Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/03/25

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive March 25th, 2016
This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

mistakenly submission, this file may have copyright issue 李芝蘭 (talk) 08:59, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: speedied per nomination, as clear copyvio. --Túrelio (talk) 10:44, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

LaPresse Mars 1989 - Kopie.pdf Riboa111 (talk) 07:28, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Túrelio: File is corrupt, empty, or in a disallowed format

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Wrong space (creator probably meant to create a user page) — Racconish ☎ 14:19, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: HOusekeeping -- this should have been a {{Speedy}}. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 14:31, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self-promotion, no educational value Timmyshin (talk) 18:33, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Mys_721tx (talk) 21:12, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Images uploaded as part of a Batch upload. Those fail com:DW and there is no FOP in Italy for the sculptures.

Natuur12 (talk) 18:06, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:55, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

COM:DW issues Steinsplitter (talk) 17:42, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 07:01, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

self-promotion Timmyshin (talk) 18:33, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Mys 721tx: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

license is incorrect Fringioα†Ω 23:36, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: The license is correct - it just isn't allowed. --Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 05:08, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

non free use. it's a logo of a website: http://www.youned.com/portal.php 吴王阖闾 (talk) 01:14, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by NahidSultan: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Angelevyn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:18, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright violations. Martin H. (talk) 16:27, 30 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Angelevyn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted. Blatant copyvios. --Martin H. (talk) 19:04, 2 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Angelevyn (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Complex logos without proper sources. Some of the files were nominate for speedy deletion but Amitie 10g removed the speedy tags and added {{PD-Coa-Mexico}}. However, firstly I'm not sure this templates apply for school logos and for sport club logos, secondly there are no sources on the files and we can't verify they are "official" or not.

Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:16, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: deleted by Krd, per Commons:Requests for checkuser/Case/Angelevyn. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:58, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 05:59, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 00:43, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 06:00, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 00:45, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 06:00, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 00:42, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 05:58, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --shizhao (talk) 00:44, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Brunokito as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Contestazione da parte di Roberta Paganelli, autrice del libro sorgente della foto. Il motivo non è la violazione di copyright, ma la mancata vendita del libro a causa della presenza di queste foto
Converted by me for procedural reasons, as the image is still in use on 1 project. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:08, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ronhjones: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Maria Farneti - Herodiade.jpg: This file was initially tagged by Brunokito as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Contestazione da parte di Roberta Paganelli, autrice...

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Brunokito as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Contestazione da parte di Roberta Paganelli, autrice del libro sorgente della foto. Il motivo non è la violazione di copyright, ma la mancata vendita del libro a causa della presenza di queste foto
Converted by me to DR, as file should go under PD-Italy. -- Túrelio (talk) 09:34, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Ronhjones: Commons:Deletion requests/File:Maria Farneti4.jpg: This file was initially tagged by Brunokito as Speedy (Speedydelete) and the most recent rationale was: Contestazione da parte di Roberta Paganelli, autrice del libro...

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This sign was never used in Canada. Fry1989 eh? 19:50, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Denniss (talk) 20:18, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Again! User:Jermboy27 Mediatus (talk) 14:15, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Reuploaded by sock. --Achim (talk) 16:33, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This sign never existed in Canada. Fry1989 eh? 22:25, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: once more. --Achim (talk) 21:01, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This sign never existed in Canada. Fry1989 eh? 18:55, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Sock reupload. --Эlcobbola talk 21:12, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hamzan2015 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope: unused files, advertising or self-promotion for non-notable or non-existing websites

BrightRaven (talk) 09:32, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


The size, the lack of EXIF and the quality make me wonder if these are really own work. Moreover, they are probably out of scope too.

BrightRaven (talk) 09:35, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 14:52, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 10:53, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hamzan2015 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF + out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used (Wikipedia Zero upload).

Gunnex (talk) 19:49, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Nominating (per above) also:

Gunnex (talk) 22:02, 8 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 18:04, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Reginadeinisseni (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not realistically useful for an educational purpose.

— Racconish ☎ 16:56, 22 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Files uploaded by Reginadeinisseni (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No confidence that user created any of these images, there are two sets of Man in blue, woman in white, two of man and woman with face really close together, two of man in tie woman in white, a composite, two newspapers and an image cropped out of the preceding image. There is no indication of user's own work in any of these, only one photo (and its crop) have metadata.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:52, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm pretty sure all of them are self made (except for the screenshots). Anyway none of them have some educational purpose, so  Delete --Vituzzu (talk) 14:52, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 15:38, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doodle art by non-notable artist. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:49, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jameslwoodward: Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Reginadeinisseni - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porque todo lo que pone es total mente mentira sobre este barrio, y creo que esta equivocado y que seguro se refiere a otro barrio llamado las 3000 viviendas que situado Sevilla. 154.56.142.88 17:01, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Información falsa y ofensiva 83.40.214.88 21:04, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Dicha foto NO se corresponde con el nombre de este barrio ni con la catalogación de "barrio marginal" 87.218.144.69 11:38, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Instead of subjective rationales, it's more simple to note that's it's a copyvio: [1]. And the file has no license anyway, which is reason enough for deletion. -- Asclepias (talk) 17:22, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . --Didym (talk) 21:40, 31 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo. Out of scope logo, promotional. Josve05a (talk) 01:34, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:11, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Minixa (talk · contribs)

[edit]

unused personal files

2003:45:5C3D:DF01:9875:1AE:5031:A26E 05:48, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:12, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private / nonsense image, see nonsense category. Not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 06:00, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:12, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 06:05, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:12, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file 2003:45:5C3D:DF01:9875:1AE:5031:A26E 06:10, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:13, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo. Out of scope logo, promotional. Josve05a (talk) 06:24, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:13, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image of random baby. Out of scope. Josve05a (talk) 07:06, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:14, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete Out of scope and unused personal image. Riley Huntley (talk) 07:39, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:14, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 09:48, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:15, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 09:48, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:15, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. If IN scope, permission via https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=1001258829884284&set=a.157482034261972.29713.100000005281695&type=3&theater (06.2015) needed. Gunnex (talk) 10:13, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:16, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, unused selfie of encyclopedically non-notable person. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:21, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:16, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of COM:SCOPE, unused selfie of encyclopedically non-notable person. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:27, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:17, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

blurred crowd photo, with no pedagogic use Pippobuono (talk) 10:31, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:17, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AnandPadsumbiya (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused unencyclopedic personal image outside our scope.

§§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 09:07, 3 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: P 1 9 9   18:47, 22 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Unused personal photos of subject with no apparent notability. Not realistically useful for educational purposes and therefore outside of Commons' project scope.

LX (talk, contribs) 10:42, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:18, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, not used, not in scope Avron (talk) 10:47, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:19, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nikoleta Nikoletaki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope, Personal photos, not used anywhere, the user has no other contributions in any project.

