If this had been shot at ƒ/8 or some other rational aperture for this kind of image, where the focal plane—the woman's backside—would be the only thing in focus, maybe it wouldn't have been a problem. I don't know what this photographer was thinking. This specific image is an especially poor example of the class of nude depictions of computer technology. Writing words on someone's bare ass does not result in a depiction of technology. It is routine that we delete images that otherwise fail COM:NUDITY, like this one, that are adorned with text in an attempt to give it a veneer of educational value. The same has happened here. Commons is not a private image host or a mirror of Flickr. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 04:23, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Commons is not a private image host or a mirror of Flickr is irrelevant as there are more than 30 million freely licensed images on flickr, but Commons only imported around 1 million of it. The uploader of this image was not the photographer in flickr, so also Commons not bing a private image host is irrelevant to the case in point.
As i said before such aperture is to secondly to control the ammount of light and exposure as the genitalia and central part of the buttocks of the model are illuminated with strong lighting and, primarily, what is in focus. The focal lenght, in this 35mm sensor, is only 50mm, and that influences what little really would be in focus if using a aperture of ƒ/8 instead of an ƒ/22 that allows more of the model back to be in focus.
Your argument of a cheap matress doesnt stick a routine check. For starters this not even a matress but some kind of cloth or textile fabric. Secondly this cloth is only visible if we distract our eyes of the main subject and look closely to the background. Third did you ever heard of using cloths or other textiles as a white or black background, as this cloth? Also in thumbnail format as used in the wikipedias (around 240px or 20% of the original resolution) the background dissapears. See for yourself.
File:Bad Request.jpg
Also the cloths is not in focus (as the back of the model also starts to get out of focus). Also the photographer is someone that, analysing his flickr stream, knows how to take excelent photos in a studio setup, so your arguments of bad quality dont stick. The text and cross on the model buttocks associated with the depiction of the anus of the model conveys the central ideia of this image (the 400 Bad Request HTTP, so your argument that the image is "adorned with text in an attempt to give it a veneer of educational value" is really bogus and spurious. Also even of this image would fail to be a good example of an nude depiction of computer technology, it still is an excelent and quality image (as is in focus, sharp, well lightned, with good contrast and colour) of female nudity, female genitalia, human female anus, anal bleaching, body painting and female exhibionism.
And this is the educational value and so this image is in scope. Tm (talk) 05:14, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Writing some technical language on a body part does not make it educational for Commons purposes. There is no rational relationship between this image and the idea of a HTTP 400 error. The amount of mental gymnastics you seem to be doing to connect the concepts is clear evidence of this image not being useful for its claimed purpose. This is like taking a picture of a small, but normal penis and slapping the text "micropenis" on it. From a photographic standpoint, as I've already pointed out, nobody rational uses an aperture size like this to shoot this sort of subject, and again, the amount of mental gymnastics you seem to be doing to justify this photographer's mistake is clearly indicative of how problematic it is. Aperture is critical in images like this with a close-in background, where the background is irrelevant to or distracting from the image, because a narrow aperture increases DoF. That you can point out how aperture affects light levels but not consider that this photographer also failed to use either shutter speed or lower ISO to mitigate that renders your point invalid—the photographer just wasn't thinking or seriously lacks experience. As an image to which 2257 probably applies, insofar as it depicts the female anogenital region in a lascivious manner, this image of an unidentified model is of limited to no use to content reusers. As I've pointed out, merely putting a text label on an image does not magically make it educational, and this image is not magically useful to secondary producers for having words drawn on this person. As an image that neither adequately illustrates an HTTP 400 error nor the human female anogenital region, it's not really useful on any WMF projects. The only argument you might have is that it illustrates a common photographic error—compensating for an overlit subject by stopping down—but even that's questionable. And of course, this isn't illustrative of the cheap air mattress on which this unidentified model is posing either. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 14:42, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep - Nudity is within scope, and Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Nude portrayals of computer technology has demonstrated that this category is within scope. It appears however that humour is not counted as being within the scope, at least not to the nominator. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:38, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    • When you closed the mass-nom you closed it because the nominator's arguments didn't provide a basis for deletion. I have brought up different, more specific grounds that apparently weren't discussed at the first DR. Namely, that this file fails at the premise it set out to take: Providing a portrayal of the HTTP 400 error. There's nothing about this image that has anything to do with HTTP 400, except perhaps the words. There's nothing here that has anything to do with HTTP 400. And because there is text marring what might otherwise be a fair depiction of the female anatomy—concerns about the technical competence of the image notwithstanding—it's useless for depicting it. If anything, this file is deceptive in its attempt to depict the HTTP 400 process. Arguing this image as useful for anything other than masturbation is about as cogent as arguing that a blurred image is useful as a depiction of common photographic mistakes. —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 23:01, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no educational value - none of the keep voters has even tried to explain its educational value - the sole fact that the image does contain a human ass is irrelevant. --Jcb (talk) 16:27, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Marked with a copyright watermark, questionable rights; even if a free image it is a poor quality personal snapshot that is not realistically useful for an educational purpose Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 04:10, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:31, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Christian Magallanes (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Images copied from the internet and uploaded as "own work". Probable copyright violations.

