Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/05/24

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive May 24th, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Known Flickr bad author (134803508@N03) Ronhjones  (Talk) 00:27, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by ~riley: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing

Sorry for copyright.--Shinobi19 (talk) 13:52, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although the subject was a model for hire, and it is possible that the uploader was a client, this image has a prominent watermark of Kamera Club whose copyright page (http://thekameraclub.co.uk/copyright-notice) reads All right reserved. KTo288 (talk) 17:37, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Investigating the uploaders other uploads reveals a pattern of copyright violations, of this is this is one, closing and deleting as part of a mass delete.--KTo288 (talk) 18:57, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Although the subject was a model for hire, and it is possible that the uploader was a client, this image has a prominent watermark of Just June whose copyright page (http://just-june.co.uk/copyright-notice/) reads All right reserved. KTo288 (talk) 17:43, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Investigating the uploaders other uploads reveals a pattern of copyright violations, of this is this is one, closing and deleting as part of a mass delete.--KTo288 (talk) 18:57, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising, out of scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:18, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Template:POV Photo très mal prise ; on ne reconnaît pas les personnes impliquées. Photo quasiment pas utilisée sur Wikipédia. Éric Messel (Déposer un message) 10:52, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

@Éric Messel : C'est une vidéo, pas une photo... --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:23, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Non à la censure !
Cyril Delacour (talk) 10:54, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ce n'est pas une photo mais une vidéo qui montre le député aux élections européennes insultant ("dingue", "taré") et agressif. Il reconnait l'implication politique de sa "boulette" (échange twitter public : menaces avérées par la condition que le film w:fr:Tom le cancre soit commercialisé. Il est clair que ça ne lui fait pas de la bonne publicité et que M. Messel lui rendrait service en limitant la diffusion de ce document révoltant où il est aussi question du travail dissimulé d'enfants (voir description du fichier) : la loi, c'est la loi, les DIRECCTE compétentes en la matière ont précisé qu'il s'agit de travail dissimulé par dissimulation d'emplois pour la réalisation du film de son ami w:fr:Manuel Pradal et a même répondu au député qu'il n'est pas possible de régulariser cela : voir les preuves ici.
Ce document touchant à des personnalités et à un film de cinéma qui a fait le tour des festivals internationaux et qui a été diffusé au public, ce document impliquant un politicien connu a un intérêt encyclopédique indéniable, seule du déni armé de mauvaise foi peut prétendre le contraire devant l'évidence.
Cyril Delacour (talk) 22:07, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: La vidéo est prise dans l'espace public que constitue un jour d'élection une école servant de bureau de vote. Il est également raisonnable de considérer qu'un député présent sur un bureau de vote a une activité relevant de la sphère publique, et non privée. Enfin, le fait de ne pas être utilisée sur Wikipédia n'est pas un motif de suppression : tout document potentiellement utilisable à titre informatif est publiable sur Wikimedia Commons. --Dereckson (talk) 16:14, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Pour clarifier l'objection de Racconish, avec lequel j'ai pu échanger sur ma page de discussion, et la décision de conservation, il y a lieu de noter que le droit français reconnait un très large pouvoir de s'opposer à l'utilisation de son image, même pour des clichés pris dans l'espace public.
Ce document pose une question d'équilibre entre le droit à l'image et la droit à la liberté d'informer.
Il arrive en effet que la jurisprudence considère que cette liberté d'informer prend le pas sur le droit à l'image, lorsque cette information est nécessaire dans une société démocratique, et contribue au débat d'idées, d'opinion.
Dans le cas présent, il se pourrait qu'un juge reconnaisse que nous sommes dans une telle situation. Dès lors, il n'apparaît pas opportun de supprimer le document, mais il apparaît opportun de mettre en garde tout réutilisateur qu'il s'expose à un risque juridique non lié au droit d'auteur mais lié au droit à l'image. Le bandeau {{Personality rights}} a été rajouté en ce sens. --Dereckson (talk) 22:11, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIOs. No indication of user's own work (despite claims) to these images, historical, overprinted, objects, newspapers, etc. All obviously copied from other sources without attribution. Commons is not a family photo album or scrapbooking site.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:15, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept on procedural grounds: As noted above, this is a really disparate group of images, and you need to nominate them separately instead of doing a batch nomination. I encourage you to renominate them immediately, unless you've changed your mind on one or more of them. Nyttend (talk) 22:48, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GdML (talk · contribs)

[edit]

A series of images claimed as own work, or licensed as own work, but clearly created by others (see descriptions, authors, sources, etc.). These include creative logos, calligraphy, awards, personal photos, pictures of horses, scans of other photos and identity images. Many are claimed to be from a family archive, but Commons is not a family scrapbook. Several are late 20th century paintings without permission from the painters.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:48, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Speedy kept on procedural grounds: As noted above, this is a really disparate group of images, and you need to nominate them separately instead of doing a batch nomination. I encourage you to renominate them immediately, unless you've changed your mind on one or more of them. Nyttend (talk) 22:48, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Adem20 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COPYVIOs. No indication of user's own work on this collection of images of various cameras, sizes, white balances, styles, locations, subjects and so on. This is a group of images culled from the internet and other sources uploaded during May 2016.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:58, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Close and renominate each file separately. These files did not uploaded by Adem20, but by several Wikipedia users from several countries several years ago, then, transferred to Commons. Google Image Search didn't returned results for most of these files prior to original date of upload, rather than Wikipedia mirrors. --Amitie 10g (talk) 19:57, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

*Delete the lot - Nominating seperately is just stupid, They should also be deleted on their respective projects too, Most if not all seem to be copyvio (I've found a few of the above on photobucket and elsewhere) –Davey2010Talk 16:48, 25 May 2016‎

Did you seen the original uploaders and my above comment carefuly? Nominating several files on the basis of the user who transferred these files to Commons rather than the original uploaders makes no sense, and even, is a violation of the Deletion Policy (since the nominator is warning and acussing for copyvio to the wrong person and based on wrong dates). Also, while finding "sources" in Google Image Search for the suspected copyvio, you should consider the date of the original upload placed by the tool/bot/trusted user who transferred to Commons (assumming that the bots/tools/trusted users are assumming good faith; ain doubts, Wikipedia have the logs). And finally and again, deleting files based on wrong information is a clear violation of the Deletion Policy. --Amitie 10g (talk) 02:25, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Close - Amitie 10g I didn't realize they were uploaded by different people etc, They were only transferred here so the nomination is both incorrect and invalid, I personally don't suggest nominating individually as there's nothing wrong with the images, Trout to the nominator. –Davey2010Talk 21:00, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Info: I've finally researched every file in this DR (174 to be exact), and based on the following:
  • ✓ No source found means that I didn't found any site that hosted the file prior to uploading (excluding the Wikipedia mirrors, sites that useed contents from Wikipedia, and sites where the image is not actually found after a quick research). These files should not be nominated again unless strong proof of copyvio, or the FOP cases
  • Google Image Search by date, based on the original date of upload to Wikipedia (some of them more than 10 years ago), that invalids the reasoning uploaded during May 2016.
  • Using WHOIS information to get the Date of creation of the Domain to determine the age of the websites (if the domain, therefore, the website was created after the date of upload to Wikipedia, then, it is excluded)
  • Some of these files are efefctively Own work, properly licensed, one of them taken from OpenStreetMap, and even, two of them are from NASA and NOAA!
  • One file was already nominated as FOP case (another process should not be allowed, specially if the second DR is for invalid reasons)
  • The Wikipedia where these files has been transferred from have the logs. Is very easy to ask to a Wikipedia Administrator and check if the deleted file matches the file transferred to Commons (but is easier to assumme that someone is assumming good faith by using Transferred from Wikipedia as source)
This DR should be speedily closed, and each problematic file nominated individually, and, leaving the warning to the right person rather than the user who transferred these files to Commons in good faith. --Amitie 10g (talk) 19:55, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy kept Did you even look at these images before you nominated them? You can expect a wide range of EXIF information in someone's uploads when he's transferring other people's images from Wikipedia! If you renominate any of these without a very good reason, expect to have the nomination speedy closed, together with a request for sanctions for disruptive editing. Nyttend (talk) 22:56, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Der Genehmigungstext widerspricht der Lizenz, das Bild ist so nicht verwendbar. Alnilam (talk) 23:36, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: with PD-old. --Jcb (talk) 17:04, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Elisfkc as duplicate (dup) and the most recent rationale was: licate|1=4K Media Inc. logo.svg KTo288 (talk) 10:19, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not a duplicate. --Jcb (talk) 20:07, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Made one to many


