Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/04/03

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive April 3rd, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. This image is from Palestine not Balochistan. It was already available atleast at these websites: [1] [2] [3] [4] TripWire (talk) 00:22, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:03, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not enough proof of ownership. I'm pretty sure this professional photograph was not uploaded by the owner. Augustine Dream (talk) 02:30, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 05:03, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation eien20 (talk) 11:17, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: as copyvio. --Jcb (talk) 12:29, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Strength honour (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This user has had two dozen images deleted that were claimed to be fair use or own work. These are posters or logos of a TV show. We have no evidence that this is anything but the enthusiasm of a fan.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:29, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi there (Jameslwoodward), I'm still new to this and apologise if my pictures were lacking info. I'm the creator of the images uploaded, how can I restore / provide evidence as required? I have sent an email for Declaration of consent for all enquiries to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. Thank you so much for your help.

Strength honour (talk) 12:59, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept Withdrawn by nom. Ticket:2016040310001661 .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:12, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 08:55, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Odder: Out of project scope

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality nonsense image uploaded to vandalize in en:Leonard Holliday. Not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 10:28, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Low quality nonsense image uploaded to vandalize in en:Leonard Holliday. Not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, out of scope, promotional.

Although Wikipedia may or may not have an article about this subject/company/organization, this logo is promotional in nature while unused. Josve05a (talk) 00:35, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I do not like logos, which consist phone numbers. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 07:08, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Caratula_del_album_"DUEÑA_DE_MI_VIDA".j Andy y mauro (talk) 02:56, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 08:06, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

commercial advertising Romanophile (talk) 04:18, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, plain advertising, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:10, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement. Jardel @lves talk 04:36, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, copyrighted cover, not own work. Taivo (talk) 08:18, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A collage of presumably non-free images. Each image needs a source and license before we can host this collage. Diannaa (talk) 18:15, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ellin Beltz: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A collage of presumably non-free images. Each image needs a source and license before we can host this collage. Diannaa (talk) 18:26, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ellin Beltz: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of the United Nations.svg. Fry1989 eh? 18:40, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 07:47, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image --ghouston (talk) 04:48, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, also self-promotion (facebook and Twitter addresses). Taivo (talk) 08:54, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

appears to be a juvenile, image can be considered a privacy violation of parents are not aware of image. would need otrc to show its an adult. Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:03, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:12, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Out of scope file. Riley Huntley (talk) 06:25, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, in scope, but I'll delete speedily all his contributions, because they are found on external sites with earlier date. Copyright violations. Files have English text, but uploader is a Mongol. Filenames and descriptions are gibberish. Taivo (talk) 09:38, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Out of scope file. Riley Huntley (talk) 06:26, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, copy of file:Baagi24.png. Taivo (talk) 09:44, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Out of scope file. Non-notable Riley Huntley (talk) 06:34, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete also copies of that file:Dokodemo logo.jpg and file:Dokodemo.logo.jpg. They surpass threshold of originality. Taivo (talk) 10:30, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Out of scope file. Riley Huntley (talk) 06:36, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete speedily all her uploads. Small photos and mostly without metadata. Two files have camera data and both with "All rights reserved" in EXIF. Some collages, where single photos are not identified. All copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 10:41, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

possible copyright problem Sakhalinio (talk) 07:00, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete also file:Torku arena helikopter.jpg. Small photos without metadata, watermark, the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 11:01, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wisneyo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status, out of COM:SCOPE.

Steinsplitter (talk) 19:33, 23 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 13:16, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 07:35, 3 April 2016 (UTC) Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.[reply]

Ies (talk) 07:38, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 07:59, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 08:01, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:04, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wisneyo (talk · contribs) (2)

[edit]

Pokéfan95's request

[edit]

Out of project scope, Commons is not a private photo album. Also a Wikipedia Zero upload.

Poké95 09:42, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Gunnex's request

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used (Wikipedia Zero upload). Uploader blocked on testwiki.

Gunnex (talk) 06:57, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Also:

and all further uploads by this user. See also logs. Block already requested. Gunnex (talk) 08:43, 12 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jim. Poké95 06:07, 20 April 2016 (UTC) (non-admin close)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wisneyo (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

Davey2010Talk 03:21, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedy. ~riley (talk) 03:33, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, unused image of a sort of advertisement. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:45, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, in addition copyright violation of text author and photographer. Now are all his contributions deleted. Taivo (talk) 11:12, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There are another file in previously uploaded. ~ Moheen (talk) 11:04, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, copy of file:Edward Thomas Devine circa 1915.jpg. Taivo (talk) 09:41, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tres1394 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering also Commons:Deletion requests/File:BPD.jpg and (all files mostly uploaded on 24.03.2016):


Gunnex (talk) 08:07, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete For File:Dyngus Day Promotion.jpg because it's a derivative work identical to this image posted over a year ago [5]. I'm not smart enough to detect the copyright notice but unless the uploader can provide proof of ownership I think that image has to be deleted.

 Delete For File:911flag3495 090911.jpg per nom, unless uploader can provide proof of ownership using COM:OTRS. However, at the bottom of the page provided by Gunnex [6] we read "Submitted by: Office of Public Relations", but I don't know if that's good enough information for the file to be kept with Template:PD-USGov. I would delete the file unless the uploader defends the image in a convincing manner.

 Delete For File:Dyngus Day Way.jpg per source found by Gunnex. That article was published the same day the file was uploaded to Commons. I assume the uploader read the article and then uploaded the image. I can't imagine that the article was written and the picture on Commons was found the same day of upload to add it to the article.

 Comment The other image, File:Engine 34.jpg, is the only one that I couldn't track down online from a source independent of Wikipedia or Commons, but given the pattern with the other pictures, I think the uploader must prove ownership or provide permission to upload that photo. I believe the assumption of good faith no longer applies to him or her. Dontreader (talk) 23:09, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:54, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self promotion, unknown 'artist' Pippobuono (talk) 08:12, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, en:Bernard Williams (disambiguation) does not mention any artists. Small unused photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:42, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

PDF no longer allowed; new version is now File:Tekenformulier.svg. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Evert Mouw (talk • contribs) 2016-03-29T13:03:12‎ (UTC)


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:45, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photos, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 08:29, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, screenshot with unknown copyright status, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably not a free image (image utilisé en 2014 dans le lien) Shev123 (talk) 08:54, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 12:04, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising content in the description, picture can also be found on many websites MMFE (talk) 09:03, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 12:09, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising content in the description, picture can also be found on many websites MMFE (talk) 09:04, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 12:10, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising content in the description, picture can also be found on several websites MMFE (talk) 09:17, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 12:12, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Mario Maraschi (talk) 11:10, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: (speedy) no valid reason for deletion. Riley Huntley (talk) 01:16, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

ygmkklkiokyji,mkniyfuiktoji-i9uotniuotiorlnlijouhkhbhhjuhhhbkkhfkhmbhbnbuehbedhndnvhdecfbbb 68.100.121.83 15:20, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Vandalism. Riley Huntley (talk) 01:23, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Press photo, "own work" highly unlikely. See for example this news article from 2012: http://www.augsburger-allgemeine.de/sport/frauen-wm-2011/Kanada-Trainerin-Morace-macht-trotz-WM-Aus-weiter-id15780476.html Headlocker (talk) 09:23, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:00, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used for spamming in Wikipedia in Spanish Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 09:33, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, posters can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 08:28, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, merely promotional image. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:46, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, copyrighted packaging with 4 watermarks plus logo. Taivo (talk) 08:43, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright infringement Jardel @lves talk 09:49, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. If the copyright holder Taylor Hill will send OTRS-permission, then the file can be restored. Taivo (talk) 08:45, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Facebook photo. PhyoWP *click 10:09, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, if author Mya Thaung‎ will send OTRS-permission, then the file can be restored. Taivo (talk) 08:57, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Elwady cheese (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Plain commercial advertising, SPAM, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 10:09, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, posters with copyrighted packaging and multiple logos. I'll delete file:Design2.png also due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 08:41, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The scanned image of a front page from a Burmese newspaper (7 Days News). [7]. PhyoWP *click 10:10, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:11, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurry; low resolution; poor description Jochen Burghardt (talk) 10:13, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small (80×94 pixels) unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:17, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per COM:TOYS this is a COM:DW Hstap (talk) 10:57, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 13:48, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non free logo; unused; out of project scope. XXN, 11:32, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 14:19, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Fralgu51 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Non-free book covers (from 2004 and 2010).