Takeaway (talk) 12:12, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:32, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope.    FDMS  4    12:47, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:34, 4 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. which is totally correct. However the style of the image would appear as if it is likely old enough to be retained. Converting to DN for help finding the real source of the image - likely an old book about pirates. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:49, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment I found http://www.golden-age-of-piracy.com/infamous-pirates/henry-every.php which has the full image, http://www.golden-age-of-piracy.com/images/general-history-of-pyrates-1724-25/henry-every.png, credited as "Henry Every & the Fancy - 18th Century Engraving" which would make it old enough. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:51, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: license changed. --JuTa 16:11, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced/replacable by TeX code (see file page). Leyo 12:38, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination (not even need anything as fancy as TeX!). --DMacks (talk) 20:30, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is not of free use; is a model of Diplocaulus made by the Japanese artist Goro Furuta: http://dinotoyblog.com/forum/index.php?topic=3958.0 Rextron (talk) 07:47, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, the photo was taken from Facebook, and does not have a Commons compatible license it seems. FunkMonk (talk) 20:01, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: as discussed. --Storkk (talk) 16:12, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Humiara (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Uploader seems to have copied all images from elsewhere on the internet and uploaded them to Commons as "own work". Probable copyright violations.

Takeaway (talk) 11:20, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, photographer should confirm licenses via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 16:15, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Selena Gomez Sel

[edit]

These are all images of Selena Gomez claimed as own work and obviously not own work. Images are widely splattered across the internet. --Whpq (talk) 18:11, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, likely copyright violations. --Storkk (talk) 16:17, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS-permission from newspaper representative is needed. Taivo (talk) 10:08, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 16:27, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake license, logo cant be own or free Animaloid (talk) 08:14, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:51, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake license, logo cant be own or free Animaloid (talk) 08:15, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:51, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake license. Old historical picture, cant be own. May be it's a self-made copy. Animaloid (talk) 08:23, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:50, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Attributed to www.regentgroup.org.uk who is not necessarily the uploader. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 10:56, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:48, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SUFICLASSICS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Are these television screenshots? There are microphones on all pictures which might belong to television stations. No EXIF and inconsistent resolution. There is also no indication that the pictures are in scope.

Stefan2 (talk) 11:04, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:47, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable "own work": official-looking photo, similar to IMDB profile picture. Wcam (talk) 11:04, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:47, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Questionable "own work": low quality, EXIF contains no camera info, uploader has no other contribution. Wcam (talk) 11:06, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:46, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 11:11, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:46, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo, not own work. Maybe in public domain due to age, but correct photographer and license are needed. Taivo (talk) 11:13, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:46, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: unused personal photograph Underwaterbuffalo (talk) 11:13, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:46, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status / out of scope.    FDMS  4    11:16, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:46, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status / out of scope.    FDMS  4    11:24, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:45, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:25, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:45, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

clearly scanned from a book, thus copyvio Antemister (talk) 11:29, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:45, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

clearly scanned from a book, thus copyvio Antemister (talk) 11:29, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:45, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screen capture from Google Earth Mjrmtg (talk) 11:30, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:45, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abubakr salah (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status / out of scope.

   FDMS  4    11:37, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:45, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Found elsewhere on web, see here Eagleash (talk) 11:58, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:44, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

looks like a broken upload. Please reupload or delete. JuTa 12:04, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:44, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by YousseF Chouirfe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

   FDMS  4    12:48, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:44, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status / out of scope.    FDMS  4    12:48, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:43, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Looks to me fairly out of scope. JuTa 13:04, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:42, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ejukarol (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Looking to me fairly out of scope.

JuTa 13:44, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:42, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:03, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Housekeeping: 17:00, 2 June 2016 Jcb (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:目黒FMバナー メグロリン.jpg (Missing license as of 26 May 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.). --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:42, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DJ MILAN SINGAPORE (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:41, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:41, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Clairineoei (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:07, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:41, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:09, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:41, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused Facebook-style photo, no educational value, out of scope. Possibly copyvio as well, judging by the watermark. P 1 9 9   14:15, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:41, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused Facebook-style personal photo, no educational value, out of scope. P 1 9 9   14:17, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:40, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Saaifalam12 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of image.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:40, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These derivative works (photos) of Super Mario can't be publish under a free licence without permission of Nintendo!

Ras67 (talk) 14:22, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:40, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused demo. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I created this file and am happy for it to be deleted because I made another (improved) video which I put in the article instead of this one. I just didn't get around to creating my own deletion request for this file yet; EugeneZelenko beat me to it - thanks.

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:39, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused map of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:39, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CiMd1JdWMAETzq2.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:39, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:39, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:38, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:38, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://doximity-res.cloudinary.com/image/upload/t_public_profile_photo_320x320/v1417492085/jbw4bhh0r2t7zdvzdbjs.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:38, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://bloximages.chicago2.vip.townnews.com/bdtonline.com/content/tncms/assets/v3/editorial/b/72/b72625c6-3fe2-11e5-b9ae-a782df93ad79/55c97c5edf645.image.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:38, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://i.ytimg.com/vi/hapCTRFDQUQ/maxresdefault.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:38, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:37, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.senemusique.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/05/dip-grand-theatre-6.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:37, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.koreaboxing.co.kr/zb4/data/mutiupload/menu6_5/3d4ac55e335eff5331a64aff004aa61f.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:37, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:37, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:37, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CeU7dR-XEAA20_x.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:36, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:36, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:36, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:36, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:39, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:39, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No valued content. -- Kaganer (talk) 14:49, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:36, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No valued content. -- Kaganer (talk) 14:49, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:36, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photos, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 15:15, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:35, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope : personal image Florn (talk) 15:22, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:35, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope : personal image Florn (talk) 15:22, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:35, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No idea who he is, unused image. Either clarify this or delete. Andy Dingley (talk) 15:22, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:35, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

