Commons:Deletion requests/Archive/2016/02/11

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Commons logo
Commons logo

This is an archive, please do not edit. Post new cases at Commons:Deletion requests.

You can visit the most recent archive here.

Archive
Archive
Archive February 11th, 2016

Commons:Deletion requests/Commons:Paid contribution disclosure policy

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:49, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]



Deleted: This is a speedy -- it has been deleted previously. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:52, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GoTBRAYS (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Getty: http://www.today.com/pets/salty-relative-wranglers-led-blind-owner-safety-71st-floor-9-t43471

Ytoyoda (talk) 04:07, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by NahidSultan: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Porbably copyvio from http://en.vietnamairport.vn/page/102/airports/noi-bai-international-airport - [Tycho] talk 14:50, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Speedily, obvious copyvio. --Revent (talk) 15:11, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Arijana Maric Gigliani, an opera singer.jpg

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

posible violación del copyright desde http://mariskalrock.com/index.php/2015/02/23/presentacion-del-nuevo-single-de-juan-saurin-producido-por-pepe-herrero/ Tarawa1943 (talk) 12:24, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Billinghurst: Copyright violation; see Commons:Licensing: Copyright violation: copyvio https://twitter.com/fansjuansaurin

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

copyrighted logo. Vanjagenije (talk) 22:15, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: actually speedy-deleted as a fair use logo. --odder (talk) 23:56, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

File is missing permission for reuse by the original photographer. According to the tag on the image page an email was sent to OTRS, but was not sufficient to actually confirm permission. DAJF (talk) 04:44, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: Please do not interfere with the OTRS process. --Jcb (talk) 00:49, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyvio from http://www.thehindubusinessline.com/info-tech/aegis-on-expansion-mode/article4931888.ece NeemNarduni2 (talk) 12:08, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Here is the official permission from Aegis Ltd

Dear Team,

I hereby affirm that Aegis Ltd the creator and/or sole owner of the exclusive copyright of the picture of Mr. Sandip Sen, Chief Executive Office, Aegis Global Ltd.

I agree to publish that work under the free license Creative Commons Attribution v1.0, 2.0, 2.5, 3.0 9 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/1.0/)

I acknowledge that by doing so I grant anyone the right to use the work in a commercial product or otherwise, and to modify it according to their needs, provided that they abide by the terms of the license and any other applicable laws.

I am aware that this agreement is not limited to Wikipedia or related sites.

I am aware that I always retain copyright of my work, and retain the right to be attributed in accordance with the license chosen. Modifications others make to the work will not be claimed to have been made by me. I acknowledge that I cannot withdraw this agreement, and that the content may or may not be kept permanently on a Wikimedia project.

Link to online source - (Flicker photo uploaded link) Example

Link to online source - https://www.flickr.com/photos/127514536@N03/ (along with same license mentioned above)


Vinod Kumar M | Vice President - Marketing | Aegis Limited | Essar House, No 41, St. John's Road, Bengaluru - 560042 | Karnataka | India | T +91 80 66376666, Extn.: 6769 | M +91 9845012076 | E vinod.m@aegisglobal.com | W www.aegisglobal.com | --Deepakhmwiki (talk) 13:49, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: OTRS ticket received. -- Darwin Ahoy! 14:50, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Aleator as duplicate of File:Dònes de cor (1907).djvu, which is not exactly the situation, though for the purposes of the Wikisources transcriptions is essentially the case. @Micru: your upload  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:40, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I believe that it properly should be  Delete, though feel that Micru should be given the opportunity to comment due to the difference in file size, quality, etc.  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:41, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
@Billinghurst: Ok, I agree with Aleator, delete the one I uploaded.--Micru (talk) 16:14, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: per nomination.  — billinghurst sDrewth 14:02, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Erkankokk (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Album covers and promo photos. No evidence of permission(s).

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:40, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 00:51, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

It is highly unlikely that the logo, which is incorporated in the image, is licensed under the stated Creative Commons license. In the unlikely event that it is, we need evidnce. JamesBWatson (talk) 21:43, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by NahidSultan: Copyright violation, see Commons:Licensing

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

i upload the wrong picture SilviaCoimbra (talk) 21:57, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Taivo: Author requested deletion of page: author's request on creation day

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No evidance of permission. If the uploader is the owner, they must email OTRS with consent Mlpearc (open channel) 06:31, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: [2016021310007408 OTRS ticket received]. -- Darwin Ahoy! 13:59, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Test drawing, useless for the project L736E (talk) 18:25, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 13:58, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible copyright violation. EXIF-data show "Juergen Tap / Hoch Zwei" as copyright-holder. http://hoch-zwei.net Archie02 (talk) 18:49, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:01, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible Copyright violation. Source of one of the three frames: http://www.euronics-deutschland.de/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Slider3a.jpg Archie02 (talk) 18:52, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 17:59, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible Copyright violation. Source : http://www.euronics-deutschland.de/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Slider3a.jpg Archie02 (talk) 18:57, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. --Yann (talk) 18:00, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Possible Copyright violation. Source http://www.euronics-deutschland.de/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/Slider4-578x178.jpg Archie02 (talk) 19:00, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: http://www.forum-koepenick.de/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/media-at-home-wuntke-shops-elektro-foto-titelbild.jpg. --Yann (talk) 18:03, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not for free use FRDian (talk) 06:59, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Copyright vioailtion. --Mys_721tx (talk) 06:41, 15 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work Biplab Anand (Talk) 11:15, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted by Hystrix: Commons:Deletion requests/File:ММ первый номер.jpg: not own work

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The person in question has recommended that this picture be removed for my own legal safety, and I would face consequences enforceable by the government of my country. James McHugh1337 (talk) 23:58, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Copyrighted image 109.146.133.66 23:59, 10 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Unauthorised use 31.77.109.33 10:25, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Unused personal image. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:00, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photos NATO are released under the legally recognized terms of "Fair Use" – see NATO, not under {{Cc-by-sa-4.0}} Kacir (talk) 23:15, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination -- Commercial use is prohibited, etc. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:19, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:19, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Image obviously copied from http://www.ebay.com/itm/Allentown-PA-1949-Street-Car-Trolley-Photo-PPL-Bulding-Dolly-Madison-Ice-Cream-/222017810908 (the reflections make it clear) where there is absolutely no indication of it's authorship or copyright status. Revent (talk) 01:15, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:20, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The photograph is attributed to the eminent (living) photographer Gianni Berengo Gardin (about whom Wikipedia has articles in Italian, French, German and Russian). The uploader doesn't claim to be Berengo Gardin and gives no evidence for the claim that Berengo Gardin copylefted this photograph via the Creative Commons license cited here. Hoary (talk) 01:17, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:21, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

superseded by higher quality version at File:Pomological_Watercolor_POM00007002.jpg. ParkerHiggins (talk) 01:23, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: in use. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:21, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low quality image, out of scope, replaced by same car in File:MHV Toyota Camry XV30 2002-2004 01.jpg. OSX (talkcontributions) 02:00, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:22, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Véase Commons:Alcance del proyecto#Formatos PDF y DjVu Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:10, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:22, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Meroj Quqanov 1 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

It's hard to tell, but I think this is an attempt at spam.