XXN, 11:34, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete also file:Diccionario de la lit.jpg due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 14:30, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Ceroles (talk) 11:43, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete also file:Mayestron singer.jpg due to same reason. Mayestron is unknown in en.wiki. Taivo (talk) 15:10, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

offensive and obscene gesture Ceroles (talk) 11:45, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution among clear copyright violations. I'll delete it speedily as likely copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 15:22, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lyceum NITT.jpg Josve05a (talk) 12:21, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete most of his uploads due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 07:22, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Lyceum NITT.jpg Josve05a (talk) 12:22, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete most of his uploads due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 07:17, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO. Unused logo, out of scope, promotional. Josve05a (talk) 12:32, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:26, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Isuru ranwalage (talk · contribs)

[edit]

First 3 images are screenshots; the other 2 images also looks like copyvios: one low-resolution 236×236px picture and the second with a title that suggests image source is facebook (or other similar webservice).

XXN, 12:42, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:31, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Socialpro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Non-free logos; no permission. Also, out of project scope.

XXN, 13:27, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, logos are free, because this is textlogo, but they are out of project scope (no mention in en.wiki). Taivo (talk) 08:05, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Mario Maraschi (talk) 13:28, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, textlogo. Taivo (talk) 08:09, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyright violation Mario Maraschi (talk) 13:28, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, text only. Taivo (talk) 08:13, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, out of scope, promotional. Josve05a (talk) 13:50, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, no mention in si.wiki, out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:39, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, out of scope, promotional. Josve05a (talk) 13:54, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, we have French flag in .svg. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:44, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, out of scope, promotional. (fr & de Wikipedia artiles has been deleted) Josve05a (talk) 13:56, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Öbu is not mentioned neither in en.wiki nor in tr.wiki. Unused logos of non-notable things are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:47, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, out of scope, promotional. Josve05a (talk) 13:57, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete also copy of this file:Logo TopON.svg due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 08:49, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, out of scope, promotional. (fr.wikipedia article was deleted in 2011) Josve05a (talk) 14:02, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, today there is no mention neither in en.wiki nor in fr.wiki. Taivo (talk) 08:59, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, out of scope, promotional. Josve05a (talk) 14:06, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:04, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, out of scope, promotional. Josve05a (talk) 14:09, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Spormex is not mentioned in en.wiki. I'll delete also file:SPX LOGO 1.jpg due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 09:14, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Permission from "teju suthar" needed. Ellin Beltz (talk) 00:46, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:34, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-quality selfie of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 01:00, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:34, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tudopode?nathy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal family photos and selfies. Outside project scope.

DAJF (talk) 01:23, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:34, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Above COM:TOO. Josve05a (talk) 02:47, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:34, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely offensive, says person depicted urinates in bed, also probably copyvio ("source=Facebook"). MartinD (talk) 13:06, 24 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. Wknight94 talk 03:18, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

too blurry Ю. Данилевский (talk) 08:27, 25 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted JurgenNL (talk) 12:24, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused low-quality selfie of non-notable individual. Outside project scope. DAJF (talk) 03:27, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:34, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nick Bilton is the author of this image, so Nick would need to CC release it Bombsplops (talk) 04:53, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:35, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

joke image, original art that is not notable or iconic does not belong here. was used to vandalize an article Mercurywoodrose (talk) 06:01, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The image was incorrectly labelled as original, and has been deemed notable by the administration of the school.Hacker6284
please note that the above argument is pure bullshit, and the editor is a vandal. nuff said.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 22:19, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:36, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:17, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Missing license as of 2 April 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Missing license as of 2 April 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 06:17, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:51, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete dubious own work. COM:OTRS permission needed. Riley Huntley (talk) 06:18, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:51, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of project Sakhalinio (talk) 06:20, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:51, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Out of scope file. Riley Huntley (talk) 06:22, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:51, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope file (has some sort of description, no file) AbdealiJK (talk) 12:06, 9 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. John Vandenberg (chat) 08:43, 13 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Dubious own work. Riley Huntley (talk) 06:22, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:51, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Out of scope file. Riley Huntley (talk) 06:23, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:51, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Out of scope file. Riley Huntley (talk) 06:23, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:51, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Out of scope file. Riley Huntley (talk) 06:23, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:52, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Out of scope file. Riley Huntley (talk) 06:24, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:52, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Out of scope file. Riley Huntley (talk) 06:24, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:52, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Out of scope file. Riley Huntley (talk) 06:25, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:52, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Out of scope file. Riley Huntley (talk) 06:25, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:52, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Out of scope file. Riley Huntley (talk) 06:27, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:52, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Out of scope file. More useful in text. Riley Huntley (talk) 06:30, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:52, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Out of scope file. Riley Huntley (talk) 06:32, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:52, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Out of scope file. Riley Huntley (talk) 06:33, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:52, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Out of scope file. Riley Huntley (talk) 06:35, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:52, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Out of scope file. Riley Huntley (talk) 06:35, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:52, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Krishnaballesh

[edit]

Krishnaballesh (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

First group. Small photos and mostly without metadata. Comparing uploader's name with file descriptions and filenames, the uploader is often himself depicted, but none of them looks like selfie. I suspect not own work, but copyright violations.

Second group. For collages source and license for every used photo is needed. Taivo (talk) 06:44, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:53, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Jacksiomne109248387597

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Jacksiomne109248387597 (talk · contribs):

Different and usually small resolution, no metadata. I suspect copyright violation of real photographers. Taivo (talk) 07:00, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:54, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Gumgum10

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Gumgum10 (talk · contribs):

Cameron Andrew Thom is not mentioned in en.wiki. Unused personal photos are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 07:05, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:54, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Elinakeinonen

[edit]

Here are all contributions of Elinakeinonen (talk · contribs):

Not own work. OTRS-permission from photographer Jyrki Tervo is needed. Taivo (talk) 07:08, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:54, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of D4GOMFILMS

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of D4GOMFILMS (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata, I suspect copyright violation. All files are unused and depicted persons are often unidentified, so there is also scope problem. Taivo (talk) 07:12, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:54, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Soumik Barua

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Soumik Barua (talk · contribs):

First group. Unused art of non-notable artist is out of project scope.

Second group. Small photos without metadata, I suspect copyright violation. Also note nonsense filenames and nonsense descriptions. Taivo (talk) 07:17, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:54, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Lamsak

[edit]

Here are all contributions of Lamsak (talk · contribs):

Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 07:24, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:55, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Akshay raj singh chanchori

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Akshay raj singh chanchori (talk · contribs):

Small photos without metadata. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 07:27, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:55, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Yousefmadari

[edit]

Yousefmadari (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

There is no freedom of panorama in Saudi Arabia. Taivo (talk) 07:32, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:55, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope and likel a copyright violation. JuTa 07:48, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:55, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, unused image of encyclopedically non-notable person. -- Túrelio (talk) 07:55, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is an image of a notable person.The person has received a well-known and significant award or honor.The person has made a widely recognized contribution that is part of the enduring historical record in his or her specific field (Call of Duty). This person is the most known and most famous person in the Call of Duty sniping community and is the largest YouTube personality in the Call of Duty sniping community. He has more than 4.2 million subscribers on his two channels combined and has gathered more than 1.3 million followers on Twitter, quarter million followers on Facebook and has established his own clothing brand. He is the most influental person in the Call of Duty community and deserves a Wikipedia page. Manvswow (talk) 17:36, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, at the time of nomination the image was unused. The article, where the image is currently used, is requested for deletion (not by me). If the article with the image remains, the image is in scope. --Túrelio (talk) 18:06, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: xcf is only experimental here. This needs to be a jpg. Also,the new file will need categories. categories. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:01, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of King Eliot

[edit]

King Eliot (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

There is no freedom of panorama in Saudi Arabia. Taivo (talk) 07:36, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:01, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too low quality to be realistically useful for an educational purpose: Out of project scope. Ies (talk) 08:03, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Oppose Not the best quality, but still a recognisable face. This is a picture from 1990 of a defunct band, so another free picture from this band, especially from that period, is not to be expected any time soon. Tekstman (talk) 16:29, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The file is used 7 times in 6 projects, so apparently it is in scope. Taivo (talk) 11:23, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: The uploader inserted it into the various WPs after this DR was started. The quality is so poor as to be an embarassment to the project. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:26, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Thomasdehaan

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Thomasdehaan (talk · contribs):

The files often small, sometimes without metadata. If camera data exists, then always different. I suspect photographer's copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:04, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:39, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Eddtoro642

[edit]

Eddtoro642 (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

Small photos and usually without metadata. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:09, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:39, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Stoian Kaev

[edit]

Stoian Kaev (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

First group. These files have two problems. At first, unused photos about non-notable musicians are out of project scope. At second, they are all called selfies, but usually that's not the case. I suspect different photographers' copyright violation.