White flowers on white background...? ;) Salicyna (talk) 15:21, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:35, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tiny duplicate of File:Flag of Argentina.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:43, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:33, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Tiny duplicate of File:Coat of arms of Argentina.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:43, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:33, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Coat of arms of Argentina.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:12, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:33, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hoax. No such event, and contains copyrighted material used improperly. Oknazevad (talk) 20:46, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:31, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused image of a child, image looks like a screenshot from tv or similar (note the stripes), likely copyvio. Holger1959 (talk) 21:51, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:32, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused image of an unknown (but identifiable) person. Holger1959 (talk) 21:53, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:32, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo is a publicity image. Unlikely to be own work, unless uploader is a representative of the authoring company, in which OTRS ticket is required. howcheng {chat} 22:36, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 04:32, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

looks like the photo on a book cover of : Ryukyu Kobujutsu Vol. # II : Sai - Kama - Tinbe & rochin [5] Please see COM:DW: seems not safe enough to share on commons , or see also {{No permission since}} and please stop this request.

Tokorokoko (talk) 02:57, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation. Photographer should confirm license via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 07:03, 7 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality penis picture #284683 Acroterion (talk) 16:51, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:55, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is not Flickr Elisfkc (talk) 18:27, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:54, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is not Flickr Elisfkc (talk) 18:27, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:54, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational Konto na chwilę (talk) 23:31, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:55, 9 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hello, I own this file, and would like the image deleted (feel free to contact me at Lawrenceabel@hotmail.co.uk LawrenceAbel (talk) 00:29, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Normally we would reject this sort of request (to delete a file uploaded several years ago), see Commons:License revocation for more info. Basically, you can't change your mind and once you release a work, it stays released.
However, deletion was initially requested shortly after upload. The subsequent communication is not exactly clear ([6], [7] [8]), so I do not read that as clear acceptance of copyright.
To closing: If deleted, please also delete File:Metroline bus LT13 (LTZ 1013), route 24, 22 June 2013.jpg (which depends on this).--Nilfanion (talk) 07:32, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: the file have not been reviewed by a trusted user, and the source is now not free https://www.flickr.com/photos/doctorwholawrence/9106661499/. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:51, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Hello, I own this file, and would like the image deleted (feel free to contact me at Lawrenceabel@hotmail.co.uk). LawrenceAbel (talk) 00:29, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Delete Normally we would reject this sort of request (to delete a file uploaded several years ago), see Commons:License revocation for more info. Basically, you can't change your mind and once you release a work, it stays released.
However, deletion was initially requested shortly after upload. The subsequent communication is not exactly clear ([9], [10] [11]), so I do not read that as clear acceptance of copyright.
To closing: If deleted, please also delete File:Metroline bus LT15 (LTZ 1015), route 24, 22 June 2013.jpg and File:Metroline bus LT21 (LTZ 1021), route 24, 22 June 2013.jpg (which depends on this).--Nilfanion (talk) 07:33, 22 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: the file have not been reviewed by a trusted user and the source is now not free https://www.flickr.com/photos/doctorwholawrence/9107016357. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:52, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, {{Use TeX}}, orphaned. Leyo 12:55, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:18, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, {{Use TeX}}, orphaned. Leyo 12:55, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:18, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, {{Use TeX}}, orphaned. Leyo 12:57, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:19, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, {{Use TeX}}, orphaned. Leyo 12:58, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:19, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, {{Use TeX}}, orphaned. Leyo 12:58, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:20, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, {{Use TeX}}, orphaned. Leyo 12:59, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's a real hard work to create one palindrome, JPG is a creative free style. User: Sergio Fabris


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:20, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, {{Use TeX}}, orphaned. Leyo 12:59, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's a hard work to create one palindrome, JPG is in creativ free style. User: Sergio Fabris


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:21, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, {{Use TeX}}, orphaned. Leyo 13:00, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:21, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, {{Use TeX}}, orphaned. Leyo 13:01, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:21, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, {{Use TeX}}, orphaned. Leyo 13:01, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:21, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, {{Use TeX}}, orphaned. Leyo 13:01, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:22, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, {{Use TeX}}, orphaned. Leyo 13:02, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:22, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, {{Use TeX}}, orphaned. Leyo 13:02, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:22, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

{{BadJPG}}, {{Use TeX}}, orphaned. Leyo 13:03, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:22, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Datei ist veraltet. Ally Benjamin (talk) 07:17, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:05, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The paper was not permanently installed so conditions for {{FoP-Slovakia}} are not fulfilled. Taivo (talk) 08:01, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: plain information is not eligible for copyright. --Jcb (talk) 15:06, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably copied from other sites, thus incorrect license @assanges(talk | cont | uploads) 08:08, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