Geraki TLG 10:50, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:20, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal artwork, not used, not in scope Avron (talk) 10:50, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:20, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, not used, not in scope Avron (talk) 10:54, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:21, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, not used, not in scope Avron (talk) 10:54, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:21, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photo, not used, not in scope Avron (talk) 10:57, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:21, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

peronal photo, not used, not in scope Avron (talk) 10:58, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:22, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dewakoplax (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

— Racconish ☎ 11:15, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, definitely out of scope. File:Dewakoplax.jpg should also be deleted (it's just a copy of Aldhi Gonzaen 03.jpg). -IagoQnsi (talk) 13:56, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:24, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I Deleted the last file too, because Dewakoplax has no valid edits in any projects, only userpages plus small vandalism. Taivo (talk) 12:19, 4 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photos, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 12:21, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:24, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ircsuman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 12:23, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:25, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal photo, out of scope Mjrmtg (talk) 12:23, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:25, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal photos, out of scope Pippobuono (talk) 12:23, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:26, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

probably useless, depicts a person, not used anywhere, wrongly categorised Pko (talk) 12:45, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:26, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Tanziimm (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 13:53, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:27, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:37, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:28, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope. unused. Ceroles (talk) 14:37, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:28, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam. Out of scope. Advertising Ceroles (talk) 14:37, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:29, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hanspeterleupp (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:38, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:30, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam. Out of scope. Ceroles (talk) 14:39, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:30, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:32, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kkunal singh rajpoot (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope

— Racconish ☎ 14:53, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 14:54, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:34, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

+ File:Logo de la fête des étudiants Valais pour 2014.png

Unused logos - Out of scope atm Scoopfinder(d) 14:59, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:36, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope — Racconish ☎ 17:17, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Same problem with:

--Túrelio (talk) 17:30, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:37, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No educational use NottNott talk|contrib 17:47, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:37, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope — Racconish ☎ 17:54, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:38, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Private / self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 17:56, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:38, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bizzow (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 18:03, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:38, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie: not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 18:05, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:39, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor snapshot of nonnotable individual. Not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 18:10, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:39, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:37, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:40, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:38, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:40, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:52, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:41, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:54, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:41, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - poor quality - no COM:EDUSE INeverCry 23:46, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:52, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MegiBerisha (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 23:48, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:53, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - no COM:EDUSE INeverCry 23:53, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:52, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:54, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:51, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:57, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:42, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:59, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:42, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Self-promotion and out of scope. Nick (talk) 23:27, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:57, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:27, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:56, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:36, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:56, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:37, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:55, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ayhams Adventure (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 23:39, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:55, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:40, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:54, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Craigslistboss (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 23:42, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:54, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Cuma yeşilbağ (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 23:50, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 11:53, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope Jcb (talk) 20:22, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:33, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; crude MS Paint drawing by the uploader IagoQnsi (talk) 20:25, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:33, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope; crude MS Paint drawing by the uploader IagoQnsi (talk) 20:25, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:33, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 21:34, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:31, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used-

Gunnex (talk) 21:35, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:31, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:35, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:29, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Dubbz94 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 22:36, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:29, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 22:54, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:24, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:00, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:24, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:07, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:25, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Duplicate of File:Logo of Google Drive.png. Fry1989 eh? 23:11, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unused poor duplicate. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:26, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:15, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:26, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Rana fa5ri (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 23:17, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:27, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:18, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:27, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:20, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:27, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:22, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:28, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:24, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:28, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope - unused personal image INeverCry 23:25, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:27, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

All the other files uploaded by this user were copyright violations, so I am not sure this is actually their own work. Random86 (talk) 00:54, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Grabbed from (example) Twitter via https://twitter.com/bapimagens/status/712365350902435841 (22.03.2016). Gunnex (talk) 19:50, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Already deleted as copyvio by Túrelio. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:38, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

We need source and licensing information for each image in the montage, and at present we don't have it. Diannaa (talk) 00:59, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete Unlikely own works, considering also 1 part (File:Taleghani Tower.jpg, also transferred from a local upload by en:User:Miladir, see also his local talk page and User talk:Miladir = serial copyright violator...) = copyvio via http://www.panoramio.com/photo/72870892 (2012, © All rights reserved by amirsartipi). Gunnex (talk) 08:23, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Gunnex. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:39, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Does not appear to be the uploader's own work, as it's web resolution, and has a watermark in the middle. Diannaa (talk) 01:02, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Amoot tower.jpg + Commons:Deletion requests/File:Karaj Collection.jpg + etc. = serial copyright violator. Gunnex (talk) 19:54, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination, COM:PRP. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:40, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

These seem to be out of scope.

Stefan2 (talk) 01:33, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:40, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Decor Australia (talk · contribs)

[edit]

OTRS tickets required

2003:45:5C3D:DF01:9875:1AE:5031:A26E 05:55, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:41, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jahedfb1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Dubious "own" works without EXIF

2003:45:5C3D:DF01:9875:1AE:5031:A26E 05:59, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:41, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyrighted packaging Ies (talk) 06:08, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:41, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kaíke Santanna (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copright status. Uploaded mostly in 03.2016 by Kaíke Santanna (talk · contributions · Statistics) (per social media analysis most likely his real name) all files seem to be (considering exif) copyrighted works by "Leonardo Santos / FocusFotografia", needing permission via COM:OTRS. Per File:Ariany Azevedo - 1° Ensaio de Ariany Azevedo e Convidados (Candeias-BA) 12-03-2016 (27).jpg versus Google+/FB most likely uploaded by a current band member. They may be also out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry (Brazilian singer "Ariany Azevedo") 3x speedy deleted (title blocked).

Gunnex (talk) 11:11, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:49, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

La photo ne représente pas le dolmen de Keristin mais un simple affleurement de granit. / The photo don't show the dolmen but only an rock in a meadow. Bzh-99 (talk) 11:12, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, uploader request. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:50, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

See Commons:Deletion requests/File:Let’s Encrypt logo.svg for an earlier deletion discussion Simon04 (talk) 11:11, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per Commons:Deletion requests/File:Let’s Encrypt logo.svg. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:51, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

likely copyvio and not own work. page 2: "© 2014 Her Justice" DavidIvar (talk) 11:48, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: probably out of scope too. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 13:57, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Legend Label (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Self-promoting image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 13:09, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:41, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image. bad resolution Ceroles (talk) 14:30, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:42, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image. bad resolution Ceroles (talk) 14:30, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:42, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:44, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photo of the uploader, a non-notable individual. Clearly out of scope IagoQnsi (talk) 15:00, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:46, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor snapshot of nonnotable individual, not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 18:14, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:38, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie of nonnotable individual, not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 18:19, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:36, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor snapshot of nonnotable individual, not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 18:21, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:36, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Poor snapshot of nonnotable child, not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 18:29, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: out of project scope. --George Chernilevsky talk 12:47, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not own work. It is from a published paper. I picked the wrong option when I uploaded this photo. Hphan1719 (talk) 00:06, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This is not own work. It is from a published paper. I picked the wrong option when I uploaded this photo. Hphan1719 (talk) 00:09, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:01, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation—has a watermark 2602:306:CDB2:4AF0:C44E:BB78:F7D0:A0EF 03:57, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violations. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:05, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio : google image Supertoff (talk) 04:14, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:06, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Description claims "This is my own work, also non-copyrighted work.", however, the uploader holds no rights to Brian Basset's work. Riley Huntley (talk) 06:59, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete As per OP. Rahul Bott (talk) 14:40, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:07, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of business — Preceding unsigned comment added by Wickpat (talk • contribs) 23:54‎, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not a valid reason for deletion. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:07, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

watermark, copyrighted Threecharlie (talk) 08:49, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:08, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

original image is from official site http://sovminrk.gov.uz/uz/photogallery/category/6 and can't be an "own work" Bogomolov.PL (talk) 09:06, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:09, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.rebel-uitvaart.nl/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Rebel-200-jaar-aanspreken-en-uitvaart-in-Huizen.pdf Agora (talk) 19:16, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Missing permission as of 25 March 2016 - Using VisualFileChange.