Second group. Unused art of non-notable artists is out of scope. Taivo (talk) 08:16, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:48, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Depicted statue looks to be recent work and thereby still copyrighted. Regrettably, Belgium has no Freedom_of_panorama exception for public works. Thereby, we need a permission from the sculptor or the image neds to be deleted. -- Túrelio (talk) 08:42, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:51, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Sebastian Felipe Ramirez

[edit]

Sebastián Felipe Ramírez (talk · contribs) uploaded these files:

Small photos without metadata, uploader is twice blocked for copyvios. I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:44, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:54, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Dekcom

[edit]

Dekcom (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

Usually small photos and usually without metadata. I suspect copyright violation. (I did not nominate his/her 3 biggest photos, which have same resolution and same camera data.) Taivo (talk) 09:07, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:55, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Christian Ferrer as Copyvio (copyvio) and the most recent rationale was: previously published http://images.google.fr/imgres?imgurl=http://static2.digitick.com/commun/upload/staticUpload/musicStory/3a/0e/2_123043_0.jpg&imgrefurl=http://www.digitick.com/place-de-concert-nicki-minaj-css4-digitick-pg3189-ai42412.html&h=1995&w=1247&tbnid=KT6XGiq3xGNR8M&tbnh=284&tbnw=177&usg=__snkt3GDGxTwRmc-zXPpG-SsbiVc=&docid=8h3tgiBFrNOSCM
Converted by me to DR merely for procedural reasons, as image is heavily in use. While the above linked hit is undated, a less cropped version of the image was published in 2013[8].  Delete. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:58, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. But used 60 times in 30 projects. Taivo (talk) 08:54, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:09, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Abdelfattahe (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Abdelfattahe (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

Usually small photos and usually without metadata. I suspect copyright violation. (I did not nominate his 3+3 bigger photos, which have same resolution and same camera data.) Taivo (talk) 09:38, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:09, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Zoegrace44

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Zoegrace44 (talk · contribs):

They are small photos and mostly without metadata. If camera data exists, then always different. I suspect copyright violation. In addition, Zoe Byrne alias Clara Jade is not mentioned in en.wiki, so photos about her can be out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:56, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:10, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Even though the photo is freely licensed I don't think this image of a sculptural postage stamp bench is allowed per non-commercial Freedom of Panorama per Commons:Freedom of panorama#Korea (South). Ww2censor (talk) 10:47, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:15, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Sergey Riabsev is the author of this photo, as per description, so permission needs to come from Sergey. Hstap (talk) 11:00, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:15, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong name(mistyped) 최광모 (talk) 11:08, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Use {{Rename}}. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:16, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong name(mistyped) 최광모 (talk) 11:08, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Use {{Rename}}. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:16, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

creators will 최광모 (talk) 05:44, 23 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Christian Ferrer (talk) 12:26, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong name(mistyped) 최광모 (talk) 11:08, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Use {{Rename}}. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:17, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong name(mistyped) 최광모 (talk) 11:08, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Use {{Rename}}. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:17, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong name(mistyped) 최광모 (talk) 11:08, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Use {{Rename}}. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:17, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong name(mistyped) 최광모 (talk) 11:09, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Use {{Rename}}. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:17, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

wrong name(mistyped) 최광모 (talk) 11:09, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Use {{Rename}}. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:17, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing essential information. Ceroles (talk) 11:24, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I can not find the picture on the given source. Furthermore this file is lacking author information.--Ceroles (talk) 20:46, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Speedy keep. The file is perfectly in order and in use in several WPs. Seems like the nominator has an issue about Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, judging by their recent deletion nominations... --E4024 (talk) 21:25, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This is superficial, just look on my contributions. Please stop with this defamation and POV.--Ceroles (talk) 23:19, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Then, please stop making non-sense DRs of old photos without proof of copyvio, specially if them are widely in use. --Amitie 10g (talk) 21:57, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Here is really problem. If we do not know the author, then we cannot be sure, that he (as author of 1923 photo) is dead more than 70 years. Anonymous Turkish works are protected 70 years from first publishing, but here is no evidence, that the photo is anonymous, and no evidence, that it was published more than 70 years ago. Taivo (talk) 13:32, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I don't hate Mustafa Kemal Atatürk. Wiki Commons it not the place for things like that. I have nominated a bunch of other pictures, but nobody attacked me like you do now. Please stop this. It is just a fact that information about this picture are missing. Not more.--Ceroles (talk) 08:59, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No evidence that (a) the photographer was anonymous or (b) that it was published more than 70 years ago. E4024 would do better to provide necessary information instead of slingiing mud here in DR. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:21, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing essential information. License review. Ceroles (talk) 11:32, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:27, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing essential information. License review. Ceroles (talk) 11:32, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:27, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License review. Seems to be a capture of a video. Ceroles (talk) 11:33, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:27, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License review. Capture of video Ceroles (talk) 11:34, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:27, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing essential information. Ceroles (talk) 11:38, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Information about author is missing.--Ceroles (talk) 20:44, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Speedy keep. The file is perfectly in order and in use in several WPs. Seems like the nominator has a POV issue about Turks, judging by their recent deletion nominations... --E4024 (talk) 21:33, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This is superficial, just look on my contributions. Please stop with this defamation and POV.--Ceroles (talk) 23:19, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete The photo has two licenses: of Ottoman Empire and of India. Ottoman license is clearly wrong, because it did not exist in 1939. Here is no proof for Indian license. No photographer data, no publication data, no evidence, that the photo is anonymous. Taivo (talk) 13:45, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: No source, no author. Possibly PD, but evidence of authorship and publication is required. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:33, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Erik820 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Non-free covers.

XXN, 11:38, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:33, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing essential information. License review. Ceroles (talk) 11:40, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Reason?--Ceroles (talk) 20:43, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Nope. Instead of being personal you could provide information about the author or date of this picture.--Ceroles (talk) 23:01, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Hundred years old photos can still be copyrighted. Here is no publication data and no author data. Taivo (talk) 14:44, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep This image is the cropped edition of File:Mustafa Kemal Atatürk.gif that was used as one of the official portraits of prime minister Mustafa Kemal Pasha. Takabeg (talk) 05:15, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: This is a painting, not a photo, and probably not anonymous. We need to know when the painter died. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:38, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing essential information. License review. Permission review. Ceroles (talk) 11:42, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What about the source, the author and permission? Please provide these information.--Ceroles (talk) 20:43, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Speedy keep. The file is perfectly in order and in use in several WPs. Seems like the nominator has an issue about her husband, Mustafa Kemal Ataturk, judging by their recent deletion nominations... --E4024 (talk) 21:25, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This is superficial, just look on my contributions. Please stop with this defamation.--Ceroles (talk) 23:18, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep In my opinion {{PD-Ottoman Empire}} applies here. Copyright formalities (copyright notice and registration) were not met. I'll change license. Taivo (talk) 14:52, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks, Taivo!--Ceroles (talk) 16:57, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: This was a gift -- no evidence at all that it was both published more than 70 years ago and that it was anonymous. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:41, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

License review. Ceroles (talk) 11:53, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you clarify the rationale,  Keep - the uploader is the operator of the blog (which adds hidden advertising or at least attempts to and does not offer contents beyond that but well, ...) and the copyright holder, as far as I can see. -- Rillke(q?) 12:11, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This is superficial, just look on my contributions. Please stop with this defamation.--Ceroles (talk) 23:17, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep I believe, that David Shankbone is the photographer and the file is own work. Taivo (talk) 16:35, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Ok. We can keep this pic.--Ceroles (talk) 16:55, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:45, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

As currently stands this page is of uncertain use or purpose. It is more like a WP article with galleries. I suggest it needs to be transferred to WP, with reworking or splitting out if necessary. It is not useful for categorising images. Lobsterthermidor (talk) 12:44, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: It's a gallery page but not a category, so there's no valid reason for deletion. Feel free to improve that page. --Achim (talk) 20:45, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Keep It does not look like article. I consider the page useful. Taivo (talk) 08:34, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: Certainly in scope of Commons galleries. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:48, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out-of-scope: Self-created artwork without obvious educational use. Takeaway (talk) 13:37, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This contributorr has uploaded more self-created artwork such as File:Backlit curtain 1.jpg, File:Backlit curtain 2.jpg, File:Backlit curtain 3.jpg, File:Divenire.png, and File:Accidental Desert.png. - Takeaway (talk) 16:38, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete all and also file:Divenire.svg. Taivo (talk) 08:20, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:50, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Łukasz Wójcik (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Non-free cover and logo.