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:18, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:23, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Advertising; out of the project scope. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 03:31, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:23, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Same file as File:Mount Hayasaki near Sakurajima.jpg そらみみ (talk) 04:26, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:24, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The images is edited badly that makes this images is not in context or fit for any Wikipedia materials Thatonewikiguy (talk) 04:29, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:24, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by SP Suhag Debbarma (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal files. No educational purpose.

Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 05:11, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:25, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright owner has not give permission for this picture public use. 87.93.57.86 05:15, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: No evidence offered that this is not own work as claimed. Google does not show this image anywhere else on the Web. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:26, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Photographer copyright owners permission does not exists. Aarniva (talk) 22:06, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: no valid reason for deletion, good size with EXIF, I didn't find a previous publication on the web. Christian Ferrer (talk) 15:48, 19 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This image is not realistically useful for an educational purpose and is created for the purpose of self-promotion. —  Rebbing  talk  05:42, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:28, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no permission 2003:45:5C21:3401:210A:BF8F:A7C0:8E13 07:27, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: File description claims that the subject is the author -- that's obviously not true. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:30, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

new updated file Goldpriceau (talk) 07:41, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: What "new updated file"?. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:31, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

own work? (small resolution, no EXF) 2003:45:5C21:3401:210A:BF8F:A7C0:8E13 07:43, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Also no description or cats, possible privacy violation. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:32, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Zero1122 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Spam (w:Special:Undelete/Draft:Advantage One Tax consult, Inc. (AO Tax)).

MER-C 07:43, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: by Denniss, closed by. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:32, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

unused personal file 2003:45:5C21:3401:210A:BF8F:A7C0:8E13 07:44, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: no description, no cats == useless. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:33, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope Smial (talk) 07:53, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:33, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

There is no source that says that this is indeed the region's flag. The title is misleading. I cannot think of anything better to do with this image. It should be deleted. Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 07:56, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  •  Keep: Is not Own work a valid source for this SVG illustration? Some lines with white background seems too simple. --Amitie 10g (talk) 17:57, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    There's probably no copyvio here, but that's not the point. There's no source that says this flag is a flag of the place the name of which appears in the file name. As far as I know it's not just unreferenced, but actually wrong. And I cannot think of anything better to do with it. Renaming it to "green and red stripes on a white background won't make it considerably more useful, although it will become slightly less harmful. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 18:29, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:35, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

vyhodnoceno jako hoax na cswiki i enwiki; kukumba není rostlina Tomas62 (talk) 08:02, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:36, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry 2x + 1x speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 08:18, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:36, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. User blocked at ptwiki. If IN scope needs permision via (example) http://sp.quebarato.com.br/itapevi/bombeiro-profissional-civil__BD3E5E.html (06.2015) = http://images.quebarato.com.br/T440x/bombeiro+profissional+civil+itapevi+sp+brasil__BD3E5E_2.jpg. Gunnex (talk) 08:25, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:36, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I would have thought that aspects of this are copyright Google play. Equally the icon of the app that is not free may well be copyrighted. Herby talk thyme 08:26, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:36, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

I think it likely that the icons on this screenshot are copyrighted and bring into question the free licensing. Herby talk thyme 08:28, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

 Delete per nomination and COM:Screenshots#Smartphones.–Totie (talk) 06:37, 17 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:36, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spam (w:Special:Undelete/User:Jomonjoe). MER-C 08:52, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:37, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

out of scope, advertising Pippobuono (talk) 08:54, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:37, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparently hypothetical logo for an unreleased, unannounced videogame. McGeddon (talk) 09:02, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:37, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Podolskijr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unclear copyright status. Uploaded (small/inconsistent [Facebook] resolutions, missing EXIF) since 11.2015 for pt:Spitz japonês, a small to medium breed of dog of the Spitz type, all files were (considering also the watermarks) most likely all previously published via http://www.spitzjaponesbrasil.com.br (® 2016, Spitz Japonês Brasil. Todos os Direitos Reservados) or related social media channels (Intagram = https://www.instagram.com/spitzjapones/, Facebook = https://www.facebook.com/spitzjapones/photos_stream). Examples: File:A8899c09ed-Bruno-bruno 4.jpg (01.2016) --> http://spitzjaponesbrasil.com.br/nossoscaes/bruno.html = http://spitzjaponesbrasil.com.br/onewebstatic/a8899c09ed-Bruno-bruno%204.jpg (last modified: 12.2015) or File:Giovanna instagram 03.JPG (12.11.2015) --> https://www.facebook.com/spitzjapones/photos/pb.1419464878376516.-2207520000.1455181496./1522651334724536/?type=3&theater (06.11.2015).

Considering also that File:Bruno de Spitz Japones Brasil.jpg was already tagged [not by me] with no-permission in 12.2015 (and got deleted): permission via COM:OTRS needed.

Gunnex (talk) 09:10, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:37, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Podolskijr (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent resolutions, missing/inconsistent EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Podolskijr (with similar deleted uploads) and (for File:Exposição 2016.jpg) exif = "Desiree Fagundes/CinofiliaNews.com" and (for File:Bruno thespitz.jpg) per FBMD... grabbed from Facebook.

Gunnex (talk) 11:33, 24 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: per nomination. Daphne Lantier 17:55, 30 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. If IN scope, permission via https://www.facebook.com/djryderoficial/photos/a.213823528684576.58358.143952162338380/962177497182505/?type=3&theater (08.2015) needed. Gunnex (talk) 09:15, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:38, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Téquiu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used.