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Failed license review Ceroles (talk) 23:35, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep. license id OK. The picture is in public domain, because its author died more that 70 years ago (the pocture was made in 1838 btw). --Interfase (talk) 23:52, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The source of this digitalized picture seems to be an online shop. If you click on the image you will see a watermark ("Antique-prints.de") on it.--Ceroles (talk) 12:21, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
reproductions of 2D works does not give new copyright, even for digitalizations and colourations that lacks of creativity and originality. Therefore, the copyright belongs to the original painter, who died more than 70 years ago, and therefore, the original works is already in the PD. --Amitie 10g (talk) 00:09, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep, as forementioned the work is too old to be under copyright. A watermark doesn't change anything about that, it just would be a copyfraud. --Don-kun (talk) 08:38, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: as above. --Yasu (talk) 16:05, 2 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Infobox5 (talk) 12:37, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: uploader request and likely a copyright violation. --JuTa 07:27, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Infobox5 (talk) 12:39, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: uploader request and likely a copyright violation. --JuTa 07:29, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Infobox5 (talk) 12:40, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: uploader request and likely a copyright violation. --JuTa 07:28, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ferlianus (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope.

Ies (talk) 14:46, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: all by George Chernilevsky except which is File:Ferlianus Gulo1.jpg in use, therefore meets COM:SCOPE. Riley Huntley (talk) 07:23, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

false racist picture for a fake GrandCelinien (talk) 19:10, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:35, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Les Forains (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Fictional association, was used to create a hoax on wp.fr, (user blocked 1 week)

Do not follow (talk) 19:16, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Thibaut120094 (talk) 15:35, 4 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

false racist picture for a fake on fr.wp GrandCelinien (talk) 19:11, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Thibaut120094: Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Les Forains

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

fake logo for a racist fake on fr.wp GrandCelinien (talk) 19:14, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Thibaut120094: Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Les Forains

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused diagram of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:27, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jianhui67 talkcontribs 08:51, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not required 111.91.93.174 07:26, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep Good quality image clearly in scope, per the 18 categories where it is. Also, for not understanding your saying that this imwge is "not required" could you expand your reasoning to open this deletion request to more than two miserable words? Tm (talk) 12:53, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
111.91.93.174 -- what does that mean? An image can be deleted if it has no possible usefulness, or infringes on the rights of the subject of the photograph, but it's not going to be deleted just because it offends your personal sensibilities. AnonMoos (talk) 22:25, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. Riley Huntley (talk) 00:15, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from https://www.lp.org/candidates/presidential-candidates-2016. Doubtful the user actually took the photo. William S. Saturn (talk) 00:11, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:44, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from https://www.lp.org/candidates/presidential-candidates-2016. Doubtful the user actually took the photo. William S. Saturn (talk) 00:12, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:45, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from https://www.lp.org/candidates/presidential-candidates-2016. Doubtful the user actually took the photo. William S. Saturn (talk) 00:13, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, or taken from https://www.lp.org/candidates/presidential-candidates-16/steve-kerbel. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:46, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from https://www.lp.org/candidates/presidential-candidates-2016. Doubtful the user actually took the photo. William S. Saturn (talk) 00:13, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, or https://www.lp.org/candidates/presidential-candidates-16/cecil-ince. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:48, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from https://web.archive.org/web/20151226172344/https://www.lp.org/candidates/presidential-candidates-2016. Doubtful the user actually took the photo. William S. Saturn (talk) 00:14, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, or http://liberalforum.net/viewtopic.php?p=631909. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:49, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

per Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Photographs by Cory W. Watts Josve05a (talk) 05:33, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:54, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file is labelled as "own work". I find it doubtful; the subject has died in 1978. The image was likely taken beforehand. Can the author confirm that s/he has indeed taken the pictures by him/herself, back when the subject was alive? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 08:20, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The picture wasn't taken by me, it was taken in Jerusalem and was kept by my family. Omrikr (talk) 14:41, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: then you can not freely license this image, only the copyright owner can do such a thing. Christian Ferrer (talk) 19:58, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Date: 23 October 1955 Soure: Own work" Riiiight. Sure. Would the uploader kindly confirm that they have taken this picture, themselves, back in 1955? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 08:26, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, own work doubtfull. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:01, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Date: 1 June 1955 Soure: Own work" Would the uploader kindly confirm that they have taken this picture, themselves, back in 1955? Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 08:27, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, own work doubtfull. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:02, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low image resolution, no EXIF Threecharlie (talk) 08:51, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, copyvio http://www.turismo.ontinyent.es/cast/patrimoni/patrimoni2.htm. Christian Ferrer (talk) 20:04, 7 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete while this image is from a US Air Force photostream, it is clearly attributed to an non-governmental source Courtesy photo/United Launch Alliance, so cannot be claimed to be in the public domain as US Government work. Ww2censor (talk) 17:49, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What's the hurry? An admin will close it all in good time based on the posts. Ww2censor (talk) 16:56, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: Per the discussion above, it is clear that the US Air Force is not the copyright holder, and simple fact that the image is on US AF flickr photostream does not automatically makes the file PD. — regards, Revi 13:08, 9 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Company logo; not likely to be article worthy (not used in Article, only for User page image) or otherwise useful or interesting MECUtalk 01:20, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Zhuyifei1999 (talk) 16:27, 13 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal artowork apparently using File:Nowoberezowo - Church of Ascension of Jesus Christ 03.jpg not used, not in scope Avron (talk) 10:37, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:04, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I doubt that this image has really a free license as stated Avron (talk) 10:52, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no evidence of permission at source. --Basvb (talk) 19:04, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
Duplicate of images found:
علي الشرفاء 4
Thatonewikiguy (talk) 10:53, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:05, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Hirsch67 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope. Some houses and roofs of houses in some unknown place. The descriptions say that it is somewhere in the Corinthian Gulf but we don't even see the sea...