XXN, 13:40, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:50, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by NickyDare (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Non-free cover and logo.

XXN, 13:42, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:50, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:09, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:50, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nywoxwyt (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial images of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:12, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by jcb, closed by. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:51, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nywoxwyt (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope; possible copyvio; files are 0kb, so mild suspicion

TJH2018talk 17:56, 31 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Nywoxwyt (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Outside Commons:Project scope, should be SVG, likely not useful as barcodes are generally specific text. Also, as this is the third DR for this user (apparently over the same thing) we may wish to warn them to cease making such uploads.

Mifter (talk) 06:26, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:05, 6 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality image, not used for three years... Pippobuono (talk) 08:24, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:48, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low quality image, not used for three years Pippobuono (talk) 08:25, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:49, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam (w:Special:Undelete/Draft:GHAR- Fully Developed Collector N.A. Bungalow Plots). MER-C 09:38, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:47, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:10, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:46, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:20, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:46, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private drawing album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:45, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:32, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:44, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisment of questionable notability. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:36, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:44, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:43, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:43, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, out of scope, promotional. Josve05a (talk) 14:39, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:42, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:41, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:42, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:41, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:41, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:41, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A selfie out of project scope. Sismarinho (talk) 15:50, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:40, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 16:22, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:37, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho 'posing' or 'family album' upload, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 18:38, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:35, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

im 'posing/profiling' (see description), file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 18:41, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:35, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Ceroles (talk) 23:03, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:33, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Ceroles (talk) 23:06, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:32, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Ceroles (talk) 23:07, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:32, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope, potential copyvio of work "minecraft". Liance (talk) 23:45, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 15:31, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image appears to have been copied from https://sites.google.com/a/lassybouity.com/john-okaka/galerie-photo, though I can't say for sure, as the webpage was never archived by the Wayback Machine. Diannaa (talk) 00:44, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --King of 22:23, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Bad quality (blurred), as such not educationally usefull. Grand-Duc (talk) 10:09, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: In use. --King of 22:26, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

grabbed form the web: http://www.ikvi.at/?p=12384 Albinfo (talk) 10:28, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete all his uploads due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 07:57, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

grabbed from the web: http://www.tetovasot.com/2015/09/ne-ditelindjen-e-veprimtarit-te-shquar-te-ceshtjes-shqiptare-joseph-dioguardi/ Albinfo (talk) 10:31, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete all his uploads due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 07:59, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

logo of AACI: http://www.aacl.us/aboutus.htm – wrong license Albinfo (talk) 10:34, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete all his uploads due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 07:58, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

AACI content Albinfo (talk) 10:35, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete all his uploads due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 07:58, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

from Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=668351709948014&set=t.100003195732329&type=3&theater Albinfo (talk) 10:37, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

That on itself is not a deletion rationale. The photographer can't be the subject of the image, so "own work" is possible. --PaterMcFly (talk) 17:50, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, I'll delete all his uploads. small photo without metadata, the uploader is serial copyright violatior. Taivo (talk) 08:01, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

grabbed from the web: https://twitter.com/osmaniflamur/status/273723968832299008 Albinfo (talk) 10:39, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete all his uploads due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 08:02, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

