Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/04/20
 |
This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests. You can visit the most recent archive here. |
 |
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-V2-_20160112.jpg){kind=link}
_(4).JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
![1.134 File:1º jogo de Tchelo pelo "Viva a Vida".jpg](#File:1º_jogo_de_Tchelo_pelo_"Viva_a_Vida".jpg){kind=link}
_–_Heckansicht,_26._März_2011,_Düsseldorf.jpg){kind=link}
_–_Frontansicht,_26._März_2011,_Düsseldorf.jpg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.svg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_(cropped).JPG){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_nur_eine_von_tausenden_von_Dokumentarfotografien_-_und_Video-Drehs.JPG){kind=link}
-ce99a5ad34.jpg){kind=link}
.png){kind=link}
Commons:Varldskulturmuseerna
[edit]I created the page without the Swedish characters ÅÄÖ in the title, bit that looks strange and since we can use ÅÄÖ in URL:s I'll create a new page using them instead. /Mattias Östmar (WMSE) (talk) 08:55, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Page was moved instead. /Lokal_Profil 09:04, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Previously published elsewhere on the web (e.g. [1]), no evidence that uploader is rights holder as claimed. (Their other uploads might be worth checking, too.) HaeB (talk) 05:54, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Didym: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - Using VisualFileChange.
Porque he cometido un error al subirlo, no era esta la foto que debería haber subido. ElCastillodeIF (talk) 10:33, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 16:19, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
obvious copyvio... Strakhov (talk) 19:58, 18 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Hedwig in Washington. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:29, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
It is not mine, I uploaded it by accident after grabbing it from a wiki editor free search MJudeDunn (talk) 20:57, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Deleted. Uploader request immediately after upload. Thuresson (talk) 21:30, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Thuresson (talk) 21:30, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable
Motopark (talk) 03:27, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: uploaded by sock. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:42, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
- File:Sealand principality unusual stamp, 1977.jpg
- File:Sealand principality unusual stamp2, 1977.jpg
- File:Sealand principality unusual stamp3, 1977.jpg
- File:Sealand principality unusual stamp4, 1977.jpg
The coin appears to be copyrighted. The uploader claims that Sealand does not claim copyright, but there is a copyright notice on the appropriate webpage http://www.sealandgov.org/treasury and Sealand makes its money by selling such souvenirs: http://www.sealandgov.org/stamps-and-coins/prince-roy-remembrance-coin. DrKay (talk) 16:37, 20 April 2016 (UTC) Added four stamps to the nomination in addition to the coin. DrKay (talk) 16:44, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete in addition to Sealand, there are rights of photographer. Taivo (talk) 16:53, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader nominated the files for speedy deletion. Taivo (talk) 08:15, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
If this is 1944 work, then how do you know, that author is 70 years dead? Taivo (talk) 17:14, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader nominated the file for speedy deletion. Taivo (talk) 08:13, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Delete Antigua copyright lasts for 50 years pma though for corporate works it may just be 50 years see WIPO's Antigua Copyright Act of 2003 Section 10 (2) & (2) and 22 (6). On the other hand it may be covered by the crown copyright which also happens to be 50 years. Either way a 1990 stamp does not quality as freely licensed. Ww2censor (talk) 14:29, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted by Taivo: Author requested deletion of page: author's request on creation day
Files uploaded by RenataCosta2016 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own works by Flickr user Nick Michael (fresh created in 03.2016), per COM:PRP, considering
- Uploaded by RenataCosta2016 (talk · contributions · Statistics), meta blocked ("Long-term abuse") per Category:Sockpuppets of Rafa Figueiredo
- exif manipulator, considering e.g. https://www.flickr.com/photos/140849574@N02/26142682282 (uploaded on Flickr 04.04.2016) = grabbed & cropped from http://cache.rkrk.kr/kSH559VCHpvZBf3no7MEgU = copyrighted work by "Mandatory Credit: Photo by Paul Fenton/ZUMA Press.(©) Copyright 2003 by Paul Fenton"
- exif manipulator, considering File:Elisha Cuthbert and Zachary Knighton.jpg (uploaded on Flickr 04.04.2016), per exif a copyrighted work by "David Edwards/DailyCeleb.com", previously published via http://www.hollywood.com/general/zachary-knighton-60187478/#/ms-16043/4 = http://www.media1.hw-static.com/wp-content/uploads/42447233.jpg (last modified: 2015, original exif available = taken with a Canon EOS 60D and not NIKON D4)
- exif manipulator, considering File:Elisha Cuthbert and Paris Hilton at the press conference of House of Wax.jpg (uploaded on Flickr on 07.04.2016) and grabbed from http://www.gettyimages.de/detail/nachrichtenfoto/elisha-cuthbert-and-paris-hilton-during-house-of-wax-nachrichtenfoto/105750096 (copyrighted by "April 26, 2005 - credit: J. Vespa")
- etc.
Please blacklist the Flickr user. I would also prefer a speedy deletion...
- File:Elisha Cuthbert and Zachary Knighton.jpg --> also nominated by meta blocked sock UsuárioMaster (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) via Commons:Deletion requests/File:Elisha Cuthbert and Zachary Knighton.jpg
- File:Elisha Cuthbert at the press conference of House of Wax 7.jpg
- File:Elisha Cuthbert at the press conference of House of Wax 6.jpg
- File:Elisha Cuthbert at the press conference of House of Wax 5.jpg
- File:Elisha Cuthbert at the press conference of House of Wax 4.jpg
- File:Elisha Cuthbert at the press conference of House of Wax 3.jpg
- File:Elisha Cuthbert signing autographs for fans.jpg
- File:Paris Hilton at the press conference of House of Wax.jpg
- File:Elisha Cuthbert and Paris Hilton at the press conference of House of Wax.jpg
- File:Elisha Cuthbert at the press conference of House of Wax 2.jpg
- File:Elisha Cuthbert at the press conference of House of Wax 1.jpg
Gunnex (talk) 20:53, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Excellent investigation! You may compare this photo at Flickr with this Getty images photo by Alberto E. Rodriguez. Flickr user Nick Michael has laterally reversed the Getty photo and removed the Getty data code at the bottom. Thuresson (talk) 21:26, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Nominating also (from the same Flickr user):
- File:The cast of Happy Endings.jpg
- File:Elisha Cuthbert in 2012.jpg
- File:Adam Pally in 2012.jpg
- File:Casey Wilson in 2012.jpg
here uploaded by another sock = UsuárioVIP (talk · contributions · Move log · block log · uploads · Abuse filter log) . Gunnex (talk) 21:27, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Info Update: All files tagged with copyvio. Gunnex (talk) 21:36, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- File:The cast of Happy Endings.jpg is the same photo as this Getty Images photo by Alberto E. Rodriguez but reversed and cropped. Thuresson (talk) 21:39, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 16:09, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
direitos autorais Zzzssddff (talk) 17:25, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Copyright violation: Copyrighted image found with Google. See source and author.
direitos autorais Zzzssddff (talk) 17:25, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Copyright violation: Copyrighted image found with Google. See source and author.
direitos autorais Zzzssddff (talk) 17:25, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Copyright violation: Copyrighted image found with Google. See source and author.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/number7cloud/25843816662 etc
- File:Hillary Clinton AIPAC 2016 Speaking.jpg
- File:Hillary Clinton AIPAC 2016 Speech.jpg
- File:Hillary Clinton AIPAC 2016.jpg
- File:Hillary Clinton AIPAC 2016 Waving.jpg
- File:Hillary Clinton AIPAC 2016 Arriving.jpg
Laber□T 19:28, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Not sure why there's a deletion request; I'm new to this but thought I'd contribute some of my photos. The photos are also listed on my flickr page: https://www.flickr.com/photos/number7cloud/25843816662 etc
- It had "all rights reserved" on it when I checked. --Laber□T 16:09, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination --Laber□T 16:10, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Speedy closed: Withdraw, and license is valid. --Amitie 10g (talk) 00:29, 22 April 2016 (UTC) (Non-admin closure)
Copyright violation, upload error Higravtindan (talk) 01:25, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 06:51, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 01:26, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 07:48, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - no COM:EDUSE INeverCry 01:28, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Base image may also be a copyvio (small/no EXIF). INeverCry 01:31, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 07:51, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
possible copyvio - small with no EXIF - also no COM:EDUSE INeverCry 01:30, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 07:49, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 01:32, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, also small photos without metadata, the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 07:53, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 01:35, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, these is the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 07:56, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 01:36, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:04, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Dubielbernal (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 01:37, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:14, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Possible copyright violations - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful
- File:DuccioBaglioniBN.JPG
- File:DuccioBaglioniTerna2.JPG
- File:DuccioBaglioniAmmonizione.JPG
- File:DuccioBaglioniArsenal.JPG
- File:DuccioBaglioniUefa.JPG
- File:DuccioBaglioniInfortunio.JPG
- File:DuccioBaglioniDelPiero.JPG
- File:DuccioBaglioniPirlo.JPG
- File:DuccioBaglioniCorteAppello.JPG
- File:DuccioBaglioniRomaJuventus.JPG
- File:DuccioBaglioniRomaInter.jpg
- File:DuccioBaglioniTerna.jpg
- File:DuccioBaglioniCalcioStorico.jpg
- File:DuccioBaglioniMilanInter.jpg
- File:DuccioBaglioniArbitro.jpg
INeverCry 01:40, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:20, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Possible copyright violations - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful - one file, File:Leon Qafzez.jpg, has EXIF, but it indicates the author is Nicola Farina, with no proof of permission - this looks to be a family collection with varried authorship - not sure about COM:SCOPE/COM:EDUSE with these either
- File:Petro-Zheji.jpg
- File:Martin Qafzez.jpg
- File:Leon Qafzez.jpg
- File:Vrimat e zeza.jpg
- File:Martin Qafzezi.jpg
- File:Nje piktor ne New Jork.jpg
- File:Rrethi i kujteses.jpg
- File:Rrethimi i vogel.jpg
- File:Ne emer te lirise.jpg
- File:Luigi Monti-Mesazh Dashurie.jpg
- File:Eagle Film Albania(Video).jpg
- File:"Mesazh Humanizmi".jpg
- File:Leon Qafzezi (Duke xhiruar "Sue Ryder Care Albania".jpg
- File:Duke xhiruar WHO.jpg
- File:Leon Qafzezi( 1992).jpg
- File:Novela te zgjedhura.jpg
- File:Leon Qafzezi -Studio e punes-Tirane.jpg
- File:Keti dhe Martin Qafzezi,foto nga telefilmi televiziv shqiptar"Enderra feminore"1995(RTSH).jpg
- File:Eagle Film Albania.jpg
- File:Leon Qafzezi skice.jpg
- File:Leon Qafzezi ne proces pune.jpg
- File:Leon Qafzezi.jpg
- File:Amalia Qafzezi.jpg
- File:Niko Qafzezi.jpg
- File:Niko Qafzezi wikipedia shqip me te njetin emer.jpg
- File:Robert Qafzezi skice.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
INeverCry 01:49, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Comment The requirements of COM:EDUSE are satisfied at least for File:Niko Qafzezi.jpg and File:Leon Qafzez.jpg, which is used in the article en:Niko Qafzezi and en:Leon Qafzezi, respectively. - Jochen Burghardt (talk) 10:14, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, as copyright violations. 8 files are used, mostly in Albanian wiki, so the files (even unused) are in scope. 3 are credited to Nicola Farina, 2 have website watermark. All files are small, all (with one exception) have no camera data. Taivo (talk) 08:37, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 01:57, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:50, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:46, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:23, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by La Rabia 24 & M.R Veny (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal/promo images
INeverCry 02:48, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photos without metadata, the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 09:31, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:50, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:33, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:50, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:35, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:52, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:40, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Possible copyright violations - small sizes - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful
- File:ST365.jpg
- File:Will365.jpg
- File:Troniengô.jpg
- File:Ngô Trọng Thành.jpg
- File:Jun365daband.jpg
- File:Nhung-hinh-anh-dep-cua-Isaac-365band.jpg
- File:365daband.jpg
INeverCry 02:56, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, one file has metadata and there was author and copyright holder HIZO THAI. One photo has watermark "Jun 365". These are the uploader's all contributions. Taivo (talk) 09:43, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:01, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:59, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:06, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:00, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:18, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:03, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:19, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 10:05, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:20, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:06, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Possible copyright violation - small size - no EXIF - own work claim doubtful INeverCry 03:20, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 10:04, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:21, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:07, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Christinaskobko (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 03:24, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. But the girl is beautiful. Taivo (talk) 10:09, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:25, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:26, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:26, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:31, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MVZOFICIAL (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal/self-promotional images
- File:Avendaño Muñoz Brandon Alan - MC CIBER.jpg
- File:Avendaño Muñoz Brandon Alan MC CIBER.jpg
- File:Avendaño Muñoz Brandon Alan (MC CIBER).jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
INeverCry 03:28, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused photos without metadata, the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 10:33, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:29, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:35, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 03:29, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:38, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:30, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:40, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MarryMeThanoj (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 03:34, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:41, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Damián Cacharrón Gesto (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 17:57, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nomination Basvb (talk) 12:45, 13 July 2015 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Damián Cacharrón Gesto (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
- File:Damián con sus botas.jpg
- File:Damian21.jpg
- File:AAEAAQAAAAAAAAMJAAAAJGZiMmQ0ZmZmLTU5NTItNGNhOC1iMTY4LWFmODMxZmM2N2JlOQ.jpg
- File:Damián Cacharrón Gesto.jpg
- File:Selección.jpg
INeverCry 03:37, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Damián Cacharrón Gesto has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in es.wiki and uploading a lot of personal photos, which are used nowhere, except on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:45, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:37, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:48, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:39, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:49, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:45, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:51, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:48, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:54, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - promotional image INeverCry 03:48, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, copyrighted screenshot, derivative work of multiple, probably copyrighted images. Taivo (talk) 10:56, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Uploader requested. New version available as File:SADC road sign W301.svg. Fry1989 eh? 03:49, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:01, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Uploader requested. New version available as File:SADC road sign TW301.svg. Fry1989 eh? 03:50, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:00, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:51, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:03, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:58, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:05, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
detected exact matched img [2], on a website says "All Rights Reserved" [3] seems not free enough to share on commons , or see also {{No permission since}}
![[2]](http://www.jaaf.or.jp/fan/player/img/W060/2.jpg){kind=link}
Tokorokoko (talk) 03:59, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, only 273×182 pixels, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:08, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:00, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:09, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Rnod alghamdi (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of scope - unused personal images
INeverCry 04:04, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photos without metadata, the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 11:10, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:05, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:12, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Previously published without a free license at http://www.yangjingmusic.com/index.php/downloads/yang-jing --ghouston (talk) 04:08, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader is Shizuka 2015 CN, photographer is Jean-Jacques Ruc. Taivo (talk) 11:21, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Previously published without a free license at http://www.yangjingmusic.com/index.php/downloads/yang-jing --ghouston (talk) 04:09, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader is Shizuka 2015 CN, photographer is Jean-Jacques Ruc. Taivo (talk) 11:19, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - badly tilted - no COM:EDUSE INeverCry 04:10, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, yes, I agree. Taivo (talk) 11:22, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:11, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:23, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:12, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:24, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:12, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. But the girl is beautiful. Taivo (talk) 11:26, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 04:14, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 11:38, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
property of Boston Globe: https://www.bostonglobe.com/lifestyle/food-dining/2014/04/22/tried-and-true-toll-house-recipe-became-american-cookie-jar-staple/mbryAY7wlCLySNiMpkoGkK/story.html 173.87.173.112 04:52, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, there is freedom of panorama in USA for architecture, but not for sculpture. Taivo (talk) 11:56, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Image overused by corporte sites https://www.rncgservices.com/bpo.html (same size) http://sourceinfoity.com/ http://www.iprocesscenter.com/ etc. ; not usefull for the project. Lacrymocéphale (talk) 07:25, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, this is promotion-only user. I warned him/her and delete all his/her contributions. Taivo (talk) 14:21, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Files of User:Sumasoft
[edit]Hi,
Looks like using Commons for hosting and/or promotion. Descriptions are adverts, most with commercial links. Images can be found in several context, may be bought to the same same photo library shop. The author is partially wrong (it the composer of the final banner but photo credits are not reported). Globaly, they're useless for the projets. See lists below.