Deleted: and redirected to duplicate file. --JuTa 18:38, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Der Genehmigungstext widerspricht der Lizenz, das Bild ist so nicht verwendbar. Alnilam (talk) 23:35, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Missing permission as of 20 May 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ewanargo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Newspaper clippings; not own work.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:03, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 16:35, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ewanargo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 14:04, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sharif52 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons is not a social media site. See our project scope.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:59, 23 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 15:47, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Sharif52 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:01, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is only being used for vandalism on en-wiki. 73.25.161.2 00:42, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy deleted. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:44, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:05, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:52, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:52, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:06, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:52, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SWARUP CHANDRA BARIK (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:52, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by The Greene Thumb (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promo images. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:52, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, del. on DE Nolispanmo 14:19, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:52, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:52, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Siebenberghouse (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. --Steinsplitter (talk) 10:53, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Mediocre quality (size and styling). File is unused because the in-image caption text (compound numbers) were apparently interfering with User:EdChem editing the articles that use this reaction. He uploaded a quick fix at en:File:Cyclotrimerisation from a single triyne.png to enable his editorial work to continue, and now I uploaded File:Tethered triyne cyclotrimerization.png as a MOS-compliant from-scratch replacement. DMacks (talk) 02:52, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Leyo 20:29, 1 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Missing license as of 24 May 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:04, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Missing license as of 24 May 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:08, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Missing license as of 24 May 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Page non encyclopédique. Elle met en cause un homme politique. Photo quasi non utilisée dans Wikipédia. Éric Messel (Déposer un message) 10:44, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Censure ? -- Cyril Delacour (talk) 10:48, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The description give you some fr.wikipedia.fr links to hunderstand this french politician Pascal Terrasse and this movie Tom le cancre / the truant are NOT personnal things ! If only notable people can write, draw, make photographs = no wikis, no COMMONS ! If you just want TV, book & newspaper, don't use internet, thanks, and don't call it "free". But french laws about children's work for a movie director is my problem with you too. Censorship ! Cyril Delacour (talk) 19:52, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cette vidéo met effectivement en cause un député PS, il se montre insultant et il m'agresse physiquement. C'est une confrontation au sujet d'emplois dissimulés d'enfants pour la réalisation d'un film de cinéma, le député avait été médiateur. Cela ne fait pas une bonne publicité à cet élu. Cependant ce n'est pas une photo et ses insultes "dingue" "taré" ainsi que son agression physique lui appartiennent.

L'argument que cette vidéo n'est pas utilisée ne tient pas. Cela fait moins de 48 h qu'elle est sur commons.wiki ! De plus M Messel efface toute publication publique, il est donc mal placé pour reprocher qu'elle n'est pas utilisée : il fait en sorte que cette vidéo ne soit pas utilisée ou vue (comme pour 3 autres documents) ! S'il veut taire ces documents c'est pour des raisons politiques.

Voilà une liste de ses censures aujourd'hui :

Je ne crois pas que sur le sujet sensible du travail dissimulé d'enfants pour du cinéma commons.wikimedia.org ait intérêt de se montrer complice par une administration de tels documents appartenant à de la censure pure et simple. La loi est très claire à ce propos : emploi d'enfants dans le spectacle donc ne vous montrez pas complices. Cela dépasse de loin un cas de "publicité personnelle" et ça touche au contraire à des personnalités publiques connues, et donc à de l'information digne d'intérêt, d'autant que ces articles sont donc concernés w:fr:Pascal Terrasse et w:fr:Tom le cancre.

Cyril Delacour (talk) 21:42, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ceci n'est pas une page "encyclopédique" justement !

« Commons is not an encyclopedia, dictionary, guide, or book. » - source

@Éric Messel: Est-ce que c’est un argument recevable selon vous qui demandez le retrait de 3 visuels et 1 vidéo pour des raisons « encyclopédiques » ? - Cyril Delacour (talk) 23:32, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

La vidéo sur le député w:fr:Pascal Terrasse ici caricaturé est conservée Cyril Delacour (talk) 21:45, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Use on the uploader's talk page does not qualify for COM:INUSE.
Thanks : now in use to show this POV problem (based on facts) - Cyril Delacour (talk) 17:15, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Peut-être voulez-vous censurer toute contradiction de la "version officielle" : Le député PS Pascal Terrasse agressé : « Je ressemble à un schtroumpf » - Le Parisien (13 Mars 2015, 19h25) - Cyril Delacour (talk) 19:49, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Prison et vie carcérale 02
Cyril Delacour (talk) 03:05, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
"Banque Citoyenne de France (essai PERSONNEL) speedy censored (of course) Cyril Delacour (talk) 14:08, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Voir cet acte de censure (sans discussion ni préavis et sous faux prétexte) accompli par Racconish sur l'historique de l'article Prison (evidence). Cyril Delacour (talk) 16:21, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Faut-il sauver le soldat Pascal Terrasse et infiniment subsidiairement l'entreprise GEPSA à qui finalement le crime profite ?

[edit]

@Racconish: Vous avez (aussi) demandé la suppression de tous ces fichiers ici

Cette caricature a été réalisée en prison (Centre Pénitentiaire de Valence) et toute "trace" de cela fait l'objet de censure (y compris par les médias) : cela révèle un État de non-droit (s'agissant de travail dissimulé d'enfants pour du cinéma à l'origine de cette affaire : Tom the truant).

Prison et vie carcérale 22.jpg
Prison et vie carcérale 21.jpg
Prison et vie carcérale 20.jpg
Prison et vie carcérale 19.jpg
Prison et vie carcérale 18.jpg
Prison et vie carcérale 17.jpg
Prison et vie carcérale 16.jpg
Prison et vie carcérale 03.jpg
Prison et vie carcérale 15.jpg
Prison et vie carcérale 14.jpg
Prison et vie carcérale 13.jpg
Prison et vie carcérale 12.jpg
Prison et vie carcérale 11.jpg
Prison et vie carcérale 10.jpg
Prison et vie carcérale 09.jpg
Prison et vie carcérale 07.jpg
Prison et vie carcérale 05.jpg
Prison et vie carcérale 08.jpg
Prison et vie carcérale 04.jpg
Prison et vie carcérale 06.jpg
Prison et vie carcérale-01.jpg
Prison et vie carcérale 02.jpg

Or ils illustrent ce qui est par ailleurs rare puisque la photographie ne permet pas de représenter des détenus en détention : la vie carcérale.