grabbed from the web: http://guerrierolfc.tumblr.com/page/60 (June 7, 2015) Albinfo (talk) 10:42, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete all his uploads due to same reason. Taivo (talk) 08:02, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. Also by uploader request (even via IP): Special:diff/192103375 Gunnex (talk) 15:21, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by EugeneZelenko as non-trivial logo. Taivo (talk) 07:52, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader has difficulties to provide correct licence information in the near future, therefore should be deleted for now, but can come back later, see de:special:diff/153106333/153139053 ° (Gradzeichen) 19:39, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Instead of DR a more friendly approach would be to offer help to a new user. I started a discussion here but a help from German speaker might be better. If there is no resolution than lets talk about deletion. --Jarekt (talk) 13:16, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Jarekt: Let's make a compromise: Next time I am more friendly and you take a look at the facts before posting to the user page. I gave a diff link in the request and there was some more discussion since. In short: The photographer in question is out of business and Dr. Furch has difficulties to provide this information in the near future. Therefore she asked me to request the deletion for now, but will come back at a later time. I provided her with the links to OTRS that you also posted on her commons page and additional info, how to get the file restored as soon as she is ready to go on with this matter. As she thenked me for both the deletion request and the information on how to restore the file later, I am under the impression that my action reflects the intentions of Dr. Furch. Do you think different? --° (Gradzeichen) 17:34, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry I do not speak German and I guess I did not bother to use Google translate, my fault. If the deletion is done with mutual understanding of what is needed I do not have a problem with it. --Jarekt (talk) 19:06, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
I actually assumed that you do not speak german (and already prepared a snappy remark on babelfish, that will now never be posted) but you could still have clicked on the link and would have noticed the link to OTRS and that Dr. Furch must have noticed it, because she posted after that link. Also my use of the rather arcene special:diff feature with the even more rare use of 2 ids in it might possibly have hinted that I do it for a reason. --° (Gradzeichen) 19:35, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The uploader has now sent information to OTRS. --° (Gradzeichen) 17:01, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, by Jcb due to missing permission. Taivo ( talk) 07:48, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Page was deleted on de-WP; no further use WolfgangRieger (talk) 08:46, 5 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --lNeverCry 22:58, 11 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Restored. Invalid deletion reason, file is in external use. --Krd 11:54, 12 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio - again was deleted yesterday see http://www.friendsmania.net/forum/pakistan-government-people-places/294374.htm Arjayay (talk) 12:21, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:06, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, now the file is used and even in mainspace, but I delete it nevertheless as small photo without metadata, probably not own work as claimed, but copyright violation. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:12, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://static.ft.lk/ftadmin/wp-content/uploads/2016/02/981.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:21, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo (only 200×296 pixels) without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:14, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, photos about Adolf Hitler are not own work. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:18, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the brothers died in 1942, so the photos are not own work as claimed. This is the uploader's only contribution. Maybe the photos were in public domain as work of US Army, but no evidence was given for that. Taivo (talk) 08:23, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://sci-bd.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/unnamed.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:24, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, also the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:24, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://i.ytimg.com/vi/TsiX6PEaRL0/hqdefault.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:25, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, also the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:26, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Selma14114 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, company Janz is unknown in de.wiki and en.wiki. Taivo (talk) 08:35, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Salbenny (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Historical photos. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, no reaction. These are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 08:52, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cannacaps (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:31, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:54, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:33, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, at moment the file is used and even in mainspace. Taivo (talk) 09:01, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All pictures uploaded by this user are copyvio. Several warnings in her discussion page have been ignored. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 14:37, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 09:09, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All pictures uploaded by this user are copyvio. Several warnings in her discussion page have been ignored. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 14:38, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 09:10, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All pictures uploaded by this user are copyvio. Several warnings in her discussion page have been ignored. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 14:38, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 09:09, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All pictures uploaded by this user are copyvio. Several warnings in her discussion page have been ignored. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 14:38, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 09:05, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All pictures uploaded by this user are copyvio. Several warnings in her discussion page have been ignored. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 14:38, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 09:08, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All pictures uploaded by this user are copyvio. Several warnings in her discussion page have been ignored. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 14:39, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, big photo, but still no metadata. Taivo (talk) 09:07, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All pictures uploaded by this user are copyvio. Several warnings in her discussion page have been ignored. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 14:39, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, big photo, but no metadata. Taivo (talk) 09:04, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All pictures uploaded by this user are copyvio. Several warnings in her discussion page have been ignored. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 14:39, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 09:06, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All pictures uploaded by this user are copyvio. Several warnings in her discussion page have been ignored. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 14:41, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 09:17, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All pictures uploaded by this user are copyvio. Several warnings in her discussion page have been ignored. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 14:42, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 09:14, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All pictures uploaded by this user are copyvio. Several warnings in her discussion page have been ignored. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 14:42, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 09:13, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All pictures uploaded by this user are copyvio. Several warnings in her discussion page have been ignored. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 14:42, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 09:12, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All pictures uploaded by this user are copyvio. Several warnings in her discussion page have been ignored. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 14:42, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 09:14, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All pictures uploaded by this user are copyvio. Several warnings in her discussion page have been ignored. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 14:42, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 09:21, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All pictures uploaded by this user are copyvio. Several warnings in her discussion page have been ignored. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 14:43, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 09:16, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All pictures uploaded by this user are copyvio. Several warnings in her discussion page have been ignored. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 14:43, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 09:20, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All pictures uploaded by this user are copyvio. Several warnings in her discussion page have been ignored. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 14:43, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 09:17, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All pictures uploaded by this user are copyvio. Several warnings in her discussion page have been ignored. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 14:44, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Watermark "Photograph Nicolas Aboaf". Taivo (talk) 09:19, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All pictures uploaded by this user are copyvio. Several warnings in her discussion page have been ignored. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 14:38, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Watermark "Felix Alberto". Taivo (talk) 09:25, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All pictures uploaded by this user are copyvio. Several warnings in her discussion page have been ignored. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 14:39, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 09:31, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All pictures uploaded by this user are copyvio. Several warnings in her discussion page have been ignored. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 14:39, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 09:29, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, also the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:32, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All pictures uploaded by this user are copyvio. Several warnings in her discussion page have been ignored. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 14:41, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 09:29, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All pictures uploaded by this user are copyvio. Several warnings in her discussion page have been ignored. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 14:41, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 09:28, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All pictures uploaded by this user are copyvio. Several warnings in her discussion page have been ignored. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 14:41, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 09:27, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All pictures uploaded by this user are copyvio. Several warnings in her discussion page have been ignored. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 14:41, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 09:30, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All pictures uploaded by this user are copyvio. Several warnings in her discussion page have been ignored. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 14:42, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 09:27, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:34, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All pictures uploaded by this user are copyvio. Several warnings in her discussion page have been ignored. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 14:42, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 09:23, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, also the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:35, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All pictures uploaded by this user are copyvio. Several warnings in her discussion page have been ignored. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 14:43, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 09:25, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Collage of unsourced photos. (Note: Not the same as any of the 3 previous deleted photos uploaded under the same name.) -- Infrogmation of New Orleans (talk) 18:22, 13 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Strakhov (talk) 14:48, 20 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All pictures uploaded by this user are copyvio. Several warnings in her discussion page have been ignored. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 14:44, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Watermark "Felix Alberto". Taivo (talk) 09:24, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All pictures uploaded by this user are copyvio. Several warnings in her discussion page have been ignored. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 14:44, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 09:22, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All pictures uploaded by this user are copyvio. Several warnings in her discussion page have been ignored. Banfield - Amenazas aquí 14:44, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata. Taivo (talk) 09:21, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.colorlines.com/sites/default/files/styles/article_lead_normal/public/images/2015/12/20151117-425.jpg?itok=pJCe9Vp3. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:43, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, also the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:36, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://depaulmagazinetest2.files.wordpress.com/2015/10/20150804_depaul_codylassen_006-copy.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:44, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, also the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:38, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:45, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, also the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:39, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/587011123469090816/bngxtwrF.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, also the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:40, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolution, missing EXIF. Images from this photoset could be found with Google Images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:47, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, also the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:41, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like http://www.ankawa.com/forum/index.php?topic=805949.0. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:50, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, not own photo as claimed, copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 09:43, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Historical photo. Proper author/date/country of creation information should be supplied to determine copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, also the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:46, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, also the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:47, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

既に同じ写真が存在したから。 Prince Skyline S54B (talk) 14:52, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 09:50, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:52, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:48, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obvious copyright violation, property of BlissCorporation. http://zorotl.com/ ChrisHamburg (talk) 15:34, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:57, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation and without any ecyclopedic purpose. http://www.hdwallpapers.im/concert-wallpaper.html ChrisHamburg (talk) 15:38, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, posters can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 09:55, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promo photo, very like a copyright violation. ChrisHamburg (talk) 15:43, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, posters can be in Commons only with OTRS-permission. Taivo (talk) 09:56, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 15:52, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete all the uploader's contributions. They are mostly small photos and mostly without metadata. 5 photos have camera data, but always different. Own work is unlikely, probably all copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 10:01, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Wikilogia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

For me ther is enough photos of in Category:Human vulvas.

Sismarinho (talk) 16:04, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

For me ther is enough photos of in Category:Human vulvas. Wikilogia (talk) 17:15, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, for collages source and license of every used photo is needed. Other files were tiny (typically 190×190 pixels) and without metadata. That way own work is not sure and I suspect copyright violation. These are Wikilogia's only uploads. Taivo (talk) 10:56, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Dubious own work. This web page has the same image Yasu (talk) 16:05, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:04, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

While I totally agree that this image came from whitehouse.gov; I also don't think the whitehouse can license "Star Wars" characters like R2-D2 and stormtroopers which are of course (c) Lucasfilm and (c) Disney. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:11, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. Winkelvi (talk) 16:13, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Keep These characters are visiting the White House just like any professional actor visits the White House. The pictures are taken by a White House photographer, during official White House business, released through an official government website, therefore, the images are in the public domain. It is similar to when Disney or Lucasfilm characters attend a press event, reporters can take pictures of the characters to file their report about the press conference. It falls under fair use for the reporters, but for the government it falls under public domain. For example on the same day, the characters joined White House Press Secretary Josh Earnest for a photo opportunity. If the copyright theory outlined above was correct, which it isn't, then the photographers in the press room would not have been able to take pictures of the Stormtrooper or R2-D2, but of course the reporters did take pictures of the characters as this article for the Los Angeles Times clearly shows: Martens, Todd. "Stormtroopers and R2-D2 visit the White House for 'Star Wars' screening", Los Angeles Times, December 18, 2015. The rationale for deleting this article, provided in nom, fails because the picture is clearly in the public domain.--MaverickLittle (talk) 19:38, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
This deletion nom fails. This White House event was covered by tons of reporters throughout the world, a small sample includes:
BBC, UK Mirror, NY Times, London Telegraph, ABC News, Hindustan Times, Josh Ernest's Twitter account, Agency French Press, London Guardian, Daily Caller, London Daily Mail, Huffington Post, Emirates 24/7, The Hindu, Cox Media Group, etc.--MaverickLittle (talk) 20:39, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
First Lady Michelle Obama's Twitter account, NBC News, Newsweek, Time magazine, Herald de Paris et Cie., Ltd are a few more.--MaverickLittle (talk) 13:17, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Pokéfan95: I agree with your opinion of "Keep" but I want to point out that de minimis only applies if there is a copyright in the first place. There is no copyright that applies to this picture since it was taken by a U.S. government employee, while working for the U.S. government, and released to the public domain through a U.S. government website. U.S. government works have no copyright; therefore, there is no copyright on which de minimis can be applied. It is a picture of someone visiting the White House (a U.S. government agency) by the White House photographer (a U.S. government employee) in the course of his employment.--MaverickLittle (talk) 15:35, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Deleted, MverickLittle said: "It is similar to when Disney or Lucasfilm characters attend a press event, reporters can take pictures of the characters to file their report about the press conference." Yes, they can, but they cannot give these photos into public domain. US government works have no its own, that means, photographer's copyright, but it can have depicted object's copyright. US government cannot take Lucasfilm copyright and give it into public domain. And the design is not de minimis, but main object of the photo. Taivo (talk) 11:14, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo, out of scope, promotional. de:SITEC Industrietechnologie GmbH was deleted in 2009. Josve05a (talk) 16:27, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, also the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:27, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Used for usepage spam at enwiki, also questionable copyright status. Steinsplitter (talk) 16:29, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete also file:Sitamarhiaditya1.jpg. Unused personal photos, the uploader's last remaining contributions. Taivo (talk) 11:30, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Too small and too dark to be of any educational purpose. Also unused. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:33, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:33, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused duplicate of File:Belbachirs medals.jpg. Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:34, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:32, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Willemdafoe62 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Promotional and possible copyright violations.