Gunnex (talk) 09:16, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:38, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

no correct licence for commons : year is mentioned with 1924, not the affordable "before 1923" Alinea (talk) 09:33, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Magyar: 1924-ben Salembe küldték a reformiskolába, ami akkoriban felkapott, elit intézménynek számított, és már Golo bátyja is ott tanult. A kép valószínűleg akkor készült, tehát 1924-ben.
Tambo (talk) 10:26, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, Salem, Baden-Württemberg, she learnt there. --Norden1990 (talk) 13:23, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Anonymous-EU. Tambo (talk) 14:38, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

On the source-given br.de site says under the clicked Foto: "Bild: Monacensia". So I e-mail the Münchner Stadtbibliothek, Monacensia-Team, they're wrote, that is false the image is from the ETHBIB Thomas-Mann-Archiv. The director of the archive will be available next week until they ask for patience, but one of her colleagues has written an advance that the Foto was created in the Studio Elisabeth (Atelier Elisabeth) in Munich and this studio there existed only until the 30s of the last century. Fauvirt (talk) 10:57, 16 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Since we know the author, "anonymous eu" cannot apply. In any event, using "anonymous eu" requires proof of both that the work was published before 1946 and that the author was actually anonymous, not merely unknown to us. Neither has been proven here. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:41, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Old logo. Not valid any more. Reemzv (talk) 09:44, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Kept: We keep old logos for historical purposes. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:41, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Low res, no permission, no Exif data. Cjp24 (talk) 09:46, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:42, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No permission, no Exif data. Cjp24 (talk) 09:49, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:42, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album. No educational purpose: Not used. Gunnex (talk) 10:22, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:42, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry 2x speedy deleted. If IN scope, permission via https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=866358076758680&set=a.158395694221592.35989.100001534865160&type=3&theater (03.2015) needed. Gunnex (talk) 10:33, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:42, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete this album cover is unlikely the copyright of the uploader. The background image is also found several time by tineye and its copyright status is unknown. Ww2censor (talk) 10:37, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:42, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as Speedy (db) and the most recent rationale was: out of scope - too bad quality. Not so bad quality, not very small, partial EXIF data exists, but there are really a lot of sunsets in Commons. Taivo (talk) 10:40, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:43, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

 Delete this album cover is unlikely the copyright of the uploader. The background image is also found several time by tineye and its copyright status is unknown. Ww2censor (talk) 10:40, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:43, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spurious {{PD-because}} reason, incorrect use of {{PD-ineligible}}. It is possible that this would be {{PD-US-no notice}} if it was published with no notice, but that has not be adequately demonstrated. Storkk (talk) 16:07, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: As Storkk, probably no-notice, but that has not been shown beyond a significant doubt. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:10, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copyright violation http://www.connectacappella.com/contact/ Theroadislong (talk) 16:20, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:11, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

EN: If this is not "PD-ineligible" (and I don't think it is) then it is a copyright violation: the file was copied from https://powerbi.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/gartner-positions-microsoft-as-a-leader-in-bi-and-analytics-platforms/ If it is ineligible for copyright, then the licensing template should be changed: the uploader is most likely not the author.

NL: Als deze afbeelding niet te eenvoudig is om onder het Amerikaanse auteursrecht te vallen dan is het een schending van auteursrechten: de afbeelding is van hier gekopieerd: https://powerbi.microsoft.com/en-us/blog/gartner-positions-microsoft-as-a-leader-in-bi-and-analytics-platforms/ Naar mijn idee is de afbeelding niet eenvoudig genoeg en is er dus sprake van mogelijke schending van auteursrechten. Als dit inderdaad in het publieke domein valt vanwege onvoldoende originaliteit, dan moet de aangegeven licentie worden aangepast - de uploader is hoogstwaarschijnlijk niet de auteur. Paul B (talk) 16:22, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:12, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Non-free logo Tom29739 (talk) 16:24, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This file was initially tagged by Tom29739 as Speedy (speedy) and the most recent rationale was: Non-free logo Bellow the COM:TOO? Amitie 10g (talk) 17:54, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

It's got that picture of a mobile phone on, so it's not just text and so should be deleted. Tom29739 (talk) 20:29, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted It may or may not be a copyvio, but PDFs of images are not permitted on Commons, so it is out of scope. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:14, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copied from here: https://denglishbi.wordpress.com/2012/07/19/power-view-meet-microsoft-excel-2013/ Also, screenshot of non-free software. No indication of permission for publication under a free licence. / Gekopieerd van hier: https://denglishbi.wordpress.com/2012/07/19/power-view-meet-microsoft-excel-2013/ Tevens screenshot van niet-vrije software. Geen aanwijzingen dat toestemming is verleend voor publicatie onder vrije licentie. Paul B (talk) 16:31, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:15, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Press Association image according to metadata so not covered by OGL. It seems gov.uk often do not credit images which are not UK goverment works (see for example Commons:Deletion requests/File:Edward Heath Number 10 official.jpg) and caution is needed when taking images from this site. January (talk) 16:35, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:15, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

How this photo is work of US government? I could not verify the license, the only license in source site was "@2000–2015 Todos los derechos reservados". OTRS-permission from authors Fabian Arellano and Gavino Duron is needed. Taivo (talk) 16:38, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Taken by authorities in North Carolina -- not PD under NC law. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:18, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, can be found in multiple sites, for example, http://www.enginehd.net/jenni-rivera-last-concert.html I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 16:47, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:18, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Newsday credits AP with photo, not uploader as claimed - http://www.newsday.com/entertainment/music/musicians-killed-in-plane-crashes-1.4315335 This image is popular on web found lots of places with image search Geraldo Perez (talk) 03:59, 18 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: Steinsplitter (talk) 11:16, 25 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The file can be found in mulyiple external sites, for example, http://weheartit.com/entry/group/15446495 I suspect copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 16:49, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 16:15, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Copy vio suspect. Keeps the logo (top right corner), has to crop in and provides low res. Tobias "ToMar" Maier (talk) 00:42, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 19:54, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Software screenshot; unfree website, unfree software (IE) Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 04:57, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:17, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of focus Smiley.toerist (talk) 11:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:18, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of focus Smiley.toerist (talk) 11:08, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:19, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of focus Smiley.toerist (talk) 11:08, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: uploader's request. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:19, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

not own work Biplab Anand (Talk) 11:15, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This cover is a work of the publishing house "Nouvelles Editions Sutton". The article is about the house itself and I got the permission to use this image. How could I prove it? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Adiflo37 (talk • contribs) 11:36, 11 February 2016‎ (UTC)[reply]


Deleted The publishing house must send a free license to OTRS. The message should come directly from an address at editions-sutton.com and must include the assertion that they have the right to sublicense all of the images on the cover -- that is required because most publishers buy only the rights to use images on a book cover and do not have the right to license them more broadly.