--Wcam (talk) 10:57, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:06, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably incorrect licensing, copied from other sites @assanges(talk | cont | uploads) 08:09, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:07, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably incorrect licensing, might copied from other sites @assanges(talk | cont | uploads) 08:09, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:07, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image for G11 page, used for advertising @assanges(talk | cont | uploads) 08:11, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:08, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake license, logo cant be own or free Animaloid (talk) 08:14, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:09, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake license, logo cant be own or free Animaloid (talk) 08:15, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:09, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

erroneous loading Сарапулов (talk) 22:05, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:39, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Odishatourism (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COPYVIOs. Tourism focus: Only one of these images has EXIF data, the rest are of various sizes, qualities, and so on, which show they were collected from other sources, not created by a single author.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:44, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:38, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image has been previously published in http://onemileatatime.boardingarea.com/2015/09/01/arlanda-express-speedy-transport-for-dummies/. If uploader has permission to upload this OTRS permission is needed. MKFI (talk) 08:36, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:24, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the image seems broken. needs someone else's review 61.73.95.117 08:36, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

✓ Done  Keep You can mark these using {{Broken file}}, or drop me a note. -- (talk) 11:56, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 15:24, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Fake license - logo can't be own or free Animaloid (talk) 08:59, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:27, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

pretty likely a copyvio Antemister (talk) 09:20, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:27, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative or duplicate of File:iPhone SE rose gold copy.png; low quality –Totie (talk) 09:20, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:27, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Xbreaker360 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope. Also not sure he has the rights to claim the action shots as his own work

Gbawden (talk) 10:27, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: probably copyvio. --Jcb (talk) 15:28, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LyvansB (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COPYVIOs. No indication of user's own work on these glam shots, various sizes, only one has metadata.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:56, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:28, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bejar Adrian (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:07, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Alan (talk) 01:37, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

il contient des numéros de téléphones dessus oubliés MBATAKA (talk) 17:54, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:30, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted bookcovers. OTRS permission given by a person with no authority to do it. Designer's / photographer's permissions needed.

Sealle (talk) 18:17, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - I cannot read the Russian ticket, but the involved OTRS agent has been notificied about this DR at the moment of nomination and has chosen to remain silent about this case. --Jcb (talk) 15:36, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is not Flickr Elisfkc (talk) 18:20, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:36, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As per Andy_Dingley and his CfD, these files state "Photos are to use for non-commercial purposes..." which suggests the CC-BY-SA license was incorrectly applied and they are not acceptable for Commons.

Themightyquill (talk) 18:30, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

They are clearly licensed as CC-by-sa on the project Flickr page https://www.flickr.com/people/69385801@N07 yet each upload on Flickr has the "Photos are to use for non-commercial purposes, but must be credited "DRs Kulturarvsprojekt" statement. With a bit more thought, I'm going to go with  Keep on all of these. It's probably a mistake on their part to have contradictory double licensing here, but they have CC- licensed them under a free licence. It is a requirement for us to be honest. It is not a requirement for us to fix their commercial mistakes. They're CC-by-sa, they're staying as CC-by-sa (whatever an additional licence adds), so they're OK for our use here, and for us to offer than as freely licensed for onward commercial use. Andy Dingley (talk) 18:59, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed the discrepancy, and they replied that they would fix it. Apparently they haven't done so yet. As said by Andy Dingley, it is not our task to correct their mistakes, but I will poke them politely. --Palnatoke (talk) 08:37, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: license at Flickr is compatible. --Jcb (talk) 15:40, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As per Andy_Dingley and his CfD, these files state "Photos are to use for non-commercial purposes..." which suggests the CC-BY-SA license was incorrectly applied and they are not acceptable for Commons.

Themightyquill (talk) 18:32, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: license at Flickr is compatible. --Jcb (talk) 15:46, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official-looking studio photo; doubtful claim of authorship. Paul_012 (talk) 18:47, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:48, 17 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is not free of rights

Voir les Mentions légales du site http://www.ville-dombasle.fr/
L'usage de tout ou partie du Site, notamment par extraction, téléchargement, reproduction, transmission, "reverse engineering", décompilation, désassemblage, représentation ou diffusion à d'autres fins que pour l'usage personnel et privé dans un but non commercial de l'internaute est strictement interdit.
Thor19 (talk) 22:33, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: not simple logo. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:19, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is not free of rights Thor19 (talk) 22:14, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Voir les Mentions légales du site http://www.ville-dombasle.fr/
L'usage de tout ou partie du Site, notamment par extraction, téléchargement, reproduction, transmission, "reverse engineering", décompilation, désassemblage, représentation ou diffusion à d'autres fins que pour l'usage personnel et privé dans un but non commercial de l'internaute est strictement interdit.

Deleted: not simple logo. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 23:19, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR Congo banknotes

[edit]

The country joined the Berne Convention in 1963. The WIPO does not list any copyright-relates laws before 1986. The country's main copyright-related law is Ordinance-Law No. 86-033 of April 5, 1986 on the Protection of Copyright and Neighboring Rights. Article 7 states:

"Official acts of the authority shall not give rise to any copyright. Any other literary, artistic, or scientific publications produced by the authorities shall generate copyright for the authorities."

I just added the above text to Commons:Currency#Congo, Democratic Republic of the (formerly Zaire). It seems that banknotes fall within the subset of government works in which the government retains copyright.