Geraki TLG 10:56, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: ok photos, some description, reasonably in scope. --Basvb (talk) 19:06, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality private image, not realistically useful for an educational purpose, out of project scope. Ies (talk) 12:52, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:06, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think this photo is out of scope. It was used in ruWP on page, where user tried to describe allegedly his own biography in style very close to vandalism. Dmitry89 (talk) 13:05, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • Maybe it is copyvio, because photo like from vk.com or smth like that, or maybe it is "no permission"-case, because in description user writes: "this photo was taken by father". Dmitry89 (talk) 13:08, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:06, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Orphaned/replaced by File:Rothenberger Gruppe.svg; {{BadJPG}}. Leyo 13:45, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:07, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, missing permission Jcb (talk) 14:21, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: it's most likely one of those option, going for out of scope. --Basvb (talk) 19:09, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Teremok bliny (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Commons:Derivative works from corporate design.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:09, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing essential information Ceroles (talk) 14:22, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:09, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nandhini subramanian (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused advertisement of school of questionable notability. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: already deleted by other admin. --Basvb (talk) 19:10, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nandhini subramanian (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Commons is not private photo album. Not used. Low quality.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:40, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:46, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

personal pic Ceroles (talk) 14:41, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:10, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Commons:Derivative works from music. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:42, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: yes, sadly, maybe reupload without sound if in scope?. --Basvb (talk) 19:11, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:46, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:12, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A crop from File:Imam-husiien-karblaa.JPG... this cropped version is not in use, and doesn't seem to be needed to keep as anyone who wished to crop the original image could do so. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:54, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: likely crop for this file. Nothing wrong. --Basvb (talk) 19:15, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Picture taken from a web page: rc-sub.com Gaijin (talk) 15:56, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:15, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

New user taken pictures from Internet. Gaijin (talk) 16:00, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:15, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

New user taking pictures from Internet. Gaijin (talk) 16:01, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:15, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

New user taking pictures from Internet. Gaijin (talk) 16:01, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:15, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

New user taking pictures from Internet. Gaijin (talk) 16:01, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Comment And we already have the sub in our collection: File:I-26 Japanese submarine.jpg. Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:10, 3 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:15, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photoshop. Nemtsov was arrested in Moscow in December (We can see green trees in the background). Also we can see Uncle Sam's hat as tatoo on the body of Boris Nemtsov (I believe, it's a political cartoon). LEANSER (talk) 17:03, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:18, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Allo002 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Not originally taken with a mobile phone. Taivo (talk) 17:32, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: scope issues. --Basvb (talk) 19:18, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. More information is needed about the actual creator of the painting. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:44, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Jose Maria Brel died 1894. [2] Thus PD-old. Basvb (talk) 19:21, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: 1894 dead date. --Basvb (talk) 19:22, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this screenshot. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:46, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: scope. --Basvb (talk) 19:20, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No indication of user's own work on this family snapshot. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:46, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: scope. --Basvb (talk) 19:20, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope. fan art Ceroles (talk) 23:09, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Basvb (talk) 19:23, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Suspicious image. Looks "photoshopped", unlikely combination of people and pose. Doing a reverse Google brings up a similar-looking standalone photo of Modi. BethNaught (talk) 23:20, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Basvb (talk) 19:23, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Screenshot of software which we ought to presume is copyrighted independent of the file uploader. BethNaught (talk) 23:25, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Jcb: Per Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Pdmead0

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is http://www.panoramio.com/photo/39028342 by Béla Somlai "© All Rights Reserved", is User:Gabriellkatona Béla Somlai or...? Oliv0 (talk) 19:33, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 22:15, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Pumba572~commonswiki (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Pumba572~commonswiki/logs (= around 40 uploads deleted related to Police of Puerto Rico) + similar behaviour for local enwiki uploads, considering en:User talk:Pumba572/logs (around 25 unfree deletions, also related mostly to Police of Puerto Rico)

Nominating (per above) also some files which were transferred from enwiki:


Gunnex (talk) 19:33, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 22:14, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

license claims own work, but also claims some other guys name. Gaijin42 (talk) 20:06, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 22:13, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per previous DR. Derivative work of the Jules Rimet Trophy, the rights to which are held by FIFA. - Fma12 (talk) 20:56, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 22:12, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Per previous DR: (1), (2), (3), among others. Derivative work of Confederations Cup, a trophy copyrighted by FIFA since 1992. - Fma12 (talk) 21:02, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 22:12, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing EXIF. Uploaded in 09.2014. Needs permission from the original photographer considering previously published via official https://www.facebook.com/745182405501734/photos/pb.745182405501734.-2207520000.1458941900./749428885077086/?type=3&theater (05.2014). Colored version (+ bigger frame) also available via https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=584530624891348&set=a.584528621558215.1073741825.100000032480702&type=1&theater (2013) Gunnex (talk) 21:44, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 22:11, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-credible claim of own work when compared with caption where in use. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:25, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 22:09, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-credible claim of own work when compared with caption where in use. Notice also burnout from flash on glass enclosed print. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:25, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 22:09, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Promotional image, on internet older. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:26, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 22:08, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Italoneris (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No confidence any of these images is own work of uploader, most are found on internet searches such as this. User has received warnings in the past for copyvios.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:27, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 22:08, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Nafees siddiqui ikauna (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No confidence of user's own work on these images, overprinting, various sizes, styles, etc. all suggest they're culled from the internet.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:29, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 22:08, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ravic381 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No confindence that any of these variable pictures, mostly of facebook size are own work of uploader. They include award groups, air shots, poster and promoational shots and so on.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:32, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 22:07, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lhagvajav (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No confidence that any of these illustrations was created by uploader, too variable, and too complicated to be COM:TOO.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:33, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 22:07, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lamba72 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope - unused personal images

INeverCry 22:34, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 22:06, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doodle art by non-notable artist. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:36, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 22:06, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from sourced book, not own work. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:37, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 22:06, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Gemmaragues (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Not own work, no indication of source other than one image is a book cover.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:40, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 22:02, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Jasurbek Nabijonov (talk · contribs)

[edit]

No indication of user's own work on these images.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:41, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Sorry for uploading these files. I would be better if I uploaded them using master of dowloads. These images were on the official site of Artel company. Jasurbek Nabijonov (talk) 13:43, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Please don't claim other peoples work as your own. Green Giant (talk) 22:01, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artwork without artists permission, COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:42, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 21:42, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not own work. Needs more information about actual artist, including life dates, as it's unlikely this was created by a 3-year old (1936-1939). Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:43, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 21:42, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Artwork without artists permission, COM:COPYVIO. Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:43, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 21:42, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation. This may be the submitter's "own work" in the sense that he captured the shot from his TV, but that doesn't mean that ABC doesn't own the rights to the image. Ubiquity (talk) 15:09, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete The same decision should be made for copy file:ABC's Wide World Sports.jpg. Taivo (talk) 15:20, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 22:29, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.
=> recent building, no FoP in France JeanBono (talk) 15:38, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

=> I cannot understand why you want to delete this picture , I took this picture myself on May 16th in 2015, the sun was setting, I could feel summer was coming ,  and because of stupid FoP (that it is not explained anywhere in Wikipedia) , you will transform this page into a boring full text website , with no pictures. I assume the fact that I want to post more pictures for this stadium , and for other great place all around the world , so send me your judge and I will deal with him. Vegas666 00:21, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. It's very simple. On Commons we cannot keep photos of copyright buildings in France. If you disagree, feel free to try to persuade Commons to change policies. Green Giant (talk) 22:27, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

recent building, no FoP in France JeanBono (talk) 15:38, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 22:24, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

recent building, no FoP in France JeanBono (talk) 15:38, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 22:24, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by User:Frickingen

[edit]

