Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Stamps by Peter Emilevich Bendel

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category:Stamps by Peter Emilevich Bendel

[edit]

These stamps are all the work of Peter Emilevich Bendel (1905-1989) and are not, therefore, PD.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:38, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep Soviet and Russian postage stamps are official signs and therefore not objects of copyright. See {{PD-RU-exempt}}, Commons:Stamps/Public domain#Russia, Commons:Stamps/Public domain#USSR. --Grebenkov (talk) 22:42, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep @Grebenkov: Thanks! --ScriWi (talk) 15:10, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep Перечень объектов, подпадающих под охрану авторского права указан в статье 1259 ГК РФ. В части 6 комментируемой нормы действительно содержится положение, согласно которому не являются объектами авторских прав государственные символы и знаки (флаги, гербы, ордена, денежные знаки и тому подобное), а также символы и знаки муниципальных образований. Очевидно, что данный перечень не является закрытым, а основным критерием исключения является статус отнесения объекта к государственным знакам.

В соответствии со статьей 2 ФЗ "О почтовой связи" почтовые марки и иные знаки, наносимые на почтовые отправления и подтверждающие оплату услуг почтовой связи являются государственными знаками почтовой оплаты (то есть имеют статус государственного знака). --Stuchka (talk) 17:21, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination - a derivative of a copyrighted work can only be PD if COM:DM applies, which is not the case for these files. --Jcb (talk) 13:18, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Jcb: Have you read Commons:Stamps/Public domain#Russia? Sealle (talk) 21:02, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, it's selfcontradicting and does not justify to keep these files. I have also read various discussions about this issue and I completely agree with @Jameslwoodward: that there is not justification to assume these files to be PD. Jcb (talk) 21:08, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I think you are confusing PD and free of copyright. You can not substitute the concept. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 21:21, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Still voting for keep! "a derivative of a copyrighted work" does not apply, since it is {{PD-RU-exempt}}. James Woodward and you, you are all wrong! --ScriWi (talk) 16:07, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Jcb: if you were right... you would have to delete all stamps on commons that are {{PD-RU-exempt}} because they are all painted by someone. So you are self contradicting! --ScriWi (talk) 16:36, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Undeleted: as per [1]. Yann (talk) 17:25, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:Deletion_requests/Files_in_Category:Stamps_by_Peter_Emilevich_Bendel&oldid=951820579"