All files in Category:Banknotes of Zaire (including its subcategory Category:Mobutu Sese Seko on banknotes) need to be deleted:

Most files in Category:Banknotes of the Democratic Republic of the Congo need to be deleted:

--AHeneen (talk) 07:46, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:01, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Zambia banknotes

[edit]

According to the Copyright and Performance Rights Act, 1994: "If the work is produced by a public officer or employee of the Government of Zambia...in the course of his employment, and the Government concerned is the first owner of the copyright in the work, the copyright in the work shall expire at the end of the period of fifty years from the end of the calendar year in which the work is made." §12(2)

The images in Category:Banknotes of Zambia need to be deleted:

--AHeneen (talk) 08:36, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:01, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uncommon and unused variant Antemister (talk) 09:26, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

"Uncommon and unused variant?" What does that mean or what does that matter? It was used during the American Civil War and is historically documented. This depiction represents the gold fringed version used in dress parades as described in the image's description. There shouldn't be grounds for deletion--Glasshouse (talk) 23:27, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
A fringed flag does usually not have a fringe on the left, at the flagpole, that's why this imange is not common rendition. Or could you change it?--Antemister (talk) 08:07, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've uploaded a new version.--Glasshouse (talk) 02:14, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thank you, but could you also replace the fringe by the one from File:Flag of the Vietnamese National Army.svg, it has amuch better quality and color shade.--Antemister (talk) 12:55, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Done--Glasshouse (talk) 14:34, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above. --INeverCry 22:03, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think, that main object of the photo is copyrighted poster. There is freedom of panorama in India for 3-dimensional, but not for 2-dimensional art. The files were previously tried and kept for photographer's copyright violation, but nobody noticed rights of poster owner. Taivo (talk) 09:28, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:03, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

file is a scan from a copyrighted book Antemister (talk) 09:43, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:03, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality, and does not show real extent of policial tibet in 1911 Antemister (talk) 09:45, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:03, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

derivative of a copyrighted logo 578985s (talk) 10:27, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:03, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Better version is available (see: File:12SSHJinsig.svg)--Der Rationalist (talk) 08:12, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:04, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Better version is available (see: File:12th SS Division Logo.svg)--Der Rationalist (talk) 08:14, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:04, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Deletion requests/Commons talk:Deletion requests/File:DJ DrAmACiDe-C.E.O. of 5TH UNIVERSE HOUSE©EST.2011 (SMALLER PIC).jpg. This is obviously not a selfie, and it also seems to be out of scope. Stefan2 (talk) 10:43, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:04, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

subject request not in use Slowking4Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 10:55, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:04, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused flag, no source. If really own work, then out of project scope. If not own work, then maybe copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 10:58, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:05, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

depiction is based largely on original research; sources are inappropriate Antemister (talk) 11:00, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:05, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the borders of tibet have little to do with reality (they are based on rather schematically drawn atlas of the early 20th century), that shouldn't be displayed here Antemister (talk) 11:03, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:05, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is freedom of panorama in Russia for architecture, but not for sculpture.
В России существует ru:свобода панорамы для архитектуры, но не для скульптуры. Taivo (talk) 11:20, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:05, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no freedom of panorama in Latvia. The fountain surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 11:38, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It is a simple circle of stone blocks. I don't think there is significant doubt about the freedom of a this photo.
That is, unless you claim that water bursts are copyrightable. I did a quick search and it didn't reveal cases where subject of this nature was ruled copyright protected. Water bursts could be considered similar to fireworks displays that per COM:CSM are not copyrighted. Pikne 07:39, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Here is significant difference. Firework is very temporary and it has no clear shape. Fountain works more-less permanently and it has constant shape. This is like sculpture, only made of water. Taivo (talk) 16:31, 19 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Per COM:CSM the reason why fireworks displays aren't protected is that in action they are not written nor recorded on a fixed medium. This seems to be the same for water bursts.
Whether it is a clear shape or not is vague for both fireworks displays and current subject. Water bursts of a fountain indeed generally last somewhat longer, but are there any specific cases or law provisions which make you think that this is relevant? Pikne 14:42, 20 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Butter sculptures are less permanent than water sculptures and they were deleted: Commons:Deletion requests/Images in Category:Butter sculptures. Taivo (talk) 18:28, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Butter sculptures, unlike fireworks displays and water bursts, are recorded on a fixed medium (again refering to COM:CSM). Pikne 19:47, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:06, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Restored: as per Commons:Undeletion requests/Archive/2016-07#File:30-Tukumsi purskaev.JPG. Yann (talk) 05:07, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:06, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical map. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:06, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern art. I think artist identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:06, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

suspected copyright violation. The editor who uploaded this image claimed it to be their own work, but a very similar image is used by HeraldScotland on http://www.heraldscotland.com/news/14489732.Holyrood_s_new_cohort_fluff_lines_as_Republicans_pledge_loyalty_to_Queen/ and on the same date this editor had also added a link for this newspaper webpage to the Fulton MacGregor article on English Wikipedia. Drchriswilliams (talk) 15:36, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:07, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image was in use in 2012, http://www.igre123.com/forum/tema/fotografsko-tekmovanje-by-emma-stan/27359/7 COM:OTRS required. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:43, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:07, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Aparece en esta página: http://v-kosmose.com/yupiter-2/sputniki-yupitera/s-2003-j-9/ Me parece que entonces incumple la licencia. Romulanus (talk) 16:52, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:07, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted map which does not appear to have been released under a free license by the original creator. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 17:03, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - This looks like another instance where I hope the nominee is wrong, but probably isn't. Is there a link that can be used as a substitute for this image? ----DanTD (talk) 04:46, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:07, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in France Elisfkc (talk) 20:05, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Il s'agit de la représentation d'un objet manufacturé vendu dans le commerce (de luxe, certes) ; il n'est soumis à aucune restriction de représentation (pas plus qu'une automobile dans la rue). --François GOGLINS (talk) 20:09, 26 May 2016 (UTC).[reply]
 Delete it is a permanently installed work in a stadium. Traduit avec Google Translate: il est une œuvre installée en permanence dans un stade. Elisfkc (talk) 20:15, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:08, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I forgot to crop the photo, please delete Paperfire (talk) 20:07, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Paperfire: Nominate it for speedy delete with {{SD |1= 7}} please. Elisfkc (talk) 20:30, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:07, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uselessly redirection CaptainClawHE (talk) 20:19, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

