Commons:Deletion requests/Low-quality sex drawings

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
  • Add {{delete|reason=Fill in reason for deletion here!|subpage=Low-quality sex drawings|year=2024|month=September|day=30}} to the description page of each file.
  • Notify the uploader(s) with {{subst:idw||Low-quality sex drawings|plural}} ~~~~
  • Add {{Commons:Deletion requests/Low-quality sex drawings}} at the end of today's log.

Low-quality sex drawings

[edit]

These files are drawings of sex acts which provide little or no educational value and are (for the most part) redundant to higher-quality illustrations or photographs. Some of the files are unused and others have a few uses, but I believe that they are of sufficiently low quality that it is better to include no illustration in a particular article than to include these ones. --Black Falcon (talk) 01:53, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Not a valid reason for deletion. // Liftarn (talk) 17:38, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Commons:Deletion policy#Regular deletion: "The file is not realistically useful for an educational purpose," including "self-created artwork without obvious educational use" and "files that add nothing educationally distinct to the collection of images we already hold covering the same subject, especially if they are of poor or mediocre quality". Black Falcon (talk) 20:38, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep How are these "not realistically useful for an educational purpose." Your noms all are dealing with sexual images, seems more like censorship. Having alternative images and illustrations increases the value of this archive, even if some are sub-your-standards-of-quality. — raeky (talk | edits) 23:58, 7 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete The 'Blowjob', 'Nipple Sucking' and 'Phonesex' files. This images are rubbish. The 'Lateral Coital Position' image seems usefull. --Martin H. (talk) 00:18, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Poor quality. --JN466 00:30, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep Lateral  Delete rest. Innocent drawing cannot be redundant to an explicit one. Trycatch (talk) 03:02, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Low quality, not demonstrably educational. Steven Walling 02:19, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep These are are sex educational material which give editors a range of options when covering sexuality topics. Three of the files are used and two others are the non-svg precursors to svgs that are used. Used implies useful which implies in scope. I accept that the phone sex drawings are appallingly bad and could do with replacements. --Simonxag (talk) 10:43, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep (except maybe Nipple Sucking.png) All drawings, in Scope & in Use --DieBuche (talk) 21:28, 9 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

per Simonxag Kept. Mbdortmund (talk) 19:51, 11 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Low-quality_sex_drawings&oldid=39118624"