Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/05/12
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
|
|
"License" on Flickr is Public Domain Mark 1.0. However, PDM 1.0 is only used for marking images that are known to be in the public domain, not releasing images under the public domain. The Flickr user should be asked to relicense their image under CC0. ★ Poké95 04:09, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Poké Hello. I have contacted the author of the image as it was emailed to me. He has changed the licence. It is the authors own image without getting involved with COI under the article. --TheDomain (talk) 04:56, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- @TheDomain: License changed (thanks), but is Hamish Dodd really the author of this image? This image doesn't look like a selfie (obviously). Unless if it was a work for hire, we need OTRS permission from the real author. Thanks, ★ Poké95 06:13, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Hello Poké. The Author has emailed the OTRS team. Thanks --TheDomain (talk) 06:36, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept for now: Waiting for OTRS response. ★ Poké95 06:40, 12 May 2016 (UTC) (non-admin close)
Reasons for deletion request - libritor - iploaded in error
Deleted by Taivo: Author requested deletion of page: author's request on creation day
Reasons for deletion request -Libritor (talk) 10:09, 12 May 2016 (UTC) uploaded in error
Deleted by Taivo: Author requested deletion of page: author's request on creation day
copyvio of instagram photo https://www.instagram.com/p/-hIsFoSauW/?taken-by=rachelc00k&hl=en Ebyabe (talk) 06:51, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyvio per nomination. --Achim (talk) 13:08, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely authorship claims based on the low resolution and missing metadata. Looks like a screengrab of a presumably non-free video. —LX (talk, contribs) 18:21, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: as above. ~riley (talk) 23:23, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
{{delete|reason=creators will|year=2016|month=May|day=12}} Sangjinhwa (talk) 12:32, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: empty file
This file was initially tagged by Krdbot as Copyvio (Copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: external source, no license, no permission. Amitie 10g (talk) 01:33, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: clear copyright violation. --JuTa 17:22, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Ich möchte mein Bild nicht mehr hier haben bzw. ich möchte nicht mehr am Wettbewerb teilnehmen! Löscht es bitte wieder
Thats my picture and I dont want it to be here and I dont want to be part of that competition anymore,thanks.
Smoothwaves (talk) 19:10, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Info deletion request by author only a few minutes after upload (<7 days), file not used. Holger1959 (talk) 10:27, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Ich möchte mein Bild nicht mehr hier haben bzw. ich möchte nicht mehr am Wettbewerb teilnehmen! Löscht es bitte wieder Thats my picture and I dont want it to be here and I dont want to be part of that competition anymore,thanks. Smoothwaves (talk) 17:00, 9 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: COM:Courtesy deletion requested shortly after upload. Unused. Unfortunate, but I will honor the request. --Storkk (talk) 13:21, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
suche Nr 4 79.232.145.58 00:27, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- ??? This is not a valid reason to delete something. Kind regards --Jivee Blau (talk) 02:07, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: not a valid reason for deletion. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:48, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
This picture contain a product name and maybe a product logo. Wolfch (talk) 01:06, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:49, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Carol Enoch (talk · contribs)
[edit]Not likely to be from the user. Seems to be stolen from Oakwood.com (interior pictures) and the property's Twitter account.
- File:View from 399 Fremont Penthouse Home.jpg
- File:399 Fremont Bay Bridge Room.jpg
- File:399 Lounge.jpg
- File:399 Fremont from Bay Bridge.jpg
SounderBruce 01:22, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:50, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
is just a normal person, someone tried to make a joke, no need for this page to exist 141.85.5.170 01:42, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete I have reverted some nonsense added by the nominator because initially there were no hits on Google images or Tineye, HOWEVER this photo is from Facebook which we know has a complex sub-licensing system but does not have any free licenses. FredWalsh (talk) 14:56, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 18:51, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:06, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:19, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work Coderzombie (talk) 02:51, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete widely available on the web and highly unlikely to be the uploader's own work. FredWalsh (talk) 15:00, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nominator; available on different websites. --Podzemnik (talk) 04:57, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Exhibitionist spam. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:58, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. FredWalsh (talk) 15:18, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 04:58, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- File:V А Skumin 1984.jpg
- File:Victor Skumin, India, 2000.jpg
- File:Victor Skumin1994.jpg
- File:ВС и ОК 0002.jpg
Low-resolution scans of photographs of the same person spanning a long period. COM:OTRS permission is required. Materialscientist (talk) 05:28, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: It's very unlikely that the photos were all taken by 1 person as claimed. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:00, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Low quality. Paterm (talk) 06:16, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete – per nomination. Senator2029 ➔ “Talk” 11:04, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Useless. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:01, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (50x50 px) resolution, missing EXIF, derived from a medal (?) with unknown copyright status. May be also out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 06:18, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom., useless. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:02, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related enwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 06:37, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:04, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Pooldracox (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related eswiki entry speedy deleted.
Gunnex (talk) 06:57, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:04, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Yashika Sefortek (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Yashika Sefortek (4 uploads = 2x copyvio). Also per FBMD... probadly grabbed from Facebook.
Gunnex (talk) 07:11, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: I agree that it's very unlikely that the pictures were taken by the uploader. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:07, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Non-trivial corporate logo, uploader is probably a lowly underling without the authority to give a CC license. BethNaught (talk) 07:20, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: OTRS permission is needed. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:07, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolution, missing EXIF. Per FBMD01000a9e0d0000d69e0000b4340100b9420100025801004e80010095610200e585020010a202004ac402009fba0400 probadly grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 07:30, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, useless. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:08, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused personnal photo. Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 07:47, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:09, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related enwiki entry speedy deleted.
Gunnex (talk) 07:48, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:10, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused personnal photos
Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 07:52, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:11, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused photo and probably copyvio. Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 07:57, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, very unlikely to be the uploader's work. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:12, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 07:59, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:12, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused media.
Sismarinho le blasé (talk) 08:01, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Useless, unused personal photos. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:13, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Obvious advertising and self promotion. Senator2029 ➔ “Talk” 08:14, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, commercial picture. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:14, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Obvious advertising and self-promotion. -- Senator2029 ➔ “Talk” 08:32, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, advertisement. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:14, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Google Maps
[edit]Copyright violation. Google map images and aerial photography are not allowed per Commons:Copyright rules by subject matter#Maps & satellite imagery.
- File:Map of Chakrampally.png
- File:Print screen of the wrong content.png
- File:Singarajupalem map.JPEJ.jpg
- File:Vadali Map.jpg
- File:WhiteChekAddress.png
Senator2029 ➔ “Talk” 08:47, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, we can't accept GoogleMaps screenshots here. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:15, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Google Maps
[edit]These files use screenshots of Google Maps.
- File:Chesapeake Research Consortium Map.jpg
- File:Flickr - brewbooks - Yellowknife (10).jpg
- File:Flickr - brewbooks - Yellowknife (11).jpg
- File:Flickr - brewbooks - Yellowknife (12).jpg
- File:Flickr - brewbooks - Yellowknife (13).jpg
- File:Flickr - brewbooks - Yellowknife (14).jpg
- File:Flickr - brewbooks - Yellowknife (15).jpg
- File:Flickr - brewbooks - Yellowknife (2).jpg
- File:Flickr - brewbooks - Yellowknife (3).jpg
- File:Flickr - brewbooks - Yellowknife (4).jpg
- File:Flickr - brewbooks - Yellowknife (5).jpg
- File:Flickr - brewbooks - Yellowknife (6).jpg
- File:Map383.png
- File:Vista Satelital de Capitanejo.jpg
Arthur Crbz (talk) 15:10, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:26, 8 May 2017 (UTC)
Out of scope: advertising not allowed on Commons.
Senator2029 ➔ “Talk” 08:49, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, advertisement. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:17, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
File:483208412-real-estate-tycoon-donald-trump-flashes-the-thumbs-up.jpg.CROP.promo-xlarge2.jpg
[edit]Very unlikely to be uploader's own work: File is credited to AFP here, and image with identical file name is here. Animalparty (talk) 08:58, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:18, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 09:29, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:19, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
A bunch of professional fashion shots claimed as own work but no exif info. Likely copyvio. Only contri of this user to date
- File:Fashion 10.jpg
- File:Fashion 9.jpg
- File:Fashion 7.jpg
- File:Fashion 8.jpg
- File:Fashion 6.jpg
- File:Fashion 5.jpg
- File:Fashion 4.jpg
- File:Fashion image 1.jpg
- File:Fashion image 3.jpg
- File:Fashion image 2.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 09:30, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: I found the pictures on Pinterest dated back to 2014. Unlikely to be uploader's work and if it is, we need OTRS permission. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:21, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Cananheybetli (talk · contribs)
[edit]A bunch of promotional shots of someone, claimed to be own work but no exif info and the only contri to date. Likely copyvio
- File:Fatih Özaşar - Geri Döndü.jpg
- File:Fatih Özaşar - Set.jpg
- File:Fatih Özaşar - Geri Döndü film.jpg
- File:Fatih Özaşar (33).jpg
- File:Fatih Özaşar (32).JPG
- File:Fatih Özaşar (30).jpg
- File:Fatih Özaşar - Geri Döndü Filmi.jpg
- File:Fatih Özaşar - Geri Döndü Film.jpg
- File:Fatih Özaşar 43.jpg
- File:Fatih özaşar (19).jpg
- File:Fatih özaşar (11).jpg
- File:Fatih özaşar (3).jpg
- File:Fatih özaşar (85).jpg
- File:Fatih Özaşar.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 09:32, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Looks like a personal photo collection. --Podzemnik (talk) 05:24, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
As my this case didn't qualify for speed deletion requirements as per "7. Author or uploader request deletion Original author or uploader requests deletion of recently created (<7 days) unused content. For author/uploader requests for deletion of content that is older[1] a deletion request should be filled instead." I would like to nominate it for regular deletion as per Deletion policy: "There are 3 main deletion procedures. These are applied in different cases, depending on the reason for deletion: Speedy deletion: in some cases files may be deleted more or less immediately. If you are absolutely certain that the deletion of a page or file falls in the speedy deletion criteria such as an upload error of yours..." On 9 Jan 2016 I uploaded this file by mistake. Despite the fact that it's indeed my own work and picture doesn't violate any rules on Commons, at the time of my action I didn't realise that being employee of company pictured facility belongs to, I can not publically distribute any media files of company property unless it's approved by external relations. In other words, this picture is property of Royal Dutch Shell and uploaded by mistake with copyrigt violation. I would appreciate deletion of this file ASAP. Roo mate (talk) 03:56, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Info After reading policies, I'd mention COM:NCR#"House rules". "Even if the rules of a facility contractually place restrictions on photography (either forbidding it entirely, or only allowing the resulting photos to be used non-commercially), these normally do not change the copyright status of a work photographed inside." — regards, Revi 04:40, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Dear Revi, thanks for your opinion.
Nevertheless, I disagree strongly as primary issue seems to be not correctly understood. Instead of focusing on core of the dispute – the fact that file was uploaded by mistake – you tend to overcomplicate issue and concentrate on copyright status on WikiCommons end.
Nobody dispute fact that the picture doesn't violate any rules on Commons and third party policies does not change the copyright status of work on Commons. But in fact, this is only side story and I could have not even mention real reason why I need this file to be removed – this is entirely my own problem.
All you need to focus on – I declare that this file was uploaded by mistake. And this case is fully addressed by current deletion policy. (see above) No other conditions to be satisfied to proceed with deletion rather than “If you are absolutely certain that the deletion of a page or file falls in the speedy deletion criteria such as an upload error of yours..."
Also it is worth to mention, that Deletion Policy is primary regulation to follow rather than House rules intended to be just support resource for specific cases, whilst this case is obvious – it’s just simple uploader mistake which has to be corrected in same simple way.
There is no reason to overcomplicated discussions. Otherwise give reason to such a strong disproportional and disparate desire to keep file putting fellow project users in real risk of employment complications.
Regards, Roo mate (talk) 04:51, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Ok, deleted as uploader request, but please avoid disturbing admins that often. Thank you. — regards, Revi 11:35, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Like other stamps of P.E. Bendel, it has to be deleted per community consensus, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Stamps by Peter Emilevich Bendel. ScriWi (talk) 16:18, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Stamps of the Soviet Union are not objects of copyright. Please see:
- {{PD-RU-exempt}}
- Commons:Stamps/Public domain#USSR
- Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Request_for_undeletion_since_it_is_.7B.7BPD-RU-exempt.7D.7D_without_doubt
- Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Undeletion_request_for_postal_cards_in_Commons:Deletion_requests.2FFiles_in_Category:_Postcards_by_Peter_Emilevich_Bendel
- Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Please_HELP.21_Huge_discussion_about_the_works_of_Creator:Peter_Emilevich_Bendel_in_particular_and_.7B.7BPD-RU-exempt.7D.7D_in_general
--Butko (talk) 04:25, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
The stamps I mentioned are of the same type (same country, same creator, same license template), but have been deleted.
Despite the links you provide here, the closing admins didn't change their mind.
So to be consistent, this file has to be deleted as well. --ScriWi (talk) 09:32, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:19, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
- Undeleted: as per [1]. Yann (talk) 14:30, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Apparent copyright violation. According to the original description on Flickr, the author is RCF / www.rarespecies.org not U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Helmy oved 03:42, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:12, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
It is a mistake (the description of source on Fortepan was wrong), she is not Füsti Molnár Éva, she is an unknown person. We get shortly a new, right picture from the Pécs National Theatre. Sorry for my english and for the mistake. Pallerti (talk) 04:22, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Support Violate privacy rights. Not in the picture is called. (Google translate) Hungarikusz Firkász (talk) 08:52, 19 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:12, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Somebody created the artworks used on those covers. There is no evidence that the uploader holds the copyright for those artworks. Materialscientist (talk) 05:24, 12 May 2016 (UTC) Materialscientist (talk) 05:24, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:12, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Painter - Svetoslav Roerich (Russian: Святослáв Николáевич Рéрих) (23 October 1904 – 30 January 1993), Russian and Indian painter, son of Helena and Nicholas Roerich, studied from a young age under his father's tutelage. Medicus (talk) 06:43, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
This is an old school logo, and we are now using the new logo which we hopefully reflect here as well. Lourdeslanote (talk) 06:07, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:12, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nicktsagaris (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused low-quality personal photos of subject with no apparent notability. Apparently uploaded for use in en:Nicktsagaris, which has been deleted. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope. Also: questionable authorship claims. Presumably, the uploader is the subject of the photos, which are clearly not selfies.
