Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category: Postcards by Peter Emilevich Bendel

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files in Category: Postcards by Peter Emilevich Bendel‎

These postcards are all the work of Peter Emilevich Bendel (1905-1989) and are not, therefore, PD.

• File:USSR EWCS №21 Rusanov sp.cancellation Arkhangelsk.jpg
• File:USSR EWCS №21 Rusanov sp.cancellation Moscow.jpg
• File:USSR EWCS №21 Rusanov sp.cancellation Oryol.jpg
• File:USSR EWCS №38 Tammsaare sp.cancellation Moscow.jpg
• File:USSR EWCS №38 Tammsaare sp.cancellation Tallinn.jpg
• File:USSR EWCS №39 Ayni sp.cancellation Dushanbe.jpg
• File:USSR EWCS №39 Ayni sp.cancellation Moscow.jpg
• File:USSR EWCS №40 Tamanyan sp.cancellation Yerevan.jpg
• File:USSR PCWCS №43 Pyotr Semyonov-Tyan-Shansky sp.cancellation Leningrad.jpg
• File:USSR PCWCS №43 Pyotr Semyonov-Tyan-Shansky sp.cancellation Lipetsk.jpg
• File:USSR PCWCS №45 Pyotr Nesterov sp.cancellation.jpg
• File:USSR PCWCS №59 F.Bellingshausen sp.cancellation Leningrad.jpg
• File:USSR PCWCS №59 F.Bellingshausen sp.cancellation Moscow.jpg
• File:USSR PCWCS №49 Felix Dzerzhinsky sp.cancellation Moscow.jpg

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:30, 24 March 2016 (UTC)

•  Keep. See Commons:Deletion requests/File:USSR EWCS №33 Union of Artists congress sp.cancellation.jpg. Please read - exhaustive reasoning for kept. Signs post payment many many times were discussed, see Category:Philately related deletion requests/kept --Andrey Korzun (talk) 23:05, 24 March 2016 (UTC)
•  Keep @Andrey: Thanks! --ScriWi (talk) 15:08, 25 March 2016 (UTC)
• But certainly the category name is a problem. Because these items are not postcards but there are postal cards and postal envelopes. It is necessary to understand the difference, because it is critical importance. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 20:47, 30 March 2016 (UTC)
• Hi Andrey, ok, I understand, but do you really think this would have made any difference to @Jameslwoodward: or to @JCB: ??? I don't think so. I get the impression they just don't care about other people's work and just like to delete. In my opinion, they know it's {{PD-RU-exempt}}, they just don't like the images. Because if they were right, all the stamps and postal cards which bear the license {{PD-RU-exempt}} would have to be deleted. That would be a whole lot of deletion requests, probably hundreds of thousands. I just feel bad I entered Peter Emilevich Bendel as creator, that was my mistake, because that made them angry and twitching their deletion finger. If I had not entered the creator line, they wouldn't even have noticed. That's the game. --ScriWi (talk) 09:03, 1 May 2016 (UTC)

---

Deleted: per nomination - a derivative of a copyrighted work can only be PD if COM:DM applies, which is not the case for these files. --Jcb (talk) 13:17, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

@JCB: "a derivative of a copyrighted work" cannot apply since it is not copyrighted work, it's {{PD-RU-exempt}}. You are all wrong!

And by the way... why are you not continuing the discussion. Just deleting without discussing is simply wrong! --ScriWi (talk) 16:53, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

Undeleted: as per [1]. Yann (talk) 15:03, 28 August 2024 (UTC)