uselessly redirection CaptainClawHE (talk) 20:23, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:08, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uselessly redirection CaptainClawHE (talk) 20:19, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

uselessly redirection CaptainClawHE (talk) 20:21, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:09, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This picture is almost identical to the image provided by the official web page (http://www.omotesenke.com/) except that it is trimed to upper 470 pixels and the tone is slightly modified. I cannot believe that this picture is original work of the uploader. Mzaki (talk) 22:09, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 22:12, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

miscolored variant of File:China India eastern border.jpg Antemister (talk) 11:06, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Widely used. --INeverCry 18:08, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Flag_of_the_Lezgi_people.png Sharval (talk) 01:10, 25 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of the Lezgi people.png -- Geagea (talk) 05:35, 1 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is not Lezgi people flag. This is flag of organization "SADVAL" in 1990-1995 years. ALDKL (talk) 18:41, 29 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Flag of the Lezgi people.png -- Geagea (talk) 20:46, 6 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is no flag of Lezgi people. Ordinem (talk) 19:11, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --INeverCry 18:12, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Have better version File:Lezgin flag.png Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 12:19, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Kept in use -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 21:51, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Have better version File:Lezgin flag.png Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 22:11, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep COM:INUSE A09090091 (talk) 18:21, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@A09090091, it is only used in File:Lezgin flag.png, which is the exactly the same of this file. If it use not useless, then we can upload lots of duplicates and just use them in one version of it. - Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 23:04, 26 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@Dr.Wiki54: Your "better version" is not better but worser (look at the quality of file) and it was uploaded later than Lezgin flag sadval. A09090091 (talk) 12:01, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]
@A09090091 it is not mine, but never mind. Yeap i agree here that i made a mistake by saying "better one". But why we should upload lots of duplicates and do not delete them. I agrre with your commemt that you wrote in other request. - Dr.Wiki54 (talk) 14:45, 27 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Ruthven (msg) 13:06, 22 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is not Flickr/Being used as an ad Elisfkc (talk) 19:18, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 18:09, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because I want to delete it. GT20015 (talk) 20:08, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use - free license is irrevocable. --INeverCry 18:11, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because I want to delete it. GT20015 (talk) 20:09, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: free license is irrevocable. --INeverCry 18:11, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Refuz ca acest fișier (fotografie realizata de mine personal) sa fie eliberat sub licența Creative Commons Atribuire și distribuire în condiții identice 4.0 Internațională GT20015 (talk) 13:08, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, Google translates this as "I refuse this file (photo taken by me personally) to be licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International". Free licenses are irrevocable. Big photo with proper license. You cannot demand deletion of the file. If you do that once more, then you can be blocked. Taivo (talk) 17:09, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Because I want to delete it. GT20015 (talk) 20:12, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: free license is irrevocable. --INeverCry 18:12, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I want to delete this file. GT20015 (talk) 20:16, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: free license is irrevocable. --INeverCry 18:13, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by François GOGLINS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Derivative works of posters. Per COM:FOP, no FoP in France.

Эlcobbola talk 19:22, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Là, c'est du pinaillage ! sauf pour File:Villemandeur-FR-45-bizarrerie-A.jpg, il s'agit de panneaux et d'affiches électorales, selon les règles du code électoral français. Je ne prends pas ça pour une attaque personnelle, certes, mais il se trouve qu'entre le copyright des bonshommes de neige et celui des affiches que l'on placarde sous notre nez sans nous demander notre avis, je nourris une certaine lassitude. De grâce, l'image File:Villemandeur-FR-45-bizarrerie-A.jpg n'est pas une affiche, même si elle en contient une. Saluts. (It is of the hair-splitting! Safe for " File:Villemandeur-FR-45-bizarrerie-A.jpg ", it is about panels and about election posters, according to the rules of the French electoral code. I do not take that for a personal attack, certainly, but it turns out that between the copyright of snowmen and that of the posters that we placard under our nose without asking us for our opinion, I feeds a certain tiredness. Please, the image " File:Villemandeur-FR-45-bizarrerie-A.jp g " a poster is not, even if it contains one.) --François GOGLINS (talk) 20:02, 17 March 2015 (UTC).[reply]
Il s'agit de produits manufacturés en série : les partis politiques utilisent un fond d'affiche qu'ils agrémentent des photos des candidats comme on le voit (It is about mass manufactured goods : the political parties use a bottom of poster that they decorate photos of the candidates as we see it):

et plus encore (and more):

Ces affiches électorales sont complétement dépourvues d'originalité (These election posters are completely deprived of originality). --François GOGLINS (talk) 14:57, 19 March 2015 (UTC).[reply]


Deleted: per nom. INeverCry 08:01, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by François GOGLINS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No FOP in France.