Once the license is received and approved, the image will be restored. OTRS, like Commons, is all volunteers, and, also like Commons, is badly understaffed, so it may be several weeks before the image is restored. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:33, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Probable DW of a campaign poster. Copyright holder should confirm license via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:15, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:34, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, possible TV/film still: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:16, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:34, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata, border and illegible watermark: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:16, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:34, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of photos/film stills of unknown origin and copyright status. Storkk (talk) 11:20, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: likely copyright violation. --Ymblanter (talk) 20:27, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of artwork (cartoon) of unknown origin and copyright status. Storkk (talk) 11:21, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:34, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

No metadata, possible video still. If uploader is photographer, that should be confirmed via COM:OTRS Storkk (talk) 11:21, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:35, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Book cover. If uploader is the copyright holder, that should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:22, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:35, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of poster of uknown origin and copyright status. Storkk (talk) 11:22, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:35, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of poster of uknown origin and copyright status. Storkk (talk) 11:22, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:35, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparent studio portrait. If uploader is the copyright holder, that should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:24, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:35, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Apparent studio portrait. If uploader is the copyright holder, that should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:24, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:35, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Likely stock photo. If uploader is the copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:25, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:35, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no camera metadata, possible professional portrait: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:47, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:35, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small size, no metadata: uploader's assertion of {{Own work}} in doubt. If uploader is copyright holder, this should be confirmed via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:47, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:35, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Out of scope. Storkk (talk) 11:51, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:35, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unfortunately, there is no Freedom of Panorama in Iceland. Storkk (talk) 11:51, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:35, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photo, not realistically useful for an educational purpose. Out of scope. Storkk (talk) 11:52, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:35, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused simple logo of non-notable company (no mention neither in en.wiki nor in ru.wiki), out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 12:00, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:36, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope (Commons is not your personal free web host). Sismarinho (talk) 12:24, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:36, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope (Commons is not your personal free web host). Sismarinho (talk) 12:24, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:36, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope (Commons is not your personal free web host). Sismarinho (talk) 12:25, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:36, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope (Commons is not your personal free web host). Sismarinho (talk) 12:26, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:36, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal photos are out of project scope. In addition, the photo is small and has no metadata, own work is not sure, maybe copyright violation. Taivo (talk) 12:32, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:36, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope — Racconish ☎ 13:38, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:37, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope (used to vandalize en:wp [1] — Racconish ☎ 14:03, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:37, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:31, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:38, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:38, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:38, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Ooshop (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:41, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:38, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability. Should be moved as wiki-text to relevant project if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:42, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:38, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Aquin2710 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful.

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:43, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:38, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope — Racconish ☎ 15:44, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: /. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:39, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CRSjwChVAAUr1eh.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:55, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: /. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:39, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://s3.amazonaws.com/bit-photos/large/4800827.jpeg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:56, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: /. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:39, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://pbs.twimg.com/profile_images/459715589049552896/so2vrQZY.jpeg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:57, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: /. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:39, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope — Racconish ☎ 16:00, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: /. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:39, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope — Racconish ☎ 16:01, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: /. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:39, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Spurious {{PD-because}}: "because Publically available abc transcription". Jimmy Lyons's lifetime was 1931 - 1986. Storkk (talk) 16:05, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: /. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:40, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

advertising, out of scope, unused file. Atlasowa (talk) 17:20, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: '. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:41, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by MFGirbaud (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused images of artwork: unknown source or personal artwork; either way, no educational value, out of scope.

P 1 9 9   17:40, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: '. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:41, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Small photo without metadata, Google image search finds similar images, the uploader's last remaining contribution among clear copyright violations. I suspect here also copyvio. Taivo (talk) 17:54, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: '. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:41, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Deleted: '. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:41, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A screenshot from a TV show. Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 18:03, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: '. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:41, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

The platypus is protected by copyright according to http://www.hexley.com/license.html and I presume that the Darwine logo is a derivative work. The author of the original requests that a copyright notice is added and permission is requested for certain use cases. This would probably make it incompatible with Commons. I have not found an exemption for the Darwine logo itself, so I am not sure. –Totie (talk) 18:34, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: '. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:42, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

A screenshot from a music video. Copyright violation. Rapsar (talk) 18:36, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: '. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:42, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Randza group (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted.

Gunnex (talk) 19:59, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:48, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Símon Nzau (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted.

Gunnex (talk) 20:01, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:48, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Mythical Creative (talk · contribs)

[edit]

All three images by this user are out of scope. Not used for personal purposes.

Ubcule (talk) 20:04, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:49, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unlikely to be own work: can be found earlier on web, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Guilherme lourenço da silva. Historical photos may be in public domain by other reasons but relevant info must be provided.

Gunnex (talk) 20:09, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:49, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Leoviyu (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Several images show usage elsewhere on Internet going back long before the August 2015 upload date here (as far back as 2011). Low resolution images (another suspicious sign). Two of the images are explicitly watermarked (and were at use at that site before uploaded here). Insufficient evidence that user has permission to upload these.

Ubcule (talk) 20:14, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:49, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Kaduh26 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unlikely to be own work: small/inconsistent (Facebook) resolutions, missing EXIF, per COM:PRP, considering User talk:Kaduh26 = a file grabbed from Facebook, as also File:FamiliaOsumare.jpg, which needs permission from https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=622678361132737&set=a.622675067799733.1073741840.100001717370500&type=3&theater (2013). File:Paipece.jpg already published (even cropped) via http://correionago.ning.com/events/homenagem-a-baba-pc-de-oxumare (2011, but most likely also grabbed somewhere from social media). 2 files are photos from photos with unknown copyright status.