« Pour montrer ce que la photographie n'autorise pas, la vie carcérale avec des détenus lors d'activités, avec le ressenti d'un détenu, en passant de la petite et vieille maison d'arrêt de Privas par le tout nouveau centre pénitentiaire de Valence (Gepsa). » - ici : Discussion sur le Projet Prison

Dans la description des fichiers est mentionné la raison de l'incarcération d'un artiste (au répertoire des métiers) en lien avec le frère-député Pascal Terrasse impliqué par la promotion d'un film de cinéma (Tom the truant) dans le travail dissimulé d'enfants qui bénéficie de l'impunité (d'où l'insurrection de cet artiste, papa en colère, que je suis).

Votre "neutralité" est mise en cause : Template:POV

De plus "Prison et vie carcérale 02.jpg" est utilisé sur l'article Prison et ne fait pour le moment l'objet d'aucune contestation. 400px Cyril Delacour (talk) 14:18, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Please stay calm and discuss ad rem, not ad personam : accusing me of being a free-mason is not polite nor constructive. — Racconish ☎ 16:49, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
C'est tout à fait calmement que je lutte contre la censure en exposant ses méthodes et ses opérateurs, ainsi que ses raisons (politiques et économiques). De plus la question reste en suspens (et non accusation) : êtes-vous oui ou non franc-maçon ? Cyril Delacour (talk) 17:40, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Comment Please assume good faith and stop arguing ad personam. — Racconish ☎ 18:26, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:57, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Template:POV Photo non encyclopédique. La citation est signée "Cyril Delacour", qui est celui qui a pris la photo ==> tentative de publicité personnelle. Aucun apport à l'encyclopédie ; photo quasiment non utilisée. Éric Messel (Déposer un message) 10:45, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Non à la censure !

Cyril Delacour (talk) 10:56, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you just want TV, books & newspapers, don't use internet, thanks, and don't call it "free". Political censorship, what else ? Do you hunderstand french ? And M. Éric Messel erase all entry of this on fr.wikipedia.fr, of course. His censorship and yours don't give me a chance chance. Finance, debt, money system are NOT my personnal things, but perhaps yours. I like philosophy, art, my daughter and life. You're opinions are "personnal" too.

Look at the work of M. Messel (censorship) :

I realy don't like fascism. Cyril Delacour (talk) 20:07, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Il est question ici de philosophie est la "valeur symbolique" évoquée c'est l'argent (money), ce qui n'est pas vraiment une chose "personnelle". Je propose ce visuel pour illustrer des articles qui touchent aux finances, à l'économie, aux banques, à la société de consommation qui tourne autour du moyen d'échange. Ce n'est sans doute pas "politiquement" correct comparé à la communication des médias mainstream, mais ce n'est pas une raison pour exercer de la censure.

Éric Messel indique que le visuel n'est pas utilisé, mais il y veille en l'effaçant lui-même chaque fois que je le propose à la diffusion, donc il en est aussi responsable et ne peut donc le reprocher. De plus cela fait très peu de temps que je me suis inscrit et que j'ai uploadé ces documents, donc cet argument appartient aussi à de la mauvaise foi.

Cyril Delacour (talk) 21:22, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

« Commons is not an encyclopedia, dictionary, guide, or book. » - source

@Éric Messel: Est-ce que c’est un argument recevable selon vous qui demandez le retrait de 3 visuels et 1 vidéo pour des raisons « encyclopédiques » ? - Cyril Delacour (talk) 23:28, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:00, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Template:POV Photo non encyclopédique. La citation est signée "Cyril Delacour", qui est celui qui a pris la photo ==> tentative de publicité personnelle. Aucun apport à l'encyclopédie ; photo quasiment non utilisée. Éric Messel (Déposer un message) 10:48, 24 May 2016 (UTC)

Non à la censure !

Cyril Delacour (talk) 10:55, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If you just want TV, books & newspapers, don't use internet, thanks, and don't call it "free". Political censorship, what else ? Do you hunderstand french ? And M. Éric Messel erase all entry of this on fr.wikipedia.fr, of course. His censorship and yours don't give me a chance chance. Finance, debt, money system are NOT my personnal things, but perhaps yours. I like philosophy, art, my daughter and life. You're opinions are "personnal" too.

Look at the work of M. Messel (censorship) :

I realy don't like fascism. Cyril Delacour (talk) 20:08, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

M Messel ne peut reprocher le fait que ce visuel n'est pas utilisé puisqu'il fait ce qu'il faut pour effacer toute proposition de publication. De plus cela fait moins de 48h que ce fichier est ici… De plus ce n'est pas de la publicité personnelle puisque la licence stipule que le crédit des oeuvres doit être porté à la connaissance de son public. Par contre si vous comprenez le français, vous pouvez constater que cela porte sur la dette publique, le système monétaire. Cela fait apparaître la ploutocratie masquée par une pseudo démocratie qui tient plus à de la mascarade qu'à autre chose : ce sont donc des raisons politiques voire économiques qui motivent M. Messel afin d'opérer une censure afin que es idées qu'exprimen Cyril Delacour (talk) 21:56, 24 May 2016 (UTC) t ce visuel ne soient pas communiquées.[reply]

« Commons is not an encyclopedia, dictionary, guide, or book. » - source

@Éric Messel: Est-ce que c’est un argument recevable selon vous qui demandez le retrait de 3 visuels et 1 vidéo pour des raisons « encyclopédiques » ? - Cyril Delacour (talk) 23:29, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cyril Delacour: Je ne peux que confirmer l'avis des autres contributeurs. Vos fichiers seraient mieux sur Facebook (ou un autre média social) que sur Commons. Merci de lire COM:SCOPE/fr avant d'importer des documents. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 16:10, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
C'est votre jugement et celui-ci précise votre position sur ce qui est ici selon vous à censurer (justifié comme vous le "pouvez") : ce n'est pas "neutre" pour un sou (justement) « La source est à wikipédia ce que la monnaie est aux échanges » (..) Cyril Delacour (talk) 16:21, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

In use here too (the "PERSONNAL essai" Banque Citoyenne de France speedy censored) : w:fr:Discussion:Décroissance_(économie) Cyril Delacour (talk) 13:58, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:59, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader also agrees to delete (nominated the file for speedy deletion). Taivo (talk) 17:14, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A clear derivative of a work by Dolk (http://expressobeans.com/public/detail.php/68905). We will need OTRS permission to allow this. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:07, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no permission. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:12, 2 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

content of http://www.royalark.net/Albania/zogu2.htm is copyright protected Albinfo (talk) 00:28, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

can also be found here: [5] --Albinfo (talk) 00:34, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:42, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