- File:NickTsagaris.jpg – copyvio, grabbed from http://www.bunburymail.com.au/story/3279615/treendale-mcdonalds-franchisee-facing-child-sex-charges/
- File:Nick Tsagaris.jpg – cropped from the same photo
- File:Wages to boost Australind economy The West Australian.png – copyvio, grabbed from https://au.news.yahoo.com/thewest/regional/south-west/a/15805817/wages-to-boost-australind-economy/
—LX (talk, contribs) 06:13, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:12, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Uploads by Katlyn714
[edit]- File:Continious-capillary-tight-junction-intercellular-cleft-1024x756.jpg – Incorrectly tagged with {{PD-USGov-NASA}}. Cites Antranik as source, no evidence of a free license.
- File:SEM of intercellular cleft between blastomeres.jpg – Cites "John Wiley & Sons" as author, which is a publishing company. No evidence of {{PD-USGov}}.
- File:Intercellular cleft.png – Can't find this image elsewhere, but given the other five images, the precautionary principle should rightly apply here.
- File:Frog blastocoel.jpg Uncropped version appears to stem from Kenyon College, uploader provides no evidence of being the copyright holder.
- File:Zebrafish blastocoel.jpg – Appears to stem from Memorial University (specifically this image), uploader provides no evidence of being the copyright holder.
- File:Figure 10.3.gif – Uncropped version exists in this PDF file, uploader provides no evidence of being the copyright holder. — ξxplicit 06:29, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:13, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Oliver Pettersen og Nicolai Wessel (talk · contribs)
[edit]May be out of project scope: Not used, considering and (examples) File:Zylinder-senkr-kreis-hr-s.svg + File:Cylinder geometry.svg + etc.
(1).svg){kind=link}
![28 File:Anthony "PrettyBoy" Taylor 2013-09-17 15-28.jpg](#File:Anthony_"PrettyBoy"_Taylor_2013-09-17_15-28.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_wikivoyage_pagebanner.jpg){kind=link}
_2013-12-06_16-19.jpeg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(mulDA0027b).jpg){kind=link}
.JPG){kind=link}
_(20494741445).jpg){kind=link}
(1).svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
(1).svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
(1).svg){kind=link}
![07:57, 12 May 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/05/12#c-Sismarinho-2016-05-12T07:57:00.000Z-File:Anthony_"PrettyBoy"_Taylor_2013-09-17_15-28.jpg){kind=link}
![05:12, 20 May 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/05/12#c-Podzemnik-2016-05-20T05:12:00.000Z-File:Anthony_"PrettyBoy"_Taylor_2013-09-17_15-28.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Gunnex (talk) 06:46, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:13, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
May be redundant (not used) considering svg-versions available via File:UNHCRflag.svg + File:UNHCRlogo.svg. Gunnex (talk) 07:22, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:13, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
[Broken logo] Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 07:35, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:13, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
[Grabbed from Internet] Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 07:38, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:13, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
[Blog spam] Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. As indicated, web screenshot taken from http://www.thegrunt.org Gunnex (talk) 07:42, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:13, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
There is no information on this advertisment as to when it was made or by whom. The CC-BY-SA license tag clearly applies to the (PD-Art) photo, not what is being photographed. Prosfilaes (talk) 07:49, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:13, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by StanParkford (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related enwiki entry deleted. Smartphone images may be derived from otherwise copyrighted content.
- File:Swiftly Inc App Logo.png
- File:Swiftly Inc App Screens.jpg
- File:Swiftly HomeScreen.png
- File:Swiftly Logo.png
Gunnex (talk) 07:57, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:13, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Andrey-Ionescu (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Andrey-Ionescu. Mysteriously watermarked, also per FBMD... probadly grabbed from Facebook.
- File:Suceava International Stefan cel Mare Airport.jpg
- File:Aeroport decembrie 2015.jpg
- File:Decembrie 2015.jpg
- File:Aeroportul International Stefan cel Mare Suceava 2015.jpg
- File:Aeroportul International " Stefan cel Mare " Suceava.jpg
- File:Prezentare-aeroport.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 08:05, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:13, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolution, missing EXIF. Per FBMD01000a9c0d00000a2d0000c4560000b0610000126f0000df7f000069b20000b3b9000048c6000039d400009f2b0100 probadly grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 08:07, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:13, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted artwork, artist Eskopekka Mäkelä is still living. MKFI (talk) 08:40, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:14, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
These images have been copied from Ravenshaw university website or similar sources eg. [2], [3]. Several other uploads by this user are also suspect.
- File:Ravenshaw University.jpg
- File:Ravenshaw Front.jpg
- File:Ravenshaw campus buildings.jpg
- File:Heritage hall.jpg
- File:Kanika library interior.jpg
- File:Kanika library reading room.jpg
- File:Kanika-Library-front.jpg
- File:Kanika Library Rear side.jpg
- File:Ravenshaw campus.jpg
- File:Administrative building.jpg.jpg
MKFI (talk) 08:57, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- +File:Gorekhnath.jpg - copyvio from [4].
- +File:SOA University Administrative Office.png, File:ITER Campus, SOA University.jpg, File:SUM Nursing College, SOA University.jpg, File:SOA University Law School.jpg, File:IMS and Sum Hospital, SOA University.jpg, File:IBCS, SOA University.jpg, File:Engineering Library, SOA University.jpg: copyvios from SOA university website: [5], [6], [7], [8]. MKFI (talk) 11:51, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:14, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
After checking some more uploads from this user I suggest nuking all them.
- File:Ravenshaw sundial.jpg
- File:SVM College Jagatsinghpur.jpg -> Seems to be an edited version of https://www.flickr.com/photos/sswain_1999/309588561 flickr file, marked "all rights reserved"
- File:Tulasi Gadi Pitha, Jagatsinghpur.jpg
- File:Swami Vivekananda Statue S.V.M College, Jagatsinghpur.jpg -> Copyvio from http://www.svmiqac.org.in/PhotoGallery.asp
- File:SVM College Jagatsinghpur Biju Patnaik Auditorium.jpg -> Copyvio from http://www.svmiqac.org.in/PhotoGallery.asp
- File:Sidha Baranga Jagannath Jagatsinghpur.jpg
- File:Siali Beach Jagatsinghpur.jpg
- File:Sarala Temple 1 Jagatsinghpur.jpg
- File:Raghunath Jew, Mahilo, Jagatsinghpur.jpg
- File:Radha Gopaljiu-temple Jagatsinghpur.jpg
- File:Paradip-port-Jagatsinghpur.jpg -> Copyvio from http://www.dutchwatersector.com/news-events/news/14667-boskalis-awarded-three-port-and-river-dredging-contracts-in-angola-gabon-and.html
- File:Paradip Sea Beach.jpg -> Copyvio from http://tripstoroadslesstravelled.blogspot.fi/2016/01/amidst-blue-waters-of-odisha.html
- File:Jagannath temple at Paradip.jpg
- File:Garoi Gobardhan Pitha Jagatsinghpur.jpg -> Copyvio from https://www.tripadvisor.com/Attraction_Review-g8146489-d8141023-Reviews-Gobardhana_Pitha_Garoi_Ashram-Garoi_Odisha.html
- File:Odisha Map 2.png
- File:India Odisha Location map.png
- File:India OD 1.png
- File:Odisha in India 1.png
- File:Odisha Map 1.png
MKFI (talk) 19:35, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Added more files:
- File:Odisha Location in India map.png
- File:Jagatsinghpur Jagannath Temple.jpg
- File:Map of Odisha in India.png
- File:Odisha Map.png
- File:Ioc-refinery Paradip.jpg
- File:Odisha Bidhan Sabha .jpg
- File:Raj Bhavan, Odisha.jpg
- File:Olive Ridley Sea Turtles at Gahirmatha Marine Sanctuary.jpg -> https://cesess.wordpress.com/photo-gallery/marine-life/ [9]
- File:Goverdhan Pitha, Garoi Asram, Jagatsinghpur.jpg
- File:Jagannath Temple ,Dhyankuda-2.jpg
- File:Paradip-Port.jpg -> Copyvio from http://www.holidify.com/blog/sea-ports-of-india/
- File:Paradip-Port Trust.jpg -> http://www.mbctv.co.in/index.php/welcome/89-slideshow/6754-cargo-operation-starts-at-paradip-port-under-police-protection
- File:IMS Sum Hospital-2.jpg
- File:ITER Bhubaneswar Campus-2.jpg -> http://brainbrunch.com/10-things-you-will-relate-to-if-you-are-from-ITER.html?fb_comment_id=973712792716720_974221312665868
![[9]](https://cesess.files.wordpress.com/2012/12/muralidharan_2009_orissa_arribada2.jpeg){kind=link}
Keep File:Ravenshaw Convention Centre,Ravenshaw University.jpg seems to be a modified version of File:Ravenshaw Convention Centre,Ravenshaw University,Cuttack.jpg
- File:IMS Sum Hospital.jpg -> Copyvio from http://educrib.com/college/9355/institute-of-medical-sciences-and-sum-hospital-ims-bhubaneswar
- File:ITER Bhubaneswar Campus.jpg -> Copyvio from http://soauniversity.ac.in/orsi2015/venue.html
MKFI (talk) 19:43, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 15:33, 2 June 2016 (UTC)
contradictory information: source "own", uploader "ChrisPri1", "Foto: Dietmar Tollerian" as file description, "Oberbank AG" (the company) as author. → «« Man77 »» [de] 09:02, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:14, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work. No exif and the file is even called Facebook... Gbawden (talk) 09:21, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:14, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Deelip Mhaske (talk · contribs)
[edit]All marked as own work but I doubt it. Professional photos with no exif info and these are the only uploads by this new user
- File:Deelip Mhaske Maharashatra CM Devendra Fadnavis New York.JPG
- File:Deelip Mhaske Maharashatra CM Devendra Fadnavis.JPG
- File:Family and Deleip.JPG
- File:Guinwa Zeineddine, (2014) Farah Yousef in Arab Idol along with Friend Deelip Mhaske Las Vegas, Nevada.JPG
- File:Farah Yousef in Arab Idol along with Friend Deelip Mhaske Las Vegas, Nevada.JPG
- File:With Cousins.JPG
- File:Guinwa Zeineddine, (2014) Fabiola Al-Ibrahim F(2015) Jennifer Chahoud (2010) along with Friend Deelip Mhaske Las Vegas, Nevada.JPG
- File:Anna Hazare and Deelip Mhaske.JPG
_Farah_Yousef_in_Arab_Idol_along_with_Friend_Deelip_Mhaske_Las_Vegas,_Nevada.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_Fabiola_Al-Ibrahim_F(2015)_Jennifer_Chahoud_(2010)_along_with_Friend_Deelip_Mhaske_Las_Vegas,_Nevada.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Gbawden (talk) 09:28, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:14, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope.
- File:Fayaz-SEO-Analyst-in-Chennai.JPG
- File:Fayaz-SEM-Analyst-in-Chennai-India.JPG
- File:Fayaz-SEO-Analyst-in-Chennai-Tamilnadu.jpg
- File:Fayaz-SEO-Analyst-in-Chennai-India.JPG
- File:Fayaz-Analytics-specialist-in-Chennai.JPG
- File:Fayaz-SEO-sem-PPC-Analyst-in-Chennai.JPG
- File:Fayaz-SEO-Specialist-in-Chennai.JPG
- File:Fayaz-SEM-Analyst-in-Chennai.JPG
- File:Fayaz-SEO-Analyst-in-Chennai-2.JPG
- File:Fayaz-seo.jpg
- File:Fayaz SEO Analyst in India.JPG
- File:Fayaz Digital Marketing Specialist in Chennai.JPG
- File:Fayaz PPC Specialist in Chennai.JPG
- File:Fayaz SEM Analyst in Chennai.JPG
§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:54, 27 August 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: one kept (in use), all other out of project scope George Chernilevsky talk 05:11, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
Personal photos, out of scope. One is used on a user page but no edits made since Aug 2015 so not a valid commons contributor
Gbawden (talk) 09:34, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:15, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anonimo6777 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope.
Gbawden (talk) 09:36, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:15, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Personal photos, out of scope. Gbawden (talk) 09:41, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:15, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
I think the claim that this image "does not meet the threshold of originality needed for copyright protection" is highly dubious. 80.168.175.26 09:43, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- According to COM:TOO#Germany, File:Laufendes-Auge.jpg (which is more complex) doesn't meet the threshold of originality in Germany. However, it also seems that the section COM:TOO#Germany describes the situation as of 12 November 2013 and that the section might not be up-to-date. --Stefan2 (talk) 12:43, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Though borderline I tend to say that this one is below TOO. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:16, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Gideon Fikayo (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope. Commons is not a photo album
- File:Fikson 8.jpg
- File:Fikson 9.JPG
- File:Brothers of life.JPG
- File:Fikimania and brothers.jpg
- File:Fikson 7.jpg
- File:Fikson 2.jpg
- File:Fikson 6.jpg
- File:Fikson 5.jpg
- File:Fikson 1.jpg
- File:Fikson 4.jpg
- File:Fikson 3.jpg
- File:Gideon Fikayo.jpg
- File:Fikson.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 09:45, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:16, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Probably not a free image Shev123 (talk) 09:51, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:17, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
COM:DW, we need OTRS permission from the author of the photograph, which is the subject in this photo, unless if this photograph is old enough. ★ Poké95 09:51, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:17, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Seems to be an old photograph. However, we need to know who is the author and when this was taken. ★ Poké95 09:57, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:17, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Old photograph (1976) still copyrighted in Canada, see {{PD-Canada}}. ★ Poké95 10:01, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:17, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Choneromen (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope.