Gunnex (talk) 20:28, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:49, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by AFZAL SOTTA (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal images by non-contributing user. Userpages at en.wikipedia and wikidata blanked on that basis and images no longer in use. (Since they were never a contributing editor, even the otherwise-tolerated use of personal images would likely be considered abuse of the facilities regardless)

Ubcule (talk) 20:42, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:50, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of project scope: Commons is not a private photo album + advertising or self-promotion. No educational purpose: Not used. Related ptwiki entry speedy deleted. Gunnex (talk) 20:43, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:50, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Agnel Dias Faria (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal-use only (and not in personal use anyway) and/or copyvio images by non-contributing user. Wikipedia is not a source of free personal webspace.

Ubcule (talk) 20:46, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:50, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused personal image. Ubcule (talk) 20:48, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:50, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Offtopic and almost-certain derivative copyvios in all cases. User's only (non-)contribution to Wikimedia projects was a spam userpage at es.wikipedia. Wikipedia/Commons is not your personal userspace. (Gogle Spanish translation: ios copia derivado Offtopic y casi-determinados en todos los casos. la única contribución de usuario (no) a los proyectos de Wikimedia era una página de usuario en el correo no deseado es.wikipedia. Wikipedia / Commons no es su espacio de usuario personal.).

Ubcule (talk) 21:17, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:51, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope, unused personal image by otherwise non-contributing user. Ubcule (talk) 21:18, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:52, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Naku ksy (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal-use only images not currently in use (one was in use at en.wikipedia userpage, but that has been blanked as inactive user, and was arguably not legitimate as user had not made any proper contributions to wikipedia anyway).

Ubcule (talk) 21:22, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:52, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Not entirely clear what this is, or whether it's a copyvio, but it's out of scope and unused for personal purposes regardless.

Ubcule (talk) 21:24, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

EDIT: The image is my own work and is not in violation of any copyright laws whatsoever. There is no reason to remove it from Wikipedia and I, the author and sole contributed to this work, authorize it's full permission for use and respectfully request that it remain un-deleted.
-Ronnie Kell Whitlock, Progress2K14
Okay, I'm prepared to believe that you're the author, but as I also said "it's out of scope and unused for personal purposes regardless."
I've just noticed that you are/were active at English Wikipedia. Going by your talk page over there it looks like the image is an album cover and was previously used in an article that got deleted for reasons that were given to you already (i.e. self-promotion, non-notability).
You were also banned there because it was clear that you were only using the project for self promotion.
Though Commons doesn't automatically follow English Wikipedia (they're related but separate projects), in this case I still believe that the album cover is not within the educational scope of Commons. Ubcule (talk) 10:38, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:53, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by GT54122 (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Appears to be background and statistics for a band, but not entirely clear whether uploader has permission for these (the magazine scans in particular should be assumed to be copyvios unless shown otherwise, "presse" is not an explanation in French nor English) and no clear indication of in-scope notability. Is uploader associated with the band? (Google translation into French: Semble être de fond et des statistiques pour un groupe, mais pas tout à fait clair si uploader a la permission pour eux (les scans de magazines en particulier devraient être supposés être copier ios sauf indication contraire, "presse" est pas une explication en français ni l'anglais) et aucune indication claire de notabilité dans le champ. Est téléchargement associé avec le groupe?).

Ubcule (talk) 21:31, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:53, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by VINOD KUMAR RAMKUMAR (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Unused personal images.

(Any use of them at en.wikipedia (en:User talk:VINOD KUMAR RAMKUMAR) was deleted long ago due to en:WP:NOTHOST, and user has not made any contributions to project itself as far as I can tell).

Ubcule (talk) 21:38, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:54, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Pretty mediocre technically, is this really a good representation of scepticism? Ubcule (talk) 21:42, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: /. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:54, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Question relative aux ayants droits, peintre décédé depuis 63 ans et famille décédée mais il peut rester des ayants droits. Olcoispeau (talk) 21:45, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: /. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:54, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by DarkObjectJellyFish (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Offtopic personal images (not in use).

Ubcule (talk) 21:47, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: /. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:54, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Phamhoangduc (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Offtopic personal images, unused.

Ubcule (talk) 21:48, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: /. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:54, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Vikram Bagade (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Personal use only images, one formerly used at en.wikipedia for spam userpage by otherwise non-contributing user, now no longer in use.

Ubcule (talk) 21:51, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: /. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:54, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by Bogdan Boogyman (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out-of-scope unused personal images, search on user's name "Дияна Бакирова" only gives eight results, so apparently not famous. (Google Russian translation: "Нет в рамках неиспользованных личных изображений, поиск по имени пользователя "Дияна Бакирова" только дает восемь результатов, так, видимо, не известные.").

Ubcule (talk) 21:53, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: /. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:54, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Files uploaded by سمير الشافعى (talk · contribs)

[edit]

Out of scope for Commons' purposes.

Despite some of the graphics being in Arabic rather than English (I assume), a translation of the titles and common sense strongly implies that they're of no more use (nor any more in-scope) than the English-language ones.

(Google translation into Arabic: "خارج النطاق لأغراض العموم.

وعلى الرغم من بعض الرسومات يجري في العربية بدلا من اللغة الإنجليزية (افترض)، ترجمة لعناوين والحس السليم يعني بقوة انهم لا أكثر من استخدام (ولا أي أكثر في نطاق) من تلك التي باللغة الإنجليزية.")

Ubcule (talk) 21:59, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: /. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:55, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Unused logo of a Brazilian enterprise. Hasn't been used since it was uploaded, in December, probably has no notability enough for having an article. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 22:02, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: /. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:55, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Derivative of a non-free, copyrighted wax sculpture. Freedom of panorama in the Netherlands does not apply in museums that charge an entrance fee. LX (talk, contribs) 22:26, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


Deleted: /. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:56, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

Out of scope : personal image without educational purpose. Florn (talk) 22:53, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

And this one too:

  • File:Korchi.jpg

    --ProfessorX (talk) 15:06, 14 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: /. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:56, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