"Fist and rose" logo are not own work, too complex to have any kind of free licence. Sfs90 (talk) 00:32, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, complex logo. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:43, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. -- Geagea (talk) 01:24, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:44, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in the USA for statues. The statues at this memorial are copyrighted. 68.193.210.74 01:36, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:45, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in the USA for statues. The statues at this memorial are copyrighted. 68.193.210.74 01:38, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:06, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No FOP in the USA for statues. The statues at this memorial are copyrighted. 68.193.210.74 01:38, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:46, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

uruguaiana.rs.gov.br is not a free site, nor even a GNU compatible one Yanguas (talk) 02:10, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination and per my comment. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:13, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sources are FALSE + FACEBOOK is NOT a free site, not even a GNU compatible one Yanguas (talk) 02:11, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:13, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sources is not a free site, not even a GNU compatible one Yanguas (talk) 02:12, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:13, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sources are FALSE, and Facebook is not a free site, not even a GNU compatible one Yanguas (talk) 02:15, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:14, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Source is FALSE, and not a free site, not even a GNU compatible one Yanguas (talk) 02:18, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:14, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sources are FALSE, and Facebook is not a free site, not even a GNU compatible one Yanguas (talk) 02:19, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:52, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sources are FALSE, and Facebook is not a free site, not even a GNU compatible one Yanguas (talk) 02:20, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:52, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:ART#This does not apply to photographs of 3D works of art Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:36, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:51, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer want this file to be uploaded DanielD5678 (talk) 02:39, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 04:58, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No longer want this file to be uploaded DanielD5678 (talk) 02:40, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:15, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See COM:TOO#Common law countries. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:45, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:17, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Originally tagged by Elisfkc as copyvio sophisticated logo. This logo is debatable, so I nominated this instead for deletion. Poké95 03:17, 24 May 2016 (UTC) [reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:09, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Originally tagged by Elisfkc with copyvio sophisticated logo. This logo is debatable, so nominating this instead for deletion. Poké95 03:22, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 10:13, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Originally tagged by Elisfkc with copyvio sophisticated logo. This logo is debatable, so nominating this instead for deletion. Poké95 03:24, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:09, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Originally tagged by Elisfkc with copyvio sophisticated logo. This logo is debatable, so nominating this instead for deletion. Poké95 03:25, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 10:12, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 06:50, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:12, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 06:51, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:14, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, the wiki page about this has a different one, File:Logo studio71.png. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:14, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 10:12, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SyedAminul (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COPYVIOs. No indication of user's own work on this group of images, some certificates, some awards, a lot of showing off and promotional images, none of which have camera data, many are Facebook size and others are obviously not created by the same person. Commons isn't a personal scrapbooking site.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:06, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

If the file mentioned by Nick is really work of Rabindranath Tagore, then it is in PD in India, because author died more than 60 years ago, and in USA, because it was published before 1923. Taivo (talk) 09:37, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:13, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons isn't here to promote people or their businesses, out of scope if indeed correctly licensed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:01, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, likely copyvio too. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:31, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by FlavorOfAlgeria (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No Exif Data, too small, this user are only copyvio, and i think that all this files are also an copyvio

Reda Kerbouche (talk) 07:38, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Reda Kerbouche: Hi, I think File:Kesra.jpg is an error since it was uploaded by Astiosaurus and not FlavorOfAlgeria . Moumou82 (talk) 16:48, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Moumou82: Oh think you for this notif, yes it's a Mistake.--Reda Kerbouche (talk) 06:15, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:49, 3 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Permission ? see http://www.20minutes.fr/societe/1537627-20150210-proces-carlton-premiere-matinee-audition-finalement-tranquille-dsk : Jacques Brinon / AP / Sipa is mentionned. Do not follow (talk) 20:28, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:45, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:40, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, additional copyright concerns. --Storkk (talk) 15:47, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Carlozav5 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COPYVIOs. No indication of user's own work, only two of these have camera data - and they're different. The rest are small, no data, and those which I searched of this uploader prior to this mass request were sent to speedy as they were all found on other websites. I have no reason to believe that any of these are own work of uploader.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:59, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 15:49, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted book cover in the picture. It is not de minimis. Regasterios (talk) 23:52, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, publisher should confirm license via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 15:52, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by The Photographer as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivate work of copyrighted art. This case does not qualify for speedy. ~riley (talk) 19:09, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The basis for this coat of arms was the image File:Coat of arms of Venezuela.svg, but that file had problems about copyright (see here). If you want to delete this file, I will not oppose.--Shadowxfox (talk) 00:41, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The original source seems to be File:Flag of Venezuela (state).svg, which in turn took the graphic from xrmap, which released their stuff to the public domain. It is possible that a copyrighted source was used for the xrmap effort, but we'd need to see that source to show a copyright issue. The other file was deleted and re-uploaded and nominated etc. a few times, but as far as I can see the only evidence for deletion was a version on the web here -- but that is dated 2011 and is pretty clearly a copy from the Wikipedia version (it's too exact a copy for the SVG to be a trace -- rather that is a bitmap generated from the SVG in all likelihood). And it does not seem to have predated the xrmap version. The claim above is that this is derivative of File:Escudo de 1871 vzla.gif, which I can only see on a Google cache version, but at first glance -- no, not even close. They are separate graphics from the looks of it. Tentative  Keep unless there is some evidence of pre-existing versions that has not been brought up. xrmap is distributed on a lot of open source systems which are very careful about copyright, certainly as much as we are. Carl Lindberg (talk) 04:16, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Most of the time, a coat of arms SVG cannot really be "derivative" of a GIF in any ordinary or usual sense (note that coat of arms images have some special rules in certain respects). The template which had such fateful effect was only added a year and a half after all image versions were uploaded and was the wrong kind of template anyway (only intended to be used for SVG derived from another SVG). It may have only been added to indicate that the SVG was an approximate vector equivalent of the GIF; it certainly should not result in automatic deletion of the SVG without considering any other factors... AnonMoos (talk) 10:06, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep An image that old is not copyrighted.--Antemister (talk) 13:02, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Individual depictions each have their own copyright. The SVG is certainly a modern work, the question is more is if there was copyrightable expression reproduced from a still-in-copyright depiction. The general design would not be copyrighted; the question is the specific artistic work (the precise lines etc. seen here). There would certainly be plenty of public domain depictions to draw from. Carl Lindberg (talk) 14:24, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. ~riley (talk) 20:07, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivate work of copyrighted art previously deleted (Please See author section) --The Photographer (talk) 20:19, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No new valid reason for deletion, wasting our time similiar to Commons:Deletion requests/File:Coat of arms of Venezuela.svg. ~riley (talk) 20:22, 6 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:17, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 15:55, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

porque es un archivo viejo y esta obsoleto Manuugijar96 (talk) 10:59, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • keep - Being obsolete is not a good reason to delete an image. The best policy would be for the image to be retained and the name to be changed - possibly adding "obsoleto" to the end of the existing name. Kiltpin (talk) 13:36, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. It is not obsolete and is not old. This seems joke.--Macucal (talk) 14:09, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. Está diseñado en base a su descripción oficial aprobado por la Junta de Andalucía en 2008 y por tanto en vigor. Nada de obsoleto.--Erlenmeyer (talk) 15:43, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Didym (talk) 22:27, 10 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COMPLAINT BY CHARLES PRAST AS BACKGROUND IS COPYRIGHTED 84.14.151.100 18:21, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: COM:De minimis. — regards, Revi 11:06, 12 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The person who uploaded this image has admitted to being the creator of the page Charles Prast on Wikipedia. That article has since been deleted as he is not notable and seems to be gaming Wikipedia for promotional purposes. He also indicates he is the copyright holder of these images in Wikimedia Commons however, he is the subject of the picture, making it difficult for him to be the copyright holder. This image and the others on Wikimedia Commons can also be seen in other online locations which means he likely used them without the permission of the photographer who took them. Navycrafted (talk) 03:07, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:26, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted by Fisher's record label; the uploader provides no proof of ownership. —ATinySliver/ATalkPage 23:34, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:20, 15 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 10:37, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:35, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Iqbal222n (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: Wikimedia Commons is not a depository of personal images