Claim "own work" questionable. Files apparently are stock shots from manufacturer HSM http:www.hsm.eu --Archie02 (talk) 17:42, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 22:23, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No freedom of panorama in Saudi Arabia. Taivo (talk) 18:31, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 22:17, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Despite name, the school is situated in Saudi Arabia. There is no freedom of panorama in Saudi Arabia. Taivo (talk) 19:15, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 22:17, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Freedom of panorama in Saudi Arabia is not okay. Canopus Grandiflora 22:51, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. As Commons:Copyright rules by territory#Saudi Arabia says, "protection period for applied art (handcrafted or manufactured) and photographs shall be twenty five years of the date of publication". There is no copyright to be protected if the applied art object – building in this case – is over 25 years old. This particular building was built in 1984 [3]. Copyright in its visual appearance therefore expired in 2009 under Saudi law. Prioryman (talk) 23:37, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
There is a difference between 2D and 3D structures. This is a three dimmensional structure and FoP rules will apply for this file rather than the one mentioned above.--Canopus Grandiflora 23:41, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Applied art objects can be 3D as well as 2D. Architecture itself is an applied art. [4] Since the building is over 25 years old, the length of time for which copyright protection obtains for an applied art object in Saudi Arabia, it is no longer under copyright. Prioryman (talk) 23:56, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Yann (talk) 19:34, 15 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is not an applied art, as it is a three-dimensional standing architecture. Per COM:FOP Saudi Arabia, no usable freedom of panorama in the Middle Eastern country. JWilz12345 (Talk|Contrib's.) 11:07, 29 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Missvain (talk) 01:03, 6 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This is routine request for small photo without metadata. Is the uploader really the photographer? Why the photo is so small? Can you upload a bigger version, for example, 2000×1500 pixels? Can you upload a version with EXIF data? Can you describe and categorize the file correctly? Taivo (talk) 19:18, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 22:16, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. Green Giant (talk) 22:16, 18 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Nothing more than an add. And nothing else by this user. Also take a look at the categories. Tobias "ToMar" Maier (talk) 00:38, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, out of COM:SCOPE. --Storkk (talk) 10:32, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be work of the uploader as it is claimed to be from somebody called "Sale" and original source is not clear so no evidence of claimed liicence MilborneOne (talk) 11:52, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Exif contains "Free to share! ;)", however we need a specific license - and the freedom to modify. "Sale" should confirm a license via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 10:34, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This appears to be a copyvio. It was uploaded by a SPA, who is probably not the real Pete Ricketts, and probably not the actual creator of the photo. The source appears to be this State of Nebraska page: https://governor.nebraska.gov/official-photos. The page itself is copyrighted; it offers a "Download high resolution photo" link, but does not expressly say what the photo may or may not be used for. Absent a clear indication that the photo's available for free use, I think we must assume that it's copyrighted and unavailable. Ammodramus (talk) 12:43, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This image has been made available by the Communications Office of Governor Pete Ricketts for use by media outlets, news organizations, and other organizations. It was uploaded to Wikipedia by his Communications Team. You can email his Public Relations Director Taylor Gage at taylor.gage@nebraska.gov or call him at 402-471-1970 to verify. GovRickettsComms (talk) 2:38, 25 March 2016 (UTC)


Deleted: per nomination: "made available" does not clearly confer the right to modify the photograph for commercial purposes. The instructions on COM:OTRS should be followed to confirm first that the Governor owns the copyright, and second to confirm the license. --Storkk (talk) 10:37, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by David Biro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Modern art. I think painter/heir(s) identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:18, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There seems to be permission, or it seems to be in progress at least, however most were deleted with a comment that they will be reuploaded again. Basvb (talk) 19:08, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: by Reinhard_Kraasch; one with permission kept. --Storkk (talk) 10:40, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by David Biro (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Unclear copyrights status of images.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:26, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is to inform you that I am the son of Ilka Gedő, and I am the copyright holder despite the fact that many of the works of Ilka Gedő are in public collections now. These public collections have not been granted full and exclusive copyright over the works, they have only been alloweed by me to publish the works in their onw museum publications.

David Biro (talk) 17:35, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

I have sent an email to Copmmons: [Ticket#2021030810010858] Confirmation of receipt (Re: Ilka Gedö (1921-1985 [...]) David Biro (talk) 18:36, 8 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination, text docs are out of scope. --P 1 9 9   15:28, 27 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

画質が低いからです。 Yami00785 (talk) 14:26, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination: unused, superseded by File:Japanese_Map_Symbol(State_Agency).png. --Storkk (talk) 10:44, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The only license I found on source site was "© Turkish Land Forces". Evidence is needed for CC-license. Taivo (talk) 17:50, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is text bottom of mil.ru main page: "© Все материалы интернет-портала Минобороны России доступны по лицензии Creative Commons Attribution 4.0". Mil.ru is clearly a free site. Taivo (talk) 19:31, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete On the first link of the terms of use like of the TSK I uploaded a pdf (the law n°4982). On the Article 29 (Madde 29) I read this:


Türkçe: "Bu Kanunla erişilen bilgi ve belgeler ticarî amaçla çoğaltılamaz ve kullanılamaz."

English: The contents and documents concerned by this law shall not be republished and used with a commercial purpose.


This is clear enough to justify the deletion of all the TSK contents.
Furthermore this law concerns all the "public institutions" (kamu kurum ve kuruluşları) (Article 2) and by "publications" (belge) is meant photographs or contents of any kind (Article 3d).
Kumkum (talk) 19:21, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep TSK.tr videos, photos and media User Social rights: TSK.tr other institutions, such as "knowledge acquisition and sharing of knowledge entitles"

Madde 19

d) Belge: Kurum ve kuruluşların sahip oldukları 4982 sayılı Kanun kapsamındaki

yazılı, basılı veya çoğaltılmış dosya, evrak, kitap, dergi, broşür, etüt, mektup, program, talimat, kroki, plan, film, fotoğraf, teyp ve video kaseti, harita, elektronik ortamda kaydedilen her türlü bilgi, haber ve veri taşıyıcılarını,

e) Bilgi veya belgeye erişim: İstenen bilgi veya belgenin niteliğine göre, kurum ve

kuruluşlarca, başvuru sahibine söz konusu bilgi veya belgenin bir kopyasınınverilmesini, kopya verilmesinin mümkün olmadığı hallerde, başvuru sahibinin bilgi veya belgenin aslını inceleyerek not almasına veya içeriğini görmesine veya işitmesine izin verilmesini,

f) Kurul: Bilgi Edinme Değerlendirme Kurulunu,
g) Kanun: 9/10/2003 tarihli ve 4982 sayılı Bilgi Edinme Hakkı Kanununu,

ifade eder. BurakOtto (talk) 09:41, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello BurakOtto please read Commons:Licensing/tr. The law 4982 says non-commercial, without exception. Commons has no NC-compatible license. Kumkum (talk) 13:15, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per Kumkum, Non-commercial licenses are not allowed on commons. --Storkk (talk) 10:50, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Why do you think, that the photographer is 70 years dead? Photographed not later than 1930, published after 1991. Taivo (talk) 18:29, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • даже не знаю, сколько же должно быть лет фотографу. Даже если допустить, что к моменту 1930 года фотографу было лет 20, то ему сегодня должно быть 106 лет(!!!). Может лучше лицензию сменить на old-Russia и по пункту 3 ??--Migel Sances Huares (talk) 19:36, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination... the photographer must have died more than 70 years ago, which has not been demonstrated. --Storkk (talk) 10:56, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's my photo and now it's violating the policy and I can't use it in the article about the player LulyBre (talk) 18:48, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