- File:LOs Niñosbob 334.jpg
- File:Calceta Bolivar456.jpg
- File:Grupo tactico22.jpg
- File:FineNIñoslocos.jpg
- File:Fine.lospibes.jpg
- File:FileChoneroSurOscura.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 10:07, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:17, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work, since there is no EXIF data to prove that the uploader is the copyright holder of the image, and the resolution is low. Per COM:PRP, OTRS permission is needed. ★ Poké95 10:08, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:49, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope. Gbawden (talk) 10:29, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:50, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope Gbawden (talk) 10:34, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:50, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope. Gbawden (talk) 10:34, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:50, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope. Gbawden (talk) 10:34, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:50, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status / out of scope. FDMS 4 10:35, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:50, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
parts of this collage are probable copyrighted, description is an advertising MMFE (talk) 10:36, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:50, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope.
FDMS 4 10:37, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:50, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
unused personal files
2003:45:5C47:D201:EC9B:DFD:EF5D:59B3 09:43, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Daphne Lantier 00:48, 6 April 2017 (UTC)
Out of project scope. ★ Poké95 10:39, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete - used in deleted hoax article en:Antonia Lia Orsi. JohnCD (talk) 11:25, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:50, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:24, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 21:34, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:31, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 21:34, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:32, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 21:34, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
COM:NUDITY, low resolution pic of breasts Pippobuono (talk) 15:15, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, only 196×224 pixels. I'll delete most of his/her uploads as copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 09:52, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
COM:NUDITY, low resolution pic of breasts, probable copyvio Pippobuono (talk) 15:16, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, only 196×224 pixels. I'll delete most of his uploads as copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 09:54, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
hardly own work, probable copyvio Pippobuono (talk) 15:17, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:59, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
hardly own work, probable copyvio Pippobuono (talk) 15:17, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, for collages source and license of every used image is needed. Taivo (talk) 09:58, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
com:nudity, probable copyvio Pippobuono (talk) 15:18, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, only 247×164 pixels. I'll delete most of his/her uploads as copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 09:57, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation, metadata shows image was edited with Adobe Photoshop Elements 5.0(20060914.r.77) and created on 18 December, 2011.--Liji (talk) 18:24, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: see file/version history and file date. No details about copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:17, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
How the file is in project scope? Taivo (talk) 18:29, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 14:14, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
out of scope, injurious Pippobuono (talk) 19:12, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:12, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE ~riley (talk) 19:42, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:11, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Pictures of Oraibi are prohibited by town leaders, even those taken from the outskirts. This picture was not taken with permission of local residents. 68.2.37.102 19:43, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 14:09, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE ~riley (talk) 19:43, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:08, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE ~riley (talk) 19:48, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:07, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Words trully cannot describe this crap! .... Anyway out of scope.... –Davey2010Talk 20:35, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: out of scope, unused. --Wdwd (talk) 14:06, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF Gunnex (talk) 20:44, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 14:04, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Photoshopped image, derivative work of copyrighted image: http://www.tycsports.com/noticias/Copa-Argentina-Boca-se-corono-ante-Central-en-Cordoba-20151104-0003.html. Likely out of scope as well. MKFI (talk) 20:46, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:02, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Ventura1 and additionally --> derived from artworks (locations: Miami + New York + St. Petersburg, Russia) by en:Enrique Martinez Celaya (1964—), an American artist, considering In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in United States and Russia. (
for artworks, sculptures, etc.)
Gunnex (talk) 21:01, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no permission. --Wdwd (talk) 14:00, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Danielsiedell (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Danielsiedell + additionally derived from artworks (locations: United States) by en:Enrique Martinez Celaya (1964—), an American artist, considering In most countries, all paintings, sculpture, architecture, text, and other creative works have copyrights which last for 70 years after the death of the creator. An image of a work that is still under copyright is a derivative work, and infringes on the copyright so that we cannot usually keep the image on Commons. In some countries, there is a special exception to the copyright law which allows such images under certain circumstances. We call that exception freedom of panorama (FOP). Unfortunately there is no applicable FOP exception in United States. (
OK for buildings only)
Gunnex (talk) 21:07, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no permission from artist. --Wdwd (talk) 13:47, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Uploader claims to have taken this picture in March 15. Subject was born in Jan 47. He doesn Maproom (talk) 22:24, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy keep - Cropped version of File:Bob Jackson.jpg, which was confirmed via OTRS and taken in July 2015. MB298 (talk) 18:56, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Duplicate to File:Bob Jackson.jpg (with lower resolution) Delelte: wrong authorship. meaningless filename, unused. --Wdwd (talk) 13:43, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 22:59, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:35, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE Herzi Pinki (talk) 23:19, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:34, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status (unsolved COM:FOP-issues, see also logs, with similar deleted uploads) considering indoor shots derived from artworks by en:Alice Anderson (1972—), a French-British sculptor [and filmmaker], needing permission from the artist.
Gunnex (talk) 23:24, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no permission for shown artwork. --Wdwd (talk) 13:33, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Pokéfan95 as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Even you start over iOS from scratch, it is still a derivative work of iOS, which is a copyrighted software. ★ Poké95 23:32, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 13:31, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Der Hochlader Benjamin Hupf ist nicht die Fotografin Sandra Wolf, insofern ist eigenes Werk eine Falschangabe. Alnilam (talk) 23:39, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: no permission, copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 13:29, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 17:32, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 14:34, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 17:34, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 14:33, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 17:38, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 14:33, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 17:39, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 14:32, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 17:41, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Wdwd (talk) 14:32, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
single-file-upload, imho rather 'advertisements, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 17:46, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 14:31, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
COM:COPYVIOs. Photographs of pages of books, dated as given in the titles, 1986-1999. Not out of copyright and not own work.
- File:Ma Elena Rodríguez Monografía (1999) (9).JPG
- File:Ma Elena Rodríguez Monografía (1999) (4).JPG
- File:Ma Elena Rodríguez Monografía (1999) (1).JPG
- File:Ma Elena Rodríguez Monografía (1999) (3).JPG
- File:Ma Elena Rodríguez Monografía (1999) (2).JPG
- File:Ma Elena Rodríguez Monografía (1999) (5).JPG
- File:Ma Elena Rodríguez Monografía (1999) (8).JPG
- File:Ma Elena Rodríguez Monografía (1999) (7).JPG
- File:Ma Elena Rodríguez Monografía (1999) (10).JPG
- File:Ma Elena Rodríguez Monografía (1999) (14).JPG
- File:Ma Elena Rodríguez Monografía (1999) (13).JPG
- File:Monografía Tequixquiac (1999) (1).JPG
- File:Monografía Tequixquiac (1973) (2).JPG
- File:Monografía Zumpango (1999) (1).JPG
- File:Tequixquiac, Peláez Guellermina (1986) (29).JPG
- File:Tequixquiac, Peláez Guellermina (1986) (30).JPG
- File:Tequixquiac, Peláez Guellermina (1986) (28).JPG
- File:Tequixquiac, Peláez Guellermina (1986) (27).JPG
- File:Tequixquiac, Peláez Guellermina (1986) (25).JPG
- File:Tequixquiac, Peláez Guellermina (1986) (26).JPG
- File:Tequixquiac, Peláez Guellermina (1986) (18).JPG
- File:Tequixquiac, Peláez Guellermina (1986) (22).JPG
- File:Tequixquiac, Peláez Guellermina (1986) (24).JPG
- File:Tequixquiac, Peláez Guellermina (1986) (23).JPG
- File:Tequixquiac, Peláez Guellermina (1986) (21).JPG
- File:Tequixquiac, Peláez Guellermina (1986) (20).JPG
- File:Tequixquiac, Peláez Guellermina (1986) (19).JPG
- File:Tequixquiac, Peláez Guellermina (1986) (12).JPG
- File:Tequixquiac, Peláez Guellermina (1986) (17).JPG
- File:Tequixquiac, Peláez Guellermina (1986) (16).JPG
- File:Tequixquiac, Peláez Guellermina (1986) (14).JPG
- File:Tequixquiac, Peláez Guellermina (1986) (15).JPG
- File:Tequixquiac, Peláez Guellermina (1986) (13).JPG
- File:Tequixquiac, Peláez Guellermina (1986) (11).JPG
- File:Tequixquiac, Peláez Guellermina (1986) (10).JPG
- File:Tequixquiac, Peláez Guellermina (1986) (9).JPG
- File:Tequixquiac, Peláez Guellermina (1986) (8).JPG
- File:Tequixquiac, Peláez Guellermina (1986) (6).JPG
- File:Tequixquiac, Peláez Guellermina (1986) (7).JPG
- File:Tequixquiac, Peláez Guellermina (1986) (5).JPG
- File:Tequixquiac, Peláez Guellermina (1986) (3).JPG
- File:Tequixquiac, Peláez Guellermina (1986) (4).JPG
- File:Tequixquiac, Peláez Guellermina (1986) (2).JPG
- File:Tequixquiac, Peláez Guellermina (1986) (1).JPG
- File:Contradanza de las Varas 2 (Ma. Elena, 1999).JPG
- File:Contradanza de las Varas 1 (Ma. Elena, 1999).JPG
- File:Contradanza de las Varas (Olvera, 2007) (1).JPG
- File:Monografía Tequixquiac 1973 (1).JPG
_(9).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(4).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(1).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(3).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(5).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(8).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(7).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(10).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(13).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(1).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(1).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(29).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(30).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(28).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(27).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(25).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(26).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(18).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(22).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(24).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(23).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(21).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(19).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(12).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(17).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(16).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(14).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(15).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(13).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(11).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(10).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(9).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(8).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(6).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(7).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(5).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(3).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(4).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(2).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(1).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(1).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:21, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 14:25, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 18:27, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: see source. --Wdwd (talk) 14:19, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 18:27, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no copyvio, see source. --Wdwd (talk) 14:21, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Like other stamps of P.E. Bendel, it has to be deleted per community consensus, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Stamps by Peter Emilevich Bendel. ScriWi (talk) 16:19, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Stamps of the Soviet Union are not objects of copyright. Please see:
- {{PD-RU-exempt}}
- Commons:Stamps/Public domain#USSR
- Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Request_for_undeletion_since_it_is_.7B.7BPD-RU-exempt.7D.7D_without_doubt
- Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Undeletion_request_for_postal_cards_in_Commons:Deletion_requests.2FFiles_in_Category:_Postcards_by_Peter_Emilevich_Bendel
- Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Please_HELP.21_Huge_discussion_about_the_works_of_Creator:Peter_Emilevich_Bendel_in_particular_and_.7B.7BPD-RU-exempt.7D.7D_in_general
--Butko (talk) 04:25, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
The stamps I mentioned are of the same type (same country, same creator, same license template), but have been deleted.
Despite the links you provide here, the closing admins didn't change their mind.
So to be consistent, this file has to be deleted as well. --ScriWi (talk) 09:31, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:00, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- Undeleted: as per [10]. Yann (talk) 14:27, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Like other stamps of P.E. Bendel, it has to be deleted per community consensus, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Stamps by Peter Emilevich Bendel. ScriWi (talk) 16:19, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Stamps of the Soviet Union are not objects of copyright. Please see:
- {{PD-RU-exempt}}
- Commons:Stamps/Public domain#USSR
- Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Request_for_undeletion_since_it_is_.7B.7BPD-RU-exempt.7D.7D_without_doubt
- Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Undeletion_request_for_postal_cards_in_Commons:Deletion_requests.2FFiles_in_Category:_Postcards_by_Peter_Emilevich_Bendel
- Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Please_HELP.21_Huge_discussion_about_the_works_of_Creator:Peter_Emilevich_Bendel_in_particular_and_.7B.7BPD-RU-exempt.7D.7D_in_general
--Butko (talk) 04:25, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
The stamps I mentioned are of the same type (same country, same creator, same license template), but have been deleted.
Despite the links you provide here, the closing admins didn't change their mind.
So to be consistent, this file has to be deleted as well. --ScriWi (talk) 09:31, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:01, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- Undeleted: as per [11]. Yann (talk) 14:29, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Like other stamps of P.E. Bendel, it has to be deleted per community consensus, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Stamps by Peter Emilevich Bendel. ScriWi (talk) 16:19, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Stamps of the Soviet Union are not objects of copyright. Please see:
- {{PD-RU-exempt}}
- Commons:Stamps/Public domain#USSR
- Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Request_for_undeletion_since_it_is_.7B.7BPD-RU-exempt.7D.7D_without_doubt
- Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Undeletion_request_for_postal_cards_in_Commons:Deletion_requests.2FFiles_in_Category:_Postcards_by_Peter_Emilevich_Bendel
- Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Please_HELP.21_Huge_discussion_about_the_works_of_Creator:Peter_Emilevich_Bendel_in_particular_and_.7B.7BPD-RU-exempt.7D.7D_in_general
--Butko (talk) 04:26, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
The stamps I mentioned are of the same type (same country, same creator, same license template), but have been deleted.
Despite the links you provide here, the closing admins didn't change their mind.