Takeaway (talk) 10:48, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:34, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by 吳介德 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Advertising

Wcam (talk) 12:22, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:34, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Checco france (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COPYVIOs. Sporting pictures, obviously copied from online professional sources, see sizes, location, etc. User's other uploads were speedies.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:51, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by colleague. --Jcb (talk) 22:33, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Shiba pro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons isn't a personal photographic album for people or their pets. Images are out of scope, assuming they are created by user (not all have metadata and at least one is facebook sized).

Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:00, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: probably not own work, two files have no EXIF, the other five are from 4 different cameras. --Jcb (talk) 22:33, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:16, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:34, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:17, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:34, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:17, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:34, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:20, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:36, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope, uploader did nothing but create out of scope content. Poké95 04:16, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:37, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unencyclopedic image only used in one vandalism page on the English Wikipedia. Passengerpigeon (talk) 04:36, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:37, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 04:52, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:37, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope Randykitty (talk) 05:36, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:38, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

movie poster, obviously not users own work. copyvio Ringerfan23 (talk) 06:21, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:38, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:39, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope. Currently used in a promotional sandbox article that has been nominated for deletion Gbawden (talk) 06:49, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  1. +1 --Titou (talk) 13:36, 11 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:39, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused photo and probably copyvio. Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 07:22, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:41, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo that can come from a Malaguti advertisement or motorcycle magazine; no Exif data Cjp24 (talk) 07:51, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:41, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No EXIF Data, is an ad. out of scoop Reda Kerbouche (talk) 07:53, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:41, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo that can come from a Malaguti advertisement or motorcycle magazine; no Exif data. See also File:Runner rally 1.png. Cjp24 (talk) 07:57, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:42, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality personal photo not realistically useful for an educational purpose Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:21, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:43, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality personal snapshot not realistically useful for an educational purpose Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:23, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:43, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing source information, not the own work of the uploader Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:27, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:43, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor quality unused personal snapshot not realistically useful for an educational purpose Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:33, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:44, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal artwork for self promotion not useful for an educational purpose Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:34, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:44, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal artwork not realistically useful for an educational purpose Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:45, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:44, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality personal photo not realistically useful for an educational purpose Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 08:46, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:45, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative work of the Sibelius Monument, a 1967 sculpture by Eila Hiltunen (1922–2003), not in Public Domain yet. FOP in Finland for buildings only. Apalsola tc 09:02, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

––Apalsola tc 09:04, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:47, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal artwork for self-promotion not realistically useful for an educational purpose Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:10, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:47, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Leidy camila Oquendo9

[edit]

Personal snapshots of a girl and her school friends, out of scope and not useful for any educational purpose – Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 09:15, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:48, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status / out of scope.    FDMS  4    10:36, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:49, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scop Gbawden (talk) 10:56, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:49, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bigbosssss (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, out of scope, Commons is not a photo album

Gbawden (talk) 11:00, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:51, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cirowwe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal photos, commons is not a photo album

Gbawden (talk) 11:02, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   19:51, 21 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Characters are copyright Disney•Pixar and the performance likely is copyrighted as well as probably having a "The Use of any recording device, either audio or video, and the taking of any photographs, either with or without flash, is strictly prohibited" similar to many Broadway productions like Hamilton.

Elisfkc (talk) 02:32, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:23, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:16, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: file does not exist. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:25, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:20, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: file does not exist. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:25, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal movie playing, out of scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:21, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, also unclear copyright statut of the images. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:27, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Near certain Photoshop insertion of another person's head, copyvio of image on the Internet https://i.ytimg.com/vi/YOniKodlzvE/hqdefault.jpg Brianhe (talk) 03:26, 24 May 2016 (UTC) Hi Brianhe .This picture was taken for CD cover and is free from any copyright violation. Hence request you to withdraw your nomination for deletion.[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, derivative and/or previously published. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:29, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Erroneous loading 176.37.97.44 04:53, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:31, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio from http://www.bharatstudent.com/cafebharat/photo_gallery_3-Hindi-Events-Mahabali_Shera-Photo-Galleries-1,8,33250,27.php Ringerfan23 (talk) 06:20, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:36, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Подложная лицензия: http://refdb.ru/look/1870801-p26.html -- Tomasina (talk) 06:35, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:37, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Vetranio as Speedy (speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Foto personal, no debiera estar en Commons.. The photo is used, so it is in scope at moment. But the article is nominated for deletion. Also, this is small photo without metadata and the uploader's only contribution, so it can be copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 06:39, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The file isn't used anymore. Probably depicted person is non-notable. Taivo (talk) 11:56, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:38, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:39, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image changed Aarnaa2016 (talk) 07:15, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: complex logo. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:39, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

OTRS-permission from author and copyright holder MICHELE CROSERA is needed. Taivo (talk) 07:47, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:41, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Simabou13 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No Exif data, Not used, this user upload 3 copyvio of 7 fils. too Small. and maby copyvio

Reda Kerbouche (talk) 07:58, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, at least 2 are coming from facebook "FBMD"+ copyviouploader (see talk page). Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:44, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Halazoune5 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No Exif data, small, some of them are out of scoop , and maby not own work of the user. this user have 5 copyvio uploading at the same day with this fils

Reda Kerbouche (talk) 08:10, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, all are coming from facebook "FBMD". Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:50, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, the user's last remaining upload. The file can be found multiple times in Internet, for example at http://mananaqueamanezca.tumblr.com/ I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:10, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:51, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

there's a better version at File:Santiago Rusinol Before the Morphine.jpg and I hadn't seen when I uploaded this ESM (talk) 08:18, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:53, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copivio from google.maps Pz-90.11 (talk) 09:25, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: in any case, not an own wonrk. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:55, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation of http://www.kurzy.cz/cnb/ekonomika/mezirocni-zmeny-mesicni-data/uk7-ceny-potravin-napoje-tabak/ Takeaway (talk) 10:21, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: non free source. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:58, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kurzycz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Possible copyright violations. All taken from http://www.kurzy.cz/