First, is File:Suma Soft.jpg a retainable textlogo? What about File:Software Testing & Quality Assurance Services.jpg?
Regards, --Lacrymocéphale (talk) 08:04, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Images found elsewhere using images.google.fr
[edit]- File:Business Process Outsourcing.jpg: http://www.siriusfreehomebiz.com/?cat=3 http://www.not-a-geek.com/our-services/
- File:Tech Support.jpg: see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Tech Support.jpg
- File:Logistics BPO solutions USA.jpg: http://castraining.net/
- File:IT Risk Management Solutions USA.jpg: http://fr.dreamstime.com/photo-stock-concept-de-gestion-des-risques-image23950040
- File:Best ITES services provider UK.jpg: http://www.123rf.com/stock-photo/bpo.html?mediapopup=6106778
- File:Subscription Order Management services outsourcing for USA.jpg: http://fr.123rf.com/images-libres-de-droits/abonnement.html?mediapopup=11589606
- File:IT Help Desk Services USA.jpg: http://www.franceloire.fr/espace-locataires/votre-ecoute http://www.detax.fr/free-profitez-dun-forfait-gratuit/
- File:Top Software development company India.jpg: http://www.presse-citron.net/les-jours-du-plug-in-java-sont-comptes/
- File:Mortgage Underwriting USA.jpg: see Commons:Deletion requests/File:Mortgage Underwriting USA.jpg
Other promotion banners
[edit]Even if I didn't found out the original image, they all look like coming from a library, maybe meaning wrong credits or licence.
- File:Database Migration Services USA.jpg
- File:Mortgage Loan Origination Processing India & USA.jpg
- File:Technology Centre of Excellence.jpg
- File:Mobile Application Development India.jpg
- File:Automation Testing Services.jpg
- File:Level 1 and Level 2 Product Support.jpg
- File:Vulnerability Assessment and Penetration Testing Services.jpg
- File:Mortgage Loan Processing Services USA.jpg
- File:Top IT Services Provider India.jpg
- File:Mortgage Post Closing USA.jpg
- File:Digital Network Forensic Services For USA.jpg
Deleted, this is promotion-only user. I warned him/her and will delete his/her contributions. Suma Soft logo is textlogo, but the company is not mentioned in en.wiki and I'll delete it as out of project scope. Software testing file is also out of scope. Taivo (talk) 14:12, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
PERCHè ERRATO Reneclesacoonfe (talk) 21:43, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 14:28, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Test upload du logo d'une marque Sch.kevin (talk) 07:51, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 16:29, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Test upload du logo d'une marque Sch.kevin (talk) 07:51, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 16:34, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Test upload du logo d'une marque Sch.kevin (talk) 07:53, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 16:35, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Test upload du logo d'une marque Sch.kevin (talk) 07:53, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 16:36, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
direitos autorais Zzzssddff (talk) 17:26, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, by Jcb with reason "Copyrighted image found with Google. See source and author." Taivo (talk) 16:26, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
{{Not-PD-US-URAA}} DS (talk) 04:06, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Keep, It is meet to {{PD-China}}, not {{Not-PD-US-URAA}}. The copyright is expired.--Shwangtianyuan (talk) 04:09, 20 April 2016 (UTC)- Keep in my opinion the photo was in public domain in source country China on URAA date. China needs 50 years from first publishing. Taivo (talk) 11:17, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
- The photo was created in 1965. On the URAA date (January 1 1996, which is within 50 years of the creation of the photo) the photo was copyrighted in China. --Wcam (talk) 14:24, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, my math is weak. 1965+50>1995. Per URAA can be undeleted in 2061 (95 years from creation). Taivo (talk) 16:45, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Photo quite identical to File:Louvre Museum (7463306162).jpg ; no information about any difference Tangopaso (talk) 08:12, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- The second image shows much more better, what the figure held in the hand. Marcus Cyron (talk) 14:37, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Comment I dont agree. Both photos are a little bit underexposed. And the background of the present photo is not uniform with the edge of a rack in the left-top corner of the photo.
- And dear Marcus Cyron, could you create deletion requests for the photos you uploaded, when a photo is quite identical to another. For example File:Louvre Museum (7463344626).jpg and File:Louvre Museum (7463348598).jpg. I already done several DR for that. Doing so, you can choose the photo to be kept. And sometimes, I go to the Louvre and try to identify these artworks. --Tangopaso (talk) 17:56, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, two images deleted. Taivo (talk) 16:57, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per COM:FOP#Slovenia: unfree architecture in the background (work by J. Plečnik, d. 1957). Eleassar (t/p) 08:24, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Also File:Slovenia, Ljubljana 103 (17058553705).jpg, File:Slovenia, Ljubljana 104 (17058553175).jpg. --Eleassar (t/p) 08:26, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 17:02, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Duplicate of File:North American F-86A Sabrejet, Smithsonian NASM, Washington DC.jpg Andy Dingley (talk) 22:28, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete This is an exception to my other comments. The image page states that this photo is in the public domain, but the other photo states that Greg licenced it under CC-BY. Fæ you may want to check into this given the source of this photo. 106.68.139.26 09:08, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
- Strike out comments from sock of banned user Russavia Andy Dingley (talk) 09:52, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - duplicate. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:19, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
See Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photographs by NRMA Motoring & Services. Also, probably should add this Flickr account to the bad authors list. Elisfkc (talk) 17:15, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Oops, already is on the list. Elisfkc (talk) 17:20, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete confirmed, on flickrwashing bad author list czar 01:44, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - copyvio - link on Flickr page! http://www.mynrma.com.au/motoring-services/reviews/car-reviews/holden/holden-colorado-7-ltz.htm. --Ronhjones (Talk) 23:48, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
I uploaded this image but I didn't took it myself. Incline to delete. Wikicology (talk) 20:02, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 23:55, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Movie banner (?) found elsewhere in internet. According the image all rights reserved to KMH GENSKE HUMBOLDT 2014. If you are ethe copyright owner see COM:OTRS Rodrigolopes (talk) 13:06, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- The Uploader/creator de:Laurentia Genske is sitting by my side at https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Wikimedia_Deutschland/WPFF_Frauenfilmfestival2016/Dokumentation#Einf.C3.BChrungsvortr.C3.A4ge_am_20._April_2016. She has just sent the message to the OTRS-team. --Bahnmoeller (talk) 13:29, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep until we confirm the permission (I'm dealing with them). --Amitie 10g (talk) 13:40, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: Permission confirmed via OTRS. --Amitie 10g (talk) 03:13, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
unusable low quality, replaced by e.g. File:Jorma Ollila 2013.jpg Kopiersperre (talk) 08:24, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 07:10, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
unusable low quality, replaced by e.g. File:Jorma Ollila 2013.jpg Kopiersperre (talk) 08:24, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 07:11, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
All files must be realistically useful for an educational purpose. Anarchyte (talk) 08:31, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, only 8×6 pixels, the uploader's only contribution. In addition, Minecraft screenshots are protected with copyright. Taivo (talk) 08:31, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Wrong licence, wrong author: corportate visual logo, "© 2014 by Exuberant-Group" http://www.exuberant-group.com/ https://www.linkedin.com/company/inno-media Lacrymocéphale (talk) 08:36, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, promotional banner, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:41, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
_-V2-_20160112.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_-V2-_20160112.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
spam from zhwiki Lt2818 (talk) 08:56, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
_-V2-_20160112.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, surpasses threshold of originality, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:56, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
_-V2-_20160112.jpg){kind=link}
Out of project scope: personal photo used in deleted autobio en: User:Shandene kemoy Gray JohnCD (talk) 09:03, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, non-notable people, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:02, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Movie poster (i.e. all rights reserved), incorrectly credited as own work Morfph (talk) 09:12, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Fantastic Beasts and Where to Find Them (film). Taivo (talk) 09:13, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted photo from Pieter Gabriel's Flickr page. Binksternet (talk) 14:42, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Missing source as of 15 April 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.
Painting of Šarūnas Sauka who is still alive. Papuass (talk) 09:55, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:22, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
unused, replaced by SVG. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 10:02, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, superseded by file:Flag of the United States Secretary of Homeland Security.svg. Taivo (talk) 09:37, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Unused, replaced by an SVG. – Illegitimate Barrister (talk) 10:07, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, superseded by file:Flag of the United States Department of Homeland Security.svg. Taivo (talk) 09:44, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
File:Pomnik i Intabulacja rodziny Nowosielskich 1820 r. Teren posesji kościoła św. Floriana w Brwinowie. Zdjęcie HSH Marcin Szymczak-Nowosielski.jpg
[edit]
Będą udostępnione własne zdjęcia zamiennie o lepszej rozdzielczości. Losy historii (talk) 10:18, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata, uploader's request. Taivo (talk) 09:50, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Secondarywaltz as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: Not "Own work". Copyright Tim Barden. All Rights Reserved. Uploader's username suggests a little more time may be in order. Tbardenvt, if you are the photographer, please follow the instructions on COM:OTRS to confirm. Storkk (talk) 10:21, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, bigger version file:Kerstin-080-Edit.jpg has OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 09:57, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Non-free image. Ssven2 (talk) 10:33, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 10:04, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
better file, higher resolution and less size: File:FerdinandII.Töchter.JPG Oursana (talk) 11:21, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:30, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope. Personal photo used in deleted autobio en:User:Dylan Bednarz JohnCD (talk) 11:40, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Bad quality. Taivo (talk) 10:41, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
No source / copyright information for the original photo. --ghouston (talk) 11:43, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, 1960 photo, unlikely to be own work. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:43, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Included in the formal IAC report anyway, and is misnamed: this file references Tartarstan 363, & was attributed to FDB981 by mistake. Markrkrebs (talk) 11:43, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 11:00, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Personal photos, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 12:04, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll delete also file:Matew.jpg due to same reason. They are Jazmin's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 11:07, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Meant as advertising, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:06, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, very promotional file, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:09, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
derivative work; logo Biplab Anand (Talk) 12:09, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 11:14, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by TheAjitTime (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, Commons is not a photo album. These are the users only contributions to commons
- File:Verma23.jpg
- File:Verma22.jpg
- File:Verma21.jpg
- File:Verma19.jpg
- File:Verma20.jpg
- File:Verma18.jpg
- File:Verma16.jpg
- File:Verma17.jpg
- File:Verma15.jpg
- File:Verma14.jpg
- File:Verma13.jpg
- File:Verma11.jpg
- File:Verma12.jpg
- File:Verma10.jpg
- File:Verma9.jpg
- File:Verma8.jpg
- File:Verma7.jpg
- File:Verma6.jpg
- File:Verma5.jpg
- File:Verma4.jpg
- File:Verma2.jpg
- File:Verma3.jpg
- File:Verma1.jpg
Gbawden (talk) 12:18, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:31, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Abid Hasan Saifi V (talk · contribs)
[edit]Personal photos, out of scope. The only contributions to commons
Gbawden (talk) 12:27, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:38, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Personal photo, out of scope Gbawden (talk) 12:28, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:43, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Personal photos, out of scope
Gbawden (talk) 12:29, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:45, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
derivative workl; IPL team logo Biplab Anand (Talk) 12:36, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 11:47, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
_(4).JPG){kind=link}
_(4).JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unliekly to be own work. Steinsplitter (talk) 12:39, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
_(4).JPG){kind=link}
- Comment Polish anonymous works from 1968 were not protected with copyright. Taivo (talk) 11:49, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Taivo: The uploader added a valide license after the file has been nominated. I think we kan keep the file. Best --Steinsplitter (talk) 11:55, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
_(4).JPG&type=revision&diff=193957267&oldid=193956877){kind=link}
Kept, fixed. Taivo (talk) 11:59, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
_(4).JPG){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Thejerintv (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personal image. One is clearly copyvio as he could not take the photo when he was baby.
Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:44, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 12:20, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
This is a non free logo, already uploded on fr.wiki by the same user. See fr:Fichier:LogoDFCO.svg Hercule (talk) 13:07, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, surpasses threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 12:33, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 13:15, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:31, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
I uploaded this image but I didn't took it myself. Incline to delete. Wikicology (talk) 20:05, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, by Ronhjones. Taivo (talk) 12:52, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
I uploaded this image but I didn't took it myself. Incline to delete. Wikicology (talk) 20:14, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 12:37, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
I uploaded this image but I didn't took it myself. Incline to delete. Wikicology (talk) 20:15, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 12:35, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Amandeep82858 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unused personnal photos.
- File:Eeeeeeeeeeeaaaa.jpg
- File:Bbbbbbbbbaa.jpg
- File:Shave.jpg
- File:Visitor.jpg
- File:His favrate.jpg
- File:Address of resi.jpg
- File:Smart and dashing.jpg
- File:Curently worked at.jpg
- File:Aman deep.jpg
- File:Likes.jpg
Sismarinho (talk) 13:55, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:03, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Pour pouvoir discuter, j'aimerais que vous m'expliquiez d'abord pourquoi vous m'annoncez cette suppression, alors que le Championnat d'Europe de Luttes Celtiques ne vient que de commencer et que j'ai l'intention d'y mettre encore de nombreuses photos. Y a-t-il une autre solution que vous pourriez me proposer, sinon, je me verrai obligé de ne les publier que sur Wiki-Brest. Merci de m'apporter des réponses précises
CL P
Luttes celtiques Tshavis (talk) 14:10, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, empty galleries are eligible for speedy deletion. Taivo (talk) 13:23, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used or used in article about city.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Info Considering log for File:Sights in Amsterdam2.jpg (was an unsourced montage of the city of Amsterdam) this new file (user pic, uploaded under same title) is embedded in a unrelated way in several wiki entries. Maybe we should speedy this file (also because it's just +/- a duplicate of File:Kpps1215.jpg... Gunnex (talk) 17:27, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader slaimed in User talk:OgreBot/Notable uploads/2016 April 19, that the Amsterdam file was erroneously uploaded and that he wants to delete it. I'll close the request speedily. Taivo (talk) 13:43, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Wrong spelling! Without "s"! New Category: Category:Bahnhofplatz (Munich)
Support Replaced with Category:Bahnhofplatz (Munich). Thuresson (talk) 21:53, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, OK, if you think so. Taivo (talk) 07:47, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal tourist snap, out of scope Union Aéromaritime de Transport (talk) 00:31, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Delete Out of scope. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:29, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, yes, that's probably true. Taivo (talk) 07:49, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
an exact copy of the File:Rhipsalis baccifera (museum de Toulouse).jpg, author of one, act committed because of an error in the file name (plants) -- ( FinitoR ) 09:15, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:34, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, copyright violation: author is Bettina Lehnes, uploader is Dijana PC. Taivo (talk) 09:41, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
I strongly doubt this image is own work given the lack of EXIF, the size, and the watermark. --BrightRaven (talk) 14:29, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:43, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Copyvio (AP photo).
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Takabeg (talk) 14:49, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:59, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This file was initially tagged by 178.236.161.194 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: not LaFerrari picture . This is not a reason to delete, if the car is identified. Taivo (talk) 15:42, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- That was my mistake - photo shows air intake of Ferrari 488 GTB, not LaFerrari. Moved to File:Ferrari 488 GTB - wlot powietrza (MSP16).jpg. Flyz1 (talk) 17:25, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep: File renamimg
Done. ~ Moheen (talk) 17:47, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept, now the file is identified and renamed. Taivo (talk) 10:14, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Brayan villalba (talk · contribs)
[edit]Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
Ies (talk) 16:21, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Brayan has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in es.wiki and uploading 5 mostly small photos, all without metadata, which are used nowhere, except on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Also some copyvios, for example, photo about himself as baby cannot be own work. Taivo (talk) 10:25, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
was speedy delete: According to metadata, it has been taken from eBay. Wdwd (talk) 13:27, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, by Cookie per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Mcapdevila. Taivo (talk) 06:09, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mcapdevila (talk · contribs)
[edit]Per precautionary principle. A quick view of the pictures show a wide disparity in sizes, backgrounds, techniques.... Only that is not enough for supporting this kind of deletion request. However, I invite you to a quick inspection of his last deleted pictures (only if being an admin, sorry). You will verify that the uploader took all of them from eBay (as the metadata showed), hosted them in one of his own sites, and claimed authorship (one of them was a screen shot from Youtube). The uploader's pattern is clearly exposed in File:Headshell.JPG. As mentioned, the image was taken from eBay (according to metadata). When I asked a speedy deletion on copyright grounds, Mcapdevila uploaded a different picture claiming that "New version of file bypasses the reasons for deletion request". However, a quick search showed that the version that "bypassed the reasons for deletion request" had been taken again from eBay. Just the original background had been removed from the picture, but it was clearly the same one (here).
Therefore, it's clear that @Mcapdevila: does not understand what free licenses and authorship mean and simply violates the copyright by using an own intermediate site. Thus, I do think all similar images are very likely another copyright violation and therefore must be deleted.
- File:Berkeley's-eLEGS-EKSO.jpg
- File:HUAWEI-ONT 4.jpg
- File:Toilet flexible pipe.JPG
- File:Corta-tubos de cadena.JPG
- File:Corta-tubos-PVC.jpg
- File:Jvc gz-mg555-02.jpg
- File:Airport Extreme UFO.JPG
- File:Compukit-II a.jpg (Cropped and rotated version from File:Compukit UK101.jpg)
- File:Superboard-II a.jpg (Cropped and rotated version from File:Ohio Scientific Superboard.jpg)
- File:Ohio Scientific Superboard.jpg (Brought from en-wikipedia)
- File:Epson-3LCD-6500lm.JPG
- File:Lightpad-Tracing-Board1.jpg
- File:Kodak-Verifax-copier.jpg
- File:Diazo-printer2.jpg
- File:Grid compass 3.jpg
- File:Insoladora offset1.jpg
- File:Insoladora-PCB1.jpg
- File:Insoladora.JPG
- File:Contact printer2.jpg
- File:4G-LTE filter 766Mhz.jpg
- File:Headshell.JPG
- File:Tiva c series tm4c123g launchpad.JPG
- File:Porta-trajes.jpg
- File:Cavallet-pi2.jpg
- File:Dukane filmstrip MicromaticII.JPG
- File:Camerafix-filmstrip.jpg
- File:Filmstrip S-Juan-Bosco.jpg
- File:Slide-copier.jpg
- File:Bossa arpillera.jpg
- File:Cable grommet.jpg
- File:Goma-tandem.jpg
- File:Dog-walker.jpg
- File:Pocket-hole apli2.JPG
- File:Pocket-hole apli1.JPG
- File:Eco slim catamaran 2.jpg
- File:Grooving plane.jpg
- File:Petrol dispenser.jpg
- File:Polvoritzador.jpg
- File:Pom d'escala.jpg
- File:Ballestilla.jpg
- File:Davis quadrant 4.jpg
- File:RJ-45 connector.jpg
- File:Pala de rentar 4.jpg
- File:Guitarra Juan Estruch 3.jpg
- File:Espasa de SantMarti3.jpg
- File:Magnano-switchblade.jpg
- File:Escola catalana plaça Sant Jaume.jpg
- File:Setrillera marquina.jpg
- File:Astrolabi Carolingi Barcelona 980.jpg
- File:Bolinders-teleradio-intercom.jpg
- File:Mesa-cuestacion-Paterna.jpg
- File:Paraguero-crop.jpg
- File:Parking-detector.jpg
- File:Revolving ampolleta 4.jpg
- File:Hertfordshire puddingstone3.jpg
- File:Plush-tissue.jpg
- File:Tiple menorquí3.jpg
- File:Montserrat-catalan-wheellock-1546.jpg
- File:Brother HR-1 Daisy wheel printer.JPG
- File:Astrocompass mk II.jpg
- File:Galvanic corrosion-1b.jpg
- File:Electric rug.jpg
- File:Coberta (nautica).jpg
- File:Etch-a-sketch inner.jpg
- File:P28F001BX flash memory-2.jpg
- File:Ampolleta de corredera.jpg
- File:Araucaria sudamerica3.jpg
- File:Verge bonaire3.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Discasto talk 13:43, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- More examples:
- File:J-l-Espejo.jpg has been taken from here. It has been enlarged (and thus, Mcapdevila's "own" picture has become blurred), but the date is far earlier that Mcapdevila's upload.
- File:Coronado35a2.jpg has been taken from here (picture 17)
- File:Festa_del_Redentore.jpg is again blurred, as it has been enlarged from the picture in here
- File:Estor_de_cuina.jpg is simply a derivative work of an already deleted picture: File:Estor cocina.jpg
- --Discasto talk 14:45, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
- Dont lie the Coronado does not exist where you say for was my own boat in 1972 I am standing before the mizzen boat, on eBay pictures I have a signed agreement with the eBay sellers giving me the right to publish the pictures of the items I purchase (more than 1500).. In that case (headshell) I have arrived to an agreement with the owner by placing a high bid in his auction..
- http://www.ebay.com/itm/351712656684--Mcapdevila (talk) 22:37, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
- Funny enough, the yacht is said to have been boated in 1978. I assume you mean that the yacht seller is lying, don't you? On the other hand, authorizations are handled through Commons:OTRS. Feel free to send an authorization stating that the original picture author releases the pictures under a CC-BY-SA license (you know it's not the same than a vague "right to publish"). Finally, just a clarification. Even if you've been given the authorization to release other people's pictures, it does not nullify their authorship. Claiming that other people's pictures are your "own" pictures is not only ugly, but not legal (under any jurisdiction). Best regards --Discasto talk 07:29, 22 April 2016 (UTC) PS: my last finding: File:Lluis Clavell 2013.jpg, a screenshot from Youtube, uploaded to Mcapdevila's web site and claimed as {{Own}}
- Another point.. you should apologize for calling me "chorizo" (an insult in spanish), infringing the Wiki 5 pillars..
- On every eBay item I ve purchased I have a signed agreement with the sellers giving me the permission (Multi-license CC-BY-SA-3.0 and GFDL - good enough for Commons) to publish the pictures of the items I purchase and therefore I am the owner as I state.. In the headshell case I have arrived to an agreement with the owner has given me permission to publish (Multi-license CC-BY-SA-3.0 and GFDL) by placing a high bid in his auction..
- http://www.ebay.com/itm/351712656684
- Regarding the youtube capture.. I am 70.. and a childhood friend to Mons. Clavell.. I called him and ask him permission to publish (Multi-license CC-BY-SA-3.0 and GFDL), and he gave me his OK he will send the corresconding Commons:OTRS
- idem with Jose Luis Espejo--Mcapdevila (talk)
- Please, don't play the victim game with me. I haven't called you "chorizo", but only described your copyright violation (my guess is that you simply don't understand how this project works). On the other hand, the points highlighted in the deletion request remain: you need to provide authorization information as described above (OTRS and all the stuff); you can't claim other people's work is yours. --Discasto talk 16:23, 23 April 2016 (UTC) PS: I do think your Clavell's mention clarifies pretty well your misunderstanding of the licensing matters. It's not Clavell, but CatalunyaReligio.cat the one that must authorise the relicensing of their works. On the other hand, Clavell's case is not the only "choriceo" you've carried out (see above the Espejo's item)
- Deleted: Files must have a valid source, something that these do not fulfill, since a private site is not valid. As user Discasto has proven, all of the files (apart from two explained above), seem to come from different copyrighted websites, including eBay, whose policy about contents is very strict and consequently they cannot be used unless an authorization via OTRS is given by their respective owners. Moreover, the lack of EXIF data evidences a fake claim of authorship. Anna (Cookie) (talk) 02:13, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by MargaretofRome (talk · contribs)
[edit]Seemingly a copyvio. The paintor Mario Ricci died in 1989 and therefore is not yet 70 years dead.