What do you mean with "my photo"? Are you the official photographer? — Yerpo Eh? 08:38, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: COM:PRP - uploader raises significant concerns. Photographer should confirm license via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 10:58, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It's my photo but has been entered incorrectly so I can't use it because it's violating copyright rules LulyBre (talk) 18:49, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: COM:PRP - uploader raises significant concerns. Photographer should confirm license via COM:OTRS. --Storkk (talk) 10:58, 19 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LOUISSIMOES (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF. Uploaded between 05.—06.2015. Considering also File:Anibal Capela.jpg = cropped from (example) http://desporto.sapo.tl/futebol/taca_da_liga/artigo/2015/01/28/fc-porto-uma-das-melhores-equipas-a-n-vel-europeu (01.2015, SAPO - Todos os direitos reservados), a copyrighted work by "Foto: PAULO NOVAIS / LUSA" and File:V. Guimarães 79-80.jpg, grabbed from (example) http://gloriasdopassado.blogspot.de/2008/04/melo.html (2008) = http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_7tsmgYAv2ao/R_DS5v0DjZI/AAAAAAAAI9g/eKO_u5hXdu0/s1600/41%2B-%2B79%2B80%2BEquipa%2BD.jpg etc.

Gunnex (talk) 12:52, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 21:43, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by LOUISSIMOES (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely own works.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 17:25, 16 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. - FitIndia Talk 07:19, 23 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.rebel-uitvaart.nl/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Rebel-200-jaar-aanspreken-en-uitvaart-in-Huizen.pdf Agora (talk) 19:17, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: copyright has obviously expired. --Jcb (talk) 21:44, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

https://www.rebel-uitvaart.nl/wp-content/uploads/2013/01/Rebel-200-jaar-aanspreken-en-uitvaart-in-Huizen.pdf Agora (talk) 19:18, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: copyright has obviously expired. --Jcb (talk) 21:44, 20 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Taken from https://www.lp.org/candidates/presidential-candidates-2016. Doubtful the user actually took the photo. William S. Saturn (talk) 00:12, 25 March 2016 (UTC) This photo was taken and edited by Shawna Joy Sterling. I know because I am Shawna Joy Sterling and I took the photo of myself using my computer's camera. I give permission for this photo to be used on Wikimedia Commons and under the Creative Commons License. Thank You! - Shawna Joy Sterling Libertarian Presidential Candidate --ShawnaSterling (talk) 23:25, 29 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:10, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful the uploader took the photo William S. Saturn (talk) 00:27, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Comment See page 3 of PDF (paper page 14). I'm pretty sure there's no copyright notice (parent webpage for that year's pamphlet series). Would that image pass muster as a free substitute under pre-1978? As I would assume so, I would have uploaded it already except for lack of a quality scan (that PDF scan I point to is not something I would upload out of quality concerns).RadioKAOS (talk) 09:01, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no evidence of publication by author without copyright notice. --Jcb (talk) 11:12, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful the uploader took the photo William S. Saturn (talk) 00:27, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:13, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful the uploader took the photo William S. Saturn (talk) 00:28, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:13, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Doubtful the uploader took the photo William S. Saturn (talk) 00:28, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:13, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing crucial information. ("Please provide where the image was first published and who created it.") Josve05a (talk) 01:19, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:13, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There's no evidence on the source website that the material therein is in the public domain. The only states that do this are Florida and California. The source webpage bears a banner © 2016 Office of Lt. Governor Brad Owen. Diannaa (talk) 01:44, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Diannaa: Please see http://www.ltgov.wa.gov/about-this-site/. It states, "Because the content on this web site is considered public information, it may be copied, downloaded, or distributed unless otherwise specified. We request that you give appropriate byline/photo/image credits. Use of lists of individuals (including address, phone or e-mail) provided on this site for commercial purposes is prohibited under RCW 42.17.260(9)." Nowhere does it say that Lt. Gov. Owen's image may not be copied or reproduced. MB298 (talk) 01:45, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Not sure this is free enough, as it does not specify that derivative works or commercial use are permitted. Diannaa (talk) 01:48, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The specific law is here. MB298 (talk) 19:51, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: a picture is not "public information". --Jcb (talk) 11:16, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Exif metadata seems non own work AntanO 03:13, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:17, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

URV, Cover hat Schöpfungshöhe Jbergner (talk) 06:50, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Bin Urheber des Covers. --Neko Kittycat (talk) 07:11, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: permission can be sent to OTRS. --Jcb (talk) 11:17, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced with File:The Pilgrim Cookbook 152.png Einstein95 (talk) 08:34, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: not exact duplicate. --Jcb (talk) 11:18, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The Nobel Prize medal is a copyrighted artistic work by the Swedish sculptor and engraver Erik Lindberg (1873–1966), and since this is a screenshot, it can not be claimed as de minimis. Josve05a (talk) 08:52, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Keep: I've removed the non-free elements (effectively not de minimis).  Speedy delete the previous version. --Amitie 10g (talk) 23:34, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: first version of the file. --Jcb (talk) 11:20, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The face of Brazilian actress Alinne Moraes has been photoshopped onto the woman in this pornographic image. The original image can easily be found in a Google Image or Tineye search. A copyright violation for the original images and just morally wrong for doing that to the actress Libertybison (talk) 09:08, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:22, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this image is at numerous sites [5] and is not an "own work" Bogomolov.PL (talk) 09:10, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:24, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyvio. Coat of arms of Seminario de Estudos Galegos is not in DP (Copyright Seminario de Estudos Galegos and Alfonso Daniel Rodríguez Castelao) . HombreDHojalata.talk 09:30, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I uploaded it because I understand that it's below the threshold of originality. Bye, --Elisardojm (talk) 20:19, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: not below TOO. --Jcb (talk) 11:25, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Orphaned logo (probably replaced); {{BadJPG}}. Leyo 09:38, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:25, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is unauthorized reproduction from https://twitter.com/GET_AWAY_TRIKE/status/612613497361305600 or http://www.pixiv.net/member_illust.php?mode=medium&illust_id=51181603 and modified silhouette without permission. 119.240.89.209 09:58, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Couldn't it simply be the same person who uploaded them both places? FunkMonk (talk) 10:52, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no evidence of permission. --Jcb (talk) 11:32, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion was way premature. I have contacted the uploader and asked if he also operates the Twitter account. FunkMonk (talk) 12:06, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is unauthorized reproduction from https://twitter.com/GET_AWAY_TRIKE/status/677004974358978560 and modified silhouette without permission. 119.240.89.209 10:07, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Couldn't it simply be the same person who uploaded them both places? FunkMonk (talk) 10:51, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: no evidence of permission. --Jcb (talk) 11:32, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

used in different blogs dated back 2010 (e.g. http://enlodehoracio.blogspot.de/2010_12_01_archive.html), file: http://4.bp.blogspot.com/_hyml2W3On9o/TQieyAnnnvI/AAAAAAAAABs/Zw8l03SF9vQ/s1600/Adlo-exposici%25C3%25B3n.jpg. Suspicious copyright status. One time upload account. Wdwd (talk) 10:22, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:32, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

the uploader has uploaded a low quality photo of a person, then uploaded a high quality image of an aircraft. The copyright situation of both imges is unclear. In case of Category:Beechcraft King Air we have other photos. Avron (talk) 10:23, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:34, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