Takeaway (talk) 10:25, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, non free source. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:02, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

subject request, not in use Slowking4Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 10:35, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: ok. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:03, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate and not correct file name, the shield is not for the old Habsburg family, but for the newer branch Habsburg-Lothringen Dan Koehl (talk) 10:53, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate or a scaled down version of File:Wappen Habsburg-Lothringen Schild.svg, deleted a×pdeHello! 10:58, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Dan Koehl (talk) 11:12, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: deleted by Axpde. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:05, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely copyvio, unlikely own work. No exif info and freely available on the web includinghttp://www.celebslight.info/15016-thomas-del-ruth/default.htm Gbawden (talk) 10:56, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:10, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work. Gbawden (talk) 11:05, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:09, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam from wuuwiki Lt2818 (talk) 11:06, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:11, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:08, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:11, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File taken from Facebook without permission. See metadata, it contains the string "FBMD". Also, I think the Wickles packages are not de minimis. Poké95 11:37, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:16, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think may be a possible copyvio. It purportedly shows a parade in 2008. The metadata says it was digitized in 2015. Other data does not add up for a photo seemingly taken in bright sun; 1/25sec, f/1.8, ISO 800. IMO the quality of the image does not correspond to the pixel size. Is it possibly a photo of a print? SovalValtos (talk) 11:27, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, obviously a photo of a photo therefore a derivative. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:18, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Cette photo est copie illégale d'une photo prise par un drone par la société SkyCam Algéria (https://www.facebook.com/SkyCamAlgeria/) voir un exemple avec le logo en incrustation sur la page Facebook de la société : https://www.facebook.com/SkyCamAlgeria/photos/a.318182581694072.1.073741827.315510595294604/391389287706734/?type=3&theater On trouve beaucoup de copies de cette photo en faisant des recherche par image.

De plus cette photo ne peut pas être celle d'un particulier car à Alger il faut des autorisations spéciales pour survoller la ville, surtput avec un drone. Seule une société ayant ces autorisations aurait pu le faire57.66.185.161 11:42, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Si le lien Facebook ne s'ouvre pas, il faut aller à la date du 13 mars 2015 pour voir la photo dans le post Facebook. --57.66.185.161 13:25, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
on voit aussi cette photo ici : http://www.hostingpics.net/viewer.php?id=366667ski.jpg (extraite de ce forum : http://forum.dzfoot.com/topic/14489-le-topic-dalger-la-blanche/page__st__1220 post http://forum.dzfoot.com/topic/14489-le-topic-dalger-la-blanche/page__view__findpost__p__4126316) --57.66.185.161 14:13, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:20, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of non-notable company. Article about company was deleted in en.wiki twice. Out of project scope. Also the logo surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 11:53, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:30, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 11:56, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:30, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probable copyvio, no source Hannibal (talk) 11:57, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, likely a copyvio. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:32, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:40, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:32, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:53, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:32, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:55, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:33, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope.    FDMS  4    12:57, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: in any cases, above TOO. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:34, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

IS NOT GOOD 林渝之 (talk) 13:06, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:34, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vu.trgiang (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Policy allows one or two personal images for user pages of active contributors, but "active" and "contributor" must come first. Commons is not Facebook. Also, there is no need for two identical images.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:09, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:35, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken from website belonging to Latvian television broadcaster. No signs of CC-license on that site. Uploaded as "Eget arbete". abbedabbtalk 13:16, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:37, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo taken from website belonging to Latvian television broadcaster. No signs of CC-license on that site. abbedabbtalk 13:19, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:37, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Band What Awaits is not mentioned in en.wiki. The photo is out of project scope. (Also source "my computer" is not a good one. The uploader is himself depicted here and this is not a selfie. Maybe copyright violation.) Taivo (talk) 13:24, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:38, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, out of scope, promotional. Josve05a (talk) 13:24, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:38, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, out of scope, promotional. Although Wikipedia may or may not have an article about this subject/company/organization, this logo is promotional in nature while unused. Josve05a (talk) 13:25, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:39, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Syahrul Bagan (talk · contribs)

[edit]

COM:COPYVIOs and COM:SCOPE issues. No confidence any of these images (memes, floating letters, food, old pictures, etc.) are own work of Uploader as claimed.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:55, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:40, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This church has been designed by the architect Maurice Boutterin (1882-1970), who died less than 70 years ago. As there is no freedom of panorama in France, these picture can't be considered as free and should by removed from Commons.

Pymouss Let’s talk - 22:53, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:44, 26 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

please check if cc 4.0 is given for the picture Queryzo (talk) 21:42, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I confirm: license review failed. Taivo (talk) 17:54, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This may have appeared in some examiner.com article but this is a Getty image. See the photo credit at http://national.suntimes.com/national-entertainment/7/72/2656650/fifth-harmony-second-album-727-release-date Whpq (talk) 01:42, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:16, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Elisfkc as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: |source=http://normanisource.tumblr.com/post/161356698942/fifth-harmony-performs-on-abcs-good-morning%7CPost was made before image was uploaded, image had no EXIF data on Flickr, likely flickr washing. Converted as the image is widely used on the various Wiki sites so it deserves more careful scrutiny than a speedy would require. Tabercil (talk) 17:40, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I do understand that, since the file is widely used, it does need a little more discussion, but this seems like a textbook case of Flickr washing. The account has three photos, all of the same subject at the same event. None of the files have any EXIF data, and they all can be found on other sites prior to the upload date listed on Flickr. Elisfkc (talk) 18:00, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note that the updated file provided on Flickr not only has the EXIF data it's also at a much higher resolution. Tabercil (talk) 02:29, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Resolved. --Natuur12 (talk) 20:45, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

although a nice image, DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho rather 'professional-looking' format, but/and missing EXIF data to verify origin, Roland zh (talk) 02:42, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:16, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright information was not provided in the source. Rather it is unknown but should be treated as non-free image. No prior publication has yet been proven. George Ho (talk) 05:12, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:16, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Veronica Nailett Rojas (talk · contribs) uploads photos of strangers as own work and this makes me suspect copyright violation here also. Small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 09:23, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:17, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

User:Lppanapat

[edit]

See Special:ListFiles/Lppanapat.

False authorship claim, likely copyvios. --Paul_012 (talk) 10:20, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:17, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It says author = "Boodee Keerthisena" which is very different from the uploader's user name. Is this someone else? A cropped copy of the photo is also used as someone's userphoto on Youtube, but I'm not sure if this predates Commons or not. Stefan2 (talk) 10:49, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per COM:PRP. --INeverCry 20:17, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has been requested for deletion by the volunteer who originally uploaded it. It is my understanding that the subject of the photograph has privacy concerns, and that she reached out to Wikimedia DC chapter members to ask for help in getting the file removed. The subject is not a public figure, is not notable, and the image is not used in any articles. Thank you for your consideration of this request. --Sarasays (talk) 01:09, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I created the photograph and request it be deleted or blanked. Geraldshields11 (talk) 12:42, 31 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you for the efforts in deleting this photograph. I appreciate it. Geraldshields11 (talk) 19:46, 14 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:18, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not sharp, impossible to identify Brunei (talk) 11:23, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:18, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

spam, del. on DE Nolispanmo 12:32, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:19, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:19, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:19, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status / out of scope.    FDMS  4    14:24, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:20, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope.    FDMS  4    14:25, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:20, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mr Lochan Kumar Batala (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:20, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope (usage doesn't appear to be encyclopedic).    FDMS  4    14:26, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:20, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope (no mainspace contribs).    FDMS  4    14:27, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:20, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status / out of scope.    FDMS  4    14:27, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:20, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rodriv8desing (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope.