- File:17 QUADRI AD OLIO SU TELA.jpg
- File:QUADRO APPESO E QUADRO SEDUTO.jpg
- File:Paesaggio con cipressi.jpg
Ies (talk) 16:34, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Dear Ies, The painter Mario Ricci is definitely not dead. I am posting here the link of his official website to confirm that he is still alive. http://www.marioricci.it/index.html. You get confused with a Mario Ricci who was a politician but not a painter. Can you remove your deletion request please? Thank you. Margaret
Deleted, if Mario Ricci sends OTRS-permission, then the files can be restored. I'll delete also other uploads of Margaret, because they depict art of Viktor Michailovich Ladviščenko. There is freedom of panorama in Russia for architecture, but not for murals and other 2-dimensional art. As both artists are still living, there is no known restore date. Taivo (talk) 06:23, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
this image derives from kapital.kz but this site allows using its content for information partners only [4] Bogomolov.PL (talk) 16:59, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, that's a strange license, but anyway. licensereview failed. Taivo (talk) 08:06, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Image of woman on a couch, not in use, out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:20, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. But the woman is very beautiful. Taivo (talk) 08:16, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
This photo is extremely old; Main Hall has since been renovated, the ivy removed, and it looks much different. It should not be connected with Wagner College. 100.42.128.10 17:21, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Are you claiming it is not Wagner College ? It claims to be dated 2005 so of course it may look cosmetically different to today. Rcbutcher (talk) 17:26, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept, Commons needs old photos also to show history. The file states clearly "2005", so differences from today's look are understandable. Taivo (talk) 08:20, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 17:31, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
![17:31, 20 April 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/04/20#c-Gunnex-2016-04-20T17:31:00.000Z-File:1º_jogo_de_Tchelo_pelo_"Viva_a_Vida".jpg){kind=link}
Deleted, small unused personal photo, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:28, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
![08:28, 25 April 2016 (UTC)](https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Deletion_requests/Archive/2016/04/20#c-Taivo-2016-04-25T08:28:00.000Z-File:1º_jogo_de_Tchelo_pelo_"Viva_a_Vida".jpg){kind=link}
Looks like the uploader is not the copyright owner. Low quality files with random names, some have watermarks. One is credited as Brett Davis-USA TODAY Sports
- File:MVOrYguN.jpg
- File:MVOrYguNE.jpg
- File:XgSFIHTpA.jpg
- File:OpSMnLsXY.jpg
- File:OpSMnLsXYk.jpg
- File:Dscрр.jpg
- File:Cadadecabb.jpg
- File:ZzJOKRM.jpg
- File:AmV.jpg
- File:Seimjmont.jpg
- File:Seicrod.jpg.jpg
- File:Seimone Augustus crod.jpg.jpg
- File:Seimone Augustus croed.jpg.jpg
- File:Seimone Augustus croped.jpg.jpg
Dudek1337 (talk) 17:42, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small photos without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contributions. The user was previously blocked for a month. I blocked him for a year. Taivo (talk) 08:41, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Danychvaicer (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entries speedy deleted.
Gunnex (talk) 17:47, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Banco Máxima is not mentioned neither in en.wiki, es.wiki, it.wiki nor pt.wiki. Unused logos of non-notable banks are out of scope. Taivo (talk) 08:53, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
_%E2%80%93_Heckansicht,_26._M%C3%A4rz_2011,_D%C3%BCsseldorf.jpg){kind=link}
_%E2%80%93_Heckansicht,_26._M%C3%A4rz_2011,_D%C3%BCsseldorf.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Nummernschild verunstaltet 79.201.203.7 19:21, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
_–_Heckansicht,_26._März_2011,_Düsseldorf.jpg){kind=link}
Kept, this is not a reason to delete anything. Taivo (talk) 08:56, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
_–_Heckansicht,_26._März_2011,_Düsseldorf.jpg){kind=link}
_%E2%80%93_Frontansicht,_26._M%C3%A4rz_2011,_D%C3%BCsseldorf.jpg){kind=link}
_%E2%80%93_Frontansicht,_26._M%C3%A4rz_2011,_D%C3%BCsseldorf.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Nummernschild verunstaltet 79.201.203.7 19:21, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
_–_Frontansicht,_26._März_2011,_Düsseldorf.jpg){kind=link}
Kept, this is not a reason to delete anything. Taivo (talk) 09:02, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
_–_Frontansicht,_26._März_2011,_Düsseldorf.jpg){kind=link}
Promotional crap Laber□T 19:23, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, I'll delete all the uploader's contributions: they are all promotional crap. Taivo (talk) 09:06, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo of a non-notable organization. Image was being used in the deleted article ro:Cursuri Copii // Gikü said done Wednesday, 20 April 2016 19:31 (UTC) 19:31, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, this is textlogo, not copyrighted, but out of project scope anyway. I'll delete also almost-copies of this file:Logo CLEVER children.jpg and file:Logo CLEVER children gri.jpg. Taivo (talk) 09:22, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo of a non-notable organization. Image was being used in the deleted article ro:Cursuri Copii // Gikü said done Wednesday, 20 April 2016 19:31 (UTC) 19:31, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:55, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Promo content for a non-notable organization. Image was being used in the deleted article ro:Cursuri Copii // Gikü said done Wednesday, 20 April 2016 19:32 (UTC) 19:32, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:56, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Promo content for a non-notable organization. Image was being used in the deleted article ro:Cursuri Copii // Gikü said done Wednesday, 20 April 2016 19:32 (UTC) 19:32, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:56, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Promo content for a non-notable organization. Image was being used in the deleted article ro:Cursuri Copii // Gikü said done Wednesday, 20 April 2016 19:32 (UTC) 19:32, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:57, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Promo content for a non-notable organization. Image was being used in the deleted article ro:Cursuri Copii // Gikü said done Wednesday, 20 April 2016 19:32 (UTC) 19:32, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:58, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Promo content for a non-notable organization. Image was being used in the deleted article ro:Cursuri Copii // Gikü said done Wednesday, 20 April 2016 19:32 (UTC) 19:32, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:59, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted logo, original enough // Gikü said done Wednesday, 20 April 2016 19:43 (UTC) 19:43, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, not a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 09:49, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Unidentified music band, missing scope // Gikü said done Wednesday, 20 April 2016 19:45 (UTC) 19:45, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, only 200×133 pixels, no camera data. Taivo (talk) 10:02, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Unidentified drummer, missing scope. // Gikü said done Wednesday, 20 April 2016 19:45 (UTC) 19:45, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, only 200×200 pixels, no metadata. Taivo (talk) 10:00, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Uploader requested. New version available as File:SADC road sign TW302.svg. Fry1989 eh? 19:54, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:03, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Uploader requested. New Version available as File:SADC road sign W302.svg. Fry1989 eh? 20:00, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:04, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
.svg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.svg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Uploader requested. New version available as File:SADC road sign W302.svg. Fry1989 eh? 20:01, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:05, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
.svg){kind=link}
Unidentified people; missing scope. // Gikü said done Wednesday, 20 April 2016 20:08 (UTC) 20:08, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, this is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:08, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Just a B&W version of this https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Black_Mass_11_(21268540588).jpg 78.144.36.170 20:10, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep: No valid reason for deletion. --Amitie 10g (talk) 00:20, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, out of scope as inferior almost-duplicate. Taivo (talk) 10:09, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Apparent copyright violation Boson (talk) 20:35, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- How can this be copyright violation? The name of the newspaper including date of publishing is mentioned. The author never tried to hide the origin or claimed it as own work. Mnlkrz (talk) 20:45, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, the newspaper is not published under CC-license and copyright belongs to newspaper. If OTRS-permission from newspaper representative arrives, then the file can be restored. I'll delete file:MED gets German Partner The Catalyst 2013-05-08.pdf due to same reason. These were the user's only uploads. Taivo (talk) 10:14, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photos, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 20:43, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 10:19, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photos, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 20:43, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 10:18, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photos, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 20:43, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 10:21, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
unused personal photos, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 20:43, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 10:22, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Paulodanielpeixoto (talk · contribs)
[edit]See COM:SCOPE.
Stefan2 (talk) 21:59, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:35, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
File:4990010202481 - Sabitri Dharamamulak Natak, Bandopadhdhaya ,Bhupendranath, 25p, LANGUAGE. LINGUISTICS. LITERATURE, bengali (0).pdf
[edit]delete please Jayantanth (talk) 22:53, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted, uploader's request 9 days after uploading, also out of scope. Taivo (talk) 10:30, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Photo from http://www.mynewsdesk.com. License review failed. Thuresson (talk) 21:07, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jean-Fred (talk) 09:16, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
per COM:TOYS INeverCry 01:41, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:09, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 02:28, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:09, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
The "Art of Animation" logo is used under a claim of fair use on the English Wikipedia, but Commons does not accept fair use cliams so this image appears to be a copyright violation. KDS4444 (talk) 03:24, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete The hotel is situated in Florida. There is freedom of panorama in USA for architecture, but not for sculpture. Taivo (talk) 10:11, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, no FoP for sculpture and derivative of a protected uk logo. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:11, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:25, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:12, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 03:28, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:12, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused promo image/bandspam INeverCry 03:43, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:12, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:45, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:12, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 03:57, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:13, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 04:18, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:14, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
No copyright or license details for scanned book cover. --ghouston (talk) 04:23, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Cover looks like art of Joan Miro (died 1983). Taivo (talk) 11:42, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, have a look here on it.wiki. K'n-yan (msg) 09:44, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
The "Parenti Editore" (publisher of book "Il sole scoppia") does not longer exist.
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:14, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal tourist photo, out of scope 185.50.215.116 21:44, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:20, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: by Jcb. Riley Huntley (talk) 06:20, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: by Jcb. Riley Huntley (talk) 06:20, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal photo, the photographer has removed all of their photos from Flickr, so there is a possible COM:IDENT issue here, perhaps these photos of people weren't supposed to be published. Another issue is the geolocation and the person's name being evident. 185.50.215.116 21:45, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: mainly agree, although the photo is nice, this stay a personal image, and the uploader changed his position, as there is also a question of privacy right, it's enough for me for this image in the full frame on the subject. Christian Ferrer (talk) 05:35, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Files uploaded by Forte Pensiero (talk · contribs)
[edit]No confidence that uploader created any of these images, only one has metadata, the others are highly variable in all aspects: size, white balance, etc.
- File:Angelo Spinillo.png
- File:Giovanni D'Alise.png
- File:Gualtiero Sigismondi.png come from [5]
- File:Lauro Tisi.png per watermark obvious screenshot from [6]
- File:Loredana Bufalieri.png
- File:Alessandro Bonafiglia Riardo..jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:57, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination, found 2 obvious copyvio, deleted the other as precaution. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:34, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Emilio Durango (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope
- File:Car tuning.jpg
- File:10155631 313058648846905 142381835063418928 n9.jpg
- File:Thb 1391262771 V12Z12 preview.jpg
Laber□T 19:25, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:27, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by AMICUS ATTORNEY (talk · contribs)
[edit]out of scope
Laber□T 19:26, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:26, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Photo from http://www.mynewsdesk.com. License review failed. Thuresson (talk) 21:09, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:24, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Looks like professional photo agency work. Can be found here, credited to Á.G. Dudek1337 (talk) 22:23, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:23, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope personal photo. Image only used in English Wikipedia hoax articles. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:32, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:22, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 16:39, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:48, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Mahabub Mamun (talk · contribs)
[edit]No indication of user's own work on these variously sized images. One has metadata, but is very small and of poor quality.
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:48, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:48, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Each image in a collage requires proper source and license, here all of them are claimed as own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:50, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination : lacks of sources. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:47, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Previously published at http://www.schroeder-ritzrau.de/ and crediting Goetz Schleser in Exif. --ghouston (talk) 06:35, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:03, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused chart of questionable notability. Should be in MediaWiki graph or SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: files are malicious. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:09, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Small photo without metadata, two watermarks. Own work is not sure, maybe copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 15:25, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per Apple Daily watermark. Apparent copyvio. --Yasu (talk) 15:35, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:14, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Missing license as of 20 April 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.
Modern art. I think painter identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:15, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted by Jcb: Missing license as of 20 April 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.