So to be consistent, this file has to be deleted as well. --ScriWi (talk) 09:30, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:01, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- Undeleted: as per [12]. Yann (talk) 14:25, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Like other stamps of P.E. Bendel, it has to be deleted per community consensus, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Stamps by Peter Emilevich Bendel. ScriWi (talk) 16:20, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Stamps of the Soviet Union are not objects of copyright. Please see:
- {{PD-RU-exempt}}
- Commons:Stamps/Public domain#USSR
- Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Request_for_undeletion_since_it_is_.7B.7BPD-RU-exempt.7D.7D_without_doubt
- Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Undeletion_request_for_postal_cards_in_Commons:Deletion_requests.2FFiles_in_Category:_Postcards_by_Peter_Emilevich_Bendel
- Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Please_HELP.21_Huge_discussion_about_the_works_of_Creator:Peter_Emilevich_Bendel_in_particular_and_.7B.7BPD-RU-exempt.7D.7D_in_general
--Butko (talk) 04:26, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
The stamps I mentioned are of the same type (same country, same creator, same license template), but have been deleted.
Despite the links you provide here, the closing admins didn't change their mind.
So to be consistent, this file has to be deleted as well. --ScriWi (talk) 09:30, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:01, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- Undeleted: as per [13]. Yann (talk) 14:23, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Like other stamps of P.E. Bendel, it has to be deleted per community consensus, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Stamps by Peter Emilevich Bendel. ScriWi (talk) 16:20, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Stamps of the Soviet Union are not objects of copyright. Please see:
- {{PD-RU-exempt}}
- Commons:Stamps/Public domain#USSR
- Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Request_for_undeletion_since_it_is_.7B.7BPD-RU-exempt.7D.7D_without_doubt
- Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Undeletion_request_for_postal_cards_in_Commons:Deletion_requests.2FFiles_in_Category:_Postcards_by_Peter_Emilevich_Bendel
- Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Please_HELP.21_Huge_discussion_about_the_works_of_Creator:Peter_Emilevich_Bendel_in_particular_and_.7B.7BPD-RU-exempt.7D.7D_in_general
--Butko (talk) 04:26, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
The stamps I mentioned are of the same type (same country, same creator, same license template), but have been deleted.
Despite the links you provide here, the closing admins didn't change their mind.
So to be consistent, this file has to be deleted as well. --ScriWi (talk) 09:29, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:01, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- Undeleted: as per [14]. Yann (talk) 14:19, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Like other stamps of P.E. Bendel, it has to be deleted per community consensus, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Stamps by Peter Emilevich Bendel. ScriWi (talk) 16:20, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Stamps of the Soviet Union are not objects of copyright. Please see:
- {{PD-RU-exempt}}
- Commons:Stamps/Public domain#USSR
- Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Request_for_undeletion_since_it_is_.7B.7BPD-RU-exempt.7D.7D_without_doubt
- Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Undeletion_request_for_postal_cards_in_Commons:Deletion_requests.2FFiles_in_Category:_Postcards_by_Peter_Emilevich_Bendel
- Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Please_HELP.21_Huge_discussion_about_the_works_of_Creator:Peter_Emilevich_Bendel_in_particular_and_.7B.7BPD-RU-exempt.7D.7D_in_general
--Butko (talk) 04:28, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
The stamps I mentioned are of the same type (same country, same creator, same license template), but have been deleted.
Despite the links you provide here, the closing admins didn't change their mind.
So to be consistent, this file has to be deleted as well. --ScriWi (talk) 09:29, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:01, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Like other stamps of P.E. Bendel, it has to be deleted per community consensus, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Stamps by Peter Emilevich Bendel. ScriWi (talk) 16:21, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Stamps of the Soviet Union are not objects of copyright. Please see:
- {{PD-RU-exempt}}
- Commons:Stamps/Public domain#USSR
- Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Request_for_undeletion_since_it_is_.7B.7BPD-RU-exempt.7D.7D_without_doubt
- Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Undeletion_request_for_postal_cards_in_Commons:Deletion_requests.2FFiles_in_Category:_Postcards_by_Peter_Emilevich_Bendel
- Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Please_HELP.21_Huge_discussion_about_the_works_of_Creator:Peter_Emilevich_Bendel_in_particular_and_.7B.7BPD-RU-exempt.7D.7D_in_general
--Butko (talk) 04:28, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
The stamps I mentioned are of the same type (same country, same creator, same license template), but have been deleted.
Despite the links you provide here, the closing admins didn't change their mind.
So to be consistent, this file has to be deleted as well. --ScriWi (talk) 09:29, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:01, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Undeleted: as per [15]. Yann (talk) 14:27, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
Like other stamps of P.E. Bendel, it has to be deleted per community consensus, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Stamps by Peter Emilevich Bendel. ScriWi (talk) 16:21, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Stamps of the Soviet Union are not objects of copyright. Please see:
- {{PD-RU-exempt}}
- Commons:Stamps/Public domain#USSR
- Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Request_for_undeletion_since_it_is_.7B.7BPD-RU-exempt.7D.7D_without_doubt
- Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Undeletion_request_for_postal_cards_in_Commons:Deletion_requests.2FFiles_in_Category:_Postcards_by_Peter_Emilevich_Bendel
- Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Please_HELP.21_Huge_discussion_about_the_works_of_Creator:Peter_Emilevich_Bendel_in_particular_and_.7B.7BPD-RU-exempt.7D.7D_in_general
--Butko (talk) 04:28, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
The stamps I mentioned are of the same type (same country, same creator, same license template), but have been deleted.
Despite the links you provide here, the closing admins didn't change their mind.
So to be consistent, this file has to be deleted as well. --ScriWi (talk) 09:28, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Have you read Commons:Stamps/Public domain#Russia? --Gandvik (talk) 13:38, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- Info I have read it. Hello Gandvik, be careful not to start a “circular” discussion. ^^ I have read it and I did some work here based on this. But, despite of Commons:Stamps/Public domain#Russia, these files were deleted by Jameslwoodward, Jcb, Storkk. Did you read the links, Butko provided above? Then you should know, that I (and some others) tried to request undeletion with every thinkable reasoning, but the admins didn't change their mind. Well then, what's the direction to go for stamps of Peter Emilevich Bendel? Delete them or keep them? You can't have both. I think it's chaos to delete some of them, but keep the others, because in my opinion that would be arbitrariness. --ScriWi (talk) 08:02, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:01, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Like other stamps of P.E. Bendel, it has to be deleted per community consensus, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Stamps by Peter Emilevich Bendel. ScriWi (talk) 16:21, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Stamps of the Soviet Union are not objects of copyright. Please see:
- {{PD-RU-exempt}}
- Commons:Stamps/Public domain#USSR
- Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Request_for_undeletion_since_it_is_.7B.7BPD-RU-exempt.7D.7D_without_doubt
- Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Undeletion_request_for_postal_cards_in_Commons:Deletion_requests.2FFiles_in_Category:_Postcards_by_Peter_Emilevich_Bendel
- Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Please_HELP.21_Huge_discussion_about_the_works_of_Creator:Peter_Emilevich_Bendel_in_particular_and_.7B.7BPD-RU-exempt.7D.7D_in_general
--Butko (talk) 04:28, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
The stamps I mentioned are of the same type (same country, same creator, same license template), but have been deleted.
Despite the links you provide here, the closing admins didn't change their mind.
So to be consistent, this file has to be deleted as well. --ScriWi (talk) 09:28, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:01, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- Undeleted: as per [16]. Yann (talk) 14:24, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
File:The Soviet Union 1967 CPA 3509 stamp (World War II Hero Political Commissar Vasily Klochkov and Feat of the Panfilov's Twenty-Eight Guardsmen with label.jpg
[edit]
Like other stamps of P.E. Bendel, it has to be deleted per community consensus, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Stamps by Peter Emilevich Bendel. ScriWi (talk) 16:21, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Stamps of the Soviet Union are not objects of copyright. Please see:
- {{PD-RU-exempt}}
- Commons:Stamps/Public domain#USSR
- Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Request_for_undeletion_since_it_is_.7B.7BPD-RU-exempt.7D.7D_without_doubt
- Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Undeletion_request_for_postal_cards_in_Commons:Deletion_requests.2FFiles_in_Category:_Postcards_by_Peter_Emilevich_Bendel
- Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Please_HELP.21_Huge_discussion_about_the_works_of_Creator:Peter_Emilevich_Bendel_in_particular_and_.7B.7BPD-RU-exempt.7D.7D_in_general
--Butko (talk) 04:28, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
The stamps I mentioned are of the same type (same country, same creator, same license template), but have been deleted.
Despite the links you provide here, the closing admins didn't change their mind.
So to be consistent, this file has to be deleted as well. --ScriWi (talk) 09:27, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:01, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Like other stamps of P.E. Bendel, it has to be deleted per community consensus, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Stamps by Peter Emilevich Bendel. ScriWi (talk) 16:22, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Stamps of the Soviet Union are not objects of copyright. Please see:
- {{PD-RU-exempt}}
- Commons:Stamps/Public domain#USSR
- Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Request_for_undeletion_since_it_is_.7B.7BPD-RU-exempt.7D.7D_without_doubt
- Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Undeletion_request_for_postal_cards_in_Commons:Deletion_requests.2FFiles_in_Category:_Postcards_by_Peter_Emilevich_Bendel
- Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Please_HELP.21_Huge_discussion_about_the_works_of_Creator:Peter_Emilevich_Bendel_in_particular_and_.7B.7BPD-RU-exempt.7D.7D_in_general
--Butko (talk) 04:28, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
The stamps I mentioned are of the same type (same country, same creator, same license template), but have been deleted.
Despite the links you provide here, the closing admins didn't change their mind.
So to be consistent, this file has to be deleted as well. --ScriWi (talk) 09:27, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:01, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Like other stamps of P.E. Bendel, it has to be deleted per community consensus, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Stamps by Peter Emilevich Bendel. ScriWi (talk) 16:22, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Stamps of the Soviet Union are not objects of copyright. Please see:
- {{PD-RU-exempt}}
- Commons:Stamps/Public domain#USSR
- Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Request_for_undeletion_since_it_is_.7B.7BPD-RU-exempt.7D.7D_without_doubt
- Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#Undeletion_request_for_postal_cards_in_Commons:Deletion_requests.2FFiles_in_Category:_Postcards_by_Peter_Emilevich_Bendel
- Commons:Village pump/Copyright#Please_HELP.21_Huge_discussion_about_the_works_of_Creator:Peter_Emilevich_Bendel_in_particular_and_.7B.7BPD-RU-exempt.7D.7D_in_general
--Butko (talk) 04:28, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
The stamps I mentioned are of the same type (same country, same creator, same license template), but have been deleted.
Despite the links you provide here, the closing admins didn't change their mind.
So to be consistent, this file has to be deleted as well. --ScriWi (talk) 09:26, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 15:01, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
- Undeleted: as per [17]. Yann (talk) 14:22, 28 August 2024 (UTC)
See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:09, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 00:49, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
no scope Info-farmer (talk) 12:02, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 00:53, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Per Commons:TOO#UK, this logo might be copyrighted in home country (UK), in which case it needs to be moved to en.wiki Techtri (talk) 17:40, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: PD-textlogo. --Jcb (talk) 11:29, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- also file:Kyushu Logos.jpg
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 20:44, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:30, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
However, I can't find evidence that Sigge Kotliar is the original author of non authomatic vectorized version (source of this file) of this Coat of arms and because this would contradict the original license The Photographer (talk) 13:43, 22 November 2015 (UTC)These additional SVG flags have either been compiled from public domain sources, or obtained by various other tools (noticeably 'potrace', used to convert bitmap flags into vector format, see e.g. usa_florida.svg which was obtained in this way). We release them in the public domain (unless this would contradict the original license, but we are unaware of any such case).
- Note that our version has since bèn changed to include other bits (the horse) traced from another copyrighted source. So the defacto license/source being claimed is National Coats of Arms cannot be copyrighted, see art. 6er Paris Convention at www.wipo.int not xrmap. I'm not going to get into the validity of that claim just wanted to clarify the situation. /Lokal_Profil 15:58, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, I know Paris. A blazon does not define a coat of arms in the very last detail. The shape of the shield, for instance, is left completely undefined. Non-geometric elements are only broadly described ("a rearing horse, facing left", but how exactly that horse is drawn is left undefined). Coats of arms including non-geometric elements leave the author of an emblazon considerable freedom to express his creativity to produce an original work. Examples of such non-geometric elements include animals and plants, but also crowns, banners, pinnacles, and so on. An emblazon of a coat of arms that contains such non-geometric elements is thus always copyrightable in itself as an original work. By extension, any drawing of a flag that shows a coat of arms is basically copyrightable. A Blasón could be free, however, Coat of arms design is copyrighted --The Photographer (talk) 16:27, 22 November 2015 (UTC)
- I fully agree which is why I instead found the xrmap version I believed was free. If, as the statement above indicates, that version isn't free then there are no objections from my part to deleting it.
- But since the current version doesn't rely on xrmap to be free, but instead Paris, that is the criteria under which it must be argued. For this reason I've pinged in the users involved in the later (Paris motivated) uploads. /Lokal_Profil 09:48, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
- It is a derived (trace) version from copyrighted activeweb website, where publish date is 2001 --The Photographer (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
- It is technically impossible to optain a traced version of the recent quality from this poor 300px x 360px source. -- MaxxL - talk 17:13, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
- MaxxL, It is obviously impossible, however, is exactly the same version of the coat of arms. I have not managed to see the author and original design that clearly exists somewhere. I believe that there is little evidence that this shield is really free for the same arguments above. The idea of placing the link is to show that this version has been circulating on the internet long before being uploaded here. We do not have a source that can verify the original work from this version was made is actually a free.--The Photographer (talk) 02:52, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
- It is a derived (trace) version from copyrighted activeweb website, where publish date is 2001 --The Photographer (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
Keep Licensing OK . This image shows a flag, a coat of arms, a seal or some other official insignia. The use of such symbols is restricted in many countries. These restrictions are independent of the copyright status.--EEIM (talk) 21:39, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- Licencing is not ok, blazon is free, however design could not be. Force the source not solve the problem --The Photographer (talk) 00:53, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
Deleted In the source flags file says clearly "These additional SVG flags have either been compiled from public domain sources, or obtained by various other tools (noticeably 'potrace', used to convert bitmap flags into vector format, see e.g. usa_florida.svg which was obtained in this way). We release them in the public domain (unless this would contradict the original license, but we are unaware of any such case)." So not all flags are in PD and we don't know exactly wich of them yes and wich no --Ezarateesteban 19:48, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
God, what have you done, you idiots. You deleted the coat of arms of a country, that is in the lead infobox of Venezuela's article in many wikipedias, such as in the Portuguese wikipedia article, which now has a redlink where the coat of arms was supposed to be. I hope you are satisfied Incendiary Iconoclasm (talk) 21:10, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
See my talk page. Incendiary Iconoclasm (talk) 21:37, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
@The Photographer: Are you proud? Are you freaking proud? By the way, many coats of arms don't even have a source. They were marked as Own work, such as the coats of arms of colombia, when it obviously is not. Go ahead and request the deletion of all coats of arms of every contry. Go ahead. Incendiary Iconoclasm (talk) 21:45, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- Most likely is the drawing their own work, the original arms is mosst likely PD, so the drawing is their own.