   FDMS  4    14:29, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:20, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:21, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:21, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:21, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:21, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:21, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/718679648687620097/shY4jkQg.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:21, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:21, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:34, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:21, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://fabmagazineonline.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/05/IMG_4984TWO-SESSION.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:35, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:21, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing http://www.archivalencia.org/documentos/ficheros_noticias/decano-teologia-botella-int1.jpgEXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like . EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:21, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope : personal image Florn (talk) 15:03, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:21, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope : personal image Florn (talk) 15:04, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:21, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A sign that contains non-free artwork (unless the uploader is the artist). howcheng {chat} 15:49, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:21, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

First of all, {{PD-art}} only applies to two-dimential artworks, not 3D-artworks., therefore this might be a copyvio of http://hoogleraren.leidenuniv.nl/search?keyword=Willem%20Jan%20Mari%20van%20Eysinga;docsPerPage=1;startDoc=1, since they University claims copyirght to the photograph.

Secondly, it is true that 3D-artworks from the Netherlands are ok ({{FoP-Nederland}}), but only for "[artworks] which are made to be permanently located in a public place, as long as the work is depicted as it is located in the public space". I would not assume that a University is defined as a public space or public place. Josve05a (talk) 16:25, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I guess I took the photograph from a Leiden University database by mistake, when taking up other (2D) pictures from the same source. However, the bust is on permanent display at the Leiden Academic Historical Museum -open accessible, so I will make a new photograph in the near future. Vysotsky (talk) 19:18, 29 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:21, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Several of the source images are from a flickr account that reposts Instagram pictures from numerous Instagram users. There is no evidence that the images on instagram have a CC-BY license claimed by the Flickr account. Ahecht (TALK
PAGE
) 16:38, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Seems like an easy one to delete. Elisfkc (talk) 19:39, 26 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete idem. Vitor MazucoMsg 00:45, 18 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:21, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Own work is in doubt. Small photo without metadata, but looks like professional advertizing. This is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Maybe copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 16:54, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:22, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NoFoP in Ukraine Andriy.v (talk) 17:25, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vitaju Andriy.v, thank you for starting with it. I will now continue to add deletion requests on all modern+soviet things in UA (which are very likely not in FoP) starting with Category:Busts of Taras Shevchenko. Cheers, --Arnd (talk) 18:31, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:22, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NoFoP in Ukraine. Andriy.v (talk) 17:30, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:22, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Al.radovski (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical images with bogus CC licenses and various derivative works

Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:47, 16 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --P 1 9 9   15:21, 3 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this image, user's other images lacked source. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:07, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:22, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We already have File:Goya Self portrait with spectacles (Musee Goya Castres).jpg with proper source and license, rather than keeping this one which says "own work". Really? Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:10, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I took this photograph, what proper source and licence should I choose ? If you compare the two files, you should notice that the quality is better, that's why I added my photograph. You should know that it's valuable for those who are interested in paintings, because it's usefull to analyse it. Rodolphe31 (talk) 20:27, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment The nominated photo is much bigger than alternatives. I added another template and a lot of categories. Taivo (talk) 19:40, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per above. --INeverCry 20:23, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image is from the 1940s, but without author information. It also has a CCSA3.0 license, but has no source or author! Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:19, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:23, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image needs OTRS from Georgette METHENS-RENARD, uploader cannot license th work of another. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:20, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:23, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is an advertising of the 80's owned by a french car manufacturer, not free of rights Do not follow (talk) 18:20, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:23, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As a 1964 image, there is no proof that the author of the image agreed to license it like this. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:21, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:25, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Requires OTRS from Bob Demuyser to be retained. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:21, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:25, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Requires OTRS from Bob Demuyser for retention. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:22, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:25, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Diploma is neither the own work of the uploader, nor that of the recipient, and is incorrectly licensed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:24, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:25, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Diploma is not own work of uploader, nor of recipient and is incorrectly licensed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:24, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:25, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work, in fact it's obviously a scan. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:24, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:25, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Identity card was not created by source given, and is not in use. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:25, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:25, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I disagree that this note is in the public domain (per license), as it has a visual image (seal) and no clue what it is. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:26, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:25, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I do not believe this image is able to be licensed as given, it doesn't appear copyright ineligible for the reasons given. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:27, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:25, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Request to delete the history version because the big screen image is very likely copyrighted and has been cropped out. Wcam (talk) 18:28, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Old revision deleted. --INeverCry 20:25, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Claimed as own work, yet the author is Andre Van Bever. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:28, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:28, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope : poor quality photo montage Florn (talk) 18:28, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:28, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:COPYVIO. Marie-Thérèse Heyvaert needs to send OTRS permission for this 1997 image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:29, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:28, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This seems to me not like photo, but like a project made by architect. Own work is in doubt. OTRS-permission from architect is needed. Taivo (talk) 18:32, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:28, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:OTRS from Mikinosuke Kawaishi required, it's not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:37, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:28, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image has no author, and can't be licensed as shown. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:37, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:29, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Proper permission is required for this image, it's a certificate of award with a DW image on it. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:38, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:29, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:OTRS from André Van Bever (Bruxelles) required. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:38, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:29, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

With unknown author and no other information, this license is incorrect. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:39, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:29, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:OTRS from Marie-Thérèse Huyvaert required. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:40, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:29, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused simple logo of non-notable company, out of project scope. "Jeans nu" is not mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in fr.wiki. Taivo (talk) 18:42, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:29, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Two issues with this image, (a) it's uploaded on top of another one and (b) no permission from author Joseph Cayet. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:43, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:29, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NoFoP in Ukraine Andriy.v (talk) 19:01, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:29, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is doubtful that the uploader is the author of ref Svkov2 (talk) 19:08, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:29, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started as a painting by ...Fonseca (see tag), but claimed 'own work', i.e. imho potentially copyright issues, Roland zh (talk) 19:09, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:29, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR as per File:AFons.jpg > disputed 'own work', Roland zh (talk) 19:14, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:39, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR as per File:AFons.jpg etc al > disputed 'own work', Roland zh (talk) 19:14, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:39, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR as per File:AFons.jpg et al > disputed 'own work', Roland zh (talk) 19:15, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:39, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational use Elisfkc (talk) 19:24, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:39, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational use Elisfkc (talk) 19:24, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:39, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started as imho rather 'posing/profiling' (see also linked page), and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 19:26, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:39, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of Serbia.svg. Fry1989 eh? 19:28, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:39, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Diese Datei war irrtümlich von mir für den Wikipediaeintrag "Lackkunst" vorgesehen, ist aber letztendlich nicht passend und ich möchte, dass das Foto wieder entfernt wird mit allen frei gegebenen Lizenzen Tanja Weidenbörner (talk) 19:35, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:39, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as per thumbnail format and missing EXIF data, Roland zh (talk) 19:48, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:39, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR as per File:Neendoor Subrahmanya Swami.jpg, but for the 'big' version, Roland zh (talk) 19:50, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:39, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho rather 'professional-looking' format, but/and missing EXIF data to verify origin, see also related uploads, Roland zh (talk) 19:51, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:40, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy from http://tanyak.ru/wp/wp-content/uploads/2015/01/IMG_6186-16--1400x933.jpg. 95.27.139.211 19:57, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:40, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 19:59, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:40, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be copy from http://alchetron.com/Monika-Hilmerova-615829-W. 95.27.139.211 20:01, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:40, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be copy from http://filmovizia.blogspot.com/2010/12/monika-hilmerova.html or any other website. 95.27.139.211 20:04, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:40, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be copy from http://www.webjournal.sk/images3/2858.jpg. 95.27.139.211 20:07, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:40, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be copy from http://www.litcentrum.sk/slovenski-spisovatelia/eleonora-gasparova. 95.27.139.211 20:09, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:40, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern sculpture is not covered by freedom of panorama in Russia Ymblanter (talk) 20:13, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:40, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Modern sculpture is not covered by freedom of panorama in Russia Ymblanter (talk) 20:13, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:40, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be copy from https://www.facebook.com/welovesas/photos/a.429058163799430.93832.428837733821473/574625515909360. 95.27.139.211 20:33, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:40, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality montage Pippobuono (talk) 20:35, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:40, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality montage Pippobuono (talk) 20:41, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:40, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probable copyvio Pippobuono (talk) 20:41, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:40, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it's not leo's painting Makhomakho (talk) 20:56, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:41, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obviously not own work; government logo Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:03, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:41, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obviously not own work; government logo Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:03, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:41, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obviously not own work; government logo Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:03, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:41, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