File:Annika Mehlhorn, Katrin Apel, Carolin Hingst (2012-08-14 Vortour der Hoffnung) (cropped).JPG
[edit]_(cropped).JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_(cropped).JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Author request on COM:FORUM. –Be..anyone 💩 11:42, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep Depicted person said, that she does not like the photo. She clearly poses here and it's understandable, that sportswoman does not look before or after competition like a bride, nobody expects that. The photo has been in Commons for half of year. This is our best photo about her. We should decline the request. Taivo (talk) 06:50, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
- Other versions "extracted from" info added, it's a crop. –Be..anyone 💩 14:16, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete As a courtesy to the lady. The expression is really terrible. --A.Savin 21:51, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete As A.Savin. I did not want this crop. -- Lothar Spurzem (talk) 11:36, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Per A.Savin. --Code (talk) 20:50, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per Savin.It doesn't encourge people to support our project if we keep unfavorable photos like this. // Martin K. (talk) 17:57, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
- A unfovarable portrait like this maybe considered a violation of personal rights Recht am eigenen Bild:
(2) Die Befugnis erstreckt sich jedoch nicht auf eine Verbreitung und Schaustellung, durch die ein berechtigtes Interesse des Abgebildeten [...] verletzt wird.
- And "not to look dumb" is for shure a legitimate interest of the person in the image. // Martin K. (talk) 18:17, 28 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:00, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photographs by Yıldız Yazıcıoğlu.
- File:Cizre after operation (2).jpg
- File:Cizre after operation.jpg
- File:YPG fighters (2).jpg
- File:HDP grup toplantısı 2 Şubat 2016.jpg
- File:Şırnak çatışması (9), Ekim 2015.jpg
- File:Şırnak çatışması (8), Ekim 2015.jpg
- File:Barış İçin Akademisyenler.jpg
- File:A boy while throwing stone.jpg
- File:Şırnak çatışması (7), Eylül 2015.jpg
- File:Şırnak çatışması çocuk cenaze töreni.jpg
- File:Şırnak çatışması (6), Eylül 2015.jpg
- File:2015 Şırnak ayaklanması.jpg
- File:DTK, HDK, DBP, HDP administrators 1 (cropped).jpg
- File:YDG-H (3).jpg
- File:YDG-H (2).jpg
- File:YDG-H.jpg
- File:HDP supporters marching to Cizre, 2015 (5).jpg
- File:HDP supporters marching to Cizre, 2015 (9).jpg
- File:Şırnak çatışması, Eylül 2015.jpg
- File:Şırnak çatışması (2), Eylül 2015.jpg
- File:Şırnak çatışması (3), Eylül 2015.jpg
- File:Şırnak çatışması (4), Eylül 2015.jpg
- File:Cizre, hendek, Ekim 2015.jpg
- File:Cizre, hendek, Ekim 2015 (2).jpg
- File:Şırnak çatışması, Eylül 2015.jpg
- File:HDP supporters marching to Cizre, 2015 (1).jpg
- File:HDP supporters marching to Cizre, 2015 (2).jpg
- File:HDP supporters marching to Cizre, 2015 (3).jpg
- File:HDP supporters marching to Cizre, 2015 (4).jpg
- File:HDP supporters marching to Cizre, 2015 (5).jpg
- File:HDP supporters marching to Cizre, 2015 (6).jpg
- File:HDP supporters marching to Cizre, 2015 (7).jpg
- File:HDP supporters marching to Cizre, 2015 (8).jpg
- File:HDP supporters marching to Cizre, 2015 (9).jpg
- File:HDP supporters marching to Cizre, 2015 (10).jpg
- File:HDP supporters marching to Cizre, 2015 (11).jpg
- File:HDP Cizre (1).jpg
- File:HDP Cizre (2).jpg
- File:HDP Cizre (3).jpg
- File:HDP Cizre (4).jpg
- File:HDP Cizre (5).jpg
- File:HDP Cizre (6).jpg
- File:HDP Cizre (7).jpg
- File:HDP Cizre (8).jpg
- File:HDP Cizre (9).jpg
- File:Kongreya Civaka Demokratîk 2015.jpg
- File:Mesut Tek 2015.jpg
- File:Partiya Sosyalîst a Kurdistan 2015.jpg
- File:PSK Mesut Tek 2015.jpg
- File:İdris Baluken & Ziya Pir, 2015.jpg
- File:İdris Baluken (cropped).jpg
- File:2016 Diyarbakır Bombing.jpg
- File:2016 Diyarbakır Bombing 1.jpg
- File:2016 Diyarbakır Bombing 2.jpg
- File:YDG-H members.jpg
- File:İmralı prison.jpg
- File:HDP Cizre (10).jpg
- File:HDP Cizre (11).jpg
- File:HDP Cizre (12).jpg
- File:Tahir Elçi.jpg
- File:Tahir Elçi (cropped).jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
,_Ekim_2015.jpg){kind=link}
,_Ekim_2015.jpg){kind=link}
,_Eyl%C3%BCl_2015.jpg){kind=link}
,_Eyl%C3%BCl_2015.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
,_Eyl%C3%BCl_2015.jpg){kind=link}
,_Eyl%C3%BCl_2015.jpg){kind=link}
,_Eyl%C3%BCl_2015.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Takabeg (talk) 03:05, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- All photos have Category:Photographs by Mahmut Bozarslan. He is a VOA photographer. Not "Yıldız Yazıcıoğlu"
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:03, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Incorrect structure: sodium is not covalently bound. Leyo 00:11, 17 December 2015 (UTC)
- This looks to have been changed. Though I would like to see the anion drawn more like what you see in File:Ammonium-acetate-3D-balls.png with a dotted line across the two oxygens. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 07:11, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Delete. It is "dangerously" misleading to show naked Na+ and the conformation, especially such slick graphics which implies advanced knowledge (but results from the opposite). --Smokefoot (talk) 13:32, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Kept: . . Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 23:39, 28 December 2015 (UTC)
Still lots of chemical mistakes. One Na looks within VDW radius of adjacent O, and even other is "closer" than covalent distance. This is an ionic substance, and (if I understand DOI:10.1107/S0108270183006587 correctly) the Na are not localized to one or the other O on a carboxylate. High-quality incorrect image provides deception of reliable content. Unused (pending-changes notwithstanding). DMacks (talk) 03:46, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per DMacks and Smokefoot above. The image is now orphaned. --Leyo 10:20, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:05, 29 April 2016 (UTC)
Uploaded as "own work" but is clearly a b&w picture-of-a-photograph originally published elsewhere. Brianhe (talk) 13:24, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per Brianhe; note that it's coming out on English Wikipedia at the moment that the uploader is inter alia a serial violator of file copyrights. BethNaught (talk) 17:43, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 20:12, 30 April 2016 (UTC)
Clear violation of copyright Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:40, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Checkingfax and GrammarFascist:
- To Whom it may concern:
- Please be so kind as to note that this image was originally posted to Flickr by owner Michael Laucke. He has generously made this file available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication with ALL RIGHTS WAIVED, as indicated on the file's Discussion page here as well as in several areas on the File page
- Notice by copyright holder states, "This file is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. The person who associated a work with this deed has dedicated the work to the public domain by waiving all of his or her rights to the work worldwide under copyright law; one can distribute, even modify the work, all without asking permission." Trusting everything is in order, I remain, with kind regards, cordially, --Natalie.Desautels (talk) 08:41, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- PS. Furthermore, the owner states that "The article was either purchased directly from the newspaper either online or from the microfiche archives. It is a work for hire, owned and paid for by Michael Laucke." Thank you once again for your kind attention. --Natalie.Desautels (talk) 08:56, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
@Checkingfax, GrammarFascist, Sainsf, and Natuur12:
Hello Hedwig in Washington. As you were very helpful in quickly resolving a copyright issue back in October 2015, I would like to again prevail upon your good nature to ask for help regarding this present copyright deletion request, here and here. Again, all copyright seems properly formed for this public domain work, with all rights waived including use of this work 'without asking permission'. I would greatly appreciate having your input on this if you have a moment; the objection presented seems to concern 'uploading' if I've understood correctly. PS. Thank you for your barnstar! It encouraged me to navigate the labyrinth and even led to a GA article I strongly contributed to! Merci! kindest regards, Natalie Natalie.Desautels (talk) 19:27, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
@Checkingfax, GrammarFascist, Sainsf, Natuur12, and Hedwig in Washington:
- PPS. I just noticed, and should make mention of the fact, that this is a OTRS verified and approuved account as of 8 October 2015. Thank you kindly, --Natalie.Desautels (talk) 22:29, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - licensing is in order on Flickr and on the Commons. Cheers!
{{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk}07:25, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: It is vanishingly unlikely that Michael Laucke is the copyright holder of a Saturday Gazette article written by Eric McLean. The Gazette's legal representatives should contact COM:OTRS to have this restored. --Storkk (talk) 14:37, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
No confidence that these images are own work of uploader. There are two of same (different sizes), two logos, but of all these photos, too many cameras, not enough consistency to be own work.
- File:Biblioteca pola.jpg deleted :come from [7] NC ND Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:46, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
- File:Banner wikipedia.jpg
- File:Edificio casa de cultura lugoes.jpg
- File:Casa de Cultura de lugones.jpg
- File:B con red.jpg
- File:Biblioteca de La Fresneda.jpg
- File:Centro lectura Santiago de Arenas.jpg
- File:Biblioteca de Lieres.jpg
- File:Biblioteca de El Berrón.jpg
- File:Biblioteca de Carbayín.jpg
- File:Sala Infantil Biblioteca de Lugones.jpg
- File:Biblioteca de Lugones.jpg
Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:52, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete all. Only 5 photos have camera data (4 different cameras). Taivo (talk) 08:03, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. User warned. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 19:37, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Same image (or other crops/resolutions) has been deleted thrice as a probable copyright violation, unlikely to be uploader's work as claimed. See: Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Prasenjit_Sen.jpg, Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Publication3.png, and Commons:Deletion_requests/File:Profsen.png Worldbruce (talk) 22:16, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Highly unlikely to be the uploader's work, as claimed. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 19:47, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you describe and categorize the file correctly? Taivo (talk) 07:18, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Unlikely to be the own work of the uploader as claimed. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 19:55, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 07:41, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Personal snapshot without realistic educational use. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 19:46, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
I do not believe, that the uploader is copyright holder, and I suspect, that the file is not published under free license. Taivo (talk) 07:59, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Not own work as claimed. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 19:43, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
This is tiny (119×115) photo without metadata. I suspect not own work, but copyright violation. In addition, Ed Sussman is probably non-notable person, so the photo is also out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:10, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Personal snapshot without realistic educational use. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 19:44, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is not a photo and does not look like 2012 work. Own work is in doubt. Who is real author and when (s)he died? Taivo (talk) 09:28, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: Photograph or scan of a halftone print. It is unlikely that the photographer owns the copyright in the original design. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 19:45, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
No source information, PD-USGov-Military can't be verified Msaynevirta (talk) 21:09, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Source information is required for all images. Without it the purported licence cannot be checked. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 20:37, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:DW of non-free copyrighted text. Unsure FoP exception as no evidence it is permanently installed. 185.50.215.116 21:48, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: under UK law the text attracts so-called "literary copyright", and having permission from the photographer is insufficient. It does not matter whether the notice is permanently located in a public place, or not, since in the UK the freedom of panorama exception does not apply to this type of work. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 20:29, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Unused personal photograph of a non-notable kid. As such this is out of project scope. De728631 (talk) 18:37, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Not useful for an educational purpose. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 19:40, 3 May 2016 (UTC)
Possible copyvio. There is no proof of {{PD-old}} and {{PD-US}}. Mustafa Barzani didn't visit Ohaio 70 years ago. Takabeg (talk) 08:43, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Depicted person was born in 1903, the photo is made somewhere on 1950-s. For anonymous works {{PD-Turkey}} demands 70 years from publishing, {{PD-Iraq}} 50 years. As first publishing country is unknown, there is also no known restore date. Taivo (talk) 09:07, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Storkk (talk) 16:34, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Per COM:FOP#Iraq. This statue was was built after the uprising of 1991 (Jalal Barzanji、Sabah A. Salih, Man in Blue Pyjamas: A Prison Memoir, University of Alberta, 2011, p. 84. ). Even if the sculptor had died just after the completion of this sculpture, rights of the creator was violated. Takabeg (talk) 08:57, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination: no freedom of panorama in Iraq. --Storkk (talk) 16:32, 5 May 2016 (UTC)
Delete There is no freedom of panorama in France per Commons:Freedom of panorama#France so while I don't know the artist of the sculpture, this 1945 sculpture is still in copyright for 70 years pma unless the artist died in 1945. Perhaps we can determine the artist so we can verify its copyright status. Ww2censor (talk) 15:02, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: Per nom. http://www.lalande2.com/pdf/cristal4.pdf (PDF p10), credits the sculpture to a Gironos Mileck, but unfortunately gives no further details. Google believes that this comment is now the third ocurrence of that name on the internet, so unfortunately the deathyear will probably remain unknown... If anyone does find the sculptor's deathyear, please categorize this DR into the appropriate undeletion category. --Storkk (talk) 09:25, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
Private image, not realitically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:38, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Can be cropped and used for illustration of beach. Taivo (talk) 07:58, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - we do have a far better picture of that beach. --Jcb (talk) 19:02, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Brahiim123 (talk · contribs)
[edit]Promotional
Laber□T 19:23, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Comment Wirex logo is used in en.wiki and therefore in scope. Taivo (talk) 09:10, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: two for no permission, kept the PD-ineligible logo which is in use and therefore in scope. --Jcb (talk) 18:57, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
Missing scope; description reads: "found in the basement of the building", title reads: "basement in Simeria" // Gikü said done Wednesday, 20 April 2016 19:36 (UTC) 19:36, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 18:59, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unused personal photo DNKA-Kaduna (talk) 06:03, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep - Unlike the other photos from this set, I think this one is usable. -mattbuck (Talk) 08:15, 2 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per matt. Riley Huntley (talk) 00:49, 5 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per Matt and Riley. Christian Ferrer (talk) 11:40, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-2){kind=link}
Should have clarified in previous DR. Unused personal photo with possible COM:IDENT issues. The photo was taken in Spain which has very strict laws about taking photos in public and publication. Secondly, the person is named in the description, and the photographer has removed ALL of their photos from Flickr. This indicates that consent to publish may not have been given, so best to delete this as COM:PRP 195.138.87.63 20:38, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: speedykept. --Jcb (talk) 20:56, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-3){kind=link}
Should have clarified in previous DR. Unused personal photo with possible COM:IDENT issues. The photo was taken in Spain which has very strict laws about taking photos in public and publication. Secondly, the person is named in the description, and the photographer has removed ALL of their photos from Flickr. This indicates that consent to publish may not have been given, so best to delete this as COM:PRP. Taivo could you perhaps look at this, instead of Jcb simply closing it...it could possibly have legal repercussions for me as the uploader 185.50.215.116 21:36, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep The photo is made in public place, where expectation of privacy is low. The person isn't even in bikinis, but wearing shirt. Her family name isn't mentioned in file description. If needed, even the first name can be removed from description. And in my opinion the woman isn't main object of the photo. Taivo (talk) 06:44, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep per Taivo and per previous DR. --Amitie 10g (talk) 00:16, 22 April 2016 (UTC)
- Speedy keep My vote is never limited to the nomination specifically, I always look for unmentioned reasoning to keep/delete. My vote remains the same as in the original nomination, the name "Naomi" in the description is not personally identifying and I see no other COM:IDENT issues. As discussed in the previous DRs, this photo meets COM:SCOPE. Riley Huntley (talk) 22:02, 25 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 18:58, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photographs by Yıldız Yazıcıoğlu.