IP 2a02:8109:ac40:9b0:cd7:ab97:162e:23c4 posted the following comment onto the image page: "Guten Tag, mein Name ist Margit Rosenberger und dieses Bild stammt von mir. Ich habe die Benutzung des Bildes nicht autorisiert und kann auch nicht erkennen, zu welchem Artikel er gehört. Bitte um Entfernung!", which I formed into a DR. -- Túrelio (talk) 10:32, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Should be handled and clarified via COM:OTRS (Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard) - the IP user could by anyone. We have a permission via OTRS from a german artist agency (copyright holder) which looks plausible to me ( Keep).--Wdwd (talk) 11:00, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Actually, permission comes from BerlinActorsMeeting, but the reasoning behind their claim of copyright ownership is not immediately clear to me. Storkk (talk) 15:34, 1 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination and per Storkk. --Jcb (talk) 11:38, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Seems to be superfluous as also indicated in the comment "not needed, deletion will be requested soon; meanwhile it is used for tests". Simon04 (talk) 11:13, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:38, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

low resolution, probably taken from Google. Exif file has no information. A 2015 camera does not take photos with this low resolution Triplecaña (talk) 11:41, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I have shot this photo by myself, not from Google. I can upload new one, of original size if it's necessary — Preceding unsigned comment was added by 109.252.231.164 (talk) 07:05, 28 March 2016‎ (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:39, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this image is present in the numerous sites [6] and can't be an "own work" Bogomolov.PL (talk) 11:45, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:39, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is present in the numerous sites [7] and can't be an "own work" Bogomolov.PL (talk) 11:48, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:40, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is present in the numerous sites [8] and can't be an 'Own work" Bogomolov.PL (talk) 11:58, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:40, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

this file is a copy of File:Вид на ул каракалпакстан.jpg which was nominated for deletion Bogomolov.PL (talk) 12:01, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:40, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Helder100 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolution, missing (7x)/inconsistent EXIF, max res 376px. Uploaded in a row on 06.11.2015 for es:Joan Oliva Peña (a Spanish football manager, eswiki entry created on same day). Considering also File:Camp Nacional Huambo.jpeg + (identical) File:Joan Oliva Camp Nac.png (max 354px) --> previously published (even in b&w) via https://futbolholistico.com/2015/07/14/joanoliva-2/ (07.2015) = https://fholistico.files.wordpress.com/2015/07/joanoliva2.jpg (identical exif, 1417px)

Gunnex (talk) 12:19, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:41, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent painting. Can be found on line. Probably not own work. BrightRaven (talk) 12:26, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:46, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Recent painting. Can be found on line. Probably not own work. BrightRaven (talk) 12:28, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:46, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:CBPassos/logs (4 related uploads = 3x copyvio) Gunnex (talk) 12:56, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:47, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ricardooctavio120 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Ricardooctavio120 and File:Lucas Stamillo - Universidade do Estado de Minas Gerais - Frutal.jpg (mysteriously watermarked).

Gunnex (talk) 14:10, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:47, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing essential information Ceroles (talk) 14:18, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: copyright has expired. --Jcb (talk) 11:50, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing information about author. Source down. Ceroles (talk) 14:27, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I do not understand, why you take deletion requests so personal? I saw this behavior of you, E4024, against Ceroles on a similar case and I think this has nothing to do good work on commons. Please discuss such topics with a bit more of professionalism instead of attacking someone on personal basis. This is just an advice.--SebiNator (talk) 18:19, 21 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
A warm welcome to Commons, SebiNator.Then let me explain it to you. First look at the user's own talk page. Full of notification of the deletion of their own pictures; (none was sent by me, BTW). What does this show you? To me it shows (1) either they have no notion on which bases pictures are deleted, or (2) while they are trying to get deleted pictures of Atatürk, they are trying to impose pictures -which are lated deleted- on... Kurdish issues. You decide who is more "professional" or has a nationalist POV. (P.S. I don't collect any salary or commissions for contributing here. :-) Best. --E4024 (talk) 07:02, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! We all should not be motivated by nationalism or hate. But as I can see, this picture of Reza Shah and Mustafa Ataturk is really lacking in information about the author. It would be very nice to see any evidence. This is just the 'neutral point of view'. And I did not ascribe any bad purposes to you regarding your contributions. A good advice from Wikipedia: Assume good faith. --SebiNator (talk) 18:43, 22 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  •  Delete The picture is lacking in information about the author at the moment. An evidence would be nice to see (maybe E4024 can help). — Preceding unsigned comment added by SebiNator (talk • contribs)

Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 11:53, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely authorship claims. For the uploader to have taken this photograph in 1914, they would have to be one of the oldest persons in the world. LX (talk, contribs) 14:28, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@ LX. Thanks also for this one. I believe this image should also fly. The quality is also not fantastic, like the other one of the church opening, but still looks workable. It is sourced from a 1950 reprint of the 1914 press (ie, when the church opened) so I agree not through the 70 year gate but discretionary as close? It's not my own work. Thank you, Campbell.


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:54, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely authorship claims. For the uploader to have taken this photograph in 1914, they would have to be one of the oldest persons in the world. LX (talk, contribs) 14:28, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@ LX. Thanks. I believe this image should fly. Noted the quality is not fantastic, but looks workable and from the 1914 press (ie, when the church opened) so through the 70 year gate. It's not my own work. Thank you, Campbell. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Campbell Anderson (talk • contribs) 15:26, 27 March 2016‎ (UTC)[reply]