obviously not own work; government logo Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:04, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:41, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

image from video game or wallpaper, no permission given Queryzo (talk) 21:32, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:41, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho rather 'professional-promoting-looking' format, but/and missing EXIF data to verify origin, Roland zh (talk) 21:42, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:41, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Сомнительнные авторство и лицензия. Персона на фото скончался в 1937 году, автор неизвестен, дата обнародования или первой публикации неизвестна Dogad75 (talk) 22:11, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:41, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Uploaded on 08.03.2016 by 1-upload user Beatlesmuzeum (talk · contributions · Statistics), the photo:

Gunnex (talk) 22:51, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:41, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Leyenda del Páramo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status. Uploaded on 08.03.2016 by user Leyenda del Páramo (talk · contributions · Statistics), both files were previously published via:

Despite of having a similar username, the leyendadelparamo.es user and/or "Leyenda del Páramo" Facebook account is not necessarily the same person as the Commons user. A verifiable connection via COM:OTRS (or by other means) must be established.

Gunnex (talk) 23:03, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:42, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Quelle und Urheber fehlen, keine Freigabe durch den veröffentlichenden Verlag der Zeitschrift, wer legt Schöpfungshöhe fest? Mef.ellingen (talk) 23:29, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Ich habe doch die Quelle angegeben, die Zeitschrieft Der Modelleisenbahner 6/1978

--Rainerhaufe (talk) 07:05, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Und der Verlag hat der Veröffentlichung der Kopie nach Creative-Commons-Lizenz „Namensnennung – Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 3.0 Deutschland“ zugestimmt? --Mef.ellingen (talk) 19:41, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]
most probably CRV, to be deleted--Pechristener (talk) 21:40, 30 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 20:42, 28 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Georgehaller (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagrams of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per above. --INeverCry 18:04, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Der Genehmigungstext widerspricht der Lizenz, das Bild ist so nicht verwendbar. Alnilam (talk) 23:33, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted on 29 May. --INeverCry 18:05, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo under free license as "own" Animaloid (talk) 11:12, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Text logo - now properly sourced and tagged. --INeverCry 18:11, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo can't be own of free. Spamer's contribution Animaloid (talk) 11:31, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Text logo - in use on ru.wiki. --INeverCry 18:15, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it's an official document, not the user own work fringio · α†Ω 11:43, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Christian. --INeverCry 18:18, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

elf kopien Zause01 10:04, 28 February 2016 (UTC)


Kept: no valid reason for deletion given. --Krd 14:20, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

same as File:Riallera - Joan Brull i Vinyoles (1863-1912).jpg ESM (talk) 13:50, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 18:20, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

it isnt relivant 50.232.198.226 15:57, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:20, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Der Genehmigungstext widerspricht der Lizenz, das Bild ist so nicht verwendbar. Alnilam (talk) 23:34, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, but also the artist died in 1969. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:26, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Der Genehmigungstext widerspricht der Lizenz, das Bild ist so nicht verwendbar. Alnilam (talk) 23:35, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Im Übrigen ist der Nutzen fürs Projekt höchst fraglich, da lexikalische Relevanz des Malers wohl nicht gegeben. --Martin Sg. (talk) 10:58, 27 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Note a very clear statement on the file "Author: Harald Georg Hirsch, Dolni Plezom cp 1, CZ - 34802 Bor This photo may only be used without the express permission of the author: (email address redacted). --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:26, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Der Genehmigungstext widerspricht der Lizenz, das Bild ist so nicht verwendbar. Alnilam (talk) 23:35, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Labeled as a 1908 photo at de.wiki - not old enough to be dure of PD-old-70. --INeverCry 18:29, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Der Genehmigungstext widerspricht der Lizenz, das Bild ist so nicht verwendbar. Alnilam (talk) 23:36, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --INeverCry 18:28, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Der Genehmigungstext widerspricht der Lizenz, das Bild ist so nicht verwendbar. Alnilam (talk) 23:36, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, no source included 3D frame. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:23, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Der Genehmigungstext widerspricht der Lizenz, das Bild ist so nicht verwendbar. Alnilam (talk) 23:40, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The permission text contradicts the license, the picture is not usable.

Deleted: per nomination, no source, included 3D frame. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:23, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Der Genehmigungstext widerspricht der Lizenz, das Bild ist so nicht verwendbar. Alnilam (talk) 23:40, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Amitie - needs source, which may be ebay. --INeverCry 18:28, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted book cover in the picture. Decide please, if it is de minimis or not. I think not. Regasterios (talk) 23:57, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Szerintem nem használható rá a de minimis, mivel kinagyítva a képet, igencsak jól használható vágást lehet(ne) csinálni a borítóról. A borító használata viszont engedélyköteles. Esetleg ki lehetne kockázni azt a részt, de akkor meg használhatatlan lesz a kép. Vagy levágni róla a borítót tartalmazó részletet. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 00:10, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kiegészítés: szerintem nem lehet úgy megvágni a képet, hogy utána használható állapot maradjon belőle. A művész úrról van rengeteg szabad kép, így bíbelődni sem érdemes vele. Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 00:11, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Egyetértek. Szerintem szándékosan van belekomponálva a borító a képbe, ezért sem de minimis. Én is próbáltam megvágni, meg visszabillenteni is, de sehogy lesz jó. Majd a szakik döntenek felette, maradhat-e így. --Regasterios (talk) 00:19, 25 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, it's not. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:22, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Der Genehmigungstext widerspricht der Lizenz, das Bild ist so nicht verwendbar. Alnilam (talk) 23:31, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Amitie. --INeverCry 18:37, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Der Genehmigungstext widerspricht der Lizenz, das Bild ist so nicht verwendbar. Alnilam (talk) 23:33, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: file in use. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:31, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Der Genehmigungstext widerspricht der Lizenz, das Bild ist so nicht verwendbar. Alnilam (talk) 23:33, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Amitie. --INeverCry 18:37, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Der Genehmigungstext widerspricht der Lizenz, das Bild ist so nicht verwendbar. Alnilam (talk) 23:34, 24 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Amitie. --INeverCry 18:40, 1 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]