- Not read the DR or the README file, but if it is the source code that's the problem, we could just scrub it and recode it, and it would be fine...If it is a artistic different they have made that is above TOO however, I understand this deletion Josve05a (talk) 21:48, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Josve05a: The hell are you talking about. The colombia coat of arms is the real coat of arms of Colombia. It is no artwork. I will just re-upload the coat of arms of Venezuela and upload it as Own work. Either that or we delete all coats of arms of every country. Incendiary Iconoclasm (talk) 22:16, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
There you go, I've reuploaded the coat of arms as Own work, just like all other coats of arms. If you delete this one, you have to delete all others as well. Incendiary Iconoclasm (talk) 22:36, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
- @Incendiary Iconoclasm: This deletion may be an error, but it would be better than you request undeletion rather than reuploading the file. Regards, Yann (talk) 23:00, 21 December 2015 (UTC)
Already closed in Commons:Deletion requests/File:Coat of arms of Venezuela.svg, user User:Incendiary Iconoclasm ( blocked (3 days) in commons and wikipedia spanish) evading copyright, "fixing" the problem uploding the file like own The Photographer (talk) 00:38, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
- Can I get a TL;DR? What is the source claiming might be copyrighted? Their design (the image) of the arms, which may be below TOO in terms of artistic expression, or the source code (of the svg) which can be solved by either redrawing it in incscape which will result in another source code which someone can claim as own, or simply scrub the code using svg optimizes and claim it as an own work. There are 2 copyright to consider in normal svg-cases, here there are 3.
- The original images copyright status. In this case PD, I assume, as it is a coat of arms of a country.
- The artistic change the 'drawer' has made, which may warrant copyright.
- Copyright of the code it self, which svg's are made of.
- Josve05a (talk) 01:25, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
- Yes, we have in 2. It is a coat of a country, in this case Venezuela, therefore, the blazon is free because PD, however, design is the artistic interpretation of someone and here is where is the copyvio. On the other hand, the svg generated with automated conversion process to svg ('potrace') was published under public domain, however, Sigge Kotliar ran the script to automatically generate this svg, he is not the original author and this would contradict the original license (Readme file from source), at this point the license is applied to a source, however, it is not only a source, It is a art work, svg is only the free format. Thus, the source code license is irrelevant because it is an automated conversion from somewhere. Btw, I've been looking for a replacement of this file, however, the official site of the government of Venezuela shows a bizarre low quality version. --The Photographer (talk) 01:59, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
| About the official source |
|---|
:::Can we use the image and the description (for vectorization) from this site http://www.hubert-herald.nl/Venezuela.htm ? --Shadowxfox (talk) 02:35, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
@The Photographer: Last chance, this http://docs.venezuela.justia.com/federales/leyes/ley-de-bandera-nacional-himno-nacional-y-escudo-de-armas-de-la-republica-bolivariana-de-venezuela.pdf ? it's the law itself, and contains images of the symbols. --Shadowxfox (talk) 02:59, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
|
- Keep Close this nonsense. Fry1989 eh? 19:33, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
- @Fry1989: Thank you. Incendiary Iconoclasm (talk) 17:10, 11 January 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Per Fry. It would be better if discussions could be limited to the points, not personalities. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:10, 22 January 2016 (UTC)
Wrong Author information. File already deleted and uploaded without a undeletion request. [18] The Photographer (talk) 04:55, 10 February 2016 (UTC)
![[18]](https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons%3ADeletion_requests%2FFile%3ACoat_of_arms_of_Venezuela.svg&type=revision&diff=182466172&oldid=182464372){kind=link}
- Keep Not this again. Fry1989 eh? 18:02, 19 February 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:45, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
- @Ellin Beltz: If a image is deleted, the user need open a Undeletion Request, and how you can see the image has a Author, source and license wrong. --The Photographer (talk) 18:03, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
- The Photographer Please respect the rules and policies of Commons, this discussion is over, I kept the file. There is no reason to take a file to COM:UNDEL which has not been deleted. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:14, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
- This file was Already deleted and you can see a comment about it by the admin Yann --The Photographer (talk) 18:21, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
- The Photographer Please respect the rules and policies of Commons, this discussion is over, I kept the file. There is no reason to take a file to COM:UNDEL which has not been deleted. Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:14, 12 March 2016 (UTC)
See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Coat of Arms of Venezuela.svg The Photographer (talk) 14:24, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Does a DR of a raster CoA be a valid reason to delete a SVG version? --Amitie 10g (talk) 15:33, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Amitie 10g: When you apply a automatic rasterisation over a bitmap image, the result is a "SVG", however, so complex as a bitmap and impossible to edit. --The Photographer (talk) 16:36, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete: Okay, I'm confused.
- As near as I can tell from reading this page, it was deleted once, then reuploaded by Incendiary Iconoclasm (talk · contribs) (who may or may not have been accused of falsely claiming it as own work?) who was angry that this left a redlink in many articles.
- What was the rationale for keeping the second time around? Ellin Beltz said "Kept: Per Fry." But the only thing the record shows Fry1989 saying was "Keep Close this nonsense."
- And while I'm trying to puzzle this out, I notice that Incendiary Iconoclasm's comments (beginning with "God, what have you done, you idiots.") were tacked directly onto a "do not edit this archive" message. Don't we normally have a renomination rather than an editing of the original?
- Delete Peer Perey --The Photographer (talk) 13:42, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep This is absolutely ridiculous. You don't get to keep nominating until you have your way. Fry1989 eh? 16:28, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion, again. If you have a problem with this close, renominating it over again is not going to solve it. Discussing it at the closed nomination is also not the way to go. Please reconsider the badgering tactics, find your COM:MELLOW and let's get some other work done. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 20:15, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Jessewaugh (talk · contribs)
[edit]Thirty-seven user images, mostly of a face. Many are shot at such a distance as to be obviously not selfies, yet all are claimed as own work. The sizes are highly variable, the cameras also range from phones to point-and-shoots. This looks more like an effort at self-promotion or promotion than anything educational. None of these images are in use on the Jesse Waugh page.
- File:JESSE-WAUGH-NOSTELL-PRIORY.JPG
- File:JESSE-WAUGH-UENO.JPG
- File:JESSE-WAUGH-CRYSTALS-FLORENCE.JPG
- File:JESSE-WAUGH-BATH.JPG
- File:JESSE-WAUGH-34TH STREET.JPG
- File:Jesse Waugh Leaving Los Angeles.jpeg
- File:Jesse-Waugh-TT.jpg
- File:Jesse-Waugh-Saqqara.JPG
- File:Jesse-Waugh-Pyramid.JPG
- File:Jesse-Waugh-NYC.JPG
- File:Jesse-Waugh-Parthenon.JPG
- File:JESSE-WAUGH-HIDDEN-HAND.jpg
- File:Jesse-Waugh-Autopia.JPG
- File:Jesse-Waugh-MET.JPG
- File:JESSE-WAUGH-Manchester.jpg
- File:JESSE-WAUGH-Light-Portrait.jpg
- File:Jesse-Waugh-Grand-Bazaar-Istanbul.jpg
- File:Jesse-Waugh-Berky.jpg
- File:Jesse-Waugh-East-L.A.jpg
- File:Jesse-Waugh-Amazon.JPG
- File:Jesse-Waugh-ABC-NYC.JPG
- File:Jesse-Waugh Tatton-Park.JPG
- File:Jesse-Waugh Stonehenge.JPG
- File:Jesse-Waugh GODS.JPG
- File:Jesse-Waugh Muir Woods.jpg
- File:JESSE WAUGH-FENP-Los-Angeles.jpg
- File:Jesse-Waugh God.JPG
- File:Jesse-Waugh Free-Exhibition.jpg
- File:Jesse Waugh Mexico.jpg
- File:Jesse-Waugh Callanish.JPG
- File:Jesse-Waugh Autopia-Long.JPG
- File:Jesse Waugh Pyramid close up.PNG
- File:Jesse Waugh San Francisco.jpg
- File:Jesse Waugh Bristol.jpg
- File:Jesse Waugh Hollywood.jpg
- File:Jesse-Robert-Waugh.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:38, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete all per nom. OTRS permission is needed from the photographer(s) of the images when proven that all these images have an educational purpose. --★ Poké95 23:48, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
+2 more:
★ Poké95 23:53, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- File:JESSE-WAUGH-UENO.JPG is clearly a self-portrait Andy Mabbett (talk) 19:18, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Whether it is a self-portrait or not, it still should be deleted because I think the user is using Commons for self-promotion. ★ Poké95 23:59, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - I don't necessarily see it as intentional self promotion... more like someone new to Commons who thinks they're helping by contributing free images. As for images taken from a distance, tripods and timers are common equipment employed by photographers, so it's debatable they were taken by others. A bunch of selfies probably aren't needed, but deleting everything is throwing the baby out with the bathwater, not to mention pretty cruel. There's nothing particularly harmful here, unlike the vast amount of low quality pornography here. If there are copyright concerns with specific images, those should be addressed individually. EDIT: Also, File:Jesse-Waugh Muir Woods.jpg is in use. The Master (talk) 03:38, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Comment We have no way of knowing if this uploader is indeed Jesse Waugh, and COM:OTRS from Mr. Waugh (and all other photographers) would be needed in order to retain the images. We have no way to know if the image which is in use is a COM:COPYVIO or not. Ellin Beltz (talk) 06:30, 18 May 2016 (UTC)- Comment I am Jesse Waugh / Jessewaugh. I have satisfactorily demonstrated copyright to Davod Solaris. Please let me know how I should demonstrate my identity. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jessewaugh (talk • contribs)
- @Jessewaugh: Please send an email to the OTRS. But as I and Ellin Beltz said above, it is unlikely that all of these images you uploaded will be kept, since we think you are using Commons for self-promotion. How can you use all of these images in one Wikipedia article? ★ Poké95 06:55, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Thank you for your reply Pokefan95|. Okay that's fine but can you please keep the four photos that have been cleared or are in use: File:JESSE-WAUGH-UENO.JPG (self-portrait), File:JESSE_WAUGH.jpg (copyright cleared), File:Jesse-Waugh Muir Woods.jpg (in use), and File:Jesse-Robert-Waugh.jpg? Thanks for all your help. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jessewaugh (talk • contribs)
- Comment Only File:Jesse-Waugh Muir Woods.jpg is in use on the en:wiki page. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:21, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: All deleted, some may be considered for undeletion once COM:OTRS permission is needed. ~riley (talk) 19:54, 23 May 2016 (UTC)
png-text, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 18:02, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:02, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho potentially non-free content, see thumbnail format and missing EXIF data, Roland zh (talk) 18:04, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:59, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho potentially non-free content, see format and missing EXIF data, Roland zh (talk) 18:08, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:59, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 18:09, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Invalid nomination, user has multiple other images. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:02, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope.
No one had found a freely distributable image to use as an example of resting bitch face. A good faith contributor searched for free images on flickr that the flickr uploader labeled as an instance of RBF. I spent a couple of minutes looking at the flickr stream of the uploader. It also includes many smiling, happy images of the very young woman in this image. Should this image illustrate the wikipedia's resting bitch face article? No, only an image characterized as an example of RBF by a reliable source should illustrate that article. The flickr uploader, myboogers, is not a reliable source. I am concerned, in fact, that he may be this young woman's grandfather. In the couple of minutes I looked at his stream the other images I saw of her suggested to me that she is only 13, 14, or 15 years old. So, this is not an reliably sourced image of RBF, rather I think it is an out of scope family image, that the uploader unfortunately labeled as RBF.
In my years here there have been a couple of instances where I uploaded properly licensed images from an amateur photographer from flickr, only to hear back from them that they didn't really understand the full implications of their CC license, where they asked me to delete the image(s). Of course, if the image was properly licensed, it is a courtesy deletion. I think this might be an image where we may get an eventual request for a courtesy deletion, from grandpa. Let's be proactive, and delete this image now, while it is still recently uploaded, rather than later, before the granddaughter learns that grandad accidentally made her a postergirl for RBF. Geo Swan (talk) 18:26, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- That's a nicely worded and sensible deletion request. I support it, so: Delete. Regards, Grand-Duc (talk) 20:30, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. This has been discussed at the talk page of the article, and we've decided against including this picture. No need to hold onto this. BU Rob13 (talk) 19:14, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping 13 May 2016 Jcb (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:Resting Bitch face example.jpg. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:58, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 18:35, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep：This is my work, I use PENTACON DCZ 10.4, impossible to find this picture before 15 March 2015. I do not know why this picture no EXIF info.--M940504 (talk) 08:25, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
- Need concrete proof that the user owns the copyright.--Liji (talk) 14:51, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- This picture and File:Taipei Kawabatachō Bridge Structure.JPG were take on the same day(15 March 2015), same place(zh:中正橋), with same camera(PENTACON DCZ 10.4). File:Taipei Kawabatachō Bridge Structure.JPG has EXIF info, this picture is not, maybe my camera has some problem. Administrator, Please Assume good faith.--M940504 (talk) 23:32, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Need concrete proof that the user owns the copyright.--Liji (talk) 14:51, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:56, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused logo of non-notable thing, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 19:01, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:55, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
OTRS-permission from author Vivek Prakash is needed. Taivo (talk) 19:14, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:55, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- also file:CMA Fans With Tennessee Larue.jpg
Tennessee Larue is not mentioned in en.wiki. I'm afraid, that photos about him are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 19:25, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:55, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE ~riley (talk) 19:41, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:55, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
COM:SCOPE. low quality. ~riley (talk) 19:43, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:54, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Used in joke/hoax articles en: Esternocleico chimiracido and en:Percigalo multifuncional limbidinoso about supposed miracle substances. Note product labels crudely drawn with felt-pen.