This is not about the quality. Please provide correct source, authorship and copyright information on the file description page, including evidence that the real author died more than 70 years ago or that the photograph was first published more than 70 years ago and that the name of the author was never disclosed. Thanks, LX (talk, contribs) 17:07, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:54, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr user's Birds album is highly suspicious, containing at least 4 copyright marked files: https://www.flickr.com/photos/71670325@N03/18544768318/in/album-72157654112455115/ - clearly watermarked copyright by Arkive.org https://www.flickr.com/photos/71670325@N03/19371315973/in/album-72157654112455115/ - likewise https://www.flickr.com/photos/71670325@N03/20589489735/in/album-72157654112455115/ - clearly watermarked copyright Fuente InBio https://www.flickr.com/photos/71670325@N03/17412941564/in/album-72157654112455115/ - clearly watermarked PlanetScott.com so I'm guessing many, if not all, of the other images in his account should be viewed as suspect. GRuban (talk) 14:31, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:59, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr user's Birds album is highly suspicious, containing at least 4 copyright marked files: https://www.flickr.com/photos/71670325@N03/18544768318/in/album-72157654112455115/ - clearly watermarked copyright by Arkive.org https://www.flickr.com/photos/71670325@N03/19371315973/in/album-72157654112455115/ - likewise https://www.flickr.com/photos/71670325@N03/20589489735/in/album-72157654112455115/ - clearly watermarked copyright Fuente InBio https://www.flickr.com/photos/71670325@N03/17412941564/in/album-72157654112455115/ - clearly watermarked PlanetScott.com so I'm guessing many, if not all, of the other images in his account should be viewed as suspect. GRuban (talk) 14:31, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:59, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr user's Birds album is highly suspicious, containing at least 4 copyright marked files: https://www.flickr.com/photos/71670325@N03/18544768318/in/album-72157654112455115/ - clearly watermarked copyright by Arkive.org https://www.flickr.com/photos/71670325@N03/19371315973/in/album-72157654112455115/ - likewise https://www.flickr.com/photos/71670325@N03/20589489735/in/album-72157654112455115/ - clearly watermarked copyright Fuente InBio https://www.flickr.com/photos/71670325@N03/17412941564/in/album-72157654112455115/ - clearly watermarked PlanetScott.com so I'm guessing many, if not all, of the other images in his account should be viewed as suspect. GRuban (talk) 14:32, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:59, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal image. Fun pic. Ceroles (talk) 14:32, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:59, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr user's Birds album is highly suspicious, containing at least 4 copyright marked files: https://www.flickr.com/photos/71670325@N03/18544768318/in/album-72157654112455115/ - clearly watermarked copyright by Arkive.org https://www.flickr.com/photos/71670325@N03/19371315973/in/album-72157654112455115/ - likewise https://www.flickr.com/photos/71670325@N03/20589489735/in/album-72157654112455115/ - clearly watermarked copyright Fuente InBio https://www.flickr.com/photos/71670325@N03/17412941564/in/album-72157654112455115/ - clearly watermarked PlanetScott.com so I'm guessing many, if not all, of the other images in his account should be viewed as suspect. GRuban (talk) 14:33, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:59, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Flickr user's Birds album is highly suspicious, containing at least 4 copyright marked files: https://www.flickr.com/photos/71670325@N03/18544768318/in/album-72157654112455115/ - clearly watermarked copyright by Arkive.org https://www.flickr.com/photos/71670325@N03/19371315973/in/album-72157654112455115/ - likewise https://www.flickr.com/photos/71670325@N03/20589489735/in/album-72157654112455115/ - clearly watermarked copyright Fuente InBio https://www.flickr.com/photos/71670325@N03/17412941564/in/album-72157654112455115/ - clearly watermarked PlanetScott.com so I'm guessing many, if not all, of the other images in his account should be viewed as suspect. GRuban (talk) 14:34, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 11:59, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Inferior duplicate of File:Прапор віце-адмірала УДФ.png PsichoPuzo (talk) 14:45, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 12:00, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Undescribed, uncategorized upload, no metadata, no categories and not used, seems out of COM:SCOPE. Ellin Beltz (talk) 15:48, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • It's COM:INUSE on arwiki, but the local copy has not yet been deleted, so this information isn't shown on Commons. No idea if arwiki has information about the image confirming the copyright tag. Such information is at least absent from Commons. --Stefan2 (talk) 21:57, 28 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
added some info from the article, however author is unknown, image is from 1937. might be an issue with the pd old. Basvb (talk) 19:14, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:01, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probably derived from http://www.isatnetworks.com/news/4580827025 KevM (talk) 17:02, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Very weird situation. Our image has more details and is much higher res than the linked image, maybe they have the same source file somewhere else? Basvb (talk) 19:17, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:02, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I question the "own work". No meta data. Google leads to this" Wouter (talk) 17:33, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Source might have copied image from here (nothing indicating a date). Basvb (talk) 19:19, 16 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:08, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Obraz nebyl naskenován celý, je zde jenom malý výřez pravého dolního roku Ivas1950 (talk) 17:45, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:10, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:30, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File:Keil-Delitzsch.JPG Jonund (talk) 18:07, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

As the photographer of File:Keil & Delitzsch.jpg, I happily call for the deletion of the photo and the substitution by the new photo. Pete unseth (talk) 19:57, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: to prevent problems for possible reusers outside Wikimedia/Wikipedia. --Jcb (talk) 12:30, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file has two problems. 1) Depicted person in non-notable, no mention neither in en.wiki nor in es.wiki. 2) The file seems to be a selfie and "author – hosana" confirms that, but uploader seems to be different. Taivo (talk) 18:10, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:31, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Selfie of nonnotable individual, not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 18:11, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:31, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Snapshot of nonnotable individual, not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 18:12, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:32, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Snapshot of nonnotable band members, not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Ruff tuff cream puff (talk) 18:18, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:32, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low resolution, replaced by File:Logo FC Sion.svg. Leyo 18:48, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:33, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing legal info Fixertool (talk) 19:24, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:33, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Graphics from Google: example: https://www.google.com.ar/search?q=caputo+saic+y+f&rlz=1C1CHWA_esAR648AR649&oq=caputo+saic+y+f&aqs=chrome..69i57j0.1701j0j7&sourceid=chrome&ie=UTF-8#q=CAPU+cotizacion 186.135.128.128 19:51, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:34, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

what are the reasons for PD-UKGov ? who says that it was created by the United Kingdom Government Goesseln (talk) 21:14, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:34, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy of File:Tuzi_Montenegro.png. Erroneously changed name of lake to Albanian, while all other names are still in English. Redirect there. Zoupan (talk) 21:37, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: fixed source - in use. --Jcb (talk) 12:37, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

You have duplicated something that is already freely available but removed acknowlegment of the source 1.152.97.109 22:07, 25 March 2016 (UTC) I represent the copyright holders and this image has been modified to remove descriptive text and the copyright without permission. This image is already freely available on the internet for users to download. Why duplicate and delete the description and supply an image without context that is readily available from the source webpage? The source webpage is reliant on a vast amount of expert volunteer effort which includes the goodwill of supplying validated images.[reply]


Deleted: copyvio. --Jcb (talk) 12:38, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Lipsia Fine Arts (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Artwork by living artist, without COM:OTRS permission.

Ellin Beltz (talk) 22:41, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

A permission to use these images was sent to the support team. --Lipsia Fine Arts (talk) 04:59, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Kept: per ticket. --Jcb (talk) 12:39, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Missing information about author or his/her death. License review Ceroles (talk) 23:22, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:40, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

license review Ceroles (talk) 23:26, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: unknown is not the same as anonymous. --Jcb (talk) 12:42, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Failed license review. Missing information about real author. Ceroles (talk) 23:32, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader requested Elisfkc (talk) 23:45, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: several months after upload you have to come up with more than just 'uploader requested'. --Jcb (talk) 12:44, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested. Did not curate before uploading Elisfkc (talk) 21:33, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:39, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader requested Elisfkc (talk) 23:45, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 12:44, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested. Did not curate before uploading Elisfkc (talk) 21:33, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:40, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader requested Elisfkc (talk) 23:46, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 12:44, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested. Did not curate before uploading Elisfkc (talk) 21:33, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:40, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader requested Elisfkc (talk) 23:46, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 12:44, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested. Did not curate before uploading Elisfkc (talk) 21:33, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:40, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Uploader requested Elisfkc (talk) 23:46, 25 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion. --Jcb (talk) 12:44, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Author requested. Did not curate before uploading Elisfkc (talk) 21:33, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Ellin Beltz (talk) 02:40, 15 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Replaced by file:LIGO schematic (multilang).svgUser: Perhelion 00:00, 26 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Jcb (talk) 12:45, 23 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]