  • This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Uploader persists uploading other people's images as "own work". This image was taken from facebook -> https://www.facebook.com/278254578869909/photos/pb.278254578869909.-2207520000.1455232828./722633904431972/?type=3&size=1491%2C682&fbid=722633904431972 Takeaway (talk) 23:22, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:56, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    unused, terrible quality Rhadamante (talk) 23:50, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:57, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    unused, terrible quality Rhadamante (talk) 23:54, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:57, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    bad quality, not ow 181.228.104.10 01:43, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:57, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Unused personal photo, out of scope. C messier (talk) 16:49, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:57, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Unused photo of a non notable person. Out of scope. C messier (talk) 16:49, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 22:57, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Poor quality duplicate of File:102d Fighter-Interceptor Squadron - Convair F-102A-70-CO Delta Dagger 56-1241.jpg, which is admittedly not much better, but at least provides a source and evidence of authorship. Revent (talk) 01:21, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --JuTa 02:35, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Modern art. I think painter identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This was uploaded by the late artist's son. He took it out of his father's archives. He'd need an explanation what to do, since the whole OTRS thing is far from easy to understand. -- Clemens 22:35, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: no license at all. --JuTa 02:29, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Modern art. I think painter identity/permission confirmation via Commons:OTRS is necessary. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:25, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: no license at all. --JuTa 02:26, 20 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Unused personal image, out of scope. P 1 9 9   17:27, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:18, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Low-res version of image available elsewhere: https://volkyfootballboots.wordpress.com/first-impression-puma-evopower-1-on-feet/ Copyright status uncertain. Ytoyoda (talk) 19:11, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 20:13, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    advertising, out of scope, unusable. Atlasowa (talk) 19:19, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:10, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    out of scope 31.174.114.209 19:29, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: copyvio. --Wdwd (talk) 20:09, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    out of scope 31.174.114.209 19:29, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:09, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    out of scope 31.174.114.209 19:29, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 20:07, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Personal image formerly used at en.wikipedia by user whose edits were all (except a single removal of an image from an article) to that talk page; now blanked as inactive user, and image no longer in use. Ubcule (talk) 20:33, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: unused personal photo, out of scope. --Wdwd (talk) 19:56, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Unused personal image. Ubcule (talk) 21:00, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 19:53, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    probably grabbed from the Web: http://www.tiranaobserver.al/reviews/nga-koci-xoxe-tek-kadri-hazbiu-spiunazh-dhe-vrasje-fundet-tragjike-te-krereve-te-sigurimit-te-shtetit/#prettyPhoto – maybe this image is public domain, but any CC license is hard to believe (as the image is about 60-70 years old) Albinfo (talk) 21:13, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Probably. How do we know that? I mean, whether it is grabbed from Flickr or from "Tirana Observer"...--Alboholic (talk) 19:30, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: no permission for original photo. (wrong date: One of the persons died 1981), deleted per COM:PCP. --Wdwd (talk) 19:48, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Unused logo of a Brazilian enterprise. Uploaded in August, haven't been used since then and probably is not notable enough to have an article. —Teles «Talk to me ˱C L @ S˲» 21:57, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nom, out of COM:PS. --Wdwd (talk) 19:45, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Unused (jpg) logo. No clear scope. Josve05a (talk) 22:21, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 19:39, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Copyright violation - see http://philwaldrep.org/about/staff/ which page is copyright to Phil Waldrep Ministries Jytdog (talk) 22:37, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Wdwd (talk) 19:38, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Not the uploader's own work. Cloudbound (talk) 23:44, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Kept: kept, used textlogo. --Wdwd (talk) 19:36, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    There is no proof that the image is a public domain. Author and publication date are unknown. Rapsar (talk) 15:50, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

     Delete This image is the derivative work of an image which was taken in 1952. See also Commons:Deletion requests/File:SaidNursi.jpg. Moreover, I think User:Diyar Muhammed (the uploader of this image) should be the SOCK of User:Diyar se. Takabeg (talk) 10:34, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: . .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 11:45, 24 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. imho rather thumbnail format and missing exif, as well as media not in use within Wikimedia projects, Roland zh (talk) 04:31, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: copyvio http://www.ibtimes.co.in/photos/saritha-s-nair-controversial-woman-kerala-656-slide-4783. Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:14, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    This is a logo of an organisation. It is possible for it to be freely licensed or that it might fall under "unoriginal", but the file description does not make this case. Jolly Janner (talk) 04:58, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: it is above TOO, then we need a permission or an evidence it is free. Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:16, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Too blurry to be useful Takeaway (talk) 12:41, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:23, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    File uploaded for use in a joke article. I am concerned about personality rights. Mihai (talk) 14:37, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: no quite notable people, out of scope. Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:28, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Out of project scope due to low educational value. Taivo (talk) 15:21, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. Christian Ferrer (talk) 09:29, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    File:United States Navy Band - Het Wilhelmus.ogg - This file has been hacked. When played a caption scrolls "William of Nassau, I am. A dick, Yes I am " and then the caption ends. The actual words are "Wilhelmus van Nassouwe ben ick van Duytschen bloet ("William of Nassau am I, of German blood")" No dicks anywhere. I do not have a substitute file to upload, so just bringing it to the commons attention. Regards Bobsd (talk) 05:16, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

     Keep The subtitle file TimedText:United_States_Navy_Band_-_Het_Wilhelmus.ogg.en.srt had been vandalized, but that change is now reverted. ParkerHiggins (talk) 05:58, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Kept: Reason for nomination addressed. --Riley Huntley (talk) 08:58, 2 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Self nomination of Flickr photo upload. This low quality file has been replaced by the equivalent and higher quality File:1984 Subaru 1800 Sportswagon 4WD station wagon (24934291355).jpg (and other files within Category:Subaru Leone (2nd generation)). The deletion of this image would be in accordance with COM:Redundant. It has incorrect wheels fitted, contravening Commons:WikiProject Automobiles#Images.

    I note that the above-mentioned category contains numerous other higher quality files to satisfy the needs of this project and beyond. Wikimedia Commons is not a repository of junk files, but should be a compendium of quality files where possible. When we have multiple files of the same topic in a category, curating this down to only show images of better quality is appropriate and supported by COM:NOTUSED. OSX (talkcontributions) 01:32, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Kept: no valid reason for deletion, not bad image with good resolution, I added some categories. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:20, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Self nomination of Flickr photo upload. This low quality file has been replaced by the equivalent and higher quality File:1984 Subaru 1800 Sportswagon 4WD station wagon (24638831910).jpg (and other files within Category:Subaru Leone (2nd generation)). The deletion of this image would be in accordance with COM:Redundant. It has incorrect wheels fitted, contravening Commons:WikiProject Automobiles#Images.