- File:Botella con liquido de Esternocleico H20.jpg
- File:12-opioid-receptors.jpg
- File:Felipe Cadavid.jpg
- File:Perigallo Multifuncional Limbidinoso.jpg
- File:18d3d0c.jpg
JohnCD (talk) 19:56, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:54, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. No one had found a freely distributable image to use as an example of resting bitch face. A good faith contributor searched for free images on flickr that the flickr uploader labeled as an instance of RBF. The flickr stream of the uploader shows the same person, labeled with a name and Twitter account, thus easily identifiable. Should this image illustrate the wikipedia's resting bitch face article? No, only an image characterized as an example of RBF by a reliable source should illustrate that article. The flickr uploader, Matt Baran, is not a reliable source.So, this is not an reliably sourced image of RBF, rather I think it is an out of scope family image, that the uploader unfortunately labeled as RBF.
Often, amateur photographers do not get the full implications of Creative Commons licenses, asking to delete their image(s) imported from Flickr or similar. Of course, if the image was properly licensed, it is a courtesy deletion. I think this might be such a candidate where we may get an eventual request for a courtesy deletio. Let's be proactive, and delete this image now, while it is still recently uploaded, rather than later, before the woman learns that her acquaintance or relative accidentally made her a postergirl for RBF. Text inspired by Geo Swan. Grand-Duc (talk) 20:43, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete -- I am sure this is a good faith upload, but I think it is ill-advised. The flickr uploader has made some very fine images available under a free license. His flickrstream promises to be a rich source of valuable images. But I don't think this is one of them, and I am concerned it may trigger him changing the license on all his images. Grand Duc and I have independently reached the conclusion that this is a family photo, and out of scope. I think we should be proactive, and delete this as out of scope because I anticipate if we don't Mr Baran will request a courtesy deletion, and change the licenses on all his other fine images, including those which would be in scope. Geo Swan (talk) 22:28, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete. This has been discussed at the talk page of the article, and we've decided against including this picture. No need to hold onto this. BU Rob13 (talk) 19:14, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: 13 May 2016 Jcb (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:Bitchy Resting Face example.jpg. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:52, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
{{{}}}
No freedom of panorama in US. But dino model could be cropped out. FunkMonk (talk) 20:45, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:52, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
no way to review this - the file is no longer available at the provided source, and it wasn't up long enough to be archived INeverCry 21:17, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:51, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Uploaded by 1-upload user Globaljournalism (talk · contributions · Statistics) on 08.03.2016. Gunnex (talk) 21:49, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:51, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Uploaded 08.03.2016. User indef blocked at enwiki. If IN scope, needs permission via http://www.worldeditions.org/team/ (Copyright 2016) = http://www.worldeditions.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/eric.jpg (last modified: 2015, identical exif) Gunnex (talk) 22:11, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:51, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Stark1976/logs. Uploaded in a row on 08.03.2016 for es:Vélez Club de Fútbol, a Spanish football team.
- File:Escudo-c.d. barrio ntra, sra los remedios.jpg
- File:Velez CF15-16.jpg
- File:Velez-Toledo 08.jpg
- File:Escudo-velez-cf.jpg
- File:Escudo-antiguo-web.png
Gunnex (talk) 22:39, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Nominating also (even with exif [taken in 2009], uploaded 2014)
considering (even in lower res, no exif) http://caminoalestadio.blogspot.de/2012/01/vivar-tellez.html (2012) = http://www.losvillarescf.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/05/202grada.jpg (per file path: 2011) or http://www.acidesa.es/index.php?g=1&c=1&c2=&f1=contenidos&s1=see_contenido_seleccionado&f2=&s2=&pag=1&orden=desc&criterio=orden&ob=&spp=777068574630ad669f0ded434632cafd&sp=&cp=bc11769d94d762295ad12b61b7bc60f6&source=listcont = http://www.acidesa.es/data/fotos_contenidos_web/271_200_20121004161625.jpg (last modified: 2013). Gunnex (talk) 22:50, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:00, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related enwiki entry speedy deleted. User indef blocked at enwiki. Gunnex (talk) 23:10, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:51, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 23:16, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:51, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Copyright violation Flow234 (talk) 23:37, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:51, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 23:55, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 21:50, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 17:16, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: File uploaded more than 10 years ago and widely used. Why not nominated before? I don't see issues; just AGF. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:24, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:12, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 17:18, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: File uploaded in 2004 and widely in use. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:25, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:12, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 17:20, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: File uploaded in 2006 and widely in use. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:26, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:12, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 17:21, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: File uploaded in 2007 and widely in use. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:26, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:12, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 17:24, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: File uploaded in 2007 and in use. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:27, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:12, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
_wikivoyage_pagebanner.jpg){kind=link}
_wikivoyage_pagebanner.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 17:29, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
_wikivoyage_pagebanner.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep: File uploaded in 2011 and in use. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:27, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:12, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
_wikivoyage_pagebanner.jpg){kind=link}
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 17:30, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: File uploaded in 2011 and in use. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:28, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:12, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 17:43, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. User has other contributions, and there's nothing wrong with the picture. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:06, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho potentially non-free content, see format and missing EXIF data, Roland zh (talk) 17:50, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:05, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 17:54, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Uploader has been involved in Commons since 2009 with most recent uploads in 2016. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:04, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Xkarim Bounadi (talk · contribs)
[edit]unfortunately to be her/his own work, i think this is from facebook. maybe it is an copyvio
- File:1454912 1068562983203756 4017010772460399375 n 09.jpg
- File:1454912 1068562983203756 4017010772460399375 n 08.jpg
- File:1454912 1068562983203756 4017010772460399375 n 07.jpg
- File:1454912 1068562983203756 4017010772460399375 n 06.jpg
- File:1454912 1068562983203756 4017010772460399375 n 05.jpg
- File:1454912 1068562983203756 4017010772460399375 n 04.jpg
- File:1454912 1068562983203756 4017010772460399375 n 02.jpg
- File:1454912 1068562983203756 4017010772460399375 n 01.jpg
- File:1454912 1068562983203756 4017010772460399375 n 03.jpg
Reda Kerbouche (talk) 12:16, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination & note some were housekeeping... 12 May 2016 Jcb (talk | contribs | block) deleted pag. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:23, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Image is watermarked and most probably copyrighted. Bujo (talk) 12:24, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:32, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Image is watermarked and most probably copyrighted. Bujo (talk) 12:25, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:32, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. Not notable association football academy of Argentina. Not in use in any article either.
also add:
- Fma12 (talk) 12:27, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:32, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
all photos of this user are copyvio, maybe this one too Reda Kerbouche (talk) 12:38, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:32, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 13:18, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:31, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
out of scope, morphing with injurious purpose Pippobuono (talk) 13:19, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:31, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
out of scope, low quality image, COM:PENIS Pippobuono (talk) 13:23, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. FredWalsh (talk) 16:15, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:31, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by NetventureHpd (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, considering also:
- File:Dr Sundar Menon Padma Shri.jpg + (cropped) File:Padma Shri Dr Sundar Menon .jpg -(uploaded 04.2016) --> grabbed from http://www.sundarmenon.com/gallery/#all/1/list (© 2016 Padma Shri Dr. Sundar Menon. All rights reserved. ) = http://www.sundarmenon.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/Dr-Sundar-Menon-Padma-Shri.jpg (last modified: 03.2016, identical exif)
- File:Dr. Sundar Menon.jpg --> cropped from (example) http://www.sundarmenon.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/03/sundarmenon.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 15:11, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:31, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work (unsourced collage + pill spam) : small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Per FBMD... probadly grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 15:13, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:30, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope of the project. Andrei Romanenko (talk) 15:54, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:30, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF. Probadly grabbed from Facebook considering exif: FBMD01000aa40d0000d0510000e8b400003ac30000bcd000000e15010095940100a9a201009db6010098ca0100b2b10200.--Liji (talk) 16:22, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: found at http://www.nownews.com/n/2016/03/20/2033837 earlier than this upload. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:29, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 16:48, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- This picture is my own work. Administrator. Please see [19]. Liji6085 is User:Replymotor's puppet and has willful hostility to other users.--Outlookxp (talk) 01:23, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- Need concrete proof that the user owns the copyright. Administrator. I do not using puppets or editing anonymously on Wikimedia Commons. Please see Special:Contributions/Replymotor, the proof can be referenced only by using Liji6085.--Liji (talk) 15:34, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- This picture is my own work. Administrator. Please see [19]. Liji6085 is User:Replymotor's puppet and has willful hostility to other users.--Outlookxp (talk) 01:23, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; uploader states it's own work. Nominator has provided nothing to contradict that, and seems to be acting without COM:AGF. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:27, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
include fairuse pictures album covers Motopark (talk) 17:04, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom, also a derivative work of copyrighted software. --★ Poké95 23:28, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:26, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 17:06, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; another one. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:25, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 17:08, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion; again. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:25, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 17:14, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion:User: (WT-shared) ResTpeRoc at wts wikivoyage. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:24, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
File EXIF shows "Author: Chris Pieser". MKFI (talk) 08:49, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
GrowLightingExpert Hello, we grabbed this photo image of the Plasma Emitter off the manufacturers website documentation. We are authorized dealers of this product and have full permission to use these images. We can connect you to an executive from this company or provide any documentation you like. Please let us know how we can help.
br,
Chris Pieser President Chameleon Plasma Grow Lighting Chris.Pieser@ChameleonGrowSystems.com
- User:GrowLightingExpert, you need to provide OTRS permission for this file. As you admitted that the image came from an other company (the manufacturer) the OTRS ticket must include a permission from the manufacturer. Note that Wikimedia Commons requires a free license (Commons:Licensing#Acceptable licenses), including derivatives and republication. Mere permission to use is not sufficient. MKFI (talk) 12:58, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:39, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
J'ai fait une faute d'orthographe à MIKE OLDFIELD, j'ai oublié le "D" à OLDFIELD Bernardfiguiere (talk) 09:49, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, note it's a CD cover. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:39, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope. ★ Poké95 10:43, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:38, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. FDMS 4 10:44, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:38, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
As my this case didn't qualify for speed deletion requirements as per
"7. Author or uploader request deletion Original author or uploader requests deletion of recently created (<7 days) unused content. For author/uploader requests for deletion of content that is older[1] a deletion request should be filled instead."
I would like to nominate it for regular deletion as per Deletion policy: "There are 3 main deletion procedures. These are applied in different cases, depending on the reason for deletion: Speedy deletion: in some cases files may be deleted more or less immediately. If you are absolutely certain that the deletion of a page or file falls in the speedy deletion criteria such as an upload error of yours..."
On 9 Jan 2016 I uploaded this file by mistake. Despite the fact that it's indeed my own work and picture doesn't violate any rules on Commons, at the time of my action I didn't realise that being employee of company pictured facility belongs to, I can not publically distribute any media files of company property unless it's approved by external relations. In other words, this picture is property of Royal Dutch Shell and uploaded by mistake with copyrigt violation.
I would appreciate deletion of this file ASAP. Roo mate (talk) 02:16, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Housekeeping: 20 May 2016 -revi (talk | contribs | block) deleted page File:Плавучий завод СПГ Прелюд.JPG (Per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Плавучий завод СПГ Прелюд.JPG. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:36, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
copyvio wac.ma S. Plaine (talk) 11:43, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:36, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
copyvio www.completesportsnigeria.com S. Plaine (talk) 11:44, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:36, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
copyvio www.kooora.com S. Plaine (talk) 11:44, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:36, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
copyvio www.football-the-story.com S. Plaine (talk) 11:45, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:36, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:45, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:36, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
copyvio wac.ma S. Plaine (talk) 11:45, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:35, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
copyvio www.kooora.com S. Plaine (talk) 11:46, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:35, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:47, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:35, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:49, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:35, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:50, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:35, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:51, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:35, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 11:57, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:35, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Saadoun Mohamed Imad Eddine (talk · contribs)
[edit]unfortunately to be her/his own work, i think this is from facebook. maybe it is an copyvio
- File:Centre d'élevage de chevaux ChaouChaoua.jpg
- File:Forest de Sid Elhoceni,Tiaret.jpg
- File:Centre d'élevage de chevaux ChaouChaoua,Tiaret.jpg
- File:La cascade de Sidi Ouadah,Tiaret.jpg
- File:Pine Forest dans la nége , Tiaret.jpg
Reda Kerbouche (talk) 12:05, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:34, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
_2013-12-06_16-19.jpeg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_2013-12-06_16-19.jpeg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Image from http://www.goodreads.com/photo/author/7161977.Turcois_Ominek ? I do not think it was uploded by the photographer. Jarekt (talk) 12:09, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
_2013-12-06_16-19.jpeg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:34, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
_2013-12-06_16-19.jpeg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Omar Farouk SLIMANI (talk · contribs)
[edit]No EXIF data, small. maybe not her/his own work
- File:Tombe au cimetière romaine de Tipaza ( apparemment décrit l'histoire de quelqu'un qui s'est suicidé).jpg
- File:Tombe Cimetière Romaine.jpg
- File:Tombe où c'est gravé la croix TIPAZA.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Reda Kerbouche (talk) 12:10, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:33, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
Wrong licence. The image was simply taken from this website and is most probably copyrighted. Bujo (talk) 12:16, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:33, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Out of scope. Not notable person, seems to be a personal photo. - Fma12 (talk) 12:16, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:32, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Dilenecirino (talk · contribs)
[edit]Trying to promote himself on the PT Wiki, Won't be long till he tries elsewhere, Anyway out of scope, Thanks,
–Davey2010Talk 14:05, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:34, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF (multiple digicams and authors), per COM:PRP, considering User talk:IP1985/logs and — per exif — copyrighted works either by "Martin Hundak" (see also e.g. Commons:Deletion requests/File:20140915IMG 7772.jpg) or "Forum2000/Ondrej Besperat".