- File:Beyaz Saray önünde Soma Faciası anma töreni (3).jpg
- File:Beyaz Saray önünde Soma Faciası anma töreni (4).jpg
- File:Beyaz Saray önünde Soma Faciası anma töreni (5).jpg
- File:Beyaz Saray önünde Soma Faciası anma töreni.jpg
- File:In front of the Soma State Hospital.jpg
- File:Mine rescue in Soma, Turkey.jpg
- File:Miners in Soma coal mine.jpg
- File:Soma, Don't forget!.jpg
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Takabeg (talk) 09:35, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:39, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photographs by Yıldız Yazıcıoğlu.
- File:CHP TÜSİAD panel discussion, November 2015 general election.jpg
- Affected: File:Faik Öztrak (cropped).jpg
- File:Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu statement after November 2015 general election (cropped).jpg
- File:Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu statement after November 2015 general election.jpg
- File:Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu, VOA.jpg
- File:Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu, VOA (cropped).jpg
- File:Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu VOA (cropped).jpg
- File:Kılıçdaroğlu (cropped).jpg
- File:Turkey coalition negotiations 2015, AKP-CHP (1).jpg
- File:Turkey coalition negotiations 2015, AKP-CHP (2).jpg
- File:Turkey coalition negotiations 2015, AKP-CHP (3).jpg
- File:Turkey coalition negotiations 2015, AKP-CHP (4).jpg
- File:Turkey coalition negotiations 2015, AKP-CHP (5).jpg
- File:Turkey coalition negotiations 2015, AKP-CHP (6).jpg
- File:Turkey coalition negotiations 2015, AKP-CHP (7).jpg
- File:Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu 2.jpg
- File:Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu 3 (cropped).jpg
- File:Turkish general election, 2015 - Republican People's Party - Ankara.jpg
- File:Kemal Kılıçdaroğlu and Recep Tayyip Erdoğan VOA.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
Takabeg (talk) 09:51, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:40, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Personal photo of a non notable person, used in a promotional sandbox article where he claims to be CEO etc Gbawden (talk) 09:53, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:41, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
per COM:OOS & COM:NOTHOST. Personal/Private photo(s). 大诺史 (talk) 15:56, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Gbawden (talk) 08:36, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photographs by Yıldız Yazıcıoğlu.
- File:Selahattin Demirtaş presidential campaign 2014.jpg
- File:Turkish general election, 2015 - Peoples' Democratic Party (Turkey) Celebration - Istanbul 3.jpg
- File:Selahattin Demirtaş 2015 in USA.jpg
- File:Selahattin Demirtaş 2015 in USA 1.jpg
- File:DTK, HDK, DBP, HDP administrators.jpg
- File:Figen Yüksekdağ Selahattin Demirtaş.jpg
- File:Figen Yüksekdağ Selahattin Demirtaş (cropped).jpg
- File:Figen Yuksekdag VOA.jpg
- File:Selma Irmak (cropped).jpg
- File:Selahattin Demirtaş (cropped).jpg
- File:DTK, HDK, DBP, HDP administrators 1.jpg
- File:Selahattin Demirtaş in August 2015.jpg
- File:Turkish general election, 2015 - Peoples' Democratic Party (Turkey) Selahattin Demirtaş.jpg
- File:Selahattin Demirtaş Paris rally 2015.jpg
- File:Selahattin Demirtaş 2015-12-18.jpg
- File:Selahattin Demirtaş (Cropped).jpg
- File:Selahattin Demirtaş.jpg
- File:Ertuğrul Kürkçü (cropped).jpg
- File:Hilmi Hacaloğlu and Ertuğrul Kürkçü.jpg
- File:Selahattin Demirtaş VOA (cropped).jpg
- File:Selahattin Demirtaş and Martin Schulz.jpg
_Celebration_-_Istanbul_3.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_Selahattin_Demirta%C5%9F.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Takabeg (talk) 10:15, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete As photographs published by VoA after June 2013 with a NC license. Kumkum (talk) 14:32, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:42, 10 May 2016 (UTC)
Peronal photo. Out of scope. -- Geagea (talk) 11:09, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:02, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of project scope, Commons is not a private photo album. ★ Poké95 11:20, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:03, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Eleonoraamosova (talk · contribs)
[edit]Professional photos found elsewhere on internet and magazine covers. Please send permission to COM:OTRS.
- File:Ghrb8714.JPG
- File:HB8A0487-web.jpg
- File:37hry.JPG
- File:FullSizeRender67889.jpg
- File:Элеонора Амосова.jpg
- File:F67832.jpg
- File:Unnamed675.jpg
- File:8290vh.JPG
- File:EA867.jpg
- File:XecQGsZrgCE.jpg
Rodrigolopes (talk) 11:39, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete all. I'll delete speedily magazine and book covers. Taivo (talk) 10:36, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:03, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Brettbelliveau (talk · contribs)
[edit]Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Comment MyMatrixx is not mentioned in en.wiki, but there exists en:HackerRank. In my opinion the logo is simple, but it is in en.wiki as fair use. Taivo (talk) 13:21, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:04, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:04, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Nitesh HUB (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://pune.mallsmarket.com/sites/default/files/photos/malls/NiteshHUB-KoregaonPark-4.jpg.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:19, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:04, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:05, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:23, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:05, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:05, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text documents of questionable notability.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:26, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:05, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Private reason. --Midnight Runner (talk) 13:49, 19 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Out of scope. --Stefan2 (talk) 14:28, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:06, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
unused personnal photo out of scope. Sismarinho (talk) 14:28, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. Riley Huntley (talk) 01:43, 26 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:06, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:29, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:06, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:30, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:06, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:06, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:07, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:07, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:07, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:07, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:07, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:07, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:08, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:08, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photographs by Yıldız Yazıcıoğlu.
- File:HDP press conference.jpg
- File:HDP delegates in Kobanî.jpg
- File:Peoples' Democratic Party electoral rally 2015 (HDP).jpg
- File:Kobanî protests in Turkey.jpg
- File:HDP protest.jpg
- File:Turkish general election Diyarbakır HDP rally poster.jpg
- File:HDP and AKP solution process negotiations.jpg
- File:Yalçın Akdoğan (cropped).jpg
- File:Yalçın Akdoğan.jpg
- File:Turkish general election, 2015 - Peoples' Democratic Party (Turkey) - Diyarbakır.jpg
- File:Turkish general election, 2015 - Peoples' Democratic Party (Turkey) - Diyarbakır 2.jpg
- File:Turkish general election, 2015 - Peoples' Democratic Party (Turkey) - Diyarbakır 3.jpg
- File:Turkish general election, 2015 - Peoples' Democratic Party (Turkey) - Diyarbakır 4.jpg
- File:Turkish general election, 2015 - Peoples' Democratic Party (Turkey) - Diyarbakır 5.jpg
- File:Turkish general election, 2015 - Peoples' Democratic Party (Turkey) - Diyarbakır 6.jpg
- File:Turkish general election, 2015 - Peoples' Democratic Party (Turkey) - Diyarbakır 7.jpg
- File:Turkish general election, 2015 - Peoples' Democratic Party (Turkey) - Diyarbakır 8.jpg
- File:Turkish general election, 2015 - Peoples' Democratic Party (Turkey) - Diyarbakır 9.jpg
- File:Turkish general election, 2015 - Peoples' Democratic Party (Turkey) Celebration - Istanbul.jpg
- File:Turkish general election, 2015 - Peoples' Democratic Party (Turkey) Celebration - Istanbul 2.jpg
- File:Turkish general election, 2015 - Peoples' Democratic Party (Turkey) Celebration - Istanbul 3.jpg
- File:Turkish general election, 2015 - Peoples' Democratic Party (Turkey) Celebration - Istanbul 4.jpg
- File:Turkish general election, 2015 - Peoples' Democratic Party (Turkey).jpg
- File:Turkish general election, 2015 - Peoples' Democratic Party (Turkey) 2.jpg
- File:Turkish general election, 2015 - Peoples' Democratic Party (Turkey) 3.jpg
- File:Turkish general election, 2015 - Peoples' Democratic Party (Turkey) - Diyarbakır Castle.jpg
- File:İbrahim Ayhan.jpg
- File:İdris Baluken November 2015 Turkish general election.jpg
- File:Osman Baydemir 2015 in Paris.jpg
- File:Osman Baydemir, 2014.jpg
- File:Baydemir & Mélenchon 2015.jpg
- File:Ziya Çalışkan.jpg
- File:Hasip Kaplan 2015.jpg
- File:Müslüm Doğan and Zeynep Altıok.jpg
- File:Müslüm Doğan and Zeynep Altıok (cropped).jpg
- File:Feleknas Uca Türkiye Büyük Millet Meclisi 23 June 2015.jpg
- File:Leyla Zana VOA.jpg
.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Diyarbak%C4%B1r.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Diyarbak%C4%B1r_2.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Diyarbak%C4%B1r_3.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Diyarbak%C4%B1r_4.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Diyarbak%C4%B1r_5.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Diyarbak%C4%B1r_6.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Diyarbak%C4%B1r_7.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Diyarbak%C4%B1r_8.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Diyarbak%C4%B1r_9.jpg){kind=link}
_Celebration_-_Istanbul.jpg){kind=link}
_Celebration_-_Istanbul_2.jpg){kind=link}
_Celebration_-_Istanbul_4.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
_2.jpg){kind=link}
_3.jpg){kind=link}
_-_Diyarbak%C4%B1r_Castle.jpg){kind=link}
.jpg){kind=link}
Takabeg (talk) 14:56, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Per previous DR (photographs of VoA taken after June 2013 with a NC license). Same problem, same effect. Kumkum (talk) 14:43, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:09, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal photo Laber□T 15:11, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:16, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Out of scope Laber□T 15:11, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:16, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Unused personal image Laber□T 15:13, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:17, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
out of scope, nudity of low quality, personal photo Pippobuono (talk) 10:54, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- Keep Kargaltsev often uses himself as a model, along with casual photographs taken by polaroid or camera phone to give an insight into his life and work in New York. These photographs range from intimate personal shots to posed compositions and are often homoerotic, political, or provocatively sexual. All types and quality of photograph feature in his gallery exhibitions and publications. Refer to Category:Kargaltsev deletion requests. --Fæ (talk) 18:53, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete Unused, horrible quality cell phone picture that happens to be of nudity. Redundant to all the other images either of or by Sasha Kargaltsev we already have. Easily replaceable by any number of other files. I picked File:Jumper (18030424354).jpg out at random, which even retains some of the nudity (there are plenty of others comparable). Commons isn't a mirror of everything Sasha Kargaltsev has ever posted. There is simply no realistic hope of educational use of this particular photo (even if we consider "common photographic mistakes" or "how not to take an image" as a realistic educational use, this one would fail). This file gives no "insight" into Sasha Kargaltsev's life in New York or creative process, certainly not that the other files of his don't already do. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 22:19, 6 May 2016 (UTC)
- Keep File clearly in scope, per FAE statements. The only "argument" the deletion requesters can bring is that this image shows a men naked, giving no explanation why is this file is out of scope, except this file is out of scope because is out of scope or this file is not educational (why, thay fail to explain) or this file is out of scope because nudity (and it offends me, so delete it). Tm (talk) 13:19, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- You seem to misunderstand my argument. That this individual is nude does limit its usefulness as an image for third parties, but that's just window dressing that provides a hook via COM:PENIS; contrary to your confused lamentations, the presence of genitals in this image is not the sole, or even primary reason for deleting it. The problem with this image is, as I thoroughly explain above thoroughly rebutting Fae's boilerplate (which you have adopted as well, evidently without considering the actual merits of this image), is that it's crap quality, isn't a prominent work of this person, isn't a test shot of a prominent work, does absolutely nothing to illustrate this gentleman's work, his life, or his creative process. It's a nude without context. We have images of this man, nudes of this man, and many images that far better depict his life and work. This is a blurry, cell phone image of nudity with a confrontational framing, no context, and which is easily replaced by other images of this man of the same quality. It hits every single point in COM:PENIS. Commons is not a repository of every minor piece of work by every single artist ever. To closing admin: Please consider discounting the votes that are solely based on boilerplate arguments that every work by this individual is in scope, rather than actual arguments that strike the substance of this image. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 14:43, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- This looks like progress, as you have put aside COM:Nudity as irrelevant and focused on your assessment of image quality. You are welcome to your personal views, but there is no policy on Commons to delete works of established artists if we have other examples that some might feel are more representative of their works. As an example, there are 19,000 works documented for William Turner, yet nobody would suggest we limit hosting copies of Turner's works to the first 1,000 and deleting the rest. Kargaltsev is highly unusual as an established LGBT artist and director who is prepared to freely release his works, yet makes a living by selling prints of the same works. Just because one artist is dead and the other still living is not grounds to apply different versions of project scope. --Fæ (talk) 14:53, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- I'm struggling to understand how the fact that this gentleman is living, or an LGBT artist, is at all relevant to the quality of this image or its reasonable hope of educational use. Everything in policy rails against this. This image is simply not useable. If at some point in the future this image is demonstrated as a test shot for some noteworthy work, there would be nothing to stop it from being reuploaded. Neither COM:SCOPE nor COM:PENIS provide a carve-out simply because the creator is a notable person. "Other crap exists" is a surprising argument to hear out of someone so experienced. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 15:18, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- Hang on, you said above that nudity was not your problem with this image, yet you are repeatedly relying on COM:Nudity. Could you put your viewpoint from the same grounds rather than stand on shifting sands? The image can be used to illustrate presentations about the artist, as far as I'm aware there are no similar images of nude men in this posture, so it can be used to illustrate male nudes in this way, and it can be used to illustrate Kargalsev's use of different photographic methods as part of his work. These are solid grounds to justify realistic educational value, especially for uses outside of Wikimedia projects. Though you have assumed that mobile phone images must be test shots, if you were to research Kargaltsev's work you would realise that his Polaroids, mobile shots and screen grabs from his video work, all become part of his gallery exhibitions and book publications. As for the relevance of him being an LGBT artist, it would be naive to presume that the fact that his works use nudity and homosexuality in a provocative way, is irrelevant to why we see a pattern of deletion requests for these uploads, especially when compared to the rare deletion requests for images in my other upload projects, including those that have images and depictions of nude people and sexual organs. --Fæ (talk) 15:43, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- I never said COM:PENIS was irrelevant. It's not necessary, but it provides a sufficient basis for deletion here. If you'll look above at my first comment, you'll see that I have actually looked extensively at this gentleman's work. Some of it is magical, much is beautiful, many show an irreverence, but all have a good quality, even a lo-fi/lomographic quality. This image has none of these things. I could honestly argue that this image does the rest of his work an injustice. Back to the merits of this image, the fact that an image could be used by someone, somewhere, hypothetically to illustrate something—whether a picture of a scrotum with hair exactly 1/2 inch long, or a picture of common photographic mistakes—is not traditionally an acceptable argument for why an image should be considered in scope. The prominence of the artist is, honestly, a distraction. This is an image that poorly depicts the artist, poorly depicts his genitals, poorly depicts his body, and poorly depicts his ceiling. It is not illustrative of his art style in a comprehendable manner. This is not the sort of image Commons is supposed to host. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 16:36, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- Hang on, you said above that nudity was not your problem with this image, yet you are repeatedly relying on COM:Nudity. Could you put your viewpoint from the same grounds rather than stand on shifting sands? The image can be used to illustrate presentations about the artist, as far as I'm aware there are no similar images of nude men in this posture, so it can be used to illustrate male nudes in this way, and it can be used to illustrate Kargalsev's use of different photographic methods as part of his work. These are solid grounds to justify realistic educational value, especially for uses outside of Wikimedia projects. Though you have assumed that mobile phone images must be test shots, if you were to research Kargaltsev's work you would realise that his Polaroids, mobile shots and screen grabs from his video work, all become part of his gallery exhibitions and book publications. As for the relevance of him being an LGBT artist, it would be naive to presume that the fact that his works use nudity and homosexuality in a provocative way, is irrelevant to why we see a pattern of deletion requests for these uploads, especially when compared to the rare deletion requests for images in my other upload projects, including those that have images and depictions of nude people and sexual organs. --Fæ (talk) 15:43, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- I'm struggling to understand how the fact that this gentleman is living, or an LGBT artist, is at all relevant to the quality of this image or its reasonable hope of educational use. Everything in policy rails against this. This image is simply not useable. If at some point in the future this image is demonstrated as a test shot for some noteworthy work, there would be nothing to stop it from being reuploaded. Neither COM:SCOPE nor COM:PENIS provide a carve-out simply because the creator is a notable person. "Other crap exists" is a surprising argument to hear out of someone so experienced. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 15:18, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- This looks like progress, as you have put aside COM:Nudity as irrelevant and focused on your assessment of image quality. You are welcome to your personal views, but there is no policy on Commons to delete works of established artists if we have other examples that some might feel are more representative of their works. As an example, there are 19,000 works documented for William Turner, yet nobody would suggest we limit hosting copies of Turner's works to the first 1,000 and deleting the rest. Kargaltsev is highly unusual as an established LGBT artist and director who is prepared to freely release his works, yet makes a living by selling prints of the same works. Just because one artist is dead and the other still living is not grounds to apply different versions of project scope. --Fæ (talk) 14:53, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- You seem to misunderstand my argument. That this individual is nude does limit its usefulness as an image for third parties, but that's just window dressing that provides a hook via COM:PENIS; contrary to your confused lamentations, the presence of genitals in this image is not the sole, or even primary reason for deleting it. The problem with this image is, as I thoroughly explain above thoroughly rebutting Fae's boilerplate (which you have adopted as well, evidently without considering the actual merits of this image), is that it's crap quality, isn't a prominent work of this person, isn't a test shot of a prominent work, does absolutely nothing to illustrate this gentleman's work, his life, or his creative process. It's a nude without context. We have images of this man, nudes of this man, and many images that far better depict his life and work. This is a blurry, cell phone image of nudity with a confrontational framing, no context, and which is easily replaced by other images of this man of the same quality. It hits every single point in COM:PENIS. Commons is not a repository of every minor piece of work by every single artist ever. To closing admin: Please consider discounting the votes that are solely based on boilerplate arguments that every work by this individual is in scope, rather than actual arguments that strike the substance of this image. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 14:43, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
- All the above reduces to "not illustrative of [Kargaltsev's] art style" based on a subjective viewpoint, especially as it was early on confirmed that nudity was not a "primary reason for deleting". That an image might be subjectively less "illustrative" of an artist's work compared to others at this moment hosted on Commons, is not a rationale for deleting a correctly licensed and sourced photograph. --Fæ (talk) 16:49, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- Actually, my argument is that the image is not in scope. For example, it runs afoul of COM:PENIS. You have attempted to rebut that argument by arguing (on a subjective basis) that this image is illustrative of the gentleman's art style, or life, or something else nebulous. I have countered that argument by pointing out the objective flaws in your claim that this is illustrative of his art style. Conclusory statements that there is an anti-LGBT bias is interesting, but a distraction. There are tens of images of this man, or by this man, on Commons, including many full body nudes. The presence of those images weakens the argument that keeping this image is somehow necessary to illustrate something about this man or his art. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 17:04, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- Really, you are too smart, the fact is that this image is just shit, but Kargaltsev's shit does not stink, why ? Pippobuono (talk) 08:18, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Actually, my argument is that the image is not in scope. For example, it runs afoul of COM:PENIS. You have attempted to rebut that argument by arguing (on a subjective basis) that this image is illustrative of the gentleman's art style, or life, or something else nebulous. I have countered that argument by pointing out the objective flaws in your claim that this is illustrative of his art style. Conclusory statements that there is an anti-LGBT bias is interesting, but a distraction. There are tens of images of this man, or by this man, on Commons, including many full body nudes. The presence of those images weakens the argument that keeping this image is somehow necessary to illustrate something about this man or his art. —/Mendaliv/2¢/Δ's/ 17:04, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
- All the above reduces to "not illustrative of [Kargaltsev's] art style" based on a subjective viewpoint, especially as it was early on confirmed that nudity was not a "primary reason for deleting". That an image might be subjectively less "illustrative" of an artist's work compared to others at this moment hosted on Commons, is not a rationale for deleting a correctly licensed and sourced photograph. --Fæ (talk) 16:49, 7 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination - this file is a personal low quality out of scope picture, the eventual appearance of a human male reproductive system does not change that. --Jcb (talk) 22:49, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
.jpg){kind=link}
selfie and personal photos, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 13:23, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:41, 11 May 2016 (UTC)
Not own work and a bad date. The license, author, date, name and description needs to be clarified or delete. More high-quality signed original: http://oi47.tinypic.com/2hi6ued.jpg --sasha (krassotkin) 06:19, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: dubious source and author. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:14, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used (Wikipedia Zero upload). Gunnex (talk) 08:05, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:15, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Copyright © Fengfeng Shi. All rights reserved. https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/shellcraft/id1061505434?mt=12 Lacrymocéphale (talk) 08:32, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: unused promotional logo. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:16, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Copyright © Fengfeng Shi. All rights reserved. https://itunes.apple.com/us/app/shellcraft/id1061505434?mt=12 Lacrymocéphale (talk) 08:48, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: unused promotional logo. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:17, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
The uploader is not the creator of this picture (he uploaded many images from websites with rights reserved) Hercule (talk) 10:01, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:18, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Lower resolution duplicate of File:Overhead view of Hurst Castle.jpg Waggers (talk) 10:01, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:19, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
The uploader is not the creator of this picture (he uploaded many images from websites with rights reserved) Hercule (talk) 10:02, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:19, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
The uploader is not the creator of this picture (he uploaded many images from websites with rights reserved) Hercule (talk) 10:02, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:19, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
The uploader is not the creator of this picture (he uploaded many images from websites with rights reserved) Hercule (talk) 10:03, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:19, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
The uploader is not the creator of this picture (he uploaded many images from websites with rights reserved) Hercule (talk) 10:03, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:20, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
The uploader is not the creator of this picture (he uploaded many images from websites with rights reserved) Hercule (talk) 10:04, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:20, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
The uploader is not the creator of this picture (he uploaded many images from websites with rights reserved) Hercule (talk) 10:04, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:20, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
The uploader is not the creator of this picture (he uploaded many images from websites with rights reserved) Hercule (talk) 10:04, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:20, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
It appears to be a copyright violation due to the presence of a watermark Yohannvt (talk) 12:09, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:22, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
unused logo of questionable notability, out of scope Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:50, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:23, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Redundant: unused low resolution version of → File:SVG black joker.svg (or File:Black jokers.jpeg). ↔ User: Perhelion 13:18, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
{{vk}}, stick to the party line, please, there were lots of uses (now all replaced) some hours ago, and {{vva}} helps to find the better version (dewiki background.) –Be..anyone 💩 13:27, 20 April 2016 (UTC) edited: see better uploader suggestion below. 15:39, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete, but keep redirect to "File:SVG black joker.svg".
Please do not delete this file until "de:File:Joker Icon.png" has been deleted.done --Soluvo (talk) 15:22, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, please delete it. I uploaded it, but it's just trash by now. --Trickstar (talk) 13:05, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: and redirected per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:24, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
copyrighted photo of Eleven Media Group. Watermark is clearly seen in the photo. [8] Ninja✮Strikers «☎» 14:11, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:25, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
unlikely user's own work. possibility comes from Facebook Ninja✮Strikers «☎» 03:25, 26 September 2017 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 T★C 10:59, 4 October 2017 (UTC)
not a user's own work. watermark of Eleven Media Group is clearly seen in the photo. cropped version of File:M Zaw Rain.jpg. Ninja✮Strikers «☎» 14:13, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:25, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
en:Ajay Kumar does not mention that person. Probably non-notable person, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 14:18, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:26, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://usatthebiglead.files.wordpress.com/2016/03/lance-stephenson.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 14:27, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Copyrighted photo, the work of professional photographer Chelsea Werner. Binksternet (talk) 14:39, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:36, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://www.bankwebinars.com/Content/images/presenters/peterson.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:38, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/519978037199126529/83qFCJ9X.jpeg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:38, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:48, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: questionable source and author. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:40, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Paulo Pará (talk · contribs)
[edit]- File:Selena Gomez performance at The Today Show.jpg
- File:Selena Gomez para a Pantene.jpg
- File:Selena Gomez performance at American Music Awards 2015.jpg
- File:Selena Gomez e Josh Hutcherson em In Dubious Battle.jpg
- File:Selena Gomez e Courtney Solomon em Getaway.jpg
- File:Selena Gomez performance at MTV Movie Awards 2013.jpg
Dudek1337 (talk) 15:14, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Comment should the Flickr user that uploaded this (141932138@N06) go on the bad authors list? Elisfkc (talk) 17:05, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Yes, he should. Just to avoid cases like this in future Dudek1337 (talk) 17:43, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Hello! I would like to clarify about this user, which I think add it on this list does not help, it is accurate that it will continue making mistakes.