Takeaway (talk) 17:04, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused photos without metadata, the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 11:37, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused blurry file which seems to be someone's graduation photo, out of COM:SCOPE and likely COM:COPYVIO as well. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:14, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, this is the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 11:39, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Flag of South Vietnam.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:15, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, only 22×15 pixels. Taivo (talk) 11:41, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:British-White-Ensign-1707.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:26, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:48, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:British-Blue-Ensign-1707.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:27, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:56, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:British-Red-Ensign-1707.svg. Fry1989 eh? 17:27, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 11:57, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho potentially non-free content, see rather thumbnail format, imho editted, and missing EXIF data, Roland zh (talk) 17:25, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 06:46, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The text is from A Man of Parts: A Novel David Lodge Penguin, Sep 15, 2011 - https://books.google.com/books?id=EFM7QICpookC&pg=PT66&lpg=PT66&dq=%22she+could+not+contribute+more+to+these+outpourings%22&source=bl&ots=pDMLQ_jbOn&sig=qlFjIv2nRqCiVw-X-uFnD9250_A&hl=en&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjQsOKU__LLAhVDx4MKHUrUAQYQ6AEIHDAA#v=onepage&q=%22she%20could%20not%20contribute%20more%20to%20these%20outpourings%22&f=false Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:29, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cette photo a été mise à jour avec un texte du domaine public. Codex

 Deleted, author is still living, text is not in public domain. Taivo (talk) 07:06, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The artwork is still under copyright; Michael Schilkin died in 1962. Undelete in 2033. MKFI (talk) 17:42, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, undeleted in 2033. Taivo (talk) 07:08, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The artwork is still under copyright; Michael Schilkin died in 1962. Undelete in 2033. MKFI (talk) 17:43, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You are right, MKFI. I didn't know this limitation of FOP in Finnland. --Matthias Süßen (talk) 17:16, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]



 Deleted, Undeleted in 2033. Taivo (talk) 07:10, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inserimento errato Spindo62 (talk) 17:46, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, ineligible for copyright due to simplicity, but ... uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 07:11, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of User:Zoranzoki21

[edit]

All files uploaded by User:Zoranzoki21 (see contribution) are not "own work" and all files are taken from various websites. --Smooth_O (talk) 17:55, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photos without metadata, the biggest is 434×116 pixels. Taivo (talk) 07:16, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Imagebookme (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Imagebookme/logs

Gunnex (talk) 18:09, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 07:24, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Corporate logo, not free to use Lacrymocéphale (talk) 18:32, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, in my opinion this is textlogo and no permission is needed. But I will delete it nevertheless, because the company has no article neither in en.wiki nor in it.wiki and is in my opinion non-notable. Taivo (talk) 07:46, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho potentially non-free content, see thumbnail format and missing EXIF data, Roland zh (talk) 18:33, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata. I will delete also his all other contributions, because they were created by atherenergy,cin, that means, uploader is not author, probably copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 07:49, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR as per File:Seran.jpg, Roland zh (talk) 18:39, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Seran 1143 (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except user talkpage in en.wiki and uploading two photos about himself, which are used nowhere, except on the talkpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 08:02, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho 'posing', file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 18:43, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:03, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho good faith upload, but bad quality, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness (quality), hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 18:46, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, bad quality, very blurry. Taivo (talk) 08:05, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

as per description rather 'posing/profiling', file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 18:56, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused personal photo without metadata, the uploader's last remaining contribution. Taivo (talk) 08:08, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

omho 'family album'-oriented upload, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 18:57, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small unused photo without metadata, out of scope. I'll delete also file:Sukan.jpg, which is big and has camera data, but still unused personal photo, not suitable for stock photo. These are the uploader's only contributions. Taivo (talk) 08:11, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho rather 'family album'-oriented upload, file not in use at Wikimedia projects, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 19:02, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 08:20, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

errore è un ritaglio OppidumNissenae (talk) 19:06, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, uploader's request on uploading day. Taivo (talk) 08:34, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started once again to verify claimed 'own work', as imho rather 'professional-looking' format and missing EXIF data, see also File:Kera (3).jpg, File:Kera (12).jpg, File:Info park ko.jpg, File:Koc win.jpg, File:Kochi1-1.jpg et al, as well as past uploads at User talk:Jawadhusain pallath, Roland zh (talk) 19:08, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, all small photos without metadata will be deleted. Taivo (talk) 08:37, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derived from deleted file. 128.68.61.174 19:38, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:22, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

NKR does not exist de-jure. NK is part of Azerbaijan. This file apparently created and/or uploaded for the purpose of vandalism or attack. Therefore, the file must be deleted according to rules of Wiki Commons. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alismayilov (talk • contribs) 19:46, 3 April 2016 (UTC) (UTC)[reply]


 Kept, it does not matter, how bad, erroneous or misleading the file is. It is used and therefore in our project scope. Taivo (talk) 09:24, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho rather 'professional-looking' format and missing EXIF data, Roland zh (talk) 21:33, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:39, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

DR started to verify claimed 'own work', as imho potentially non-free content (thumbnail & missing EXIF), see also File:Srivyshnaviyarlagadda.jpg, Roland zh (talk) 21:35, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 09:37, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader didnt provide a real source of rights for the use of this photo. TheBellaTwins1445 (talk) 21:38, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete all his uploads: small photos without metadata, probably copyright violations. Taivo (talk) 09:41, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Вероятно, не является собственной работой: https://www.google.ru/search?tbs=sbi:AMhZZivFcE-4XZM74htkbO90ui2Puf1L4tF2GY20kWXnieRO5CYI1QXqMCZBOi9HrnQpEmogmsTGheb95SXrtjVRoX_1yIgGM2ZiUZPJhz3JTL60ubldVa3mjucHyMZrBVihnl2k8-VVqz41JNwNjinQOp0rINoVI7Z4BORnb29AmOlGxZchsyLK9g6pe0jqLsPyOd8IDLk7mepGzYn-GpT0-nQL0nB8_1AtAgs-uN6_1Jyrl5WmaUlZwOuxeeiuH8rUMCNBHgVcx8M6XVQ3ISPfLBvgCuJkmhGgN323nS_1ofKjSaB7D143asTOwYrQj5_1LnX7EDRVNugWlpBcj1CGnThvI0rXDAfMo8rLFg3GhriwEBmiiCp206LJp_1yFIzp63FeZbpAK5YELwib05h5sSAZWsSCEtZviywkITWKaZ1xUV8k5t5PrRmEK1coeRwAU5HvEC7d2zrEIzrhR8DCmsBF6du9lQZh3tyH0aXEhlwmLPJKmQmsS0bR-WqtmYZIga0TzZq828l9316HrGLkRNyeGeo3QU_1sGPzTzj3k281Th89KzSB3-q0lyjVTj8ewjBLweApN0fh_1erXrLc5iEdpU4wkZvGA3yyiVeniThNCPmwpareRGF600cqjQ526fpUQPw7zJoQhJMsPMUcfHiyUXXaOvvDtHbZ4KOdemVAP-GKTnTTL0bWMI63LZrlNjJb8CtAZCGywfxWdD4HLrPEuWpa75RG65kJV1sao_1e6S4pi6X90RcQ2a_1Zkl3Ds0TbjqDj_1j3WTn2oXHLZL6qRwG_1uTiqUhI7H-B1j2eSihFJ40VxpwSNsIpcDHkn6G7AoAlQUEKk9LY-NLVWfsh2LdsKt9gcH6FmFov427skT_1C6FpDjWjctKWP8cW_1qQdJtg2zJpTBYKB1gOU2pcBr9BWWuPbhIK8TMSdlQr2z9rPzeWmjv_1RfRSI3VjUmBao51kGeXyNuqHCStvTOp6klIBZTumxK3j56PdIxiHPqJa7_1da3vfHTwD_1UCEIb_1MMr9GacAsGJ_1ts2udnF4hz0UOeNH4iP6LVXx0S-24UfGS8nGK7vpQP7_1oM_1bBTaCXr_16dhskQn_1EuNizTuj6BPO_1EBTuU1LBXn-CKQc8PWYVnYv3jrqrsrXmTtdgzFb-cPzR0ALjiLNWMdvYjaw2dBEOzNgk7iB39QEVj_1HPYIybSMomiyKHT4R6KJTeoGCkFZwc_1MZ9XjS5-55BOZPRSIL80WjelYQeGpDlDRrXlboYKaJTc4kd8OvUXUYpTL4jDRNhiPduP0iYS7PyYSPfDZU7nXP5TnYPDVJ32oJEQmp4qe-zsyfhMzJp1SazZRn52E6BO_10LjTlt66LbXGh_1T8lR8B9n6L2WzkVxZ7dqOAU308yw0E9Lv9eI0BPSX4ylI4EY6QRDdc4PbITVaVx54CzKKRIm0g6TmTOfS8hEx7o88cAtBMOwToB6W-fm68bU4BtbJkZ0eRFPMwqkMmxYkFkOARiVZyPEuxV7yQDvPWtIdgorWHMaNfd-B6wyQuw1dbOoPWGEfElmtS1lesO835qrn4P0IYJd6mNnXY_10vpHYsA2Oxq2SENaLfo3sIq5GizjxgXV-BBjOuFnQkW5&hl=ru -- Tomasina (talk) 21:44, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, small photo without metadata, the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 09:44, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