Il s'agit d'un bâtiment public très ancien dont l'architecte est mort depuis plus de 70 ans, il ne porte pas de marque sous copyright. Que reprochez-vous à cette photo ?
It is about a very old public building from which the architect died for more than 70 years, it does not wear mark under copyright. For what do you blame this photo? --- François GOGLINS (talk) 08:50, 27 May 2016 (UTC).[reply]
  • Il s'agit d'un bâtiment public très ancien dont l'architecte est mort depuis plus de 70 ans, il ne porte pas de marque sous copyright. Que reprochez-vous à cette photo ?
    It is about a very old public building from which the architect died for more than 70 years, it does not wear mark under copyright. For what do you blame this photo? --- François GOGLINS (talk) 08:50, 27 May 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Il s'agit d'un bâtiment public très ancien dont l'architecte est mort depuis plus de 70 ans, il ne porte pas de marque sous copyright. Que reprochez-vous à cette photo ?
It is about a very old public building from which the architect died for more than 70 years, it does not wear mark under copyright. For what do you blame this photo? --- François GOGLINS (talk) 08:50, 27 May 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Il s'agit d'un bâtiment public très ancien dont l'architecte est mort depuis plus de 70 ans, il ne porte pas de marque sous copyright. Que reprochez-vous à cette photo ?
It is about a very old public building from which the architect died for more than 70 years, it does not wear mark under copyright. For what do you blame this photo? --- François GOGLINS (talk) 08:50, 27 May 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Il s'agit d'un bâtiment public très ancien dont l'architecte est mort depuis plus de 70 ans, il ne porte pas de marque sous copyright. Que reprochez-vous à cette photo ?
It is about a very old public building from which the architect died for more than 70 years, it does not wear mark under copyright. For what do you blame this photo? --- François GOGLINS (talk) 08:50, 27 May 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Il s'agit d'un bâtiment public très ancien dont l'architecte est mort depuis plus de 70 ans, il ne porte pas de marque sous copyright. Que reprochez-vous à cette photo ?
It is about a very old public building from which the architect died for more than 70 years, it does not wear mark under copyright. For what do you blame this photo? --- François GOGLINS (talk) 08:50, 27 May 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Il s'agit d'un bâtimen très ancien dont l'architecte est mort depuis plus de 70 ans, il ne porte pas de marque sous copyright. Que reprochez-vous à cette photo ?
It is about a very old building from which the architect died for more than 70 years, it does not wear mark under copyright. For what do you blame this photo? --- François GOGLINS (talk) 08:50, 27 May 2016 (UTC).[reply]
Il s'agit d'un bâtiment très ancien dont l'architecte est mort depuis plus de 70 ans, il ne porte pas de marque sous copyright. Que reprochez-vous à cette photo ?
It is about a very old building from which the architect died for more than 70 years, it does not wear mark under copyright. For what do you blame this photo? --- François GOGLINS (talk) 08:50, 27 May 2016 (UTC).[reply]
C'est un échaudage d'étais pour soutenir une façade lors de la déconstruction du bâtiment.

Elisfkc (talk) 20:13, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment made it through the 700 most recent images, many more uploaded. These are the ones that were either obviously still in copyright, or I was unable to quickly figure out their copyright status and they seemed like they could be.
Traduit avec Google Translate: a travers les 700 images les plus récentes, beaucoup plus téléchargés. Ce sont ceux qui étaient soit évidemment toujours en droit d'auteur, ou je fus incapable de comprendre rapidement leur statut d'auteur et ils semblaient comme ils pourraient l'être. Elisfkc (talk) 20:19, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Avant de clore définitivement tous ces fichiers, j'aimerais que vous demandiez avis à des modérateurs éclairés . Merci. --François GOGLINS (talk) 20:21, 26 May 2016 (UTC).[reply]
@François GOGLINS: If I understand you correctly, you want the reasoning as to why. Please read the section on France in Commons:Freedom of panorama.
Traduit avec Google Translate: Si je vous comprends bien, vous voulez que le raisonnement pour expliquer pourquoi. S'il vous plaît lire la section sur la France en Liberté de panorama. Elisfkc (talk) 20:26, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The architecture of the building is the problem. That is copyrighted just like any other work. Elisfkc (talk) 21:44, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • En ce moment, le sénat français modifie la législation française sur le droit de panorama, il ne me semble pas urgent de supprimer ces fichiers. En outre, pour quelques images (comme l'église de Cornant), je ne comprends même pas que vous y voyez une atteinte à un droit d'auteur ou de marque. Pour la pharmacie, l'enseigne est une enseigne obligatoire de droit français (pas une marque) ; idem pour l'enseigne de la poste. Je vais caviarder ces images des insignes qui vous gênent. Le résultat sera surprenant. ==> At the moment, the French senate modifies the French legislation on the right(law) of panorama, it does not seem to me urgent to delete(eliminate) these files. Besides, for some images (as the church of Folding(Hooking)), I do not even understand that you see an infringement(achievement) on a right(law) of author or mark(brand) there. For the pharmacy, the sign(brand) is a compulsory sign(brand) of French law no ( no mark(brand)); idem for the sign(brand) of the post office. I am going to censor these images of the badges which hamper(bother) you. The result(profit) will be surprising.--François GOGLINS (talk) 21:37, 26 May 2016 (UTC).[reply]