    I note that the above-mentioned category contains numerous other higher quality files to satisfy the needs of this project and beyond. Wikimedia Commons is not a repository of junk files, but should be a compendium of quality files where possible. When we have multiple files of the same topic in a category, curating this down to only show images of better quality is appropriate and supported by COM:NOTUSED. OSX (talkcontributions) 01:33, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Kept: no valid reason for deletion, not bad image with good resolution, I added some categories. Christian Ferrer (talk) 06:25, 3 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Unused text document of questionable notability, out of project scope, should be converted to text if notable Motopark (talk) 14:53, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 03:25, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    out of scope, del. on de Nolispanmo 15:12, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 03:19, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    out of scope, del on DE Nolispanmo 15:14, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 03:19, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    copyvio, spam, out of scope, del on DE Nolispanmo 15:20, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 03:19, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    copyvio, spam, out of scope, del on DE Nolispanmo 15:20, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 03:19, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused text document of questionable notability and unclear copyrights status. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:46, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 03:19, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:51, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 03:19, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 03:18, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 03:18, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Out of Commons:Project scope: Unused trivial logo of questionable notability. Should be in SVG if useful. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:54, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 03:18, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Out of scope — Racconish ☎ 15:54, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 03:17, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Only simple logos can be in Commons without OTRS-permission. The logo is in en.wiki as fair use. Taivo (talk) 16:06, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Érico (talk) 03:17, 4 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Duplicate of File:Flag of the Dominican Republic.svg. Fry1989 eh? 15:25, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: no license at all. --JuTa 20:16, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Self nomination of low quality Flickr file replaced by the equivalent and higher quality File:1986 Mazda 626 (GC Series 2) Super Deluxe sedan (24816347532).jpg (and other files within Category:Mazda 626 (GC)). The deletion of this image would be in accordance with COM:Redundant. It also has incorrect wheels fitted, contravening Commons:WikiProject Automobiles#Images.

    I note that the above-mentioned category contains numerous other higher quality files to satisfy the needs of this project and beyond. Wikimedia Commons is not a repository of junk files, but should be a compendium of quality files where possible. When we have multiple files of the same topic in a category, curating this down to only show images of better quality is appropriate and supported by COM:NOTUSED. OSX (talkcontributions) 01:37, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:42, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    DR started to verify claimed 'own work' as p.e. imho rather thumbnail format (video/tv?) and missing exif, Roland zh (talk) 04:39, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: likely copyvio, already published on-line before uploaded to Commons. P 1 9 9   14:47, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

     Delete I really doubt this unique font text can be considered below the threshold of originality. It just looks too unique. Ww2censor (talk) 10:50, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This is a tough one. Sia is Australian by birth, but recently married in the USA. The WP:EN article on the song is not clear where she recorded this work or where this cover was designed -- it was released on both USA and Australian labels. This text is clearly PD in the USA -- there is no copyright on fonts, however complex, there, but it is equally clear that the low Australian ToO would put this under copyright there. I suggest  Delete under COM:PRP. .     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:00, 18 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Nadie valora lo que aporto. Propongo eliminar mi propia imagen porque nadie la aprueba. Gracias, Si es posible borrenlo a la brevedad, para que los bibliotecarios no me esten llamando la atención a cada rato. Gracias Loxox (talk) 03:03, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: as per User:Jameslwoodward and self-nomination by uploader (User:Loxox). Furthermore, it is an unused image without any educational value. --P 1 9 9   14:51, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    EXIF credits "krischerfotografie", who should confirm license via COM:OTRS. Storkk (talk) 11:20, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:52, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    This file was initially tagged by Stas1995 as duplicate , it is same photo though different dimensions, see File:Sunrise TLK2.jpg  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:18, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination; watermarks and tiny size make it unusable anyway. P 1 9 9   14:56, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Most probably a very bad quality photograph made with a mobile phone of an image on a computer screen, similar to Commons:Deletion requests/File:JarpagDolma.jpg by the same uploader. Quality too low to be useful. Possible copyright violation. Takeaway (talk) 12:21, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: unusable, many better ones already on Commons. P 1 9 9   14:56, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    This file was initially tagged by Moumou82 as duplicate. File type difference, to file File:Kowan-Nafadji.png, png is preferred, and the images are not exact duplictes, and this is apparently of lesser quality  — billinghurst sDrewth 12:36, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   14:57, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    I am not sure if this logo is applicable for {{PD-textlogo}}, as this logo has shadows, which is complex. Not own work. Poké95 12:55, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: below COM:TOO but unused promotional logo. P 1 9 9   14:58, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Self nomination of Flickr file. Low quality and replaced by File:1995 Ford Laser (KJ) Lynx 3-door hatchback (2015-08-07).jpg. OSX (talkcontributions) 14:14, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Kept: quality more than acceptable and different angle; moreover the coordinates give it added usefulness. P 1 9 9   15:01, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Self nomination, low quality file, not really useable. OSX (talkcontributions) 14:20, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination, but borderline. P 1 9 9   15:04, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    File uploaded for use in a joke article on ro.wikipedia. I am concerned about personality rights. Mihai (talk) 14:37, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: unused personal photo. P 1 9 9   15:04, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Chriswhalencpa (talk · contribs) has done nothing in Wikipedia, except userpage in en.wiki and uploading a selfie, which is used nowhere, except on the userpage. All his activity in Wikipedia is out of project scope. Taivo (talk) 15:25, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: unused personal photo. P 1 9 9   15:06, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Unlikely to be own work: small resolutions, missing EXIF, could be found on other web sites with Google Images, like https://www.prlog.org/11637550-gary-beers-recent-photo.jpg. EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:49, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:07, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Personal photo, out of scope. P 1 9 9   16:52, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