missing information, out of scope Ceroles (talk) 23:09, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, I'll delete all the user's uploads. They are historical photos without attribution, but not enough old for public domain. Filenames are typically bad, for example file:Hihihii.jpg. Taivo (talk) 09:49, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio. maybe Ceroles (talk) 23:15, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, historical photo, not own work as claimed, but not enough old for public domain. Taivo (talk) 10:01, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Note the license, year, and move-to-Commons warning on the original Italian Wikipedia file. Michael Barera (talk) 23:18, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, the photo is in public domain in Italy, but due to URAA not in USA until 2085. Taivo (talk) 10:10, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio of work "minecraft" (and potentially original author, uploader claims is his own but has been circulating on Internet for a few years), non-notable meme, out of project scope. Liance (talk) 23:46, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Minecraft screenshots are not free. Taivo (talk) 10:14, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Very obviously out of project scope, potential copyvio, not in use anywhere. Liance (talk) 23:47, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Minecraft screenshots are not free. Taivo (talk) 10:16, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Official photo which had previously been published elsewhere on the internet ([10]); needs evidence for permission. HaeB (talk) 23:47, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:17, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Potential copyvio of work "minecraft", not in use anywhere. Liance (talk) 23:48, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Minecraft screenshots are not free. Taivo (talk) 10:19, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Potential copyvio of work "minecraft", non-notable Internet meme, out of project scope, not in use anywhere. Liance (talk) 23:48, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Minecraft screenshots are not free. Taivo (talk) 10:21, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested for deleting this file via the app's "report a violation" feature Kaartic [talk] 02:09, 30 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Materialscientist (talk) 00:08, 6 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Potential copyvio of work "minecraft", not in use anywhere. Liance (talk) 23:49, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, very bad quality anyway. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:22, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Logo of non-notable "minecraft server", not in use anywhere and out of project scope. Liance (talk) 23:53, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Taivo (talk) 10:23, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Potential copyvio of work "minecraft". Liance (talk) 23:53, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


 Deleted, Minecraft screenshots are not free. This is the uploader's only contribution. Taivo (talk) 10:25, 14 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of copyright Carlitoscarlos (talk) 08:34, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete This is not a simple logo, no way. Taivo (talk) 12:01, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 18:58, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Skhawan

[edit]

Here are last remaining contributions of Skhawan (talk · contribs):

Unused personal photos are out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:05, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:19, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:SCOPE no encyclopedic value. The teenager in the photograph is the girlfriend of the uploader, he used this photo to create an article in Wikipedia in Spanish, without encyclopedic value. Metrónomo's truth of the day: "That was also done by the president" not an excuse. 10:11, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:24, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Zaidlaazizi

[edit]

Zaidlaazizi (talk · contribs) created in es.wiki an article about himself, which was speedily deleted, and userpage. Also he uploaded photos about himself. One of them is used on the userpage and the others nowhere. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 10:10, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:25, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Joyce See (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely own works, considering (not in that size) previously published via https://mtalvernia-hospital.org/history/ (Mount Alvernia Hospital. All Rights Reserved © 2016.). Source country most likely Singapore. "The hospital was officially opened on March 4, 1961.", fails also COM:CRT#Singapore (70 years publication). Most likely scanned from local archives. Further details/permisions needed.

Gunnex (talk) 10:18, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, lacks of info to determine copyright statut. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:29, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image/Photographs of identifiable people 최광모 (talk) 10:20, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Big photo with EXIF data, suitable for stock photo. Per https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:2014%EB%85%84_12%EC%9B%94_24%EC%9D%BC_%EA%B2%BD%EA%B8%B0%EB%8F%84_%EC%86%8C%EB%B0%A9%EA%B3%B5%EB%AC%B4%EC%9B%90_%EC%B5%9C%EC%8B%A0%ED%98%9C.jpg&oldid=181684715 the subject is identified. Taivo (talk) 09:25, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, private image + uploader request=fine for deletion with me. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:40, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image/Photographs of identifiable people 최광모 (talk) 10:20, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment Big photo with EXIF, maybe suitable for stock photo about board games. Per https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:201506_DSC01202_%EC%B5%9C%EA%B4%91%EB%AA%A8_SONY_DSC-RX10_20151029.JPG&oldid=178348047 the subject is identified. Taivo (talk) 09:29, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, subject's private or family life+uploader request. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:35, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image/Photographs of identifiable people 최광모 (talk) 10:20, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete People are identified (look history), but educational value is rather small. Taivo (talk) 12:43, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, subject's private or family life+uploader request. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:36, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image/Photographs of identifiable people 최광모 (talk) 10:20, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment People are identified (look file history). For me the photo seems quite interesting. Taivo (talk) 12:48, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, subject's private or family life+uploader request. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:36, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image/Photographs of identifiable people 최광모 (talk) 10:20, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment per https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:2015%EB%85%84_5%EC%9B%94_3%EC%9D%BC_%EA%B2%BD%EA%B8%B0%EB%8F%84_%EA%B3%BC%EC%B2%9C%EC%8B%9C_%EB%B3%84%EC%96%91%EB%A1%9C_111_%EC%A3%BC%EA%B3%B55%EB%8B%A8%EC%A7%80%EC%95%84%ED%8C%8C%ED%8A%B8_%EC%B5%9C%EC%8B%A0%ED%98%9C_DSC09796.JPG&oldid=177130009 the person is identified. Big photo with EXIF data, maybe suitable for stock photo. Taivo (talk) 12:52, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, subject's private or family life+uploader request. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:37, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image/Photographs of identifiable people 최광모 (talk) 10:21, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Persons are identified (look file history). Somehow it seems to me, that this is not suitable for stock photo. Taivo (talk) 12:55, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, private image + uploader request=fine for deletion with me. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:39, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Iskaziz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

This uploader has had two images deleted already that were claimed as "own work" and obviously not. Another user has had many images deleted that were "fair use". It's obvious that the logo included here is not "own work" as claimed. So, while these do not show up on Google Images, I think they should all have OTRS permission.

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 09:19, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete also file:Kampung Quest - Premiere Welcome Speech.jpg. Taivo (talk) 06:52, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not for these images -- it covers only a specific group of images different from these. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 21:05, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, no permission from the television producer or more likely from the tv chanel. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:17, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unclear copyright status. Uploaded on 01.07.2013 at Flickr (" ForFashionTV"), transferred to Commons 1 day later, but on same day also published via (example) http://www.eonline.com/photos/9239/2013-bet-awards-arrivals/296558 = http://www.eonline.com/eol_images/Entire_Site/2013530/rs_634x1024-130630174625-634.Chrisbrown.BET2013.6.30.13.JMD_copy.jpg (last modified: 01.07.2013), giving credits to "Frederick M. Brown/Getty Images for BET" = http://www.gettyimages.de/detail/nachrichtenfoto/recording-artists-chris-brown-and-sevyn-streeter-nachrichtenfoto/172006698 (June 30, 2013, credit: Frederick M. Brown). Permission needed.