 Keep For buildings which François GOGLINS states above that the architect died more than 70 years ago.
Traduit avec Google Translate: pour les bâtiments qui François GOGLINS états ci-dessus que l'architecte est mort il y a plus de 70 ans. Elisfkc (talk) 21:28, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: @Elisfkc: I looked at a number of these, and I saw a simple street vender cart, a French Open tennis shot, old buildings, etc. This is just too unwieldy to deal with in its present form. These need to be gone back thru and nominated singly or in smaller groups. --INeverCry 18:52, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Ich habe versucht die ursprügliche Seite mit diesem Image in besserer Qualtität zu verknüpfen, was nicht gelang. Das Image sollte hier angefügt werden: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wappen_Luetzelbach.png Ein weiterer Beitrag ist nicht erforderlich TGuecklhorn (talk) 21:21, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 18:57, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This uploader redraws images from deviant art and other websites, and uploads as "own work." See http://paleo-king.deviantart.com/art/Sonorasaurus-thompsoni-598038801 and https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Padillasaurus_leivaensis_skeletal_by_bricksmashtv-da038as.jpg which refers to one of the other drawings in this series. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:51, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Alright, how many times do I have to say this, I DON'T steal images from other accounts and reupload them for myself. I'm over here creating illustrations of Dinosaurs no one has touched on before (or very few people). Of the bones illustrated for Padillasaurus, not one of them was based off of that Sonorasaurus skeletal. Only the general shape (with some modifications to the skull and forelimbs) was based off of it. Nobody else has done a full body Elaltitan skeletal, I'm the only one who has attempted one. Yes, it's in serious need of an upgrade, but NO, it was not traced off of anyone else's artwork. My Nemegtosaurus skull was not based off of a prior restoration, but rather based DIRECTLY off of the actual skull material (which you would be able to see if you actually looked at the paper, which I have a feeling none of you actually have). Yes, this sounds like I'm just being a fucking twat, but I would very much like to protect my reputation as an artist, and I will NOT have that reputation tarnished by some fuckwits on Wikipedia who don't seem to understand how much work goes into every single one of these illustrations I produce. I'm creating new illustrations for previously untouched Sauropods while I have school, AND I'm co-authoring a paper. I may be occasionally rushed for time, but I try to put as much work into every skeletal as I can. And I sure as hell am not restoring any fossils off of somebody else's skeletal (certainly without proper credit at least). Now I'm beginning to understand why artists and paleontologists alike hate this website, cause it's filled with twats who just swing back and forth depending on the "newest paper" without doing any actual fucking research for themselves. Take a look at some of the fossils (either in person or through photos), and tell me how much of the conclusions in most of these papers fucking suck. How many papers continue to find Argentinosaurus as closely related to Opisthocoelicaudia, when the fossils are CLEARLY pointing to a Titanosaur almost as basal as Andesaurus, because some idiot didn't code their fucking characters properly. Yeah, I sound like a total cunt right now, but I've had enough of this bullshit. I'd probably do better off starting my own goddamn website, with real scientific data and research heralding it. Clearly, not one of you I've talked to so far can do anything better for these Dinosaurs. Somebody on this website has to know what the fuck their doing, right? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bricksmashtv4 (talk • contribs)

It would appear these drawings already appear on a website, http://bricksmashtv.deviantart.com/. There is no scientific paper or other source listed for this illustration; since you didn't dig these up yourself, you have to be working from some other source. It is off-topic to be insulting to the project, the process or the users. The only reference on the species I can find is behind a paywall, but it's http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080 /02724634.2012.660898 2012: A reappraisal of the Late Cretaceous Argentinean sauropod dinosaur Argyrosaurus superbus, with a description of a new titanosaur genus by Philip D. Mannionab & Alejandro Oteroc on pages 614-638. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:52, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I have seen the original paper without paying, though I may have gotten it through WP:REX. The author of this is Bricksmash, and he is right that it is not copied from anyone else work. However, the style and formatting is likely based off Nima Sassani's work, but Nima is not Greg Paul, and his format isn't copyrighted. Bricksmashtv4, what group is the paper on (as specific as you are allowed to be), because I may want to make an illustration on it if it is a rarely depicted dinosaur. IJReid (talk) 15:04, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Closing admin, please notice http://asier-larramendi.deviantart.com/art/Elaltitan-lilloi-538315805 which is the only online (non-paywall) source of this image available. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:38, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I know that they're on DeviantArt, that's my page. Here's the paper itself (which I got thanks to Sci-Hub): file:///home/chronos/u-89f2a75e875d8dc15b31eb18610ecada3244df0c/Downloads/Elaltitan%20and%20Argyrosaurus.pdf . You are correct that the style and formatting is inspired by Nima Sassani's work, in fact he's a good friend of mine. I have seen Asier Larramendi's skeletal as well, and I do like it as well (in fact the overall proportions are probably closer than in Nima's Elaltitan skeletal (it's the one labelled "juvenile". The Elaltitan paper had not yet been released when this was uploaded): http://paleo-king.deviantart.com/art/Argyrosaurus-superbus-255541486 .

Apologies for my earlier comments, I was just rather frustrated with all this that's happened.


Deleted: per COM:PRP - looks too close to http://paleo-king.deviantart.com/art/Sonorasaurus-thompsoni-598038801, which isn't freely licensed. --INeverCry 19:06, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]