- File:OB 10424.jpg
- File:20110831IMG 2282.jpg
- File:20110623IMG 0895.jpg
- File:19540801IMG 0783.jpg
- File:20110719IMG 1573.jpg
- File:20110615IMG 0591.jpg
- File:Madeleine Albrigtová na FF UK 23. 10. 2012.jpg
- File:Čínský disident Aj Wej-Wej 5. 2. 2016.jpg
- File:20110831IMG 2287.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 15:24, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:35, 27 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tonninorup (talk · contribs)
[edit]1st image is pointless but could be saved if really wanted, The rest are all pointless photoshops, Thanks,
- File:Sådan skal en cykelhjelm sidde..jpg
- File:Jaasdsadasdas.jpg
- File:Dasdas13014793020895171378866813365.jpg
–Davey2010Talk 14:12, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- If first is kept it have a misleading title, besides they were used for vandalism and no indication the uploader is same as the person depicted or have permission. TherasTaneel (talk) 14:33, 20 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:47, 3 June 2016 (UTC)
out of scope, COM:NUDITY, and probably copyvio Pippobuono (talk) 13:25, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:05, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
COM:PENIS, out of scope, probable copyvio Pippobuono (talk) 13:25, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:05, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Per * probadly grabbed from Facebook. Gunnex (talk) 14:06, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:06, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
out of scope Vbif-routine (talk) 14:06, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:06, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
screenshot of tv show Vbif-routine (talk) 14:07, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:06, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
out of scope Vbif-routine (talk) 14:08, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:06, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
out of scope Vbif-routine (talk) 14:09, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:06, 4 June 2016 (UTC)
As the image says, it was taken by Pitita Alcala. It was uploaded by User:Ajholt. So unlikely "Own work". Possibly more important, this is a low resolution version of a much higher resolution image from http://authors.simonandschuster.ca/Carrie-White/74367575 (see High Resolution Images at the bottom of the page). In short very likely copyright violation. GRuban (talk) 15:08, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation. —howcheng {chat} 22:15, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo proposée par erreur. Espirat (talk) 15:54, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Unused image; deletion requested by uploader. —howcheng {chat} 22:16, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Copyright violation (the image is watermarked as belonging to the site relax.by). Andrei Romanenko (talk) 16:11, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Copyright violation. —howcheng {chat} 22:16, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolution, missing EXIF, most likely a video screenshot. Gunnex (talk) 13:42, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. -- Geagea (talk) 13:08, 7 June 2016 (UTC)
File:My theory on a worst case severe weather scenario for the Southern Plains, and for the main body of Oklahoma City.pdf
[edit]Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:08, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- I don't understand why you want to delete this. --Kersti (talk) 10:44, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Kersti Nebelsiek: my fault, I accidentally copied my Spanish wording. I meant to use the English one for this: See Commons:Project scope#PDF and DjVu formats. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:13, 26 May 2016 (UTC)
- keep convert to dejavu, then revisit. Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 14:42, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination with note that the publication is unused, and apparently a personal or vanity publication of the author, who may or may not be the uploader. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:33, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
The file is not own work. It can be in public domain die to age, but correct source and license are needed. Taivo (talk) 11:14, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:34, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF. Also per FBMD... probadly grabbed from Facebook.
- File:Deportivo Altotonga.jpg --> grabbed from https://www.facebook.com/1665841816993031/photos/a.1665844163659463.1073741827.1665841816993031/1699245196986026/?type=3&theater (2015, identical
FBMD...) - File:Rodrigo Ruiz.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 13:43, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:35, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
_(mulDA0027b).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(mulDA0027b).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Sculpture by Patti Warashina in Portland, Oregon. As the artist is still alive and there is no FOP in the United States for sculptures, therefore Commons can't host this file. User:Armbrust (Local talk - en.Wikipedia talk) 14:05, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:35, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Anpas 1904 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. User indef blocked at itwiki.
- File:Livrea Anpas.png
- File:Divisa Anpas pantone 165c.jpg
- File:Storia loghi ANPAS.jpg
- File:Divisa Anpas.png
Gunnex (talk) 14:09, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:35, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
out of scope Vbif-routine (talk) 14:10, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:35, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
out of scope Vbif-routine (talk) 14:10, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:35, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
out of scope Vbif-routine (talk) 14:11, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:31, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unsharp. There are better images in Category:Heteropoda venatoria. Mhohner (talk) 14:22, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
- Delete per nominator. Stas (talk) 20:55, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:36, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
.JPG){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF., per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Ssmtwiki (2x uploads: 1x copyvio). Uploaded on 07.03.2016. Probadly grabbed from social media. Considering also (even cropped) http://jesusmaryacademy.com/infrastructure.html (@ Jesus & Mary Academy 2013, Darbhanga, India) = http://jesusmaryacademy.com/images/infra.jpg (last modified: 2013) Gunnex (talk) 14:27, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:36, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status and unlikely to be own work: Uploaded by 1-upload user Femre92 (talk · contributions · Statistics) on 08.03.2016 but previously published on multiple sites via Google and/or social media like https://www.facebook.com/drhusnuyeerdogan/photos/a.1576146035976512.1073741825.1575054466085669/1664737190450729/?type=3&theater (2015) Gunnex (talk) 14:51, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:36, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
out of scope, bad editing of photos Pippobuono (talk) 15:07, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:38, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope. SimmeD (talk) 17:17, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:40, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 18:34, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep:Ridiculous reason for deletion request, what is the relationship between "no EXIF info" and "unlikely to be own work" ?--M940504 (talk) 03:27, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:40, 8 June 2016 (UTC)
name 186.16.63.5 18:48, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
- What's wrong with the name? Please be more specific. --Tryphon (talk) 20:29, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
- Is the permission really ok? The text (in Portuguese) seems to be about news items, not about art work. /Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:02, 11 February 2009 (UTC)
Kept. No reason for deletion. Coyau (talk) 20:39, 15 March 2009 (UTC)
Porque este quadro possui um autor e o mesmo nào foi mencionado 2.40.160.160 04:04, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination with note that it's impossible to license an image as "70 years after author's death" with "unknown" as author. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:22, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:Coat of Arms of Venezuela.svg The Photographer (talk) 14:23, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:25, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
I suspect all images by this user are copyvios. File:Mehdi Bemani .jpg looks professional publicity portrait. File:To The Dust Again.jpg is from 1987. File:"MARIA" Documentary fime by Mehdi Bemani.jpg has EXIF author Parvin Saadati, File:Mehdi Bemani MARIA Talabshoh Sheikhof.jpg is a cropped version of the same with no EXIF.
- File:Mehdi Bemani .jpg
- File:Vittorio Storaro and Mehdi Bemani.jpg
- File:To The Dust Again.jpg
- File:"MARIA" Documentary fime by Mehdi Bemani.jpg
- File:Mehdi Bemani MARIA Talabshoh Sheikhof.jpg
MKFI (talk) 20:53, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:27, 9 June 2016 (UTC)
low quality, no educational value Jugydmort (talk) 16:37, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - Has been used in the past. A well drawn illustration of the subject that gives editors a choice. --Simonxag (talk) 16:27, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - it's not even clear if she is sucking/licking/kissing/smelling the nipple/stomach/whatever. --Jcb (talk) 16:53, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
no funciona bien Michael Daniel Murillo (talk) 16:39, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:50, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
Because the template message is specifically about animals photos needing location information, I propose moving this template to Template:Animal needs location or something similar. This will allow Template:Add location to be available for future use in line with its broader sense. Senator2029 ➔ “Talk” 02:25, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Comment: Should not be better to discussed this in the Village Pump before nominatin a template in use? --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:58, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
The text of the template now speaks of animals, but the same is also true for plants and fungi. Therefore, if I wanted to use it for plants, I simply would add "or plant" to the template not make up a new template. "Animal needs location" is therefore not a good name. A template with a much broader use (outside biology) may not be specific enough to teach a better understanding of the reasons for adding locational information. But even in this case I would propose, not to move the template, but to add a posibility to specify the use case (animal, plant fungi, landscape photos, buildings and so on), so that the general template describes all use cases, the template use with specified use case only shows the reason for the specified use case. --Kersti (talk) 07:32, 25 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Please use either the template talk page or the village pump, rather than nominating for deletion. I think Kersti's argument carries weight. Green Giant (talk) 03:33, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Unclear copyright status. Uploaded on 08.03.2016, sourced with "SIP" (= ?), author = unknown and taken idate = 1979. Source country = unknown (cross-wiki upload from cawiki). Even as anonymous work (which I doubt) may be copyrighted +70 anos disclosure till the end of 2049. Gunnex (talk) 06:28, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- "SIP" means "servei d'investigació prehistorica", a section of Prehistory Museum of Valencia. They released the photo during a edit-a-thon.--TaronjaSatsuma (talk) 08:11, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. The uploader cannot just pick a license - that is the autho'rs prerogative. Green Giant (talk) 03:44, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Taken in 1910, so certainly not an own work. BU Rob13 (talk) 07:41, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Not own work, but very likely to be in the PD due the age. --Amitie 10g (talk) 20:56, 21 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Canadian photos from before 1949 are in the public domain. 1910 means the file is PD in the US too. Green Giant (talk) 03:49, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Не соответсвует категории. На фото хребет Малый Яман тау, вид с хребта Караташ Белорецкого райогна РБ, а не урочище Янган Тау Салавасского района РБ, как заявлено 81.30.176.28 07:44, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Please change the description or categories if you think they are incorrect but we don't delete files for such reasons. Green Giant (talk) 04:05, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Incorrect Maps of Mongolia
[edit]- Image:Arhangay somon.png - One district missing; Superceeded by Image:Mongolia Arkhangai sum map.png
- Image:Bayan-Olgiy somon.png - Several districts missing; Superceeded by Image:Mongolia Olgii sum map.png
- Image:Bayanhongor somon.png - A lake mistaken as a district; Superceeded by Image:Mongolia Bayankhongor sum map.png
- Image:Bulgan somon.png - Several districts missing; Superceeded by Image:Mongolia Bulgan sum map.png
- Image:Darhan-Uul somon.png - Incorrect province geometry, one district missing; Superceeded by Image:Mongolia Darkhan sum map.png
- Image:Dornod somon.png - Two districts missing, one that doesn't exist; Superceeded by Image:Mongolia Dornod sum map.png
- Image:Dornogovi somon.png - Two districts missing, one that doesn't exist; Superceeded by Image:Mongolia Dornogovi sum map.png
- Image:Dundgovi somon.png - Incorrect province boundary; Superceeded by Image:Mongolia Dundgovi sum map.png
- Image:Govi-Altay somon.png - One district missing; Superceeded by Image:Mongolia Govi-Altai sum map.png
- Image:Govisumber somon.png - Incorrect province geometry, one district missing; Superceeded by Image:Mongolia Govisumber sum map.png
- Image:Hentiy somon.png - Several districts missing, one that doesn't exist; Superceeded by Image:Mongolia Khentii sum map.png
- Image:Hovd somon.png - Three lakes mistaken as districts, several real districts missing; Superceeded by Image:Mongolia Khovd sum map.png
- Image:Hovsgol somon.png - One district missing; Superceeded by Image:Mongolia Khovsgol sum map.png
- Image:Omnogovi somon.png - One of two without very obvious errors; Superceeded by Image:Mongolia Omnogovi sum map.png
- Image:Orhon sum.png - Incorrect province geometry, districts missing; Superceeded by Image:Mongolia Orkhon sum map.png
- Image:Ovorhangay somon.png - One of two without very obvious errors; Superceeded by Image:Mongolia Ovorkhangai sum map.png
- Image:Selenge somon.png - Several districts missing, several that don't exist; Superceeded by Image:Mongolia Selenge sum map.png
- Image:Suhbaatar somon.png - Several districts missing; Superceeded by Image:Mongolia Sukhbaatar sum map.png
- Image:Tov somon.png - Several districts missing, several that don't exist; Superceeded by Image:Mongolia Tov sum map.png
- Image:Uvs somon.png - A lake mistaken as a district, one missing district; Superceeded by Image:Mongolia Uvs sum map.png
- Image:Zavhan somon.png - One district missing, one that doesn't exist; Superceeded by Image:Mongolia Zavkhan sum map.png
- Image:Ulaanbaatar sum.png - No similarity with the actual city; Superceeded by Image:Ulan Bator subdivisions.png
The listed maps of Mongolian 2nd level districts all contain significant errors (missing districts, districts that don't actually exist, incorrect boundaries and labels, etc.), because the author only had access to inaccurate data at the time of creation. As a result of discussions on enwiki, a new set of maps with correct data was created there quite a while ago. Those correct maps have later been moved to the Commons, superceeding the nominated ones. Since keeping obviously incorrect maps seems to be outside of the project scope (no informational value in support of the encyclopedia), I'm now submitting the whole bunch for deletion. They have served their purpose, aren't needed anymore, and are not in use in any WP project (nor should they).