Nominating also the crop: File:Sevyn Streeter cropped.jpg Gunnex (talk) 13:04, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:18, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Crowemusic (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Non-free cover and logo.

XXN, 13:06, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:19, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promo photo. No evidence of permission(s). EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:51, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
What permission is needed? I am the owner of the file and I am making it free to use for anyone. Maliotti (talk) 09:48, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, big size with EXIFS, no trace of a previous publication, the uploader have no deleted uploads, the images is in use. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:32, 17 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The uploader recognises that this is a derivative work of File:Autofellatio6.jpg, so they can not release this SVG under CC-0 when there are clear attribution requirements needed as part of the original file. 106.69.252.240 04:13, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: per Amitie. Green Giant (talk) 14:35, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files of Jindory1618

[edit]

Jindory1618 (talk · contribs) uploaded these photos:

First group. Mostly small photos and always without metadata. I suspect copyright violation.

I do not believe, that Woody the Woodpecker is his/her own work. Copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 08:31, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 14:44, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted photo from the Orchestre National de Lille. No persmission. Trizek from FR 10:11, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(message from Fredtq1 copied from talk page) "Hello, the copyright is that of Ugo Ponte and not that of the orchestre national de lille. The photographer Ugo Ponte offers the right on these photos of the maestro. Source: Flickr as well as photographer in person. "
Do you have the link to the Flickr page, to check? Thanks, Trizek from FR 14:29, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
 Delete Ugo Ponte in watermark, Ugo Ponte in EXIF. He must send OTRS-permission. If the file is deleted meanwhile, it can be restored, after the permission arrives. Taivo (talk) 09:15, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and Taivo. Green Giant (talk) 14:49, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope. Sismarinho (talk) 10:22, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment He is trainer of en:Fandango (wrestler) and en:Mark Henry. Taivo (talk) 13:14, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Taivo. Green Giant (talk) 14:56, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Ceroles (talk) 11:46, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Used in ar.wiki, that means, in scope. Taivo (talk) 16:24, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per Taivo. Green Giant (talk) 15:29, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal file. — Tulsi Bhagat (talk) 06:22, 9 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 10:40, 16 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The source for this was a US Air Force page which no longer exists, but the photographer is shown as "unknown". That is a red flag that this is not actually a US Air Force image as claimed -- the Air Force keeps good records and knows who took its images. Also note that this is an enemy general taken around the time he was an enemy. That also makes it unlikely that it was actually taken by an Air Force employee. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:25, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 15:31, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Emanuel De Cruz (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal doodle-art is outside of COM:SCOPE.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 16:55, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 15:32, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image of calligraphy has no description, no source, no author, no date and is categorized "Mecca". I looked at the page where it's in use, there is no additional information. Nominating for help determining the copyright status of this image. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:22, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: This appears to be the work of Ibn al-Wardi, who died about 1349. I have added the necessary information. Green Giant (talk) 18:39, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image of calligraphy has no description, no source, no author, no date and is categorized "Mappa Mundi". I looked at the page where it's in use, there is no additional information. Nominating for help determining the copyright status of this image. It certainly looks old enough but it's missing too much information. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:22, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: This appears to be the work of Ibn al-Wardi, who died about 1349. I have added the necessary information. Green Giant (talk) 18:39, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

imho rather 'family album', see en-profile and contribution, and doubtful educational usefulness, hence out of scope Wikimedia Commons, Roland zh (talk) 19:01, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. The user has a few content edits on Wikisource several months before uploading this single personal, which is more than sufficient to keep this file. Green Giant (talk) 19:10, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Contains more than just Thrips tabaci.--Kopiersperre (talk) 21:06, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. It makes sense after Kopiersperre's second comment. The redirect has been deleted and the cropped image has been moved there. Green Giant (talk) 19:23, 24 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Perché rappresenta la mia immagine personale 79.45.155.36 08:07, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Perché rappresenta la mia immagine personale Fabietto68 (talk) 08:35, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Big photo with EXIF data, usable as stock photo. Taivo (talk) 11:30, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:Courtesy deletions. Unused. --Storkk (talk) 11:45, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio. Missing information. Ceroles (talk) 23:15, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Whether the real author is known nor the date of this photo --> missing essential information.--Ceroles (talk) 10:56, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Unknown is not the same as anonymous. Burden of proof is to show that photographer intended to be anonymous or died before 1951, neither of which has even been claimed here. {{Own work}} claim is almost certainly false. --Storkk (talk) 11:47, 25 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This (and the uploader's other uploads) looks like it might be a screenshot from Google Street View. Check for example the characteristic blurring of the taxi's rear wheel here, blurring in "Share the Road" sign in File:CrouchNCTD.jpg, and the stitch marks in File:CoastHigwayNCTD.jpg. Can someone double check? Is there a way to tell for certain? 80.43.190.174 09:16, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:52, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

missing information. out of scope. Ceroles (talk) 11:47, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment That's probably Sahibzada Muhammad Ishaq Zaffar. Article project about him was rejected thrice. In addition, small photo without metadata, maybe not own work, but copyright violation. This cannot be 2016 photo, because depicted person died in 2006. Taivo (talk) 16:29, 5 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:53, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Lacking adequate source details / OTRS tag from photographer Ryan Fanshaw MPF (talk) 14:13, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:53, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image looks like scan from book, not like own image of wiki-editor. Dinamik (talk) 20:28, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:53, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image looks like scan from book, not like own image of wiki-editor. Dinamik (talk) 20:31, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:54, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image looks like scan from book, not like own image of wiki-editor. Dinamik (talk) 20:37, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:54, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

propagande Aga (d) 22:13, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

 KeepGlenn Greenwald and Dieudonné are both well-known. Sources in English and French. genium ⟨✉⟩ 22:25, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Logo is PD-text and it is in use to illustrate an discussion. Could very well be propaganda but that doesn't make it out of scope. Natuur12 (talk) 13:26, 12 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not in scope, no use elswhere. Kumkum (talk) 21:02, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination & with note: No point keeping an image of every twitter hashtag. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:54, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

found a picture with a higher resolution on Google. Copyvio Ceroles (talk) 23:14, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: Then, provide proof of copyvio. Vladimir Bilynsky (Білинський Володимир) born in 1852 and died in 1966, and is not too hard to determine how old is the photo (and how old seems Vladimir Bilynsky), and the copyright expiring term in Ukraine is 50 to 70 years after the death of the (know) author and first publication before 1951. Therefore, is very hard that this portrait is not in the PD yet. --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:54, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Please let me know who the real author is and whether he is living or not.--Ceroles (talk) 10:54, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Unidentified author, not own work. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 19:55, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Violation of copyright Carlitoscarlos (talk) 08:35, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment It seems to me, that the logo does not consist of only simple geometrical shapes and surpasses so threshold of originality, but I am not totally sure. Taivo (talk) 12:00, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: out of scope. --Jcb (talk) 00:46, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Some doubts about ownership by uploader, per Google-hits. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:15, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:48, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The image source is photobucket, and the licence is PD. This looks to me to be more of a TV screenshot. The other source which is mentioned is proekt-wms.narod.ru/states/nauru.htm -- this is a personal website whose data may have been released under GFDL. It's unfortunate that this photo has been on WMF servers now for 11 years, but it needs to be deleted. Hstap (talk) 10:35, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 00:46, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Illegal images taken while trespassing on my private property 174.25.19.243 00:24, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: unlikely to be true, and even if true would not be a criterion for deletion. --Storkk (talk) 16:37, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This plaque has a full sentence of text and is therefore under copyright. Since the NRHS listing was in 1992, this must be post-1989, so no copyright notice is required. It is not a Federal plaque, so PD-USGOV does not apply. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:48, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination - a google image search tells there is no such thing as a federal plaque for this, all plaques are different. This one also tells about a local Oregon status. --Jcb (talk) 13:42, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]