He did not hear anyone in the Portuguese Wikipedia, where he posted these images as if they were restricted content. I think it would be better to block it here, because it will send more pictures if we do not take offers. Only warning, but if you do not want to do that, fine, but know that it will continue sending those images and making these errors, without going to the right spot. --JeanVitorSouza (talk) 23:25, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- I blocked Paulo Pará for a year. Taivo (talk) 10:11, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:42, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
File:Tina Downham - Portrait, Wedding & Commercial Photographer - Monochrome 17th April 2016.jpg
[edit]
Small unused personal photo, out of project scope. Claimed to be a selfie – due to small size and missing metadata that's not sure, maybe real photographer's copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 15:14, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:42, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
according to the uploader she is not the photographer but that the photographer Cammila has allowed it being used. It is also found already on other pages. So the uploader data is incorrect and a proper permission is not sent to OTRS Yger (talk) 16:15, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete also file:Martin linder 2 foto camillasvensk webb.jpg Taivo (talk) 10:20, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9 ✉ 16:44, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Vitalie Ciugureanu (talk · contribs)
[edit]Unlikely own work. Maybe PD, but more evidences are needed.
- File:Victor Antonescu2.jpg
- File:Theodor Mihali.jpg
- File:Delegaţia la Iaşi.jpg
- File:Daniel Ciugureanu2.jpg
Rodrigolopes (talk) 10:46, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Also nominating
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:20, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
(C) 2015 http://gagauziainvest.md/ Gbawden (talk) 12:40, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:21, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
File:2015-11-19 13th international up-and-coming film festival in Hannover (1041) nur eine von tausenden von Dokumentarfotografien - und Video-Drehs.JPG
[edit]_nur_eine_von_tausenden_von_Dokumentarfotografien_-_und_Video-Drehs.JPG&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
_nur_eine_von_tausenden_von_Dokumentarfotografien_-_und_Video-Drehs.JPG&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
COM:DW of copyright protected work. Steinsplitter (talk) 12:44, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 22:21, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Files uploaded by Tomwsanchez (talk · contribs)
[edit]Modern art. I think painter identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.
- File:Untitled, 2015, ink on mylar, 75x53".jpg
- File:"Every now. And again." 2011, Hammer Museum, Los Angeles, CA ink on wall.jpg
EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:13, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Comment There is a ticket for these two images at [9]. File:"Every now. And again." 2011, Hammer Museum, Los Angeles, CA ink on wall.jpg has been temporarily undeleted so I can show the image to the artist so that she can ask the photographer for permission. --Rrburke (talk) 14:47, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Comment File:Linn_Meyers,_Every_now._And_again._(Detail),_2011.jpg should probably be added to this list, because it appears to be a scaled-down version of File:"Every now. And again." 2011, Hammer Museum, Los Angeles, CA ink on wall.jpg. --Rrburke (talk) 14:49, 21 April 2016 (UTC)
,_2011.jpg){kind=link}
Kept: File:Untitled, 2015, ink on mylar, 75x53".jpg - file has OTRS permission --Jcb (talk) 22:22, 12 May 2016 (UTC)
Published elsewhere without a free license, e.g., http://www.nytimes.com/2015/06/17/us/anne-gaylor-passionate-atheist-is-dead-at-88.html?_r=0 where it's credited to Paul J. Gaylor. --ghouston (talk) 06:04, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- The license for this photo belongs to the Freedom From Religion Foundation, who provided it to the NYT for the obit. Anne Gaylor founded FFRF, Paul Gaylor was her husband. NYT captioned the photo incorrectly, Paul took the photo, but it belongs to FFRF. I uploaded this photo at the request of FFRF creating an account, AndrewFFRF, belonging to FFRF to upload other files for use in articles. I have not edited any content of articles, but am simply providing files. Not only am I an employee of FFRF, but an attorney for FFRF. There is no copyright issue here. Unsigned edit by User:AndrewFFRF
- Please follow the instructions at Commons:OTRS to resolve this. Thuresson (talk) 21:48, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:44, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
No proof that the uploader holds the copyright of the photograph. Same with the author (S. Sen) —Vensatry (Ping me) 09:24, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:43, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
-ce99a5ad34.jpg&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
-ce99a5ad34.jpg&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
-ce99a5ad34.jpg){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:43, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
-ce99a5ad34.jpg){kind=link}
Probable copyvio Sismarinho (talk) 14:18, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:43, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
OTRS-permission from author and copyright holder Marjolaine Roland is needed. Taivo (talk) 14:23, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:43, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
File description says, that this is not own work, only own photo. There is no freedom of panorama in India for 2-dimensional art. Maybe the file is in public domain due to age, but for that author and his/her death year must be given. Taivo (talk) 14:29, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:42, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:42, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:39, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
The date of origin and the source are incorrect or irrelevant as it has (John Maloof) no legally rights to publish this and other photographs from the originator.-----hoep (talk) 16:34, 24 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:42, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Historical drawing. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:41, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Unauthorized derivative of copyrighted artwork czar 15:28, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:41, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Unauthorized derivative of copyrighted artwork czar 15:29, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:41, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
also file:Vijayakanth cropped.jpg
There is no freedom of panorama in India for photos. The photo is not de minimis. Taivo (talk) 15:36, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:41, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Naughty Jeffrey as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Author or uploader request deletion. The file has been 2½ months in Commons and I do not see problems with the file. Maybe we should not grant courtesy deletion. Taivo (talk) 15:48, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - Image from NASA. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:41, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Naughty Jeffrey as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Author or uploader request deletion. The file has been in Commons 2½ months. Maybe we should decline courtesy deletion. Taivo (talk) 16:04, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - Image from NASA. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:40, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Naughty Jeffrey as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Author or uploader request deletion. The file has been in Commons 2½ months. Maybe we should decline courtesy deletion. Taivo (talk) 16:05, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion - Image from NASA. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:40, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
This file was initially tagged by Naughty Jeffrey as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Author or uploader request deletion. The file has been in Commons 1½ months. Maybe we should decline courtesy deletion. Taivo (talk) 16:06, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Kept: no valid reason for deletion: Image is from NASA. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:40, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.
- File:A világ egy nagy misztikum.jpg
- File:Az ember csak por az idő tengerében.jpg
- File:Gondolkodóm az élet értelmén.jpg
Ies (talk) 16:24, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Jocika169 answer
[edit]What why?
I mean i 'now that these images are not the best qualites but i have the right to preserve my privacy!
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:40, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Stepan Beketov is not mentioned neither in en.wiki, nor in ru.wiki. The photo seems to be out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 16:28, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Info Unused photo. Uploader has not edited any Wikimedia project so far ([10]). Thuresson (talk) 21:58, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:39, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
Unlikely to be own work: older and higher resolution versions exist Xochiztli (talk) 16:33, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:39, 14 May 2016 (UTC)
It's not the own work of Konivitch, but a non free logo. See fr:File:Logo_SCO_Angers.svg Hercule (talk) 08:07, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Delete This is not a simple logo. Taivo (talk) 07:05, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:18, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
.png&action=edit&redlink=1){kind=link}
.png&action=edit§ion=T-1){kind=link}
This is not only composed of simple geomectrics, there is also shading Hercule (talk) 08:16, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 13:30, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
.png){kind=link}
This had an automatic speedy tag on it due to a license tag it was uploaded with. As it's credited to Miami Dade Police Dept, which I think is credible, it might be {{PD-FLGov}}. I've applied that template. Note, however, the Exif credits nytimes. Storkk (talk) 10:36, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence for PD-FLGov. --Jcb (talk) 18:14, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Clear violation of copyright Walter Görlitz (talk) 05:40, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- No indication that the copyright holder has allowed the uploader to do so. Walter Görlitz (talk) 06:00, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Checkingfax and GrammarFascist:
- To Whom it may concern:
- Please be so kind as to note that this image was originally posted to Flickr by owner Michael Laucke. He has generously made this file available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication with ALL RIGHTS WAIVED, as indicated on the file's Discussion page here as well as in several areas on the File page
- Notice by copyright holder states, "This file is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication. The person who associated a work with this deed has dedicated the work to the public domain by waiving all of his or her rights to the work worldwide under copyright law; one can distribute, even modify the work, all without asking permission." kind regards, cordially, --Natalie.Desautels (talk) 08:41, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- PS. Furthermore, the owner states that "The article was either purchased directly from the newspaper either online or from the microfiche archives. It is a work for hire, owned and paid for by Michael Laucke." Thank you once again for your kind attention. --Natalie.Desautels (talk) 08:57, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- @Checkingfax, GrammarFascist, Sainsf, Natuur12, and Hedwig in Washington:
- PPS. I just noticed, and should make mention of the fact, that this is a OTRS verified and approuved account as of 8 October 2015. Thank you kindly, --Natalie.Desautels (talk) 22:26, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Keep - licensing is in order on Flickr and on the Commons. Cheers!
{{u|Checkingfax}} {Talk}07:28, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: no evidence of permission - obtaining a copy of a newspaper page does not make you the copyright holder. --Jcb (talk) 19:19, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
The uploader is not the creator of this logo (he uploaded many logos from websites with rights reserved) Hercule (talk) 10:00, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Comment per {{PD-Algeria}} the logo is in public domain, if published before 1948. Taivo (talk) 09:32, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
- This logo was in use beginning from 1989, see here - Jcb (talk) 19:23, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 19:23, 15 May 2016 (UTC)
Although the uploader claims "self" ({{cc-by-sa-2.5}}), but it's very clear that he/she is not the composer, poet, performer of this march. Takabeg (talk) 08:30, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- When the march was created? Who are the authors? Maybe the march is in public domain due to age? Taivo (talk) 08:34, 23 April 2016 (UTC)
Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:30, 16 May 2016 (UTC)
Files in Category:Temp. cat for 2013030310005101
[edit]As per my comment regarding ticket:2013030310005101 on https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard&oldid=193872029#request_permissions_verification_image_of_Cameron_Townsend:
The ticket (ticket:2013030310005101) does not specify a license, just a statement that any and all images already on the internet can be used without permission. That statement does not [explicitly] allow for adoptations, which thereby fails our licensing policy.
- Info Pinging ticket agent Jcb who approved this ticket.
- File:Lazaro Cardenas and W. C. Townsend.jpg
- File:Townsend4.jpeg
- File:William C. und Elaine Townsend-in Peru.jpg
- File:William Cameron Townsend6.jpg
Josve05a (talk) 02:51, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- Don't remember exactly based on what circumstances I approved this ticket. Sometimes there is more to see in other messages from the same sender. In this case I assume the acceptance was based on the acceptance of ticket:2013030110010064 about 4 different pictures from the same series. Jcb (talk) 15:31, 20 April 2016 (UTC)
- I have received the official approval to use all the pictures on the SIL website and elswhere. There is no need for further permissions. In other words: What kind of permission are you looking for, after the headquarter of the organisation sent an e-mail stating that all pictures related to Cameron Townsend can be used unfettered? --Theophilus77 (talk) 12:50, 8 May 2016 (UTC)
- Info Pinging ticket agent Jcb who approved this ticket. It has been another period of time since last activity on this, is there clarity? Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:34, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- The permission was approved by @Krd: in ticket:2013030110010064. It's less explicit than we would accept now, but for our 2013 practice it looks good enough. Jcb (talk) 21:26, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
- That's not correct, 2013030110010064 does not contain any valid permission, but I have kept the 4 mentioned images for dewiki only / not commons capable as some kind of pd-old. The actual permission, later used for the images at dewiki before they have been reuploaded to Commons, is in ticket:2013030510010986. Please verify. --Krd 06:38, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- That ticket covers some specific files, but it's not always visible which files, because some of them are dead links. The ticket at least covers File:William_Cameron_Townsend6.jpg with a valid license. Jcb (talk) 15:09, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- That's not correct, 2013030110010064 does not contain any valid permission, but I have kept the 4 mentioned images for dewiki only / not commons capable as some kind of pd-old. The actual permission, later used for the images at dewiki before they have been reuploaded to Commons, is in ticket:2013030510010986. Please verify. --Krd 06:38, 18 May 2016 (UTC)
- The permission was approved by @Krd: in ticket:2013030110010064. It's less explicit than we would accept now, but for our 2013 practice it looks good enough. Jcb (talk) 21:26, 17 May 2016 (UTC)
Kept: per discussion. --Krd 10:14, 11 June 2016 (UTC)