For a related discussion with the author in 2008 see here. He seems to have stopped editing in 2012, so there's hardly a chance that we'll ever see those maps fixed. --Latebird (talk) 10:37, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- All of the maps which you claim to be incorrect are COM:INUSE on English Wikipedia. --Stefan2 (talk) 11:38, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- A gallery on the creator's talk page does not qualify as COM:INUSE, if the files have no other educational value. --Latebird (talk) 14:05, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Latebird - the maps were a first-run attempt at putting in information that was not in Wikipedia at the time. Borders have changed or corrections have been pointed out since the creation, and the maps are now superceded by someone who has taken the work to carry on.
I support the deletion. All of the maps I created were done so that when changes occur or when users wanted to add more they could do so without interruption or threat of misuse.
I have not made edits for some time, and am at a point where I do not have the time to devote anymore to editing maps. I am doing work that far supercedes the kind of things that are occupying your time. Enjoy your hobbies, Latebird. Live life to the fullest.
-Rarelibra
Kept: We have numerous files that are out of date or no longer correct, but this is not a reason for deletion. If a map is out of date, suggest corrections to the uploader, upload a corrected version yourself or remove the map wherever it is being incorrectly used. Green Giant (talk) 04:08, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Missing evidence that the photographer has been dead for at least 70 years, as stated in the copyright tag.
It is also stated that the photographer is anonymous. If that is the case (I'm not able to verify), then we need evidence that this was published more than 70 years ago. The file information page identifies a publication from the 1960s, which was less than 70 years ago. Stefan2 (talk) 11:21, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Wilhelm Weinberg died in 1937, that is 79 years ago, at the age of 74. This photograph was certainly not taken in the year of his death, presumably some 20 years earlier. The publication using this image is from the 1960s, not the image itself. This image is used widely on the web. --Furfur (talk) 19:50, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- The copyright term for anonymous works runs for 70 years from publication, not from creation. The first known publication was in the 1960s, which is less than 70 years ago. --Stefan2 (talk) 20:11, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Stefan2: Don't be such a dick. There is much more relevant work to do.--79.242.222.215 21:30, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Not sure what you mean. It's the uploader's responsibility to show that the picture is in the public domain. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:35, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- @Stefan2: Don't be such a dick. There is much more relevant work to do.--79.242.222.215 21:30, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- This photograph was certainly not published in 1962 for the first time. Weinberg was already famous at that time. His discovery of the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium dates back to the year 1908. --Furfur (talk) 17:09, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- keep PD US no notice. alternatively migrate to english as "fair use". Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 14:36, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, A lot of guessing going on here. Deleted as per Stefan2. Thuresson (talk) 21:30, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Lars Elinderson has contacted me and made me aware that it is not him in the Photo. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Esquilo (talk • contribs)
- At least his real photo is here. Thuresson (talk) 21:41, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 21:41, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
I took them with my iPhone. Please let me know how can I further prove to you the rights to these photos, thank you Artsupawatt.
- Is this about Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Artsupawatt or about the files which were speedily deleted? --Stefan2 (talk) 11:41, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept, No administrative action has been requested. Thuresson (talk) 21:51, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
It has no relationship with wikipedia Othmanebenjelloun (talk) 08:18, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Question @Othmanebenjelloun: I notice that it's a self nomination. Do you want to delete your own photo? I don't oppose it being courtesy deleted if there there are privacy concerns or similar reasons.--Pere prlpz (talk) 12:21, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
Kept: As photograph of a notable singer this is within COM:SCOPE. No suitable reason was provided why we should not keep this photograph. AFBorchert (talk) 07:25, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
Ryan Belhsen doesn't exist Othmanebenjelloun (talk) 14:57, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Hm... did you just get the name wrong, the correct name being Oussama Belhcen whose first album happens to carry the name Ryan Belhsen. When I compare this pic of Oussame Belhcen with this photo, it appears to be the same guy, doesn't it? We can rename the file and fix its description. There is no need to delete a file because of that. --AFBorchert (talk) 16:25, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Kept, Thuresson (talk) 21:48, 12 June 2016 (UTC)
Sorry, but this is Derivative work of a probably copyrighted 2D object of art. A.Savin 13:00, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 17:36, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:08, 12 May 2016 (UTC) Template:Ping: Magog the Ogre No estoy segura si aqui es donde puedo preguntar por que ha sido solicitado borrarse. Creo que es por que subi una foto de tesis. Por esos miso reverti el document para que no aparezca la foto de tesis. Favor de considerar los demas trabajos y obras publicadas por la autora porque no son tesis; son publicaciones y libros que inclusive estan en bibliotecas de Stanford, UCLA y Harvard, como el libro Artistas y Artesanos. I am not sure if it is here where I can ask why there is a deletion request. I think is because I uploaded a tesis picture. That is the reason why I reverted the document in order to not include the tesis picture. Please consider the rest of the published articles and books of the author because those are not tesis; the rest are publications that actually are present in libraries of renowned univeristites such as Stanford, UCLA and Harvard, such as the book Artistas y Artesanos.
Deleted: per nomination. Out of scope. --Storkk (talk) 09:28, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Probably not a free image Shev123 (talk) 14:43, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Photographer should confirm license via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 09:29, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
The map style looks very much like Google Maps. Possibly taken from there. Stefan2 (talk) 14:53, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep the creator was a prolific amateur cartographer who used various GIS sources to create his maps. Unfortunately, that editor is mostly inactive now, but he most definitely did not use Google Maps, and I fail to see the similarities with that mapping service. Imzadi 1979 → 06:17, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Doesn't look particularly Google Maps-like to me. If evidence of copyright violation is available, please re-nominate. --Storkk (talk) 09:31, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
this seems like graffiti on toilet wall, no educational use Jugydmort (talk) 16:31, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - In use on nl.wp, therefore in scope. -mattbuck (Talk) 18:08, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Maybe better not to have any image than it? (If we really need illustration, we could seek something better) --Jugydmort (talk) 19:38, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- It is not for Commons to tell other projects what they should or should not use in their articles. -mattbuck (Talk) 20:01, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Maybe better not to have any image than it? (If we really need illustration, we could seek something better) --Jugydmort (talk) 19:38, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - Appalling quality, but in use. Hopefully it will be replaced by something better, but even then it should be kept as having been used. It could still be used to illustrate childish sex drawings. --Simonxag (talk) 20:18, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Sorry Simon, but we don't keep stuff on the grounds that it could be used to illustrate bad photography, we shouldn't do the same for drawings. That it's in use is enough. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:28, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Anyway, due to MediaWiki idiosyncrasies in resizing transparent GIFs, it's not too useful except at full (unresized) resolution, and should probably be replaced by the SVG (not nominated for deletion). AnonMoos (talk) 13:02, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- P.S. Previous discussion at Commons:Deletion requests/Low-quality sex drawings... -- AnonMoos (talk) 13:05, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Still in use on nlwiki over a month later. Clearly therefore in scope. --Storkk (talk) 09:32, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
duplicate of File:Phonesex.svg Hérisson grognon (talk) 15:48, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
Kept: in use. --Krd 17:38, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
Re-uploaded under another filename using a throwaway account, for privacy reasons. Author/source info will be omitted and PD status will be verified by OTRS. It should be much more difficult to tie the image to the user in question at this point. If anyone locates the new image and wishes to nominate it for deletion, please do not name the author/source when doing so, or else use a private channel. Uses in article space have been replaced - please do not link them here. Dcoetzee (talk) 22:46, 26 March 2012 (UTC)
A contributor the undertow uploaded a hoax image of a tattoo in January 2008, at File:OC.jpg. This chaos causing hoax was hosted here for over four years, and was widely copied, as an example of a "gang tattoo" by both mainstream media sources, and, shockingly, some US law enforcement sites. Because this chaos causing hoax image was present at this name for over four years, and was so widely copied, nothing should ever be at this name again. Geo Swan (talk) 00:03, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: Since the current file uploaded under this name (more than a year ago, then renamed) seems to be totally unrelated with the previous file that you're discussing, I don't see a valid reason to delete this redirection (otherwise, it may be fully protected). --Amitie 10g (talk) 01:28, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Okay, I think you are overlooking that this was a very serious hoax. This image may only be a selfie of the uploader. It isn't really identified, so even if it was someone of genuine wikipedia notability, no one who was looking for it could find it. They can't search for it by category, since it isn't in any categories. And they can't search for it by name, because the description doesn't contain a name. "Colloque" is merely french for "seminar".
Meanwhile, the original File:OC.jpg, the hoax gang tattoo had been copied to dozens websites. Maybe, since 2012, some or many of those websites figured out it was a hoax. But we don't know how many haven't. Is this among the top dozen WMF hoaxes? I don't know. But even if it were only among the top 100, or top 1000 most damaging hoaxes a WMF project helped perpetrate, it would still be worthwhile to salt this name, so it is never a source of confusion again.
Did you check the contribution history of the uploader? This upload is the only thing they have ever done on any WMF project. Geo Swan (talk) 02:26, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
- Okay, I think you are overlooking that this was a very serious hoax. This image may only be a selfie of the uploader. It isn't really identified, so even if it was someone of genuine wikipedia notability, no one who was looking for it could find it. They can't search for it by category, since it isn't in any categories. And they can't search for it by name, because the description doesn't contain a name. "Colloque" is merely french for "seminar".
- Delete Delete the redirect, I think. External sites may have links to the original image under this name, which ended up being pretty controversial, so it would probably be best to not entangle the current uploaded image with that history. Looks like it only spent 3 months or so with this name. The point of redirects is to allow older links to the file to continue to work -- but in this case, it's far more likely such links meant to refer to the older file, not the new one. Carl Lindberg (talk) 18:20, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
As for the new (unrelated) image itself, it is a photo of w:Olivier Carré. The photo though is by François Daburon who seems to be a professional photographer. I don't see the image on the web elsewhere... seems likely that the politician (or staff) got the portrait image, and may have uploaded it. Unsure if they would have the rights to license it, but it's possible. Carl Lindberg (talk) 00:49, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per Carl. We don't usually delete redirects, but here it is likely to hurt more than help. I am also nominating the new image as I agree with Carl's second point - it is likely a copyright violation, given its metadata. --Storkk (talk) 09:42, 21 June 2016 (UTC)
Like other postal cards of P.E. Bendel, it has to be deleted per community consensus, see Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category: Postcards by Peter Emilevich Bendel. ScriWi (talk) 16:32, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 17:58, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
Blurry and wrong proportions. SVG available as File:Flag of Colombia.svg. Fry1989 eh? 15:57, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:02, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
_(20494741445).jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(20494741445).jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Are we sure that just because this is on Flickr, that the actual journal has released all rights? FunkMonk (talk) 20:41, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep: See the source closer. Posted at Internet Archive as a free-of-copyright research book. --Amitie 10g (talk) 00:55, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- See my nomination closer. There is no statement that the actual journal itself has released the rights. FunkMonk (talk) 09:28, 22 May 2016 (UTC)
- RENAME: Histort should be History. File should be renamed.PumpkinSky talk 01:02, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:04, 24 June 2016 (UTC)
no EXIF info, unlikely to be "own work". Uploader has otherwise no contribution.--Liji (talk) 16:28, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep:Ridiculous reason for deletion request, what is the relationship between "no EXIF info" and "unlikely to be own work" ?--M940504 (talk) 03:30, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
- keep exif data is supplemental, not depostive. suspicious, but not reasonable doubt. if you could find it in a google image search elsewhere, you would have a point, but not until then. Slowking4 § Richard Arthur Norton's revenge 14:13, 30 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: was posted here in 2012 with an incompatible license. --Jcb (talk) 01:47, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Kumkum as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Derivative work of this Youtube video, 25 April 2015, without appropriate licensing. Source is under a free license, so OK or not? Yann (talk) 16:35, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Delete As I said in the speedy deletion: even if this April 2016 Youtube video is under an appropriate licensing, it contains a screenshot and photoshopped derivative work from this Youtube video of April 2015, which is not under a free licensing: first publication's licensing prevails. Kumkum (talk) 17:07, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 01:36, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
{No source since|month=May|day=12|year=2016} Я попытался найти источник, откуда был взят данный файл, но тот источник, который указан в описании, не подтверждает, что файл был взят именно оттуда. Кроме того, ссылка на то, что файл был размещен на условиях указанной лицензии также не подтверждается на сайте www.volganet.ru. KSK (talk) 11:21, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep système OTRS is ok for this file --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 05:13, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- Question Who is the author and who the owner of this file? The administration of the Volgograd region can't be the author.--KSK (talk) 09:16, 13 May 2016 (UTC)
- In this case we interested in copyright holder only. See analogue: Category:Kremlin.ru -> File:1st BRIC summit Ekaterinburg.jpg -> Presidential Press and Information Office. --sasha (krassotkin) 08:11, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
- Info OTRS Ticket:2011030310013721 is OK. There was this gallery on the site http://web.archive.org/web/20131109163426/http://oblkompriroda.volganet.ru/folder_9/photoalbum/ with name "Их нужно сберечь! Краснокнижные первоцветы". But web archive did not save it and the site had been redesigned. --sasha (krassotkin) 08:11, 19 June 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 10:30, 25 June 2016 (UTC)
Urheberrechtsverletzung, der Uploader ist sicherlich nicht Paul London. Gripweed (talk) 14:51, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:19, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
Cargué mal la imagen no era esta imagen la que quería alzar. Robslpy (talk) 18:04, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:19, 26 June 2016 (UTC)
There is no freedom of panorama in Morocco. The architect en:Michel Pinseau died in 1999, so the photo can be restored in 2070 after copyright expiring. Taivo (talk) 17:16, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 10:08, 27 June 2016 (UTC)