     Keep Seems illustrative of the kind of passes that adorn speakers and delegates at conferences.--KTo288 (talk) 00:23, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Kept: withdrawn as per User:KTo288. P 1 9 9   15:08, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:09, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    posible violación del copyright desde http://zombiewarmanagement.com/juan-saurin-genesis-maldito-digital/ Tarawa1943 (talk) 17:27, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:19, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    posible violación del copyright desde http://juansaurin.com/index.php/eventos/ Tarawa1943 (talk) 17:54, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:19, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Copyrighted logo. Too complicated to be a text logo. Rapsar (talk) 18:04, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:20, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Image from http://www.wikiwand.com/de/Andreas_K%C3%A4mmerling Cjp24 (talk) 19:35, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: the link here is a mirror of de:wp, so it could not have been the original source of the image. A Google search of this image with dates preceding the upload date gave 1 result that was also a link to de:wp. That said it has the marks of a copyvio: only upload by editor, small size, no EXIF data. P 1 9 9   15:43, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    small size, no exif, susp. copyvio /St1995 20:16, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:28, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Web-resolution image with usage elsewhere going back to 2011 (i.e. four years before upload here). Two typical copyvio warning signs:- Only image uploaded by this user, virtually no background info. Ubcule (talk) 20:50, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:28, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Unused, inferior to File:Vlajka obce Blučina.svg TFerenczy (talk) 21:54, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:29, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Limited usefulness pre-rendered lettering which appears to have been uploaded mainly as a reason to link to someone's site covering the same topic. Ubcule (talk) 21:56, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: no educational value. P 1 9 9   15:29, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Unused, inferior to File:Litohoř_TR_flag.svg TFerenczy (talk) 21:56, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. P 1 9 9   15:30, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Copyrighted logo of w:The Jon Bon Jovi Soul Foundation Vanjagenije (talk) 22:15, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Tend to  Keep this per COM:TOO. →Nagy 12:47, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Kept: as per User:Nagy. P 1 9 9   15:32, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    The outside of the depicted water pistol appears to incorporate artistic aspects that are likely copyrightable. Gazebo (talk) 15:02, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per COM:TOYS (not an utilitarian object). --BrightRaven (talk) 16:40, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Files uploaded by Wxx199101046 (talk · contribs)

    [edit]

    Highly unlikely own work. One image looks like an image taken from a website or catalog, the other from a publication. No context even to make it educational.

    P 1 9 9   15:09, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 16:42, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Duplicate of SVG. Fry1989 eh? 15:47, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination, and redirected. P 1 9 9   15:58, 7 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    There is no proof that the image is a public domain. Publication date are unknown. Not every image that producet by the Presidency of Turkish Government is public domain. Rapsar (talk) 15:51, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

     Delete Per nom. Takabeg (talk) 10:35, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 08:22, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Credited to "RETRICA" (watermark), but has no permission from that entity. Vanjagenije (talk) 17:05, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 08:23, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Fantasy borders of Europe, doesn't represent anything, out of scope. Also nominated: File:Moja mapka 2.png -- P 1 9 9   17:07, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Represents my imagination. Drzewianin (talk) 10:38, 12 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Oh it's very useful. It shows polish gigantomania and demands... --Jonny84 (talk) 12:28, 27 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Deleted: per nomination (out of scope). --BrightRaven (talk) 08:24, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    advertising, out of scope, unused file. Atlasowa (talk) 17:32, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --BrightRaven (talk) 08:34, 8 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Unused and unusable blurry photo, no context to make it usable. P 1 9 9   14:47, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 18:23, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Files uploaded by Fcoohat (talk · contribs)

    [edit]

    Particularly low-quality cell phone/tablet images of nudity, of which we already have plenty (see COM:VAGINAS). Some of the filenames (とわちゃんのオッパイ and 性行為中の女性器, which roughly translate to "Towa-chan's tits" and "Female genitals during sexual activity") suggest pretty clearly that these uploads are intended for out-of-scope purposes.

    —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 18:53, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 18:28, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Possible copyright violation. Source: http://www.euronics-deutschland.de/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/Slider2a.jpg Archie02 (talk) 18:58, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination - copyvio - 24 January 2014 12:52:40 - http://www.technikforhome.de/wp-content/uploads/euronics-xxl-einbeck-aussen.jpg. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 18:29, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    It is not the own work of VOA so it can not be considered as a public domain. Rapsar (talk) 19:30, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

     Delete This image is not original one. There is better version (December 2014). The same image has been used on internet since 2013. So I think it isn't the own work of VOA. Takabeg (talk) 12:07, 1 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Ronhjones  (Talk) 18:30, 12 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Unclear copyright status. Claim that this official symbol (coat of arms / brasão ) of Brazilian municipality pt:Wenceslau Braz (Minas Gerais) was published or commissioned by a Brazilian government prior to 1983 ({{PD-BrazilGov}}) is not supported. Uploaded in 2010 and taken from a random site. All coats of arms and flags of Brazilian municipalities are established by municipal law. Generally for most of the Brazilian coats of arms and flags: unlikely also that these symbols were digitized in there present form prior to 1983 (when "Internet" was available only for a few institutions, TCP/IP was standardized in 1982). Their creation date could be quite recent, maybe not even by an employee of the Brazilian government. Gunnex (talk) 20:50, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Natuur12 (talk) 18:16, 16 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Files uploaded by Teromakotero (talk · contribs)

    [edit]

    Commons:Derivative works from web sites screenshots.

    -> This file is OK --Teromakotero (talk) 16:36, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    -> This file has problems, because the converting process to WebM failed. I didn't notice it and uploaded it to Wikimedia Commons. Then I uploaded it with the same name again with correctly converted WebM -file. I'm using this file to help people in Finland to upload videos in our Wikibooks Project. So I hope you delete this file and let the other be in Wikimedia Commons. --Teromakotero (talk) 16:36, 21 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:44, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]


    Deleted: per nomination. --Krd 08:19, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    This deletion discussion is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive. You can read the deletion policy or ask a question at the Village pump. If the circumstances surrounding this file have changed in a notable manner, you may re-nominate this file or ask for it to be undeleted.

    Files uploaded by Finn.nguyen (talk · contribs)

    [edit]

    I am unsure about the exact threshold of originality in Vietnam, however, these 'own work' claims are obviously incorrect. I have just speedily deleted 11 images uploaded by this user, all under 'own work' claims, that were obvious copyright violations from a variety of websites. Delete per the precautionary principle, unless they are actually below the TOO in Vietnam... it so, relicense.

    Revent (talk) 15:26, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Looks like this one is not copyrighted (and already present): File:Emblem of Hanoi.svg --- [Tycho] talk 15:30, 11 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    same thing for Tan Son Nhat International Airport and File:TIA-logo.jpg Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:18, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    Regarding File:NIA Logo.png : Noi Bai International Airport too is owned by Airports Corporation of Vietnam then by the government. Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:21, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]
    I found nothing regarding Hanoi Metro and File:Hanoi Metro logo.png Christian Ferrer (talk) 21:34, 20 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

    Kept: most are PD-VietnamGov, some deleted. --ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 10:30, 21 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]